C1 Algebra - Simultaneous Equations
C1 Algebra - Simultaneous Equations
C1 Algebra - Simultaneous Equations
com
Paper Reference(s)
6663/01
Edexcel GCE
Core Mathematics C1
Advanced Subsidiary
Simultaneous Equations
Calculators may NOT be used for these questions.
A booklet ‘Mathematical Formulae and Statistical Tables’ might be needed for some questions.
The marks for the parts of questions are shown in round brackets, e.g. (2).
Advice to Candidates
You must ensure that your answers to parts of questions are clearly labelled.
1
C1 Algebra – Simultaneous Equations PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
y – 3x + 2 = 0
y2 – x – 6x2 = 0
(Total 7 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
1
The 18th term of the series is 25 and the 21st term of the series is 32 .
2
(a) Use this information to write down two equations for a and d.
(2)
n 2 − 15n = 55 × 40.
(4)
___________________________________________________________________________
y = x – 4,
2x2 – xy = 8,
show that
x2 + 4x – 8 = 0.
(2)
y = x – 4,
2x2 – xy = 8,
giving your answers in the form a ± b√3, where a and b are integers.
(5)
(Total 7 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
y = x – 2,
y2 + x2 = 10.
(Total 7 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
x – 2y = 1,
x2 + y2 = 29.
(Total 6 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
x + y = 3,
x2 + y = 15.
(Total 6 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
x+y=2
x2 + 2y = 12.
(Total 6 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
8. The curve C has equation y = x2 – 4 and the straight line l has equation y + 3x = 0.
(b) Write down the coordinates of the points at which C meets the coordinate axes.
(2)
(c) Using algebra, find the coordinates of the points at which l intersects C.
(4)
(Total 9 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
9.
y Q
y 2 = 4(x – 2)
2x – 3y = 12
O A x
The diagram above shows the curve with equation y2 = 4(x – 2) and the line with
equation 2x – 3y = 12.
The curve crosses the x-axis at the point A, and the line intersects the curve at the points
P and Q.
___________________________________________________________________________
x – 3y + 1 = 0,
x2 – 3xy + y2 = 11.
(Total 7 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
y
A
R
B
O x
The diagram above shows the line with equation y = 9 – x and the curve with equation
y = x2 – 2x + 3. The line and the curve intersect at the points A and B, and O is the
origin.
___________________________________________________________________________
x = 2y – 2,
x2 = y2 + 7.
(6)
(Total 8 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
2x + y = 8,
3x2 + xy = 1
x2 + 8x − 1 = 0.
(2)
2x + y = 8,
3x2 + xy = 1
giving your answers in the form a + b√17, where a and b are integers.
(5)
(Total 7 marks)
___________________________________________________________________________
Note
2nd M: Multiplying out their (3x – 2)2, which must lead to a 3 term quadratic,
i.e. ax2 + bx + c, where a ≠ 0, b ≠ 0, c ≠ 0, and collecting terms.
“Non-algebraic” solutions:
No working, and only one correct solution pair found (e.g. x = 4, y = 10):
M0 M0 A0 M0 A0 M1 A0
No working, and both correct solution pairs found, but not demonstrated:
M0 M0 A0 M1 A1 M1 A1
Both correct solution pairs found, and demonstrated: Full marks
Alternative:
2
y+2 y+2 y+2
x= y2 – – 6 =0 M1
3 3 3
n 5
(c) 2750 = [– 35 + (n – 1)] M1A1ft
2 2
{ 4 × 2750 = n(5n – 75) }
4 × 550 = n(n – 15) M1
Note
In the main scheme, if the given a is used to find d from one of the
equations, then allow M1A1 if both values are checked in the 2nd
equation.
− 4 ± 4 2 − (4 × 1× –8)
(b) x= or (x + 2)2 ± 4 – 8 = 0 M1
2
x = –2 ± (any correct expression) A1
48 = 16 3 = 4 3 or 12 = 4 3 = 2 3 B1
(
y = −2±2 3 – 4 ) M: Attempt at least one y value M1
x = −2 + 2 3 , y = −6 + 2 3 x = −2 − 2 3 , y = −6 − 2 3 A1 5
2ndA1 for correct y answers. Pairings need not be explicit but they
must say which is x and which is y.
Mis-labelling x and y loses final A1 only.
[7]
8. (a)
l
C : “U” shape B1
C : Position B1
l : Straight line through origin with negative gradient B1 3
(c) x2 – 4 = –3x
x2 + 3x – 4 = 0 (x + 4)(x – 1) = 0 x = … M1
x=–4 x=1 A1
y = 12 y = –3 M: Attempt one y value M1 A1 4
[9]
2
3y + 12 2 x − 12
(b) y2 = 4 − 2 or = 4(x – 2) M1
2 3
8−0 0 − (−2)
(c) Grad. of AQ = , Grad. of AP = M1 A1ft
18 − 2 2−3
(attempt one for M mark)
1
m1 × m2 = × –2 = –1, so ∠PAQ is a right angle (A1 is c.s.o.) M1 A1 4
2
Alternative: Pythagoras: Find 2 lengths [M1]
AQ = √320, AP = √5, PQ = √325 (O.K. unsimplified)[A1ft]
(if decimal values only are given, with no working
shown, require at least 1 d.p. accuracy for M1(implied) A1)
AQ2 + AP2 = PQ2, so ∠PAQ is a right angle [M1, A1]
M1 requires attempt to use Pythag. for right angle at A , and
A1 requires correct exact working + conclusion.
[11]
C1 Algebra: Simultaneous Equations – Mark Schemes 14
C1 Algebra – Simultaneous Equations PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com
11. (a) x2 – 2X + 3 = 9 – x M1
x2 – x – 6 = 0 (x + 2)(x − 3) = 0 x = −2, 3 M1 A1
y = 11, 6 M1 A1 ft 5
x3
(b) ∫ (x ) M1 A1
2
− 2 x + 3 dx = − x 2 + 3x
3
3
x3 −8 2
− x + 3 x = (9 − 9 + 9 ) − M1 A1
2
− 4 − 6 = 21
3 −2 3 3
1 1
Trapezium: (11 + 6) × 5 = 42 B1 ft
2 2
1 2 5
Area = 42 − 21 = 20 M1 A1 7
2 3 6
Alternative: (9 – x) – (x2 – 2x + 3) = 6 + x – x2 M1 A1
2 3
∫ (6 + x − x )dx = 6 x + 2
x x
2
− M1 A1 ft
3
3
x2 x3 9 8 5
6 x + − = 18 + − 9 − − 12 + 2 + , = 20 M1 A1, A1
2 3 −2 2 3 6
[12]
1. Many candidates scored full marks for this standard question on simultaneous
equations. Mistakes were usually in signs or in combining terms, leading to a loss of
accuracy rather than method marks, but an exception to this was the squaring of the
equation y – 3x + 2 = 0 to give y2 – 9x2 + 4 = 0 . A few candidates, having found
solutions for x, failed to find y values. It was disappointing to see many candidates
resorting to the quadratic formula when factorisation was possible.
2. Although most candidates made a reasonable attempt at this question, only those who
demonstrated good skills in algebra managed to score full marks. The structure of parts
(a) and (b) was intended to help candidates, but when the initial strategy was to write
down (correctly) 3d = 32.5 – 25, there was sometimes confusion over what was required
for the two equations in part (a). Even when correct formulae such as u18 = a + 17d
were written down, the substitution of u18 = 25 did not always follow. The work seen in
these first two parts was often poorly presented and confused, but credit was given for
any valid method of obtaining the values of d and a without assuming the value of a.
In part (c), many candidates managed to set up the correct sum equation but were
subsequently let down by poor arithmetic or algebra, so were unable to proceed to the
given quadratic equation. Being given 55 × 40 (to help with the factorisation in the last
part of the question) rather than 2200 sometimes seemed to be a distraction.
Despite being given the 55 × 40, many candidates insisted on using the quadratic
formula in part (d). This led to the problem of having to find the square root of 9025
without a calculator, at which point most attempts were abandoned.
3. In part (a) most tried the simple substitution of (x – 4) into the second equation. Some
made a sign error (–4x instead of +4x) and proceeded to use this incorrect equation in
part (b). Some candidates did not realise that part (a) was a first step towards solving the
equations and repeated this work at the start of part (b) (sometimes repairing mistakes
made there). The major loss of marks in part (b) was a failure to find the y values but
there were plenty of errors made in trying to find x too. Those who attempted to
complete the square were usually successful although some made sign errors when
rearranging the 2 and some forgot the ± sign. Of those who used the quadratic formula it
was surprising how many incorrect versions were seen. Even using the correct formula
was no guarantee of success as incorrect cancelling was common:
− 4 ± 48 −4±4 3
was often simplified to − 2 ± 24 or became − 2 ± 4 3 .
2 2
4. This question was a good source of marks for most candidates. Almost all realised the
necessity to form an equation in one variable and the majority could perform the
appropriate expansion and substitution, leading to the correct 3-term quadratic. There
seemed to be less reliance on the quadratic formula than had been seen in previous C1
papers, with most candidates trying to factorise and usually doing so correctly.
A disappointing number failed to score the final two marks because they finished after
finding the two values of the first variable. Non-algebraic solutions were rare and,
pleasingly, few candidates thought that (x – 2)2 = x2 + 4.
5. Generally this question was answered well although there were a number of sign slips
14
either in the initial substitution, using x = 1 – 2y, or losing the minus sign from y = −
5
when substituting back to find x. It was encouraging to see few students using the more
x −1
difficult y = substitution.
2
This was one question where an ability to factorise a quadratic expression would have
helped many candidates. A large number attempted to use the formula and sometimes
could not simplify 576 , another error that was seen using this approach was to call the
solutions to their equation in y, x = … and this meant they lost the final two marks.
There were only a few attempts that used “false squaring” namely x2 + 4y2 = 1 and the
vast majority realized that simply “spotting” the solution (5, 2) did not constitute a full
solution and therefore gained few marks.
6. This question was answered very well. Nearly all of the candidates managed to
substitute correctly to get the correct quadratic, and most then found two values of one
variable. Many also found the corresponding values of the other variable, though some
candidates forgot to do the last step of finding the other values. A significant minority
subtracted the original equations, but a number of these made errors or were unable to
rearrange x 2 − x = 12 .
7. Many candidates were able to produce fully correct solutions to this question. A small
minority had difficulty in obtaining an equation in one variable, but apart from this,
algebra was generally sound and mistakes were usually minor. Occasionally, having
found values for x (or y), candidates failed to continue to find values for the other
variable.
8. In part (a) of this question good sketches were usually drawn, but it was disappointing
that many candidates had to resort to a table of values and that some did not use a ruler
to draw the axes and the straight line graph. Where mistakes were made, it was
surprisingly the straight line that caused more problems than the parabola. For part (b),
many candidates gave only the coordinates of intersection with the x-axis, or failed to
include zero coordinates in their answers. Even those who had difficulty with the sketch
were often able to solve simultaneously in part (c), which was well done apart from
occasional slips. A few candidates, referring back to their sketch, thought that only one
intersection point was possible.
9. Although there were some excellent solutions to this question, it was for many
candidates very demanding algebraically. Most were able to write down the co-
ordinates of A in part (a), and then to attempt the elimination of either x or y to find an
equation which should have led to the intersection points of the curve and the straight
line. Algebraic mistakes were very common, and while some of these resulted in the
loss of accuracy marks rather than method marks, that was not the case for mistakes
such as y2 = 4x – 8 ⇒ y = 4 x − 8 = 4 x − 8 . Those candidates who sensibly started
by finding a quadratic equation in y rather than x made the algebra easier for themselves
and were generally more successful overall in the question.
It was not unusual for part (c) to be omitted, but for those who attempted it, methods
using gradients and methods based on Pythagoras’ theorem were equally popular. Those
who found equations of AP and AQ did not always state the gradients explicitly, and
some candidates failed to conclude their arguments.
10. Good marks were often scored in this question, the most popular method being to find x
in terms of y (x = 3y – 1), then to form a quadratic equation in y. Although sign slips
were common, methods were generally sound. Other approaches were seen
occasionally, such as (a) finding y in terms of x (giving slightly more awkward
manipulation), (b) first multiplying the linear equation by x, then subtracting, leading to
x = y 2 − 11 .
A few candidates, having solved a quadratic equation in y, thought that they had found x
and substituted back incorrectly at the final stage.
11. The vast majority of candidates coped well with part (a), solving the equations
simultaneously to find the correct coordinates of A and B. A few made it more difficult
for themselves initially by finding a quadratic in y rather than x. Others simply used a
table of values of x and y to find the intersection points.
The most popular method in part (b) was to find the area between the curve and the x-
2
axis 21 , and then to subtract this from the area of the trapezium, and many
3
candidates completed this accurately to score full marks. Quite often the area of the
2
trapezium was not considered at all, the answer being left as 21 . Those who used
3
integration to find the area under the straight line were more likely to make numerical
mistakes. The alternative approach of subtracting first ( 9 − x ) − ( x 2 − 2 x + 3) and then
integrating ( 6 + x − x 2 ) was sometimes used successfully, but was less than fully
convincing when the initial subtraction was performed “the wrong way round”.
Occasionally y limits were wrongly used for the integration instead of x limits.
12. In part (a), most candidates were able to use 9 = 3 to show convincingly that x = 2y - 2.
Just a few used logarithms, usually correctly, to complete the proof. Part (b), however,
proved to be a good test of algebraic competence. Forming an appropriate equation in y
was the important step, and candidates who thought that x = 2y - 2 implied x = 4y – 4
(or similar) oversimplified the y equation to a two-term quadratic and limited
themselves to a maximum of 2 marks.
Otherwise, apart from slips in expanding (2y – 2) , many went on to achieve a fully
correct solution. It was unfortunate, however, that some candidates solved the quadratic
in y but gave their answers as values of x, substituting back to find “y”. Others, having
solved for y, omitted to find the corresponding values of x.