Stocks Using Python

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Stocks Using Python

Tesla Vs. Lucid

The table below shows the comparison of key financial ratios of Tesla Inc. and Lucid Motors for

the year ending 31/12/2021:

Tesla Lucid

Current ratio 1.38 16.43

Debt-Equity Ratio 0.22 0.51

Long-term debt ratio 0.14 0.34

Inventory Turnover 6.99 1.22

Asset Turnover 0.87 0.00

Return on Equity (ROE) 18.20 -66.00

Return on Assets (ROA) 9.08 -32.73

Return on Investment (ROI) 15.57 -43.71

Stock Valuation

Present value of the stock $673.42 $17.60

Tesla and Lucid are among the American companies that produce electric vehicles; although

both electric vehicles manufacturers are based in California, Elon Musk's popularity may give

Tesla an advantage. Young Gravy, after all, exhorts young people to "whip a Tesla" rather than

"whip a Lucid." But after a few laps around the course, Lucid can catch up, much like in a real

automobile race. After all, Lucid only joined the chat couple of years ago, while Tesla had a head

start (MCWILLIAMS, 2021).

When it comes to how these two EV companies fare in the market, the above financial ratio table

is used; current ratio is used to show company’s capability to meet its short-term obligations - the
current ratio is a liquidity ratio that assesses a company's capacity to meet short-term financial

commitments with a one-year maturity. It explains to investors and analysts how a business can

use the majority of the current assets listed on its balance sheet to pay down its outstanding debt

and other payables (CFI, 2022). Tesla’s current ratio is 1.38; this means that the company is in a

good position when it comes to meeting its short-term obligations – the company is using its

current asset well. The Lucid’s current ratio is 16.43; it obvious that a larger current is good.

Acceptable current ratio ranges from 1.5 to 3. A current ratio of 9 or 10 can suggest that your

business is having trouble allocating capital and is keeping too much cash on hand. From a

financial standpoint, that money might be better used for investments or growth strategies.

Therefore it seems that Lucid is having difficulties managing its current assets.

Another key financial measure is the ROI (Return on Investment). It is a profitability measure

that evaluates the performance or potential return from a business or investment. The ROI

formula looks at the benefit received from an investment, or its gain, divided by the investment's

original cost (Carlson, 2019). In simple terms, ROI shows the profit or loss generated on the

amount of money invested; Tesla’s ROI of 15.57% shows that the company is efficient in

generating sales. On the other hand, Lucid’s negative ROI indicates that the company’s costs are

greater than the returns.


Stocks Using Python

Nike vs. Puma

The table below shows the comparison of key financial ratios of Nike and Puma for the year

ending 31/12/2021:

Nike Puma

Current ratio 2.72 1.28

Debt-Equity Ratio 0.74 -39.68

Long-term debt ratio 0.42 1.03

Inventory Turnover 3.59 8.96

Asset Turnover 1.18 1.12

Return on Equity (ROE) 44.86 1190.78

Return on Assets (ROA) 15.17 -1285

Return on Investment (ROI) 25.82 -3077

Stock Valuation

Present value of the stock $102.20 $63.16

Nike and Puma are among best companies in the sportswear manufacturing industry; each has

continued to hold the top rank in the sportswear industry. Over time, these companies have left

their distinctive imprints on users' hearts and minds, both consciously and unintentionally. And

they have no intention of stopping any time soon.

Both companies seem to be doing well when it comes to utilizing their current assets in paying

their short term obligations. Nike has a current ratio of 2.72 meaning that it is in a very healthy

position to pay its short term debts. Puma has less current ratio that Nike but the company is still

doing well a current ratio of 1.28.


The table above shows that Puma seems to be struggling with its debt management; when we

look at the company’s debt to equity ratio, it is not doing very well. The debt-to-equity ratio (also

known as the "risk ratio," "gearing," or "debt-equity ratio") is a leverage ratio that determines

how much overall debt and financial liabilities weigh against total shareholders' equity. A

company's negative D/E ratio indicates that its shareholders' equity is negative. It signifies that

the business has more liabilities than assets, to put it another way. This is typically regarded as a

very dangerous indicator, suggesting that the business may be in danger of going bankrupt. Nike

seems to be doing well when it comes to its debt management since it has a D/E ratio of 0.74.

Conclusion

After performing stock analysis in Python, I came to realize that my optimal portfolio would

require 56.8% of my money in Tesla investment, 38.6% in Nike investment, 4.2% in Puma

investment, and 0.4 in Lucid investment. This gives a portfolio beta of 1.05; this beta value

means that when relative to the S&P 500, it increases by 10.5% if the S&P's excess return

increases by 10%. At the end, my actual return would be 0.00174, which is larger than the

required return of 0.00148; therefore my investment portfolio is totally profitable due to the fact

that huge portions of my investments are in less riskier and highly profitable stocks.
References

Carlson, R. (2019). The Return on Investment Ratio Explained. Retrieved from

https://www.thebalancesmb.com/return-on-investment-ratio-393206

CFI. (2022). Current Ratio. Retrieved from

https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/finance/current-ratio-formula/

MCWILLIAMS, J. (2021). Who Will Win The Electric Car Race? Tesla VS Lucid Motors.

Retrieved from https://greyjournal.net/hustle/inspire/who-will-win-the-electric-car-race-

tesla-vs-lucid-motors/

You might also like