A Review of Blockchain Technology Implementation in Shipping Industry
A Review of Blockchain Technology Implementation in Shipping Industry
A Review of Blockchain Technology Implementation in Shipping Industry
net/publication/338070848
CITATIONS READS
3 571
4 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Edvard Tijan on 24 December 2019.
Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinarni
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL znanstveni časopis
OF MARITIME RESEARCH POMORSTVO
https://doi.org/10.31217/p.33.2.3
ABSTRACT A RT I C L E I N F O
This article presents a comprehensive review of the current and rising trends of blockchain Review article
technology usage in shipping industry. The definition and features of blockchain technology are Received 13 May 2019
provided, as well as the potential usage of blockchain technology in various areas (financial services, Accepted 6 September 2019
Internet of Things, medicine, government, etc.), in order to better understand its complexity and
application. Furthermore, the major challenges of blockchain technology are shown, and the most Key words:
prominent examples of blockchain applications in shipping industry are provided. The application Blockchain technology
and advantages of blockchain technology in seaports are demonstrated through several examples. Shipping industry
Seaports
Italy and Croatia, and is being implemented with the aim operational risk in financial market, risk management,
of creating the necessary concepts, technological solu- Internet of Things (IoT) to public and social services
tions, models and planning to establish the most advanced (Tijan, Aksentijević, et al., 2019). IoT technology may be
digitized logistic processes for multimodal freight traffic improved by blockchain technologies. The Internet of
and passenger services in the program area. Things represents the digital, or “smart” connection of
objects using RFID sensors, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and other
“smart” protocols in order to accelerate business proc-
2 Blockchain technology
esses (Jović et al., 2019). The typical applications of IoT
The blockchain technology is based on a method where include logistics management with Radio-Frequency
previously unknown parties can jointly generate and Identification (RFID) technology, smart homes, e-health,
maintain practically any database on a fully distributed smart grids, the maritime industry, etc (Tijan, Aksentijević,
basis where transaction correctness and completeness et al., 2019).
are validated using consensus of independent verifiers There is a difference between blockchain and other
(Tijan, Aksentijević, et al., 2019). Blockchain consists of smart technologies. For example, Blockchain is designed
two terms: the “block” and the “chain”. “Block” represents as a basis for applications that involve transaction and
transactions, while “chain” links these transactions into interactions. These can include smart contracts (smart
one chain. Block is the basic blockchain unit. Each block contracts are automatically carried out when a specific
contains a list of transactions and links to the previous condition is met, for instance regarding the conditions of
block in the chain. The principle of blockchain technology goods or environmental conditions) or other smart appli-
is accomplished through a decentralized peer-to-peer net- cations that support specific Internet of Things processes.
work. The peer-to-peer network is defined as a data shar- In this way, blockchain technology can improve not just
ing network between many working units (Peer-to-peer compliance in the IoT but also IoT features and cost-effi-
mreže, 2009). ciency (i-SCOOP, 2018).
The first blockchain was used as a basis for Bitcoin
cryptocurrency in the financial sector. Bitcoin uses peer- 3 Blockchain challenges
to-peer technology, and it operates without any trusted
third-party authority that may appear as a bank, a char- Blockchain technology is still very immature, there is
tered accountant, a notary, or any other centralized no single underlying standard, concepts are difficult to be
service (Maersk and IBM to Form Joint Venture Applying mastered and there is need for programming interven-
Blockchain to Improve Global Trade and Digitize Supply tion even in the simplest forms of implementation (Tijan,
Chains, 2018)���������������������������������������������
. Bitcoin is open-source; its design is pub- Aksentijević, et al., 2019). Furthermore, lack of regulation
lic, nobody owns or controls (Bitcoin, 2019). Moreover, it creates insecurity, because some facets of smart contract
is a cryptographically secure electronic payment system, technology might be adopted by the logistics market,
and it enables transactions involving virtual currency in just to be overregulated, or even to be considered illegal
the form of digital tokens called Bitcoin (BTC or bitcoins) (Gatteschi et al., 2018).
(Conti et al., 2018). In the shipping industry, blockchain Blockchain technology suffers from scalability and
was initially used to enable confidential financial transac- performance issues: all nodes in the chain must process
tions between the stakeholders, without relying on “third all transactions, and this presents an issue with large and
parties”. However, there is a difference between public especially global scale roll-outs (Tijan, Aksentijević, et al.,
blockchain networks, and solutions which are present 2019)��������������������������������������������������
. Therefore, “the technology is very energy inten-
in shipping industry. Public blockchain allow anyone to sive, and proof calculations expend significant amounts of
join, no one has control over the networks etc. (Public Vs processor power. Furthermore, users’ privacy might be re-
Private Blockchain In A Nutshell, 2018), while the last are duced, because all nodes contain a full copy of the ledger,
typically based on permissioned blockchains which have and there is no central authority to contact in case of evi-
very different properties and are much more similar to dent security breach” (Tijan, Aksentijević, et al., 2019).
traditional information systems or database. Distributed trust and therefore security and privacy
Blockchain-based smart contract represents a distrib- are at the core of the blockchain technologies, and have
uted operating system (Uvod u blockchain — Ethereum i the potential to either make them a success or cause them
pametni ugovori – startit, 2017). A smart contract can be to fail (Karame
��������������������������������������������������
and Capkun, 2018)�������������������������
. Personal data, and sen-
defined as a self-executing pre-evaluated contract (Allam, sitive data in general, should not be trusted in the hands
2019). A smart contract aims to digitally facilitate, verify, of third-parties, where they are susceptible to attacks
or enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract and misuse (Zyskind, Nathan and Sandy’ Pentland, 2015).
(Mourouzis and Tandon, 2019). Blockchain technology Instead, users should own and control their data without
includes several preventive mechanisms (e.g., distributed compromising security or limiting companies’ and author-
consensus and cryptography) to reduce risks of cyber- ities’ ability to provide personalized services. One of the
attacks. Blockchain can be applied in diverse applications solutions is a platform which will combine a blockchain,
from financial assets, payment systems, smart contracts, re-purposed as an access-control moderator, with an off-
142 M. Jović et al. / Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 33 (2019) 140-148
Figure 2 Comparison between paper solution and CargoX digital solution (From the Past to the Future, 2019)
With������������������������������������������������������
Smart B/L ������������������������������������������
application�������������������������������
, CargoX aims to substitute to- requires the deployment of blockchain technology, which is
day’s physical (paper based) proof of ownership (used to based on the entire information delivery chain to the end
prove ownership of the cargo at the destination port) with user – from the moment the product leaves the factory, field
the digital proof of ownership, making the Bill of Lading saf- etc. – to the receiving customer via a “trust less” system and
er, immediately portable, easier to archive and much cheap- transparent blockchain contracts (ShipChain: The Logistics
er than the current Bill of Lading in paper form. Figure 2 Platform Powered by Blockchain, 2018).
shows the comparison between current work flow and With the support of the ShipChain platform, there will
work flow provided from CargoX Smart B/L™ blockchain be a possibility of monitoring cargo and status points
based solution for transferring documents in less than 20 globally, i.e. on all geographic points. Each point will be
seconds (From the Past to the Future, 2019). encrypted and available for interpreting and only in-
CargoX aims to connect issuers, carriers, importers, volved stakeholders will see all the cargo data. Carriers
exporters and other stakeholders in a balanced system will have more visibility through their supply chain and
based on trust and interaction. In this respect, CargoX’s will communicate easily. Information on loads, geo-
goal is to eliminate the need for an intermediary by pro- graphic points, and basic compliance information will be
viding tools for secure document sharing, significantly re- recorded and publicly validated within the “sidechain”
ducing costs and time of delivery by offering a high level of (S&R-Shipchain-Outline Content Breakdown, 2017).
security and transparency. A sidechain is a separate blockchain that is attached to
Port of Koper presents a good example of successful its parent blockchain using a two-way peg (What are
implementation of blockchain technology. In August 2018, Sidechains? – Hacker Noon, 2018)����������������������
. The two-way peg ena-
the first ever container processed with the revolutionary bles interchangeability of assets at a predetermined rate
new blockchain-based CargoX Smart Bill of Lading™ was between the parent blockchain and the sidechain (What
released in the aforementioned port. The Bill of Lading for are Sidechains? – Hacker Noon, 2018). The contract will be
this shipment has been issued electronically and trans- completed and recorded on the main blockchain after de-
ferred with the help of an ultra-secure and reliable pub- livery and receipt of the cargo (ShipChain, 2018).
lic blockchain network in just minutes instead of days or The features of ShipChain may be summarized as fol-
weeks, and the chances of loss, theft or damage to the Bill lows (Shipchain, 2019):
of Lading have been dramatically reduced to near-zero (7 1. Visibility – unified solution for asset tracking (a single
Major Blockchain Technology Developments In Maritime platform from shipment to delivery)
Industry In 2018, 2019). 2. Trust – transparency through immutability (data stor-
age that cannot be changed, which is approved by all
Blockchain platform for global monitoring of goods – participants)
ShipChain
3. Control – thanks to secure ShipChain Vaults, business
ShipChain was established to address the problems fac- owners have complete control over who & how their
ing the logistics industry. The solution offered by ShipChain data is queried.
144 M. Jović et al. / Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 33 (2019) 140-148
Figure 3 GSCP platform (ICO Review — 5 reasons why Blockshipping should be revolution the Global Container Shippin Industry, 2018)
M. Jović et al. / Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 33 (2019) 140-148 145
changing hands up to 200 times between its being dis- According to Oude Weernink et al. (2017), blockchain
patched and its final delivery (Port of Rotterdam block- in seaports can be used in several ways, such as (Oude
chain solutions begin deployment, 2019). Weernink et al., 2017):
Blockchain technology can connect stakeholders that
were not previously associated, enable new forms of col- 1. Current exchange of information in seaports
laboration, and create new business opportunities. In
logistics, blockchain has the potential to transform port When the carrier enters the port, the cargo documen-
processes by documenting, validating and securing each tation is generally processed by the ship’s agent and sent
event in the chain (The Blockchain Potential for Port to the PCS – “Port Community System”. Figure 4 shows cur-
Logistics | KennisDC Logistiek, 2017). rent information flow in the import carrier process (Oude
Through its typical features, blockchain can add value Weernink et al., 2017).
to port logistics and port digitalization in numerous ways PCS allows the distribution of information between the
(An explorative study on blockchain technology in applica- stakeholders in the network to facilitate the movement of
tion to port logistics | KennisDC Logistiek, 2018). Therefore, containers throughout the process. not all the parties in-
according to KennisDC Logistiek, t��������������������������
hese are related to build- volved are included in the network (insurance companies,
ing trust, provision of secure data, visibility, network ex- banks, etc.). This process has inefficient means of commu-
pansion and integration of supply flows (The Blockchain nication, leaving enough space for improvements that a
Potential for Port Logistics | KennisDC Logistiek, 2017). blockchain can accomplish.
Figure 4 Current information flow in the import carrier process (Oude Weernink et al., 2017)
Figure 5 Blockchain information flow in the import carrier process (Oude Weernink et al., 2017)
146 M. Jović et al. / Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 33 (2019) 140-148
2. Information flow in seaports with the support of lysed. The research was conducted by collecting the most
blockchain technology prominent ways of using blockchain technology in ship-
Blockchain implementation may facilitate the exchange ping industry, with the emphasis on maritime transport, in
of information between parties involved in the process. order to determine the direction in which the blockchain
technology is developing.
This can be achieved by storing the cargo information on
the ledger. Figure 5 shows blockchain information flow in The impact of blockchain technology in shipping indus-
the import carrier process (Oude Weernink et al., 2017). try may definitely be considered positive, according to the
examples researched. As mentioned before, blockchain im-
Instead
�����������������������������������������������������
of exchanging documentation, stakeholders in-
plementation in shipping industry faces certain challenges
volved in the process are granted permission to access the
or risks (Tijan, Aksentijević, et al., 2019), (Gatteschi et al.,
blocks where the data are stored. This leads to the crea-
2018), (Karame and Capkun, 2018), (Zyskind, Nathan and
tion of a unique, shared piece of information that can be
Sandy’ Pentland, 2015) which should be minimized in order
accessed in real-time and with lower transaction costs.
to fully exploit the aforementioned advantages (Figure 6).
The process can be further accelerated by involving stake-
holders who are currently external of the process (banks, One of the challenges Blockchain technology faces
insurance companies). is the lack of standards, because not all stakeholders are
looking to implement similar blockchain solutions and
3. Blockchain application in all segments of seaport platforms. As a result, an interoperability issue may arise.
operations Although blockchain technology offers an innovative
platform for a new decentralized and transparent trans-
The database can be further enhanced by implement-
action mechanism in industry and business (Abeyratne
ing the Internet of Things (IoT) device by connecting them
and Monfared, 2016), it is still very immature. Numerous
as blockchain nodes. For example, trackers can be mount-
trials and blockchain pilot projects exist globally but they
ed on containers so the sensor signals can automatically
are now primarily linked to smaller groups i.e. partici-
record data on the blockchain without any user input.
pants in the industry (Maersk, IBM) who have started to
Moreover, sensors installed in the container can monitor
establish their own alliances in order to achieve the ad-
the status of the goods, providing information to the insur-
vantages of Blockchain technology. Nevertheless, the suc-
ance company. Furthermore, by connecting smart devices,
cessful projects will probably experience a fast expansion
it is also possible to fully automate the process. in shipping industry and in overall transportation chain as
well. Various experts consider that successful blockchain
5 Discussion implementation is possible only if all stakeholders are in-
volved in the process, such as shipping lines, terminal op-
Blockchain is certainly one of the most widely debated erators, manufacturers, banks, insurers, brokers and port
topics recently, and could have a lasting effect on the fu- authorities. As long as blockchain technology exists only
ture of shipping industry. In this research, business proc- in a limited area within the smaller pilot projects, benefits
esses that are part of shipping industry were identified of Blockchain technology (e.g. reducing time of document
and the current state of blockchain technology was ana- processing) will not be fully exploited. In this respect,
Source: Authors
M. Jović et al. / Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 33 (2019) 140-148 147
one of the main advantages of Blockchain technology is rollouts. Nevertheless, the blockchain technology possesses
reducing the need for paper documents. Global shipping huge potential for development and further improvements
industry, especially maritime transport still involves a in maritime transport.
large number of paper documents, prolonging the time for
processing the data and any step that enhances the cur-
Acknowledgments
rent state might have significant effects for the whole sec-
tor. Blockchain can in this case register all the document This work was supported by “DigLogs – Digitalising
changes and provide visibility of their location to all other Logistics Processes” (Interreg V-A Italy – Croatia 2014-
interested parties. Openly accessible distributed block- 2020) project.
chains that are not proprietary to one company can guar-
antee that nobody can easily forge the paper trail.
Positive aspects of Blockchain could actually change References
the whole shipping industry and overall trading processes [1] 7 Major Blockchain Technology Developments in Maritime In-
if the risks associated with Blockchain are correctly miti- dustry in 2018 (2019). Available at: https://www.marinein-
gated. According to World Economic Forum, Blockchain sight.com/know-more/7-major-blockchain-technology-
could boost trade by more than $1 trillion in the next 10 developments-in-maritime-industry-in-2018/ (Accessed: 5
years by mitigating risks, removing barriers and stream- July 2019).
lining trading processes (World Economic Forum, 2018). [2] Abeyratne, S. and Monfared, R. (2016) ‘Blockchain Ready
Manufacturing Supply Chain Using Distributed Ledger’, In-
ternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Technol-
6 Conclusion ogy, 05(09), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.15623/ijret.2016.0509001.
[3] Allam, Z. (2019) ‘On Smart Contracts and Organisational
Blockchain technology is a digital and distributed ledger Performance: A Review of Smart Contracts through the
which enables decentralization, real-time peer-to-peer op- Blockchain Technology’, Review of Economic and Business
eration, transparency etc. It is based on a method by which Studies, 11(2), pp. 137–156. doi: 10.1515/rebs-2018-0079.
previously unknown parties can jointly generate and main- [4] An explorative study on blockchain technology in application
tain almost any database on a fully distributed basis. to port logistics | KennisDC Logistiek (2018). Available at:
http://www.kennisdclogistiek.nl/publicaties/an-explora-
Blockchain technology is a potential solution to nu-
tive-study-on-blockchain-technology-in-application-to-
merous problems such as: insufficient availability of cargo port-logistics (Accessed: 23 April 2019).
monitoring (maritime transport involves many stakehold- [5] Bitcoin (2019). Available at: https://bitcoin.org/ (Accessed:
ers) and lack of transparency (resulting from poor data 2 May 2019).
handling), relying on paperwork in 21st century, etc. In [6] Blockshipping’s GSCP ICO – Transforming the Global Contain-
this respect, Maersk and IBM developed their blockchain er Shipping Industry (2019). Available at: https://www.
solution: the need for documentation will be reduced, and blockshipping.io/ (Accessed: 24 April 2019).
automated paperwork will enable safe sending and sign- [7] Caban, J., Ignaciuk, P. and Misztal, W. (2017) ‘Safety of Mari-
ing of contracts via blockchain technology. Another exam- time Transport in the Baltic Sea’, in MATEC Web of Confer-
ple of blockchain usage in maritime transport is an open ences: 18th International Scientific Conference – LOGI 2017.
system based on blockchain technology and encrypted de- České Budějovice, Czech Republic: EDP Sciences, pp. 1–8.
centralized data storage created by CargoX. The goal is to doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201713400003.
connect stakeholders such as issuers, carriers, importers, [8] CargoX | Reshaping the Future of Global Trade with the
and exporters in a balanced system based on trust and in- World’s First Blockchain Bill of Lading (2019). Available at:
https://cargox.io/ (Accessed: 26 April 2019).
teraction by using their BDTS platform.
[9] Conti, M. et al. (2018) ‘A Survey on Security and Privacy Is-
Each seaport, as a part of maritime transport, which sues of Bitcoin’, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,
aims to be competitive should accept digitalization. 20(4), pp. 3416–3452. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2842460.
Blockchain could have a tremendous impact on the future [10] Deloitte (2018) Breaking blockchain open Deloitte’s 2018
of port digitalisation. One of the seaports that showed large global blockchain survey. Available at: https://www2.
interest in digitalizing and using blockchain is the port of deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cz/Documents/finan-
Rotterdam which has developed an application relying on cial-services/cz-2018-deloitte-global-blockchain-survey.
blockchain software in order to securely track the owner- pdf (Accessed: 3 May 2019).
ship and location of cargo shipments. [11] From the Past to the Future (2019). Available at: https://
cargox.io/welcome/ (Accessed: 5 July 2019).
Although blockchain technology provides numerous
[12] Gatteschi, V. et al. (2018) ‘Blockchain and Smart Contracts for
advantages, the disadvantage is the absence of a single un- Insurance: Is the Technology Mature Enough?’, MDPI: Future
derlying standard. Furthermore, concepts are difficult to Internet 2018, 10(6), pp. 8–13. doi: 10.3390/fi10020020.
be mastered and programming intervention are necessary [13] Gausdal, A. H., Czachorowski, K. V. and Solesvik, M. Z. (2018)
even in the simplest forms of implementation. Furthermore, ‘Applying Blockchain Technology: Evidence from Norwegian
all nodes in the chain must process all transactions, and Companies’, MDPI Sustainability, 10(6), pp. 1–16. doi:
this presents an issue with large and especially global scale 10.3390/su10061985.
148 M. Jović et al. / Scientific Journal of Maritime Research 33 (2019) 140-148
[14] Halim, R. A. et al. (2018) ‘Decarbonization Pathways for In- [30] Peer-to-peer mreže (2009). Available at: https://www.cis.
ternational Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Im- hr/www.edicija/Peer-to-peermree.html (Accessed: 29 April
pact Assessment’, MDPI Sustainability, 10(7). doi: 10.3390/ 2019).
su10072243. [31] Port of Rotterdam blockchain solutions begin deployment
[15] i-SCOOP (2018) Blockchain and the Internet of Things: the (2019). Available at: https://www.governmenteuropa.eu/
IoT blockchain opportunity and challenge. Available at: ht- port-of-rotterdam-blockchain/93106/ (Accessed: 3 May
tps://www.i-scoop.eu/blockchain-distributed-ledger-tech- 2019).
nology/blockchain-iot/ (Accessed: 15 July 2019). [32] Public Vs Private Blockchain In A Nutshell (2018). Available at:
[16] IBM- Blockchain (2018). Available at: https://www.ibm. https://medium.com/coinmonks/public-vs-private-block-
com/blogs/blockchain/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ chain-in-a-nutshell-c9fe284fa39f (Accessed: 2 May 2019).
GTD-Overview-Image2-e1516060395602-1024x443.png [33] S&R-Shipchain-Outline Content Breakdown (2017).
(Accessed: 7 May 2019). Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/
[17] IBM (2018) TradeLens: How IBM and Maersk Are Sharing 5b58858a710699d85d651e42/t/5b65b09c1ae6cf3410eeb
Blockchain to Build a Global Trade Platform – THINK Blog. de7/1533391031469/S%26R-%2BShipchain-%2BOutline.
Available at: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/think/2018/11/ pdf (Accessed: 26 April 2019).
tradelens-how-ibm-and-maersk-are-sharing-blockchain-to- [34] ShipChain: The Logistics Platform Powered by Blockchain
build-a-global-trade-platform/ (Accessed: 23 April 2019). (2018). Available at: https://hacked.com/shipchain-the-lo-
[18] ICO Review — 5 reasons why Blockshipping should be revolu- gistics-platform-of-the-future/ (Accessed: 26 April 2019).
tion the Global Container Shipping Industry (2018). Available [35] Shipchain (2019). Available at: https://shipchain.io/ (Ac-
at: https://medium.com/biomanforcerose/ico-review-5-rea- cessed: 24 April 2019).
sons-why-blockshipping-should-be-revolution-the-global-
[36] ShipChain (2018). Available at: https://shipchain.io/ (Ac-
container-shipping-be18595c6933 (Accessed: 7 May 2019).
cessed: 24 April 2019).
[19] IMO (International Maritime Organization) (2019). Availa-
ble at: https://business.un.org/en/entities/13 (Accessed: 2 [37] Shipping Blockchain: Maersk Spin-Off Aims to Commercialize
May 2019). Trade Platform – CoinDesk (2018). Available at: https://
www.coindesk.com/shipping-blockchain-maersk-spin-off-
[20] Jović, M. et al. (2019) ‘An Overview of Security Challenges Of
aims-commercialize-trade-platform (Accessed: 24 April
Seaport IoT Systems’, in 42nd International Convention on
2019).
Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and
Microelectronics (MIPRO). Opatija, Croatia: MIPRO Proceed- [38] The Blockchain Potential for Port Logistics | KennisDC Lo-
ings Digital Economy/Digital Society 2019. Available at: ht- gistiek (2017). Available at: http://www.kennisdclogistiek.
tps://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?rad=986080. nl/publicaties/the-blockchain-potential-for-port-logistics
(Accessed: 23 April 2019).
[21] Karame, G. and Capkun, S. (2018) ‘Blockchain Security and
Privacy’, IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(4), pp. 11–12. doi: [39] Tijan, E., Aksentijević, S., et al. (2019) ‘Blockchain technolo-
10.1109/MSP.2018.3111241. gy implementation in logistics’, MDPI-Sustainability (Swit-
[22] Laurent, M. et al. (2018) ‘A Blockchain based Access Control zerland), 11(4). doi: 10.3390/su11041185.
Scheme’, in 15th International Conference on Security and [40] Tijan, E., Jović, M., et al. (2019) The Single Window concept
Cryptography (SECRYPT 2018). Porto, Portugal, pp. 168– in international trade, transport and seaports, Pomorstvo :
176. doi: 10.5220/0006855601680176. scientific journal of maritime research. Available at: https://
[23] Lindman, J., Rossi, M. and Tuunainen, V. (2017) ‘Opportuni- www.bib.irb.hr/993505 (Accessed: 7 May 2019).
ties and risks of Blockchain Technologies in payments – a [41] Treiblmaier, H. (2019) ‘Combining Blockchain Technology
research agenda’, in Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii Interna- and the Physical Internet to Achieve Triple Bottom Line
tional Conference on System Sciences. Aalto University Re- Sustainability: A Comprehensive Research Agenda for Mod-
search information portal. doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2017.185. ern Logistics and Supply Chain Management’, MDPI-Logis-
[24] Maersk and IBM to Form Joint Venture Applying Blockchain tics, 3(1), p. 10. doi: 10.3390/logistics3010010.
to Improve Global Trade and Digitize Supply Chains (2018). [42] Uvod u blockchain — Ethereum i pametni ugovori – startit
Available at: https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/press- (2017). Available at: https://startit.rs/uvod-u-blockchain-
release/53602.wss (Accessed: 2 May 2019). ethereum-i-pametni-ugovori/ (Accessed: 26 April 2019).
[25] Maersk and IBM Unveil First Industry-Wide Cross-Border [43] Wang, H. et al. (2016) ‘Big data and industrial Internet of
Supply Chain Solution on Blockchain (2017). Available at: ht- Things for the maritime industry in Northwestern Norway’,
tps://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/51712. IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference, Proceed-
wss (Accessed: 3 May 2019). ings/TENCON, 2016-Janua (November). doi: 10.1109/TEN-
[26] Morpheus.Network – Disrupt Global Trade (2019). Available CON.2015.7372918.
at: https://morpheus.network/ (Accessed: 26 April 2019). [44] What are Sidechains? – Hacker Noon (2018). Available at:
[27] Mourouzis, T. and Tandon, J. (2019) Introduction to Decen- https://hackernoon.com/what-are-sidechains-1c45ea2d-
tralization and Smart Contracts. Available at: http://arxiv. af3 (Accessed: 29 April 2019).
org/abs/1903.04806 (Accessed: 29 April 2019). [45] World Economic Forum (2018) Blockchain could boost glo-
[28] News – Blocklab (2019). Available at: http://www.blocklab. bal trade by $1 trillion. Available at: https://www.weforum.
nl/news/ (Accessed: 3 May 2019). org/agenda/2018/09/blockchain-set-to-increase-global-
[29] Oude Weernink, M. et al. (2017) ‘The Blockchain Potential trade-by-1-trillion/ (Accessed: 5 July 2019).
for Port Logistics’, Erasmus University and The Delft Univer- [46] Zyskind, G., Nathan, O. and Sandy’ Pentland, A.’ (2015) ‘De-
sity of Technology, (2 January 2018), p. 16. Available at: centralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal
http://smart-port.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Bi- Data’, IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops. doi: 10.1109/
jlage-6_White-Paper-Blockchain.pdf. SPW.2015.27.