ANO-145-AWRG-2.1 (01 Dec 2017)
ANO-145-AWRG-2.1 (01 Dec 2017)
ANO-145-AWRG-2.1 (01 Dec 2017)
VERSION : 2.1
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION : 01-12-2017
OFFICE OF PRIME INTEREST : AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTORATE
01/12/2017 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Foreword
FOREWORD
1. The Civil Aviation Authorities of South Asian Regional Initiative (SARI) members (here in after
referred as “Member State Country”) have agreed to a common comprehensive and detailed
aviation requirements, with a view to make it compatible for maintenance carried out in one
Member State to be accepted by the Civil Aviation Authority in another Member State.
ANO-145-AWRG, (herein also referred as ANO 145), requirements for ‘Approved Maintenance
Organisations’ has been developed on the basis of Master Document of SARI Part-145. The
ANO 145 is applicable to maintenance organisations involved in the maintenance of large
aircraft or of aircraft used for commercial air transport, and components intended for fitment
thereto. The ANO 145 has been divided in to Two Sections:
Section B: Procedures for PCAA & Acceptable Means of Compliance to ANO 145
(Published separately as PCAA Manual MNL-145-AWRG)
2. EASA Part 145 (EU regulations 2042/003 amended by 1149/2011, 962/2010, 127/2010, EC
1056/2008, EC 376/2007, EC 707/2006 as well as EASA ED Decision 2003/19/RM amended
by Decision 2012/002/R, 2011/011/R, 2010/006/R, 2010/002/R, 2009/007/R, 2007/002/R &
2006/011/R for the AMC and GM) has been selected to provide the basic content of ANO 145,
but with appropriate customization for the needs of Pakistan. The paragraph numbering is as
per SARI Part-145 Master document. When technical differences exist with respect to EASA
Part-145, the text in italics is to be taken as the wordings of ANO-145.
3. Future development of the requirements of ANO 145 will be in accordance with the Notice of
Proposed Amendment (NPA) procedures agreed among Member States usually after industry
consultation. This procedure will allow for the amendment of ANO 145 to be proposed by the
Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan and will include provision for changes to be made with
amendments to ICAO SARPS, and EASA Part 145.
4. Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority has agreed to adapt SARI 145 into its national codes with
National Variants and it shall NOT unilaterally initiate amendment of its national codes without
having made a proposal for amendment of SARI Part 145 in accordance with the agreed
procedure.
5. Definitions and abbreviations of terms used in ANO 145 that are specific to this ANO are given
in Para.A.1 of this ANO and covered under respective clauses of the ANO.
6. Amendments to the text in ANO 145 are issued as amendment pages containing revised
paragraphs, following NPA adoption.
7. New, amended and corrected text will be enclosed within heavy brackets until a subsequent
‘Amendment’ is issued.
(a) ‘Shall’ is used to indicate a mandatory requirement and may appear in this ANO.
(b) ‘Should’ is used to indicate a recommendation and normally appears in AMCs and GM.
(c) ‘May’ is used to indicate discretion by the Authority, the industry or the applicant, as
appropriate.
(d) ‘Will’ indicates a mandatory requirement and is used to advise industry of action incumbent
on the Authority.
NOTE: The use of the male gender implies the female gender and vice a versa.
I. LIST OF AMENDMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. LIST OF AMENDMENTS
APPENDICES TO AMCs
Within the scope of this regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) ‘Aircraft’ means any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of the air
other than reactions of the air against the earth's surface;
(b) ‘Certifying staff’ means personnel responsible for the release of an aircraft or a component after
maintenance;
(d) ‘large aircraft’ means an aircraft, classified as an aeroplane with a maximum take-off mass of more
than 5 700 kg (12 500 pounds), or a multi-engine helicopter;
(e) ‘large aeroplane’ means an aeroplane of more than 5,700 kg (12,500 pounds) maximum certificated
take-off weight. The category ‘Large Aeroplane’ does not include the commuter aeroplane category.
(f) ‘Commuter category aeroplane’ means a propeller driven twin engined aeroplane that has a seating
configuration, excluding the pilot seat(s) of nineteen or fewer and a maximum certified takeoff
weight of 8618 Kg (19000 lbs).
(g) ‘Maintenance’ means in relation to aircraft or an aircraft component, the performance of tasks
required to ensure the continuring airworthiness of an aircraft or an aircraft component including
any one or combination or overhaul inspection, replacement, defect rectification and the
embodiment of a modification or repair.
(h) ‘Organisation’ means a natural person, a legal person or part of a legal person. Such an
organisation may hold more than one Part 145 approval;
(i) ‘Pre-flight inspection’ means the inspection carried out before flight to ensure that the aircraft is fit
for the intended flight;
(j) “Principle place of business” means the head office or the registered office of the undertaking
within which the principle financial functions and operational control of the activities referred to
in this Regulation are exercised.
This Air Navigation order is issued by Director General Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan in pursuance
of powers vested in him under Rules 4, 5, 25 thru 30, Rule 32, 33, sub-rule (2) of 51, sub-rule (3) and
(5) of 333, Rule 341, 360 and all other enabling provisions of the Civil Aviation Rules, 1994.
This Air Navigation Order shall be effective wef 1st December, 2017 and supersedes earlier revisions of
ANO-145 and ANO-001-AWRG-5.0 dated 4th April, 2011 on ‘Approval of Maintenance Organisations’
specific to organisations defined under Para 145.A.5 of this ANO. Phase wise implementation of this
ANO for the organizations which have been carrying out the Maintenance under ANO-001-AWRG-5.0
or previously enforced regulations shall be in accordance with the latest directive issued by
Airworthiness Directoarte.
01/12/2017 1 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Organisations involved in the maintenance of large aircraft or of aircraft used for commercial air
transport, and components intended for fitment thereto, shall be approved in accordance with the
provisions of this ANO.
This Section establishes the requirements to be met by an organisation to qualify for the issue or
continuation of an approval for the maintenance of aircraft and components.
GM 145.A.10 Scope
This Guidance Material (GM) provides guidance on how the smallest organisations satisfy the intent
of ANO‐145:
1. By inference, the smallest maintenance organisation would only be involved in a limited
number of light aircraft, or aircraft components, used for commercial air transport. It is
therefore a matter of scale; light aircraft do not demand the same level of resources,
facilities or complex maintenance procedures as the large organisation.
2. It is recognised that a ANO‐145 approval may be required by two quite different types of small
organisations, the first being the light aircraft maintenance hangar, the second being the
component maintenance workshop, e.g. small piston engines, radio equipment, etc.
01/08/2017 2 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
3. Where only one person is employed (in fact having the certifying function and others),
these organisations approved under ANO‐145 may use the alternatives provided in point 3.1
limited to the following:
Class A2 Base and Line maintenance of aeroplanes of 5700 kg and below (piston
engines only).
Class A3 Base and Line maintenance of single-engined helicopters of less than 3175 kg.
Class A4 Aircraft other than A1, A2 and A3
Class B2 Piston engines with maximum output of less than 450 HP.
Class C Components.
Class D1 Non-destructive Testing.
3.1 145.A.30 (b): The minimum requirement is for one fulltime person who meets the ANO-066
requirements for certifying staff and holds the position of ‘accountable manager,
maintenance engineer and is also certifying staff’. No other person may issue a
certificate of release to service and therefore if absent, no maintenance may be
released during such absence.
3.1.1 The quality monitoring function of 145.A.65(c) may be contracted to an
appropriate organisation approved under ANO-145 or to a person with
appropriate technical knowledge and extensive experience of quality audits
employed on a part‐time basis, with the agreement of PCAA.
Note: Fulltime for the purpose of ANO-145 means not less than 35 hours per
week except during vacation periods.
3.1.2 145.A.35. In the case of an approval based on one person using a
subcontracted quality monitoring arrangement, the requirement for a record of
certifying staff is satisfied by the submission to and acceptance by the PCAA
of the PCAA Form 4. With only one person the requirement for a separate
record of authorisation is unnecessary because the PCAA Form 3 approval
schedule defines the authorisation. An appropriate statement, to reflect this
situation, should be included in the exposition.
3.1.3 145.A.65(c). It is the responsibility of the contracted quality monitoring
organisation or person to make a minimum of 2 visits per 12 months and it is
the responsibility of this organisation or person to carry out such monitoring on
the basis of 1 pre‐announced visit and 1 not announced visit to the
organisation. It is the responsibility of the organisation to comply with the
findings of the contracted quality monitoring organisation or the person.
CAUTION: it should be understood that if the contracted organisation or the
above mentioned person loses or gives up its approval, then the organisation’s
approval will be suspended.
4. Recommended operating procedure for ANO-145 approved maintenance organisation
based upon up to 10 persons involved in maintenance.
4.1 145.A.30 (b): The normal minimum requirement is for the employment on a fulltime basis
of two persons who meet the competent authorities’ requirements for certifying staff,
whereby one holds the position of ‘maintenance engineer’ and the other holds the
position of ‘quality audit engineer’.
Either person can assume the responsibilities of the accountable manager providing that
they can comply in full with the applicable elements of 145.A.30(a), but the
‘maintenance engineer’ should be the certifying person to retain the independence of
the ‘quality audit engineer’ to carry out audits. Nothing prevents either engineer from
undertaking maintenance tasks providing that the ‘maintenance engineer’ issues the
certificate of release to service.
The ‘quality audit engineer’ should have similar qualifications and status to the
01/08/2017 3 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
‘maintenance engineer’ for reasons of credibility, unless he/she has a proven track-
record in aircraft quality assurance, in which case some reduction in the extent of
maintenance qualifications may be permitted.
In cases where the PCAA agrees that it is not practical for the organisation to
nominate a post-holder for the quality monitoring function, this function may be
contracted in accordance to paragraph 3.1.1.
An application for the issue, change or continuation of an approval shall be made to PCAA in a form
and manner established by Authority.
In a form and in a manner established by the PCAA means that the application should be made
on a PCAA Form 2 (refer to Appendix III to AMC to ANO-145) as mentioned in latest revision of
AWNOT-088-AWRG.
The organisation shall specify the scope of work deemed to constitute approval in its exposition
(Appendix II to Implementing rules contains a table of all classes and ratings).
01/08/2017 4 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
C6 Equipment 25 ‐ 38 - 44 - 45 - 50
C7 Engine – APU 49 - 71 - 72 - 73 ‐ 74 - 75 - 76 -
77 - 78 - 79 - 80 - 81 - 82 - 83
C9 Fuel 28 - 47
C13 Indicating/Recording 31 - 42 - 46
Systems
C15 Oxygen 35
C16 Propellers 61
C19 Windows 56
01/08/2017 5 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
(a) Facilities are provided appropriate for all planned work, ensuring in particular, protection from the
weather elements. Specialized workshops and bays are segregated as appropriate, to ensure that
environmental and work area contamination is unlikely to occur.
1. For base maintenance of aircraft, aircraft hangars are both available and large enough to
accommodate aircraft on planned base maintenance;
2. For component maintenance, component workshops are large enough to accommodate the
components on planned maintenance.
(b) Office accommodation is provided for the management of the planned work referred to in
paragraph (a), and certifying staff so that they can carry out their designated tasks in a manner
that contributes to good aircraft maintenance standards.
(c) The working environment including aircraft hangars, component workshops and office
accommodation is appropriate for the task carried out and in particular special requirements
observed. Unless otherwise dictated by the particular task environment, the working environment
must be such that the effectiveness of personnel is not impaired:
1. Temperatures must be maintained such that personnel can carry out required tasks without
undue discomfort.
2. Dust and any other airborne contamination are kept to a minimum and not be permitted to
reach a level in the work task area where visible aircraft/component surface contamination is
evident. Where dust/other airborne contamination results in visible surface contamination, all
susceptible systems are sealed until acceptable conditions are re-established.
3. Lighting is such as to ensure each inspection and maintenance task can be carried out in an
effective manner.
4. Noise shall not distract personnel from carrying out inspection tasks. Where it is impractical to
control the noise source, such personnel are provided with the necessary personal equipment
to stop excessive noise causing distraction during inspection tasks.
6. The working environment for line maintenance is such that the particular maintenance or
inspection task can be carried out without undue distraction. Therefore, where the working
environment deteriorates to an unacceptable level in respect of temperature, moisture, hail,
ice, snow, wind, light, dust/other airborne contamination, the particular maintenance or
inspection tasks must be suspended until satisfactory conditions are re-established.
(d) Secure storage facilities are provided for components, equipment, tools and material. Storage
conditions ensure segregation of serviceable components and material from unserviceable
aircraft components, material, equipment and tools. The conditions of storage are in accordance
with the manufacturer's instructions to prevent deterioration and damage of stored items. Access
to storage facilities is restricted to authorised personnel.
01/08/2017 6 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
plan relative to the maintenance programme. The aircraft hangar visit plan should be updated
on a regular basis.
2. Protection from the weather elements relates to the normal prevailing local weather elements
that are expected throughout any twelve month period. Aircraft hangar and component
workshop structures should prevent the ingress of rain, hail, ice, snow, wind and dust etc.
Aircraft hangar and component workshop floors should be sealed to minimise dust
generation.
3. For line maintenance of aircraft, hangars are not essential but it is recommended that
access to hangar accommodation be demonstrated for usage during inclement weather for
minor scheduled work and lengthy defect rectification.
4. Aircraft maintenance staff should be provided with an area where they may study
maintenance instructions and complete maintenance records in a proper manner.
(a) The organisation shall appoint an accountable manager who has corporate authority for
ensuring that all maintenance required by the customer can be financed and carried out
to the standard required by this ANO. The accountable manager shall:
1. ensure that all necessary resources are available to accomplish maintenance in
accordance with 145.A.65(b) to support the organisation approval.
2. establish and promote the safety and quality policy specified in 145.A.65(a).
3. demonstrate a basic understanding of this ANO.
(b) The organisation shall nominate a person or group of persons, whose responsibilities
include ensuring that the organisation complies with this ANO. Such person(s) shall
ultimately be responsible to the accountable manager.
1. The person or persons nominated shall represent the maintenance management
structure of the organisation and be responsible for all functions specified in this ANO.
2. The person or persons nominated shall be identified and their credentials submitted in a
form and manner established by PCAA.
3. The person or persons nominated shall be able to demonstrate relevant knowledge,
background and satisfactory experience related to aircraft or component
maintenance and demonstrate a working knowledge of this ANO.
01/08/2017 7 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
4. Procedures shall make clear who deputizes for any particular person in the case of
lengthy absence of the said person.
(c) The accountable manager under paragraph (a) shall appoint a person with responsibility
for monitoring the quality system, including the associated feedback system as required by
145.A.65(c). The appointed person shall have direct access to the accountable manager
to ensure that the accountable manager is kept properly informed on quality and
compliance matters.
(d) The organisation shall have a maintenance manhour plan showing that the organisation has
sufficient staff to plan, perform, supervise, inspect and quality monitor the organisation
in accordance with the approval. In addition, the organisation shall have a procedure to
reassess work intended to be carried out when actual staff availability is less than the
planned staffing level for any particular work shift or period.
(e) The organisation shall establish and control the competence of personnel involved in any
maintenance, management and/or quality audits in accordance with a procedure and to a
standard agreed by the competent authority. In addition to the necessary expertise
related to the job function, competence must include an understanding of the application
of human factors and human performance issues appropriate to that person's function in
the organisation.
"Human factors" means principles, w h i c h apply to aeronautical design, certification,
training, operations and maintenance and which seek safe interface between the
human and other system components by proper consideration of human performance.
"Human performance" means human capabilities and limitations, which have an
impact on the safety and efficiency of aeronautical operations.
(f) The organisation shall ensure that personnel who carry out and/or control a continued
airworthiness non-destructive test of aircraft structures and/or components are appropriately
qualified for the particular non-destructive test in accordance with the European or equivalent
Standard recognised by PCAA. Personnel who carry out any other specialised task shall be
appropriately qualified in accordance with officially recognised Standards. By derogation to
this paragraph those personnel specified in paragraphs (g) and (h)(1) and (h)(2), qualified in
category B1 or B3 in accordance with ANO-066 may carry out and/or control colour contrast
dye penetrant tests.
(g) Any organisation maintaining aircraft, except where stated otherwise in point (j), shall in the
case of aircraft line maintenance, have appropriate aircraft rated certifying staff qualified as
category B1, B2, B3, as appropriate, in accordance with ANO-066 and point 145.A.35.
In addition, such organisations may also use appropriately task trained certifying staff
holding the privileges described in points 66.A.20(a)(1) and 66.A.20(a)(3)(ii) and
qualified in accordance with ANO-066 and point 145.A.35 to carry out minor scheduled line
maintenance and simple defect rectification. The availability of such certifying staff shall not
replace the need for category B1, B2, B3 certifying staff, as appropriate.
(h) Any organisation maintaining aircraft, except where stated otherwise in paragraph (j) shall:
1. in the case of base maintenance of large aircraft, have appropriate aircraft type
rated certifying staff qualified as category C in accordance with ANO-066 and
145.A.35. In addition the organisation shall have sufficient aircraft type rated staff
qualified as category B1, B2 as appropriate in accordance with ANO-066 and 145.A.35
to support the category C certifying staff.
(i) B1 and B2 support staff shall ensure that all relevant tasks or inspections have
been carried out to the required standard before the category C certifying
staff issues the certificate of release to service.
(ii) The organisation shall maintain a register of any such B1 and B2 support staff.
(iii) The category C certifying staff shall ensure that compliance with paragraph (i) has
been met and that all work required by the customer has been accomplished
01/08/2017 8 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
during the particular base maintenance check or work package, and shall also
assess the impact of any work not carried out with a view to either requiring its
accomplishment or agreeing with the operator to defer such work to another
specified check or time limit.
2. in the case of base maintenance of aircraft other than large aircraft have either:
(i) appropriate aircraft rated certifying staff qualified as category B1, B2, B3, as
appropriate, in accordance with ANO-066 and point 145.A.35 or,
(ii) appropriate aircraft rated certifying staff qualified in category C assisted by support
staff as specified in point 145.A.35(a)(i).
(i) Component certifying staff shall comply with latest revision of AWNOT-025-AWEG.
(j) By derogation to paragraphs (g) and (h), in relation to the obligation to comply with
ANO-066, the organisation may use certifying staff qualified in accordance with the following
provisions:
1. For organisation facilities located outside Pakistan the certifying staff may be qualified in
accordance with the national aviation regulations of the State in which the
organisation facility is registered subject to the conditions specified in Appendix IV to
this ANO.
2. For line maintenance carried out at a line station of an organisation which is located
outside Pakistan, the certifying staff may be qualified in accordance with the national
aviation regulations of the State in which the line station is based, subject to the
conditions specified in Appendix IV to this ANO.
3. For a repetitive pre‐flight airworthiness directive which specifically states that the flight
crew may carry out such airworthiness directive, the organisation may issue a limited
certification authorisation to the aircraft commander and/or the flight engineer on the
basis of the flight crew license held. However, the organisation shall ensure that
sufficient practical training has been carried out to ensure that such aircraft
commander or flight engineer can accomplish the airworthiness directive to the required
standard.
4. In the case of aircraft operating away from a supported location the organisation
may issue a limited certification authorisation to the commander and/or the flight
engineer on the basis of the flight crew license held subject to being satisfied that
sufficient practical training has been carried out to ensure that the commander or flight
engineer can accomplish the specified task to the required standard. The provisions of
this paragraph shall be detailed in an exposition procedure.
5. In the following unforeseen cases, where an aircraft is grounded at a location other
than the main base where no appropriate certifying staff is available, the organisation
contracted to provide maintenance support may issue a one-off certification
authorisation:
(i) to one of its employees holding equivalent type authorisations on aircraft of
similar technology, construction and systems; or
(ii) to any person with not less than five years maintenance experience and holding a
valid ICAO aircraft maintenance license rated for the aircraft type requiring
certification provided there is no organisation appropriately approved under this
ANO at that location and the contracted organisation obtains and holds on file
evidence of the experience and the license of that person.
All such cases as specified in this subparagraph shall be reported to PCAA within seven
days of the issuance of such certification authorisation. The organisation issuing the
one-off authorisation shall ensure that any such maintenance that could affect flight
safety is rechecked by an appropriately approved organisation.
01/08/2017 9 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
1. Has sufficient staff means that the organisation employs or contracts competent staff, as
detailed in the man-hour plan, of which at least half the staff that perform maintenance in
each workshop, hangar or flight line on any shift should be employed to ensure
01/08/2017 10 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
3. The maintenance man-hour plan should relate to the anticipated maintenance workload
except that when the organisation cannot predict such workload, due to the short-term
nature of its contracts, then such plan should be based upon the minimum maintenance
workload needed for commercial viability. Maintenance workload includes all necessary
work such as, but not limited to, planning, maintenance record checks, production of
worksheets/cards in paper or electronic form, accomplishment of maintenance, inspection
and the completion of maintenance records.
4. In the case of aircraft base maintenance, the maintenance man-hour plan should relate to
the aircraft hangar visit plan as specified in AMC 145.A.25 (a).
5. In the case of aircraft component maintenance, the maintenance man-hour plan should
relate to the aircraft component planned maintenance as specified in 145.A.25 (a) (2).
6. The quality monitoring compliance function man-hours should be sufficient to meet the
requirement of 145.A.65(c) which means taking into account AMC 145.A.65(c). Where
quality monitoring staff perform other functions, the time allocated to such functions needs to
be taken into account in determining quality monitoring staff numbers.
7. The maintenance man-hour plan should be reviewed at least every 3 months and updated
when necessary.
8. Significant deviation from the maintenance man-hour plan should be reported through
the departmental manager to the quality manager and the accountable manager for review.
Significant deviation means more than a 25% shortfall in available man-hours during a
calendar month for any one of the functions specified in 145.A.30(d).
AMC 1 145.A.30(e)
The referenced procedure requires amongst others that planners, mechanics, specialised services
staff, supervisors, certifying staff and support staff, whether employed or contracted, are assessed
for competence before unsupervised work commences and competence is controlled on a
continuous basis.
01/08/2017 11 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 12 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
AMC 3 145.A.30(e)
Additional training in fuel tank safety as well as associated inspection standards and maintenance
procedures should be required for maintenance organisations’ technical personnel, especially
technical personnel involved in the compliance of CDCCL tasks.
Guidance is provided for training to maintenance organisation personnel in Appendix IV to AMC
to 145.A.30(e) and 145.B.10(3).
01/08/2017 13 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
AMC 4 145.A.30(e)
Competence assessment should include the verification for the need of additional EWIS training
when relevant.
In the absence of specific PCAA guidance, guidance of EASA AMC 20-22 may be used for EWIS
training programme to maintenance organisation personnel.
01/08/2017 14 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
In the particular case of helicopters, and in addition to the items above, the following:
01/08/2017 15 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
(t) removal and installation of external cargo provisions (i.e., external hook, mirrors) other
than the hoist.
(u) removal and installation of quick release external cameras and search lights.
(v) removal and installation of emergency float bags, not including the bottles.
(w) removal and installation of external doors fitted with quick release attachments.
(x) removal and installation of snow pads/skid wear shoes/slump protection pads.
The above procedures should be specified in the maintenance organisation exposition and
be accepted by PCAA.
2.(i) Typical tasks that may be certified and/or carried out by the commander holding an
ATPL or CPL are minor maintenance or simple checks included in the following list:
01/08/2017 16 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
3. The authorisation should have a finite life of twelve months subject to satisfactory re-current
training on the applicable aircraft type.
01/08/2017 17 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
availability of required tooling and/or test equipment needed to complete the work.
01/08/2017 18 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Topics should be related to maintenance engineering where possible; too much unrelated theory
should be avoided.
1 General/Introduction to human factors
1.1 Need to address human factors
1.2 Statistics
1.3 Incidents
2 Safety Culture/Organisational factors
3 Human Error
3.1 Error models and theories
3.2 Types of errors in maintenance tasks
3.3 Violations
3.4 Implications of errors
3.5 Avoiding and managing errors
3.6 Human reliability
4 Human performance & limitations
4.1 Vision
4.2 Hearing
4.3 Information--‐processing
4.4 Attention and perception
4.5 Situational awareness
4.6 Memory
4.7 Claustrophobia and physical access
4.8 Motivation
4.9 Fitness/Health
4.10 Stress
4.11 Workload management
4.12 Fatigue
4.13 Alcohol, medication, drugs
4.14 Physical work
4.15 Repetitive tasks/complacency
5 Environment
5.1 Peer pressure
5.2 Stressors
5.3 Time pressure and deadlines
5.4 Workload
5.5 Shift Work
5.6 Noise and fumes
5.7 Illumination
01/08/2017 19 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 20 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
personnel performance,
— competences to be observed during the assessment in relation with each job function,
— actions to be taken when assessment is not satisfactory,
— recording of assessment results.
For example, according to the job functions and the scope, size and complexity of the
organisation, the assessment may consider the following (the table is not exhaustive):
01/08/2017 21 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
support staff
Quality audit
Service staff
Specialized
Supervisor
Mechanics
Managers
Certifying
Planners
staff and
staff
Knowledge of applicable officially recognized standards X X
01/08/2017 22 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
support staff
Quality audit
Service staff
Specialized
Supervisor
Mechanics
Managers
Certifying
Planners
staff and
staff
Ability to identify and rectify existing and
X X X X X
potential unsafe conditions
Ability to manage third parties involved in maintenance
X X
activity
Ability to confirm proper accomplishment of
X X X X
maintenance tasks
Ability to identify and properly plan performance of
critical task
X X X
Ability to prioritise tasks and report discrepancies X X X X
01/08/2017 23 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Telephone Email
Independent worker
Trade Group: airframe engine electric avionics other (specify) ……… …………
Telephone
Telephone
Approval Number
Period of employment From: To:
Domain of employment
Planning Engineering Technical records
Store department Purchasing
Mechanics/Technician
Line Maintenance Base Maintenance Component Maintenance
Servicing Removal/installation
Testing/inspection
Scheduled Maintenance Inspection Repair
Trouble-shooting Trouble‐shooting Overhaul
Repair Re‐treatment
Reassembly
A/C type A/C type Component
type
01/08/2017 24 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Details of employment
Certified
Name Date
Position Signature
Contact
GM 145.A.30(j)(4) Personnel requirements (Flight crew)
Refer to applicable flight crew National licensing requirements
Advisory A copy of the present credential will be kept for at least 3 years from its issuance
by the Organization
01/08/2017 25 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 26 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 27 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
1. Holding an ANO-66 license with the relevant type/group rating, or a national qualification in
the case of components, does not mean by itself that the holder is qualified to be
authorised as certifying staff and/or support staff. The organisation is responsible to
assess the competence of the holder for the scope of maintenance to be authorised.
2. The sentence “the organisation shall ensure that certifying staff and support staff have an
adequate understanding of the relevant aircraft and/or components to be maintained
together with the associated organisation procedures” means that the person has received
training and has been successfully assessed on:
• the type of aircraft or component;
• the differences on:
01/08/2017 28 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 29 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
2. Continuation training should cover changes in relevant requirements such as ANO-145, changes in
organisation procedures and the modification standard of the products being maintained plus
human factor issues identified from any internal or external analysis of incidents. It should also
address instances where staff failed to follow procedures and the reasons why particular
procedures are not always followed. In many cases the continuation training will reinforce the need
to follow procedures and ensure that incomplete or incorrect procedures are identified to the
company in order that they can be corrected. This does not preclude the possible need to carry out
a quality audit of such procedures.
3. Continuation training should be of sufficient duration in each 2 year period to meet the intent of
145.A.35(d) and may be split into a number of separate elements. 145.A.35(d) requires such
training to keep certifying staff updated in terms of relevant technology, procedures and human
factors issues which means it is one part of ensuring quality. Therefore sufficient duration should
be related to relevant quality audit findings and other internal / external sources of information
available to the organisation on human errors in maintenance. This means that in the case of an
organisation that maintains aircraft with few relevant quality audit findings, continuation training
could be limited to days rather than weeks, whereas a similar organisation with a number of
relevant quality audit findings, such training may take several weeks. For an organisation that
maintains aircraft components, the duration of continuation training would follow the same
philosophy but should be scaled down to reflect the more limited nature of the activity. For example
certifying staff who release hydraulic pumps may only require a few hours of continuation training
whereas those who release turbine engine may only require a few days of such training. The
content of continuation training should be related to relevant quality audit findings and it is
recommended that such training is reviewed at least once in every 24 month period.
4. The method of training is intended to be a flexible process and could, for example, include an
ANO‐147 continuation training course, aeronautical college courses, internal short duration
courses, seminars, etc. The elements, general content and length of such training should be
specified in the maintenance organisation exposition unless such training is undertaken by an
organisation approved under ANO-147 when such details may be specified under the approval and
cross-referenced in the maintenance organisation exposition.
01/08/2017 30 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 31 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 32 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
(a) a release document issued by an organisation under the terms of a bilateral agreement
signed by PCAA;
(b) EASA Form 1;
(c) FAA Form 8130-3;
(d) Transport Canada TCCA 24-0078 or Authorised Release Certificate Form One;
(e) Any other release document subject to acceptance of PCAA.”
2. For acceptance of standard parts, raw material and consumable material, refer to AMC
M.A.501(c) and AMC M.A.501 (d).
01/08/2017 33 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 34 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 35 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
modifications.
(e) The organisation shall provide a common work card or worksheet system to be used
throughout relevant parts of the organisation. In addition, the organisation shall either
transcribe accurately the maintenance data contained in paragraphs (b) and (d) onto such
work cards or worksheets or make precise reference to the particular maintenance task
or tasks contained in such maintenance data. Work cards and worksheets may be
computer generated and held on an electronic database subject to both adequate
safeguards against unauthorised alteration and a back-up electronic database which shall
be updated within 24 hours of any entry made to the main electronic database. Complex
maintenance tasks shall be transcribed onto the work cards or worksheets and subdivided
into clear stages to ensure a record of the accomplishment of the complete maintenance
task.
Where the organisation provides a maintenance service to an aircraft operator who requires
their work card or worksheet system to be used then such work card or worksheet system
may be used. In this case, the organisation shall establish a procedure to ensure correct
completion of the aircraft operators' work cards or worksheets.
(f) The organisation shall ensure that all applicable maintenance data is readily available for
use when required by maintenance personnel.
(g) The organisation shall establish a procedure to ensure that maintenance data it controls is
kept up to date. In the case of operator/customer controlled and provided maintenance
data, the organisation shall be able to show that either it has written confirmation from the
operator/customer that all such maintenance data is up to date or it has work orders
specifying the amendment status of the maintenance data to be used or it can show that it is
on the operator/customer maintenance data amendment list.
01/08/2017 36 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 37 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 38 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 39 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 40 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 41 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
‘Certifies that the work specified, except as otherwise specified, was carried out in accordance
with ANO-145 and in respect to that work the aircraft/aircraft component is considered ready
for release to service’.
Reference should also be made to the PCAA ANO-145 approval number.
2. It is acceptable to use an alternate abbreviated certificate of release to service
consisting of the following statement ‘ANO-145 release to service’ instead of the full
certification statement specified in paragraph 1. When the alternate abbreviated certificate
of release to service is used, the introductory section of the technical log should include
an example of the full certification statement from paragraph 1.
3. The certificate of release to service should relate to the task specified in the (S)TC
holder’s or operator’s instructions or the aircraft maintenance programme which itself may
cross-refer to maintenance data.
4. The date such maintenance was carried out should include when the maintenance took
place relative to any life or overhaul limitation in terms of date/flying hours/cycles/landings
etc., as appropriate.
5. When extensive maintenance has been carried out, it is acceptable for the certificate of
release to service to summarise the maintenance as long as there is a unique cross-
reference to the work package containing full details of maintenance carried out.
Dimensional information should be retained in the work-pack record.
01/08/2017 42 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 43 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 44 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
specified in paragraph 2.4 including the aircraft from which the aircraft
component was removed.
2.6.2. Serviceable aircraft components removed from a non-PCAA registered aircraft
may only be issued with a PCAA Form 1 if the components are leased or
loaned from the maintenance organisation approved under ANO-145 who
retains control of the airworthiness status of the components. A PCAA Form
1 may be issued and should contain the information as specified in
paragraph 2.4 including the aircraft from which the aircraft component was
removed.
2.7. Used aircraft components removed from an aircraft withdrawn from service.
Serviceable aircraft components removed from a Member State registered aircraft
withdrawn from service may be issued with a PCAA Form 1 by a maintenance
organisation approved under ANO-145 subject to compliance with this subparagraph.
(a) Aircraft withdrawn from service are sometimes dismantled for spares. This
is considered to be a maintenance activity and should be accomplished
under the control of an organisation approved under ANO-145, employing
procedures approved by the Competent Authority.
(b) To be eligible for installation, components removed from such aircraft may be
issued with a PCAA Form 1 by an appropriately rated organisation following
a satisfactory assessment.
(c) As a minimum, the assessment will need to satisfy the standards set out in
paragraphs 2.5 and 2.6 as appropriate. This should, where known, include
the possible need for the alignment of scheduled maintenance that may be
necessary to comply with the maintenance programme applicable to the
aircraft on which the component is to be installed.
(d) Irrespective of whether the aircraft holds a certificate of airworthiness or
not, the organisation responsible for certifying any removed component
should ensure that the manner in which the components were removed and
stored are compatible with the standards required by ANO-145.
(e) A structured plan should be formulated to control the aircraft disassembly
process. The disassembly is to be carried out by an appropriately rated
organisation under the supervision of certifying staff who will ensure that the
aircraft components are removed and documented in a structured manner in
accordance with the appropriate maintenance data and disassembly plan.
(f) All recorded aircraft defects should be reviewed and the possible effects
these may have on both normal and standby functions of removed
components are to be considered.
(g) Dedicated control documentation is to be used as detailed by the disassembly
plan, to facilitate the recording of all maintenance actions and component
removals performed during the disassembly process. Components found to
be unserviceable are to be identified as such and quarantined pending a
decision on the actions to be taken. Records of the maintenance
accomplished to establish serviceability are to form part of the component
maintenance history.
(h) Suitable ANO-145 facilities for the removal and storage of removed
components are to be used which include suitable environmental
conditions, lighting, access equipment, aircraft tooling and storage facilities
for the work to be undertaken. While it may be acceptable for components to
be removed, given local environmental conditions, without the benefit of an
enclosed facility, subsequent disassembly (if required) and storage of the
components should be in accordance with the manufacturer’s
recommendations.
01/08/2017 45 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
2.8. Used aircraft components maintained by organisations not approved in accordance with
ANO-145. For used components maintained by a maintenance organisation not
approved under ANO-145, due care should be taken before acceptance of such
components. In such cases an appropriately rated maintenance organisation
approved under ANO-‐145 should establish satisfactory conditions by:
(a) dismantling the component for sufficient inspection in accordance with the
appropriate maintenance data;
(b) replacing all service life‐limit components when no satisfactory evidence of
life used is available and/or the components are in an unsatisfactory
condition;
(c) reassembling and testing as necessary the component;
(d) completing all certification requirements as specified in 145. A.50.
2.9. Used aircraft components removed from an aircraft involved in an accident or incident.
Such components should only be issued with a PCAA Form 1 when processed in
accordance with paragraph 2.7 and a specific work order including all additional
necessary tests and inspections deemed necessary by the accident or incident. Such
a work order may require input from the TC holder or original manufacturer as
appropriate. This work order should be referenced in block 12.
01/08/2017 46 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 47 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 48 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
lksd
01/08/2017 49 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
both.
5. Paper systems should use robust material which can withstand normal handling and filing.
The record should remain legible throughout the required retention period.
6 Computer systems may be used to control maintenance and/or record details of maintenance
work carried out. Computer systems used for maintenance should have at least one
backup system which should be updated at least within 24 hours of any maintenance.
Each terminal is required to contain programme safeguards against the ability of
unauthorised personnel to alter the database.
01/08/2017 50 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 51 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 52 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
nm
ANO 145.A.65 Safety and Quality Policy, Maintenance Procedures and Quality System
(a) The organisation shall establish a safety and quality policy for the organisation to be
included in the exposition under 145.A.70.
(b) The organisation shall establish procedures agreed by PCAA taking into account human
factors and human performance to ensure good maintenance practices and compliance with
this ANO which shall include a clear work order or contract such that aircraft and
components may be released to service in accordance with point 145. A.50.
1. The maintenance procedures under this paragraph apply to points 145.A.25 to 145.A.95.
2. The maintenance procedures established or to be established by the organisation under
this paragraph shall cover all aspects of carrying out the maintenance activity,
including the provision and control of specialised services and lay down the
standards to which the organisation intends to work.
3. With regard to aircraft line and base maintenance, the organisation shall establish
procedures to minimise the risk of multiple errors and capture errors on critical
systems, and to ensure that no person is required to carry out and inspect in relation
to a maintenance task involving some element of disassembly/ reassembly of several
components of the same type fitted to more than one system on the same aircraft
during a particular maintenance check. However, when only one person is available to
carry out these tasks then the organisation’s work card or worksheet shall include an
additional stage for re-inspection of the work by this person after completion of all the
same tasks.
4. Maintenance procedures shall be established to ensure that damage is assessed and
modifications and repairs are carried out using data approved by PCAA or by a
design organisation acceptable to PCAA, as appropriate.
(c) The organisation shall establish a quality system that includes the following:
1. Independent audits in order to monitor compliance with required aircraft/aircraft
component standards and adequacy of the procedures to ensure that such
procedures invoke good maintenance practices and airworthy aircraft/aircraft
components. In the smallest organisations the independent audit part of the quality
system may be contracted to another organisation approved under this ANO or a
person with appropriate technical knowledge and proven satisfactory audit experience;
and
2. A quality feedback reporting system to the person or group of persons specified
in 145.A.30(b) and ultimately to the accountable manager that ensures proper and
timely corrective action is taken in response to reports resulting from the independent
audits established to meet paragraph (1).
(d) The organization shall establish (as applicable) a Safety Management System (SMS) as per the
requirements mentioned in the latest revision of ANO-001-RGSP.
AMC 145.A.65(a) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
The safety and quality policy should as a minimum include a statement committing the organisation
to:
• Recognise safety as a prime consideration at all times.
• Apply Human factors principles.
• Encourage personnel to report maintenance related errors/incidents.
• Recognise that compliance with procedures, quality standards, safety standards and
regulations is the duty of all personnel.
• Recognise the need for all personnel to cooperate with the quality auditors.
01/12/2017 53 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
AMC 145.A.65(b) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. Maintenance procedures should be held current such that they reflect best practice within the
organisation. It is the responsibility of all organisation’s employees to report any
differences via their organisation’s internal occurrence reporting mechanisms.
2. All procedures, and changes to those procedures, should be verified and validated before use
where practicable.
3. All technical procedures should be designed and presented in accordance with good human
factors principles.
AMC 145.A.65(b)(2) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
Specialised services include any specialised activity, such as, but not limited to non-destructive
testing requiring particular skills and/or qualification. ANO145.A.30(f) covers the qualification of
personnel but, in addition, there is a need to establish maintenance procedures that cover the
control of any specialised process.
AMC 145.A.65(b)(3) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. The purpose of this procedure is to minimise the rare possibility of an error being
repeated whereby the identical aircraft components are not reassembled thereby
compromising more than one system. One example is the remote possibility of failure to
reinstall engine gearbox access covers or oil filler caps on all engines of a multi‐engined
aircraft resulting in major oil loss from all engines.
Another example is the case of removal and refitment of oil filler caps, which should require a
re-inspection of all oil filler caps after the last oil filler cap has supposedly been refitted.
2. Procedures should be established to detect and rectify maintenance errors that could, as
minimum, result in a failure, malfunction, or defect endangering the safe operation of the
aircraft if not performed properly. The procedure should identify the method for capturing
errors, and the maintenance tasks or processes concerned.
In order to determine the work items to be considered, the following maintenance tasks
should primarily be reviewed to assess their impact on safety:
• Installation, rigging and adjustments of flight controls,
• Installation of aircraft engines, propellers and rotors,
• Overhaul, calibration or rigging of components such as engines, propellers, transmissions
and gearboxes but additional information should also be processed, such as:
• Previous experiences of maintenance errors, depending on the consequence of the
failure,
• Information arising from the ‘occurrence reporting system’ required by 145.A.60,
• PCAA requirements for error capturing, if applicable.
3. In order to prevent omissions, every maintenance task or group of tasks should be signed-off.
To ensure the task or group of tasks is completed it should only be signed-off after
completion. Work by unauthorised personnel (i.e. temporary staff, trainee,) should be
checked by authorised personnel before they sign-off. The grouping of tasks for the purpose
of signing-off should allow critical steps to be clearly identified
Note: A “sign-off” is a statement by the competent person performing or supervising the work, that
the task or group of tasks has been correctly performed. A sign-off relates to one step in the
maintenance process and is therefore different to the release to service of the aircraft.
“Authorised personnel” means personnel formally authorised by the maintenance
organisation approved under ANO-145 to sign-off tasks. “Authorised personnel” are not
necessarily “certifying staff”.
4. The maintenance organisation should ensure that when carrying out a modification, repair
01/08/2017 54 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
AMC 145.A.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. The primary objectives of the quality system are to enable the organisation to ensure that it
can deliver a safe product and that organisation remains in compliance with the
requirements.
2. An essential element of the quality system is the independent audit
3. The independent audit is an objective process of routine sample checks of all aspects of the
organisation’s ability to carry out all maintenance to the required standards and includes
some product sampling as this is the end result of the maintenance process. It represents an
objective overview of the complete maintenance related activities and is intended to
complement the 145.A.50 (a) requirement for certifying staff to be satisfied that all required
maintenance has been properly carried out before issue of the certificate of release to
service. Independent audits should include a percentage of random audits carried out on a
sample basis when maintenance is being carried out. This means some audits during the
night for those organisations that work at night.
4. Except as specified in sub-paragraphs 7 and 9, the independent audit should ensure that all
aspects of ANO-145 compliance are checked every 12 months and may be carried out as
a complete single exercise or subdivided over the 12 month period in accordance with a
scheduled plan. The independent audit does not require each procedure to be checked
against each product line when it can be shown that the particular procedure is
common to more than one product line and the procedure has been checked every 12
months without resultant findings. Where findings have been identified, the particular
procedure should be rechecked against other product lines until the findings have been
rectified after which the independent audit procedure may revert back to 12 monthly for the
particular procedure.
5. Except as specified otherwise in subparagraph 7, the independent audit should sample
check one product on each product line every 12 months as a demonstration of the
effectiveness of maintenance procedures compliance. It is recommended that procedures
and product audits be combined by selecting a specific product example, such as an aircraft
or engine or instrument and sample checking all the procedures and requirements
associated with the specific product example to ensure that the end result should be an
airworthy product.
01/08/2017 55 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
For the purpose of the independent audit, a product line includes any product under an
Appendix II approval class rating as specified in the approval schedule issued to the
particular organisation.
It therefore follows for example that a maintenance organisation approved under ANO-145
with a capability to maintain aircraft, repair engines, brakes and autopilots would need to
carry out four complete audit sample checks each year except as specified otherwise in
subparagraphs 5, 7 or 9.
6. The sample check of a product means to witness any relevant testing and visually
inspect the product and associated documentation. The sample check should not involve
repeat disassembly or testing unless the sample check identifies findings requiring such
action.
7. Except as specified otherwise in sub-paragraph 9, where the smallest organisation, that is an
organisation with a maximum of 10 personnel actively engaged in maintenance, chooses to
contract the independent audit element of the quality system in accordance with 145.A.65
(c)(1) it is conditional on the audit being carried out twice in every 12 month period.
8. Except as specified otherwise in sub‐paragraph 9, where the organisation has line stations
listed as per 145.A.75 the quality system should describe how these are integrated into the
system and include a plan to audit each listed line station at a frequency consistent with the
extent of flight activity at the particular line station. Except as specified otherwise in
sub‐paragraph 9 the maximum period between audits of a particular line station should not
exceed 12 months.
9. Except as specified otherwise in sub-paragraph 5, PCAA may agree to increase any of the
audit time periods specified in this AMC 145.A.65 (c)(1) by up to 100% provided that there is
no safety related findings and subject to being satisfied that the organisation has a good
record of rectifying findings in a timely manner.
10. A report should be raised each time an audit is carried out describing what was checked
and the resulting findings against applicable requirements, procedures and products.
11. The independence of the audit should be established by always ensuring that audits are
carried out by personnel not responsible for the function, procedure or products being
checked. It therefore follows that a large maintenance organisation approved under
ANO-145, being an organisation with more than about 500 maintenance staff should have
a dedicated quality audit group whose sole function is to conduct audits, raise finding
reports and follow up to check that findings are being rectified. For the medium sized
maintenance organisation approved under ANO‐145, being an organisation with less than
about 500 maintenance staff, it is acceptable to use competent personnel from one
section/department not responsible for the production function, procedure or product to
audit the section/department that is responsible subject to the overall planning and
implementation being under the control of the quality manager. Organisations with a
maximum of 10 maintenance staff actively engaged in carrying out maintenance may
contract the independent audit element of the quality system to another organisation or a
qualified and competent person approved by the Competent Authority.
AMC 145.A.65(c)(2) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. An essential element of the quality system is the quality feedback system.
2. The quality feedback system may not be contracted to outside persons. The principle
function of the quality feedback system is to ensure that all findings resulting from the
independent quality audits of the organisation are properly investigated and corrected in a
timely manner and to enable the accountable manager to be kept informed of any safety
issues and the extent of compliance with ANO-145.
3. The independent quality audit reports referenced in AMC 145.A.65(c)(1) sub-paragraph 10
should be sent to the relevant department(s) for rectification action giving target
rectification dates. Rectification dates should be discussed with such department(s)
01/08/2017 56 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
before the quality department or nominated quality auditor confirms such dates in the
report. The relevant department(s) are required by 145.A.65(c)(2) to rectify findings and
inform the quality department or nominated quality auditor of such rectification.
4. The accountable manager should hold regular meetings with staff to check progress on
rectification except that in the large organisations such meetings may be delegated on a
day to day basis to the quality manager subject to the accountable manager meeting at
least twice per year with the senior staff involved to review the overall performance and
receiving at least a half yearly summary report on findings of non-compliance.
5. All records pertaining to the independent quality audit and the quality feedback system should
be retained for at least 2 years after the date of clearance of the finding to which they
refer or for such periods as to support changes to the AMC 145.A.65(c)(1) sub-paragraph 9
audit time periods, whichever is the longer.
GM 145.A.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. The purpose of this GM is to give guidance on just one acceptable working audit plan to
meet part of the needs of 145.A.65 (c)1. There is any number of other acceptable working
audit plans.
2. The proposed plan lists the subject matter that should be covered by the audit and
attempts to indicate applicability in the various types of workshops and aircraft facilities.
The list should therefore be tailored for the particular situation and more than one list may
be necessary. Each list should be shown against a timetable to indicate when the particular
item is scheduled for audit and when the audit was completed.
01/08/2017 57 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 58 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 59 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
mn
01/08/2017 60 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
covered. Where an organisation uses a different format, for example, to allow the exposition to
serve for more than one approval, then the exposition should contain a cross-reference Annex
using this list as an index with an explanation as to where the subject matter can be found in the
exposition.
The exposition should contain information, as applicable, on how the maintenance organisation
complies with Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations’ (CDCCL) instructions.
Small maintenance organisations may combine the various items to form a simple exposition
more relevant to their needs.
The operator may use electronic data processing (EDP) for publication of the maintenance
organisation exposition. The maintenance organisation exposition should be made available to
PCAA in a form acceptable to the Authority. Attention should be paid to the compatibility of
EDP publication systems with the necessary dissemination of the maintenance organisation
exposition, both internally and externally.
PART 0 GENERAL ORGANISATION
This section is reserved for those maintenance organisations approved under ANO-145 who are
also operators within PCAA.
PART 1 MANAGEMENT
1.1 Corporate commitment by the accountable manager
1.2 Safety and quality policy
1.3 Management personnel
1.4 Duties and responsibilities of the management personnel
1.5 Management organisation chart
1.6 List of certifying staff and support staff
1.7 Manpower resources
1.8 General description of the facilities at each address intended to be approved
1.9 Organisations intended scope of work
1.10 Notification procedure to PCAA regarding changes to the organisation’s
activities/approval/location/personnel.
1.11 Exposition amendment procedures including, if applicable, delegated procedures
01/08/2017 61 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
PART 4
01/08/2017 62 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
PART 5
5.1 Sample of documents
5.2 List of Subcontractors as per 145.A.75 (b)
5.3 List of Line maintenance locations as per 145.A.75 (d)
5.4 List of contracted organisations as per 145.A.70(a)(16)
PART 7
(Reserved)
PART 8
(Reserved)
01/08/2017 63 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
(c) The quality system procedures including the methods of qualifying mechanics,
inspection, certifying staff and quality audit personnel.
(d) Contracting operator procedures and paperwork.
9. The accountable manager’s exposition statement as specified under 145.A.70 (a)(1) should
embrace the intent of the following paragraph and in fact this statement may be used
without amendment. Any modification to the statement should not alter the intent.
This exposition and any associated referenced manuals define the organisation and procedures
upon which the (Competent Authority*) ANO-‐145 approval is based as required by 145.A.70.
These procedures are approved by the undersigned and should be complied with, as applicable,
when work orders are being progressed under the terms of the ANO-‐145 approval.
It is accepted that these procedures do not override the necessity of complying with any new
or amended regulation published by the (competent authority*) from time to time where these
new or amended regulations are in conflict with these procedures.
It is understood that the (Competent Authority*) will approve this organisation whilst the
(Competent Authority*) is satisfied that the procedures are being followed and work standards
maintained. It is further understood that the (Competent Authority*) reserves the right to
suspend, limit or revoke the approval of the organisation if the (Competent Authority*) has
evidence that procedures are not followed or standards not upheld.
Signed ........................................
Dated ..........................................
NOTE: Where it states (Competent Authority*) please insert the actual name of the Competent
Authority, for example, EASA, CAA--‐NL, LBA, DGAC, CAA, etc.
Whenever the accountable manager changes, it is important to ensure that the new
accountable manager signs the paragraph 9 statement at the earliest opportunity.
Failure to carry out this action could invalidate the ANO‐145 approval.
10. When an organisation is approved against any other Part containing a requirement for an
exposition, a supplement covering the differences will suffice to meet the requirements
except that the supplement should have an index showing where those parts missing from
the supplement are covered.
01/08/2017 64 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 65 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
3.3 For the criteria specified in sub‐paragraph 3.1 the organisation is not required to have
complete facilities for maintenance that it needs to sub-contract but it should have its
own expertise to determine that the sub-contractor meets the necessary standards.
However an organisation cannot be approved unless it has the in-house facilities,
procedures and expertise to carry out the majority of maintenance for which it
wishes to be approved in terms of the number of class ratings.
3.4 The organisation may find it necessary to include several specialist sub-contractors
to enable it to be approved to completely certify the release to service of a particular
product. Examples could be specialist welding, electroplating, painting etc. To
authorise the use of such subcontractors, PCAA will need to be satisfied that the
organisation has the necessary expertise and procedures to control such sub-
contractors.
3.5 An organisation working outside the scope of its approval schedule is deemed to be not
approved. Such an organisation may in this circumstance operate only under the sub-
contract control of another organisation approved under ANO‐145.
3.6 Authorisation to sub‐contract is indicated by PCAA accepting the maintenance
organisation exposition containing a specific procedure on the control of sub-
contractors.
4. PRINCIPLE ANO-145 PROCEDURES FOR THE CONTROL OF SUB‐CONTRACTORS NOT
APPROVED UNDER ANO-145
4.1 A pre-audit procedure should be established whereby the maintenance organisations’
subcontract control section, which may also be the 145.A.65(c) quality system
independent audit section, should audit a prospective subcontractor to determine
whether those services of the subcontractor that it wishes to use meets the intent of
ANO-145.
4.2 The organisation approved under ANO-145 needs to assess to what extent it will use
the sub-contractor`s facilities. As a general rule the organisation should require its
own paperwork, approved data and material/spare parts to be used, but it could
permit the use of tools, equipment and personnel from the sub-contractor as long as
such tools, equipment and personnel meet the requirement of ANO-145. In the case
of sub-contractors who provide specialised services it may for practical reasons be
necessary to use their specialised services personnel, approved data and material
subject to acceptance by the organisation approved under ANO‐145.
4.3 Unless the sub-contracted maintenance work can be fully inspected on receipt by the
organisation approved under ANO-145 it will be necessary for such organisation to
supervise the inspection and release from the sub-contractor. Such activities should
be fully described in the organisation procedure. The organisation will need to
consider whether to use its own staff or authorise the sub‐contractor's staff.
4.4 The certificate of release to service may be issued either at the sub-contractor or at the
organisation facility by staff issued a certification authorisation in accordance
with ANO 145.A.30 as appropriate, by the organisation approved under ANO‐145.
Such staff would normally come from the organisation approved under ANO‐145 but
may otherwise be a person from the sub-contractor who meets the approved
maintenance organisation certifying staff standard which itself is approved by PCAA
via the maintenance organisation exposition. The certificate of release to service and
the PCAA Form 1 will always be issued under the maintenance organisation
approval reference.
4.5 The sub-contract control procedure will need to record audits of the sub-contractor, to
have a corrective action follow up plan and to know when sub-contractors are being
used. The procedure should include a clear revocation process for sub-contractors
who do not meet the ANO-145 approved maintenance organisation’s requirements.
4.6 The ANO-145 quality audit staff will need to audit the sub-contract control section and
sample audit sub-contractors unless this task is already carried out by the quality audit
01/08/2017 66 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 67 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 69 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
APPENDICES TO THE
IMPLEMENTING RULES
01/08/2017 70 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Appendix I
These instructions relate only to the use of the PCAA Form 1 for maintenance purposes. Attention is
drawn to the applicable PCAA regulation which covers the use of the PCAA Form 1 for production
purposes.
1.1 The primary purpose of the Certificate is to declare the airworthiness of maintenance
work undertaken on products, parts and appliances (hereafter referred to as ‘item(s)’).
1.2 Correlation must be established between the Certificate and the item(s). The originator
must retain a Certificate in a form that allows verification of the original data.
1.3 The Certificate is acceptable to many airworthiness authorities, but may be dependent
on the existence of bilateral agreements and/or the policy of the airworthiness authority.
The ‘approved design data’ mentioned in this Certificate then means approved by the
airworthiness authority of the importing country.
1.4 The Certificate is not a delivery or shipping note.
1.5 Aircraft are not to be released using the Certificate.
1.6 The Certificate does not constitute approval to install the item on a particular aircraft,
engine, or propeller but helps the end user determine its airworthiness approval status.
1.7 A mixture of production released and maintenance released items is not permitted on
the same Certificate.
2. GENERAL FORMAT
2.1 The Certificate must comply with the format (Kindly visit PCAA website at
www.caapakistan.com.pk to download the latest version of PCAA Form 1 under
reference CAAF-601-AWRG) including block numbers and the location of each block.
The size of each block may however be varied to suit the individual application, but not
to the extent that would make the Certificate unrecognisable.
2.2 The Certificate must be in ‘landscape’ format but the overall size may be significantly
increased or decreased so long as the Certificate remains recognisable and legible. If
in doubt consult PCAA.
2.3 The User/Installer responsibility statement can be placed on either side of the form.
2.4 All printing must be clear and legible to permit easy reading.
2.5 The Certificate may either be pre-printed or computer generated but in either case the
printing of lines and characters must be clear and legible and in accordance with the
defined format.
2.6 The Certificate should be in English, and if appropriate, in one or more other
languages.
2.7 The details to be entered on the Certificate may be either machine/computer printed or
hand-written using block letters and must permit easy reading.
2.8 Limit the use of abbreviations to a minimum, to aid clarity.
2.9 The space remaining on the reverse side of the Certificate may be used by the
originator for any additional information but must not include any certification statement.
Any use of the reverse side of the Certificate must be referenced in the appropriate
block on the front side of the Certificate
01/12/2017 71 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
3. COPIES
3.1 There is no restriction in the number of copies of the Certificate sent to the customer or
retained by the originator.
4. ERROR(S) ON A CERTIFICATE
4.1 If an end-user finds an error(s) on a Certificate, he must identify it/them in writing to the
originator. The originator may issue a new Certificate only if the error(s) can be verified
and corrected.
4.2 The new Certificate must have a new tracking number, signature and date.
4.2 The request for a new Certificate may be honoured without re-verification of the item(s)
condition. The new Certificate is not a statement of current condition and should refer
to the previous Certificate in block 12 by the following statement; “This Certificate
corrects the error(s) in block(s) [enter block(s) corrected] of the Certificate [enter
original tracking number] dated [enter original issuance date] and does not cover
conformity/condition/release to service”. Both Certificates should be retained according
to the retention period associated with the first.
Block 1:
“Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA)”
Block 6 Item:
Enter line item numbers when there is more than one line item. This block permits easy cross-
referencing to the Remarks block 12.
Block 7 Description:
Enter the name or description of the item. Preference should be given to the term used in the
instructions for continued airworthiness or maintenance data (e.g. Illustrated Parts Catalogue,
Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Service Bulletin, Component Maintenance Manual).
01/08/2017 72 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Block 9 Quantity:
State the quantity of items.
Block 11 Status/Work:
The following describes the permissible entries for block 11. Enter only one of these terms –
where more than one may be applicable, use the one that most accurately describes the
majority of the work performed and/or the status of the article.
(i) Overhauled: Means a process that ensures the item is in complete conformity with
all the applicable service tolerances specified in the type certificate holder’s, or
equipment manufacturer’s instructions for continued airworthiness, or in the data which
is approved or accepted by the Authority. The item will be at least disassembled,
cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, reassembled and tested in accordance with
the above specified data.
(ii) Repaired: Rectification of defect(s) using an applicable standard*.
(iii) Inspected / Tested: Examination, measurement, etc. in accordance with an
applicable standard* (e.g. visual inspection, functional testing, bench testing etc.).
(iv) Modified: Alteration of an item to conform to an applicable standard*.
Block 12 Remarks:
Describe the work identified in block 11, either directly or by reference to supporting
documentation, necessary for the user or installer to determine the airworthiness of item(s) in
relation to the work being certified. If necessary, a separate sheet may be used and referenced
from the main PCAA Form 1. Each statement must clearly identify which item(s) in block 6 it
relates to.
01/08/2017 73 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
“Certifies that, unless otherwise specified in this block, the work identified in block 11
and described in this block was accomplished in accordance to the requirements of
Section A, Subpart F of ANO-M and in respect to that work the item is considered
ready for release to service. THIS IS NOT A RELEASE UNDER ANO-145.”
If printing the data from an electronic PCAA Form 1, any appropriate data not fit for other blocks
should be entered in this block.
Block 13a-13e:
General Requirements for Blocks 13a-13e: Not used for maintenance release. Shade, darken,
or otherwise mark to preclude inadvertent or unauthorised use.
Block 14a:
Mark the appropriate box(es) indicating which regulations apply to the completed work. If the
box “other regulations specified in block 12” is marked, then the regulations of the other
airworthiness authority(ies) must be identified in block 12. At least one box must be marked, or
both boxes may be marked, as appropriate.
For all maintenance carried out by maintenance organisations approved in accordance with
Section A, Subpart F of ANO-M, the box “other regulation specified in block 12” shall be ticked
and the certificate of release to service statement made in block 12. In that case, the
certification statement “unless otherwise specified in this block” is intended to address the
following cases;
(a) Where the maintenance could not be completed.
(b) Where the maintenance deviated from the standard required by ANO-M.
(c) Where the maintenance was carried out in accordance with a requirement other than
that specified in ANO-M. In this case block 12 shall specify the particular national
regulation.
For all maintenance carried out by maintenance organisations approved in accordance with
Section A of ANO-145, the certification statement “unless otherwise specified in block 12” is
intended to address the following cases;
(a) Where the maintenance could not be completed.
(b) Where the maintenance deviated from the standard required by ANO-145.
(c) Where the maintenance was carried out in accordance with a requirement other than
that specified in ANO-145. In this case block 12 shall specify the particular national
regulation.
01/08/2017 74 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
This space shall be completed with the signature of the authorised person. Only persons
specifically authorised under the rules and policies of PCAA are permitted to sign this block. To
aid recognition, a unique number identifying the authorised person may be added.
User/Installer Responsibilities:
Place the following statement on the Certificate to notify end users that they are not relieved of
their responsibilities concerning installation and use of any item accompanied by the form:
01/08/2017 75 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/12/2017 76 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
1. The following formats of an issued PCAA Form 1 or equivalent certificate are acceptable:
•
•
A paper certificate bearing a signature (both originals and copies are accepted);
A paper certificate generated from an electronic system (printed from electronically
•
stored data) when complying with the following subparagraph 2;
An electronic PCAA Form 1 or equivalent when complying with the following
subparagraph 2.
Any organisation intending to implement an electronic signature procedure to issue PCAA Form
1 and/or to exchange electronically such data contained on PCAA Form 1 should document it
and submit it to PCAA as part of the documents attached to its exposition.
•
•
guarantee secure access for each certifying staff;
ensure integrity and accuracy of the data certified by the signature on the form and be
able to show evidence of the authenticity of PCAA Form 1 (recording and record
•
keeping) with suitable security, safeguards and backups;
•
be active only at the location where the part is being released with a PCAA Form 1;
•
not permit to sign a blank form;
provide a high degree of assurance that the data has not been modified after signature
(if modification is necessary after issuance, i.e., re-certification of a part, a new form
•
with a new number and reference to the initial issuance should be made).
provide for a ‘personal’ electronic signature, identifying the signatory. The signature
should be generated only in presence of the signatory.
•
•
it is uniquely linked to the signatory;
•
it is capable of identifying the signatory;
it is created using means that the signatory can maintain under his sole control.
Organisation(s) are reminded that additional PCAA requirements may need to be satisfied
when operating electronic systems. The electronic system should be based on a policy and
management structure (confidentiality, integrity and availability), such as:
•
•
Administrators, signatories;
•
Scope of authorisation, rights;
•
Password and secure access, authentication, protections, confidentiality;
•
Track changes;
•
Minimum blocks to be completed, completeness of information;
•
Archives;
etc.
The electronic system generating PCAA Form 1 may contain additional data such as;
01/08/2017 77 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
•
•
Manufacturer code;
•
Customer identification code;
•
Workshop report;
•
Inspection results;
etc.
In addition to this statement, it is accepted to print or display a signature in any form, such as a
representation of the hand-written signature of the person signing (i.e. scanned signature) or a
representation of their name.
When printing the electronic form, PCAA Form 1 should meet the general format as specified in
Appendix I to ANO-145. A watermark-type ‘PRINTED FROM ELECTRONIC FILE’ should be
printed on the document.
When the electronic file contains a hyperlink to data required to determine the airworthiness of
the item(s), the data associated to the hyperlink, when printed, should be in a legible format and
be identified as a reference from PCAA Form 1.
Additional information not required by PCAA Form 1 completion instructions may be added to
the printed copies of PCAA Form 1, as long as the additional data do not prevent a person from
filling out, issuing, printing, or reading any portion of PCAA Form 1. This additional data should
be provided only in block 12 unless it is necessary to include it in another block to clarify the
content of that block.
The electronic exchange of the electronic PCAA Form 1 should be accomplished on a voluntary
basis. Both parties (issuer and receiver) should agree on electronic transfer of PCAA Form 1.
• all data of PCAA Form 1, including referenced data required by PCAA Form 1
•
completion instructions;
all data required for authentication of PCAA Form 1.
•
•
data necessary for the electronic format;
additional data not required by PCAA Form 1 completion instructions, such as
manufacturer code, customer identification code.
The system used for the exchange of the electronic PCAA Form 1 should provide:
• A high level of digital security; the data should be protected, not altered or not
•
corrupted;
Traceability of data back to its source.
The organisation(s) are reminded that additional PCAA requirements may need to be satisfied
when operating the electronic exchange of the electronic PCAA Form 1.
01/08/2017 78 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
The receiver should be capable of regenerating PCAA Form 1 from the received data without
alteration; if not, the system should revert back to the paper system.
When the receiver needs to print the electronic form, refer to subparagraph (c) here above.
• Maintenance documentation used, including the revision status, for all work performed
and not limited to the entry made in block 11. A statement such as ‘in accordance with
•
the CMM’ is not acceptable.
•
NDT methods with appropriate documentation used when relevant.
•
Compliance with airworthiness directives or service bulletins.
•
Repairs carried out.
•
Modifications carried out.
•
Replacement parts installed.
•
Life-limited parts status.
•
Shelf life limitations.
•
Deviations from the customer work order.
Release statements to satisfy a foreign Civil Aviation Authority maintenance
•
requirement.
•
Information needed to support shipment with shortages or re-assembly after delivery.
References to aid traceability, such as batch numbers.”
01/08/2017 79 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Appendix II
1. Except as stated otherwise for the smallest organisation in paragraph 12, Table 1 outlines the full
extent of approval possible under ANO 145 in a standardised form. An organisation must be
granted an approval ranging from a single class and rating with limitations to all classes and
ratings with limitations.
2. In addition to Table 1, the ANO 145 approved maintenance organisation is required by ANO
145.A.20 to indicate scope of work in the maintenance organisation exposition. See also
paragraph 11.
3. Within the approval class(es) and rating(s) granted by PCAA, the scope of work specified in the
maintenance organisation exposition defines the exact limits of approval. It is therefore essential
that the approval class(es) and rating(s) and the organisation's scope of work are compatible.
4. A category ‘A’ class rating means that the maintenance organisation approved in accordance with
ANO 145 may carry out maintenance on the aircraft and any component (including engines
and/or APUs), in accordance with aircraft maintenance data or, if agreed by PCAA, in accordance
with component maintenance data, only whilst such components are fitted to the aircraft.
Nevertheless, such ‘A’ rated maintenance organisation approved in accordance with ANO 145
may temporarily remove a component for maintenance, in order to improve access to that
component, except when such removal generates the need for additional maintenance not eligible
for the provisions of this paragraph. This will be subject to a control procedure in the maintenance
organisation exposition acceptable to PCAA. The limitation section will specify the scope of such
maintenance thereby indicating the extent of approval.
5. A category ‘B’ class rating means that the ANO 145 approved maintenance organisation may
carry out maintenance on the uninstalled engine and/or APU and engine and/or APU
components, in accordance with engine/APU maintenance data or, if agreed by PCAA, in
accordance with component maintenance data, only whilst such components are fitted to the
engine and/or APU. Nevertheless, such ‘B’ rated maintenance organisation approved in
accordance with ANO 145 may temporarily remove a component for maintenance, in order to
improve access to that component, except when such removal generates the need for additional
maintenance not eligible for the provisions of this paragraph. The limitation section will specify the
scope of such maintenance thereby indicating the extent of approval. A maintenance organisation
approved in accordance with ANO 145 with a category ‘B’ class rating may also carry out
maintenance on an installed engine during ‘base’ and ‘line’ maintenance subject to a control
procedure in the maintenance organisation exposition. The maintenance organisation exposition
scope of work shall reflect such activity where permitted by PCAA.
6. A category ‘C’ class rating means that the ANO 145 approved maintenance organisation may
carry out maintenance on uninstalled components (excluding engines and APUs) intended for
fitment to the aircraft or engine/APU. The limitation section will specify the scope of such
maintenance thereby indicating the extent of approval. ANO 145 approved maintenance
organisation with a category ‘C’ class rating may also carry out maintenance on an installed
component during base and line maintenance or at an engine/APU maintenance facility subject to
a control procedure in the maintenance organisation exposition. The maintenance organisation
exposition scope of work shall reflect such activity where permitted by PCAA.
7. A category ‘D’ class rating is a self contained class rating not necessarily related to a specific
aircraft, engine or other component. The ‘D1’ — Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) rating is only
necessary for a ANO 145 approved maintenance organisation that carries out NDT as a particular
task for another organisation. ANO 145 approved maintenance organisation with a class rating in
‘A’ or ‘B’ or ‘C’ category may carry out NDT on products it is maintaining subject to the
maintenance organisation exposition containing NDT procedures, without the need for a ‘D1’
class rating.
01/08/2017 80 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
approved for either ‘Base’ or ‘Line’ maintenance or both. It should be noted that a ‘Line’ facility
located at a main base facility requires a ‘Line’ maintenance approval.
9. The limitation section is intended to give the competent authorities the flexibility to customise the
approval to any particular organisation. Ratings shall be mentioned on the approval only when
appropriately limited. The table referred to in point 13specifies the types of limitation possible.
Whilst maintenance is listed last in each class rating it is acceptable to stress the maintenance task
rather than the aircraft or engine type or manufacturer, if this is more appropriate to the
organisation (an example could be avionic systems installations and related maintenance). Such
mention in the limitation section indicates that the maintenance organisation is approved to carry
out maintenance up to and including this particular type/task.
10. When reference is made to series, type and group in the limitation section of class A and B, series
means a specific type series such as Airbus 300 or 310 or 319 or Boeing 737-300 series or
RB211-524 series or Cessna 150 or Cessna 172 or Beech 55 series or continental O-200 series
etc; type means a specific type or model such as Airbus 310-240 type or RB 211-524 B4 type or
Cessna 172RG type; any number of series or types may be quoted; group means for example
Cessna single piston engine aircraft or Lycoming non-supercharged piston engines etc.
11. When a lengthy capability list is used which could be subject to frequent amendment, then such
amendment may be in accordance with the indirect approval procedure referred to in points
M.A.604(c) and M.B.606(c) or 145.A.70(c) and 145.B.40, as applicable.
12. A maintenance organisation which employs only one person to both plan and carry out all
maintenance can only hold a limited scope of approval rating. The maximum permissible limits are:
CLASS COMPONENTS
RATING OTHER THAN
C1 TO C22 AS PER CAPABILITY LIST
COMPLETE ENGINES OR
APU’S.
NDT METHOD(S) TO BE
CLASS SPECIALISED D1 NDT
SPECIFIED.
It should be noted that such an organisation may be further limited by the competent authority in the
scope of approval dependent upon the capability of the particular organisation.
01/08/2017 81 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Table 1
CLASS RATING LIMITATION BASE LINE
AIRCRAFT A1 Aeroplanes above 5700 [Rating reserved to [YES/ [YES/
kg Maintenance Organisations NO]* NO]*
approved in accordance with
Annex II (ANO-145)]
[Shall state aeroplane
manufacturer or group or
series or type and/or the
maintenance tasks]
Example: Airbus A320 Series
A2 Aeroplanes 5700 kg and [Shall state aeroplane [YES/ [YES/
below manufacturer or group or NO]* NO]*
series or type and/or the
maintenance tasks]
Example: DHC-6 Twin Otter
Series
A3 Helicopters [Shall state helicopter [YES/ [YES/
manufacturer or group or NO]* NO]*
series or type and/or the
maintenance task(s)]
Example: Robinson R44
A4 Aircraft other than A1, A2 [Shall state aircraft series or [YES/ [YES/
and A3 type and/or the maintenance NO]* NO]*
task(s).]
ENGINES B1 Turbine [Shall state engine series or type and/or the
maintenance task(s)] Example: PT6A Series
B2 Piston [Shall state engine manufacturer or group or series or
type and/or the maintenance task(s)]
B3 APU [Shall state engine manufacturer or series or type
and/or the maintenance task(s)]
COMPONENTS C1 Air Cond &Press [Shall state aircraft type or aircraft manufacturer or
OTHER THAN C2 Auto Flight component manufacturer or the particular component
COMPLETE C3 Comms and Nav and/or cross refer to a capability list in the exposition
ENGINES OR C4 Doors - Hatches and/or the maintenance task(s).]
APUs C5 Elect Power & Lights Example: PT6A Fuel Control
C6 Equipment
C7 Engine - APU
C8 Flight Controls
C9 Fuel
C10 Helicopter - Rotors
C11 Helicopter - Trans
C12 Hydraulic Power
C13 Indicating -recording
system
C14 Landing Gear
C15 Oxygen
C16 Propellers
C17 Pneumatic & Vacuum
C18 Protection ice/rain/fire
C19 Windows
C20 Structural
C21 Water ballast
C22 Propulsion Augmentation
SPECIALIZED D1 Non Destructive Testing [Shall state particular NDT method(s)]
SERVICES
01/08/2017 82 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/12/2017 83 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/12/2017 84 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
The following fields on page 2 “Maintenance Organisation Approval Schedule” of the maintenance
organisation approval certificate should be completed as follows:
• Date of original issue: It refers to the date of the original issue of the maintenance organisation
exposition
• Date of last revision approved: It refers to the date of the last revision of the maintenance
organisation exposition affecting the content of the certificate. Changes to the maintenance
organisation exposition which do not affect the content of the certificate do not require the
reissuance of the certificate.
• Revision No: It refers to the revision No of the last revision of the maintenance organisation
exposition affecting the content of the certificate. Changes to the maintenance organisation
exposition which do not affect the content of the certificate do not require the reissuance of the
certificate.
01/08/2017 85 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Appendix IV
Conditions for the use of staff not qualified to ANO-066 in accordance with ANO.145.A.30 (j) 1
and 2
1. Certifying staff in compliance with the following conditions will meet the intent of ANO.145.A.30(j)
(1) and (2):
(a) The person shall hold a licence or a certifying staff authorisation issued under the national
regulations in full compliance with ICAO Annex 1.
(b) The scope of work of the person shall not exceed the scope of work defined by the national
licence or the certifying staff authorisation, whatever is the most restrictive.
(c) The person shall demonstrate he/she received the training on human factors and aviation
legislation referred to in modules 9 and 10 of Appendix I to ANO-066.
(d) The person shall demonstrate five years maintenance experience for line maintenance
certifying staff and eight years for base maintenance certifying staff. However, those persons
whose authorised tasks do not exceed those of a ANO-066 category A certifying staff, need to
demonstrate three years maintenance experience only.
(e) Line maintenance certifying staff and base maintenance support staff demonstrate he/she
received type training and passed examination at the category B1, B2 or B3 level, as
applicable, referred to in Appendix III to ANO-066 for each aircraft type in the scope of work
referred to in point (b). Those persons whose scope of work does not exceed those of a
category A certifying staff may however receive task training in lieu of complete type training.
(f) Base maintenance certifying staff shall demonstrate he/she received type training and passed
examination at the category C level referred to in Appendix III to ANO-066 for each aircraft
type in the scope of work referred to in point (b), except that for the first aircraft type, training
and examination shall be at the category B1, B2 or B3 level of Appendix III.
01/08/2017 86 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Appendix V
Refer Appendix titled ‘Safety Management System Frame Work for Approved Maintenance
Organization’ to latest revision of ANO-001-RGSP available on PCAA website
www.caapakistan.com.pk
01/12/2017 87 ANO-145-AWRG-2.1
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
01/08/2017 88 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
APPENDIX I
PCAA FORM 4 APPLICATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Kindly visit PCAA website at www.caapakistan.com.pk to download the latest version of PCAA Form 4
under reference CAAF-604-AWRG
APPENDIX II
ANO 145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT
Kindly visit PCAA website at www.caapakistan.com.pk to download the latest version of PCAA Form 6
under reference CAAF-606-AWRG
This appendix includes general instructions for providing training on Fuel Tank Safety issues.
A) Effectivity:
B) Affected Organisations:
•
maintenance data are affected by CDCCL.
PCAA for the oversight of the ANO 145 approved organisation specified in this paragraph B.
Phase 1 only:
• The group of persons representing the maintenance management structure of the organisation,
•
the quality manager and the staff required to quality monitor the organisation.
Personnel of PCAA responsible for the oversight of ANO 145 approved maintenance
organisations specified in paragraph B).
• Personnel of the ANO 145 approved maintenance organisation required to plan, perform,
supervise, inspect and certify the maintenance of aircraft and fuel system components specified
in paragraph A).
Phase 1 - Awareness
The training should be carried out before the person starts to work without supervision but not
later than 6 months after joining the organisation. The persons who have already attended the
Level 1 Familiarizations course in compliance with Initial Issue of ANO 145 Appendix IV is
already in compliance with Phase 1.
01/08/2017 89 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
Type: Should be an awareness course with the principal elements of the subject. It may take
the form of a training bulletin, or other self study or informative session. Signature of the
reader is required to ensure that the person has passed the training.
Level: It should be a course at the level of familiarization with the principal elements of the
subject.
Objectives:
1. Be familiar with the basic elements of the fuel tank safety issues.
2. Be able to give a simple description of the historical background and the elements
requiring a safety consideration, using common words and showing examples of
non-conformities.
A flexible period may be allowed by PCAA to allow organisations to set the necessary courses and
impart the training to the personnel, taking into account the organisation’s training
schemes/means/practices. This flexible period should not extend beyond a date to be determined
by PCAA.
The persons who have already attended the Level 2 Detailed training course in compliance with
Initial Issue ANO 145 Appendix IV either from a ANO145 maintenance organisation or from a
PCAA approved training organisation are already in compliance with Phase 2 with the
exception of continuation training.
Staff should have received Phase 2 training within 12 months of joining the organization.
Type: Should be a more in-depth internal or external course. It should not take the form of a
training bulletin, or other self study. An examination should be required at the end, which
should be in the form of a multi choice question, and the pass mark of the examination
should be 75%.
Level: It should be a detailed course on the theoretical and practical elements of the
subject.
01/08/2017 90 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
When the course is provided in a classroom, the instructor should be very familiar with
the data in Objectives and Guidelines. To be familiar, an instructor should have
attended himself a similar course in a classroom and made additionally some lecture of
related subjects.
Objectives:
- have knowledge of the history of events related to fuel tank safety issues and the
theoretical and practical elements of the subject, have an overview of the FAA
regulations known as SFAR (Special FAR) 88 of the FAA and of JAA Temporary
Guidance Leaflet TGL 47, be able to give a detailed description of the concept of
fuel tank system ALI (including Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations
CDCCL, and using theoretical fundamentals and specific examples;
- have the capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a
logical and comprehensive manner;
- be able to identify the components or parts or the aircraft subject to FTS from the
manufacturer’s documentation,
Continuation training
The organisation should ensure that the continuation training is required in each two years
period. The syllabus of the training programme referred to in 3.4 of the Maintenance
Organisation Exposition (MOE) should include the additional syllabus for this continuation
training.
The continuation training may be combined with the phase 2 training in a classroom or at
distance.
The continuing training should be updated when new instruction are issued which are related to
the material, tools, documentation and manufacturer’s or PCAA’s directives.
The following guidelines should be taken into consideration when the phase 2 training programmes
are being established:
01/08/2017 91 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0
ANO-145 APPROVED MAINTENANCE ORGANISATIONS
b) how the mechanics can recognise, interpret and handle the improvements in the
instruction for continuing airworthiness that have been made or are being made
regarding the fuel tank system maintenance,
c) awareness of any hazards especially when working on the fuel system, and when the
Flammability Reduction System using nitrogen is installed.
Paragraphs a) b) and c) above should be introduced in the training programme addressing the
following issues:
i. The theoretical background behind the risk of fuel tank safety: the explosions of mixtures of fuel
and air, the behaviour of those mixtures in an aviation environment, the effects of temperature
and pressure, energy needed for ignition etc, the ‘fire triangle’, - Explain 2 concepts to prevent
explosions:
2) flammability reduction,
ii. The major accidents related to fuel tank systems, the accident investigations and their
conclusions,
iii. SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA Interim Policy INT POL 25/12: ignition prevention program
initiatives and goals, to identify unsafe conditions and to correct them, to systematically improve
fuel tank maintenance),
iv. Explain briefly the concepts that are being used: the results of SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA
INT/POL 25/12: modifications, airworthiness limitations items and CDCCL,
v. Where relevant information can be found and how to use and interpret this information in the
instructions for continuing airworthiness (aircraft maintenance manuals, component
maintenance manuals, Service Bulletins…)
vi. Fuel Tank Safety during maintenance: fuel tank entry and exit procedures, clean working
environment, what is meant by configuration control, wire separation, bonding of components
etc,
vii. Flammability reduction systems when installed: reason for their presence, their effects, the
hazards of an FRS using nitrogen for maintenance, safety precautions in maintenance/working
with an FRS,
The training should include a representative number of examples of defects and the associated repairs
as required by the TC/STC holders maintenance data.
F) Approval of Training
For ANO145 approved organisations, the approval of the initial and continuation training programme
and the content of the examination can be achieved by the change to the MOE. The necessary
changes to the MOE to meet the content of this AMC should be made and implemented at the time
requested by PCAA
01/08/2017 92 ANO-145-AWRG-2.0