Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 32 views

    19 Guzman vs. Limcolioc 1939

    Uploaded by

    finserglen choclit lopez
    1) Proceso de Guzman died without a will, leaving behind children from his first marriage and a second wife, Angela Limcolioc. 2) The court appointed Proceso's daughter from his first marriage, Nicolasa de Guzman, as the judicial administratrix of his estate. 3) Angela appealed her appointment, wanting to be named administratrix instead due to her preference as the widow. However, the court affirmed Nicolasa's appointment because the properties were acquired during Proceso's first marriage, so his children had a greater interest in the estate than Angela.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    19 Guzman vs. Limcolioc 1939

    Uploaded by

    finserglen choclit lopez
    32 views1 page
    1) Proceso de Guzman died without a will, leaving behind children from his first marriage and a second wife, Angela Limcolioc. 2) The court appointed Proceso's daughter from his first marriage, Nicolasa de Guzman, as the judicial administratrix of his estate. 3) Angela appealed her appointment, wanting to be named administratrix instead due to her preference as the widow. However, the court affirmed Nicolasa's appointment because the properties were acquired during Proceso's first marriage, so his children had a greater interest in the estate than Angela.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Proceso de Guzman died without a will, leaving behind children from his first marriage and a second wife, Angela Limcolioc. 2) The court appointed Proceso's daughter from his first marriage, Nicolasa de Guzman, as the judicial administratrix of his estate. 3) Angela appealed her appointment, wanting to be named administratrix instead due to her preference as the widow. However, the court affirmed Nicolasa's appointment because the properties were acquired during Proceso's first marriage, so his children had a greater interest in the estate than Angela.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    32 views1 page

    19 Guzman vs. Limcolioc 1939

    Uploaded by

    finserglen choclit lopez
    1) Proceso de Guzman died without a will, leaving behind children from his first marriage and a second wife, Angela Limcolioc. 2) The court appointed Proceso's daughter from his first marriage, Nicolasa de Guzman, as the judicial administratrix of his estate. 3) Angela appealed her appointment, wanting to be named administratrix instead due to her preference as the widow. However, the court affirmed Nicolasa's appointment because the properties were acquired during Proceso's first marriage, so his children had a greater interest in the estate than Angela.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    G.R. No.

    L-46134 April 18, 1939

    In the Matter of the Intestate of Proceso de Guzman.


    NICOLASA DE GUZMAN, applicant-appellee,
    vs.
    ANGELA LIMCOLIOC, oppositor-appellant.

    Camus and Zaballa for appellant.


    Arsenio Santos for appellee.

    AVANCEÑA, C. J.:

    Proceso de Guzman died on January 1, 1937, without leaving a will. The deceased was first married
    to Agatona Santos, with whom he had four children, named Nicolasa, Apolinario, Ana and Tomasa.
    After Agatona's death, the deceased contracted a second marriage with Angela Limcolioc, with
    whom he did not have any child.

    On the 7th of the same month of January, 1937, the Court of First Instance of Rizal appointed
    Nicolasa de Guzman judicial administratrix of the properties of the deceased Proceso de Guzman.
    On the 8th of the same month of January, 1937, Angela Limcolioc, widow of the deceased, asked
    that this appointment be set aside and that she had named administratrix instead, on that ground of
    her preference as the widow. The court denied this petition and sustained the appointment of
    Nicolasa. From these resolutions, Angela appealed.

    In this instance the appellant contends that the trial court erred in not appointing her administratrix of
    the estate of the deceased Proceso de Guzman and in appointing Nicolasa de Guzman as such
    administratrix without first setting the case for hearing.

    The principal consideration reckoned with in the appointment of the administrator of the estate of a
    deceased person is the interest in said estate of the one to be appointed as such administrator. This
    is the same consideration which the law takes into account in establishing the preference of the
    widow to administer the estate of her husband, upon the latter's death, because she is supposed to
    have an interest therein as a partner in the conjugal partnership. But this preference established by
    law is not absolute, if there are other reasons justifying the appointment of an administrator other
    than surviving spouse. If the interest in the estate is what principally determines the preference in the
    appointment of an administrator of the estate of a deceased person, and if, under the circumstances
    of each case, it develops that there is another who has more interest therein than the surviving
    spouse, the preference established in the latter's favor becomes untenable.

    The application filed by Nicolasa de Guzman for her appointment alleges that during the marital life
    of the deceased with his first wife Agatona Santos, both, through their mutual labor, acquired all the
    properties left by the deceased, not having acquired any property during his second marriage with
    Angela Limcolioc. The court bore these allegations in mind. It is true that the case was not heard for
    the purpose of establishing these allegations, but when Angela asked for the reconsideration of the
    appointment of Nicolasa, she did not deny these allegations and merely stated that they do not
    justify her appointment as administratrix. For failure of Angela to deny these allegations, thus taking
    them for granted, the court was justified in considering them when it denied the reconsideration of its
    resolution and when it sustained the appointment of Nicolasa.

    If the properties left by the deceased Proceso de Guzman were acquired during his marriage with
    Agatona Santos, his children, among them Nicolasa, have more interest therein than his now widow,
    Angela Limcolioc, who would only be entitled, by way of usufruct, to a portion equal to that
    corresponding to one of the children who has received no betterment.

    The appealed decision is affirmed, with costs to the appellant. So ordered.

    You might also like