AlbemarleCorporation 10K 20160229

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
________________________________________
FORM 10-K
________________________________________
x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
or
¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-12658
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
VIRGINIA 54-1692118
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
451 Florida Street
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70801
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 225-388-8011
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered

COMMON STOCK, $.01 Par Value NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $6.2 billion
based on the reported last sale price of common stock on June 30, 2015, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter.
Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 17, 2016: 112,250,676
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of Albemarle Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into Parts II and III
of this Form 10-K.
Albemarle Corporation and Subsidiaries
Index to Form 10-K

Year Ended December 31, 2015
Page
PART I
Item 1. Business 3
Item 1A. Risk Factors 11
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 23
Item 2. Properties 23
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 26
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 27
Executive Officers of the Registrant 27
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 28
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 29
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 29
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 56
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 58
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 117
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 117
Item 9B. Other Information 117
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 117
Item 11. Executive Compensation 118
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 118
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 118
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 118
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 118
Signatures 123
PART I
Item 1. Business.
Albemarle Corporation was incorporated in Virginia in 1993. Our principal executive offices are located at 451 Florida Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
70801. Unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “Albemarle,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company” mean Albemarle Corporation and our
consolidated subsidiaries.
On January 12, 2015 (the “Acquisition Closing Date”), we completed the acquisition (the “Merger”) of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”)
pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) for a purchase price of approximately $5.7 billion. As a result, Rockwood became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Albemarle. For additional information about the Merger, see “Recent Acquisitions, Joint Ventures and Divestitures” beginning
on page 10, and also Note 2, “Acquisitions,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
We are a leading global developer, manufacturer and marketer of highly-engineered specialty chemicals that meets customer needs across a diverse
range of end markets. The end markets we serve include petroleum refining, consumer electronics, energy storage, construction, automotive, steel and
aerospace, lubricants, pharmaceuticals, crop protection, household appliances, heating, ventilation, aluminum finishing, food safety and custom chemistry
services. We believe that our commercial and geographic diversity, technical expertise, innovative capability, flexible, low-cost global manufacturing base,
experienced management team and strategic focus on our core base technologies will enable us to maintain leading market positions in those areas of the
specialty chemicals industry in which we operate.
We and our joint ventures currently operate 51 production and research and development (“R&D”) facilities, as well as a number of administrative and
sales offices, in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Australia. As of December 31, 2015, we served approximately 30,000
customers in approximately 100 countries. For information regarding our unconsolidated joint ventures see Note 10, “Investments,” to our consolidated
financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Business Segments
During 2015, our operations were managed and reported under three reportable segments: Performance Chemicals, Refining Solutions and Chemetall ®
Surface Treatment. Financial results and discussion about our segments included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are organized according to these
categories except where noted.
For financial information regarding our reportable segments, including revenues generated for each of the last three fiscal years from each of the
product categories included in our reportable segments, and geographic area information, see Note 25, “Segment and Geographic Area Information,” to our
consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
On October 26, 2015, we announced that effective January 1, 2016, Performance Chemicals will be split into two separate reportable segments: (1)
Bromine Specialties, and (2) Lithium and Advanced Materials, which will include Lithium, Performance Catalyst Solutions and Curatives. Each unit will
have a dedicated team of sales, product management, research & development, process technology, manufacturing, sourcing, sales and operations planning
and customer service groups and will have full accountability for improving execution through greater asset and market focus, agility and responsiveness.
We expect this change to provide further clarity into the performance of each business.
Performance Chemicals Segment

As of December 31, 2015, our Performance Chemicals segment consisted of three product categories: Lithium, Performance Catalyst Solutions, and
Bromine.
Lithium. Our Lithium business develops advanced materials for a wide range of industries and end markets. We believe that our Lithium business is a
low-cost producer of the most diverse product portfolio of lithium derivatives in the industry.
We develop and manufacture a broad range of basic lithium compounds, including lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide, lithium chloride, and value-
added lithium specialties and reagents, including butyllithium and lithium aluminum hydride. Lithium is a key component in products and processes used in
a variety of applications and industries, which include lithium batteries used in consumer electronics and automobiles, high performance greases,
thermoplastic elastomers for car tires, rubber soles and plastic bottles, catalysts for chemical reactions, organic synthesis processes in the areas of steroid
chemistry and vitamins, various life science applications, as well as intermediates in the pharmaceutical industry, among other applications. We also develop
and manufacture cesium products for the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, and zirconium, barium and titanium products for various pyrotechnical
applications, including airbag igniters.
3
In addition to developing and supplying lithium compounds, we provide technical services, including the handling and use of reactive lithium
products. We also offer our customers recycling services for lithium containing by-products resulting from synthesis with organolithium products, lithium
metal and other reagents. We plan to continue to focus on the development of new products and applications.
Lithium—Customers
Our most significant customers include Panasonic Corporation, Syngenta AG, Umicore S.A., Samsung SDI Co. Ltd. and Royal DSM N.V.
Lithium—Competition
The global lithium market consists of producers located in the Americas, Asia-Pacific and, to a lesser extent, Africa. We believe that we are a leading
global provider of lithium compounds. Major competitors include FMC Corporation, Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A., SichuanTianqi Lithium, and
Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium. Competition in this part of the business is based on product quality, reliability of supply and customer service. In the metal-based
specialty chemicals business, key competitors include Cabot Corporation and Sigma-Aldrich Corporation. Competition in this part of the business is based
on product quality and product diversity.
Lithium—Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

We obtain lithium through solar evaporation of our ponds at the Salar de Atacama, in Chile, and in Silver Peak, Nevada. After we obtain the lithium
brine from the Salar de Atacama, we process it into lithium carbonate and lithium chloride at a plant in nearby La Negra, Chile. The lithium brine from our
Silver Peak site is processed into lithium carbonate at our plant in Silver Peak. Subsequently, in other locations in the United States (“U.S.”), Germany, France
and Taiwan, we further process the materials into various derivatives, depending on the markets we serve.
Our mineral rights with respect to the Salar de Atacama in Chile consist exclusively of our right to access lithium brine pursuant to a long-term contract
with the Chilean government, originally entered into in January 1975 by one of our predecessors and subsequently amended and restated. Our contract with
the Chilean government will remain in effect until the date on which we have produced and sold 200,000 metric tons of lithium in any of its forms from the
Salar de Atacama. As of December 31, 2015, the remaining amount of lithium we were permitted to sell under the contract equaled approximately 115,000
metric tons of total lithium. In February 2016 we announced that we were granted approval by the Environmental Assessment Commission of the Antofagasta
Region to increase our currently authorized lithium brine removal rate in the Salar de Atacama. The size of the area at the Salar de Atacama covered by our
claims is approximately 16,700 hectares. We currently own the land on which we operate our facility at the Salar de Atacama and our processing facility in La
Negra. However, the ownership of the land at the Salar de Atacama will revert to the Chilean government once we have sold all amounts of lithium remaining
under our contract with the Chilean government (the ownership of the land and fixed assets in La Negra will remain unchanged). In February 2016, we also
announced that we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chilean government that provides sufficient lithium to support the production of
70,000 metric tons annually of technical and battery grade lithium carbonate and 6,000 metric tons annually of lithium chloride in La Negra, over a 27-year
period, beginning January 1, 2017.
Our mineral rights in Silver Peak, Nevada consist exclusively of our right to access lithium brine pursuant to a settlement agreement with the U.S.
government, originally entered into in June 1991 by one of our predecessors. Pursuant to this agreement, we have rights to all of the lithium that we can
remove economically. We or our predecessors have been operating at the Silver Peak site since 1966. Our Silver Peak site covers a surface of approximately
15,301 acres, 10,826 acres of which we own through a subsidiary. The remaining acres are owned by the U.S. government from whom we lease the land
pursuant to a lease agreement which is renewed annually. Based on our 2015 production levels, we believe that the amount of lithium brine we can
economically obtain from our Silver Peak, Nevada site pursuant to our contract with the U.S. government could support the current levels of lithium
carbonate production for approximately 20 years. Assuming certain operating conditions are satisfied, our annual lithium carbonate production capacity is
estimated to be approximately 6,000 metric tons at our Silver Peak facility. However, no assurance can be given that the indicated levels of production of
lithium carbonate at either Silver Peak or La Negra will be realized.
We also own a 49% interest in Windfield Holdings Pty Ltd, which directly owns 100% of the equity of Talison Lithium Pty Ltd, a company
incorporated in Australia (“Talison”). Talison, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and operates a lithium mine in Greenbushes, Western Australia
and mines lithium ore, which is then milled and processed to separate lithium concentrate from the rest of the ore. Talison currently sells the lithium
concentrate to its shareholders. Talison has a leading position in two categories of lithium concentrates: (i) technical-grade lithium concentrates which have
low iron content for use in the manufacture of glass, ceramics and heat-proof cookware; and (ii) a high-yielding chemical-grade lithium concentrate,
4
which is used to produce lithium chemicals which form the basis for manufacture of lithium-ion batteries for laptop computers, mobile phones, electric
bicycles and electric vehicles. Assuming certain operating conditions are satisfied, the annual lithium concentrate production capacity at the Talison facility
is estimated to be approximately 575,000 metric tons. However, no assurance can be given that the indicated levels of production of lithium concentrate at
Talison will be realized.
Performance Catalyst Solutions (“PCS”). We have four product lines in our PCS division: polymer catalysts, curatives, organometallics and electronic
materials. We manufacture organometallic co-catalysts (e.g., aluminum, magnesium and zinc alkyls) as well as metallocene components and co-catalysts (e.g.,
methylaluminumoxane, organoborons, metallocene compounds, and finished polymerization catalysts comprising these products). We also offer finished
single-site catalysts with or without our proprietary ActivCat ® activation technology and a line of proprietary Ziegler-Natta catalysts under the Advantage™
brand. Our co-catalysts and finished catalysts are used in our customers’ production of polyolefin polymers. Such polymers are commodity (i.e., Ziegler-Natta
polymerization technology-based) and specialty (i.e., Single Site polymerization technology-based) plastics serving a wide variety of end markets including
packaging, non-packaging, films and injection molding. Some of our organometallic products are also used in the manufacture of alpha-olefins (i.e., hexene,
octene, decene). In electronic materials, we manufacture and sell high purity metal organic products into electronic applications such as the production of
light-emitting diodes (“LEDs”) for displays and general lighting, as well as other products used in the production of solar cells. Our curatives include a range
of curing agents used in polyurethanes, epoxies and other engineered resins.
PCS—Customers
Our PCS business customers include multinational corporations such as ExxonMobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation, Total Petrochemicals, Saudi
Basic Industries Corporation and Ineos Group Holdings S.A. There are thousands of polyolefin and elastomer units worldwide which require a constant
supply of co-catalysts and finished catalysts.
PCS—Competition
Our PCS business serves the global market including the Americas, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. Our major competitors in the PCS market include
AkzoNobel, Chemtura Corporation and W.R. Grace & Co. in the polyolefin catalyts and co-catalysts areas. Lonza is our main competitor in the curatives
market.
PCS—Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

The major raw materials we use in our PCS operations include aluminum, ethylene, alpha-olefins, isobutylene and toluene, most of which are readily
available from numerous independent suppliers and are purchased or provided under contracts at prices we believe are competitive. The cost of raw materials
is generally based on market prices, although we may use contracts with price caps or other tools, as appropriate, to mitigate price volatility. These raw
materials may nevertheless be subject to significant volatility despite our mitigating efforts. Our profitability may be affected if we are unable to recover
significant raw material costs from our customers.
Bromine. Our bromine and bromine-based business includes products used in fire safety solutions and other specialty chemicals applications. Our fire
safety technology enables the use of plastics in high performance, high heat applications by enhancing the flame resistant properties of these materials. Some
of the end market products that benefit from our fire safety technology include plastic enclosures for consumer electronics, printed circuit boards, wire and
cable, electrical connectors, textiles and foam insulation. Our bromine based business also includes specialty chemicals products such as elemental bromine,
alkyl bromides, inorganic bromides, brominated powdered activated carbon and a number of bromine fine chemicals. Our products are used in chemical
synthesis, oil and gas well drilling and completion fluids, mercury control, water purification, beef and poultry processing and various other industrial
applications. Other specialty chemicals that we produce include tertiary amines for surfactants, biocides, and disinfectants and sanitizers.
Bromine—Customers
Our bromine business offers more than 40 products to a variety of end markets. We sell our products mostly to chemical manufacturers and processors,
such as polymer resin suppliers, drilling and oil service companies, beef and poultry processors, water treatment and photographic companies, energy
producers and other specialty chemical companies.
Sales of bromine and brominated derivatives in Asia are expected to grow long-term due to the underlying growth in consumer demand and the shift of
the production of consumer electronics from the U.S. and Europe to Asia. In response to this development, we have established a sales and marketing network
in China, Japan, Korea and Singapore with products sourced from the U.S., Europe, China and the Middle East.
A number of customers of our bromine business operate in cyclical industries, including the consumer electronics and oil field industries. As a result,
demand from our customers in such industries is also cyclical.
5
Bromine—Competition
Our bromine business serves the following geographic markets: the Americas, Asia, Europe and the Middle East, each of which is highly competitive.
Product performance and quality, price and contract terms are the primary factors in determining which qualified supplier is awarded a contract. Research and
development, product and process improvements, specialized customer services, the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel and maintenance of a good
safety record have also been important factors to compete effectively in the marketplace. Our most significant competitors are Chemtura Corporation and
Israel Chemicals Ltd.
Bromine—Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

The bromine we use is sourced from two locations: Arkansas and the Dead Sea. Our bromine production operations in Arkansas are supported by an
active brine rights leasing program. We estimate that, at current production levels, we will be able to produce bromine in Arkansas for more than 50 years. In
addition, through our 50% interest in Jordan Bromine Company Limited (“JBC”), a consolidated joint venture with operations in Safi, Jordan, we source
bromine from the Dead Sea, which is believed to have indefinite quantities of brine. In addition, we have a joint venture with Weifang Sinobrom Import and
Export Company, Ltd. (“Sinobrom”) in China that allows us the option to source bromine directly from China’s Shandong Province brine fields.
Refining Solutions Segment

Our two main product lines in this segment are (i) Clean Fuels Technologies, which is primarily composed of hydroprocessing catalysts (“HPC”), and
(ii) Heavy Oil Upgrading (“HOU”), which is primarily composed of fluidized catalytic cracking (“FCC”) catalysts and additives. HPC products are widely
applied throughout the refining industry. Their application enables the upgrading of oil fractions to clean fuels and other usable oil feedstocks and products
by removing sulfur, nitrogen and other impurities from the feedstock. In addition, they improve product properties by adding hydrogen and in some cases
improve the performance of downstream catalysts and processes. We continuously seek to add more value to refinery operations by offering HPC products
that meet our customers’ requirements for profitability and performance in the very demanding refining market. FCC catalysts assist in the high yield
cracking of less desired refinery petroleum streams into derivative, higher-value products such as transportation fuels and petrochemical feedstocks like
propylene. Our FCC additives are used to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide in FCC units and to increase liquefied petroleum gas olefins
yield, such as propylene, and to boost octane in gasoline. Albemarle offers unique refinery catalysts to crack and treat the lightest to the heaviest feedstocks
while meeting refinery yield and product needs. We offer a wide range of HPC products and approximately 60 different FCC catalysts and additives products
to our customers.
Customers
Our Refining Solutions segment customers include multinational corporations such as ExxonMobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation, TOTAL S.A.,
Saudi Aramco and its joint ventures, and INEOS Group Holdings S.A.; independent petroleum refining companies such as Valero Energy Corporation, SK
Energy Holdings, Reliance Industries and Marathon Petroleum; national petroleum refining companies such as Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., Petróleos Mexicanos,
PetroVietnam, Kuwait National Petroleum Company, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company and Indian Oil Corp.
In 2015 the total number of refineries world wide was reduced from 643 to 634 and we see this trend continuing with smaller refineries shutting down
and being replaced by mega refineries, with growth concentrated in the Middle East. Oil refining has once again increased after minor declines in the last two
years.
We estimate that there are currently approximately 500 FCC units being operated globally, each of which requires a constant supply of FCC catalysts.
In addition, we estimate that there are approximately 3,000 HPC units being operated globally, or a capacity of approximately 44 million barrels per day,
each of which typically requires replacement HPC catalysts once every one to four years.
Competition
Our Refining Solutions segment serves the global market including the Americas, Asia, Europe and the Middle East, each of which is highly
competitive. Product performance and quality, price and contract terms are the primary factors in determining which qualified supplier is awarded a contract.
Research and development, product and process improvements, specialized customer services, the ability to attract and retain skilled personnel and the
maintenance of a good safety record have also been important factors to compete effectively in the Catalysts marketplace. Through our research and
development programs, we strive to differentiate our business by developing value-added products and products based on proprietary technologies.
6
Our major competitors in the HPC catalysts market include Criterion Catalysts and Technologies, Advanced Refining Technologies and Haldor
Topsoe. Our major competitors in the FCC catalysts market include W.R. Grace & Co., BASF Corporation and China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec).
Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

The major raw materials we use in our Refining Solutions operations include sodium silicate, sodium aluminate, kaolin, rare earths and metals such as
molybdenum, nickel and cobalt, most of which are readily available from numerous independent suppliers and are purchased or provided under contracts at
prices we believe are competitive. The cost of raw materials is generally based on market prices, although we may use contracts with price caps or other tools,
as appropriate, to mitigate price volatility. These raw materials may nevertheless be subject to significant volatility despite our mitigating efforts. Our
profitability may be affected if we are unable to recover significant raw material costs from our customers.
Chemetall Surface Treatment Segment

Our Chemetall Surface Treatment segment operates under the Chemetall ® brand name and is a leading global supplier of applied surface treatments and
services for metal, plastic and glass substrates in a wide range of industries and end markets. Chemetall Surface Treatment’s products are used for a variety of
applications and serve the automotive, aerospace, aluminum finishing, coil, cold forming, glass and general industrial markets, including metal fabrication.
We also provide process control and on-site support at our customers’ facilities with local representation worldwide. Our systems are designed to ensure that
the final requirements of our customers’ treated products are met in terms of proper surface treatment prior to painting, corrosion protection and preservation
of mechanical properties.
Chemetall Surface Treatment competes in markets characterized by proprietary manufacturing technologies and know-how, demanding product-
handling requirements, rigorous product quality and performance specifications, all accompanied by longstanding customer relationships. In order to remain
competitive, we are focused on developing innovative products, improving process technologies, expanding our customer base, and broadening our
technology capabilities in existing and new markets through internal research and development and bolt-on acquisitions.
Customers
Chemetall Surface Treatment serves customers globally in a wide variety of industries with a diverse product portfolio. Our customer base ranges from
local, small and mid-size companies to global, multinational Fortune 500 companies such as Airbus Group, Arcelor Mittal, Caterpillar, Daimler, Ford,
Renault-Nissan, Novelis, PSA Peugeot Citroen and Hyundai/KIA, among many others.
Competition
We believe we are a global leader in the surface treatment market. Our global competitors include Henkel, Nihon Parkerizing, PPG Industries and
Nippon Paint. Competition in this market is based primarily on customer service, product innovation and quality, and technological capabilities.
Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

The major raw materials used in our Chemetall Surface Treatment segment include phosphoric acid and phosphates, as well as non-ferrous metals such
as zinc and nickel. The raw materials used in our operations are purchased from various suppliers at prices that we believe are competitive. We secure our
supply of phosphoric acid, which is used in our conversion coating process, through quarterly supply contracts with fixed prices. Phosphoric acid is produced
from phosphate rock, and the majority of global phosphate rock reserves are located in Northern Africa, China, the Middle East, U.S. and Russia. Even though
we do not expect a shortage of phosphate rock and phosphoric acid in the near term, we employ a global procurement strategy to mitigate the risk of supply
disruptions. Non-ferrous metal products are traded on exchanges such as the London Metal Exchange (LME). We believe that zinc and nickel will be
available in sufficient quantities for the foreseeable future.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution

We have an international strategic account program that uses cross-functional teams to serve large global customers. This program emphasizes creative
strategies to improve and strengthen strategic customer relationships with emphasis on creating value for customers and promoting post-sale service.
Complementing this program are regional Albemarle sales personnel around the world who serve numerous additional customers within North America,
Europe, the Middle East, India, Asia Pacific, Russia, Africa and Latin America. We also utilize commissioned sales representatives and specialists in specific
market areas, some of which are affiliated with subsidiaries of large chemical companies.
7
Research and Development

We believe that in order to generate revenue growth, maintain our margins and remain competitive, we must continually invest in research and
development, product and process improvements and specialized customer services. Through research and development, we continue to seek increased
margins by introducing value-added products and proprietary processes and innovative green chemistry technologies. Our green chemistry efforts focus on
the development of products that benefit society in a manner that minimizes waste and the use of raw materials and energy, avoids the use of toxic reagents
and solvents and is produced in safe, environmentally friendly manufacturing processes. Green chemistry is encouraged with our researchers through periodic
focus group discussions and special rewards and recognition for outstanding new green developments.
Our research and development efforts support each of our business segments. As of December 31, 2015, the focus of research in Performance Chemicals
is divided among new and improved flame retardants, new uses for bromine and bromine-based products, curing agents and the development of efficient
processes for the manufacture of chemical intermediates and actives for the pharmaceutical and agrichemical industries. Fire safety solutions research is
focused primarily on developing new flame retardants which not only meet the higher performance requirements required by today’s polymer producers,
formulators and original equipment manufacturers but which also have superior toxicological and environmental profiles. Another area of research is the
development of bromine-based products for use as biocides in industrial water treatment and food safety applications and as additives used to reduce mercury
emissions from coal-fired power plants. Curatives research is focused primarily on improving and extending our line of curing agents and formulations. The
objective of the Lithium research and development effort is to develop innovative chemistries and technologies with applications relevant within targeted
key markets. Research and development efforts are generally focused on both process development (e.g., pilot plant for the recycling of lithium ion batteries)
as well as new product development (e.g., for lithium ion battery applications). PCS research efforts are focused on catalyst performance as well as process
improvements.
Our Refining Solutions research is focused on the needs of our refinery catalysts customers. Refinery catalysts research is focused primarily on the
development of more effective catalysts and related additives to produce clean fuels and to maximize the production of the highest value refined products
through hydrotreating catalyst technologies. With regard to HOU, we focus our efforts on the production of more and better fuels from more complex and
lower accessible/convertible feedstock through the use of novel FCC technologies.
Chemetall Surface Treatment’s research and development activities are focused on the development of products to meet customer demands that are also
in accordance with regional environmental requirements. Our goal is to help solve our customers’ complex manufacturing challenges by developing
proprietary formulations utilizing industry knowledge, expertise and a forward-looking team of individuals with manufacturing know-how. Our commitment
to research and development and product portfolio enhancements are an important aspect of our business that characterizes Chemetall as a supplier of choice
that creates value for our customers.
We have incurred research and development expenses of $102.9 million, $88.3 million and $82.2 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property, including our patents, licenses and trade names, is an important component of our business. As of December 31, 2015, we
owned approximately 3,000 active and approximately 1,500 pending patent applications in key strategic markets worldwide. We also have acquired rights
under patents and inventions of others through licenses, and we license certain patents and inventions to third parties.
Regulation
Our business is subject to a broad array of employee health and safety laws and regulations, including those under the Occupational Safety and Health
Act. We also are subject to similar state laws and regulations as well as local laws and regulations for our non-U.S. operations. We devote significant resources
and have developed and implemented comprehensive programs to promote the health and safety of our employees and we maintain an active health, safety
and environmental program. We finished 2015 with an occupational injury and illness rate of 0.60 for Albemarle employees and nested contractors,
compared to 0.327 in 2014.
Our business and our customers also may be subject to significant requirements under the European Community Regulation for the Registration,
Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (“REACH”). REACH imposes obligations on European Union manufacturers and importers of chemicals and
other products into the European Union to compile and file comprehensive reports, including testing data, on each chemical substance, and perform chemical
safety assessments. Additionally, substances of high concern—such as Carcinogenic, Mutagenic and Reprotoxic (“CMRs”); Persistent,
8
Bioaccumulative and Toxic (“PBTs”); very Persistent, very Bioaccumulative (“vPvB”); and endocrine disruptors—will be subject to an authorization
process. Authorization may result in restrictions in the use of products by application or even banning the product. The REACH regulations impose
significant additional burdens on chemical producers, importers, downstream users of chemical substances and preparations, and the entire supply chain. Our
significant manufacturing presence and sales activities in the European Union will require us to incur significant additional compliance costs and may result
in increases in the costs of raw materials we purchase and the products we sell. Increases in the costs of our products could result in a decrease in their overall
demand; additionally, customers may seek products that are not regulated by REACH, which could also result in a decrease in the demand of certain of our
products subject to the REACH regulations.
Historically, there has been scrutiny of certain brominated flame retardants by regulatory authorities, legislative bodies and environmental interest
groups in various countries. We manufacture a broad range of brominated flame retardant products, which are used in a variety of applications. Concern about
the impact of some of our products on human health or the environment may lead to regulation, or reaction in our markets independent of regulation.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those governing the discharge of pollutants
into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the cleanup of contaminated properties. Ongoing compliance
with such laws and regulations is an important consideration for us. Key aspects of our operations are subject to these laws and regulations. In addition, we
incur substantial capital and operating costs in our efforts to comply with them.
Liabilities associated with the investigation and cleanup of hazardous substances, as well as personal injury, property damages or natural resource
damages arising from the release of, or exposure to, such hazardous substances, may be imposed in many situations without regard to violations of laws or
regulations or other fault, and may also be imposed jointly and severally (so that a responsible party may be held liable for more than its share of the losses
involved, or even the entire loss). Such liabilities also may be imposed on many different entities with a relationship to the hazardous substances at issue,
including, for example, entities that formerly owned or operated the property affected by the hazardous substances and entities that arranged for the disposal
of the hazardous substances at the affected property, as well as entities that currently own or operate such property. We are subject to such laws, including the
federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as CERCLA or Superfund, in the U.S., and similar
foreign and state laws. We may have liability as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) with respect to active off-site locations under CERCLA or state
equivalents. We have sought to resolve our liability as a PRP at these sites through indemnification by third parties and settlements, which would provide for
payment of our allocable share of remediation costs. Because the cleanup costs are estimates and are subject to revision as more information becomes
available about the extent of remediation required, and in some cases we have asserted a defense to any liability, our estimates could change. Moreover,
liability under CERCLA and equivalent state statutes may be joint and several, meaning that we could be required to pay in excess of our pro rata share of
remediation costs. Our understanding of the financial strength of other PRPs has been considered, where appropriate, in estimating our liabilities. Accruals for
these matters are included in the environmental reserve discussed below. Our management is actively involved in evaluating environmental matters and,
based on information currently available to us, we have concluded that our outstanding environmental liabilities for unresolved waste sites currently known
to us should not have a material effect on our operations.
We use and generate hazardous substances and wastes in our operations and may become subject to claims for personal injury and/or property damage
relating to the release of such substances into the environment. In addition, some of our current properties are, or have been, used for industrial purposes,
which could contain currently unknown contamination that could expose us to governmental requirements or claims relating to environmental remediation,
personal injury and/or property damage. While we conduct our operations so as to minimize the risk of incurring such losses, the nature of our business and
the types of operations in which we engage create a potential for such losses to occur. These risks could expose us to substantial liability for personal injury,
wrongful death, property damage, loss of production, pollution and other environmental damages. Depending on the frequency and severity of such
incidents, it is possible that the Company’s operating costs, insurability and relationships with customers, employees and regulators could be impaired. In
particular, our customers may elect not to purchase our product if they view our safety record as unacceptable. This could also cause us to lose customers and
substantial revenues. However, we believe that the likelihood of an environmental-related catastrophic occurrence or a series of occurrences that could
materially affect the Company’s financial position or competitiveness is low.
We record accruals for environmental matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated. It is possible that new information or future developments could require us to reassess our potential exposure related to environmental matters. We
may incur significant costs and liabilities in order to comply with existing environmental laws and regulations. It is also possible that other developments,
such as increasingly strict
9
environmental laws, regulations and orders of regulatory agencies, as well as claims for damages to property and the environment or injuries to employees
and other persons resulting from our current or past operations, could result in substantial costs and liabilities in the future. As this information becomes
available, or other relevant developments occur, we will adjust our accrual amounts accordingly. While there are still uncertainties related to the ultimate
costs we may incur, based upon our evaluation and experience to date, we believe our reserves are adequate. We cannot assure you that, as a result of former,
current or future operations, there will not be some future impact on us relating to new regulations or additional environmental remediation or restoration
liabilities. See “Safety and Environmental Matters” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on
page 53.
Climate Change
The growing concerns about climate change and the related imposition by governments of more stringent regulations may provide us with new or
expanded business opportunities. The Company seeks to capitalize on the “green revolution” by providing solutions to companies pursuing alternative fuel
products and technologies (such as renewable fuels, gas-to-liquids and others), emission control technologies (including mercury emissions), alternative
transportation vehicles and energy storage technologies and other similar solutions. As demand for, and legislation mandating or incentivizing the use of
alternative fuel technologies that limit or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions increase, we continue to monitor the market and offer solutions where we have
appropriate technology and believe we are well positioned to take advantage of opportunities that may arise if new legislation is enacted.
Recent Acquisitions, Joint Ventures and Divestitures

Over the last three years, we have devoted resources to acquisitions and joint ventures, including the subsequent integration of acquired businesses.
These acquisitions and joint ventures have expanded our base business, provided our customers with a wider array of products and presented new alternatives
for discovery through additional chemistries. Following is a summary of our acquisitions and joint ventures during recent years.
On January 12, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Rockwood for a purchase price of approximately $5.7 billion, with Rockwood becoming a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Albemarle. Through the acquisition of Rockwood, we became a leading integrated and low cost global producer of lithium and
lithium compounds used in lithium-ion batteries for electronic devices, alternative transportation vehicles and energy storage technologies, meeting the
significant growth in global demand for these products. We are also now one of the largest global producers of surface treatments and coatings for metal
processing, servicing the automotive, aerospace and general industrial markets. The acquisition of Rockwood reflects our commitment to drive sustainable
growth.
On February 19, 2015, our Chemetall Surface Treatment segment completed the acquisition of all remaining shares of its Shanghai Chemetall joint
venture for a purchase price of $57.6 million, and is now the sole owner of the entity.
On May 1, 2015, our Chemetall Surface Treatment segment completed the acquisition of the aluminum finishing business of Chemal GmbH & Co. KG
(“Chemal GmbH”), based in Hamm, Germany. Cash paid in connection with this acquisition was approximately $2.2 million.
On December 23, 2015, we paid approximately $4.8 million in connection with the acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interests’ share of
Nanjing Chemetall Surface Technologies Co., Ltd.
In 2015, we announced our intention to pursue strategic alternatives, including divestitures, related to certain businesses which include minerals-based
flame retardants and specialty chemicals, fine chemistry services and metal sulfides. On January 4, 2016, we completed the sale of our Tribotecc metal
sulfides business to Treibacher Industrie AG for net proceeds of approximately $137 million. Included in the transaction were sites in Vienna and
Arnoldstein, Austria, and Tribotecc’s proprietary sulfide synthesis process. On February 1, 2016, we completed the sale of our minerals-based flame
retardants and specialty chemicals businesses to Huber Engineered Materials, a division of J.M. Huber Corporation, for net proceeds of approximately $187
million. The transaction includes Albemarle’s Martinswerk GmbH subsidiary and manufacturing facility located in Bergheim, Germany, and Albemarle’s
50% ownership interest in Magnifin Magnesiaprodukte GmbH, a joint-venture with Radex Heraklith Industriebeteiligung AG at Breitenau, Austria.
On September 1, 2014, we closed the sale of our antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets to SI Group, Inc. and received net proceeds
of $104.7 million. Included in the transaction were Albemarle’s manufacturing sites in Orangeburg, South Carolina and Jinshan, China, along with
Albemarle’s antioxidant product lines manufactured in Ningbo, China.
10
In 2014, the Company and ICL Industrial Products (“ICL”) announced entering into an agreement to establish a manufacturing joint venture for the
production of ICL’s FR-122P polymeric flame retardant and Albemarle’s GreenCrest™ polymeric flame retardant. In 2015, the parties terminated their
agreement due to the likelihood that, for purposes of competition law approvals, the duration of the proposed joint venture would need to be shortened to
such an extent that the return on investment would no longer be attractive. In lieu of the joint venture, the parties have signed a long-term supply
arrangement pursuant to which ICL would supply the GreenCrest™ polymeric flame retardant to the Company.
Employees
As of February 1, 2016, we had 6,963 employees of whom 2,990, or 43%, are employed in the U.S. and Latin America; 2,740, or 39%, are employed in
Europe; 894, or 13%, are employed in Asia and 339, or 5%, are employed in the Middle East. Certain of these employees are represented by unions or works
councils. We believe that we generally have a good relationship with our employees, and with the unions and works councils that represent certain
employees.
Available Information
Our internet website address is http://www.albemarle.com. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), as well as reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, as
soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The
information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this report or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC. These
reports may also be obtained at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. The SEC also maintains a website at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding SEC registrants, including Albemarle.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and the charters of the Audit and Finance, Health, Safety and Environment,
Executive Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees are also available on our website and are available in print to any shareholder upon
request by writing to Investor Relations, 451 Florida Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70801, or by calling (225) 388-8011.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.

You should consider carefully the following risks when reading the information, including the financial information, contained in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Adverse conditions in the global economy and volatility and disruption of financial markets can negatively impact our customers, suppliers and other
business partners and therefore have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
A global or regional economic downturn may reduce customer demand or inhibit our ability to produce our products, negatively impacting our
operating results. Our business and operating results have been and will continue to be sensitive to global economic downturns (including credit market
tightness which can impact our liquidity as well as our customers, suppliers and other business partners), declining consumer and business confidence,
fluctuating commodity prices, volatile exchange rates and other challenges that can affect the global economy. Our customers may experience deterioration
of their businesses, cash flow shortages and difficulty obtaining financing. As a result, existing or potential customers can delay or cancel plans to purchase
products and may not be able to fulfill their obligations in a timely fashion. Further, suppliers and other business partners may be experiencing similar
conditions, which could impact their ability to fulfill their obligations to us. Also, it could be difficult to find replacements for certain of those business
partners without incurring significant delays or cost increases. If the current weakness in much of the global economy continues or deepens significantly, our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Our inability to secure key raw materials, or to pass through increases in costs and expenses for other raw materials and energy, on a timely basis or at all,
could have an adverse effect on the margins of our products and our results of operations.
The long-term profitability of our operations will be, in part, related to our ability to continue to economically obtain resources, including energy and
raw materials. For example, our lithium and bromine businesses rely upon our continued ability to produce, or otherwise obtain, lithium and bromine of
sufficient quality in adequate amounts to support our operations. If we fail to secure and retain the rights to continue to access these key raw materials, we
may have to restrict or suspend our operations that rely upon these key resources, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, other raw material and energy costs account for a significant percentage of our total costs of products sold, even if they can be
obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Our raw material and energy costs can be volatile and may increase
11
significantly. Increases are primarily driven by significantly tighter market conditions and major increases in the pricing of basic building blocks for our
products such as crude oil, chlorine and metals (including molybdenum and rare earths which are used in the refinery catalysts business). We generally
attempt to pass through changes in the prices of raw materials and energy to our customers, but we may be unable to or be delayed in doing so. Our inability
to efficiently and effectively pass through price increases, or inventory impacts resulting from price volatility, could adversely affect our margins.
We face competition from other specialty chemical companies, which places downward pressure on the prices and margins of our products.
We operate in a highly competitive marketplace, competing against a number of global specialty chemical producers. Competition is based on several
key criteria, including product performance and quality, product price, product availability and security of supply and responsiveness of product
development in cooperation with customers and customer service. Some of our competitors are larger than we are and may have greater financial resources. In
addition, our products are facing increasing competition from market participants in China. These competitors may also be able to maintain significantly
greater operating and financial flexibility than we do. As a result, these competitors may be better able to withstand changes in conditions within our
industry, changes in the prices of raw materials and energy and in general economic conditions. Additionally, competitors’ pricing decisions could compel us
to decrease our prices, which could affect our margins and profitability adversely. Our ability to maintain or increase our profitability is, and will continue to
be, dependent upon our ability to offset decreases in the prices and margins of our products by improving production efficiency and volume, shifting to
higher margin chemical products and improving existing products through innovation and research and development. If we are unable to do so or to
otherwise maintain our competitive position, we could lose market share to our competitors.
Within the end-use markets in which we compete, competition between products is intense. Substitute products also exist for many of our products.
Therefore, we face substantial risk that certain events, such as new product development by our competitors, changing customer needs, production advances
for competing products, price changes in raw materials and products, our failure to secure patents or the expiration of patents, could result in declining
demand for our products as our customers switch to substitute products or undertake manufacturing of such products on their own. If we are unable to
develop, produce or market our products to effectively compete against our competitors, our results of operations may materially suffer.
We believe that our customers are increasingly looking for strong, long-term relationships with a few key suppliers that help them improve product
performance, reduce costs, or support new product development. To satisfy these growing customer requirements, our competitors have been consolidating
within product lines through mergers and acquisitions. We may also need to invest and spend more on research and development and marketing costs to
strengthen existing customer relationships, as well as attract new customers. Our indebtedness could limit our flexibility to react to these industry trends and
our ability to remain competitive.
Albemarle’s brands, product image and trademarks represent the unique product identity of each of our products and are important symbols of the
Company’s reputation. Accordingly, the performance of our business could be adversely affected by any marketing and promotional materials used by our
competitors that make false or unsubstantiated claims, implies immoral or improper conduct or is otherwise disparaging to our Company or its products.
Further, our own actions could hurt such brands, product image and trademarks if our products underperform or we otherwise draw negative publicity.
Downturns in our customers’ cyclical industries could adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Downturns in the businesses that use our specialty chemicals will adversely affect our sales. Many of our customers are in industries, including the
electronics, building and construction, oilfield and automotive industries, that are cyclical in nature and sensitive to changes in general economic
conditions. Historically, downturns in general economic conditions have resulted in diminished product demand, excess manufacturing capacity and lower
average selling prices, and we may experience similar problems in the future. A decline in economic conditions in our customers’ cyclical industries may
have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
Our results are subject to fluctuation because of irregularities in the demand for our HPC catalysts and certain of our agrichemicals.
Our HPC catalysts are used by petroleum refiners in their processing units to reduce the quantity of sulfur and other impurities in petroleum products.
The effectiveness of HPC catalysts diminishes with use, requiring the HPC catalysts to be replaced, on average, once every one to three years. The sales of our
HPC catalysts, therefore, are largely dependent on the useful life cycle of the HPC catalysts in the processing units and may vary materially by quarter. In
addition, the timing and profitability of HPC catalysts sales can have a significant impact on revenue and profit in any one quarter. Sales of our agrichemicals
are also subject to fluctuation as demand varies depending on climate and other environmental conditions, which
12
may prevent or reduce farming for extended periods. In addition, crop pricing and timing of when farms alternate from one crop to another crop in a particular
year can also alter sales of agrichemicals.
Changes in our customers’ products can reduce the demand for our specialty chemicals.
Our customers use our specialty chemicals for a broad range of applications. Changes in our customers’ products or processes may enable our customers
to reduce consumption of the specialty chemicals that we produce or make our specialty chemicals unnecessary. Customers may also find alternative
materials or processes that no longer require our products. Should a customer decide to use a different material due to price, performance or other
considerations, we may not be able to supply a product that meets the customer’s new requirements. Consequently, it is important that we develop new
products to replace the sales of products that mature and decline in use. Our business, results of operations, cash flows and margins could be materially
adversely affected if we are unable to manage successfully the maturation of our existing products and the introduction of new products.
Our research and development efforts may not succeed and our competitors may develop more effective or successful products.
The specialty chemicals industry is subject to periodic technological change and ongoing product improvements. In order to maintain our margins and
remain competitive, we must successfully develop, manufacture and market new or improved products. As a result, we must commit substantial resources each
year to research and development. Ongoing investments in research and development for future products could result in higher costs without a proportional
increase in revenues. Additionally, for any new product program, there is a risk of technical or market failure in which case we may not be able to develop the
new commercial products needed to maintain our competitive position or we may need to commit additional resources to new product development
programs. Moreover, new products may have lower margins than the products they replace.
Our industries and the end-use markets into which we sell our products experience periodic technological change and product improvement.
Manufacturers periodically introduce new generations of products or require new technological capacity to develop customized products. Our future growth
will depend on our ability to gauge the direction of the commercial and technological progress in all key end-use markets and upon our ability to fund and
successfully develop, manufacture and market products in such changing end-use markets. We will have to continue to identify, develop, market and in
certain cases, secure regulatory approval for innovative products on a timely basis to replace or enhance existing products in order to maintain our profit
margins and our competitive position. We may not be successful in developing new products and/or technology, either alone or with third parties, or
licensing intellectual property rights from third parties on a commercially competitive basis. Our new products may not be accepted by our customers or may
fail to receive regulatory approval. If we fail to keep pace with the evolving technological innovations in our end-use markets on a competitive basis, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We also expect competition to increase as our competitors develop and introduce new and enhanced products. As new products enter the market, our
products may become obsolete or competitors’ products may be marketed more effectively than our products. If we fail to develop new products, maintain or
improve our margins with our new products or keep pace with technological developments, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows will suffer.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Protection of our proprietary processes, methods and compounds and other technology is important to our business. We generally rely on patent, trade
secret, trademark and copyright laws of the U.S. and certain other countries in which our products are produced or sold, as well as licenses and nondisclosure
and confidentiality agreements, to protect our intellectual property rights. The patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright laws of some countries may not
protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. Failure to protect our intellectual property rights may result in the loss of
valuable proprietary technologies. Additionally, some of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application and, even if a patent
application has been filed, it may not result in an issued patent. If patents are issued to us, those patents may not provide meaningful protection against
competitors or against competitive technologies. We cannot assure you that our intellectual property rights will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented
or rendered unenforceable.
We also conduct research and development activities with third parties and license certain intellectual property rights from third parties and we plan to
continue to do so in the future. We endeavor to license or otherwise obtain intellectual property rights on terms favorable to us. However, we may not be able
to license or otherwise obtain intellectual property rights on such terms or at all. Our inability to license or otherwise obtain such intellectual property rights
could have a material
13
adverse effect on our ability to create a competitive advantage and create innovative solutions for our customers, which will adversely affect our net sales and
our relationships with our customers.
We could face patent infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or products infringe on their proprietary
technologies. If we are found to be infringing on the proprietary technology of others, we may be liable for damages and we may be required to change our
processes, redesign our products partially or completely, pay to use the technology of others, stop using certain technologies or stop producing the infringing
product entirely. Even if we ultimately prevail in an infringement suit, the existence of the suit could prompt customers to switch to products that are not the
subject of infringement suits. We may not prevail in intellectual property litigation and such litigation may result in significant legal costs or otherwise
impede our ability to produce and distribute key products.
We also rely upon unpatented proprietary manufacturing expertise, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and
maintain our competitive position. While we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual
property, we cannot assure you that our confidentiality agreements will not be breached, that they will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets
and proprietary manufacturing expertise or that adequate remedies will be available in the event of an unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets or
manufacturing expertise.
Our business and operations could suffer in the event of cyber-security breaches.
Attempts by others to gain unauthorized access to our information technology systems become more sophisticated over time. These attempts, which
might be related to industrial or other espionage, include covertly introducing malware to our computers and networks and impersonating authorized users,
among others. We seek to detect and investigate all security incidents and to prevent their recurrence, but in some cases we might be unaware of an incident
or its magnitude and effects. The theft, unauthorized use or publication of our intellectual property and/or confidential business information could harm our
competitive position, reduce the value of our investment in research and development and other strategic initiatives or otherwise adversely affect our
business. To the extent that any cyber-security breach results in inappropriate disclosure of our customers’ or licensees’ confidential information, we may
incur liability as a result.
Our substantial international operations subject us to risks of doing business in foreign countries, which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We conduct a substantial portion of our business outside of the U.S. We expect sales from international markets to continue to represent a significant
portion of our net sales and the net sales of our joint ventures. Accordingly, our business is subject to risks related to the differing legal, political, social and
regulatory requirements and economic conditions of many jurisdictions. Risks inherent in international operations include the following:
• fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may affect product demand and may adversely affect the profitability in U.S. Dollars of products and
services we provide in international markets where payment for our products and services is made in the local currency;
• transportation and other shipping costs may increase;
• intellectual property rights may be more difficult to enforce;
• increased cost of, and decreased availability of raw materials;
• changes in foreign laws and tax rates or U.S. laws and tax rates with respect to foreign income may unexpectedly increase the rate at which our income
is taxed, impose new and additional taxes on remittances, repatriation or other payments by subsidiaries, or cause the loss of previously recorded tax
benefits;
• foreign countries may adopt other restrictions on foreign trade or investment, including currency exchange controls;
• trade sanctions could result in losing access to customers and suppliers in those countries;
• unexpected adverse changes in foreign laws or regulatory requirements may occur;
• agreements may be difficult to enforce and receivables difficult to collect;
• compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations may be burdensome;
• compliance with anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws may be costly;
• unexpected adverse changes in export duties, quotas and tariffs and difficulties in obtaining export licenses;
• general economic conditions in the countries in which we operate could have an adverse effect on our earnings from operations in those countries;
• foreign operations may experience staffing difficulties and labor disputes;
14
• foreign governments may nationalize private enterprises; and

• our business and profitability in a particular country could be affected by political or economic repercussions from terrorist activities and the response
to such activities, the possibility of hyperinflationary conditions and political instability in certain countries.
In addition, certain of our joint ventures operate, and we have ongoing capital projects in, high-risk regions of the world such as the Middle East and
South America. Unanticipated events such as geopolitical changes could result in a write-down of our investment in the affected joint venture or a delay or
cancellation of those capital projects, which could negatively impact our future growth and profitability. Our success as a global business will depend, in
part, upon our ability to succeed in differing legal, regulatory, economic, social and political conditions by developing, implementing and maintaining
policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we and our joint ventures do business.
Furthermore, our subsidiaries are subject to rules and regulations related to anti-bribery prohibitions of the U.S. and other countries and export controls
and economic embargoes, violations of which may carry substantial penalties. For example, export control and economic embargo regulations limit the
ability of our subsidiaries to market, sell, distribute or otherwise transfer their products or technology to prohibited countries or persons. Failure to comply
with these regulations could subject our subsidiaries to fines, enforcement actions and/or have an adverse effect on our reputation and the value of our
common stock.
Changes in, or the interpretation of, tax legislation or rates throughout the world could materially impact our results.
Our future effective tax rate and related tax balance sheet attributes could be impacted by changes in tax legislation throughout the world. Currently,
the majority of our net sales are generated from customers located outside of the U.S., and a substantial portion of our assets and employees are located
outside of the U.S. If these funds are needed for our operations in the U.S., we believe we will be able to access such funds in a tax efficient manner to satisfy
cash flow needs.
We have not accrued income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings for most non-U.S. subsidiaries, because those earnings are
intended to be indefinitely reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Certain tax proposals with respect to such earnings could substantially increase
our tax expense, which would substantially reduce our income and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from operating
activities. Currently, there are no contemplated cash distributions that will result in incremental U.S. taxes payable in excess of applicable foreign tax credits
related to such undistributed earnings. As a result, we have not provided any deferred income taxes on the portion of undistributed foreign earnings
determined not to be permanently reinvested in foreign operations.
Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, expirations of tax
holidays, changes in the assessment regarding the realization of the valuation of deferred tax assets, or changes in tax laws and regulations or their
interpretation. We are subject to the regular examination of our income tax returns by various tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse
outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for taxes. It is possible the outcomes from these examinations will
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, which may adversely affect our operating results and net income.
We conduct our business and incur costs in the local currency of most of the countries in which we operate. The financial condition and results of
operations of each foreign operating subsidiary and joint venture are reported in the relevant local currency and then translated to U.S. Dollars at the
applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. Changes in exchange rates between these foreign currencies and the
U.S. Dollar will affect the recorded levels of our assets, liabilities, net sales, cost of goods sold and operating margins and could result in exchange losses. The
primary currencies to which we have exposure are the European Union Euro, Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollar, Chinese Renminbi, Australian Dollar, Chilean
Peso and the British Pound Sterling. Exchange rates between these currencies and the U.S. Dollar in recent years have fluctuated significantly and may do so
in the future. With respect to our potential exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations, for the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately
42% of our net sales were denominated in such currencies. Significant changes in these foreign currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar could also have an
adverse effect on our ability to meet interest and principal payments on any foreign currency-denominated debt outstanding. In addition to currency
translation risks, we incur currency transaction risks whenever one of our operating subsidiaries or joint ventures enters into either a purchase or a sales
transaction using a different currency from its functional currency. Our operating results and net income may be affected by any volatility in currency
exchange rates and our ability to manage effectively our currency transaction and translation risks.
15
Our business could be adversely affected by environmental, health and safety laws and regulations to which our raw materials, products and facilities are
subject.
In the jurisdictions in which we operate, we are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations,
including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and the
cleanup of contaminated properties. Further, some of the raw materials we handle are subject to government regulation. These regulations affect the
manufacturing processes, handling, uses and applications of our products. In addition, our production facilities and a number of our distribution centers
require numerous operating permits that are subject to renewal. Due to the nature of these requirements and changes in our operations, our operations may
exceed limits under permits or we may not have the proper permits to operate our operations. Ongoing compliance with such laws, regulations and permits is
an important consideration for us and we incur substantial capital and operating costs in our compliance efforts. Environmental laws have become
increasingly strict in recent years. We expect this trend to continue and anticipate that compliance will continue to require increased capital expenditures and
operating costs.
Compliance with environmental laws generally increases the costs of manufacturing, the cost of registration/approval requirements, the costs of
transportation and storage of raw materials and finished products, as well as the costs of the storage and disposal of wastes, and could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations. We may incur substantial costs, including fines, damages, criminal or civil sanctions and remediation costs, or experience
interruptions in our operations, for violations arising under these laws or permit requirements. Furthermore, environmental laws are subject to change and
have tended to become stricter over time. Such changes in environmental laws or their interpretation, or the enactment of new environmental laws, could
result in materially increased capital expenditures and compliance costs.
Violations of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations may subject us to fines, penalties and other liabilities and may require us to change
certain business practices or curtail production.
If we violate environmental, health and safety laws or regulations, in addition to being required to correct such violations, we can be held liable in
administrative, civil or criminal proceedings for substantial fines and other sanctions could be imposed that could disrupt or limit our operations. Liabilities
associated with the investigation and cleanup of hazardous substances, as well as personal injury, property damages or natural resource damages arising from
the release of, or exposure to, such hazardous substances, may be imposed in many situations without regard to violations of laws or regulations or other fault,
and may also be imposed jointly and severally (so that a responsible party may be held liable for more than its share of the losses involved, or even the entire
loss). Such liabilities may also be imposed on many different entities with a relationship to the hazardous substances at issue, including, for example, entities
that formerly owned or operated the property affected by the hazardous substances and entities that arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances at
the affected property, as well as entities that currently own or operate such property. Such liabilities can be difficult to identify and the extent of any such
liabilities can be difficult to predict. We use, and in the past have used, hazardous substances at many of our facilities, and we have in the past, and may in the
future, be subject to claims relating to exposure to hazardous materials and the associated liabilities may be material. We also have generated, and continue
to generate, hazardous wastes at a number of our facilities. Some of our facilities also have lengthy histories of manufacturing or other activities that have
resulted in site contamination. We have also given contractual indemnities for environmental conditions relating to facilities we no longer own or operate.
The nature of our business, including historical operations at our current and former facilities, exposes us to risks of liability under these laws and regulations
due to the production, storage, use, transportation and sale of materials that can cause contamination or personal injury if released into the environment.
Additional information may arise in the future concerning the nature or extent of our liability with respect to identified sites, and additional sites may be
identified for which we are alleged to be liable, that could cause us to materially increase our environmental accrual or the upper range of the costs we believe
we could reasonably incur for such matters.
We may be subject to indemnity claims and liable for other payments relating to properties or businesses we have divested.
In connection with the sale of certain properties and businesses, we have agreed to indemnify the purchasers for certain types of matters, such as certain
breaches of representations and warranties, taxes and certain environmental matters.
With respect to environmental matters, the discovery of contamination arising from properties that we have divested may expose us to indemnity
obligations under the sale agreements with the buyers of such properties or cleanup obligations and other damages under applicable environmental laws.
We may not have insurance coverage for such indemnity obligations or cash flows to make such indemnity or other payments. Further, we cannot
predict the nature of and the amount of any indemnity or other obligations we may have to the applicable purchaser. Such payments may be costly and may
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
16
Contractual indemnities may be ineffective in protecting us from environmental liabilities.

At several of our properties where hazardous substances are known to exist (including some sites where hazardous substances are being investigated or
remediated), we believe we are entitled to contractual indemnification from one or more former owners or operators; however, in the event we make a claim,
the indemnifier may disagree with us or not have the financial capacity to fulfill its indemnity obligation. If our contractual indemnity is not upheld or
effective, our accrual and/or our costs for the investigation and cleanup of hazardous substances could increase materially.
We may be exposed to certain regulatory and financial risks related to climate change.
Growing concerns about climate change may result in the imposition of additional regulations or restrictions to which we may become subject. Climate
changes include changes in rainfall and in storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, significantly changing sea levels and increasing atmospheric and
water temperatures, among others. For example, there have been concerns regarding the declining water level of the Dead Sea, from which our joint venture,
JBC, produces bromine. A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to climate
change. For example, some of our operations are within jurisdictions that have, or are developing, regulatory regimes governing greenhouse gas emissions.
Potentially, additional U.S. federal regulation will be forthcoming with respect to greenhouse gas emissions (including carbon dioxide) and/or “cap and
trade” legislation that could have impacts on our operations. In addition, we have operations in the European Union, Brazil, China, Japan, Jordan, Saudi
Arabia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, which have implemented measures to achieve objectives under the Kyoto Protocol, an international
agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCC”), which set binding targets for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions. The first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol expired in 2012. An amendment was passed by the UNFCC during the December 2012
Doha climate change talks that would implement a second commitment period through 2020. As of February 11, 2016, 60 countries have ratified the 2012
amendments. In December 2015, the 21st Conference of Parties for the UNFCC concluded with more than 190 countries adopting the Paris Agreement, a
partly binding and partly voluntary agreement to cut global carbon emissions in an effort to limit the rise in global temperatures. The outcome of new
legislation or regulation in the U.S. and other jurisdictions in which we operate may result in new or additional requirements, additional charges to fund
energy efficiency activities, fees or restrictions on certain activities. While certain climate change initiatives may result in new business opportunities for us
in the area of alternative fuel technologies and emissions control, compliance with these initiatives may also result in additional costs to us, including,
among other things, increased production costs, additional taxes, reduced emission allowances or additional restrictions on production or operations. Any
adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such
limitations. Even without such regulation, increased public awareness and adverse publicity about potential impacts on climate change emanating from us or
our industry could harm us. We may not be able to recover the cost of compliance with new or more stringent laws and regulations, which could adversely
affect our business and negatively impact our growth. Furthermore, the potential impacts of climate change and related regulation on our customers are
highly uncertain and may adversely affect us.
Regulation, or the threat of regulation, of some of our products could have an adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
We manufacture or market a number of products that are or have been the subject of attention by regulatory authorities and environmental interest
groups. For example, for many years we have marketed methyl bromide, a chemical that is particularly effective as a soil fumigant. In recent years, the market
for methyl bromide has changed significantly, driven by the Montreal Protocol of 1990 and related regulations prompted by findings regarding the
chemical’s potential to deplete the ozone layer. Completion of the phase-out of methyl bromide as a fumigant took effect January 1, 2005, with critical uses
allowed on an annual basis until feasible alternatives are available.
Over the past decade, there has been increasing scrutiny of certain brominated flame retardants by regulatory authorities, legislative bodies and
environmental interest groups in various countries. We manufacture a broad range of brominated flame retardant products, which are used in a variety of
applications to protect people, property and the environment from the negative consequences of fire. Concern about the impact of some of our products on
human health or the environment may lead to regulation, or reaction in our markets independent of regulation, that could reduce or eliminate markets for
such products.
Agencies in the European Union continue to evaluate the risks to human health and the environment associated with certain brominated flame
retardants such as tetrabromobisphenol A and decabromodiphenylethane, both of which we manufacture. Additional government regulations, including
limitations or bans on the use of brominated flame retardants, could result in a decline in our net sales of brominated flame retardants and have an adverse
effect on our sales and profitability. In addition, the threat of additional regulation or concern about the impact of brominated flame retardants on human
health or the environment could lead to a negative reaction in our markets that could reduce or eliminate our markets for these products, which could have an
adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
17
We could be subject to damages based on claims brought against us by our customers or lose customers as a result of the failure of our products to meet
certain quality specifications.
Our products provide important performance attributes to our customers’ products. If a product fails to perform in a manner consistent with quality
specifications or has a shorter useful life than guaranteed, a customer could seek replacement of the product or damages for costs incurred as a result of the
product failing to perform as guaranteed. These risks apply to our refinery catalysts in particular because, in certain instances, we sell our refinery catalysts
under agreements that contain limited performance and life cycle guarantees. Also, because many of our products are integrated into our customers’ products,
we may be requested to participate in, or fund in whole or in part the costs of, a product recall conducted by a customer. For example, some of our businesses
supply products to customers in the automotive industry. In the event one of these customers conducts a product recall that it believes is related to one of our
products, we may be asked to participate in or fund in whole or in part such a recall.
Our customers often require our subsidiaries to represent that our products conform to certain product specifications provided by our customers. Any
failure to comply with such specifications could result in claims or legal action.
A successful claim or series of claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could
result in a loss of one or more customers.
Our business is subject to hazards common to chemical businesses, any of which could injure our employees or other persons, damage our facilities or
other properties, interrupt our production and adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.
Our business is subject to hazards common to chemical manufacturing, storage, handling and transportation, including explosions, fires, inclement
weather, natural disasters, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, remediation, chemical spills, discharges or releases of
toxic or hazardous substances or gases and other risks. These hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life to our employees and other persons, severe
damage to, or destruction of, property and equipment and environmental contamination. In addition, the occurrence of material operating problems at our
facilities due to any of these hazards may diminish our ability to meet our output goals. Accordingly, these hazards and their consequences could adversely
affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our operations as a whole, including our results of operations and cash flows, both during and after
the period of operational difficulties.
Natural disasters and weather-related matters could impact our results of operations.
Historically, major hurricanes have caused significant disruption to the operations on the U.S. Gulf Coast for many of our customers and our suppliers
of certain raw materials, which had an adverse impact on volume and cost for some of our products. Our operations at the Salar de Atacama, in Chile, could be
subject to significant rain events and earthquakes. If similar weather-related matters or other natural disasters occur in the future, they could negatively affect
the results of operations at our sites in the affected regions as well as have adverse impacts on the global economy.
The insurance that we maintain may not fully cover all potential exposures.
We maintain property, business interruption and casualty insurance but such insurance may not cover all risks associated with the hazards of our
business and is subject to limitations, including deductibles and maximum liabilities covered. We may incur losses beyond the limits, or outside the
coverage, of our insurance policies, including liabilities for environmental remediation. In addition, from time to time, various types of insurance for
companies in the specialty chemical industry have not been available on commercially acceptable terms or, in some cases, have not been available at all. We
are potentially at additional risk if one or more of our insurance carriers fail. Additionally, severe disruptions in the domestic and global financial markets
could adversely impact the ratings and survival of some insurers. Future downgrades in the ratings of enough insurers could adversely impact both the
availability of appropriate insurance coverage and its cost. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, if at all, and our premiums
may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.
We may incur significant charges in the event we close or divest all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility.
We continually assess our manufacturing operations in order to manufacture and distribute our products in the most efficient manner. Based on our
assessments, we may make capital improvements to modernize certain units, move manufacturing or distribution capabilities from one plant or facility to
another plant or facility, discontinue manufacturing or distributing certain products or close or divest all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility. We also
have shared services agreements at several of our plants and if such agreements are terminated or revised, we would assess and potentially adjust our
manufacturing operations. The closure or divestiture of all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility could result in future charges that could be significant.
18
If we are unable to retain key personnel or attract new skilled personnel, it could have an adverse effect on our business.
The unanticipated departure of any key member of our management team could have an adverse effect on our business. In addition, because of the
specialized and technical nature of our business, our future performance is dependent on the continued service of, and on our ability to attract and retain,
qualified management, scientific, technical, marketing and support personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we may be unable to continue
to attract or retain such personnel.
Some of our employees are unionized, represented by workers’ councils or are employed subject to local laws that are less favorable to employers than the
laws of the U.S.
As of February 1, 2016, we had 6,963 employees. Certain of these employees are represented by unions or works councils. In addition, a large number
of our employees are employed in countries in which employment laws provide greater bargaining or other rights to employees than the laws of the U.S. Such
employment rights require us to work collaboratively with the legal representatives of the employees to effect any changes to labor arrangements. For
example, most of our employees in Europe are represented by workers’ councils that must approve any changes in conditions of employment, including
salaries and benefits and staff changes, and may impede efforts to restructure our workforce. Although we believe that we have a good working relationship
with our employees, a strike, work stoppage, slowdown or significant dispute with our employees could result in a significant disruption of our operations or
higher ongoing labor costs.
Our joint ventures may not operate according to their business plans if our partners fail to fulfill their obligations, which may adversely affect our results
of operations and may force us to dedicate additional resources to these joint ventures.
We currently participate in a number of joint ventures and may enter into additional joint ventures in the future. The nature of a joint venture requires
us to share control with unaffiliated third parties. If our joint venture partners do not fulfill their obligations, the affected joint venture may not be able to
operate according to its business plan. In that case, our results of operations may be adversely affected and we may be required to increase the level of our
commitment to the joint venture. Also, differences in views among joint venture participants may result in delayed decisions or failures to agree on major
issues. If these differences cause the joint ventures to deviate from their business plans, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may not be able to successfully integrate the businesses of Albemarle and Rockwood and therefore may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits
of the Merger.
Realization of the anticipated benefits in the Merger will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully integrate the businesses and operations of
Albemarle and Rockwood. We will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating business practices, operations and
support functions.
Our success after the Merger will also depend in part upon our ability to retain key employees subsequent to the Merger. The diversion of
management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the integration of the two companies’ operations could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial results, financial condition or our stock price. The integration process may also result in additional and unforeseen
expenses. There can be no assurance that the contemplated synergies anticipated from the Merger will be realized, or maintained if realized. If the integration
is not successful, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. There can be no
assurances that the expected benefits and efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses will be realized to offset the integration and restructuring
costs over time.
We may not be able to consummate future acquisitions or integrate acquisitions into our business, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses.
As part of our business growth strategy, we have acquired businesses and entered into joint ventures in the past and intend to pursue acquisitions and
joint venture opportunities in the future. Our ability to implement this component of our growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate
acquisition or joint venture candidates and our financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity. The expense incurred in consummating
acquisitions or entering into joint ventures, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition or our failure to integrate businesses successfully, could result in
unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to realize any of the anticipated benefits from acquisitions or joint ventures.
The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant
financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations. Some of the risks associated with the
integration of acquisitions include:
• potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management;
19
• unforeseen claims and liabilities, including unexpected environmental exposures;

• unforeseen adjustments, charges and write-offs;
• problems enforcing the indemnification obligations of sellers of businesses or joint venture partners for claims and liabilities;
• unexpected losses of customers of, or suppliers to, the acquired business;
• difficulty in conforming the acquired businesses’ standards, processes, procedures and controls with our operations;
• variability in financial information arising from the implementation of purchase price accounting;
• inability to coordinate new product and process development;
• loss of senior managers and other critical personnel and problems with new labor unions; and
• challenges arising from the increased scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our operations.
Although our pension plans currently meet minimum funding requirements, events could occur that would require us to make significant contributions to
the plans and reduce the cash available for our business.
We have several defined benefit pension plans around the world, including in the U.S., United Kingdom (“U.K.”), Germany, Belgium, and Japan,
covering most of our employees. We are required to make cash contributions to our pension plans to the extent necessary to comply with minimum funding
requirements imposed by the various countries’ benefit and tax laws. The amount of any such required contributions will be determined annually based on an
actuarial valuation of the plans as performed by the plans’ actuaries.
In previous years, we have made voluntary contributions to our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plans. We anticipate approximately $8.0 million
of required cash contributions during 2016 for our defined benefit pension plans. Additional voluntary pension contributions in and after 2016 may vary
depending on factors such as asset returns, interest rates, and legislative changes. The amounts we may elect or be required to contribute to our pension plans
in the future may increase significantly. These contributions could be substantial and would reduce the cash available for our business.
Further, an economic downturn or recession or market disruption in the capital and credit markets may adversely impact the value of our pension plan
assets, our results of operations, our statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and our liquidity. For example, we have several pension plans located in
Germany, Belgium, Japan and the U.S. Our funding obligations could change significantly based on the investment performance of the pension plan assets
and changes in actuarial assumptions for local statutory funding valuations. Any deterioration of the capital markets or returns available in such markets may
negatively impact our pension plan assets and increase our funding obligations for one or more of these plans and negatively impact our liquidity. We cannot
predict the impact of this or any further market disruption on our pension funding obligations.
The occurrence or threat of extraordinary events, including domestic and international terrorist attacks, may disrupt our operations and decrease demand
for our products.
Chemical-related assets may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other possible targets in the U.S. and throughout the world. As a result, we
are subject to existing federal rules and regulations (and may be subject to additional legislation or regulations in the future) that impose site security
requirements on chemical manufacturing facilities, which increase our overhead expenses.
We are also subject to federal regulations that have heightened security requirements for the transportation of hazardous chemicals in the U.S. We
believe we have met these requirements but additional federal and local regulations that limit the distribution of hazardous materials are being considered.
We ship and receive materials that are classified as hazardous. Bans on movement of hazardous materials through cities, like Washington, D.C., could affect
the efficiency of our logistical operations. Broader restrictions on hazardous material movements could lead to additional investment to produce hazardous
raw materials and change where and what products we manufacture.
The occurrence of extraordinary events, including future terrorist attacks and the outbreak or escalation of hostilities, cannot be predicted, and their
occurrence can be expected to continue to negatively affect the economy in general and specifically the markets for our products. The resulting damage from
a direct attack on our assets, or assets used by us, could include loss of life and property damage. In addition, available insurance coverage may not be
sufficient to cover all of the damage incurred or, if available, may be prohibitively expensive.
20
We will need a significant amount of cash to service our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt depends on a range of economic, competitive and
business factors, many of which are outside our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt obligations. If
we are unable to service our debt obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, reduce or delay capital
expenditures, sell assets or raise additional equity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or raise additional equity on
commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and impair our liquidity. Our inability to generate sufficient cash
flow to satisfy our debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, could have a material adverse effect on our business
and financial condition.
Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may adversely affect our business.
Our February 2014 credit agreement and the indentures governing our senior notes contain select restrictive covenants. These covenants provide
constraints on our financial flexibility. The failure to comply with the covenants in our February 2014 credit agreement, the indentures governing the senior
notes and the agreements governing other indebtedness, including indebtedness incurred in the future, could result in an event of default, which, if not cured
or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Financial Condition and Liquidity—
Long-Term Debt” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 50.
A downgrade of the ratings on our debt or an increase in interest rates could cause our debt service obligations to increase.
Borrowings under our February 2014 credit agreement, our commercial paper program and our September 2015 term loan agreement bear interest at
floating rates. The rates under our February 2014 credit agreement and our September 2015 term loan agreement are subject to adjustment based on the
ratings of our senior unsecured long-term debt by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings
(“Fitch”). S&P has rated our senior unsecured long-term debt as BBB-, Moody’s has rated our senior unsecured long-term debt as Baa3, and Fitch has rated
our senior unsecured long-term debt as BBB-. S&P has rated our commercial paper as A-3, Moody’s has rated it as P-3 and Fitch has rated it as F-3. S&P,
Moody’s and/or Fitch may downgrade our ratings in the future. The downgrading of any of our ratings or an increase in any of the benchmark interest rates
would result in an increase of our interest expense on our variable rate borrowings.
Changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing and the market price
of our securities.
Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities on factors that include our operating results, actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our
industry and their view of the general outlook for the economy. Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, upgrading or downgrading the
current rating or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading. Downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list
for possible future downgrading would likely increase our cost of future financing, could limit our access to the capital markets and have an adverse effect on
the market price of our securities.
Because a significant portion of our operations is conducted through our subsidiaries and joint ventures, our ability to service our debt may be dependent
on our receipt of distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries and joint ventures.
A significant portion of our operations is conducted through our subsidiaries and joint ventures. As a result, our ability to service our debt may be
partially dependent on the earnings of our subsidiaries and joint ventures and the payment of those earnings to us in the form of dividends, loans or advances
and through repayment of loans or advances from us. Payments to us by our subsidiaries and joint ventures will be contingent upon our subsidiaries’ or joint
ventures’ earnings and other business considerations and may be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions. In addition, there may be significant tax and
other legal restrictions on the ability of non-U.S. subsidiaries or joint ventures to remit money to us.
We may continue to expand our business through acquisitions and we may incur additional indebtedness, including indebtedness related to acquisitions.
We have historically expanded our business primarily through acquisitions. A part of our business strategy is to continue to grow through acquisitions
that complement our existing technologies and accelerate our growth. Because the consummation of acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses
involves significant risk, this means that investors in our securities will be subject to the risks inherent in our acquisition strategy. In addition, the indentures
governing our senior notes does not limit our
21
ability to incur additional indebtedness in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. Our credit facilities have limited financial maintenance covenants. As a
result, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in connection with acquisitions.
As a result of the Merger, Albemarle, on a consolidated basis, incurred substantial additional indebtedness and related debt service obligations. This
additional indebtedness and the related debt service obligations could have important consequences, including:
• reducing flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses, the competitive environment and the industries in which we operate,
and to technological and other changes;
• lowering credit ratings;
• reducing access to capital and increasing borrowing costs generally or for any additional indebtedness to finance future operating and capital
expenses and for general corporate purposes;
• reducing funds available for operations, capital expenditures and other activities; and
• creating competitive disadvantages relative to other companies with lower debt levels.
We may be subject to increased tax exposure resulting from Rockwood pre-acquisition periods.
Under the terms of certain purchase agreements, third party sellers have agreed to substantially indemnify us for tax liabilities pertaining to
Rockwood’s pre-acquisition periods generally until the applicable statutes of limitations expire. To the extent such companies fail to indemnify or satisfy
their obligations, or if any amount is not covered by the terms of the indemnity, earnings could be negatively impacted in future periods through increased
tax expense.
We have not established proven or probable reserves through the completion of a feasibility study for the minerals that we produce.
We have not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable”
feasibility study for any of the minerals that we produce. Furthermore, we have no plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our projects. Since
we commenced production without having established proven or probable reserves, there may be greater inherent uncertainty as to whether or not
mineralized material can be economically obtained as originally planned and anticipated. Also, because we do not have any proven or probable reserves, we
may not be able to continue to produce such minerals at existing levels or to expand our production capacity in the future which could harm our business,
results or operations and financial condition.
Future events may impact our deferred tax asset position and U.S deferred federal income taxes on undistributed earnings of international affiliates that
are considered to be reinvested indefinitely.
We evaluate our ability to utilize deferred tax assets and our need for a valuation allowance based on available evidence. This process involves
significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between
future projected operating performance and actual results. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine, based on
available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be utilized.
In making this determination, we evaluate all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments (either increases or
decreases), to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance are determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The
utilization of our deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carry-back or carry-forward periods under
the tax law. Due to significant estimates used to establish the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably
possible that we will be required to record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Changes to the valuation allowance or the
amount of deferred tax liabilities could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, should we
change our assertion regarding the permanent reinvestment of the undistributed earnings in foreign operations, a deferred tax liability may need to be
established.
If our goodwill, intangible assets or long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.
Under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), we review our intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment on October 31 of each year, or more
frequently if required. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill, intangible assets or long-
lived assets may not be recoverable, include, but are not limited to, a decline in our stock price and market capitalization, reduced future cash flow estimates,
and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a significant charge in our financial statements during the
22
period in which any impairment of our goodwill, intangible assets or long-lived assets is determined, negatively impacting our results of operations.
Our required capital expenditures may exceed our estimates.

Our capital expenditures for continuing operations generally consist of expenditures to maintain and improve existing equipment and substantial
investments in new equipment. Commencement of production requires start-up, commission and certification of product quality by our customers, which may
impact the expected timing of sales of product from such facility. Construction of large chemical operations is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties,
including, among others, the ability to complete the project on a timely basis and in accordance with the estimated budget for such project and our ability to
estimate future demand for our products.
Future capital expenditures may be significantly higher, depending on the investment requirements of each of our business lines, and may also vary
substantially if we are required to undertake actions to compete with new technologies in our industry. We may not have the capital necessary to undertake
these capital investments. If we are unable to do so, we may not be able to effectively compete in some of our markets.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

NONE
Item 2. Properties.
We operate on a global basis. Our principal executive offices in Baton Rouge, LA, and regional shared services offices in Budapest, Hungary and
Dalian, China are leased. We and our affiliates also operate regional sales and administrative offices in various locations throughout the world, which are
generally leased. Effective as of June 2016, our principal executive offices will be located in Charlotte, NC.
We believe that our production facilities, research and development facilities, and sales and administrative offices are generally well maintained,
effectively used and are adequate to operate our business. During 2015, the Company’s manufacturing plants operated at approximately 73% capacity in the
aggregate.
Set forth below is information regarding our significant production facilities operated by our affiliates and us:
Location Business Segment in 2015 Principal Use Owned/Leased

Amsterdam, the Refining Solutions Production of refinery catalysts, research and product Owned
Netherlands development activities
Auckland, New Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for general Leased
Zealand industry, aerospace, and other pre-treatment technologies
Baton Rouge, Performance Chemicals Research and product development activities, and production Owned; on leased land
Louisiana of flame retardants, catalysts and additives
Bayswater North, Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for general Owned
Australia industry, aerospace, and other pre-treatment technologies
Bitterfeld, Germany Refining Solutions Refinery catalyst regeneration, rejuvenation, and sulfiding Owned by Eurecat S.A., a joint venture
owned 50% by each of IFP
Investissements and us
Blackman Township, Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for general Owned
Michigan industry, automotive, and other pre-treatment technologies
Boksburg, South Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Africa other pre-treatment technologies
Cambridge, U.K. Performance Chemicals Production of performance catalysts Leased
Canovelles, Spain Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
other pre-treatment technologies
23
Cayirova-Kocaeli, Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Turkey other pre-treatment technologies
Changchun, China Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Leased by Changchun Chemetall
other pre-treatment technologies Chemicals Company Limited, a joint
venture owned 57% by us and 43% by
Changchun Yongchan Petro Chemicals
Company Limited
Chennai, India Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Chongqing, China Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Leased by Chongqing Chemetall Surface
other pre-treatment technologies Treatment Company Limited, a joint
venture owned 55% by us and 45% by
Zhongtian Environmental Protection
(Group) Company Limited
El Marqués, Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for aerospace, Leased
Querétaro, Mexico automotive, other pre-treatment technologies
Foshan, China Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for general industry Leased by Foshan Chemetall Surface
and automotive Treatment Company, a joint venture
owned 57% by us and 43% by
Changchun Yongchan Petro Chemicals
Company Limited
Giussano, Italy Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Greenbushes, Performance Chemicals Production of lithium spodumene minerals and lithium Owned by Windfield Holdings Pty Ltd, a
Australia concentrate joint venture in which we own 49%, and
Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries Inc
which owns the remaining interest
Jubail, Saudi Arabia Performance Chemicals Manufacturing and marketing of organometallics Owned; Albemarle Netherlands BV and
Saudi Specialty Chemicals Company (a
SABIC affiliate) each owns 50% interest
Jundiai/São Paulo, Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Brazil other pre-treatment technologies
Kings Mountain, Performance Chemicals Production of technical and battery grade lithium hydroxide Owned
North Carolina
La Mirada, California Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for pre-treatment Leased
technologies and aerospace
La Negra, Chile Performance Chemicals Production of lithium carbonate and lithium chloride Owned
Langelsheim, Germany Performance Chemicals; Chemetall Production of butyllithium, lithium chloride, specialty Owned
Surface Treatment products, lithium hydrides, cesium, special metals, as well as
surface treatment chemicals for automotive technologies, other
pre-treatment technologies and aerospace (sealants)
24

Louvain-la-Neuve, Refining Solutions; Performance Regional offices and research and customer technical service Owned
Belgium Chemicals; All Other activities
La Voulte, France Refining Solutions Refinery catalysts regeneration and treatment, research and Owned by Eurecat S.A., a joint venture
development activities owned 50% by each of IFP
Investissements and us
Magnolia, Arkansas Performance Chemicals Production of flame retardants, bromine, inorganic bromides, Owned
agricultural intermediates and tertiary amines
McAlester, Oklahoma Refining Solutions Refinery catalyst regeneration, rejuvenation, pre-reclaim burn Owned by Eurecat S.A., a joint venture
off, as well as specialty zeolites and additives marketing owned 50% by each of IFP
activities Investissements and us
Mobile, Alabama Performance Chemicals Production of tin stabilizers Owned by PMC Group, Inc. which
operates the plant for Stannica LLC, a
joint venture in which we and PMC
Group Inc. each own a 50% interest
Mönchengladbach, Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for general industry Owned
Germany
Nanjing, China Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Leased
New Johnsonville, Performance Chemicals Production of specialty products Owned

Tennessee
Niihama, Japan Refining Solutions Production of refinery catalysts Leased by Nippon Ketjen Company
Limited, a joint venture owned 50% by
each of Sumitomo Metal Mining
Company Limited and us
Pasadena, Texas Performance Chemicals; All Other Production of aluminum alkyls, alkenyl succinic anhydride, Owned
orthoalkylated anilines, and other specialty chemicals
Pasadena, Texas Refining Solutions Production of refinery catalysts, research and development Owned
activities
Pasadena, Texas Refining Solutions Refinery catalysts regeneration services Owned by Eurecat U.S. Incorporated, a
joint venture in which we own a 57.5%
interest and a consortium of entities in
various proportions owns the remaining
interest
Pune, India Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Safi, Jordan Performance Chemicals Production of bromine and derivatives and flame retardants Owned and leased by JBC, a joint
venture owned 50% by each of Arab
Potash Company Limited and us
Salar de Atacama, Performance Chemicals Production of lithium brine and potash Owned; however ownership will revert to
Chile the Chilean government once we have
sold all remaining amounts under our
contract with the Chilean government
pursuant to which we obtain lithium brine
in Chile
25

Santa Cruz, Brazil Refining Solutions Production of catalysts, research and product development Owned by Fábrica Carioca de
activities Catalisadores S.A, a joint venture owned
50% by each of Petrobras Química S.A.
—PETROQUISA and us
Sens, France Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Owned
Shanghai, China Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for automotive and Leased
Silver Peak, Nevada Performance Chemicals Production of lithium-carbonate Owned
Singapore, Singapore Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for aerospace and Leased
Soissons, France Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for aerospace Owned
industry
South Haven, All Other Production of custom fine chemistry products including Owned
Michigan pharmaceutical actives
Taichung, Taiwan Performance Chemicals Production of butyllithium Owned
Takaishi City, Osaka, Performance Chemicals Production of aluminum alkyls Owned by Nippon Aluminum Alkys, a
Japan joint venture owned 50% by each of
Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. and us
Twinsburg, Ohio Performance Chemicals Production of bromine-activated carbon Leased
Tyrone, Pennsylvania All Other Production of custom fine chemistry products, agricultural Owned
intermediates, performance polymer products and research and
development activities
Willstatt, Germany Chemetall Surface Treatment Production of surface treatment chemicals for coil coating Leased
applications
Yeosu, South Korea Performance Chemicals Research and product development activities/small scale Owned
production of catalysts and catalyst components
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

On February 19, 2015, Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd and Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd, who collectively owned approximately
882,000 shares of Rockwood common stock immediately prior to the Merger, commenced an action in the Delaware Chancery Court seeking appraisal of
their shares of Rockwood common stock pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law § 262. These shareholders exercised their right not to receive the
Merger consideration which was comprised of (i) $50.65 in cash, without interest, and (ii) 0.4803 of a share of Albemarle common stock, for each share of
Rockwood common stock owned by such shareholders. Following the Merger, these shareholders ceased to have any rights with respect to their Rockwood
shares, except for their rights to seek an appraisal of the cash value of their Rockwood shares under Delaware law. On March 16, 2015, Albemarle, on behalf
of Rockwood, filed an Answer and Verified List in response to the appraisal petition. On November 2, 2015, the court granted the parties’ jointly stipulated
amended scheduling order, which set forth dates for fact and expert discovery, as well as trial. On December 21, 2015, the parties entered into a Settlement
Agreement and Release to resolve the matter, and on January 11, 2016, the Court dismissed the matter with prejudice.
In addition, we are involved from time to time in legal proceedings of types regarded as common in our business, including administrative or judicial
proceedings seeking remediation under environmental laws, such as Superfund, products liability, breach of contract liability and premises liability
litigation. Where appropriate, we may establish financial reserves for such proceedings. We also maintain insurance to mitigate certain of such risks.
26
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant.

The names, ages and biographies of our executive officers, as of February 17, 2016, are set forth below. The term of office of each officer is until the
meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual shareholders’ meeting (May 10, 2016).
Name Age Position

Luther C. Kissam IV 51 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Matthew K. Juneau 55 Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations
Susan Kelliher 49 Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Karen G. Narwold 56 Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate and Government Affairs, Corporate Secretary
Scott A. Tozier 50 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Donald J. LaBauve, Jr. 49 Vice President, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer
Luther C. Kissam IV was elected to our Board of Directors effective November 2011, as Chief Executive Officer effective September 2011 and as our
President effective May 2013. Previously, Mr. Kissam served as President from March 2010 until March 2012, Executive Vice President, Manufacturing, Law
and HS&E from May 2009 until March 2010, and as Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and Law and Corporate Secretary from January 2008 until May
2009. Mr. Kissam joined us in October 2003 and served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from that time until December 2005,
when he was promoted to Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Before joining us, Mr. Kissam served as Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary of Merisant Company (manufacturer and marketer of sweetener and consumer food products), having previously served as Associate
General Counsel of Monsanto Company (provider of agricultural products and solutions).
Matthew K. Juneau was elected as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations effective May 2015. Previously, Mr. Juneau
served as Senior Vice President, President Performance Chemicals since December 2013, Vice President, Polymer Solutions since March 2012, Vice President,
Global Sales and Services from May 2009 to February 2012, and prior to that as Division Vice President of our performance chemicals business in the Fine
Chemistry division since January 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Juneau held various positions of increasing responsibility in research and development and
business management with us including Managing Director of our European operations from January 2003 until December 2007. Mr. Juneau joined us as a
chemical engineer in June 1982.
Susan Kelliher joined us in March of 2012, as Senior Vice President, Human Resources. Ms. Kelliher has over twenty years of human resources
experience, having most recently served at Hewlett Packard as Vice President, Human Resources—Global Sales and Enterprise Marketing from April 2010 to
February 2012, and as Vice President, Human Resources—Imaging and Printing Group from September 2007 to April 2010. Prior to joining Hewlett Packard,
she was the Vice President of Human Resources for Cymer, Inc., the world’s leading supplier of deep ultraviolet illumination sources. Prior to that,
Ms. Kelliher served in various executive and managerial human resources positions at The Home Depot, Inc., Raytheon Company, YUM! Brands’ Pizza Hut
division, beginning her career at Mobil Oil.
Karen G. Narwold joined us in September of 2010 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate and Government Affairs,
Corporate Secretary. Ms. Narwold has over 25 years of legal, management and business experience with global industrial and chemical companies. After five
years in private practice, she served as Vice President, General Counsel, Human Resources and Secretary of GrafTech International Ltd., a global graphite and
carbon manufacturer and former subsidiary of Union Carbide. She then served as Vice President and Strategic Counsel of Barzel Industries, a North American
steel processor and distributor. Ms. Narwold resigned from Barzel in November 2009, after Barzel reached an agreement to sell substantially all of its assets in
a planned transaction that was consummated in a sale pursuant to Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Prior to joining Albemarle, Ms. Narwold served
as Special Counsel with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP and with Symmetry Advisors where she worked in the areas of strategic, financial and capital structure
planning and restructuring for public and private companies.
27
Scott A. Tozier was elected as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective January 2011. Mr. Tozier also served as our Chief
Accounting Officer from January 2013 until February 2014. Mr. Tozier has over 25 years of diversified international financial management experience.
Following four years of assurance services with the international firm Ernst & Young, LLP, Mr. Tozier joined Honeywell International, Inc., where his 16 year
career spanned senior financial positions in the U.S., Australia and Europe. His roles of increasing responsibilities included management of financial
planning, analysis and reporting, global credit and treasury services and Chief Financial Officer of Honeywell’s Transportation Systems, Turbo Technologies
and Building Solutions divisions. Most recently, Mr. Tozier served as Vice President of Finance, Operations and Transformation of Honeywell International,
Inc.
Donald J. LaBauve Jr. was elected Vice President, Corporate Controller effective February 2013, and Chief Accounting Officer effective February
2014, after having previously served as Vice President, Finance - Business Operations since April 2009. Mr. LaBauve served as Chief Financial Officer, Fine
Chemistry from April 2007 until April 2009, and prior to that time held the role of Controller, Polymer Solutions from January 2006 through March 2007.
Since joining the Company as Ethyl Corporation in April 1990, Mr. LaBauve has held various staff and leadership positions of increasing responsibility
within the finance function, including an assignment to our European headquarters in Belgium in April 2000 where he held the regional finance leadership
role from July 2002 through June 2005.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “ALB.” The following table sets forth on a per share basis the
high and low sales prices for our common stock for the periods indicated as reported on the NYSE composite transactions reporting system and the dividends
declared per share on our common stock.
Common Stock Price Range Dividends

Declared Per
Share of
High Low Common Stock
2014
First Quarter $ 67.31 $ 60.92 $ 0.275
Second Quarter $ 72.69 $ 64.55 $ 0.275
Third Quarter $ 76.28 $ 58.37 $ 0.275
Fourth Quarter $ 63.38 $ 51.35 $ 0.275
2015
First Quarter $ 62.23 $ 46.78 $ 0.29
Second Quarter $ 64.99 $ 52.23 $ 0.29
Third Quarter $ 55.83 $ 41.37 $ 0.29
Fourth Quarter $ 57.99 $ 44.10 $ 0.29
There were 112,219,351 shares of common stock held by 2,789 shareholders of record as of December 31, 2015. On February 26, 2016, we declared a
dividend of $0.305 per share of common stock, payable April 1, 2016.
The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2016 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, or the Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Stock Performance Graph

The graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $100 in our common stock on December 31, 2010 and the
reinvestment of all dividends thereafter. The information contained in the graph below is furnished and therefore not to be considered “filed” with the SEC,
and is not incorporated by reference into any document that incorporates this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
28
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The information for the five years ended December 31, 2015, is contained in the “Five-Year Summary” included in Part IV, Item 15, Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-looking Statements
Some of the information presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the documents incorporated by reference, may constitute forward-
looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current
expectations, which are in turn based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable based on our current knowledge of our business and operations. We have
used words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will” and variations of such words and similar
expressions to identify such forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult
to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Therefore, there can be no assurance that our actual results will not differ materially from the results and
expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, without limitation:
• changes in economic and business conditions;
• changes in financial and operating performance of our major customers and industries and markets served by us;
• the timing of orders received from customers;
• the gain or loss of significant customers;
• competition from other manufacturers;
• changes in the demand for our products or the end-user markets in which our products are sold;
• limitations or prohibitions on the manufacture and sale of our products;
• availability of raw materials;
• changes in the cost of raw materials and energy, and our ability to pass through such increases;
• changes in our markets in general;
• fluctuations in foreign currencies;
29
• changes in laws and government regulation impacting our operations or our products;
• the occurrence of regulatory proceedings, claims or litigation;
• the occurrence of cyber-security breaches, terrorist attacks, industrial accidents, natural disasters or climate change;
• hazards associated with chemicals manufacturing;
• the inability to maintain current levels of product or premises liability insurance or the denial of such coverage;
• political unrest affecting the global economy, including adverse effects from terrorism or hostilities;
• political instability affecting our manufacturing operations or joint ventures;
• changes in accounting standards;
• the inability to achieve results from our global manufacturing cost reduction initiatives as well as our ongoing continuous improvement and
rationalization programs;
• changes in the jurisdictional mix of our earnings and changes in tax laws and rates;
• changes in monetary policies, inflation or interest rates that may impact our ability to raise capital or increase our cost of funds, impact the
performance of our pension fund investments and increase our pension expense and funding obligations;
• volatility and uncertainties in the debt and equity markets;
• technology or intellectual property infringement, including cyber-security breaches, and other innovation risks;
• decisions we may make in the future;
• the ability to successfully execute, operate and integrate acquisitions and divestitures, including the integration of Rockwood’s operations, and
realize anticipated synergies and other benefits; and
• the other factors detailed from time to time in the reports we file with the SEC.
We assume no obligation to provide revisions to any forward-looking statements should circumstances change, except as otherwise required by
securities and other applicable laws. The following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following is a discussion and analysis of results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. A discussion of consolidated
financial condition and sources of additional capital is included under a separate heading “Financial Condition and Liquidity” on page 48.
Overview
We are a leading global developer, manufacturer and marketer of highly-engineered specialty chemicals that meets customer needs across a diverse
range of end markets. The end markets we serve include petroleum refining, consumer electronics, energy storage, construction, automotive, steel and
aerospace, lubricants, pharmaceuticals, crop protection, household appliances, heating, ventilation, aluminum finishing, food safety and custom chemistry
services. We believe that our commercial and geographic diversity, technical expertise, innovative capability, flexible, low-cost global manufacturing base,
experienced management team and strategic focus on our core base technologies will enable us to maintain leading market positions in those areas of the
specialty chemicals industry in which we operate.
Secular trends favorably impacting demand within the end markets that we serve combined with our diverse product portfolio, broad geographic
presence and customer-focused solutions will continue to be key drivers to our future earnings growth. We continue to build upon our existing green
solutions portfolio and our ongoing mission to provide innovative, yet commercially viable, clean energy products and services to the marketplace. We
believe our disciplined cost reduction efforts, ongoing productivity improvements and our recently completed acquisition of Rockwood position us well to
take advantage of strengthening economic conditions as they occur while softening the negative impact of the current challenging global economic
environment.
2015 Highlights
• In the first quarter, we increased our quarterly dividend for the 21st consecutive year, to $0.29 per share.
• On January 12, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Rockwood for a purchase price of approximately $5.7 billion.
• In connection with the acquisition of Rockwood, we realigned our organizational structure under three reportable segments: Performance Chemicals,
Refining Solutions and Chemetall Surface Treatment.
• On February 19, 2015, our Chemetall Surface Treatment segment completed the acquisition of all remaining shares of its Shanghai Chemetall joint
venture for a purchase price of $57.6 million.
30
• We repaid our $325.0 million senior notes which matured on February 1, 2015.
• We announced a new leading-edge catalyst that will further strengthen our position in the hydrocracking pre-treat (“HC-PT”) market. Pilot plant
testing of the new HC-PT catalyst is complete and commercial sales have begun.
• On May 1, 2015, our Chemetall Surface Treatment segment completed the acquisition of the aluminum finishing business of Chemal GmbH & Co. KG
(“Chemal GmbH”), based in Hamm, Germany. Cash paid in connection with this acquisition was approximately $2.2 million.
• We announced the start of commissioning activities associated with our new, state-of-the-art lithium carbonate production plant located at our La
Negra site in northern Chile. We believe the 20,000 MT plant will help enable the Company to meet the accelerating demand for lithium.
• We announced our intent to transfer the production of n-Butyllithium from our facility in New Johnsonville, Tennessee, to existing plants in Germany
and Taiwan. The transfer process is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2016. The New Johnsonville facility will continue to manufacture
some specialty lithium products and will support blending operations for customers in North America.
• We announced that we will relocate our corporate headquarters and Performance Chemicals business from Baton Rouge, LA to Charlotte, NC. In
addition, we will relocate Baton Rouge employees in our Refining Solutions business to our existing Clear Lake, TX office. Approximately 120
employees will be relocated to Charlotte or Clear Lake, with the majority of the relocations expected to take place in June 2016.
• On October 15, 2015, we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% senior notes issued by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Rockwood Specialties Group,
Inc., at a redemption price of 103.469% of the principal amount of $1.25 billion, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The 4.625%
senior notes were repaid with proceeds from a new term loan credit facility, comprised of a 364-day term loan facility in an aggregate principal
amount of $300 million and a five-year term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $950 million.
• We announced our intention to add up to 50,000 MT of mineral conversion production capacity to significantly boost battery grade lithium
production to meet the growing needs of the energy storage market, in particular for customers in the global transportation industry utilizing lithium
ion battery technology. Albemarle has commenced feasibility studies and is evaluating potential sites. The plant is expected to be operational in
2020.
• We announced the first commercial application of our AlkyStarTM catalyst technology in Shandong, China. Our zeolite-based AlkyStarTM catalyst
successfully produced high-quality alkylate after start-up of the world’s first solid acid catalyst alkylation unit.
• On November 5, 2015, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Tribotecc metal sulfides business to Treibacher Industrie AG. On January 4, 2016,
the Company closed the sale of this business. Included in the transaction were sites in Vienna and Arnoldstein, Austria, and Tribotecc’s proprietary
sulfide syntheses process. We received net proceeds of approximately $137 million in the first quarter of 2016 from the sale of this business.
• On December 16, 2015, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses to
Huber Engineered Materials, a division of J.M. Huber Corporation. The transaction includes Albemarle’s Martinswerk GmbH subsidiary and
manufacturing facility located in Bergheim, Germany, and Albemarle’s 50% ownership interest in Magnifin Magnesiaprodukte GmbH, a joint-venture
with Radex Heraklith Industriebeteiligung AG at Breitenau, Austria. On February 1, 2016, the Company closed the sale of these businesses and
received net proceeds of approximately $187 million.
• On December 23, 2015, we paid approximately $4.8 million in connection with the acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interests’ share of
Nanjing Chemetall Surface Technologies Co., Ltd.
• We achieved earnings from continuing operations of $360.1 million during 2015 as compared to $230.4 million for 2014. Our operating results
contributed $360.7 million to cash flows from operations in 2015. Earnings from continuing operations for 2015 includes pension and other
postretirement benefit (“OPEB”) actuarial gains of $27.8 million after income taxes, compared to pension and OPEB actuarial losses of $83.3 million
after income taxes in 2014.
Outlook
Bromine Specialties, and (2) Lithium and Advanced Materials, which will include Performance Catalyst Solutions and Curatives. Each unit will have a
dedicated team of sales, product management, research & development, process technology, manufacturing, sourcing, sales and operations planning and
customer service groups and will have full accountability for improving execution through greater asset and market focus, agility and responsiveness. We
expect this change to provide further clarity into the performance of each business.
31
The current global business environment presents a diverse set of opportunities and challenges in the markets we serve, from slow and uneven global
growth, currency exchange volatility, significantly lower crude oil prices, a dynamic pricing environment in bromine derivatives and an ever-changing
landscape in electronics, to the continuous need for cutting edge catalysts and technology by our refinery customers, diverse energy storage needs including
exciting opportunities in electric vehicles, and increasingly stringent environmental standards. Amidst these dynamics, we believe our business fundamentals
are sound and that we are strategically well-positioned as we remain focused on increasing sales volumes, significant deleveraging following our acquisition
of Rockwood, optimizing and improving the value of our portfolio through pricing and product development, managing costs and delivering value to our
customers. We believe that our businesses remain positioned to capitalize on new business opportunities and long-term trends driving growth within our end
markets and to respond quickly to improved economic conditions. Additionally, we are on track to exceed our original expectations regarding synergies from
the acquisition of the Rockwood businesses earlier in the year.
Through 2015, our operations were managed and reported under three reportable segments: Performance Chemicals, Refining Solutions and Chemetall
Surface Treatment. Financial results and discussion about our segments included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are organized according to these
categories except where noted.
Performance Chemicals: We expect 2016 to be a challenging year for Bromine sales and profitability growth due to an expected decline in demand of
clear brine fluids used in offshore drilling projects as well as the expiration of a methyl bromide supply agreement at the end of 2015 that was not replaced.
Through working capital discipline and strong controls on costs, we expect to generate healthy cash flows in the Bromine business despite these challenges.
For Lithium and Advanced Materials, we expect continued strong growth in 2016 led by demand in battery grade applications and continued price
improvement in Lithium. Performance Catalyst Solutions experienced strong growth in 2015 due market demand in general and due to certain competitor
outages, and we expect to maintain a similar level of profitability in 2016.
We believe that the combination of solid, long-term business fundamentals, with our strong cost position, product innovations and effective
management of raw material inventory inflation will enable us to manage our business through end market challenges and to capitalize on opportunities that
are expected with favorable market trends in select end markets and with a more evenly sustained economic recovery.
On a long-term basis for Bromine, we continue to believe that improving global standards of living, widespread digitization, increasing demand for
data management capacity and the potential for increasingly stringent fire safety regulations in developing markets are likely to drive continued demand for
fire safety products. Demand for drilling completion fluids in 2015 held up better than expected, but is likely to still be impacted negatively in the short term
as a result of sustained lower oil prices impacting offshore drilling projects around the world. Longer term, absent an increase in regulatory pressure on
offshore drilling, we would expect this business to resume a solid growth trajectory once oil prices recover from recent levels as we expect that deep water
drilling will continue to increase around the world. We are focused on profitably growing our globally competitive bromine and derivatives production
network to serve all major bromine consuming products and markets. We believe the global supply/demand gap will tighten as demand for existing and
possible new uses of bromine expands over time.
On a long-term basis for Lithium and Advanced Materials, we believe that demand for lithium will continue to grow as new applications for lithium
power continue to be developed and the use of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicles escalates. In addition, we expect growth in
Performance Catalyst Solutions to come from growing global demand for plastics driven by rising standards of living and infrastructure spending,
particularly in Asia and the Middle East.
Refining Solutions: 2015 net sales were down 14% and Adjusted EBITDA was down 23% due largely to declines in clean fuels technology sales
volumes slightly offset by solid growth in heavy oil upgrading volumes. In 2016, despite some near-term concerns about how the price of oil will impact the
crude slate used by refineries and the resulting demand for catalysts, we expect to see continued, sustained high level performance from heavy oil upgrading
as well as improvement in clean fuels technology results due to increased change outs by refiners and an improved product mix, although certain national oil
companies, among others, are expected to look for ways to delay catalysts change outs due to the current oil economic environment.
On a longer term basis, we believe increased global demand for transportation fuels and implementation of more stringent fuel quality requirements will
drive growth in our Refining Solutions business. Delivering superior end-use performance continues to be the most effective way to create sustainable value
in the refinery catalysts industry, and we believe our technologies continue to provide significant performance and financial benefits to refiners challenged to
meet tighter regulations around the world, those managing new contaminants present in North America tight oil, and those in the Middle
32
East and Asia seeking to use heavier feedstock while pushing for higher propylene yields. While lower oil prices may impact the overall crude slate for a
period of time, longer term, we believe that the global crude supply will get heavier and more sour, trends that bode well for catalysts demand. Given this and
based on our technology, current production capacities and expected growth in end market demand, we believe that we remain well-positioned for the future.
Chemetall Surface Treatment: Demand for surface treatment products generally follows the activity levels of metal processing manufacturers,
including the automotive, steel and aerospace industries, as well as products sold to general industrial markets, including heavy equipment, household
appliances, manufacturing, heating, ventilation and aluminum finishing. We believe that our strong customer relationships, service, and our geographic and
end market diversity coupled with the growth coming from recently completed acquisitions, will lead to continued growth for 2016.
On a longer term basis, we expect to continue to generate growth from our focus on new product development, improving process technologies,
expanding our customer base, and broadening our technology capabilities in existing and new markets through internal research and development and bolt-
on acquisitions.
All Other: In 2015, we announced our intention to pursue strategic alternatives for several businesses: minerals-based flame retardants and specialty
chemicals, fine chemistry services and metal sulfides, which together comprise the “All Other” category. We closed on the sale of the metal sulfides business
on January 4, 2016 and we closed on the sale of the minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals business on February 1, 2016.
Corporate: In the first quarter of 2016, we increased our quarterly dividend rate to $0.305 per share. We continue to focus on cash generation, working
capital management and process efficiencies. We expect our global effective tax rate for 2016 to be approximately 23.0%; however, our rate will vary based
on the locales in which income is actually earned and remains subject to potential volatility from changing legislation in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions.
Actuarial gains and losses related to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plan obligations are reflected in Corporate as a component of non-operating
pension and OPEB plan costs under mark-to-market accounting. Results for the year ended December 31, 2015 include an actuarial gain of $38.9 million
($27.8 million after income taxes), as compared to a loss of $130.8 million ($83.3 million after income taxes) for the year ended December 31, 2014.
We remain committed to evaluating the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions or other business development activities that will
complement our business footprint. Additional information regarding our products, markets and financial performance is provided at our web site,
www.albemarle.com. Our web site is not a part of this document nor is it incorporated herein by reference.
33
Results of Operations
The following data and discussion provides an analysis of certain significant factors affecting our results of operations during the periods included in
the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
Selected Financial Data Year Ended December 31, Percentage Change

2015 2014 2013 2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013
(In thousands, except percentages and per share amounts)
NET SALES $ 3,651,335 $ 2,445,548 $ 2,394,270 49 % 2%
Cost of goods sold 2,454,463 1,674,700 1,543,799 47 % 8%
GROSS PROFIT 1,196,872 770,848 850,471 55 % (9)%
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN 32.8% 31.5% 35.5%
Selling, general and administrative expenses 512,274 355,135 158,189 44 % 125 %
Research and development expenses 102,871 88,310 82,246 16 % 7%
Restructuring and other, net (6,804) 25,947 33,361 (126)% (22)%
Acquisition and integration related costs 146,096 30,158 — 384 % *
OPERATING PROFIT 442,435 271,298 576,675 63 % (53)%
OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN 12.1% 11.1% 24.1%
Interest and financing expenses (132,722) (41,358) (31,559) 221 % 31 %
Other income (expenses), net 48,474 (16,761) (6,674) * 151 %
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN NET
INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS 358,187 213,179 538,442 68 % (60)%
Income tax expense 29,122 18,484 134,445 58 % (86)%
Effective tax rate 8.1% 8.7% 25.0%
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF
UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS 329,065 194,695 403,997 69 % (52)%
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of
tax) 30,999 35,742 31,729 (13)% 13 %
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS 360,064 230,437 435,726 56 % (47)%
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of tax) — (69,531) 4,108 (100)% *
NET INCOME 360,064 160,906 439,834 124 % (63)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (25,158) (27,590) (26,663) (9)% 3%
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ALBEMARLE
CORPORATION $ 334,906 $ 133,316 $ 413,171 151 % (68)%
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS AS
A PERCENTAGE OF NET SALES 9.9% 9.4% 18.2%
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations $ 3.01 $ 2.57 $ 4.88 17 % (47)%
Discontinued operations — (0.88) 0.05 (100)% *
$ 3.01 $ 1.69 $ 4.93 78 % (66)%
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations $ 3.00 $ 2.57 $ 4.85 17 % (47)%
Discontinued operations — (0.88) 0.05 (100)% *
$ 3.00 $ 1.69 $ 4.90 78 % (66)%
* Percentage calculation is not meaningful.
34
Comparison of 2015 to 2014

Net Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recorded net sales of $3.65 billion, a 49% increase compared to net sales of $2.45 billion for the
corresponding period of 2014. Approximately $1.4 billion of the increase was attributable to the impact of the Rockwood acquisition. Excluding the
acquisition of Rockwood, net sales decreased by $210.1 million primarily due to $106.5 million of unfavorable sales volumes, $87.7 million of unfavorable
impacts from currency translation and $15.8 million of unfavorable price impacts due to market conditions and portfolio mix. The unfavorable sales volumes
were due to lower Clean Fuels Technologies, Fine Chemistry Services, and Bromine volumes partially offset by increased Heavy Oil Upgrading and PCS
sales volumes. The unfavorable price impacts were primarily due to lower Refining Solutions, Fine Chemistry Services, and PCS prices partly offset by
favorable price impacts for Bromine.
Gross Profit
For the year ended December 31, 2015, our gross profit increased $426.0 million, or 55%, from the corresponding 2014 period. Gross profit for 2015
includes $1.4 million of pension and OPEB benefits (including mark-to-market actuarial gains of $2.0 million) allocated to cost of good sold, as compared to
$36.5 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of $36.4 million) allocated to cost of goods sold in 2014. Excluding the
$37.9 million increase in gross profit related to pension and OPEB plans, gross profit increased by $388.1 million due to $470.9 million of gross profit
attributable to the performance of the acquired Rockwood business, which includes a $75.9 million charge for the utilization of the inventory markup
recorded as part of purchase accounting for the acquisition, partially offset by an $82.8 million decrease in gross profit due primarily to unfavorable impacts
from currency translation, unfavorable price impacts due to market conditions and portfolio mix and lower overall sales volumes. Overall, these factors
contributed to a higher gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2015 of 32.8%, up from 31.5% in the corresponding period of 2014. Excluding
the impact of pension and OPEB mark-to-market actuarial losses and gains, our gross profit margin was 32.7% in 2015 and 33.0% in 2014.
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2014 is primarily attributable to: (a) a decrease in the weighted-average discount rate for our pension plans to
4.03% from 5.00% to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2014 measurement date, and (b) changes in mortality assumptions, and to a lesser
extent, other demographic assumptions related to our pension plans. The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2014 was partially offset by a higher return on
pension plan assets in 2014 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our
U.S. pension plan assets was 8.87% versus an expected return of 6.91%.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2015, our selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased $157.1 million, or 44%, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2014. SG&A expenses for 2015 includes approximately $37.4 million of pension and OPEB benefits (including mark-to-market
actuarial gains of $36.9 million) allocated to SG&A, as compared to $97.1 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of
$94.5 million) allocated to SG&A in 2014. Excluding the $134.5 million decrease in SG&A related to pension and OPEB plans, SG&A increased by $291.6
million, or 13.0%, due to the acquisition of Rockwood, net of realized synergies. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 14.0% in 2015, compared
to 14.5% in 2014. Excluding the impact of pension and OPEB mark-to-market actuarial losses and gains, SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were
15.0% in 2015 and 10.7% in 2014.
The mark-to-market actuarial gain in 2015 is primarily attributable to: (a) an increase in the weighted-average discount rate to 4.67% from 4.18% for
our U.S. pension plans and to 2.89% from 2.34% for our foreign pension plans to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2015 measurement date,
and (b) changes in mortality assumptions. The mark-to-market actuarial gain in 2015 was partially offset by a lower return on pension plan assets in 2015
than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S. and foreign pension
plan assets was (2.74)% versus an expected return of 6.85%. The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2014 resulted from the factors as discussed in Gross Profit
above.
Research and Development Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2015, our R&D expenses increased $14.6 million, or 16%, from the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to
the acquisition of Rockwood. As a percentage of net sales, R&D expenses were 2.8% in 2015, compared to 3.6% in 2014.
35
Restructuring and Other, Net
Included in restructuring and other, net, for the year ended December 31, 2015 is a gain of $6.8 million ($5.4 million after income taxes) recognized
upon the sale of land in Avonmouth, U.K., which was utilized by the phosphorus flame retardants business we exited in 2012. Restructuring and other, net, of
$25.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes the following items:
(a) Estimated costs of approximately $20.5 million ($13.6 million after income taxes) in connection with action we initiated to reduce the high cost
supply capacity of certain aluminum alkyl products, primarily through the termination of a third party manufacturing contract.
(b) An impairment charge of $3.0 million ($1.9 million after income taxes) for certain capital project costs also related to aluminum alkyls capacity
which we do not expect to recover.
(c) Other net charges of $2.4 million ($1.4 million after income taxes), mainly in connection with a write-off of certain multi-product facility project
costs that we do not expect to recover in future periods.
Acquisition and Integration Related Costs
The year ended December 31, 2015 includes $137.7 million of acquisition and integration related costs directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood
(mainly consisting of professional services and advisory fees, costs to achieve synergies, relocation costs, and other integration costs) and $8.4 million of
costs in connection with other significant projects. The year ended December 31, 2014 includes $23.6 million of acquisition and integration related costs
directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood and $6.6 million of costs in connection with other significant projects.
Interest and Financing Expenses
Interest and financing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased $91.4 million to $132.7 million from the corresponding 2014 period,
due mainly to higher borrowing levels in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood. Included in 2015 is a charge of approximately $5.4 million related
to the early extinguishment of the 4.625% senior notes we assumed from Rockwood.
Other Income (Expenses), Net
Other income (expenses), net, for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $48.5 million versus ($16.8) million for the corresponding 2014 period. The
change was due mainly to $54.7 million of favorable foreign currency translation gains and a $12.3 million reduction in amortization of bridge facility fees
and other financing fees related to the acquisition of Rockwood. The foreign currency gains are primarily related to cash denominated in U.S. Dollars held by
foreign subsidiaries where the European Union Euro serves as the functional currency.
Income Tax Expense
The effective income tax rate for 2015 was 8.1% compared to 8.7% for 2014. Our effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory income
tax rates in the comparative periods mainly due to the impact of earnings from outside the U.S, including net impacts on the release of the liability from
earnings that were not indefinitely invested and were repatriated from legacy Rockwood. Our effective tax rate for 2015 was affected by discrete net tax
benefit items of $41.6 million related mainly to the release of prior year uncertain tax positions associated with lapses in statutes of limitations and audit
closures, items associated with U.S. provision to return adjustments, and an OPEB plan termination gain recorded in the period. Our effective income tax rate
in 2014 was affected by tax benefits of $74.2 million related to restructuring charges, a pension plan actuarial loss and the release of reserves related
principally to the expiration of the U.S. federal statute of limitations. See Note 20, “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part
II, Item 8 of this report for a reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to our effective rate for 2015 and 2014.
Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Investments
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments was $31.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $35.7 million in the same
period last year. The current year equity in net income of unconsolidated investments includes a $27.1 million charge for utilization of fair value adjustments
to inventories as well as a $2.0 million impairment charge related to our unconsolidated investment in Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores SA. Excluding theses
charges, equity in net income of unconsolidated investments increased by $24.4 million primarily due to equity income derived from unconsolidated
investments we acquired from Rockwood (Performance Chemicals and Chemetall Surface Treatment segments), partially offset
36
by lower equity income reported by our Refining Solutions segment joint venture Nippon Ketjen Company Limited primarily due to lower sales volumes.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations, after income taxes, of $69.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a pre-tax charge of $85.5
million ($65.7 million after income taxes) related to the sale of our antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets to SI Group, Inc., which closed
on September 1, 2014. This charge represented the difference between the carrying value of the related assets and their fair value as determined by the sales
price less estimated costs to sell, and was primarily attributable to the write-off of goodwill, intangibles and long-lived assets, net of cumulative foreign
currency translation gains of $17.8 million.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
For the year ended December 31, 2015, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $25.2 million compared to $27.6 million in the same
period last year. This decrease of $2.4 million was due primarily to changes in consolidated income related to our Jordanian joint venture.
Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation increased to $334.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $133.3 million for the
corresponding period of 2014. The total estimated impact of the Rockwood acquisition is income of approximately $3.8 million before income taxes,
including earnings of the acquiree (as included in Note 2, “Acquisitions” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report),
acquisition and integration related costs, interest expense associated with additional borrowings, and other currency transaction gains related to the
execution of the closing. Excluding the impact of the Rockwood acquisition, net income increased approximately $197.8 million primarily due to a $144.4
million decrease in pension and OPEB charges versus the prior year, the loss from discontinued operations and restructuring and other charges in the prior
year of $69.5 million and $25.9 million, respectively, plus the gain on sale of land of $6.8 million in restructuring and other for the 2015 period, partly offset
by unfavorable impacts in operating profit of approximately $48.8 million, including the unfavorable impacts of currency translation.
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax
Total other comprehensive loss, after income taxes, was $360.8 million in 2015 compared to $178.7 million in 2014. The majority of these amounts are
the result of translating our foreign subsidiary financial statements from their local currencies to U.S. Dollars. In 2015, other comprehensive loss from foreign
currency translation adjustments was $413.0 million, mainly as a result of unfavorable movements in the European Union Euro of approximately $279
million, the British Pound Sterling of approximately $49 million, the Brazilian Real of approximately $30 million, the Turkish Lira of approximately $10
million, the Korean Won of approximately $7 million, the Chinese Renminbi of approximately $8 million, the South African Rand of approximately $8
million and a net unfavorable variance in various other currencies totaling approximately $23 million (each approximately $5 million or less). Also included
in total other comprehensive loss for 2015 is income of $50.9 million in connection with the revaluation of our €700.0 million senior notes which were
designated as a hedge of our net investment in foreign operations. In 2014, other comprehensive loss from foreign currency translation adjustments was
$168.8 million, mainly as a result of unfavorable movements in the European Union Euro of approximately $124 million, the Chinese Renminbi of
approximately $18 million and the Brazilian Real of approximately $13 million. Also included in total other comprehensive loss for 2014 is a realized loss
of $21.0 million related to an interest rate swap which settled in the fourth quarter of 2014, and income of $11.4 million in connection with the revaluation of
our €700.0 million senior notes and settlement of related foreign currency forward contracts, both of which were designated as a hedge of our net investment
in foreign operations.
Segment Information Overview. Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables. Results for
2014 have been recast to reflect the change in segments previously noted and a change in our measure of segment profit or loss to adjusted EBITDA as
discussed below. During the first quarter we announced our intention to pursue strategic alternatives for several businesses - mineral flame retardants, fine
chemistry services and metal sulfides, which together comprise the “All Other” category. The Corporate category is not considered to be a segment and
includes corporate-related items not allocated to the reportable segments. Pension and OPEB service cost (which represents the benefits earned by active
employees during the period) and amortization of prior service cost or benefit are allocated to the segments, All Other, and Corporate, whereas the remaining
components of pension and OPEB benefits cost or credit (“Non-operating
37
pension and OPEB items”) are included in Corporate. Segment data includes intersegment transfers of raw materials at cost and allocations for certain
corporate costs.
Beginning in 2015, the Company uses earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for certain non-recurring or unusual
items such as restructuring charges, facility divestiture charges, non-operating pension and OPEB items and other significant non-recurring items (“adjusted
EBITDA”), on a segment basis to assess the ongoing performance of the Company’s business segments. Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not
required by, or presented in accordance with, U.S. GAAP. The Company has reported adjusted EBITDA because management believes it provides
transparency to investors and enables period-to-period comparability of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative
to Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
Year Ended December 31, Percentage Change

2015 % 2014 % 2015 vs. 2014
(In thousands, except percentages)
Net sales:
Performance Chemicals $ 1,610,319 44.1 % $ 1,121,645 45.9 % 44 %
Refining Solutions 729,261 20.0 % 852,139 34.8 % (14)%
Chemetall Surface Treatment 824,906 22.6 % — —% *
All Other 471,434 12.9 % 471,764 19.3 % —%
Corporate 15,415 0.4 % — —% *
Total net sales $ 3,651,335 100.0 % $ 2,445,548 100.0 % 49 %
Adjusted EBITDA:
Performance Chemicals $ 535,520 55.8 % $ 306,572 54.5 % 75 %
Refining Solutions 197,595 20.6 % 256,485 45.6 % (23)%
Chemetall Surface Treatment 202,028 21.1 % — —% *
All Other 53,993 5.6 % 73,973 13.2 % (27)%
Corporate (29,814) (3.1)% (74,875) (13.3)% (60)%
Total adjusted EBITDA $ 959,322 100.0 % $ 562,155 100.0 % 71 %
* Percentage calculation is not meaningful.
38
See below for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA, the non-GAAP financial measure, to Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the
most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP, (in thousands):
Chemetall Reportable
Performance Refining Surface Segments Consolidated
Chemicals Solutions Treatment Total All Other Corporate Total
2015
Adjusted EBITDA $ 535,520 $ 197,595 $ 202,028 $ 935,143 $ 53,993 $ (29,814) $ 959,322
Depreciation and amortization (120,248) (34,039) (78,903) (233,190) (18,183) (8,703) (260,076)
Utilization of inventory markup(a) (79,977) — (20,030) (100,007) (3,029) — (103,036)
Restructuring and other, net — — — — — 6,804 6,804
Acquisition and integration related costs (b) — — — — — (146,096) (146,096)
Interest and financing expenses — — — — — (132,722) (132,722)
Income tax expense — — — — — (29,122) (29,122)
Non-operating pension and OPEB items — — — — — 46,244 46,244
Other(c) — (1,971) — (1,971) — (4,441) (6,412)
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle
Corporation $ 335,295 $ 161,585 $ 103,095 $ 599,975 $ 32,781 $ (297,850) $ 334,906
2014
Adjusted EBITDA $ 306,572 $ 256,485 $ — $ 563,057 $ 73,973 $ (74,875) $ 562,155
Depreciation and amortization(d) (51,707) (32,670) — (84,377) (13,478) (2,552) (100,407)
Restructuring and other, net — — — — — (25,947) (25,947)
Loss from discontinued operations (net of tax) — — — — — (69,531) (69,531)
Non-operating pension and OPEB items — — — — — (125,462) (125,462)
Other(e) — — — — — (17,492) (17,492)
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle
Corporation $ 254,865 $ 223,815 $ — $ 478,680 $ 60,495 $ (405,859) $ 133,316
(a) In connection with the acquisition of Rockwood, the Company valued Rockwood’s existing inventory at fair value as of the Acquisition Closing Date, which resulted in a
markup of the underlying net book value of the inventory totaling approximately $103 million. The inventory markup was expensed over the estimated remaining selling
period. For the year ended December 31, 2015, $75.9 million was included in Cost of goods sold, and Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments was reduced by
$27.1 million, related to the utilization of the inventory markup.
(b) See “Acquisition and Integration Related Costs” on page 36 for a description of these costs.
(c) Refining Solutions includes an impairment charge of approximately $2.0 million related to our unconsolidated investment in Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores SA. Corporate
includes approximately $4.4 million of financing-related fees expensed in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood.
(d) Excludes discontinued operations.
(e) Financing-related fees expensed in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood.
Performance Chemicals
Performance Chemicals segment net sales for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $1.61 billion, up $488.7 million, or 44%, in comparison to the
same period in 2014. The increase was driven mainly by the acquisition of Rockwood, $26.0 million of favorable PCS volumes due to higher demand, and
$9.4 million of favorable Bromine price impacts on certain products, partly offset by $21.8 million of unfavorable Bromine volumes on weaker demand and
$27.9 million of unfavorable impacts from currency translation, primarily due to the weaker European Union Euro. Adjusted EBITDA for Performance
Chemicals was up 75%, or $228.9 million, to $535.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014, with
approximately $213.5 million due to the acquisition of Rockwood, $24.6 million in higher PCS sales volumes due to strong demand, and $9.4 million in
favorable Bromine pricing impacts due to market conditions, offset partly by $16.1 million of unfavorable impacts of currency translation, primarily due to
the weaker European Union Euro.
39
Refining Solutions
Refining Solutions segment net sales for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $729.3 million, a decrease of $122.9 million, or 14%, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2014. This decrease was predominantly due to $103.5 million of unfavorable Clean Fuels Technology volumes due to customer
demand, $15.0 million unfavorable Clean Fuels Technology and Heavy Oil Upgrading pricing impacts due to product and customer mix, and $30.4 million
of unfavorable impacts from currency translation, primarily due to the weaker European Union Euro, partially offset by $30.4 million of higher Heavy Oil
Upgrading volumes. Refining Solutions adjusted EBITDA decreased 23%, or $58.9 million, to $197.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 in
comparison to the corresponding period of 2014. This decrease was due primarily to lower overall sales volumes primarily in Clean Fuels Technology due to
lower demand, unfavorable pricing and mix due to economic conditions and specific crude feeds, and unfavorable impacts of currency translation, primarily
due to the weaker European Union Euro, partially offset by $21.7 million in favorable pricing on raw materials and natural gas.
Chemetall Surface Treatment
Arising from the acquisition of Rockwood, Chemetall Surface Treatment segment net sales and adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2015
were $824.9 million, and $202.0 million, respectively.
All Other
All Other net sales for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $471.4 million, a decrease of $0.3 million compared to the year ended December 31,
2014. The decrease was driven mainly by $55.3 million of unfavorable Fine Chemistry Services volumes, and $29.4 million of unfavorable impacts from
currency translation impacts, primarily due to the weaker European Union Euro, offset by the acquisition of Rockwood. All Other adjusted EBITDA was
down 27%, or $20.0 million, for the year ended December 31, 2015 in comparison to the same period of 2014. This decrease was due primarily to lower
overall sales and unfavorable impacts from currency translation, primarily due to the weaker European Union Euro, partially offset by the acquisition of
Rockwood.
Corporate
Corporate adjusted EBITDA was a charge of $29.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $45.1 million, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2014. The change was due mainly to $52.7 million of foreign currency translation gains and achieved synergies partially offset by the
acquisition of Rockwood. The foreign translation gains are primarily related to cash denominated in U.S. Dollars held by foreign subsidiaries where the
European Union Euro serves as the functional currency.
Comparison of 2014 to 2013

Net Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded net sales of $2.45 billion, a 2% increase compared to net sales of $2.39 billion for the
corresponding period of 2013. This increase was due primarily to favorable volume impacts of approximately $60.1 million in Refining Solutions, $11.3
million in Minerals and $8.3 million in Performance Chemicals partially offset by unfavorable volume impacts of approximately $27.8 million in Fine
Chemistry Services and unfavorable currency impacts of approximately $2.2 million due to a stronger U.S. Dollar as we closed out the year.
Gross Profit
For the year ended December 31, 2014, our gross profit decreased $79.6 million, or 9%, from the corresponding 2013 period. Our gross profit for 2014
was impacted by approximately $36.5 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of $36.4 million) allocated to cost of
goods sold, as compared to $42.2 million of pension and OPEB benefits (including mark-to-market actuarial gains of $42.7 million) allocated to cost of
goods sold in 2013. Overall, these factors contributed to our gross profit margin of 31.5% for 2014, down from 35.5% in 2013. Excluding the impact of
pension and OPEB mark-to-market actuarial losses and gains, our gross profit margin was 33.0% in 2014 and 33.7% in 2013.
The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2014 is primarily attributable to: (a) a decrease in the weighted-average discount rate for our pension plans to 4.03%
from 5.00% to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2014 measurement date, and (b) changes in mortality assumptions, and to a lesser extent,
other demographic assumptions related to our pension plans. The mark-to-market actuarial loss in 2014 was partially offset by a higher return on pension
plan assets in 2014 than was expected, as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance. The weighted-average actual return on our U.S.
pension plan assets was 8.87% versus an expected return of 6.91%.
40
The mark-to-market actuarial gain in 2013 is primarily attributable to: (a) an increase in the weighted-average discount rate for our pension plans to
5.00% from 4.04% to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2013 measurement date; (b) the weighted-average actual return on U.S. pension plan
assets of 15.07% was higher than the expected return of 7.25% as a result of overall market and investment portfolio performance; and (c) changes in
demographic assumptions related to our pension plans, such as mortality rates, rates of compensation and other factors.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2014, our SG&A expenses increased $196.9 million, or 125%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. This
increase was primarily due to unfavorable pension and OPEB items and incentive compensation costs. SG&A expenses for 2014 includes approximately
$97.1 million of pension and OPEB costs (including mark-to-market actuarial losses of $94.5 million), as compared to $90.5 million of pension and OPEB
benefits (including mark-to-market actuarial gains of $96.3 million) in 2013. The mark-to-market actuarial losses and gains in 2014 and 2013, respectively,
resulted from the factors as discussed in Gross Profit above.
As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 14.5% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 6.6% for the corresponding period in
2013. Excluding the impact of pension and OPEB mark-to-market actuarial losses and gains, SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 10.7% in 2014
and 10.6% in 2013.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, our R&D expenses increased $6.1 million, or 7%, from the year ended December 31, 2013, mainly as a result of
higher personnel costs and higher spending for outside services. As a percentage of net sales, R&D expenses were 3.6% in 2014, compared to 3.4% in 2013.
Restructuring and Other, Net
Restructuring and other, net, of $25.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes the following items:
(a) Estimated costs of approximately $20.5 million ($13.6 million after income taxes) in connection with action we initiated to reduce the high cost
supply capacity of certain aluminum alkyl products, primarily through the termination of a third party manufacturing contract.
(b) An impairment charge of $3.0 million ($1.9 million after income taxes) for certain capital project costs also related to aluminum alkyls capacity
which we do not expect to recover.
(c) Other net charges of $2.4 million ($1.4 million after income taxes), mainly in connection with a write-off of certain multi-product facility project
costs that we do not expect to recover in future periods.
In connection with a realignment of our operating segments effective January 1, 2014, in the fourth quarter of 2013, we initiated a workforce reduction
plan which resulted in a reduction of approximately 230 employees worldwide. We recorded charges of $33.4 million ($21.9 million after income taxes)
during the year ended December 31, 2013 for termination benefits and other costs related to this workforce reduction plan.
Acquisition and Integration Related Costs
The year ended December 31, 2014 includes $23.6 million of acquisition and integration related costs directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood
and $6.6 million of costs in connection with other significant projects. Acquisition-related costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2013 are
included in SG&A expenses and were not significant.
Interest and Financing Expenses
Interest and financing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $9.8 million to $41.4 million from the corresponding 2013 period, due
mainly to higher borrowing levels in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood and decreases in interest capitalized on lower average construction work
in progress balances in the 2014 period.
Other Expenses, Net
Other expenses, net, for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $16.8 million versus $6.7 million for the corresponding 2013 period. This increase was
due to $16.7 million of amortized bridge facility fees and $1.0 million of other financing fees in the 2014 period related to the acquisition of Rockwood,
partially offset by net favorable items of $7.6 million primarily related to favorable currency impacts compared to the corresponding period in 2013 due to
more effective management of currency risks.
41
Income Tax Expense
The effective income tax rate for 2014 was 8.7% compared to 25.0% for 2013. Our effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory
income tax rates in the comparative periods mainly due to the impact of earnings from outside the U.S. Our effective income tax rate in 2014 was affected by
tax benefits of $74.2 million related to restructuring charges, a pension plan actuarial loss and the release of reserves related principally to the expiration of
the U.S. federal statute of limitations. See Note 20, “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a
reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to our effective rate for 2014 and 2013.
Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Investments
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments was $35.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $31.7 million in the same
period last year. This increase was due primarily to higher equity income reported by our Refining Solutions segment joint ventures Nippon Ketjen Company
Limited and Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores SA, our Performance Chemicals segment joint venture Stannica, and our Magnifin joint venture (included in
All Other), partly offset by lower equity income amounts reported by our Refining Solutions segment joint venture Eurecat.
(Loss) Income from Discontinued Operations
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, after income taxes, was ($69.5) million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $4.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2013. Included in 2014 is a pre-tax charge of ($85.5) million ($65.7 million after income taxes), which represented the
difference between the carrying value of the related assets and their fair value as determined by the sales price less estimated costs to sell. This charge was
primarily attributable to the write-off of goodwill, intangibles and long-lived assets, net of cumulative foreign currency translation gains of $17.8 million.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
For the year ended December 31, 2014, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $27.6 million compared to $26.7 million in the same
period last year. This increase of $0.9 million was due primarily to higher profits of our consolidated joint venture JBC in the 2014 period.
Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation decreased to $133.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $413.2 million for the
corresponding period of 2013 primarily due to an unfavorable impact of $73.6 million (after income taxes) related to discontinued operations, unfavorable
impacts of $266.4 million related to pension and OPEB items mainly resulting from an actuarial loss in 2014 compared to an actuarial gain in 2013, charges
of $30.2 million in 2014 for certain significant acquisition-related costs (of which $23.6 million relates to the acquisition of Rockwood), higher
manufacturing and SG&A costs of approximately $33.0 million, higher interest and financing expenses of $9.8 million, and higher other expenses, net, of
$10.1 million, partly offset by lower income tax expense of $116.0 million, lower restructuring and other, net, of $7.4 million, favorable volume impacts of
approximately $12.2 million on market demand, and lower variable input costs of approximately $9.3 million.
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, after income taxes, was ($178.7) million in 2014 compared to $31.3 million in 2013. The majority of these
amounts are the result of translating our foreign subsidiary financial statements from their local currencies to U.S. Dollars. In 2014, other comprehensive (loss)
from foreign currency translation adjustments was ($168.8) million, mainly as a result of unfavorable movements of approximately $(124) million in the
European Union Euro, $(18) million in the Chinese Renminbi and ($13) million in the Brazilian Real. Also included in total other comprehensive (loss)
income, for 2014 is ($21.0) million related to a realized loss on an interest rate swap which settled in the fourth quarter, and $11.4 million in connection with
the revaluation of our €700.0 million senior notes and settlement of related foreign currency forward contracts, both of which were designated as a hedge of
our net investment in foreign operations. In 2013, other comprehensive income from foreign currency translation adjustments was $31.7 million, mainly as a
result of favorable movements in the European Union Euro of approximately $42 million, partially offset by unfavorable movements in the Brazilian Real of
approximately $14 million.
42
Year Ended December 31, Percentage Change

2014 % 2013 % 2014 vs. 2013
(In thousands, except percentages)
Net sales:
Performance Chemicals $ 1,121,645 45.9 % $ 1,141,890 47.7 % (2)%
Refining Solutions 852,139 34.8 % 775,207 32.4 % 10 %
All Other 471,764 19.3 % 477,173 19.9 % (1)%
Total net sales $ 2,445,548 100.0 % $ 2,394,270 100.0 % 2%
Adjusted EBITDA:
Performance Chemicals $ 306,572 54.5 % $ 364,712 65.4 % (16)%
Refining Solutions 256,485 45.6 % 190,388 34.1 % 35 %
All Other 73,973 13.2 % 71,691 12.9 % 3%
Corporate (74,875) (13.3)% (69,240) (12.4)% 8%
Total adjusted EBITDA $ 562,155 100.0 % $ 557,551 100.0 % 1%
most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with GAAP, (in thousands):
Reportable
Performance Refining Segments Consolidated
Chemicals Solutions Total All Other Corporate Total
2014
Adjusted EBITDA $ 306,572 $ 256,485 $ 563,057 $ 73,973 $ (74,875) $ 562,155
Depreciation and amortization(a) (51,707) (32,670) (84,377) (13,478) (2,552) (100,407)
Restructuring and other, net — — — — (25,947) (25,947)
Acquisition and integration related costs (b) — — — — (30,158) (30,158)
Interest and financing expenses — — — — (41,358) (41,358)
Income tax expense — — — — (18,484) (18,484)
Loss from discontinued operations (net of tax) — — — — (69,531) (69,531)
Non-operating pension and OPEB items — — — — (125,462) (125,462)
Other(c) — — — — (17,492) (17,492)
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 254,865 $ 223,815 $ 478,680 $ 60,495 $ (405,859) $ 133,316
2013
Adjusted EBITDA $ 364,712 $ 190,388 $ 555,100 $ 71,691 $ (69,240) $ 557,551
Depreciation and amortization(a) (46,225) (33,580) (79,805) (13,323) (2,188) (95,316)
Restructuring and other, net — — — — (33,361) (33,361)
Interest and financing expenses — — — — (31,559) (31,559)
Income tax expense — — — — (134,445) (134,445)
Income from discontinued operations (net of tax) — — — — 4,108 4,108
Non-operating pension and OPEB items — — — — 146,193 146,193
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 318,487 $ 156,808 $ 475,295 $ 58,368 $ (120,492) $ 413,171
(a) Excludes discontinued operations.

(b) See “Acquisition and Integration Related Costs” on page 41 for a description of these costs.
(c) Financing-related fees expensed in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood.
43
Performance Chemicals
Performance Chemicals segment net sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $1.12 billion, down $20.2 million, or 2%, in comparison to the
same period in 2013. The decrease was due to lower Bromine sales volumes of $28.5 million, unfavorable Bromine pricing of $16.6 million, unfavorable PCS
pricing of $8.7 million and $3.3 million of unfavorable currency exchange impacts partially offset by $36.7 million of increased PCS sales volumes.
Adjusted EBITDA for Performance Chemicals was down 16%, or $58.1 million, to $306.6 million for the year ended 2014 compared to 2013, as a result of
lower pricing due to market conditions, higher manufacturing and SG&A costs of approximately $22.0 million, and unfavorable currency impacts of
approximately $2.3 million mainly due to the weaker Japanese yen.
Refining Solutions
Refining Solutions segment net sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $852.1 million, an increase of $76.9 million, or 10%, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily due $35.1 million of increased Clean Fuels Technology sales volumes, $23.7 million of increase
Heavy Oil Upgrading sales volumes, $1.4 million of increased Chemical Catalysts sales volumes, and $16.6 million of favorable price impacts in both Heavy
Oil Upgrading and Clean Fuels Technology. Refining Solutions adjusted EBITDA increased 35%, or $66.1 million, to $256.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2014 in comparison to the corresponding period of 2013. This increase was due primarily to higher overall sales volumes, improved pricing,
and a $3.1 million increase in equity income reported by our Nippon Ketjen Company Limited joint venture primarily due to higher sales volumes
All Other
All Other net sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $471.8 million, a decrease of $5.4 million, or 1% compared to the year ended
December 31, 2013. The decrease was driven mainly by $27.8 million of unfavorable Fine Chemistry Services volumes partially offset by $11.3 million of
increased Minerals sales volumes, $9.3 million of improved price impacts and $1.9 million of favorable currency exchange impacts. All Other adjusted
EBITDA was up 3%, or $2.3 million, for the year ended December 31, 2014 in comparison to the same period in 2014. This increase was due primarily to a
favorable mix of sales volumes, $9.3 million of favorable price impacts, and lower SG&A costs.
Corporate
Corporate adjusted EBITDA was a charge of $74.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $5.6 million, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2013. The change was due mainly to unfavorable incentive compensation costs.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Estimates, Assumptions and Reclassifications
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Listed below are
the estimates and assumptions that we consider to be critical in the preparation of our financial statements.
Certain amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Property, Plant and Equipment. We assign the useful lives of our property, plant and equipment based upon our internal engineering estimates which
are reviewed periodically. The estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment range from 2 to 60 years and depreciation is recorded on the
straight-line method, with the exception of our long-term mineral rights, which are depleted on a units-of-production method. We evaluate the recovery of
our property, plant and equipment by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from
the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the
carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized.
Acquisition Method of Accounting. We recognize the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition for acquired businesses. Determining the fair value of these items requires management’s
judgment, the utilization of independent valuation experts and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and
amounts of future cash inflows and
44
outflows, discount rates, customer attrition rates, royalty rates, market prices and tax rates, among other items. The judgments made in the determination of
the estimated fair value assigned to the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the investee, as well as the estimated useful
life of each asset and the duration of each liability, can materially impact the financial statements in periods after acquisition, such as through depreciation
and amortization expense. For more information on our acquisitions and application of the acquisition method, see Note 2, “Acquisitions” to our
consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Income Taxes. We assume the deductibility of certain costs in our income tax filings, and we estimate the future recovery of deferred tax assets,
uncertain tax positions, and indefinite investment assertions.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities. We estimate and accrue the costs required to remediate a specific site depending on site-specific facts and
circumstances. Cost estimates to remediate each specific site are developed by assessing (i) the scope of our contribution to the environmental matter, (ii) the
scope of the anticipated remediation and monitoring plan and (iii) the extent of other parties’ share of responsibility.
Actual results could differ materially from the estimates and assumptions that we use in the preparation of our financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize sales when the revenue is realized or realizable, and has been earned, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. We
recognize net sales as risk and title to the product transfer to the customer, which usually occurs at the time shipment is made. Significant portions of our sales
are sold free on board shipping point or on an equivalent basis, and other transactions are based upon specific contractual arrangements. Our standard terms
of delivery are generally included in our contracts of sale, order confirmation documents and invoices. We recognize revenue from services when
performance of the services has been completed. Where the Company incurs pre-production design and development costs under long-term supply contracts,
these costs are expensed where they relate to the products sold unless contractual guarantees for reimbursement exist. Conversely, these costs are capitalized
if they pertain to equipment that we will own and use in producing the products to be supplied and expect to utilize for future revenue generating activities.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in a business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance which requires
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets to not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. We estimate the fair value
based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows include assumptions about sales volumes, selling prices, raw material prices,
labor and other employee benefit costs, capital additions, income taxes, working capital, and other economic or market-related factors. Significant
management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform
a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation
incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to the
Company and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of
events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying amounts. The Company
performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2015 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date. In addition, no indications of
impairment in any of our reporting units were indicated by the sensitivity analysis.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and in-progress research and development, for impairment annually and
between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible
asset impairment standard allows us to first to assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only
required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than
its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is
performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents, customer lists and trade names, are amortized over their estimated useful lives
generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with our Lithium business and Chemetall
Surface Treatment segment which are amortized using the
45
pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method. We evaluate the recovery of our definite-
lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and
eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying
amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment
loss is recognized. See Note 12, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
Under authoritative accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As
required, we recognize a balance sheet asset or liability for each of our pension and OPEB plans equal to the plan’s funded status as of the measurement date.
The primary assumptions are as follows:
• Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in
the future.
• Expected Return on Plan Assets—We project the future return on plan assets based on prior performance and future expectations for the types of
investments held by the plans as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets for these investments. These projected returns reduce the net
benefit costs recorded currently.
• Rate of Compensation Increase—For salary-related plans, we project employees’ annual pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension
benefits at retirement.
• Mortality Assumptions—Assumptions about life expectancy of plan participants are used in the measurement of related plan obligations.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to
qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. The remaining components of pension and OPEB plan expense, primarily service cost, interest cost and
expected return on assets, are recorded on a quarterly basis. The market-related value of assets equals the actual market value as of the date of measurement.
During 2015, we made changes to assumptions related to discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets. We consider available information
that we deem relevant when selecting each of these assumptions.
Our U.S. defined benefit plans for non-represented employees are closed to new participants, with no additional benefits accruing under these plans as
participants’ accrued benefits have been frozen. In selecting the discount rates for the U.S. plans, we consider expected benefit payments on a plan-by-plan
basis. As a result, the Company uses different discount rates for each plan depending on the demographics of participants and the expected timing of benefit
payments. For 2015, the discount rates were calculated using the results from a bond matching technique developed by Milliman, which matched the future
estimated annual benefit payments of each respective plan against a portfolio of bonds of high quality to determine the discount rate. We believe our selected
discount rates are determined using preferred methodology under authoritative accounting guidance and accurately reflect market conditions as of the
December 31, 2015 measurement date.
In selecting the discount rates for the foreign plans, we look at long-term yields on AA-rated corporate bonds when available. Our actuaries have
developed yield curves based on the yields of constituent bonds in the various indices as well as on other market indicators such as swap rates, particularly at
the longer durations. For the Eurozone, we apply the Aon Hewitt yield curve to projected cash flows from the relevant plans to derive the discount rate. For
the U.K., the discount rate is determined by applying the Aon Hewitt yield curve for typical schemes of similar duration to projected cash flows of
Albemarle’s U.K. plan. In other countries where there is not a sufficiently deep market of high-quality corporate bonds, we set the discount rate by referencing
the yield on government bonds of an appropriate duration.
At December 31, 2015, the weighted-average discount rate for the U.S. and foreign pension plans was increased to 4.67% and 2.89%, respectively, from
4.18% and 2.34%, respectively, at December 31, 2014 to reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2015 measurement date. The discount rate for the
OPEB plans at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 4.59% and 4.15%, respectively.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider past performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plan as
well as the expected long-term allocations of plan assets to these investments. For the years 2015 and 2014, the weighted-average expected rate of return on
U.S. pension plan assets was 6.85% and 6.91%, respectively, and the weighted-average expected rate of return on foreign pension plan assets was 5.63% and
4.00%, respectively. Effective January 1, 2016, the weighted-average expected rate of return on U.S. and foreign pension plan assets is 6.90% and 5.65%,
46
respectively. The weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets for our OPEB plans was 7.00% during 2015 and 2014. There has been no change to
the assumed rate of return on OPEB plan assets effective January 1, 2016.
In projecting the rate of compensation increase, we consider past experience in light of movements in inflation rates. At December 31, 2015, the
assumed weighted-average rate of compensation increase changed to 3.17% from 3.40% for our foreign pension plans.
In October 2014, the Society of Actuaries (“SOA”) published updated mortality tables which reflect increased life expectancy. We revised our mortality
assumptions to incorporate the new set of mortality tables issued by the SOA for purposes of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December
31, 2014. Further, the SOA released an updated Mortality Improvement Scale, MP-2015, on October 8, 2015. The updated improvement scale incorporates
two additional years of mortality data and reflects a trend toward somewhat smaller improvements in longevity. In addition, the SOA released a set of factors
to adjust the RP-2014 Mortality Tables to base year 2006. We revised our mortality assumption to incorporate these updated mortality improvements for
purposes of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2015.
At December 31, 2015, the assumed rate of increase in the pre-65 and post-65 per capita cost of covered health care benefits for U.S. retirees was zero as
the employer-paid premium caps (pre-65 and post-65) were met starting January 1, 2013.
A variance in the assumptions discussed above would have an impact on the projected benefit obligations, the accrued OPEB liabilities, and the annual
net periodic pension and OPEB cost. The following table reflects the sensitivities associated with a hypothetical change in certain assumptions, primarily in
the U.S. (in thousands):
(Favorable) Unfavorable
1% Increase 1% Decrease
Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)
in Benefit Obligation in Benefit Cost in Benefit Obligation in Benefit Cost
Actuarial Assumptions
Discount Rate:
Pension $ (130,542) $ 3,680 $ 157,588 $ (5,268)
Other postretirement benefits $ (5,160) $ 254 $ 6,192 $ (320)
Expected return on plan assets:
Pension * $ (6,712) * $ 6,712
Other postretirement benefits * $ (27) * $ 27
* Not applicable.
Of the $694.1 million total pension and postretirement assets at December 31, 2015, $83.1 million, or approximately 12%, are measured using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Gains or losses attributable to these assets are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as either an increase or
decrease in plan assets. See Note 15, “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of
this report.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance
with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax
rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more
likely than not. In order to record deferred tax assets and liabilities, we are following guidance under ASU 2015-17, which requires deferred tax assets and
liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also provided for operating losses, capital losses and certain tax credit carryovers. A
valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The realization of such deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character.
Although realization is not assured, we do not establish a valuation allowance when we believe it is more likely than not that a net deferred tax asset will be
realized.
We only recognize a tax benefit after concluding that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained upon audit by the respective taxing
authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. Once the recognition
47
threshold is met, we recognize a tax benefit measured as the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is greater than 50% likely to be realized.
Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in Income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income.
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Due to the statute of limitations, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal
income tax audits by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for years prior to 2011. In 2015, the IRS continued its audit of legacy Albemarle’s U.S.
consolidated group for 2011 and 2012. Additionally, in 2015 the IRS finalized its audit of legacy Rockwood’s U.S. consolidated group for 2010 and 2011.
Due to the statute of limitations, we also are no longer subject to U.S. state income tax audits prior to 2010.
With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., several audits are in process. During 2015, the German tax authorities continued and announced audits on
multiple German subsidiaries for various years from 2006 through 2013, the Belgium tax authorities continued the audit of our Belgium subsidiary for 2012
and 2013, and audits of two of our Korean entities for 2011 through 2013 were closed. We also have various audits ongoing for the years 2007 through 2014
related to Russia, the Philippines, India, Italy, and France.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position.
Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying
matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits are uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible
significant increases or decreases in the liability related to uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is
reasonably possible that we could record a decrease in the liability related to uncertain tax positions, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $3.3
million as a result of closure of tax statutes.
We have designated the undistributed earnings of substantially all of our foreign operations as indefinitely invested and as a result we do not provide
for deferred income taxes on the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries. If it is determined that cash can be repatriated with little to no tax consequences,
we may choose to repatriate cash at that time. Our foreign earnings are computed under U.S. federal tax earnings and profits (“E&P”) principles. In general, to
the extent our financial reporting book basis over tax basis of a foreign subsidiary exceeds these E&P amounts, deferred taxes have not been provided, as
they are essentially permanent in duration. The determination of the amount of such unrecognized deferred tax liability is not practicable. We provide for
deferred income taxes on our undistributed earnings of foreign operations that are not deemed to be indefinitely invested.
Stock-based Compensation Expense

The fair value of restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards with a service condition are determined based on the
number of shares or units granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant, and the fair value of stock options is determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of performance unit awards with a service and a market condition are estimated on the date of grant using a
Monte Carlo simulation model. The fair value of these awards is determined after giving effect to estimated forfeitures. Such value is recognized as expense
over the service period, which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant. To the extent restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards,
performance unit awards and stock options are forfeited prior to vesting in excess of the estimated forfeiture rate, the corresponding previously recognized
expense is reversed as an offset to operating expenses.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
Overview
The principal uses of cash in our business generally have been capital investments, funding working capital, acquisitions and repayment of debt. We
also make contributions to our defined benefit pension plans, pay dividends to our shareholders and repurchase shares of our common stock. Historically,
cash to fund the needs of our business has been principally provided by cash from operations, debt financing and equity issuances.
We are continually focused on working capital efficiency particularly in the areas of accounts receivable and inventory. We anticipate that cash on
hand, cash provided by operating activities and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses, satisfy debt service obligations, fund
capital expenditures and other investing activities, fund pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
48
Cash Flow
Our cash and cash equivalents were $213.7 million at December 31, 2015 as compared to $2.5 billion at December 31, 2014. Cash provided by
operating activities was $360.7 million, $492.6 million and $432.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2015 versus 2014 was primarily due to higher acquisition and integration related costs in
connection with the Rockwood acquisition, higher payments for interest and higher payments for income taxes in 2015, as compared to 2014. The increase in
cash provided by operating activities in 2014 versus 2013 was primarily due to a decrease in accounts receivable and higher dividends received from
unconsolidated investments in 2014, partially offset by a decrease in accrued expenses.
During 2015, cash on hand, cash provided by operations, a return of capital from an unconsolidated investment and proceeds from borrowings funded
$2.1 billion for acquisitions, $227.6 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to shareholders of $119.3 million, and
pension and postretirement contributions of $21.6 million. Also during 2015, our consolidated joint venture, JBC, paid dividends of approximately $70
million, which resulted in dividends to noncontrolling interests of $23.3 million. During 2014, cash on hand, cash provided by operations and proceeds from
divestitures funded payments of $150.0 million for repurchases of our common stock, $110.6 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and
equipment, dividends to shareholders of $84.1 million, $33.4 million for the settlement of a forward starting interest rate swap, debt financing costs of $17.6
million and pension and postretirement contributions of $13.9 million. Also during 2014, our consolidated joint venture, JBC, paid dividends of
approximately $51 million, which resulted in dividends to noncontrolling interests of $15.5 million. Additionally, in 2014 we issued a series of new senior
notes totaling approximately $1.9 billion. During 2013, proceeds from borrowings net of repayments, cash on hand and cash provided by operations funded
payments of $582.3 million for repurchases of our common stock, $155.3 million of capital expenditures for plant, machinery and equipment, dividends to
shareholders of $78.1 million and pension and postretirement contributions of $13.3 million. Also during 2013, our consolidated joint venture, JBC, paid
dividends of approximately $38 million, which resulted in dividends to noncontrolling interests of $10.0 million.
Net current assets decreased to approximately $214.3 million at December 31, 2015 from $2.21 billion at December 31, 2014, with the decrease being
largely due to lower cash and cash equivalents in connection with acquisitions in 2015. Included in net current assets at December 31, 2015 is $275.8 million
of assets held for sale, net of related liabilities. Other changes in the components of net current assets are due to the timing of the sale of goods and other
normal transactions leading up to the balance sheet dates and are not the result of any policy changes by the Company, nor do they reflect any change in
either the quality of our net current assets or our expectation of success in converting net working capital to cash in the normal course of business.
Capital expenditures were $227.6 million, $110.6 million and $155.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and
were incurred mainly for plant, machinery and equipment. We expect our capital expenditures to approximate $230 million in 2016 for capacity increases,
cost reduction and continuity of operations projects.
On November 5, 2015, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its Tribotecc metal sulfides business to Treibacher Industrie AG. Included in
the transaction were sites in Vienna and Arnoldstein, Austria, and Tribotecc’s proprietary sulfide syntheses process. On January 4, 2016, the Company closed
the sale of this business. We received net proceeds of approximately $137 million, and we currently expect to record a gain in the first quarter of 2016 related
to the sale of this business.
On December 16, 2015, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its mineral-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses to
Huber Engineered Materials, a division of J.M. Huber Corporation. The transaction includes Albemarle’s Martinswerk GmbH subsidiary and manufacturing
facility located in Bergheim, Germany, and Albemarle’s 50% ownership interest in Magnifin Magnesiaprodukte GmbH, a joint-venture with Radex Heraklith
Industriebeteiligung AG at Breitenau, Austria. On February 1, 2016, the Company closed the sale of these businesses. We received net proceeds of
approximately $187 million, subject to post-closing adjustments. We currently expect to record a gain in the first quarter of 2016 related to the sale of these
businesses.
During 2014 and 2013 we repurchased approximately 2.2 million shares and 9.2 million shares of our common stock, respectively, pursuant to the
terms of our Board authorized share repurchase program. All of the shares repurchased in 2014 and approximately 7.1 million of the shares repurchased in
2013 were also repurchased pursuant to the terms of accelerated share repurchase agreements with major financial institutions. As of December 31, 2015,
there were 3,749,340 remaining shares available for repurchase under the Company’s authorized share repurchase program.
49
On February 26, 2016, we increased our quarterly dividend rate to $0.305 per share, a 5% increase from the quarterly rate of $0.29 per share paid in
2015.
During 2015, we incurred $137.7 million of acquisition and integration related costs directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood (mainly consisting
of professional services and advisory fees, costs to achieve synergies, relocation costs, and other integration costs) and $8.4 million of costs in connection
with other significant projects. In 2014, we incurred $23.6 million of acquisition and integration related costs directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood
and $6.6 million of costs in connection with other significant projects. We currently anticipate incurring additional acquisition and integration related costs
of approximately $60 million through 2016 in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood; actual results may differ from this estimate.
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents included $200.7 million and $558.7 million, respectively, held by our
foreign subsidiaries. The majority of these foreign cash balances are associated with earnings that we have asserted are indefinitely invested and which we
plan to use to support our continued growth plans outside the U.S. through funding of capital expenditures, acquisitions, research, operating expenses or
other similar cash needs of our foreign operations. From time to time, we repatriate cash associated with earnings from our foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. for
normal operating needs through intercompany dividends, but only from subsidiaries whose earnings we have not asserted to be indefinitely invested or
whose earnings qualify as “previously taxed income” as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we
repatriated approximately $122.5 million, $10.0 million and $7.2 million of cash associated with earnings, respectively, as part of these foreign earnings cash
repatriation activities. With regard to the access of internal cash from Albemarle, Rockwood and their respective subsidiaries to help fund the Merger, the
structure implemented did not impact the indefinite investment assertion of Albemarle as no taxes were triggered in the movements of Albemarle’s cash. With
regard to the acquisition of Rockwood, the Company’s purchase price accounting included tax liabilities related to the repatriation of cash that occurred in
2015. As of December 31, 2015, the deferred tax liability has been fully utilized as the repatriation planning has concluded. We have asserted that
substantially all future earnings of former Rockwood entities have been elected to be indefinitely invested.
While we continue to closely monitor our cash generation, working capital management and capital spending in light of continuing uncertainties in
the global economy, we believe that we will continue to have the financial flexibility and capability to opportunistically fund future growth initiatives.
Additionally, we anticipate that future capital spending including business acquisitions, share repurchases and other cash outlays should be financed
primarily with cash flow provided by operations and cash on hand, with additional cash needed, if any, provided by borrowings. The amount and timing of
any additional borrowings will depend on our specific cash requirements.
Long-Term Debt
Our $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on January 20, 2005 and bearing interest at a rate of 5.10%, matured and were
repaid on February 1, 2015. We currently have the following senior notes outstanding:
Issue Month/Year Principal (in millions) Interest Rate Interest Payment Dates Maturity Date
December 2014 €700.0 1.875% December 8 December 8, 2021
November 2014 $250.0 3.00% June 1 December 1 December 1, 2019
December 2010 $350.0 4.50% June 15 December 15 December 15, 2020
Our senior notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of our other senior unsecured indebtedness from time to time outstanding.
The senior notes are effectively subordinated to any of our existing or future secured indebtedness and to the existing and future indebtedness of our
subsidiaries. As is customary for such long-term debt instruments, each senior note outstanding has terms that allow us to redeem the notes before their
maturity, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes to
be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest thereon (exclusive of interest accrued to the
date of redemption) discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis using the comparable government rate (as defined in the indentures governing
the senior notes) plus between 25 and 40 basis points, depending on the note, plus, in each case, accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption. Holders
may require us to purchase such notes at 101% upon a change of control triggering event, as defined in the indentures. The senior notes are
50
subject to typical events of default, including bankruptcy and insolvency events, nonpayment and the acceleration of certain subsidiary indebtedness of $40
million or more caused by a nonpayment default.
Upon completion of the Rockwood acquisition, we assumed Rockwood’s senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.25 billion. These
senior notes bore interest at a rate of 4.625% payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, and had a scheduled maturity of October 15,
2020. Under the terms of the indenture governing the 4.625% senior notes, as amended and supplemented, on October 15, 2015, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc., redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% senior notes at a redemption price equal to 103.469% of the principal
amount of the notes, representing a premium of $43.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The guarantees of the 4.625% senior
notes and the senior notes we issued in 2014 were released upon repayment of the 4.625% senior notes.
The 4.625% senior notes we assumed from Rockwood were repaid with proceeds from a new term loan agreement we entered into on September 14,
2015 (the “September 2015 Term Loan Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Administrative Agent”) and certain other lenders. The September
2015 Term Loan Agreement provides for borrowings under a 364-day term loan facility (the “364-Day Facility”) and a five-year term loan facility (the “Five-
Year Facility”), or collectively, the “Term loan facilities.” As of December 31, 2015, aggregate amounts outstanding under the 364-Day Facility and the Five-
Year Facility were $300.0 million and $950.0 million, respectively. As of February 19, 2016, we repaid the 364-Day Facility in full and we repaid
approximately $31 million of borrowings under the Five-Year Facility, each primarily with proceeds from the sale of the Company’s Tribotecc metal sulfides
business and the sale of the Company’s minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses, both of which closed in the first quarter of 2016.
Borrowings under the facilities bear interest equal to, at the option of the Company: (a) the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin ranging
from 1.000% to 1.875% per annum depending upon the long-term, unsecured, senior, non-credit enhanced debt rating of the Company, or (b) a base rate
(defined as the highest of (i) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%; (ii) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by the
Administrative Agent as its “prime rate”; or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%) plus a margin of 0.000% to 0.875% per annum depending upon the long-
term, unsecured, senior, non-credit enhanced debt rating of the Company. As of December 31, 2015, the interest rate on both Term loan facilities was LIBOR
plus 1.375%.
Borrowings under the 364-Day Facility were required to be repaid 364 days after initial funding. Borrowings under the Five-Year Facility are required
to be repaid in equal quarterly installments on the last business day of each March, June, September and December, beginning with September 30, 2016, and
ending with the last such day to occur prior to the fifth anniversary after initial funding (each a “Payment Date”), in an aggregate principal amount equal to
(a) in the case of each Payment Date occurring on or after the first anniversary and prior to the second anniversary of initial funding, 1.25% of the aggregate
principal amount of such loans, and (b) in the case of each Payment Date occurring on or after the second anniversary of initial funding, equal to 2.5% of the
aggregate principal amount of such loans. On the fifth anniversary after initial funding, any remaining amounts outstanding under the Five-Year Facility
become due and payable. Additionally, the agreement requires that proceeds from divestitures of the Company’s Tribotecc metal sulfides business and the
Company’s minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses, and intended divestiture of its Fine Chemistry Services business, must be
used to repay amounts outstanding under the September 2015 Term Loan Agreement. Borrowings under the September 2015 Term Loan Agreement are
subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio requirement that is aligned with the maximum leverage ratio
requirement of our February 2014 Credit Agreement.
Our revolving, unsecured credit agreement dated as of February 7, 2014, as amended, (the “February 2014 Credit Agreement”) currently provides for
borrowings of up to $1.0 billion and matures on February 7, 2020. Borrowings bear interest at variable rates based on the LIBOR for deposits in the relevant
currency plus an applicable margin which ranges from 1.000% to 1.700%, depending on the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s Ratings
Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”). The applicable margin on the facility was 1.300% as of December 31,
2015. There were no borrowings outstanding under the February 2014 Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2015.
Borrowings under the February 2014 Credit Agreement are conditioned upon compliance with the following covenants: (a) consolidated funded debt,
as defined in the agreement, must be less than or equal to 3.50 times consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, which reflects adjustments for certain
non-recurring or unusual items such as restructuring charges, facility divestiture charges and other significant non-recurring items (herein “consolidated
adjusted EBITDA” or “adjusted EBITDA”), as of the end of any fiscal quarter; (b) with the exception of certain liens as specified in the agreement, liens may
not attach to assets when the aggregate amount of all indebtedness secured by such liens plus unsecured subsidiary indebtedness, other than indebtedness
incurred by our subsidiaries under the February 2014 Credit Agreement, would exceed 20% of consolidated net worth, as defined in the agreement; and
(c) with the exception of certain indebtedness as specified in the agreement, subsidiary indebtedness may not exceed the difference between 20% of
consolidated net worth, as defined in the agreement, and indebtedness secured by liens permitted under the agreement. On August 15, 2014, certain
amendments were
51
made to the February 2014 Credit Agreement which includes, among other things, an increase in the maximum leverage ratio (as described above) from 3.50
to 4.50 for the first four quarters following the completion of the acquisition of Rockwood, stepping down by 0.25 on a quarterly basis thereafter until
reaching 3.50.
On May 29, 2013, we entered into agreements to initiate a commercial paper program on a private placement basis under which we may issue unsecured
commercial paper notes (the “Commercial Paper Notes”) from time-to-time up to a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $750.0
million. The proceeds from the issuance of the Commercial Paper Notes are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of
other debt of the Company. Our February 2014 Credit Agreement is available to repay the Commercial Paper Notes, if necessary. Aggregate borrowings
outstanding under the February 2014 Credit Agreement and the Commercial Paper Notes will not exceed the $1.0 billion current maximum amount available
under the February 2014 Credit Agreement. The Commercial Paper Notes will be sold at a discount from par, or alternatively, will be sold at par and bear
interest at rates that will vary based upon market conditions at the time of issuance. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes will vary but may not
exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The definitive documents relating to the commercial paper program contain customary representations, warranties,
default and indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2015, we had $351.3 million of Commercial Paper Notes outstanding bearing a weighted-average
interest rate of approximately 1.07% and a weighted-average maturity of 29 days. The Commercial Paper Notes are classified as Current portion of long-term
debt in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
The non-current portion of our long-term debt amounted to $3.2 billion at December 31, 2015, compared to $2.2 billion at December 31, 2014. The
increase is attributable to debt associated with the acquisition of Rockwood. In addition, at December 31, 2015, we had the ability to borrow $648.7 million
under our commercial paper program and the February 2014 Credit Agreement, and $154.1 million under other existing lines of credit, subject to various
financial covenants under our February 2014 Credit Agreement. We have the ability and intent to refinance our borrowings under our other existing credit
lines with borrowings under the February 2014 Credit Agreement, as applicable. Therefore, the amounts outstanding under those credit lines, if any, are
classified as long-term debt. We believe that as of December 31, 2015 we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of our debt covenants. For additional
information about our long-term debt obligations, see Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this
report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, including bank guarantees
and letters of credit, which totaled approximately $63.8 million at December 31, 2015. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements has, or is likely to have,
a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Other Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations for capital projects, various take or pay and throughput agreements, long-term debt,
operating leases and other commitments as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter

Long-term debt obligations(a) $ 677,345 $ 59,130 $ 86,400 $ 335,479 $ 1,158,351 $ 1,544,512
Expected interest payments on long-term debt
obligations(b) 92,761 95,719 99,338 101,072 82,496 525,695
Operating lease obligations (rental) 14,643 10,664 9,217 7,436 6,665 21,124
Take or pay / throughput agreements(c) 43,654 11,762 6,363 6,063 5,923 11,484
Letters of credit and guarantees 24,789 11,248 3,190 14 210 24,356
Capital projects 36,599 1,580 — — — —
Total $ 889,791 $ 190,103 $ 204,508 $ 450,064 $ 1,253,645 $ 2,127,171
(a) Amounts represent the expected principal payments of our long-term debt, including capital leases, and do not include any fair value adjustments or premiums or discounts.
(b) Interest on our fixed rate borrowings was calculated based on the stated rates of such borrowings. A weighted average interest rate of approximately 1.53% was used for our
remaining long-term debt obligations.
(c) These amounts primarily relate to contracts entered into with certain third party vendors in the normal course of business to secure raw materials for our production processes.
In order to secure materials, sometimes for long durations, these contracts mandate a minimum amount of product to be purchased at predetermined rates over a set timeframe.
52
Amounts in the table above exclude required employer pension contributions. Contributions to our domestic and foreign qualified and nonqualified
pension plans, including our supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”), are expected to approximate $13 million in 2016. We may choose to make
additional pension contributions in excess of this amount. We made contributions of approximately $18.0 million to our domestic and foreign pension plans
(both qualified and nonqualified) during the year ended December 31, 2015.
The liability related to uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities totaled $101.7 million and
$25.3 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Related assets for corresponding offsetting benefits recorded in Other assets totaled $50.9
million and $22.1 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. We cannot estimate the amounts of any cash payments during the next twelve
months associated with these liabilities and are unable to estimate the timing of any such cash payments in the future at this time.
Liquidity Outlook
We anticipate that cash on hand and cash provided by operating activities, divestitures and borrowings will be sufficient to pay our operating expenses,
satisfy debt service obligations, fund any capital expenditures and share repurchases, make pension contributions and pay dividends for the foreseeable
future. With the acquisition of Rockwood now closed, our main focus over the next three years, in terms of uses of cash, will be deleveraging to restore our
borrowings to more normal levels and capturing synergies related to the integration of Rockwood. This may include refinancing certain of our existing
outstanding debt if market conditions are favorable. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate the merits of any opportunities that may arise for acquisitions
of businesses or assets, which may require additional liquidity.
Our cash flows from operations may be negatively affected by adverse consequences to our customers and the markets in which we compete as a result
of moderating global economic conditions and reduced capital availability. Additionally, realization and timing of anticipated divestitures could have a
significant impact on our cash flows in any given period.
While we maintain business relationships with a diverse group of financial institutions, an adverse change in their credit standing could lead them to
not honor their contractual credit commitments, decline funding under existing but uncommitted lines of credit, not renew their extensions of credit or not
provide new financing. While the global corporate bond and bank loan markets remain strong, periods of elevated uncertainty related to global economic
and/or geopolitical concerns may limit efficient access to such markets for extended periods of time. If such concerns heighten, we may incur increased
borrowing costs and reduced credit capacity as our various credit facilities mature. When the U.S. Federal Reserve or similar national reserve banks in other
countries decide to tighten the monetary supply in response, for example, to improving economic conditions, we may incur increased borrowing costs as
interest rates increase on our variable rate credit facilities, as our various credit facilities mature or as we refinance any maturing fixed rate debt obligations.
Overall, with generally strong cash-generative businesses and no significant long-term debt maturities before 2019, we believe we have and will
maintain a solid liquidity position.
We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $213.7 million as of December 31, 2015, of which $200.7 million is held by our foreign subsidiaries. This
cash represents an important source of our liquidity and is invested in short-term investments including time deposits and readily marketable securities with
relatively short maturities. Substantially all of this cash is held, and intended for use, outside of the U.S. We anticipate that any needs for liquidity within the
U.S. in excess of our cash held in the U.S. can be readily satisfied with borrowings under our existing U.S. credit facilities or our commercial paper program.
Safety and Environmental Matters

We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign requirements regulating the handling, manufacture and use of materials (some of which may be
classified as hazardous or toxic by one or more regulatory agencies), the discharge of materials into the environment and the protection of the environment.
To our knowledge, we are currently complying and expect to continue to comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws, regulations,
statutes and ordinances. Compliance with existing federal, state, local and foreign environmental protection laws is not expected to have a material effect on
capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position, but the costs associated with increased legal or regulatory requirements could have an adverse
effect on our results.
Among other environmental requirements, we are subject to the federal Superfund law, and similar state laws, under which we may be designated as a
PRP, and may be liable for a share of the costs associated with cleaning up various hazardous waste sites. Management believes that in cases in which we may
have liability as a PRP, our liability for our share of cleanup is de minimis. Further, almost all such sites represent environmental issues that are quite mature
and have been investigated, studied and in many cases settled. In de minimis situations, our policy generally is to negotiate a consent decree and to pay any
apportioned settlement, enabling us to be effectively relieved of any further liability as a PRP, except for remote contingencies.
53
In other than de minimis PRP matters, our records indicate that unresolved PRP exposures should be immaterial. We accrue and expense our proportionate
share of PRP costs. Because management has been actively involved in evaluating environmental matters, we are able to conclude that the outstanding
environmental liabilities for unresolved PRP sites should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial condition.
Our environmental and safety operating costs charged to expense were $42.2 million, $35.7 million and $44.0 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively, excluding depreciation of previous capital expenditures, and are expected to be in the same range in the next few years. Costs for remediation
have been accrued and payments related to sites are charged against accrued liabilities, which at December 31, 2015 totaled approximately $35.3 million, an
increase of $26.1 million from $9.2 million at December 31, 2014. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements
included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for a reconciliation of our environmental liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation and asset retirement obligation matters in excess of
the amounts recorded should occur over a period of time and should not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or
cash flows on a consolidated annual basis, although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or
cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period.
Capital expenditures for pollution-abatement and safety projects, including such costs that are included in other projects, were approximately $25.0
million, $15.2 million and $14.1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In the future, capital expenditures for these types of projects may increase due
to more stringent environmental regulatory requirements and our efforts in reaching sustainability goals. Management’s estimates of the effects of
compliance with governmental pollution-abatement and safety regulations are subject to (a) the possibility of changes in the applicable statutes and
regulations or in judicial or administrative construction of such statutes and regulations and (b) uncertainty as to whether anticipated solutions to pollution
problems will be successful, or whether additional expenditures may prove necessary.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting guidance that changed the criteria for reporting discontinued
operations and modified related disclosure requirements to provide users of financial statements with more information about the assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses of discontinued operations. The guidance modified the definition of discontinued operations by limiting its scope to disposals of components
of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Additionally, these new
requirements require entities to disclose the pretax profit or loss related to disposals of significant components that do not qualify as discontinued operations.
These new requirements became effective on January 1, 2015. For additional information, refer to Note 3, “Divestitures,” to our consolidated financial
statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance designed to enhance comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries,
jurisdictions and capital markets. The core principle of the guidance is that revenue recognized from a transaction or event that arises from a contract with a
customer should reflect the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for goods or services provided. To achieve that core principle
the new guidance sets forth a five-step revenue recognition model that will need to be applied consistently to all contracts with customers, except those that
are within the scope of other topics in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). Also required are new disclosures to help users of financial statements
better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from contracts with customers. The new disclosures include
qualitative and quantitative information about contracts with customers, significant judgments made in applying the revenue guidance, and assets
recognized related to the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. These new requirements become effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are assessing the
impact of these new requirements on our financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which clarifies the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an
award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The accounting guidance requires that a performance target that
affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be
reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the
performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been
rendered. These new requirements become effective for annual and interim reporting periods
54
beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the analysis that reporting entities must perform to determine whether certain
types of legal entities should be consolidated. Specifically, the amendments affect (a) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (b) the consolidation
analysis of reporting entities that are involved with variable interest entities, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships;
and (c) certain investment funds. These amendments are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We are assessing the impact of these amendments on our financial statements,
however we do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April and August 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the balance sheet presentation of debt issuance costs (except for debt
issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements). The guidance requires debt issuance costs relating to a recognized debt liability to be presented as a
direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability in the balance sheet. This new requirement will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. We do not expect this
guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that, among other things, provides for a practical expedient related to interim period
remeasurements of defined benefit plan assets and obligations. The practical expedient permits entities to remeasure plan assets and obligations using the
month-end that is closest to the date of the actual event. Disclosure of such election and related month-end remeasurement date is required. This guidance
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied prospectively. Early
application is permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance which clarifies the proper method of accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement.
The guidance requires software licenses included in a cloud computing arrangement to be accounted for consistently with the acquisition of other software
licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This new
requirement will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is
permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In May 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance for which investments measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical
expedient should no longer be categorized within the fair value hierarchy. Although removed from the fair value hierarchy, disclosure of the nature, risks and
amount of investments for which fair value is measured using the practical expedient is still required. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted.
We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The scope of
this guidance excludes inventory measured using the last-in first-out method or the retail inventory method. This new requirement will be effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied prospectively. Early application is
permitted. We are assessing the impact of this new requirement on our financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that eliminates the requirement to retrospectively adjust prior period financial statements for
measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated. Measurement-period adjustments should continue to be
calculated as if they were known at the acquisition date, but will now be recognized in the reporting period in which they are determined. The new guidance
also requires that the acquirer present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the amount recorded in current-period earnings,
by line item, that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition
date. As allowed by the provisions of this new guidance, we early-adopted this new guidance in the third quarter of 2015. The adoption of this new guidance
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the balance sheet classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The
guidance requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance. As
allowed by the provisions of this new guidance, we early-adopted this new
55
guidance in the fourth quarter of 2015 on a prospective basis. Accordingly, deferred tax asset and liability amounts as of December 31, 2014 were not
retrospectively adjusted.
In February 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires assets and liabilities arising from leases to be recorded on the balance sheet.
Additional disclosures are required regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. This new guidance will be effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach.
Early application is permitted. We have not evaluated the impact of the updated guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The primary currencies to which we have foreign currency exchange rate exposure are the European Union Euro, Japanese Yen, Singapore Dollar,
Chinese Renminbi, Australian Dollar, Chilean Peso and the British Pound Sterling. In response to greater fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates in
recent periods, we have increased the degree of exposure risk management activities to minimize the potential impact on earnings.
We manage our foreign currency exposures by balancing certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and through the use, from time
to time, of foreign currency forward contracts. The principal objective of such contracts is to minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The counterparties to these contractual agreements are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial
relationships. We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the
counterparties. We do not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
The primary method we use to reduce foreign currency exposure is to identify natural hedges, in which the operating activities denominated in
respective currencies across various subsidiaries balance in respect to timing and the underlying exposures. In the event a natural hedge is not available, we
may employ a forward contract to reduce exposure, generally expiring within one year. While these contracts are subject to fluctuations in value, such
fluctuations are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. Unless otherwise noted, gains and losses on foreign
currency forward contracts are recognized currently in income, and generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.
At December 31, 2015, our financial instruments which are subject to foreign currency exchange risk consist of foreign currency forward contracts with
an aggregate notional value of $217.7 million and with a fair value representing a net liability position of $0.3 million. Fluctuations in the value of these
contracts are intended to offset the changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the fair value of
our foreign currency hedge portfolio assuming an instantaneous 10% change in select foreign currency exchange rates from their levels as of December 31,
2015, with all other variables held constant. A 10% appreciation of the U.S. Dollar against foreign currencies that we hedge would result in a decrease of
approximately $0.2 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. A 10% depreciation of the U.S. Dollar against these foreign currencies
would result in an increase of approximately $19.2 million in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. The sensitivity of the fair value of our
foreign currency hedge portfolio represents changes in fair values estimated based on market conditions as of December 31, 2015, without reflecting the
effects of underlying anticipated transactions. When those anticipated transactions are realized, actual effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates
could have a material impact on our earnings and cash flows in future periods.
On December 18, 2014, the carrying value of our 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes was designated as an effective hedge of our net investment in
foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves as the functional currency, and beginning on the date of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of these
senior notes to our reporting currency have been and will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
We are exposed to changes in interest rates that could impact our results of operations and financial condition. We manage global interest rate and
foreign exchange exposure as part of our regular operational and financing strategies. We had variable interest rate borrowings of $1.7 billion and $392.3
million outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These borrowings represented 44% and 13% of total outstanding debt and bore average
interest rates of 1.51% and 0.82% at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. A hypothetical 10% increase (approximately 15 basis points) in the average
interest rate applicable to these borrowings would change our annualized interest expense by approximately $2.6 million as of December 31, 2015. We may
enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating to our borrowing costs.
Our raw materials are subject to price volatility caused by weather, supply conditions, political and economic variables and other unpredictable factors.
Historically, we have not used futures, options or swap contracts to manage the volatility
56
related to the above exposures. However, the refinery catalysts business has used financing arrangements to provide long-term protection against changes in
metals prices. We seek to limit our exposure by entering into long-term contracts when available, and we seek price increase limitations through contracts.
These contracts do not have a significant impact on our results of operations.
57
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts
and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with management’s and our directors’ authorizations; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework 2013 set forth
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of
December 31, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The
concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that there are inherent limitations in all systems of internal control. Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Our management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 excludes Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”)
because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2015. Rockwood is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and
total net sales represent 31% and 39%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
/ S/ LUTHER C. KISSAM IV
Luther C. Kissam IV
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)
February 29, 2016
58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Albemarle Corporation:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (1) present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Albemarle Corporation and its subsidiaries (or the “Company”) at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework 2013 issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements
and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing
the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (or
“Rockwood”) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase
business combination during 2015. We have also excluded Rockwood from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Rockwood is a wholly-
owned subsidiary whose total assets and total net sales represent 31% and 39%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2015.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
February 29, 2016
59
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

Year Ended December 31 2015 2014 2013
Net sales $ 3,651,335 $ 2,445,548 $ 2,394,270
Cost of goods sold 2,454,463 1,674,700 1,543,799
Gross profit 1,196,872 770,848 850,471
Selling, general and administrative expenses 512,274 355,135 158,189
Research and development expenses 102,871 88,310 82,246
Restructuring and other, net (6,804) 25,947 33,361
Acquisition and integration related costs 146,096 30,158 —
Operating profit 442,435 271,298 576,675
Interest and financing expenses (132,722) (41,358) (31,559)
Other income (expenses), net 48,474 (16,761) (6,674)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in net income of
unconsolidated investments 358,187 213,179 538,442
Income tax expense 29,122 18,484 134,445
Income from continuing operations before equity in net income of unconsolidated
investments 329,065 194,695 403,997
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax) 30,999 35,742 31,729
Net income from continuing operations 360,064 230,437 435,726
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of tax) — (69,531) 4,108
Net income 360,064 160,906 439,834
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (25,158) (27,590) (26,663)
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 334,906 $ 133,316 $ 413,171
Continuing operations $ 3.01 $ 2.57 $ 4.88
Discontinued operations — (0.88) 0.05
$ 3.01 $ 1.69 $ 4.93
Continuing operations $ 3.00 $ 2.57 $ 4.85
Discontinued operations — (0.88) 0.05
$ 3.00 $ 1.69 $ 4.90
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic 111,182 78,696 83,839
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted 111,556 79,102 84,322
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock $ 1.16 $ 1.10 $ 0.96
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
60
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(In Thousands)
Net income $ 360,064 $ 160,906 $ 439,834
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation (412,999) (168,809) 31,704
Pension and postretirement benefits (758) (487) (502)
Net investment hedge 50,861 11,384 —
Interest rate swap 2,101 (20,962) —
Other 29 136 135
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (360,766) (178,738) 31,337
Comprehensive (loss) income (702) (17,832) 471,171
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (23,267) (27,510) (27,019)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ (23,969) $ (45,342) $ 444,152
61
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands)
December 31 2015 2014
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 213,734 $ 2,489,768
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts (2015—$4,148; 2014—$1,563) 552,828 385,212
Other accounts receivable 79,877 49,423
Inventories 508,728 358,361
Other current assets 71,351 66,086
Assets held for sale 404,485 —
Total current assets 1,831,003 3,348,850
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 3,881,162 2,620,670
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,396,424 1,388,802
Net property, plant and equipment 2,484,738 1,231,868
Investments 455,417 194,042
Other assets 216,998 160,956
Goodwill 2,893,811 243,262
Other intangibles, net of amortization 1,733,047 44,125
Total assets $ 9,615,014 $ 5,223,103
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 306,517 $ 231,705
Accrued expenses 402,379 166,174
Current portion of long-term debt 677,345 711,096
Dividends payable 32,306 21,458
Liabilities held for sale 128,706 —
Income taxes payable 69,432 9,453
Total current liabilities 1,616,685 1,139,886
Long-term debt 3,174,674 2,223,035
Postretirement benefits 49,647 56,424
Pension benefits 381,552 170,534
Other noncurrent liabilities 254,826 87,705
Deferred income taxes 736,317 56,884
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
Equity:
Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value (authorized 150,000 shares), issued and outstanding — 112,219 in 2015 and
78,031 in 2014 1,122 780
Additional paid-in capital 2,059,151 10,447
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (421,288) (62,413)
Retained earnings 1,615,407 1,410,651
Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity 3,254,392 1,359,465
Noncontrolling interests 146,921 129,170
Total equity 3,401,313 1,488,635
Total liabilities and equity $ 9,615,014 $ 5,223,103
62
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

Common Stock Additional Accumulated Other Total Albemarle
Paid-in Comprehensive Retained Shareholders’ Noncontrolling
Shares Amounts Capital Income (Loss) Earnings Equity Interests Total Equity
Balance at January 1, 2013 88,899,209 $ 889 $ 2,761 $ 85,264 $ 1,744,684 $ 1,833,598 $ 98,410 $ 1,932,008
Net income 413,171 413,171 26,663 439,834
Other comprehensive income 30,981 30,981 356 31,337
Cash dividends declared (79,833) (79,833) (10,014) (89,847)
Stock-based compensation and
other 9,072 9,072 9,072
Exercise of stock options 191,732 2 5,551 5,553 5,553
Shares repurchased (9,198,056) (92) (4,542) (577,664) (582,298) (582,298)
Tax benefit related to stock plans 3,266 3,266 3,266
Issuance of common stock, net 256,834 3 (3) — —
Shares withheld for withholding
taxes associated with common
stock issuances (96,877) (1) (6,148) (6,149) (6,149)
Balance at December 31, 2013 80,052,842 $ 801 $ 9,957 $ 116,245 $ 1,500,358 $ 1,627,361 $ 115,415 $ 1,742,776
Balance at January 1, 2014 80,052,842 $ 801 $ 9,957 $ 116,245 $ 1,500,358 $ 1,627,361 $ 115,415 $ 1,742,776
Net income 133,316 133,316 27,590 160,906
Other comprehensive loss (178,658) (178,658) (80) (178,738)
Noncontrolling interests’ share of
contributed capital in subsidiary — 1,780 1,780
other 13,556 13,556 13,556
Exercise of stock options 77,546 1 2,712 2,713 2,713
Shares repurchased (2,190,254) (22) (13,319) (136,659) (150,000) (150,000)
Tax benefit related to stock plans 826 826 826
stock issuances (51,547) (1) (3,284) (3,285) (3,285)
Balance at December 31, 2014 78,030,524 $ 780 $ 10,447 $ (62,413) $ 1,410,651 $ 1,359,465 $ 129,170 $ 1,488,635
Balance at January 1, 2015 78,030,524 $ 780 $ 10,447 $ (62,413) $ 1,410,651 $ 1,359,465 $ 129,170 $ 1,488,635
Net income 334,906 334,906 25,158 360,064
Other comprehensive loss (358,875) (358,875) (1,891) (360,766)
other 13,696 13,696 13,696
Exercise of stock options 18,000 — 517 517 517
Tax deficiency related to stock
plans (167) (167) (167)
Acquisition of Rockwood 34,113,064 341 2,036,209 2,036,550 17,582 2,054,132
Noncontrolling interest assumed
in acquisition of Shanghai
Chemetall — 4,843 4,843
Purchase of noncontrolling
interest — (4,655) (4,655)
stock issuances (28,137) — (1,550) (1,550) (1,550)
Balance at December 31, 2015 112,219,351 $ 1,122 $ 2,059,151 $ (421,288) $ 1,615,407 $ 3,254,392 $ 146,921 $ 3,401,313
63
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year $ 2,489,768 $ 477,239 $ 477,696
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income 360,064 160,906 439,834
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 260,076 103,572 107,370
(Gain) loss associated with restructuring and other (6,804) 6,333 —
Loss on disposal of businesses — 85,515 —
Stock-based compensation 15,188 14,267 10,164
Excess tax benefits realized from stock-based compensation arrangements (121) (826) (3,266)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax) (30,999) (35,742) (31,729)
Dividends received from unconsolidated investments and nonmarketable securities 59,912 40,688 21,632
Pension and postretirement (benefit) expense (38,817) 133,681 (132,707)
Pension and postretirement contributions (21,613) (13,916) (13,294)
Unrealized gain on investments in marketable securities (1,239) (825) (3,681)
Deferred income taxes (136,298) (64,947) 64,865
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (8,788) 36,221 (65,906)
Decrease (increase) in inventories 27,649 (6,486) (1,810)
Decrease in other current assets excluding deferred income taxes 12,756 5,809 5,261
Increase in accounts payable 23,745 28,296 19,267
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and income taxes payable (96,896) (6,680) 12,185
Other, net (57,126) 6,743 4,674
Net cash provided by operating activities 360,689 492,609 432,859
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of Rockwood, net of cash acquired (2,051,645) — —
Other acquisitions, net of cash acquired (48,845) — —
Capital expenditures (227,649) (110,576) (155,346)
Decrease in restricted cash 57,550 — —
Cash payments related to acquisitions and other — — (2,565)
Cash proceeds from divestitures, net 8,883 104,718 —
Return of capital from unconsolidated investment 98,000 — —
Payment for settlement of interest rate swap — (33,425) —
Sales of marketable securities, net 998 649 169
Repayments from (long-term advances to) joint ventures 2,156 (7,499) —
Net cash used in investing activities (2,160,552) (46,133) (157,742)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes — 1,888,197 —
Proceeds from borrowings of other long-term debt 2,250,000 — 117,000
Repayments of long-term debt (2,626,241) (6,017) (135,733)
Other borrowings (repayments), net 54,625 (5,825) 398,544
Dividends paid to shareholders (119,302) (84,102) (78,107)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests (23,286) (15,535) (10,014)
Purchase of noncontrolling interest (4,784) — —
Repurchases of common stock — (150,000) (582,298)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 517 2,713 5,553
Excess tax benefits realized from stock-based compensation arrangements 121 826 3,266
Withholding taxes paid on stock-based compensation award distributions (1,549) (3,284) (6,149)
Debt financing costs (4,544) (17,644) (108)
Other (3,882) — —
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (478,325) 1,609,329 (288,046)
Net effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents 2,154 (43,276) 12,472
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (2,276,034) 2,012,529 (457)
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 213,734 $ 2,489,768 $ 477,239
64
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Albemarle Corporation and our wholly owned, majority owned and
controlled subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise indicates, the terms “Albemarle,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company” mean Albemarle Corporation and
our consolidated subsidiaries. We apply the equity method of accounting for investments in which we have an ownership interest from 20% to 50% or where
we exercise significant influence over the related investee’s operations. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in
consolidation.
As described further in Note 2, “Acquisitions,” we completed our acquisition of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”) on January 12, 2015. The
consolidated financial statements contained herein include the results of operations of Rockwood, commencing on January 13, 2015.
Organizational Realignment
As a result of the Rockwood acquisition, in 2015 we realigned our organizational structure under three reportable segments: Performance Chemicals,
Refining Solutions and Chemetall Surface Treatment. Throughout this document, including these consolidated financial statements and related footnotes,
current and prior year financial information is presented in accordance with this structure.
Discontinued Operations
Effective January 1, 2015, a component or group of components that is classified as held for sale or that has been disposed of by sale, and which
represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on our operations and financial results, is reported as discontinued operations beginning in the
period when these criteria are met. Our assets and liabilities held for sale at December 31, 2015 did not meet the criteria to be presented as discontinued
operations.
On September 1, 2014, the Company closed the sale of its antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets to SI Group, Inc. In accordance
with the accounting guidance for discontinued operations in effect prior to January 1, 2015, the financial results of this disposed group were presented as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and excluded from segment results for 2014 and 2013. See Note 3, “Divestitures” for
additional information.
Estimates, Assumptions and Reclassifications

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“U.S.”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize sales when the revenue is realized or realizable, and has been earned, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. We
recognize net sales as risk and title to the product transfer to the customer, which usually occurs at the time shipment is made. Significant portions of our sales
are sold free on board shipping point or on an equivalent basis, and other transactions are based upon specific contractual arrangements. Our standard terms
of delivery are generally included in our contracts of sale, order confirmation documents and invoices. We recognize revenue from services when
performance of the services has been completed. Where the Company incurs pre-production design and development costs under long-term supply contracts,
these costs are expensed where they relate to the products sold unless contractual guarantees for reimbursement exist. Conversely, these costs are capitalized
if they pertain to equipment that we will own and use in producing the products to be supplied and expect to utilize for future revenue generating activities.
Performance and Life Cycle Guarantees

We provide customers certain performance guarantees and life cycle guarantees. These guarantees entitle the customer to claim compensation if the
product does not conform to performance standards originally agreed upon. Performance guarantees relate to minimum technical specifications that products
produced with the delivered product must meet, such as yield and
65
product quality. Life cycle guarantees relate to minimum periods for which performance of the delivered product is guaranteed. When either performance
guarantees or life cycle guarantees are contractually agreed upon, an assessment of the appropriate revenue recognition treatment is evaluated. When testing
or modeling of historical results predict that the performance or life cycle criteria will be satisfied, revenue is recognized in accordance with shipping terms at
the time of delivery. When testing or modeling of historical results predict that the performance or life cycle criteria may not be satisfied, we bill the customer
upon shipment and defer the related revenue and cost associated with these products. These deferrals are released to earnings when the contractual period
expires, and are generally not significant.
Shipping and Handling Costs

Amounts billed to customers in a sales transaction related to shipping and handling have been classified as net sales and the cost incurred by us for
shipping and handling has been classified as cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. In addition, taxes billed to
customers in a sales transaction are presented in the consolidated statements of income on a net basis.
Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risks and original maturities of three months or
less.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market with cost determined primarily on the first-in, first-out basis. Cost is determined on the weighted-
average basis for a small portion of our inventories at foreign plants and our stores, supplies and other inventory. A portion of our domestic produced finished
goods and raw materials are determined on the last-in, first-out basis.
Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment include costs of assets constructed, purchased or leased under a capital lease, related delivery and installation costs and
interest incurred on significant capital projects during their construction periods. Expenditures for renewals and betterments also are capitalized, but
expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with yearly planned major maintenance are deferred and
amortized over 12 months or until the same major maintenance activities must be repeated, whichever is shorter. The cost and accumulated depreciation
applicable to assets retired or sold are removed from the respective accounts, and gains or losses thereon are included in income.
We assign the useful lives of our property, plant and equipment based upon our internal engineering estimates which are reviewed periodically. The
estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment range from two to sixty years and depreciation is recorded on the straight-line method, with the
exception of our long-term mineral rights, which are depleted on a units-of-production method.
We evaluate the recovery of our property, plant and equipment by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the undiscounted net cash
flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying
amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.
Investments
Investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting if the investment gives us the ability to exercise significant influence, but not
control, over the investee. Significant influence is generally deemed to exist if we have an ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee between 20%
and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investee’s board of directors and the impact of commercial arrangements, are considered in
determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Under the equity method of accounting, we record our investments in equity-method
investees in the consolidated balance sheets as Investments and our share of investees’ earnings or losses together with other-than temporary impairments in
value as Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments in the consolidated statements of income.
Certain mutual fund investments are accounted for as trading equities and are marked-to-market on a monthly basis through the consolidated
statements of income. Investments in joint ventures and nonmarketable securities of immaterial
66
entities are estimated based upon the overall performance of the entity where financial results are not available on a timely basis.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation

Environmental compliance costs include the cost of purchasing and/or constructing assets to prevent, limit and/or control pollution or to monitor the
environmental status at various locations. These costs are capitalized and depreciated based on estimated useful lives. Environmental compliance costs also
include maintenance and operating costs with respect to pollution prevention and control facilities and other administrative costs. Such operating costs are
expensed as incurred. Environmental remediation costs of facilities used in current operations are generally immaterial and are expensed as incurred. We
accrue for environmental remediation costs and post-remediation costs that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations at facilities or off-plant
disposal sites in the accounting period in which responsibility is established and when the related costs are estimable. In developing these cost estimates, we
evaluate currently available facts regarding each site, with consideration given to existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations, prior
experience in remediation of contaminated sites, the financial capability of other potentially responsible parties and other factors, subject to uncertainties
inherent in the estimation process. If the amount and timing of the cash payments for a site are fixed or reliably determinable, the liability is discounted.
Additionally, these estimates are reviewed periodically, with adjustments to the accruals recorded as necessary.

Our research and development expenses related to present and future products are expensed as incurred. These expenses consist primarily of personnel-
related costs and other overheads, as well as outside service and consulting costs incurred for specific programs. Our U.S. facilities in Michigan,
Pennsylvania, Texas and Louisiana and our global facilities in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, China and Korea form the capability base for our contract
research and custom manufacturing businesses. These business areas provide research and scale-up services primarily to innovative life science companies.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We account for goodwill and other intangibles acquired in a business combination in conformity with current accounting guidance that requires that
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets not be amortized.
We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of our reporting units to the related carrying value. We estimate the fair value
based on present value techniques involving future cash flows. Future cash flows include assumptions about sales volumes, selling prices, raw material prices,
labor and other employee benefit costs, capital additions, income taxes, working capital, and other economic or market-related factors. Significant
management judgment is involved in estimating these variables and they include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. We perform
a sensitivity analysis by using a range of inputs to confirm the reasonableness of these estimates being used in the goodwill impairment analysis. We use a
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) approach to determine our discount rate for goodwill recoverability testing. Our WACC calculation
incorporates industry-weighted average returns on debt and equity from a market perspective. The factors in this calculation are largely external to the
Company and, therefore, are beyond our control. We test our recorded goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year or upon the occurrence of
events or changes in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of our reporting units below their carrying amounts. The Company
performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2015 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date. In addition, no indications of
impairment in any of our reporting units were indicated by the sensitivity analysis.
We assess our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which include trade names and in-progress research and development, for impairment annually and
between annual tests if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired. The indefinite-lived intangible
asset impairment standard allows us to first to assess qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. Further testing is only
required if we determine, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value is less than
its carrying amount. If we determine based on the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, an impairment test is
performed by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to its carrying amount.
Definite-lived intangible assets, such as purchased technology, patents, customer lists and trade names, are amortized over their estimated useful lives
generally for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years. Except for customer lists and relationships associated with our Lithium business and Chemetall
Surface Treatment segment, which are amortized using the pattern of economic benefit method, definite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the
straight-line method. We evaluate the recovery of our definite-lived intangible assets by comparing the net carrying value of the asset group to the
undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of that asset group when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset group is not
67
recoverable, the fair value of the asset group is measured and if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. See Note 12,
“Goodwill and Other Intangibles.”
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits

Under authoritative accounting standards, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. As
required, we recognize a balance sheet asset or liability for each of our pension and other postretirement benefit (“OPEB”) plans equal to the plan’s funded
status as of the measurement date. The primary assumptions are as follows:
• Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which is based on projections of benefit payments to be made in
the future.
• Expected Return on Plan Assets—We project the future return on plan assets based on prior performance and future expectations for the types of
investments held by the plans, as well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets for these investments. These projected returns reduce the net
benefit costs recorded currently.
• Rate of Compensation Increase—For salary-related plans, we project employees’ annual pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension
benefits at retirement.
• Mortality Assumptions—Assumptions about life expectancy of plan participants are used in the measurement of related plan obligations.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to
qualify for a remeasurement during a fiscal year. The remaining components of pension and OPEB plan expense, primarily service cost, interest cost and
expected return on assets, are recorded on a quarterly basis. The market-related value of assets equals the actual market value as of the date of measurement.
During 2015, we made changes to assumptions related to discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets. We consider available information
that we deem relevant when selecting each of these assumptions.
In selecting the discount rates for the U.S. plans, we consider expected benefit payments on a plan-by-plan basis. As a result, the Company uses
different discount rates for each plan depending on the demographics of participants and the expected timing of benefit payments. For 2015, the discount
rates were calculated using the results from a bond matching technique developed by Milliman, which matched the future estimated annual benefit payments
of each respective plan against a portfolio of bonds of high quality to determine the discount rate. We believe our selected discount rates are determined
using preferred methodology under authoritative accounting guidance and accurately reflect market conditions as of the December 31, 2015 measurement
date.
In selecting the discount rates for the foreign plans, we look at long-term yields on AA-rated corporate bonds when available. Our actuaries have
developed yield curves based on the yields on the constituent bonds in the various indices as well as on other market indicators such as swap rates,
particularly at the longer durations. For the Eurozone, we apply the Aon Hewitt yield curve to projected cash flows from the relevant plans to derive the
discount rate. For the UK, the discount rate is determined by applying the Aon Hewitt yield curve for typical schemes of similar duration to projected cash
flows of Albemarle’s UK plan. In other countries where there is not a sufficiently deep market of high-quality corporate bonds, we set the discount rate by
referencing the yield on government bonds of an appropriate duration.
In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider past performance and future expectations for the types of investments held by the plan as
well as the expected long-term allocation of plan assets to these investments. In projecting the rate of compensation increase, we consider past experience in
light of movements in inflation rates.
In October 2014, the Society of Actuaries (“SOA”) published updated mortality tables which reflect increased life expectancy. We revised our mortality
assumptions to incorporate the new set of mortality tables issued by the SOA for purposes of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December
31, 2014. Further, the SOA released an updated Mortality Improvement Scale, MP-2015, on October 8, 2015. The updated improvement scale incorporates
two additional years of mortality data and reflects a trend toward somewhat smaller improvements in longevity. In addition, the SOA released a set of factors
to adjust the RP-2014 Mortality Tables to base year 2006. We revised our mortality assumption to incorporate these updated mortality improvements for
purposes of measuring our U.S. pension and OPEB obligations at December 31, 2015.
68
Employee Savings Plans

Certain of our employees participate in our defined contribution 401(k) employee savings plan, which is generally available to all U.S. full-time
salaried and non-union hourly employees and to employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides for such participation.
Additionally, the Company sponsors various defined contribution plans for certain employees at foreign locations, the most significant of which is a plan in
the Netherlands similar to a collective defined contribution plan.
Deferred Compensation Plan

We maintain an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) that was adopted in 2001 and subsequently amended. The purpose of the EDCP is to
provide current tax planning opportunities as well as supplemental funds upon the retirement or death of certain of our employees. The EDCP is intended to
aid in attracting and retaining employees of exceptional ability by providing them with these benefits. We also maintain a Benefit Protection Trust (the
“Trust”) that was created to provide a source of funds to assist in meeting the obligations of the EDCP, subject to the claims of our creditors in the event of
our insolvency. Assets of the Trust are consolidated in accordance with authoritative guidance. The assets of the Trust consist primarily of mutual fund
investments (which are accounted for as trading securities and are marked-to-market on a monthly basis through the consolidated statements of income) and
cash and cash equivalents.
Stock-based Compensation Expense

The fair value of restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards with a service condition are determined based on the
number of shares or units granted and the quoted price of our common stock on the date of grant, and the fair value of stock options is determined using the
Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of performance unit awards with a service condition and a market condition are estimated on the date of grant
using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The fair value of these awards is determined after giving effect to estimated forfeitures. Such value is recognized as
expense over the service period, which is generally the vesting period of the equity grant. To the extent restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards,
performance unit awards and stock options are forfeited prior to vesting in excess of the estimated forfeiture rate, the corresponding previously recognized
expense is reversed as an offset to operating expenses.
Income Taxes
We use the liability method for determining our income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance
with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax
rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more
likely than not. In order to record deferred tax assets and liabilities, we are following guidance under ASU 2015-17, which requires deferred tax assets and
liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance.
Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated income tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also provided for operating losses, capital losses and certain tax credit carryovers. A
valuation allowance, reducing deferred tax assets, is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The realization of such deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income of the appropriate character.
Although realization is not assured, we do not establish a valuation allowance when we believe it is more likely than not that a net deferred tax asset will be
realized.
We only recognize a tax benefit after concluding that it is more likely than not that the benefit will be sustained upon audit by the respective taxing
authority based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. Once the recognition threshold is met, we recognize a tax benefit measured as
the largest amount of the tax benefit that, in our judgment, is greater than 50% likely to be realized. Under current accounting guidance for uncertain tax
positions, interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in Income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income.
We have designated the undistributed earnings of substantially all of our foreign operations as indefinitely invested and as a result we do not provide
for deferred income taxes on the unremitted earnings of these subsidiaries. If it is determined that cash can be repatriated with little to no tax consequences,
we may choose to repatriate cash at that time. Our foreign earnings are computed under U.S. federal tax earnings and profits, or E&P, principles. In general, to
the extent our financial reporting book basis over tax basis of a foreign subsidiary exceeds these E&P amounts, deferred taxes have not been provided as they
are essentially permanent in duration. The determination of the amount of such unrecognized deferred tax liability is not
69
practicable. We provide for deferred income taxes on our undistributed earnings of foreign operations that are not deemed to be indefinitely invested.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income is comprised principally of foreign currency translation adjustments, amounts related to the
revaluation of our euro-denominated senior notes which were designated as a hedge of our net investment in foreign operations in 2014, a realized loss on a
forward starting interest rate swap entered into in 2014 which was designated as a cash flow hedge, and deferred income taxes related to the aforementioned
items.
Foreign Currency Translation

The assets and liabilities of all foreign subsidiaries were prepared in their respective functional currencies and translated into U.S. Dollars based on the
current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet dates, while income and expenses were translated at average exchange rates for the periods presented.
Translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of equity.
Foreign exchange transaction gains (losses) were $51.8 million, ($3.7) million and ($10.6) million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and
2013, respectively, and are included in Other income (expenses), net, in our consolidated statements of income, with the unrealized portion included in
Other, net, in our consolidated statements of cash flows. The gains in 2015 are primarily related to cash denominated in U.S. Dollars held by foreign
subsidiaries where the European Union Euro serves as the functional currency.
Derivative Financial Instruments

We manage our foreign currency exposures by balancing certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and through the use of foreign
currency forward contracts from time to time, which generally expire within one year. The principal objective of such contracts is to minimize the financial
impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. While these contracts are subject to fluctuations in value, such fluctuations are generally expected to
be offset by changes in the value of the underlying foreign currency exposures being hedged. Unless otherwise noted, gains and losses on foreign currency
forward contracts are recognized currently in Other income (expenses), net, and generally do not have a significant impact on results of operations.
We may also enter into interest rate swaps, collars or similar instruments from time to time, with the objective of reducing interest rate volatility relating
to our borrowing costs.
The counterparties to these contractual agreements are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships. We are
exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties. We do
not utilize financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. Our foreign currency forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015 and
2014 have not been designated as hedging instruments under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, Derivatives and Hedging.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued accounting guidance that changed the criteria for reporting discontinued
operations and modified related disclosure requirements to provide users of financial statements with more information about the assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses of discontinued operations. The guidance modified the definition of discontinued operations by limiting its scope to disposals of components
of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. Additionally, these new
requirements require entities to disclose the pretax profit or loss related to disposals of significant components that do not qualify as discontinued operations.
These new requirements became effective on January 1, 2015. Refer to Note 3, “Divestitures” for additional information.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance designed to enhance comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries,
jurisdictions and capital markets. The core principle of the guidance is that revenue recognized from a transaction or event that arises from a contract with a
customer should reflect the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for goods or services provided. To achieve that core principle
the new guidance sets forth a five-step revenue recognition model that will need to be applied consistently to all contracts with customers, except those that
are within the scope of other topics in the ASC. Also required are new disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount,
timing and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows from contracts with customers. The new disclosures
70
include qualitative and quantitative information about contracts with customers, significant judgments made in applying the revenue guidance, and assets
recognized related to the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. These new requirements become effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are assessing the
impact of these new requirements on our financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which clarifies the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an
award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The accounting guidance requires that a performance target that
affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be
reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the
performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been
rendered. These new requirements become effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and early adoption is
In February 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the analysis that reporting entities must perform to determine whether certain
types of legal entities should be consolidated. Specifically, the amendments affect (a) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (b) the consolidation
analysis of reporting entities that are involved with variable interest entities, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships;
and (c) certain investment funds. These amendments are effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December
15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We are assessing the impact of these amendments on our financial statements,
however we do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April and August 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the balance sheet presentation of debt issuance costs (except for debt
issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements). The guidance requires debt issuance costs relating to a recognized debt liability to be presented as a
direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability in the balance sheet. This new requirement will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. We do not expect this
guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that, among other things, provides for a practical expedient related to interim period
remeasurements of defined benefit plan assets and obligations. The practical expedient permits entities to remeasure plan assets and obligations using the
month-end that is closest to the date of the actual event. Disclosure of such election and related month-end remeasurement date is required. This guidance
will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied prospectively. Early
application is permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance which clarifies the proper method of accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement.
The guidance requires software licenses included in a cloud computing arrangement to be accounted for consistently with the acquisition of other software
licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the arrangement should be accounted for as a service contract. This new
requirement will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is
In May 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance for which investments measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical
expedient should no longer be categorized within the fair value hierarchy. Although removed from the fair value hierarchy, disclosure of the nature, risks and
amount of investments for which fair value is measured using the practical expedient is still required. This guidance will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted.
We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The scope of
this guidance excludes inventory measured using the last-in first-out method or the retail inventory method. This new requirement will be effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied prospectively. Early application is
permitted. We are assessing the impact of this new requirement on our financial statements.
71
In September 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that eliminates the requirement to retrospectively adjust prior period financial statements for
measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated. Measurement-period adjustments should continue to be
calculated as if they were known at the acquisition date, but will now be recognized in the reporting period in which they are determined. The new guidance
also requires that the acquirer present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the amount recorded in current-period earnings,
by line item, that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition
date. As allowed by the provisions of this new guidance, we early-adopted this new guidance in the third quarter of 2015. Refer to Note 2, “Acquisitions” for
additional information about the adoption of these new requirements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the balance sheet classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The
guidance requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet, along with any related valuation allowance. As
allowed by the provisions of this new guidance, we early-adopted this new guidance in the fourth quarter of 2015 on a prospective basis. Accordingly,
deferred tax asset and liability amounts as of December 31, 2014 were not retrospectively adjusted.
In February 2016, the FASB issued accounting guidance that requires assets and liabilities arising from leases to be recorded on the balance sheet.
Additional disclosures are required regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows from leases. This new guidance will be effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach.
Early application is permitted. We have not evaluated the impact of the updated guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2—Acquisitions:
On July 15, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) to acquire all the outstanding shares of Rockwood (the
“Merger”). On January 12, 2015 (the “Acquisition Closing Date”), we completed the acquisition of Rockwood for a purchase price of approximately $5.7
billion. As a result, Rockwood became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Albemarle. The cash consideration was funded with proceeds from our 2014 Senior
Notes, August 2014 Term Loan Agreement, Cash Bridge Facility and February 2014 Credit Agreement, each of which is described further in Note 14, “Long-
Term Debt.” The fair value of the equity consideration was based on the closing price of Albemarle’s common stock on the Acquisition Closing Date of
$59.70 per share, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the Acquisition Closing Date each issued and outstanding share of Rockwood common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, (other than shares owned directly or indirectly by Albemarle, Rockwood or the Merger Sub, as defined in the Merger Agreement, and Appraisal Shares
as defined in the Merger Agreement) was canceled and extinguished and converted into the right to receive (i) $50.65 in cash, without interest, and (ii)
0.4803 of a share of Albemarle common stock, par value $0.01 per share, (the “Merger Consideration”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, equity awards
relating to shares of Rockwood’s common stock were canceled and converted into the right to receive the cash value of the Merger Consideration. On the
Acquisition Closing Date, we issued approximately 34.1 million shares of Albemarle common stock.
Subsequent to the acquisition of Rockwood, Albemarle continues to be a leading global developer, manufacturer and marketer of technologically
advanced and high value-added specialty chemicals. We are a leading integrated and low-cost global producer of lithium and lithium compounds used in
lithium ion batteries for electronic devices, alternative transportation vehicles and energy storage technologies, meeting the significant growth in global
demand for these products. We are also one of the largest global producers of surface treatments and coatings for metal processing, servicing the automotive,
aerospace and general industrial markets.
Included in Net sales and Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015 is approximately $1.4 billion and
$176.2 million, respectively, attributable to the businesses acquired from Rockwood. Included in Acquisition and integration related costs on our
consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 is $137.7 million of costs directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood (mainly
consisting of professional services and advisory fees, costs to achieve synergies, relocation costs, and other integration costs), and $8.4 million of costs in
connection with other significant projects. Acquisition and integration related costs for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $23.6 million of costs
directly related to the acquisition of Rockwood and $6.6 million of costs in connection with other significant projects. Acquisition-related costs incurred
during the year ended December 31, 2013 are included in Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses and were not significant.
72
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

The aggregate purchase price noted above was allocated to the major categories of assets and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values
at the Acquisition Closing Date, which were based, in part, upon third-party appraisals for certain assets, including specifically-identified intangible assets.
The excess of the purchase price over the preliminary estimated fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $2.8 billion and was recorded as
goodwill.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Rockwood and the amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the
acquisition date, which have been allocated on a preliminary basis (in thousands):
Total purchase price $ 5,725,321
Net assets acquired:

Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,555,139
Trade and other accounts receivable 262,947
Inventories 290,326
Other current assets 86,267
Property, plant and equipment 1,377,249
Investments 529,453
Other assets 25,538
Definite-lived intangible assets:
Patents and technology 227,840
Trade names and trademarks 258,740
Customer lists and relationships 1,264,227
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trade names and trademarks 104,380
Other 26,410
Current liabilities (406,513)
Long-term debt (1,319,132)
Pension benefits (316,086)
Other noncurrent liabilities (195,052)
Deferred income taxes (845,965)
Noncontrolling interests (17,582)
Total identifiable net assets 2,908,186
Goodwill 2,817,135
Total net assets acquired $ 5,725,321
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including the residual amount allocated to goodwill, is based upon
preliminary information and is subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date) as additional information
concerning final asset and liability valuations is obtained. Significant changes to the purchase price allocation since our initial preliminary estimates
reported in the first quarter of 2015 were primarily related to decreases in the estimated fair values of certain current assets, property, plant and equipment,
investments and intangible assets and increases in certain other noncurrent liabilities and noncontrolling interests, which resulted in an increase to
recognized goodwill of approximately $192.3 million. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet finalized relate to the
fair value of specific property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, and related deferred income taxes. The fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are based on management’s preliminary estimates and assumptions, as well as other information compiled by management, including
valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. While the Company believes that such preliminary estimates provide a reasonable
basis for estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, it will evaluate any necessary information prior to finalization of the amounts.
During the measurement-period, the Company will adjust assets or liabilities if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of
the acquisition date that, if known, would have
73
resulted in revised estimated values of those assets or liabilities as of that date. The effect of measurement-period adjustments to the estimated fair values will
be reflected as if the adjustments had been completed on the acquisition date. The impact of all changes that do not qualify as measurement-period
adjustments will be included in current period earnings. If the actual results differ from the estimates and judgments used in these fair values, the amounts
recorded in the consolidated financial statements could be subject to a possible impairment of the intangible assets or goodwill, or require acceleration of the
amortization of intangible assets in subsequent periods.
Goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of the anticipated synergies and economies of scale from the combined companies and the overall
strategic importance of the acquired businesses to Albemarle. The goodwill attributable to the acquisition will not be amortizable or deductible for tax
purposes.
The weighted-average amortization periods for the intangible assets acquired are 20 years for patents and technology, 20 years for trade names and
trademarks and 24 years for customer lists and relationships. The weighted-average amortization period for all definite-lived intangible assets acquired is 23
years.
Long-term debt assumed primarily includes Rockwood’s 4.625% senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.25 billion and a fair value
adjustment of approximately $43.7 million related to the senior notes. The fair value adjustment was based primarily on reported market values using Level 1
inputs. See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” for additional information about these senior notes.
As discussed further in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the third quarter of 2015 the Company early-adopted new accounting
guidance that changes the reporting requirements for measurement-period adjustments that occur in periods after a business combination is consummated.
For the three months ended December 31, 2015, Depreciation and amortization expense included in Cost of goods sold was reduced by approximately $3.0
million as a result of measurement period adjustments related to previous reporting periods. There were no significant measurement-period adjustments
recorded in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 that related to previous reporting periods.
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 assume that the Merger
occurred on January 1, 2014. The pro forma amounts include certain adjustments, including interest expense, depreciation, amortization expense and income
taxes. The pro forma amounts for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were adjusted to exclude approximately $137.7 million and $23.6 million,
respectively, of nonrecurring acquisition and integration related costs. Additionally, pro forma amounts for the year ended December 31, 2015 were adjusted
to exclude approximately $103.0 million of charges related to the utilization of the inventory markup as further described in Note 25, “Segment and
Geographic Area Information.” The 2014 pro forma results do not include adjustments related to cost savings or other synergies that are anticipated as a result
of the Merger. Accordingly, these unaudited pro forma results are presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the
actual results of operations of the combined company would have been if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2014, nor are they indicative of future
results of operations.
Year Ended December 31,

2015 2014
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma Net sales $ 3,684,665 $ 3,870,428
Pro forma Net income from continuing operations $ 527,997 $ 353,313
Pro forma Net income from continuing operations per share:
Basic $ 4.75 $ 3.13
Diluted $ 4.73 $ 3.12
Litigation Related to the Merger
On February 19, 2015, Verition Multi-Strategy Master Fund Ltd. and Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd., who collectively owned approximately
882,000 shares of Rockwood common stock immediately prior to the Merger, commenced an action in the Delaware Chancery Court seeking appraisal of
their shares of Rockwood common stock pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law § 262. These shareholders exercised their right not to receive the
Merger Consideration for each share of Rockwood common stock owned by such shareholders. Following the Merger, these shareholders ceased to have any
rights with respect to their Rockwood shares, except for their rights to seek an appraisal of the cash value of their Rockwood shares under Delaware law. On
March 16, 2015, Albemarle, on behalf of Rockwood, filed an Answer and Verified List in response to
74
the appraisal petition. On November 2, 2015, the court granted the parties’ jointly stipulated amended scheduling order, which set forth dates for fact and
expert discovery, as well as trial. On December 21, 2015, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release to resolve the matter, and on January
11, 2016, the Court dismissed the matter with prejudice.
Acquisition of Remaining Interest in Shanghai Chemetall Chemicals Co., Ltd.

On January 29, 2015, we acquired the remaining 40% interest in Shanghai Chemetall Chemicals Co., Ltd., (“Shanghai Chemetall”) for approximately
$57.6 million ($45.6 million net of cash acquired), the proceeds of which came from the release of restricted cash acquired from Rockwood at closing. As of
the acquisition date, Shanghai Chemetall became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Albemarle and is being consolidated into the Chemetall ® Surface Treatment
segment. The purchase price and the fair value of our equity interest immediately before the date of acquisition (approximately $60 million), as well as the
fair value of the noncontrolling interest in Nanjing Chemetall Surface Technologies Co., Ltd., have been allocated to the net assets acquired at the
acquisition date. On December 23, 2015, we paid approximately $4.8 million in connection with the acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interests’
share of Nanjing Chemetall Surface Technologies Co., Ltd.
NOTE 3—Divestitures:
Assets Held for Sale
In 2015, we announced our intention to pursue strategic alternatives, including divestitures, related to certain businesses which include minerals-based
flame retardants and specialty chemicals, fine chemistry services and metal sulfides. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we determined that the assets held for sale
criteria in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, were met for these businesses as well as a small group of assets at an idled site. As such,
the assets and liabilities of these businesses are included in Assets held for sale and Liabilities held for sale, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 2015. We have determined that as of December 31, 2015, the expected cash flows of these businesses were sufficient to establish
recoverability of the asset carrying values, and therefore no impairment charge has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements under the held-
for-sale model.
On November 5, 2015, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its Tribotecc metal sulfides business to Treibacher Industrie AG. Included in
the transaction were sites in Vienna and Arnoldstein, Austria, and Tribotecc’s proprietary sulfide synthesis process. On January 4, 2016, the Company closed
the sale of this business. We received net proceeds of approximately $137 million, and we currently expect to record a gain in the first quarter of 2016 related
to the sale of this business.
On December 16, 2015, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses to
Huber Engineered Materials, a division of J.M. Huber Corporation. The transaction includes Albemarle’s Martinswerk GmbH subsidiary and manufacturing
facility located in Bergheim, Germany, and Albemarle’s 50% ownership interest in Magnifin Magnesiaprodukte GmbH, a joint-venture with Radex Heraklith
Industriebeteiligung AG at Breitenau, Austria. On February 1, 2016, the Company closed the sale of these businesses. We received net proceeds of
approximately $187 million, subject to post-closing adjustments. We currently expect to record a gain in the first quarter of 2016 related to the sale of these
businesses.
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities that were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2015, are as follows (in
thousands):
Assets
Current assets $ 156,421
Net property, plant and equipment 115,865
Goodwill 46,794
Other intangibles, net of amortization 66,324
All other noncurrent assets 19,081
Assets held for sale $ 404,485
Liabilities
Current liabilities $ 72,756
Deferred income taxes 24,947
All other noncurrent liabilities 31,003
Liabilities held for sale $ 128,706
75
Assets held for sale and related liabilities are classified as current in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 because the Company has
completed or expects to complete the sale of such assets in 2016. The results of operations of the businesses classified as held for sale are included in
continuing operations within the consolidated statements of income. These businesses did not qualify for discontinued operations treatment because the
Company’s management does not consider their sale as representing a strategic shift that had or will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and
financial results.
Discontinued Operations
On April 15, 2014, the Company signed a definitive agreement to sell its antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets to SI Group, Inc.
Included in the transaction were Albemarle’s manufacturing sites in Orangeburg, South Carolina and Jinshan, China, along with Albemarle’s antioxidant
product lines manufactured in Ningbo, China. On September 1, 2014, the Company closed the sale of these businesses and assets and received net proceeds
of $104.7 million. A working capital settlement of $7.6 million (recorded in Other accounts receivable at December 31, 2014) was received in the first quarter
of 2015. Financial results of the disposed group have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for 2014 and 2013.
A summary of results of discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows (in thousands):

2014 2013
Net sales $ 154,273 $ 222,146
(Loss) income from discontinued operations $ (90,439) $ 5,985

Income tax (benefit) expense (20,908) 1,877
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of tax) $ (69,531) $ 4,108
Included in (Loss) income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 are pre-tax charges of $85.5 million ($65.7 million after
income taxes) related to the loss on the sale of the disposed group, representing the difference between the carrying value of the related assets and their fair
value as determined by the sales price less estimated costs to sell. The loss is primarily attributable to the write-off of goodwill, intangibles and long-lived
assets, net of cumulative foreign currency translation gains of $17.8 million.
NOTE 4—Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

Supplemental information related to the consolidated statements of cash flows is as follows (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Cash paid during the year for:
Income taxes (net of refunds of $7,333, $6,035 and $14,296 in 2015, 2014 and
2013, respectively)(a) $ 162,408 $ 56,174 $ 51,772
Interest (net of capitalization) $ 153,271 $ 33,604 $ 29,629
Supplemental non-cash disclosures related to investing activities:

Capital expenditures included in Accounts payable $ 45,826 $ 20,373 $ 13,741
(a) Cash paid for income taxes during 2015 includes approximately $111 million of taxes paid on repatriation of earnings from legacy Rockwood entities.
76
NOTE 5—Earnings Per Share:

Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations are calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

2015 2014 2013
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
Numerator:
Net income from continuing operations $ 360,064 $ 230,437 $ 435,726
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (25,158) (27,590) (26,663)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 334,906 $ 202,847 $ 409,063
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share 111,182 78,696 83,839
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations $ 3.01 $ 2.57 $ 4.88
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
Numerator:
Net income from continuing operations $ 360,064 $ 230,437 $ 435,726
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (25,158) (27,590) (26,663)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 334,906 $ 202,847 $ 409,063
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares for basic earnings per share 111,182 78,696 83,839
Incremental shares under stock compensation plans 374 406 483
Weighted-average common shares for diluted earnings per share 111,556 79,102 84,322
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations $ 3.00 $ 2.57 $ 4.85
The Company’s policy on how to determine windfalls and shortfalls for purposes of calculating assumed stock award proceeds under the treasury stock
method when determining the denominator for diluted earnings per share is to exclude the impact of pro forma deferred tax assets (i.e. the windfall or shortfall
that would be recognized in the financial statements upon exercise of the award). At December 31, 2015, there were 1,114,041 common stock equivalents not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Included in the calculation of basic earnings per share are unvested restricted stock awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends. At
December 31, 2015, there were 9,250 unvested shares of restricted stock awards outstanding.
We have the authority to issue 15 million shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or series. As of December 31, 2015, no shares of preferred
stock have been issued.
On February 12, 2013, our Board of Directors authorized an increase in the number of shares the Company is permitted to repurchase under our share
repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company is now permitted to repurchase up to a maximum of 15 million shares, including those shares previously
authorized but not yet repurchased.
Under its existing Board authorized share repurchase program, in 2014 and 2013 the Company repurchased 2,190,254 shares and 7,064,932 shares of
its common stock, respectively, pursuant to accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreements with two financial institutions. Amounts paid pursuant to the
ASR agreements were $150 million and $450 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, and these purchases were funded through a combination of available
cash on hand and debt. The Company determined that each of the ASR agreements met the criteria to be accounted for as a forward contract indexed to its
own stock and were therefore treated as equity instruments. The final number of shares delivered upon settlement of each agreement was determined with
reference to the daily Rule 10b-18 volume weighted-average prices of the Company’s common stock over the term of each agreement, less a forward price
adjustment amount. The shares repurchased reduced the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted
earnings per share.
During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company repurchased 2,190,254 and 9,198,056 shares of its common stock, respectively,
pursuant to the terms of its share repurchase program. There were no shares of the Company’s
77
common stock repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, there were 3,749,340 remaining shares available for
repurchase under the Company’s authorized share repurchase program.
NOTE 6—Other Accounts Receivable:

Other accounts receivable consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Value added tax/consumption tax $ 24,316 $ 23,205
Other 55,561 26,218
Total $ 79,877 $ 49,423
NOTE 7—Inventories:
The following table provides a breakdown of inventories at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Finished goods $ 308,462 $ 262,769
Raw materials and work in process(a) 144,886 53,152
Stores, supplies and other 55,380 42,440
Total inventories $ 508,728 $ 358,361
(a) Balance at December 31, 2015 includes $39.1 million of work in process related to the Lithium product category.
Approximately 17% and 28% of our inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The portion of our domestic inventories stated on the LIFO basis amounted to $85.1 million and $100.7 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively, which are below replacement cost by approximately $36.9 million and $43.0 million, respectively.
NOTE 8—Other Current Assets:

Other current assets consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Deferred income taxes—current (a) $ — $ 1,801
Income tax receivables 23,740 22,837
Prepaid expenses 43,280 41,448
Other 4,331 —
Total $ 71,351 $ 66,086
(a) See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 20, “Income Taxes.”
78
NOTE 9—Property, Plant and Equipment:

Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Useful December 31,

Lives
(Years) 2015 2014
Land (a) — $ 145,912 $ 56,249
Land improvements 5 – 30 59,423 49,099
Buildings and improvements(a) 10 – 45 297,163 214,364
Machinery and equipment (b) 2 – 45 2,305,641 2,106,451
Long-term mineral rights and production equipment costs 7 – 60 652,871 85,888
Construction in progress — 420,152 108,619
Total $ 3,881,162 $ 2,620,670
(a) Includes Land under capital lease of $2.8 million and Buildings and improvements under capital lease of $9.9 million at December 31, 2015.
(b) Consists primarily of (1) short-lived production equipment components, office and building equipment and other equipment with estimated lives ranging 2 – 7 years,
(2) production process equipment (intermediate components) with estimated lives ranging 8 – 19 years, (3) production process equipment (major unit components) with
estimated lives ranging 20 – 29 years, and (4) production process equipment (infrastructure and other) with estimated lives ranging 30 – 45 years.
In 2015, approximately $1.4 billion was allocated to Property, plant and equipment in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood. See Note 2,
“Acquisitions” for additional information about the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed upon the acquisition of Rockwood. In 2014, we sold
our antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets to SI Group, Inc. Included in the transaction were our manufacturing sites in Orangeburg, South
Carolina and Jinshan, China, along with our antioxidant product lines manufactured in Ningbo, China. In connection with the sale, net property, plant and
equipment was reduced by $100.0 million. See Note 3 “Divestitures” for additional information about this transaction.
The cost of property, plant and equipment, including buildings and improvements under capital lease, is depreciated generally by the straight-line
method. Depletion of long-term mineral rights is based on the units-of-production method. Depreciation expense amounted to $180.7 million, $97.9 million
and $99.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Depreciation expense related to discontinued operations was
$2.3 million and $8.6 million during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Interest capitalized on significant capital projects in 2015,
2014 and 2013 was $11.2 million, $2.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, accumulated amortization for assets under capital
lease acquired from Rockwood was $0.3 million.
79
NOTE 10—Investments:
Investments include our share of unconsolidated joint ventures, nonmarketable securities and marketable equity securities. The following table details
our investment balances at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands).
December 31,
2015 2014
Joint ventures(a) $ 430,952 $ 169,891
Nonmarketable securities 208 177
Marketable equity securities 24,257 23,974
Total $ 455,417 $ 194,042
(a) Balance at December 31, 2015 excludes our investment in Magnifin Magnesiaprodukte GmbH & Co. KG (“Magnifin”), which is included in Assets held for sale. Refer to
Note 3, “Divestitures.”
Our ownership positions in significant unconsolidated investments are shown below:
December 31,
2015 2014 2013
* Windfield Holdings Pty Ltd - a joint venture with Sichuan Tianqi Lithium Industries, Inc., that mines lithium ore and
produces lithium concentrate 49% —% —%
* Nippon Aluminum Alkyls - a joint venture with Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. that produces aluminum alkyls 50% 50% 50%
* Magnifin Magnesiaprodukte GmbH & Co. KG - a joint venture with Radex Heraklith Industriebeteiligung AG that
produces specialty magnesium hydroxide products 50% 50% 50%
* Nippon Ketjen Company Limited - a joint venture with Sumitomo Metal Mining Company Limited that produces
refinery catalysts 50% 50% 50%
* Eurecat S.A. - a joint venture with IFP Investissements for refinery catalysts regeneration services 50% 50% 50%
* Fábrica Carioca de Catalisadores S.A. - a joint venture with Petrobras Quimica S.A. - PETROQUISA that produces
catalysts and includes catalysts research and product development activities 50% 50% 50%
Our investment in the significant unconsolidated joint ventures above, including Magnifin, amounted to $402.6 million and $148.3 million as of
December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and the amount included in Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax) in the consolidated
statements of income totaled $25.4 million, $34.7 million and $32.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As further
described in Note 25, “Segment and Geographic Area Information,” Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments (net of tax) for the year ended
December 31, 2015 was reduced by $27.1 million related to the utilization of the inventory markup to fair value in connection with the acquisition of
Rockwood. Undistributed earnings attributable to our significant unconsolidated investments represented approximately $105.9 million and $107.8 million
of our consolidated retained earnings at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. All of the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have investments
are private companies and accordingly do not have a quoted market price available.
The following summary lists our assets, liabilities and results of operations for our significant unconsolidated joint ventures presented herein (in
thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Summary of Balance Sheet Information:
Current assets $ 331,630 $ 226,392
Noncurrent assets 935,790 181,343
Total assets $ 1,267,420 $ 407,735
Current liabilities $ 106,966 $ 74,242

Noncurrent liabilities 339,604 63,585
Total liabilities $ 446,570 $ 137,827
80

2015 2014 2013
Summary of Statements of Income Information:
Net sales $ 560,376 $ 499,394 $ 499,941
Gross profit $ 253,569 $ 164,063 $ 168,898
Income before income taxes $ 157,501 $ 101,983 $ 101,680
Net income $ 111,491 $ 71,466 $ 71,322
We have evaluated each of the unconsolidated investments pursuant to current accounting guidance and none qualify for consolidation. Dividends
received from our significant unconsolidated investments were $58.1 million, $39.6 million and $20.1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying amount of our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures exceeded the amount of underlying equity
in net assets by approximately $11.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively. These amounts represent the differences between the value of certain assets of the
joint ventures and our related valuation on a U.S. GAAP basis. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, remained to
be amortized over the remaining useful lives of the assets with the balance of the difference representing primarily our share of the joint ventures’ goodwill.
The Company holds a 49% equity interest in Windfield Holdings Pty Ltd (“Windfield”), which we acquired in the Rockwood acquisition. With regards
to the Company’s ownership in Windfield, the parties share risks and benefits disproportionate to their voting interests. As a result, the Company considers
Windfield to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”). However, the Company does not consolidate Windfield as it is not the primary beneficiary. The carrying
amount of our 49% equity interest in Windfield, which is our most significant VIE, was $280.2 million at December 31, 2015. The Company’s aggregate net
investment in all other entities which it considers to be VIE’s for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary was $27.6 million and $6.2 million at
December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Our unconsolidated VIE’s are reported in Investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The
Company does not guarantee debt for, or have other financial support obligations to, these entities, and its maximum exposure to loss in connection with its
continuing involvement with these entities is limited to the carrying value of the investments. Included in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2015, is a return of capital from Windfield of $98.0 million.
Assets of the Benefit Protection Trust, in conjunction with our EDCP, are accounted for as trading securities in accordance with authoritative
accounting guidance. The assets of the Trust consist primarily of mutual fund investments and are marked-to-market on a monthly basis through the
consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, these marketable securities amounted to $21.6 million and $22.2 million,
respectively.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, loans receivable from our 50%-owned joint venture, Saudi Organometallic Chemicals Company (“SOCC”), totaled
approximately $30.0 million and are included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Interest on these loans is based on either the London Inter-
Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or Saudi Arabia Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“SAIBOR”), plus a margin of 1.275%, per annum. Principal repayments on amounts
outstanding under this arrangement are required as mutually agreed upon by the joint venture partners, but with any outstanding balances due in full no later
than December 31, 2021.
81
NOTE 11—Other Assets:

Other assets consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Deferred income taxes—noncurrent (a) $ 76,025 $ 62,440
Assets related to unrecognized tax benefits(a) 50,875 22,100
Long-term advances to joint ventures(b) 31,780 34,084
Deferred financing costs(c) 19,605 23,583
Other 38,713 18,749
Total $ 216,998 $ 160,956
(a) See Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 20, “Income Taxes.”
(b) See Note 10, “Investments.”
(c) See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt.”
NOTE 12—Goodwill and Other Intangibles:

Goodwill and other intangibles consist principally of goodwill, customer lists, trade names, trademarks, patents and other intangibles.
The following table summarizes the changes in goodwill by operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Chemetall
Performance Refining Surface
Chemicals Solutions Treatment All Other Total
Balance at December 31, 2013 $ 42,025 $ 218,382 $ — $ 23,796 $ 284,203
Divestitures(a) — — — (15,088) (15,088)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (9) (25,725) — (119) (25,853)
Balance at December 31, 2014 42,016 192,657 — 8,589 243,262
Acquisition of Rockwood 1,293,467 — 1,482,517 41,151 2,817,135
Other acquisitions(b) — — 23,993 — 23,993
Reclass to assets held for sale(c) — — — (46,794) (46,794)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (47,659) (19,929) (73,251) (2,946) (143,785)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 1,287,824 $ 172,728 $ 1,433,259 $ — $ 2,893,811
(a) In 2014, we reduced goodwill by $15.1 million in connection with the sale of our antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets which closed on September 1,
2014. See Note 3 “Divestitures” for additional information about this transaction.
(b) Primarily relates to the acquisition of the remaining interest in Shanghai Chemetall. See Note 2, “Acquisitions.”
(c) See Note 3, “Divestitures.”
82
Other intangibles consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Customer Lists Trade Names and Patents and

and Relationships Trademarks (a) Technology Other (b) Total
Gross Asset Value
Balance at December 31, 2013 $ 86,426 $ 26,907 $ 48,743 $ 38,342 $ 200,418
Acquisitions(c) — — 5,228 — 5,228
Divestitures(d) (34,892) (8,171) (11,316) (14,161) (68,540)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other (3,055) (1,181) (2,257) (740) (7,233)
Balance at December 31, 2014 48,479 17,555 40,398 23,441 129,873
Acquisition of Rockwood 1,264,226 363,120 227,838 26,410 1,881,594
Other acquisitions(e) 76,052 — 1,433 73 77,558
Reclass to assets held for sale(f) (16,608) — (54,060) (1,454) (72,122)
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other (88,092) (25,468) (15,508) (6,117) (135,185)
Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 1,284,057 $ 355,207 $ 200,101 $ 42,353 $ 1,881,718
Accumulated Amortization
Balance at December 31, 2013 $ (35,988) $ (8,970) $ (40,354) $ (26,903) $ (112,215)
Amortization (2,839) (824) (388) (1,686) (5,737)
Divestitures(d) 14,487 1,539 5,738 5,820 27,584
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other 1,409 343 2,173 695 4,620
Balance at December 31, 2014 (22,931) (7,912) (32,831) (22,074) (85,748)
Amortization (51,926) (12,228) (12,501) (627) (77,282)
Reclass to assets held for sale(f) 596 — 3,880 1,322 5,798
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other 2,303 381 1,675 4,202 8,561
Balance at December 31, 2015 $ (71,958) $ (19,759) $ (39,777) $ (17,177) $ (148,671)
Net Book Value at December 31, 2014 $ 25,548 $ 9,643 $ 7,567 $ 1,367 $ 44,125
Net Book Value at December 31, 2015 $ 1,212,099 $ 335,448 $ 160,324 $ 25,176 $ 1,733,047
(a) Included in Trade Names and Trademarks are indefinite-lived intangible assets with a gross carrying amount of $9.2 million and $113.1 million at December 31, 2014 and
2015, respectively.
(b) Included in Other is an indefinite-lived intangible asset with a gross carrying amount of $21.9 million at December 31, 2015.
(c) Increase in Patents and Technology relates to a purchase accounting adjustment in connection with our acquisition of Cambridge Chemical Company, Ltd.
(d) In 2014 we reduced intangible assets by $68.5 million and related accumulated amortization by $27.6 million in connection with the sale of our antioxidant, ibuprofen and
propofol businesses and assets which closed on September 1, 2014. See Note 3 “Divestitures” for additional information about this transaction.
(e) Primarily relates to the acquisition of the remaining interest in Shanghai Chemetall. See Note 2, “Acquisitions.”
(f) See Note 3, “Divestitures.”
Useful lives range from 15 – 25 years for customer lists and relationships; 11 – 20 years for trade names and trademarks; 17 – 20 years for patents and
technology; and 5 – 15 years for other.
Amortization of other intangibles amounted to $77.3 million, $5.7 million and $8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. Included in amortization for the year ended December 31, 2015 is $49.2 million of amortization using the pattern of economic benefit method.
Amortization of other intangibles related to discontinued operations was $0.9 million and $3.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013,
respectively.
83
Total estimated amortization expense of other intangibles, excluding other intangibles in assets held for sale, for the next five fiscal years is as follows
(in thousands):
Estimated Amortization
Expense
2016 $ 90,002
2017 $ 91,485
2018 $ 92,884
2019 $ 93,275
2020 $ 93,189
NOTE 13—Accrued Expenses:

Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Employee benefits, payroll and related taxes $ 125,236 $ 49,072
Obligations in connection with Rockwood acquisition (a) 128,881 —
Other(b) 148,262 117,102
Total $ 402,379 $ 166,174
(a) Includes accruals related to certain litigation matters and businesses divested by Rockwood prior to the Acquisition Closing Date.
(b) No individual component exceeds 5% of total current liabilities.
NOTE 14—Long-Term Debt:

Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Term loan facilities $ 1,250,000 $ —
1.875% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $5,109 at December 31, 2015 and $6,605 at December 31,
2014 763,946 844,315
3.00% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $244 at December 31, 2015 and $306 at December 31, 2014 249,756 249,694
2014 423,706 423,561
2014 348,443 348,129
5.10% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $3 at December 31, 2014 — 324,997
5.45% Senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $995 at December 31, 2015 and $1,029 at December 31,
2014 349,005 348,971
Commercial paper notes 351,349 367,178
Fixed rate foreign borrowings 995 1,958
Variable-rate foreign bank loans 77,452 25,139
Variable-rate domestic bank loans 20,479 —
Capital lease obligations 16,807 —
Miscellaneous 81 189
Total long-term debt 3,852,019 2,934,131
Less amounts due within one year 677,345 711,096
Long-term debt, less current portion $ 3,174,674 $ 2,223,035
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2015 are as follows (in millions): 2016—$677.3; 2017—$59.1; 2018—$86.4;
2019—$335.5; 2020—$1,158.4; thereafter—$1,544.5.
84
Rockwood Acquisition Financing

The net proceeds from senior notes we issued in the fourth quarter of 2014, together with borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, commercial
paper notes, August 15, 2014 term loan credit agreement and a senior unsecured cash bridge facility, were used to finance the cash portion of the
consideration for the acquisition of Rockwood, pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition, repay our 5.10% senior notes, with the remainder, if any,
used for general corporate purposes.
Senior Notes
In the fourth quarter of 2014, we issued a series of senior notes (collectively, the “2014 Senior Notes”) as follows:
• €700.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on December 8, 2014, bearing interest at a rate of 1.875% payable annually on
December 8 of each year, beginning in 2015. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 2.10%. These senior notes mature on
December 8, 2021.
• $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on November 24, 2014, bearing interest at a rate of 3.00% payable semi-annually
on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning June 1, 2015. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 3.18%. These
senior notes mature on December 1, 2019.
Upon completion of the Rockwood acquisition, we assumed Rockwood’s senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.25 billion. These
senior notes bore interest at a rate of 4.625% payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, and had a scheduled maturity of October 15,
2020. At October 15, 2015, the carrying amount of the 4.625% senior notes included an unamortized premium of approximately $38.0 million, which
resulted from an adjustment to fair value upon our assumption of the notes from Rockwood. The effective interest rate of the notes was approximately 3.95%.
Under the terms of the indenture governing the 4.625% senior notes, as amended and supplemented, on October 15, 2015, our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc., redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% senior notes at a redemption price equal to 103.469% of the principal
amount of the notes, representing a premium of $43.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The guarantees of the 4.625% senior
notes and the 2014 Senior Notes were released upon repayment of the 4.625% senior notes. Included in Interest and financing expenses in our consolidated
statements of income and Other, net, in our consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 is a loss on early extinguishment of
approximately $5.4 million related to these senior notes.
Our $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, issued on December 10, 2010, bear interest at a rate of 4.50% payable semi-annually on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. The effective interest rate on these senior notes is approximately 4.70%. These senior notes mature on December 15,
2020.
Our $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes, which were issued on January 20, 2005 and bore interest at a rate of 5.10%, matured and
were repaid on February 1, 2015. The effective interest rate on these senior notes was approximately 5.19%. As a result of the refinancing of these senior notes
prior to December 31, 2014, these senior notes were included in Current portion of long-term debt at December 31, 2014.
In anticipation of refinancing our 5.10% senior notes in the fourth quarter of 2014, on January 22, 2014, we entered into a pay fixed, receive variable
rate forward starting interest rate swap with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., to be effective October 15, 2014. Our risk management objective and strategy for
undertaking this hedge was to eliminate the variability in the interest rate and partial credit spread on the 20 future semi-annual coupon payments that we
will pay in connection with our 4.15% senior notes. The notional amount of the swap was $325.0 million and the fixed rate was 3.281%, with the cash
settlement determined by reference to the changes in the U.S. Dollar 3-month LIBOR and credit spreads from the date we entered into the swap until the date
the swap was settled (October 15, 2014). This derivative financial instrument was designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging. We determined there was no ineffectiveness during the term of the swap. On October 15, 2014, the swap was settled, resulting in a
payment to the counterparty of $33.4 million. This amount was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and is being amortized to
interest expense over the life of the 4.15% senior notes. The amount to be reclassified to interest expense from Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income during the next twelve months is approximately $3.3 million.
85
In connection with the offering of the 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes which were priced on December 1, 2014, we entered into two forward
contracts on November 24, 2014, each with a notional value of €350.0 million, to exchange a total of €700.0 million for U.S. Dollars, with settlement
occurring on December 18, 2014, and with the total notional value representing an amount equivalent to the gross proceeds from the offering of the 1.875%
Euro-denominated senior notes. The objective of entering into these forward contracts was to minimize the financial impact of changes in the Euro-to-U.S.
Dollar exchange rate with respect to our foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves as the functional currency. From the effective date of the contracts until
the date of settlement, the forward contracts were designated as effective hedges of our net investment in these foreign subsidiaries. Upon settlement, a gain of
$5.2 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, and such amount is expected to remain in accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income until the complete or substantially complete liquidation of our investment in these foreign subsidiaries. On December 18, 2014, the carrying
value of the 1.875% Euro-denominated senior notes was designated as an effective hedge of our net investment in foreign subsidiaries where the Euro serves
as the functional currency, and beginning on the date of designation, gains or losses on the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting currency have
been and will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, gains of $50.9 million
and $12.8 million were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in connection with the revaluation of these senior notes to our reporting
currency.
September 2015 Term Loan Agreement

The 4.625% senior notes we assumed from Rockwood were repaid with proceeds from a new term loan agreement we entered into on September 14,
2015 (the “September 2015 Term Loan Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the “Administrative Agent”) and certain other lenders. The September
2015 Term Loan Agreement provides for borrowings under a 364-day term loan facility (the “364-Day Facility”) and a five-year term loan facility (the “Five-
Year Facility”), or collectively, the “Term loan facilities.” As of December 31, 2015, aggregate amounts outstanding under the 364-Day Facility and the Five-
Year Facility were $300.0 million and $950.0 million, respectively. As of February 19, 2016, we repaid the 364-Day Facility in full and we repaid
approximately $31 million of borrowings under the Five-Year Facility, each primarily with proceeds from the sale of the Company’s Tribotecc metal sulfides
business and the sale of the Company’s minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses, both of which closed in the first quarter of 2016.
Borrowings under the facilities bear interest equal to, at the option of the Company: (a) LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.000% to 1.875% per annum
depending upon the long-term, unsecured, senior, non-credit enhanced debt rating of the Company, or (b) a base rate (defined as the highest of (i) the Federal
Funds Rate plus 0.50%; (ii) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by the Administrative Agent as its “prime rate”;
or (iii) one-month LIBOR plus 1.00%) plus a margin of 0.000% to 0.875% per annum depending upon the long-term, unsecured, senior, non-credit enhanced
debt rating of the Company. As of December 31, 2015, the interest rate on both Term loan facilities was LIBOR plus 1.375%.
Borrowings under the 364-Day Facility were required to be repaid 364 days after initial funding. Borrowings under the Five-Year Facility are required
to be repaid in equal quarterly installments on the last business day of each of March, June, September and December, beginning with September 30, 2016,
and ending with the last such day to occur prior to the fifth anniversary after initial funding (each a “Payment Date”), in an aggregate principal amount equal
to (a) in the case of each Payment Date occurring on or after the first anniversary and prior to the second anniversary of initial funding, 1.25% of the
aggregate principal amount of such loans, and (b) in the case of each Payment Date occurring on or after the second anniversary of initial funding, equal to
2.5% of the aggregate principal amount of such loans. On the fifth anniversary after initial funding, any remaining amounts outstanding under the Five-Year
Facility become due and payable. Additionally, the agreement requires that proceeds from divestitures of the Company’s Tribotecc metal sulfides business
and the Company’s minerals-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals businesses, and intended divestiture of its Fine Chemistry Services business,
must be used to repay amounts outstanding under the September 2015 Term Loan Agreement. Borrowings under the September 2015 Term Loan Agreement
are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio requirement that is aligned with the maximum leverage
ratio requirement of our February 2014 Credit Agreement, as defined below.
Credit Agreement
Our revolving, unsecured credit agreement dated as of February 7, 2014, as amended, (the “February 2014 Credit Agreement”) currently provides for
borrowings of up to $1.0 billion and matures on February 7, 2020. Borrowings bear interest at variable rates based on the LIBOR for deposits in the relevant
currency plus an applicable margin which ranges from 1.000% to 1.700%, depending on the Company’s credit rating from Standard & Poor’s Ratings
Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”). The applicable margin on the facility was 1.300% as of December 31,
2015.
Borrowings under the February 2014 Credit Agreement are conditioned upon compliance with the following covenants: (a) consolidated funded debt,
as defined in the agreement, must be less than or equal to 3.50 times consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, (which reflects adjustments for
certain non-recurring or unusual items such as restructuring charges,
86
facility divestiture charges and other significant non-recurring items), or herein “consolidated adjusted EBITDA,” as of the end of any fiscal quarter; (b) with
the exception of certain liens as specified in the agreement, liens may not attach to assets when the aggregate amount of all indebtedness secured by such
liens plus unsecured subsidiary indebtedness, other than indebtedness incurred by our subsidiaries under the February 2014 Credit Agreement, would exceed
20% of consolidated net worth, as defined in the agreement; and (c) with the exception of certain indebtedness as specified in the agreement, subsidiary
indebtedness may not exceed the difference between 20% of consolidated net worth, as defined in the agreement, and indebtedness secured by liens
permitted under the agreement.
On August 15, 2014, certain amendments were made to the February 2014 Credit Agreement which include the following: (a) an increase in the
maximum leverage ratio (as described above) from 3.50 to 4.50 for the first four quarters following the completion of the acquisition of Rockwood, stepping
down by 0.25 on a quarterly basis thereafter until reaching 3.50; and (b) requiring subsidiaries of Albemarle that guarantee the 2014 Senior Notes to also
guarantee the February 2014 Credit Agreement.
In January 2015, we borrowed $250.0 million under the February 2014 Credit Agreement in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood, and such
amount was repaid in full in February 2015. As of December 31, 2015, there were no borrowings outstanding under the February 2014 Credit Agreement.
Commercial Paper Notes

On May 29, 2013, we entered into agreements to initiate a commercial paper program on a private placement basis under which we may issue unsecured
commercial paper notes (the “Commercial Paper Notes”) from time-to-time up to a maximum aggregate principal amount outstanding at any time of $750.0
million. The proceeds from the issuance of the Commercial Paper Notes are expected to be used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of
other debt of the Company. Our February 2014 Credit Agreement is available to repay the Commercial Paper Notes, if necessary. Aggregate borrowings
outstanding under the February 2014 Credit Agreement and the Commercial Paper Notes will not exceed the $1.0 billion current maximum amount available
under the February 2014 Credit Agreement. The Commercial Paper Notes will be sold at a discount from par, or alternatively, will be sold at par and bear
interest at rates that will vary based upon market conditions at the time of issuance. The maturities of the Commercial Paper Notes will vary but may not
exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The definitive documents relating to the commercial paper program contain customary representations, warranties,
default and indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2015, we had $351.3 million of Commercial Paper Notes outstanding bearing a weighted-average
interest rate of approximately 1.07% and a weighted-average maturity of 29 days.
August 2014 Term Loan Agreement and Cash Bridge Facility

On August 15, 2014, we entered into a term loan credit agreement (the “August 2014 Term Loan Agreement”) providing for a tranche of senior
unsecured term loans in an aggregate amount of $1.0 billion that were intended to be used as short-term borrowings to fund a portion of the cash
consideration for the Rockwood acquisition and pay related fees and expenses. In January 2015, we borrowed and repaid $1.0 billion and $816.5 million,
respectively, under the August 2014 Term Loan Agreement. In February 2015, the remaining balance outstanding was repaid in full. The weighted-average
interest rate on borrowings under the August 2014 Term Loan Agreement was approximately 1.67%. This agreement matured 364 days following the date of
funding, which occurred on January 12, 2015.
On December 2, 2014, we entered into an agreement for a senior unsecured cash bridge facility (the “Cash Bridge Facility”) pursuant to which the
lenders thereunder would provide up to $1.15 billion in loans intended to be used as short-term borrowings to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the
Rockwood acquisition and pay related fees and expenses, with maturity 60 days following the completion of the Rockwood acquisition. In January 2015, we
borrowed and repaid $800.0 million under the Cash Bridge Facility. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings under the Cash Bridge Facility was
approximately 1.67%.
Structuring and underwriting fees of approximately $19.0 million were paid in 2014 in connection with bridge financing arrangements, which are
reflected in Other, net, in our consolidated statements of cash flows. These costs were capitalized and were expensed over the term of the facilities or until the
date at which permanent financing was obtained and the facilities were eliminated. Accordingly, we expensed $16.7 million in 2014 and $2.3 million in
2015, which is reflected in Other income(expenses), net, in the consolidated statements of income and Other, net, in our consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Financing Costs
Debt financing costs paid in 2014 in connection with the 2014 Senior Notes, August 2014 Term Loan Agreement and February 2014 Credit Agreement
were $17.6 million. In 2015, we paid approximately $4.5 million of debt financing costs
87
primarily related to the 2014 Senior Notes, the September 2015 Term Loan Agreement and amendments to the February 2014 Credit Agreement.
Other
We have additional uncommitted credit lines with various U.S. and foreign financial institutions that provide for borrowings of up to approximately
$257 million at December 31, 2015. Outstanding borrowings under these agreements were $98.9 million and $27.1 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. The average interest rate on borrowings under these agreements during 2015, 2014 and 2013 was approximately 0.74%, 0.83% and 0.76%,
respectively.
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had the ability and intent to refinance our borrowings under our other existing credit lines with borrowings under
the February 2014 Credit Agreement. Therefore, the amounts outstanding under those credit lines, if any, are classified as long-term debt at December 31,
2015 and 2014. At December 31, 2015, we had the ability to borrow $648.7 million under our commercial paper program and the February 2014 Credit
Agreement.
We believe that as of December 31, 2015, we were, and currently are, in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
NOTE 15—Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits:
We maintain various noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees, primarily in the U.S., the United Kingdom (“U.K.”),
Germany and Japan. In connection with the acquisition of Rockwood, in the first quarter of 2015 we assumed the obligations of various defined benefit
pension plans that were maintained by Rockwood which cover certain employees, primarily in the U.S., the U.K. and Germany. We also have a contributory
defined benefit plan covering certain Belgian employees. The benefits for these plans are based primarily on compensation and/or years of service. Our U.S.
and U.K. defined benefit plans for non-represented employees are closed to new participants, with no additional benefits accruing under these plans as
participants’ accrued benefits have been frozen. The funding policy for each plan complies with the requirements of relevant governmental laws and
regulations. The pension information for all periods presented includes amounts related to salaried and hourly plans.
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status, as well as a summary of significant assumptions, for our
defined benefit pension plans (in thousands):
88
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Year Ended December 31, 2014
U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans
Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligation at January 1 $ 729,652 $ 53,112 $ 629,337 $ 49,245
Service cost 1,233 6,034 7,029 1,746
Interest cost 31,231 9,875 30,491 1,571
Plan amendments — 870 — —
Actuarial (gain) loss (55,851) (42,977) 130,887 10,341
Benefits paid (38,300) (16,118) (37,866) (3,913)
Acquisitions 39,125 416,150 — —
Divestitures(a) — — (30,226) —
Reclass to liabilities held for sale — (26,608) — —
Employee contributions — 478 — 283
Foreign exchange gain — (26,708) — (6,161)
Settlements/curtailments — (582) — —
Other — 331 — —
Benefit obligation at December 31 $ 707,090 $ 373,857 $ 729,652 $ 53,112
Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at January 1 $ 598,250 $ 9,444 $ 605,604 $ 10,941
Actual return on plan assets (16,789) 140 53,696 499
Employer contributions 1,606 16,392 7,042 2,940
Benefits paid (38,300) (16,118) (37,866) (3,913)
Acquisitions 29,314 109,875 — —
Divestitures(a) — — (30,226) —
Employee contributions — 478 — 283
Foreign exchange loss — (3,237) — (1,306)
Settlements/curtailments — (582) — —
Other — 314 — —
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 $ 574,081 $ 116,706 $ 598,250 $ 9,444
Funded status at December 31 $ (133,009) $ (257,151) $ (131,402) $ (43,668)
(a) Reduction in benefit obligations and plan assets in 2014 is in connection with the sale of our antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets which closed on
September 1, 2014. See Note 3 “Divestitures” for additional information about this transaction.
89
December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014

U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance
sheets:
Current liabilities (accrued expenses) $ (1,110) $ (7,498) $ (3,219) $ (1,316)
Noncurrent liabilities (pension benefits) (131,899) (249,653) (128,183) (42,352)
Net pension liability $ (133,009) $ (257,151) $ (131,402) $ (43,668)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other

comprehensive (loss) income:
Prior service benefit $ (211) $ (1,052) $ (286) $ (321)
Net amount recognized $ (211) $ (1,052) $ (286) $ (321)
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine

benefit obligations at December 31:
Discount rate 4.67% 2.89% 4.19% 1.85%
Rate of compensation increase —% 3.17% —% 3.40%
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $1.1 billion and $776.6 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively.
Postretirement medical benefits and life insurance is provided for certain groups of U.S. retired employees. Medical and life insurance benefit costs
have been funded principally on a pay-as-you-go basis. Although the availability of medical coverage after retirement varies for different groups of
employees, the majority of employees who retire before becoming eligible for Medicare can continue group coverage by paying a portion of the cost of a
monthly premium designed to cover the claims incurred by retired employees subject to a cap on payments allowed. The availability of group coverage for
Medicare-eligible retirees also varies by employee group with coverage designed either to supplement or coordinate with Medicare. Retirees generally pay a
portion of the cost of the coverage. Plan assets for retiree life insurance are held under an insurance contract and are reserved for retiree life insurance benefits.
In 2005, the postretirement medical benefit available to U.S. employees was changed to provide that employees who are under age 50 as of December 31,
2005 would no longer be eligible for a company-paid retiree medical premium subsidy. Employees who are of age 50 and above as of December 31, 2005 and
who retire after January 1, 2006 will have their retiree medical premium subsidy capped. Effective January 1, 2008, our medical insurance for certain groups
of U.S. retired employees is now insured through a medical carrier.
90
The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status, as well as a summary of significant assumptions, for our
postretirement benefit plans (in thousands):

2015 2014
Other Postretirement Other Postretirement
Benefits Benefits
Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligation at January 1 $ 64,500 $ 62,832
Service cost 137 216
Interest cost 2,573 3,040
Actuarial (gain) loss (5,682) 3,741
Benefits paid (5,042) (5,329)
Acquisitions 2,607 —
Settlements/curtailments(a) (2,594) —
Benefit obligation at December 31 $ 56,499 $ 64,500
Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at January 1 $ 4,439 $ 5,620
Actual return on plan assets 280 214
Employer contributions 3,615 3,934
Benefits paid (5,042) (5,329)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 $ 3,292 $ 4,439
Funded status at December 31 $ (53,207) $ (60,061)

(a) We assumed responsibility for one domestic OPEB plan in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood which covered a small number of active employees and retirees. This
plan was terminated in the first quarter of 2015 and provisions were made for the affected employees and retirees to receive benefits under an existing plan.
December 31,
2015 2014
Other Postretirement Other Postretirement
Benefits Benefits
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets:
Current liabilities (accrued expenses) $ (3,560) $ (3,637)
Noncurrent liabilities (postretirement benefits) (49,647) (56,424)
Net postretirement liability $ (53,207) $ (60,061)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income:

Prior service benefit $ 239 $ 334
Net amount recognized $ 239 $ 334
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:

Discount rate 4.59% 4.15%
Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50%
91
The components of pension benefits cost (credit) are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended

December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
U.S. Pension Foreign Pension U.S. Pension Foreign Pension U.S. Pension Foreign Pension
Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans Plans
Service cost $ 1,233 $ 6,034 $ 7,029 $ 1,746 $ 12,177 $ 1,785
Interest cost 31,231 9,875 30,491 1,571 28,406 1,477
Expected return on assets (41,635) (6,507) (39,714) (427) (38,975) (417)
Actuarial loss (gain) 2,577 (35,813) 116,705 10,270 (130,297) (2,619)
Amortization of prior service benefit 75 43 (727) 50 (741) 52
Total net pension benefits (credit) cost $ (6,519) $ (26,368) $ 113,784 $ 13,210 $ (129,430) $ 278
Weighted-average assumption
percentages:
Discount rate 4.18% 2.34% 5.14% 3.41% 4.10% 3.12%
Expected return on plan assets 6.85% 5.63% 6.91% 4.00% 7.25% 4.35%
Rate of compensation increase —% 3.16% 3.50% 3.16% 3.50% 3.36%
Effective January 1, 2016, the weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets for the U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension plans is 6.90%
and 5.65%, respectively.
The estimated amounts to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic pension costs during 2016 are as follows (in
thousands):
U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans

Amortization of prior service benefit $ 75 $ 853
The components of postretirement benefits cost (credit) are as follows (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Other Postretirement Other Postretirement Other Postretirement
Benefits Benefits Benefits
Service cost $ 137 $ 216 $ 309
Interest cost 2,573 3,040 2,764
Expected return on assets (244) (342) (413)
Actuarial (gain) loss (5,707) 3,868 (6,120)
Amortization of prior service benefit (95) (95) (95)
Settlements/curtailments (2,594) — —
Total net postretirement benefits (credit) cost $ (5,930) $ 6,687 $ (3,555)
Weighted-average assumption percentages:

Discount rate 4.15% 5.03% 4.00%
Expected return on plan assets 7.00% 7.00% 7.00%
Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50% 3.50%
Effective January 1, 2016, the weighted-average expected rate of return on plan assets for our postretirement benefit plans is 7.00%.
92
The estimated amounts to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic postretirement costs during 2016 are as follows
(in thousands):
Other Postretirement
Benefits
Amortization of prior service benefit $ (95)
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date (exit price). The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred on the
date of the event or change in circumstance that caused the transfer. There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year ended December 31,
2015. Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the closing price on the last business day of the year. Listed securities for
which no sale was reported on such date are valued at the mean between the last reported bid and asked price. Securities traded in the over-the-counter market
are valued at the closing price on the last business day of the year or at bid price. The net asset value of shares or units is based on the quoted market value of
the underlying assets. The market value of corporate bonds is based on institutional trading lots and is most often reflective of bid price. Government
securities are valued at the mean between bid and ask prices. Holdings in private equity securities are typically valued using the net asset valuations
provided by the underlying private investment companies.
The following table sets forth the assets of our pension and postretirement plans that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for Quoted Prices in
Identical Items (Level Active Markets for Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2015 1) Similar Items (Level 2) (Level 3)
Pension Assets:
Domestic Equity(a) $ 168,945 $ 166,612 $ 2,333 $ —
International Equity(b) 143,976 87,311 56,665 —
Fixed Income(c) 287,809 240,143 47,666 —
Absolute Return(d) 83,127 — — 83,127
Cash 6,930 6,930 — —
Total Pension Assets $ 690,787 $ 500,996 $ 106,664 $ 83,127
Postretirement Assets:
Fixed Income(c) $ 3,292 $ — $ 3,292 $ —
(a) Consists primarily of U.S. stock funds that track or are actively managed and measured against the S&P 500 index.
(b) Consists primarily of international equity funds which invest in common stocks and other securities whose value is based on an international equity index or an underlying
equity security or basket of equity securities.
(c) Consists primarily of debt obligations issued by governments, corporations, municipalities and other borrowers. Also includes insurance policies.
(d) Consists primarily of funds with holdings in private investment companies. See additional information about the Absolute Return investments below.
93
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the plans’ Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Year Ended
Absolute Return: December 31, 2015
Beginning Balance $ 80,740
Transfers in due to acquisition 103,237
Purchases 5,641
Sales (103,035)
Total losses relating to assets sold during the period(a) (610)
Total unrealized losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date(a) (2,846)
Ending Balance $ 83,127
(a) These losses are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and are included as changes in plan assets in the tables above.
The following table sets forth the assets of our pension and postretirement plans that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in
Pension Assets:
Domestic Equity(a) $ 169,581 $ 169,581 $ — $ —
International Equity(b) 85,007 85,007 — —
Fixed Income(c) 268,911 255,828 13,083 —
Absolute Return(d) 80,740 — — 80,740
Cash 3,455 3,455 — —
Total Pension Assets $ 607,694 $ 513,871 $ 13,083 $ 80,740
Postretirement Assets:
Fixed Income(c) $ 4,439 $ — $ 4,439 $ —
(a) Consists primarily of U.S. stock funds that track or are actively managed and measured against the S&P 500 index.
(b) Consists primarily of international equity funds which invest in common stocks and other securities whose value is based on an international equity index or an underlying
equity security or basket of equity securities.
(c) Consists primarily of debt obligations issued by governments, corporations, municipalities and other borrowers. Also includes insurance policies.
(d) Consists primarily of funds with holdings in private investment companies. See additional information about the Absolute Return investments below.
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the plans’ Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
Year Ended
Absolute Return: December 31, 2014
Beginning Balance $ 123,599
Purchases 50,506
Sales (96,397)
Total losses relating to assets sold during the period(a) (158)
Total unrealized gains relating to assets still held at the reporting date(a) 3,190
Ending Balance $ 80,740
(a) These (losses) gains are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and are included as changes in plan assets in the tables above.
The Company’s pension plan assets in the U.S. and U.K. represent approximately 98% of the total pension plan assets. The investment objective of
these pension plan assets is to achieve solid returns while preserving capital to meet current plan cash flow requirements. Assets should participate in rising
markets, with defensive action in declining markets expected to an
94
even greater degree. Depending on market conditions, the broad asset class targets may range up or down by approximately 10%. These asset classes include
but are not limited to hedge fund of funds, bonds and other fixed income vehicles, high yield fixed income securities, equities and distressed debt. At
December 31, 2015 and 2014, equity securities held by our pension and OPEB plans did not include direct ownership of Albemarle common stock.
The weighted-average target allocations as of the measurement date are as follows:
Target Allocation
Equity securities 44%
Fixed income 43%
Absolute return 12%
Other 1%
Our Absolute Return investments consist primarily of our investments in hedge fund of funds. These are holdings in private investment companies with
fair values that are based on significant unobservable inputs including assumptions where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. Investment
managers or fund managers associated with these investments provide valuations of the investments on a monthly basis utilizing the net asset valuation
approach for determining fair values. These valuations are reviewed by the Company for reasonableness based on applicable sector, benchmark and company
performance to validate the appropriateness of the net asset values as a fair value measurement. Where available, audited financial statements are obtained
and reviewed for the investments as support for the manager’s investment valuation. In general, the investment objective of these funds is high risk-adjusted
returns with an emphasis on preservation of capital. The investment strategies of each of the funds vary; however, the objective of our Absolute Return
investments is complementary to the overall investment objective of our U.S. pension plan assets.
We made contributions to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plans of $21.6 million, $13.9 million and $13.3 million during the years ended
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We expect contributions to our domestic nonqualified and foreign qualified and nonqualified pension
plans to approximate $13 million in 2016. Also, we expect to pay approximately $4 million in premiums to our U.S. postretirement benefit plan in 2016.
However, we may choose to make additional voluntary pension contributions in excess of these amounts.
The current forecast of benefit payments, which reflects expected future service and excludes plans associated with businesses that were divested in the
first quarter of 2016, amounts to (in millions):
Other Postretirement
U.S. Pension Plans Foreign Pension Plans Benefits
2016 $ 40.3 $ 13.9 $ 4.8
2017 $ 41.4 $ 14.7 $ 4.7
2018 $ 42.8 $ 14.6 $ 4.5
2019 $ 43.8 $ 14.5 $ 4.3
2020 $ 44.8 $ 15.1 $ 4.1
2021-2025 $ 230.9 $ 83.5 $ 18.8
We have a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”), which provides unfunded supplemental retirement benefits to certain management or
highly compensated employees. The SERP provides for incremental pension benefits to offset the limitations imposed on qualified plan benefits by federal
income tax regulations. Costs (credits) relating to our SERP were ($2.1) million, $7.3 million and ($1.5) million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively. The projected benefit obligation for the SERP recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was
$23.1 million and $26.4 million, respectively. The benefit expenses and obligations of this SERP are included in the tables above. Benefits of $1.1 million
are expected to be paid to SERP retirees in 2016. On October 1, 2012, our Board of Directors approved amendments to the SERP, such that effective
December 31, 2014, no additional benefits shall accrue under this plan and participants’ accrued benefits shall be frozen as of that date to reflect the same
changes as were made under the U.S. qualified defined benefit plan.
At December 31, 2015, the assumed rate of increase in the pre-65 and post-65 per capita cost of covered health care benefits for U.S. retirees was zero as
the employer-paid premium caps (pre-65 and post-65) were met starting January 1, 2013.
95
Defined Contribution Plans

On March 31, 2004, a new defined contribution pension plan benefit was adopted under the qualified defined contribution plan for U.S. non-
represented employees hired after March 31, 2004. On October 1, 2012 our Board of Directors approved certain plan amendments, such that effective January
1, 2013, the defined contribution pension plan benefit is expanded to include non-represented employees hired prior to March 31, 2004, and revised the
contribution for all participants to be based on 5% of eligible employee compensation. The employer portion of contributions to our U.S. defined
contribution pension plan amounted to $12.8 million, $8.4 million, and $8.8 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Certain of our employees participate in our defined contribution 401(k) employee savings plan, which is generally available to all U.S. full-time
salaried and non-union hourly employees and to employees who are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that provides for such participation. This
U.S. defined contribution plan is funded with contributions made by the participants and us. Our contributions to the 401(k) plan amounted to $11.7 million,
$10.0 million and $10.6 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Contributions for 2015 include our contributions to Rockwood’s former 401(k) plan
which was merged into Albemarle’s 401(k) plan effective December 1, 2015.
In 2006, we formalized a new plan in the Netherlands similar to a collective defined contribution plan. The collective defined contribution plan is
supported by annuity contracts through an insurance company. The insurance company unconditionally undertakes the legal obligation to provide specific
benefits to specific individuals in return for a fixed amount of premiums. Our obligation under this plan is limited to a variable calculated employer match for
each participant plus an additional fixed amount of contributions to assist in covering estimated cost of living and salary increases (indexing) and
administrative costs for the overall plan. We paid approximately $7.2 million, $10.1 million and $10.3 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, in
annual premiums and related costs pertaining to this plan.
Multiemployer Plan
Certain current and former employees of Rockwood participate in a multiemployer plan in Germany, the Pensionskasse Dynamit Nobel
Versicherungsverein auf Gegenseitigkeit, Troisdorf (“DN Pensionskasse”), that provides monthly payments in the case of disability, death or retirement. The
risks of participating in a multiemployer plan are different from single-employer plans in the following ways: (a) assets contributed to the multiemployer plan
by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers, and (b) if a participating employer stops contributing to the
plan, the unfunded obligation of the plan may be borne by remaining participating employers.
Some participants in the plan are subject to collective bargaining arrangements, which have no fixed expiration date. The contribution and benefit
levels are not negotiated or significantly influenced by these collective bargaining arrangements. Also, the benefit levels generally are not subject to
reduction. Under German insurance law, the DN Pensionskasse must be fully funded at all times. The DN Pensionskasse was fully funded as of December 31,
2014, the date of the most recently available information for the plan. This funding level would correspond to the highest funding zone status (at least 80%
funded) under U.S. pension regulation. Since the plan liabilities need to be fully funded at all times according to local funding requirements, it is unlikely
that the DN Pensionskasse plan will fail to fulfill its obligations, however, in such an event, the Company is liable for the benefits of its employees who
participate in the plan. Additional information of the DN Pensionskasse is available in the public domain.
The majority of the Company’s contributions are tied to employees’ contributions, which are generally calculated as a percentage of base
compensation, up to a certain statutory ceiling. Our contributions to this plan were €2.7 million (approximately $3.1 million) during the year ended
December 31, 2015. The Company’s contributions represented more than 5% of total contributions to the DN Pensionskasse in 2015. Although the DN
Pensionskasse could be subject to a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) in 2016, the DN Pensionskasse was not subject to a FIP at December 31, 2015.
96
NOTE 16—Other Noncurrent Liabilities:

Other noncurrent liabilities consist of the following at December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
December 31,
2015 2014
Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions(a) $ 101,677 $ 25,340
Executive deferred compensation plan obligation 21,631 22,168
Environmental liabilities(b) 33,805 4,841
Asset retirement obligations(b) 37,230 15,085
Other 60,483 20,271
Total $ 254,826 $ 87,705
(a) See Note 20, “Income Taxes.”

(b) See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies.”
NOTE 17—Commitments and Contingencies:

In connection with the closing of the Rockwood acquisition on January 12, 2015, we have become liable for both recorded and unrecorded
contingencies of Rockwood. We are not aware of any unrecorded contingencies assumed in connection with the Rockwood acquisition whose ultimate
outcome will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on an annual basis, although any such
sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a particular quarterly reporting period. We believe
that amounts recorded are adequate for known items which might become due in the current year.
Environmental
We had the following activity in our recorded environmental liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Balance, beginning of year $ 9,235 $ 16,599 $ 20,322
Expenditures (4,178) (4,548) (3,013)
Acquisition of Rockwood 38,666 — —
Divestitures (1,826) (1,954) —
Accretion of discount 984 — —
Revisions of estimates 150 34 (902)
Reclass to liabilities held for sale (5,253) — —
Foreign currency translation (2,480) (896) 192
Balance, end of year 35,298 9,235 16,599
Less amounts reported in Accrued expenses 1,493 4,394 7,386
Amounts reported in Other noncurrent liabilities $ 33,805 $ 4,841 $ 9,213
As part of the Rockwood acquisition, we assumed $38.7 million of environmental remediation liabilities globally, the majority of which relate to sites
in Germany and the U.S. where the Company is currently operating groundwater monitoring and/or remediation systems. For certain locations where the
Company is operating these groundwater monitoring and/or remediation systems, prior owners or insurers have assumed all or most of the responsibility.
Environmental remediation liabilities assumed as part of the Rockwood acquisition includes discounted liabilities of $24.5 million, discounted at rates
ranging from 2.8% to 4.3%, with the undiscounted amount totaling $64.5 million.
The amounts recorded represent our future remediation and other anticipated environmental liabilities. These liabilities typically arise during the
normal course of our operational and environmental management activities or at the time of acquisition of the site, and are based on internal analysis as well
as input from outside consultants. As evaluations proceed at each relevant site, changes in risk assessment practices, remediation techniques and regulatory
requirements can occur, therefore such liability estimates may be adjusted accordingly. The timing and duration of remediation activities at these sites will be
determined when evaluations are completed. Although it is difficult to quantify the potential financial impact of these remediation liabilities, management
estimates (based on the latest available information) that there is a reasonable possibility
97
that future environmental remediation costs associated with our past operations, in excess of amounts already recorded, could be up to approximately $18
million before income taxes.
We believe that any sum we may be required to pay in connection with environmental remediation matters in excess of the amounts recorded would
likely occur over a period of time and would likely not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows on a
consolidated annual basis although any such sum could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows in a
particular quarterly reporting period.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The following is a reconciliation of our beginning and ending asset retirement obligation balances for 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

2015 2014
Balance, beginning of year $ 15,085 $ 16,930
Acquisition of Rockwood 17,265 —
Liabilities incurred 3,636 —
Accretion of discount 1,289 323
Liabilities settled — (333)
Divestitures — (1,816)
Foreign currency translation adjustments (45) (19)
Balance, end of year $ 37,230 $ 15,085
Our asset retirement obligations are recorded in Other noncurrent liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Asset retirement obligations
assumed through the acquisition of Rockwood primarily relate to post-closure reclamation of sites involved in the surface mining and manufacturing of
lithium. We are not aware of any conditional asset retirement obligations that would require recognition in our consolidated financial statements.
Rental Expense
Our rental expenses include a number of operating lease agreements, primarily for office space, transportation equipment and storage facilities. We also
have certain buildings and improvements under capital lease. The following schedule details the future non-cancelable minimum lease payments for the next
five years and thereafter (in thousands):
Operating Leases Capital Leases

2016 $ 14,643 $ 3,163
2017 $ 10,664 $ 3,178
2018 $ 9,217 $ 3,193
2019 $ 7,436 $ 10,201
2020 $ 6,665 $ —
Thereafter $ 21,124 $ —
19,735
Less: amount representing interest 2,928
Present value of net minimum obligations $ 16,807
Rental expense was approximately $45.0 million, $31.9 million, and $30.7 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Rental expense related to
discontinued operations was approximately $1.3 million and $1.6 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively. Rental expense is shown net of sublease income
which was minimal during 2015, 2014 and 2013.
98
Litigation
We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings of types regarded as common in our business, including administrative or judicial proceedings
seeking remediation under environmental laws, such as the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly
known as CERCLA or Superfund, products liability, breach of contract liability and premises liability litigation. Where appropriate, we may establish
financial reserves for such proceedings. We also maintain insurance to mitigate certain of such risks. Costs for legal services are generally expensed as
incurred.
Also see Note 2, “Acquisitions” for a discussion about litigation matters in connection with the Acquisition of Rockwood.
Indemnities
We are indemnified by third parties in connection with certain matters related to acquired and divested businesses. Although we believe that the
financial condition of those parties who may have indemnification obligations to the Company is generally sound, in the event the Company seeks
indemnity under any of these agreements or through other means, there can be no assurance that any party who may have obligations to indemnify us will
adhere to their obligations and we may have to resort to legal action to enforce our rights under the indemnities.
The Company may be subject to indemnity claims relating to properties or businesses it divested, including properties or businesses that Rockwood
divested prior to the Acquisition Closing Date. In the opinion of management, and based upon information currently available, the ultimate resolution of any
indemnification obligations owed to the Company or by the Company is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
Other
The Company has standby letters of credit and guarantees with various financial institutions. The following table summarizes our letters of credit and
guarantee agreements (in thousands):
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter

Letters of credit and other guarantees $ 24,789 $ 11,248 $ 3,190 $ 14 $ 210 $ 24,356
The outstanding letters of credit are primarily related to insurance claim payment guarantees with expiration dates ranging from 2016 to 2022. The
majority of the Company’s other guarantees have terms of one year and mainly consist of performance and environmental guarantees, as well as guarantees to
customs and port authorities. The guarantees arose during the ordinary course of business.
We do not have recorded reserves for the letters of credit and guarantees as of December 31, 2015. We are unable to estimate the maximum amount of
the potential future liability under guarantees and letters of credit. However, we accrue for any potential loss for which we believe a future payment is
probable and a range of loss can be reasonably estimated. We believe our liability under such obligations is immaterial.
We currently, and are from time to time, subject to transactional audits in various taxing jurisdictions and to customs audits globally. We do not expect
the financial impact of any of these audits to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
NOTE 18—Stock-based Compensation Expense:

Incentive Plans
We have various share-based compensation plans that authorize the granting of (i) stock options to purchase shares of our common stock, (ii) restricted
stock and restricted stock units, (iii) performance unit awards and (iv) stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) to employees and non-employee directors. The
plans provide for payment of incentive awards in one or more of the following at our option: cash, shares of our common stock, qualified and non-qualified
stock options, SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and performance unit awards. The share-based awards granted by us generally
contain vesting provisions ranging from one to five years, and with respect to stock options granted by us, have a term of not more than ten years from the
date of grant. Stock options granted to employees generally vest over three years and have a term of ten years. Restricted stock and restricted stock unit
awards vest in periods ranging from one to five years from the date of grant. Performance unit awards are earned at a level ranging from 0% to 200%
contingent upon the achievement of specific performance criteria over periods ranging from one to three years. Distribution of earned units occurs generally
50% upon completion of the applicable measurement period with the remaining 50% distributed one year thereafter.
99
We granted 313,803, 222,939 and 297,924 stock options during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no significant modifications made to
any share-based grants during these periods.
On April 20, 2010, the maximum number of shares available for issuance to participants under the Albemarle Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan (the
“Incentive Plan”) increased by 4,470,000 shares to 7,470,000 shares. With respect to any awards, other than stock options or SARs, the number of shares
available for awards under the Incentive Plan were reduced by 1.6 shares for each share covered by such award or to which such award related. Effective May
7, 2013, the Albemarle Corporation 2008 Stock Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors and the 1996 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (as
amended and restated in 2005) were merged into the Albemarle Corporation 2013 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (the “Non-Employee Directors Plan”). Under the Non-Employee Directors Plan, a maximum aggregate number of 500,000 shares of our common
stock is authorized for issuance to the Company’s non-employee directors; any shares remaining available for issuance under the prior plans were canceled.
The aggregate fair market value of shares that may be issued to a director during any compensation year (as defined in the agreement, generally July 1 to June
30) shall not exceed $150,000. At December 31, 2015, there were 2,622,398 shares available for grant under the Incentive Plan and 451,466 shares available
for grant under the Non-Employee Directors Plan.
Total stock-based compensation expense associated with our incentive plans for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounted to
$15.2 million, $14.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively, and is included in Cost of goods sold and SG&A expenses in the consolidated statements of
income. Total related recognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $5.6 million, $5.2 million and $3.7
million, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about the Company’s fixed-price stock options as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
Weighted-Average
Remaining Aggregate
Weighted-Average Contractual Term Intrinsic Value
Shares Exercise Price (Years) (in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 1,484,243 $ 50.30 6.5 $ 17,887
Granted 313,803 55.74
Exercised (18,000) 28.72
Forfeited (98,519) 62.98
Expired (4,600) 66.14
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 1,676,927 $ 50.76 6.1 $ 14,152
Exercisable at December 31, 2015 998,952 $ 43.95 4.5 $ 14,048
The fair value of each option granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-
Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

2015 2014 2013
Dividend yield 1.80% 1.71% 1.58%
Volatility 32.92% 33.03% 33.55%
Average expected life (years) 6 6 6
Risk-free interest rate 2.17% 2.94% 2.18%
Fair value of options granted $ 16.04 $ 19.56 $ 19.73
Dividend yield is the average of historical yields and those estimated over the average expected life. The stock volatility is based on historical
volatilities of our common stock. The average expected life represents the weighted average period of time that options granted are expected to be
outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules and our historical exercise patterns. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate
with stripped coupon interest for the period equal to the contractual term of the share option grant in effect at the time of grant.
The intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0.5 million, $2.4 million and $7.0 million,
respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option.
100
Total compensation cost not yet recognized for nonvested stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2015 is approximately $7.9 million and is
expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.3 years. Cash proceeds from stock options exercised and tax benefits related to
stock options exercised were $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively. The Company issues new shares of common
stock upon exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted common stock awards.
The following table summarizes activity in performance unit awards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015:
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value Per
Shares Share
Nonvested, beginning of period 456,018 $ 66.21
Granted 214,610 55.34
Vested (43,177) 65.39
Forfeited (130,246) 64.50
Nonvested, end of period 497,205 62.04
The weighted average grant date fair value of performance unit awards granted in 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $11.9 million, $20.1 million and $16.9
million, respectively. Performance units awarded in 2013 include shares with a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.3 million related to awards
granted in 2011 that earned at a rate of 200% based upon the achievement of specific performance criteria.
The weighted average fair value of performance unit awards that vested during 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $2.5 million, $7.4 million and $14.5 million,
respectively, based on the closing prices of our common stock on the dates of vesting. Total compensation cost not yet recognized for nonvested performance
unit awards outstanding as of December 31, 2015 is approximately $13.4 million, calculated based on current expectation of specific performance criteria,
and is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of approximately 1.6 years. Each performance unit represents one share of
common stock.
The following table summarizes activity in non-performance based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015:
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value Per
Shares Share
Nonvested, beginning of period 105,288 $ 61.34
Granted 61,156 56.64
Vested (39,073) 61.97
Forfeited (9,250) 62.37
Nonvested, end of period 118,121 58.62
The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted in 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $3.5 million, $2.7
million and $3.4 million, respectively. The weighted average fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards that vested in 2015, 2014 and
2013 was $2.2 million, $2.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively, based on the closing prices of our common stock on the dates of vesting. Total
compensation cost not yet recognized for nonvested, non-performance based restricted stock and restricted stock units as of December 31, 2015 is
approximately $3.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 2.1 years. The fair value of the non-performance
based restricted stock and restricted stock units was estimated on the date of grant adjusted for a dividend factor, if necessary.
101
NOTE 19—Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:

The components and activity in Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (net of deferred income taxes) consisted of the following during the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
Foreign Pension and

Currency Post-Retirement Net Investment Interest Rate
Translation (a) Benefits (b) Hedge Swap (c) Other Total
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) - balance at December 31, 2012 $ 85,117 $ 989 $ — $ — $ (842) $ 85,264
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
reclassifications 31,704 — — — (2) 31,702
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income — (502) — — 137 (365)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 31,704 (502) — — 135 31,337
Other comprehensive income attributable to
noncontrolling interests (356) — — — — (356)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) - balance at December 31, 2013 $ 116,465 $ 487 $ — $ — $ (707) $ 116,245
Other comprehensive (loss) income before
reclassifications (151,059) — 11,384 (21,174) — (160,849)
comprehensive (loss) income (17,750) (487) — 212 136 (17,889)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (168,809) (487) 11,384 (20,962) 136 (178,738)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests 80 — — — — 80
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income - balance at December 31, 2014 $ (52,264) $ — $ 11,384 $ (20,962) $ (571) $ (62,413)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before
reclassifications (412,999) (774) 50,861 — 2 (362,910)
comprehensive (loss) income — 16 — 2,101 27 2,144
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (412,999) (758) 50,861 2,101 29 (360,766)
Other comprehensive loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests 1,891 — — — — 1,891
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income - balance at December 31, 2015 $ (463,372) $ (758) $ 62,245 $ (18,861) $ (542) $ (421,288)
(a) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for the year ended December 31, 2014 are included in (Loss) income from discontinued operations
(net of tax) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and resulted from the release of cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments into earnings upon the sale of our
antioxidant, ibuprofen and propofol businesses and assets which closed on September 1, 2014. See Note 3, “Divestitures.”
(b) The pre-tax portion of amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income consists of amortization of prior service benefit, which is a component of
pension and postretirement benefits cost (credit). See Note 15, “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits.”
(c) The pre-tax portion of amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income is included in interest expense.
102
The amount of income tax (expense) benefit allocated to each component of Other comprehensive (loss) income for the years ended December 31,
2015, 2014 and 2013 is provided in the following tables (in thousands):
Pension and
Foreign Currency Postretirement Net Investment Interest Rate
Translation Benefits Hedge(a) Swap (b) Other
2015
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax $ (451,781) $ (751) $ 80,746 $ 3,336 $ 19
Income tax benefit (expense) 38,782 (7) (29,885) (1,235) 10
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax $ (412,999) $ (758) $ 50,861 $ 2,101 $ 29
2014
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax $ (163,536) $ (772) $ 17,971 $ (33,091) $ 217
Income tax (expense) benefit (5,273) 285 (6,587) 12,129 (81)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax $ (168,809) $ (487) $ 11,384 $ (20,962) $ 136
2013
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax $ 29,895 $ (781) $ — $ — $ 214
Income tax benefit (expense) 1,809 279 — — (79)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax $ 31,704 $ (502) $ — $ — $ 135
(a) Other comprehensive income, before tax, for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $12.8 million related to the revaluation of our euro-denominated senior notes and a
$5.2 million gain on the settlement of related foreign currency forward contracts, both of which were designated as a hedge of our net investment in foreign operations. See
Note 14, “Long-Term Debt” for additional information about these transactions.
(b) Other comprehensive (loss), before tax, for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a realized loss of ($33.4) million on the settlement of our forward starting interest rate
swap which was designated and accounted for as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt” for additional information
about this interest rate swap.
NOTE 20—Income Taxes:

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated investments, and current and deferred income tax
expense (benefit) are composed of the following (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in net income of
unconsolidated investments:
Domestic $ 8,594 $ 45,689 $ 351,731
Foreign 349,593 167,490 186,711
Total $ 358,187 $ 213,179 $ 538,442
Current income tax expense:

Federal $ 85,245 $ 36,708 $ 53,953
State 71 3,209 2,195
Foreign 80,104 25,700 18,414
Total $ 165,420 $ 65,617 $ 74,562
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:

Federal $ (129,433) $ (32,890) $ 69,817
State (1,170) (1,139) 2,416
Foreign (5,695) (13,104) (12,350)
Total $ (136,298) $ (47,133) $ 59,883
Total income tax expense $ 29,122 $ 18,484 $ 134,445
103
The reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
% of Income Before Income Taxes

2015 2014 2013
Federal statutory rate 35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit 1.7 0.2 0.7
Change in valuation allowance(a) 4.7 1.0 (2.2)
Impact of foreign earnings, net (b) (19.6) (24.8) (10.7)
Subpart F income 6.8 1.2 0.4
Deemed repatriation of foreign income(d) 91.6 — —
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries(b)(d) (99.6) (0.3) 2.9
Nondeductible transaction costs 1.8 — —
Depletion (1.6) (2.4) (0.9)
Revaluation of unrecognized tax benefits/reserve requirements(c) (11.3) (0.6) (0.1)
Domestic manufacturing tax deduction (0.9) (2.2) (0.9)
Other items, net (0.5) 1.6 0.8
Effective income tax rate 8.1 % 8.7 % 25.0 %
(a) During 2013, our Avonmouth, U.K. legal entity was dissolved, therefore the corresponding valuation allowance and deferred tax assets were written off.
(b) During 2015, 2014 and 2013, we received actual and deemed distributions of $1.4 billion, $12.6 million and $12.3 million, respectively, from various foreign subsidiaries and
joint ventures, and realized an expense, net of foreign tax credits, of $350.2 million, $2.8 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to the repatriation of these earnings,
which impacted our effective tax rate. We have asserted, for all periods being reported, indefinite investment of our share of the income of JBC, a Free Zones company under
the laws of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The applicable provisions of the Jordanian law, and applicable regulations thereunder, do not have a termination provision and
the exemption is indefinite. As a Free Zones company, JBC is not subject to income taxes on the profits of products exported from Jordan, and currently, substantially all of
the profits are from exports. This gave us a rate benefit of 7.1%, 12.4%, and 4.5% for 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.
(c) During 2014, we released various tax reserves primarily related to the expiration of the applicable U.S. federal statute of limitations for 2009 through 2010 which provided a
net benefit of approximately $2.5 million. In 2015, the main impact is from the release of reserves on the close of a U.S. federal audit, and lapse of statute of limitations. These
releases provided a net benefit of approximately $41 million.
(d) In prior years, we designated the undistributed earnings of substantially all of our foreign subsidiaries as indefinitely invested. In 2015, we were not indefinitely invested in a
portion of earnings from legacy Rockwood entities that were part of the repatriation planning, for which a deferred tax liability of $387.0 million was established in the opening
balance sheet. This liability reversed upon the completion of the repatriation with $356.2 million impacting earnings and $30.8 million from foreign exchange differences. The
reversal of this liability offsets the tax amount of $327.9 million from legacy Rockwood entities included in the deemed repatriation of foreign income.
As described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the fourth quarter of 2015 we early adopted on a prospective basis new
accounting guidance that requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the consolidated balance sheet. Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 consist of the following (in thousands):
104
December 31,
2015 2014
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued employee benefits $ 28,167 $ 20,834
Accrued expenses 33,048 2,379
Operating loss carryovers 131,985 82,017
Pensions 111,059 79,113
Intangibles — 5,732
Tax credit carryovers 2,555 34,469
Other 32,725 20,227
Gross deferred tax assets 339,539 244,771
Valuation allowance (85,370) (30,768)
Deferred tax assets 254,169 214,003
Deferred tax liabilities:

Depreciation (378,669) (190,280)
Intangibles (488,855) —
Foreign currency translation adjustments — (4,752)
Other (46,937) (18,420)
Deferred tax liabilities (914,461) (213,452)
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets $ (660,292) $ 551

Classification in the consolidated balance sheets:
Current deferred tax assets $ — $ 1,801
Current deferred tax liabilities — (6,806)
Noncurrent deferred tax assets 76,025 62,440
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities (736,317) (56,884)
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets $ (660,292) $ 551
Changes in the balance of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance are as follows (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Balance at January 1 $ (30,768) $ (33,757) $ (49,562)
Additions(a) (61,122) (1,895) (4,359)
Deductions 6,520 4,884 20,164
Balance at December 31 $ (85,370) $ (30,768) $ (33,757)
(a) Additions for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes $42.0 million related to the acquisition of Rockwood.
At December 31, 2015, we had approximately $3.0 million of domestic credits available to offset future payments of income taxes, expiring in varying
amounts between 2021 and 2035. We have established valuation allowances for $0.3 million of those domestic credits since we believe that it is more likely
than not that the related deferred tax assets will not be realized. We believe that sufficient taxable income will be generated during the carryover period in
order to utilize the other remaining credit carryovers.
At December 31, 2015, we have on a pre-tax basis, domestic state net operating losses of $529.9 million, expiring between 2019 and 2036, which have
pre-tax valuation allowances of $507.9 million established, and domestic capital losses comprised of federal amounts of $16.9 million and state amounts of
$55.6 million expiring between 2017 and 2020, which have pre-tax valuation allowances of $15.8 million and $55.6 million established, respectively. In
addition, we have on a pre-tax basis $393.6 million of foreign net operating losses of which a majority have an indefinite life, which have pre-tax valuation
allowances for $177.5 million established. We have established valuation allowances for these deferred tax assets since we believe that it is more likely than
not that the related deferred tax assets will not be realized. For the same reason, we established pre-tax valuation allowances for $0.9 million related to foreign
deferred tax assets not related to net operating losses. The realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent on the generation of sufficient taxable income in
the appropriate
105
tax jurisdictions. Although realization is not assured, we believe it is more likely than not that the remaining deferred tax assets will be realized. However, the
amount considered realizable could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income change. We believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will
generate sufficient taxable income in the future to fully utilize all other deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 2015, we have not recorded U.S. income taxes on approximately $1.1 billion of cumulative undistributed earnings of our non-U.S.
subsidiaries and joint ventures, as these earnings are intended to be either indefinitely invested or subject to a tax-free liquidation and do not give rise to
significant incremental U.S. taxes. If it is determined that cash can be repatriated with little to no tax consequences, we may choose to repatriate cash at that
time. If in the foreseeable future we can no longer demonstrate that these earnings are indefinitely invested, a deferred tax liability will be recognized. A
determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these undistributed earnings is not practicable.
Liabilities related to uncertain tax positions were $101.7 million and $25.3 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, inclusive of interest
and penalties of $6.5 million and $0.3 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and are reported in Other noncurrent liabilities as provided in
Note 16. These liabilities at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were reduced by $50.9 million and $22.1 million, respectively, for offsetting benefits from the
corresponding effects of potential transfer pricing adjustments, state income taxes and rate arbitrage related to foreign structure. These offsetting benefits are
recorded in Other assets as provided in Note 11. The resulting net liabilities of $44.0 million and $2.9 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively,
if recognized and released, would favorably affect earnings.
The liabilities related to uncertain tax positions, exclusive of interest, were $95.7 million and $25.0 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. The following is a reconciliation of our total gross liability related to uncertain tax positions for 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Balance at January 1 $ 24,969 $ 29,143 $ 28,398
Acquisition of Rockwood 124,758 — —
Additions for tax positions related to prior years 4,329 — —
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years (46,211) (214) (348)
Additions for tax positions related to current year 202 2,232 2,061
Lapses in statutes of limitations/settlements (6,736) (5,057) (473)
Foreign currency translation adjustment (5,596) (1,135) (495)
Balance at December 31 $ 95,715 $ 24,969 $ 29,143
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Due to the statute of limitations, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal
income tax audits by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for years prior to 2011. In 2015, the IRS continued its audit of legacy Albemarle’s U.S.
consolidated group for 2011 and 2012. Additionally, in 2015 the IRS finalized its audit of legacy Rockwood’s U.S. consolidated group for 2010 and 2011.
Due to the statute of limitations, we also are no longer subject to U.S. state income tax audits prior to 2010.
With respect to jurisdictions outside the U.S., several audits are in process. During 2015, the German tax authorities continued and announced audits on
multiple German subsidiaries for various years from 2006 through 2013, the Belgium tax authorities continued the audit of our Belgium subsidiary for 2012
and 2013, and audits of two of our Korean entities for 2011 through 2013 were closed. We also have various audits ongoing for the years 2007 through 2014
related to Russia, the Philippines, India, Italy, and France.
While we believe we have adequately provided for all tax positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than our accrued position.
Accordingly, additional provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying
matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
Since the timing of resolutions and/or closure of tax audits is uncertain, it is difficult to predict with certainty the range of reasonably possible
significant increases or decreases in the liability related to uncertain tax positions that may occur within the next twelve months. Our current view is that it is
reasonably possible that we could record a decrease in the liability related to uncertain tax positions, relating to a number of issues, up to approximately $3.3
million as a result of closure of tax statutes.
106
NOTE 21—Restructuring and Other:

Restructuring and other, net, reported in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 consists of the
following (in thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Exit of phosphorus flame retardants business(a) $ (6,804) $ — $ —
Charges in connection with aluminum alkyl supply capacity reduction (b) — 23,521 —
Charges in connection with global business realignment (c) — — 33,361
Other, net (d) — 2,426 —
Total Restructuring and other, net $ (6,804) $ 25,947 $ 33,361
(a) In the third quarter of 2015, a gain of $6.8 million ($5.4 million after income taxes) was recognized upon the sale of land in Avonmouth, U.K., which was utilized by the
phosphorus flame retardants business we exited in 2012. In 2012, charges in connection with our exit of the phosphorus flame retardants business were recorded in
Restructuring and other, net, on our consolidated statements of income.
(b) In 2014, we initiated action to reduce high cost supply capacity of certain aluminum alkyl products, primarily through the termination of a third party manufacturing contract.
Based on the contract termination, we estimated costs of approximately $14.0 million ($9.3 million after income taxes) in the first quarter and $6.5 million ($4.3 million after
income taxes) in the fourth quarter for contract termination and volume commitments. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2014 we recorded an impairment charge of $3.0
million ($1.9 million after income taxes) for certain capital project costs also related to aluminum alkyls capacity which we do not expect to recover.
(c) In connection with an announced realignment of our operating segments effective January 1, 2014, in the fourth quarter of 2013 we initiated a workforce reduction plan which
resulted in a reduction of approximately 230 employees worldwide. In the fourth quarter of 2013 we recorded charges of $33.4 million ($21.9 million after income taxes) for
termination benefits and other costs related to this workforce reduction plan. Payments under this workforce reduction plan are complete.
(d) The amount for 2014 mainly consists of $3.3 million ($2.1 million after income taxes) recorded in the second quarter for certain multi-product facility project costs that we do
not expect to recover in future periods, net of other credits recorded in the fourth quarter.
NOTE 22—Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

In assessing the fair value of financial instruments, we use methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and other risk factors existing
at the time of assessment. Fair value information for our financial instruments is as follows:
Long-Term Debt—the fair values of our senior notes and other fixed rate foreign borrowings are estimated using Level 1 inputs and account for the
majority of the difference between the recorded amount and fair value of our long-term debt. The carrying value of our remaining long-term debt reported in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value as substantially all of such debt bears interest based on prevailing variable market
rates currently available in the countries in which we have borrowings.
December 31,
2015 2014
Recorded Amount Fair Value Recorded Amount Fair Value
(In thousands)
Long-term debt $ 3,852,019 $ 3,810,981 $ 2,934,131 $ 2,994,935
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts—we enter into foreign currency forward contracts in connection with our risk management strategies in an attempt
to minimize the financial impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk and are not
used for trading or other speculative purposes. The fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts are estimated based on current settlement values. At
December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with notional values totaling $217.7 million and $479.9 million,
respectively. Our foreign currency forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014 have not been designated as hedging instruments under
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. At December 31, 2015, $0.3 million was included in Accrued expenses associated with the fair value of our foreign
currency forward contracts, and at December 31, 2014, $0.6 million was included in Other accounts receivable associated with the fair value of our foreign
currency forward contracts.
Gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts are recognized currently in Other income (expenses), net; further, fluctuations in the value of
these contracts are generally expected to be offset by changes in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. For the years ended December 31,
2015, 2014 and 2013 we recognized losses of ($38.5) million, ($17.8) million and ($1.1) million, respectively, in Other income (expenses), net, in our
consolidated statements of income
107
related to the change in the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts. These amounts are generally expected to be offset by changes in the value of
the underlying exposures being hedged which are also reported in Other income (expenses), net. Also, for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and
2013, we recorded $38.5 million, $17.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, related to the change in the fair value of our foreign currency forward
contracts, and net cash settlements of ($37.6) million, ($18.3) million and ($1.8) million, respectively, in Other, net, in our consolidated statements of cash
flows.
The counterparties to our foreign currency forward contracts are major financial institutions with which we generally have other financial relationships.
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.
NOTE 23—Fair Value Measurement:

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date (exit price). The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following hierarchy:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability
We endeavor to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are deemed to have occurred on the
date of the event or change in circumstance that caused the transfer. There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year ended December 31,
2015. The following tables set forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and
2014 (in thousands):
Quoted Prices in
Assets:
Investments under executive deferred compensation plan (a) $ 21,631 $ 21,631 $ — $ —
Private equity securities (b) $ 2,626 $ 31 $ — $ 2,595
Pension assets (c) $ 690,787 $ 500,996 $ 106,664 $ 83,127
Postretirement assets (c) $ 3,292 $ — $ 3,292 $ —
Liabilities:
Obligations under executive deferred compensation plan (a) $ 21,631 $ 21,631 $ — $ —
Foreign currency forward contracts (d) $ 250 $ — $ 250 $ —
108
Quoted Prices in
Assets:
Investments under executive deferred compensation plan (a) $ 22,168 $ 22,168 $ — $ —
Private equity securities (b) $ 1,806 $ 21 $ — $ 1,785
Foreign currency forward contracts (d) $ 631 $ — $ 631 $ —
Pension assets (c) $ 607,694 $ 513,871 $ 13,083 $ 80,740
Postretirement assets (c) $ 4,439 $ — $ 4,439 $ —
Liabilities:
Obligations under executive deferred compensation plan (a) $ 22,168 $ 22,168 $ — $ —
(a) We maintain an EDCP that was adopted in 2001 and subsequently amended. The purpose of the EDCP is to provide current tax planning opportunities as well as supplemental
funds upon the retirement or death of certain of our employees. The EDCP is intended to aid in attracting and retaining employees of exceptional ability by providing them with
these benefits. We also maintain a Benefit Protection Trust (the “Trust”) that was created to provide a source of funds to assist in meeting the obligations of the EDCP, subject
to the claims of our creditors in the event of our insolvency. Assets of the Trust are consolidated in accordance with authoritative guidance. The assets of the Trust consist
primarily of mutual fund investments (which are accounted for as trading securities and are marked-to-market on a monthly basis through the consolidated statements of
income) and cash and cash equivalents. As such, these assets and obligations are classified within Level 1.
(b) Primarily consists of private equity securities classified as available-for-sale and are reported in Investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The changes in fair value are
reported in Other income (expenses), net, in our consolidated statements of income. Holdings in private equity securities are typically valued using the net asset valuations
provided by the underlying private investment companies and as such are classified within Level 3.
(c) See Note 15 “Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits” for further information about fair value measurements of our pension and postretirement plan assets, including
the reconciliations of the plans’ Level 3 assets.
(d) As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our
operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, we minimize our risks from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations through the use of foreign currency
forward contracts. Unless otherwise noted, these derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The
foreign currency forward contracts are valued using broker quotations or market transactions in either the listed or over-the-counter markets. As such, these derivative
instruments are classified within Level 2.
The following table presents the fair value reconciliation of private equity securities Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the
periods indicated (in thousands):

2015 2014
Beginning balance $ 1,785 $ 750
Total unrealized gains included in earnings relating to assets still held at the reporting date 810 35
Purchases — 1,000
Ending balance $ 2,595 $ 1,785
109
NOTE 24—Related Party Transactions:

Our consolidated financial statements include sales to and purchases from unconsolidated affiliates in the ordinary course of business as follows (in
thousands):

2015 2014 2013
Sales to unconsolidated affiliates $ 25,903 $ 45,415 $ 29,420
Purchases from unconsolidated affiliates 115,697 64,631 57,022
NOTE 25—Segment and Geographic Area Information:

As a result of the Rockwood acquisition, in 2015 we realigned our organizational structure under three reportable segments: Performance Chemicals,
Refining Solutions and Chemetall Surface Treatment. Each segment has a dedicated team of sales, research and development, process engineering,
manufacturing and sourcing, and business strategy personnel and has full accountability for improving execution through greater asset and market focus,
agility and responsiveness. The new business structure aligns with the markets and customers we serve through each of the segments. The new structure also
facilitates the continued standardization of business processes across the organization, and is consistent with the manner in which information is presently
used internally by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments is shown in the following tables. Results for 2014 and 2013 have been recast to
reflect the change in segments noted above and a change in our measure of segment profit or loss to adjusted EBITDA as discussed below. Segment results for
all periods presented exclude discontinued operations as further described in Note 3, “Divestitures.”
The “All Other” category is comprised of three operating segments that did not fit into any of our core businesses subsequent to the acquisition of
Rockwood: mineral-based flame retardants and specialty chemicals, fine chemistry services and metal sulfides. For additional information about these
businesses, see Note 3, “Divestitures.”
The Corporate category is not considered to be a segment and includes corporate-related items not allocated to the reportable segments. Pension and
OPEB service cost (which represents the benefits earned by active employees during the period) and amortization of prior service cost or benefit are allocated
to the reportable segments, All Other, and Corporate, whereas the remaining components of pension and OPEB benefits cost or credit (“Non-operating
pension and OPEB items”) are included in Corporate. Segment data includes intersegment transfers of raw materials at cost and allocations for certain
corporate costs.
Beginning in 2015, the Company uses earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for certain non-recurring or unusual
items such as restructuring charges, facility divestiture charges, non-operating pension and OPEB items and other significant non-recurring items (“adjusted
EBITDA”), on a segment basis to assess the ongoing performance of the Company’s business segments. Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not
required by, or presented in accordance with, U.S. GAAP. The Company has reported adjusted EBITDA because management believes it provides
transparency to investors and enables period-to-period comparability of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative
to Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
110

2015 2014 2013
(In thousands)
Net sales:
Performance Chemicals $ 1,610,319 $ 1,121,645 $ 1,141,890
Refining Solutions 729,261 852,139 775,207
Chemetall Surface Treatment 824,906 — —
All Other 471,434 471,764 477,173
Corporate 15,415 — —
Total net sales $ 3,651,335 $ 2,445,548 $ 2,394,270
Adjusted EBITDA:
Performance Chemicals $ 535,520 $ 306,572 $ 364,712
All Other 53,993 73,973 71,691
Corporate (29,814) (74,875) (69,240)
Total adjusted EBITDA $ 959,322 $ 562,155 $ 557,551
111
most directly comparable financial measure calculated and reported in accordance with GAAP, (in thousands):
Chemetall Reportable
Performance Refining Surface Segments Consolidated
Chemicals Solutions Treatment Total All Other Corporate Total
2015
Adjusted EBITDA $ 535,520 $ 197,595 $ 202,028 $ 935,143 $ 53,993 $ (29,814) $ 959,322
Depreciation and amortization (120,248) (34,039) (78,903) (233,190) (18,183) (8,703) (260,076)
Utilization of inventory markup(a) (79,977) — (20,030) (100,007) (3,029) — (103,036)
Restructuring and other, net(c) — — — — — 6,804 6,804
Other(d) — (1,971) — (1,971) — (4,441) (6,412)
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 335,295 $ 161,585 $ 103,095 $ 599,975 $ 32,781 $ (297,850) $ 334,906
2014
Adjusted EBITDA $ 306,572 $ 256,485 $ — $ 563,057 $ 73,973 $ (74,875) $ 562,155
Depreciation and amortization(e) (51,707) (32,670) — (84,377) (13,478) (2,552) (100,407)
Restructuring and other, net(c) — — — — — (25,947) (25,947)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of tax) — — — — — (69,531) (69,531)
Non-operating pension and OPEB items — — — — — (125,462) (125,462)
Other(d) — — — — — (17,492) (17,492)
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 254,865 $ 223,815 $ — $ 478,680 $ 60,495 $ (405,859) $ 133,316
2013
Adjusted EBITDA $ 364,712 $ 190,388 $ — $ 555,100 $ 71,691 $ (69,240) $ 557,551
Depreciation and amortization(e) (46,225) (33,580) — (79,805) (13,323) (2,188) (95,316)
Restructuring and other, net(c) — — — — — (33,361) (33,361)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of tax) — — — — — 4,108 4,108
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 318,487 $ 156,808 $ — $ 475,295 $ 58,368 $ (120,492) $ 413,171
(a) In connection with the acquisition of Rockwood, the Company valued Rockwood’s existing inventory at fair value as of the Acquisition Closing Date, which resulted in a
markup of the underlying net book value of the inventory totaling approximately $103 million. The inventory markup was expensed over the estimated remaining selling
period. For the year ended December 31, 2015, $75.9 million was included in Cost of goods sold, and Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments was reduced by
$27.1 million related to the utilization of the inventory markup.
(b) See Note 2, “Acquisitions.”
(c) See Note 21, “Restructuring and Other.”
112
(d) For the year ended December 31, 2015, Refining Solutions includes an impairment charge of approximately $2.0 million related to our unconsolidated investment in Fábrica
Carioca de Catalisadores SA. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, Corporate includes approximately $4.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively, of financing-
related fees expensed in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood.
(e) Excludes discontinued operations.
As of December 31,
2015 2014 2013
(In thousands)
Identifiable assets:
Performance Chemicals $ 4,358,598 $ 1,085,246 $ 1,148,478
Refining Solutions 937,445 1,100,361 1,217,313
Chemetall Surface Treatment 3,207,621 — —
All Other 517,695 268,555 468,147
Corporate(a) 593,655 2,768,941 750,859
Total identifiable assets $ 9,615,014 $ 5,223,103 $ 3,584,797
Goodwill:
Performance Chemicals $ 1,287,824 $ 42,016 $ 42,025
Chemetall Surface Treatment 1,433,259 — —
All Other — 8,589 23,796
Total goodwill $ 2,893,811 $ 243,262 $ 284,203
(a) As of December 31, 2014, Corporate included net proceeds received from the issuance of the 2014 Senior Notes, which, together with borrowings from our Commercial
Paper Notes, August 2014 Term Loan Agreement and Cash Bridge Facility, were used to finance the cash portion of the Merger Consideration, pay related fees and expenses
and repay our senior notes which matured on February 1, 2015. See Note 14, “Long-Term Debt” and Note 2, “Acquisitions” for additional details about these transactions.

2015 2014 2013
(In thousands)
Depreciation and amortization:
Discontinued Operations — 3,165 12,054
All Other 18,183 13,478 13,323
Corporate 8,703 2,552 2,188
Total depreciation and amortization $ 260,076 $ 103,572 $ 107,370
Capital expenditures:
All Other 13,054 9,053 18,831
Corporate 2,683 24 514
Total capital expenditures $ 227,649 $ 110,576 $ 155,346
113

2015 2014 2013
(In thousands)
Net Sales:
United States $ 1,118,847 $ 884,373 $ 933,182
Foreign (a) 2,532,488 1,561,175 1,461,088
Total $ 3,651,335 $ 2,445,548 $ 2,394,270
(a) No sales in a foreign country exceed 10% of total net sales. Also, net sales are attributed to countries based upon shipments to final destination.
As of December 31,
2015 2014 2013
(In thousands)
Long-Lived Assets:
United States $ 833,238 $ 698,863 $ 748,719
Chile 916,965 — —
Netherlands 157,644 167,965 193,775
Jordan 230,460 227,805 227,818
Australia 282,552 — —
Brazil 45,847 59,474 78,078
Germany 189,895 75,813 86,175
China 29,780 5,310 41,858
France 50,991 37,347 34,523
Korea 72,685 80,362 86,827
United Kingdom 5,320 3,665 3,665
Other foreign countries 103,977 48,819 47,139
Total $ 2,919,354 $ 1,405,423 $ 1,548,577
Net sales to external customers by product category in each of the segments consists of the following:

2015 2014 2013
(In thousands)
Performance Chemicals:
Bromine $ 775,729 $ 808,857 $ 856,298
Lithium 508,844 — —
Performance Catalyst Solutions 325,746 312,788 285,592
Total Performance Chemicals $ 1,610,319 $ 1,121,645 $ 1,141,890
Refining Solutions $ 729,261 $ 852,139 $ 775,207
Chemetall Surface Treatment $ 824,906 $ — $ —
Bromine Specialties, and (2) Lithium and Advanced Materials, which will include Performance Catalyst Solutions and Curatives.
114
NOTE 26—Quarterly Financial Summary (Unaudited):
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2015
Net sales $ 884,404 $ 931,485 $ 905,093 $ 930,353
Gross profit $ 258,466 $ 300,566 $ 312,210 $ 325,630
Restructuring and other, net (a) $ — $ — $ (6,804) $ —
Acquisition and integration related costs(b) $ 59,523 $ 24,166 $ 42,798 $ 19,609
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation (c) $ 43,115 $ 52,147 $ 65,392 $ 174,252
Basic earnings per share(c) $ 0.40 $ 0.46 $ 0.58 $ 1.55
Shares used to compute basic earnings per share 108,130 112,189 112,202 112,207
Diluted earnings per share(c) $ 0.40 $ 0.46 $ 0.58 $ 1.55
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share 108,464 112,607 112,544 112,608
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2014
Net sales $ 599,843 $ 604,721 $ 642,418 $ 598,566
Gross profit $ 195,599 $ 207,363 $ 205,446 $ 162,440
Restructuring and other, net (a) $ 17,000 $ 3,332 $ 293 $ 5,322
Acquisition and integration related costs(b) $ — $ 4,843 $ 10,261 $ 15,054
Net income (loss) from continuing operations $ 66,004 $ 89,404 $ 88,019 $ (12,990)
Loss from discontinued operations (net of tax)(d) (1,769) (60,025) (6,679) (1,058)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (7,652) (6,932) (8,546) (4,460)
Net income (loss) attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 56,583 $ 22,447 $ 72,794 $ (18,508)
Continuing operations $ 0.73 $ 1.05 $ 1.02 $ (0.22)
Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.76) (0.09) (0.02)
$ 0.71 $ 0.29 $ 0.93 $ (0.24)
Shares used to compute basic earnings per share 79,735 78,662 78,244 78,144
Continuing operations $ 0.73 $ 1.04 $ 1.01 $ (0.22)
Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.76) (0.08) (0.02)
$ 0.71 $ 0.28 $ 0.93 $ (0.24)
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share 80,112 79,091 78,659 78,545
(a) See Note 21, “Restructuring and Other.”

(b) See Note 2, “Acquisitions.”
(c) The fourth quarter of 2015 includes an income tax benefit of $44.6 million primarily related to the release of certain tax reserves associated with lapses in statutes of limitations
and audit closures.
(d) Included in Loss from discontinued operations (net of tax) for the year ended December 31, 2014 is ($65.7) million related to the loss on the sale of our antioxidant, ibuprofen
and propofol businesses and assets, the majority of which was recorded in the second quarter. See Note 3, “Divestitures.”
As discussed in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” actuarial gains and losses related to our defined benefit pension and OPEB plan
obligations are recognized annually in our consolidated statements of income in the fourth quarter and whenever a plan is determined to qualify for a
remeasurement during a fiscal year. During the year ended December 31, 2015, actuarial gains were recognized as follows: fourth quarter—$38.9 million
($27.8 million after income taxes) as a result of the annual remeasurement process. During the year ended December 31, 2014, actuarial losses were
recognized as
115
follows: first quarter—$15.4 million ($9.8 million after income taxes) as a result of the remeasurement of the assets and obligations of (i) one of our U.S.
defined benefit plan which covers non-represented employees, and (ii) our SERP, in connection with a realignment of of our operating segments effective
January 1, 2014 and related workforce reduction plan; third quarter—$2.8 million ($1.8 million after income taxes) as a result of the remeasurement of the
assets and obligations of one of our U.S. defined benefit plans for represented employees which was part of the businesses and assets we divested on
September 1, 2014; fourth quarter—$112.6 million ($71.8 million after income taxes) as a result of the annual remeasurement process.
116
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
NONE
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Design and Evaluation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. In making this
assessment, management used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework”
(2013) set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the assessment, management concluded that,
as of December 31, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein. Management’s report and the independent registered public
accounting firm’s report are included in Item 8 under the captions entitled “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and “Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and are incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) occurred during the fiscal quarter
ended December 31, 2015 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.

NONE
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by this Item 10 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the information
in “Executive Officers of the Registrant” appearing after Item 4 in Part I of this Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Business Conduct

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, known as the Albemarle Code of Business Conduct. The
Albemarle Code of Business Conduct is available on our website at http://www.albemarle.com. Shareholders may also request a free copy of the Albemarle
Code of Business Conduct from: Albemarle Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 451 Florida Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70801. We will disclose
any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of the Code of Business Conduct as defined in
Item 406 of Regulation S-K by posting such information on our website.
117
New York Stock Exchange Certifications

Because our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), our Chief Executive Officer is required to make, and he has made, an
annual certification to the NYSE stating that he was not aware of any violation by us of the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. Our Chief
Executive Officer made his annual certification to that effect to the NYSE as of May 22, 2015. In addition, we have filed, as exhibits to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer required under Sections 906 and 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
of 2002 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the quality of our public disclosure.
Additional information will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this Item 11 will be contained in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) The following consolidated financial and informational statements of the registrant are included in Part II Item 8 on pages 58 to 116:
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Changes in Equity and Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and
2013
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(2) No Financial Statement Schedules are provided in accordance with Item 15(a)(2) as the information is either not applicable, not required or has been
furnished in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 15, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation, Albemarle Holdings Corporation and
Rockwood Holdings, Inc. [filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on July 18, 2014, and
incorporated herein by reference].
118
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (including Amendment thereto) [filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-119723) filed on October 13, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference].
3.2 Albemarle Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws, effective January 12, 2015 [filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on January 12, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference].
4.1 Indenture, dated as of January 20, 2005, between the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee [filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on January 20, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference].
4.2 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 10, 2010, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust
Company, N.A., as successor trustee to The Bank of New York [filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-
12658) filed on December 10, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference].
4.3 Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 24, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation, Albemarle Holdings Corporation,
Albemarle Holdings II Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee [filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on November 24, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
4.4 Form of Global Security for the 4.50% Senior Notes due 2020 [filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-
12658) filed on December 10, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference].
4.5 Form of Global Security for the 3.000% Senior Notes due 2019 [filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No.
1-12658) filed on November 24, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
4.8 Form of Global Security for the 1.875% Senior Notes due 2021 [filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated herein by reference].
10.1 2013 Stock Compensation and Deferral Election Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Albemarle Corporation [filed as Annex A to the
Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (No. 1-12658) filed on March 28, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.2 Compensation Arrangement with Luther C. Kissam, IV, dated August 29, 2003 [filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated herein by reference].
10.3 Albemarle Corporation 2003 Incentive Plan, adopted January 31, 2003 and approved by the shareholders on March 26, 2003 [filed as
Annex A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (No. 1-12658) filed on February 26, 2003, and incorporated
herein by reference].
10.4 First Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation 2003 Incentive Plan, dated as of December 13, 2006 [filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on December 18, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.5 Notice of Performance Unit Award [filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on February
25, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.6 Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award [filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on
February 25, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.7 Notice of Option Grant [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on February 25, 2013,
and incorporated herein by reference].
119
10.8 Notice of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award [filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-
12658) filed on February 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.9 Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award [filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on
10.10 Notice of Option Grant [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on February 28, 2014,
and incorporated herein by reference].
10.11 Notice of TSR Performance Unit Award [filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on
10.12 Notice of Option Grant [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on March 2, 2015, and
10.13 Notice of TSR Performance Unit Award [filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on
March 2, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference].
*10.14 Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award (2015).
10.15 Amended and Restated Albemarle Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2005 [filed as Exhibit
10.13 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated
10.16 First Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 1, 2010 [filed as Exhibit
10.17 Second Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 18, 2011 [filed as Exhibit
10.18 Third Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated December 2, 2013 [filed as Exhibit
*10.19 Form of Severance Compensation Agreement (Pension-Eligible Employees).
*10.20 Form of Severance Compensation Agreement (Non-Pension-Eligible Employees).
*10.21 Form of Amendment to Severance Compensation Agreement.
10.22 Albemarle Corporation Severance Pay Plan, as revised effective as of December 13, 2006 [filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on December 18, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.23 Amended and Restated Albemarle Corporation Benefits Protection Trust, effective as of December 13, 2006 [filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on December 18, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.24 Albemarle Corporation Employee Relocation Policy [filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated herein by reference].
10.25 Albemarle Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of April 20, 2010 [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-166828) filed on May 14, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference].
120
10.26 Amended and Restated Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2013 [filed as Exhibit
10.27 First Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of November 14, 2014 [filed as Exhibit
*10.28 Second Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of February 12, 2015.
*10.29 Third Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of July 31, 2015.
*10.30 Fourth Amendment to the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, dated as of December 17, 2015.
10.31 Share Purchase Agreement, among Albemarle Corporation, Albemarle Overseas Development Corporation and International Chemical
Investors, SA, dated August 31, 2006 [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated herein by reference].
10.32 Credit Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation and Albemarle Global Finance Company SCA, as
borrowers, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries that from time to time become parties thereto, the several banks and other financial
institutions as may from time to time become parties thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender
and L/C Issuer [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on February 7, 2014, and
10.33 Credit Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation as borrower, certain of Albemarle Corporation’s
subsidiaries that from time to time become parties thereto, as guarantors, the several banks and other financial institutions that may from
time to time become parties thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-198415) filed on August 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.34 First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation and Albemarle Global Finance
Company SCA, as borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions that may from time to time become parties thereto, and
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-
198415) filed on August 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.35 Cash Bridge Credit Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation as Borrower, the Lenders party thereto, and
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed
on December 8, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.36 Consent, dated November 24, 2014, of Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, to Albemarle Corporation, regarding the Credit
Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2014 [filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on
December 8, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.37 Consent, dated November 24, 2014, of Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, to Albemarle Corporation, regarding the Credit
Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2014 [filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658) filed on
December 8, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference].
10.38 First Amendment to Credit Agreement (Term Loan), dated as of December 22, 2014, among Albemarle Corporation, as borrower, certain
of Albemarle Corporation’s subsidiaries that from time to time become parties thereto, as guarantors, the several banks and other
financial institutions as may from time to time become parties thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as
Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (No. 1-12658), and
121
10.39 Second Amendment to Credit Agreement and Increase of Aggregate Commitments, dated as of December 22, 2014, among Albemarle
Corporation and Albemarle Global Finance Company SCA, as borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions as may from
time to time become parties thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated herein by reference].
10.40 Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2015, among Albemarle Corporation and Albemarle Global Finance
Company SCA, as borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions as may from time to time become parties thereto, and
Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2015 (No. 1-12658), and incorporated herein by reference].
10.41 Term Loan Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2015, among Albemarle Corporation, as borrower, the Lenders party thereto, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent [filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 1-12658)
filed on September 14, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference].
*12.1 Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
*21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company.
*23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
*31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
*32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*99.1 Five-Year Summary.
*101 Interactive Data Files (Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, furnished in XBRL (eXtensible
Business Reporting Language)).
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014, (iv) the
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, (v) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
* Included with this filing.
122
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALBEMARLE C ORPORATION
(Registrant)
By: / S/ LUTHER C. KISSAM IV

(Luther C. Kissam IV)
Dated: February 29, 2016
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 29, 2016.
Signature Title
/ S/ LUTHER C. KISSAM IV President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive
(Luther C. Kissam IV) officer and principal financial officer)
/ S/ DONALD J. LAB AUVE, JR. Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting
(Donald J. LaBauve, Jr.) officer)
/ S/ WILLIAM H. HERNANDEZ Director

(William H. Hernandez)
/ S/ DOUGLAS L. M AINE Director

(Douglas L. Maine)
/ S/ J. KENT M ASTERS Director

(J. Kent Masters)
/ S/ JIM W. NOKES Chairman of the Board

(Jim W. Nokes)
/ S/ JAMES J. O’B RIEN Director

(James J. O’Brien)
/ S/ B ARRY W. PERRY Director

(Barry W. Perry)
/ S/ JOHN SHERMAN, JR. Director

(John Sherman, Jr.)
/ S/ GERALD A. STEINER Director

(Gerald A. Steiner)
/ S/ HARRIETT TEE TAGGART Director

(Harriett Tee Taggart)
/ S/ ALEJANDRO D. WOLFF Director

(Alejandro D. Wolff)
123
Exhibit 10.14
NOTICE OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD
under the
ALBEMARLE CORPORATION 2008 INCENTIVE PLAN
This AWARD, made as of the 1st day of April 2015, by Albemarle Corporation, a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), to
XXXX ("Participant"), is made pursuant to and subject to the provisions of the Company's 2008 Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). All terms
that are used herein that are defined in the Plan shall have the same meanings given them in the Plan.
Contingent Restricted Stock Units
1. Grant Date. Pursuant to the Plan, the Company, on April 1, 2015 (the "Grant Date"), granted Participant an incentive
award ("Award") in the form of XXXX Restricted Stock Units, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and subject to the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
2. Accounts. Restricted Stock Units granted to Participant shall be credited to an account (the "Account") established
and maintained for Participant. A Participant's Account shall be the record of Restricted Stock Units granted to the Participant under
the Plan, is solely for accounting purposes and shall not require a segregation of any Company assets.
3. Terms and Conditions. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Restricted Stock Units shall remain nonvested and
subject to substantial risk of forfeiture.
Valuation of Restricted Stock Units
4. Value of Units. The value of each Restricted Stock Unit on any date shall be equal to the value of one share of the
Company's Common Stock on such date.
5. Value of Stock. For purposes of this Award, the value of the Company's Common Stock is the Fair Market Value of
the Stock (as defined in the Plan) on the relevant date.
Vesting of Restricted Stock Units
6. Vesting. Participant's interest in 100% of the Restricted Stock Units shall become vested and non-forfeitable on the
third anniversary of the Grant Date.
Termination of Employment During the Vesting Period
7. Death or Disability. Anything in this Notice of Award to the contrary notwithstanding, if Participant dies or becomes
Disabled while in the employ of the Company or an Affiliate and prior to the
forfeiture of the Restricted Stock Units under paragraph 8, all Restricted Stock Units that are forfeitable shall become non-forfeitable as
of the date of Participant's death or Disability, as the case may be. For purposes of this Award, "Disabled" means a Participant's
permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.
8. Forfeiture. Subject to paragraph 18 hereof, all Restricted Stock Units that are forfeitable shall be forfeited if
Participant's employment with the Company or an Affiliate terminates for any reason except the Participant's death or Disability.
Payment of Awards
9. Time of Payment. Payment of Participant's Restricted Stock Units shall be made as soon as practicable after the Units
have become non-forfeitable, but in no event later than March 15th of the calendar year after the year in which the Units become non-
forfeitable.
10. Form of Payment. The vested Restricted Stock Units shall be paid in whole shares of the Company's Common
Stock.
11. Death of Participant. If Participant dies prior to the payment of his or her non-forfeitable Restricted Stock Units,
such Units shall be paid to his or her Beneficiary. Participant shall have the right to designate a Beneficiary in accordance with
procedures established under the Plan for such purpose. If Participant fails to designate a Beneficiary, or if at the time of the
Participant's death there is no surviving Beneficiary, any amounts payable will be paid to the Participant's estate.
12. Taxes. The Company will withhold from the Award the number of shares of Common Stock necessary to satisfy
Federal tax-withholding requirements and state and local tax-withholding requirements with respect to the state and locality designated
by the Participant as their place of residence in the Company's system of record at the time the Award becomes taxable, except to the
extent otherwise determined to be required by the Company, subject, however, to any special rules or provisions that may apply to
Participants who are non-US employees (working inside or outside of the United States) or US employees working outside of the
United States. It is the Participant's responsibility to properly report all income and remit all Federal, state, and local taxes that may be
due to the relevant taxing authorities as the result of receiving this Award.
General Provisions
13. No Right to Continued Employment. Neither this Award nor the granting or vesting of Restricted Stock Units
shall confer upon Participant any right with respect to continuance of employment
by the Company or an Affiliate, nor shall it interfere in any way with the right of the Company or an Affiliate to terminate the
Participant's employment at any time.
14. Change in Capital Structure. In accordance with the terms of the Plan, the terms of this grant shall be adjusted as
the Committee determines is equitable in the event the Company effects one or more stock dividends, stock split-ups, subdivisions or
consolidations of shares or other similar changes in capitalization.
15. Governing Law. This Award shall be governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and applicable
Federal law. All disputes arising under this Award shall be adjudicated solely within the state or Federal courts located within the
Commonwealth of Virginia.
16. Conflicts. (a) In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Plan as in effect on the Grant Date and the
provisions of this Award, the provisions of the Plan shall govern. All references herein to the Plan shall mean the Plan as in effect on
the Grant Date.
(b) In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Award and the provisions of any separate
Agreement between the Company and the Participant, including, but not limited to, any Severance Compensation Agreement entered
between the Participant and the Company, the provisions of this Award shall govern.
17. Binding Effect. Subject to the limitations stated above and in the Plan, this Award shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the legatees, distributees, and personal representatives of Participant and the successors of the Company.
18. Change in Control. Anything in this Notice of Award to the contrary notwithstanding, upon a Change in Control
(as defined in the Plan) prior to the forfeiture of the Restricted Stock Units under paragraph 8, the Participant's Restricted Stock Units
shall be fully vested and paid.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Award to be signed on its behalf.
By
Exhibit 10.19
Albemarle Corporation
451 Florida Street
Baton Rouge, LA 70801
[For Pension Plan Eligible Employees]

____________, 20__
<Participant Name>
<Address>
Dear <Participant Name>:
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Albemarle Corporation (the “Corporation”) recognizes that the possibility of a Change
in Control of the Corporation exists, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management may result in the
departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of the Corporation.
The Board has determined that appropriate steps should be taken to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and
dedication of members of the Corporation’s management, including yourself, to their assigned duties without distraction in the face of
potentially disturbing circumstances arising from a possible Change in Control of the Corporation.
In order to induce you to remain in the employ of the Corporation and in consideration of your continued service to the
Corporation, the Corporation agrees that you shall receive certain benefits in the event of a Change in Control and certain severance
benefits in the event your employment with the Corporation is terminated subsequent to a Change in Control, as set forth in this
Severance Compensation Agreement (“Agreement”).
1. Definitions.
a. “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i) any Person, or “group” as defined in section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, becomes, directly
or indirectly, the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding
securities of the Corporation that are entitled to vote generally for the election of the Corporation’s directors (the
“Voting Securities”) (other than as a result of an issuance of securities by the Corporation approved by
Continuing Directors, or open market purchases approved by Continuing Directors at the time the purchases are
made). However, if any such Person or “group” becomes the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more, and less than
30%, of the Voting Securities, the Continuing Directors may determine, by a vote of at least two-thirds of the
Continuing Directors, that the same does not constitute a Change in Control;
(ii) as the direct or indirect result of, or in connection with, a reorganization, merger, share exchange or
consolidation (a “Business Combination”), a contested election of directors, or any combination of these
transactions, Continuing Directors cease to
constitute a majority of the Corporation’s board of directors, or any successor’s board of directors, within two
years of the last of such transactions;
(iii) the shareholders of the Corporation approve a Business Combination, unless immediately following such
Business Combination, (1) all or substantially all of the Persons who were the Beneficial Owners of the Voting
Securities outstanding immediately prior to such Business Combination Beneficially Own more than 60% of the
combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors of the Corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a
company which as a result of such transaction owns the Corporation through one or more Subsidiaries) in
substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the
Voting Securities, (2) no Person (excluding any employee benefit plan or related trust of the Corporation or the
Corporation resulting from such Business Combination) Beneficially Owns 30% or more of the combined
voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the
Corporation resulting from such Business Combination, and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board
of directors of the Corporation resulting from such Business Combination are Continuing Directors.
For purposes of this Paragraph 1.a. and other provisions of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the
meanings set forth below:
(A) “Affiliate and Associate” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 of the
General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and as in effect on the
date of this Agreement (the “Exchange Act”).
(B) “Beneficial Owner” means that a Person shall be deemed the “Beneficial Owner” and shall be deemed to
“beneficially own,” any securities:
(i) that such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates owns, directly or indirectly;
(ii) that such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates, directly or indirectly, has the
right to acquire (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) pursuant to any
agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing) or upon the exercise of conversion rights,
exchange rights, rights, warrants or options, or otherwise; provided, however, that, a Person shall not be deemed
to be the “Beneficial Owner” of, or to “beneficially own,” securities tendered pursuant to a tender or exchange
offer made by such Person or any such Person’s Affiliates or Associates until such tendered securities are
accepted for purchase or exchange;
(iii) that such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates, directly or indirectly, has the
right to vote, including pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing;
provided, however, that a Person shall not be deemed the “Beneficial Owner” of, or to “beneficially own,” any
security under this subsection as a result of an agreement, arrangement or understanding to vote such security if
such agreement, arrangement or understanding: (1) arises solely from a revocable proxy given in response to a
public proxy solicitation made pursuant to, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the General
Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act and (2) is not also then reportable by such Person on Schedule
13D under the Exchange Act (or any comparable or successor report); or
(iv) that are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by any other Person (or any Affiliate or
Associates thereof) with which such Person (or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates) has any
agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing), for the purpose of acquiring, holding,
voting (except pursuant to a revocable proxy as described in ‘the proviso to subsection (iii) of this definition) or
disposing of any voting securities of the Corporation provided, however, that notwithstanding any provision of
this definition, any Person engaged in business as an underwriter of securities who acquires any securities of the
Corporation through such Person’s participation in good faith in a firm commitment underwriting registered
under the Securities Act of 1933, shall not be deemed the “Beneficial Owner” of, or to “beneficially own,” such
securities until the expiration of forty days after the date of acquisition; and provided, further, that in no case
shall an officer or director of the Corporation be deemed (1) the beneficial owner of any securities beneficially
owned by another officer or director of the Corporation solely by reason of actions undertaken by such persons
in their capacity as officers or directors of the Corporation; or (2) the beneficial owner of securities held of
record by the trustee of any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or any Subsidiary of the Corporation for
the benefit of any employee of the Corporation or any Subsidiary of the Corporation, other than the officer or
director, by reason of any influences that such officer or director may have over the voting of the securities held
in the trust.
(C) “Continuing Directors” means any member of the Corporation’s Board, while a member of that Board,
and (i) who was a member of the Corporation’s Board prior to January 12, 2015, or (ii) whose subsequent
nomination for election or election to the Corporation’s Board was recommended or approved by a majority of
the Continuing Directors.
(D) “Person” means any individual, firm, company, partnership or other entity.
(E) “Subsidiary” means, with references to any Person, any company or other entity of which an amount of
voting securities sufficient to elect a majority of the directors or Persons having similar authority of such
company or other entity is beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by such Person, or otherwise controlled by
such Person.
b. “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

c. “Date of Termination” shall mean:
(i) in case your employment is terminated for Total Disability, thirty (30) days after Notice of Termination is given
(provided that you shall not have returned to the full-time performance of your duties during such thirty (30) day
period), and
(ii) in all other cases, the date specified in the Notice of Termination (which shall not be less than thirty (30) nor
more than sixty (60) days, respectively, from the date such Notice of Termination is given).
d. “Good Reason for Resignation” shall mean, without your express written consent, any of the following:
(i) a change in your position with the Corporation which in your reasonable judgment does not represent a
promotion from your status or position immediately prior to the Change in Control or the assignment to you of
any duties or responsibilities or diminution of duties or responsibilities which in your reasonable judgment are
inconsistent with your position with the Corporation in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, it
being understood that any of the foregoing in connection with termination of your employment for Cause or
Total Disability shall not constitute Good Reason for Resignation;
(ii) a reduction by the Corporation in the annual rate of your base salary as in effect immediately prior to the date of
a Change in Control;
(iii) the Corporation’s requiring your office nearest to your principal residence to be located at a different place
which is more than thirty-five (35) miles from where such office is located immediately prior to a Change in
Control;
(iv) the failure by the Corporation to continue in effect compensation or benefit plans in which you participate,
which in the aggregate provide you compensation and benefits substantially equivalent to those prior to a
Change in Control;
(v) the failure of the Corporation to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any Successor (as defined in Paragraph 5a
hereof) to assume and agree to perform this Agreement, as contemplated in Paragraph 5a hereof;
(vi) any purported termination of your employment which is not effected pursuant to a Notice of Termination
satisfying the requirements hereof; for purposes of this Agreement, no such purported termination shall be
effective for any purpose except to constitute a Good Reason for Resignation.
Any of the foregoing events shall constitute Good Reason for Resignation only if, and to the extent, there exists “good reason” as such
term is defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations issued
thereunder (“Section 409A”).
e. “Incentive Compensation Award” shall mean payment or payments under Incentive Compensation Plans.
f. “Incentive Compensation Plans” shall mean any variable compensation or other incentive compensation plans
maintained by the Corporation, in which awards are paid in cash, stock or other property including, but not limited to: (i) the Albemarle
Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan, as amended (ii) any variable compensation plan, (iii) or any successor plan thereto.
g. “Normal Retirement Date” shall mean the first day of the calendar month next following the date on which a
Participant attains the age of 65.
h. “Notice of Termination” shall mean a written notice as provided in Paragraph 14 hereof.
i. “Pension Plan” shall mean the Albemarle Corporation Pension Plan, as it may be amended prior to a Change
in Control.
j. “Pension Program” shall mean the Pension Plan, the Albemarle Corporation Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (as amended prior to a Change in Control), plus any other excess or supplemental pension plans maintained by the
Corporation.
k. “Termination for Cause” shall mean termination of your employment upon your willfully engaging in conduct
demonstrably and materially injurious to the Corporation, monetarily or otherwise, provided that there shall have been delivered to you
a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the unanimous affirmative vote of the entire membership of the Board at a meeting of the Board
called and held for such purpose (after reasonable notice to you and an opportunity for you, together with your counsel, to be heard
before the Board), finding that in the good faith opinion of the Board you were guilty of the conduct set forth and specifying the
particulars thereof in detail.
For purposes of this Paragraph l, no act, or failure to act, on your part shall be deemed “willful” unless done, or omitted to be
done, by you not in good faith and without reasonable belief that your action or omission was in the best interest of the Corporation.
Any act or failure to act based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board or based upon the advice of
counsel for the Corporation shall be conclusively presumed to be done or omitted to be done by you in good faith and in the best
interests of the Corporation.
l. “Severance Multiple” shall mean the lesser of (a) two (2), and (b) the number obtained by multiplying two (2)
by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days from the Date of Termination to your Normal Retirement Date and the
denominator of which is 730 but such number under this clause (l) shall not be less than one (1).
m. “Total Disability” shall mean total physical or mental disability rendering you unable to perform the duties of
your employment for a continuous period of six (6) months. Any question as to the existence of your Total Disability upon which you
and the Corporation cannot agree shall be determined by a qualified physician not employed by the Corporation and selected by you
(or, if you are unable to make such selection, it shall be made by any adult member of your immediate family), and approved by the
Corporation. The determination of such physician made in writing to the Corporation and to you shall be final and conclusive for all
purposes of this Agreement.
2. Compensation Upon Termination or While Disabled. Following a Change in Control, you shall be entitled to the
following benefits:
a. Termination Benefits. If your employment by the Corporation shall be terminated subsequent to the Change in
Control and during the term of this Agreement, and under circumstances that would qualify as a “separation from service” under
Section 409A, (a) by reason of your death after you have received a Notice of Termination, (b) by the Corporation other than a
Termination for Cause, or (c) by you for Good Reason for Resignation, then you shall be entitled to the benefits provided below,
without regard to any contrary provision of any plan:
(i) Accrued Salary. The Corporation shall pay you, not later than the fifth (5th ) day following the Date of
Termination, your full base salary and vacation pay accrued through the Date of Termination at the rate in effect
at the time the Notice of Termination is given (or at the rate in effect immediately prior to a Change in Control,
if such amounts were higher).
(ii) Accrued Incentive Compensation. The Corporation shall pay you, not later than five (5) days following your
Date of Termination, the amount of your accrued Incentive Compensation which consists of the annual cash
bonus. If the Date of Termination is after the end of a Variable Compensation Year, but before such Incentive
Compensation for said Variable Compensation Year has been paid, the Corporation shall pay you Incentive
Compensation for that Variable Compensation Year based upon the calculated company score and your
individual performance modifier. If an individual performance modifier has not been determined as of the Date
of Termination, it will be set at one hundred percent (100%).
In addition, if the Date of Termination is other than the first day of a Variable Compensation Year, the
Corporation shall pay you Incentive Compensation for the Variable Compensation Year in which the Date of
Termination occurs, equal to the target variable compensation for the year in which the Change in Control
occurs, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total number of days which have elapsed in the
current Variable Compensation Year to the Date of Termination, and the denominator of which is three hundred
sixty-five (365). Payments under this clause (ii) shall be made to you not later than five (5) days after the Date of
Termination.
If there is more than one Incentive Compensation Program, your accrued Incentive Compensation shall be
calculated separately for each Program.
For the purpose of this Paragraph 2.a.(ii), “Incentive Compensation Program” means any of the Incentive
Compensation Plans defined in Paragraph 1.f. and any other plan or program for the payment of incentive
compensation, variable compensation, bonus, benefits or awards for which you were, or your position was,
eligible to participate; “Incentive Compensation” means any compensation, variable compensation, bonus,
benefit or award paid or payable under an Incentive Compensation Program; and “Variable Compensation
Year” means a calendar or fiscal plan year of an Incentive Compensation Program.
(iii) Insurance Coverage. The Corporation shall arrange to provide you (and your dependents, if applicable) with the
following:
(a) If you are eligible, you shall participate in the Corporation’s retiree medical benefit plans as if you retired
from the Corporation on your Date of Termination, except that the Corporation shall provide such medical
coverage at no cost to you for eighteen (18) months following your Date of Termination and thereafter, you
shall participate therein on the same terms as other retired employees (to the extent these benefits are provided
by a self-insured plan, any reimbursements for claims incurred shall be made as soon as practicable, but in no
event can they be made later than the end of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the claim
was incurred);
(b) If you are not eligible for the retiree medical plans, you will no longer continue to participate in the
Corporation’s medical benefit plans, except for COBRA, and (i) if you elect to receive COBRA benefits, the
Corporation shall provide you with such benefits at no cost to you for eighteen (18) months following your loss
of medical coverage.
(iv) Retirement Benefits. The Supplemental Pension Benefit Credits made on your behalf under the Albemarle
Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) as well as all earnings accrued on such amounts,
shall be immediately vested and non-forfeitable and shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the EDCP.
(v) Outplacement Counseling. The Corporation shall make available to you, at the Corporation’s expense,
outplacement counseling. You may select the organization that will provide the outplacement counseling,
however, the Corporation’s obligation to provide you benefits under this subsection (v) shall be limited to
$25,000. This counseling must be used, if at all, no later than the end of the second calendar year after the year
of your Date of Termination.
(vi) Financial Counseling. Following your Date of Termination, the Corporation shall make available to you, two
years (plus the remaining unexpired portion of the year in which your Date of Termination falls) of financial
counseling services which may include tax counseling services. You may select the organization that will provide
you with the financial and tax counseling services, however, the Corporation’s obligation to provide you benefits
under this subsection (vi) shall be limited to $25,000. To be eligible for reimbursement, the financial counseling
must begin in the calendar year of your Date of Termination, unless such Date of Termination is less than 60
days before the end of such calendar year, in which case the financial counseling must begin no later than during
the following calendar year.
(vii) Severance Payment. The Corporation shall pay as severance pay to you, not later than the fifth (5th ) day
following the Date of Termination, a lump sum severance payment (the “Severance Payment”) equal to the
Severance Multiple times the following:
(a) the greater of your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the Corporation immediately
prior to the Date of Termination and your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the
Corporation immediately prior to a Change in Control, whether or not such annual base compensation was
includible in your gross income for federal income tax purposes; plus
(b) the greater of your target annual variable compensation that was in place immediately prior to a Change in
Control, or your target annual variable compensation that was in place immediately prior to the Date of
Termination (whether or not such award was includible in your gross income for federal income tax purposes).
The Severance Payment shall be reduced by the amount paid to you under Paragraph 7(c) below.
(viii) Reduction of Severance Payment.

If the payments or benefits to which you will be entitled under this Agreement (referred to in this Paragraph as
the “Payments”) would cause you to be liable for the federal excise tax levied on certain “excess parachute
payments” under Code Section 4999 (“Excise Tax”), then the Payments shall be reduced (or repaid to the
Corporation, if previously paid or provided) as provided below. In no event shall you be entitled to receive any
kind of gross-up payment or Excise Tax reimbursement from the Corporation. For purposes of this Paragraph
(viii), the terms “excess parachute payment” and “parachute payment” will have the meanings assigned to them
by Section 280G of the Code.
If your Payments exceed 2.99 times your “Base Amount” ( as defined in Code Section 280G), a “reduced
payment amount" shall be calculated by reducing the Payments to the minimum extent necessary so that no
portion of any Payment, as so reduced or repaid, constitutes an “excess parachute payment.” If it is determined
that any Excise Tax is payable by you, you shall receive either (i) all Payments otherwise due to you or (ii) the
reduced payment amount described in the preceding sentence, whichever will provide you with the greater
after-tax economic benefit taking into account for these purposes any applicable Excise Tax.
Whether Payments to you are to be reduced, pursuant to this Paragraph, and the extent to which they are to be
so reduced, will be determined by the Corporation in good faith and the Corporation will notify you in writing
of its determination. Any such notice shall describe in reasonable detail the basis of the Corporation’s
determination. If you accept the Corporation’s determination, you shall so advise the Corporation of your
determination within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the Corporation. If you object to such
determination within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the Corporation, the Corporation will retain, at its
expense, a nationally recognized public accounting firm, employment consulting firm or law firm selected by
the Corporation and reasonably acceptable to you to review the matter. Such firm shall meet with you and your
representatives and the Corporation and its representatives and thereafter render its written opinion as to the
extent, if any, that in such firm’s reasonable judgment the payments and benefits otherwise due to you
hereunder must be reduced hereunder. The decision of such firm concerning the extent of any required
reduction in such payments and benefits shall be final and binding on both you and the Corporation.
(ix) No Duty to Mitigate. You shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment provided for in this
Paragraph 2 by seeking other employment or otherwise, nor shall the amount of any payment or benefit
hereunder be reduced by any compensation earned by you as the result of employment by another employer or
by retirement benefits after the Date of Termination.
(x) Six Month Delay. If, as of the Date of Termination, you are considered a Specified Employee (as such term is
defined in Section 409A), any payments or benefits due upon, or within the six month period following and due
to, a termination of your employment that constitutes a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section
409A and which do not otherwise qualify under the exemptions under Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-1, shall be
paid or provided to you in a lump sum on the earlier of (i) the first day of the month following the six month
anniversary of your separation from service (as such term is defined in Section 409A) for any reason other than
death, and (ii) the date of your death, and any remaining payments and benefits shall be paid or provided in
accordance with the normal payment dates specified for such payment or benefit.
b. Payments While Disabled. During any period prior to the Date of Termination and during the term of this
Agreement that you are unable to perform your full‑time duties with the Corporation, whether as a result of your Total Disability or as
a result of a physical or mental disability that is not total or is not permanent and therefore is not a Total Disability, you shall continue
to receive your base salary at the rate in effect at the commencement of any such period, together with all other compensation and
benefits that are payable or provided under the Corporation’s benefit plans, including its disability plans. After the Date of Termination,
your benefits shall be determined in accordance with the Corporation’s Pension Program, insurance and other applicable programs.
The compensation and benefits, other than salary, payable or provided pursuant to this Paragraph 2b shall be the greater of (x) the
amounts computed under the Pension Program, disability benefit plans, insurance and other applicable programs in effect immediately
prior to a Change in Control and (y) the amounts computed under the Pension Program, disability benefit plans, insurance and other
applicable programs in effect at the time the compensation and benefits are paid.
c. Payments if Termination for Cause, or by You Except With Good Reason . If your employment shall be
terminated by the Corporation for Cause or by you other than with Good Reason for Resignation, the Corporation shall pay you your
full base salary and accrued vacation pay then in effect through the Date of Termination, at the rate in effect at the time Notice of
Termination is given plus any benefits or awards which have been earned or become payable but which have not yet been paid to you.
You shall receive any payment due under this subsection c. on your Date of Termination. Thereafter the Corporation shall have no
further obligation to you under this Agreement.
d. After Death. If your employment shall be terminated by reason of your death, your benefits shall be
determined in accordance with the Corporation’s Pension Program and insurance programs then in effect except that if your death
occurs after the execution of a definitive agreement which results in a Change in Control, then your beneficiary shall be entitled to the
benefits under this Agreement as if the Corporation issued you a Notice of Termination terminating your employment thirty (30) days
after a Change in Control.
3. Treatment of Incentive Plan Awards Upon a Change in Control . Upon a Change in Control, any outstanding awards
granted under one or more of the Albemarle Incentive Plans, shall be treated in accordance with the terms of the Notices granting such
awards. In the event a Notice of Award does not provide for how the award will be treated upon a Change in Control, the provisions
of the applicable Plan shall govern.
4. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue in effect through
December 31, 2016; provided, however, that commencing on January 1, 2015 and each January 1 thereafter, the term of this
Agreement shall automatically be extended for one additional year unless, not later than September 30 of the preceding year, the
Corporation or you shall have given notice that it or you do not wish to extend this Agreement. Notwithstanding any such notice by
the Corporation or you not to extend the Agreement, if a Change in Control shall have occurred prior to such termination of this
Agreement, the attempted termination of this Agreement shall be deemed ineffective and this Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect. In any event, the term of this Agreement shall expire on the second (2nd) anniversary of the date of the Change in Control.
This Agreement shall terminate if your employment is terminated by you or the Corporation prior to a Change in Control.
5. Successors; Binding Agreement.
a. Successors of the Corporation. The Corporation will require any Successor to all or substantially all of the
business and/or assets of the Corporation to expressly assume and agree, by an agreement in form and substance satisfactory to you, to
perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Corporation would be required to perform it if no such
succession had taken place. Failure of the Corporation to obtain such assent at least five business days prior to the time a person
becomes a Successor (or where the Corporation does not have at least five business days advance notice that a person may become a
Successor, within three business days after having notice that such person may become or has become a Successor) shall constitute
Good Reason for Resignation by you and, if a Change in Control has occurred or thereafter occurs, shall entitle you immediately to the
benefits provided in Paragraph 2a hereof upon delivery by you of a Notice of Termination which the Corporation, by executing this
Agreement, hereby assents to. For purposes of this Agreement, “Successor” shall mean any person that purchases all or substantially
all of the assets of the Corporation or the Surviving Corporation (and Parent Corporation, if applicable) or obtains or succeeds to, or
has the practical ability to control (either immediately or with the passage of time), the Corporation’s business directly, by merger or
consolidation, or indirectly, by purchase of voting securities of the Corporation or by acquisition of rights to vote voting securities of
the Corporation or otherwise, including but not limited to any person or group that acquires the beneficial ownership or voting rights
described in Paragraph 1.a.(ii).
b. Your Successor . This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by your personal or legal
representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devises and legatees. If you should die following your Date of
Termination while any amount would still be payable to you hereunder if you had continued to live, all such amounts, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this Agreement to your devisee, legatee or other designee or, if there is
no such designee, to your estate.
6. Confidentiality.
a. You acknowledge that: (i) the business conducted by the Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Business ”) is
intensely competitive and your position with the Corporation has exposed you to knowledge of Confidential Information (as defined
below); (ii) the direct and indirect disclosure of any such Confidential Information to existing or potential competitors of the
Corporation would place the Corporation at a competitive disadvantage and would do damage, monetary or otherwise, to the
Corporation’s business; and (iii) the engaging by you in any of the activities prohibited by this Agreement may constitute improper
appropriation and/or use of Confidential Information. For purposes of this Agreement, "Confidential Information" shall mean trade
secrets, know-how and other proprietary information of the Corporation known to you, and which gives the Corporation a competitive
advantage, relating to the Corporation's business, but shall not include information generally available to or known by the public or
information that is or becomes available to you on a non-confidential basis from a source other than the Corporation or its directors,
officers or employees (other than by reason of a breach of any obligation of confidentiality).
b. From and after the date of termination of your employment with the Corporation ("Date of Termination") until
the first anniversary thereof (the "Non-Competition Period"), you shall not, directly or indirectly, whether individually, as a director,
stockholder, owner, partner, employee, consultant, principal or agent of any business, or in any other capacity, make known, disclose,
furnish make available or utilize any of the Confidential Information, other than in the proper performance of the duties contemplated
herein, or as required by law or by a court of competent jurisdiction or other administrative or legislative body; provided that if required
to disclose any of the Confidential Information by law or by a court or other administrative or legislative body, you shall promptly
notify the Corporation so that the Corporation may seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy. Notwithstanding anything in
this Agreement or any code of conduct or ethics, disclosure policy or other code, policy or similar document of the Company to the
contrary, nothing herein or therein shall restrict Employee from reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
communicating directly with its staff, about a possible securities law violation.
c. You also agree to comply with the [Patent and Confidentiality Agreement [and Intellectual Property
Agreement]] [OR] [Employee Non-Solicitation, Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement] previously signed by you and
delivered to the Corporation, including those provisions which are applicable after your Date of Termination.
7. Non-Compete; Consideration.
a. During the Non-Competition Period, you shall not engage in Competition (as defined below) with the
Corporation. For purposes of this Agreement, “Competition” by you shall mean your engaging in, or otherwise directly or indirectly
being employed by or acting as a consultant to, or being a director, officer, employee, principal, agent, stockholder, member, owner,
joint venturer or partner of, or permitting the your name to be used in connection with the competitive activities of any other business
or organization in competition with the business of the Corporation as the same shall be constituted on the date of the Change in
Control; provided that it shall not be a violation of this Agreement for you to: (i) become the registered or beneficial owner of less than
five percent (5%) of any class of the capital stock of a competing corporation registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, provided that you do not actively participate in the business of such corporation until the expiration of the Non-Competition
Period; (ii) be involved with the activities of any other business or organization which did not compete, directly or indirectly, with the
business of the Corporation as the same shall be constituted on the date of the Change in Control; or (iii) be engaged in any business
from which the Corporation derives no more than five percent
(5%) of its revenues if you were not directly engaged in such business at the Corporation prior to the Date of Termination.
b. The “business of the Corporation” is defined as the development, manufacture, and marketing of chemical
products and the technologies that are associated with such development and manufacturing. The categories of products that Albemarle
creates, and which are included in this definition, include, but are not limited to, lithium and lithium compounds, bromine and
derivatives, catalysts and surface treatment chemistries used in consumer electronics, flame retardants, metal processing, plastics,
contemporary and alternative transportation vehicles, refining, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, construction, and customer chemistry
services.
c. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, during the Non-Competition Period, you agree that you will
not, directly or indirectly, for your benefit or for the benefit of any other person, firm or entity, do any of the following:
(i) solicit from any customer doing business with the Corporation, business of the same or of a similar nature to the
business conducted between the Corporation and such customer; or
(ii) solicit the employment or services of, or hire, any person who at the time is employed by or a consultant to the
Corporation.
(iii) solicit the services of any consultant engaged in competitive activities for the Corporation.
d. In consideration for your agreement to the provisions of this Paragraph 7, the Corporation shall pay you, not
later than the fifth (5th ) day following the Date of Termination an amount equal to the sum of the following:
(i) the greater of your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the Corporation immediately prior
to the Date of Termination and your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the Corporation
immediately prior to a Change in Control, whether or not such annual base compensation was includible in your
gross income for federal income tax purposes; plus
(ii) the amount of your actual annual variable compensation payment you received for a year preceding the date on
which the Change in Control occurs, (whether or not such award was includible in your gross income for
federal income tax purposes).
8. Remedies.
a. You acknowledge that your agreement to the matters set forth in Paragraphs 6 and 7 is being entered into in
connection with the consummation of a transaction involving a Change in Control of the Corporation and that the services rendered by
you to the Corporation are of a special and unique character, which gives this agreement a particular value to the Corporation, the loss
of which may not be reasonably or adequately compensated for by damages in an action at law; and that a material breach or
threatened breach by you of any of the provisions contained in Paragraphs 6 or 7 of this Agreement will cause the Corporation
irreparable injury. You therefore agree that, upon breach by you of Paragraph 6 or 7 of this Agreement, the Corporation shall be
entitled, in addition to any other right or remedy, to a temporary, preliminary and permanent injunction, without the necessity of
proving the inadequacy of monetary damages or the posting of any bond or security, enjoining or restraining you from any such breach
or threatened breaches.
b. In addition, in the event of a material breach by you of the provisions of clauses a or b of Paragraph 7, the
Corporation shall be entitled to obtain from you the amounts paid to you under Paragraph 7.
c. You further acknowledge and agree that due to the uniqueness of your services and confidential nature of the
information you possess, the covenants set forth herein are reasonable and necessary for the protection of the business and goodwill of
the Corporation. It is the intent of the parties hereto that if in the opinion of any court of competent jurisdiction any provision set forth
in this Agreement is not reasonable in any respect, such court shall have the right, power and authority to modify any and all such
provisions as to such court shall appear not unreasonable and to enforce the remainder of this Agreement as so modified.
9. Notice to Corporation to Cure. In the event that you believe that you have a Good Reason for Resignation, you shall
notify the Corporation in writing of such fact and the reasons therefore no later than 90 days after the relevant event has occurred. The
Corporation may within thirty (30) days after your notice, elect to take such steps that would be necessary so that you would no longer
have a Good Reason for Resignation. Failure to satisfy the requirements of this Paragraph 9 will result in there not being any Good
Reason for Resignation for purposes of this Agreement.
10. Relationship to Other Agreements. To the extent that any provision of any other agreement between the Corporation
and you shall limit, qualify or be inconsistent with any provision of this Agreement, then for purposes of this Agreement, while the
same shall remain in force, the provision of this Agreement shall control and such provision of such other agreement shall be deemed
to have been superseded, and to be of no force or effect, as if such other agreement had been formally amended to the extent necessary
to accomplish such purpose.
11. Nature of Payments. All payments to you under this Agreement shall be considered either payments in consideration
of your continued service to the Corporation or severance payments in consideration of your past service to the Corporation.
12. Validity. If any provision or term (or part thereof) of this Agreement shall be, or be found by any authority or court
of competent jurisdiction to be, invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other
provision or term (or part thereof) in that jurisdiction or the whole of the Agreement in any other jurisdiction, all of which shall remain
in full force and effect.
13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
14. Notice. Any purported termination of your employment by the Corporation or by you following a Change in
Control shall be communicated to the other party by a Notice of Termination. A Notice of Termination shall indicate the specific
termination provision in this Agreement relied upon and shall set forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to
provide a basis for termination of your employment under the provision so indicated. For the purpose of this Agreement, notices and all
other communications provided for in the Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered
or mailed by United States registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the respective addresses set forth on
the first page of this Agreement, provided that all notices to the Corporation shall be directed to the attention of the Board of the
Corporation with a copy to the Secretary of the Corporation or to such other address as either party may have furnished to the other in
writing in accordance herewith, except that notice of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt.
15. Fees and Expenses. The Corporation shall pay all legal fees and related expenses incurred by you: (i) as a result of
your termination following a Change in Control, (ii) in seeking to obtain or enforce any right or benefit provided by this Agreement
(including all fees and expenses, if any, incurred in contesting or disputing any such termination or incurred by you in seeking advice
in connection therewith), (iii) in making the determinations under Paragraph 2.a(viii), (iv) in seeking advice to determine whether you
have a Good Reason for Resignation and providing the notice to the Corporation under Paragraph 9, (v) and contesting any claim by
the Corporation under Paragraph 8; provided that such fees are incurred no later than the end of the second calendar year after the year
16. Release. In order to receive payment of the amounts under Paragraph 2.a(i), (ii), (iv) and (vii), you shall execute and
deliver to the Corporation a General Release which shall contain the provisions set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement and which
shall otherwise be in a form reasonably acceptable to you and the Corporation. Such General Release must be executed within the
ninety (90) day period following your termination, provided, however, that to the extent any amounts payable under Paragraph 2.a.(i),
(ii), (iv) or (vii) constitute deferred compensation for purposes of Section 409A, and the ninety (90) day period referred to herein shall
commence in one tax year and end in the subsequent tax year, the payments described in this Paragraph 16 shall be made solely in the
subsequent tax year.
17. Survival. The respective obligations of, and benefits afforded to, the Corporation and you as provided in Paragraphs
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15 and 16 of this Agreement shall survive termination of this Agreement.
18. Miscellaneous. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged unless such waiver,
modification or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by you and such officer as may be specifically designated by the Board.
No waiver by either party hereto at any time of any breach by the other party hereto of, or compliance with, any condition or provision
of this Agreement to be performed by such other party shall be deemed a waiver of similar or dissimilar provisions or conditions at the
same or at any prior or subsequent time. No agreements or representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, with respect to the
subject matter hereof have been made by either party which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement.
19. Governing Law. a. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed
by the laws of the State of Virginia.
b. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be interpreted and applied so that the
payments and benefits set forth herein shall either be exempt from or shall comply with the requirements of Section 409A.
To the extent that the Corporation determines that any provision of this Agreement would cause you to incur any additional tax
or interest under Section 409A, the Corporation shall be entitled to reform such provision to attempt to comply with or be exempt from
Section 409A. To the extent that any provision hereof is modified in order to comply with Section 409A, such modification shall be
made in good faith and shall, to the maximum extent reasonably possible, maintain the original intent and economic benefit to you and
the Corporation without violating the provisions of Section 409A.
In no event may you, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment to be made under this Agreement or
otherwise which constitutes a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A.
20. Amendment. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both you and the
Corporation.
21. Headings; Construction. The headings used in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only
and do not define or limit the provisions hereof. Any Attachments to this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall be
deemed a part of it.
If this letter sets forth our agreement on the subject matter hereof, kindly sign and return to the Corporation the enclosed copy
of this letter which will then constitute our agreement on this subject.
Sincerely,
By:
Name: Luther C. Kissam
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Agreed to this day
of , 20XX
(Name)
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL RELEASE
1. This General Release is given by _____________________ (“Employee”) to Albemarle Corporation (the “Corporation”)
and its successors.
2. Employee agrees to and hereby does release and discharge the Corporation, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and its and their
successors, assigns, directors, officers, representatives and employees (collectively, “Releasees”) from any and all claims, causes of
action and demands of any kind, whether known or unknown, which Employee has or ever has had, which are based on acts or
omissions occurring up to and including the date this General Release is fully executed. In this General Release, Employee further
releases the Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates from any and all compensation owed to Employee, including vacation pay
and any attorneys’ fees, damages and costs Employee could recover under any statute or common law theory, except arising under the
Severance Compensation Agreement between Employee and the Corporation and any employee benefit plan of the Corporation.
Included within this release, without limiting its scope, are claims arising out of Employee’s employment or the termination of
Employee’s employment based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
as amended, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as amended, the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act as amended, the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended by the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 as amended, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, [insert any appropriate reference to Virginia law], the U.S.
Patriot Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and any other federal, state or local civil rights, disability, discrimination, retaliation or
labor law, or any theory of contract or tort law.
3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, nothing herein shall be construed to release, terminate or discharge Employee’s
rights (i) to indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation as provided in the articles or certificate of incorporation, bylaws
or other organizational documents of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, or as provided or permitted under any
applicable law, or as provided in any indemnification agreement or (ii) under any policy of directors’ and officers’ liability, errors and
omissions liability or other insurance maintained by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates, in each case where
Employee was or is a party or otherwise involved or is threatened to be made a party to or otherwise involved in any threatened,
pending or completed action, proceeding, investigation, inquiry or other matter, whether civil, criminal, administrative or otherwise, by
reason of the fact that Employee is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
(including Employee’s conduct with respect to an employee benefit plan) or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation or any
of its subsidiaries or affiliates as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise.
Exhibit 10.20
Albemarle Corporation
451 Florida Street
Baton Rouge, LA 70801
[For Non-Pension Plan Eligible Employees]

__________, 20__
<Participant Name>
<Address>
Dear <Participant Name>:
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Albemarle Corporation (the “Corporation”) recognizes that the possibility of a Change
in Control of the Corporation exists, and the uncertainty and questions which it may raise among management may result in the
departure or distraction of management personnel to the detriment of the Corporation.
The Board has determined that appropriate steps should be taken to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and
dedication of members of the Corporation’s management, including yourself, to their assigned duties without distraction in the face of
potentially disturbing circumstances arising from a possible Change in Control of the Corporation.
In order to induce you to remain in the employ of the Corporation and in consideration of your continued service to the
Corporation, the Corporation agrees that you shall receive certain benefits in the event of a Change in Control and certain severance
benefits in the event your employment with the Corporation is terminated subsequent to a Change in Control, as set forth in this
Severance Compensation Agreement (“Agreement”).
1. Definitions.
a. “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any of the following events:
(i) any Person, or “group” as defined in section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, becomes, directly
or indirectly, the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding
securities of the Corporation that are entitled to vote generally for the election of the Corporation’s directors (the
“Voting Securities”) (other than as a result of an issuance of securities by the Corporation approved by
Continuing Directors, or open market purchases approved by Continuing Directors at the time the purchases are
made). However, if any such Person or “group” becomes the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more, and less than
30%, of the Voting Securities, the Continuing Directors may determine, by a vote of at least two-thirds of the
Continuing Directors, that the same does not constitute a Change in Control;
(ii) as the direct or indirect result of, or in connection with, a reorganization, merger, share exchange or
consolidation (a “Business Combination”), a contested election of
directors, or any combination of these transactions, Continuing Directors cease to constitute a majority of the
Corporation’s board of directors, or any successor’s board of directors, within two years of the last of such
transactions;
(iii) the shareholders of the Corporation approve a Business Combination, unless immediately following such
Business Combination, (1) all or substantially all of the Persons who were the Beneficial Owners of the Voting
Securities outstanding immediately prior to such Business Combination Beneficially Own more than 60% of the
combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors of the Corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including, without limitation, a
company which as a result of such transaction owns the Corporation through one or more Subsidiaries) in
substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the
Voting Securities, (2) no Person (excluding any employee benefit plan or related trust of the Corporation or the
Corporation resulting from such Business Combination) Beneficially Owns 30% or more of the combined
voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the
Corporation resulting from such Business Combination, and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board
of directors of the Corporation resulting from such Business Combination are Continuing Directors.
For purposes of this Paragraph 1.a. and other provisions of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the
meanings set forth below:
(A) “Affiliate and Associate” shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in Rule 12b-2 of the
General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and as in effect on the
date of this Agreement (the “Exchange Act”).
(B) “Beneficial Owner” means that a Person shall be deemed the “Beneficial Owner” and shall be deemed to
“beneficially own,” any securities:
(i) that such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates owns, directly or indirectly;
(ii) that such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates, directly or indirectly, has the
right to acquire (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) pursuant to any
agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing) or upon the exercise of conversion rights,
exchange rights, rights, warrants or options, or otherwise; provided, however, that, a Person shall not be deemed
to be the “Beneficial Owner” of, or to “beneficially own,” securities tendered pursuant to a tender or exchange
offer made by such Person or any such Person’s Affiliates or Associates until such tendered securities are
accepted for purchase or exchange;
(iii) that such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates, directly or indirectly, has the
right to vote, including pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding, whether or not in writing;
provided, however, that a Person shall not be deemed the “Beneficial Owner” of, or to “beneficially own,” any
security under this subsection as a result of an agreement, arrangement or understanding to vote such security if
such agreement, arrangement or understanding: (1) arises solely from a revocable proxy given in response to a
public proxy solicitation made pursuant to, and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the General
Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act and (2) is not also then reportable by such Person on Schedule
13D under the Exchange Act (or any comparable or successor report); or
(iv) that are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by any other Person (or any Affiliate or
Associates thereof) with which such Person (or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates) has any
agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing), for the purpose of acquiring, holding,
voting (except pursuant to a revocable proxy as described in ‘the proviso to subsection (iii) of this definition) or
disposing of any voting securities of the Corporation provided, however, that notwithstanding any provision of
this definition, any Person engaged in business as an underwriter of securities who acquires any securities of the
Corporation through such Person’s participation in good faith in a firm commitment underwriting registered
under the Securities Act of 1933, shall not be deemed the “Beneficial Owner” of, or to “beneficially own,” such
securities until the expiration of forty days after the date of acquisition; and provided, further, that in no case
shall an officer or director of the Corporation be deemed (1) the beneficial owner of any securities beneficially
owned by another officer or director of the Corporation solely by reason of actions undertaken by such persons
in their capacity as officers or directors of the Corporation; or (2) the beneficial owner of securities held of
record by the trustee of any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or any Subsidiary of the Corporation for
the benefit of any employee of the Corporation or any Subsidiary of the Corporation, other than the officer or
director, by reason of any influences that such officer or director may have over the voting of the securities held
in the trust.
(C) “Continuing Directors” means any member of the Corporation’s Board, while a member of that Board,
and (i) who was a member of the Corporation’s Board prior to January 12, 2015, or (ii) whose subsequent
nomination for election or election to the Corporation’s Board was recommended or approved by a majority of
the Continuing Directors.
(D) “Person” means any individual, firm, company, partnership or other entity.
(E) “Subsidiary” means, with references to any Person, any company or other entity of which an amount of
voting securities sufficient to elect a majority of the directors or Persons having similar authority of such
company or other entity is beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by such Person, or otherwise controlled by
such Person.
b. “Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

c. “Date of Termination” shall mean:
(i) in case your employment is terminated for Total Disability, thirty (30) days after Notice of Termination is given
(provided that you shall not have returned to the full-time performance of your duties during such thirty (30) day
period), and
(ii) in all other cases, the date specified in the Notice of Termination (which shall not be less than thirty (30) nor
more than sixty (60) days, respectively, from the date such Notice of Termination is given).
d. “Good Reason for Resignation” shall mean, without your express written consent, any of the following:
(i) a change in your position with the Corporation which in your reasonable judgment does not represent a
promotion from your status or position immediately prior to the Change in Control or the assignment to you of
any duties or responsibilities or diminution of duties or responsibilities which in your reasonable judgment are
inconsistent with your position with the Corporation in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control, it
being understood that any of the foregoing in connection with termination of your employment for Cause or
Total Disability shall not constitute Good Reason for Resignation;
(ii) a reduction by the Corporation in the annual rate of your base salary as in effect immediately prior to the date of
a Change in Control;
(iii) the Corporation’s requiring your office nearest to your principal residence to be located at a different place
which is more than thirty-five (35) miles from where such office is located immediately prior to a Change in
Control;
(iv) the failure by the Corporation to continue in effect compensation or benefit plans in which you participate,
which in the aggregate provide you compensation and benefits substantially equivalent to those prior to a
Change in Control;
(v) the failure of the Corporation to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any Successor (as defined in Paragraph 5a
hereof) to assume and agree to perform this Agreement, as contemplated in Paragraph 5a hereof;
(vi) any purported termination of your employment which is not effected pursuant to a Notice of Termination
satisfying the requirements hereof; for purposes of this Agreement, no such purported termination shall be
effective for any purpose except to constitute a Good Reason for Resignation.
Any of the foregoing events shall constitute Good Reason for Resignation only if, and to the extent, there exists “good reason” as such
term is defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations issued
thereunder (“Section 409A”).
e. “Incentive Compensation Award” shall mean payment or payments under Incentive Compensation Plans.
f. “Incentive Compensation Plans” shall mean any variable compensation or other incentive compensation plans
maintained by the Corporation, in which awards are paid in cash, stock or other property including, but not limited to: (i) the Albemarle
Corporation 2008 Incentive Plan, as amended (ii) any variable compensation plan, (iii) or any successor plan thereto.
g. “Normal Retirement Date” shall mean the first day of the calendar month next following the date on which a
Participant attains the age of 65.
h. “Notice of Termination” shall mean a written notice as provided in Paragraph 14 hereof.
i. “Termination for Cause” shall mean termination of your employment upon your willfully engaging in conduct
demonstrably and materially injurious to the Corporation, monetarily or otherwise, provided that there shall have been delivered to you
a copy of a resolution duly adopted by the unanimous affirmative vote of the entire membership of the Board at a meeting of the Board
called and held for such purpose (after reasonable notice to you and an opportunity for you, together with your counsel, to be heard
before the Board), finding that in the good faith opinion of the Board you were guilty of the conduct set forth and specifying the
particulars thereof in detail.
For purposes of this Paragraph l, no act, or failure to act, on your part shall be deemed “willful” unless done, or omitted to be
done, by you not in good faith and without reasonable belief that your action or omission was in the best interest of the Corporation.
Any act or failure to act based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board or based upon the advice of
counsel for the Corporation shall be conclusively presumed to be done or omitted to be done by you in good faith and in the best
interests of the Corporation.
j. “Severance Multiple” shall mean the lesser of (a) two (2), and (b) the number obtained by multiplying two (2)
by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days from the Date of Termination to your Normal Retirement Date and the
denominator of which is 730 but such number under this clause (j) shall not be less than one (1).
k. “Total Disability” shall mean total physical or mental disability rendering you unable to perform the duties of
your employment for a continuous period of six (6) months. Any question as to the existence of your Total Disability upon which you
and the Corporation cannot agree shall be determined by a qualified physician not employed by the Corporation and selected by you
(or, if you are unable to make such selection, it shall be made by any adult member of your immediate family), and approved by the
Corporation. The determination of such physician made in writing to the Corporation and to you shall be final and conclusive for all
purposes of this Agreement.
2. Compensation Upon Termination or While Disabled. Following a Change in Control, you shall be entitled to the
following benefits:
a. Termination Benefits. If your employment by the Corporation shall be terminated subsequent to the Change in
Control and during the term of this Agreement, and under circumstances that would qualify as a “separation from service” under
Section 409A, (a) by reason of your death after you have received a Notice of Termination, (b) by the Corporation other than a
Termination for Cause, or (c) by you for Good Reason for Resignation, then you shall be entitled to the benefits provided below,
without regard to any contrary provision of any plan:
(i) Accrued Salary. The Corporation shall pay you, not later than the fifth (5th ) day following the Date of
Termination, your full base salary and vacation pay accrued through the Date of Termination at the rate in effect
at the time the Notice of Termination is given (or at the rate in effect immediately prior to a Change in Control,
if such amounts were higher).
(ii) Accrued Incentive Compensation. The Corporation shall pay you, not later than five (5) days following your
Date of Termination, the amount of your accrued Incentive Compensation which consists of the annual cash
bonus. If the Date of Termination is after the end of a Variable Compensation Year, but before such Incentive
Compensation for said Variable Compensation Year has been paid, the Corporation shall pay you Incentive
Compensation for that Variable Compensation Year based upon the calculated company score and your
individual performance modifier. If an individual performance modifier has not been determined as of the Date
of Termination, it will be set at one hundred percent (100%).
In addition, if the Date of Termination is other than the first day of a Variable Compensation Year, the
Corporation shall pay you Incentive Compensation for the Variable Compensation Year in which the Date of
Termination occurs, equal to the target variable compensation for the year in which the Change in Control
occurs, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the total number of days which have elapsed in the
current Variable Compensation Year to the Date of Termination, and the denominator of which is three hundred
sixty-five (365). Payments under this clause (ii) shall be made to you not later than five (5) days after the Date of
Termination.
If there is more than one Incentive Compensation Program, your accrued Incentive Compensation shall be
calculated separately for each Program.
For the purpose of this Paragraph 2.a.(ii), “Incentive Compensation Program” means any of the Incentive
Compensation Plans defined in Paragraph 1.f. and any other plan or program for the payment of incentive
compensation, variable compensation, bonus, benefits or awards for which you were, or your position was,
eligible to participate; “Incentive Compensation” means any compensation, variable compensation, bonus,
benefit or award paid or payable under an Incentive Compensation Program; and “Variable Compensation
Year” means a calendar or fiscal plan year of an Incentive Compensation Program.
(iii) Insurance Coverage. The Corporation shall arrange to provide you (and your dependents, if applicable) with the
following:
(a) If you are eligible, you shall participate in the Corporation’s retiree medical benefit plans as if you retired
from the Corporation on your Date of Termination, except that the Corporation shall provide such medical
coverage at no cost to you for eighteen (18) months following your Date of Termination and thereafter, you
shall participate therein on the same terms as other retired employees (to the extent these benefits are provided
by a self-insured plan, any reimbursements for claims incurred shall be made as soon as practicable, but in no
event can they be made later than the end of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the claim
was incurred);
(b) If you are not eligible for the retiree medical plans, you will no longer continue to participate in the
Corporation’s medical benefit plans, except for COBRA, and (i) if you elect to receive COBRA benefits, the
Corporation shall provide you with such benefits at no cost to you for eighteen (18) months following your loss
of medical coverage.
(iv) Retirement Benefits. The Supplemental Pension Benefit Credits made on your behalf under the Albemarle
Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“EDCP”) as well as all earnings accrued on such amounts,
shall be immediately vested and non-forfeitable and shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the EDCP.
(v) Outplacement Counseling. The Corporation shall make available to you, at the Corporation’s expense,
outplacement counseling. You may select the organization that will provide the outplacement counseling,
however, the Corporation’s obligation to provide you benefits under this subsection (v) shall be limited to
$25,000. This counseling must be used, if at all, no later than the end of the second calendar year after the year
(vi) Financial Counseling. Following your Date of Termination, the Corporation shall make available to you, two
years (plus the remaining unexpired portion of the year in which your Date of Termination falls) of financial
counseling services which may include tax counseling services. You may select the organization that will provide
you with the financial and tax counseling services, however, the Corporation’s obligation to provide you benefits
under this subsection (vi) shall be limited to $25,000. To be eligible for reimbursement, the financial counseling
must begin in the calendar year of your Date of Termination, unless such Date of Termination is less than 60
days before the end of such calendar year, in which case the financial counseling must begin no later than during
the following calendar year.
(vii) Severance Payment. The Corporation shall pay as severance pay to you, not later than the fifth (5th ) day
following the Date of Termination, a lump sum severance payment (the “Severance Payment”) equal to the
Severance Multiple times the following:
(a) the greater of your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the Corporation immediately
prior to the Date of Termination and your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the
Corporation immediately prior to a Change in Control, whether or not such annual base compensation was
includible in your gross income for federal income tax purposes; plus
(b) the greater of your target annual variable compensation that was in place immediately prior to a Change in
Control, or your target annual variable compensation that was in place immediately prior to the Date of
Termination (whether or not such award was includible in your gross income for federal income tax purposes).
The Severance Payment shall be reduced by the amount paid to you under Paragraph 7(c) below.
(viii) Reduction of Severance Payment.
If the payments or benefits to which you will be entitled under this Agreement (referred to in this Paragraph as
the “Payments”) would cause you to be liable for the federal excise tax levied on certain “excess parachute
payments” under Code Section 4999 (“Excise Tax”), then the Payments shall be reduced (or repaid to the
Corporation, if previously paid or provided) as provided below. In no event shall you be entitled to receive any
kind of gross-up payment or Excise Tax reimbursement from the Corporation. For purposes of this Paragraph
(viii), the terms “excess parachute payment” and “parachute payment” will have the meanings assigned to them
by Section 280G of the Code.
If your Payments exceed 2.99 times your “Base Amount” ( as defined in Code Section 280G), a “reduced
payment amount" shall be calculated by reducing the Payments to the minimum extent necessary so that no
portion of any Payment, as so reduced or repaid, constitutes an “excess parachute payment.” If it is determined
that any Excise Tax is payable by you, you shall receive either (i) all Payments otherwise due to you or (ii) the
reduced payment amount described in the preceding sentence, whichever will provide you with the greater
after-tax economic benefit taking into account for these purposes any applicable Excise Tax.
Whether Payments to you are to be reduced, pursuant to this Paragraph, and the extent to which they are to be
so reduced, will be determined by the Corporation in good faith and the Corporation will notify you in writing
of its determination. Any such notice shall describe in reasonable detail the basis of the Corporation’s
determination. If you accept the Corporation’s determination, you shall so advise the Corporation of your
determination within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the Corporation. If you object to such
determination within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice from the Corporation, the Corporation will retain, at its
expense, a nationally recognized public accounting firm, employment consulting firm or law firm selected by
the Corporation and reasonably acceptable to you to review the matter. Such firm shall meet with you and your
representatives and the Corporation and its representatives and thereafter render its written opinion as to the
extent, if any, that in such firm’s reasonable judgment the payments and benefits otherwise due to you
hereunder must be reduced hereunder. The decision of such firm concerning the extent of any required
reduction in such payments and benefits shall be final and binding on both you and the Corporation.
(ix) No Duty to Mitigate. You shall not be required to mitigate the amount of any payment provided for in this
Paragraph 2 by seeking other employment or otherwise, nor shall the amount of any payment or benefit
hereunder be reduced by any compensation earned by you as the result of employment by another employer or
by retirement benefits after the Date of Termination.
(x) Six Month Delay. If, as of the Date of Termination, you are considered a Specified Employee (as such term is
defined in Section 409A), any payments or benefits due upon, or within the six month period following and due
to, a termination of your employment that constitutes a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section
409A and which do not otherwise qualify under the exemptions under Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-1, shall be
paid or provided to you in a lump sum on the earlier of (i) the first day of the month following the six month
anniversary of your separation from service (as such term is defined in Section 409A) for any reason other than
death, and (ii) the date of your death, and any remaining payments and benefits shall be paid or provided in
accordance with the normal payment dates specified for such payment or benefit.
b. Payments While Disabled. During any period prior to the Date of Termination and during the term of this
Agreement that you are unable to perform your full‑time duties with the Corporation, whether as a result of your Total Disability or as
a result of a physical or mental disability that is not total or is not permanent and therefore is not a Total Disability, you shall continue
to receive your base salary at the rate in effect at the commencement of any such period, together with all other compensation and
benefits that are payable or provided under the Corporation’s benefit plans, including its disability plans. After the Date of Termination,
your benefits shall be determined in accordance with the Corporation’s benefits, insurance and other applicable programs. The
compensation and benefits, other than salary, payable or provided pursuant to this Paragraph 2b shall be the greater of (x) the amounts
computed under the disability benefit plans, insurance and other applicable programs in effect immediately prior to a Change in Control
and (y) the amounts computed under the disability benefit plans, insurance and other applicable programs in effect at the time the
compensation and benefits are paid.
c. Payments if Termination for Cause, or by You Except With Good Reason . If your employment shall be
terminated by the Corporation for Cause or by you other than with Good Reason for Resignation, the Corporation shall pay you your
full base salary and accrued vacation pay then in effect through the Date of Termination, at the rate in effect at the time Notice of
Termination is given plus any benefits or awards which have been earned or become payable but which have not yet been paid to you.
You shall receive any payment due under this subsection c. on your Date of Termination. Thereafter the Corporation shall have no
further obligation to you under this Agreement.
d. After Death. If your employment shall be terminated by reason of your death, your benefits shall be
determined in accordance with the Corporation’s benefits and insurance programs then in effect except that if your death occurs after
the execution of a definitive agreement which results in a Change in Control, then your beneficiary shall be entitled to the benefits
under this Agreement as if the Corporation issued you a Notice of Termination terminating your employment thirty (30) days after a
Change in Control.
3. Treatment of Incentive Plan Awards Upon a Change in Control . Upon a Change in Control, any outstanding awards
granted under one or more of the Albemarle Incentive Plans, shall be treated in accordance with the terms of the Notices granting such
awards. In the event a Notice of Award does not provide for how the award will be treated upon a Change in Control, the provisions
of the applicable Plan shall govern.
4. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue in effect through
December 31, 2015; provided, however, that commencing on January 1, 2016 and each January 1 thereafter, the term of this
Agreement shall automatically be extended for one additional year unless, not later than September 30 of the preceding year, the
Corporation or you shall have given notice that it or you do not wish to extend this Agreement. Notwithstanding any such notice by
the Corporation or you not to extend the Agreement, if a Change in Control shall have occurred prior to such termination of this
Agreement, the attempted termination of this Agreement shall be deemed ineffective and this Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect. In any event, the term of this Agreement shall expire on the second (2nd) anniversary of the date of the Change in Control.
This Agreement shall terminate if your employment is terminated by you or the Corporation prior to a Change in Control.
5. Successors; Binding Agreement.
a. Successors of the Corporation. The Corporation will require any Successor to all or substantially all of the
business and/or assets of the Corporation to expressly assume and agree, by an agreement in form and substance satisfactory to you, to
perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Corporation would be required to perform it if no such
succession had taken place. Failure of the Corporation to obtain such assent at least five business days prior to the time a person
becomes a Successor (or where the Corporation does not have at least five business days advance notice that a person may become a
Successor, within three business days after having notice that such person may become or has become a Successor) shall constitute
Good Reason for Resignation by you and, if a Change in Control has occurred or thereafter occurs, shall entitle you immediately to the
benefits provided in Paragraph 2a hereof upon delivery by you of a Notice of Termination which the Corporation, by executing this
Agreement, hereby assents to. For purposes of this Agreement, “Successor” shall mean any person that purchases all or substantially
all of the assets of the Corporation or the Surviving Corporation (and Parent Corporation, if applicable) or obtains or succeeds to, or
has the practical ability to control (either immediately or with the passage of time), the Corporation’s business directly, by merger or
consolidation, or indirectly, by purchase of voting securities of the Corporation or by acquisition of rights to vote voting securities of
the Corporation or otherwise, including but not limited to any person or group that acquires the beneficial ownership or voting rights
described in Paragraph 1.a.(ii).
b. Your Successor . This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by your personal or legal
representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devises and legatees. If you should die following your Date of
Termination while any amount would still be payable to you hereunder if you had continued to live, all such amounts, unless otherwise
provided herein, shall be paid in accordance with the terms of this Agreement to your devisee, legatee or other designee or, if there is
no such designee, to your estate.
6. Confidentiality.
a. You acknowledge that: (i) the business conducted by the Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Business ”) is
intensely competitive and your position with the Corporation has exposed you to knowledge of Confidential Information (as defined
below); (ii) the direct and indirect disclosure of any such Confidential Information to existing or potential competitors of the
Corporation would place the Corporation at a competitive disadvantage and would do damage, monetary or otherwise, to the
Corporation’s business; and (iii) the engaging by you in any of the activities prohibited by this Agreement may constitute improper
appropriation and/or use of Confidential Information. For purposes of this Agreement, "Confidential Information" shall mean trade
secrets, know-how and other proprietary information of the Corporation known to you, and which gives the Corporation a competitive
advantage, relating to the Corporation's business, but shall not include information generally available to or known by the public or
information that is or becomes available to you on a non-confidential basis from a source other than the Corporation or its directors,
officers or employees (other than by reason of a breach of any obligation of confidentiality).
b. From and after the date of termination of your employment with the Corporation ("Date of Termination") until
the first anniversary thereof (the "Non-Competition Period"), you shall not, directly or indirectly, whether individually, as a director,
stockholder, owner, partner, employee, consultant, principal or agent of any business, or in any other capacity, make known, disclose,
furnish make available or utilize any of the Confidential Information, other than in the proper performance of the duties contemplated
herein, or as required by law or by a court of competent jurisdiction or other administrative or legislative body; provided that if required
to disclose any of the Confidential Information by law or by a court or other administrative or legislative body, you shall promptly
notify the Corporation so that the Corporation may seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy. Notwithstanding anything in
this Agreement or any code of conduct or ethics, disclosure policy or other code, policy or similar document of the Company to the
contrary, nothing herein or therein shall restrict Employee from reporting to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
communicating directly with its staff, about a possible securities law violation.
c. You also agree to comply with the [Patent and Confidentiality Agreement [and Intellectual Property
Agreement]] [OR] [Employee Non-Solicitation, Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement] previously signed by you and
delivered to the Corporation, including those provisions which are applicable after your Date of Termination.
7. Non-Compete; Consideration.
a. During the Non-Competition Period, you shall not engage in Competition (as defined below) with the
Corporation. For purposes of this Agreement, “Competition” by you shall mean your engaging in, or otherwise directly or indirectly
being employed by or acting as a consultant to, or being a director, officer, employee, principal, agent, stockholder, member, owner,
joint venturer or partner of, or permitting the your name to be used in connection with the competitive activities of any other business
or organization in competition with the business of the Corporation as the same shall be constituted on the date of the Change in
Control; provided that it shall not be a violation of this Agreement for you to: (i) become the registered or beneficial owner of less than
five percent (5%) of any class of the capital stock of a competing corporation registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, provided that you do not actively participate in the business of such corporation until the expiration of the Non-Competition
Period; (ii) be involved with the activities of any other business or organization which did not compete, directly or indirectly, with the
business of the Corporation as the same shall be constituted on the date of the Change in Control; or (iii) be engaged in any business
from which the Corporation derives no more than five percent (5%) of its revenues if you were not directly engaged in such business at
the Corporation prior to the Date of Termination.
b. The “business of the Corporation” is defined as the development, manufacture, and marketing of chemical
products and the technologies that are associated with such development and manufacturing. The categories of products that Albemarle
creates, and which are included in this definition, include, but are not limited to, lithium and lithium compounds, bromine and
derivatives, catalysts and surface treatment chemistries used in consumer electronics, flame retardants, metal processing, plastics,
contemporary and alternative transportation vehicles, refining, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, construction, and customer chemistry
services.
c. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, during the Non-Competition Period, you agree that you will
not, directly or indirectly, for your benefit or for the benefit of any other person, firm or entity, do any of the following:
(i) solicit from any customer doing business with the Corporation, business of the same or of a similar nature to the
business conducted between the Corporation and such customer; or
(ii) solicit the employment or services of, or hire, any person who at the time is employed by or a consultant to the
Corporation.
(iii) solicit the services of any consultant engaged in competitive activities for the Corporation.
d. In consideration for your agreement to the provisions of this Paragraph 7, the Corporation shall pay you, not
later than the fifth (5th ) day following the Date of Termination an amount equal to the sum of the following:
(i) the greater of your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the Corporation immediately prior
to the Date of Termination and your annual base compensation which was payable to you by the Corporation
immediately prior to a Change in Control, whether or not such annual base compensation was includible in your
gross income for federal income tax purposes; plus
(ii) the amount of your actual annual variable compensation payment you received for a year preceding the date on
which the Change in Control occurs, (whether or not such award was includible in your gross income for
federal income tax purposes).
8. Remedies.
a. You acknowledge that your agreement to the matters set forth in Paragraphs 6 and 7 is being entered into in
connection with the consummation of a transaction involving a Change in Control of the Corporation and that the services rendered by
you to the Corporation are of a special and unique character, which gives this agreement a particular value to the Corporation, the loss
of which may not be reasonably or adequately compensated for by damages in an action at law; and that a material breach or
threatened breach by you of any of the provisions contained in Paragraphs 6 or 7 of this Agreement will cause the Corporation
irreparable injury. You therefore agree that, upon breach by you of Paragraph 6 or 7 of this Agreement, the Corporation shall be
entitled, in addition to any other right or remedy, to a temporary, preliminary and permanent injunction, without the necessity of
proving the inadequacy of monetary damages
or the posting of any bond or security, enjoining or restraining you from any such breach or threatened breaches.
b. In addition, in the event of a material breach by you of the provisions of clauses a or b of Paragraph 7, the
Corporation shall be entitled to obtain from you the amounts paid to you under Paragraph 7.
c. You further acknowledge and agree that due to the uniqueness of your services and confidential nature of the
information you possess, the covenants set forth herein are reasonable and necessary for the protection of the business and goodwill of
the Corporation. It is the intent of the parties hereto that if in the opinion of any court of competent jurisdiction any provision set forth
in this Agreement is not reasonable in any respect, such court shall have the right, power and authority to modify any and all such
provisions as to such court shall appear not unreasonable and to enforce the remainder of this Agreement as so modified.
9. Notice to Corporation to Cure. In the event that you believe that you have a Good Reason for Resignation, you shall
notify the Corporation in writing of such fact and the reasons therefore no later than 90 days after the relevant event has occurred. The
Corporation may within thirty (30) days after your notice, elect to take such steps that would be necessary so that you would no longer
have a Good Reason for Resignation. Failure to satisfy the requirements of this Paragraph 9 will result in there not being any Good
Reason for Resignation for purposes of this Agreement.
10. Relationship to Other Agreements. To the extent that any provision of any other agreement between the Corporation
and you shall limit, qualify or be inconsistent with any provision of this Agreement, then for purposes of this Agreement, while the
same shall remain in force, the provision of this Agreement shall control and such provision of such other agreement shall be deemed
to have been superseded, and to be of no force or effect, as if such other agreement had been formally amended to the extent necessary
to accomplish such purpose.
11. Nature of Payments. All payments to you under this Agreement shall be considered either payments in consideration
of your continued service to the Corporation or severance payments in consideration of your past service to the Corporation.
12. Validity. If any provision or term (or part thereof) of this Agreement shall be, or be found by any authority or court
of competent jurisdiction to be, invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other
provision or term (or part thereof) in that jurisdiction or the whole of the Agreement in any other jurisdiction, all of which shall remain
in full force and effect.
13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
14. Notice. Any purported termination of your employment by the Corporation or by you following a Change in
Control shall be communicated to the other party by a Notice of Termination. A Notice of Termination shall indicate the specific
termination provision in this Agreement relied upon and shall set forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to
provide a basis for termination of your employment under the provision so indicated. For the purpose of this Agreement, notices and all
other communications provided for in the Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered
or mailed by United States registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to the respective addresses set forth on
the first page of this Agreement, provided that all notices to the Corporation shall be directed to the attention of the Board of the
Corporation with a copy to the Secretary of the Corporation or to such other address as either party may have furnished to the other in
writing in accordance herewith, except that notice of change of address shall be effective only upon receipt.
15. Fees and Expenses. The Corporation shall pay all legal fees and related expenses incurred by you: (i) as a result of
your termination following a Change in Control, (ii) in seeking to obtain or enforce any right or benefit provided by this Agreement
(including all fees and expenses, if any, incurred in contesting or disputing any such termination or incurred by you in seeking advice
in connection therewith), (iii) in making the determinations under Paragraph 2.a(viii), (iv) in seeking advice to determine whether you
have a Good Reason for Resignation and providing the notice to the Corporation under Paragraph 9, (v) and contesting any claim by
the Corporation under Paragraph 8; provided that such fees are incurred no later than the end of the second calendar year after the year
16. Release. In order to receive payment of the amounts under Paragraph 2.a(i), (ii), (iv) and (vii), you shall execute and
deliver to the Corporation a General Release which shall contain the provisions set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement and which
shall otherwise be in a form reasonably acceptable to you and the Corporation. Such General Release must be executed within the
ninety (90) day period following your termination, provided, however, that to the extent any amounts payable under Paragraph 2.a.(i),
(ii), (iv) or (vii) constitute deferred compensation for purposes of Section 409A, and the ninety (90) day period referred to herein shall
commence in one tax year and end in the subsequent tax year, the payments described in this Paragraph 16 shall be made solely in the
subsequent tax year.
17. Survival. The respective obligations of, and benefits afforded to, the Corporation and you as provided in Paragraphs
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15 and 16 of this Agreement shall survive termination of this Agreement.
18. Miscellaneous. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waived or discharged unless such waiver,
modification or discharge is agreed to in writing and signed by you and such officer as may be specifically designated by the Board.
No waiver by either party hereto at any time of any breach by the other party hereto of, or compliance with, any condition or provision
of this Agreement to be performed by such other party shall be deemed a waiver of similar or dissimilar provisions or conditions at the
same or at any prior or subsequent time. No agreements or representations, oral or otherwise, express or implied, with respect to the
subject matter hereof have been made by either party which are not expressly set forth in this Agreement.
19. Governing Law. a. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed
by the laws of the State of Virginia.
b. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall be interpreted and applied so that the
payments and benefits set forth herein shall either be exempt from or shall comply with the requirements of Section 409A.
To the extent that the Corporation determines that any provision of this Agreement would cause you to incur any additional tax
or interest under Section 409A, the Corporation shall be entitled to reform such provision to attempt to comply with or be exempt from
Section 409A. To the extent that any provision hereof is modified in order to comply with Section 409A, such modification shall be
made in good faith and shall, to the maximum extent reasonably possible, maintain the original intent and economic benefit to you and
the Corporation without violating the provisions of Section 409A.
In no event may you, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment to be made under this Agreement or
otherwise which constitutes a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A.
20. Amendment. No amendment to this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by both you and the
Corporation.
21. Headings; Construction. The headings used in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only
and do not define or limit the provisions hereof. Any Attachments to this Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall be
deemed a part of it.
If this letter sets forth our agreement on the subject matter hereof, kindly sign and return to the Corporation the enclosed copy
of this letter which will then constitute our agreement on this subject.
Sincerely,
By:
Name: Luther C. Kissam
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Agreed to this day

of , 20XX
(Name)
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL RELEASE
1. This General Release is given by _____________________ (“Employee”) to Albemarle Corporation (the “Corporation”)
and its successors.
2. Employee agrees to and hereby does release and discharge the Corporation, its subsidiaries and affiliates, and its and their
successors, assigns, directors, officers, representatives and employees (collectively, “Releasees”) from any and all claims, causes of
action and demands of any kind, whether known or unknown, which Employee has or ever has had, which are based on acts or
omissions occurring up to and including the date this General Release is fully executed. In this General Release, Employee further
releases the Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates from any and all compensation owed to Employee, including vacation pay
and any attorneys’ fees, damages and costs Employee could recover under any statute or common law theory, except arising under the
Severance Compensation Agreement between Employee and the Corporation and any employee benefit plan of the Corporation.
Included within this release, without limiting its scope, are claims arising out of Employee’s employment or the termination of
Employee’s employment based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
as amended, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as amended, the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act as amended, the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended by the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 as amended, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, [insert any appropriate reference to Virginia law], the U.S.
Patriot Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and any other federal, state or local civil rights, disability, discrimination, retaliation or
labor law, or any theory of contract or tort law.
3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, nothing herein shall be construed to release, terminate or discharge Employee’s
rights (i) to indemnification, advancement of expenses and exculpation as provided in the articles or certificate of incorporation, bylaws
or other organizational documents of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates, or as provided or permitted under any
applicable law, or as provided in any indemnification agreement or (ii) under any policy of directors’ and officers’ liability, errors and
omissions liability or other insurance maintained by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates, in each case where
Employee was or is a party or otherwise involved or is threatened to be made a party to or otherwise involved in any threatened,
pending or completed action, proceeding, investigation, inquiry or other matter, whether civil, criminal, administrative or otherwise, by
reason of the fact that Employee is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates
(including Employee’s conduct with respect to an employee benefit plan) or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation or any
of its subsidiaries or affiliates as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise.
Exhibit 10.21
FORM OF AMENDMENT TO
SEVERANCE COMPENSATION AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT modifies the Severance Compensation Agreement dated _____ between Albemarle Corporation, a
Virginia corporation (the "Company"), and _____ ("Employee") (referred to herein as the "Agreement").
1. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended to add a new paragraph (c) at the end thereof to read as follows:
"(c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section 3, with respect to any awards granted under the Incentive
Plans in 2014 or later, upon a Change in Control, such awards shall be treated in accordance with the terms of the
Notices granting such awards."
2. Paragraph 2.a(vi) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"(vi) Financial Counseling. Following your Date of Termination, the Corporation shall make available to you, two
years (plus the remaining unexpired portion of the year in which your Date of Termination falls) of financial counseling
services which may include tax counseling services. You may select the organization that will provide you with the
financial and tax counseling services, however, the Corporation's obligation to provide you benefits under this
subsection (vi) shall be limited to $25,000. To be eligible for reimbursement, the financial counseling must begin in the
calendar year of your Date of Termination, unless such Date of Termination is less than 60 days before the end of such
calendar year, in which case the financial counseling must begin no later than during the following calendar year."
3. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, defined terms used in this Amendment shall have the same
meanings as set forth in the Agreement, as applicable.
4. Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, all other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain
unchanged.
5. The provisions of this Amendment to the Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof.
[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have caused this Amendment to be signed, each on their own behalf,
as of this _____ day of _____, 2015.
By
Employee
Exhibit 10.28
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
In accordance with Section 12.1 of the Albemarle Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and
Restated Effective January 1, 2013 (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1. Effective February 1, 2015, Section 4.2(d)(i) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"(i) Eligibility. The following employees are eligible to receive the credit provided under paragraph (ii) of this
Section 4.2(d):
(1) Ahmad Khalifeh
Effective as of such date, Mohammad Sabri shall receive no further credits under the Plan."
2. The provisions of this Second Amendment shall be effective as of February 1, 2015.

th
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer has caused these presents to be signed this 12 day of
February, 2015.
By: /s/ Susan M. Kelliher

Exhibit 10.29
THIRD AMENDMENT
TO THE
1. A new paragraph (d) is added to Section 3.1 of the Plan to read as follows:
"(d) Rockwood Employees
(i) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 3.1, the provisions of this paragraph (d) shall apply
to any employees who were employees of Rockwood Specialties Inc. or any of its affiliates as of January 12,
2015 ("Rockwood Employees") when the closing of the acquisition of Rockwood by the Company took place
(the "Closing").
(ii) With respect to Rockwood Employees who became Albemarle employees as of the Closing, such
Employees shall be eligible for the Plan (A) for purposes of receiving Employer allocations under Section 4.2 of
the Plan, as of the Closing, and (B) for purposes of making Voluntary Compensation Deferrals under Section 4.1
of the Plan, as of January 1, 2016.
(iii) With respect to all Rockwood Employees eligible for the Plan and not covered by subparagraph (ii) of
this Section 3.1(d), such Employees, once otherwise eligible for the Plan, shall become participants in the Plan as
of the later of (a) January 1, 2016, or (b) the date of completion of the conversion of the Rockwood payroll to
the Albemarle payroll platform.
(iv) With respect to eligibility for Voluntary Compensation Deferrals by the Rockwood Employees
described in this paragraph (d), notwithstanding Section 3.1(a)(ii)(B) hereof, such eligibility shall be effective
immediately upon the employees' meeting the eligibility requirements of this paragraph (d)."
2. The provisions of this Third Amendment shall be effective as of January 12, 2015.
st
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer has caused these presents to be signed this 31 day of
July, 2015.

Exhibit 10.30
FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO THE
1. Effective January 1, 2016, Section 2.5 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"2.5 Bonus(es) for purposes of the Plan shall mean the following:
(a) Awards made under the Company's Annual Incentive Plan and the Global Bonus Plan, and amounts paid under
the Sales Incentive Plan. Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) hereof, Bonuses shall not include any
other award-type payment allowances including, but not limited to, Signing or Retention Bonuses or Special
Recognition Awards, unless otherwise specified by the Company.
(b) For purposes of determining Employer allocations under Sections 4.2(a)(i)(A) and 4.2(b)(i)(A) of this Plan,
Bonuses shall also include awards made under the following programs:
• Chemetall Incentive Compensation Plan;

• RSM Metalworking Bonus Plan;
• Chemetall Incentive Plan Regional Sales Manager;
• Salaried Technical Sales Manager Compensation Plan;
• Safety Bonus Program;
• Rockwood Lithium Inc. Corporate Bonus Plan;
• Rockwood Lithium Inc. Salaried Location Bonus Plan;
• Rockwood Lithium Inc. Non-Represented Hourly Location Bonus Plan;
• Rockwood Lithium New Johnsonville Facility Bonus Plan; and
• Commissions paid under the Commissioned Technical Sales Manager Compensation Plan.
• Amended and Restated 2009 Rockwood Holdings, Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan.
(c) For purposes of Sections 4.1(a), 4.2(a)(i)(B), and 4.2(b)(i)(B) of this Plan, Bonuses shall also include awards
made under the following programs:
• Chemetall Incentive Compensation Plan;
• RSM Metalworking Bonus Plan;
• Chemetall Incentive Plan Regional Sales Manager; and
• Rockwood Lithium Inc. Corporate Bonus Plan."
2. The provisions of this Fourth Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2016.

th
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation by its duly authorized officer has caused these presents to be signed this 17 day
of December, 2015.

Exhibit 12.1
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(In Thousands, Except for Ratios)

2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
Earnings:
Pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment
for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests or
equity in net income or losses of unconsolidated investments $ 358,187 $ 213,179 $ 538,442 $ 368,212 $ 482,531
Fixed Charges:
Interest expense (before capitalized interest and loss on
extinguishment of debt) 138,556 43,774 37,701 38,777 39,992
Portion (1/3) of rents representing interest factor 14,990 10,641 10,241 11,028 10,298
Total fixed charges 153,546 54,415 47,942 49,805 50,290
Amortization of capitalized interest 2,551 2,163 1,987 1,527 1,242
Distributed income of unconsolidated investments 59,912 40,688 21,632 26,908 23,685
Interest capitalized (11,187) (2,416) (6,142) (5,977) (2,418)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (net of
tax) (25,158) (27,590) (26,663) (18,591) (28,083)
Pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustment
for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests or
equity in net income or losses of unconsolidated investments
plus fixed charges, amortization of capitalized interest, less
interest capitalized and net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests that have not incurred fixed charges $ 537,851 $ 280,439 $ 577,198 $ 421,884 $ 527,247
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 3.5 5.2 12.0 8.5 10.5
Exhibit 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF ALBEMARLE CORPORATION
NAME PLACE OF FORMATION

Aachener Chemische Werke Gesellschaft für glastechnische Produkte und Verfahren mbH Germany
ACI Cyprus, L.L.C. Delaware
Albemarle Australia Pty Ltd. Australia
Albemarle Avonmouth Works Limited United Kingdom
Albemarle Brazil Holdings LTDA. Brazil
Albemarle Cambridge Chemicals Limited United Kingdom
Albemarle Care Fund Virginia
Albemarle Catalysts Company B.V. Netherlands
Albemarle Chemical Canada Ltd. Canada
Albemarle Chemicals (Shanghai) Company Limited China
Albemarle Chemicals Korea, Ltd. Korea
Albemarle Chemicals Ltd. Cyprus
Albemarle Chemicals Private Limited India
Albemarle Chemicals S.A.S. France
Albemarle Chemicals South Africa (PTY) Ltd. South Africa
Albemarle Corporation Virginia
Albemarle de Venezuela C.A. Venezuela
Albemarle Europe Sprl Belgium
Albemarle Foundation Virginia
Albemarle Global Finance Company SCA Belgium
Albemarle Global Holdings Ltd Seychelles
Albemarle Holdings Company Limited Turks & Caicos Islands
Albemarle Holdings Limited China
Albemarle Hungary Private Limited Liability Company Hungary
Albemarle International Holdings CV Netherlands
Albemarle Israel Limited Israel
Albemarle Italy S.R.L. Italy
Albemarle Japan Corporation Japan
Albemarle Japan Holdings B.V. Netherlands
Albemarle Knight Lux 1 Holdings Corporation Delaware
Albemarle Korea Corporation Korea
Albemarle Management (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China
Albemarle Medway U.K. Limited United Kingdom
Albemarle Middle East FZE United Arab Emirates
Albemarle Netherlands B.V. Netherlands
Albemarle Netherlands Holdings, BV Netherlands
Albemarle Netherlands Holdings, CV Netherlands
Albemarle Overseas Employment Corporation Virginia
Albemarle Quimica LTDA Brazil
Albemarle Saudi Trading Company Saudi Arabia
Albemarle Singapore PTE LTD Singapore
Albemarle Spain S.L.U. Spain
Albemarle Taiwan Limited Taiwan
Albemarle Virginia Corporation Virginia
AM Craig Ltd. United Kingdom
Ardrox Ltd. United Kingdom
BCI Pensions Trustees Ltd. United Kingdom
Brent Europe Ltd. United Kingdom
Brent International B.V. Netherlands
Caledonian Applied Technology Limited United Kingdom
Chemetall (Australasia) Pty. Ltd. Australia
Chemetall (Proprietary) Ltd. South Africa
Chemetall (Thailand) Co. Ltd. Thailand
Chemetall AB Sweden
Chemetall Asia Pte. Ltd. Singapore
Chemetall B.V. Netherlands
Chemetall Canada, Limited Canada
Chemetall Corporation Delaware
Chemetall do Brasil Ltda. Brazil
Chemetall GmbH Germany
Chemetall Hong Kong Ltd. China
Chemetall Hungária Vegyianyagokat Gyártó es Forgalmazó Kft Hungary
Chemetall India Company Ltd. United Kingdom
Chemetall India Private Limited India
Chemetall Italia S.r.l. Italy
Chemetall Ltd. United Kingdom
Chemetall Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. Mexico
Chemetall New Zealand Ltd. New Zealand
Chemetall Philippines Co. Ltd., Inc. Philippines
Chemetall Polska Sp.z o.o. Poland
Chemetall S.A. Spain
Chemetall S.R.L. Italy
Chemetall S.R.L. Argentina
Chemetall Sanayi Kimyasallari Ticaret ve Sanayi A.S. Turkey
Chemetall S.A.S. France
Chemetall Surface Technologies China Co., Ltd. China
Chemetall Surface Treatment Holding Co., Ltd. Thailand
Chemetall US, Inc. Delaware
Chemserve Ltd. United Kingdom
Chillihurst Limited United Kingdom
CM-Hilfe GmbH Unterstützungskasse Germany
CSI Kemwood AB Sweden
DNVJ Vermögensverwaltung GmbH Germany
Dynamit Nobel GmbH Germany
Dynamit Nobel Unterstützungsfonds GmbH Germany
Excalibur Realty Company Delaware
Excalibur II Realty Company Delaware
Foote Chile Holding Company Delaware
Foote Minera e Inversiones Ltda. Chile
Jordan Bromine Company Limited Jordan
KENDELL S.r.l. Italy
Knight Chimiques de Spécialité S.A.S. France
Knight Lux 1 S.à r.l. Luxembourg
Metalon Environmental Management & Solutions GmbH Germany
Nanjing Chemetall Surface Technologies Co., Ltd. China
Ningbo Jinhai Albemarle Chemical and Industry Co., Ltd. China
OOO Chemetall Russia
Process Ink Holdings Ltd. United Kingdom
Process Inks And Coatings Ltd. United Kingdom
Rockwood Holdings, Inc. Delaware
Rockwood Lithium, Inc. Delaware
Rockwood Lithium GmbH Germany
Rockwood Lithium India Pvt. Ltd. India
Rockwood Lithium Japan K.K. Japan
Rockwood Lithium Korea LLC South Korea
Rockwood Lithium Shanghai Co., Ltd. China
Rockwood Lithium Taiwan Co., Ltd. Taiwan
Rockwood Lithium (UK) Ltd. United Kingdom
Rockwood Litio Limitada Chile
Rockwood Specialties GmbH Germany
Rockwood Specialties Group GmbH Germany
Rockwood Specialties Group Finance GmbH Germany
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. Delaware
Rockwood Specialties LLC Delaware
Rockwood Specialties Limited United Kingdom
Rockwood Vermögensverwaltung GmbH Germany
Rockwood Vermögensverwaltung S.à r.l. & Co. KG Germany
RT Lithium Limited United Kingdom
RSG Immobilien GmbH Germany
Shandong Sinobrom Albemarle Bromine Chemicals Company Limited China
Shanghai Chemetall Chemicals Co., Ltd. China
The Brent Manufacturing Company Ltd. United Kingdom
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 No. 333-199110 and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-75622, 333-150694,
333-166828, and 333-188599) of Albemarle Corporation of our report dated February 29, 2016 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
February 29, 2016
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Luther C. Kissam IV, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Albemarle Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2015;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: February 29, 2016
/s/ LUTHER C. KISSAM IV

Luther C. Kissam IV
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Albemarle Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luther C. Kissam IV, principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ LUTHER C. KISSAM IV

Luther C. Kissam IV
February 29, 2016
Exhibit 99.1
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY
(In Thousands, Except for Per Share Amounts and Footnote Data)
Year Ended December 31 2015 (a) 2014 2013 2012 2011

Results of Operations
Net sales $ 3,651,335 $ 2,445,548 $ 2,394,270 $ 2,519,154 $ 2,651,667
Costs and expenses 3,208,900 2,174,250 1,817,595 2,119,371 2,131,919
Operating profit 442,435 271,298 576,675 399,783 519,748
Interest and financing expenses (132,722) (41,358) (31,559) (32,800) (37,574)
Other income (expenses), net 48,474 (16,761) (6,674) 1,229 357
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes and equity in net income of unconsolidated
investments 358,187 213,179 538,442 368,212 482,531
Income tax expense 29,122 18,484 134,445 80,433 104,471
Income from continuing operations before equity in
net income of unconsolidated investments 329,065 194,695 403,997 287,779 378,060
Equity in net income of unconsolidated investments
(net of tax) 30,999 35,742 31,729 38,067 43,754
Net income from continuing operations 360,064 230,437 435,726 325,846 421,814
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of
tax) — (69,531) 4,108 4,281 (1,617)
Net income 360,064 160,906 439,834 330,127 420,197
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (25,158) (27,590) (26,663) (18,591) (28,083)
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation $ 334,906 $ 133,316 $ 413,171 $ 311,536 $ 392,114
Financial Position and Other Data
Total assets $ 9,615,014 $ 5,223,103 $ 3,584,797 $ 3,437,291 $ 3,203,824
Operations:
Working capital $ 214,318 $ 2,208,964 $ 1,046,552 $ 1,022,304 $ 954,442
Current ratio 1.13 2.94 3.40 3.66 3.38
Depreciation and amortization $ 260,076 $ 103,572 $ 107,370 $ 99,020 $ 96,753
Capital expenditures $ 227,649 $ 110,576 $ 155,346 $ 280,873 $ 190,574
Investments in joint ventures $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 10,868
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired $ 2,100,490 $ — $ 2,565 $ 3,360 $ 13,164
Research and development expenses $ 102,871 $ 88,310 $ 82,246 $ 78,919 $ 77,083
Gross profit as a % of net sales 32.8 31.5 35.5 35.7 35.9
Total long-term debt $ 3,852,019 $ 2,934,131 $ 1,078,864 $ 699,288 $ 763,673
Total equity (b) $ 3,401,313 $ 1,488,635 $ 1,742,776 $ 1,932,008 $ 1,678,827
Total long-term debt as a % of total capitalization 53.1 66.3 38.2 26.6 31.3
Net debt as a % of total capitalization (c) 51.7 22.6 25.2 9.6 13.9
Common Stock
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations $ 3.01 $ 2.57 $ 4.88 $ 3.44 $ 4.35
Discontinued operations $ — $ (0.88) $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ (0.02)
Shares used to compute basic earnings per share 111,182 78,696 83,839 89,189 90,522
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations $ 3.00 $ 2.57 $ 4.85 $ 3.42 $ 4.30
Discontinued operations $ — $ (0.88) $ 0.05 $ 0.05 $ (0.02)
Shares used to compute diluted earnings per share 111,556 79,102 84,322 89,884 91,522
Cash dividends declared per share $ 1.16 $ 1.10 $ 0.96 $ 0.80 $ 0.67
Total equity per share(b) $ 30.31 $ 19.08 $ 21.77 $ 21.73 $ 18.90
Return on average total equity 13.7% 8.3% 22.5% 17.3% 24.9%
Footnotes:
(a) On January 12, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. (“Rockwood”). Results for 2015 include the operations of
Rockwood commencing on January 13, 2015.
(b) Equity reflects the repurchase of common shares amounting to: 2015—0; 2014—2,190,254; 2013—9,198,056; 2012—1,092,767; and 2011—
3,000,000. 2015 also includes the impact of 34,113,064 shares of common stock issued in connection with the acquisition of Rockwood.
(c) We define net debt as total debt plus the portion of outstanding joint venture indebtedness guaranteed by us (or less the portion of outstanding joint
venture indebtedness consolidated but not guaranteed by us), less cash and cash equivalents.

AlbemarleCorporation 10K 20160229

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AlbemarleCorporation 10K 20160229

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

AlbemarleCorporation 10K 20160229

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Commission file number 001-12658

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 225-388-8011

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 17, 2016: 112,250,676

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Index to Form 10-K

Item 1A. Risk Factors 11

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 23

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 26

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 27

Executive Officers of the Registrant 27

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 29

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 56

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 58

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 117

Item 9B. Other Information 117

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 117

Item 11. Executive Compensation 118

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 118

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 118

Performance Chemicals Segment

Lithium—Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

PCS—Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

Bromine—Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

Refining Solutions Segment

Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

Chemetall Surface Treatment Segment

Raw Materials and Significant Supply Contracts

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

Research and Development

Recent Acquisitions, Joint Ventures and Divestitures

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

• foreign governments may nationalize private enterprises; and

Contractual indemnities may be ineffective in protecting us from environmental liabilities.

• potential disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of management;

• unforeseen claims and liabilities, including unexpected environmental exposures;

Our required capital expenditures may exceed our estimates.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Location Business Segment in 2015 Principal Use Owned/Leased

Cambridge, U.K. Performance Chemicals Production of performance catalysts Leased

Location Business Segment in 2015 Principal Use Owned/Leased

Location Business Segment in 2015 Principal Use Owned/Leased

New Johnsonville, Performance Chemicals Production of specialty products Owned

Location Business Segment in 2015 Principal Use Owned/Leased

Silver Peak, Nevada Performance Chemicals Production of lithium-carbonate Owned

Taichung, Taiwan Performance Chemicals Production of butyllithium Owned

Twinsburg, Ohio Performance Chemicals Production of bromine-activated carbon Leased

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Name Age Position

Common Stock Price Range Dividends

Stock Performance Graph

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Selected Financial Data Year Ended December 31, Percentage Change

Comparison of 2015 to 2014