Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    College of Education - Graduate Studies: 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 Total Points 100

    Uploaded by

    Rosalie B. Candido
    This document provides rubrics to assess student learning outcomes for two activities: 1) A graduate oral presentation that is scored based on organization, content, presentation, and communication. The maximum score is 100 points. 2) Recitation/participation/interactive discussion that is scored based on knowledge/understanding, thinking/analysis, and communication. Each category is scored on a scale of excellent to very poor. The rubrics establish clear criteria to evaluate student performance in these learning activities in graduate studies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    College of Education - Graduate Studies: 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 Total Points 100

    Uploaded by

    Rosalie B. Candido
    43 views2 pages
    This document provides rubrics to assess student learning outcomes for two activities: 1) A graduate oral presentation that is scored based on organization, content, presentation, and communication. The maximum score is 100 points. 2) Recitation/participation/interactive discussion that is scored based on knowledge/understanding, thinking/analysis, and communication. Each category is scored on a scale of excellent to very poor. The rubrics establish clear criteria to evaluate student performance in these learning activities in graduate studies.

    Original Title

    RUBRICS (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides rubrics to assess student learning outcomes for two activities: 1) A graduate oral presentation that is scored based on organization, content, presentation, and communication. The maximum score is 100 points. 2) Recitation/participation/interactive discussion that is scored based on knowledge/understanding, thinking/analysis, and communication. Each category is scored on a scale of excellent to very poor. The rubrics establish clear criteria to evaluate student performance in these learning activities in graduate studies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    43 views2 pages

    College of Education - Graduate Studies: 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 Total Points 100

    Uploaded by

    Rosalie B. Candido
    This document provides rubrics to assess student learning outcomes for two activities: 1) A graduate oral presentation that is scored based on organization, content, presentation, and communication. The maximum score is 100 points. 2) Recitation/participation/interactive discussion that is scored based on knowledge/understanding, thinking/analysis, and communication. Each category is scored on a scale of excellent to very poor. The rubrics establish clear criteria to evaluate student performance in these learning activities in graduate studies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Republic of the Philippines

    POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES


    COLLEGE OF EDUCATION – GRADUATE STUDIES

    RUBRICS TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (SLOs)

    A. Scoring Rubric for Graduate Oral Presentation


    Category Scoring Criteria Total Score
    Points
    The type of presentation is appropriate for the assigned topic 5
    Organization and level of graduate program.
    Information is presented in a logical sequence. 5
    (15 points)
    Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. 5
    Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and 5
    established a framework for the rest of the presentation.
    Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the 5
    Content
    target audience.
    (45 points) Presentation contains accurate information. 10
    Materials included is relevant to the overall messages/purpose. 10
    Appropriate amount of materials are prepared, and points made 10
    reflect well their relative importance.
    There are appropriate conclusions summarizing the 5
    presentation.
    Presenter maintains good eye contact with the audience and is 5
    appropriately animated.
    Presenter uses a clear, audible voice. 5
    Presentation
    Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. 5
    (40 points) Good language skills and pronunciation are used 5
    Visual aids (power point presentation, videos, etc.) 5
    Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5
    Information was well communicated. 10
    Score Total Points 100

    B. Scoring Rubric for Recitation/Participation/Interactive Discussion

    Excellent Very Good Good Poor Very Poor


    Knowledge/ The student The student The student The student The student
    Understandin demonstrate demonstrate demonstrate uses uses little
    g s a depth of s a depth of s a depth of knowledge relevant or
    (40%) understandin understandin understandin that is accurate
    g by using g by using g by using generally information,
    relevant and accurate accurate accurate with not even that
    accurate detail; the detail; only minor which was
    detail; the answers are answers are inaccuracies presented in
    answers are thorough adequate but and that is the assigned
    thorough and go do not go generally text.
    and go beyond what much relevant;
    beyond what was beyond what answers do
    was presented in was not go much
    presented in class or in presented in beyond what
    class or in the assigned class or in was
    the assigned text. the assigned presented in
    text. text. class.
    Thinking/ The The The The The student’s
    Analysis student’s student’s student’s student’s discussion
    (30%) discussion discussion discussion discussion is shows no
    shows a high shows a shows an not always analytical
    level of good level of acceptable fully structure for
    conceptual conceptual level of developed. relevance.
    ability. ability. conceptual

    “THE COUNTRY’S 1st POLYTECHNICU”


    ability.
    Communicatio The student The student The student The student The student
    n is is is is confuses in
    (30%) imaginative imaginative imaginative imaginative what is to be
    and effective and effective and effective and effective communicate
    in conveying in conveying in conveying in conveying d; glaring and
    ideas; ideas; ideas, main ideas, frequent
    grammar grammar grammar but they are errors in
    and syntax and syntax and syntax a bit grammar and
    in the in the in the unimaginativ syntax in the
    English English English e; occasional English
    language are language are language are slight errors language
    flawless. flawless flawless. in grammar. abound.

    Prepared by:

    DR. VICTORIA C.
    NAVAL
    Professor

    “THE COUNTRY’S 1st POLYTECHNICU”

    You might also like