Footing 1

FOOTiNG
Foundations
SOFiSTiK | 2020
FOOTiNG
Foundations
FOOTiNG Manual, Service Pack 2020-6 Build 289
Copyright © 2020 by SOFiSTiK AG, Oberschleissheim, Germany.
SOFiSTiK AG
HQ Oberschleissheim Office Nuremberg

Bruckmannring 38 Flataustraße 14
85764 Oberschleissheim 90411 Nuremberg
Germany Germany
T +49 (0)89 315878-0 T +49 (0)911 39901-0

F +49 (0)89 315878-23 F +49(0)911 397904
[email protected]
www.sofistik.com
This manual is protected by copyright laws. No part of it may be translated, copied or reproduced, in any form or by
any means, without written permission from SOFiSTiK AG. SOFiSTiK reserves the right to modify or to release
new editions of this manual.
The manual and the program have been thoroughly checked for errors. However, SOFiSTiK does not claim that
either one is completely error free. Errors and omissions are corrected as soon as they are detected.
The user of the program is solely responsible for the applications. We strongly encourage the user to test the
correctness of all calculations at least by random sampling.
Front Cover
Project: Queensferry Crossing | Photo: Bastian Kratzke
Contents | FOOTiNG
Contents
Contents i
1 Task Description 1-1
2 Input tabs 2-1

2.1 System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
2.2 Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3
2.3 Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4
2.4 Sleeve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5
2.5 Soil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6
2.6 Design conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8
2.7 Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9
2.8 Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10
3 Methods of Analysis 3-1
4 Definitions 4-1
5 Input Description 5-1

5.1 Input Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
5.2 Input Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
5.3 POS – Position Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
5.4 CTRL – Control of the Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
5.5 MATF – Material Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
5.6 ACT – Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9
5.7 TAB – Soil Pressure according to Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-10
5.8 BESI – Safety factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-11
5.9 GEOM – Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-13
5.10 SLEE – Sleeve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-17
5.11 COLU – Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-19
5.12 LC – LF - Characteristic Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-21
5.13 LOAD – Design Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-23
5.14 BEW – Reinforcement Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-25
5.15 KN – Selection Support Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-26
5.16 ECHO – Output Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-28
5.17 SPT – Structural point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-30
6 Output Description 6-1

6.1 Position Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.2 System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.2.1 Column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
6.2.2 Stat. Heights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
SOFiSTiK 2020 i
FOOTiNG | Contents
6.2.3 sleeve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1

6.2.4 Moment-V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
6.3 Permissible Soil Pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
6.4 Soil Pressure/Buckling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
6.5 Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
6.6 Sleeve Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
ii SOFiSTiK 2020
Task Description | FOOTiNG
1 Task Description
The SSD task FOOTiNG determined either for given loads the necessary foundation measure-
ments or he leads at predetermined foundation measurements necessary evidence through.
Loads than vertical forces, moments and horizontal forces are taken into account. The design
combinations required are automatically formed. Additional stresses second order theory can
be considered.
The foundations for a bending design, a push or a tax punching shear are performed. It can be
single and strip foundations are processed. When the footings of a quiver can be arranged.
There is also the opportunity to take on the expense of a Auflagerknoten SOFiSTiK from a
database (eg from the support task COLUMN).
The data entered in a graphically interactive working environment within the SSD
(SOFiSTiK Structural Desktop).
The program FOOT determines the necessary foundation dimensions in dependence on the
defined loads and permissible soil pressure. The permissible soil pressures can be preset
or determined from the tables 1 - 6 according to DIN 1054:2010-12 or from self-defined ta-
bles. Axial forces, moments and lateral forces in both directions are allowed as permanent
and imposed loads. A bending design and a punching checks is done by the program for the
foundation. Isolated foundation and strip foundation can be calculated here. For isolated foun-
dations it is possible to defined a sleeve. Additional moments according to second-order theory
and loads acting on sleeve are allowed for the design . If desired, a picture of the determined
foundation including loads can be output.
2
Figure 1.1
SOFiSTiK 2020 1-1

FOOTiNG | Task Description
1-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

Input tabs | FOOTiNG
2 Input tabs
2.1 System
In the tab System general information about the foundation are set, for example position title
and the selection of materials for concrete and steel and all information for control of the proofs
and calculation.
Figure 2.1
In the section ”General” the following control options are available:
• Rounding foundation: Rounding value for the automatic determination of foundation

size (default 0.05 m)
• Critical cut: Distance of the critical perimeter for the punching shear. With the default
setting ”iterative” the program automatically calculates the worst punching cone. For
special situations or comparative calculations, alternatively a factor can be entered (e.g.
1.4*d).
• Reinforcement: Average longitudinal reinforcement level ρ in [%] within the circular cut
1.5d. With the default setting 0.0 [%] the level of the reinforcement in round cut 1.5d is
determined from the calculated reinforcement.
• Load raise factor: The load raise factor β takes into account the effect of moments in
the loaded area. For special situations or comparative analyzes alternatively here can
be entered a factor.
Default: If no moments exist, the program sets β=1.1 as a minimum, otherwise the load
raise factor β is determined according to the German "Heft 600".
• Design section: Here the location for the dimensioning cut (bending design foundation)
SOFiSTiK 2020 2-1

FOOTiNG | Input tabs
is specified. The following design sections are available:

◦ edge of column
◦ mid of column
◦ mid of column smoothed
◦ mid of sleeves flank
◦ edge of sleeve
In section ”Proof” the desired proofs for soil according to DIN EN 1997-1 are selected. The
selected proofs are executed and transferred to the result. The extend of output is controlled
in the tab ”Output”.
In the section ”Design” the required proofs for the reinforced concrete according to DIN EN
1992-1-1: 2013-04 are selected. In particular, a punching check can be enforced, even if the
shear check will be decisive.
2-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

2.2 Geometry
In the tab ”Geometry” the type of foundation and its dimensions are set, as well as the axis
distance for the reinforcement design.
Figure 2.2
Predefined dimensions of the foundation can be set using the lock-symbol. In case one of the
ground proof is not successfully complied and both lock-symbols are opened, the correspond-
ing foundation widths are increased, holding the given proportion bx/by.
SOFiSTiK 2020 2-3

2.3 Column
All information related to a columnn connected to the coundation is located in the tab
”Column”. The dimensions and materials are taken automatically when it is possible.
Figure 2.3
Eccentricity
In case an eccentric column, there are two possibilities to control the automatic increase of the
foundation dimensions.
• Based on Foundation edge:

The values of e and ey will be measured from the outer foundation edge and mantained
during the calculation. A positive value refers to the right side, a negative one to the left
side.
• Based on Foundation center:
The values of e and ey will be relative to the center of the foundation. A positive value
of e displace the column in positive x-direction.
2-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

2.4 Sleeve
All information related to the geometry of a sleeve foundation is located in the tab ”Sleeve”.
The tab is disabled for foundations without sleeve.
Figure 2.4
SOFiSTiK 2020 2-5

2.5 Soil
In tab ”Subsoil” all values related to the soil are set.
Figure 2.5
Bore Profile:
• In a combo box you can select a soil profile, which has been previously defined in the
task ”Bore profile”.
Soil Pressure:
• The design values of soil resistance can be selected from the Tables A6.1 - A6.8 (DIN
1054:2010-12).
• A user defined table is also allowed.
• A permissible soil resistance can be defined instead of a table (default 210 [kN/m2 ]).
Soil layers:
• Several soil layer can be taken into account, they are represented in the corresponding
graphic.
• The location of the ground water level will be considered.
Foundation Surcharge:
A uniform additional load can be defined for the foundation.
• Permanent: The load will be consider as permanent for the soil verification.
• Variable: every soil verification will be performed once with the variable load and once
2-6 SOFiSTiK 2020

without it.
SOFiSTiK 2020 2-7

2.6 Design conditions

The security factors for load Actions and soil proofs are set in this tab. The predefined values
are assigned according to the Design Code and usually they should not be changed.
Figure 2.6
The values will be assigned automatically to the Actions table.
2-8 SOFiSTiK 2020

2.7 Loads
In tab ”Loads” take place the load input, which can be set manually or automatically from the
corresponding reactions stored in the database(CDB). Additional influences for Second Order
Theory (ΔM, ΔH) can be agregated to the table. These will be consided for the determination
of the load conbinations.
Figure 2.7
The next input options are available:
• For a pure FOOTiNG-Project the selection of Nodes is not allowed.

Some default Load Cases are already included (G,Q,S,W), the corresponding loads
will be manually inserted. Additional Actions and Load Cases will be added in the
Load Case Manager. With the Button ”Create” the MAXIMA-Engine will be started to
define the relevant Load Combinations for each verification and the will be shown the
respective table.
• The loads can be taken over the Program COLUMN selecting the corresponding Node.
The support reactions will be taken from the Database (CDB) and the Load Combina-
tions for the different proofs will be generated with help of the Superposition Program
MAXIMA. Additional influences for Second Order Analisys (ΔM, ΔH) can be included in
the table.
• The loads can be assigned through Node selection also in case of a general 3D Sys-
tem.
The support reactions will be taken from the Database (CDB) and the Load Combina-
tions for the selected Nodes will be generated automatically. When several Nodes are
selected, they will share the same Mark and a common Foundation will be determinated
for those Nodes.
SOFiSTiK 2020 2-9

2.8 Output
In tab ”Output” the results output is configurated.
Figure 2.8
The standard results output is short and clear. The most relevant Load Combinations and
proofs are included by default.
Specially for bearing failure verification, there are additional output options and graphics to
improve the understanding of the results.
All Load Combinations used during the calculation can be printed out.
2-10 SOFiSTiK 2020

Methods of Analysis | FOOTiNG
3 Methods of Analysis
The determination of the minimum foundation dimensions is don according to DIN EN 1997-
1:2009-09 / DIN 1054:2010-12. An opening of the ground joint is not allowed for permanent
loads.
The maximum permissible foundation dimensions are 21 m in all directions. They are rounded
to a integral multiples of a rounding off value.
The permissible soil pressures can be input or they can be determined with an interpolation by
the program from the tables A6.1-A6.8 DIN 1054:2010-12. Another possibility is to use a table
which is input by the user. Different combinations of internal forces and moments can be
defined for a foundation.
In addition it is possible to taken over combinations of internal forces and moments from the
SOFiSTiK database. The necessary foundation dimensions are determined then for these
combinations in dependence on the available soil pressure.
At the end the bending design and the shear check are done for all combinations. The design
occurs according to DIN EN 1992-1-1:2013-04. A design cut is divided in eight sections. A
corresponding part of the total moment is allocated to every section according to table 2.10
Heft 240 DAfStb. The distribution may be asymmetrical in case of foundation which is loaded
eccentrically. The punching check for EC 2 according to the relevant design code.
Several load cases which include axial forces, moments about the X and Y axis and lateral
forces in X and Y direction as permanent and imposed load can be considered for a foundation.
The largest necessary foundation dimensions result from one of these load cases. These
dimensions are used for the bending design and the punching check for all other load cases.
For the check of the permissible soil pressures the stress are calculated for the moment loading
about the X and Y axis. On the other hand only the in each case corresponding moment acts
unaxial for the determination of the design moments. It is calculated in dependence on the
input at the column section, in column centre, at the sleeve edge for sleeve foundations or in
SOFiSTiK 2020 3-1

FOOTiNG | Methods of Analysis
the centre of the sleeve wall.
d
M
N dk Wall 6M
Ho = 5 6
t + 5H
H t
6
Rough Ho
t
z= 5
6t
H
M
H = 6 1
5 t + 5H
b
Figure 3.1
d
M
N dk Wall 3M 5
Ho = 2 t + 4H
H
≈ 6t
Ho
2
z≈ 3 t
t
H
M
H = 3 1
2 t + 4H
Figure 3.2
3-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

Methods of Analysis | FOOTiNG
NEd
MEd
VEd
Fs
a z
Fc
dw
Wall
T2
T3
t
T1
C1
T4

Figure 3.3
SOFiSTiK 2020 3-3

FOOTiNG | Methods of Analysis
3-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

Definitions | FOOTiNG
4 Definitions
The indications are described in Heft 240 DAfStb page 25-27. A coordinate system in clockwise
direction is preset for the load definition. The positive Z axis shows in direction of the axial
forces.
A system values, like foundation sides, column sides, foundation thickness and static heights
are specified in cm. The loads have to be input in the SI system in kN and m and the stresses
in kN/m2 .
The control of the determination of the foundation size is activated via a definition of the foun-
dation sides.
The application point of the loads lies in the origin of the local coordinate system for the foun-
dation. The origin of the Z axis lies at the upper edge of foundation, for sleeve foundations at
the upper edge of the sleeve.
SOFiSTiK 2020 4-1

FOOTiNG | Definitions
4-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

Input Description | FOOTiNG
5 Input Description
5.1 Input Language

The input occurs in a free format with the CADINP input language (see the general manual
SOFiSTiK: ’Basics’).
Three categories of units are distinguished:
mm Fixed unit. Input is always required in the specified unit.
[mm] Explicit unit. Input defaults to the specified unit. Alternatively, an explicit as-
signment of a related unit is possible (eg. 2.5[m] ).
[mm] 1011 Implicit unit. Implicit units are categorised semantically and denoted by a cor-
responding identity number (shown in green). Valid categories referring to the
unit ”length” are, for example, geodetic elevation, section length and thickness.
The default unit for each category is defined by the currently active (design code
specific) unit set. This input default can be overridden as described above. The
specified unit in square brackets corresponds to the default for unit set 5 (Eu-
rocodes, NORM UNIT 5).
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-1

FOOTiNG | Input Description
5.2 Input Records

The following records are defined:
Record Items
POS Position Description
CTRL OPT VAL
MATF FUND STEE COLU PROF
ACT TYPE GAMF GAMU PSI0 PSI1 PSI2 TIT
TAB T
BESI LF GAMG GAMQ LAGU LAGF WIGR WIGL
GEOM TYP BX BY HI HA D1X D1Y
NBEM CFUN
SLEE HSWO HSWI WXWU WYWU WXGU WXWL TYPE
KOEB SCOV
COLU QA CX CY D1 DU AS ASV
EX EY EZ EOPT
SPT NO X Y Z NX NY NZ
SX SY SZ GUID
LC NO TYPE V MY MX HX HY
DMY DMX DHX DHY TIT
LOAD NO TYPE V MY MX HX HY
ZUGV TIT
KN NO POS GEO BX BY WI REP
TIT
BEW SDUX SDUY DMIN DMAX CMIN CMAX DUST
KOEV KOEH KOAV KOAH
ECHO OPT1 VAL
The records HEAD and END are described in the general manual SOFiSTiK: ’Basics’.
5-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.3 POS – Position Description
POS
Item Description Unit Default
LIT32 −
With POS the position gets a description.
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-3

5.4 CTRL – Control of the Calculation
CTRL
OPT SAVE Save design results in the CDB. LT NEIN

IMPO Import system data to CDB. LT NEIN
DMII assume delta-moments and delta-forces − YES
BEM the bending design are enforced − NO
FKDU Factor for punching cone − 2.36
KLAF gapping for mid 2/3 − YES
EGZ include dead load and extra load − YES
BETR Angle for round cut − 1.5
FVSD Coefficient moments − 0
BEWR Reinforcement ration ρ % 0
SYMB Arrange symmetric reinforcement LT -
TOT complete reinf.
LFDM continuous meter
BGRZ limit of footing size m 21
AM1 minimum reinforcement for bending LT NO
BRND rounding for the reinforcement cm 0.5
SCHU Shear design LT JA
RUND Rounding foundation cm 5
REIB Friction angle degree 25
KBEM Determinate reinforcement for each Node LT NO
STEP Reinforcement distribution T8, T3 or T1 LT T8
DRSW Punching Bars Angle Grd 45
ROEN Reinforcement ratio of punching cone − 1
1 = additional reinf. in the round cut
c+2*3.0d (DIN EN 1992-1-1 6.4.4.(1))
0 = additional reinf. in the critical round cut
VAL Input of the value ∗
SAVE
YES Save design results in the Database (CDB).
5-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

IMPO
YES Import system data to Database (CDB). Note that no calculations are perform when
this option is set.
DMII
YES If Delta-values are given for characteristic loads, they will be added to the respective
component and subsequently combined.
NO ignore Delta-values even if they are given for characteristic loads.
BEM
YES Force creation of bending reinforcement, even if it is not required because of geomet-
ric reasons.
da = d / ((bx-cx)/2.) > 1
KLAF
YES For 2. Core Value gapping is allowed.
NO 2. Core Value should not gape.
EGZ
YES Consider self-weight and additional loads.
NO No self-weight neither additional loads.
BETR
1.5 Angle for round cut can be set as 1.5d or 1.0d.
These correspond to an angle of 33.7 or 45 degrees respectively.
For DIN EN 1992-1-1:2013-04 the value will be set as 0. The program calculates the
most unfavorable punching cone. Use this value to proof distinct calculation results.
FVSD
With CTRL FVSD Val it is possible to define the coefficient for the consideration of
moment effects in the load area.
DIN EN 1992-1-1:2013-04
1.10 Inner columns
1.4 Edge columns
1.5 Corner columns
– The program uses 1.1, if moments do not act or a factor is calculated from the mo-
ments.
BEWR
value The mean longitudinal reinforcement ratio ρ should be calculated as mean values
taking into account a slab width equal to the column width plus 3d each side.
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-5

0 The reinforcement ratio as mean values taking into account a slab width equal to the
column width plus 3d each side is calculated from the determined reinforcement.
VED The longitudinal reinforcement is increased, to avoid a shear respectively a punching
reinforcement.
SYMB
With CTRL SYMB TOT or LFDM symmetric reinforcement can be configured. The
maximum reinforcement value will be used for both directions. With TOT the total
reinforcement will be used and with LFDM the running lengt applied.
BGRZ
The size of Foundation is limited to 21 [m]. With CTRL BGRZ Val (Val = max. [cm] )
this limitation can be modified.
AM1
With CTRL AM1 YES the minimum reinforcement for bending is defined.
BRND
Rounding for the bending reinforcement distribution.
SCHU
YES Force Shear reinforcement.
NO Shear reinforcement suppresed.
RUND
Increment to determinate Foundation size
(Default.: 5 cm)
REIB
Friction angle for the slide verification (Voreinst.: 25 Grad)
KBEM
Determinate reinforcement for each Node.
Several nodes can be given to perform the design, the size of the Foundation will be
determinated useing the forces of all nodes. Use KBEM to determinate the bend-
ing and shear reinforcement for the maximum load effect or for each node and its
respective loads.
STEP
Distribution of bending reinforcement
T8 divide in 8 sections
T3 divide in 3 sections
T1 constant section
5-6 SOFiSTiK 2020

DRSW
For the calculation of the horizontal Sleeve reinforcement, is assumed that the forces
of the column rebar are tranfered to the vertical Stirrups of the Sleeve. These forces
are directed, by mean of punching rebar, to the horizontal Stirrups. The punching
rebar angle q depends on the Sleeve roughness and lap length.
(Angle q ≤45˚)
ROEN
1 The reinforcement of bending shall be calculated in general accordance with DIN EN
1992-1-1, 6.4.4 (1) in the region of the column plus 3d per page.
Hint: additional reinf. in the round cut c+2*3.0d (DIN EN 1992-1-1 6.4.4.(1))
0 The user can specify that only the reinforcement in the punching area should be
considered.
Hint: additional reinf. in the critical round cut (defined by the user)
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-7

5.5 MATF – Material Input
MATF
FOOT Material number of Foundation − -

STEE Material number of reinforcement − -
COLU Material number of Column − -
PROF NUmber of Soil Profile − -
Note: See AQUA manual for more details.
FOOT, STEE, COLU

+PROG AQUA
HEAD materials
NORM DIN 'EN1992-2004'
CONC 1 C 45 ; STEE 2 B 500A; CONC 3 C 25
END
PROF
For Bearing Failure verification the input of soil slayers is required. A Soil Profile valid for
FOOTiNG can only be created via FOOTiNG Dialog or CADINP.
+PROG AQUA
HEAD Soil Profile
BORE 1 X 0 Y 0 Z -1.5 NX 0 NY 0 NZ 1 ALF 0 HGWL 0 HGWH 2.2 TITL "Bohrprofil01"

BLAY S 0 MUE 0 DES 0 VARI CONS C 0 PHI 30 GAM 18 GAMA 8
BLAY S 999 VARI CONS
BTAB OPT 'A6.6:H' FACS 1
BORE 2 X 0 Y 0 Z 0 NX 0 NY 0 NZ 1 ALF 0 HGWL 0 HGWH 2.2 TITL "Bohrprofil02"

BLAY S 999 VARI CONS
BTAB V1 222.33 FACS 1
END
5-8 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.6 ACT – Actions
See also: MATF

ACT
TYPE Type of the action LT2 *

GAMF Favourable safty factor − *
GAMU Unfavourable safty factor − *
PSI0 Combination value rare − *
PSI1 Combination value frequent − *
PSI2 Combination value quasi permanent − *
TIT Description of the action LT32 ’0
TYPE
GAMF
Favourable safty factor
GAMU
Unfavourable safty factor
PSI0
Combination value rare
PSI1
Combination value frequent
PSI2
Combination value quasi permanent
TIT
Description of the action
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-9

5.7 TAB – Soil Pressure according to Tables
TAB
T Anchoring depth m !
T
If the anchoring depth is higher than 2.00 m, the specific weight of the soil has to be defined
with the record.
5-10 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.8 BESI – Safety factors
BESI
LC Design situation, loading − 1

Savety factors of aktions DIN EN 1990
GAMG permanent − 1.35
GAMQ variable − 1.50
Position stability (DIN EN 1990)
LAGU unfavorable − 1.10
LAGF favorable − 0.90
Savety factors of resistances DIN 1054
WIGR Base falure − 1.40
WIGL Sliding −s 1.10
LC
Design Situation to DIN 1054:2010-12, 2.2
Loading
1 BS-P - Persistent situation
2 BS-T - Transient situation
3 BS-A - Accidental situation
Safety factors of actions DIN DIN 1054:2010-12
GAMG
Safety factors of permanent actions
GAMQ
Safety factors of variable actions Savety factors of leakage of position stability (DIN EN
1990:2010-12)
LAGU
unfavorable
LAGF
favorable Safety factors of resistances
WIGR
Bearing Failure resistance
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-11

WIGL
Sliding resistance Safety factors of actions
Action BS-P BS-T BS-A

permanent 1.35 1.20 1.10
variable 1.50 1.30 1.10
Safety factors of position stability
Action BS-P BS-T BS-A

unfavorable 1.10 1.05 1.00
favorable 0.90 0.90 0.95
Safety factors of resistances
Resistance BS-P BS-T BS-A

Bearing Failure 1.40 1.30 1.20
Sliding 1.10 1.10 1.10
5-12 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.9 GEOM – Geometry
GEOM
TYPE Type of fundation LT EINZ

EINZ Normal foundation
KOE Sleeve foundation
BLOC Sleeve block out foundation
STRE Strip foundation
STIF Boot foundation
BX Foundation dimension in X direction cm !
BY Foundation dimension in Y direction cm !
HI Foundation thickness inside cm !
HA Foundation thickness outside cm !
D1X Distance of reinforcement in X direction cm !
D1Y Distance of reinforcement in Y direction cm !
NBEM Control design section LT STR
STR, STM, AUSR, KOEM, KOER
TYPE
EINZ Normal foundation
KOE Sleeve foundation
BLOC Sleeve block out foundation
STRE Strip foundation
STIF L-Shaped foundation
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-13

HX HI
HA
X
CY BY
CX
BX
Figure 5.1
5-14 SOFiSTiK 2020

CY
HY
HI
HA HA
EY
BY
Figure 5.2
BX, BY
The foundation dimensions are defined by the foundation sides BX and BY: Foundation di-
mensions in cm:
BX > 0, BY > 0 no modification

BX > 0, BY < 0 BY is modified
BX < 0, BY > 0 BX is modified
BX < 0, BY < 0 BX and BY are modified
BX:BY = aspect ratio
BX = 0, BY = 0 BX and BY are modified
A:B (coulmn dimensions = aspect ratio)
The calculation for the determination of the foundation dimensions can be controlled by the
proportions of the sides BX and BY. If BX or BY < 0, then this values is modified. The program
starts the iteration with the absolute value.
BX > 0, BY > 0
The input foundation dimensions are not modified. A comparison with the permissible soiol
pressures is not done. The soil pressures are determined with the defined foundation dimen-
sions and the defined loads. It follows the design and the punching check. If the stability check
is not correct, then the foundation dimensions are increased and an information is printed.
BX > 0, BY < 0
The measure of BX is here not changed. BY is determined in such a way, that the permissible
soil pressures are kept under the available loads.
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-15

BY < 0, BY > 0
The measure of BY is here not changed. BX is determined in such a way, that the permissible
soil pressures are kept under the available loads.
BX < 0, BY < 0
BX and BY are determined. In this case the aspect ratio of BX:BY is not modified.
BX = 0, BY = 0
BX and BY are determined. The constant aspect ratio results from the column dimensions
CX:CY.
HI
Foundation thickness inside
Die Fundamenthöhe wird am Stützenrand bzw. am Köcherrand angegeben.
HA
Foundation thickness outside
HA must be equal to or less HI.
D1X, D1Y
The static heights HX and HY are necessary for the design in both direction. Both values have
to be different and smaller than the foundation thickness.
NBEM
The position for the design section can be defined with the option NBEM. If nothing is input,
the design is done at the column edge (STR).
STM design in column centre (without rounding off)

STR design at column edge
AUSR design in column centre with rounding off
KOEM design in the middle of the sleeve wall
KOER design at sleeve wall edge
5-16 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.10 SLEE – Sleeve
SLEE
HSWO Sleeve height outside cm !

HSWI Sleeve height inside cm !
WXWU Upper Wall thickness from sleeve in X direction cm !
WYWU Upper Wall thickness from sleeve in Y direction cm WXWU
WXGU Gap width at the top cm
WXWL Gap width at the bottom cm
TYPE Sleeve type (R = rough, G = smooth) LT R
KOEB Control sleeve design LT LEON
(LEON, PSCH, STWM)
CLX
WXGU WXWU
SPT
WXWL HSWO
EZ
x HSWI
z
HI
WXGL HA
EX
BX
Figure 5.3
HSWO, HSWI, WXWU, WYWU

The sleeve height outside and inside and the wall thickness of the sleeve in cm are additionally
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-17

necessary. Normally the program uses a rough sleeve. A smooth sleeve is defined with the
input G for the sleeve TYPE.
WXGU, WXWL
WXGU and WXWL are the gap width of the sleeve to the column.
TYPE
Type of the sleeve gap
R = rough
G = smooth
KOEB
The input for KEOB defines, whether the design should be done according to Leonhardt
(LEON), according to Paschen (PSCH) (DAfStb, Heft 411) or according to the beam structure
model (STWM).
5-18 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.11 COLU – Column
COLU
QA Typ of column LT Q4

QU Rectangle with circum. reinf.
QK Circle with circum. reinf.
Q4 Rectangle with rod reinf.
QS Rectangle with bar bundle
QR sym. reinf.
CX Dimension in X direction cm 30.
CY Dimension in Y direction cm 30.
D1 Distance of reinforcement cm 5.0
DU Diameter mm 12
AS necassary Reinforcement of column cm2 0.
ASV available Reinforcement of column cm2 0.
EX Eccentricity in X direction cm 0.
EY Eccentricity in Y direction cm 0.
EZ Eccentricity in Y direction cm 0.
EOPT Eccentricity LT SP
RAND with reference to foundation edge
SP with reference to centre of gravity
QA
Type of column
QU Rechteckquerschnitt mit Umfangsbewehrung

QK Kreisquerschnitt mit Umfangsbewehrung
Q4 Rechteckquerschnitt mit Eckbewehrung
QS Rechteckquerschnitt mit Stabbündel
QR Sym. reinforcement
CX, CY
The values CX and CY have to be input in cm. The column dimensions are necessary for the
punching check and for the aspect ratio of the foundation dimensions. The distribution of the
moments and thus the reinforcement in the design section result from the ratio of the length of
one column side to the corresponding foundation side.
D1
Distance of the reinforcement of the column in cm
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-19

DU
Diameter of the column reinforcement in mm
AS
necessary Reinforcement of the column cm2
ASV
available Reinforcement of the column cm2 Dieser Wert wird benötigt, um realistische Über-
greifungslängen bei der Bemessung der Köcherbewehrung zu erhalten.
g g g
EY
EX
Figure 5.4
EX, EY, EZ
It is possible to define the column eccentrically on the foundation. With the option SP the wall
is generated eccentrically to the centre of gravity.
EOPT
the eccentricity references to the edge of foundation (RAND) or to the centre of gravity (SP).
Columns of halls with onesided loading should keep a constant space from the foundation
edge.
5-20 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.12 LC – LF - Characteristic Loads
See also: , LKOE, LAST

LC
NO Number of loadcase − -
TYPE Type of Action LT G
(G, Q, S, W, A)
KN Node number of support − -
V Axial force kN !
MY Moment about Y axis kNm -
MX Moment about X axis kNm -
HX Lateral force in X direction kN -
HY Lateral force in Y direction kN -
DMY Second order theory moment about Y axis kNm -
DMX Second order theory moment about X axis kNm -
DHX Second order theory force in X direction kN -
DHY Second order theory force in Y direction kN -
TIT Title of the loadcase LT32 -
NO
Number of the characteristic loadcase.
TYPE
Type of the action
G permanent loading
Q variable loading (A, B)
S Snow
W Wind
Q_A variable loading (C, D)
Q_B variable loading (E)
A außergewöhnlich
KN
Node number
The Node number for the takeover of support reactions from the Database (CDB) is set here.
A positive axial force acts as a loading and a negative one as an unloading. The moment MY
acts on X direction (about the Y axis) and the moment MX in Y direction (about the X axis). A
positive lateral force HX and a negative moment MY as well as a positive lateral force HY and
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-21

Figure 5.5
a positive moment MX have the same action direction.
5-22 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.13 LOAD – Design Loads
See also: LF, LKOE

LOAD
NO Number of the load − -

TYPE Type for the check LT BEME
(K1, K2, GL, GB, LAGS, BEME)
KN Node number − -
V Axial force kN !
MY Moment about Y axis kNm -
MX Moment about X axis kNm -
HX Lateral force in X direction kN -
HY Lateral force in Y direction kN -
ZUGV Additional load in Z direction kN -
TIT Title of the loadcase LT64 -
NO
Number of the design load.
TYPE
Type of the check
K1 mid 1/3
K2 mid 2/3
GL Sliding
GB Bearing Failure
LAGS Stability
BEME Reinforcement Design
KN
Node number
By taking over the supporting forces from the database (CDB) the node number should be
defined.
A positive axial force acts as a loading and a negative one as an unloading. The moment MY
acts on X direction (about the Y axis) and the moment MX in Y direction (about the X axis). A
positive lateral force HX and a negative moment MY as well as a positive lateral force HY and
a positive moment MX have the same action direction.
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-23

Figure 5.6
5-24 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.14 BEW – Reinforcement Parameter
See also: MAT

BEW
Bewehrung Fundamentplatte
SDUX diameter X-direction mm 12
SDUY diameter Y-direction mm 12
DMIN minimaler diameter mm 8
DMAX maximaler diameter mm 28
CMIN minimaler distance cm 5
CMAX maximaler distance cm 25
Schubbewehrung
DUST diameter Schubbewehrung mm 20
Sleeve reinforcement
KOEV diameter vertikal mm 14
KOEH diameter horizontal mm 14
KOAV distance vertikal cm 20
KOAH distance horizontal cm 30
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-25

5.15 KN – Selection Support Nodes
See also: LCDB

KN
NO Node number − *
POS Position description LT8 *
GEO Description for the same size of foundation LT16 *
BX Foundation dimension in X direction cm *
BY Foundation dimension in Y direction cm *
WI Rotation of the foundation axis opposite to the global degree 0
coordinate system
REP Computational fixed point of the column in the foun- m 0

dation
TIT Positionsbezeichnung LT32 *
BX, BY
The foundation dimensions are defined by the foundation sides BX and BY
WI, REP
A rotation can be defined with WI, if the foundation axes are not identically to those ones of the
global coordinate system. The computational fixed point of the column has not to be identically
to the defined point of application of the loads on the foundation. This can be adapted with the
input REP.
5-26 SOFiSTiK 2020

Node at
REP support
X WI
X
ACHS = POSZ
Figure 5.7
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-27

5.16 ECHO – Output Options
ECHO
OPT1 COMB Reinforcement for each Load Case LT NEIN

GB Bearing Failure (JA, VOLL, EXTR) LT NEIN
TAB Soil pressure table LT NEIN
ACT Actions table LT JA
TESI Partial Safety Factors LT JA
CRFC Reinforcement of column connection LT JA
RFC Bending ans Shear reinforcement LT JA
SRFC Sleeve reinforcement LT JA
GLEI Slide verification LT JA
KIPP Tipping verification LT JA
LAGS Stability verification LT JA
LOAD Print Loads LT VOLL
PUN Punching verification LT JA
SYST Representation of Foundation (dimensions LT JA
and reinforcement)
WERT YES LT

NO
VOLL
EXTR
COMB Perform code veryfications and design for all Load Cases.
GB GB controls the Bearing Failure verification.
A valid Soil Profile including soil layers must be provided using the Record MATF.
YES perform the Bearing Failure verification.
VOLL expanded output.
EXTR create sketch.
TAB Soil pressure table (A6.1-A6.8 or user defined) will be printed.
ACT Output of applied Actions (DIN 1054:2010-12) .
TESI Output of Partial Safety Factors for Actions (DIN 1054:2010-12, DIN EN
1990:2010-12) and Resistances (DIN 1054:2010-12).
CRFC Print reinforcement of column connection.
RFC Perform reinforcement design.
5-28 SOFiSTiK 2020

YES Print bending reinforcement and shear verification.

VOLL a expanded table will be printed for each combination.
SRFC Print Sleeve reinforcement. The verification can be performed by Leonhardt,
Paschen or beam model.
GLEI Slide verification. For Horizontal Loads the defined friction coefficient will be
used.
KIPP Tipping verification. In case of self-weight loads the 1. core value will be checked
and for gapping the 2. core value.
LAGS Stability verification.
LOAD Output of the combined Loads.
JA Print only the combinations that were applied in one verification or for
reinforcement design.
VOLL All tested combinations will be printed.
EXTR include a sketch of the characteristic loads.
PUN Punching verification control.
SYST Graphical representation of design results.
SOFiSTiK 2020 5-29

5.17 SPT – Structural point
SPT
NO Point number − -
X Point coordinates [m] 1001 0.0
Y [m] 1001 0.0
Z [m] 1001 0.0
NX z-axis of the local coordinate system − *
NY − *
NZ − *
SX x-axis of the local coordinate system − *
SY − *
SZ − *
GUID 128 bit code given as hexadecimal string Lt !
Note: See SOFIMSHC manual for more details.
A Structural Point in FOOTiNG is used to define a foundation connected to the corresponding

Structural Element. All parameters refer to a local coordinate system which is located in the
center of the upper face of the foundation. Its z-axis points downward in gravity direction
towards the lower face of the foundation. This coordinate system is independant from the
coordinate system of the structural point the foundation is connected to.
5-30 SOFiSTiK 2020

Output Description | FOOTiNG
6 Output Description
6.1 Position Description
Foundation: quast-zweiachsig/F1 260x260
6.2 System
6.2.1 Column
Dimensions of the column
cx edge length in X direction in cm

cy edge length in Y direction in cm
c diameter of the column cross section
p
c = 1.13 · c · cy for rectangular columns
For rough sleeve foundations c is determined
from the dimensions of the sleeve.
ex’ eccentric loading from the foundation edge
in cm
ey’ eccentric connection in Y direction
exs eccentric loading from the foundation
centre of gravity in cm
eys eccentric connection in Y direction
6.2.2 Stat. Heights
Static heights for the design
dx height for X direction in cm

dy height for Y direction in cm
d average value from both directions
6.2.3 sleeve
Dimensions of the sleeve
kx edge length in X direction in cm

ky edge length in Y direction in cm
ha sleeve height from foundation upper edge
hi inner sleeve height
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-1

FOOTiNG | Output Description
wax sleeve wall thickness in X direction

way sleeve wall thickness in Y direction
6.2.4 Moment-V.
The total moment is divided in eight parts according to table 2.10 from Heft 240 DAfStb
X-Ri parts of the total moment in % for the moment

in X direction (cy/by)
Y-Ri parts of the total moment in % for the moment
in Y direction (cx/bx)
The parts refer to the half foundation. The sum of the parts is 50.
A partitioning for both sides is done for eccentric loaded foundations.
Type Marking of the loadcase with the action

V(kN) axial force in kN
My(kNm) moment in X direction (about Y axis) in kNm
Mx(kNm) moment in Y direction (about X axis) in kNm
Hx(kN) lateral force in X direction in kN
Hy(kN) lateral force in Y direction in kN
Difference load from P-Delta Effect
dMy(kNm) additional moment in X direction

dMx(kNm) additional moment in Y direction in kNm
dHx(kN) additional lateral force in X direction in kN
dHy(kN) additional lateral force in Y direction in kN
foundation in kN/m2 , dead weight of the foundation,

if it was used.
The additional loads from the sleeve are determined for a sleeve foundation.
sleeve in kN
superimposed load in kN/m2 , superimposed load which results
from the fill around the sleeve
LC The loads become a number and a description
6-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

V(kN) axial force in kN

Hx(kN) lateral force in X direction in kN
Hy(kN) lateral force in Y direction in kN
accV(kN) accompanying load in Z-direction
6.3 Permissible Soil Pressure

The parts which give the permissible soil pressure are compiled for the determination from
tables:
table soil pressure interpolated from the input tables with the defined anchoring
depth
rectangular foundation
increase for rectangular foundations for a side ratio
b : by < 2 bzw. b’ : b’y < 2 DIN 1054:2010-12, 6.10.2.2 (2)
dense packing soil
increase about the input percent value
DIN 1054:2010-12, 6.10.2.2 (3)
ground water
decrease in case of ground water DIN 1054:2010-12, 6.10.2.3
6.4 Soil Pressure/Buckling

The permissible and the calculated soil pressures are compared. The marked combinations
for this check were build without safety factors.
rho soil friction angle for determination of the safety

against sliding
LF Combination number
V(kN) axial force in kN mit dead weight of the foundation
sigma soil pressure in kN/m2 with reference to the
subarea A’ which centre of gravity is the load
application point. Beside there is the
permissible value.
If lateral forces are available, the permissible stresses are reduced about a factor.
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-3

Fact. Factor
bx’/by’ reduced edge length for determination of sigma
ex/ey eccentricity of the resulting load
At gaping gap at the end of the line gapping appears.
+0.00
gam = 16.0
x
+1.55
z phi = 30.0 gam = 16.0
M 1 : 100
6.5 Design
STM column centre
STR column edge
AUSR column centre rounded off
KOEM sleeve wall centre
KOER sleeve edge
The design is done for a section of a width B/8 (B = edge length of the foundation) and the
corresponding part of the moment. The reinforcement for each section and for the total section
is output. The reinforcement can be complemented in the round cut area of 1.5 d with parts
from the shear design, if necessary.
Moment Total moment for the position of design in kNm

M/8 proportional moment in kNm for the
corresponding section
b widht of the section in cm
d static height in cm
e-b Epsilon for concrete in o/oo
e-s Epsilon for steel in o/oo
As The reinforcement in cm2 is printed for each
section (width = B/8).
As-total The reinforcement for the total section is
printed in cm2 .
6-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

The design is done for both directions by indicating the number and description of the combi-
nation. For a strip foundation the design is done for a strip of 100 cm only for the X direction.
6.6 Sleeve Design

It is printed the kind of the analysis (Leonhardt, Paschen or beam structure model) and the kind
of the shuttering (rough or smooth). The design is done in X and Y direction. The reinforcement
is determined for the flank walls and the back-wall. Impact loads can be input additionally for
the design.
LF number of combination
Ri. direction
erf-t necessary anchoring depth of the column in the
sleeve in cm
Zs tensile force in the back-wall in kN
Z design force in kN
As reinforcement in cm2
Pos. of reinforcement vertical or horizontal and wall or shoulder above or
lower
description description of combination
The absorption of the lateral forces in the end wall or back-wall is verified additionally for smooth
shuttering.
Round Cut
Output about the round cut for punching
a-crit measure for the critical round cut

(1.0*d resp. 1.5*d)
a-crit critical round cut in cm
u-crit circumference of the round cut which is
generated around the column in cm
A-Fund foundation area in m2
A-crit round cut area in m2
At different heights of the foundation outside and at the edge of the

column
hrmx height at the round cut in X direction in cm
hrmy height at the round cut in Y direction in cm
hrm average height at the round cut in cm
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-5

Safety Check against Punching

A shear reinforcement can be prevented via a further increase of the bending reinforcement in
both directions X and Y in the round cut area.
SOFiSTiK 2014-1 FOOTiNG - Einzel- und Streifenfundamente (V 14.01)

Einzelfundament
Fundament: quast-zweiachsig/F1 260x260
Größe aus LF 7 G+Q(2)+0.6W(4) (Grundbruch)
S y s t e m Einzelfundament Moment-V.
Fundament Stütze stat.Höhen X-Ri Y-Ri
[m] [m] [m] [o/o] [o/o]
bx 2.600 cx 0.500 dx 0.450 7.2 7.9
by 2.600 cy 0.300 dy 0.440 10.0 10.0
hi 0.500 c 0.415 d 0.445 14.0 14.0
ha 0.500 ex' mittig 18.8 18.1
Teilsicherheitsbeiwerte BS-P ständige Situation

Einwirkungen (DIN 1054) ständig 1.35
veränderlich 1.50
Lagesicherheit (DIN EN 1990) ungünstig 1.10
günstig 0.90
Widerstände (DIN 1054) Grundbruch 1.40
Gleiten 1.10
Einwirkungen DIN EN 1990

Kenn γ-u γ-f ψ-0 ψ-1 ψ-2 Bezeichnung
G 1.350 1.000 Eigengewicht
Q 1.500 0.000 0.700 0.500 0.300 Veränderliche Last
W 1.500 0.000 0.600 0.200 0.000 Wind
Charakteristische Lasten OK Fundament

LF/ V My Mx Hx Hy Bezeichnung
Typ [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN] [kN]
1/G 844.8 -55.9 57.5 0.0 0.0 Ständige Last
2/Q 500.0 -63.1 34.0 0.0 0.0 Verkehrslast
4/W 75.0 -155.0 5.1 30.0 0.0 Wind
SOFiSTiK AG - www.sofistik.de
55.9 63.1
57.5 844.8 34.0 500.0
1G Ständige Last 2Q Verkehrslast
Lastbilder Knoten 0, Lastfall 1-2

M 1 : 50
6-6 SOFiSTiK 2020


Einzelfundament
155.0
5.1 75.0 30.0
4 W Wind
Lastbilder Knoten 0, Lastfall 4

M 1 : 50
Zusätzliche Lasten Fundament Gesamtlast
[kN/m2] [kN]
Eigengewicht 12.5 84.5
Auflast ständig 0.0
Lastzusammenstellung OK-Fundament
Lastfall V My Mx Hx Hy zugV Nachweis Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN] [kN] [kN]
1 844.8 -55.9 57.5 0.0 0.0 1.Kernw. G
2 1389.8 -212.0 94.6 18.0 0.0 2.Kernw. G+Q(2)+0.6W(4)

3 1269.8 -255.1 86.4 30.0 0.0 2.Kernw. G+W(4)+0.7Q(2)
4 919.8 -210.9 62.6 30.0 0.0 2.Kernw. G+W(4)
5 889.8 -148.9 60.6 18.0 0.0 2.Kernw. G+0.6W(4)
6 1344.8 -119.0 91.5 0.0 0.0 2.Kernw. G+Q(2)
7 1389.8 -212.0 94.6 18.0 0.0 1958.0 Grundbruch G+Q(2)+0.6W(4)
8 1269.8 -255.1 86.4 30.0 0.0 1778.0 Grundbruch G+W(4)+0.7Q(2)
9 919.8 -210.9 62.6 30.0 0.0 1253.0 Grundbruch G+W(4)
10 889.8 -148.9 60.6 18.0 0.0 1208.0 Grundbruch G+0.6W(4)
11 1344.8 -119.0 91.5 0.0 0.0 1890.5 Grundbruch G+Q(2)
12 844.8 -55.9 57.5 0.0 0.0 1140.5 Grundbruch G
13 1958.0 -309.6 133.2 27.0 0.0 1389.8 Gleiten 1.35G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
14 844.8 -55.9 57.5 0.0 0.0 844.8 Gleiten G
15 1778.0 -374.2 121.0 45.0 0.0 1269.8 Gleiten 1.35G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
16 1253.0 -308.0 85.3 45.0 0.0 919.8 Gleiten 1.35G+1.5W(4)
17 1140.5 -75.5 77.6 0.0 0.0 844.8 Gleiten 1.35G
18 1482.3 -354.7 100.8 45.0 0.0 1269.8 Gleiten G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
19 957.3 -288.4 65.2 45.0 0.0 919.8 Gleiten G+1.5W(4)
20 1890.5 -170.1 128.6 0.0 0.0 1344.8 Gleiten 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
21 1746.8 -295.6 118.8 27.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+1.1G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
22 760.3 -50.3 51.8 0.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+0.9G
23 1566.8 -360.2 106.6 45.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+1.1G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
24 1041.8 -294.0 70.9 45.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+1.1G+1.5W(4)
25 929.3 -61.5 63.2 0.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+1.1G
26 1397.8 -349.1 95.1 45.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+0.9G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
27 872.8 -282.8 59.4 45.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+0.9G+1.5W(4)
28 1679.3 -156.1 114.2 0.0 0.0 Lagesich. 0.9GF+1.1G+1.5Q(2)
29 1958.0 -309.6 133.2 27.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. 1.35G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
30 844.8 -55.9 57.5 0.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. G
31 1778.0 -374.2 121.0 45.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. 1.35G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
32 1253.0 -308.0 85.3 45.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. 1.35G+1.5W(4)
33 1140.5 -75.5 77.6 0.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. 1.35G
34 1482.3 -354.7 100.8 45.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
35 957.3 -288.4 65.2 45.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. G+1.5W(4)
36 1890.5 -170.1 128.6 0.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
1.Kernweite nach DIN EN 1997-1:2009-09

Lastfall V My Mx bx' by' ex ey ex/bx ey/by Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [m] [m]
1 929.3 55.9 57.5 2.480 2.476 0.060 0.062 0.023 0.024 G
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-7


Einzelfundament
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [m] [m]
4 1004.3 225.9 62.6 2.150 2.475 0.225 0.062 0.087 0.024 G+W(4)
Lagesicherheitsnachweis gem. DIN EN 1990:2010-12

Lastfall Ri. V MEd,dst MEd,stb Mdst/ Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] Mstb
27 X 948.9 305.3 1233.5 0.248 0.9GF+0.9G+1.5W(4)
21 Y 1822.8 118.8 2369.7 0.050 0.9GF+1.1G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
Gleiten Reibungswinkel 25.0 Grad Gleitwiderstand 1.10

Lastfall Vk Hx Hy Td Rrd Td/R Bezeichnung
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [kN]
16 1004.3 45.0 0.0 45.0 425.7 0.106 1.35G+1.5W(4)
Grundbruchnachweis X-Richtung Grundbruchwiderstand 1.40 LF 7:G+Q(2)+0.6W(4)

b'/a'= 230/ 247 cm, V= 1474.3 kN, H= 18.0 kN, Omega= 90.0 Grad
Boden
Kote Phi Gamma Kohäs. Länge Fläche
[m] [Grad] [kN/m3] [kN/m2] [m] [m2]
0.00 30.0 18.00
18.00
0.50 30.0 18.00 14.50 26.96 UK Fundament
99.00 30.0 8.00
phim 30.0 18.00 Summe 14.50 26.96
Beiwerte Tragfähigk. Form Neigung

Breite 10.047 0.721 0.970
Gründungstiefe 18.401 1.465 0.982
Nd= 2072.1 kN, RNk= 3007.0 kN, RNd= 2147.8 kN, , mue= 0.96
+0.00
X-
gam=18.0 +0.50
Z phi=30.0 gam=18.0
Grundbruchbild X-Ri. M 1 : 100
Pos: quast-zweiachsig/F1 Bemessung nach DIN EuroNorm EN 1992 (2011) Concrete Structures
------------------------
Lastfall V My Mx Hx Hy Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN] [kN]
37 1958.0 -309.6 133.2 27.0 0.0 1.35G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
38 844.8 -55.9 57.5 0.0 0.0 G
39 1778.0 -374.2 121.0 45.0 0.0 1.35G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
40 1253.0 -308.0 85.3 45.0 0.0 1.35G+1.5W(4)
41 1140.5 -75.5 77.6 0.0 0.0 1.35G
42 1482.3 -354.7 100.8 45.0 0.0 G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
43 957.3 -288.4 65.2 45.0 0.0 G+1.5W(4)
44 1890.5 -170.1 128.6 0.0 0.0 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
Material
Beton Stahl Sicherheitsbeiwerte
Fundament C 20/25 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
Stütze C 45/55 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
6-8 SOFiSTiK 2020


Einzelfundament
Bemessung Stützenanschluss
Knoten/ V My Mx Mue As Bezeichnung
Lastfall [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [cm2]
39 -1778.0 -374.2 121.0 3.23 48.52 1.35G+1.5W(4)+1.05Q(2)
Bemessung Stützenrand
Moment M/8 b d eps.b eps.s As Stanz ges As Lastfall
[kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [o/oo] [o/oo] [cm2] [cm2] [cm2]
530.7 38.0 0.325 0.450 -2.09 25.00 1.91 LF 37:1.35G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
53.1 0.325 0.450 -2.72 25.00 2.69 2.32
74.3 0.325 0.450 -3.50 23.41 4.01² 3.18
100.0 0.325 0.450 -3.50 16.06 5.37 1.82 42.60 in X-Richtung
553.1 43.8 0.325 0.440 -2.41 25.00 2.26 LF 37:1.35G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)
55.3 0.325 0.440 -2.93 25.00 3.04² 3.42
77.4 0.325 0.440 -3.50 21.04 4.16² 3.03
100.0 0.325 0.440 -3.50 15.13 5.52 1.67 46.21 in Y-Richtung
² Mindestbewehrung Querkrafttragfähigkeit (DIN EN 1992-1-1 NA.6.54.1)
Rundschnitt a-crit = 0.99*d

a-crit u-crit A-Fund A-crit
[cm] [cm] [m2] [m2]
44.1 436.8 6.76 1.46
Durchstanznachweis, Abschn. 6.4 LF 37:1.35G+1.5Q(2)+0.9W(4)

VEd,red Querkraft 1.534 [MN]
beta Erhöhung der Querkraft 1.29 Aussermittigkeit
ro_l Mittlerer Längsbewehrungsgrad 0.30 [%]
erhöht Vrd,max --> VEd 0.50 [%]
zusätzliche Bewehrung im Rundschnitt
in X-Richtung 14.64 [cm2]
in Y-Richtung 16.22 [cm2]
vEd Querkraft im Rundschnitt 1.016 [MN/m2]

vRd,c Aufnehmb.Querkraft(ohne Schubbew.) 0.726 [MN/m2] < vEd
vRd,max Druckstrebenfestigkeit 1.016 [MN/m2]
Durchstanzbewehrung
Schnitt d/a a u VEd,red VRd,s erforderlich As
[cm] [cm] [MN] [MN] [cm2] [cm2/m]
1 0.30 13.4 243.9 0.767 0.987 27.33 11.21
2 0.80 35.6 383.7 0.767 0.987 27.33 7.12
uout 1.91 85.1 694.4 1.110 1.110
mit Schrägstäben
0.99 44.1 436.8 1.016 1.146 31.73
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-9


Einzelfundament
9.5
52
7
As=42.6 cm2
2.60
30
28
X Z
5
Y Y
5
7
42Ø12
9.5
2
Anzahl
Abstand
50 50
2.60
X
Z
As=46.2 cm2
34Ø14
2 4 22 4 2 Anzahl
12 7.5 6.5 7.5 12 Abstand
Z X Abmessungen und Bewehrung: quast-zweiachsig/F1 M 1 : 50

Y
6-10 SOFiSTiK 2020


DBV-Beispiel 11: Blockfundament (kritischer Rundschnitt und Lasterhöhung BETA automatisch durch FOOT ermittelt)
Fundament: dbv-beispiel-11/F1 300x300
Größe vorgegeben
S y s t e m Blockfundament Moment-V.
Fundament Stütze stat.Höhen Köcher X-Ri Y-Ri
[m] [m] [m] [m] [o/o] [o/o]
bx 3.000 cx 0.400 dx 0.750 kx 0.600 7.3 7.3
by 3.000 cy 0.400 dy 0.730 ky 0.600 10.0 10.0
hi 0.800 c 0.452 d 0.740 ha 0.0 14.0 14.0
ha 0.800 ex' mittig hi 0.600 18.7 18.7
h 0.800

veränderlich 1.50
günstig 0.90
Gleiten 1.10

Q 1.500 0.000 0.700 0.500 0.300 Veränderliche Last

LF/ V My Mx Hx Hy Bezeichnung
Typ [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN] [kN]
1/G 1350.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ständige Last
2/Q 1500.0 22.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Verkehrslast
20.3 22.5
1350.0 1500.0
1G Ständige Last 2Q Verkehrslast

M 1 : 50
[kN/m2] [kN]
11 4072.5 61.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sohlwiderst. 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
Sohlwiderstand nach DIN 1054:2010-12

Lastfall V My Mx Sigma bx' by' ex ey Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN/m2] [m] [m] [m] [m]
11 4315.5 61.2 0.0 484 < 500 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
3030.0 -42.8 0.0 2.972 3.000 0.014 0.000
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-11


Pos: dbv-beispiel-11/F1 Bemessung nach DIN EuroNorm EN 1992 (2011) Concrete Structures
-----------------------
14 4072.5 61.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
Material
Fundament C 30/37 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
Stütze C 40/50 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
14 -4072.5 61.2 0.0 1.31 21.03 1.35G+1.5Q(2)
Moment M/8 b d eps.b eps.s As ges As Lastfall
[kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [o/oo] [o/oo] [cm2] [cm2]
1171.6 85.9 0.375 0.750 -1.28 25.00 2.56 LF 14:1.35G+1.5Q(2)
117.2 0.375 0.750 -1.54 25.00 3.50
164.0 0.375 0.750 -1.93 25.00 5.57²
218.7 0.375 0.750 -2.40 25.00 6.63 36.52 in X-Richtung
1147.1 84.1 0.375 0.730 -1.30 25.00 2.58 LF 14:1.35G+1.5Q(2)
114.7 0.375 0.730 -1.58 25.00 3.53
160.6 0.375 0.730 -1.98 25.00 5.71²
214.1 0.375 0.730 -2.46 25.00 6.67 36.99 in Y-Richtung
Köcherbemessung Stabwerksmodell :rauhe Schalungsflächen erf t= 60.0 [cm]

LF Ri. T[kN] As[cm2] Bezeichnung
14 X Zugkraft aus Stütze 284.6 6.51.35G+1.5Q(2)
Stützenzugkraft Fs = 457.2 [kN] (= 21.03/2 * fyd)
Versatz Bewehrung a = 19.1 [cm]
innerer Hebelarm z = 31.5 [cm]
vertikale Bügel 6.5
Druckstreben Theta 45 Grad 284.6 6.5
horizontale Bügel 6.5
Rundschnitt a-crit = 0.68*d

a-crit u-crit A-Fund A-crit
[cm] [cm] [m2] [m2]
50.3 476.2 9.00 1.76
Durchstanznachweis, Abschn. 6.4 LF 14:1.35G+1.5Q(2)

VEd,red Querkraft 3.276 [MN]
beta Erhöhung der Querkraft 1.10 Aussermittigkeit
vEd Querkraft im Rundschnitt 1.023 [MN/m2]
vRd,c Aufnehmb.Querkraft(ohne Schubbew.) 0.845 [MN/m2] (vmin) < vEd
vRd,max Druckstrebenfestigkeit 1.183 [MN/m2]
vmin = Mindestwert für VRd,c (6.2.2(1))
Durchstanzbewehrung
Schnitt d/a a u VEd,red VRd,s erforderlich As
[cm] [cm] [MN] [MN] [cm2] [cm2/m]
1 0.30 22.2 299.5 1.638 1.802 41.44 13.84
2 0.80 59.2 532.0 1.638 1.802 41.44 7.79
uout 1.44 106.8 830.9 1.767 1.767
mit Schrägstäben
0.68 50.3 476.2 1.023 1.712 39.38
6-12 SOFiSTiK 2020


14.5
4
10
4
60
As=36.5 cm2
3.00
8.5
40
11
X Z
Y Y
10
10
4
14.5
4
27Ø14
Anzahl
Abstand
40 80
3.00
10
X
Z
60
80
As=37.0 cm2
27Ø14
4 4 11 4 4 Anzahl
14.5 10 8.5 10 14.5 Abstand
Z X Abmessungen und Bewehrung: dbv-beispiel-11/F1 M 1 : 50

Y
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-13


DBV-Beispiel 12: Köcherfundament (kritischer Rundschnitt und Lasterhöhung BETA automatisch durch FOOT ermittelt)
Fundament: dbv-beispiel-12/F1 300x200
Größe vorgegeben
S y s t e m Köcherfundament Moment-V.
[m] [m] [m] [m] [o/o] [o/o]
bx 3.000 cx 0.600 dx 0.450 kx 1.300 8.0 11.4
by 2.000 cy 0.400 dy 0.460 ky 1.100 10.0 14.4
hi 0.500 c 1.351 d 0.455 ha 1.0 14.0 17.0
ha 0.500 ex' 1.100 hi 1.000 18.0 17.0
h 1.550 wax 0.250 18.0 14.0
way 0.250 14.0 11.0
10.0 8.5
8.0 6.8

veränderlich 1.50
günstig 0.90
Gleiten 1.10

W 1.500 0.000 0.600 0.200 0.000 Wind
Q_E 1.500 0.000 1.000 0.900 0.800 Nutzlast Lagerräume Kat. E

LF/ V My Mx Hx Hy dMy dMx dHx dHy Bezeichnung
Typ [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kN] [kN]
1/G 257.0 -96.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -48.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ständige Last
2/Q_E 573.0 -180.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 -106.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lastfall 2
3/W 0.0 -90.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lastfall 3
96.0 180.0
257.0 573.0 20.0
1G Ständige Last 2 Q_E Lastfall 2

M 1 : 50
90.0
35.0
3 W Lastfall 3
Lastbilder Knoten 0, Lastfall 3

M 1 : 50
6-14 SOFiSTiK 2020


Zusätzliche Lasten Fundament Köcher Gesamtlast

[kN/m2] [kN] [kN]
Eigengewicht 12.5 37.5 112.5
Auflast ständig 0.0 0.0
Auflast Boden 18.9 -27.0 86.4
1 257.0 -144.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.Kernw. G
4 257.0 -234.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 2.Kernw. G+W(3)

[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [m] [m]
1 455.9 41.2 0.0 2.819 2.000 0.090 0.000 0.030 0.000 G

[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [m] [m]
4 455.9 185.4 0.0 2.186 2.000 0.407 0.000 0.136 0.000 G+W(3)
Pos: dbv-beispiel-12/F1 Bemessung nach DIN EuroNorm EN 1992 (2011) Concrete Structures
-----------------------
24 1206.4 -623.4 0.0 30.0 0.0 1.35G+1.5Q_E(2)
26 1206.4 -758.4 0.0 82.5 0.0 1.35G+1.5Q_E(2)+1.5W(3)
Material
Fundament C 25/30 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
Stütze C 45/55 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
26 -1206.4 -758.4 0.0 2.27 54.58 1.35G+1.5Q_E(2)+1.5W(3)
Bemessung Köcherrand
Moment M/8 b d eps.b eps.s As ges As Lastfall
[kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [o/oo] [o/oo] [cm2] [cm2]
471.6 37.7 0.250 0.450 -2.14 25.00 1.90 LF 26:1.35G+1.5Q_E(2)+1.5W(3)
47.2 0.250 0.450 -2.55 25.00 2.39
66.0 0.250 0.450 -3.42 25.00 3.39
84.9 0.250 0.450 -3.50 18.88 4.49
84.9 0.250 0.450 -3.50 18.88 4.49
66.0 0.250 0.450 -3.42 25.00 3.39
47.2 0.250 0.450 -2.55 25.00 2.39
37.7 0.250 0.450 -2.14 25.00 1.90 24.33 in X-Richtung
63.6 7.2 0.375 0.460 0.75³ LF 24:1.35G+1.5Q_E(2)
9.2 0.375 0.460 0.75³
10.8 0.375 0.460 2.64²
10.8 0.375 0.460 2.39²
8.9 0.375 0.460 0.75³
7.0 0.375 0.460 0.75³
5.4 0.375 0.460 0.75³
4.3 0.375 0.460 0.75³ 9.56 in Y-Richtung
³ min-As: Ø 8, t = 25.0 cm
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-15


Köcherbemessung Stabwerksmodell :rauhe Schalungsflächen erf t= 90.0 [cm]
LF Ri. T[kN] As[cm2] Bezeichnung
26 X Zugkraft aus Querkraft 78.6 1.81.35G+1.5Q_E(2)+1.5W(3)
Einbindetiefe t = 100.0 [cm]
Köcherwandachsen aw= 105.0 [cm]
Zugkraft aus Stütze 765.5 17.6
Stützenzugkraft Fs = 1187. [kN] (= 54.58/2 * fyd)
Versatz Bewehrung a = 27.5 [cm]
innerer Hebelarm z = 50.0 [cm]
vertikale Bügel 19.4 (= 17.6 + 1.8)
Anteil aus Querkraft 82.5 1.9
Druckstreben Theta 45 Grad 765.5 17.6
horizontale Bügel 19.5 (= 17.6 + 1.9)
Schubnachweis X-Richtung Schnitt 4-4

VEd,red Querkraft 485.2 [kN] LF 26:1.35G+1.5Q_E(2)+1.5W(3)
VEd0 Querkraft Stützenrand 710.2 [kN]
VRd,c Aufnehmb.Querkraft(ohne Schubbew.) 338.9 [kN] < VEd
Vrd,max Druckstrebenfestigkeit 2581.9 [kN] > VEd0
Theta Winkel zwischen den Betondruckstreben 18.4 [Grad]
Asw Erforderliche Schubbewehrung 9.18 [cm2]
minAsw Mindestquerkraftbewehrung 16.64 [cm2]
1.30
1.10
3
13.5
3
1.05
25
11
1.00
2
As=24.3 cm2
2.00
8.5
40
X 1.10 Z
8
Y Y
10
11
2
13.5
18Ø14
3
3
Anzahl
Abstand
60 50
3.00
10
25
1.00
1.05
X
Z
50
As=9.6 cm2
16Ø12
3 5 2 6 Anzahl
17.5 16 17.5 21.5 Abstand
Z X Abmessungen und Bewehrung: dbv-beispiel-12/F1 M 1 : 50

Y
6-16 SOFiSTiK 2020


Bauingenieur Band 81 Mai 2006: Streifenfundament
Fundament: streifenfundamen/F1 270x100
Größe vorgegeben
S y s t e m Streifenfundament
[m] [m] [m] [m] [o/o] [o/o]
bx 2.700 cx 0.300 dx 0.450
hi 0.500 c 0.300 d 0.450
ha 0.500 ex' mittig

veränderlich 1.50
günstig 0.90
Gleiten 1.10

W 1.500 0.000 0.600 0.200 0.000 Wind

LF/ V My Hx Bezeichnung
Typ [kN] [kNm] [kN]
1/G 161.1 0.0 0.0 Ständige Last
4/W 0.0 0.0 -33.8 Wind
161.1 33.8
1G Ständige Last 4 W Wind

M 1 : 50
[kN/m2] [kN]
Lastfall V My Hx zugV Nachweis Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kN] [kN]
1 161.1 0.0 0.0 1.Kernw. G
2 161.1 0.0 -33.8 2.Kernw. G+W(4)
3 161.1 0.0 -33.8 217.5 Grundbruch G+W(4)
7 217.5 0.0 -50.7 161.1 Gleiten 1.35G+1.5W(4)
12 145.0 0.0 -50.7 Lagesich. 0.9GF+0.9G+1.5W(4)

[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [m] [m]
1 194.8 0.0 0.0 2.700 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 G

[kN] [kNm] [kNm] [m] [m] [m] [m]
2 194.8 16.9 0.0 2.527 1.000 0.087 0.000 0.032 0.000 G+W(4)
Lagesicherheitsnachweis gem. DIN EN 1990:2010-12

Lastfall Ri. V MEd,dst MEd,stb Mdst/ Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kNm] Mstb
12 X 175.4 25.4 236.7 0.107 0.9GF+0.9G+1.5W(4)
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-17


Gleiten Reibungswinkel 25.0 Grad Gleitwiderstand 1.10
Lastfall Vk Hx Hy Td Rrd Td/R Bezeichnung
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [kN]
7 194.9 -50.7 0.0 50.7 82.6 0.614 1.35G+1.5W(4)
Grundbruchnachweis X-Richtung Grundbruchwiderstand 1.40 LF 3:G+W(4)

b'/a'= 253/ 100 cm, V= 194.9 kN, H= 33.8 kN, Omega= 90.0 Grad
Boden
Kote Phi Gamma Kohäs. Länge Fläche
[m] [Grad] [kN/m3] [kN/m2] [m] [m2]
0.00 35.0 19.00
19.00
0.50 35.0 19.00 15.17 27.72 UK Fundament
99.00 35.0 9.00
phim 35.0 19.00 Summe 15.17 27.72
Beiwerte Tragfähigk. Form Neigung

Breite 22.614 1.000 0.565
Gründungstiefe 33.296 1.000 0.683
Nd= 263.0 kN, RNk= 2094.6 kN, RNd= 1496.2 kN, , mue= 0.18
+0.00
X-
gam=19.0 +0.50
Z
phi=35.0 gam=19.0
Grundbruchbild X-Ri. M 1 : 100
Pos: streifenfundamen/F1 Bemessung nach DIN EuroNorm EN 1992 (2011) Concrete Structures
------------------------
Lastfall V My Hx Bezeichnung
[kN] [kNm] [kN]
17 217.5 0.0 0.0 1.35G
19 217.5 0.0 -50.7 1.35G+1.5W(4)
Material
Fundament C 20/25 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
Stütze C 20/25 B 500 B (EN 1992) 1.50 1.15
Bemessung Wandanschluss
Knoten/ V My Mue As Bezeichnung
Lastfall [kN] [kNm] [cm2]
17 -217.5 0.0 0.03 0.75 1.35G
Moment b d eps.b eps.s As ges As Lastfall
[kNm] [m] [m] [o/oo] [o/oo] [cm2] [cm2]
68.6 1.000 0.450 -1.46 25.00 3.41 LF 19:1.35G+1.5W(4)

VEd,red Querkraft 71.7 [kN] LF 19:1.35G+1.5W(4)
VEd0 Querkraft Stützenrand 110.6 [kN]
VRd,c Aufnehmb.Querkraft(ohne Schubbew.) 151.6 [kN] > VEd
Vrd,max Druckstrebenfestigkeit 1032.8 [kN] > VEd0
6-18 SOFiSTiK 2020


Theta Winkel zwischen den Betondruckstreben 18.4 [Grad]
As=3.4 cm2
1.00
25
X Z
4
Y Y
4Ø12
3
Anzahl
Abstand
30 50
2.70
X
Z
As=1.8 cm2
Z X Abmessungen und Bewehrung: streifenfundamen/F1 M 1 : 50

Y
SOFiSTiK 2020 6-19

Footing 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Footing 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Footing 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FOOTiNG

FOOTiNG Manual, Service Pack 2020-6 Build 289

Copyright © 2020 by SOFiSTiK AG, Oberschleissheim, Germany.

HQ Oberschleissheim Office Nuremberg

T +49 (0)89 315878-0 T +49 (0)911 39901-0

1 Task Description 1-1

2 Input tabs 2-1

3 Methods of Analysis 3-1

5 Input Description 5-1

6 Output Description 6-1

6.2.3 sleeve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1

SOFiSTiK 2020 1-1

1-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

In the section ”General” the following control options are available:

• Rounding foundation: Rounding value for the automatic determination of foundation

SOFiSTiK 2020 2-1

is specified. The following design sections are available:

2-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 2-3

• Based on Foundation edge:

2-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 2-5

2-6 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 2-7

2.6 Design conditions

The values will be assigned automatically to the Actions table.

2-8 SOFiSTiK 2020

The next input options are available:

• For a pure FOOTiNG-Project the selection of Nodes is not allowed.

SOFiSTiK 2020 2-9

2-10 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 3-1

the centre of the sleeve wall.

3-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 3-3

3-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 4-1

4-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.1 Input Language

Three categories of units are distinguished:

mm Fixed unit. Input is always required in the specified unit.

SOFiSTiK 2020 5-1

5.2 Input Records

5-2 SOFiSTiK 2020

5.3 POS – Position Description

Item Description Unit Default

With POS the position gets a description.

SOFiSTiK 2020 5-3

5.4 CTRL – Control of the Calculation

Item Description Unit Default

OPT SAVE Save design results in the CDB. LT NEIN

VAL Input of the value ∗

5-4 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 5-5

5-6 SOFiSTiK 2020

SOFiSTiK 2020 5-7

5.5 MATF – Material Input

Item Description Unit Default

FOOT Material number of Foundation − -