Lack of Supply Chain Coordination and The Bullwhip Effect

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

LACK OF SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION AND THE BULLWHIP

EFFECT
Supply chain coordination – all stages in the inventory network make
moves together (normally brings about more prominent absolute store
network benefits)

SC coordination necessitates that each stage consider the impacts of its


activities on different stages

Lack of coordination results when:

– Objectives of various stages struggle or

– Information moving between stages is mutilated

Bullwhip Effect

 Fluctuations in orders increment as they climb the store network from


retailers to wholesalers to makers to providers (appeared in Figure)
 Distorts request data inside the store network, where various stages
have altogether different appraisals of what request resembles
 Results in a deficiency of store network coordination

 Examples: Proctor &Gamble (Pampers); HP (printers); Barilla (pasta)

THE EFFECT OF LACK OF COORDINATION ON PERFORMANCE


 Manufacturing cost (increases)

 Inventory cost (increases)

 Replenishment lead time (increases)


 Transportation cost (increases)

 Labor cost for shipping and receiving (increases)

 Level of product availability (decreases)

 Relationships across the supply chain (worsens)

 Profitability (decreases)

OBSTACLES TO COORDINATION IN A SUPPLY CHAIN


 Incentive Obstacles

 Information Processing Obstacles

 Operational Obstacles

 Pricing Obstacles

 Behavioral Obstacles

Incentive Obstacles

 When incentives offered to different stages or participants in a supply


chain lead to actions that increase variability and reduce total supply
chain profits – misalignment of total supply chain objectives and
individual objectives

 Local optimization within functions or stages of a supply chain

 Sales force incentives

Information Processing Obstacles

 When demand information is distorted as it moves between different


stages of the supply chain, leading to increased variability in orders
within the supply chain

 Forecasting based on orders, not customer demand


o Forecasting demand based on orders magnifies demand
fluctuations moving up the supply chain from retailer to
manufacturer

 Lack of information sharing

Operational Obstacles

 Actions taken in the course of placing and filling orders that lead to an
increase in variability

 Ordering in large lots (much larger than dictated by demand)

 Large replenishment lead times

 Rationing and shortage gaming (common in the computer industry


because of periodic cycles of component shortages and surpluses)

Pricing Obstacles

 When pricing policies for a product lead to an increase in variability of


orders placed

 Lot-size based quantity decisions

 Price fluctuations (resulting in forward buying)

Behavioral Obstacles

 Problems in learning, often related to communication in the supply chain


and how the supply chain is structured

 Each stage of the supply chain views its actions locally and is unable to
see the impact of its actions on other stages

 Different stages react to the current local situation rather than trying to
identify the root causes

 Based on local analysis, different stages blame each other for the
fluctuations, with successive stages becoming enemies rather than
partners
 No stage learns from its actions over time because the most significant
consequences of the actions of any one stage occur elsewhere, resulting
in a vicious cycle of actions and blame

 Lack of trust results in opportunism, duplication of effort, and lack of


information sharing

MANAGERIAL LEVERS TO ACHIEVE COORDINATION


 Aligning Goals and Incentives

 Improving Information Accuracy

 Improving Operational Performance

 Designing Pricing Strategies to Stabilize Orders

 Building Strategic Partnerships and Trust

Aligning Goals and Incentives

 Align incentives so that each participant has an incentive to do the things


that will maximize total supply chain profits

 Align incentives across functions

 Pricing for coordination

 Alter sales force incentives from sell-in (to the retailer) to sell-through
(by the retailer)

Improving Information Accuracy

 Sharing point of sale data

 Collaborative forecasting and planning

 Single stage control of replenishment

o Continuous replenishment programs (CRP)

o Vendor managed inventory (VMI)

Improving Operational Performance


 Reducing replenishment lead time

o Reduces uncertainty in demand

o EDI is useful

 Reducing lot sizes

o Computer-assisted ordering, B2B exchanges

o Shipping in LTL sizes by combining shipments

o Technology and other methods to simplify receiving

o Changing customer ordering behavior

 Rationing based on past sales and sharing information to limit gaming

o “Turn-and-earn”

o Information sharing

Designing Pricing Strategies to Stabilize Orders

 Encouraging retailers to order in smaller lots and reduce forward buying

 Moving from lot size-based to volume-based quantity discounts


(consider total purchases over a specified time period)

 Stabilizing pricing

o Eliminate promotions (everyday low pricing, EDLP)

o Limit quantity purchased during a promotion

o Tie promotion payments to sell-through rather than amount


purchased

Building Strategic Partnerships and Trust in a Supply Chain

 Background

 Designing a Relationship with Cooperation and Trust

 Managing Supply Chain Relationships for Cooperation and Trust


 Trust-based relationship

o Dependability

o Leap of faith

 Cooperation and trust work because:

o Alignment of incentives and goals

o Actions to achieve coordination are easier to implement

o Supply chain productivity improves by reducing duplication or


allocation of effort to appropriate stage

– Greater information sharing results

You might also like