Students' Rights and Responsibilities

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Students’ Rights and Responsibilities 1

Students’ Rights and Responsibilities

Kelsey Crouch

College of Southern Nevada


Students’ Rights and Responsibilities 2

Introduction

A high school in the northeastern United States commenced a new dress code rule

banning anything gang affiliated (jewelry, emblems, earrings, and athletic caps, etc). The rule

was set in place due to the high gang activity happening in the schools. A student by the name of

Bill Foster, who was not involved with any of these groups, decided to wear an earring because

he thought it would be attractive to the ladies. After doing so, he was suspended for breaking a

school rule. Unpleased with this act, he filed a suit.

A Violation of Freedom Rights? Yes.

In December 1965, a group of students in Des Moines planed a public showing of their

support for a truce in the Vietnam War. They decided to wear black armbands throughout the

holiday season and to fast on December 16 and New Year's Eve. The principal of the Des

Moines school learned of the plan and met to create a policy that stated that any student wearing

an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension. A few

students wore their armbands to school and were sent home. The students did not return to

school until after New Year's Day, the planned end of the protest. In 1969 the United States

Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that

students' free rights should be protected and said, "Students don't shed their constitutional rights

at the school house gates." (Tinker v. Des Moines) In the case concerning Bill Foster, I believe

the same statement is true. The first amendment applies to students as well. According to this

case, the court would probably rule with Foster.

In a case in 2000, a fifteen- year-old student who had been diagnosed with gender

identity disorder, Doe, (referred to in the case as Doe) had to be inspected by his principal daily
Students’ Rights and Responsibilities 3

because his outfit choices were considered unacceptable to wear to school. If not dressed

appropriately, he would be sent home. Doe is biologically male but, as a result of the gender

identity disorder, has a female gender identity and prefers to be referred to as a female. “The

Superior Court decision confirms that a school may not exert its authority over a student simply

to enforce stereotyped ideas of how boys and girls should look, a ruling that has significant

impact for all gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students.” ( Doe v. Yunits) Foster was also

trying to express himself. It was not out of violence or hatred but rather a way to express himself

as an individual.

A Violation of Freedom Rights? No.

Students in a journalism class at Hazelwood East High School were in charge of writing

articles for the school paper, The Spectrum. Two of the articles submitted for publication in the

final edition of the paper contained stories on divorce and teenage pregnancy. The school

principal felt that the subjects of these two articles were inappropriate. As a result, he prohibited

these articles from being published in the paper. The students were upset and went to courts.

Both the circuit court and the Supreme Court felt that this was not an act against the first

amendment. In the Bill Foster case, if the school could find enough evidence that Foster wearing

an earring was considered inappropriate, than I could see how the courts could use this case to

help rule with the school. Although it was not symbolizing divorce or pregnancy, wearing the

earring could give an impression to other students that gang affiliation was accepted.

In another dress code case, a high school student came to school wearing a Marilyn

Manson t-shirt. The shirt depicted a three-faced Jesus, bearing the words "See No Truth. Hear

No Truth. Speak No Truth." On the back, the shirt contained the word "BELIEVE" with the
Students’ Rights and Responsibilities 4

letters "LIE" highlighted. The school told the student that the t-shirt was against the school’s

dress code, which prohibited "clothing with offensive illustrations." The school gave him a

choice to change or go home. He went home and then returned to school the next day in another

similar shirt. Consequently, he was suspended. In the ruling of the court, “in a 2-1 vote, a Sixth

Circuit panel ruled that school officials may prohibit students from wearing clothing that is

vulgar or offensive.” (First Amendment Schools) If other students found his earring as offensive,

Foster would have no case. It is clear that schools have the right to prohibit things that are

considered offensive or vulgar; as well if they found his earring to be potential dangerous

because it was so highly affiliated with gangs in the area.

Conclusion

In my personal opinion, with the facts that were presented, I believe that the high school

violated Bill Foster’s first amendment right. As I stated earlier in the Doe v. Yunits case, it was

not out of violence or hatred but rather a way to express himself as an individual. I stand with the

Tinker v. Des Moines case; students don't shed their constitutional rights at the school house

gates. Especially if he wasn’t even affiliated with any gangs, I believe he should not have been

suspended.
Students’ Rights and Responsibilities 5

References:

Doe v. Yunits. (n.d.). Retrieved February 19, 2016, from http://www.glad.org/work/cases/pat-

doe-v-yunits/

Facts and Case Summary - Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. (n.d.). Retrieved February 19, 2016, from

http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-

hazelwood-v-kuhlmeier

First Amendment Schools: The Five Freedoms - Court Case. (n.d.). Retrieved February 19, 2016,

from http://www.firstamendmentschools.org/freedoms/case.aspx?id=1685

Tinker v. Des Moines. (n.d.). Retrieved February 18, 2016, from

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1968/21

Underwood, J., & Webb, L. D. (2006). School law for teachers: Concepts and applications.

Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

You might also like