Reaction Quotient: Trial 1 Trial 2

Reaction Quotient
How do you predict which direction a reaction will proceed to reach equilibrium?
Why?
When a reaction reaches equilibrium there must be some non-negligible amount of every species in the
reaction, otherwise the reaction cannot react in both directions. Knowing this, it is very easy to predict
which direction a reaction will go to reach equilibrium when one of the components of the reaction has
an initial concentration of zero. Many of the problems you have worked with thus far have some compo-
nent at zero concentration, but real life does not work that way. Most of the time, the reaction in question
has some measureable amount of every species. Deciding which way the reaction will go to reach equilib-
rium then becomes more challenging.
Model 1 – A Theoretical Equilibrium

Trial 1 A (g) + B (g) ←
→ C (g) Trial 2 A (g) + B (g) ←
→ C (g)
Initial 1.000 M 1.000 M 1.000 M Initial 2.000 M 0.500 M 0.500 M
Change Change
Equilibrium 1.464 M 1.464 M 0.536 M Equilibrium 2.150 M 0.650 M 0.350 M
Trial 3 A (g) + B (g) ←

→ C (g) Trial 4 A (g) + B (g) ←
→ C (g)
Change Change
Trial 5 A (g) + B (g) ←

→ C (g) Trial 6 A (g) + B (g) ←
→ C (g)
Change Change
1. Examine Model 1.
a. Write the theoretical chemical reaction that is used in the trials of Model 1.
b. If 0.50 M of reactant A reacts, predict the change in concentration of B and C.
2. What variables were changed in the different trials shown in Model 1?
Reaction Quotient 1
3. In Trial 1 of Model 1 there is an arrow in the “change” section of the table.
a. Explain what that arrow represents.
b. What evidence is present in the table to indicate the direction the arrow should be pointing?
4. With your group, determine which direction each of the other trials in Model 1 reacted to reach
equilibrium. Indicate that direction with an arrow in the “change” section of the table.
5. Is it true that there are equal concentrations of reactants and products when all of the reactions in
Model 1 reach equilibrium? Justify your answer with evidence from Model 1.
6. According to Model 1, are the final concentrations of all species in the reaction the same when
the reaction reaches equilibrium, regardless of the initial concentration?
7. Does the reaction in Model 1 always proceed in the forward direction when there are more reac-
tants than products? Justify your answer with evidence from Model 1.
8. Write the equilibrium constant expression for the reaction in Model 1.
9. Discuss with your group how you could determine the equilibrium constant, K eq, for the reaction
in Model 1. Divide the work among group members. Use data from multiple trials to calculate
the equilibrium constant for the reaction and determine the average. Show all work.
2 POGIL™ Activities for AP* Chemistry

Read This!
The key to knowing which direction a reaction will need to proceed in order to reach equilibrium is
knowing if you have too much reactant or too much product compared to the equilibrium state. Keep in
mind, however, that there are many combinations of reactant and product concentrations that constitute
an equilibrium state.
Model 2 – Comparing Q and K eq
Reaction Equilibrium Direction to

Trial Q versus K eq
Quotient, Q Constant, K eq Equilibrium
1
2
3
4
5
6
10. Fill in the Equilibrium Constant column in Model 2 using data from Model 1.
11. Fill in the Direction to Equilibrium column in Model 2 using data from Model 1.
Read This!
The reaction quotient for a reaction is the ratio of products to reactants, similar to the equilibrium
constant. The difference is you calculate the ratio with initial conditions.
[C]eq [C]initial
K eq = –––––––– Q = ––––––––––––
[A]eq [B]eq [A]initial [B]initial
12. Calculate the reaction quotient for each of the trials in Model 1 and record the data in Model 2
in the appropriate column. Divide the work among group members. Show your work below.
Reaction Quotient 3
13. Consider how the concentration values in the reaction quotient change when the reaction pro-
ceeds in the forward direction.
a. Does the numerator increase or decrease?
b. Does the denominator increase or decrease?
c. Overall, does the Q ratio increase or decrease when the reaction proceeds in the forward
direction?
14. Consider how the concentration values in the reaction quotient change when the reaction pro-
ceeds in the reverse direction.
a. Does the numerator increase or decrease?
b. Does the denominator increase or decrease?
c. Overall does the Q ratio increase or decrease when the reaction proceeds in the forward
direction?
15. Fill in the Q versus K eq column in the table in Model 2. Write Q > K eq, Q < Keq or Q = K eq.
16. Complete the following statements.
a. When the reaction quotient is greater than the equilibrium constant, the reaction proceeds
more in (the forward, the reverse, neither) direction to reach equilibrium.
b. When the reaction quotient is less than the equilibrium constant, the reaction proceeds more
in (the forward, the reverse, neither) direction to reach equilibrium.
c. When the reaction quotient is equal to the equilibrium constant, the reaction proceeds more
in (the forward, the reverse, neither) direction to reach equilibrium.

17. Consider the following reaction.
2SO2 (g) + O2 (g) ←
→ 2SO3 (g) K eq = 3900 at 2000 K
a. Write the equilibrium constant expression for the reaction.
b. Write the reaction quotient expression for the reaction.
c. A reaction vessel contains 0.150 M sulfur dioxide, 0.150 M oxygen and 2.000 M sulfur triox-
ide. Predict the direction the reaction must shift to reach equilibrium. Show a calculation to
justify your answer.

2HI (g) ←
→ H2 (g) + I2 (g) K eq = 0.25 at 25 °C
A reaction vessel contains 0.500 M hydrogen, 0.500 M iodine vapor and 0.750 M hydrogen
iodide. Predict the direction the reaction must shift to react equilibrium. Show a calculation to
justify your answer.
Reaction Quotient 5
Extension Questions
Cd2+ (aq) + 4Cl1− (aq) ←
→ CdCl42− (aq) K eq = 108 at 25 °C
a. Write the reaction quotient expression for the reaction.
b. A reaction vessel contains 0.100 M cadmium ion, 0.500 M chloride and 0.250 M tetrachlo-
rocadmate ion. Predict the direction the reaction must shift to reach equilibrium. Show a
calculation to justify your answer.

C (s) + H2O (g) ←
→ H2 (g) + CO (g) K eq = 4.09 × 10−3 at 2000 K
a. A 1.000-L reaction vessel contains 4.00 M of water vapor, 0.040 M hydrogen and 0.040 M
carbon monoxide. Calculate the reaction quotient and state which direction the quotient
predicts the reaction must shift to reach equilibrium.
b. Discuss why the prediction above is wrong in this case.
21. LeChâtelier’s principle states that an equilibrium system will shift in the direction that reduces
the stress put on the system. Is this consistent with the predictions made by calculating the reac-
tion quotient and comparing Q to the equilibrium constant? Provide an example to support your
answer.

Reaction Quotient: Trial 1 Trial 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reaction Quotient: Trial 1 Trial 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reaction Quotient: Trial 1 Trial 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Reaction Quotient

Model 1 – A Theoretical Equilibrium

Trial 3 A (g) + B (g) ←

Trial 5 A (g) + B (g) ←

b. If 0.50 M of reactant A reacts, predict the change in concentration of B and C.

2. What variables were changed in the different trials shown in Model 1?

8. Write the equilibrium constant expression for the reaction in Model 1.

2 POGIL™ Activities for AP* Chemistry

Model 2 – Comparing Q and K eq

Reaction Equilibrium Direction to

b. Does the denominator increase or decrease?

b. Does the denominator increase or decrease?

4 POGIL™ Activities for AP* Chemistry

b. Write the reaction quotient expression for the reaction.

18. Consider the following reaction.

20. Consider the following reaction.

b. Discuss why the prediction above is wrong in this case.

6 POGIL™ Activities for AP* Chemistry

You might also like