Drop Call Optimization
Drop Call Optimization
Drop Call Optimization
www.huawei.com
Table of contents
1. Challenges
2. Analytics: Using heat maps: Mapping topography to statistics
3. Strategy
4. Project milestones and timelines
5. Role of verticals
6. Status update
a) Pre post report
7. Reach out to
2
DCR Challenges
Drop call prime reasons per circle
a. Low call volume a. Outages a. Outages a. Low call volume a. Low call volume a. Low call volume
b. Outages b. Operational Issues b. Operational Issues b. Outages b. Outages b. Outages
c. Operational Issues c. Low call volume c. Low call volume c. Operational Issues c. Operational Issues c. Operational Issues
d. Coverage holes
e. Radio optimization
3
A,B,C- Circles in drop call concerns ambit due to change in TRAI DCR formula (quarterly) effective Q4 2017
Analytics
Traffic Vs Drop call – UP East Heat-map
Low traffic,
Grid Analysis
High drop
1. Focused approach
2. Reduced time to act
1. TCH traffic
2. TCH Drop %
3. TCH Drop count
4. Call attempt (LCV)
5. PTA (Hardware)
6. Cell density
7. Vendor dominance
High traffic, High drop
Strategy
Phase wise
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Phase 7 Phase 8
Data collection Phase-out Codec tuning IBCA AFLP HO Drive Parameter Power control
re-tuning
• Data collection • Initiate • Study • Implement • Study • Target culprit • Careful • Careful
(GIS, Physical shutdown of utilization IBCA cycle GPS/Non GPS target cells by implementation implementation
site data, TRAI LCV sites (not (Including AFLP gain looking at HO of RXLEVMIN, of POC
reports, BBH) ignoring festive season • Observe Incoming RXLEVACCMI parameters
coverage impact for impact • GPS to be N in high DCR
• Traffic requirement) previous installed in • Tuning of areas • Optimization
utilization • Initiate new areas2 Ericsson and based on Drive
years1)
statistics • Study physical Huawei • Seek revisions based inputs
utilization of • Shutdown of optimization boundaries in HOC
• Analysis on network VAMOS parameters
VAMOS traffic • RLT tuning • Neighbor
wherever
• Verify possible optimization
• LCV, Military, equipped and
water bodies carried traffic • Operations
study incl. FR, HR, correction
VAMOS drive
- Level of Completion +
AFLP
LCV shutdown VAMOS Shutdown TRX Shutdown IBCA
Day1* Day2 Day3 Day4 Day5 Day6 Day7 Day8 Day9 Day10 Day11 Day12 Day13 Day14 Day15 Day16 Day17 Day18 Day19 Day20 Day21
AFLP Implementation
REPAIR
IBCA Implementation
Assessment
Assessing LCV
shutdown impact
Disable VAMOS
TRAI
Drop Call Optimization RF Team
Soft Hard
Data LCV LCV
Parameter Cells Clutter RLT VAMOS HR Tuning TRX Degrow IBCA AFLP/AFP Optimizatio Optimizatio
Collection Cells Shutdown
n n
UPE 14693 Done Done 2015 1082 3539 2879/4320 2086 1934
BIH 12556 Done Done 9792 118 1071 371/690 TRX 423 /839 23
GUJ 11858 Done Done 173 16 522 / 803 TRX 6512 5069
MAH 13523 Done Done 10694 NA 7436 654 / 741 TRX 505 42 7177 2075 527
AP 10050 Done Done 478/6841 240 3247 1368/1368 TRX 987 386
*Completed/
TBD TDB
D3- Drop Deep Dive Pre-Post
Bihar Activity Cell Count PRE POST UPW Activity Cell Count PRE POST
RLT 9792 0.89 0.77 Soft Optimization 590 1.34 0.93
HR Tuning 1071 0.71 0.55 VAMOS disable 109 0.54 0.49
VAMOS disable 118 0.92 0.66 TRX Shutdown 158cells 0.33 0.32
UPE Activity Cell Count PRE POST MAH Activity Cell Count PRE POST
HR Tuning 3539 0.87 0.76 HR Tuning 7436 0.77 0.75
VAMOS disable 1082 1.24 1.16 TRX Shutdown 654 0.72 0.71
DYMA Off 1025 2.89 2.83 AFP 2075 1.07 1.06
Soft Optimization 1015 0.36 0.28 IBCA 7177 0.81 0.75
IBCA Implementation 2806 0.76 0.50 DFCA 527 1.02 0.91
1.10 1.02
1.00
0.90 0.85 0.86 0.84
0.76 0.77 0.77
0.80
0.70
0.60 0.60 0.59
0.55 0.57
0.60
0.50
0.40
UPE UPW BIH AP GUJ MAH
[email protected] – UP East
[email protected] – Maharashtra
[email protected] – Bihar
[email protected] – AP
[email protected] – UP West
[email protected] - Gujarat