Chapter VI - Answers - MADULA - ELAINE (Ethics)

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

ETHICS

NAME: Madula, Maria Elaine C.


CHAPTER VI
TOPIC: SYNTHESIS: MAKING INFORMED DECISION
DATE: June 16, 2020

1. How can you be a Filipino if you do not follow Filipino customs?


 It does not necessarily mean that if you do not follow Filipino customs
you are not a genuine Filipino. Actually, there are customs now that are
not being observed but still one can remain a Filipino. You can be genuine
by staying true to your country, loving your country, and doing what you
can for your country.

2. What is the distinction between a religious notion if sin and the philosophical
understanding of immoral or unethical acts?
 The philosophical understanding of immoral or unethical acts generally
revolve around treating people equally and always as ends in themselves
instead of as merely means to an end. No external source of morality is
required as it can be derived solely from our shared status as human
beings.

3. How realistic is Kohlberg's ideal of the highest stage of post-conventional


morality, that of universal ethical principles, given a feelings and emotions are
inseparable of human choice?
 It is itself unrealistic. An ideal of principles need not concern itself with
realism. Such ideals are aspirations, goals, directions of effort, not rules to
obey.
The law has to attempt practical realism: a law left ignored or
disobeyed fails its purpose. Laws can be broken; ideals cannot - they
remain ideals even when remote.

4. Given that human condition is one of finitude, how will you know that you are
sufficiently informed when you finally make your moral judgment?
 You can always ask or take advice from reputable sources (people, books
and etc.)As your conscience begins to be rightly formed, your conscience
will ‘accuse you’ if you are making the wrong choice.
The more you form your conscience the better you ‘know’ you are
making a correct moral judgment, however, the more the risk, as well, of
feeling proud and think that ‘you don't need advice anymore’.

5. If a global ethic is currently emerging; does that mean that the true meaning of
morality changes over time? Please explain your answer.
 Moral is a matter of personal view and social influence. On the matter of
global ethic I am skeptic as we have too different trends (in terms of social
equity, education, culture, economic, policies, etc.) to expect
homogeneity and we should not even if it sounds pleasant. Instead all
human being should participate in redefining what it is ethic and what is
morally acceptable or not. That is our core responsibility as people, not
corporations and mass-media one but ours.
There is a no danger in moral agreement but in global ethic as we could
certainly not agree worldwide on what is acceptable or not due to
differences. The danger is stupid ideological battles, stupid deaths and
suffering for those who could oppose to global ethic which is not actually
the result of individual choice nor consent.

6. Is there a difference between one's ethical responsibility toward fellow human


and toward nonhuman nature? Please explain your answer
 No. But most humans are one-sided: they focus on the “responsibility”
toward money and government, but never toward nature or humans.
That’s why habitats are being lost and animals are going extinct, why
the oceans are largely plastic now, and why so many people are
depressed and suicidal. It’s why every person on earth is oppressed by
other people right now. It’s why people think giving money is a “good
deed”.
Everyone thinks money is what’s important, but there is nothing ethical
in money.

You might also like