Ex 1 Cantilever Beam
Ex 1 Cantilever Beam
Ex 1 Cantilever Beam
INTRODUCTION
Deflection is defined as the movement of a beam from its initial position after forces and
loads are applied to the beam. It is known as well as displacement from external loads,
weight, and gravity. Beam Apparatus will be in the conducting of this experiment which has
an extensive range that can cover experiments relating with bending of beams. The Beam
Apparatus is an essential tool where it has a wide range experiment use from determining
elastic modulus of beams of different materials to study of beams with any loading. This
experiment is conducted to study the relationship between the load and the deflection of
cantilever beam. Therefore, this experiment will focus more on cantilever type of beam.
CHAPTER 2
THEORY
As the load is applied, the cantilever beam will start to bend and deflect away
from its initial position. The dotted line in the diagram below portrays the deflection
of the beam.
2.2 DEFLECTION EQUATION
Deflection of beams can be calculated by using equations and formulae. However,
they are factors that need to be take into account before proceeding in calculating the
deflections. These factors include, material, distance from support, moment of
inertia of a section, force applied and types of beams. Generally, deflection can be calculated
by double integrating Bending Moment Equation, M(x) divided by Young’s Modulus
multiply to Moment of inertia:
M ( x)
EI
When beam is loaded such as figure 1, the relationship of stress distribution and
curvature of the beam is as follow:
Figure 1
M σ E
= = … … … … .(1)
I y R
My
σ=
Ix
Where,
M = Bending moment
I x = 2nd Moment of inertia of area of the beam section (moment
of inertia)
E = Modulus of elasticity
R = Radius of curvature
σ = Bending stress at the distance y from neutral axis
y = Distance from neutral axis
The 2nd derivative of the deflection is able to show that the curvature of beam 1/R is
given to a close approximation. If z is the deflection of beam at distance x from an
origin, therefore:
d2 z 1 M
= = . .. . . .. . .. . .. . .(2)Deflection of beam subjected to direct loading can be
d x 2 R EI
shown by using equation (2) and can also be expressed in big
Macaulay Method is the method used to determine the deflection of beam in this
experiment.
d2 y L
EI 2
=W 2 x − W ( x − ). . .. . . .. . .(1)
dx 2
2
dy W 2 x W
EI = − ¿
dx 2 2
W 2 x3 W
EIY= − ¿
2 6
1
x=L , Y =0=¿ C= (W L2 −8 W 2 L2)
48
dy 5W
x=L , =0=¿ W 2 =
dx 16
Deflection at point x, = L/4
L3 W 2 W − 8 W 2
y= ( + ) . .. . .. . .. .(4)
EI 384 192
Where,
L = Length of beam
E = Young’s Modulus (205GPa)
I = 2nd Moment area of beam
W = Load
Y = Deflection at point x = L/4
CHAPTER 3
RESULTS
CHAPTER 4
OBSERVATION
First of all, before conducting the experiment it is required to check the balance of the
beam by using bubble level. This is so that all the data that will be collected are precise. Next,
the first dial gauge is to be placed one forth of the beam and another one at the end of the
beam. Set these two dial gauges to zero value before placing load on the hanger. As for the
supportive force, all the data must be multiplied by 2 which is 1mm = 2N. Before adding
more loads, both dial gauges must be set to zero so that it would not mess with the new value.
This crucial step is to be done for both increment and decrement of loads.
During the experiment, no error occurred. It is safe to say that all the data are taken
correctly. To clarify this, the collected data can be compared to the theoretical data. It can be
seen that both collected and theoretical data possess small difference in values which
indicates that the experiment is conducted in the correct manner.
CHAPTER 5
CALCULATION
Deflection at point x=L/4 of the theoretical value of the Young’s Modulus of each
specimen
L3 W 2 W −8 W 2
Y= (
EI 384
+
192 )
Given E Brass=110 GPa, when W =5 N , W 2 =2.13 Nm
25 −10
m=
0.00276 −0.00115
m=9316.77 N m −1
25 −10
m=
0.00207 −0.00096
m=13513.51 N m− 1
25 −10
m=
0.00475 −0.00205
m=5555.56 N m −1
L3 W 2 W −8 W 2
Y= (
EI 384
+
192 )
Since Y and W is the x-axis and y-axis of the graph respectively, by changing the
equation to
L3 W 2 L3 W L3 8 W 2
Y= + −
EI 384 EI 192 EI 192
L3 W 2 L3 2 W L3 16 W 2
Y= + −
EI 384 EI 384 EI 384
EI ∙ 384 ∙Y =L3 W 2+ L3 2 W − L3 16 W 2
EI ∙ 384 ∙ Y + L3 15 W 2
W=
L3 2
EI ∙ 192 ∙Y 15 W 2
W= +
L3 2
Y =mX +C
We know that
EI ∙ 192
m=
L3
m L3
E=
I ∙ 192
9316.77 ×0.6 3
E=
(1.715× 10−10 )(192)
13513.51 ×0.63
E=
(3.959 ×10−10 )(192)
5555.56 ×0.63
E= − 11
(5.177 ×10 )(192)
110 −61.1
× 100 %=44.45 %
110
70− 38.4
× 100 %=45.14 %
70
210− 120
×100 %=42.86 %
210
CHAPTER 6
DISCUSSION
Load vs. Deflection(experimental)
35
30 30
30
25 25
25
20 20
20
Load(N)
15 15
15
10 10
10
5 5
5
0
0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01
Deflection(m)
30
25
20
Load(N)
15
10
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deflection(m)
30
25
20
Load(N)
15
10
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deflection(m)
30
25
20
Load(N)
15
10
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 0.01
Deflection(m)
According to the graphs obtained, we can see that all the three specimens, brass,
aluminium and mild steel shows increasing graphs. This means that when the load
applied increases, the defection of the specimens also increases. From the graphs above,
we can see that mild steel is the stiffest material while brass is the least stiff material.
After that, the gradient of the graphs above can be used to obtain the theoretical Young’s
modulus for all three specimens. The higher the value of young’s modules, the less the
deflection will occur.
CONCLUSION
From the experiment conducted, we can deduce that mild steel has
the greatest deflection, followed by brass and lastly, aluminium. Although the
deflection of each material varies, the graphs of load against deflection for all
three materials show a proportional relationship. This is due to the fact that the
deflection will increase as the load increases. Based on the graphs, the modulus
elasticity for the three materials is also determined by calculating the gradients.
The calculation shows that the modulus elasticity of the mild steel, brass and
aluminium are 120.7 GPa, 61.1 GPa and 38.4 GPa respectively. Therefore, mild
steel is the stiffest material compared to others. Next, according to the theory,
deflection is inversely proportional to the modulus elasticity and the stiffness.
However, the deflection recorded is contrary to the theory. This might occur due
to some errors while conducting the experiment.