10HSEQENVPL09 - 5 - Cliff Head Onshore Operations EP Summary

Cliff Head Field Onshore Operations
Environment Plan Summary
Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd Controlled

Document
No. 10/HSEQ/ENV/PL09/SUM
Revision 5
Issue date: 8/03/2019
Cliff Head Field Onshore Operations Environment Plan Summary

Cliff Head Field Onshore Operations Environment Plan Summary 10/HSEQ/ENV/PL09/SUM | Revision: 5
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4
1.1 Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd Health, Safety & Environment
Policy Statement ......................................................................................................................... 6
2 Description of the Activity..................................................................................... 7
2.1 Scope of this EP ............................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Pipelines ........................................................................................................................... 9
3 Description of Existing Environment ................................................................. 11
3.1 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 11
3.1.1 Temperature ................................................................................................................. 11
3.1.2 Rainfall .......................................................................................................................... 11
3.1.3 Wind and Humidity ...................................................................................................... 12
3.2 Land Form and Soils ..................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Surface and Groundwater Systems ............................................................................. 14
3.4 Conservation Estate ...................................................................................................... 14
3.5 Flora ................................................................................................................................ 15
3.5.1 Regional Flora .............................................................................................................. 15
3.5.2 Local Flora .................................................................................................................... 15
3.5.3 Phytophthora Cinnamomi ........................................................................................... 16
3.6 Fauna .............................................................................................................................. 19
3.7 Social Environment ....................................................................................................... 20
3.7.1 Population and Demographics ................................................................................... 20
3.7.2 Economic ...................................................................................................................... 21
3.7.3 Cultural Environment .................................................................................................. 21
3.7.4 Economic Environment ............................................................................................... 21
4 Assessment of Environmental Effects and Risks ............................................ 22
4.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................. 22
4.1.1 Key Definitions ............................................................................................................. 22
4.1.2 Risk Assessment Methodology .................................................................................. 22
4.1.3 Hazard Identification .................................................................................................... 23
4.1.4 Hazard Analysis ........................................................................................................... 23

4.1.5 Risk Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 23
4.1.6 Risk Treatment ............................................................................................................. 23
5 Implementation Strategy ..................................................................................... 24
5.1 Key Performance Indicators (Targets) ......................................................................... 24
5.2 General ............................................................................................................................ 24
5.3 Roles & Responsibilities ............................................................................................... 24
5.3.1 TEO Personnel ............................................................................................................. 24
5.3.2 Contractors and Visitors ............................................................................................. 26
6 Reporting Arrangements ..................................................................................... 26
6.1 Reporting on Routine Operations ................................................................................ 26
6.2 Reporting on Incidents .................................................................................................. 27
6.2.1 Internal .......................................................................................................................... 27
6.2.2 External ......................................................................................................................... 27
6.3 Auditing Routine Operations ........................................................................................ 28
6.4 Contractors Reporting to TEO ...................................................................................... 28
6.5 Consultation ................................................................................................................... 29
Appendix A ASP Layout ........................................................................................................... 30
Appendix B Triangle Energy Risk Matrix Toolkit (10/HSEQ/GEN/PC23/RG01 .................... 32
Appendix C Cliff Head (Onshore) Environmental Risk Assessment ................................... 34

1 Introduction
Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd (TEO) is required to develop and implement an Environment
Plan (EP) under the Petroleum Pipelines (Environment) Regulations 2012. This EP has been
prepared in accordance with this legislation.
On the 7th of February 2018, Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd (TEO) took over operatorship
of the Arrowsmith Stabilisation Plant (ASP) from Upstream Production Solutions Pty Ltd
(Upstream PS) post DMIRS approval of the Arrowsmith Onshore Safety Case
(10/HSEQ/GEN/PL10, Revision 3).
The facility is within production licences L1 and L2 and is located in the central western region of
Western Australia; approximately 25 km South of Dongara, within the Shire of Irwin, and 350 km
north of Perth.
The ASP is located onshore at 306 179mE 6 742 784mN. This EP is:
• Appropriate for the nature and scale of the Cliff Head Operations;
• Demonstrates that the environmental impacts and risks of the operation will be as low as
reasonably practical (ALARP);
• Provides for appropriate environmental performance objectives, environmental
performance standards and measurement criteria;
• Includes an appropriate implementation strategy (IS) and monitoring, recording and
reporting arrangements;
• Demonstrates that there has been an appropriate level of consultation in developing the
plan; and
• Complies with applicable legislation
In this EP CH refers to onshore development including the Production and Injection W ater
Pipelines and the Main Plant Facilities. ASP refers to the Main Plant only.
Figure 1 - Regional Location of Cliff Head Development

1.1 Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd Health, Safety &

Environment Policy Statement
2 Description of the Activity

The Cliff Head oil field is located off the Western Australian coast (Production Licence WA-31- L),
west of the Big Horseshoe Reef; approximately 20 km south-southwest of Dongara (refer to Figure
1). The water depth in the vicinity of the field is approximately 16 m and the closest landfall is
some 10km due east. The field itself is approximately 1,260 m below sea level. The wells are tied
to a wellhead platform located at 293385m E, 6740245m N.
Production facilities construction was completed in December 2005 after which development
drilling commenced. Production commenced on 1 May 2006. The first export of crude oil from
the ASP was delivered to the BP Kwinana Unloading Facility on 5 May 2006. The Cliff Head
Pipeline and ASP facilities (Cliff Head Development-CHD) original design life was 10 years
(2006 to 2016).
A CHD Asset Life Extension Project (ALEP) has been an ongoing process implemented to
manage the life extension of CHD assets beyond the original basis of design (10 years), until
2029 (Asset Life Extension Project Execution Plan: CHD-00-RA-PP-0001).
The ALEP criteria were to:
• Demonstrate to management, certifying authority, and regulators that facilities can
continue through to 2029. The mechanism is the 5-yearly Safety Case revisions;
• Create schedules and costs for capital projects to demonstrate continued business case
and extend operational life.
Engineering assessments of SCEs were conducted to determine suitability of the SCE for
ongoing operation beyond the original basis of design and to recommend mitigation and
deferment strategies to support SCE life extension until 2029 based on:
• Close-out of engineering assessment recommended actions; and
• Continued maintenance, inspection and testing per the Critical Maintenance Register
regime.
All completed SCE engineering assessments have confirmed suitability for ongoing operation
and the possibility to extend asset life until 2029. This includes both the production fluids and
injection water pipelines. This involved third-party verification of the pipeline life extension
engineering assessments. (Section 2.36, 10/HSEQ/GEN/PL10, Rev 3).
The Cliff Head oil field facility consists of the following infrastructure:
• An unmanned well head platform, Cliff Head Alpha (CHA) to accommodate the well heads
and support equipment;
• Up to five producing wells with electrical submersible pumps (ESPs) to enable artificial
lifting of the produced fluid (i.e. crude oil and water);
• Three water injection wells;
• An insulated subsea production pipeline, which transports the produced fluids from CHA
to Arrowsmith Stabilisation Plant (ASP), crossing beneath the shoreline and the dune
system, by means of a horizontal directionally drilled (HDD) hole;
• An insulated subsea water injection pipeline from ASP to the two injection wells at CHA;
• Arrowsmith Stabilisation Plant (ASP) located approximately 3km inland, which separates
the oil and produced formation water (PFW) and stabilises the oil ready for transport;
• Onshore source water well to supply make-up water during the early water injection phase
• A subsea power and control cable, and chemical supply umbilical running from ASP to
CHA; and
• Crude oil load-out facilities and transport by road to BP Refinery in Kwinana for refining
Additional activities include:

• Installation and maintenance of five groundwater bores to be installed in Q4 2018;
• Site remediation activities relating to the Onshore Injection Water Pipeline integrity issue
on the 29th of November 2018 including contaminated soil removal, pond remediation and
HDPE liner removal off site;
• Rehabilitation of land impacted by onshore operations incident which occurred 29 th of
November 2017.
Note all additional activities listed above will only be completed post approval from DMIRS
(Environmental). Furthermore, additional activities listed above were risk assessed and a
documented management of change process followed to identify all operational changes.
2.1 Scope of this EP

This EP covers the onshore component of the Cliff Head operations operated under Pipeline
Licence PL70. Additional documents for Environmental Management for the Cliff Head project
include:
• Cliff Head Onshore Operations Oil Spill Contingency Plan [10/HSEQ/ENV/PL08] outlines
the procedure for response to an oil spill onshore;
• Cliff Head Field Operations Environment Plan (State Waters) [10/HSEQ/ENV/PL01]
outlines the environmental management of operations in state waters;
• Cliff Head Operations Environment Plan (Commonwealth Waters) [10/HSEQ/ENV/PL11];
• CHA Offshore Operations Oil Spill Contingency Plan [10//HSEQ/ENV/PL02] outlines the
procedures for response to an oil spill in State and Commonwealth W aters
Figure 2 - Main Components of the Cliff Head Development
2.2 Pipelines
The Cliff Head development includes the operation of two pipelines:
• The production pipeline carries the well stream fluids from the wellhead platform (CHA) to
the onshore plant (ASP);
• The water injection pipeline, transports PFW and additional make-up injection water from
the ASP to CHA;
The two pipelines are essentially identical in size (273.1mm, i.e. 10”) and design, they are
constructed from steel (wall thickness 14.3mm).
In addition, there is an 80mm integrated power cable complete with fibre optic cables and a 60mm
umbilical flat pack for the chemical injection fluids.
The shore crossing was installed by HDD. The onshore component of the pipeline runs 2.4km
from the HDD shore crossing to ASP and is buried.
The shore crossing consists of two separate boreholes, which are lined with a bund sleeve pipe.
Both boreholes are approximately 1000m in length. They enter the ground approximately 500m
onshore and exit through the seabed approximately 500m offshore.
Onshore are also two ‘corrosion monitoring trenches. Approval for the 270m trench was granted
to excavate and leave open a 15m span of the onshore Cliff Head (CH) pipeline in order to monitor
the corrosion rate of the injection water pipeline. The resulting trench is located on the eastern
end of the pipeline easement at S29025’39” E114059’52” and is approximately 15m(length) x
4m(width) x 1.8m(depth). The trench walls are retained with an interlocking non-friable stone
pitched wall over a GeoFabric underlay. The entire excavation is enclosed in a permanent 19m x
9m galvanised chainmesh fence 1.8m high with a single strand of barbed wire at the top and a
1.5m wide firebreak at the base of the fence. The design of the monitoring trench provides a safe
work environment and also protects local fauna by preventing large animals from entering the
trench and allowing a means of climbing out of the trench should smaller animals enter the
compound.
The second monitoring trench “1130m pipeline monitoring trench” is installed 1130m west of the
ASP (approximately 304916mE 6742989mN [GDA Zone 50]), The pipeline installation was
managed under the 1130m Monitoring Trench & HDD Temporary Access Trench Bridging
Environment plan (4716-HS-H0107).
Operational activities conducted at the 270m and 1130m trenches are defined in detail in section
6.3.6.
Approval was obtained from the DBCA (both with regards to the deed of easement and the
proposal implementation and monitoring).
Arrowsmith Stabilisation Plant (ASP) Appendix A contains a site layout for the ASP.
The ASP is a Petroleum Pipeline facility (licensed under PL70) and is located on the site of the
disused lime sand plant approximately 3 km inland and 20 km south of the town of Dongara.
Processing at the treatment facility comprises degassing, dewatering and stabilisation of the crude
oil. It also serves as the operations control base for the offshore facility.
The facility is designed to have a gross liquid (oil and formation water) capacity of approximately
3
4,770 m per day (30,000 barrels per day). The site is accessed by sealed road directly from the
Brand Highway with a slip lane for entry and an acceleration lane for vehicles exiting towards
Perth on the highway. It is fenced with emergency exits at various locations. The main gate is
electrically operated from the plant control room and incorporates an intercom and Closed-Circuit
Television (CCTV) coverage. CCTV cameras are also used to monitor tanker-loading operations.
The oil is of waxy consistency, therefore heating and insulation is provided to piping, tanks and
equipment to keep the oil from depositing the wax. Heat is obtained from waste heat recovery
units on each of the power generator exhaust systems and from two electric heaters.
Pipe work containing oil is fitted with electrical trace heating cables. The main activities conducted
at ASP are as follows:
• Transport of crude product is via road transport to the BP refinery at Kwinana

• Pig launching and receiving facilities for weekly pigging operations. Pigging is undertaken
weekly to clear material build up in the pipeline that can render chemical treatments for
bacteria ineffective
3 Description of Existing Environment

A detailed description of the existing environment surrounding the Cliff Head Oil Field
Development was presented in Chapter 2 of the PER [Primary Environmental Review (2004)].
The following section provides a summary of the existing environment and describes the existing
physical, biological, social, cultural, and economic environment within the L1 Licence Area.
3.1 Climate
The oil field is within a region that has a Mediterranean type climate characterised by seasonal
patterns of hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters, with a low number of rain days. The highest
temperatures occur in January and February while the lowest temperatures occur in August.
There is a dominant winter rainfall with approximately 55% of annual rainfall occurring in June and
August. During summer months rainfall is uncommon, resulting in a summer drought that lasts
approximately four months.
Winds over the region are relatively strong (mean 12–16 knots; maximum 30–35 knots) and are
most frequently from the southern sector (southeast to southwest) during the summer months and
from the eastern sector (northeast to southeast) during the winter months
3.1.1 Temperature
Average maximum temperatures peak in February in Geraldton, with a monthly mean of about
33°C. Hot days are usually followed by a cool change with fresh to strong southerly sea breezes.
In contrast, winters are mild with the July average maximum temperature being the lowest of any
month at 20°C. August minima are the lowest on average at 9°C. Due to the position of the sub-
tropical ridge during winter, winds with an onshore component are common and along with
increased cloudiness help to moderate temperatures
Figure 3 - Mean Maximum and Minimum Temperatures [°C] (Geraldton)
3.1.2 Rainfall
Annual rainfall at Geraldton Airport averages 444 mm (Figure 4) over approximately 60 days
(Figure 5). June is the wettest month, with a long-term average of 100 mm, whilst rain occurs on
one day out of every three during an average winter.
Approximately 85% of the annual total falls between May and October, on average, mostly as a
result of the passage of cold fronts. Sometimes these fronts are associated with cloud bands from
the north-west, which enhance the totals.
The driest months are December and January with means of approximately 5 mm. In summer it
rains on about four days over the three months.
Rainfall in summer is often associated with thunderstorms, which can occasionally produce heavy
localised falls in short periods. Summer months may also record scattered and irregular
thunderstorm rain or the infrequent influence of a decaying tropical cyclone. Thunderstorm days
total about 10-15 per annum.
Figure 4 - Mean Monthly Rainfall (mm) (Geraldton)
Figure 5 - Mean Number of Rain Days per Month
3.1.3 Wind and Humidity

The wind climatology at Geraldton is strongly dominated by the effects of the land-sea interface
where offshore land breezes are common in the morning, whilst afternoon sea breezes are
common in the warmer months. W inter tends to be the period of most variability in winds due to
the latitude and mobility of the sub-tropical ridge, and a weak land-sea temperature contrast. It
also tends to be the season with the lightest winds; however, cold fronts can occasionally bring
strong winds and gales to the area.
During the remainder of the year, the sub-tropical ridge is generally south of Geraldton and thus
winds with an easterly component prevail overnight and in the morning. The wind speeds average
about 20 km/h at 9 am and 25 km/h at 3 pm. Average wind speeds in the October – March period
increase to approximately 30 km/h at 3 pm, as a result of the sea breeze. Mean climatic conditions
are presented in Table 4.
Table 1: Mean climatic conditions
Month
Aspect Ave
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mean 9 am wind
speed– 22 22 21 18 17 17 17 16 16 19 21 21 19
km/h(easterly)
Mean 9 am
relative humidity 51 51 53 59 66 75 78 76 67 55 49 49 61
(%)
Mean 3 pm wind
speed– km/h 31 30 27 23 20 17 17 18 22 26 29 30 24
(south- westerly)
Mean 3 pm
relative humidity 46 44 44 46 49 55 58 58 53 50 47 47 50
(%)
* All figures supplied from www.bom.gov.au: refer to Geraldton Airport
3.2 Land Form and Soils

The Cliff Head Development is situated within the Perth Basin geological province on the coastal
fore-plain. The area is part of the Quindalup dune system and dunes comprising Holocene age
calcareous sands are the dominant feature of the landscape. There are no watercourses or
drainage lines along the pipeline route.
The dunes are generally aligned parallel to the prevailing wind direction in a north to north-
easterly direction. The frontal dunes have a parabolic profile with steep, peaked relief and are up
to 40 m high. The older dunes are lower and have a more gently undulating relief.
The frontal vegetated dunes have little to no humus content and are very highly susceptible to
wind erosion if the vegetation on the crests is damaged or cleared, the older vegetated dunes
have a higher humus layer and the erosion is less, but still high.
Throughout the coastal plain there are a number of blow-outs (mobile unvegetated dunes)
however none are present within the pipeline route. The soils are characterised by:
• Variable calcium carbonate content depending on the shell content levels of the beach
and dune sands from which they originated;
• A typically alkaline pH level, which varies up to 9.5 in the more calcareous patches to
close to neutral in swales (depressions between dunes) or where sands overlie
limestone;
• Variable salinity levels caused by seawater spray, with salinity decreasing with distance
inland
• High porosity and low water holding capacity
3.3 Surface and Groundwater Systems

The Irwin River valley is the only major coordinated drainage indentation within the area of Cliff
Head. A number of swamps surrounded by dense scrub, frequent limestone outcrops and the
occasional laterite outcrop are the other major features in the region; but these fall outside the CH
area. The sub-surface geology of the area consists of the Late Jurassic Yarragadee Formation,
which is overlain by Tertiary Sediments.
Groundwater is present in the Tertiary sediments and the Yarragadee Formation and the
groundwater level is near, or at, surface in the aforementioned swamps and low-lying areas;
following the surface topography, but with lower relief.
The porous and permeable coastal limestones and dune systems tend to allow rainwater to
percolate vertically to the water table rather than running laterally off the surface.
3.4 Conservation Estate

The Cliff Head pipeline traverses the Beekeepers North Class C Nature Reserve. Figure 6 shows
the ASP facility and onshore pipeline with reference to the Nature Reserve.
Figure 6 – Pipeline Locality Map (Beekeepers Nature Reserve)
3.5 Flora
3.5.1 Regional Flora
ASP is located within the Irwin Botanical District (Northern Sandplains Region), within the
Southwest Botanical Province as defined by Beard (1976). Beard (1976) mapped the vegetation
on a regional scale and categorised the vegetation as part of the Illyarrie system. The Illyarrie
system consists of coastal limestone ridges formed from lithified aeolian calcarenite, with a
covering of shallow yellow sand. The Illyarrie system is not well conserved locally, with only small
areas in the Yardanogo Nature Reserve, but it is well conserved regionally and there are very
large areas in the Beekeepers Nature Reserve to the west. The region was subsequently
classified as part of the Geraldton Sandplains under the Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for
Australia (EA 2000). The Geraldton Sandplains are described as “mainly proteaceous scrub-
heaths, rich in endemics, on the sandy earths of an extensive, undulating, lateritic sandplain
mantling Permian to Cretaceous strata. Extensive York Gum and Jam woodlands occur on
outwash plains associated drainage.” (EA 2000).
3.5.2 Local Flora

Vegetation condition across the pipeline area varies between very poor in the eastern part
adjacent to the plant site to excellent in the western parts. There is some weed invasion on the
fore-dunes but the vegetation structure is still intact. The vegetation mapped varied between tall
thickets and low heaths. The plant communities present reflect the harsh nature of the
environment, with species dominance and morphology within each community dependent on the
soil depth and water availability at each site. The coastal heath communities dominate the more
exposed sites closer to the coast on dune crests and in exposed sites on flats with little soil
covering the limestone basement. The predominantly Acacia rostellifera thicket communities
occurred in primary dune swales closer to the coast where water harvested from the dunes and
shelter from the prevailing winds provides conditions suitable for plant growth. Thicket
communities become more dominant further from the coast east of the secondary dunes.
A total of eight vegetation units were described and mapped within the Development area during
the spring 2003 survey. These consisted of six plant communities, one mosaic unit and one
disturbance unit (refer Table 5 and Figure 7). None of the plant communities mapped are
Threatened Ecological Communities as defined by the Department of Biodiversity Conservation
and Attractions (DBCA).
Table 2 Vegetation units
Thickets: T1 Dense Thicket of Acacia rostellifera, Acacia rostellifera x xanthina and

Melaleuca species over mixed shrubs on grey sand with occasional limestone
outcropping.
Plant community T1 was mapped in a small pocket on the northern edge of
the plant site survey area. The vegetation within this community was in
excellent condition, with no evidence of grazing. The Acacia shrubs were
generally over 2 m in height and very dense. Other common shrubs included
Melaleuca systena, Melaleuca cardiophylla and Desmocladus asper.
Interspersed within this community were patches of Eucalyptus alcate subsp.
Opima in swales. A total of 32 vascular plant taxa were recorded within this
plant community.
Thickets: Plant Community T1 that has been modified by grazing and other human
T1w activities and has a greatly modified understorey with a high weed cover.
The majority of the plant site, as well as the eastern end of the pipeline
corridor, was mapped as T1w. These areas would originally have been plant
community T1 but have been severely modified by grazing and clearing. The
herb layer is completely dominated by weed species, with some areas also
devoid of taller shrubs. 41 plant taxa were recorded in this unit, 11 of which
were weed species.
Thickets: T2 Thicket of Melaleuca huegelii subsp. Huegelii and Melaleuca cardiophylla over
Acanthocarpus preissii over mixed low shrubs and daisies on grey sand on
dune crests.
Plant community T2 was mapped on the crests of several narrow dunes within
the pipeline corridor. The cover of the vegetation was lower than in
surrounding areas due to wind exposure. These crests run into a large mobile
dune north of the Development area. Other common shrubs included
Melaleuca leuropoma and Scaevola crassifolia. A total of 41 plant species
were recorded within plant community T2.
Heath dominated by Melaleuca leuropoma and Melaleuca huegelii subsp.
Huegelii over a herb layer dominated by sedge and daisy species on grey
sand with limestone outcropping.
This plant community was mapped over the majority of the pipeline corridor on
Heath: H1 the plains between the dune systems. It was generally very uniform in cover
and height although small patches of emergent Allocasuarina lehmanniana
subsp. Lehmanniana were present. Common understorey species included
Baumea juncea, Lepidosperma pubisquameum and Rhodanthe citrina. It was
the most diverse plant community mapped within the Development area, with
64 species recorded.
Dense Heath dominated by Lepidosperma gladiatum, Scaevola crassifolia
and Zygophyllum fruticulosum, with occasional taller shrubs, over herbs on
white sand.
Plant community H2 was mapped on the plain behind the foredune. It differed
Heath: H2 structurally from the heaths on the plains further from the beach. The plants
here were shorter, probably due to greater exposure to wind. Occasional taller
shrubs were present, including Acacia rostellifera xanthina, Santalum
acuminatum and Allocasuarina lehmanniana subsp. Lehmanniana. This plant
community was in excellent condition with a total of 37 species recorded.
Low Heath dominated by Scaevola crassifolia, Tetragonia decumbens and
Myoporum insulare on white sand.
Heath: H3 This plant community was mapped in a very narrow strip on the ocean side of
the foredune. Vegetation cover was low and sparse, with some weeds
present. Only nine plant species were recorded.
Mosaic of plant communities T2 and H1 on dune crests and swales. An area
located between plant communities H2 and H1 was mapped as a mosaic unit.
Thicket/Heath
It was situated in an area of high topographical relief where the vegetation on
T2/H1
the dunes and swales could not be separated. This area contained both plant
community T2 and plant community H1 in small merging patches.
Disturbed Areas where the vegetation has been almost completely removed by human
Areas activity.
3.5.3 Phytophthora Cinnamomi

Phytophthora cinnamomi is a virulent plant pathogen (commonly referred to as dieback) that
belongs to the water moulds and as such requires moist conditions to propagate, spread and infect
hosts. This pathogen causes disease epidemic within native vegetation of the high rainfall areas
of Western Australia, particularly in the plant families Proteaceae, Epacridaceae, and Myrtaceae.
The pathogen can spread unaided by root-to-root contact, by native and introduced animal activity
and by human vectoring in soil on machinery and footwear.
The pipeline route lies at the northern limit of the portion of Western Australia where plant disease
caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi is known to occur. The pipeline area was surveyed by two
experienced interpreters for the presence of symptoms of plant disease caused by P. cinnamomi
during October 2003. The survey focused on areas that were most at risk of containing the
pathogen through a history of human access such as tracks and previous operational areas.
The pipeline route has been classified as ‘Uninterpretable’ due to the extremely low density of
species within the vegetation that are known to be susceptible to the pathogen. Despite the
presence of long utilised fisherman’s tracks to the beach and a former mining operation, no clear
evidence supporting the presence of P. cinnamomi within the Development area was observed
during the survey. Soil moistures were adequate to support a recovery of the pathogen from
samples in the event that it may have been present and the only observed stressed plants
were sampled during the survey. All four samples collected during the survey returned analysis
results negative for the presence of P.cinnamomi.
Figure 7 - Vegetation Distribution

3.6 Fauna
Fauna species included under conservation acts and/or agreements (e.g., the Commonwealth
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the Western Australian
Wildlife Conservation Act 1990) are formally recognised as having conservation significance
under state or federal legislation. In addition, species that are at the limit of their distribution, those
that have a very restricted range and those that occur in breeding colonies, such as some
waterbirds, can be considered of conservation significance, although this level of significance has
no legislative or published recognition and is based on interpretation of distribution information.
On the basis of the above comments, three levels of conservation significance are recognised in
this report:
• Level 1: Species listed under State or Commonwealth Acts

• Level 2: Species not listed under State or Commonwealth Acts, but listed in publications
on threatened fauna or as Priority Species by DBCA
• Level 3: Species not listed under Acts or in publications but considered of at least local
significance because of their pattern of distribution.
Table 6 lists the fauna of conservation significance that may be present in the area.
Table 3: Significant Fauna Potential Found Onsite.
Significance Level 1
Common WA Wildlife Significance Significance
Species
Name EPBC Listed Conservation Level 2 Level 3
Act Listed
Reptiles
Aspidites Ramsay’s
ramsayi python ✓
(woma)
Morelia spilota South-west
variegata carpet ✓
python
Phyllodactylus Marbled
✓
marmoratus gecko
Pletholax gracilis Burton’s
legless ✓
lizard
Egernia King’s skink
✓
multiscutata
Birds
Calyptorhynchus Carnaby’s
latirostris black Endangered ✓
cockatoo
Falco peregrinus Peregrine
✓
falcon
Haliaeetus White
leucogaster bellied sea Migratory
eagle
Morops ornatus Rainbow
Migratory
bee-eater
Thinornis Hooded
✓
rubricollis plover
Significance Level 1
Common WA Wildlife Significance Significance
Species
Name EPBC Listed Conservation Level 2 Level 3
Act Listed
Ardeotis Australian
✓
australis bustard
Calamanthus Striated
✓
campestris fieldwren
Pomatostomus White-
superciliosus browed ✓
ashbyi babbler
Oreioca Crested
✓
gutturalis bellbird
Larus pacificus Pacific gull ✓
Lophoictinia Square-
✓
isura tailed kite
Eopsaltria White-
georgiana breasted ✓
robin
Mammals
Macropus irma Brush
✓
wallaby
Hydromys Water rat
✓
chysogaster
Rattus fuscipes Bush rat ✓
Hemisaga Cricket
✓
vepreculae
Hyaleus Native bee
✓
globuliferous
3.7 Social Environment

The development area is in the Shire of Irwin, in the Mid-West region of Western Australia. The
twin towns of Dongara and Port Denison are the nearest townships to the development. The
region has supported petroleum exploration since the 1950’s with oil and gas production beginning
soon after. The Perth Basin has become a prominent oil and gas production province supporting
a number of onshore operators. The Arrowsmith Stabilisation Plant is located in private property
owned by TEO. The onshore pipeline is within the Beekeepers Nature Reserve.
Similarly, mineral extraction is undertaken in the area, primarily for mineral sands.
3.7.1 Population and Demographics

The Mid West region has a population of approximately 52,000 people. The two largest shires in
the region are the City of Geraldton (18,916 persons) and the Shire of Greenough (14,035)
persons, which account for about 60% of the region’s population. The population of the Shire of
Irwin is small in comparison, comprising 3,052 people (ABS, 2006 Census).
Education and Employment

The total employment in the Shire of Irwin in August 2006 was 1,334 people (ABS, 2006 census).
The most common industries of employment for persons aged 15 years and over usually resident
in this Shire were Sheep, Beef Cattle and Grain Farming (9.5%); Fishing (4.4%); School Education
(4.4%); Supermarket and Grocery Stores (3.8%); and Accommodation 3.5%.
3.7.2 Economic
The key economic features of the mid-western region of WA are as follows 1:
• A diverse economy built around mining, agriculture, fishing and tourism
• The Mid West's gross regional product was $3.5 Billion in 2005/2006 which is 17 per cent
higher than the previous year in real growth terms
• Mining is the most valuable sector. In 2005/06, the mining and petroleum production in the
Mid-West reached a value of $2.4 billion
3.7.3 Cultural Environment

No archaeological or ethnographical evidence or sites were identified to be associated with the
development area as per Report of an Archaeological Survey for Aboriginal Sites Potential Drill
Locations Dongara Region (Quartermaine 1999).
3.7.4 Economic Environment

The significant economic activities in the region include oil, gas and mineral exploration and
production, and broad hectare cropping and grazing activities. Other activities in the area include
aquaculture and olive growth and production. Early settlement in the Dongara region was by
pastoralists.
1
See http://www.mwdc.wa.gov.au/Economy.aspx
4 Assessment of Environmental Effects and Risks

4.1 Scope
This section assesses the environmental effect of the production phase of the Cliff Head
development activities on the environment, identifies mitigation measures to address and
minimise these impacts and assesses the residual environmental risk with these measures
implemented.
Environmental aspects/activities with the potential for impact from the Cliff Head Operations are:
• Planned Activities: Onshore (ASP & Production Pipelines)

− Soil Management;
− Flora and Fauna Management; Noise
− Atmospheric Emissions; Waste Management
− Contaminated Drainage Water and W aste Oils
• Unplanned Activities: Onshore (ASP and Production Pipelines)
− Accidental Releases of Hydrocarbons, Chemicals and Produced Formation Water;

− Soil Management including contaminated waste removal post incident response);
− Remediation of temporary storage areas (temporary storage bunds and temporary
water storage / Evaporation pond)
These activities have the potential to result in adverse effects on the physical, socio-economic
and biological environment of local marine environment.
4.1.1 Key Definitions

Accident Event An event capable of causing critical, major, moderate, minor damage to the
environment, or negligible damage with no significant environmental effect.
Hazard A physical situation with the potential for damage to the environment, human
injury, damage to property or some combination of these.
Risk The likelihood of a specified undesired event occurring within a specified period
or in specified circumstances. It may be either a frequency (the number of
specified events occurring in a time unit) or a probability (the probability of
specified event following a prior event), depending upon circumstances.
4.1.2 Risk Assessment Methodology

The risk assessment approach used within this Environmental Plan is consistent with the
approach outlined in AS14001, ISO31000:2009 Risk Management Principles and Guidelines on
Implementation and HB203: 2006 Environmental Risk Management. Qualitative environmental
risk is assessed as follows for identified environmental aspects/activities which could result in an
environmental impact.
The environmental risk rating presented in this section represents residual risk levels, i.e. the
likelihood of occurrence of the end-point environmental impact/consequence taking into account
risk management controls implemented as a result of the design, personnel skill training and
competency assessments, procedures and emergency response plans.
The environmental risk assessment tools used for this risk assessment are the Triangle Energy
(Operations) Pty Ltd Risk Assessment Matrix, Consequence Definitions and Likelihood
Definitions (refer Appendix B). An extreme environmental risk is considered to lie in the Risk Level
1 (18-36), a high environmental risk lies in Risk Level 2 (12-16), etc. Also, as defined in Appendix
B, a significant environmental impact is defined as lying within consequence levels 3 to 6.
Environmental risk assessment consists of four basic steps:
• Hazard identification
• Hazard analysis
• Risk evaluation
• Risk treatment
These steps are described briefly in the sections below.
4.1.3 Hazard Identification

Hazard identification involves identifying the sources of risk, i.e. those activities or incidents that
could result in an environmental impact. Hazards are categorised into those arising from routine
operations, and those arising from non-routine operations and incidents.
4.1.4 Hazard Analysis

Hazard analysis determines the likelihood of an activity or event occurring, and the consequences
of that activity or event on the environment. The Risk Matrix Toolkit [00/HSEQ/GEN/PC01/FM01],
given in Appendix B, was used to assess the consequence and likelihood of all identified events.
The matrix is based on six classifications of severity and six for the likelihood of a hazard.
4.1.5 Risk Evaluation

Risk evaluation prioritises the risks, i.e. determines if the risk of an activity or incident is acceptably
low, or if management actions are required to reduce the risk to ALARP. The risk evaluation
presented in Appendix C takes existing safeguards, or management measures into consideration,
i.e. it represents the residual risk with existing safeguards in place.
4.1.6 Risk Treatment

Appendix C presents the detailed assessment of risks, impacts and their management for the
operation of ASP and pipeline facilities. The Implementation Strategy in Section 8 focuses on the
significant issues identified to ensure the ongoing management of environmental risks to ALARP.
5 Implementation Strategy
5.1 Key Performance Indicators (Targets)
TEO has committed to the key performance indicators presented in Table 1 to ensure that
environmental performance objectives for the CH are met.
5.2 General
The primary goal of the Implementation Strategy is to ensure that the environmental performance
objectives and standards outlined in Section 7 of this EP are achieved.
The Implementation Strategy includes operational systems and procedures that:
• Identify specific systems, practices and procedures to be used to ensure that
environmental risks and effects are reduced to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP)
(Section 8.3)
• Comply with all relevant legislation applying to the activity
• Establish a clear chain of command that sets out the roles and responsibilities of
Personnel in relation to the implementation, management and review of the EP (Section
8.4)
• Ensure that each Employee or Contractor working on, or in connection with the CH is
aware of their responsibilities in relation to the environment and has the appropriate skills
and training (Section 8.5)
• Monitor, audit and review environmental performance and the Implementation Strategy.
Maintain an up-to-date emergency response manual that includes detailed response and
investigative arrangements
• Maintain quantitative records of emissions and discharges to the environment that are
accurate and can be monitored and audited against environmental performance
standards and measurement criteria
• Ensure that the agreed environmental performance objectives and standards are met
(Section 9)
• Provide for appropriate consultation with relevant government authorities and other
interested persons or organisations (Section 10)
5.3 Roles & Responsibilities

This section outlines the roles and responsibilities of personnel in relation to the implementation,
management and review of this EP.
5.3.1 TEO Personnel

5.3.1.1 PIC
It is the responsibility of the PIC to:
• Demonstrate "duty of care" through personal example and clearly defined team
responsibilities
• Ensure that the requirements of this EP are implemented (including seeking advice from
HSEQ representatives)
• Ensure funds are available to ensure all Cliff Head Operations are conducted in an
environmentally responsible manner
• Maintain an easily accessible copy of this EP and the OSCP
• Oversee management of Cliff Head Operations (including directing staff on required
environmental actions)
• Attend all HSEQ meetings and daily operations meetings and raise any environmental
issues
• Establish systems that encourage free and open communication and consultation on
HSEQ issues
• Ensure that all environmental incidents are recorded and reported to TEO Perth
• Perth Basin HSEQ Advisor and Senior Environmental Advisor
• Participate in all incident investigations as required
• Participate in regular emergency response drills
5.3.1.2 Operators
It is the responsibility of Operators and Maintenance Staff to:
• Carry out all aspects of this EP for which he/she is responsible
• Follow good housekeeping procedures and work practices
• Complete all activities as prioritised and defined by the PIC
• Never undertake any task that does not meet TEO HSEQ standards
• Verbally report all HSEQ hazards, incidents and near misses to the PIC immediately
• Identify hazards and correct them on a “see and fix” basis where it is in their ability to do
so
• Access, review and comply with MSDSs for all hazardous substances
• Participate in training as appropriate
• Attend HSEQ meetings and raise any environmental issues
Participate in regular emergency response drills
5.3.1.3 Senior Environmental Advisor

It is the responsibility of the Senior Environmental Advisor to:
• Ensure that the requirements of this EP are implemented (including seeking advice from
HSEQ representatives)
• Demonstrate "duty of care" through personal example
HSEQ issues
• Ensure regulator reportable incidents are reported
• Ensure that the site requirements of this EP are implemented
• Ensure that the requirements of this EP are implemented
• Provide advice on environmental matters
• Participate in environmental incident investigations
• Conduct AIEA and participate in regulator environmental audits / inspections
• Keep this EP up to date
• Participate in major incident investigations
• Contact person for liaising with Environmental Regulators
• Liaise with external stakeholders
• Ensure that all environmental incidents are recorded and reported to TEO
5.3.1.4 Senior HSE Advisor

It is the responsibility of the Senior HSE Advisor to:
• Demonstrate "duty of care" through personal example
• Attend HSEQ meetings and raise awareness of environmental issues / aspects
HSEQ issues
• Ensure that all environmental incidents are recorded and reported to the TEO General
Manager and documented in myOSH;
• Lead all incident investigations as required
• Participate in environmental audits as required
• Participate in major incident investigations
5.3.1.5 Administrations officer

It is the responsibility of the Administrations officer to:
• Issue site inductions to TEO personnel and Contractors;
• Maintain SharePoint system for document management;
• Maintain access to key Environmental and HSE documents including o the Cliff Head
Onshore Operations Environment Plan.
5.3.2 Contractors and Visitors

It is the responsibility of all contractors working in the CH to:
• Undertake Comprehensive and site induction

• Ensure all licences, certificates and permits are current and valid
• Understand environmental management relevant to the tasks performed
• Follow all CH procedures and requirements
• Report all incidents
11.5 Training
Environmental related training courses undertaken by personnel include:
• ASP Comprehensive Induction which includes environmental management. It is an TEO

requirement that all employees, contractors and visitors to site undertake this induction
annually
• Safety and Environment Competency Based Training
• Emergency Response Competency Based Training
• Risk analysis, risk assessment, permit to work and Job Safety Environment Analysis
• Competency Based Training
• Chemical Management Competency Based Training
• Basic Fire Fighting
• Oil Spill Response Training
• Pigging Competency Based Training
• Tanker Loading Competency Based Training
6 Reporting Arrangements
This section outlines the following reporting requirements:
• Reporting by Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd on routine operations;

• Reporting by Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd on incidents;
• Auditing routine operations;
• Reports by Contractors to TEO; and
• Review of this EP
6.1 Reporting on Routine Operations

MyOSH is a Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd. Online Database which stores incident reports,
hazards, audits and inspections and action tracking. Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd
personnel undertake regular workplace inspections of different components of Operations.
Hazard cards are raised by TEO Personnel when they observe safety or environmental concerns.
Items requiring action (during workplace inspections or on hazard cards) are addressed
immediately, where possible. Actions and remedial actions are documented in MyOSH and closed
out on completion.
A Daily Production Report is produced by the ASP Personnel, summarising routine operations.
This report also documents any unusual occurrences or accidents that occur in the Cliff Head. A
Visitor’s Log is maintained to record all persons visiting the site.
TEO has an Environmental Protection Act 1986 licence L8096/2005/3 for operation of the
Arrowsmith Stabilisation Plant. A report on the conditions within the licence is submitted annually
to the Department of Water and Environment Regulation (DWER).
An Annual Environmental Report is submitted (in October) to provide evidence that environmental
performance objectives have been met and the implementation strategy of the EP has been
complied with. The Annual Environmental Report includes details of:
• Summary of Activities;
• Meeting of Objectives and Standards;
• Summary of Audits and Incidents;
• Planned Emissions and Discharges;
• Biological Monitoring/Research;
• Identification of New or Increased Risks;
• Training and Exercises; and
• Ongoing Consultation
An emissions and discharges report is submitted to DMIRS PEB quarterly in the Quarterly
Emissions and Discharges Report Form (ENV-PEB-088). The report will include a description and
quantity of:
• Injection W ater Volume (metered daily);
• Spill Volumes (Crude Oil, Injection W ater, Chemicals and Oils) (estimated where spill
occurs)
• Volume of gas flared ((mass balance based on other gas metering
• Volume of gas vented (gas to flare not vented)
• Discharges to W ater (no discharges to water)
• Waste disposed (volume, type – invoices)
• Chemical Injected Down Hole (injection rates)
• Monitoring Equipment (intervals as per maintenance policy for individual equipment)
6.2 Reporting on Incidents

6.2.1 Internal
Hazards and incidents are reported in accordance with Cliff Head Incident and Investigation
Reporting Procedure (10/HSEQ/GEN/PC23).
6.2.2 External
6.2.2.1 Reportable Incidents
A reportable incident is an incident arising from the activity if the incident has caused or has the
potential to cause an adverse environmental impact, this includes:
• Spill of >80 L hydrocarbons in areas of inland waters
• Spill of >500 L hydrocarbons in other areas
• Emission of petroleum in a gaseous form in excess of 500 m 3
• Any uncontrolled escape or ignition of petroleum or any other flammable or combustible

material causing a potentially hazardous situation
• Any spillage of hydrocarbons or other material (including drilling fluids, chemicals,
produced formation water or substances that have the potential to adversely affect
surface vegetation, soil or subsurface ground water) that affects a ground surface area
2
greater than 100 m .
• Fire from the Cliff Head Operation impacting the Bee Keepers Nature Reserve
• Onshore spills of hydrocarbon with the potential to impact the marine environment
• Any incident with raw consequence level of ‘moderate’ or higher
Reportable incidents shall be reported orally to DMIRS PEB on 0419 960 621 immediately and
followed by a written report (to [email protected]) within 3 days of the
first occurrence of the incident. The report will be in the DMIRS Environmental Incident Report
Form (ENV-PEB-189).
6.2.2.2 Recordable Incidents

A recordable incident is an incident that breaches an environmental performance objective or
environmental performance standard documented in the EP for the activity and is not a reportable
incident. Recordable incidents shall be reported to DMIRS PEB on the Monthly Recordable
Environmental Incident Report Form (ENV-PEB-190) by the 15th of the following month.
6.3 Auditing Routine Operations

TEO conducts an Annual Environmental Compliance Audit annually. The audit brief includes the
commitments in this EP and conditions from all Environmental Licences.
Annual management reviews are conducted to determine the continuing suitability, adequacy and
effectiveness of HSE management systems. Information reviewed includes audit results, incident
reports, performance reports and relevant views from stakeholders. Reviews are documented
including observations, conclusions, recommendations and follow-up;
Corporate audits are conducted every three years at all sites and organisational levels to establish
the extent of conformance with these Standards. Audits may be more frequent depending on the
organisation’s HSE risk profile and performance history. Audit teams comprise of auditors who
are independent of the part of the organisation being audited. Performance improvement plans
are prepared and executed to address non-conformities.
The HSE Policy and these Standards are reviewed at least every three years and revised as
required. Refer to section 11.3 for the relevant TEO HSE standards and section 10.2 of the HSE
Management System description (10/HSEQ/GEN/POL3544, Rev 0) for Monitoring, Audit and
review requirements. Additional related documents include the CHA and ASP Operations CPS
Audit Procedure (10/OP/INT/PC02) and the ASP CHA Audit schedule (10/HSEQ/GEN/PL15).
The TEO General Management will see assurance of conformance with these Standards and will
regularly review HSE performance, risks and strategic issues. Annual self-assessments are
conducted at each site to establish the extent of conformance with the High Risk Control
Protocols. Improvement plans are prepared and executed to address non-conformities.
Systems are in place to identify, report, respond to and manage non-conformities and
improvement opportunities. Non-conformities are investigated, and corrective and preventative
actions implemented, and their effectiveness reviewed to avoid recurrence.
6.4 Contractors Reporting to TEO

Contractors and third parties are required to complete a HSEQ prequalification report, on request,
which includes evidence of operational and technical data for the Contractor’s equipment and
how that equipment is maintained. Lost and damaged equipment or other incidents (e.g. spills)
that may occur during Contractor activities shall be reported orally to the TEO Manager Production
and development – WA (or delegate) immediately and be formally reported in MyOSH.
6.5 Consultation
TEO endeavour to consult with relevant government authorities, interested persons and
organisations on all operations. TEO Production Solutions commit to being available for ongoing
consultation. Consultation on environmental management issues has historically been
undertaken with the stakeholders listed in Table 9.
Table 4:Cliff Head Environmental Stakeholders
Stake Holder Area of Interest Events Where Contact is Initiated

City of Geraldton Waste management Management of contaminated waste
for Cliff Head disposal off site at the Meru waste
(Onshore) facility.
Department of Water All areas of the Cliff Reportable incidents, developments and
and Environment Head (onshore) environmental management
Regulation (DWER) Annual reporting
Inspections
Department of Mines, All areas of the Cliff Reportable and Recordable incidents
Industry Regulation Head (Onshore) Developments
and Safety (DMIRS)
Emissions and discharges reporting
Petroleum
Environment Branch Annual reporting
(PEB) Audits
Department of Water ASP Abstraction Annual Reporting on conditions of
and Environment Bore licence to take water
Regulation (DOW)
Department of Fire All areas of the Cliff Fire emergencies (including drills)
and Emergency Head (Onshore)
Services (DFES)
Shire of Irwin All areas of the Cliff Any operation or development affected
Head (Onshore) by local government restrictions
Fire
Department of Onshore pipeline Annual site visit and rehabilitation
Biodiversity, easement consultation
Conservation and
Attractions.
Appendix A ASP Layout

Figure 8: ASP Layout

Appendix B Triangle Energy Risk Matrix Toolkit (10/HSEQ/GEN/PC23/RG01

Appendix C Cliff Head (Onshore) Environmental Risk Assessment

Aspects Impacts Management/Mitigation Measures C L Residual Risk
Soil Disturbance Soil Erosion • Maintenance wherever practicable of the existing vegetation cover since this protects the 2 B Low
Reduction of local biodiversity, loss of fauna mobile sands from being lifted and eroded by winds.
habitat • A Rehabilitation Plan (Woodman Consulting, 2006) was prepared by Triangle Energy
(Operations) Pty Ltd (TEO) to guide revegetation of disturbed areas, i.e. pipeline easement
and dune areas around the ASP. Implementation of the Rehabilitation Plan has been
documented in annual progress/rehabilitation monitoring reports to DBCA.
• Access to ASP via Brand Highway (sealed road) Excavation / Penetration Procedure in place
• No clearing without a permit or written notice of exemption
• Access to easement is via existing tracks at slow speed (<60 km/h)
Pipeline access: disturbance to native Reduction of local biodiversity, loss of fauna • No vehicle access permitted on pipeline easement in Beekeepers Reserve. Inspections 2 B Low
vegetation and wildlife habitat undertaken by foot in areas without access via easements
• Revegetation with indigenous species (Refer: Rehabilitation Plan (Woodman Environmental
Consulting, 2006)
• In areas of poor vegetation cover, where further impacts are likely, appropriate corrective
actions shall be taken
• Where possible, areas that have been recently revegetated should be avoided by vehicular
machinery movements
• No disturbance to areas of native vegetation
• Revegetation success to be monitored in accordance with Rehabilitation Plan
• Further restoration works may be required in areas where vegetation establishment has been
less than acceptable
• Access to easement will be via existing tracks at slow speeds (<60 km/h) Physical barriers
(including revegetation) will be used to stop public
• access to the pipeline easement Only clean fill certified as weed free shall be used if
additional material is required. Fill material will be similar to the natural soil of the area. Top-
soil will be returned to facilitate vegetation
• If area requiring earthworks is within a sensitive environment only weed free certified soil
should be used
• Consultation with DBCA and DMIRS regarding disturbance to native vegetation and wildlife
on a case by case basis
• Easement rehabilitation consists of local endemic species
• Access tracks should be kept navigable by adequately controlling vegetation growth
• Use of appropriate signage to deter third party access
• Regular monitoring to be undertaken along the easement to observe for erosion,
sedimentation and associated environmental impacts
• Pipeline easement signposted along entire route
• If significant erosion is encountered, erosion and sediment control structures will be
constructed
• Excavation / Penetration Procedure in place
• Pipeline right of way is accessed via exiting tracks and speed limited to 60 km/h
Pipeline Access- Introduction of weeds or Reduced Rehabilitation success, loss of • Regular inspection, monitoring and auditing of the pipeline route will include an assessment 2 B Low
pathogens along easement biodiversity and loss of habitat of weed impacts. (Refer: Rehabilitation Plan – Woodman Environmental Consulting, 2006)
• The presence of noxious weeds will be reported to local authorities and their control
conducted in conjunction with local authorities
• Maintenance crews made aware of weed control requirements
• In identified weed infestation areas, all vehicles and machinery brought onto the pipeline
corridor or other work sites shall be washed down before entering the pipeline corridor. All soil
and organic matter should be removed including under the vehicle
• The pipeline corridor shall not be used for access into the Beekeepers Reserve

• Physical barriers to stop public access to pipeline easement
Pipeline Access- Third party access Soil erosion; • Signage along pipeline right of way installed (access points); 2 B Low
causing damage along the pipeline right of Reduction of local biodiversity, loss of fauna • Regular monitoring to be undertaken along the easement to observe for erosion,
way habitat; sedimentation and associated environmental impacts
Reduced Rehabilitation success, loss of • The pipeline corridor shall not be used for access into the Beekeepers Reserve
biodiversity and loss of habitat • Physical barriers to stop public access to pipeline easement including bollards and fences at
pipeline inspection trenches;
• No vehicle access permitted on pipeline easement in Beekeepers Reserve. Inspections
undertaken by foot in areas without access via easements
• Pipeline easement signposted along entire route;
• If significant erosion is encountered, erosion and sediment control structures will be
constructed;
Plant operations- Pest animal invasion Loss of fauna diversity and abundance and • Keep facilities clean and litter free to discourage vermin from being attracted to site 1 C Low
loss of fauna habitat • Discourage weeds generally so as not to provide habitat for vermin
• Maintain ASP weed free to discourage habitat for vermin
Bushfire originating from maintenance Loss of fauna, personnel or public third-party • Ensure all equipment complies with relevant fire safety standards 3 A Low
activity damage • Fire break will be maintained around the ASP outside the perimeter fence
• Vehicles and machinery not parked in areas of high fire risk (i.e. over tall grass or cleared
vegetation debris)
• Ensure all operations and maintenance vehicles have a fire extinguisher, communications
units and first aid kit
• Where flammable or combustible materials are required to be stored on site, appropriate fire
prevention (e.g. spark guards for welding) and firefighting equipment is available on site.
• Incompatible chemicals not stored together
• When undertaking hot work, ensure the immediate area is clear of flammable materials
• Consult with DFES regarding weather conditions, fire hazards, fire restrictions, notifications
and permitting requirements prior to any maintenance” ‘hot works” activities on easement
• Do not light fires for recreational purposes or rubbish disposal
• Provide maps showing the location of all onshore project infrastructure to the relevant
authorities (DFES,DMIRS, Shire of Irwin)
• DFES and TEO will be notified as soon as possible in the event of a fire outbreak that is
outside the control of site personnel
• Restricted burning permit in place (as per Bushfires Act 1954) and conditions adhered to
Licence to take water
Plant Operations- fire emanating from Bushfire, damage to vegetation and fauna, • Smoke detection in equipment rooms 3 A Low
facilities possible injury to personnel or public, possible • Portable fire extinguishers
third party
• Pipeline operations and maintenance in accordance with Department of Fire and Emergency
damage Services (DFES) requirements including complying with relevant fire restrictions, notification
requirements and permitting procedures
• Ensure all equipment complies with relevant fire safety standards
• Vehicles and machinery parked in designated areas
• Regular check vehicles to ensure that combustible materials such as grass and debris have
not built up in critical areas where ignition could occur
• All vehicles contain a fire extinguisher, satellite phone and first aid kit
• Where flammable or combustible materials are required to be stored on site appropriate fire
prevention (e.g. spark guards for welding) and firefighting equipment is available on-site (e.g.
fire extinguishers, water knapsacks and rake hoes)
• Incompatible chemicals not stored together
• When undertaking hot work, ensure the immediate area is clear of flammable materials
• Create and maintain fire breaks around the ASP outside perimeter fence

• Consult with DFES regarding weather conditions, fire hazards, fire restrictions, notification
and permitting requirements prior to any maintenance hot works
• Do not light fires for recreational or rubbish disposal
• Establish fire evacuation procedures and an emergency assembly area and communicate this
to all personnel working or visiting at the site (verbally and via a diagram)
• Provide maps showing the location of all project infrastructure to relevant fire authorities, such
as DFES, DBCA, DMIRS, Town of Dongara and Shire of Irwin
• Evacuate any site subject to fire that cannot be immediately extinguished
• Notify DFES and TEO as soon as possible in the event of an outbreak that is outside the
control of site personnel
• Power generator enclosure equipped with fire and gas detection and fire suppression
systems
• A flare system is provided for safe disposal of flash gas and emergency release. Vegetation
cleared from flare for 50m radius
• In the event of fire, a fire water pond is available to provide water for local fire crews hydrants
• In addition, 2 plastic fire water storage tanks will be available each containing 46,000 L
capacity
• A fire water booster pump (standalone diesel unit) and fire water distribution system (3
hydrants) is available
• All plant instrumentation and control systems contained in air-conditioned rooms to reduce
the risk of over-heating in summer
• ASP is located on former lime facility
• ASP is manned 24 hrs/d Designated smoking area Licence to take water
Plant operations – excessive noise Disturbance to fauna and surrounding • Generators are housed in specially designed acoustic enclosures which reduce the noise 1 B Low
emissions neighbours emissions
• Generators are fitted with exhaust silencers
• The ASP has been designed to produce noise levels in the order of 85 dB (A) at 1m from the
noise source and approximately 62dB (A) at the nearest sensitive receptor.
• Plant equipment maintained
Gas emissions from maintenance vehicles Short term impacts to local air quality • Gas emission from maintenance vehicles are minor 1 B Low
• Ensure all maintenance vehicles are equipped with appropriate pollution devices e.g. mufflers
Plant operations- air pollution from Short term impact to local air quality • Regular maintenance of vehicles and power generations equipment to minimise emissions 2 D Medium
equipment (generators, flare) and • Monitoring of fuel and flare rates
unplanned atmospheric emissions
• Automatic/manual re-ignition of flare
• Wind monitor – Wireless weather station (IC0348) used to measure wind;
• Procedure to increase purge gas when high winds or inclement weather is expected
(10/OP/PS/PC01/WI06)
• PCS – flare pilot burner extinguished alarms and countdown alarm configured to alert of flare
outage and incident reporting requirements
Plant operations- Handling and transport of Pollution of the environment that could affect • Chemicals stored in leak proof area during transit 1 B Low
hazardous materials that may result in flora, fauna and humans • Transfer of chemicals will not be undertaken during extreme weather conditions
spillage
• Chemicals handled with extreme care to prevent spillage
• MSDS’s on site for all chemicals and hazardous goods, and available for personnel use and
review
• Designated hazardous storage area
• Drip trays in place for transfer operations
• Incident reporting via MyOSH and follow up investigation
• Drip trays in place for transfer operations

Plant operations- Hydrocarbon spill from Oil spill causing injury or death of flora and • All produced water is injected into the CHA reservoir or CHOWS Triennial integrity testing of 1 B Low
rupture of the PW storage tank fauna and contamination of environment CHOWS (where operational)
• Tanks are contained in fully bunded and sealed areas
• Handling procedures adopted which aim to avoid spills to land or water
• Appropriate spill response equipment for containment and recovery available on site
• Detailed spill response procedures are detailed in OSCP
• Workforce training shall be conducted in chemical handling, spill response and recovery
procedures
• Regular pumping out of bunds that do not connect with the water treatment system
Plant operations- waste management Contamination of soil and water, damage to • SDS to be available to personnel which identify hazardous materials and their safe handling, 2 B Low
flora and fauna, reduction in visual amenity storage and disposal
• Personnel trained in the safe handling, storage and disposal of all wastes streams
• Wastes created by personnel conducting operations or maintenance activities at the ASP and
along the easement have a carry-in/carry- out policy
• Hazardous wastes managed in compliance with relevant regulatory requirements including:
• Safe storage prior to collection and transport off-site for reuse, recycling, treatment or
disposal at locations approved in accordance with AS 1940 Storage and Handling of
Combustible and Flammable Liquids
• Storage areas designed to prevent contamination of soil and water and adequately contain
any spills
• Spill response equipment stored in the vicinity of storage facilities, where immediate access is
unhindered
• Spillages immediately contained and cleaned up
• Contaminated soils managed according to the concentration of contaminants and leachability.
• Vehicles, plant and equipment are checked as operating correctly, including identification and
rectification of any leaks
• Non-prescribed wastes managed in accordance with the policy of avoid, reduce, reuse and
recycle
• Reusable and recyclable wastes such as timber skids, pallets, drums and scrap metal
stockpiled for salvage
• Designated collection bins at work sites for aluminium cans, glass and paper recycling
• Sewage and sullage will be via approved septic systems and disposed to municipal sewage
treatment plant
• ASP maintained to an orderly and hygienic standard
• Putrescible waste receptacles covered
• No waste left on site
• Licenced waste contractor records showing type and location of waste disposal
Onshore drainage system operation Pollution to local environment • Local containment bunds (concrete slab and collection sump) processes to control Water 1 C Low
Discharge from Process Bund Areas 10/HSEQ/ENV/PC01 and Storm and Ground Water
Management 10/HSEQ/ENV/PC05
• All the oily waste fluids are educted and removed to the Tanker Loading Oil Containment
Tanks or reinjected back into the process. Waste is then removed from the manhole by a
licensed liquid waste contractor for treatment and disposal in accordance with EPA
regulations.
Transfer of crude oil via tanker Pollution to local environment • The ASP Load-out Work Instruction (10/OPPSPC/07/WI01) details the safe load-out of crude 1 B Low
oil into oil tanker at the ASP site to the BP refinery in Kwinana. This document is at the load-
out terminal for reference by tanker loading personnel

• All oily waste liquid is recovered from the process bunds and returned to the process or
removed from site
• A weather shelter located over the loading equipment to minimise impact of weather
• Road tanker filling control system and auto shut-off
• Road tanker contractor selection
• Collection pit installed to contain spills
• CCTV cameras will be used within the plant to monitor the tanker loading operations
• Tanker loading bay designed to contain potential spills within concrete pad and collection
drains and sump
• Onshore OSCP available to deal with spills
Failure of Crude Oil Storage tank Oil spill causing injury or death of flora and • All hydrocarbons and dirty water that are released will be collected and all oily waste liquid 2 A Low
fauna and contamination of environment will be recovered from the process bunds and returned to the process
• The storage tank is fully bunded and contained in a sealed area
• Regular tank inspection
Failure of pipelines Oil spill causing injury or death of flora and • The plant is illuminated 24hrs a day 3 A Low
fauna and contamination of environment • Continuous corrosion control monitoring program to minimise the risk of leaks in piping and
flanges
• Routine Inspections to measure rate of corrosion in the pipeline
• Use of corrosion inhibitor. The rate will be adjusted to effectively eliminate corrosion in the
pipeline
• All relevant personnel undergo a corrosion awareness training program Reduced number of
flanges, valves and connection points (leak locations) Heavy walled pipe
• Absorption materials on site for clean-up of spills
• Onshore OSCP available to deal with spills
• Personnel trained Emergency Response Plan and Oil Spill Contingency
• Plan (OSCP) procedures for efficient first response
• All oil spill equipment maintained to ensure it is functional and accessible
• Inductions covering oil spill prevention, response, recovery, and waste management for all
relevant personnel
• 24 hr observation via control room
• Pigging to remove corrosive fluids (corrosion mitigation) Capped pipework
• Cathodic protection
Plant Operations- Chemical Injection Pollution to environment • Tanks are contained with fully bunded and sealed areas 2 B Low
process failing causing chemical spill from • Chemical injection package located onshore to enable more frequent monitoring and
storage tank or pump failure maintenance
• Pumps status is monitored continuously
• The minimum practicable volume of chemicals is stored on-site
• SDS will be available on-site where the chemical is stored and handled Chemicals are not
stored or handled in the vicinity of water storage areas Appropriate handling procedures
adopted which aim to avoid spills to land
• and water
• Appropriate spill response equipment, including containment and recovery equipment
available on site
• Onshore OSCP to deal with spills
• Workforce training in chemical handling and spill response and recovery procedures
Produced W ater Spills (valve or pump leak) Pollution to environment tie soils, • Major vessels onsite (Production Separator, IGF, Tanks) are contained within separate 2 B Low
groundwater, vegetation bunded areas The tank storage bunds are graded towards one corner where a normally-
closed bund valve is provided for the discharge of clean storm-water to the nearest soak pit
• Routine surveillance of onshore facilities (note that plant is permanently manned) Inductions
to all personnel, contractors and visitors covering PFW management.

• The onshore pipeline is inspected on a monthly basis as per the Pipeline Inspection
Procedure (10/HSEQ/GEN/PC11). Onshore there is a ‘corrosion monitoring trench’.
• OSCP in place Investigation into spills Maintenance Scheduler
Pipeline maintenance and clearing Risk assessment
Soil and landform impact from Vegetation • Loss of habitat; • TEO personnel and CE spotters to assess track prior to clearing; 1 B Low
clearing • Exceeding approved licence; • Internal approval by Environmental Advisor;
• Erosion; • Clearing will be dedicated to maintaining previously cleared areas;
• Impact to pipeline markers • No additional clearing;
• Increased environmental footprint; • Clearing plan to define use of mulched material to be spread evenly across PPL ROW (As
• Soil compaction per AS 2885=
• Objective to maintain line of site - options for clearing to include leave trees in low lying gully;
• Maintain width of ROW as per EP;
• Minimal runs required (e.g. run over twice for full PPL
Weeds/dieback introduction from soil for Invasive species into nature reserve • Weed spraying program in place; 3 A Low
road or site stabilisation and vehicle • Vehicle washdown /Weed and seed certification provided from CE;
movement
• Environment Management Plan;
• Daily maintenance sheet;
• Vehicles/equipment to be blown down with pressure air cleaner at location (on PPL ROW);
• Weed and dieback procedure (10/HSEQ/ENV/PL09/WI01)
Fauna impact due to vehicle movement Loss of Fauna life • Site meeting with client and contractor at launch of project, prior planning communicated 1 C Low
clearly to team;
• Clearing plan;
• Clear communications between team and client
• Relocate fauna approximately 100 metres; CE team capable of relocating fauna as required; if
hazardous then leave (e.g. hives);
• TEO personnel and CE spotters to assess track prior to clearing;
• Operators experienced in snake/reptile handling;
• Pre-cleared land/PPL ROW clearing and maintenance.
Clearing foreign Flora/priority species • Over clearing; • Site meeting with TEO and CE at launch of project, prior to planning communicated clearly to 2 B Low
• Damage to priority species; the team;
• Regulatory impact • Clearing plan – define pipeline clearing area;
• Clear direction maps given by supervisor;
• EP to define waste management (to reduce impact on fauna);
• Relocate fauna approximately 100m; CE team capable of relocating fauna as required; if
hazardous then leave (e.g. Hives);
• Daily report to be sent to the Environmental Advisor with pre and post images of progress for
clearing work. Environmental advisor to provide report to DMIRS/DBCA;
• Pipeline markers
Fire due to vehicle movement, equipment Impact of fire on surrounding vegetation (Flora • Clearing during low/medium fire risk season; 4 C Medium
and clearing activities and Fauna) • Equipment not likely to cause a spark;
• Firefighting equipment (engine fire suppression, LC has 400L of water and 2 x 10L water);
• All personnel are trained for firefighting;
• Review weather conditions each day of operation (call DFES – CE);
• Support from ASP available – fire trailer to be on standby during PPL clearing and
maintenance work;
• DFES available for support
Spills (diesel/oil spills) due to: vehicle Impact of fire on surrounding vegetation (Flora • Double bunded diesel tank (400L of diesel); 1 B Low
movement /equipment /refuelling and Fauna) • Spill kits standard on tractor and vehicles;

• Refuelling will occur on bunded areas – not infield;
• Minimal volumes of oil held (approximately 3 x 20Lt drums) which are bunded;
• Work instruction for spill kit use – all part of induction for CE. Must understand spill scenarios
Waste generation from pipeline clearing No significant consequences All waste material will be mulched and left on site 1 A Low
and maintenance activities
Air quality impact from emissions No significant consequences All waste material will be mulched and left on site 1 A Low
Noise impact No significant consequences All waste material will be mulched and left on site 1 A Low
Emergency Clearing activities for Injection Water Pipeline incident
Soil and landform impact from Vegetation • Loss of habitat; • External approval obtained for clearing by DMIRS, DWER (formerly OEPA, DBCA, DER); 1 B Low
clearing • Exceeding approved licence clearing • Maps provided to contractor documenting where we are permitted to clear (as per DMIRS
area; notification letter dated1st of December 2017)
• Erosion; • Communicate through tool box talk/pre-start meeting all clearing requirements
• Increased environmental footprint;
Weeds/dieback introduction via vehicular Invasive species into nature reserve • Weed spraying program in place; 3 A Low
access to site during clearing and • Vehicle washdown /Weed and seed certification provided from Lenane Holdings;
stabilisation activities.
• Lenane Holdings Clean down procedure (Procedure 52)
• Lenane Holdings Machinery and Vehicle hygiene inspection procedure (Procedure 57)
• Lenane Holdings Pressure washer procedure (Procedure 39)
• Lenane Holdings Workshop washdown bay (Procedure 46)
• Lenane Holdings Clean down vehicles and machinery (Procedure 52)
• Lenane Holdings Hygiene inspection checklists (LH Sems/Checklist, Inspections and Audit/
Hygiene Inspections/Excavator
Fauna impact due to vehicle movement Loss of Fauna life • Site meeting with client and contractor at launch of project, prior planning communicated 1 C Low
clearly to team;
• Relocate fauna approximately 100 metres; (e.g. hives);
• Operators experienced in snake/reptile handling
Clearing foreign Flora/priority species • Over clearing; • Site meeting with TEO and contractors at launch of project, prior to planning communicated 2 B Low
• Damage to priority species; clearly to the team;
• Regulatory impact • External approval obtained for clearing by DMIRS, DWER (formerly OEPA, DBCA, DER);
• Maps provided to contractor documenting where we are permitted to clear (as per DMIRS
notification letter dated1st of December 2017)
• EP to define waste management (to reduce impact on fauna);
Fire due to vehicle movement, equipment Impact of fire on surrounding vegetation (Flora • Clearing during low/medium fire risk season; 1 B Low
and clearing activities and Fauna) • Equipment not likely to cause a spark;
• Firefighting equipment;
• All Lenane Holdings personnel are trained for firefighting;
• Support from ASP available – fire trailer to be on standby during PPL clearing and
maintenance work;
• DFES available for support
Waste generation from emergency clearing No significant consequences All waste material will be placed in appropriate waste receptacles on site and disposed of as per 1 A Low
activities Section 7.9 of the Cliff Head Onshore Environment Plan.
Air quality impact from emissions No significant consequences All equipment used to clear vegetation is maintained. 1 A Low
Noise impact No significant consequences All equipment used to clear vegetation is maintained. 1 A Low

th
Site remediation activities post emergency response for incident 29 November 2017 (contaminated soil removal, pond remediation and HDPE liner removal off site).
Removal of native vegetation and potential Loss of vegetation; • Existing access tracks used; 1 A Low
habitat Destruction of fauna habitat; • Only contaminated soil and HDPE liner to be removed offsite;
Introduction of noxious weeds and vermin, • Topsoil which was stockpiled during emergency incident response to be reinstated post
exotic species, flora and animal diseases; contaminated soil and HDPE liner removal and temporary water storage pond remediation;
Prosecution • Personnel trained in local environmental sensitivities during RapidInduct induction;
• Approval obtained from DMIRS, DWER, DBCA and GCC;
• Further rehabilitation assessment work to be conducted in July to confirm re-seeding
requirements;
Soil disturbance Increased Erosion • Temporary contaminated soil storage bunds and water storage pond to be rehabilitated as 2 B Low
Compaction soon as possible;
Subsidence • Region is underlain by limestone so there is a low potential of subsidence;
Dust from vehicular movement • Dust control measures implemented (e.g. water spraying) if dust generation becomes a
problem;
• Use existing road and tracks only;
• Soil removal zones restricted to temporary contaminated soil storage bund and temporary
waste water pond locations only
Introduction of noxious weeds and vermin, Mobilisation of equipment to site • Designated access tracks used only 2 B Low
exotic species and animal diseases to the Vehicles carrying seeds from affected areas • Vehicle weed hygiene inspections
receiving environment
Weeds and contaminated soil on vehicles • RapidInduct induction
• Equipment cleaned and inspected for soil, plant material and pest animal contamination prior
to mobilisation to minimise risk of introducing exotic species with advice from DBCA
Disposal of wastes: Waste discharge to the environment due to • Minimal waste generated during soil remediation activities; 2 B Low
Release of waste oils into the environment inadequate waste disposal practices; • Focus will be on removing all contaminated waste from site including contaminated soil and
Loss of rubbish into the environment Soil, surface water and groundwater HDPE liner for all bunds and disposing this waste at the Meru Waste Facility;
contamination • All other waste material will be placed in appropriate waste receptacles on site and disposed of
Environmental damage due to spill of waste
product Potential contamination of soils surrounding as per Section 7.9 of the Cliff Head Onshore Environment Plan;
bund locations
Litter left around worksite • All general waste (e.g. drinking bottles) will be taken back to ASP for offsite disposal;
• Approval obtained from the Greater City of Geraldton (GCC) to transport and accept all
contaminated soil waste as well as HDPE liner at the Meru Waste Facility
Groundwater contamination Contaminated soils causing potential • Controlled soil removal and HDPE liner removal offsite to ensure no loss of contaminated soil 2 A Low
groundwater contamination through seepage to the environment during removal and transport;
out of bund • Trucks used are secure and designed to contain all liquid/hydrocarbon waste that has the
potential to leak during contaminated soil removal and HDPE liner removal;
• Install groundwater monitoring bores to confirm no groundwater contamination as a result of
the Environmental incident which occurred on the 29th of November 2017, as well as any
potential contamination caused by soil removal offsite and temporary water storage pond
remediation;
• All Groundwater monitoring to be in compliance with AS/NZS 5667 Water Quality Sampling;
• All laboratory analysis to be processed by NATA accredited laboratory’s;
• Groundwater analysis results to be compared against
Impact of noise on local residents, wildlife Disturbance to local residents, wildlife or • General area has low population density and is remote from high density populations e.g. 1 A Low
or adjacent activities adjacent activities; Dongara;
Noise levels above occupational health levels; • Ear protection for workforce;
Disruption of sensitive fauna habitats • Avoidance of sensitive fauna habitats;
• Noisy activities scheduled for daylight hours

Fire Bushfire – loss of vegetation, fauna and/or • Adequate fire equipment located on site and personnel trained in its use; 3 A Low
habitat; • Smoking allowed at designated smoking area only;
Disruption of operations and site access • All vehicles fitted with fire extinguisher;
Damage to equipment • Diesel vehicles only on site;
Damage to site office • Exemption under the Bushfires Act 1954 for restricted burning periods
Destruction of fauna habitat • Emergency response plan;
• ASP site induction;
• Local emergency response – fire brigade and DFES;
• Permit to work system
Failure to comply with Environmental Prosecution • Site specific induction contains explanation of Environmental Licence Requirements and 1 B
reporting requirements Environmental management plan commitments;
Failure to meet Environmental Licence • Monthly recordable incident reporting;
commitments • Quarterly emissions and discharges reports;
• Environment Plan review and resubmission to DMIRS to include all operational tasks
Groundwater bore installation
Groundwater, surface water or soil Loss of containment • All water purged during initial ground water bore installation will be contained in IBC 1 B
contamination Spills containers on site and disposed of offsite as per the Cliff Head waste management procedure;
• Purge volumes will be dependent on depth and diameter of bore piping;
• Spill kits available for any hydraulic leak from equipment;
• All groundwater bore installation activities are supervised by Environmental specialist (Senior
Environmental advisor/ Environmental consultant (i.e. GEMEC)
Noise during groundwater bore drilling Noise levels above occupational health levels; • Ear protection for workforce (as required); 1 A
operations Disruption of sensitive fauna habitats • Avoidance of sensitive fauna habitats;
• All activities scheduled for daylight hours
Waste management PVC pipework/ drilling material/ waste water • All waste material will be placed in appropriate waste receptacles on site and disposed of as 1 C
waste per Section 7.9 of the Cliff Head Onshore Environment Plan;
• All hazardous wastes are to be handled and disposed of in accordance with the Prescribed
Waste Management Procedure (10/HSQ/ENV/PC04);
• Inspection during activity to confirm that hazardous wastes are managed in accordance with
Prescribed Waste Management Procedure (10/HSEQ/ENV/PC04);
• All personnel receive environmental induction detailing waste management expectations
Weed management Weeds/dieback introduction from vehicle • Weed spraying program in place; 2 B
movement • Vehicle washdown /Weed and seed certification provided from Dongara Drilling or alternate
service provider that will be drilling the ground water bores;
Bush fire or process plant fire caused by Bushfire – loss of vegetation, fauna and/or • Permit to work/JSA reviewed by PIC/Senior Environmental Advisor pre-start to confirm all risks 3 A
equipment habitat; are identified and corresponding controls are sufficient;
Disruption of operations and site access • Personnel gas detectors to be warn during any hot works;
Damage to equipment • Ensure all groundwater bores are located as per figure
Damage to site office
Destruction of fauna habitat

10HSEQENVPL09 - 5 - Cliff Head Onshore Operations EP Summary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

10HSEQENVPL09 - 5 - Cliff Head Onshore Operations EP Summary

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

10HSEQENVPL09 - 5 - Cliff Head Onshore Operations EP Summary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cliff Head Field Onshore Operations

Environment Plan Summary

Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd Controlled

Issue date: 8/03/2019

Cliff Head Field Onshore Operations Environment Plan Summary

2 Description of the Activity..................................................................................... 7

2.1 Scope of this EP ............................................................................................................... 8

2.2 Pipelines ........................................................................................................................... 9

3 Description of Existing Environment ................................................................. 11

3.1 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 11

3.1.1 Temperature ................................................................................................................. 11

3.1.2 Rainfall .......................................................................................................................... 11

3.1.3 Wind and Humidity ...................................................................................................... 12

3.2 Land Form and Soils ..................................................................................................... 13

3.3 Surface and Groundwater Systems ............................................................................. 14

3.4 Conservation Estate ...................................................................................................... 14

3.5 Flora ................................................................................................................................ 15

3.5.1 Regional Flora .............................................................................................................. 15

3.5.2 Local Flora .................................................................................................................... 15

3.5.3 Phytophthora Cinnamomi ........................................................................................... 16

3.6 Fauna .............................................................................................................................. 19

3.7 Social Environment ....................................................................................................... 20

3.7.1 Population and Demographics ................................................................................... 20

3.7.2 Economic ...................................................................................................................... 21

3.7.3 Cultural Environment .................................................................................................. 21

3.7.4 Economic Environment ............................................................................................... 21

4 Assessment of Environmental Effects and Risks ............................................ 22

4.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................. 22

4.1.1 Key Definitions ............................................................................................................. 22

4.1.2 Risk Assessment Methodology .................................................................................. 22

4.1.3 Hazard Identification .................................................................................................... 23

4.1.4 Hazard Analysis ........................................................................................................... 23

4.1.5 Risk Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 23

4.1.6 Risk Treatment ............................................................................................................. 23

5 Implementation Strategy ..................................................................................... 24

5.1 Key Performance Indicators (Targets) ......................................................................... 24

5.2 General ............................................................................................................................ 24

5.3 Roles & Responsibilities ............................................................................................... 24

5.3.1 TEO Personnel ............................................................................................................. 24

5.3.2 Contractors and Visitors ............................................................................................. 26

6 Reporting Arrangements ..................................................................................... 26

6.1 Reporting on Routine Operations ................................................................................ 26

6.2 Reporting on Incidents .................................................................................................. 27

6.2.1 Internal .......................................................................................................................... 27

6.2.2 External ......................................................................................................................... 27

6.3 Auditing Routine Operations ........................................................................................ 28

6.4 Contractors Reporting to TEO ...................................................................................... 28

6.5 Consultation ................................................................................................................... 29

Appendix A ASP Layout ........................................................................................................... 30

Appendix B Triangle Energy Risk Matrix Toolkit (10/HSEQ/GEN/PC23/RG01 .................... 32

Appendix C Cliff Head (Onshore) Environmental Risk Assessment ................................... 34

Figure 1 - Regional Location of Cliff Head Development

1.1 Triangle Energy (Operations) Pty Ltd Health, Safety &

2 Description of the Activity

Additional activities include:

2.1 Scope of this EP

• Transport of crude product is via road transport to the BP refinery at Kwinana

3 Description of Existing Environment

Figure 5 - Mean Number of Rain Days per Month