1 - Mis770 Assignment Two 2015
1 - Mis770 Assignment Two 2015
1 - Mis770 Assignment Two 2015
Particulars:
• Due: Week 9, 11:59 pm, Friday 18th September, 2015
• Marks: 20%
• Submission: Online, to your individual/group assignment dropbox in CloudDeakin
• This assignment may be completed individually
Assignment Overview
The purpose of this assignment is to utilise the knowledge learned in Module Two to
investigate a dataset that will enable you to draw conclusions from the data and assist you in
your decision making. You will also draw on information/techniques covered in Module One.
The assignment requires you to analyse a given dataset, interpret them, and then draw
conclusions such that you are able to reply to specific questions being asked of you.
(These questions are asked in the attached memorandum.)
The data relate to a random sample of 120 houses sold in the (fictitious) Melbourne City of
Kingfisherbay and are to be used to assess the underlying factors associated with variation in house
prices, rental costs and returns. Note: All data, reports, people and scenarios in this assignments
are either fictitious or have been modified from their original state.
The assignment may be completed individually.
• provide you with some examples of the application of data analysis and statistics within
an organisation,
• test your understanding of the material in the relevant topics,
• enable you to demonstrate your ability to use Excel to analyse statistical data,
• test your ability to analyse and interpret your results, and
• test your ability to effectively communicate the results of your analysis to others.
Before tackling an assignment, make sure you have prepared yourself well. As a minimum, read
the relevant sections of the prescribed text.
You play the role of Kim Williams who is the Manager of the Research and Analysis section at the Real
Estate Institute of Victoria (REIV). Your role includes analysing a variety of housing data including house
prices, affordability, investment returns, rental availability and rental returns. You are often required to
report outcomes of your analysis to senior managers at the Institute who have little or no knowledge of
data analysis.
Of specific interest to the REIV is the increasing house prices in Melbourne and potentially what this will
mean for buyers yet to enter the market. A recent analysis, which received publicity in the media,
showed that there were more Melbourne suburbs with a median house price of over $1 million, with
this trend only set to continue as evidenced from recent auction and private sales figures (refer to the
documents million dollar suburbs.pdf and buyers smash records.pdf – sourced from the Melbourne’s
Herald Sun).
Just recently you have been working on a pilot survey from the City of Kingfisherbay concerning house
prices, rental costs and returns, as well as other related data.
In light of the above, the REIV is very interested to see where the City of Kingfisherbay, and more
specifically its suburbs are at when it comes to house prices and affordability. Kerry Tan, Director of the
Housing Affordability Division at the Real Estate Institute has written to you regarding the
Kingfisherbay housing survey. Her memo to you is reproduced below:
From: Kerry Tan, Director, Housing Affordability Division, Real Estate Institute
Dear Kim,
You will have seen the recent media articles about how Melbourne’s house prices are increasing and how
more Melbourne suburbs now have a median house price of over $1 million. I am concerned about the
direct effect this will have on housing affordability in Melbourne, especially for buyers yet to enter the
market. I know that you recently undertook a survey of house sales in the City of Kingfisherbay.
I would be very interested to find out what the housing prices are like in the City of Kingfisherbay and
more specifically within its suburbs.
It is generally claimed that Kingfisherbay is more expensive than other bay side
areas. Can you check if this claim is true for Kingfisherbay overall?
Also, can you please check this claim for each of the three suburbs in Kingfisherbay?
Submission
Your submission will comprise of ONE document (a Microsoft WORD file). If you submit
multiple documents, you will be penalised. To get the Microsoft Excel output into Microsoft
Word, you need to copy your relevant analysis output and paste it with the paste special
option (paste as a picture).
Your submission document should contain the following information in exactly the
order indicated:
1) the written memorandum, comprising of no more than two pages, then after this, in
a section titled APPENDIX
2) your analysis (output that you have copied into your Word document from
Microsoft Excel), which will be no more than 10 pages of output.
Materials
0 – < 4.5 Marks 4.5 – < 5.4 Marks 5.4 – < 6.3 Marks 6.3 – < 7.2 Marks 7.2 – 9.0 Marks
Memorandum
(Marks: 9) Does not Interpretation and Explains most of Provides detailed Provides an
communicate any communication of the main findings and accurate outstanding
of the main findings is at a of the analysis descriptions of the descriptions and
findings of the basic level or does accurately and most important conclusions that is
analysis in an not adequately enables reader to features of the carefully
accurate or useful explain the main draw some analysis along with considered and
way. findings of the reasonable appropriately insightful.
analysis. conclusions. qualified
conclusions.
0 – < 4.5 Marks 4.5 – < 5.4 Marks 5.4 – < 6.3 Marks 6.3 – < 7.2 Marks 7.2 – 9.0 Marks
Overall Assignment
Presentation A very poor The analysis is The presentation of The analysis is well An exemplary
(Marks: 2) presentation of the poorly presented the analysis is organised and presentation of the
analysis. or mostly satisfactory. follows principles analysis.
disorganised. of good graphical
display.
The memorandum The memorandum The memorandum The memorandum The memorandum
is un-professional, is difficult to follow is clear and easy to is professional, is truly
difficult to follow and/or contains follow but it easy to follow with professional, logical
and/or contains some spelling or contains minor good structure and easy to follow
numerous spelling grammatical errors spelling or
or grammatical grammatical errors
errors
0 – 0.9 Marks 1.0 – 1.19 Marks 1.2 – 1.39 Marks 1.4 – 1.59 Marks 1.6 – 2.0 Marks