The Second Amendment

We Need Government Control Not Gun Control

Tyrants have always loathed an armed people. History shows this from theses sources:

“”This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration.
Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead.” (Chancelor’s
Speech, 1935 by Adolf Hilter)

“The most foolish mistake we could make would be to allow the subject peoples to
possess arms. So let’s not have any talk about native militas.” (Hitler’s Secret
Conversations, 1941-44, Farrar, Strauss and Young, 1953)

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must
command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” (by
Mao Zedong in the Problems of
War and Strategy, Nov 6 1938, published in “Selected Works of Mao Zedong,” 1965)

“US Senator, If I could have banned them all- ‘Mr. And Mrs. America turn in
your guns’ –I would have!” (Statement on TV program 69 Minutes, Feb 5 1995 by CFR
California U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein)
(US President, has sworn an oath to defend the US Constitution, (not to violate it,
criticize it, and belittle it)) “When we got organized as a country, [and] wrote a fairly radical
Cons titution, with a radical Bill of Rights, giving radical amounts of freedom to Americans, it was
assumed that Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly…When personal
freedom is
being abused, you have to move to limit it.” (April 19 1994, on MTV by ex-President Bill Clinton)

“Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA – ordinary citizens don’t need
guns, as their having guns DOESN’T SERVE THE STATE.’’ – HEINRICH HIMMLER

“All military-type firearms are to be handed in immediately…The SS, SA and Stahlhelm give
every respectable German man the opportunity of campaigning with them. Therefore anyone who
does not belong to one of the above-named organizations and who unjustifiably nevertheless
KEEPS his weapon…must be regarded as an ENEMY OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT.’’ –
SA OBERFUHRER OF BAD TOLZ (3/33)

"The measures adopted to restore public order are: First of all the elimination of the so-called
subversive elements.... They were elements of disorder and subversion. On the morrow of
each conflict I gave the categorical order to confiscate the largest possible number of
weapons of every sort and kind. This confiscation, which continues with the utmost
energy, has given satisfactory results." (By Italy’s Fascist ruler, Prime Minister Benito
Mussolini, in a speech delivered at the Italian Senate on June 8, 1923)

Regardless of many people’s denials, there are certain groups in America who want to ban all
private ownership of firearms, which is grossly unconstitutional. These groups aren’t liberal or
conservative, but extremist since both the left and the right all hold dear the 2nd Amendment with
only different interpretations of it obviously.

Here’s one source on it, which involves the CIA on it [the Gestapo plot to ban all handguns]:
“”A principle player in the 1974 foundings of both HCI [then called the Nation al Council to Control
Handguns] and the NCBH [National Coalition to Ban Handguns, now renamed the Coalition
Against Gun Violence] was Ed Wells, who was A 25-YEAR VETERAN OF THE COVERT
OPERATIONS DIVISION OF THE CIA… There was also a fund raiser for NCBH hosted by the
man Nixon appointed as CIA Director, William Colby… HCI spokesman Greg Risch – incredibly –
admitted that “SURE THERE ARE A LOT OF CIA PEOPLE IN IT [HCI]”, and also stated that
there are quite a few “EX-CIA WHO DONATE TO US.” David Emory’s Talk Radio (On NAZIs)

Here’s Janet Reno’s take on gun control: “Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a
step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal.”

The Bible Issue and Guns:

Many Christians believe over the decades that disarmament (or pacifism. Pacifism means do no
resistance whatsoever in response. That means even if your kid or family member is being
assaulted, you do nothing about it. Pacifism would ban the police since the police uses violence
to stop violent situations at time) is biblical. Some even believe that total blind allegiance to the
government is great even saying that evil government is of God. The spin stops here and the
truth must be presented. The Bible always supported self-defense. In the OT, the Hebrews not
only went to battle and conquered their enemies, but they did so at the command of God and
went with his blessings as in Deut. Chapter 20. Pacifists use Exodus 20:13 to dispute self-
defense and arms use, but in Ex. 20:13 “kill” means from the original Hebrew word “ratsach”
meaning premeditated murder not self-defense using arms if necessary. The OT like 1
Samuel 13:9-22, etc. outline self defense concepts. The Bible supports the self-defense of men
and women will defend themselves against someone intent on harming them. Weapons used in
the right manner for a just cause are never evil. There is nothing wrong with pacifism or non-
violence per se, but we are not forbidden to protecting ourselves or families at all.

There are no admonitions not to carry weapons in the Bible. In the OT, men carried swords,
bows, and arrows, spears, or whatever freely and without restrictions as long as the nation
remained under its own sovereignty. Weapons were utilized to hunt not only for self defense.
Only when Israel was taken over by enemy nations were the people forced to give up weapons.
Now we must go on to the NT to Jesus Christ. Many pacifists think that Christ never used any
self-defense and refused to take any forceful actions on his own? This lie is exposed and refuted.
Christ was meek in the NT, but God who is Christ is a being of Love and Justice. Sometimes
justice requires force and Christ drove people breaking Jewish laws from the temple in
Jerusalem and risked his life publicly and vocally where things needed to be changed
among corrupt religious and governmental leaders. During this time, the Roman government
banned weapons except for special Jewish “police groups” charged with enforcing the law and an
occupying army.

But, many Jews disobey the government rule by often having short swords or daggers concealed
on their persons and even the Lord Jesus Christ tells his disciples on one occasion: “Then said
he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he
hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.” (Luke 22:36) (This is the verse that
pacifists forgotten) Later, in the NT Bible, Jesus told the disciples that they could get a sword if
they want to. Jesus, who was facing death shortly never, said that having weapons is a sin. Christ
in his 2nd coming will judge, and breaks his enemies with a rod of iron and sword in his mouth.
After Jesus Christ’s coming, we wouldn’t need weapons since it will be filled with peace. The NT
in Hebrew 13:17 teaches that Christians should obey the laws of the land they are in, provided
the laws aren’t immoral according to the Biblical principles or compromise your religion beliefs or
moral conscience. In other words, if they government says do abortion or murder innocent
people, you have a right not to do that. Daniel 3 and 6 outline Daniel and his three friends
disobeyed Nebuchadnezzar’s command that everyone should bow and worship the pagan image
on the plain of Dura. They refused and were thrown in the furnace for punishment, they trusted
themselves to God and he delivered them. This supports self-defense along with the Constitution.
The verse in Ephesians saying not to use carnal weapons is true, but it inheritably doesn’t
condemn self-defense at all. In other words, we shouldn’t fight people preemptively or fight (in
the government in a rebellious type way) to establish a man made Kingdom of God on Earth. Yet,
we have every right to protect our family and friends if they are in immediate danger. As always,
violence is forbidden by any Christian. As Dr. Martin Luther King rightfully said, non-violent-
resistance should always be a goal in solving problems, but self-defense is always a higher
option if circumstances lead to that. This doesn’t mean you have to own a gun. This does mean
that people have a right to own a gun if they want to. Also, guns have been used for sport and
other uses not just shooting in self defense at all. I do respect Christians who follow non-
resistance though.

Basic Historical Precedents to Promote Self-Defense and Gun Rights

The following comes from www.jpfo.org/sixaboutsecond.htm-

1). The Holy Bible in the OT supports self-defense in Exodus 22:2.

2). The Talmud states (I don’t agree with Talmud on every issue though) that: “If someone comes
to kill you, arise quickly and kill him.” (Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin. 1994, 2, 72a; The Babylonian
Talmud: Tractate Berakoth. 1990, 58a, 62b).

3). Cicero, Rome’s leading orator, had early argued that the right to self-defense was natural and
inborn, and not a creation of the government. The right to use weapons was a necessary part of
the right to self-defense — any view to the contrary was silly nonsense. [Stephen P. Halbrook,
That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of A Constitutional Right (1984), p. 17, fn 76-77.]

4). Roman Catholic Doctrine: Christian doctrine has long asserted the right and duty of self
defense. “Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his
aggressor a lethal blow.” See Catechism of the Catholic Church 1994, sections 2263-65 (citing
and quoting Thomas Aquinas). I don’t agree with Roman Catholic doctrine. This is an example.

5). Protestant Doctrine: Individual has personal and unalienable right to self-defense, even
against government. Samuel Rutherford, Lex, Rex [1644] 1982, pp. 159-166, 183-185 (Sprinkle
Publications edition.) Jesus advised his disciples to arm themselves in view of likely persecution.
Luke 22:36.

6). John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government (1690) aimed at reforming Britain’s monarchy
and parliamentary system and limiting the power of government, and profoundly influenced the
Founders and all Western Civilization. John Locke explained that civil government properly exists
to more effectively protect the rights that all individuals have in the “state of nature.”

The individuals have the rights to life, liberty, and property. They give civil government the power
over themselves only to the extent that it better protects those rights. Thomas Jefferson, author of
the Declaration of Independence, specifically declared that the ideas of John Locke’s Second
Treatise were “generally approved by the citizens of the United States.” Jefferson mandated that
Locke’s Second Treatise be taught in the University of Virginia. (end of website source)

*For any major nation in history especially the 20th century that had gun control and banned all
firearms for the citizen to acquire, extermination, genocide, and bad effects will always proceed.
Look at these results.

+In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, approximately 20 million
dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
+In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to
defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
+In 1928, Germany established gun control. From 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies,
homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.
+In 1935, China established gun control. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents were
unable to defend themselves and were rounded up and exterminated.
+In 1964, Guatemala established gun control. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
+In 1970, Uganda established gun control. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to
defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
+In 1956, Cambodia established gun control. From 1975 to 1977, one million "educated" people,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
That places total victims who lost their lives at the hands of their own governments because of
gun control at approximately 56 million in the last century.

*Over the last 10 years, law-abiding citizens have been stripped of their right to own some
or all types of firearms in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and New Zealand among others.
The USA is next on the list, but it will be more harder and with more bloodshed to enforce a ban
of the private ownership of handguns since the U.S.A. has the 2nd Amendment. This is one of the
pure goals of the globalist/occult-influenced United Nations. To prevent one of self-defense
against tyrants is always a routine used by these globalists to achieve the plot of the one-world
government. Gun Control doesn’t work since constant weapons constraints aimed at law-abiding
citizens or against the 2nd Amendment with no end in sight or definite extent will lead to
confiscation of legal firearms.

This always the case in that scenario without any question. The right of self-defense is a God-
given right. If changes don’t occur, within the next 10-20 years in America, all guns might
be banned and that policy will be enforced by the Gestapo U.N./BATF agents utilized in the
Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.

What did the Founding Fathers Think About Gun Control?

These people weren’t perfect on all issues, but it seems that they are on point involving
this circumstance. There are so many quotes of these people supporting gun rights
making proof of the 2nd Amendment’s principle rights outlined that only the desperate,
lying individuals will deny these quotes. Here they are:

1). “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined
nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted
and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent
homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater … confidence than an
armed man." (Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria in On Crimes and punishment
(1764)).

2). "Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve
order in the world as well as property . . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-
abiding deprived of the use of them." Thomas Paine, Thoughts on Defensive War (1775).

3). "The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A well
regulated militia,
composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense
of a free country..."
(James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, 6-8-1789)

4). "…The said Constitution be never construed …to prevent the people of the
United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." (Samuel
Adams, during Massachusetts's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788)).

5). "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of
other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." –
(James Madison, The Federalist Papers No. 46 at 243-244.)

6). "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost
every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws
by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a
force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in
the United States"—(Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of
the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the
United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888).)

7). "A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves and include all men
capable of bearing arms …To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of
people always possess arms . . . " Richard Henry Lee, Additional Letters From the
Federal Farmer 53 (1788).

8). "...a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the
proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed ... - Constitution of Virginia, Article 1, Bill
of Rights, Section 13.

9). "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the
best and most effectual way to enslave them." (George Mason, during Virginia's
Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788).)

10). The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the
whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of
regular troops." (Noah Webster, An Examination into the Leading Principles of the
Federal Constitution Proposed BV the Late Convention (1787).)

11). "To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except
in private self-defense or by partial orders of towns...is a dissolution of the government."
(John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of
America (1787-1788).)

More quotes can be found at www.thejackal.freeservers.com/about.html

and www.vtgunsmiths.com/arms/ffquote.html

*The Constitution and many founding fathers supported the militias as composed of
men and women voluntarily holding arms. Holding any arms therefore is very legal
and anyone advocating the ban of them is not only unconstitutional, but also
morally wrong. The Founding Fathers classified these rights as individual rights not
collective or rights only for a few militias. One supporter of gun control was Adolph
Hitler who banned all arms in his Third Reich (except for a chosen few). George W. Bush
once supported a ban on all semi-automatic shotguns. It didn’t occur thankfully. The liar
Nixon and Reagan were ardent gun-control people as well. Dictators Mao Tse Tung and
Joseph Stalin also enforced gun bans. Today in 2009, Barack Obama has anti-gun
tendencies despite him talking about the Second Amendment being about an individual
right of citizens to own a firearm.

Doctors vs. Guns U.S. Statistics:

Number of physicians in the US = 700,000
Accidental deaths caused by physician s per year =120,000
Accidental deaths per physician = 0.171 (U.S. Dept. of Health &
Human Services)
Number of gun owners in the US = 80,000,000
Number of accidental gun deaths per year (all age groups) =1,500
Accidental deaths per gun owner = 0.0000188 (U.S. Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms)
Therefore, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous
than gun owners.

:
ACCIDENTAL DEATHS
Fact: Firearm misuse causes only a small number of accidental deaths in the U.S. (107)
For
example, compared to accidental death from firearms, you are:
• Twice as likely to suffocate on a swallowed object
• Seven times more likely to be poisoned
• 10 times more likely to die falling
• And 31 times more likely to die in an automobile accident

Fact: In 1996, there were only 21 accidental gun deaths for children under age 15. About
twice as many children under the age of ten die from drowning in bathtubs. (108)
Fact: In 1993, there were 1,334 drownings and 528 firearm-related accidental deaths from
ages 0-19. Firearms outnumber pools by a factor of over 30:1. Thus, the risk of drowning
in a pool is nearly 100 times higher than from a firearm-related accident for everyone,
and nearly 500 times for ages 0-5. (109)

Sources:
107 National Safety Council's 1997 Accident Fact Book
108 Centers for Disease Control
109 National Center for Health Statistics, and the National Spa and Pool Institute

Behold these quick facts:

1). Assault Weapons aren’t a serious problem in America since according to Gary
Klueck’s “Targeting Guns” in 1997, a complication of 48 metropolitan police department
from 1980-1994, shown that assault weapons were used in less than 2% of crimes
involving in firearms and 0.25% of all violent crime. (All before the enactment of any
national or state assault weapons ban). In 1998, at LA, out of the 538 documented gun
incidents, only (0.2%) involved an assault weapon. In SF at 1998, only 2.2% of
confiscated weapons were assault weapons.

2). Gun banning even in the UK increased crime. According to the British Home Office,
reported by the BBC News, July 12, 2002 presented that street robberies soared 28% in
2001. Violent crime is up 11%, murders up 4%, and rapes up 14%. Even homicide rates
are on an all time high in 2000 after a virtual ban on private handgun ownership.
According to statistics by the British Home Office, 3,000 crimes involving handguns
were recorded in 1999-2000, including the 42 homicides, 310 cases of attempted murder,
2561 robberies, and 204 burglaries as a result of the gun ban.

3). A Zogby/SA survey of 1,015 likely voters in June 2002 concluded that 75% of
Americans believe the right to keep and bear arms is an individual right proven in

http://www.exodusnews.com/NATIONAL/national090.htm
[Exodus On Line] plus the Second Amendment Foundation’s site of

http://www.saf.org/pub/rkba/press-releases/Zogby1.htm
ABC News determined the rate to be 77% according to ABC News on May 14, 2002.

4). The FBI Uniform Crime Statistics in 1994 mentioned that 2/3 of the people who die
each year from gun fire are criminals being shot by other criminals.

5). Dr. Gary Kleck, University of Florida man using FBI Uniform Crime Statistics fin
1997, shown that among the 15 states with the highest homicide rates, 10 have restrictive
or very restrictive gun control laws. Maryland has the toughest gun control laws in the
nation and ranks #1 in robberies, and #3 in both in violent crime and murder. In the FBI
Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) for 2000, p. 79, Table 5 “Index of Crime by State”
presented that 20% of U.S. homicides occur in just 4 cities with just 6% of the population
of the U.S.A. (in NYC, Chicago, Detriot, and D.C.) and each has a virtual prohibition on
private handguns.

6). This information is from http://keepandbeararms.com/downloads/GunFacts_v3.2.pdf

Surprisingly of many Republicans support strict Gun Control Policies:

Republicans are just as guilty as Democrats in terms of seeking strict gun control laws. At
least the Democrats are blatant in their rhetoric of disarming the populace, but Republicans are
more in a deceptive way to convey that exact message. That’s one more sign of this 2-party
system of being nothing more than a real show [It has been controlled by the CFR since 1921].
Here’s some facts:

a). In 1969, journalist William Safire asked Richard Nixon what he thought about gun control.
"Guns are an abomination," Nixon replied. According to Safire, Nixon went on to confess that,
"Free from fear of gun owners' retaliation at the polls, he favored making handguns illegal and
requiring licenses for hunting rifles." (from web.archive.org/web/20030...ology.org/ )

b). It was President George Bush, Sr. who banned the import of "assault weapons" in 1989, and
promoted the view that Americans should only be allowed to own weapons suitable for "sporting
purposes."

c). It was Governor Ronald Reagan of California who signed the Mulford Act in 1967,
"prohibiting the carrying of firearms on one's person or in a vehicle, in any public place or on any
public street." The law was aimed at stopping the Black Panthers, but affe cted all gun owners.
Twenty-four years later, Reagan was still pushing gun control. "I support the Brady Bill," he said
in a March 28, 1991 speech, "and I urge the Congress to enact it without further delay."
d). One of the most aggressive gun control advocates today is Republican mayor Rudolph
Giuliani of New York City, whose administration sued 26 gun manufacturers in June 2000, and
whose police commissioner, Howard Safir, proposed a nationwide plan for gun licensing,
complete with yearly "safety" inspections.

e). Another Republican, New York State Governor George Pataki, on August 10, 2000, signed
into law what The New York Times called "the nation’s strictest gun controls," a radical
program mandating trigger locks, background checks at gun shows and "ballistic fingerprinting" of
guns sold in the state. It also raised the legal age to buy a handgun to 21 and banned "assault
weapons," the sale or possession of which would now be punishable by seven years in prison.

f). President George W. Bush continues to support the ban of assault weapons by Title IX of the
Federal Violent Crime Control Act of 1994. Clinton passed this priority with high support by
Republicans [at September 13, 1994].

g). The Hatch-Craig Gun Control Amendment (May 14, 1999) was passed and headed by
Republican Senator Orrin Hatch (from Utah) and Republican Senator Larry Craig [Idaho]
by a 48-47 vote. It called for more restrictions on gun ownership by background checks for any
private gun shows and assign a U.S. attorney to every district for the purpose of harassing gun
owners. 47 out of 55 Republican senators voted for this legislation. At July 18, 2001, 164 House
Republicans dropped the No U.N. Gun control policy and it was proposed by Ron Paul
[Republican Senator from Texas]. This bill was to boycott the U.N.’s illegal gun control policies
taking away guns from civilians and there are many other examples of this.

*The GOP, on the other hand, uses treachery and deception to mislead the citizenry into thinking
that they will protect the right to keep and bear arms. Yet, it is clearly evident that they are
enemies of liberty as well as the some of the Democrats. That is why I’m an independent. I don’t
trust the Republicans or the Democrats unconditionally at all.
The Nazi Connection to Gun Control

It is a known historical fact that Hitler supported gun control. On of the laws passed by the Nazis
was called the Weapons Law passed at March 18, 1938. That law only had firearms ownership
to the Nazi party members and other “reliable people.” This Nazi Law barred Jews from
businesses involving firearms being racist obviously. Another Nazi who signed the law was
“Minister” Wilhelm Frick. These laws are recorded at “Reichsgestezblatt” (equivalent of the U.S.
Federal Register) at 1943-1944 recorded a t the U.S. Library of Congress. Dr. Solynom Fekete
translated the Nazi law into English. The guns restricted on the Jewish people was one of the
many reasons for the extremely high numbers of Jewish deaths along with other people. Again, a
people that’s armed and foreright in their resistance and opposition to tyranny will overcome the
tactics of a tyrannical force. The Gestapo of Germany enforced these gun control measures.
What does this have do with the U.S.? Plenty. The Nazi Law is found to be completely similar
to the USA’s Gun Control Act of 1968. This illegal law was proposed as early as August 1963.
Later in the decade in 1968, a stronger debate raged over gun control proceeded over urban
riots, etc. Senator D. Tydings (D-MD) was the militant who wanted the trash bill passed, yet U.S.
Representative John Dingell (D-MI) who testified at those Senator hearings on gun expressed
legitimate concerns over the issue. Dingell claimed that it might lead to the confiscation of
firearms as happened in Nazi Germany and Tydings angrily accused Dingell of using “scare
tactics”, but he really didn’t. Also the late Roman Catholic Senator Thomas J. Dodd of
Connecticut was involved in the bill. By after WWII during the Nuremburg trials, Thomas was an
assistant to the chief prosecutor at the Nuremburg war crime trials. He must have had access to
the German text of the Nazi Weapons Law along with other documents which he in fact did. Dodd
tried to show that the Nazi law wasn’t similar to the 1968 Gun law [which is a lie], but it silenced
Dingell’s criticisms. Dodd isn’t a Nazi, but supported the Nazi precept of gun control which
invalidates the Constitution and moral rights.

Later it passed. A book by Jewish pro-gun rights heroes by Jay Simkin and Aaron Zelman [ex-
Vietnam vet and the founder of Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership. Their logo is a
Hexagram be ing pagan though which they don’t know.] called Gun Control: Gateway to
Tyranny outlines this 100% fully. GET THE BOOK. It shows hard evidence when looking at the
Nazi law and the 1968 U.S. law, it’s the same like law-abiding firearm owners in Illinois,
Massachusetts, and even in New Jersey people must carry identification cards based on formats
from directly the Nazi Weapons Law. The 1938 Nazi Weapons Law therefore disarmed, enslaved,
and murdered the many innocent victims of the Holocaust and in the United States with its Gun
Control Act of 1968 and is enforced by the modern day Gestapo, known as the “Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms (BATF). John Ashcroft, George W. Bush, Charles Schumer, Diane
nd
Feinstein, and other have dealt with 2 Amendment issues. Numerous folks want this new world
order as well. That is why many foreign troops (including the U.S. military) have conducted
exercises throughout America. Some researchers believe that a foreign invasion is a possibility in
America. Always remember friends, that Adolf Hitler, Mussolini, Himmler, V.I. Lenin, Joseph
Stalin, Moa Zedong, and other mass murderers or dictators supported gun bans against innocent
citizens.

This will occur by UN/NA TO/foreign troops through martial law and under martial law. These
foreign troops are trained even here to accomplish that goal by the Sino-Muslim-Russian-
Mexican-Cuban-German-EU-NATO-UN invasion coming unto our soil in the years to come.
There are over 600,000 U.N. troops here now!!!
The NRA has lost its salt
The National Rifle Association has indeed lost its original salt and is part of
the establishment basically. The NRA was once an authentic, fruitful, and
truthful organization. The NRA was founded in 1871 by an act of the New York
Legislature at the request of Union officers. In fact, 8 out of the first 10
Presidents of the NRA were Union veterans. President Ulysses S. Grant (who
lineage relates to the Illuminati Collins bloodline) was elected the 8th
President of the NRA and the NRA elected General Phillip Sheridan after
Grant finished his term. Phillip Sheridan removed the governors of Texas and
Louisiana for failure to suppress the KKK. During the 1950's-1960's, groups of
blacks organized a NFA chapter in order to obtain surplus military rifles to
fight off Klansmen. The NRA supported the Gun Control Act of 1968 (and the
U.S. gun ban in 1933), which suppressed a lot of citizens from owning
weapons.

The NRA for more than a century had committed some moral actions in gun
training, education, and programs (they are many honorable people in the NRA
today), but the ILA (Institute for Legislature Action) and PVF (Political Victor
Fund) existed within the NRA. Both the ILA and PVF are nothing more than
compromisers to preserve their jobs rather than our freedoms. NRA Executive
Vice President Wayne LaPierre supported Project Exile, a program letting the
federal government instead of rightfully allowing the state to prosecute gun
crimes. This is solely the state's responsibility. LaPierre commented on Project
Exile that no guns should be in schools period except for the police. Hey, that
would exclude the ROTC gun displays so they can go to jail now if they have a
gun.

LaPierre contends that there ought to be no unsupervised youth with guns.

This would even strongly punish innocent accidents or youth shooting cans.
Guns used by youth in the right way is nothing immoral and it should be
encouraged. LaPierre also seeks background checks, gun cases, and tests to
own a gun. Wow, So much for the 2nd Amendment wherefore we are entitled
to self-defense or the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. I don’t agree
with Ron Paul on every issue, but even he was heavily pro-Second
Amendment (but the NRA gave him a B rating in a false way).

The smoking gun outlining treason by the NRA is on October 8, 2003 court
case between the NRA. The NRA attorney Stephen Halbrook said these
following words to the D.C. federal court in oral arguments:

The court: The government can put restrictions on the right to bear arms.
Mr. Halbrook: Your honor, we are here wanting to register handguns. We are
not here wanted unrestricted access. We're not here asking to carry them, other
than in the house.
The court: You're saying that the government can impose reasonable
restrictions?
Mr. Halbrook: Yes, your honor, Yes, your honor.
(From keepandbeararms.com/Silve...lbrook.asp )

THIS IS WRONG BY THE NRA since they explicitly believe in the

registration of firearms. Halbrook and others needs to realize that the Nazi
Adolph Hitler, through his Gun Control Act of 1938, in the 1930's-1940's,
Communist Mao Zedong, Fascist Mussolini, Stalin, and others all believed in
the registration and eventually banning of all firearms. These acts contributed
to the genocide of innocent people in the nations that dictators resided in.

History will repeat itself if we don't learn about it. The Nazi laws are exactly
similar to the USA's Gun Control Act of 1968. Also, wasn't extreme gun control
racist for African Americans in the U.S.A. not only the Jewish people inside Nazi
Germany? Yes, since even a 1792 federal law restricted black men from even to
serve in state militias. Even free blacks were banned to have guns before the
Civil War in several states. Alabama banned all guns in 1866 and disarmed
black people was one of the many reasons why the Masonic Ku Klux Klan
terrorized black families who couldn't shoot back leading to 3,446 deaths from
the end of the Civil War to the end of the Civil Rights Movement.

Let's not forget the racist nation of India having Hindus restricting 300 million
Dalits to own weapons, live a great life, and have basic liberty and human
rights as explained by Velu Annamalai and others. Gandhi is turning in his
grave at India now (Gandhi called the Untouchables "Children of God") and if
India seeks to become a real Republic fulfilling its full potential, which I
want, they must give the Dalits full rights.

Peaceful American people now of all races are treated as slaves in some cases by
the violations of our liberties going on.
History seems to repeat itself now since unending laws continually restricting
the right to bear arms always leading to confiscation and extermination. That's
a fact. The NRA attorney said that we shouldn't carry guns except in the house,
which is lunacy. We can carry guns in or out of our house if we seek to and
that's very legal.

The NRA once supported Senator Arlen Specter in Pennslyvania. Spector is

known for being anti-gun, pro-war on terror, and pro-abortion. In 2008, the NRA
support the anti-gun bill of HR 2640 (which can deprive hunters their rights to
own a gun under certain circumstances). HR 2640 or the Veterans Disarmament
Act -- which has already passed the House -- would place any veteran who has
ever been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) on the federal
gun ban list. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy of New York, a chief sponsor of the bill,
loved the bill. This was done in response to the events of the massacre in Virginia
Tech. McCarthy admitted that this is a first step toward a National database. This
is exactly what President Bill Clinton did over seven years ago when his
administration illegitimately added some 83,000 veterans into the National
Criminal Information System (NICS system) -- prohibiting them from purchasing
firearms, simply because of afflictions like PTSD. The Military Order of the
Purple Heart is opposed to this legislation. It doesn’t even offer a trial by a jury
to define who is a heavily mentally ill (It’s defined by a committee or a doctor).
Many NRA leaders love to protect the gun rights of hunters, but they don’t
fully want to protect the 2nd Amendment rights of all American citizens.

A group like Gun Owners of America is a real organization supporting gun

rights. The establishment’s plan is to allow the federal government to control
every citizens’ actions with guns even if they innocent of no crime. This has been
promoted by he new Attorney General of the Barack Obama administration
named Eric Holder.
Isn't it surprising that one of the men who infiltrated the National Rifle
Association was John M. Snyder, and according to Eric John Phelps: "a former
Jesuit seminarian who is a member of the People's Order of St. Michael the
Archangel and presently leading the effort to make 'St. Gabriel o f the
Sorrowful Mother' the patron saint of gun owners? In the light of the Jesuit
Conference seeking to ban all privately owned firearms, HOW RIDICULOUS
CAN HE BE!!!!!!!" (Vatican Assassins: Wounded in the House of My Friends by
Eric Jon Phelps, pgs. 134, 2001).

The Jesuits have been anti-gun for decades in the United States of America. One
such Jesuit is named Rev. M. Pfleger. He’s a friend of Freemason Jesse Jackson
and Louis Farrakhan. The Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) accuses Pfleger
of calling for the death of a gun shop owner. An article form the ISRA says that:
“…During an address at an anti-gun rally in front of Chuck's, Rev. Michael
Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina's Church, exhorted the crowd to "drag" shop owner,
John Riggio, from his shop "like a rat" and "snuff" him…“ Of course, this Jesuit is
an extremist and someone we should keep our eye on. Certain people believe
that there aren't folks who want to ban all guns, but they are sadly mistaken.
Here's just some words by a few of these gun-grabbing extremists:

“Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe.”

(Diane Feinstein, Associated Press, November 18, 1993)

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright
ban, picking up every one of them; "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in," I
would have done it.” (Diane Feinstein, CBS-TV's "60 Minutes," February 5, 1995)

"If a bill to ban handguns came to the house floor, I would vote for it.” (Pete
Stark, Town Hall Meeting, June 1999, Fremont California)

"My staff and I right now are working on a comprehensive gun-control bill. We
don't have all the details, but for instance, regulating the sale and purchase of
bullets. Ultimately, I would like to see the manufacture and possession of
handguns banned except for military and police use. But that's the endgame.
And in the meantime, there are some specific things that we can do with
legislation." (Chicago Tribune, December 5, 1999)
Radical Gun Control and Racism

In early America, the French Black Code in 1751 required Louisiana colonist to prevents
blacks to own guns and if they refuse they were required that “"any black carrying any
potential weapon, such as a cane." If a black refused to stop on demand, and was on
horseback, the colonist was authorized to "shoot to kill." (Thomas N. Ingersoll, "Free Blacks
in a Slave Society: New Orleans, 1718-1812", _William and Marry Quarterly_, 48:2 [April, 199 1],
178-79.)

There were many laws in French Louisiana and early America that prevents many African
Americans to bear any arms even freed blacks. It existed in Virginia, North Carolina, and other
places around the country. A North Carolina Supreme Court statue gave the ruling that:

“That if any free negro, mulatto, or free person of color, shall wear or carry about his or her
person, or keep in his or her house, any shot gun, musket, rifle, pistol, sword, dagger or
bowie-knife, unless he or she shall have obtained a licence therefor from the Court of
Pleas and Quarter Sessions of his or her county, within one year preceding the wearing,
keeping or carrying therefor, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be
indicted therefor. (State v. Newsom, 5 Iredell 181, 27 N.C. 250 (1844).

Elijah Newson [A free African American] was indicted in Cumberland County in June of 1843 for
carrying a shotgun without a license an d the North Carolina Supreme Court still kept up with the
status quo of restricting him his 2nd Amendment rights by virtue of a license issue. The Western
states with concerns over Native American tension gave blacks [free or slave] the right to bear
arms only with a license like in the 1798 Kentucky Comprehensive Act to use it on frontier
plantations, etc. Whites didn’t have to use a license. After the civil war and the immoral slavery
was abolished, the Black Codes [a new form of slavery] rose up. In the Black Codes required
licenses for blacks to carry gun or a simple Bowie knife. The Masonic KKK came and killed
thousands of blacks for many reasons, but one of illegal disarmament needed for self-
defense against blood-thirty racists. For decades, "gun control" helped keep black people
defenseless against lynching. Between 1882 and 1968, 3,446 blacks were murdered in the
U.S. by lynching.

According to www.jpfo.org/gpj4.htm

“People should know that American "gun control" laws were first created to make sure Black
people could not revolt or escape from slavery. After the Civil War, former slave-states devised
more "gun control" laws. Disarmed by these laws, free Black people were defenseless against
repressive police and racist attacks. Over 3,700 Black people were lynched, and thousands of
others were assaulted, intimidated and terrorized by the Ku Klux Klan and racist mobs. Today's
"gun control" laws are just like those which the slaveholders and Klansmen supported. Here is a
sampling: Gun bans in slave states (Virginia, Maryland, Georgia, Mississippi) and after the
Civil War (Alabama, South Carolina). License and registration requirements before the Civil
War (Florida, Delaware) and af ter (Mississippi, Louisiana). Post-Civil War bans on
inexpensive guns (Tennessee, Arkansas), and special high taxes and fees on guns
(Alabama, Texas). Warrantless searches of Black people's homes to look for firearms (pre-Civil
War Florida)” (end of website source). In 1941, Florida Supreme Court Justice Buford admitted
that Florida's gun control laws were passed for the purpose of disarming black American laborers,
and were never intended to be applied to the white population. At 1968, the Gun Control Act was
past to curb rioting, but it was also used to prevent law-abiding blacks in urban areas to defend
themselves against criminals therefore creating more government control over the populace. The
government makes illegal law to get more control is the oldest play in the book. For years this has
all occurred for the control of the black and the world population to create the New World Order.
That’s their plan.

The global elite (as found in Secret Societies, the Vatican/Jesuit network, many of the royal, elite
bloodlines, etc.) want 85-90% of all human beings on Earth dead to create their utopia. The
George Guidestones and a quote from Prince Philip outline this nefarious anti-population view of
the elite. Gun Control is a big tool in disarming human beings in society. There is a racist
mentality that if you restrict or ban all guns in a community, crime will go down. What these
racists really say is the “Don’t allow guns in urban communities since minorities are more
susceptible to violence than other people in other communities.” I know that’s racist, but that’s
exact racist, sick mindset of these people who support illegal gun-grabbing. Fact is that anyone
regardless of race, class, socioeconomic stats, or any background should a right to own a
weapon if they choose regardless of what area they live. I reject racism. Therefore, the
right to bear arms is a true tenet that ought to be preserved.

By Timothy