Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 27 views

    CIR V Pineda Digest

    Uploaded by

    Timothy Joel Cabrera
    Manuel B. Pineda received a share of his father's estate worth P2,500. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) conducted an investigation and found unpaid estate taxes. The BIR issued an assessment demanding Manuel pay the entire estate tax deficiency. Manuel appealed, arguing he should only pay his proportionate share. The Court of Tax Appeals ruled in Manuel's favor. The issue is whether the BIR can collect the full deficiency from Manuel. The Supreme Court ruled that yes, under the tax code the BIR has two options to collect unpaid taxes - either collecting proportionate shares from each heir or subjecting estate property in the hands of any heir to payment of the full tax. In this case, the

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CIR V Pineda Digest

    Uploaded by

    Timothy Joel Cabrera
    27 views2 pages
    Manuel B. Pineda received a share of his father's estate worth P2,500. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) conducted an investigation and found unpaid estate taxes. The BIR issued an assessment demanding Manuel pay the entire estate tax deficiency. Manuel appealed, arguing he should only pay his proportionate share. The Court of Tax Appeals ruled in Manuel's favor. The issue is whether the BIR can collect the full deficiency from Manuel. The Supreme Court ruled that yes, under the tax code the BIR has two options to collect unpaid taxes - either collecting proportionate shares from each heir or subjecting estate property in the hands of any heir to payment of the full tax. In this case, the

    Original Title

    CIR v Pineda Digest

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Manuel B. Pineda received a share of his father's estate worth P2,500. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) conducted an investigation and found unpaid estate taxes. The BIR issued an assessment demanding Manuel pay the entire estate tax deficiency. Manuel appealed, arguing he should only pay his proportionate share. The Court of Tax Appeals ruled in Manuel's favor. The issue is whether the BIR can collect the full deficiency from Manuel. The Supreme Court ruled that yes, under the tax code the BIR has two options to collect unpaid taxes - either collecting proportionate shares from each heir or subjecting estate property in the hands of any heir to payment of the full tax. In this case, the

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    27 views2 pages

    CIR V Pineda Digest

    Uploaded by

    Timothy Joel Cabrera
    Manuel B. Pineda received a share of his father's estate worth P2,500. The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) conducted an investigation and found unpaid estate taxes. The BIR issued an assessment demanding Manuel pay the entire estate tax deficiency. Manuel appealed, arguing he should only pay his proportionate share. The Court of Tax Appeals ruled in Manuel's favor. The issue is whether the BIR can collect the full deficiency from Manuel. The Supreme Court ruled that yes, under the tax code the BIR has two options to collect unpaid taxes - either collecting proportionate shares from each heir or subjecting estate property in the hands of any heir to payment of the full tax. In this case, the

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    CIR v Pineda digest

    FACTS

     May 23, 1945 Atanasio Pineda died. He was survived by his wife, and 15 children.
    Estate proceedings were had in the Court of First Instance. The estate was divided among the
    heirs and Manuel B. Pineda, the eldest, received P2,500.00 for his share in the estate.
     Shortly thereafter, the BIR conducted an investigation and found that the net estate tax liability
    has not been paid.
    The BIR issued an assessment demanding from Manuel the entire amount of the Estate deficiency
    tax.
     Manuel appealed to the Court of tax appeals
    The court ruled in his favor, holding that he is only liable to pay his proportionate share in the
    estate.

    ISSUE

     May the BIR collect from him the entire Estate Deficiency Tax?

    RULING

     Answer
    - Yes
     Legal Basis
    - The Government has two ways of collecting the tax in question. One is by going after all the
    heirs and collecting from each one of them the amount of the tax proportionate to the
    inheritance received. The reason why in case suit is filed against all the heirs the tax due from
    the estate is levied proportionately against them is to achieve thereby two results: first,
    payment of the tax; and second, adjustment of the shares of each heir in the distributed estate
    as lessened by the tax.

    Another remedy, pursuant to the lien created by Section 315 of the Tax Code upon all
    property and rights to property belonging to the taxpayer for unpaid income tax, is by
    subjecting said property of the estate which is in the hands of an heir or transferee to the
    payment of the tax due, the estate.
     Application/Conclusion
    - In this this case, the government availed of option 2. The Bureau of Internal Revenue should
    be given, in instances like the case at bar, the necessary discretion to avail itself of the most
    expeditious way to collect the tax as may be envisioned in the particular provision of the Tax
    Code above quoted, because taxes are the lifeblood of government and their prompt and
    certain availability is an imperious need.

    You might also like