IEEE Guide For Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power Switchgear Assemblies

IEEEC37.
81™-1989(R2009)
Recognized as an American National Standard (ANSI)
IEEE Guide for Seismic Qualification of

Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power
Switchgear Assemblies
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Sponsor
Switchgear Committee
of the
IEEE Power Engineering Society
Approved November 9, 1989

Reaffirmed December 9, 2009
IEEE Standards Board
Approved April 13, 1990

Reaffirmed July 29, 2005
American National Standards Institute
Abstract: IEEE C37.81-1989, IEEE Guide for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power
Switchgear Assemblies, provides specific requirements and guidance for seismic qualification of metal-
enclosed power switchgear assemblies. This guide may also be used in other applications in which seismic
response of metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies is a consideration.
Keywords: Class 1E metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies, generic response spectrum (GRS),
performance requirements, seismic criteria
Copyright © 1989 by
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394, USA
Copyright © 1998 IEEE All Rights Reserved 1
Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Provided by IHS under license with IEEE Licensee=SNC Lavalin Inc/5938179006, User=Hojatie, hooman
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 05/22/2012 12:22:06 MDT
Authorized licensed use limited to: IHS Stephanie Dejesus. Downloaded on June 17,2010 at 14:10:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE Standards documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinating Committees of the
IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. The IEEE develops its standards through a consensus develop-
ment process, approved by the American National Standards Institute, which brings together volunteers representing varied
viewpoints and interests to achieve the final product. Volunteers are not necessarily members of the Institute and serve with-
out compensation. While the IEEE administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the consensus devel-
opment process, the IEEE does not independently evaluate, test, or verify the accuracy of any of the information contained
in its standards.
Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The IEEE disclaims liability for any personal injury, property or other dam-
age, of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resulting
from the publication, use of, or reliance upon this, or any other IEEE Standard document.
The IEEE does not warrant or represent the accuracy or content of the material contained herein, and expressly disclaims
any express or implied warranty, including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a specific purpose, or that
the use of the material contained herein is free from patent infringement. IEEE Standards documents are supplied “AS IS.”
The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market,
or provide other goods and services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the
time a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in the state of the art and
comments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is subjected to review at least every five years for revi-
sion or reaffirmation. When a document is more than five years old and has not been reaffirmed, it is reasonable to conclude
that its contents, although still of some value, do not wholly reflect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to check
to determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.
In publishing and making this document available, the IEEE is not suggesting or rendering professional or other services
for, or on behalf of, any person or entity. Nor is the IEEE undertaking to perform any duty owed by any other person or
entity to another. Any person utilizing this, and any other IEEE Standards document, should rely upon the advice of a com-
petent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances.
Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meaning of portions of standards as they relate to specific
applications. When the need for interpretations is brought to the attention of IEEE, the Institute will initiate action to prepare
appropriate responses. Since IEEE Standards represent a consensus of concerned interests, it is important to ensure that any
interpretation has also received the concurrence of a balance of interests. For this reason, IEEE and the members of its
societies and Standards Coordinating Committees are not able to provide an instant response to interpretation requests
except in those cases where the matter has previously received formal consideration.
Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome from any interested party, regardless of membership affiliation with
IEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a proposed change of text, together with appropriate
supporting comments. Comments on standards and requests for interpretations should be addressed to:
Secretary, IEEE-SA Standards Board

445 Hoes Lane
Piscataway, NJ 08854
USA
Note: Attention is called to the possibility that implementation of this standard may require use of subject mat-
ter covered by patent rights. By publication of this standard, no position is taken with respect to the existence or
validity of any patent rights in connection therewith. The IEEE shall not be responsible for identifying patents
for which a license may be required by an IEEE standard or for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or
scope of those patents that are brought to its attention.
Authorization to photocopy portions of any individual standard for internal or personal use is granted by the Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., provided that the appropriate fee is paid to Copyright Clearance Center. To
arrange for payment of licensing fee, please contact Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, 222 Rosewood Drive,
Danvers, MA 01923 USA; (978) 750-8400. Permission to photocopy portions of any individual standard for educational
classroom use can also be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center.
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Foreword
(This Foreword is not a part of IEEE C37.81-1989, IEEE Guide for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power
Switchgear Assemblies.)
This guide complements ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987, Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E
Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations [10]1 by providing specific requirements and guidance for seismic
qualification of metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies.
Metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies fall into the category of complex devices as described in ANSI/IEEE Std
344-1987 [10]; therefore, basic seismic qualification is dependent on test data. Analysis may be used in data reduction,
reconciling response spectra, and evaluating changes. A method of combined test and analysis may also be used in
justifying seismic qualification of similar equipment to the tested samples.
It should be noted that while the primary purpose of this guide is for the application of metal-enclosed power
switchgear assemblies in nuclear power generating stations, it is not restricted to this application. This guide may also
be used as a guide in other applications in which the seismic response of metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies
is a consideration.
At the time this guide was published, it was under consideration for approval as an American National Standard. The
Accredited Standards Committee on Power Switchgear, C37, had the following members at the time this guide was
sent to letter ballot:
T. C. Burtnett, Chair
C. H. White, Secretary
M. B. Williams (Program Administrator)
A. K. McCabe (Executive Vice-Chairman of High-Voltage Switchgear Standards)
S. H. Telander (Executive Vice-Chairman of Low-Voltage Switchgear Standards)
D. L. Swindler (Executive Vice-Chairman of IEC Activities)
Organization Represented Name of Representative

Association of Iron and Steel Engineers....................................... J. M. Tillman
Electric Light and Power Group................................................... R. L. Capra
G. R. Brandenberger (Alt.)
T. E. Bruck (Alt.)
M. J. Eckelkamp
K. D. Hendrix
M. C. Mingoia (Alt.)
J. H. Provanzana
D. T. Weston
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.......................... H. W. Mikulecky
S. C. Atkinson (Alt.)
R. W. Haas
W. F. Hoenigmann
D. G. Kumbera (Alt.)
D. M. Larson
E. W. Schmunk
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
C. A. Schwalbe
1The numbers in brackets correspond to the references listed in 1.2 of this guide.
ANSI/IEEE publications are available from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway,
NJ 08855-1331 or from the Sales Department, American National Standards Institute, 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018.

Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved iii
Organization Represented Name of Representative
National Electrical Manufacturers Association............................ R. A. McMaster
T. C. Burtnett
R. H. Miller
H. L. Miller (Alt.)
R. O. D. Whitt
Tennessee Valley Authority ......................................................... R.B. Rotton
Testing Laboratory Group ............................................................ L. Frier
W. T. O’Grady
R. W. Seelbach (Alt.)
US Department of Agriculture, REA. .......................................... H. L. Bowles
Western Area Power Administration ........................................ G. D. Birney
US Department of the Army,
Office of the Chief of Engineers................................................ W. M. Jones
US Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Reclamation ............................................................. J. W. Reif
US Department of the Navy,
Naval Construction Battalion Center ....................................... R. L. Clark
The following persons were on the Balloting Committee that approved this guide for submission to the IEEE
Standards Board:
S. R. Lambert, Chair
D. G. Kumbera, Vice Chair
J. H. Brunke, Secretary
C. S. Alexander K. D. Hendrix R. Ranjan

R. J. Alton H. L. Hess J. C. W. Ransom
J. G. Angelis W. F. Hoenigmann J. E. Reed
R. H. Arndt N. V. Holmgren A. B. Rishworth
S. C. Atkinson P. L. Kolarik H. C. Ross
L. R. Beard R. K. Kozovich W. N. Rothenbuhler
H. L. Bowles D. M. Larson L. R. Saavedra
M. T. Brown W. E. Laubach L. H. Schmidt
C. G. Burland J. G. Leach E. W. Schmunk
R. L. Capra G. N. Lester C. A. Schwalbe
S. L. Carter D. L. Lott J. C. Scott
L. V. Chabala E. L. Luehring J. F. Sellers
A. Dixon J. A. Maneatis J. H. Simpson
G. W. Dolloff R. Matulic H. M. Smith
J. J. Dravis P. C. Mayo G. St. Jean
C. J. Dvorak L. V. McCall D. L. Swindler
P. W. Dwyer R. A. McMaster S. H. Telander
R. D. Garzon H. W. Mikulecky F. C. Teufel
L. W. Gaussa D. C. Mills E. F. Veverka
G. Genest F. Muench C. L. Wagner
K. I. Gray A. F. Parks J. H. Widdifield
G. R. Hanks G. O. Perkins W. R. Wilson
W. E. Harper C. A. Popeck B. F. Wirtz
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
iv
Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved
The Working Group of the IEEE Switchgear Committee, which prepared this guide, consisted of the following persons
at the time of Standards Board approval:
L. W. Gaussa, Sr., Chair
R. N. Carson J. A. Maneatis W. N. Rothenbuhler

A. P. Colaiaco* W. C. McKay K. M. Skreiner*
C. E. Corley* T. P. McNamara* S. H. Telander
K. I. Gray J. J. Mikos* D. R. Webster
R. W. Long* G. O. Perkins C. E. Zanzie*
G. Laguens
*Previous members of the Working Group who contributed to the writing of this standard.
When the IEEE Standards Board approved this standard on November 9, 1989, it had the following membership:
Dennis Bodson, Chair

Marco W. Migliaro, Vice Chair
Andrew G. Salem, Secretary
Arthur A. Blaisdell Kenneth D. Hendrix John E. May, Jr.

Fletcher J. Buckley Theodore W. Hissey, Jr. Lawrence V. McCall
Allen L. Clapp John W. Horch L. Bruce McClung
James M. Daly David W. Hutchins Donald T. Michael*
Stephen R. Dillon Frank D. Kirschner Richard E. Mosher
Donald C. Fleckenstein Frank C. Kitzantides Stig Nilsson
Eugene P. Fogarty Joseph L. Koepfinger* L. John Rankine
Jay Forster* Michael Lawler Gary S. Robinson
Thomas L. Hannan Edward Lohse Donald W. Zipse
*Member Emeritus
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

v
Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved
CLAUSE PAGE
1. Scope and References .........................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Scope.......................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 References .................................................................................................................................................. 2
2. Definitions...........................................................................................................................................................2
3. Seismic Criteria...................................................................................................................................................4
3.1 Generic Response Spectrum ...................................................................................................................... 4

3.2 Information Furnished by the User ............................................................................................................ 6
4. Performance Requirements .................................................................................................................................6
4.1 General ....................................................................................................................................................... 6

4.2 Functional Performance Criteria ................................................................................................................ 6
4.3 Electrical Performance Criteria.................................................................................................................. 7
4.4 Structural Performance Criteria ................................................................................................................. 7
4.5 Demonstration of Adequacy ...................................................................................................................... 7
5. Qualification Methods.........................................................................................................................................8
5.1 Analysis...................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.2 Testing........................................................................................................................................................ 8
5.3 Combined Test and Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8
5.4 Experience.................................................................................................................................................. 8
6. Testing and Results .............................................................................................................................................8
6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 8

6.2 Selection and Test Setup ............................................................................................................................ 9
6.3 Resonance Search Procedure ..................................................................................................................... 9
6.4 Seismic Test Input...................................................................................................................................... 9
6.5 Number and Duration of Tests................................................................................................................. 10
6.6 Tests and Measurements Before Seismic Tests ....................................................................................... 10
6.7 Tests and Measurements During Seismic Tests....................................................................................... 10
6.8 Tests and Measurements After Seismic Tests.......................................................................................... 11
6.9 Refurbishment Maintenance and Repairs During Testing ....................................................................... 12
7. Combined Analysis and Testing .......................................................................................................................12
7.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 12

7.2 Analysis.................................................................................................................................................... 13
7.3 Test Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 13
7.4 Qualifying the Complete Assembly......................................................................................................... 14
8. Extrapolation for Similar Equipment ................................................................................................................14
9. Documentation ..................................................................................................................................................15
9.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................... 15

9.2 Test Qualification Report......................................................................................................................... 15
vi Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

9.3 Combined Analysis and Test Qualification Report ................................................................................. 15
9.4 Documentation for Qualification by Extrapolation ................................................................................. 16
Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved vii

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

IEEE Guide for Seismic Qualification of
Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power
Switchgear Assemblies
1. Scope and References
This guide provides requirements and guidance for the seismic qualification of metal-enclosed power switchgear
assemblies including switching, interrupting, control, instrumentation, metering, and protective and regulating devices
mounted therein.
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
1.1 Scope
This guide may be used by equipment manufacturers to establish procedures that will yield data to substantiate
performance claims or by equipment users to evaluate and verify performance of representative devices and
assemblies as part of an overall qualification effort.
As used in this guide, the word switchgear shall mean metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies with the
requirements as defined in ANSI/IEEE C37.20.1-1987, Standard for Metal-Enclosed Low-Voltage Power Circuit
Breaker Switchgear [4], ANSI/IEEE C37.20.2-1987, Standard for Metal-Clad and Station-Type Cubicle
Switchgear [5], and ANSI/IEEE C37.20.3-1987, Standard for Metal-Enclosed Interrupter Switchgear [6]. By definition,
metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies include metal-clad switchgear, station-type cubicle switchgear, metal-
enclosed interrupter switchgear, and low-voltage power circuit breaker switchgear. This guide does not cover metal-
enclosed bus or control switchboards.
Metal-enclosed power switchgear assemblies fall into the category of complex devices as described in ANSI/IEEE Std
344-1987 [10]. Therefore, basic seismic qualification is dependent on test data. Switchgear assemblies have many
different types and arrangements of devices and components. It is neither practical nor necessary to test each unique
configuration of devices and components, nor is it necessary to test a given configuration for every possible seismic
environment. However, it is essential that each switchgear assembly used in Class 1E applications be seismically
qualified for its environment, and this qualification must be based on data obtained by test. Analysis may be used in
data reduction, reconciling response spectra, and evaluation of changes.
A method of combined test and analysis may also be used in justifying seismic qualification of equipment similar to
the tested sample.

IEEE C37.81-1989 IEEE GUIDE FOR SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E METAL-ENCLOSED
Devices, such as relays, instruments, circuit breakers, and control switches, are qualified for use on a switchgear
assembly by demonstrating that their seismic withstand capabilities as determined by seismic tests equal or exceed the
seismic environment of the location on the switchgear assembly where they will be mounted.
Three standard Generic Response Spectra (GRS) have been developed that cover the seismic requirements for most
locations. The GRS have been developed as a composite of a number of Required Response Spectra (RRS) proposed
for nuclear generating stations throughout the US, and cover approximately 75% of the locations sampled. The GRS
establish standard seismic ratings, and any switchgear assembly that has been demonstrated by test to have met a rating
will therefore be seismically qualified for any user application where the RRS is enveloped by the GRS.
If the standard GRS do not apply to a particular application, specific seismic information must be furnished by the user
and used as the basis for qualification.
1.2 References
The following references should be used in conjunction with this guide:
[1] ANSI/IEEE C37.09-1979, Standard Test Procedure for AC High-Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a Symmetrical
Current Basis.
[2] ANSI/IEEE C37.13-1981, Low-Voltage AC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures.
[3] ANSI/IEEE C37.14-1979, Low-Voltage DC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures.
[4] ANSI/IEEE C37.20.1-1987, Standard for Metal-Enclosed Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breaker Switchgear.
[5] ANSI/IEEE C37.20.2-1987, Standard for Metal-Clad and Station-Type Cubicle Switchgear.
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
[6] ANSI/IEEE C37.20.3-1987, Standard for Metal-Enclosed Interrupter Switchgear.
[7] ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987, Standard for Seismic Testing of Relays.
[8] ANSI/IEEE C37.100-1981, Definitions for Power Switchgear.
[9] ANSI/IEEE Std 323-1983, Qualifying Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations.
[10] ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987, Recommended Practice for Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Equipment for Nuclear
Power Generating Stations.
2. Definitions
The definitions in this section establish the meanings of terms in the context of their use in this guide. See ANSI/IEEE
C37.100-1981 [8] for further definitions.
Biaxial Test: Specimen under test is subjected to acceleration in the principal horizontal axis and in the vertical axis
simultaneously.
Class 1E: The safety classification of the electric equipment and systems that are essential to emergency reactor
shutdown, containment isolation, reactor core cooling, and containment and reactor heat removal, or are otherwise
essential in preventing significant release of radioactive material to the environment. (See ANSI/IEEE Std 344-
1987 [10].)
2 Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved

POWER SWITCHGEAR ASSEMBLIES IEEE C37.81-1989
Damping: The generic term ascribed to the numerous complex energy dissipating mechanisms in a system. As an
identifying parameter of a specific seismic response spectrum, the percent of critical damping is assumed to be
constant.
Fragility Level: The highest level of input excitation, expressed as a function of input frequency, that an equipment
can withstand and still perform the required Class 1E functions. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7] and ANSI/IEEE
Std 344-1987 [10].)
Fragility Response Spectrum (FRS): A Test Response Spectrum (TRS) obtained from tests to determine the fragility
level of equipment. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7] and ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Generic Response Spectra (GRS): The response spectra that define the seismic ratings of metal-enclosed power
switchgear.
Ground Acceleration: The acceleration of the ground resulting from the motion of a given earthquake. The maximum
ground acceleration can be obtained from the ground response spectrum as the acceleration at high frequencies (in
excess of 33 Hz). (See ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Malfunction: The loss of capability of Class 1E equipment to initiate or sustain a required function, or the initiation
of an undesired spurious action that can result in consequences adverse to safety. (See Reference [10].)
Metal-Enclosed Power Switchgear: A switchgear assembly completely enclosed on all sides and top with sheet
metal (except for ventilating openings and inspection windows) containing primary power circuit switching or
interrupting devices, or both, with buses and connections and may include control and auxiliary devices. Access to the
interior of the enclosure is provided by doors or removable covers. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.100-1981 [8].)
NOTE — Metal-clad switchgear, station-type cubicle switchgear, metal-enclosed interrupter switchgear, and low-voltage power
circuit breaker switchgear are specific types of metal-enclosed power switchgear.
Modal Participation Factor: The magnitude of each structural mode (natural frequency) that participates to compose
the final dynamic response of the system. Each participation factor is a function of the system mass distribution and the
generalized mode shape at each natural frequency.
Multifrequency Test: A broad band test motion, simulating a typical seismic motion, that can produce a simultaneous
response from all applicable modes of a multidegree-of-freedom system.
Natural Frequency: The frequency or frequencies at which a body vibrates due to its own physical characteristics
(mass, shape, boundary condition, and elastic restoring forces brought into play) when the body is distorted in a
specific direction and then released. (See ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Octave: The interval between two frequencies that have a frequency ratio of 2 (e.g., 1 to 2 Hz, 2 to 4 Hz, 4 to 8 Hz,
etc.). (See ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7].)
Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE): An earthquake that could reasonably be expected to occur at the plant site
during the operating life of the plant; it is that earthquake which produces the vibratory ground motion for which those
features of the nuclear power plant, necessary for continued operation without undue risk to the health and safety of the
public, are designed to remain functional. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7] and ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Production Test (for Switchgear): Tests made to check the quality and uniformity of the workmanship and materials
used in the manufacture of switchgear. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.100-1981 [8].
Proof Testing: Tests that are used to qualify equipment for a particular application or to a particular requirement.
Required Response Spectrum (RRS): The response spectrum issued by the user or his agent as part of his
specifications for qualification, or artificially created to cover future applications. The RRS constitutes a requirement
to be met. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7] and ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Response Spectrum: A plot of the maximum response of single-degree-of-freedom bodies of different natural
frequencies, at a damping value expressed as a percent of critical damping, when these bodies are rigidly mounted on
the surface of interest (that is, on the ground for the ground response spectrum or on the floor of a building for the
floor’s response spectrum) when that surface is subjected to a given earthquake’s motion as modified by any
intervening structures. (See ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE): The earthquake that produces the maximum vibratory ground motion for which
certain structures, systems, and components are designed to remain functional. These structures, systems, and
components are those necessary to assure: (1) the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary, (2) the capability
to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition, and (3) the capability to prevent or mitigate the
consequences of accidents that could result in potential off-site exposures comparable to the guideline exposures of the
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 100 (December 5, 1973). (See ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Sine Sweep Test: A sinusoidal input with continuously varying frequency covering the range of interest.
Test Response Spectrum (TRS): The response spectrum that is developed from the actual time history of the actual
motion of the shake table. (See ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10].)
Transmissibility: Ratio of the response at any one point in the equipment to the input of the equipment at a single
frequency.
Zero Period Acceleration (ZPA): The peak acceleration of the motion time history that corresponds to the high-
frequency asymptote on the response spectrum. (See ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7].)
3. Seismic Criteria
3.1 Generic Response Spectrum
Three GRS’s, (GRS I, GRS II, and GRS III) have been defined for the seismic qualification of switchgear as shown in
Fig 1. These spectra were developed to provide a selection of standard switchgear seismic ratings that meet the
requirements of most seismic applications. Experience has shown that most RRS peaks lie between 3 and 12 Hz. For
the purposes of defining practical values for analysis of test data, the 1/3 octave frequencies 3.2 Hz and 12.8 Hz are
used. This broad range has been divided into three narrower parts to more accurately represent typical response
spectra, to be used individually or in various combinations.
1) GRS I was chosen to meet RRS peaking between 3.2 Hz and 5 Hz.
2) GRS II was chosen to meet RRS peaking between 5 Hz and 8 Hz.
3) GRS III was chosen to meet RRS peaking between 8 Hz and 12.8 Hz.
In the event that an equipment’s seismic capability cannot be accurately represented by the three GRS’s, then scaling
factors G1, G2, and G3 can be used to adjust GRS I, GRS II, and GRS III up or down across the entire frequency range.
For example, ratings of G1 = 0.5, G2 = 1.0, and G3 = 1.0, respectively, would mean that the equipment is qualified for
the full GRS II and GRS III levels shown in Fig 1, but through either test machine or equipment capability limitations,
data exists to establish qualification to only 0.5 of the GRS I level.
One or more of the GRS’s (I, II, or III) shall envelop both the horizontal and vertical RRS. If the GRS does not envelop
both the vertical and horizontal RRS, then a special qualification test must be developed.
If none of the GRS apply for a particular application, the user must provide the specific seismic requirements. --``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

GRS AMPLITUDE (g’s) GRS AMPLITUDE (g’s)

FREQUENCY (Hz) I II III FREQUENCY (Hz) I II III
1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 8.0 2.3 3.8 3.8

1.3 0.7 0.7 0.7 10.0 1.9 3.3 3.8
1.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 12.8 1.9 2.3 3.8
2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 16.0 1.9 1.9 3.3

2.5 2.3 1.7 1.7 20.0 1.8 1.8 2.3
3.2 3.8 1.9 1.9 25.6 1.6 1.6 1.8
4.0 3.8 2.3 1.9 32.0 1.3 1.3 1.3

5.0 3.8 3.8 1.9 ZPA 1.0 1.0 1.0
6.4 3.3 3.8 2.3
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Figure 1— 5% Generic Response Spectra for Switchgear Seismic Testing (All Values Are for SSE.)

3.2 Information Furnished by the User
The information furnished by the user must describe the seismic environment for the equipment. Any condition that
may be of consequence during the seismic event must be described. The information to be furnished by the user is
shown below:
1) If one or more GRS applies, the user shall specify the applicable GRS for the SSE. He shall also specify the
OBE in relationship to the SSE.
2) If the GRS does not apply, the user shall provide adequate information to describe the seismic environment
for both the SSE and the OBE. If response spectra are provided, the same damping shall be used for the front-
to-back, side-to-side, and vertical directions for the switchgear orientation. The preferred damping to be
provided by the user is 5%.
3) Identify Class 1E power circuits and functions. For example, the failure of a circuit breaker to trip or failure
to remain open may be critical; whereas, for other applications, failure to close or false tripping may be
acceptable fail-safe modes.
4) Identify Class 1E control circuits and functions. For example, a certain relay may be used for alarm only and
malfunction is acceptable; whereas, other relays or controls in safety related circuits must not malfunction.
5) Identify interface and boundary requirements
a) Electrical connections—Purchaser is to provide interface information so that the possible seismic effects
of interfaces, such as incoming buses, cable, or conduits, can be evaluated. As an example, incoming
power cables entering the equipment from above may add mass to the switchgear and change its seismic
responses; or conduit connections may be too stiff to allow for relative motion between the switchgear
and the conduit support.
b) Physical clearances—Due to expected relative motion between the switchgear and walls, columns, and
adjacent equipment, the clearances around the switchgear shall be specified.
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
c) Mounting—The mounting methods or requirements shall be specified to the user by the manufacturer or
qualifier based on the qualification test mounting configuration.
6) Any special requirements or interlocks to prevent the interchange of non-Class1E and Class 1E circuit
breakers or other components shall be specified.
4. Performance Requirements
4.1 General
This section defines the criteria of adequacy that the switchgear must satisfy. Adequacy means the capability of each
component to perform its function during and after the SSE postulated for the specific equipment location.
When the switchgear is seismically tested to qualify for application in a specified seismic environment, the possible
failure modes may be structural or functional or both. Structural damage is a permanent alteration of a critical part of
the switchgear structure or of accessory devices or components. Functional failure during or after a seismic event is
any seismically induced momentary or sustained change of state of a multistate device, which causes the device to
operate outside the limits of its specified operating characteristics. Such functional failures are usually caused by
chatter or changes of state of contacts in control devices rather than by structural damage. Acceptance criteria for
device operating characteristics must be specified.
4.2 Functional Performance Criteria
4.2.1 Circuit Breakers and Primary Switching Devices
Class 1E circuit breakers or primary switching devices shall change state only when called upon to do so.

4.2.2 Accessories and Controls
Accessories and control components shall not malfunction in a manner that would jeopardize their Class 1E function
or the Class 1E function of the switchgear.1 Where the qualification method is by proof testing, the Class 1E functions
must be specified by the user. For a generic seismic qualification program, the manufacturer may have to conduct this
review based on his experience with specific Class 1E switchgear applications, such as incoming lines, motor
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
protection, diesel generator protection, etc.
In addition, the following shall apply:
1) All the Class 1E control and instrument transformers shall continue to operate properly with no malfunctions,
such as interruptions or short circuits.
2) All Class 1E control devices shall have a sustained change of state only when called upon to do so.
3) Components that are not Class 1E may malfunction but such malfunction shall not jeopardize the intended
Class 1E functions of any other components.
4.3 Electrical Performance Criteria
4.3.1 Switching Capability
The seismic event shall not impair the switching capability of any Class 1E circuit breaker included in the assembly.
(See 6.8.)
4.3.2 Current Carrying Capability
The seismic event shall not impair the continuous current or short-time current capability of the circuit breaker(s)
disconnecting switch(es), bus(es), and other current carrying path(s) as demonstrated in 6.8.
4.3.3 Dielectric Strength
The seismic event shall not degrade the dielectric strength of the insulation systems so as to result in dielectric
breakdown of the equipment. (See 6.8 for more information.)
4.4 Structural Performance Criteria
Structural damage, such as local yielding, is acceptable if it does not jeopardize the intended Class 1E function of the
circuit breaker(s) and associated auxiliary systems. Also, that loss of structural integrity or failure of component
mounting and becoming missiles are not acceptable.
4.5 Demonstration of Adequacy
The capability of the switchgear to meet its seismic requirements shall be demonstrated by test or combined test and
analysis in accordance with Sections 6 and 7 of this guide.
1Prior to the final design of the associated electrical system, it may be difficult to determine which of the switchgear control and auxiliary functions
will be used in Class 1E circuits. It is possible that indicating lights, indicating meters, and visual alarms may not be used for crtitical functions.
Therefore, prior to any seismic qualification program, all Class 1E circuits, devices, and contacts and their function must be reviewed and identified.

5. Qualification Methods
5.1 Analysis
Switchgear falls into the category of complex devices as described in ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10]. Seismic
qualification is dependent on test data, and analysis alone cannot be justified.
However, analysis may be used in data reduction, reconciling response spectra, and evaluating changes.
5.2 Testing
The testing method for seismic qualification is described in Section 6 of this guide.
5.3 Combined Test and Analysis
Some Class 1E switchgear cannot be qualified by testing alone, because of the size of the equipment, or the large
number of possible configurations. Therefore, another method of qualification, which is to calculate the expected
seismic motions of the equipment based on analysis of the performance of typical units during a test, may be used.
This method is described in Section 7.
5.4 Experience
There are many types of equipment that are similar in function and physical characteristics to equipment that has been
previously qualified by testing, analysis, or a combination of testing and analysis. In addition, other equipment types
are similar to equipment that has been in service for various periods of time and has been exposed to in-plant vibration
and natural seismic disturbances.
Qualification of the aforementioned equipment types may be accomplished by justifying their similarity with the
previously qualified equipment or with equipment that has been exposed to other more severe environments.
Similarity of the equipment characteristics and of the excitation environment must be established by techniques that
can be technically justified.
Due consideration to differences in design and manufacturing techniques must be considered as part of the technical
justification supporting similarity.
When using performance experience of switchgear during past natural seismic disturbance, it is required to document
that the switchgear equipment has been adequately cycled to end-of-design life conditions, then mechanically aged to
the equivalent of five OBE events, and then performed its intended Class 1E function during and after the specified
earthquake event.
6. Testing and Results
6.1 Introduction
The seismic testing of Class 1E switchgear should demonstrate its ability to perform its required functions during and
after it is subjected to the forces resulting from one SSE. Prior to the SSE, the switchgear must withstand the effects
of OBE testing. (See 6.5.)

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

For the Class 1E function, the GRS or the RRS define the SSE level. Therefore, the objective of the seismic tests is to
produce TRS’s that envelop the SSE.
The seismic responses of the assembly at the device location become the seismic requirements for the various Class 1E
devices located throughout the switchgear assembly. Devices, such as instruments, relays, switches, instrument
transformers, panel meters, fuses, terminal blocks, and indicating lights, are qualified either during tests on the
switchgear assembly or else separately and individually based upon comparison of the seismic capability of the device
and the seismic response at the device location.
There are different ways in which this can be accomplished, such as:
1) Devices are in place on the switchgear and functionally operative when the assembly is being tested.
2) Devices mounted on other equipment and having undergone seismic tests can be qualified, if it can be shown
by test data that the seismic environment at the device mounting locations on the tested specimen exceeds that
on the switchgear under consideration.
Devices must have been functionally operated during the SSE of the seismic test.
3) The seismic environments of the device mounting locations are recorded during the seismic test of the
assembly to define the seismic environments for separate testing of the devices.
4) Other methods combining test and analysis. (See Section 7.)
6.2 Selection and Test Setup
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
The test assembly shall be representative of the switchgear to be qualified. Variations in size or component
configuration from the tested sample of switchgear may be seismically qualified by justifiable interpretation and
extrapolation of test results.
The switchgear to be tested shall be attached to the test table in a manner that simulates the intended service mounting
specified by the manufacturer, or to that agreed to by the user and the manufacturer.
Interface and boundary requirements, such as incoming buses, cables, or conduits, shall be considered. Equipment
shall be connected in a manner that simulates its expected installation when in actual use unless an analysis can be
performed and justified to show that the equipment’s performance would not be altered by the expected means of
connection.
The switchgear shall be completely assembled and wired, with circuit breakers and/or switches connected to the bus
and energized. Application of rated voltage and current on the primary circuits is not required during the seismic test.
The control circuits for the primary switching device and all control, protective, and auxiliary devices being qualified
shall be energized at rated voltage.
6.3 Resonance Search Procedure
A resonance search may be performed to aid in the analysis of seismic performance of the switchgear. A low-level sine
sweep of approximately 0.2 g may be performed in the front-to-back plus vertical and side-to-side plus vertical
orientations. The frequency of the sine sweep should cover the range between 1 Hz and 50 Hz at a sweep rate of not
more than 1 octave/min.
6.4 Seismic Test Input
The seismic test input requirements are described in ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10]. The narrow band characteristic of
the GRS may make it beneficial to utilize the “random motion with sine beats” motion suggested in ANSI/IEEE Std
344-1987 [10] as a method of enveloping a narrow peak and keeping the ZPA at a reasonable level. The motion may
be either biaxial or triaxial with the method of achieving an acceptable test shown later on in this section. The

horizontal and vertical shake table input components for the test shall be designed such that the horizontal and vertical
TRS’s envelop the applicable GRS as specified in 6.3.1.5 of ANSI/IEEE Std 323-1983 [9]. The horizontal and vertical
shake table input components do not have to be equal.
For tests using the user’s specified RRS, the TRS must envelop the applicable RRS within the guidelines of ANSI/
IEEE Std 344-1987 [10]. The margins specified in ANSI/IEEE Std 323-1983 [9] and ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10]
apply.
6.4.1 Multiaxis Testing
1) For phase-independent biaxial inputs, the switchgear shall be tested in two orientations: front-to-back plus
vertical and side-to-side plus vertical.
2) For biaxial inputs that are not phase independent, the switchgear shall be tested in four orientations:
a) With horizontal and vertical inputs in phase (front-to-back and up-to-down)
b) With the horizontal inputs 180° out of phase with the vertical inputs (back-to-front and up-to-down)
c) With switchgear orientation rotated 90° about the vertical axis and the horizontal inputs 180° in phase
with the vertical inputs (left-to-right and up-to-down)
d) With the switchgear orientation rotated 90° about the vertical axis and the horizontal inputs 180° out of
phase with the vertical inputs (right-to-left and up-to-down)
When a single inclined input force is used, the 180°, out-of-phase input may be achieved by rotating the
switchgear 180° about the vertical axis for above orientations (b) and (d).
3) For triaxial tests, only one orientation is required for phase independent input motions.
6.5 Number and Duration of Tests
The duration of each test designed to reproduce the OBE and SSE shall be at least equal to the original time history
used to obtain the RRS, with a minimum of 15 seconds. The 15 second minimum duration requirement also applies
when using a GRS for the RRS if the time history data is not known. The number of OBE tests shall be justified for
each site or shall produce the equivalent effect of five OBE’s. OBE level tests shall precede the SSE test in each pair
of equipment axes (front-to-back plus vertical and side-to-side plus vertical). (See 6.1.4 in ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987
[10].)
6.6 Tests and Measurements Before Seismic Tests
Prior to making the seismic tests, the switchgear shall be subjected to the standard production tests specified in ANSI/
IEEE C37.09-1979 [1], ANSI/IEEE C37.14-1979 [3], ANSI/IEEE C37.20.1-1987 [4], ANSI/IEEE C37.20.2-1987 [5],
ANSI/IEEE C37.20.3-1987 [6], and ANSI/IEEE C37.13-1981 [2] as applicable to the equipment being tested. These
tests are made for the purposes of establishing benchmarks and criteria for use as reference values.
6.7 Tests and Measurements During Seismic Tests
Various measurements, recordings, and operational tests are made during the seismic tests as shown below:
6.7.1 Accelerometers
Accelerometers shall be used to monitor the horizontal and vertical table motion. The TRS for one OBE and one SSE
test in each orientation shall be documented. If an adjustment in the OBE level is made to optimize the input curve
shape, the test at the lowest level OBE can be documented in lieu of documenting all tests. The preferred value of
damping for the generation of the TRS’s is 5%, which corresponds to the value of damping used for the input GRS.
Consideration should be given to the placement of additional accelerometers on fixed panels, hinged panels, and other
areas where critical components, devices, and accessories can be located.

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

After testing has been completed, data from these accelerometers can be useful to allow requalification, in the event
that changes are made to parts of the equipment which would make requalification of those areas necessary, possibly
without the need for retesting.
6.7.2 Electrical Measurements
Electrical monitoring circuits shall be used to record simulated Class 1E functions during the SSE tests.
The monitoring shall cover at least the following:
1) The change of state of the power circuit breaker or other primary switching device. Remotely operate the
primary switching device during the test and monitor for proper operation. At least one opening and one
closing operation shall be made.
2) Continuity of voltage and current transformer windings
3) Continuity of primary and secondary disconnect contacts
4) Performance of auxiliary devices, in order to determine if a malfunction has occurred in the behavior of relay,
auxiliary switch, or control switch contacts
For proof testing, the preferred method is to simulate the Class 1E function and evaluate functional performance
directly before, during, and after the seismic test of the switchgear assembly by having all control circuits, devices,
relays (set at user’s expected most sensitive setting), and instruments energized and fully operative. The pass/fail
criterion in this case is that all control devices must maintain their position, or state, to operate as required by the
Class 1E function. In the case where a contact provides a signal to a control device located elsewhere, functional
performance may be evaluated directly by having the downstream device in operation. If the downstream device is not
available, use the second method listed below. For generic testing, the following methods can be applied:
1) Class 1E function is established based on the review as described above, and testing to evaluate functional
performance directly as for proof testing; or,
2) Monitor the contacts for a maximum of two milliseconds change of state for electromechanical device
malfunction as described in ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7]. Either an electronic chatter detector, which is
described in 5.2.4.1 of ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987 [7], or a recording device may be used.
6.7.3 Other Information Obtained During Tests
Information shall be obtained to measure the displacement at the locations where the switchgear may interface with
other equipment or structures.
6.8 Tests and Measurements After Seismic Tests
Tests and measurements after the seismic test program shall be the same as those performed prior to the seismic test
(see 6.6) except the dielectric tests shall be at the standard field test levels. The purpose of these tests is to verify that
the equipment can still perform in an acceptable manner.
The switchgear shall be inspected visually to determine which parts, if any, may have sustained damage. Any findings
shall be suitably documented. For high-voltage circuit breakers, the operation of the circuit breaker is verified by
repeating the mechanical operation and timing test portions of the production tests. For ac low-voltage circuit breakers,
operation is verified by repeating the no-load operation test portion of the production tests. Any damage, or significant
changes in operating times or speeds over the preseismic test values, shall be justified by the manufacturer.
All current carrying components shall be inspected visually to determine where damage, if any, has occurred. Any
findings shall be suitably documented. For ac high-voltage circuit breakers, the capability to carry continuous and
short-time currents is verified by repeating the electrical resistance of current path test portion of the production tests.

--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

The dc resistance shall not exceed the predetermined limits set by the manufacturer. Any damage, or significant
changes in resistance over the preseismic values, shall be justified by the manufacturer.
All insulation systems shall be inspected visually to identify any parts which may have sustained damage. Any
findings shall be suitably documented. The integrity of the insulation systems is verified by repeating the dielectric test
portions of the production tests. However, the dielectric tests shall be made at the field dielectric test level, which is
0.75 times the production test level.
6.9 Refurbishment Maintenance and Repairs During Testing
6.9.1 Refurbishment
Any refurbishment performed on equipment during a test program may be classified as maintenance or repair
according to its degree. Examples of maintenance activities include calibration of relays and retorquing of hardware.
Examples of repairs include welding or rewelding of portions of equipment; replacing damaged components, such as
sheared bolts; and retightening loose electrical terminals.
6.9.2 Maintenance
When maintenance is required, the severity of the problem shall be determined and documented in detail in the test
report. Maintenance may be performed, and testing continued. When maintenance is performed during OBE testing,
it becomes part of the post-earthquake field maintenance checks and procedures for the equipment.
6.9.3 Repairs
When repairs are necessary during the OBE test, retest is required unless justified otherwise. When repairs are
necessary during or after the SSE test, the general requirement is to retest unless justified otherwise. When the
condition requiring repair during the SSE tests does not interfere with the performance of the safety function, during
or after the test, then the SSE can be shown to be not cumulative due to testing in other axes, and does not unacceptably
affect equipment performance in subsequent qualification tests, such as LOCA, then continuation without retest may
be justifiable. When repairs constitute a design change, the equipment must be retested, unless justified otherwise.
When repairs are made, the details shall be included in the test report.
7. Combined Analysis and Testing
7.1 Introduction
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
As discussed in Section 5. of ANSI/IEEE Std 344-1987 [10], the qualification of complex equipment by analysis alone
is not recommended because of the difficulty in developing an accurate model of the equipment and in obtaining data
numbers describing the physical parameters of the model. However, an accurate mathematical model can be
constructed and validated by using data acquired from a seismic test performed on a representative switchgear
assembly.
Because a switchgear is complex equipment, it is necessary to have detailed information about the switchgear structure
in order to identify significant mass points and structural elements, and in order to provide adequate descriptions of
these items so that the responses at all points of interest can be calculated.

7.2 Analysis
7.2.1 Developing the Model
Switchgear assemblies are comprised of various basic structural modules arranged together in a cooperative manner to
form a vertical section. A complete assembly may consist of a single self-standing vertical section or of two or more
vertical sections located side by side on a common floor or base structure and having adjacent sections joined and
bussed together.
Basic structural modules typically include power circuit breakers, circuit breaker compartments, main bus
compartments, line compartments, front and rear housing extensions, superstructures mounted atop other
compartments, and similar items. Circuit breakers, bus assemblies, voltage transformers, current transformers, and
similar items having different ratings may vary in size and weight, thus generating groups of similar but slightly
different modules, each of which has its own unique response characteristics.
The objective of modeling is to provide mathematical descriptions for each module, which will define the response of
the module for seismic input conditions. The inputs are derived from the specified response spectra. The results of the
analysis include parameters such as basic structural natural frequencies, mode shapes, and maximum equipment
responses (in terms of peak accelerations, peak-to-peak displacements, and “in-structure” response spectra).
7.2.2 Validating the Model
After a modeling technique has been developed, then a specific combination of basic modules is selected for
validation. The same combination of modules is physically assembled and subjected to seismic testing.
Comparisons are made between the responses of the mathematical model and those obtained from the test, given the
same input conditions. Modifications of the modeling technique may be required in order to obtain the same responses
as those observed in the test. When the condition is reached where model responses and test responses coincide within
the envelope, then the model technique is considered to have been validated.
In the validation testing procedure, it is important to include as many different basic modules as practical in order to
validate a broad cross section of the types of modules that may be expected to be utilized. When the condition is
reached in which model responses and test responses are in agreement, then the modeling technique is considered to
have been validated. Documentation of validation is required. (See 9.3.)
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
7.3 Test Procedure
1) A static test may be performed to determine the structural stiffness of equipment and its mounting.
a) In situ low-level dynamic testing may be used to determine the dynamic properties of switchgear
equipment.
2) Dynamic tests shall be made as follows:
a) To establish seismic qualification of a circuit breaker and other related devices that can change state, a
multifrequency seismic test program, as described in Section 6., shall be conducted on a representative
assembly. See 6.7 for qualifition data to be taken during the test.
b) In addition to the qualification data above, additional data shall be taken and recorded to determine
natural frequencies, damping factors, and structural responses at selected points in the assembly. A
multi-frequency test alone is not adequate for this purpose, since it does not provide the parameters
required for the mathematical model. Single-frequency tests shall be used to provide this information in
addition to any multifrequency tests. The following parameters are necessary to validate the computer
model:
i) Equipment resonances in terms of natural frequency, damping factor, and modal shape. Only base-
excitable modes due to input frequencies in the 1 Hz to 33 Hz range need be considered.

ii) Measurements of the important nonlinear effects, such as softening or hardening systems, or
increasing damping with increasing seismic input levels.
iii) Characteristic modal participation parameters that relate response motions at the points of interest
in the assembly to the multifrequency biaxial or triaxial test input motions.
7.4 Qualifying the Complete Assembly
A mathematical model of the complete assembly can be synthesized by combining the models for its basic modules
that have been generated using the validated modeling techniques. This model is then mathematically subjected to the
seismic input derived from the applicable response spectra.
The seismic responses computed at each device in the assembly define the seismic requirement for those devices.
Qualification shall consist of demonstrating that:
1) The structural and functional capability of each device is not less than the required displacement at the
location of the device in the equipment in terms of the following criteria:
a) FRS, GRS, or other TRS’s shall be used for active Class 1E devices (those which are subject to
malfunction, such as relays).
b) The ZPA level shall be used for rigid passive Class 1E devices (those which are not subject to
malfunction, such as terminal blocks).
c) The ZPA level shall be used for non-Class 1E devices.
2) The seismic responses of the switchgear assembly, as determined by the analysis, are no greater than
responses observed during validation testing in terms of both maximum displacements and of mounting
reaction forces. When larger responses are determined, they shall be justified.
8. Extrapolation for Similar Equipment
It has been noted in 7.2 that switchgear assemblies may consist of one or more vertical sections arranged in a single
assembly. While all vertical sections produced by the same manufacturer are usually similar in construction, each may
contain a different complement of devices. Additionally, since adjacent vertical sections are joined and bussed
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
together, the responses to a given input response spectra may vary from one assembly to another depending upon the
number of vertical sections in the assembly. It is necessary to consider the possible effects of all differences when
comparing the responses of similarly modeled assemblies.
As an example, one characteristic of large multisectional assemblies may involve the appearance of low-frequency
torsional modes that are somewhat different from the characteristics of single vertical sections or small multisectional
assemblies. The degree of importance of these torsional modes may depend upon factors such as length-to-depth ratio
of the assembly, characteristics of the required response spectra, modal participation factors, and damping factors as
they combine to affect the assembly response. This assembly response shall be considered when qualifying devices
mounted on the switchgear assembly, when qualifying attachments and connections to the assembly, and when
qualifying clearances to objects adjacent to the assembly.
Extrapolations from one switchgear assembly to another shall be justified.

9. Documentation
9.1 General
The documentation shall verify that the switchgear meets its performance requirements when subjected to specific
seismic accelerations. The information to be furnished for the various qualification methods is shown below:
9.2 Test Qualification Report
1) Dates of testing
2) Test specimen description and identification, including the bill of materials and a list of all auxiliary devices
and their locations in the switchgear assembly
3) User seismic specification reference
4) Test facility name and location
5) Test facility report reference
6) The general test description, including photographs, response spectra, assembly anchoring details, interfaces
with outside systems, instrumentation lists, and drawings shall be provided that demonstrate that the
requirements of Section 6 have been met. If the test data is not supplied, references to the identification and
location of the complete test data shall be provided.
7) Test data in the form of TRS. Show enveloping of RRS or justify any points not enveloping
8) Records of any malfunctions, failures, repairs, and maintenance that occurred or was required during the test,
including justification and retesting performed
9) Results, conclusions, and qualification statement
10) Signatures (as required) and date
9.3 Combined Analysis and Test Qualification Report
1) Identification and description of equipment qualified

2) Summary of user requirements
3) Switchgear seismic test references and documentation (See 9.2.)
4) Seismic analysis documentation
a) Computer program used and validation references
b) Comparison of the computed description with actual weight, dimensions, arrangements, and other
physical characteristics of the equipment being qualified
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
c) List of critical frequency modes in the 1 Hz to 33 Hz range
d) Model validity and justification statement
e) Equipment response for RRS specified
i) Mounting-Reaction forces
ii) Connections, attachments, and clearances-Deflections
iii) RRS generated for active Class 1E devices
iv) ZPA levels generated for passive Class 1E devices and non-Class 1E devices
f) Seismic capability for each device, component, and accessory in terms of:
i) FRS, GRS, or other TRS for the active Class 1E devices
ii) ZPA levels for the passive Class 1E devices and for all the non-Class 1E devices
5) Results, conclusions, and qualification statement

IEEE C37.81-1989
9.4 Documentation for Qualification by Extrapolation
If qualification is established by extrapolation from similar tested equipment, the documentation shall contain as a
minimum:
1) Description of both equipments

2) Qualification of original equipment as applicable (See 9.2 and 9.3.)
3) A detailed description of the differences between the two equipments
4) Justification that the differences do not degrade the seismic performance below the acceptable limits (may
require additional analysis or testing) including any supporting data
--``,,,,````,`,,``,,```,,,,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---


IEEE Guide For Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power Switchgear Assemblies

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IEEE Guide For Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power Switchgear Assemblies

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

IEEE Guide For Seismic Qualification of Class 1E Metal-Enclosed Power Switchgear Assemblies

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IEEEC37.

Recognized as an American National Standard (ANSI)

IEEE Guide for Seismic Qualification of

Approved November 9, 1989

IEEE Standards Board

Approved April 13, 1990

American National Standards Institute

Copyright © 1998 IEEE All Rights Reserved 1

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Secretary, IEEE-SA Standards Board

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Organization Represented Name of Representative

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

C. S. Alexander K. D. Hendrix R. Ranjan

L. W. Gaussa, Sr., Chair

R. N. Carson J. A. Maneatis W. N. Rothenbuhler

Dennis Bodson, Chair

Arthur A. Blaisdell Kenneth D. Hendrix John E. May, Jr.

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

3.1 Generic Response Spectrum ...................................................................................................................... 4

4. Performance Requirements .................................................................................................................................6

4.1 General ....................................................................................................................................................... 6

6. Testing and Results .............................................................................................................................................8

6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 8

7. Combined Analysis and Testing .......................................................................................................................12

7.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 12

8. Extrapolation for Similar Equipment ................................................................................................................14

9.1 General ..................................................................................................................................................... 15

vi Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved vii

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

1. Scope and References

Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved 1

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

The following references should be used in conjunction with this guide:

[2] ANSI/IEEE C37.13-1981, Low-Voltage AC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures.

[3] ANSI/IEEE C37.14-1979, Low-Voltage DC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures.

[6] ANSI/IEEE C37.20.3-1987, Standard for Metal-Enclosed Interrupter Switchgear.

[7] ANSI/IEEE C37.98-1987, Standard for Seismic Testing of Relays.

[8] ANSI/IEEE C37.100-1981, Definitions for Power Switchgear.

2 Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved 3

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

3.1 Generic Response Spectrum

4 Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

GRS AMPLITUDE (g’s) GRS AMPLITUDE (g’s)

1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 8.0 2.3 3.8 3.8

2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 16.0 1.9 1.9 3.3

4.0 3.8 2.3 1.9 32.0 1.3 1.3 1.3

Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved 5

Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.

3.2 Information Furnished by the User

4.2 Functional Performance Criteria

4.2.1 Circuit Breakers and Primary Switching Devices

6 Copyright © 1989 IEEE All Rights Reserved