Assignment 3 Case Study 1. 16th August 2020
Assignment 3 Case Study 1. 16th August 2020
Assignment 3 Case Study 1. 16th August 2020
Report
Submitted by: Himanshu Sharma
Student ID: S3701796
Date: 16th August 2020
Email: [email protected]
This study source was downloaded by 100000808620417 from CourseHero.com on 04-03-2021 22:46:12 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/66821310/Assignment-3-Case-Study-1-16th-August-2020docx/
Objective:
Owing to different sectors that are supplying the garbage to the available five sectors, a solver equation was to be
established in order to ensure minimum cost of transportation to the site and maximize the amount of the recycled
garbage.
The rec-cycling site can recycle only as per its maximum capacity of recycling and as per its efficiency
As per the given data provided, the actual maximum recycling capacity can be calculated as
Now consider for a given sector a and site b, Xab will be the amount of garbage from sector a
disposal to site b for recycling
From the given table we have the following Constraints (based on estimated recyclable garbage)
X11+X21+X31+X41+X51+X61+X71+X81+X91+X101˂20
˃7
X12+X2+X32+X42+X52+X62+X72+X82+X92+X102˂20
˃8
X13+X23+X33+X43+X53+X63+X73+X83+X93+X103˂30
˃6
X14+X24+X34+X44+X54+X64+X74+X84+X94+X104˂15˃
9
X15+X25+X35+X45+X55+X65+X75+X85+X95+X105˂15˃
8.25
Sector 1 2 3 4 5
1 13.60 5.60 19.60 29.60 37.20
2 9.60 8.40 33.20 36.40 35.20
3 5.60 11.60 14.80 37.60 34.40
4 10.40 14.40 18.00 32.80 35.60
5 6.00 12.40 8.40 31.60 35.20
6 16.80 19.60 26.00 30.80 24.40
7 19.20 24.80 39.60 24.80 22.80
8 21.60 24.00 20.80 30.40 19.60
9 12.40 16.40 26.40 30.00 28.80
10 12.80 26.00 28.4 24.00 33.20
The total cost of transportation will be equivalent to=total no of km x cost of transportation per km
=1140.80 x$113918
=$129,957,654.40
From the above table it clearly shows the distance of each recycling site with reference to the sectors
For the cost of transportation to be minimized, close recycling sites should be selected to that effect
There will be three stages of procedural allocation. The first stage of allocation will be selection of close
sectors to the recycling sites
Since there are 5 recycling sites and ten sectors, each recycling site will be allocated 2 close sectors to
supply the garbage as shown below
Recycling Sites
Sector 1 2 3 4 5
1 13.60 5.60 19.60 29.60 37.20
2 9.60 8.40 33.20 36.40 35.20
3 5.60 11.60 14.80 37.60 34.40
4 10.40 14.40 18.00 32.80 35.60
5 6.00 12.40 8.40 31.60 35.20
6 16.80 19.60 26.00 30.80 24.40
7 19.20 24.80 39.60 24.80 22.80
8 21.60 24.00 20.80 30.40 19.60
9 12.40 16.40 26.40 30.00 28.80
10 12.80 26.00 28.4 24.00 33.20
Key Site with no sector allocated
Allocated sectors to sites
From the above, sectors 4 and 9 have not been allocated any recycling site. The
remaining sectors will be allocated to the sites with reference to their closest
proximities
Now, the second stage of allocation will be for the remaining sectors to the recycling sites. The two closes
sectors will be selected from here
Recycling site
4
Sector 5
4 32.80 35.60
9 30.00 28.80
Sector 1 2 3 4 5
1 13.60 5.60 19.60 29.60 37.20
2 9.60 8.40 33.20 36.40 35.20
3 5.60 11.60 14.80 37.60 34.40
4 10.40 14.40 18.00 32.80 35.60
5 6.00 12.40 8.40 31.60 35.20
6 16.80 19.60 26.00 30.80 24.40
7 19.20 24.80 39.60 24.80 22.80
8 21.60 24.00 20.80 30.40 19.60
9 12.40 16.40 26.40 30.00 28.80
10 12.80 26.00 28.4 24.00 33.20
But from the above sites 4 and five has been allocated more than two sectors and therefore final
reallocation should be done
Sector 1 2 3 4 5
1 13.60 5.60 19.60 29.60 37.20
2 9.60 8.40 33.20 36.40 35.20
3 5.60 11.60 14.80 37.60 34.40
4 10.40 14.40 18.00 32.80 35.60
5 6.00 12.40 8.40 31.60 35.20
6 16.80 19.60 26.00 30.80 24.40
7 19.20 24.80 39.60 24.80 22.80
8 21.60 24.00 20.80 30.40 19.60
9 12.40 16.40 26.40 30.00 28.80
10 12.80 26.00 28.4 24.00 33.20
N/B The highlighted cells represent sectors allocated to the recycling sites
Therefore, the solver equation for the minimum cost of transportation will be
On replacement of the solver equation with the actual digits we shall have
5.6+6.0+5.6+8.4+18.0+20.8+24.8+24.00+24.4+28.8=166.4 megatonnes
therefore, the cost for the minimum cost of transportation will be
=166.4x$113,918
=$18,955,955.20
From the above calculations, comparing the two scenarios of supply, the factor of contrast can be found by
= (Total cost when all sectors are supplying) / (Total Cost using the SOLVER equation)
= ($129,957,654.40/$18955955)
=7 Times
DISCUSSION:
The solver equation that was found is meant to be used to calculate for the final figure of the minimum distance
from the sector to the site. However, a sector of much higher distance was picked at some instances. The reason
was because having more than two sectors supplying garbage would deny the other site its supply. Therefore, a
balance is brought in between picking the site of slightly longer distance. In this scenario, all sectors were all
allocated respective recycling sites.
Moreover, the factor of the minimized cost, as calculated using the solver equation was found to be 7 times less
than the amount with the assumption that all sites were supplying garbage to the recycling site.
CONCLUSION:
In order for the cost of garbage recycling to be toned down, sectors of minimal distance apart with respect to the
recycling site should be considered for garbage supply. Moreover, sectors supplying the garbage should ensure
consistent supply of garbage in order to maximize the garbage collection