Teachers Rights and Responsibilities

Teachers' Rights and Responsibilities
Alyssa Hanzel
CSN-EDU 210
Teachers' Rights and Responsibilities
"Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom - and no such thing as
public liberty without freedom of speech." -Benjamin Franklin. As our First Amendment,
Freedom of Speech allows us the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.
Should there be a limit on how far we take that freedom? Freddie Watts, an African-American
principal, believes there should be. Mr. Watts and another administrator, Jimmy Brothers, had a
very heated conversation with Ann Griffin. Mrs. Griffin, a white tenure teacher, exclaimed that
she "hated all black folks". As two African-American Administrators in a pre dominantly black
school, Mrs. Griffin's statements raises major red flags. Will she be able to treat students fairly
without judgment? Based on these concerns, dismissal has been recommended.
Pro Support
In MCALLISTER v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Findlaw, 2013),
McAllister attended a rally for the movement known as "Occupy Los Angeles". The following
statement was made by McAllister during a television interview, "I think that Zionist Jews who
are running these big banks and our Federal Reserve, which are not run by the federal
government, they need to be run out of this country". News travelled fast of this statement, which
urged people to call LAUSD, requesting for her dismissal. Although they do recognize freedom
of speech as a law, McAllister's words do not fall under protected speech. McAllister was
terminated and later appealed the final judgment. Judgment was affirmed. McAllister's case
parallels Griffin's case in which remarks were made about another group of people. These
remarks fall under the terms of hate speech. Hate speech is when a person attacks a person or
group based on as race, religion, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, disability, or gender.
Another case where First Amendment was called into play is LOEFFELMAN v. BOARD
OF EDUCATION OF THE CRYSTAL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (Findlaw, 2004). In 2002,
Jendra Loeffelman had a series of questions asked by students. Student O.W. asked if Mrs.
Loeffelman was for interracial relationships. Loeffelman's response was "I'm totally against it"
and continued by stating that "mixed children" are "dirty". Loeffelman, a tenure teacher, like
Ann Griffin, was fired and argued that her comments were protected by the First Amendment.
Appeal was denied and judgment was affirmed.
In Chapter Three, Teachers' Rights, of School Law for Teachers by Julie Underwood and
L. Dean Webb, Protected and Disruptive Speech are discussed (pgs. 48, 49). Ann Griffin's
statements are not protected speech according to the following passage, "The Court further held
that unless the public expression undermines the effectiveness of the working relationship
between the teacher and the teacher's superior or coworkers, the teacher's ability to perform
assigned duties, or the orderly operation of the schools, such expression may not furnish grounds
for reprisal" (Underwood, Webb pg. 48). Unfortunately for Griffin, her words display
discrimination and they affect not only her coworkers, but students at the pre dominantly black
school and are grounds for reprisal.
Con Support
In Chapter Two, Employment and Tenure, of School Law for Teachers by Julie
Underwood and L. Dean Webb, goes on to explain how tenure is awarded and the benefits to
follow. "Once a teacher is granted tenure the teacher is said to have a "property right" to
continued employment, which cannot be taken away without due process" (Underwood, Webb
pg. 36). The statement made by Ann Griffin was a personal opinion that does not reflect onto her
students. As a tenure teacher, she has been awarded an indefinite contract. In a similar case in the
Fairfax County school system, tenure teacher Violet Nichols was let go with insufficient
evidence (Brown, 2012).
Nichols was fired from the school based on observations made in the class and having a
more "old school" approach. Based on the evidence provided though, "Nichols's students scored
no differently on state tests than other sixth-graders at Rose Hill" (Brown, 2012). Students
parents testified as well stating things she was accused of were just not true. In the end, Fairfax
County school system dropped its effort to fire Violet Nichols and she is to return to teaching.
In 1968, the PICKERING v. BOARD OF EDUCATION case discusses a teachers' freedom
of speech and how it is protected (Underwood, Webb pg. 48). Pickering wrote a letter to the local
newspaper criticizing how school funds were being handled. After being dismissed by the
school, the case was taken by the United States Supreme Court. The court then overturned his
dismissal. As a citizen, teachers have the right to make critical public comments."Pickering's
statements were not directed at the people he normally worked with, nor that there was any
disruption to the operation of the schools" (Underwood, Webb pg. 49). As the case goes for Ann
Griffin, her alleged statements were not involved in the classroom nor does it affect her teaching
skills. We are unaware of the context of her statement, the heated argument, or why it was leaked
to begin with.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I am pro support of the schools decision to dismiss Ann Griffin. I strongly
believe schools should have a zero tolerance of discrimination of any kind. If this were to be able
actual court case, I believe the court would agree with the schools decision as well. Griffin's
comments show that she could clearly have clouded judgment when working with students of
color. Tenure has no place in being a saving grace for those who do wrong like this scenario. The
case with Loeffelman really made my decision set in stone. Knowing if Griffin were to make
those remarks to coworkers, it would be only a matter of time until it was reflected onto the
children like Loeffelman did. Children are our future and should be protected in any way
possible. As someone who has personally been verbally abused in high school by a teacher who
had tenure, I would like to see tenure to have stricter guidelines and harder to get.
References
Brown, Emma (2012). Teacher Tenure: a Fairfax schools firing case. The Washington Post.
CaseLaw/Findlaw (2004). Loeffel v. Board of Education of the Crystal City School District.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/mo-court-of-appeals/1109760.html
CaseLaw/FindLaw (2013). McAllister v. Los Angeles Unified School District.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1633454.html
Underwood, Julie & Webb, L. Dean (2006). School Law for Teachers. Pearson Merrill Prentice
Hall, pgs 36, 48,49

Teachers Rights and Responsibilities

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Teachers Rights and Responsibilities

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Teachers Rights and Responsibilities

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Teachers' Rights and Responsibilities

without judgment? Based on these concerns, dismissal has been recommended.

In MCALLISTER v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Findlaw, 2013),

OF EDUCATION OF THE CRYSTAL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT (Findlaw, 2004). In 2002,

Appeal was denied and judgment was affirmed.

school and are grounds for reprisal.

evidence (Brown, 2012).

In 1968, the PICKERING v. BOARD OF EDUCATION case discusses a teachers' freedom

CaseLaw/FindLaw (2013). McAllister v. Los Angeles Unified School District.

Hall, pgs 36, 48,49

You might also like