Ultrathin CAD-CAM Ceramic Occlusal Veneers and Anterior Bilaminar Veneers For The Treatment of Moderate Dental Biocorrosion: A 1.5-Year Follow-Up
Ultrathin CAD-CAM Ceramic Occlusal Veneers and Anterior Bilaminar Veneers For The Treatment of Moderate Dental Biocorrosion: A 1.5-Year Follow-Up
Ultrathin CAD-CAM Ceramic Occlusal Veneers and Anterior Bilaminar Veneers For The Treatment of Moderate Dental Biocorrosion: A 1.5-Year Follow-Up
Clinical Relevance
Ultrathin bonded posterior occlusal veneers represent a conservative alternative to
traditional onlays and complete coverage crowns for the treatment of moderate and severe
erosive lesions.
Figure 2. (A): Scannable stone replica of waxed cast with unaltered canines as repositioning reference. (B-C): Complete waxing (including canines,
mandibular incisal edges and mandibular third molars). (D-E): Scannable stone replica of the complete waxing were useful for anterior restorations
(mock-up, selective preparations, provisionals and enabled the use of the biogeneric copy tool).
ease could not be confirmed because of the dental CR was chosen. The vertical dimension of occlusion
wear pattern and patient medical history. However, (VDO) was arbitrarily augmented by 1 mm at the
the frequent consumption of acidic beverages (yerba incisal to allow space for the restoration on the
mate tea with lemon) may explain the severity in palatal aspect of the maxillary anterior teeth and to
this case. Furthermore, the presence of wear facets minimize the amount of preparation required for the
on the functional surfaces, such as the palatal and ultrathin occlusal veneers.16 A complete mouth
incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular additive waxing was ordered (GEO Classic Mint-
incisors, suggests the combination of biocorrosion Opaque Wax, Renfert GmbH, Hilzingen, Germany)
and attrition disorder. The patient was immediately and carried out in two steps by the dental technician.
advised to control the intake of acid drinks and to First, all teeth planned to be restored (maxillary
use an occlusal guard to protect the teeth from arch: anteriors and premolars; mandibular arch:
mechanical wear. second premolars, first and second molars) were
additively waxed, except for the canines. Both waxed
The restorative treatment was set in two stages: models were then duplicated (Elite Double 32 Fast,
ultrathin CAD-CAM ceramic occlusal veneers on Zhermack, Badia Polesine, Italy) and poured with
selected posterior teeth and bilaminar veneers scannable stone (Snow Rock 3D Scan, Dk Mungyo
(direct composite resin on palatal and ceramic on Corp, Hanrim-myun Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do,
labial) on maxillary anterior teeth.17,18 Diagnostic South Korea) (Figure 2A). This step provided
casts (Pearl White GC Fujirock EP, GC America, technical accuracy for intraoral repositioning of
Alsip, IL, USA) were obtained from complete arch silicone guides for mock-up fabrication and provi-
polyvinyl siloxane impressions (Virtual, Ivoclar sional restorations and primarily enabled the use of
Vivadent). The bite was recorded at maximum the biogeneric copy in the software (CEREC inLab
intercuspal position (MIP), and casts were mounted v4.0.2, Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim,
on a semiadjustable articulator. Centric relation Germany) to generate the definitive restorations.
(CR) was initially considered; however, MIP position Untouched canines and rearmost molars were
was utilized instead because the patient already had strategic for the correlation between the waxed
a retrognathic profile, which would be aggravated if models and the preparations. Then the technician
Operative Dentistry
preparations with the anatomy of the additive planned for restoration) in order to avoid early
waxing. Minimum editing was needed to obtain supraeruption, which could compromise the process
precise margins and ideal contact strength. The of correlation. Restorations were crystalized (Pro-
ultrathin occlusal veneers were milled from lithium gramat P300, Ivoclar Vivadent) and characterized
disilicate glass-ceramic blocks (A2 High Translucen- (stains mahogany, copper, and white IPS e.max
cy e.max CAD). The sprue was preferably located at CAD) and finally glazed.
the nonworking cusps: lingual (inferior arch) and At the following appointment, the ultrathin occlu-
buccal (superior arch). In the same appointment, the sal veneers were luted without the need for anes-
restorations were visually inspected to detect even- thesia. Provisionals were removed, and the prepara-
tual cracks and marginal chipping and, while in the tions were inspected for any remaining adhesive
precrystallized stage, tried in for occlusal contacts resin/acrylic resin. The conditioning of the restora-
and general fit (Figure 6A). tions included 10% hydrofluoric acid etching (Dents-
Due to the nonretentive geometry of the prepara- ply) for 20 seconds. After rinsing for 20 seconds, the
tion, provisionals were fabricated with some redun- restorations were subjected to postetching cleaning
dancy with respect to retention measures. The using 37.5% phosphoric acid (Ultra-Etch) under
surrounding occlusal enamel was spot etched with motion for one minute, followed by air-water spray
37.5% phosphoric acid (Ultra-Etch, Ultradent Prod- cleaning for 30 seconds. After air-drying, intaglio
ucts Inc, South Jordan, UT, USA) (Figure 6B) surfaces were silanated (Monobond Plus, Ivoclar
followed by coating protection of the previously Vivadent) and heat dried at 688C for around five
sealed dentin surfaces with a water-soluble separat- minutes (Calset, AdDent Inc, Danbury, CT, USA).
ing agent (Pro-V Coat, Bisco Dental Products, Under rubber dam, tooth preparations were
Schaumburg, IL, USA) (Figure 6C) in order to airborne-particle abraded with 50 lm aluminum
prevent potential resin bonding to the provisional oxide at 0.2 MPa and etched for 30 seconds with
poly(methyl methacrylate) resin (Dencôr Lay). The 37.5% phosphoric acid (Ultra-Etch), rinsed, and
polyvinyl siloxane indexes (Platinum 85, Zhermack) dried. Both fitting surfaces, restoration and tooth,
were then loaded with the acrylic resin (Dencôr Lay) were coated with adhesive resin (Optibond FL,
and precisely repositioned (Figure 6D). Provisionals Bottle No. 2) and left unpolymerized until the
were not retrieved, and excesses on the embrasures preheated luting material (Z100, 3M ESPE) (pre-
were purposely left in order to provide extra heated at 688C with Calset, Adent) was applied to
retention. Mandibular third molars were provision- the tooth.20 The restorations were seated (the entire
alized during all restorative phases (although not sextant) followed by careful elimination of gross
Operative Dentistry
DISCUSSION
It is notable how well patients presenting with
moderate to severe loss of tooth structure due to
biocorrosion react when minimally invasive recon-
structive approaches are proposed to them. Both
biological and economic costs are significantly lower
compared to traditional and more aggressive options,
Figure 5. (A): Scanning of wax-up replica. (B): Powdering of
making the decision-making process easier and the
prepared teeth. (C): Preview of the restorative design after the acceptance rate higher. The diagnostic wax-up and
correlation of the models. Note the excellent overlap between the wax- mock-up play a key role in this matter, helping both
up and prepared teeth.
patient and clinician assess the physical aspects of
the proposal as well as in the following technical
steps of the work flow. Despite the fact that digital
excess composite resin and initial light polymeriza- design along with the possibility of 3D printing is
tion.21 Each surface was exposed at an irradiance of already available, the wax-up was delegated to a
1000 mW/cm2 (Valo, Ultradent) for 60 seconds (20 skilled technician and performed in the traditional
seconds per surface repeated three times). All additive way.
margins were then covered with an air barrier (K- The option of using the mock-up for a period of
Y Jelly,) and light polymerized for 10 seconds. time (in the present case, two weeks) provides a good
Occlusal adjustments were minor due to the adjust- level of predictability, mainly when the VDO is
ments in the precrystallized stage (Figure 7). The augmented. Based on the study of Abduo,19 the
Resende & Others: Ultrathin Occlusal Veneers
Clinical Follow-Up
The intraoral aspects of the patient can be observed
before treatment (Figure 1A through 1C), after
treatment completion (Figure 9A through 9E), and
after 1.5 years of treatment (Figure 10A through
10D).
CONCLUSIONS
This case report demonstrates the feasibility of
restoring the dental sequelae of moderate biocorro-
sion with ultrathin CAD-CAM ultrathin occlusal
veneers and anterior bilaminar veneers. The treat-
ment was successful due to the conservation of the
dental tissue, esthetics, and effectiveness to restore
dental wear caused by biocorrosion confirmed by the
reevaluation after 1.5 years of clinical service,
although it has been observed that addressing the
etiologic factor along with the use of an occlusal
splint (when associated to attrition) is of paramount
importance.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude to FAPERJ for the
research grant E-26/112.046/2012; the Federal University of
Rio de Janeiro for the inLab MC XL milling unit; Dr. Silvana
Marques Miranda Spyrides (chair, Department of Prostho-
dontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal
Figure 9. Right (A) sextant in occlusion. Occlusal views of the University of Rio de Janeiro) for her support on building the
completed restorations (B,C). Patient’s smile after treatment conclu- new CAD-CAM laboratory as well as the buying process of the
sion (D). milling unit MCXL through the university; Sirona Brazil for
the discount for the Cerec System and for the Hugo stool; Mr
Resende & Others: Ultrathin Occlusal Veneers
Figure 10. 1.5-year follow-up. (A): Restorations well integrated in the smile. (B) Palatal view of the anterior teeth. Note the subtle blending between
composite - ceramic. (C-D): Lower posterior teeth (no signs of cracks or chipping in the restorations).
Holger Kappler (Kappler) for the discount on the Cerec MCXL or kind in any product, service, and/or company that is
cabinet; Mr Herbert Mendes and Dr Camila Madruga (Ivoclar presented in this article.
Vivadent) for the Variolink Veneer Kit and Empress Direct
and also for the discount on IPS e.max CAD blocks and the
Programat P300 oven and other dental materials from Ivoclar; (Accepted 5 August 2017)
Mr Rodrigo Negreiros (3M ESPE) for Protemp 4; Dr Joshua
Friedman (AdDent) for Calset and Microlux; Dr Byoung Suh REFERENCES
(Bisco Dental Products) for Pro-V Coat; Dr Richard Tuttle
(Ultradent) for Ultra-Etch, Ultrapak, Opalescence 10%, Jiffy 1. Magne P & Belser U (2002) Bonded Porcelain Restora-
Kit; Ms Leigh Anne Jones (territory manager, Kerr Restor- tions in the Anterior Dentition: A Biomimetic Approach
atives) for Optibond FL and Kolor þ Plus; Dr Gabriela Lomeu Quintessence Publishing, Chicago.
for assisting during the restoration of the anterior maxillary
teeth; and Mr Arno Egon Gressler (Dental Design - Caxias do 2. Grippo JO (2012) Biocorrosion vs. erosion: The 21st
Sul, Brazil) for the diagnostic wax-up. This work was century and a time to change. Compendium of Continuing
supported by grant E-26/112.046/2012 from FAPERJ (Carlos Education in Dentistry 33(2) e33-e37.
Chagas Filho Foundation for the Support of Research in the
State of Rio de Janeiro). 3. Lussi A, Hellwig E, Ganss C, & Jaeggi T (2009) Buonocore
memorial lecture. Dental erosion Operative Dentistry
Regulatory Statement 34(3) 251-262.
This study was conducted in accordance with all the 4. Barron RP, Carmichael RP, Marcon MA, & Sàndor GK
provisions of the local human subjects oversight committee
(2003) Dental erosion in gastroesophageal reflux disease
guidelines and policies of the Universidade Federal do Rio de
Janeiro. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 69(2) 84-89.
5. Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, & Magne P (2011)
Conflict of Interest Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and
The authors of this article certify that they have no ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental
proprietary, financial, or other personal interest of any nature erosion Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 105(4) 217-226.
Operative Dentistry
6. Magne P, Stanley K, & Schlichting LH (2012) Modeling of veneers: A clinical report Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
ultrathin occlusal veneers Dental Materials 28(7) 116(4) 474-482.
777-782.
17. Magne P, Magne M, & Belser UC (2007) Adhesive
7. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, & restorations, centric relation, and the Dahl principle:
Spiekermann H (2001) Fracture resistance of lithium Minimally invasive approaches to localized anterior tooth
disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia based three-unit fixed erosion European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 2(3)
partial dentures: A laboratory study International Jour- 260-273.
nal of Prosthodontics 14(3) 231-238.
18. Vailati F, & Belser UC (2011) Palatal and facial veneers
8. Beuer F, Schweiger J, & Edelhoff D (2008) Digital to treat severe dental erosion: A case report following the
dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/ three-step technique and the sandwich approach Europe-
CAM generated restorations British Dental Journal an Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 6(3) 268-278.
204(9) 505-511.
19. Abduo J (2012) Safety of increasing vertical dimension of
9. Leinfelder KF (2001) Ask the expert. Will ceramic occlusion: A systematic review Quintessence Internation-
restorations be challenged in the future? Journal of the al 43(5) 369-379.
American Dental Association 132(1) 46-47.
20. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF, & Giudici R.
10. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, & Hickel R (2004) (2006) Polymerization kinetics of pre-heated composite
Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical Journal of Dental Research 85(1) 38-43.
survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior
teeth of the permanent dentition Operative Dentistry 21. Wilson PR (1996) Low force cementation Journal of
29(5) 481-508. Dentistry 24(4) 269-273.
11. Leinfelder KF (2005) Indirect posterior composite resins 22. Krämer N, & Frankenberger R. (2000) Leucite-reinforced
Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 26(7) glass ceramic inlays after six years: Wear of luting
495-503. composites Operative Dentistry 25(6) 466-472.
12. Spreafico RC, Krejci I, & Dietschi D (2005) Clinical 23. Schulte AG, Vöckler A, & Reinhardt R. (2005) Longevity
performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-
and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in curing composite resin Journal of Dentistry 33(5)
vivo Journal of Dentistry 33(6) 499-507. 433-442.
13. Magne P, & Douglas WH (1999) Porcelain veneers: 24. Krämer N, & Frankenberger R. (2005) Clinical perfor-
Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of mance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays
the crown International Journal of Prosthodontics 12(2) and onlays after eight years Dental Materials 21(3)
111-121. 262-271.
14. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, & Davidson C (2002) 25. Goldberg J, Güth JF, & Magne P. (2016) Accelerated
Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations Fatigue Resistance of Thick CAD/CAM Composite Resin
after immediate or delayed composite placement Journal Overlays Bonded with Light- and Dual-polymerizing
of Dentistry 30(5-6) 259-269. Luting Resins Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 18(4) 341-348.
15. Magne P (2005) Immediate dentin sealing: A fundamen- 26. Lee JH, Um CM, & Lee IB (2006) Rheological properties
tal procedure for indirect bonded restorations Journal of of resin composites according to variations in monomer
Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 17(3) 144-154. and filler composition Dental Materials 22(6) 515-526.
16. Schlichting LH, Resende TH, Reis KR, & Magne P (2016) 27. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF, & Giudici R.
Treatment of severe dental erosion with ultra-thin CAD/ (2006) Polymerization kinetics of pre-heated composite
CAM composite occlusal veneers and anterior bilaminar Journal of Dental Research 85(1) 38-43.