Velasco VS Poizant

MIGUEL VELASCO,
Petitioner, v. JEAN M. POIZAT, Respondent. GR. NO. L-11528, MARCH

15, 1918, STREET, J.:
DOCTRINE: Nothing in this Act shall prevent the directors from collecting, by action in any court
of proper jurisdiction, the amount due on any unpaid subscription, together with accrued interest
and costs incurred.
The corporation has no legal capacity to release an original subscriber to its capital stock from
the obligation of paying for his shares, in whole or in part.
FACTS: The plaintiff, as assignee in insolvency of "The Philippine Chemical Product

Company" (Ltd.) is seeking to recover of the defendant, Jean M. Poizat, the sum of P1,500,
upon a subscription made by him to the corporate stock of said company. It appears that the
corporation in question was originally organized by several residents of the city of Manila, where the
company had its principal place of business, with a capital of P50,000, divided into 500 shares. The
defendant subscribed for 20 shares of the stock of the company, an paid in upon his
subscription the sum of P500, the par value of 5 shares. The action was brought to recover the
amount subscribed upon the remaining shares. It appears that the defendant was a stock holder in
the company from the inception of the enterprise, and for sometime acted as its treasurer and
manager. While serving in this capacity he called in and collected all subscriptions to the capital
stock of the company, except the aforesaid 15 shares subscribed by himself and another 15 shares
owned by Jose R. Infante.
A meeting of the board of directors of the company was held at which a majority of the stock
was presented. Upon this occasion two resolutions were adopted. The first was a proposal
that the directors, or shareholders, of the company should make good by new subscriptions,
in proportion to their respective holdings, 15 shares which had been surrendered by Infante. It
seems that this shareholder had already paid 25 per cent of his subscription upon 20 shares, leaving
15 shares unpaid for, and an understanding had been reached by him and the management by
which he was to be released from the obligation of his subscription, it being understood that what he
had already paid should not be refunded. Accordingly, the directors present at this meeting
subscribed P1,200 toward taking up his shares, leaving a deficiency of P300 to be recovered by
voluntary subscriptions from stockholders not present at the meeting. The other proposition was to
the effect that Juan [Jean] M. Poizat, who was absent, should be required to pay the amount
of his subscription upon the 15 shares for which he was still indebted to the company. The
resolution further provided that, in case he should refuse to make such payment, the
management of the corporation should be authorized to undertake judicial proceedings
against him. When notification of this resolution reached Poizat through the mail it evoked
from him a manifestation of surprise and pain, which found expression in a letter written by
him in reply, dated July 27, 1914, and addressed to Velasco, as treasurer and administrator.
In this letter Poizat states that he had been given to understand by some member of the board of
directors that he was to be relieved from his subscription upon the terms conceded to Infante. The
company soon went into voluntary insolvency, Velasco being named as the assignee. At the
hearing of the Court of First Instance, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, and the
complaint was dismissed. Hence, this petition.
Issue: Whether the Jean Poizant is liable for the shares it subscribed.
Held: Yes. The Court held that it cannot be permitted that a subscriber should escape from his
lawful obligation by reason of the failure of the officers of the corporation to perform their duty in
making a call, and when making a call is impracticable, the obligation must be treated as due
upon demand. Also, under Section 36 of the Corporation Law he is also liable for interest at the
lawful rate from the date of his subscription, unless relieved from this liability by the by-laws of the
company. The Corporation law clearly recognizes that a stock subscription is subsisting
liability from the time the subscription is made, since it requires the subscriber to pay
interest quarterly from that date unless he is relieved from such liability by the by-laws of the
corporation. The subscriber is as much bound to pay the amount of the share subscribed by him as
he would be to pay any other debt, and the right of the company to demand payment is no less
incontestable.
The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of First Instance. Poizant is liable to pay
P1,500 with interest from July 13, 1014 and costs of the suit.

Velasco VS Poizant

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Velasco VS Poizant

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Velasco VS Poizant

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MIGUEL VELASCO,

Petitioner, v. JEAN M. POIZAT, Respondent. GR. NO. L-11528, MARCH

FACTS: The plaintiff, as assignee in insolvency of "The Philippine Chemical Product

You might also like