Control No: _______________

SLK 2 for DISCIPLINE AND IDEAS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

(HUMSS 11) QUARTER __2 WEEK ___1___

Competency Examine the key concepts and ideas of Filipino thinkers in the Social
Sciences rooted in Filipino language/s and experiences;
A. 19th Century (Isabelo delos Reyes, Jose Rizal, others)
B. 20th-21st Century (Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pantayong Pananaw, others)
Objectives • Identify the historical trends of Philippine psychological thought;
• Examine carefully the significance of the different key concepts/
ideas influenced by Jose Rizal, Isabelo delos Reyes and other
Filipino thinkers from 19th-21st centuries to support disadvantaged
or unrepresented groups; and
• Discuss the key concepts and ideas in the Social Sciences rooted
in Filipino language/ experiences.
Topic/
Subject Filipino Thinkers in the Social Sciences (19th-21st Century)
Matter
Textbook None
Materials Pen and paper
Copyrights DepEd Talisay
Total Points 90
Date January 4-8, 2020

I. CONTENT MAP

FILIPINO THINKERS
19TH 20TH-21ST
IN THE
CENTURY CENTURY
SOCIAL SCIENCES

1
II. CONTENT NOTES
A. 19th CENTURY FILIPINO THINKERS AND THEIR IDEAS OF SOCIAL
THEARO AND SOCIALISM

Orientalism, according to Syed Fasid Alatas,

influenced the content of education that the origin of
social sciences and the question of alternative points
are unmodified. This lack of thematization made the
thought style of our Filipino thinkers not getting
attention compared to European and American social
theorists such as Max Weber, Durkheim, and others.

The Social Sciences are taught in the Third World

in a Eurocentric manner (from the point of view of the
Europeans to Asians). This resulted in the alienation of
social scientists from local and regional scholarly
traditions. We should note that during the 19th century,
the impression given during the period that Europeans
such as Max Weber, Durkheim, and others were
thinking about the nature of society and its
development, there were no thinkers in Asia doing the
same. The absence of non-European thinkers in these
José Protasio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda accounts influenced the development of social
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Rizal
June 19, 1861 thought. This history of social thought or a course on
social thought and theory would cover theorists such
as Montesquieu, Vico Compte, Spencer, Max Weber, Durkheim, Simmel, Toennies,
Sombart, Mannheim, Pareto, Summer, Ward, Small, and others. Non-Western thinkers are
excluded. It is necessary to make a distinction between Orientalism as the obtrusive
stereotypical portrayal of the Orient and the new
Orientalism of today which is characterized by the
neglect and silencing of non-Western thoughts. What is
meant by the silencing or marginalization of non-
Western thinkers? It is when all non-Europeans appear
in the text and courses, they are the objects of study
and not the subjects who were the sources of
sociological theories and ideas.

Alatas concentrated on the work of Jose Rizal and

Ibn Khaldun. In his work, he said that “Jose Rizal
(1861-1896) was the Filipino thinker and activist and
probably the first systematic social thinker in Southeast
Asia. He raised original problems and creatively
treated them. He lived during the formative period of
sociology but theorized about the nature of society in
ways not done by Western sociologists. He gave us a
Leaders of the reform movement in Spain. Left to right:
different perspective on the colonial dimension of the Rizal, del Pilar, and Ponce (c. 1890).
emerging modernity of the 19th century. He published https://www.pinterest.com/pin/5418400173694761
0/
his first novel, Noli Me Tangere in 1887. It was a
reflection of exploitative conditions under Spanish colonial rule and enraged the Spanish
friars. It was a diagnosis of the problems of Filipino society and a reflection of the

2
 problems of exploitation in Filipino colonial society.
His second novel El Filibusterismo, published in
1891, examined the possibilities and consequences
of revolution.

Sociological theory from Rizal’s work can be

discerned in his writings: (1) the theory of colonial
society, that explains the nature and conditions of
colonial society; (2) Rizal’s critique on colonial
knowledge of the Philippines; (3) finally, his
discourse on the meaning of/ and requirements for
emancipation. In Rizal’s thought, the corrupt
Spanish colonial government and its officials
oppress and exploit the Filipinos, while blaming the
backwardness of the Filipinos on their alleged
laziness. But this project was to show that in fact, the
Filipinos were a relatively advanced society in their
pre-colonial times and that their backwardness was a
product of colonialism, Isabelo delos Reyes y
Isabelo De los Reyes (Don Belong)
Florentino (Don Belong – July 7, 1864- October 10,
(July 7, 1864 – October 10, 1938) 1938), was a prominent Filipino politician, writer,
and labor activist in the 19th and 20th centuries. He
was the founder of Iglesia Filipina Independiente, an independent Philippine national
church. He is known as the “Father of the Filipino Socialism”. He followed his mother’s
footsteps by initially turning to write as a career, his works were part of the 1887
Exposicion General de las Filipinas in Madrid. He later became a journalist, editor, and a
publisher in Manila and was imprisoned in 1897 for revolutionary activities. He was
deported to Spain where he was jailed for his activites. He had his first brush with
socialism during his stay in Barcelona where he mingled and was influenced by the
writings of European socialists and Marxists. He was acquainted with anarchists,
syndicalists, and other extremists and ideological thinkers. He was released in 1898 and
was banned from leaving Spain and became a drifter in Barcelonia. During this time he
came to know radicals such as a Francisco Ferrer, Aljandro Lerroux, and others. On his
return to the Philippines, he becake the leader of the Nacioanlista Party. He took with his
works by socialists such as Karl Marx, Proudhon, Bakunin, and Errico Malatesta. He was
the first president of Union Obrera Democratica, formed on February 02, 1902, wherein
they aimed to “achieve the longed-for alliance between capital and labor.” He represented
workers in various disputes, supervised educational discussions, and lead the country’s
May 1 protest-celebration, an annual tradition that is held today. His patriotism fled into his
desire for unionism: only thorugh the unity of workers they could defeat the imperialists.
Throughout his life, he wrote and published multiple newspapers and works in various
subjects such as history, folklore, religion, and politics.

B. “SIKOLOHIYANG PILIPINO”: PHILIPPINE PSYCHOLOGICAL THOUGHT

ORIENTATION OF THREADS AND CONTEXT (20TH CENTURY)

Filipino Psychology (Sikolohiyang Pilipino) is defined as the psychology rooted in the

experience, ideas and cultural orientation of the Filipinos. It was formalized in 1975 by the
Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (National Association of Filipino
Psychology) under the leadership of Virgilio Enriquez, also known as the Father of Filipino

3
 Psychology.

Filipino Psychology in the Philippines exists and grows as

part of the nationalist indigenization movement in the
Philippines. Its roots can be traced back to the introduction of the
American education system in the Philippines. Agustin Alonzo
was among the first Filipino psychologists to return from their
education in America (1925) and taught at the College of
Education at the University of the Philippines. His team brought
with them psychological knowledge rooted in the American
tradition of psychology. This Western psychology is taught in
VIRGILIO ENRIQUEZ schools as universal and scientific despite generally considered
by some as insensitive and inappropriate to Philippine culture.
Father of Filipino
Psychology
This hegemony (political, economic, or military predominance or
control of one state over others) is referred to as colonial
(November 24, 1942 – psychology.
August 31, 1994)

In the 1960s, other Filipino intellectuals and scholars

were already aware of the limitations and
incompatibility of Western psychology. These Western-
oriented approaches in research had led scholars to
paint Filipino through the “judgmental and
impressionistic views of the colonizers.” It is with the
use of these American categories and standards that the
native Filipinos suffer from the American comparison
in subtle expressions to put forward Western behavior
patterns a model for us. There were also early efforts to
connect the traditional way of teaching and studying
psychology in 1960, which includes the translation of
foreign materials and the use of Filipino language as a
mode of instruction. These efforts fail to address the
problems brought about by the colonial and Filipino
psychology because of non-collaboration of
psychologists.
ZEUS SALAZAR

known in pioneering an emic

In the 1970s, during the chaotic time of Ferdinand
Marcos’ regime nationalist and radical sentiments
perspective in Philippine history called
Pantayong Pananaw among scholars had allowed colonial and Filipino
psychology along with the advances in Filipinology and
History’s Pantayong Pananaw was led by Virgilio Enriquez, Prospero Covar and Zeus
Salazar in the indigenization movement of their respective fields. When Zeus Salazar
returned to the Philippines after his training in Paris, he joined the UP-Faculty Department
of history, where he taught for 30 years, using Filipino as the medium of instruction from
the very start of his teaching career in 1969 following the tradition adapted by his mentor
Guadalupe Fores-Guanzon in 1965. This gave way to the existence of the Pantayong
Pananw, and its seed was already sown in Salazar’s published essay in 1970, entitled “Ang
Pagtuturo ng Kasaysayan sa Pilipino.” He insisted on the use of Filipino and emerged as
one of the main figures in the indigenization movement in UP-Diliman. He worked closely
with like-minded scholars such as Prospero Covar (Father of Pilipinolohiya), Virgilio
Enriquez (Father of Sikolohiyang Pilipino), and Leonardo Mercado (the last being a

4
leading proponent of Filipino philosophy).

Virgilio G. Enriquez was born on November 24, 1942, at Santol, Balagtas formerly
Bigaa, Bulacan. He is the founder of the Pambansang Samahan ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino
(National Association for Sikolohiynag Pilipino, Inc).

C. “PHILIPPINE PSYCHOLOGICAL THOUGHT, CONCEPTS AND METHODS”

Filipino Psychology is the scientific study of the

ethnicity, society and culture of a people and the
application to the psychological practice of
indigenous knowledge rooted in the people’s ethnic
heritage and consciousness. It is based on Filipino’s
true feelings, behaviors and mostly derived from
indigenous Filipino source, language and methods.
It is described largely as post-colonial and as
liberation psychology. Some argue that it is a local
version of critical psychology since it served as
emancipator Social Science that aims to decolonize academic nationalism.

There are several types of Psychology in the Philippines: (1) Academic Scientific or
Akademiko – Siyentipikal na Sikolohiya – it follows the American oriented psychological
tradition that can be traced back to Wilhelm Wndt in 1876, introduced in the Philippines
through the formal American education system in universities; (2) Academic Philosophic
Psychology or Akademiko-Pilosopiya na Sikolohiya – it was started by priest-professors at
the Univeristy of Santo Tomas during the 17th century Spanish era. This tradition originally
came from the writings of the preachers and monks in philosophy and “pre-scientific”
Spanish elites and would later join with the American-oriented scientific psychology; (3)
Ethnic Psychology or Taal na Sikolohiya – this includes the frame of psychological
reasoning, enculturation, practices, beliefs, and proto-clinical practices that can be culled
from language, literature, myths, legends, etc.; (4) Psycho-Medical Systems or Siko-
Medikal na mga Sistema – a psychological tradition that is closely related to ethnic
psychology. The psycho-medical tradition has religion as the basis and explanation. This
includes the faith-healing practices of the Babaylan or Katalonan. According to Salazar, he
believes that “no real” healing could take place if there were no common ideologies or
frames of reference, understood and accepted both the healer and the patient.

BASIC TENETS

I. CORE VALUES OR KAPWA (SHARED INNER SELF) – Kapwa is the core construct
of Filipino psychology. Kapwa has two categories: (1) Ibang tao (outsider) and (2) Hindi
Ibang Tao (one of us).

A. IBANG TAO (OUTSIDER)

1. Pakikitungo (Civility) – right behavior meant the right deportment toward authorities.
2. Pakikisalamuha (An Act of Mixing) – social value that is primarily dwelling under
common conditions is synonymous with the ability to adapt.
3. Pakikilahok (An Act of Joining) – participation of the entire community to help a
person or someone.
4. Pakikibagay (Conformity) – the act of socializing to conform or be accepted in a group.

5
5. Pakikisama – the act of being united with the group.

B. HINDI IBANG TAO (ONE OF US)

1. Pakikipagpalagayan ng Loob – an act of mutual trust; you gain trust from a camaraderie
or fellow human being.
2. Pakikisangkot – the act of joining others; people join/share responsibilities in a
particular group.
3. Pakikipagkapwa – the act of being one with others; social interaction with others.

II. PIVOTAL INTERPERSONAL VALUES

PAKIRAMDAM – shared inner perceptions. Filipinos use their inner perception of

other’s emotions, moods, or feelings as a guide in their dealings with other people.

III. LINKING SOCIO-PERSONAL VALUES

KAGANDAHANG-LOOB – shared humanity; refers to being od help to other

people in times of need due to a perception of being together as part of Filipino humanity.

IV. ACCOMODATIVE SURFACE VALUES

A. HIYA – translated as “shyness” by most Western Psychologists. It is a “sense of

propriety” or quality of being properly following recognized custom.

B. UTANG NA LOOB (norm of reciprocity) – Filipinos are expected by others to

return favors – whether these were asked for or not – when it is needed or wanted.

C. PAKIKISAMA AND PAKIKIPAGKAPWA – smooth interpersonal relationships.

This attitude is primarily guided by conformity with the majority; conformity to the
group.

V. CONFRONTATIVE SURFACE VALUES

A. BAHALA NA – translates literally as” leave it to God (Bathala)”. It is used as an

expression, almost universally in Filipino culture. Filipinos engage in this attitude
as a culture-influences adaptive coping strategy when face with challengeing
situations.

B. LAKAS NG LOOB – characterized by being courageos in the midst of problems

and uncertainties; bravery.

C. PAKIKIBAKA – it means concurrent clashes. It refers to the ability of the Filipino

to undertake revolutions and uprisings, fights against a common enemy.

VI. SOCIETAL VALUES

A. KARANGALAN (DIGNITY) – refers to what other people see in a person and

how they use that information to make or judge about one’s worth.

B. PURI (external aspect of DIGNITY) – refers to how a person judge a person of his

6
 worth. It is based on conformity to social norms, regardless of how obsolete they
are.

C. DANGAL (internal aspect of DIGNITY) – refers to how a person judges his worth.

D. KATARUNGAN (JUSTICE) – refers to equity in giving rewards to a person; fair

judgments.

E. KALAYAAN (FREEDOM AND MOBILITY) – this may clash with the less
important value of pakikisama or pakikinagay (conformity).

VII. APPROACHES AND METHODS

A. PAKIKIPAGKUWENTUHAN - the researcher engages in a storytelling with an

umpukan. The researcher merely serves as the facilitator, while the kalahok or
participants are the ones who are to talk to them, kwento from the Spanish
word”cuento” literally means “ to tell a story.”

B. PANUNULUYAN - method in which the researcher stays in the home of his

kalahok or participant while he researches with consent by the host family, whose
head serves as the tulay to anumpukan.

C. PAGDADALAW-DALAW - the researcher occasionally visits the house of his

host or tulay as opposed to staying in the house.

D. PAGTATANONG-TANONG - the researcher undergoes a kind of questioning

session with his kalahok or participants. In this method, however” lead questions”
(those questions which directly refer to the topic being studied) are not supposed to
be asked; instead the questions to be asked are supposed to have been derived from
the kalahok’s answers themselves.

E. PAKIRAMDAM - the researcher uses entirely his/her feelings or emotions to

justify if his participants or kalahok are ready to be part of the research or not.

VIII. PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

Filipino psychopathology or sikopatolohiya in Filipino, from Spanish” psicopatologia”

is the study of abnormal psychology in Filipino context. Several mental disorders have
been identified that culture-bound syndromes, can, therefore, be found only in the
Philippines or in other societies with which Filipino share cultural connections. Examples
of such are:

A. AMOK- Malayan mood disorder, more aptly called “Austronesian Mood” in which
a person suddenly loses control of himself and goes into a killing attitude, after
which he/she hallucinates and fails into a trance. After he/she wakes up, he has no
memory of the event.

B. BANGUNGOT- a relatively common occurrence in which a person suddenly loses

control of his respiration and digestion and falls into a coma and untimely to death.
The person is believed to dream of falling into a deep bottomless onset of his death.

7
 This syndrome has been repeatedly linked to Thailand’s Burgada syndrome and the
indigestion of rice. However, no such medical ties have been proven.

III. ACTIVITIES

Activity 1: Examine the key concepts and ideas of the 19th Century Filipino thinkers in the
Social Sciences rooted in Filipino language/s and experiences.
Date: __________
Directions: Your task is to discuss on the table below the key concepts and ideas of Filipino
thinkers in the Social Sciences rooted in Filipino language/s and experiences. You can go
back to the text you have read to get the answers. Write your answers on a separate sheet of
paper.
HPS: 25 points
QUESTIONS ANSWERS
1. What is the core concept of Filipino psychology?
2.Do you agree on the indigenization movement in U.P.
Diliman as Zeus Salazar published his essay in 1970 entitled
“Ang Pagtuturo ng Kasaysayan sa Pilipinas?” why?
3. How does the perspective of Pantayong Pantanaw by Zeus
Salazar helps us in teaching Social Sciences course/subjects in
the Philippines?
4. Why is Rizal considered as the first systematic thinker in
Southeast Asia?
5. Explain Jose Rizal’s his ideas about socialism.

Activity 2: Examine the key concepts and ideas of the 20th-21st Century Filipino thinkers in
the Social Sciences rooted in Filipino language/s and experiences.
Date: _____________

Title: “HOW ORGANIZED ARE YOU”

Directions: Your task is to identify the historical trends of Philippine psychological thought.
Fill in the “GRAPHIC ORGANIZER” with the different traditions upon which Psychology
can be traced (Salazar). Write your answers on a separate sheet of paper.
HPS: 10 points

CORE
VALUES/
KAPWA

SOCIETAL
VALUES

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

8
Activity 3: Examine the key concepts and ideas of Filipino thinkers in the Social Sciences
rooted in Filipino language/s and experiences: A. 19th Century (Isabelo delos Reyes, Jose
Rizal, others); B. 20th-21st Century (Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Pantayong Pananaw, others)
Date: _____________
Title: “KNOW ME”

Directions: Your task is to examine carefully the significance of the different key
concepts/ideas influenced by Jose Rizal, Isabelo delos Reyes and other Filipino thinkers from
the 19th – 21st centuries to support disadvantaged or unrepresented groups. Write your
answers on a separate sheet of paper.
HPS: 40 points
FILIPINO THINKERS SIGNIFICANT KEY EXAMPLES
CONCEPTS/INFLUENCE (REAL-LIFE
SITUATIONS)

IV. EVALUATION:
Date: _________________
Directions: Read and choose the best answer to the following questions/statements below.
Write the chosen letter on a separate sheet of paper.
HPS: 15 points
1. He wrote two novels that were a reflection of the exploitative conditions under the Spanish
colonial rule and examined the possibilities and consequences of a revolution that enraged the
Spanish friars. Who was this activist and Filipino thinker?
A. Zeus Salazar B. Jose P. Rizal C. Isabelo de los Reyes D. Virgilio Enriquez

2. Which of the following psychology deals with the study of ethnicity, society, and culture
of people and its application to the psychological practice of indigenous knowledge rooted in
the people’s ethnic heritage and consciousness?
A. Filipino Psychology C. Ethnic Psychology
B. American Psychology D. Western Psychology

9
3. Who among the following thinkers was considered as the Father of Filipino Psychology
(Ama ng Sikolohiyang Pilipino)?
A. Zeus Salazar B. Isabelo de los Reyes C. Virgilio Enriquez D. Prospero Covar

4. Zeus Salazar was among the Filipino thinkers best known in pioneering an emic
perspective in Philippine History, earning him the title of “Father of New Philippine
Historiography.” What is that kind of perspective which means “to-us-from-us”?
A. Pantayong Pananw C. Cyclical View
B. Linear View D. Dialectic Materialism

5. Who among the following established a relihious order named Cofradia de San Jose
exclusive for the native Filipinos, because Catholic religious orders refused to admit native
Filipinos as members?
A. Zeus Salazar C. Jose P. Rizal
B. Isabelo de los Reyes D. Apolinario de la Cruz/ Hermano Pule

6. Who among the Filipino thinkers is a historian, anthropologist, and philosopher of history
that pioneered the Pantayong Pananaw perspective?
A. Isabelo de los Reyes B. Jose P. Rizal C. Zeus Salazar D. Virgilio
Enriquez

7. Which of the following titles were given to Isabelo de los Reyes?

A. Father of Philippine Labor Movement and Filipino Socialism
B. Father of New Philippine Historiography
C. Father of Filipino Psychology
D. Father of Filipino Philosophy

8. The following Filipino values such as bahala na, lakas ng loob at pakikibaka belong to?
A. Confrontative surface values C. Accommodative surface values
B. Societal Values D. Pivotal interpersonal Values

9. Which of the following values belong to societal values?

A. Bahala na B. Puri at Dangal C. Hiya at Utang na Loob D. Pakiramdam

10. Which of the following statement about methods/ approaches in Filipino Psychology best
describes “Panunuluyan”?
A. The researcher stays in the home of his participant while he researches with the consent by
the host family whose head serves as the bridge.
B. The researcher occasionally visits the house of his host as opposed to staying in the house.
C. The researcher undergoes a kind of opportunity session with his participant.
D. The researcher uses entirely his feelings or emotions to justify his participants’ readiness
to be part of his research.

11. Who among the Filipino thinkers founded the Iglesia Independente
A. Isabelo de los Reyes B. Jose P. Rizal C. Zeus Salazar D. Virgilio Enriquez

10
12. What religious organization did Hermano Pule established for the native Filipinos?
A. Cofradias de San Jose C. La Liga Filipina
B. Society of Jesus D. Iglesia Independente

13. What novel did Dr. Jose P. Rizal wrote which enraged the Spanish friars due to the
exposure of their exploitative treatment towards the Filipinos?
A. Noli Me Tangere C. El Filibusterismo
B. Mi Ultimo Adios D. La Solidaridad

14. All of which are the types of Filipino Psychology except:

A. Siyentipikal na Sikolohiya C. Psycho-Medical Systems
B. Psychopathology D. Ethnic Psychology

15. All of which are Filipino psychological methods and approaches except:
A. Pakiramdam B. Panunuluyan C. Amok D. Pagtatanong-tanong

V. REFERENCES
ARTICLES’ LINK:
NA. (nd). “19th Century Filipino Thinkers and their Ideas of Social Theory and Socialism”
https://en.wikipedia.org/Isabelo-delos-Reyes
NA. (nd). ecumenico.org/teaching-social-theory-as- alternative-discourse/
NA. (nd). “Isabelo Delos Reyes.” From https://www.esquiremag.ph/long-reads/features/the-
underrated- ilustrado-isabelo-delos-reyes-a-filipino.renaissance-man-a22212-
20190628- lfrm
NA. (nd). “Socialism.” From iep.utm.edu/socialism/
NA. (nd). “Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Philippine Psychological Thought Orientation of Threads
and Context.” From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino-psychology
NA. (nd). “Philippine Psychological Thought: Concepts and Methods.” From
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipino-psychology
NA. (nd). “Filipino Psychology. From
https://www.slideshare.net/yanloveaprilbordador/Filipinopsychology-concepts-and-
methods
PICTURES’ LINK:

NA. (nd). “Jose P. Rizal.” From http://en.wikipedia.org/wi/kiJose-Rizal

NA. (nd). “Rizal’s House in Calamba, Laguna.” From http://en.wikipedia.org/wikiJose-Rizal
NA. (nd). “Virgilio G. Enriquez.” From https://en.wkipedia.org/wi/kiVirgilio Enriquez
NA. (nd). “Leaders of the Reform Movement in Spain.” From
https://en.wikipedia.org/wikiJose- Rizal;ecumenico.org/teaching-social-theory-as-
alternative-discourse
NA. (nd). “Isabelo delos Reyes.” From
https://www.slideshare.net/PennVillanueva/remembering-dr-jose- rizal?next-
slideshow=1
NA. (nd). “Zeus A. Salazar.” From https://en.wikipedia.org/Zeus-Salazar
NA. (nd). “Hermano Pule/Apolinario de la Cruz.” From
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermano-Pule

11
VI. ANSWER KEY

Answers to Activity 1, Activity 3 may vary depending on the learner.

VII. ADDITIONAL READINGS

Directions: Your task is to give your point of view on the following instances. Write a
“Reflection Paper” on one topic. Choose only one. Submit it in print/ encoded in a
scrapbook/folder/portfolio. Create your own title.

A. Importance of Pantayong Pananaw in teaching/learning Social Science subjects/ courses.

B. Significance of the Filipino language in Filipino Psychology.
C. Maintaining our Filipino psychological thoughts in our daily living, promoting the
common good, protecting the disadvantaged or unrepresented group, patriotism, nationality
and freedom.
RUBRICS TO DETERMINE YOUR RATING
EXCELLENT VERY GOOD GOOD SATISFACTORY
(98-100 Points) (94-97 Points) (85- 93 Points) (80-84 Points)
When all the possible When there are When there are 50% When there are only
ideas/concepts were 80% of the possible of the possible 35% of the possible
evident, explained, ideas/concepts ideas/concepts that concepts/ideas were
and properly were evident/ were evident but not evident but not
discussed; analysis or properly discussed/ discussed/analyzed/c discussed/analyzed/cr
critical thinking of the analyzed/critical ritical thinking was itical thinking was not
learner was applied. thinking of the not so applied by the applied by the learner.
learner was learner.
applied.

Subject Teacher: ____________________________

Contact Number: ____________________________

Prepared by:
Name: EVAN B. ABELLANOSA
School: CANSOJONG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Contact No: 09561382289

12
VIII. FEEDBACK NOTES HUMSS 11 DISS Week 1
To the learner/s and parents/s, please write your comment/s and/or suggestion/s regarding the
learning material on the space provided below.

LEARNER’S FEEDBACK
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
______________________

PARENTS’/GUARDIANS’ FEEDBACK
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________

13
IX. ANSWER SHEET HUMSS 11 DISS Week 1

Control No: _______________

Name: __________________________________ Grade& Sec.: ______________

Contact No: ___________ School: ________________ Subject Teacher: ____________

14