Advances in Cryojet Machining: Development and Improvement Areas
Advances in Cryojet Machining: Development and Improvement Areas
Advances in Cryojet Machining: Development and Improvement Areas
Machining
Development and improvement areas
Good morning, sir! We have centred our innovative project around cryojet machining
and we will also talk about two qualitative improvements that we will be suggesting
about the process, later in the presentation. It is also worth noting that from what we
made out of the sources that we looked up to, this process is not very commonly
used, owing to some restrictions, something that we will discuss as well.
The idea
The danger associated with
icicles and sharp ice edges- an
opportunity that can be tapped.
Moving on, here is a little about a fact that we had in our mind before we decided to
choose this particular topic for our report. So, icicles are a tapered formation of ice
and till date, there have been many incidents from all around the world where large
chunks of icicles have fallen down on people and pierced through their skin, in the
process. Heavy and large-sized icicles are a formation in very cold countries and
when they fall on someone and the person dies, then no trace is left behind. So,
cryojet machining precisely revolves around this concept and with this fact, I wanted
to imply the kind of potential this technology is capable of achieving.
Introduction
Here I’ll talk a little bit about cryojet machining. So, this is a derivative of Abrasive
water jet machining in which ice is used as an abrasive to cut the material. While
cutting the material, the ice particles melt and go into the water tank of the machine.
This way, the material that is being worked upon does not get contaminated due to
foreign particles from the abrasive and no damage due to heat occurs around the
area that is cut. The pressurised water acting as a cutting jet can be reused with
sufficient filtration, thus, forming a closed circuit. If widely brought into practice, this
type of machining is capable of saving a lot of resources and time because mineral
abrasives are not used by this technology.
Major advancements
1. Galecki and Vickers (1982) carried out 3. Kluz et al. (1995) showed that an air-ice
surface cleaning and abrading with an particle stream can be generated and
ice-blasting technique. applied for processing of bio-materials
2. Krzysztof et al. (1982) demonstrated that and food.
cleaning was an important application of 4. F-W Bach et al. (2013) describe a process
ice particles. Ice had the potential to that is based on an in-situ phase shift of
prevent workpiece contamination and the water jet immediately after having left
eliminate pollution. the nozzle.
So, here are some of the major advancements which really established cryojet
machining for what it is today. This was first used for cleaning purposes and liquid
nitrogen was used to cool down ice further and it is still used. From 2013, a process
has been described wherein water was spontaneously shifted to the solid state in
which water was precooled in a thermal exchanger and subjected to a very high
pressure. Here I would add on that extremely cold, liquefied gases are often used in
this procedure.
Applications
1. Experimental procedures
have used this process to
cut steel, titanium, food and
biomaterials.
2. Cleaning and abrading have
also been carried out.
Moving onto the next slide, this process does not have very widespread applications,
when it comes to actual machining. Still, we were able to go through some
experimental procedures which were using this method to cut steel and titanium and
other soft materials. However, this process is used in the form of ice-blasting wherein
the velocity is restricted, such that the ice crystals are only used for cleaning and
abrading purposes.
Advantages
As for the advantages, I had many mentioned all of these in my previous slides. Here,
the 2nd and 3rd points are quite important from the point of view of cutting of food and
other bio-materials, where even the slightest application of a high amount of heat can
spoil the material. The 1st point is in accordance with the fact that a closed-circuit is
formed and no water is wasted, as such, making it an environment-friendly
alternative.
Challenges
Coming to the challenges, a major challenge about this process is that it can be
operated in a very narrow-range of temperatures and it is difficult to achieve and
maintain that kind of a range in laboratories. This is something that limits the usage of
the machining process and as a result of which, it hasn’t been studied or used widely.
Some studies have also suggested that the efficiency of cutting in this process is
lower than when mineral abrasives are used, but again, this is an area which has not
been studied to the fullest and one possible reason that I came up with could be due
to the density of ice, which is even lesser than that of water at 4 degree celsius, and
this is because material removal rate depends upon the three-fourths power of the
abrasive grains’ density.
Proposed methods of
improvement (Qualitative)
Here, I will briefly skim through the qualitative methods of improvement that we could
come up with. To come up with these, we obviously could not conduct any actual
experiment due to the lack of resources and that’s why we have kept our evaluation
qualitative only.
Escalating the
hardness of ice
A one-line description of it
The material removal rate is directly proportional to density of the of abrasive grains
raised to the power 3/4, indicating that an increase in the density of ice will increase
the MRR. However, the density of water is the highest at 4°C and this is accounted by
the anomalous behaviour of water. The plot on the right shows that how the density of
ice is known to vary with temperature. Since ice can't be cooled further beyond a
temperature point and taking note of the above propositions, we concluded that the
ice used in the process should have a temperature between -10 to -20 °C.
References
● In-process generation of water ice particles for cutting and cleaning purposes. (2010).
● Yuvaraj, N., & Kumar, M. P. (2016). Cutting of aluminium alloy with abrasive water jet and cryogenic
assisted abrasive water jet: A comparative study of the surface integrity approach. Wear , 18–32.
● Galecki, G. and Vickers, G.: The development of ice blasting for surface cleaning. 6th International
Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology. (1982), Cranfield, BHRA, Fluid Engineering, 59/80
● Truchot, P., Mellinger, P., Duchamp, R., Kim, T. J., and Ocampo, R.: Development Of A Cryogenic Waterjet
Technique For Biomaterial Processing Applications. Proceedings of the 6th American Water Jet
Conference. (1991), St.Louis, Waterjet Technology Association, 473/480
● Geskin, E., Tismenetskiy, L., and Li, F.: Development Of Ice Jet Machining Technology. Proceedings of
the 8th American Water Jet Conference. (1995), St. Louis, American Water Jet Conference, 671/680
● pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/43/1-
2/48/541337/Hardness-of-single-ice-crystals?redirectedFrom=fulltext