The document discusses the historical method, which involves critically examining and analyzing primary and secondary sources to reconstruct the past. It involves several steps:
1. Selecting a subject of study and collecting relevant sources on that subject, which can include written documents, images, artifacts, and oral histories.
2. Examining the authenticity and credibility of sources using external and internal criticism, such as determining authorship, date, and consistency.
3. Extracting and interpreting information from reliable primary sources, while also considering secondary sources that analyze and synthesize primary sources.
The historical method aims to reconstruct history through a rigorous analysis of evidence, but historians recognize they can only access fragments of the full past
The document discusses the historical method, which involves critically examining and analyzing primary and secondary sources to reconstruct the past. It involves several steps:
1. Selecting a subject of study and collecting relevant sources on that subject, which can include written documents, images, artifacts, and oral histories.
2. Examining the authenticity and credibility of sources using external and internal criticism, such as determining authorship, date, and consistency.
3. Extracting and interpreting information from reliable primary sources, while also considering secondary sources that analyze and synthesize primary sources.
The historical method aims to reconstruct history through a rigorous analysis of evidence, but historians recognize they can only access fragments of the full past
The document discusses the historical method, which involves critically examining and analyzing primary and secondary sources to reconstruct the past. It involves several steps:
1. Selecting a subject of study and collecting relevant sources on that subject, which can include written documents, images, artifacts, and oral histories.
2. Examining the authenticity and credibility of sources using external and internal criticism, such as determining authorship, date, and consistency.
3. Extracting and interpreting information from reliable primary sources, while also considering secondary sources that analyze and synthesize primary sources.
The historical method aims to reconstruct history through a rigorous analysis of evidence, but historians recognize they can only access fragments of the full past
The document discusses the historical method, which involves critically examining and analyzing primary and secondary sources to reconstruct the past. It involves several steps:
1. Selecting a subject of study and collecting relevant sources on that subject, which can include written documents, images, artifacts, and oral histories.
2. Examining the authenticity and credibility of sources using external and internal criticism, such as determining authorship, date, and consistency.
3. Extracting and interpreting information from reliable primary sources, while also considering secondary sources that analyze and synthesize primary sources.
The historical method aims to reconstruct history through a rigorous analysis of evidence, but historians recognize they can only access fragments of the full past
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
Introduction: History as Reconstruction Agreed ground rules for researching
and writing academic research or
the historian is many times removed professional history from the events under investigation Historians have to verify sources, to historians rely on surviving records date them, locate their place of “Only a part of what was observed in origin and identify their intended the past was remembered by those functions who observe it; only a part of what Core protocols historians use for was remembered was recorded; only handling sources a part of what was recorded has survived; only a part of what has Historians have to base their survived has come to the historian’s accounts on source materials attention.” Historians need to be able to locate “Only a part of what is credible has and organize the relevant sources been grasped, and only a part of on which they will base their account what has been grasped can be The process of critically examining expounded or narrated by the and analyzing the records and historian,” survivals of the past Fallible ( capable of error…capable In short, the Historical Method is… of making mistakes ) The process of critically examining Biases – personal, political, and analyzing the records and religious, personal idiosyncrasies survivals of the past Each has his own frame of Thus, it involves preference – a set of interlocking values, loyalties, assumptions, Selection of Subject interests and principles of actions Collection of Sources History is not fiction Examination of Genuineness Historical accounts must be based on all available relevant evidence Extraction from Sources
A version of the past that cannot be Historical Sources
supported by evidence is worthless Source – an object from the past or The reconstruction of the total past testimony concerning the past on of mankind, although it is the goal of which historians depend in order to historians, thus becomes the goal create their own depiction of that they know full well is past. UNATTAINABLE. Howell and Prevenier, From Reliable What is Historical Method? Sources an Introduction to Historical Method Tangible remains of the past These sources were present during an experience of time period and Anthony Brundage, Going to offer an inside view of a particular Sources event. Written Sources Primary sources provide first-hand 1. Published materials testimony or direct evidence concerning a topic under Books, magazines, journals investigation. They are created by Travelogue witnesses or recorders who experienced the events or conditions transcription of speech being documented. 2. Manuscript [any handwritten or These sources are created at the typed record that has not been time when the events or conditions printed] are occurring, it can also include Archival materials autobiographies, memoirs, and oral histories recorded later. Memoirs, diary Primary sources are characterized Non- written Sources by their content, regardless of Oral history whether they are available in original format, in Artifact microfilm/microfiche, in digital Ruins format, or in published format.
Fossils Four Main Categories of Primary
Sources Art works 1. Written sources Video recordings 2. Images Audio recordings 3. Artifacts What are Primary Sources? 4. Oral testimony Testimony of an eyewitness What are Secondary Sources? A primary source must have been produced by a contemporary of the A secondary source interprets and event it narrates analyzes primary sources. These sources are one or more steps A primary source is a document or removed from the event. physical object which was written or created during the time under Secondary sources may have study. pictures, quotes or graphics of primary sources in them. Examples: History textbook 6. Semantics – determining the meaning of a text or word Printed materials (serials, periodicals which interprets previous research) 7. Hermeneutics – determining ambiguities What is Historical Criticism? What is Internal Criticism? In order for a source to be used as evidence in history, basic matters The Problem of Credibility about its form and content must be Relevant particulars in the document settled – is it credible? 1. External Criticism Verisimilar – as close as what really 2. Internal Criticism happened from a critical examination of vast available sources What is External Criticism? Test of Credibility The problem of authenticity 1. Identification of the author To spot fabricated, forged, faked documents e.g. to determine his reliability; mental To distinguish a hoax or processes, personal attitudes misrepresentation 2. Determination of the approximate Test of Authenticity date 1. Determine the date of the document e.g. handwriting, signature, to see whether are anachronistic seal th e.g. pencils did not exist before the 16 3. Ability to tell the truth Century e.g. nearness to the event, 2. Determine the author competence of e.g. handwriting, signature, witness, degree of attention seal 4. Willingness to tell the truth 3. Anachronistic style e.g. to determine if the author e.g. idiom, orthography, punctuation consciously or unconsciously tells falsehoods 4. Anachronistic reference to events 5. Corroboration e.g. too early, too late, too remote i.e historical facts – particulars which rest 5. Provenance or custody upon the independent testimony of e.g. determines its two or more reliable witnesses genuineness Three Major Components to Effective Historical Thinking
1. Sensitive to Multiple Causation
2. Sensitive to Context 3. Awareness of the interplay of continuity and change in human affairs Sensitivity to Multiple Causation Every event or situation is the product of multiple causes or factors, short-term or long-term Inquiry into all relevant condition and circumstances that determine the direction of human affairs Sensitivity to Context consciousness about how other times and places differ from our own Bridging the cultural and temporal gap Interpreting the past using values and beliefs of the past (historical mindedness) Continuity and Change There can be “history” only when there is change