Allama Iqbal's Ideal State
Allama Iqbal's Ideal State
Allama Iqbal's Ideal State
Society is much more than its existing individuals; it is in its nature infinite
Alongside the prominence Allama Iqbal gives in his works to the concept of individual
selfhood or khudi, his writings lay an equal measure of emphasis on the primacy of
society. In a lecture delivered at Aligarh in 1910, he posited, “Society is much more
than its existing individuals; it is in its nature infinite; it includes within its contents the
innumerable unborn generations which, though they ever lie beyond the limits of
immediate social vision, must be considered as the most important portion of a living
community in the successful group-life it is the future which must always control the
present.” He further believes that an ideal society is one that is driven by modern and
reconstructed Islamic ideals, and is therefore one that is united, integrated,
egalitarian, properly educated, morally emancipated, technically trained, peaceful,
and socially democratic.
Iqbal opines that the essence of Islamic monotheism or Tauhid, as a working idea, is
human unity, human equality, and human freedom, and that these ideal principles
must be transformed into a realisation of definite human organisation. This opinion,
that humanity unites in divinity, that humanity attains equality in divinity, that
humanity attains freedom in divinity, that if this divinity were denied and
disrespected, mankind would be divided and disintegrate, serves as a beacon light
towards tolerance, national integration, interfaith harmony, and the dialogue of
civilisations in this day and age. From Iqbal’s perspective, “The political ideal of Islam
consists in the creation of a people born of a free fusion of all races and nationalities,
and the moment our grasp of the Islamic principle is loosened, the solidarity of our
community is gone.”
Iqbal further believes that a system of proper and well-grounded education could
truly bring about a renaissance of thought and action in the Muslim world, an area in
which his views, in some senses, build upon, but at times contrast with, the
teachings of his reformist predecessor Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan. While Sir Sayyid
Ahmed Khan attempted to push Muslims towards the need to acquire modern
education for purposes of social advancement, enabling them to secure government
and similar jobs, helping them regain their past status of honour in the Indian society,
Iqbal believes that the value of education lies far beyond the sole purpose of
securing employability; it is a multi-faceted means of character-building through
which a society survives.
In emphasising the key role of education and training towards promoting the
economic welfare of the masses, Iqbal is inspired by eighteenth-century Indian
reformer Shah Wali’ullah, who believed that a just economic system is an essential
part of an ideal society. Being in an era that fell about 150 years after Shah
Wali’ullah, and mindful of first the industrial revolution followed by the communist
revolution, Iqbal lays stress on technical education as a path towards greater
economic prosperity. Iqbal reminded the Muslim public worker of his time, who had
concentrated almost exclusively on securing a due share in the government service,
that, as a field, its prospects for the production of wealth are extremely limited. It
offers prospects of economic elevation only to a few individuals. As the general
growth of a community depends largely on its economic independence, one of the
most important role of available resources, charitable or otherwise, is to afford
opportunities of technical education to the children of our community. To Iqbal,
technical education is thus even more important than higher education since he
believes the former touches the general economic condition of the masses which
form the backbone of a community, but the latter only a few individuals who happen
to possess more than average intellectual energy.
Iqbal is of the firm view that an ideal society must also be a peaceful one as he truly
believes that “Islam is essentially a religion of peace…” and “…all forms of political
and social disturbance are condemned by the Quran in the most uncompromising
terms.” He further explains that the ideal of Islam is to secure social peace at any
cost as all methods of violent change in society are, to his mind, condemned by
Islam in the most unmistakable language. He refers to Tartushi — a Muslim lawyer
of Spain — as being quite true to the spirit of Islam when he says: “Forty years of
tyranny are better than one hour of anarchy”.
Any discussion of the nature and values of Iqbal’s ideal society would be incomplete
until such a society is also declared to be democratic in nature, because, to Iqbal’s
mind, democracy “is the most important aspect of Islam regarded as a political ideal.”
He also famously wrote to Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah in a letter dated
May 28, 1937, “For Islam the acceptance of social democracy in some suitable form
and consistent with the legal principles of Islam is not a revolution but a return to the
original purity of Islam… …Perhaps this is the best reply you can give to the atheistic
socialism of Jawahar Lal Nehru.”
Iqbal’s ideas therefore declare with clarity and conviction that an ideal society is one
that is driven by modern and reconstructed Islamic principles of human unity, human
equality, and human freedom, working under a peaceful, socially democratic system,
and the moral, social, political, and economic amelioration of the masses through
proper training, education and engagement.
The faith which you represent, he instructs, recognises the worth of the individual,
and disciplines him to give away all to the service of God and man. Its possibilities
are not yet exhausted. It can still create a new world where the social rank of man is
not determined by his caste or colour, or the amount of dividend he earns, but by the
kind of life he lives; where the poor tax the rich, where human society is founded not
on the equality of stomachs but the equality of spirits, where an untouchable can
marry the daughter of a king, where private ownership is a trust and where capital
cannot be allowed to accumulate so as to dominate the real producer of wealth. This
superb idealism of our faith, he submits, needs emancipation from the medieval
fancies of theologians and legists.