Phosphorus Processing Page 21

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Sustainability 2018, 10, 1482 2 of 19

Consequently, humanity, for the first time in history, has a binding global framework with
clear targets underlying societal and economic policies and activities. This normative framework is
supposed to protect our planet from nothing less than the risk of catastrophic consequences induced
by the ongoing overuse of natural resources and excessive emission of greenhouse gases. However,
it is apparently in conflict with—at least the perceived—short-term economic interest of businesses
and governments as demonstrated by the Trump administration in the United States. Nonetheless,
some industry stakeholders have started to become receptive to the opportunities and potentials
unveiled by the present paper and inclined to align its processing activities accordingly.

2. Societal, Environmental and Economic Framework

2.1. Resource Use and Decoupling


Steffen et al. [1] saw the timespan from 1901 to 2000 as the century of great acceleration: the global
population grew 3.7-fold, total material extraction 8-fold, use of fossil fuels 12-fold, greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions 13-fold, extraction of ores and minerals 27-fold and the global economy at constant
prices 23-fold. Hence, per capita GHG emissions increased by a factor 3.5 and ore and mineral
extraction by a factor 7.3, outpacing the concurrent economic growth by 17%. The figures reveal that
material extraction outpaces population growth by a factor two, indicating that per capita resource use
has doubled, from 4.6 to 9.2 tons.
Since the global economy during the 20th century expanded by a factor 23 (at constant prices),
the per capita income increased six-fold. Hence, the global economy grew by a much larger pace
than resource use and population, showing already a spontaneous decoupling of resource use from
population growth and per capita income without targeted policy measures [2].
Resource decoupling means reducing the rate of use of (primary) resources per unit of economic
activity, commonly expressed as GDP. What we can call increasing resource use efficiency or
“dematerialization” is based on using less material, energy, water and land resources for the same
economic output. From 1970, per capita resource extraction was stagnating while per capita income
continued to rise until 2000, as nicely shown in Figure 1 by a comparison of global material extraction
and global metabolic rates over time [2]. However, from the beginning of the 21st century, resource
use efficiency has declined, i.e., resource use per capita has been on the rise again. While resource use
in Western industrialized countries continued stagnating or declining, resource use in Asia has risen
and outpaced global GDP growth. The accelerated pace of extraction and consumption of resources
goes hand in hand with the increase in global trade. Figures suggest that free trade and globalization
has induced production to shift from countries with high resource efficiency to countries with lower
resource efficiency.
Population is still growing and estimated to reach 9 billion people in 2050, living in urban
agglomerations on a planet with limited resources [3]. In the light of the universal agreements on
sustainable development (SDGs) and climate change (COP21), it is evident that we cannot continue
with business as usual. Deep and permanent decoupling of resource use from human well-being
is a universal requirement to which we are all committed. Engineers need to develop, scientists to
assess and investors and operators to implement processes that truly increase resource efficiency and
reduce the environmental footprint of our industrial operations. We need to produce more with less!
Figure 1 shows historic (1990–2005) unsustainable global ratios between material extraction and GDP,
as well as between metabolic rates and income.

You might also like