Civil Procedure
Civil Procedure
Civil Procedure
Personal Jurisdiction
A. Overview
B. Constitutional Limits on In Personam Adjudication (with or without trial)
Jurisdiction A. Overview
C. Statutory Provisions for In Personam B. Adjudication without Trial
Jurisdiction C. Adjudication at Trial
D. Approach for Exam D. Motions for JMOL, RJMOL, and New
Trial
Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard
A. Overview Defining the Scope of Litigation: Joinder
B. Standard for Notice of Claims and Parties
C. Service of Process (under FRCP 4) A. Overview
D. Service of Other Documents B. Permissive Party Joinder (“Proper
Parties”)
Subject Matter Jurisdiction C. Claim Joinder by Plaintiff
A. Overview D. Claim Joinder by Defendant
B. Diversity of Citizenship E. Necessary and Indispensible Parties
C. Federal Question Jurisdiction F. Impleader
D. Supplemental Jurisdiction G. Intervention
E. Removal
The Preclusion Doctrines
Venue A. Overview
A. Overview B. Claim Preclusion
B. Venue Choices in Federal Court C. Issue Preclusion
C. Transfer of Venue D. Interjurisdictional Preclusion
D. Forum Non Cenveniens
Erie
Pretrial Litigation A. Overview
A. Overview B. Swift and Erie
B. Pleadings C. A Variety of Tests
C. Discovery D. Two Doctrines, Not One
D. Pretrial Dismissal and Default E. Exam Approach
E. Judicial Management
Personal Jurisdiction
A. Overview
- the ability of a court to exercise power over a particular defendant or item of property.
- a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant only if:
1. a state statute says it may; and
2. the exercise of personal jurisdiction is constitutional.
B. Constitutional Limits
- traditional rule: physical power
- raw physical power.
- the forum state has power over persons and things found within the state boundaries.
- the court does not discuss whether jurisdiction would be “fair” or “convenient.”
- modern rule: due process/contact & fairness
1. defendant must have such minimum contacts with the forum such that the exercise of
personal jurisdiction over him is fair and reasonable.
- consider whether defendant purposefully availed himself of the benefits and
protections of state law and whether he could have anticipated being brought into state court.
2. notice also required.