Development and Validation of Performance Test of Urdu (PTU)
Development and Validation of Performance Test of Urdu (PTU)
Development and Validation of Performance Test of Urdu (PTU)
Abstract
This paper discusses the Development and validation of Performance Test of Urdu (PTU) for first grade students. The present
study is conducted in Srinagar district of Kashmir. The investigator has taken 100 first grade students from Govt. schools of
District Srinagar. The investigator finds out reliability by test-retest reliability as 0.51, split half (U/L) as 0.77, split half (O/E) 0.78
Validity of Performance test of Urdu ( PTU) has been determined by face validity.
16
(b) Standardization To teachers it can be used to determine the performance
The PTU has been standardized by finding its reliability and of student in Urdu at Primary level.
validity. To administrators it will be helpful in promotion of
1. Reliability:- The reliability of performance test has been student to next upper class...
determined by :- For teacher educators it will prepare ground to develop
1) Test Retest: - The reliability of the PTU was found skills teacher trainees/resource persons so that they may
by administering the test on a group of 100 First be able to train teachers who can perform well in first
grade students. The reliability Coefficient, was grade classroom.
computed between first and second test scores after For researchers it will help to explore the performance of
applying Pearsons’ Correlation formula came out to a student and Language skills in urdu at first primary.
be as 0.51 (Significant at 0.01 level).
2) Split half (U/L):- The reliability of the scale was References
found by administering the PTU on a group of 100 1. Anastassi Anne. Psychological Testing Maccmillian
First grade students. The reliability Coefficient, after Publishing company 866 Third Avenue, New York, 1988;
applying Spearman - Brown prophecy formula came 10022:121-156.
out to be as 0.77 (Significant at 0.01 level). 2. Balsara Matriya. Adminstration and reorganization of
3) Split half (O/E):- The reliability of the scale was Teacher Education. Kaniska Publication, 2002, 6.
found by administering the PTU on a group of 100 3. Best W, Khan James V. Research Methodology: 7th
First Grade students. The reliability Coefficient, after edition Reprinted Printice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs N.
applying Spearman - Brown prophecy formula came J, U.S.A, 2001, 342.
out to be as 0.78 (Significant at 0.01 level). 4. Freeman Frank S. Theories and practice of Psychological
testing: Third Edition Oxford & IBH Publishing Co Pvt.
Reliability (N =100) Ltd New Delhi, 1965, 63-117.
Split half (U/L) Split half (O/E) 5. Garret HE. Statistics in Psychology and Education:
Reliability
0.77 0.78
Surjeet Publication, 2008, 338.
6. Koul, Lokesh. Methodology of Educational Research:
2. Validity: The validity of PTU has been determined by
Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd, 2009, 168-169.
7. Paula Polk Lilard. Montessori in the Classroom: A
Face Validity: - To final out what the test measures, it was
Teacher’s Account of How Children Really Learn.
decided to determine its face validity. For this, the expert’s
Amazon sales New Delhi, 1997.
opinion had been considered.
8. Pestonjee DM. Second handbook of Psychological and
Administration of PTU social instrument Volume one: Concept publishing
The Performance test can be administered to a First primary company New Delhi, 1997.
students in the school with the instruction given at top of it. 9. Pestonjee DM. Third handbook of Psychological and
The test administrator reads out the instruction before social instrument Volume one: Concept publishing
administering. company New Delhi, 1997.
10. Rather AR, Peer NK. Fundamentals of Measurement &
Time required for administering the test Evaluation: Gulshan Publishers, 2002.
The PTU can be completed in a single sitting by student. It 11. Secretary. JKSB of school education Bharstani Urdu.Urdu
takes about 30 minutes to respond completely. ki Pehli KitabI: Abdul Gani TFC Madinachowk Srinagar.
2015.
Scoring 12. Sharma RA. Essentials of Measurement in Education and
Each item is scored on 2-point Performance Test (PTU) Psychology: Surya Publication, 2004.
distributed on Right, Wrong. 13. Singh Arvind, Preet Khosla, Mohra. Educational
Measurement and Evaluation: Vinod Publication
For each Question/item Right Wrong Educational Publishers, 2005.
1 0 14. Thorndike, Robert L, Hagen E. Measurement and
Evaluation in Psychology and Education New Delhi:
The possible range of scores on the PTU is 1-15. Wiley Eastern Pvt. Ltd, 1970.
A student scoring high on the Performance test (PTU) is high
performing than the student scoring low on the PTU is low
performing.
Norms
Range of score Classification
11&above good
6-10 Average
1-5 Poor
Uses
The PTU is valuable and useful instrument to the teachers,
administrators, teacher educators and above all to researchers.
17