Chap3 Econ Growth and Dev't
Chap3 Econ Growth and Dev't
Chap3 Econ Growth and Dev't
Economic growth is essential for human effective means of sustained human devel-
development, but to exploit fully the oppor- opment. The Republic of Korea is a stun-
tunities for improved well-being that growth ning example of growth with equity. Sec-
offers, it needs to be properly managed. ond, countries can make significant im-
Some developing countries have been very provements in human development over
successful in managing their growth to long periods - even in the absence of good
improve the human condition, others less growth or good distribution - through
so. There is no automatic link between well-structured social expenditures by gov-
economic growth and human progress. One ernments (Botswana, Malaysia and Sri
of the most pertinent policy issues concerns Lanka). Third, well-structured government
the exact process through which growth social expenditures can also generate fairly
translates, or fails to translate, into human dramatic improvements in a relatively short
development under different development period. This is true not only for countries
conditions. starting from a low level ofhuman develop-
ment but also for those that already have
Typology ofcountry experience moderate human development (Chile and
Costa Rica). Fourth, to maintain human
The human development experience in development during recessions and natural
various countries during the last three dec- disasters, targetted interventions may be
ades reveals three broad categories of per- necessary (Botswana, Chile, Zimbabwe and
formance. First are countries that sus- the Republic of Korea in 1979-80). Fifth,
tained their success in human development, growth is crucial for sustaining progress in
sometimes achieved very rapidly, sometimes human development in the long run, other-
more gradually. Second are countries that wise human progress may be disrupted
had their initial success slow down signifi- (Chile, Colombia, Jamaica, Kenya and
cantly or sometimes even reverse. Third are Zimbabwe). Sixth, despite rapid periods of
countries that had good economic growth GNP growth, human development may not
but did not translate it into human develop- improve significantly if the distribution of
ment. From these country experiences income is bad and ifsocial expenditures are
emerges the following typology: low (Nigeria and Pakistan) or appropriated
• Sustained human development, as in by those who are better off (Brazil). Finally,
Botswana, Costa Rica, the Republic ofKorea, while some countries show considerable
Malaysia and Sri Lanka. progress in certain aspects ofhuman devel-
• Dz"sruptedhuman development, as in Chile, opment (particularly in education, health
China, Colombia, Jamaica, Kenya and and nutrition), this should not be inter-
Zimbabwe. preted as broad human progress in all fields,
• Missed opportunitiesfor human develop- especially when we focus on the question of
ment, as in Brazil, Nigeria and Pakistan. democratic freedoms.
The analysis ofthese country cases leads The main policy conclusion is that eco-
to several important conclusions. First, nomic growth, ifit is to enrich human devel-
growth accompanied by an equitable distri- opment, requires effective policy manage-
bution of income appears to be the most ment. Conversely, ifhuman development is
TABLE 3.1
Under-five mortality and other basic indicators of human development
Under-five Adult literacy (%) Calorie supply
mortality rate Life expectancy as % of
(per 1,000 live births) (years) Female Male req uirements
HDI
Country 1987 1960 1975 1988 1960 1975 1987 1970 1985 1970 1985 1965 1985
Sustained human development
Korea, Rep. 0.903 120 55 33 54 64 70 81 91 94 96 96 122
Malaysia 0.800 106 54 32 54 64 70 48 66 71 81 101 121
Botswana 0.646 174 126 92 46 52 59 44 69 37 73 88 96
Sri Lanka 0.789 113 73 43 62 66 71 69 83 85 91 100 110
Costa Rica 0.916 121 50 22 62 69 75 87 93 88 94 104 124
Disrupted human development
China 0.716 202 71 43 47 65 70 56 82 86 111
Chile 0.931 142 66 26 57 65 72 88 97 90 97 108 106
Jamaica 0.824 88 40 22 63 68 74 97 96 100 116
Colombia 0.801 148 93 68 55 61 65 76 88 79 82 94 110
Kenya 0.481 208 152 113 45 52 59 19 49 44 70 98 92
Zimbabwe 0.576 182 144 113 45 53 59 47 67 63 81 87 89
Missed opportunities
Brazil 0.784 160 116 85 55 61 65 63 76 69 79 100 111
Nigeria 0.322 318 230 174 40 46 51 14 31 35 54 95 90
Pakistan 0.423 277 213 166 43 50 58 11 19 30 40 76 97
8 --
----------- ------- ...... ... _-
control. Many macroeconomic reforms in
both internal and external markets were
__ -.KOR--- ----
6 ------ carried out in an economy that had gradu-
ally returned to more extensive controls in
4
2
.:::::::::::::.;:~
....... -z::::::: -
the 1970s after the substantial reforms of
the 1960s.
......•..........•.......... In social expenditures, the coverage of
o population by health insurance was increased
Botswana - - - - BOT'---' from a tenth in 1978, a year after its initia-
Costa Rica cos •..•..
-2 tion, to almost a third by 1981 and to almost
Korea. Rep.----- KOR -----
Malaysia - _ MAL _ _ a half by 1985. In addition, a medical
-4
Sri Lanka - - SRI - - assistance programme for the lowest in-
1960-70 1970-80 1980-87 come groups was introduced in 1979.
Members of poor families (depending on
Under-five mortality rate their income and ability to work) were en-
titled to free or subsidised medical care,
350
especially maternal and child care.
In addition, the public works pro-
300
grammes to provide employment to the
250 poor during crisis periods were temporarily
increased during the recession. These pro-
200 grammes provided an estimated 9.4 million
150
------------ -- ...... man-days of employment in 1980 alone.
Direct income transfers were made to those
100
~
KOR
............
••••cos
--'BOT __
-- ... --- _ who were unable to work and take advan-
MAL -_ --. tage ofthese employment opportunities due
~.. SRI ~ _
to infirmity or old age. Moreover, the Live-
50
....... -;;.:.::~:::::.:.:.:::: . lihood Protection Programme, initiated in
o 1961, was expanded to benefit an estimated
1960 65 70 75 80 85 87 2 million people in 1981, through grants of
cereals and through cash for fuel and tuition
Social sector public expenditure, percentage of GDP expenses.
As a consequence of these effective
24 meso interventions, the human develop-
ment levels continued to improve even
20 during the difficult years of 1980 and 1981,
though at a temporarily slower rate. Mean-
16 while, the major changes introduced in
•••••••••••••.. cos . macroeconomic policies restored price sta-
12
... .....•••• bility quickly. While the 1980s have not
... ' ... -.. ..... ,----
--- ........ _,"" ,.
w ........;::::.::·· SRI been easy years, the Korean economy has
8
'----- ,-,
performed extremely well, promoting the
human development of its citizens.
BOT " "
4 ~ ---.KOR------' ,------------- One important lesson from this experi-
-------- ence is that countries with a generally im-
o pressive growth but a less impressive in-
1975 1980 1985 come distribution may require well-struc-
tured meso interventions, particularly
.
-.-. Chinese health system recovers a high pro-
portion of its costs: hospitals typically re-
100
---______
'.....::::~ .....
-..:::.-:,:.......... COL--. _ cover about three-quarters of their operat-
---JAM .. __ - - ......==.•••••••••••••••••• ing costs through user fees and drug sales.
---------------~~~~:::~~~;;~~~.;~~~
50
To put this in perspective, the costs per
o hospital admission average $36 for rural
1960 65 70 75 80 85 87 people, even though the annual rural in-
come per capita is less than $100 in many
Social sector public expenditure. percentage of GDP regions. The costs are about twice as high
($75) for urban residents, but most of them
24 are still covered by compulsory, state-sub-
sidised health insurance.
20 The network of barefoot doctors appar-
ently has been another casualty of the re-
16 forms, with rural health care coverage de-
clining, county hospitals and rural clinics in
12 financial distress, and private medical prac-
tice emerging again.
8 ..-..............- China's new "household responsibility
system" reintroduced the concept of eco-
4 nomic incentives for individual productiv-
ity. But the larger role for private and coop-
o erative enterprises, the growth ofpiece work,
1975 1980 1985 and the establishment of liberalised enter-
prise zones - all part of the post-I978
............ _.... --
BRA· ............ - - ..... , .....
There are two important reasons for .............
.....
such poor human development in Brazil.
One is the extreme inequality of income
4
2
._:;:J....... -....
- -~PAK
.------
.--.------~ ............
.--",
.."".,.", .. , ..........
...---
......_
"'.'
......
ECONOMIC lrRO\\'11 I Il 59
ments on education and health does not nationwide immunisation programme was
challenge the overall conclusion: Pakistan financed by postponing the construction of
spends too little of its GNP on social devel- an expensive urban hospital. Education
opment. spending was tripled in the last four years.
Moreover, a large part of the limited And a special tax was levied on all imports to
social expenditures goes to lower-priority finance additional spending on education.
activities. Of the public current expendi- Pakistan's overall experience shows that
tures on education, 24% was for tertiary inadequate social spending and poorly struc-
education in 1985, compared with 7% in Sri tured meso policies can prevent a low-in-
Lanka in 1986, and only 40% was for pri- come country from improving the human
mary education. There appears to be a condition even if there is rapid economic
similar bias towards lower-priority activities growth with a relatively moderate distribu-
in health spending, but some recent policy tion of income.
changes are steps in the right direction. A