Standard Method statement-PIT
Standard Method statement-PIT
Standard Method statement-PIT
1.0 Introduction
Pile Integrity Testing (PIT) is a Non-Destructive integrity test method for foundation piles.
The method evaluates continuity of the pile shaft and provides information on any potential
defects due to honeycombs, necking (cross-section reduction), potential bulbs, sudden changes
in soil stratum, concrete quality in terms of wave speed etc. It is known as “Low Strain”
method since it requires the impact of only a small hand-held hammer and the resultant strains
are of extremely low magnitude. The test procedure is standardized as per ASTM D5882 and
also forms part of various specifications and code provisions worldwide. The number of tests
shall be decided by the engineer to the project.
The testing method and interpretation requires expert interpretation and analysis. It is desirable
that the agency employed for testing proves its competence by submitting past studies and
expertise. In India, Geo Dynamics owns and operates the Pile Integrity Tester system procured
from Pile Dynamics, Inc., and has several years of experience in testing and is considered to
be a pioneer in country.
The purpose of testing is evaluate the pile for potential defects that maybe caused due to
necking, honey-combs, soil inclusions, cold joints etc. The method also evaluates the bulge or
bulbs inside the pile but a bulb is not considered as a defect.
3.0 References:
• ASTM D5882-07. Standard Test Method for Low-Strain Integrity Testing of Piles.
American Society for Testing and Materials.
• IS:14893. Non-Destructive Integrity Testing of Piles (NDT) - Guidelines
• Likins G. & Rausche F., “Recent Advances and Proper Use of PDI Low Strain Pile
Integrity Testing”, Application of Stress-wave Theory to Piles, Rotterdam, 2000
• Vaidya Ravikiran & Shah D.L., “Pile Diagnostics By Low Strain Integrity Testing”, IGC
2001, “The New Millenium Conference”, Indore, India, December 2001.
The pile concrete should attain atleast 75% of it required compressive strength before testing
is conducted. This can be checked with the help of 7 and 28 days cube test results.
The pile head at the testing level shall be made reasonably flat by chipping or by chisel. In
some cases it can even be done using a grinder or carborundum stone. Ensure that concrete is
sound, hard and good. No high strength mortar or cement paste shall be applied on the pile top
to make it smooth and even.
The projecting rebars need to be bent outside for easy access within core region. Safe and
reasonable access to the pile is the responsibility of the client.
Data supplied at the time of testing shall include length of the pile from testing level, cutoff
level of the pile, pile diameter and pile reference as well as location. Soil information available
for the location or in the vicinity shall be provided and is a valuable tool for interpretation.
Additional data like pile installation records, load test results etc., shall also be supplied on
request.
The testing involves attachment of an accelerometer onto the pile top (not near its edge) with
the help of bonding material like candle wax, vaseline etc. After attachment, the pile is
impacted with a hand held device (a hand held hammer). Typically six blows are impacted to
the hammer and an average of similar of these blows constitutes one data set.
The test involves collection of several data sets for each pile so that a reasonable inference can
be obtained for each pile. For piles having diameter 600mm and above, testing maybe
conducted on atleast 3 locations, whereas minimum one location is enough for smaller
diameter piles.
7.0 Data Processing
The data collected using PIT equipment shall be processed using PIT
PIT-W
W 2009 software. Once
the hammer is impacted onto the pile a wave is generated. This wave moves down the pile and
as it moves down it gets weak. It also getss affected by surrounding soil, projecting
reinforcement etc.
To ensure that the signals are clearly visible for interpretation, data shall be processed in terms
of Magnification (MA to enhance the energy lost), reduce reflections from soil to evaluate
concrete (HI PASS Filter), and re reduce
duce reflections from reinforcement (Wavelet Filter).
Filter) The
MA shall be a factor of the length of the pile and normally must be equal to the pile length.
The Magnifcation Delay shall be default 20% to avoid errors in interpretation.
The report shall clearly indicated piles that are acceptable or questionable
onable or rejected. The
comments shall generally be based on the following guidelines.
1. Piles with toe response and no defect apparent shall be classified as acceptable.
2. Piles with no toe response and significant reduction or defect above the pile toe shall be
rejected and replacement or any other remedial action maybe considered. The test
engineer should specify the approximate location of defect in such a case.
3. Piles with a sudden major increase in resistance or impedance may not show toe response
and are termed as inconclusive and a typical such pile can be selected for static / high
strain dynamic test at the discretion of the engineer.
4. Piles that show toe response but some impedance reduction / defect maybe under-rated /
replaced / repaired / or subjected to additional high strain dynamic or static testing at the
discretion of the engineer.
Acceptance / rejection of piles in Para: 3 and 4 above shall also be based on construction
records (concrete consumption, geotechnical data, and construction method) that will provide
valuable help in result interpretation.
9.0 Limitations
Certain limitations are inherent in the low strain test method. These limitations must be
understood and taken into consideration in making the final integrity evaluation.
1. The test method can generally evaluate for piles upto an L/D ratio of 45 to 50. However,
this also depends on the soil resistance that may attenuate the signals.
2. The method can normally identify the first major bulb or a major defect. Interpretation
may not be possible to evaluate multiple bulges or defects as the wave may not travel
beyond the first anomaly.
3. The method is intended to find major anomalies and defects and small defects generally
up to 10% of pile diameter may not be identified with this method.
4. Although the test system can be used to evaluate length of piles, the determination of pile
length is approximate within a range of ± 5 – 10% due to variation in concrete density.
This implies that the method cannot evaluate defects that could be present in the bottom
5%-10% of the pile shaft.
5. The method is not applicable to steel piles, micro piles, jointed pre-cast piles etc.
Care should be taken to avoid movement of heavy machinery around the testing area.
If excavations are deep, then precautions should be taken to avoid collapse of soil at the time
of testing.
**********