Qa QC: The Difference Between QA and QC, Why It Matters, and How To Keep Your Projects From Going Sideways

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 25

QA = QC 2

The Difference Between QA and QC,


Why It Matters, and How to Keep
Your Projects from Going Sideways
ACEC-IDOT Bridge Seminar
Fall 2018
John C. Ashton, S.E., P.E.
Learning Outcomes

A. Explain the difference between QA and QC


B. Derive lessons learned from various audits
C. Distill QA/QC principles to “Take 5 for
Quality”

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
A
Explain the difference
between QA and QC

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Overview

• Purpose of QA/QC
• Goals of procedure as outlined
 Fair, Impartial, Flexible, Consistent
(regardless of staff assignments)
• No system is foolproof
• Reduction in chance of error
• The Cart vs. The Horse
• One more form and we’ll be done…

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Overview (con.)

• QA Definition: Quality Assurance


 Program-wide approach
 Oversees and monitors project-related QC policies,
procedures, standards, and guidelines
• QC Definition: Quality Control
 Project-specific activities to ensure project deliverables
are completed correctly and meet client requirements
 Project management, guidance, supervision, review
 Making, checking, and reviewing of…
 Designs, plans, quantities, specifications, and reports

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Overview (con.)

• QA Manual
• QA Audit Forms
• QC Manual – Inspection Module
• QC Manual – Design Module
• QC Manual – Construction Management
Module

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Overview (con.)

• Engineers love equations


 QA = QC × QC = QC2
• Non-engineers love mnemonic devices
 If Auditing, it’s QA
 If Checking, it’s QC

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Derive lessons learned from
B
various audits

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Lessons Learned
• Check prints
 Should conform to standard color-coded conventions
 If hard copies not kept, full-color scans on network required
 Should clearly indicate that QC cycle was completed
 Completion means: through final backchecking
 Various submittal review stages should be identifiable
 Initialed, dated, labeled, separate PDF files, etc.

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Lessons Learned (con.)
• Time on QC should be billed to QC
 If client requires tasks to be billed separately…
 Create separate phases under each task
 PM, QC, Design, etc.
• Signed contract should be in place with client
 To protect both parties
• Inter-office collaboration is fine, if…
 Checking remains disciplined / thorough

10

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Lessons Learned (con.)

• Get by with a little help from your friends…


 Try new things to grow personally & professionally
 Never done a timber truss design before?
 Ask someone who has
• Avoid the “global warming” effect
 Ask more than one person who is knowledgeable about
the subject to get a majority professional consensus
 If 99% of scientists agree that global warming is real, then you
can still find someone in the other 1% to interview for your pro-
coal “documentary”

11

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Lessons Learned (con.)

• Follow QC procedures in letter as well as intent


 3 people minimum looking at a calc or drawing
 Originator
 Checker
 Senior reviewer (PM or RM, typically using PE/SE seal)
 Check numbers in calc as well as assumptions and
methodology
 Originator should be forthcoming about assumptions
 Checker must ask originator if assumptions unclear

12

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Lessons Learned (con.)
• Follow procedures
 Plan the work & work the plan
 Plan out staff assignments,
including all QC staff
 Ensure all staff are versed
with and adhering to QC
manual
 Know the difference between
QC and QA; QA = QC2
 Don’t ASSUME; ask
questions, flag concerns (on
all OUR work)
13

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Lessons Learned (con.)
• Avoid common traps
 Don’t try to do it all yourself
 Cutting corners to meet a tight
schedule creates more
problems than it solves
 Fatigue reduces productivity
and increases likelihood of
mistakes
 Don’t focus on dwg. review to the
exclusion of calc review
 Don’t rely on others to catch your
mistakes; take ownership

14

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Don’t Let Your Project Go Off the Rails

• Avoid distressing situations – do it right 1st time


 Lawsuits, insurance claims, subpoenas, overhead

15

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
C
Distill QA/QC principles to
“Take 5 for Quality”

16

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Project Management Controls
• Primary
 Good PM Practices
 Good QC / Checking Procedures

• Secondary
 Good RM Oversight of PMs and Staff
 Good QC / Review Practices

17

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Project Management Controls (con.)
• Tertiary
 Common Sense
 If Communication Seems Lacking…
 Ask, Instead of Waiting for Someone to Tell

18

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Ways to Improve
• Take Inter-Office Work
Agreements (IOWAs) and
Inspection Plan Analyses
(IPAs) seriously and use as a
PM tool to organize the project
at the front end

• PM training to emphasize:
 Inter-Office Work Agreements
 Recordkeeping
 Communication
 Disposition of client comments
19

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Ways to Improve (con.)
• Check Print Training
 Stamping and color-coding of
check prints to ensure all
comments (including client
comments) are picked up and
backchecked

 Three sets of eyes on all


submittals:
 Originator
 Checker
 Reviewer

20

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Take 5 for Quality Poster

1. Do it right the first time


2. Check thoroughly rather than
spot-checking
3. Correct everything identified
by the checker
4. Backcheck everything
5. Review (and stamp as
needed) by a senior level
engineer
21

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Conclusion

• PM tools like IOWA, IPA, etc., are there for a reason


• QC policies & procedures (color-coding, check print
stamps, 3-person rule) are there for a reason
• Management checks and balances are in place for a
reason
 Your RM can and will intervene to help get the project
back on track
 But your RM can’t do anything if they don’t know there’s
a problem

22

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Conclusion (con.)

• Not supposed to be a burden


• Process should become second nature
• Rules not set in stone
• Full commitment required
• Firm-wide implementation

23

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Review Learning Outcomes

A. Explain the difference between QA and QC


QA = QC ×___QC
B. Derive lessons learned from various audits
a AAA A/A/AA by originator
b BBB B/B/BB by checker
c CCC C/C/CC by originator
d DDD D/D/DD by back-checker (PM or checker)
e EEE E/E/EE by senior level reviewer (PM or RM)

C. Distill QA/QC principles to “Take 5 for Quality”

24

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.
Questions?

25

Visit us at www.collinsengr.com.

You might also like