An Ultrawideband Coplanar Waveguide-Fed Tapered Ring Slot Antenna
An Ultrawideband Coplanar Waveguide-Fed Tapered Ring Slot Antenna
An Ultrawideband Coplanar Waveguide-Fed Tapered Ring Slot Antenna
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1. Configuration of the antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Cross-sectional view.
along with the design parameters, the signal is first fed into a 50
coplanar waveguide via a standard miniature adapter (SMA)
connector. At the end of the CPW feeding line, a pair of 100
slotlines are connected in parallel to ensure impedance matching.
The widths of the slotlines are then widened steadily to increase
the characteristic impedance and therefore facilitate the radia-
tion from the slotline to free space. To minimize the required an-
tennadimension,theslotlinesaredirectedbackwardintentionally
and are described by equations of ellipses. For optimum inband
impedance matching, a set of parametric studies were carried out
using Ansoft High Frequency Simulation Solver (HFSS) version
9.0. It is found that the ratio of outer semiminor to semimajor axes
of the elliptical profile, i.e., , is the most significant
parameter to affect the impedance matching. Roughly speaking,
an optimal ratio of 3:4 can be observed for a variety of substrates.
The initial width of the radiating slot is kept the same as the
width of a 100 slotline, and the end width of the radiating slot
can serve as a fine-tuning parameter. A narrower slot will Fig. 2. Measured and simulated return losses of the proposed antenna.
inevitably affect the inband impedance matching while a wider
one may increase the cross-polarization level. It is also found that
III. EXPERIMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
the ground plane size around the radiation slots, which is defined
by by , can be minimized as long as the inband matching
A. Return Loss and Radiation Patterns
condition is remained.
The lowest operating frequency of the proposed antenna can The simulated and measured return losses are illustrated in
be approximated by Fig. 2. The simulation was performed by Ansoft HFSS 9.0 and
the measurement was taken by an Agilent E8362B vector net-
work analyzer. Fairly good agreement between the results can
(1) be observed and the little discrepancy can be mostly attributed
to the fabrication inaccuracy. The measured antenna impedance
bandwidth with dB (or VSWR ) is from 3.1
where is the estimated to more than 12 GHz. The actual operating bandwidth is, how-
longest current path along the outer boundary of the elliptical ever, ultimately limited by the distortion of radiation patterns.
profile, is the speed of light, and is the ef- Suitable band-notched structures [10], [11] can be introduced
fective dielectric constant. Due to the fact that the bandwidth to the antenna to avert the potential interference due to the co-
of the coplanar waveguide-to-slotline transition is much wider existence of UWB and wireless local-area networks (WLAN)
than that required in UWB radios, the highest antenna operating as well.
frequency, on the other hand, is generally limited by the distor- The radiation patterns were measured and calibrated in an
tion of radiation patterns. Also note that owing to the symmetry anechoic chamber. Fig. 3(a) and (b) illustrates the simulated and
of antenna geometry, bonding wires between the ground planes measured normalized patterns in both E- (or -) and H- (or -)
are not necessary and the proposed antenna is therefore a true planes at the center frequencies of UWB low and high bands.
uniplanar design. The UWB low band is from 3.1 to 5.1 GHz, whereas the high
The proposed antenna was fabricated on a Rogers RO4003 band is from 5.825 to 10.6 GHz. The copolarized components
substrate with dielectric constant and height in the E- and H-planes are and , respectively. It is shown
mm. The loss tangent is 0.0027 at 10 GHz. At the center in the figure that the copolarizations are broadside and bidirec-
frequency of the UWB spectrum, i.e., 6.85 GHz, the design tional, and the slight asymmetry in the measured H-planes can
parameters for a 50 coplanar waveguide are mm be attributed to the alignment mismatch in the measurement as
and mm. The length and width of the 100 slotline well as the reflection from the connecting cable. The cross-po-
and are determined at the same frequency and equal larizations, although not shown here for simplicity, are gener-
to 0.3 and 5 mm, respectively. The antenna geometric param- ally small compared to the copolarizations. It is also interesting
eters are designed in accordance with the design guideline in to note that the patterns in the high band are quite distinct from
the previous paragraphs and are given by mm, those in the low band. This phenomenon is frequently encoun-
mm, mm, mm, tered in UWB antenna design and will be exploited in detail in
and mm. According to (1), the corresponding lowest the next section.
operating frequency is 3.2 GHz. The ratio of is
equal to 0.8, which is close to the ratio for optimum antenna B. Antenna Transfer Functions
inband impedance matching. The ground plane around the radi-
ating slots is minimized by setting as 5 mm, and the overall Due to the extremely large operating bandwidth, UWB an-
antenna size is thus 66.1 44 mm . tennas evaluated solely in the traditional sense are generally not
MA AND TSENG: UWB COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE-FED TAPERED RING SLOT ANTENNA 1107
dimensionless (2)
Fig. 3. Measured and simulated radiation patterns of the proposed antenna. (a) where represents the normalized IR of an antenna.
E- (yz -) plane. (b) H- (xz -) plane. The main idea behind this revised definition is that the con-
ventional two-antenna gain measurement method can now be
sufficient. Instead, many researchers devote themselves to inves- readily adopted to evaluate the antenna transfer function as long
tigating the derivation of antenna transfer functions or the corre- as the standard antenna for calibration purpose is well matched
sponding antenna impulse responses so as to give a comprehen- to the measuring system and with constant group delay. The
sive description of the antenna performance [12]–[13][14]–[15]. experimental arrangement for evaluating this dimensionless
Baum et al. extend the definitions of antenna gain and radiation normalized antenna transfer function is shown in Fig. 4(a).
pattern into time domain and also describe in detail the relation- With this arrangement, the dimensionless normalized antenna
ship between the antenna transient gain and the conventional transfer function of the antenna under test (AUT) can be deter-
gain definition in the continuous-wave sense [12], [13]. Soergel mined by [7]
et al. compare the measurement procedures for UWB antennas
in frequency domain to that in time domain [14]. Scheers et al. (3)
propose a normalize impulse response (IR) for transverse elec-
where is the measured transmission scattering
tromagnetic mode horns and successfully apply this normalized
parameter of the AUT at a specific angle is
IR in simulating the system responses of various problems [15].
that of the standard antenna in its maximum gain direction, and
These system responses are reported to be curial in UWB an-
is the dimensionless normalized antenna transfer
tenna design as well [3].
function of the standard antenna, which is given by
Recently, we modified the definition of the antenna transfer
function given in [15] by a normalization factor , re- (4)
1108 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 54, NO. 4, APRIL 2006
IV. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a new UWB coplanar waveguide-fed tapered
ring slot antenna has been proposed and demonstrated. This an-
tenna possesses adequate impedance bandwidth and quite stable
Fig. 7. Magnitude of the simulated system responses with the E-planes of the radiation patterns in both UWB low and high bands. The pat-
transceiving antenna pairs being aligned with each other. tern distortion phenomenon that commonly occurred in UWB
antenna design has been explained in terms of mode transition,
reducing the intermediate-frequency (IF) bandwidth or using and the suggestion for improving the antenna radiation charac-
time-gating techniques in a vector network analyzer can also teristics has been given. The responses of a transceiving antenna
improve the measurement accuracy at the expense of time. system further certify the suitability of the antenna for UWB
applications. The future works will be in introducing suitable
band-notched structures to mask the WLAN bands and in sim-
C. System Responses
ulating the system responses in a more realistic environment
We have addressed that the system responses of a transceiving with the help of the measured dimensionless normalized an-
antenna system are frequently discussed in UWB antenna de- tenna transfer functions.
sign [3]. It is also noted that an antenna system with desir-
able responses but insufficient impedance bandwidth may be ACKNOWLEDGMENT
even more preferable than that with adequate impedance band-
width but less attractive responses. In this section, it is there- The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the
fore interesting to evaluate the system responses as the pro- reviewers and to Prof. S.-K. Jeng at National Taiwan University
posed antenna serving as both the transmitting and receiving an- for their valuable and thoughtful comments.
tennas in a transceiving antenna system. Such system responses
can be experimentally evaluated in an anechoic chamber, or REFERENCES
instead, can be simulated with the help of individual transfer [1] H. G. Schantz, “Planar elliptical element ultra-wideband dipole an-
functions of the transmitting and receiving antennas. In [7], we tennas,” in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 3, San Antonio, TX, Jun.
have demonstrated that the newly proposed dimensionless nor- 2002, pp. 44–47.
[2] H. G. Schantz and M. Barnes, “The COTAB UWB magnetic slot an-
malized antenna transfer function is capable of accurately pre- tenna,” in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 4, Boston, MA, Jul. 2001, pp.
dicting such system responses by simply substituting the corre- 104–107.
sponding transfer functions into [3] Z. N. Chen, X. H. Wu, N. Yang, and M. Y. W. Chia, “Considerations
for source pulses and antennas in UWB radio systems,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 52, pp. 1739–1748, Jul. 2004.
[4] Z. N. Chen, “Novel bi-arm rolled monopole for UWB applications,”
IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, pp. 672–677, Feb. 2005.
[5] J. McLean, H. Foltz, and R. Sutton, “Pattern descriptors for UWB an-
(5) tennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, pp. 553–559, Jan. 2005.
[6] M. Ciattaglia and G. Marrocco, “Approximate calculation of time-do-
In (5), and are the main effective height for aperture antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
dimensionless normalized antenna transfer functions of the Propag., vol. 53, pp. 1054–1061, Mar. 2005.
[7] T. G.. Ma and S. K. Jeng, “Planar miniature tapered-slot-fed annular slot
transmitting and receiving antennas, respectively, and antennas for ultra-wideband radios,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.
and are the associated orientations of the antennas. 53, pp. 1194–1202, Mar. 2005.
Fig. 4(b) illustrates a typical transceiving antenna system with [8] K. L. Wong, C. H. Wu, and S. W. Su, “Ultrawide-band square planar
metal-plate monopole antenna with a trident-shaped feeding strip,” IEEE
the E-planes of the antennas being aligned with each other. Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, pp. 1262–1269, Apr. 2005.
The angle between the - and ’-axes is , and the separation [9] J. Liang, C. C. Chiau, X. Chen, and C. G. Parini, “Printed circular disc
distance between the antennas is . In evaluating the system monopole antenna for ultra-wideband applications,” Electron. Lett., vol.
40, pp. 1246–1247, Sep. 2004.
responses, the corresponding antenna transfer functions should [10] H. G. Schantz, G. Wolenec, and E. M. Myszka, “Frequency notched
be properly substituted into (5) in accordance with the angle of UWB antenna,” in Proc. IEEE UWBST Conf., Reston, VA, Nov. 2003,
. pp. 214–218.
[11] Y. Kim and D.-H. Kwon, “CPW-fed planar ultra wideband antenna
Fig. 7 illustrates the evaluated system responses of the con- having a frequency band notch function,” Electron. Lett., vol. 40, pp.
figuration in Fig. 4(b). The separation distance is 2 m and the 403–404, Apr. 2004.
1110 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 54, NO. 4, APRIL 2006
[12] E. G. Farr and C. E. Baum, “Extending the definitions of antenna gain Chao-Hsiung Tseng (S’03–M’05) was born in
and radiation pattern into time domain,”, Air Force Research Lab. Sensor Miaoli, Taiwan, R.O.C., in 1974. He received the
and Simulation Note 350, 1992. B.S. degree in electronic engineering from National
[13] C. E. Baum, E. G. Farr, and C. A. Frost, “Transient gain of antennas Taipei Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan,
related to the traditional continuous-wave (CW) definition of gain,” R.O.C., in 1994 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
in Ultra-Wideband Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 4, Jun. 1998, pp. communication engineering from National Taiwan
109–118. University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C., in 1999 and
[14] W. Soergel, F. Pivit, and W. Wiesbeck, “Comparison of frequency do- 2004, respectively.
main and time domain measurement procedures for ultra wideband an- From 1999 to 2000, he was an Associate
tennas,” in Proc. Antenna Measurement Techniques Assoc. 25th Annu. Microwave Researcher with the Center for Mea-
Meeting Symp., Irvine, CA, Oct. 2003, pp. 72–76. surement Standards, Industrial Technology Research
[15] B. Scheers, M. Acheroy, and A. V. Vorst, “Time-domain simulation and Institute, Hsinchu. From 2001 to 2002, he was a Teaching Assistant with the
characterization of TEM horns using a normalized impulse response,” Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, where he
Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 147, pp. 463–468, became a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in 2004. He is now a Visiting Scholar
Dec. 2000. with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of California, Los
Angeles. His research interests include left-handed metamaterials, microwave
measurements and calibration techniques, and microwave-imaging systems
and techniques.
Tzyh-Ghuang Ma (S’00–M’06) was born in Taipei,
Taiwan, R.O.C., in 1973. He received the B.S. and
M.S. degrees in electrical engineering and the Ph.D.
degree in communication engineering from National
Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C., in 1995,
1997,and 2005, respectively.
In 2005, he joined the Faculty of the Department
of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Uni-
versity of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan,
R.O.C., where he is now an Assistant Professor. His
research interests include mobile antenna designs,
electromagnetic theory and numerical techniques, ultrawideband antenna, and
passive circuit designs.