Energy from municipal solid waste

in Chennai, India – a feasibility study

Camilla Axelsson
Theres Kvarnström

Arbetsgruppen för Tropisk Ekologi Minor Field Study 150

Committee of Tropical Ecology ISSN 1653-5634
Uppsala University, Sweden
May 2010 Uppsala
 Energy from municipal solid waste
in Chennai, India – a feasibility study

Camilla Axelsson
Theres Kvarnström
Abstract
Solid waste management is one of the most essential functions in a country to achieve a
sustainable development. In India, it has been one of the least prioritized functions during the
last decades. The most common ways to treat waste in India today are open dumping and
uncontrolled burning. These methods are causing severe environmental pollution and health
problems. India is one of the world’s largest emitter of methane gas from waste disposal.
Since methane is a strong greenhouse gas, even small emissions have large impact on the
climate. Improper treatment of waste will also affect peoples’ health, first of all by the
spreading of toxic compounds from uncontrolled burning and secondly by leakage of sewage
from the dumping grounds into the groundwater.

When waste is incinerated in an incineration plant there are many environmental benefits.
First of all, the possibility of using flue gas treatment prevents emissions of toxic compounds
to emit to the air compared to if waste is burnt uncontrolled. Secondly, the amount of waste
going to the dumpsite will decrease, resulting in a reduction of methane formation and less
leakage of sewage from the dumpsite to the groundwater.

Chennai is the fourth largest city in India with a population of 4.3 million (2001 census). It is
the Corporation of Chennai, CoC, which has the overall responsibility for solid waste
management in the city. With street sweepers, tricycles and compactors they collect and
transport the waste to one of the two dumpsites in the city; Perungudi in the north or
Kodungaiyur in the south. Like most municipalities in India, CoC has experienced difficulties
keeping in pace with last decades’ industrialization, resulting in insufficient collection of
municipal solid waste and over burdened dumpsites. Another consequence of the rapid
industrialization is the increased demand for electricity. Today there is not enough installed
capacity of power stations in Chennai to meet this demand, leading to daily power cuts.

If the waste on the two dumpsites will be left untreated, the dumpsites are only expected to be
useful until the year 2015. To prolong the lifespan of the dumpsites CoC has signed a contract
with the company Hydroair Tectonics, who shall minimize the waste on Perungudi. There is a
chance that there will be a similar contract on Kodungaiyur as well. This company will build a
processing plant that will segregate the waste into recyclable, inert, organic and burnable
material. The inert and organic waste will be processed further into bricks and compost,
which will be sold on the open market. The burnable material will be processed into a fluffy
fraction called RDF-fluff. In the initial stage the RDF-fluff will be sold to coal-fired industries
as “green coal”. In the future Hydroair Tectonics plans to build a combustion unit for burning
RDF and generate electricity, which will be sold to the grid.

This report will give an overview of the current waste and electricity situation in Chennai and
analyze whether Hydroair Tectonics should build this combustion unit or if they should sell
the generated RDF to industries. The result will be presented in a case study.
2
Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning
Ett fungerande avfallshanteringssystem i världens länder är väsentligt för att åstadkomma en
global hållbar utveckling. Indien har, liksom många andra utvecklingsländer, stora brister i sitt
avfallshanteringssystem. De vanligaste metoderna att hantera avfallet i landet idag är
okontrollerad deponering och öppen förbränning, vilka är de värsta metoderna när det gäller
miljö- och hälsoeffekter. Indien är en av världens största utsläppare av metan från
avfallsdeponering. Eftersom metan är en stark växthusgas ger även mindre utsläpp betydande
påverkan på klimatet. Ett fungerande avfallshanteringssystem är dessutom viktigt för att
förhindra sjukdomsspridning. Varje år dör tusentals människor i Indien av sjukdomar
orsakade av bristfällig renhållning.

Den senaste tidens urbanisering och ekonomiska utveckling som har präglat landet har
resulterat i en lavinartad ökning av mängden hushållsavfall. Samtidigt har behovet av
elektricitet ökat som en ytterligare konsekvens av detta. Idag har Indien stora problem med att
tillgodose behovet av el i landet, vilket leder till dagliga elavbrott. Regeringen i Indien har
under de senaste åren insett vilket omfattande problem de står inför och har mer aktivt börjat
arbeta för att förbättra el- och avfallssituationen. Genom att införa striktare regler för
avfallshantering och samtidigt förbättra investeringsklimatet för elproduktion från
förnyelsebara energikällor hoppas de komma tillrätta med de båda problemen. Vad många
politiker förespråkar är energiproduktion från avfall; en lösning som både minskar mängden
sopor till dumparna och samtidigt genererar elektricitet .

Borlänge Energi har under lång tid varit engagerad i avfallsprojekt i utvecklingsländer. Deras
engagemang i Indien började med ett samarbete med organisationen Hand in Hand som är en
Non-governmental Organization, NGO, i Chennai. Detta examensarbete är skrivet på uppdrag
av Borlänge Energi och har finansierats genom ett Minor Field Study, MFS, - stipendium från
Sida. Syftet med arbetet är att göra en förstudie om möjligheten att bygga en
avfallsförbränningsanläggning med energiutvinning i Chennai.

Situationen i Chennai idag

Chennai är Indiens fjärde största stad med 4,3 miljoner invånare (2001 census). Idag är det
kommunen i Chennai, CoC, som har det övergripande ansvaret för stadens avfallshantering.
Staden är uppdelad i 10 administrativa zoner. För att effektivisera avfallshanteringen har CoC
outsourcat avfallshanteringen i 4 av de 10 zonerna till det privatägda företaget Neel Metal
Fanalca. Metoden för uppsamling och transport av avfallet är dock densamma. Med hjälp av
gatusopare, trehjulingar och tyngre lastbilar samlas avfallet ihop och transporteras sedan till
en av stadens två dumpar, Kadungaiyur i norr eller Perungudi i söder. Dessa dumpar är
okontrollerade, vilket innebär att de varken har någon uppsamling av lakvatten eller utvinning
av deponigas. Varje dag transporteras cirka 1 500 ton avfall till vardera av dumparna. Om
denna avfallsmängd inte minskar de närmsta åren beräknas dumparnas livslängd sträcka sig
till år 2015. Uppsamlingen av avfall i Chennai sker med en effektivitet av 73 procent. Det
avfall som inte samlas upp förbränns under okontrollerade former längs vägar och i gränder.
Hushållsavfallet i Chennai består till största delen av organiskt avfall och inert material, som
grus och sand. Det lägre värmevärdet ligger på 1,6 MWh/ton.

Vardagen i Chennai präglas av strömavbrott som ibland varar i flera timmar. I januari år 2009
kunde 7,5 procent av elbehovet i staden inte tillgodoses. Idag sker ingen utvinning av energi
från avfall i Chennai.

3
Situationen i Chennai i framtiden
I takt med att dumparna i Chennai börjar bli överfyllda med sopor har kommunen i Chennai
arbetat för att hitta en lösning som minimerar mängden sopor på dumparna och därmed
förlänger deras livstid. Nyligen skrev de kontrakt med ett företag från Mumbai, Hydroair
Tectonics, för att de ska ta hand om allt avfall som dumpas på Perungudi. Det kan tänkas bli
ett liknande kontrakt på Kadungaiyur i framtiden. Till en början kommer företaget att bygga
en sorteringsanläggning på dumpen som mekaniskt och manuellt separerar olika fraktioner av
avfallet. De olika fraktionerna bearbetas sedan vidare till användbara produkter. Av den
organiska och inerta fraktionen tillverkas kompost respektive tegelsten, som säljs på den
öppna marknaden. Återvinningsbart material separeras och säljs till återvinningsföretag. Den
brännbara fraktionen hackas sönder till en fluffig massa kallad RDF-fluff, som kan användas
som bränsle för energiproduktion. Till att börja med kommer Hydroair Tectonics att sälja
RDF-fluffet till koleldande industrier som ett substitut till kol. I ett senare skede funderar
företaget på att investera i en förbränningsanläggning för energiproduktion.

Fallstudie
I detta examensarbete beskrivs de ekonomiska och tekniska förutsättningarna för att bygga en
anläggning för energiproduktion från förbränning av RDF-fluff. Resultatet presenteras i en
fallstudie som kommer kunna användas av Hydroair Tectonics för att bedöma om de ska
bygga en anläggning eller inte.

I fallstudien beskrivs en typanläggning för energiproduktion för förbränning av RDF. Två

scenarier för energiproduktion undersöks. I det ena fallet förbränns RDF för att generera el,
som säljs till nätet. I detta fall blir anläggningens elektriska effekt 10,5 MW. I det andra fallet
förbränns RDF-fluff tillsammans med industriavfall, för att generera el som säljs till nätet och
processånga som säljs till en närbelägen industri. I detta fall blir den elektriska effekten 12,2
MW och den termiska effekten 12,5 MW. Det senare fallet innebär högre lönsamhet, för det
första genom att fler produkter tas tillvara och för det andra för att inblandningen av
industriavfall ger bränslemixen ett högre energiinnehåll.

Beroende på vilken återbetalningstid Hydroair Tectonics accepterar, varierar den totala

anläggningskostnaden för att det ska vara mer lönsamt att bygga anläggningen än att sälja
RDF-fluffet till industrier. Resultatet blev följande:

Vid antagandet att Hydroair Tectonics väljer en återbetalningstid på 15 år bör företaget:

 förbränna RDF i en anläggning för generering av el, om de totala
anläggningskostnaderna på 15 år inte överstiger 540 miljoner kr
 förbränna RDF tillsammans med industriavfall i en anläggning för generering av el
och processånga, om de totala anläggningskostnaderna inte överstiger 910 miljoner kr
 sälja RDF till industrier för 150 kr per ton om ovanstående fall inte gäller.

4
Acknowledgements
This master’s thesis is the final part of our, Camilla Axelsson’s and Theres Kvarnström’s,
degree as Master of Science in engineering. The degree will be earned in Energy Systems at
the Swedish Agricultural University and Uppsala University. When Borlänge Energy asked us
to go to India to do a feasibility study about waste -to-energy we did not hesitate a moment to
go. The time in India was very worthwhile and we got invaluable experiences as well as
unforgettable memories.

There have been many people involved in our master’s thesis. We would like to take the
opportunity to express our gratitude to everyone who has provided us with valuable thoughts
and information along the way and thereby made this study possible. Thank you,

Borlänge Energy for giving us the opportunity to carry out this master’s thesis in India. We
would especially like to thank you, our supervisor Ronny Arnberg, for your strong
engagement and for assisting us with relevant contacts.

Inge Johansson, Technical Adviser for waste-to-energy, Avfall Sverige, for your engagement
and interest and for always giving us quick and extensive responses on our e-mails.

Jörgen Carlsson, Developing Engineer, Umeå Energy, for giving us useful information about
the waste incineration technique.

Kjell Pernestål, Senior teacher at the department of physics and material, Uppsala University,
for taking your time and helping us with the technical part of the study.

Sida, through the Committee of Tropical Ecology at Uppsala University, for funding our trip
to India.

Hand in hand, for welcoming us to your office in Chennai and providing us with a desk.
Especially thank you, ER.N. Sekar, Superintending Engineer and K.S. Sudhakar, Project
Coordinator, for assisting us with valuable information about the waste situation in India and
McKay Savage, Field Officer and International Coordinator, for proofreading our master’s
thesis.

Hydroair Tectonics, for your great hospitality during our stay in Mumbai. Thank you for the
opportunity to see your waste processing plant in Ichalkaranji and for letting us work at your
office.

R.Balasubramanian, Secretary, TNERC, for your hospitality and for sharing your knowledge
of the electricity system in Tamil Nadu. Dhenuka Srinivasan, Senior Consultant, Ernst &
Young, for your kindness and help with CDM. S. Balaji, Additional Chief Environmental
Engineer, TNPCB, for your valuable information regarding pollution control.

At last we would like to thank everyone in India and Sweden who took of their time to share
their knowledge with us and for making our stay in India unforgettable. Thank you!

Uppsala, May 2009.

Camilla Axelsson & Theres Kvarnström

5
6
Nomenclature
BFB Bubbling Fluidized Bed
BOOM Build, Own, Operate and Maintenance
CDM Clean Development Mechanism
CEA Central Electricity Authority
CER Certified Emission Reduction
CFB Circulating Fluidized Bed
CH4 Methane
CMDA Chennai Metropolitan Development Agency
CoC Corporation of Chennai
CO Carbon monoxide
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CO2 eq Carbon dioxide equivalent
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
DNA Designated National Authority
DOE Designated Operational Entity
DST Department of Science and Technologies
EB Executive Board
ENTEC Environment Technology
EU European Union
HCl Hydrogen chloride
HF Hydrogen fluoride
HgCl Mercury chloride
HHV Higher Heating Value
H2O Water
IET International Emission Trading
IPCC International Panel on Climate Change
IREDA Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency
LHV Lower Heating Value
MFS Minor Field Study
MNRE Ministry of New and Renewable Energy
MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forest
MoU Memorandum of Understanding
MoUD Ministry of Urban Development
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
MSWM Municipal Solid Waste Management
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NEERI National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
NOx Nitrogen oxides
O2 Oxygen
PCB Polychlorinated biphenyls
PCDD Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
PCDFs Polychlorinated dibenzofurans
PDD Project Development Document
PVC Polyvinyl chloride
RBI Reserve Bank of India
RDF Refuse Derived Fuel
RES Renewable Energy Sources
SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction

7
Sida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
SLF Sanitary Landfill
SNCR Selective Non Catalytic Reduction
SIPCOT State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu
SOx Sulphur oxides
SWM Solid Waste Management
TDB Technology Development Board
TEDA Tamil Nadu Energy Development
TNEB Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
TNERC Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission
TNPCB Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board
TPD Tons Per Day
UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
VER Voluntary Emission Reduction

8
List of Contents
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 15
1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 15
1.2 Objective ......................................................................................................................... 16
1.3 Expected result of the study ............................................................................................ 17
1.3.1 For whom is this report written?............................................................................... 17
1.4 Limitations ...................................................................................................................... 17
1.5 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 17
1.5.1 Description of the current and future waste and electricity situation in Chennai ..... 17
1.5.2 Setting up a waste-to energy plant ............................................................................ 18
1.5.3 The case for MSW incineration in Chennai ............................................................. 18
1.5.4 Exchange rate ........................................................................................................... 18
2 Solid waste management and electricity production in Chennai .......................................... 19
2.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 19
2.2 Solid waste generation .................................................................................................... 20
2.2.1 Industrial Waste ........................................................................................................ 20
2.2.2 Agricultural Waste .................................................................................................... 20
2.2.3 Hazardous Waste ...................................................................................................... 21
2.2.4 Bio-Medical Waste ................................................................................................... 21
2.2.5 E-Waste .................................................................................................................... 22
2.2.6 Construction and Demolition Waste......................................................................... 22
2.2.7 Municipal solid waste ............................................................................................... 22
2.3 Municipal solid waste management in Chennai ............................................................. 23
2.3.1 Governmental actors responsible for SWM ............................................................. 23
2.3.2 Local bodies responsible for SWM in Chennai ........................................................ 25
2.3.3 Collection and transportation of MSW ..................................................................... 26
2.3.4 Recycling .................................................................................................................. 29
2.3.5 MSW treatment......................................................................................................... 30
2.4 Environmental and health impacts of MSW treatment ................................................... 32
2.4.1 Environmental and health impacts of open dumping ............................................... 32
2.4.2 Environmental and health impacts of uncontrolled burning .................................... 33
2.5 Characteristics of MSW in Chennai................................................................................ 35
2.5.1 The Composition of MSW in Chennai ..................................................................... 35
2.5.2 Chemical characteristics of MSW ............................................................................ 37
2.5.3 Heating value ............................................................................................................ 37
2.5.4 Future waste characteristics ...................................................................................... 39
2.6 Electricity production in Chennai ................................................................................... 40
2.6.1 The electricity situation in Chennai .......................................................................... 40
2.6.2 Installed capacity of power stations in Tamil Nadu ................................................. 41
2.6.3 Future electricity production .................................................................................... 41
2.7 The current situation for MSW-to-energy ...................................................................... 42
2.7.1 Combustion ............................................................................................................... 42
2.7.2 Pyrolysis and gasification ......................................................................................... 44
2.7.3 Sanitary landfill with energy recovery ..................................................................... 44
2.7.4 Anaerobic biomethanation ........................................................................................ 45
2.7.5 MSW to products ...................................................................................................... 46
3 Future MSW-to-energy in Chennai ....................................................................................... 49
3.1 Hydroair Tectonics .......................................................................................................... 49
3.1.1 The processing plant ................................................................................................. 49

9
 3.1.2 MSW to products ...................................................................................................... 51
3.1.3 Sanitary landfill ........................................................................................................ 55
3.1.4 Leachate treatment .................................................................................................... 55
4 Setting up a waste-to-energy plant ........................................................................................ 57
4.1 Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 57
4.1.1 Emission standards ................................................................................................... 57
4.2 Funding for MSW-to-energy projects ............................................................................. 58
4.2.1 Support systems ........................................................................................................ 58
5 The case for MSW incineration in Chennai .......................................................................... 61
5.1 The case study ................................................................................................................. 61
5.1.1 Should there be mass burning of MSW or only combustion of the burnable fraction
of the MSW (the RDF)? .................................................................................................... 61
5.1.2 Who should process the waste and which methods should be used? ....................... 65
5.1.3 Where should the plant be situated? ......................................................................... 65
5.1.4 Should there be co-incineration with another fuel? In that case, which fuel is
suitable for co-incineration? .............................................................................................. 66
5.1.5 Which technology should be used for combustion and what type of flue gas
treatment should be used?.................................................................................................. 67
5.1.6 Which type of energy should be recovered? ............................................................ 70
5.2 Presentation of the case ................................................................................................... 71
5.2.1 Alternative case ........................................................................................................ 71
5.2.2 Problem formulation and system boundaries ........................................................... 72
5.3 Technical viability .......................................................................................................... 73
5.3.1 Specification of technology and parameters ............................................................. 73
5.3.2 Potential power generation ....................................................................................... 81
5.4 Financial viability ........................................................................................................... 87
5.4.1 Revenues ................................................................................................................... 87
5.4.2 Alternative cost ......................................................................................................... 89
5.4.3 Estimation of allowed plant cost .............................................................................. 89
5.4.4 Result ........................................................................................................................ 90
6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 93
7 Conclusive discussion ........................................................................................................... 95
7.1 Method criticism ............................................................................................................. 95
7.2 Source of errors ............................................................................................................... 96
7.3 Suggestions of further studies ......................................................................................... 96
8 References ............................................................................................................................. 97
8.1 Written references ........................................................................................................... 97
8.2 Personal communication ............................................................................................... 103
8.3 Picture Sources .............................................................................................................. 104

10
List of figures
Figure 1 Map of India. .............................................................................................................. 19
Figure 2 The zones of Chennai. ............................................................................................... 19
Figure 3 The biomethanation plant in Koyembedu wholesale market complex, Chennai....... 21
Figure 4 Zone wise garbage removal in Chennai. .................................................................... 23
Figure 5 The Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000. ..................................................... 24
Figure 6 Hierarchy of waste management. ............................................................................... 25
Figure 7 Neel Metal Fanalca's 4 zones. Modified from. .......................................................... 26
Figure 8 MSW collection scheme. ........................................................................................... 27
Figure 9 Bins used for segregation of waste. ........................................................................... 27
Figure 10 Indian street sweeper. .............................................................................................. 28
Figure 11 Transfer station. ....................................................................................................... 28
Figure 12 Tricycle collecting waste at door step (left) and compactor emptying a street bin
(right). ....................................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 13 Neel Metal Fanalca vehicle. ..................................................................................... 29
Figure 14 Perungudi dumpsite seen from outside. ................................................................... 31
Figure 15 Analysis of the composition of MSW in Chennai, made by the CoC (2003) and
NEERI (2006). ......................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 16 Analysis of the composition of organic matter in Chennai, made by the CoC 2003.
.................................................................................................................................................. 36
Figure 17 Analysis of the composition of the recyclable fraction in Chennai, made by NERRI
(2006). ...................................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 18 Installed capacity in Tamil Nadu, January 2009. ..................................................... 41
Figure 19 Estimated flowchart of the processing of waste at Perungudi dumpsite in Chennai.
.................................................................................................................................................. 50
Figure 20 Segregation unit for separation of the organic and inert components. .................... 51
Figure 21 Bioculture is sprayed on the windrows. ................................................................... 51
Figure 22 The compost ready to be sold to farmers. ................................................................ 52
Figure 23 The RDF processing machinery. ............................................................................. 53
Figure 24 Bailed RDF fluff. ..................................................................................................... 53
Figure 25 The mechanical processing of bricks. ...................................................................... 54
Figure 26 Bubling bluidized bed and circulating fluidized bed. .............................................. 69
Figure 27 The NID-system. ...................................................................................................... 70
Figure 28 The flow chart and the system boundaries of the case study. .................................. 72
Figure 29 Ecofluid bubbling fluidized bed with attaching parts. ............................................. 73
Figure 30 Alstom turbine. ........................................................................................................ 73
Figure 31 The Rankine cycle and T-s diagram. ....................................................................... 75
Figure 32 The dew point in Chennai through a year. ............................................................... 76
Figure 33 The steam process illustrated in a T-s diagram. ....................................................... 77
Figure 34 T-s diagram with two turbines. ................................................................................ 78
Figure 35 The steam cycle in scenario 2. ................................................................................. 79
Figure 36 Allowed plant costs for different payback times in million Rupees. ....................... 91

11
List of tables
Table 1 The exchange rate as on 31 July 2009......................................................................... 18
Table 2 Solid waste generation sources in Chennai. ................................................................ 20
Table 3 Market price for waste fractions. ................................................................................ 30
Table 4 Characteristics of Chennai´s two dumpsites. .............................................................. 31
Table 5 Description of how different emissions are created and their effect on the
environment and health. ........................................................................................................... 34
Table 6 Concentration of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in soil samples from Perungudi dumpsite and a
control site. ............................................................................................................................... 35
Table 7 Estimated intakes of PCDD/Fs for children and adults via soil ingestion and dermal
exposure. .................................................................................................................................. 35
Table 8 The chemical characteristics of the MSW in Chennai, based on analysis made by the
CoC (2003) and NEERI (2006). ............................................................................................... 37
Table 9 Tamil Nadu's power supply and peak demand in January 2009. ................................ 40
Table 10 Standard values of compost in India and specific values from the compost produced
in Ichalkaranji. .......................................................................................................................... 52
Table 11 Specific characteristics of RDF fluff. ........................................................................ 53
Table 12 The higher and lower heating value for RDF. ........................................................... 54
Table 13 Characteristics of RDF fluff and pellets. ................................................................... 54
Table 14 Standard for leachate treatment. ................................................................................ 55
Table 15 The emissions standards for waste incineration in India and Sweden. ..................... 58
Table 16 The average lower heating value of MSW and RDF in Chennai. ............................. 63
Table 17 The conditions for mass burning of MSW in Chennai compared to Sweden. .......... 64
Table 18 Characteristics of water in stage a in the Rankine cycle. .......................................... 76
Table 19 Characteristics of water in stage b in the Rankine cycle ........................................... 76
Table 20 Characteristics of saturated vapour in stage c in the Rankine cycle. ........................ 77
Table 21 Characteristics of the wet vapour in stage d in the Rankine cycle. ........................... 78
Table 22 Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LTd's steam requirements. ........................... 79
Table 23 The two extra stages in the steam cycle. ................................................................... 79
Table 24 Boiler efficiency. ....................................................................................................... 81
Table 25 Fuel specifications for scenarios 1 and 2. ................................................................. 81
Table 26 Parameters in the Rankine cycle. .............................................................................. 81
Table 27 The estimated technical parameters. ......................................................................... 87
Table 28 Revenues from scenarios 1 and 2. ............................................................................. 87
Table 29 The potential revenues from CERs. .......................................................................... 89
Table 30 The known revenues and costs for the plant. ............................................................ 90
Table 31 Allowed plant costs for different payback times. ...................................................... 90

12
List of boxes
Box 1 Estimation of the heating value of MSW in Chennai .................................................... 39
Box 2 Mass burning plant in Timarpur, New Delhi ................................................................. 43
Box 3 RDF plants in Hyderabad and Vijayawada ................................................................... 44
Box 4 Biomethanation plant in Lucknow ................................................................................ 46
Box 5 Estimation of the price for land to build a waste-to-energy plant ................................. 59
Box 6 Strengths and weaknesses with mass burning of MSW ................................................ 62
Box 7 Moving grate and fluidized bed - Strength and weakness ............................................. 68
Box 8 Fluidized bed ................................................................................................................. 69
Box 9 The NID-system ............................................................................................................ 70
Box 10 The Rankine cycle ....................................................................................................... 75
Box 11 Calculations of the enthalpy after the turbine. ............................................................. 78
Box 12 Calculation of the enthalpy before the boiler in the presence of a preheater .............. 80
Box 13 The fuel power of the plant in scenario 1 .................................................................... 82
Box 14 The fuel power of the plant in scenario 2 .................................................................... 82
Box 15 The steam flow in scenarios 1 and 2............................................................................ 83
Box 16 Calculation of the electric efficiency in scenario 1 ..................................................... 83
Box 17 Calculations of the electric and thermal efficiencies in scenario 2 ............................. 84
Box 18 The potential electric power in scenario 1 ................................................................... 85
Box 19 The potential electric and thermal power in scenario 2 ............................................... 86
Box 20 The power that needs to be cooled in scenarios 1 and 2 .............................................. 86
Box 21 The revenues from selling electricity and process steam ............................................ 88

13
List of appendices
Appendix 1 The ownership of the power stations in India .................................................... 107
Appendix 2 Annual waste dumped in Chennai ...................................................................... 108
Appendix 3 Carbon content of MSW in Chennai .................................................................. 109
Appendix 4 The total methane emission in Chennai .............................................................. 110
Appendix 5 Calculations of the carbon dioxide emissions from open dumping in Chennai . 112
Appendix 6 Characteristics of the waste in Chennai analysed by the CoC and NEERI ........ 114
Appendix 7 Regulatory systems for setting up an incineration plant in India ....................... 115
Appendix 8 Example of suitable technology with price estimations ..................................... 116
Appendix 9 Clean Development Mechanism ......................................................................... 119
Appendix 10 Revenues from CDM in scenarios 1 and 2 ....................................................... 124
Appendix 11 MSW management in developed countries ...................................................... 129
Appendix 12 Technologies for treating MSW ....................................................................... 136
Appendix 13 Dioxins ............................................................................................................. 145

14
1 Introduction
Solid Waste Management (SWM) is one of the most essential functions of the local
authorities in India to achieve a sustainable development in the country. Nevertheless, it has
also been one of the least prioritized services during the last decades.

The largest part of the solid waste generated is Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), which is waste
generated from the households and commercial establishments. The rapid urbanization and
the economical development in India during the last years have resulted in an increase in
MSW generation. The local authorities have had problems keeping in pace with the growing
problems with MSW, resulting in overfilled dumpsites and uncontrolled burning. Since India
has 18 percent of the world’s population [4], but only 2 percent of the world’s total land area
[5], the problem becomes even more urgent.

When waste is not treated properly, the environmental and health impacts can be disastrous.
Today, India is one of the world’s largest methane emitters from solid waste disposal. Since
methane is an aggressive greenhouse gas, it will affect global warming on a large scale. A
functional SWM is also necessary to prevent the spreading of diseases and improve the
standard of living of people. Every year thousands of people die in India of water borne
diseases, caused by lack of sanitation. [6]

Another result from the rapid industrialization is the increased demand for electricity. Today
India suffers major problems with shortage of electricity which results in daily power cuts all
throughout India. In some cities these power cuts could last for hours leading to disturbances
in the daily routines and productivity losses.

Chennai is the fourth largest city in India, with a population of 4.3 million (2001 census). [47]
Like most of the municipalities in India today, the corporation of Chennai experiences
difficulties handling the problems related to SWM and shortage of electricity. The two
dumpsites in the city are overfilled and the environmental and health effects of the
mistreatment of waste during the past have started to get more noticeable.

The last decade’s pressure from the government of India with stricter regulations and
standards concerning SWM has forced the municipalities to more actively work towards a
change. What many municipalities advocate for future waste management is a solution that
minimizes the waste going to the dumpsite and at the same time generates energy. Such
solution is often referred to as an MSW-to-energy solution.

1.1 Background
This master’s thesis is a Minor Field Study (MFS), which is a scholarship program for field
studies in developing countries, funded by the Swedish International Development
Cooperation Agency (Sida). The project is carried out on behalf of Borlänge Energy, which is
an energy producing company situated in Borlänge, Sweden. They provide the city of
Borlänge with electricity and district heating from an MSW-to-energy facility.

Borlänge Energy has been involved in several projects on sustainable development in

developing countries during the past years. Since Borlänge Energy is a municipal owned
company, their involvement is not based on potential financial profits. The only finance for
these projects is subsidies from Sida. Borlänge Energy’s engagement reflects the culture of

15
the city and creates working opportunities for the citizens involved in these projects, which is
the main incentive.

Borlänge Energy’s engagement in India started with cooperation with the non-governmental
organisation (NGO), Hand in Hand, situated in Chennai. Hand in Hand is an international
organisation involved in many projects concerning sustainable development, including solid
waste management. This cooperation enables Hand in Hand to get funding for their projects
from Sida. Because of the fact that the engagement in India is relatively new, Borlänge
Energy requested a pre-study of the current waste situation in 2008, in order to determine the
feasibility for an MSW-to-energy project. Since Borlänge Energy has several years of
experience from producing energy from waste, they could assist with technology transfer and
know-how, if a future waste-to-energy project would be carried out in Chennai.

During the fieldwork in Chennai it became clear that one company had signed contract to take
care of a large part of the MSW in Chennai. The company’s name is Hydroair Tectonics Ltd
and is situated in Mumbai. Most likely, they will also take care of the other part of the MSW
in Chennai in the nearest future. Since their waste treatment methods were in line with
Borlänge Energy’s beliefs of sustainable waste management, the study changed focus and
started to see the possibilities of cooperating with this company.

The cooperation between Borlänge Energy and Hydroair Tectonics started successfully. A
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the two companies was signed in October
2008. An MoU is a non-binding document that can be signed between organizations to
facilitate sharing of information and technology. One of the purposes with this agreement is
for Borlänge Energy to provide Hydroair Tectonics with technical knowledge, regarding
energy recovery from waste. Since the head of international projects at Borlänge Energy,
Ronny Arnberg, also is the chairman of the board in the international group at the Swedish
trade association Swedish Waste Management (Avfall Sverige), the cooperation has now
expanded to include even this association. Recently it was decided that the Swedish Waste
Management will be partner with Hydroair Tectonics in an upcoming project funded by Sida.

1.2 Objective
The aim with this master’s thesis is to do a feasibility study about the possibility to recover
energy from MSW in Chennai, with focus on combustion. In order to evaluate the feasibility
for building a combustion unit, the current waste and electricity situation in Chennai as well
as the future MSW treatment plans are analysed. This information will be used to formulate a
case study, in which the following questions are answered:

1. Should there be mass burning of MSW or only combustion of the burnable fraction of
the MSW (RDF)?
2. Who should process the waste and which methods should be used?
3. Where should the plant be situated?
4. Should there be co-incineration with another fuel? In that case, which fuel is suitable
for co-incineration?
5. Which technology should be used for combustion and what type of flue gas treatment
should be used?
6. Which type of energy should be recovered?

16
When the case is formulated the technical and financial viability are analysed. The possible
energy extracted from the plant is determined as well as the plant cost.

1.3 Expected result of the study

The study will result in an informative and analysing report of the current and future MSW
situation in Chennai. It is meant to serve as informative material for those people interested in
learning more about the MSW and electricity situation in Chennai as well as guidelines for
future MSW management.

1.3.1 For whom is this report written?

This master’s thesis is written on behalf of Borlänge Energy. It is written for decision makers,
NGO’s and private companies who might be involved in future MSW management in
Chennai.

Since this report assumes that the Indian company Hydroair Tectonics will play an important
role in future MSW management, the result of the case study is especially interesting for
them.

1.4 Limitations
 MSW stands for the largest part of the waste generated in Chennai and causes difficult
problems for the municipality. Therefore, the focus will be on energy recovery from
MSW and not other waste types.
 Energy recovery from MSW can be achieved through different technologies such as
biomethanation, gasification and combustion. Due to the fact that combustion has been
proven successful in many developed countries and that it is an efficient method to
reduce the volume of the waste, this study will focus on energy recovery from
combustion.
 In the case study, only the technical and financial viability will be covered. The
environmental gains from improving the waste situation in Chennai will not be
evaluated, except from the carbon dioxide reductions, which will result in Certified
Emission Reductions (CERs) and thereby give financial revenues.

1.5 Methodology
The information in this master’s thesis is obtained through interviews, study visits and
literature studies. The methodologies used for the three main sections are described below as
well as the exchange rates used in this report.

1.5.1 Description of the current and future waste and electricity situation
in Chennai
In this section the current and future waste and electricity situation in Chennai is described.
To be able to get an overview of the waste and electricity situation, several interviews with
companies, institutions and governmental actors involved in solid waste management in
Chennai were made.

17
The information about future MSW management in Chennai was given by the company
Hydroair Tectonics, since they are going to take care of at least half of the generated MSW in
Chennai in the near future. A study visit to one of Hydroair Tectonics MSW treatment plants
in Ichalkaranji, together with interviews and work at their head office in Mumbai made it
possible to thoroughly analyse their treatment methods.

1.5.2 Setting up a waste-to energy plant

This chapter gives an overview of the regulations and support systems that need to be
considered when setting up a waste-to-energy plant in India. The information is given by
interviews.

1.5.3 The case for MSW incineration in Chennai

In this chapter, the case study is presented and the technical and financial viability is analysed.
The presentation of the case is based on analysis of the information given in the sections
above.

In the technical viability analyses, the potential energy that can be extracted from the plant is
calculated. The methods used for the calculations are based on literature studies and known
equations. In the technical viability analysis it is assumed that the company Hydroair
Tectonics and the industry Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd will cooperate and
exchange energy/fuel. Therefore this section is based on data from these two companies.
Furthermore, standard values from Borlänge Energy’s waste-to-energy facility are used.

In the financial viability analysis, an estimation of the maximum plant cost for the project is
made, in order for the project to be profitable. The calculations are based on the possible
revenues from the plant and on the alternative costs for not building the plant. These data
were obtained from interviews and Internet sources.

1.5.4 Exchange rate

The financial calculations are based on the exchange rate on the 31 July 2009, given in Table
1. [43]

Table 1 The exchange rate as on 31 July 2009.

United States Dollar Indian Rupee Euro Swedish Krona
USD INR EUR SEK
1 48.1 0.707 7.31

18
2 Solid waste management and electricity production in
Chennai
This chapter will give an overview of SWM in Chennai, with extra focus on management of
MSW. The electricity situation will be described as well as the current and future situation
concerning energy recovery from MSW.

2.1 Background
Chennai lies on India’s southeast coast and is the capital of the state Tamil Nadu. Figure 1
shows Chennai´s location. [155] Chennai district borders to Tiruvallur in the north and
Kancheepuram in the south, both within Tamil Nadu. The population of the city is 4.3 million
(2001 census), which makes it the fourth largest city in India. [47]

The English language is widely spoken in Chennai along CHINA

with the local language Tamil. PAKISTAN

The city is known for its many IT and automobile New NEPAL
Delhi
manufacturing industries. Many foreign and national
companies are located in large industrial areas in and in the
INDIA
outskirt of the city. [52]

Chennai has a hot and humid climate with a maximum

temperature of 38-42 degree Celsius in June and a Chennai
minimum temperature of 18-20 degree Celsius in January. Tami Nadu State
The annual monsoon season is between mid-September and SRI LANKA
mid-December, which is when Chennai get its most Figure
Figur 11Map
MapofofIndia.
India.[IN]
[155]
rainfall. [52]

The municipality of Chennai is divided into 10 administrative zones, as can be seen in Figure
2. Each zone is further divided into 15 wards, which totally
gives 150 wards. The Corporation of Chennai (CoC) is the
local elected government in Chennai. [46] The CoC
provides Chennai with water supply, education, health care,
water drainage, electricity and solid waste management.
[49]

The department of Solid waste management (SWM) at CoC

takes care of all the handling of solid waste, from generation
to final disposal. Like many municipalities in India, the CoC
experiences a hard time handling the growing problem of
waste. The insufficient management in Chennai during the
past has put strain on the environment and peoples’ health
and the CoC has a heavy burden to carry on their shoulder
to try to improve the system.
Figure 2 The zones of Chennai. [160]

19
2.2 Solid waste generation
The solid waste in Chennai can be divided into the following categories: industrial waste,
agricultural waste, hazardous waste, bio-medical waste, e-waste, construction and demolition
waste and MSW. A study performed in 1996 by Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority (CMDA) in collaboration with the World Bank shows that the residences are the
largest generator of solid waste in Chennai [54], which can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2 Solid waste generation sources in Chennai. [54]

Solid waste generation source [%]
Residences 68
Commercial buildings 14
Restaurants, Hotels, Schools and other 11
Markets 4
Hospitals and Clinics (collected separately) 3
Total 100

The following section will shortly explain the different types of waste in Chennai.

2.2.1 Industrial Waste

Industrial waste is unwanted material from an industrial operation. It may be liquid, sludge,
solid or hazardous waste. [55]

One of the largest industrial areas in Chennai is called Manali and is situated in the northern
suburb in the Tiruvallur district. Major chemical industries are situated in this area,
particularly petrochemical industries. [129]

No figures exist about how much industrial waste is generated every day in Chennai. The
industries are themselves responsible for taking care of their waste. The industries often have
private scrap dealers collecting their recyclable waste. The scrap dealers buy the waste from
the industries and sell it to manufacturing industries that recycle the material. [121]

2.2.2 Agricultural Waste

Agricultural waste is waste produced as a result of various agricultural operations. It includes
manure, harvest waste and other wastes from farms, poultry and slaughter houses. [56]

Within the ten zones of Chennai there is no land for agricultural purposes. Yet in the nearby
districts in Tamil Nadu there are areas used for agricultural operations. The interesting crops
for cultivation here are paddy, ground nut, prosopis juliflora and sugarcanes. [130]

In Tamil Nadu there are agricultural waste-to-energy projects from combustion, gasification
and biomethanation. There are nine combustion power plants, that together stand for 109
MW. There is one gasification plant (1 MW) and two biomethanation plants; one that uses
vegetable waste (0.25 MW) and one that uses poultry litter waste (4 MW). [130]

20
 Figure 3 shows a 0.25 MW
biomethanation plant that was set
up at the Koyembedu wholesale
market complex in September
2005. Around 100 tons of
vegetable waste reaches the plant
every day. [54] The plant is
unique in India in the way that it
produces electricity only from
vegetable waste, no leather or
other animal waste. [131]

Figure 3 The biomethanation plant in Koyembedu wholesale

market complex, Chennai. [57]

2.2.3 Hazardous Waste

Hazardous waste is waste that can cause significant damage to environment and human health
if it is not treated properly. [54]

During a long period of time the industries in Chennai disposed their hazardous waste
together with the MSW on roadsides and in low-lying areas, as there was no infrastructure
available. As an attempt to solve this problem the Supreme Court created the Hazardous
Waste Handling Rules 1989, which forced the state governments to provide infrastructure
such as landfills for disposal and treatment of hazardous waste. [54]

For fifteen years Tamil Nadu Government violated these rules allowing industrial expansion
without taking any measurements for the hazardous waste generated. The proposal from
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), to establish common treatment storage and
disposal facility for hazardous waste, became a difficult issue because of the public opinion
that the nearby land and the groundwater would be polluted. Threatened by pressure from the
Supreme Court, the Tamil Nadu Government finally selected Gummidipoondi in the
Tiruvallur district for the treatment site. [58]

In January 2006 the work on a treatment facility in Gummidipoondi started, despite massive
public opposition. The facility is situated on a 40 acre big area and consists of a sanitary
landfill and an incinerator. [58]

2.2.4 Bio-Medical Waste

Bio-medical waste means any waste, which is generated during the diagnosis treatment of
immunization of human beings or animals in research activities or in the production or testing
of medication. [59]

Bio-medical waste is waste generated from healthcare centres. The 528 hospitals in Chennai
city generate about 12 000 kg of bio-medical waste per day. It is considered hazardous firstly
for its potential for infection and secondly for its ingredients of antibiotics, cytotoxic drugs,
corrosive chemicals and radioactive substances. [54] According to the Bio-Medical Waste
(Management and Handling) Rules, 1998, bio- waste needs to be treated in certain facilities.
[60] Two sites were chosen by TNPCB for location of common treatment and disposal of

21
biomedical waste from hospitals in Chennai and the nearby districts. They are situated in
Thenmelpakkam and Chennakuppan in the Kancheepuram district. [54] The main processes
in these facilities are incineration and autoclaving.1 [61]

2.2.5 E-Waste
E-waste is the informal name of electronic products nearing the end of their useful life.
Products such as mobile phones, computers, refrigerators etc fall under this category. [132]

E-waste contains over a thousand different substances, many of which are toxic to
environment and human health. One of the primary sources of e-waste in Chennai is computer
waste from the many western IT companies which have been established in the southern parts
of the city.

Today there are no specific guidelines or environmental laws for e-waste in India. Since it is
considered both “hazardous” and “non-hazardous” it falls under the Hazardous Waste
Management Rules, 2003. [62] Thus, the creation of new guidelines for handling e-waste is in
progress by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), which most likely will be
transformed into environmental laws later. [132]

TNPCB has authorized seven e-waste recycling industries, which receive e-waste scrap from
industries in Tamil Nadu. They use mechanical tools to break the scrap and then manually
segregate it into different components for recycling. The scrap is segregated into plastic
components, glass, ferrous and non-ferrous material. Some of the components are not suitable
for this process and are therefore exported to reprocessing facilities in Belgium, Singapore,
Hong Kong, China and Taiwan for metal recovery. [54]

However there are informal scrap dealers and recyclers in residential areas in Chennai and in
the outskirts of the city. With small tools and crude methods they manually sort out valuable
materials from the scrap. In order to segregate aluminium from the e-waste they often burn
the waste, which causes toxic air pollution. [54]

2.2.6 Construction and Demolition Waste

Construction and demolition waste is waste from building materials debris and debris
resulting from construction, re-modelling, repair and demolition operations. [63]

Every day Chennai city generates around 500 tons of construction and demolition waste.
There are a few sites identified by the CoC, where the generators of this waste can dump their
waste, as well as collect the waste if they want to use the material for landfilling etc. This
system does not work perfectly and it exists unauthorized dumping of construction debris
along certain roads. [54]

2.2.7 Municipal solid waste

MSW includes residential and commercial waste generated in a municipal area, excluding
industrial hazardous waste but including bio-medical waste. [63]

1
Autoclaving is a process of killing pathogenic microorganisms through saturation with steam under pressure.
[42]

22
Low-income countries like India produce approximately 0.4-0.9 kg waste per person and day,
while the waste generation rate in high-income countries ranges from 1.1-5 kg per person and
day. [7] The average waste generation in Chennai is estimated to be 585 gram per person and
day, which is the highest per capita generation of all cities in India [64] [54]. The population
in Chennai 2008 was 5.03 million according to CMDA and the total amount of solid waste
collected per day was 3400 tons [54]. Zones 10 and 5 are the largest zones by area but zones 5
and 8 generate the highest amount of waste which is shown in Figure 4.

600

500

400

300

200 t/day

100

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zone
R
Figure 4 Zone wise garbage removal in Chennai. [128]

2.3 Municipal solid waste management in Chennai

The following text will explain the role of the governmental actors and the different aspects of
MSWM in Chennai.

2.3.1 Governmental actors responsible for SWM

In India it is the local bodies that have the overall responsibilities for SWM in each city.
Unfortunately, the municipal laws regarding SWM do not have adequate provision do deal
effectively with the problems of solid waste in India today. [9] However, governmental actors
provide the local bodies with certain directives and guidelines how the MSW should be
handled. The governmental actors that are responsible for SWM are the Ministry for
Environment and Forest (MoEF), Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the Ministry of
New and Renewable Energy (MNER) and the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD). [10]

2.3.1.1 The Ministry for Environment and Forest

The principle activities of the Ministry for Environment and Forest (MoEF) consist of
protection of the environment in the form of legislations. This includes conservation of flora,
fauna, forest and wildlife as well as control and prevention of pollution. MoEF created the
Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000. [13]

Figure 5 illustrates the Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000, in the form of Schedule
(I-IV). Below each schedule there are specifications, standards and procedure descriptions
how MSW should be handled. [20] The responsibility for the implementation of the
Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000, lies within every municipality. [19]

23
Schedule-I Relates to implementation Schedule
Schedule-II Specifications relating to collection, segregation, storage, transportation, processing
and disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW).

Schedule-III Specifications for landfilling indicating; site selection, facilities at the site,
specifications for landfilling, pollution prevention, water quality monitoring, ambient
air quality monitoring, plantation at landfill site, closure of landfill site and post care.

Schedule-IV Indicate waste processing options including; standards for composting, treated
leachates and incinerations
Figure 5 The Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000. [157]

2.3.1.2 Central Pollution Control Board

Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) is together with the State Pollution Control Boards
responsible for the implementation and review of the standards and guidelines described in
the Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000. They shall make sure that the monitored data
will be in compliance with the standards specified under Schedules II, III and IV. [19] In
Tamil Nadu it is the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB), which has the
responsibility on state level.

CPCB advises the Central Government on any matter concerning the improvement of the
quality of air and prevention and control of air and water pollution. If a company wants to set
up a facility that will cause pollution, it needs to get clearance from CPCB. [22]

2.3.1.3 The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) is responsible for both renewable
energies and new fossil fuel technologies. Its main objectives regarding MSW management
are

 to accelerate the promotion for MSW-to-energy projects

 to create favourable conditions with financial regime, to develop and demonstrate the
viability of recovering energy from waste
 to realize the available potential of MSW-to-energy by the year 2017 [8]

Tamil Nadu Energy Development Agency (TEDA) implements The Ministry of New and
Renewable Energy’s (MNRE’s) goals and visions on state level. They encourage research and
development on renewable energy sources and implement such projects within Tamil Nadu as
well as distribute subsidies to the projects. [89] TEDA promotes mainly four renewable
energy sources: wind, biomass, solar energy and energy recovery from waste. [130]

2.3.1.4 The Ministry of Urban Development

The Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) created the solid waste management manual,
which serves as guidelines for the municipalities to handle their work more efficiently. It also
provides the municipalities with technical guidelines on aspects of solid waste management.
[10]

The urban local bodies, which are responsible for the SWM in each city, often lack adequate
knowledge and expertise to deal efficiently with the problems of waste management. As an
attempt to improve the situation, the MoUD decided in 1998 to create a solid waste

24
management manual. The manual serves as guidelines for the urban local bodies to handle
their work more efficiently. [15]

According to the solid waste management manual, the best method to deal with waste in India
is to adapt the “hierarchy of waste management”. This method is known throughout the world
as a sustainable solution for the growing problem of solid waste. Figure 6 shows the hierarchy
as it is described in the solid waste management manual.

Most prefered

Minimisation

Recycling

Processing
Recycling
Transformation
Least prefered
Disposal on land

Figure 6 Hierarchy of waste management. [15]

1. Waste minimisation/reduction at source means that the waste is prevented from

entering the waste stream by the means of reusing products and using less material for
manufacturing them.
2. Recycling means the act of sorting out recyclable materials like plastic, glass, metals
and paper from the waste and reprocessing them into new products.
3. Waste processing includes biological and thermal processing and can result in useful
products like energy and compost.
a) Biological processing includes composting and biomethanation.
b) Thermal processing includes combustion, pyrolysis and gasification.
4. Waste transformation (without recovery of resources) is for example combustion
without energy recovery. Mechanical decomposition and autoclaving fall under this
category.
5. Disposal on land (landfilling) should be the solution only if the waste cannot be
treated with the four previous methods. The landfills should be designed to minimize
the impact on the environment. [15]

2.3.2 Local bodies responsible for SWM in Chennai

In each state in India it is the local urban bodies that are responsible for solid waste
management. They can choose if they want to have full responsibility of SWM in the
community or outsource some of the responsibility to private contractors. In many cities in
India there are also NGOs or other welfare organizations helping with SWM. This section will
describe the different actors responsible for SWM in Chennai.

25
2.3.2.1 The CoC and private contractors
The overall responsibility of SWM in Chennai lies within the Solid Waste Management
Department in the CoC. 7 percent of the CoC’s total budget is allotted to this specific
department. Each zone has an assistant commissioner responsible for the SWM in the
corresponding zone. Yet, during the last decades the CoC has experienced difficulties keeping
SWM at a good level, especially regarding MSWM. Therefore, the CoC has since a couple of
years outsourced some of the collection and transportation of the MSW to private contractors.
[64]

Chennai was the first city in India to outsource SWM to a

private company. For seven years a Singaporean based
company ONYX was responsible for sweeping, collecting,
storing and transporting MSW in zone 6, 8 and 10, and to
create public awareness in these zones. In 2007 the private
company Neel Metal Fanalca replaced ONYX in the three
zones. In July 2008 a fourth zone was privatised; zone 3, which
is included in Neel Metal Fanalca’s responsibility. [64] The
privatised zones are seen in figure 7.

Neel Metal Fanalca is a joint venture between Fanalca SA of

Columbia and JBM Group of India. Fanalca SA of Columbia
has 20 years of experience in SWM and operates in Colombia,
Panama, Chile, Venezuela and now India. [65]

The waste collection by the private company is more efficient

due to more machines and less manpower. The total cost for
street sweeping, collection and transporting of waste by the
CoC is $33 per ton compared to $25 per ton by the private
company. [64] According to R Umapathy, head of the waste
management department at CoC, the CoC currently prefers a Figure 7 In the four zones
50-50 distribution between private and governmental collection marked, SWM is outsourced to
to balance efficiency versus unemployment. [128] the private company Neel Metal
Fanalca. [65]
2.3.2.2 NGOs and welfare associations
NGOs and welfare associations have a significant role in the SWM in Chennai. In some areas
they assist the CoC with collection of the waste at household level. Civic Exnora is an
international NGO funded in Chennai and active on grass root level. They educate households
in recycling and reusing waste as well as motivate communities to work towards Zero Waste.
Another NGO in Chennai, Hand in Hand, employs former ragpickers to a low, but stable
monthly salary. [64]

2.3.3 Collection and transportation of MSW

The collection and transportation of waste are similar in all zones, regardless if it is the
government or the private company who is responsible. Both of them need to follow the
Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000. The structure of the transportation and collection
system is described in this section.

26
2.3.3.1 Structure of collection and transportation
The collection and transportation of the waste is made in two different ways depending on
how the waste is generated. Household waste is collected through door-to-door collection
with tricycles. Waste thrown on the streets is collected through street bin collection with
compactors. [128] The collection efficiency in Chennai is 73 percent, which means that 73
percent of all the MSW in Chennai is collected and transported to a final disposal. [76] A
schematic view over Chennai’s MSW collection and transportation is seen in Figure 8.

Municipal Solid Waste Collection

Door-to-door Collection Street Sweeping

Street Bins Collection

Collection Point

Recyclable Material

Transfer Station

Dumpsite

Figure 8 MSW collection scheme. [128]

 Door-to-door collection: Tricycles collect the

waste from bins outside the households. These
bins are emptied in larger bins placed on the
tricycle. The households are supposed to
segregate their domestic waste into two different
bins, the organic waste in green bins and the
recyclable waste in red bins. The bins are shown
in figure 9. The tricycle then has corresponding
red and green bins for the collected waste. This
is however not totally implemented in Chennai
at the moment. Few households have two
Figure 9 Bins used for segregation of
waste. [39]
27
 different bins. Nevertheless, the future goal is to implement two parallel waste
streams, one organic and one inorganic. [128]

 Street sweeping: Street sweeping has become

the principal method of primary collection in
Chennai and other cities in India. [9] The
street sweepers use short brooms to clear the
streets from waste which then is put in bins
along the roadsides. [39] Figure 10 shows an
Indian street sweeper.

 Street bins collection: Compactors collect the Figure 10 Indian street sweeper. [156]
waste from the street bins. After the
collection, the compactors transport the waste to a collection point, a transfer station or
the dumpsite depending on which is closest. [128]

 Collection point: If the distance to the transfer station is far, the tricycles and
compactors leave the waste at a collection point. At the collection point recyclable
material such as plastic, paper and metal is segregated, often by ragpickers. The
recyclable material is then sold to private scrap dealers. From the collection point,
compactors transport the remaining waste to a transfer station. [64]

 Transfer station: At the transfer station

machines lift the waste from the compactors
or tricycles to a heavy vehicle, a four-wheel-
drive lorry, which can be seen in figure 11.
The Lorry transports the waste to a dumpsite
for final disposal. Chennai has totally eight
transfer stations, each for one zone, except
for zones 6 and 10 that share transfer station.
Zone 1 lies very close to Kodungaiyur
dumpsite and therefore has neither collection
point nor transfer station. [64] Figure 11 Transfer station. [65]

2.3.3.2 Collection and Transportation by the CoC

The CoC is responsible for the collection of MSW in zones 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9. The CoC has
9700 workers employed to handle the MSW in these six zones, most of whom are street
sweepers. [128] The CoC’s vehicles are coloured red, green and yellow. The tricycle used for
door-to-door collection and the compactor can be seen in figure 12.

28
Figure 12 Tricycle collecting waste at door step (left) and compactor emptying a street bin (right). [128]

2.3.3.3 Collection and Transportation by Neel Metal Fanalca

Neel Metal Fanalca is responsible for the waste
in the remaining four zones, except for
demolition and construction waste and drainage
water. 2700 people are employed by Neel Metal
Fanalca to handle SWM in these four zones. The
vehicles are white with a green leaf and marked
Neel Metal Fanalca. [65] Figure 13
shows one of Neel Metal Fanalca’s vehicles.

Figure 13 Neel Metal Fanalca vehicle. [161]

2.3.4 Recycling
The CoC does not have a formal recycling program, whereas Neel Metal Fanalca recycles
parts of their waste at their transfer stations. However, the informal sector takes care of the
largest part of the recycling activities. This sector has formed a wide network with different
hierarchical levels. Ragpickers, the lowest standing in this hierarchy, collect recyclable
material in the streets, at collection points, transfer stations and dumpsites. [54] They sell the
recyclable material to private dealers, who sell it to the recycling industry. This chapter will
give an overview of recycling activities by Neel Metal Fanalca and recycling by the informal
sector, in the form of ragpickers.

2.3.4.1 Recycling in the formal sector

Neel Metal Fanalca has employees working at the transfer stations to segregate the valuable
material from the waste. The recycled fractions are sold to fixed prices shown in table 3.

29
Table 3 Market price for waste fractions. [133]
Waste fractions [Rs./kg] [$]
Plastic 13 0.27
Glass 1.5 0.031
Paper 3.5 0.073
Liquor bottles (coloured) 3 0.062
Liquor bottles (white) 11 0.23
Metal 7 0.15
Plastic bottles 11 0.23

Neel Metal Fanalca’s vision is to segregate everything except the inert material. To be able to
fulfil this goal, the public awareness has to increase. The segregation has to start at household
level with segregation of organic and non-organic waste into separate bins. This is planned to
be achieved through education campaigns to politicians, schools and people through public
meetings. [133]

2.3.4.2 Ragpickers
About one fourth of the population in India live under the poverty line, which means that they
have less than $1 per day per person. [2] For some of these people MSW becomes a source of
income by recycling and reusing the waste. A large amount of the MSW generated is recycled
through ragpickers. It is one of the poorest and marginalized groups of people in India. They
are neither employed by the CoC nor do they get regular salaries. Because of this they are
referred to as the informal sector. Nevertheless, they have a significant role in Chennai’s
MSWM. Each day ragpickers recycle approximately 400 tons of Chennai’s MSW and thereby
they reduce the transportation cost for the CoC. [54]

Since MSW contains hazardous waste including medical waste, the ragpickers are exposed to
safety and health risks while walking around and segregating waste without any safety
equipment. Ragpickers are not included in the general laws concerning employment, and
therefore, will not get any help on the occasion of illness or accidents. [66]

Ragpickers scavenge for recyclable material such as paper, plastic, glass and metal. Each
kilogram segregated waste is sold to waste dealers for a few rupees. Their daily income
reaches from Rs. 40 to 100 ($0.83-$2.10). [67] The most valuable material is metal. In order
to segregate the metals from the waste the ragpickers have historically started fires on the
dumpsite. Burning of waste releases toxic compounds to the air, which cause health risks for
the surrounding people. As an attempt to solve the problem the CoC decided in 2008 to ban
the ragpickers from entering to the dumpsite. This decision has changed the livelihood for
about 300 rag-picking families in Chennai and many of them are on the verge of starvation.
[69]

2.3.5 MSW treatment

Today the management of MSW is going through a difficult phase in metropolitan cities
because of the unavailability of facilities to treat and dispose the waste generated. The most
common methods for treating MSW today in India are uncontrolled burning and unscientific
disposal on open dumpsites.

30
The uncontrolled burning of waste is performed by locals in alleys in the city and in rural
areas where MSWM is poorly developed. Furthermore, it is performed at dumpsites by
ragpickers as a way to segregate the valuable metals from the waste.

In contrast to scientific landfills, open dumpsites do not have any collection of leachate water
or capture of landfill gas, i.e. methane gas, neither do they use inert material to cover the
waste. A description of the two dumpsites in Chennai is given in this section as well as future
plans for MSW disposal.

2.3.5.1 Dumpsites in Chennai

At present, Chennai has two open dumpsites, Perungudi in the south and Kodungaiyur in the
north, both of which are uncontrolled. These dumpsites are placed on marshy land, which
used to be aquifers and bird sanctuaries. [37]

The northern zones dump their waste at Kodungaiyur dumpsite, which represent about half of
the total amount of waste generated in Chennai. The other half comes from the southern zones
and is dumped at Perungudi dumpsite. The characteristics of the two dumping grounds can be
seen in table 4.

Table 4 Characteristics of Chennai´s two dumpsites. [70]

Dumping ground Kodungaiyur Perungudi
North of Chennai (within South of Chennai
Location
the city) in zone 1 (outside the city)
Opening year 1980 1968
Neighbourhood within [km] 1 0.5
Daily Waste disposed [tons/day] 1400-1500 1500-1800
Disposal by [zones] 1-5 6-10
Area of disposal [ha] 140 80
Average height [m] 5 3.2

When the sun heats the glass material among the waste, the waste around get heated up which
eventually starts small fires, as seen in figure 14. [120]

Figure 14 Perungudi dumpsite seen from outside. The second figure illustrates smoke from fires caused by
glass material at the dumpsite [161]

31
2.3.4.4 Future MSW disposal
CMDA has not yet identified a new landfill site for future MSW disposal. The CoC is going
to optimize and modernize the two existing dumpsites as well as minimize the waste going
there, by processing and segregation (see chapter 5 for further description of future MSWM).
This will extend the lifespan of the two existing dumpsites with 50-100 years according to
CMDA. [135]

2.4 Environmental and health impacts of MSW treatment

Unscientific dumping and open burning are the least preferred treatments for MSW, causing
severe environmental and health related problems. The following text will give an overview
of how the MSWM in Chennai has affected the citizens and the surrounding environment.

2.4.1 Environmental and health impacts of open dumping

Because of the shortage of land in urban areas in India, areas not suitable for any other
purposes are often chosen as dumpsites. Hence, these areas are often inappropriate for waste
disposal. This is also the case in Chennai, where both the dumpsites are placed on marshland.
This facilitates the spreading of toxic compounds to the groundwater. [120]

The Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000, require that the site chosen for the dumpsite
is suitable for this purpose. The site should be examined to make sure that it will meet certain
criteria. The two dumpsites in Chennai only meet the requirements in the Municipal Solid
Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000, on 4 out of 17 criteria. [37] Consequently pollutants are spread to
the surrounding environment, affecting wildlife and humans.

The wetlands on which the two dumpsites in Chennai are placed are connected to the Bay of
Bengal through canals and backwaters. Lead, mercury and dioxins affect the marine life as
they bio-accumulate in fish and eventually also accumulate in humans while consuming fish.
[37]

The contamination of the soil and groundwater as a result of not collecting the leachate water,
leads to polluted water that people use for sanitary purposes. Every year thousands of people
in India die from diarrhoea diseases caused by insufficient sanitation. [14] In Chennai, studies
show that the residents around the dumpsites have to spend more money to purchase water
and medicine than in other locations in the city. [73] Other problems due to open dumping are
contamination of the surface water by the run-off from dumpsites, acidification of the soil,
bad odour, pests, rodents and the spread of epidemics through stray animals. [15]

Another aspect is the biodiversity and ecological value that these areas had before they
became dumpsites, considering the fact that these lands used to serve as aquifers and bird
sanctuaries.

2.4.1.1 Emissions of methane (CH4) due to open dumping

Dumpsites are also a large source of methane gas. Since methane is a 21 times more
aggressive greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide it will have an impact on global warming on a
large scale. India is currently one of the world’s largest methane emitters from solid waste
disposal. [10] Appendix 4 shows the calculation of methane emissions from Chennai’s
dumpsites with the first-order decay model. [75] The result shows that the methane gas

32
emitted in Chennai during 2008 was 28 000 tons (595 000 tons CO2 eq). According to data
from 2004, Chennai accounted for 6 percent of India’s methane emissions from landfills.

2.4.2 Environmental and health impacts of uncontrolled burning

The health effects from open burning have become more noticeable the recent years in
Chennai. In the daily newspapers there are constant articles about people living close to the
dumpsites who complain about health problems such as rashes and suffocation, due to the
pollution from the fires started by ragpickers. [68]

The emissions from uncontrolled burning of waste depend on the combustion process and on
the composition of waste. Table 5 describes how different emissions are created and their
effect on the environment and health.

If combustion takes place in an incineration plant, the burning process can be controlled and
optimized for good incineration conditions. Moreover, the created pollutants can be reduced
with flue gas treatment. Open burning on the other hand, will release the pollutants directly to
the atmosphere. [17]

33
Table 5 Description of how different emissions are created and their effect on the environment and health.
[152]
Gives the following effect on health and
Emissions The formation is due to:
environment:
 Acidification
 Eutrophication
 The nitrogen content of the
Nitrogen oxides (NOX)  Contributes to the formation of
fuel
ambient ozone
 Poisons the blood if inhaled
 The sulphur content of the
fuel  Acidification
Sulphur dioxide (SO2)  The combustion process:  Health effects for persons with
temperature, oxygen inhalation problems
concentration and duration
 Contributes to the greenhouse
 The carbon content of the
Carbon dioxide (CO2) effect (only the carbon with fossil
fuel
origin contributes)
 The combustion process:
 Harmful to the cardiovascular
Carbon monoxide (CO) Created when the supply is
system
scarce
 Cancerogenic
 The combustion process:  Contributes to the formation of
Voltaic organic
Created when the oxygen ambient ozone
compounds (VOC)
supply is scarce  Methane is a VOC that contributes
to the greenhouse effect
 Harmful if inhaled, heavy metals
 The ash content of the waste
Dust get stuck to particles which is
 The combustion process
transported to the lungs
 The combustion process:
 Contributes to the greenhouse
Nitrous oxide (N2O) Crated at low combustion
effect
temperatures
Heavy metals (Cd, Pb,  The heavy metal content of  Most heavy metals are toxic to
Hg et al) the fuel human and wildlife
 The combustion process: The
combustion temperature, the
oxygen supply, the presence
Hydrogen chloride
of catalyst  Acidification
(HCl)
 The PVC content in the waste
i.e. the chlorinated material in
the fuel
 The chloride content in the  Can cause cancer while
Dioxins presence of copper, which accumulating in fatty tissues in
works as a catalyst human and wildlife

The most significant effect on the local environment and people’s health around the dumpsite
due to open burning are the emissions of dioxins. The following will give a deeper analysis of
the dioxin concentration around one of the dumpsites in Chennai.

2.4.2.2 Emissions of dioxins due to open burning

Open burning is a significant source of high dioxin concentrations in the soil and air around
the dumpsites. Dioxins are toxic pollutants which are created when MSW is burned.
Appendix 13 gives a brief explanation of dioxins. The major source of dioxin is burning of
chlorinated waste such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC). [79]

34
A study conducted by Minh et al. (2003) [79] in collaboration with Annamalai University in
Tamil Nadu measured the concentrations of the dioxins PCDDs, PCDFs and PCBs around
Perungudi dumpsite. The concentration of the dioxins in the soil at the dumpsite was
compared to a reference site, a control site, at least 30 km away from any dumpsite. The result
showed a 224 times higher concentration of PCDD/Fs at the dumpsite compared to the control
site. For PCBs it was 238 times higher. The concentrations of PCDD/Fs and PCBs with the
Toxic Equivalent (TEQs) can be seen in table 6.

Table 6 Concentration of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in soil samples from Perungudi dumpsite and a control site.
[79]
Perungudi dumpsite Control site
[pg/g dry weight] [TEQs] [pg/g dry weight] [TEQs]
Total PCDD/Fs 7 400 47 33 0.2
Range PCDD/Fs 2 200-34 000 9.9 -200 18-79 0.05-0.34
Total PCBs 6 670 5.1 28 0.022
Range PCBs 1 300-20 000 2.4-10 12-52 0.015-0.029

Furthermore the study looks at the exposure of dioxins to humans living near the dumpsite.
Dioxins are lipophilic and enter fatty tissues in human and wildlife either direct through
dermal absorption and inhalation of dust from polluted soil or indirect by consuming food
grown in contaminated areas. The assessment was implemented on two groups of people,
ragpickers at the dumpsite and people living far away from the dumpsite who were the control
group. More than a hundred people were daily observed at Perungudi dumpsite when the
study was conducted in 2000. The results are displayed divided into adults and children in
table 7. It is seen that children’s intake through ingestion is eleven times higher than for
adults. The people at the dumpsite had around 260 times higher concentrations of dioxins in
the fatty tissues compared to the control site for both children and adults. [79]

Table 7 Estimated intakes of PCDD/Fs for children and adults via soil ingestion and dermal exposure. [79]
Perungudi dumpsite Control site
Adult Child Adult Child
Soil ingestion [pg TEQ/kg/day] 0.0152 0.1730 0.00006 0.00067
Dermal exposure [pg TEQ/kg/day] 0.0361 0.0310 0.00014 0.00012

2.5 Characteristics of MSW in Chennai

The waste composition depends on several factors such as income, climate, culture, food
habits and lifestyle etc. [24] MSW in low-income countries contains a larger fraction of
organic matter and less recyclable material than high-income countries due to different life
style and consumption patterns. The waste in low-income countries also has a high percentage
of inert material. The reason is first of all the high amount of ash from the traditional use of
biomass as fuel and secondly the daily activities of street sweeping.

2.5.1 The Composition of MSW in Chennai

There are two main studies made analysing the composition and the chemical characteristics
of the MSW generated in Chennai. The first analysis is made by the CoC in 2003 and the
second analysis is made by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute
(NEERI) in 2006. [54] [128] Depending on where the analyses are made, if they are made on

35
the dumpsite or earlier in the waste stream, the results could differ. In these cases the MSW is
assumed to be from the dumpsite. Figure 15 illustrates the composition of the MSW generated
in Chennai.

Figure 15 Analysis of the composition of MSW in Chennai, made by the CoC (2003) and NEERI (2006).
[49] [54]

The result shows that the two largest fractions of the MSW are organic waste and inert
material.

2.5.1.1 Organic waste

The organic components consist of kitchen waste and green waste. Green waste consists of
garden waste and waste from agricultural operations. Figure 16 illustrates the relation between
the two components. Since the year 2000, there has been a ban for dumping organic waste in
India according to the Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000. The rules require that all
organic waste should be segregated and processed, with the aim to reduce methane production
in the dumpsites. However, the CoC and other municipalities throughout the country
experience difficulties monitoring and enforcing this rule. [10]

Figure 16 Analysis of the composition of organic matter in Chennai, made by the CoC 2003. [49]
2.5.1.2 Recyclable Waste

36
The recyclable waste in Chennai consists of plastic, paper, metals and glass. As shown in
figure 17, the fraction of paper and plastic is very high. Since metal is removed by ragpickers
for their high re-sale value, the fraction found on the dumpsites is very low.

The plastic waste can be divided in two different categories: thermoplastics and thermoset
plastics. They stand for 80 percent and 20 percent respectively, of the consumer plastic waste
generated in India. The thermoplastics are recyclable plastic and consist of Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET), Low Density Poly Ethylene (LDPE), Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) etc.
while thermoset plastics are non-recyclable and contain alkyd, epoxy, ester, melamine
formaldehyde, polyurethane etc. [81]

Figure 17 Analysis of the composition of the recyclable fraction in Chennai, made by NERRI (2006). [54]

2.5.1.3 Inert Material

The inert material in the MSW in Chennai consists of bricks, sand, stone and silt. The largest
part of this waste comes from street sweeping and illegal dumping of construction and
demolition waste. [128]

2.5.2 Chemical characteristics of MSW

The chemical characteristics of the MSW in Chennai are illustrated in table 8.

Table 8 The chemical characteristics of the MSW in Chennai, based on analysis made by the CoC (2003)
and NEERI (2006). [49] [54]
Characteristics CoC NEERI
Moisture content [%] 27.6 47.0
Ph value 7.7 6.2-8.1
Volatile matter at 550C [%] no data 42.6
Carbon [%] 21.5 24.7
Nitrogen Content [%] 0.8 0.9
Phosphorus as P2O3 [%] 0.6 0.4
Potassium as K2O [%] 0.6 0.9
C/N Ratio [%] no data 29.3

2.5.3 Heating value

The heating value of a fuel is the amount of heat released by a specific quantity of the fuel at
complete combustion. Two types of heating value are defined, a lower and a higher. The

37
lower heating value takes into consideration the amount of energy needed to vaporize the
moisture in the fuel. The higher heating value on the other hand includes this energy. It is
thereby important to define if it is the higher or lower value that is given, to be able to make a
comparison.

According to the CoC the lower heating value of the MSW in Chennai is between 1.1 and 1.2
MWh/ton, (946-1032 kcal/kg), which is a value given for India in general. [136]

Since knowing that the heating value of the MSW in Chennai is an important factor for
deciding if this waste is suitable for combustion, the heating value has also been estimated
numerically. There are different methods to calculate the heating value of a fuel. A common
method is to use the Dulong’s formula, as described in box 1. This method takes into account
the content of moisture, carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur in the fuel. Given the
information about the content of these substances in each component of MSW, given in
appendix 6, and the information about the percentage of each component in the MSW, the
total heating value of the mixed MSW can be calculated. The result shows that the lower
heating value of the MSW in Chennai is 1.6 MWh/ton (1376 kcal/kg).

38
 Box 1 Estimation of the heating value of MSW in Chennai
The heating value of a fuel can be calculated using the Dulong’s formula [100]:

𝑜
𝐻𝑖 = 0.339 ∙ 𝑐 + 0.105 ∙ 𝑠 + 𝑕 − − 0.0251 ∙ 𝑤
8
2.5
𝐻𝑠 = 𝐻𝑖 + ∙ (9 ∙ 𝑕 + 𝑤)
100

Where:
Hi Lower heating value [MJ/kg]
Hs Higher heating value [MJ/kg]
c coal [mass%]
s sulphur [mass%]
h hydrogen [mass%]
o oxygen [mass%]
w water [mass%]

Assumptions:
Mass percentage of specific substances in MSW
Study m(w) (%) m(c) (%) m(h) (%) m(o) (%) m(n) (%) m(s) (%)
CoC 31.7 16.8 2.4 12.1 0.6 0.06
NEERI 38.8 16.8 2.4 12.1 0.7 0.06

The mass percentage of the substances in MSW in Chennai, was calculated from the
information about the energy content in each component of the waste. (see appendix 6)

Result:
LHV (Hi) HHV (Hs)
Study MWh/ton kcal/kg MWh/ton kcal/kg
CoC 1.6 1376 2.0 1720
NEERI 1.6 1376 2.0 1720

According to Dulong’s formula both the studies show that the lower heating value in
Chennai is 1.6 MWh/ton (1376 kcal/kg) and the higher is 2.0 MWh/ton (1720 kcal/kg).

2.5.4 Future waste characteristics

Future waste characteristics in India and Chennai will be more similar to those in high-income
countries, with more recyclable material, less inert components and the organic fraction will
be proportionally smaller. Thus, the heating value will be higher. More packaging material
will increase the need for more environmental friendly material for a sustainable
development. Today, one fourth of the plastic material used in India consists of PVC, which
is a chemical that is almost phased out in many high income countries. [25]

39
2.6 Electricity production in Chennai
This chapter will give an overview of the electricity situation in Chennai and the possibility to
produce electricity from MSW.

2.6.1 The electricity situation in Chennai

Today Chennai suffers from daily power cuts, which can last for hours. The power cuts vary
in length and differ between areas in Chennai, though a normal power cut lasts one to two
hours. [86] Many of the power cuts are announced, meaning that the time and the area of a
power cut are decided in advance. A consequence of this is that many citizens plan their
working days after the power cuts, resulting in loss of productivity and disturbances in the
daily life.

The shortage of electricity in Chennai and in many cities in India is partly because the
government has not been able to keep up with the country’s economic growth the recent
years. Hence, the installed capacity of power stations has not been enough to cover the
demand. In January 2009 Tamil Nadu suffered an electricity deficit of 7.3 percent and the
shortage during peak hours was 853 MW which can be seen in table 9. [84]

Table 9 Tamil Nadu's power supply and peak demand in January 2009. [84]
Power Supply in Tamil Nadu January 2009
Surplus/Deficit (-)
Requirement [MWh] Availability [MWh] [MWh] [%]
5243 4860 -383 -7.3
Peak demand/Peak met in Tamil Nadu January 2009
Surplus/Deficit (-)
Peak demand [MW] Peak met [MW] [MW] [%]
9180 8327 -853 -9.3

The power disruptions are a problematic issue especially for the industries in Chennai. The
city hosts 30 percent of India’s automobile industry and 35 percent of India’s auto component
industry. [82] Moreover, 14 percent of India’s total software exports come from Chennai. [83]
The power interruptions affect the industries that get an irregular working week, resulting in
loss of productivity. [134] For several industries the power disruptions have caused increased
production costs. Nevertheless, for fear of losing business, the extra cost is not passed on to
the consumers, resulting in closing of small-scale industries. [85] Besides from industries,
other examples of sectors that suffer hard from the power cuts are hospitals and educational
institutions, even though the government claims that essential service should not be affected.
[86]

2.6.1.1 The governmental actors responsible for electricity production

The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) is the national authority responsible for matters
regarding electricity production, transmission and distribution. They advise the government
on questions relating to national electricity policy and they formulate plans for development
of the electricity system. [27]

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), which is the state government energy supplier in
Tamil Nadu, is the only licensed energy distributor in Tamil Nadu. TNEB generates, transmits

40
and distributes electricity. [87] 50 percent of the electricity in Tamil Nadu is produced by
TNEB. The remaining electricity is provided from the national grid or by private producers.
[137]

2.6.1.2 The price for electricity

An electricity producing company can sell the generated electricity to TNEB for
approximately Rs. 3/kWh ($0.062/kWh). Depending on what fuel this company uses, the
price differs slightly. If the company uses renewable energy sources the price is Rs. 3.15/kWh
($0.065/kWh). The TNEB sells the electricity to the users of electricity in the state of Tamil
Nadu. Depending on the user, the price for electricity differs. For industries the price is Rs.
6/kWh ($0.12/kWh) while it is Rs. 2.5/kWh ($0.052/kWh) for residences. For the agricultural
sector, electricity is provided for free because of their difficult financial situation. [130]

2.6.2 Installed capacity of power stations in Tamil Nadu

The total installed capacity of power plants in Tamil Nadu was 14 GW on January 2009. A
power station can be owned by the government of India, a state government or by private
companies. The ownership of power stations in each energy sector is specified in appendix 1.
Tamil Nadu’s energy mix is seen in figure 18. The installed capacity from Renewable Energy
Sources (RES) was slightly above 4 GW which corresponds to 31 percent. This makes Tamil
Nadu the state in India with the highest rate of renewable energy sources. [88] Discounting
larger hydropower plants, the main non-conventional energy source in Tamil Nadu is wind
energy. [130]

*Renewable energy sources (RES)

includes small hydro power plants (up
to 25 MW), wind energy, bio energy
and waste energy.

Figure 18 Installed capacity in Tamil Nadu, January 2009. [88]

2.6.3 Future electricity production

The Indian government has specified a goal in the 11th New and Renewable Energy five-year
plan, which tells that 10 percent of the power generation capacity should come from
renewable sources by the end of the year 2012. [16] This number does not include
hydropower plants larger than 25 MW. Compared to Chennai which has a share of 31 percent
renewable energy sources in their energy mix, India as a whole only has 9 percent, (as on 31
January 2009). The increased demand for electricity the upcoming years will impose the
development for electricity production from renewable energies.

41
2.6.3.1 Potential for power generation from MSW
Waste-to-energy will play an important role to reach the target of 10 percent power generation
from renewable sources. The installed power capacity from waste-to-energy plant in India
was 90 MW on 31 January 2009, of which 31 MW was produced in captive power plants
meaning that the power plant use the energy produced for their own use. [121], [29] Today,
the largest part of the power generated from waste comes from agricultural waste. However,
both industrial waste and MSW are interesting for power generation.

A few projects already exist in India with power generation from MSW, whereas in Chennai
no such projects exist. Nevertheless, the growing amount of garbage and the electricity deficit
in Tamil Nadu have opened the discussion further for future MSW-to-energy alternatives.
Except for contributing with electricity to the grid, future electricity production from MSW
would have benefits such as

 replacing fossil fuel, which is the most common fuel for electricity production in
Tamil Nadu
 prolonging the lifespan of the two overfilled dumpsites in Chennai, since less waste
will be dumped
 decreasing the pollution related to open dumping.

2.7 The current situation for MSW-to-energy

The technology of producing energy from MSW has been accepted and proven worldwide. In
India on the other hand, the viability of this technology is yet to be demonstrated. As
mentioned above, there are no current activities for producing energy from MSW in Chennai.
Yet, in other cities in India MSW-to-energy projects have been commissioned, more or less
successfully during the last decade. The following chapter will give an insight into these
projects in order to better understand the challenges with implementing an MSW-to-energy
project in Chennai.

2.7.1 Combustion
Combustion is an exothermic chemical reaction that occurs when a fuel is heated in an oxygen
rich environment. When energy is extracted from burning of MSW, the combustion takes
place in a closed combustion chamber with surplus of air and temperature range of 700-1300
degrees. The incineration techniques and flue gas treatments are described more thoroughly in
chapter 5 and appendix 12. There are two options which are commonly used for combustion
of MSW:

 Mass burning
 Combustion of RDF

Mass burning of MSW is a common method for waste reduction and energy recovery in high-
income countries. The waste is burnt directly in a boiler without processing it further to
pellets or “fluff”. It requires waste with sufficient heating value to sustain combustion.
However, in India and other developing countries, this technology is not much practiced.

42
If the burnable fraction of MSW is sorted out and further homogenized the result is called
Refuse Derived Fuel or shortly RDF. For a more detailed description of the segregation
process see section 3.1.2. In developing countries it is more common to incinerate RDF than
MSW, since the heating value of the MSW is often too low to sustain combustion. Since the
inert and organic waste is sorted out from the RDF fraction, the heating value will be higher
than for MSW. The RDF can be combusted in a fluidized bed or in a grate, co-incinerated in
industrial boilers or used in pyrolysis and gasification systems. The steam generated from the
process can be used to produce energy. [30]

2.7.1.1 Mass burning plants in India

Today there are no operating incineration plants for direct incineration of MSW in India.
There have been failed projects in the past, which has strengthened the opinion that direct
incineration is not suitable for Indian waste. [9] Box 2 describes one of these projects.
Nevertheless, in many cities small incinerators are used for burning bio-medical and
hazardous waste.

Box 2 Mass burning plant in Timarpur, New Delhi

The first large scale incineration plant in India was commissioned at Timarpur, New Delhi
in 1987 by MNES, with the support of the Danish Firm Vølund Miljøteknik A/S. It cost
about Rs. 250 million ($5.2 million) and was projected to produce 3.7 MW electricity. It
was designed to process MSW that had an average heating value of 1.7 MWh/ton (1462
kcal/kg) and an approximate moisture content of 15 percent. [11] After 6 months the plant
was out of operation and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi had to close down the plant.
The main reason for the poor performance of the plant was a mismatch of the plant design
and the waste processed. [31]

2.7.1.2 RDF plants in India

RDF plants are in the initial stage of development in India. There are numbers of projects that
are operating all over India, more or less successful. The two projects described in box 3 are
examples of plants that have been proven successful and have generated electricity to the grid.

43
 Box 3 RDF plants in Hyderabad and Vijayawada

Hyderabad
A 6 MW power plant was set up in Hydrerabad in November 2003, based on combustion
of RDF. The project was performed by SELCO International Ltd, Hyderabad and financed
by soft loans from the Technology Development Board (TDB), the Department of Science
and Technologies (DST) and the Indian Renewable Energy development Agency
(IREDA). The plant cost about Rs. 400 million ($8.3 million) and is based on indigenous
technology.

The MSW is firstly converted into fluff or pellets of RDF and then combusted in a boiler.
The heating value of the RDF is around 3.5-4.1 MWh/ton (3010-3526 kcal/kg). The steam
generated in the boiler is used to run a steam turbine and generate electricity. From
November 2003 till January 2005 the plant had generated 35 GWh of electricity. [32]

Vijayawada
In Vijayawada a 6 MW power project was commissioned in December 2003, based on
combustion of RDF. It was performed by Shiram Energy Systems, Hyderabad and
financed with soft loans from TDB and IREDA. The cost for the project was about Rs. 450
million ($9.4 million).

A total amount of 500 tons of MSW is being collected from the urban areas of Vijayawada
and Guntur every day. The MSW is firstly transported to various sites where the waste is
processed and converted into fluff of RDF and thereafter transported to the plant site where
the electricity generation takes place. The plant is operating at full capacity and had
generated 28 GWh of electricity from the day it was commission until January 2005. [32]

2.7.2 Pyrolysis and gasification

Pyrolysis and gasification are similar to combustion in that manner that they are thermal
processes that use high temperature to break down the waste. The main difference from
combustion is that they use less oxygen. Pyrolysis degrades waste in the absence of air while
gasification uses some oxygen, but not enough to start the combustion. Gasification refers to
the production of gaseous components, whereas pyrolysis produces liquid residues and
charcoal. The syngas generated from the gasification process mostly consists of carbon
monoxide and hydrogen and could be used in gas turbines to produce electricity. Today,
energy production from gasification of MSW is in the development stage and it has not yet
been proven viable on a commercial scale. [33]

2.7.2.1 Pyrolysis and gasification plants in India

There are currently no commercial pyrolysis and gasification plants for treating MSW in
India. [9] However, there exist gasifiers for biomass applications such as agricultural waste,
sawmill dust and forest waste. [31]

2.7.3 Sanitary landfill with energy recovery

There are four basic conditions that need to be fulfilled in order for a landfill site to be called
a sanitary landfill:

44
  The landfill site should either be located on land which naturally contains leachate
security, or the site should have additional lining materials to prevent leachate to reach
the ground water and surrounding soil. Leachate collection and treatment is a basic
requirement.
 The design of the landfill should be developed from geological and hydro geological
investigations made by engineers.
 Trained staff should be based at the landfill for regular maintenance of the plant and
supervision.
 The waste should be spread in layers and compacted. [34]

The degradation of organic waste results in production of landfill gas, which has a methane
content of 25-55 percent. The gas can be collected and used for energy recovery. [35]

2.7.3.1 Sanitary landfills with energy recovery in India

There was not a single sanitary landfill site in India, until just recently. All cities in India
disposed their waste unscientifically in low-lying areas without pollution prevention measures
taken. Along with the Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000, the local bodies started to
more actively take measures towards the treatments of MSW. Today there are landfill sites in
Surat, Pune, Puttur and Karwar and some more sites are under construction. [9]

There are currently no projects in India that recover energy from the landfill gas captured.
However, pre-feasibility studies and/or pump tests have been commissioned on dumpsites in
Mumbai, Delhi, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad and Pune which speaks for the realisation of landfill
gas-to-energy projects in the near future. [10]

2.7.4 Anaerobic biomethanation

Anaerobic digestion is a biological process where organic material is decomposed by
microorganisms under anaerobic condition. The result is generation of biogas, which consists
of 55-60 percent methane. The process is similar to the decomposition taking place in
landfills, yet more advantageous since it has a more efficient methane formation. One ton of
anaerobic digested MSW can produce 2-4 times more methane in three weeks than one ton of
landfilled MSW in 6-7 years. The waste from the biomethanation process can be used as
compost for soil conditioning. [31] The biogas can be used for energy production or
alternatively engine fuel.

2.7.4.1 Biomethanation plants in India

Biomethanation is a relatively well-established technology for treatment of agricultural waste
and sewage sludge in India. Even though the application for the organic fraction of MSW is
less common, there exist smaller projects in the country for this purpose. [9]

Biomethanation on a small scale is a proven technology in Lucknow and in other cities in

India. In these cities, selected organic waste from canteens, vegetable markets etc, is used.
Box 4 gives more information about the plant in Lucknow. [9]

45
 Box 4 Biomethanation plant in Lucknow
A 5 MW MSW-based power project was established at Lucknow in December 2003, based
on high-rate biomethanation technology. It was executed by Asia Bio-energy Ltd, Chennai
on BOOM (Build, Own, Operate and Maintenance) basis. The technology is developed
and commercialized by Environment Technology (ENTEC), Austria and the project cost
was about Rs. 740 million ($15 million). [32]

The plant is designed to take care of about 500-600 tons of MSW every day from Lucknow
city. This amount of MSW is converted into 115 tons of dry volatile solids, which produce
about 50 000 m3 of biogas and 75 tons of organic fertilizer. The biogas generated is used
for electricity production to the grid. Even though the plant is dimensioned for 5 MW
electric power, it has only reached a maximum limit of 1 MW since it was commissioned.
The main problem achieving its designed capacity has been the difficulties of getting
segregated and source collected biodegradable MSW to the plant. [32]

2.7.5 MSW to products

By segregating, processing and recycling the MSW, the amount of waste that needs to be
managed decreases. It is an energy conserving process, since recycling of material replaces
the virgin material needed for the manufacturing of new products.

The segregation can be done manually in the households or mechanically in processing plants.
In many developed countries it is common for each household to segregate the MSW
manually in different bins. The separated fractions are then transported to industries for
processing and recycling. In developing countries manual segregation has proven to be
difficult due to lack of infrastructure. [128] An alternative method is mechanical segregation
in processing plants. Besides from recyclables such as plastic, metal and paper that can be
segregated manually, the plant enables mechanical segregation of inert material, organic and
burnable fraction. Further processing of these fractions could give bricks, compost and RDF
respectively, which can be sold on the open market. [37]

During the last years, numbers of processing plants have been set up in India that manually
and mechanically segregates the MSW. The main incentives for these plants have been the
income possibilities from selling recyclables, compost and bricks as well as selling RDF or
selling the electricity generated from combusting RDF. Since these processing plants have
numbers of environmental benefits, there are possibilities of getting subsidies from the
government and income through CDM (see appendix 9 and section 4.2.1.3), which gives these
project stronger financial viability.

2.7.5.1 Bricks
The inert material of the MSW can be recycled and used for manufacturing of bricks. These
bricks are not as robust as cement bricks, which make them less suitable for quality
construction work. Yet, they are interesting for less sensitive construction work such as
sidewalks. [123]

46
2.7.5.2 Compost
Aerobic composting is the decomposition of organic material by microorganisms to produce
humus-like material called compost. It is suitable for the organic fraction of the MSW and
agricultural waste such as garden waste, waste from slaughter houses and dairy waste. The
compost is most commonly used as soil conditioning.

There are different types of composting technologies, windrow composting and vermi
composting being two common methods:

 Windrow composting is a method where the waste is piled in elongated rows to allow
diffusion of oxygen and retention of heat. The piles are regularly turned to increase the
porosity and facilitate the diffusion of air. It is suitable for large-scale applications.
[38]
 Vermi composting is a process where the organic fraction is converted to compost
through the action of worms. This method is especially suitable in smaller towns since
it is easy to operate and the technology required is rather simple. [9]

Farmers in India have been using composting for many years to process agricultural waste
and cow dung, for the purpose of soil conditioner improvement. The application for MSW has
been proven successful and demonstrated in numbers of cities in India. Windrow composting
has been found most relevant for large-scale applications and vermi composting more relevant
in smaller scale. [9] 106 small scale composting units have been introduced in Chennai on
ward level. [64]

2.7.5.3 RDF
As described earlier in the text, RDF is processed from the burnable fraction of the MSW.
The RDF can be chopped to a fluffy fraction called RDF-fluff or it can be further processed to
pellets, which can be sold on the open market or used directly. [37]

2.7.5.4 The processing plant in Ichalkaranji

An example of a processing plant in India is the one that the company Hydroair Tectonics Ltd
from Mumbai, has set up in Ichalkaranji. The 300 tons of MSW per day that arrives to the
plant is segregated into recyclables, inert material, burnable waste and organic waste. The
recyclables are sold directly to scrap dealers for re-sale value while the other fractions are
processed further to bricks, RDF-fluff and compost respectively. At present there is no
electricity production from the RDF-fluff at the plant-site, instead the fluff is sold to industries
as a substitute for coal. [123]

47
48
3 Future MSW-to-energy in Chennai
The problems that Chennai Corporation has been facing during the last years regarding solid
waste management and electricity production have become more manifest today than ever.
The two dumpsites in Chennai, Kodungaiyur and Perungudi, are overfilled with waste and the
residents in Tamil Nadu are getting tired of planning their daily routines after the announced
and unannounced power cuts. This, together with stricter regulation from the government has
made Chennai Corporation more actively work towards changing the situation.

This chapter will describe future MSW management in Chennai. In the sections where the
source is not given, the facts are based on Hydroair Tectonics internal documents. [37]

3.1 Hydroair Tectonics

Recently, the company Hydroair Tectonics Ltd from Mumbai has signed a contract with
Chennai Corporation to take care of the waste going to Perungudi dumpsite. An area of 30
acres is provided by the CoC at Perungudi dumping ground. In return the company needs to
pay a royalty fee to the CoC of Rs. 15/ton ($0.31/ton) of MSW.

3.1.1 The processing plant

The company will set up an integrated MSW treatment plant at Perungudi dumping ground in
Chennai, which is going to process 1400 tons of MSW every day. It is going to be two
segregation units, each processing 700 tons of MSW per day. M/S Shiram Energy Systems
Ltd is an associate for this project. They have implemented the 6 MW processing plant in
Hyderabad which has been operating successfully since 2003 (see box 3 section 2.7.1.2).

The MSW will be segregated into the following fractions: recyclables, inert material,
compostable fractions and burnable waste. The segregation is made both manually and
mechanically. The incoming waste is initially weighted on a weight bridge, tipped on a
tipping ground and then processed according to figure 19.

49
 Waste Received

1400 TPD* 35 %

Moisture**

20% 7% 25% 5% 8%

Compost Bricks RDF Recyclables MSW to SLF

280 TPD 98 TPD 350 TPD 70 TPD 112 TPD

Electricity

*TPD=tons per day

**Here it is not sure whether this is the natural moisture in the waste or if this is moisture in excess of the natural
moisture

Figure 19 Estimated flowchart of the processing of waste at Perungudi dumpsite in Chennai. [37]

The compostable and inert components are segregated and processed to compost and bricks
respectively. The burnable material is separated and chopped to Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF)
which can be used in a boiler to produce electricity. Most of the recyclable components will
be segregated and sold to scrap dealers, for resale value. Larger inert components and other
waste that is not suitable for recycling or biological processing will be put on a sanitary
landfill. More than one third of the waste received at the plant consists of moisture. Leachate
water will be collected and processed in a treatment plant.

3.1.1.1 Compliance with the Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000
The technology used will meet the requirements of The Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules
2000, in line with the following rules:

 Biodegradable Waste will be processed by composting only.

 Compost or any other end products will comply with standards as specified in
Schedule-IV of The Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000.
 Land filling shall be restricted to non-biodegradable, inert waste and other waste that
are not suitable either for recycling or for biological processing.

50
3.1.2 MSW to products
A large part of the financial income of the plant will be revenues from selling the products
generated from the segregation process. The products are recyclables, compost, RDF and
bricks. If Hydroair Tectonics builds a unit for burning RDF with energy recovery in the
future, the primary product will be electricity.

The following text will give a short description of the manufacturing process of the products
and the segregation process, based on facts from the existing plant in Ichalkaranji.

3.1.2.1 Compost
1. When the large stone blocks and recyclables have been sorted out manually from the
waste at the tipping ground, the segregation of the compostable fraction starts. The
MSW is fed into a drum
machine with holes
measuring 80 mm in
diameter. The compostable
fraction, mixed with the
inert material, passes
through the holes. The
remaining waste makes up
the burnable fraction,
which is going to be
processed to RDF. The
segregation unit is shown
in figure 20.
Figure 20 Segregation unit for separation of the organic and
inert components. [37]

The compostable fraction

mixed with inert material
is used for aerobic
composting in windrows.
The waste is processed
for 35 days with regular
stir and mixing with bio-
culture, which accelerates
the degradation, as seen in
figure 21.

Figure 21 Bioculture is sprayed on the windrows. [37]

2. The processed waste is passed on to the second mechanical segregation step, which is
a drum machine with holes measuring 20 mm in diameter. The larger fractions of inert
material will be separated and sent to a sanitary landfill or to a stone crusher.
3. The remaining waste will continue to the next segregation step, which is based on
gravity separation. Air is added from below and the inert fraction with higher density
is separated from the compostable fraction.

51
 4. The final segregation step, before the
compostable fraction can be used as
compost, is the magnetic separator which
separates small components of metals from
the organic fraction.
5. The compost is packed in plastic bags, as
illustrated in figure 22, and sold to farmers
as soil conditioner or organic fertiliser.

In Schedule-IV of The Municipal Solid Waste Figure 22 The compost ready to be sold to
(M&H) Rules, 2000 there are standards specified farmers. [65]
for the maximum amount of heavy metals that is
allowed in compost for the purpose of using it as fertilizer. There are also standards for pH
value and C:N ratio. A sample taken on the 6th of June 2008 from the compost produced at
Hydroair Tectonics’ segregation plant in Ichalkaranji shows that the standard values were not
exceeded. The values can be seen in table 10.

Table 10 Standard values of compost in India and specific values from the compost produced in
Ichalkaranji. [37]
Physical characteristics Standard Ichalkaranji
C : N ratio 20 – 40 27.35
pH 5.5 – 8.5 6.54
Should not exceed
Heavy metals mg/kg
(mg/kg)
Arsenic 10 BDL
Cadmium 5 0.22
Chromium 50 0.19
Copper 300 90
Lead 100 BDL
Mercury 0.15 BDL
Nickel 50 BDL
Zinc 1000 212
*BDL=Below Detectable Level

3.1.2.2 RDF
The larger fractions of MSW, which are separated in the first segregation step, consist of
larger stone blocks and burnable waste such as paper, plastic, textiles, coconut shells, rubber
etc. The large inert fractions and the recyclable plastic and metals are sorted out manually
and the remaining burnable waste is passed on to a mechanical separation unit. Air is added
from below and the heavy non-combustible material, such as glass and inert material are
separated from the light combustible fractions. Finally, the combustible material is
mechanically crushed and chopped into a small fluffy fraction. The RDF processing
machinery is illustrated in figure 23.

52
Figure 23 The RDF processing machinery. [37]

The result is called RDF fluff and can be

used as fuel in a boiler for electricity
generation. Alternatively it can be sold to
energy demanding industries as a
substitute for coal.

For the purpose of storing and

transportation, the RDF fluff can be
bailed as seen in figure 24, or processed
further to briquettes or pellets. If it is
going to be sold directly to the market
further processing of RDF fluff is
Figure 24 Bailed RDF fluff. [37] preferable.

In table 11 the range of specific characteristics of RDF fluff is shown.

Table 11 Specific characteristics of RDF fluff. [37]

Characteristics Range [%]
Moisture 10 - 30
Ash Content 20 - 30
Volatile Matter 50 - 65
Fixed Carbon 12 - 15
Mineral matter 20 - 30
Carbon 20 - 30
Hydrogen 3-5
Nitrogen 1 - 1.5
Sulphur 0.2 - 0.3
Oxygen 20 - 25

From the above characteristics of RDF fluff, the heating value can be calculated with
Dulong’s formula, see box 1 section 2.5.3. [100] The result gives a higher heating value of
2.2-3.7 MWh/ton (1900-3200 kcal/kg), as seen in table 12.

53
Table 12 The higher and lower heating value for RDF. [37]
LHV (Hi) HHV (Hs)
RDF
MWh/ton kcal/kg MWh/ton kcal/kg

Lower limit 2.0 1684 2.2 1905

Higher limit 3.1 2705 3.7 3152

When RDF fluff is processed further to pellets the characteristics change, as illustrated in
table 13.

Table 13 Characteristics of RDF fluff and pellets. [37]

Product Fluff Pellets
Shape Irregular Cylindrical
Size 25 x 25mm to 150 x 150mm 8 mm to 25 mm in diameter
Bulk density 0.02-0.03 MT/m3 0.6 to 0.7 MT/m3

Hydroair Tectonics is considering building a plant for burning RDF fluff with the purpose of
generating electricity. However, this plant will not be built in the initial stage, but after some
years when the segregation plant has been proven viable. In the initial state the RDF
generated from the segregation plant is going to be sold to energy demanding industries as a
substitute for coal.

3.1.2.3 Eco bricks

The inert fraction is separated from the compostable fraction through the different steps
described above. Ash which is received from industries to the dumpsite is mixed with inert
particles larger than 4 mm, but
smaller than 20 mm in diameter.
The ash mixture is added to
another mixture consisting of
inert particles smaller than 4 mm
in diameter, cement and water.
Everything is blended together
and processed mechanically to
bricks. Figure 25 illustrates the
process of making bricks. These
bricks are not appropriate for the
construction of houses but they
are a good alternative for road
work such as construction of Figure 25 The mechanical processing of bricks. [37]
sidewalks.

3.1.2.4 Recyclable material

The recyclable material is mostly segregated manually initially when the MSW arrives to the
plant. Furthermore it is separated mechanically through magnetic separators. Around 5
percent of the incoming MSW is recyclable material, which will be sold to scrap dealers for a
resale value.

54
3.1.3 Sanitary landfill
A sanitary landfill will be made at the dumpsite. The waste going to the landfill is restricted
to certain inert material and other unusable waste and will stand for less than 8 percent of the
incoming waste. Compactors will be used to arrange the waste in thin layers and to achieve
high density of the waste. To minimize the run off to the ground water, the sanitary landfill
will have a sealing system consisting of sheets made of plastic material and soil layer with
low permeability. The site will be provided with a leachate collection and removal system,
which will be explained in the next section. Sand, silt and soil, which are separated during the
segregation steps, are going to be used as earth cover to prevent infiltration. A cover of 10 cm
is provided daily and an intermediate cover of 40-64 cm during monsoon.

3.1.4 Leachate treatment

A large part of the waste is moisture, which will result in runoff from the plant, in the form of
leachate water if it is not collected. The leachate from the project facility and sanitary landfill
site will be collected through a drainage layer, a perforated pipe collector system and a sump
collection area. It is carried to collection tanks and later on to a treatment plant. At the plant,
the leachate will be treated so that it can meet certain standards as specified in the Schedule-
IV of The Municipal Solid Waste (M&H) Rules, 2000. These are illustrated in table 14.
Table 14 Standard for leachate treatment. [37]
Standards
Parameter
( Mode of Disposal )
Inland Public Land
surface sewers disposal
water
Suspended solids, mg/l, max 100 600 -
Dissolved solids (inorganic) mg/l, max. 2100 2100 -
pH value 5.5 - 9.0 5.5 - 9.0 -
Ammonium nitrogen (as N), mg/l, max. 50 50 -
Total nitrogen (as N), mg/l, max. 100 - -
Biochemical oxygen demand ( 3 days 30 350 100
at 27 deg C) max.(mg/l)
Chemical oxygen demand, mg/l, max. 250 - -
Arsenic (as As), mg/l, max 0.2 0.2 0.2
Mercury (as Hg), mg/l, max 0.01 0.01 -
Lead (as Pb), mg/l, max 0.1 1.0 -
Cadmium (as Cd), mg/l, max 2.0 1.0 -

55
56
4 Setting up a waste-to-energy plant
During the last decade major reforms have been made in the field of investment in India,
which have improved the investment climate for both domestic and foreign companies. [94]

When a foreign company wants to set up a waste-to-energy facility in India there are certain
regulations that need to be considered before setting up the plant. There are also financial and
infrastructural support systems, which could be good to have in mind when calculating the
budget for the project. This chapter will describe the main regulation and support systems in
India.

4.1 Regulations
The company needs to get clearances from the federal government and from specific state
authorities before starting the business in India. These regulations are specified further in
appendix 7. The environmental clearance is one of the most important regulations, when
plants that will pollute toxic gases are going to be implemented. It is the State Pollution
Control Board that will give these clearances, by following the national emission standards.
[140]

4.1.1 Emission standards

Each country has specific national standards for how much pollutants are allowed from a
waste incineration plant. The emission standards for waste incineration in India are specified
in table 15. These values are compared to the corresponding values for Sweden, which is an
industrial country that has practiced MSW incineration for many years. Both the Swedish and
the Indian values refer to an oxygen concentration of 11 percent in the flue gases. The Indian
values are specified for hazardous waste. Nevertheless, according to Mr S.Balaji TNPCB,
incineration of MSW will fall under this category as well. The Swedish values are for waste
incineration in general.

57
Table 15 The emissions standards for waste incineration in India and Sweden. [107] [108]
EMISSION STANDARDS
PARAMETER India Sweden SAMPLING DURATION
(A*) (B*)
Particulates [mg/m3] 50 30 10 30 Minutes
HCl [mg/m3] 50 60 10 30 Minutes
SO2 [mg/m3] 200 200 50 30 Minutes
100 100 150** 30 Minutes/ **10 Minutes
CO [mg/m3] Standard refers to daily
50 50
average value
Total Organic Carbon [mg/m3] 20 20 10 30 Minutes
HF [mg/m3] 4 4 2 30 Minutes
NOX (NO and NO2 expressed as
400 400 200 30 Minutes
NO2 ) [mg/m3]

Total dioxins and furans [ng/m3] 0.1 0.1 6-8 hours sampling.

Sampling time anywhere

Cd + Th + their compounds
0.05 0.05 between 30 minutes and 8
[mg/m3]
hours.
Sampling time anywhere
Hg and its compounds [mg/m3] 0.05 0.05 between 30 minutes and 8
hours.
Sb + As + Pb + Cr + Co + Cu + Mn + Sampling time anywhere
Ni + V + their compounds 0.5 0.5 between 30 minutes and 8
[mg/m3] hours.
* The company can choose between two cases, A or B. The 30 minutes sampling values during one year, that are
below the standard value, should be 100 % in case A and 97 % in case B.
** For CO there is an alternative that 95 % (instead of 97 %) of the 10 minutes sampling values during one year
should be below the standard value.

4.2 Funding for MSW-to-energy projects

Except from revenues that MSW-to-energy projects can get from selling energy and
segregating products generated from the process, a company that sets up an MSW-to-energy
plant could also get financial and infrastructural support from the federal and state
government. There is also a possibility to get revenues through CDM.

4.2.1 Support systems

The company can get support from the federal and state government to start the business in
the form of subsidies and infrastructural support.

58
4.2.1.1 Subsidies
If a company produces energy from renewable energy sources there are subsidies that they
can apply for. The company can apply for subsidies from the following agencies:

 Federal level: Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA)

 State level: Tamilnadu Energy Development Agency (TEDA)

Both IREDA and TEDA are under the administrative control of the Ministry of New and
Renewable Energy (MNRE). [90] The company needs to be inspected by TEDA before the
application can be approved and sent to MNRE. [130]

For projects regarding energy recovery from MSW, there are possibilities to get financial
assistance of Rs. 20 million ($0.4 million), per MW subject to ceiling of 20 percent of project
cost and Rs. 100 millions per project ($2 million), whichever is less. [50]

4.2.1.2 Infrastructural support

Every state provides infrastructural support for the companies that are about to be established
in the state.

The infrastructural support, which is provided by the state government and paid by the
company, is in the form of land, power, water and roads.

Guidance bureau provides help with all infrastructural support except for land. For the land
requirements the company needs to contact State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil
Nadu (SIPCOT). The price for land varies depending on where the waste-to-energy plant is
going to be built. The prices are generally higher in the central and the southern part of
Chennai. If the area needed for the plant is 2 ha, the estimated price for land to build a waste-
to-energy plant is Rs. 11 250 ($230) (see box 5). [138] However, if the CoC consider the area
is required for a good cause they could even give the land to the company for free. [128]

Box 5 Estimation of the price for land to build a waste-to-energy plant

𝑃 = (𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 ∙ 𝐴) + 𝑃𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 + 𝐶
Where:
P Price for the land needed for the waste-to-energy plant [Rs.]
Pland Average price for land in Chennai [Rs./ha]
Pprocess Processing charge [Rs.]
C Cost for application [Rs.]
A Area needed for plant [ha]

Assumptions: [138]
Pland Rs. 5000/ha
Pprocess Rs. 1000
C Rs. 250
A 2 ha

Result:
The calculated price for the land needed for the waste-to-energy plant is Rs. 11 250
($230).

59
4.2.1.3 CDM
The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is an arrangement under the Kyoto Protocol and
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). CDM allows
developed countries to reduce greenhouse gases in developing countries to be able to achieve
their emission reduction targets. [91] In appendix 9, CDM is described more thoroughly.

An MSW-to-energy project that treats waste, which otherwise would be sent to a landfill,
would prevent methane emissions to the atmosphere. Since methane is a 21 times more
aggressive green house gas than carbon dioxide, this project would reduce the carbon dioxide
emissions and thereby account for as a CDM project. A successfully implemented CDM
project generates carbon credits, Certified Emission Reductions (CERs), to the project owner.
Each CER is equivalent to one ton reduced carbon dioxide. The CERs can be used by the
investor to manage the reduction target within the Kyoto protocol or be sold on the
International Emission Trading (IET) market to generate income. [92] The price for a CER
was 11-12 EUR as on the first month of 2009. [110]

The baseline is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per produced unit energy and is often
described in kg CO2/MWh. The project’s baseline is compared to the baseline estimated for
the area where the project is going to be set up.

The baseline in Tamil Nadu, including import and export was 0.85 kg CO2/MWh in 2008. If a
project in Chennai should be classified as a CDM project, the project’s baseline has to be less
than 0.85 kg CO2/MWh. The difference between the Tamil Nadu baseline and the project’s
baseline corresponds to the CERs that can be issued. [139]

60
5 The case for MSW incineration in Chennai
As mentioned previously, Hydroair Tectonics has recently signed a contract with the CoC to
take care of the waste at Perungudi dumpsite and it is a great chance that they will get a
similar contract at Kodungaiyur dumpsite. They are planning to process the waste and
produce RDF, which initially will be sold to energy demanding industries as a substitute for
coal. When the segregation plant has been proven financially viable Hydroair Tectonics is
discussing whether or not to build a plant for burning RDF fluff and generate electricity.

There are many possibilities to produce energy from incineration. This chapter will analyse
which method would be most suitable for Chennai. A case will be presented, in which the best
solution for MSW incineration with energy recovery in Chennai will be discussed and
analysed. Thereafter the technical and financial viability will be analysed for this specific
case.

5.1 The case study

The case for MSW incineration with energy recovery in Chennai is presented by answering
the following questions.

 Should there be mass burning of MSW or only combustion of the burnable fraction of
the MSW (RDF)?
 Who should process the waste and which methods should be used?
 Where should the plant be situated?
 Should there be co-incineration with another fuel? In that case, which fuel is suitable
for co-incineration?
 Which technology should be used for combustion and what type of flue gas treatment
should be used?
 Which type of energy should be recovered?

5.1.1 Should there be mass burning of MSW or only combustion of the

burnable fraction of the MSW (the RDF)?
Mass burning of MSW is a common method in developed countries to reduce the volume of
MSW and at the same time generate energy. Box 6 illustrates the strengths and weaknesses
with mass burning of waste. [118]

61
 Box 6 Strengths and weaknesses with mass burning of MSW

+
 No pre-treatment is required
 Reduces the volume of waste by ~ 90%
 Proven and commercially available technology in developed countries
-
 High capital costs. To cover the costs it is advantageous if the plant has:
1. high utilization factor
2. tipping fee for MSW
3. production of another energy source except from electricity, such as heat, cold
and/or process steam.
 Negative public perception in certain countries
 The characteristics of the MSW need to be suitable for incineration
 Produces toxic residues, though bottom ash can be recycled
 Minimum recovery of material, except for ferrous materials

In developing countries mass burning of waste is not common. However, there exist RDF
plants that generate energy from combusting the burnable fraction of the MSW. Depending on
the MSW characteristics and system for MSW management in the country different methods
are suitable. Whether mass burning of MSW or combustion of RDF is most suitable for the
conditions in Chennai will be discussed below in respect of public opinion, waste
characteristics, infrastructure and possibilities for combined recycling activities. In the end of
the section, a comparison is made between the conditions in Sweden, to illustrate why one
method could be suitable in one country and not in another.

5.1.1.1 Public opinion

Many citizens and decision makers in Chennai do not consider incineration of MSW as an
option for energy recovery. Firstly they believe waste incineration is bad for the environment
and human health. Since open burning along roadsides and at dumpsites have been common
treatments for MSW in the past, the citizens associate incineration with toxic pollution.
Secondly, the memory of failed waste incineration projects in India has made the people
doubt that the waste characteristic in India is suitable for combustion. Even though
combustion of RDF is a type of waste incineration, it is considered more acceptable by the
public than direct incineration of MSW. RDF is often referred to as “green coal” by decision
makers. The CoC opposes direct incineration, but they have accepted Hydroair Tectonics
future plans to build a unit for burning RDF at Perungudi dumpsite. [136] Therefore, setting
up an incineration plant for burning RDF would probably be less problematic than setting up a
plant for mass burning of MSW.

5.1.1.2 Waste characteristics

Composition: The composition of MSW in India is not optimal for combustion, due to high
content of inert and compostable material and high moisture content. Furthermore, the MSW
contain some hazardous waste, because of insufficient segregation of MSW at source.
Segregation of hazardous waste is very important before burning MSW in order to minimize
toxic pollution. The composition of RDF in India is more suitable for combustion. Since RDF

62
contains less inert material it will cause less operational problems during the combustion
process. RDF also contains less sulphur and chlorine than MSW, which lowers the risk for
corrosion problems in the boiler. [98] The lower content of inert and organic material will
also give the RDF lower moisture content, which is more beneficial for incineration.

Heating value: The lower heating value of a fuel should preferably be about 3 MWh/ton
(2580 kcal/kg), in order to operate an incineration plant without additional fuel. [143] The
average lower and higher heating values of MSW and RDF in Chennai, which also were
presented earlier in the study, is summarized in table 16.
Table 16 The average lower heating value of MSW and RDF in Chennai. [100]
Waste type LHV [MWh/ton] HHV [kcal/kg]
MSW 1.6 1376
RDF 2.6 2236

The heating value of MSW or RDF could be increased by reducing the moisture content. This
could be done by air drying during the dry seasons. During the wet seasons this could be done
by using hot flue gases from the combustion process. Another pre-treatment method is to mix
the MSW or RDF with another fuel with a higher heating value. Since the lower heating value
of MSW in India only is 1.6 MWh/ton, compared to 2.6 MWh/ton for RDF, more pre-
treatment is needed for MSW to sustain the combustion. Nevertheless, incineration of RDF
could be sufficient in Chennai without pre-treatment, if the boiler used for incineration allows
a slightly lower heating value.

Uncertainties in data: Since the climate in Chennai varies from dry and hot weather to
monsoon climate, there will be great variations in moisture content of the waste during the
year which will affect the heating value. Different studies show great variations in
characteristics and composition of MSW in India, depending on the season and the area where
the study was performed. This complicates the process of designing an incineration plant. A
misjudgement in design could cause a project failure, which was what happened 1987 when
the Danish Firm Vølund Miljøteknik set up a plant for mass burning of MSW in Delhi. The
main reason for the failure of this plant was that the MSW was very different in composition,
moisture and energy content than the waste that was initially tested. It had a higher percentage
of inert material in the form of sand, silt, rock and ashes. The energy content was only about
50 percent of the designed value which could not sustain combustion. Large quantities of
auxiliary fuel were needed as well as combustion air. This put strain on the burner and the air
supply arrangements and the high content of inert material caused problems in the ash
handling systems. [11]

5.1.1.3 Infrastructure
Since the capital cost for a mass burning plant with good flue gas treatment is high, the plant
needs to get revenues in order to cover the cost. The revenues could for example come from
selling electricity, process steam, district heating and cooling and/or from receiving a tipping
fee from those dumping the waste at the plant. Considering the electricity deficit in Chennai,
the main product from the plant will be electricity. Process steam could be sold to a nearby
industry; however, the feasibility for this purpose needs to be investigated. Because of the
warm climate, there is no need for district heating in Chennai. There is a need for district
cooling, although there is no infrastructure in Chennai today for that. Since there is no fee for
dumping MSW at the dumpsite in Chennai, there is no possibility for receiving a tipping fee

63
when dumping MSW at the plant. Regarding RDF, the investment cost for building a
combustion unit will be lower (see section 5.1.5.1).

5.1.1.4 Combined recycling activities

According to the hierarchy of waste management, which is described in section 2.3.1.4, waste
minimization, recycling and biological processing should be prioritized before thermal
processing. Production of RDF is combined with recycling activities and biological
processing, which gives other products that can be sold to the market such as recyclables,
bricks and compost. For a developing country like India, with a lack of an organized system
for segregation of MSW at source, producing RDF would give better use of resources. Better
use of resources gains both the environment and the economy. The financial incentives, in the
form of revenues from selling products generated from the process, are strong in developing
countries. Besides from selling waste products, there is also the possibility of getting revenues
through CDM. Since the processing of MSW decreases the waste going to the dumpsite,
methane emissions to the air will be prevented. The CO2-eqs that are prevented correspond to
the CERs that the company is eligible for. [92]

5.1.1.5 Developed vs. developing countries

Since mass burning of MSW has been proven both technically and financially viable in
developed countries, many western companies want to expand their business and apply the
same technology in India. Somehow, all projects regarding mass burning of MSW that have
been implemented in India the past years have failed. (see section 2.7.1.1). Table 17
summarizes the conditions in Chennai together with a comparison of the conditions in a
developing country (Sweden). See appendix 11 for further explanations of the different
conditions in Sweden.

Table 17 The conditions for mass burning of MSW in Chennai compared to Sweden.
Parameter Chennai Sweden
Positive public perception of mass burning of MSW no yes
Segregation of MSW at source no yes
Efficient segregation of hazardous waste no yes
Suitable MSW characteristics for combustion no yes
~ Heating value MWh/ton (LHV) 1.6 3
Possibility of getting revenues from:
Tipping fee no yes
Selling electricity yes yes
Selling district heating no yes
Selling district cooling uncertain yes
Selling process steam uncertain yes

5.1.1.6 Conclusion
The following arguments speak for the alternative that there should be combustion of RDF
and not mass burning of MSW in Chennai. Compared to MSW, RDF has

 more positive public perception

 more suitable characteristics for incineration
 higher heating value
 better possibility of material recovery

64
  less content of hazardous waste
 less investment cost when building a combustion plant.

Combustion of RDF

5.1.2 Who should process the waste and which methods should be
used?
Considering that there should be combustion of RDF, a processing plant for producing RDF
needs to be built. Hydroair Tectonics has several years of experience of processing waste and
their concept has been proven viable, both financially and technically. [122] They have
recently signed a contract with the CoC to take care of the waste at Perungudi dumpsite and it
is a good chance that they will get a similar contract at Kodungaiyur dumpsite. In this case
study it is therefore assumed that this company build a processing plant at either one or both
of the dumpsites in Chennai in the nearest future.

Hydroair Tectonics has experience from producing bricks from the inert material, compost
from the organic material and RDF from the burnable material. Furthermore, they have
experience from separating the recyclable fraction (see chapter 3). This concept has been
proven successful, thus it is assumed that they will continue with the same concept. The RDF
should initially be sold to coal fired industries as a substitute for coal. Depending on the
financial and technical viability for building a combustion unit, the RDF should in the future
either continuously be sold to coal fired industries or combusted with energy recovery.
Because of the electricity deficit in Chennai, a future alternative for compost could instead be
to use the organic waste for electricity production in a biomethanation plant.

5.1.2.1 Conclusion
Hydroair Tectonics should build a processing plant for MSW at either one or both of the
dumpsites in Chennai. In the initial stage they should segregate the inert, compostable and
burnable fraction and produce bricks, compost and RDF, respectively. The recyclables should
be separated. RDF should be sold to coal fired industries or burnt with energy recovery.
Biomethanation of the organic waste could be a solution for the future.

Hydroair Tectonics – The method that they should use is the

same as described in chapter 3

5.1.3 Where should the plant be situated?

There are several factors that need to be considered when deciding the location of the plant,
such as price, transportation and characteristics of the building ground.

The price for land differs greatly depending on the location and the building purpose of a new
establishment. If the CoC consider that the building will gain the society, they can even give
the land for free. [128] Taking into consideration that the plant for burning RDF will provide
the city with electricity, there is a great chance that the land will be given by the CoC for free.
[135]

65
However, because of the land deficit in Chennai, the best solution would be to build the plant
on the existing dumping ground, since this land area is not suitable for many other purposes.
Another advantage with building the plant on the dumping ground is that the existing
transportation routes for collecting and dumping the MSW do not need to change. The
problem though is that the two dumping grounds in Chennai are built on wetland, meaning
that these grounds are not suitable to build on. The processing plant for RDF will consist of
several small segregation units. Considering their light weight, they will not be a problem to
set up at the dumpsite. Whether the plant for burning RDF is suitable to build on the dumping
ground or not needs further investigations. If the plant, because of its heavier weight, has to be
placed elsewhere, the RDF could easily be transported. To minimize the transportation costs
the RDF-fluff could be processed further to briquettes or pellets. The plant in the case study
could be situated at either one of the two dumpsites in Chennai.

5.1.3.1 Conclusion
The RDF plant should preferably be situated on the dumpsite or close to the dumping ground
to avoid unnecessary transportation and straining on the environment. Considering the
availability and price for land, the dumping ground is a good alternative.

The plant in the case study could be situated at either one of

the dumpsites in Chennai or close to them

5.1.4 Should there be co-incineration with another fuel? In that case,

which fuel is suitable for co-incineration?
Considering the case of building a unit for burning RDF with energy recovery, the heating
value of RDF could be sufficient if the type of boiler used can handle a slightly lower heating
value. Yet, if suitable fuel is available, co-incineration is positive for increasing the heating
value and producing more energy.

Agricultural or industrial wastes are examples of fuel that could be suitable for co-incineration
with RDF. Alternatively, small amounts of coal could be added. The following text will
discuss the potential for these alternatives.

5.1.4.1 Agricultural waste

In a study made by Anna University, the future potential in Tamil Nadu for using agricultural
waste for energy production was made. The result shows that the potential is low. Within the
ten zones in Chennai the potential is 0 MW, since there is no land for agricultural purposes
there. In the nearby districts Kancheepuram and Tiruvallur the potentials are 9.47 MW and
8.33 MW, respectively. On the other hand, there are already smaller agricultural waste-to-
energy projects planned here which results in a zero potential. [130]

66
5.1.4.2 Industrial waste
To determine if a certain industrial waste is suitable for co-incineration with RDF there are
some issues that need to be considered:

 If the difference in viscosity and density is too large between the RDF and the
industrial waste, this can result in thermal straining of the boiler.
 The content of heavy metals and other hazardous waste should be limited.
 The waste should not have high content of chlorine, since chlorine causes problems
with high temperature corrosion. [143]

Most of the industrial areas are situated outside the ten zones of Chennai. One of the largest
industrial areas is called Manali and is situated north of Chennai. Here there are numbers of
industries which produce waste that could be interesting for co-incineration with RDF.

5.1.4.3 Coal
A large part of the electricity produced in Chennai comes from coal fired power stations. All
power stations in this area use sub-bituminous coal, with a heating value of about 5 MWh/ton
(4300 kcal/kg) As Chennai lies on the coast, there is a good possibility to import coal, which
can be mixed with MSW to increase the heating value. [137]

5.1.4.4 Conclusion
Whether there should be co-incineration with another fuel or not depends on the allowed
heating value for the chosen boiler and on the price and supply of suitable fuel in the
surrounding areas.

Since there is no potential for using agricultural waste, it leaves the alternatives of using
industrial waste or coal. If a suitable industrial waste could be found, it would be the best
solution both environmentally and financially.

RDF is preferably co-incinerated with suitable industrial waste,

if it is available.

5.1.5 Which technology should be used for combustion and what type of
flue gas treatment should be used?
There exist different technologies for waste combustion. In the following sections the best
alternatives regarding combustion technology and flue gas treatment for Chennai will be
discussed.

5.1.5.1 Combustion technology

The two main technologies for burning waste are moving grate and fluidized bed. The
strength and weaknesses with these technologies are described in box 7. Other technologies
for waste incineration are described in appendix 12.

67
 Box 7 Moving grate and fluidized bed - Strength and weakness

Moving grate
+
 Can handle MSW without pre-treatment
 Easy to operate
 Proven and commercially available in developed countries
-
 High maintenance costs due to many moving parts
 Minimum material recovery except for ferrous material
 Slow response to operational changes

Fluidized bed
+
 Can be used in combination with recycling operations [104]
 High combustion efficiency [30]
 Less ash because of the high combustion efficiency [30]
 Reduced NOx emissions due to lower temperatures[30]
 Low maintenance needed due to no moving parts [150]
 Fast respons to operational changes [150]
-
 Require pre-treatment of the waste
 High capital cost (The pre-treatment plant stands for a large part of the costs) [30]
 High temperatures can cause problems with sintering [150]

When the solution is to burn RDF, fluidized bed is a good choice of technology, which is
described in box 8. Except from environmental benefits, the fluidized bed has financial
advantages. When burning mixed MSW in a fluidized bed, the waste needs to undergo pre-
treatments to make it more homogenous. The pre-treatment facility is a large part of the
investment costs. Since RDF fluff is already homogenised, there is no need to have this
facility in this case, which makes it a cheaper choice than a moving grate. [144]

A large difference in operating a fluidized bed compared to a moving grate is that the
response from operational changes can be seen faster, which is an advantage. However,
operating a fluidized bed can be difficult for inexperienced technicians. According to Björn
Petterson at Händelöverket in Norrköping they had problems with sintering in their fluidized
bed during the first years due to inexperience, which was very costly. [126] To avoid these
problems knowledge transfer is important.

The fluidized bed should be bubbling and not circulating. The extra cyclone in the CFB
increases the investment costs, which makes it more profitable for larger applications. Since
the plant in Chennai will be relatively small it is therefore more motivated with a BFB. [150]

68
 Box 8 Fluidized bed
The fluidized bed (FB) consists of a chamber with a bed of inert material. The fuel is
distributed inside the bed and pre-heated with a gas or oil burner until it reaches the
ignition temperature. The bed mixture, which is supported by a plate, is fluidized by air or
other gas being blown through the plate. The combustion has no flames and temperature is
about 700-900 degrees Celsius. The flue gas carries particles out of the vertical chamber
into a cyclone, from where the inert bed material is carried back to the chamber again.
[35]

There are two types of fluidized bed combustor: bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) and
circulating fluidized bed (CFB) (see figure 26). The main difference is that the airflow is
higher in a CFB, allowing more particles to be carried over the vertical chamber. The
higher turbulence increases the contact area of the fuel particles and the combustion air.
The result is an increase in thermal efficiency to 90 percent compared to 89 percent with
the BFB and a decrease in emissions of CO and NOx. [30]

The extra cyclone, which is a part of the CFB, means higher investment costs. Therefore,
BFB is suitable for smaller applications of 1-50 MW plants while CFB is better for larger
applications of 10-200 MW. [97]

Figure 26 Bubling bluidized bed and circulating fluidized bed. [172]

5.1.5.2 Flue gas treatment

When waste is burned in an incineration plant with good flue gas treatment, the pollution will
be much less compared to open burning, which is common in India today.

As specified in section 4.1.1, the emission standards for waste incineration in India are similar
to those in Sweden. In other words, if a plant for burning RDF is going to be built in India, it
will need the same flue gas treatment as a plant in Sweden.

One of the challenges to set up an RDF-boiler for energy generation in Chennai is for the
project to be profitable. Since flue gas treatment is a large part of the investment cost, it is
important to choose a system with low investment and operational costs. Another issue is that
the availability of water in many areas in India is limited, which speaks for a flue gas
treatment that does not need waste water treatment. A semi-dry system with low investment
cost could therefore be a suitable choice. An example of a semi-dry system is the NID-system,
which is explained more in box 9. The advantage of this system is that it is simple and

69
efficient and it does not need any waste water treatment. Moreover it has low investment and
operational costs. [145]

Box 9 The NID-system

The NID-system consists of a NID reactor, fabric filter, lime and activated carbon. The
layout can be seen in figure 27. In this system lime, active carbon and water are mixed to
slurry and added to the flue gases before the fabric filter through the NID-reactor. The
slurry will bind to the acid components and the dioxins, which later are removed in the
fabric filter. The slurry is then re-circulating to save chemicals. [145]

A NID-system can be provided by Alstom, which is an international provider of power

generation and rail infrastructure technology. [95] The price for a NID-system from Alstom
is about Rs. 300 million ($6 million). [154]

Figure 27 The NID-system. [170]

Regarding NOx reduction, SCR is more efficient but since it is expensive, it is only motivated
if the requirement for NOx reduction is very high. [145] Considering that SNCR has been
sufficient to meet the standards for several plants in Sweden, SNCR should be sufficient for
this specific case in Chennai.

5.1.5.3. Conclusion
The RDF should be incinerated in a bubbling fluidized bed and the flue gas treatment should
be semi-dry with low investment cost.

Bubbling fluidized bed and semi dry flue gas treatment.

5.1.6 Which type of energy should be recovered?

Considering the electricity deficit in Chennai, the plant should first of all generate electricity.
Though, it could be difficult to find profit in this type of project, if selling electricity is the
only income.

70
In Chennai it is common that certain industries use coal for the production of process steam,
which is used in their production. If an industry of this kind would be situated close to the
RDF plant, the steam generated from the plant could be delivered directly to the industry. This
would be a cheaper and a more environmental friendly alternative for the industry than using
coal. If the same industry also generates waste suitable for combustion it could be co-
incinerated with RDF. A co-operation between an industry and an energy producing company
is thereby a win-win situation.

Because of the warm weather in Chennai, district heating is not an alternative. On the other
hand district cooling could be an alternative. Yet, considering the large investment cost for
district cooling pipelines and the current infrastructure in Chennai today, this alternative
might be more suitable in a few years from now.

5.1.6.1 Conclusion
In the initial stage electricity and/or steam should be generated. In the future, district cooling
could be a good alternative.

Electricity and/or steam

5.2 Presentation of the case

According to this study, the answers to the questions in the section above represent the best
solution for future MSW incineration in Chennai. The case can be summarized as follows:

 It should be combustion of RDF.

 Hydroair Tectonics should process the waste according to the methods described in
chapter 5.
 The plant should be situated on or close to one of the dumpsites.
 RDF could be combusted separately or co-incinerated with industrial waste or coal if
the heating value is not sufficient.
 The RDF should be combusted in a bubbling fluidized bed (BFB) with semi dry flue
gas treatment.
 Electricity and/or steam should be recovered.

5.2.1 Alternative case

An alternative to building an incineration plant with energy recovery is to sell the RDF
generated from the processing plant to coal firing industries as “green coal”. These industries
could use RDF as a substitute for coal in the existing coal boilers.

71
5.2.2 Problem formulation and system boundaries
The next part of the case study will try to answer the question:

 Should Hydroair Tectonics invest in a combustion unit burning RDF with recovery of
electricity and/or steam or should they sell their RDF to industries?

To be able to answer the question, the technical and financial viability for this specific case
will be analysed.

The technical and financial viability will be determined for two scenarios. In scenario 1, only
electricity is sold whereas in scenario 2, both electricity and steam is recovered. In scenario 2
it is assumed that a nearby industry buys the steam.

The result will be compared to the alternative case, which is that Hydroair Tectonics should
sell the RDF to coal fired industries. The case study with system boundaries is illustrated in
figure 28. As seen in the figure, the processing plant (that separates the waste fractions and
produces the RDF fluff) is not included in the case study.

Alternative case - sell

Processing plant the RDF
Hydroair Tectonics will If scenario 1 or 2 is a
produce bricks, compost bad investment, the
and RDF RDF should instead be
sold to industries

Combustion
Hydroair Tectonics will
invest in a combustion unit
for burning RDF with
energy recovery

Scenario 1: Scenario 2:
Recovery of electricity Recovery of electricity
and process steam

Figure 28 The flow chart and the system boundaries of the case study.

72
5.3 Technical viability
This section will analyze the technical viability of the project. To begin with, the technical
parameters will be specified and thereafter the potential power that could be extracted from
the plant will be determined.

5.3.1 Specification of technology and parameters

To be able to determine the potential power that could be extracted from the plant, the
following parameters must be specified:

 Efficiency of boiler, turbine and generator [%]

 Heating value of fuel [MWh/ton] (kcal/kg)
 Flow rate of waste to the plant [kg/s]
 Enthalpy of working medium at different stages in the steam power process [kJ/kg]

The following sections will determine these parameters for scenario 1 and scenario 2.

5.3.1.1 Efficiency of boiler, turbine and generator

The efficiency of the boiler, turbine and
generator can vary slightly from different
manufacturers. Below are examples of
suitable technology for the plant in this
case study. Further information about
price estimations and other suitable
technologies can be seen in appendix 8.

When electricity and process steam are

required, a steam boiler is necessary. The
boiler efficiency can vary for different
boiler types. Figure 29 illustrates an
example of a BFB boiler type called Figure 29 Ecofluid bubbling fluidized bed with attaching
Ecofluid, which is manufactured by parts. [144]
AE&E Group. This company is an
international provider of systems for thermal power generation and environmental
technologies and has a manufacturing unit in Chennai, AE&E Chennai Works. [109] This
boiler can burn fuel with lower heating value down
to 2.2 MWh/ton (1892 kcal/kg) and the boiler
efficiency is about 89 percent. [144] Further details
about the boiler can be found in appendix 8.

The turbine and generator can be provided by

Alstom, which is a global provider of power
generation technology. Figure 30 illustrates a
turbine, though a larger one than this project will
require. An average turbine and generator from
Alstom have efficiencies of 85 and 98 percent,
Figure 30 Alstom turbine. [171] respectively. [154]

73
5.3.1.2 Heating value
The heating value in scenarios 1 and 2 is assumed to be different, due to different conditions
in the scenarios.

Scenario 1: In scenario 1 there will only be production of electricity. RDF has an average
lower heating value of 2.6 MWh/ton (2236 kcal/kg) (see section 3.1.2.2). The BFB boiler in
appendix 8 can handle waste with a lower heating value down to 2.2 MWh/ton (1892
kcal/kg), which indicates that combusting RDF should be sufficient most of the time without
auxiliary fuel. Therefore it is assumed in this scenario that RDF will be burnt without
additional fuel, which means that the lower heating value of the fuel will remain at 2.6
MWh/ton (2236 kcal/kg).

Scenario 2: In scenario 2 it is assumed that there will be production of process steam, which
will be delivered to a nearby industry. If the same industry produces waste with a heating
value higher than the heating value for RDF, this waste could be co-incinerated with RDF.
Thereby the energy content of the fuel mix will be higher and the potential generated energy
will increase.

An example of an industry, that could be interested in buying steam generated from an MSW-
to-energy plant and also produces suitable waste for co-incineration, is Orchid Chemicals &
Pharmaceuticals Ltd, situated in Alathur south of Chennai. They burn coal to produce process
steam, which is used in their manufacturing processes. This company generates industrial
waste, which consists of carbon compounds such as toluene and ethanol. The heating value of
this waste is about 4.2 MWh/ton (LHV) (3612 kcal/kg). [153]

In Scenario 2 it is assumed that Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd will expand their
business and build a production unit close to the RDF plant. Instead of producing steam from
coal, they will buy the steam generated from the RDF plant. The RDF plant will co-incinerate
industrial waste with RDF, which will increase the heating value of the fuel mix.

It is assumed that the infusion of industrial waste will be about 25 percent of the total waste
mix consisting of RDF fluff and industrial waste. This will give a heating value of 3 MWh/ton
(2580 kcal/kg) (LHV).

5.3.1.3 The flow rate of waste

The amount of MSW going to Kodungaiyur dumpsite is approximately 1400-1500 tons per
day compared to 1500-1800 tons per day to Perungudi dumpsite. The company Hydroair
Tectonics has signed a contract with the CoC to take care of 1400 tons of MSW per day at
Perungudi dumpsite resulting in 350 tons of RDF. [37] If there will be a similar contract for
waste processing at Kodungaiyur dumpsite in the near future it can be assumed that the
amount of RDF will be about the same. With this assumption the incineration plant in the case
study could be situated at either one of the dumpsites.

The generation of waste in Chennai is most likely to increase with time. The segregation plant
will probably have the capacity to increase the production of RDF but as the incineration plant
is dimensioned for 350 tons per day it will not be possible to increase the amount of RDF
going to the incineration plant. However, the RDF could then be sold to industries and thereby
replace fossil fuels like sub-bituminous coal, which is widely used by industries in Tamil
Nadu.

74
Scenario 1: In scenario 1 it is assumed that the amount of RDF going to the plant will be 350
tons per day.

Scenario 2: With an infusion of industrial waste, which increases the heating value of the fuel
mix to 3 MWh/ton (2580 kcal/kg), the total amount of fuel going to the plant will be 466 tons
per day.

5.3.1.4 Parameters in the Rankine cycle

The process in an incineration plant is a steam power process, which is explained more in box
10. The parameters in the different stages in the Rankine cycle can be optimized for
maximum energy recovery. Nevertheless, compared to the ideal process, there are factors in
the real process that limit the possibilities of extracting maximum of energy. The fuel,
construction material and economy are examples of such factors. The principal rule for
maximum energy recovery is that the difference between the warmest and coolest point in the
Rankine cycle is as large as possible, i.e. that the steam should have a high temperature before
the turbine and a low temperature in the condenser.

Box 10 The Rankine cycle

The cycle consists of four processes which take place in four different components in a
closed system. The four components are: feed water pump, steam boiler, turbine and
condenser, all which can be seen in figure 31. The feed water pump increases the pressure
of the working medium. In the boiler the water is heated and vaporized into steam. The
steam goes through a turbine where it expands to overheated pressure and temperature, as
work is extracted. In the condenser the steam condenses into water when heat is transferred
to a cooling medium. From this stage, the condense water goes to a feed water tank before
it continues to the feed water pump and the Rankine cycle is completed.

To decide the electric and thermal power of a steam power plant, a temperature-entropy
diagram, T-s diagram, can be used. By deciding the pressure and temperature at stage a, b,
c and d in figure 31 it is possible to find out the enthalpy in the working medium at these
specific stages.

Figure 31 The Rankine cycle and T-s diagram. [167] [168]

75
The following section will specify the different stages in the Rankine cycle (as illustrated in
box 10) for the steam process in the case study.

Stage a: Stage a occurs after condenser when the working medium is saturated liquid. The
temperature at this stage is the same as in the condenser. For optimal energy recovery the
temperature in the condenser should be as low as possible. The highest dew point2 of the
surrounding area decides the lowest temperature for the system. [149] The average dew point
in Chennai can be seen in figure 32.

F
Figure 32 The dew point in Chennai through a year. [44]

The highest dew point in Chennai occurs in April and is 24.4 degrees Celsius. [44] This gives
the lowest possible temperature in the condenser to 35 degrees Celsius as some degrees have
to be added for the loss in the heat exchanger. [149]

When the temperature is decided, the pressure and enthalpy is given in a T-s diagram. The
values are presented in table 18.
Table 18 Characteristics of water in stage a in the Rankine cycle. [100]
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]
a 35 0.056 146.6

Stage b: The feed water pump increases the pressure of the water before it is fed into the
boiler at stage b. In order to get a flow of the feed water into the boiler, there has to be a
pressure difference before and after the boiler. Since it is a marginal pressure difference, this
is neglected. [149] The temperature of the feed water at stage b is the same as after the
condenser (stage a) and the pressure is the same as after the boiler (stage c). The enthalpy is
given in a T-s diagram and the values are presented in table 19.
Table 19 Characteristics of water in stage b in the Rankine cycle. [100]
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]
b 35 45 506.8

2
The dew point is the lowest temperature humid air can have without condensing into water.

76
The efficiency of the process could increase if steam is tapped off from the turbine to preheat
the feed water in preheaters, thus the temperature at stage b would increase. This is a financial
deliberation, where the profitability will depend on the price for electricity. In this study
preheating of the water is only performed in scenario 2, because the condensate from the
industry has a high temperature that would be senseless not to use.

Stage c: Stage c occurs after the boiler and before the turbine, when the working medium is
saturated vapour. For optimal energy recovery, the temperature at this stage should be as high
as possible. The maximum temperature that could be reached depends on the fuel. When coal
is incinerated, it is possible to reach temperatures around 530 degrees Celsius [149].
However, when the fuel is waste, which gives corrosive flue gases, the maximum temperature
is lower, around 400 degrees Celsius. [145] Better material or chemical additives would make
it possible to use higher temperatures. [149]

For the values in stage c in the Rankine cycle, Borlänge Energy’s values from their waste-to-
energy plant will be used. These values can be seen in table 20.

Table 20 Characteristics of saturated vapour in stage c in the Rankine cycle. [145] [100]
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]
c 400 45 3208

Stage d: Stage d occurs after the turbine and before the condenser when the working medium
is wet vapour. Hence, the temperature at this stage will be the same as in the condenser, i.e. 35
degrees Celsius. Figure 33 shows the steam power process in a T-s diagram. The blue line
illustrates the ideal process, while the red line illustrates the real process, assuming that the
isentropic efficiency of the turbine is 85 percent. In the ideal or isentropic process the steam
expands trough the turbine to the surrounding temperature and pressure (stage dis). Because of
the efficiency of the turbine the real process allows the steam to expand longer through the
turbine (stage d).

Figure 33 The steam process illustrated in a T-s diagram. [100]

The enthalpy in stage dis is read from the T-s diagram to 2 100 kJ/kg, which gives the
enthalpy in stage d to 2 270 kJ/kg. The calculations are presented in box 11.

77
 Box 11 Calculations of the enthalpy after the turbine.
𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑑
𝜂𝑡 =
𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑑 𝑖𝑠

Where:
ηt The isentropic efficiency of the turbine [%]
h Enthalpy [kJ/kg]

Assumptions:
ηt 85 % [154]

Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]

c 400 45 3208
dis 35 0.056 2100

Result:
The enthalpy in stage d is 2 270 kJ/kg.

The data for stage d is presented in table 21. The pressure and enthalpy is read from the T-s
diagram.

Table 21 Characteristics of the wet vapour in stage d in the Rankine cycle. [100]
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]
d 35 0.056 2270

Technical and financial limitation: There are financial and technical aspects that limit the
lowest possible temperature in the condenser. The lower the chosen temperature is in the
condenser, the larger cooling tower is needed, which makes this a financial deliberation.

Whether the chosen temperature in the condenser is too low or not can be illustrated in a T-s
diagram. As seen in figure 33 the point after the turbine (stage d) is in the wet area which is
below the line. This means that the steam will start to condense in the turbine and cause
erosion. To prevent this, steam could be extracted from the turbine (2), reheated in the boiler
and then sent back to a low pressure turbine (2’), as illustrated in figure 34. [167]

Figure 34 T-s diagram with two turbines. [167]

78
If two turbines are used, more of the energy content in the waste can be extracted and less
needs to be cooled away. The revenue from electricity will be bigger with two turbines, but
the extra turbine will increase the investment cost. Two turbines are only financially viable for
larger applications [144], hence this will not be an alternative for this specific case in
Chennai.

There is also a possibility to increase the pressure before the turbine. However, an increased
pressure means higher internal electricity costs and increased investment costs in the form of
more robust pipes. [149]

Additional parameters in scenario 2: In scenario 2, when both electricity and process steam
will be produced, the energy extracted from the plant will increase. Nevertheless, the
maximum extracted electric power will decrease when steam is tapped off the turbine. The
decrease in electric power produced depends on the pressure, temperature and flow of the
process steam leaving the turbine. Table 22 specifies the steam requirements of Orchid
Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Table 22 Steam requirements of Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals LTd. [153]
Required steam characteristics
Pressure [bar] 10
Temperature [°C] 180
Mass flow [kg/s] 6

Steam with this specific characteristic will be tapped off at an outlet of the turbine. The rest of
the steam flow will expand totally through the turbine and generate electricity. At the
industry, the steam will go to a steam generator, which functions as a condenser. Considering
losses in the steam generator, the steam pressure drawn from the turbine has to be slightly
higher. Assuming that the steam is drawn at 12 bar, this gives the temperature to 220 degrees
Celsius.

Hence, the Rankine cycle in scenario 2 will have two more stages, x and y, which are
specified in table 23 and figure 35. The enthalpy in stage x is read from the T-s diagram.

Table 23 The two extra stages in the steam cycle. [100]

Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]
y 220 12 2866
x 188 12 798.6

Figure 35 The steam cycle in scenario 2. [100]

79
The water after the industry has a temperature of 190 degrees Celsius. This water can be used
to preheat the feed water before the boiler. As the water from the industry has a pressure of 12
bar, a valve is necessary before the feed water tank to lower the pressure. The new value for
the enthalpy in stage b with preheaters is 380.9 kJ/kg and is calculated in box 12. This gives
the temperature of the feed water before the boiler to 90 degrees Celsius. However, this makes
only a small difference for the efficiency of the plant and is neglected in the further
calculations.

Box 12 Calculation of the enthalpy before the boiler in the presence of a preheater

𝑚𝑏 ∙ (𝑕𝑏2 − 𝑕𝑏1 ) = 𝑚𝑥 (𝑕𝑥 − 𝑕𝑎 )

Where:
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg] m [kg/s]
a 35 0.056 146.6 17.0
b1 35 45 150.8 17.0
x 188 12 798.6 6.0

Result:
The enthalpy after the preheater before the boiler (hb2) is calculated to 380.9 kJ/kg.

80
5.3.1.5 Summary of parameters
Table 24, 25 and 26 summarize the parameters that will be used to determine the potential
thermal and electrical power that could be extracted from the MSW incineration plant in the
two scenarios in the case study.

Table 24 Boiler efficiency.

Parameter
Boiler efficiency [%] 89
Turbine efficiency [%] 85
Generator efficiency [%] 98

Table 25 Fuel specifications for scenarios 1 and 2.

Parameter Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Fuel RDF RDF + industrial waste
Heating value [MWh/ton] (kcal/kg) 2.6 (2236) 3 (2580)
Heating value [MJ/kg] 9.4 10.8
Flow rate of waste [tons/day] 350 466
Flow rate of waste [kg/s] 4.1 5.4

Table 26 Parameters in the Rankine cycle.

Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg]
a 35 0.056 146.6
b (scenario 1) 35 45 150.8
b (scenario 2) 90 45 380.9
c 400 45 3208
d 35 0.056 2270
y 220 12 2866
x 188 12 798.6

5.3.2 Potential power generation

This section will calculate the potential electric and thermal power that could be extracted
from an MSW incineration plant in scenarios 1 and 2. Firstly, the fuel power, steam flow and
the thermal and electric efficiency are estimated.

5.3.2.1 The fuel power of the plant

The fuel power of the plant can be estimated if the flow rate and heating value of the fuel is
known, as well as the efficiency of the boiler.

The fuel power of the plant in scenarios 1 and 2 is 34 MW and 52 MW, respectively. The
calculations are presented in boxes 13 and 14.

81
 Box 13 The fuel power of the plant in scenario 1

𝑃𝐹 = 𝐵 ∙ 𝐻𝑖 ∙ 𝜂𝑏
Where:
PF Fuel power [MW]
B Flow rate of waste [kg/s]
Hi Lower heating value [MJ/kg]
ηb Efficiency of the furnace in a BFB [%]

Assumptions:
B 350 ton/day (4.1 kg/s)
Hi 2.6 MWh/ton (9.4 MJ/kg)
Ηb 89.5 % [111]

Result:
The fuel power of the plant is 34 MW in scenario 1.

Box 14 The fuel power of the plant in scenario 2

𝑃𝐹 = 𝐵 ∙ 𝐻𝑖 ∙ 𝜂𝑏

Where:
PF Fuel power [MW]
B Flow rate of waste [kg/s]
Hi Lower heating value [MJ/kg]
ηb Efficiency of the furnace in a BFB [%]

Assumptions:
B 466 ton/day (5.4 kg/s)
Hi 3 MWh/ton (10.8 MJ/kg)
ηb 89.5 % [111]

Result:
The fuel power of the plant is 52 MW in scenario 2.

5.3.2.2 Steam flow

The steam flow can be calculated from the enthalpy difference over the boiler (stages a and c
in the Rankine cycle) and the fuel power of the plant.

This gives a steam flow of 11.3 kg/s and 17.0 kg/s in scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. The
calculations are presented in box 15.

82
 Box 15 The steam flow in scenarios 1 and 2
𝑃𝐹
𝑚=
(𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑎 )
Where:
m Steam flow [kg/s]
h Enthalpy [kJ/kg]
PF Fuel power [kW]

Assumptions:
hc 3208 kJ/kg
ha 146.6 kJ/kg
PF1 34 MW (34 493 kW)
PF2 52 MW (52 196 kW)

Result:
The steam flow in scenario 1 and 2 is 11.3 kg/s and 17.0 kg/s, respectively.

5.3.2.3 Electrical and thermal efficiencies

The efficiencies of the plants in scenarios 1 and 2 are calculated from data of the steam flow
and the enthalpy at different stages in the steam cycle.

In scenario 1 the total mass flow of the steam is 11.3 kg/s throughout the whole cycle. In
scenario 2 the total mass flow of the steam after the boiler is 17.0 kg/s. Since the industry
needs steam with a mass flow of 6 kg/s at 180 degrees Celsius and 10 bar, steam with
characteristics shown in table 22 will be tapped off at an outlet of the turbine. The rest of the
flow (11 kg/s) will expand through the turbine to stage (d) and generate electricity.

The electric efficiency in scenario 1 is 31 percent and 24 percent in scenario 2. The thermal
efficiency in scenario 2 is 24 percent. The calculations are presented in boxes 16 and 17.

Box 16 Calculation of the electric efficiency in scenario 1

𝑚 ∙ (𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑑 )
𝜂𝑒 =
𝑚 ∙ (𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑎 )
Where:
ηe Electric efficiency of the plant [%]
m Steam flow [kg/s]
h Enthalpy [kJ/kg]

Assumptions:
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg] m [kg/s]
a 35 0.056 146.6 11.3
b 35 45 150.8 11.3
c 400 45 3208 11.3
d - - 2270 11.3

Result:
The electric efficiency in scenario 1 is 31 %.
83
Box 17 Calculations of the electric and thermal efficiencies in scenario 2

𝑚𝑐 ∙ 𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑦 + 𝑚𝑑 ∙ (𝑕𝑦 − 𝑕𝑑 )
𝜂𝑒 =
𝑚𝑐 ∙ (𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑎 )

𝑚𝑥 ∙ (𝑕𝑦 − 𝑕𝑥 )
𝜂𝑡𝑕 =
𝑚𝑐 ∙ (𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑎 )

Where:
ηe Electric efficiency of the plant [%]
ηth Thermal efficiency of the plant [%]

Assumptions:
Stage T [°C] P [bar] h [kJ/kg] 𝑚 [kg/s]
a 35 0.056 146.6 17.0
b2 90 45 380.9 17.0
c 400 45 3208 17.0
d 35 0.056 2270 11.0
y 220 12 2866 6.0
x 188 12 798.6 6.0

Result:
The electric efficiency is 24 % and the thermal efficiency is 24 % in scenario 2.

84
5.3.2.4 The potential electric and thermal power extracted from the plant
When electricity is produced, only a part of the energy in the fuel can be extracted. How much
depends on the electric efficiency and the efficiencies of the turbine and generator. The
thermal power possible to extract depends on the thermal efficiency.

The potential electric power in scenario 1 is 10.5 MW, whereas it is 12.2 MW in scenario 2.
The thermal power in scenario 2 is 12.5 MW. The calculations are presented in boxes 18 and
19.

Box 18 The potential electric power in scenario 1

𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝑚𝑐 ∙ (𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑎 )

𝑃𝑒 = 𝜂𝑒 ∙ 𝜂𝑔 ∙ 𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑡

Where:
Pe Electric power [kW]
ηe Electric efficiency of the plant [%]
ηg Efficiency of the generator [%]
Ptot Maximum power of the plant [kW]
m Steam flow [kg/s]
h Enthalpy [kJ/kg]

Assumptions:
ηe 31 %
ηg 98 % [154]
m 11.3 kg/s
hc 3208 kJ/kg
ha 146.6 kJ/kg

Result:
The electric power in an incineration plant producing electricity is 10.5 MW.

85
 Box 19 The potential electric and thermal power in scenario 2

𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝑚𝑐 ∙ (𝑕𝑐 − 𝑕𝑎 )

𝑃𝑒 = 𝜂𝑒 ∙ 𝜂𝑔 ∙ 𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑡

𝑃𝑡𝑕 = 𝜂𝑡𝑕 ∙ 𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑡

Where:
Pe Electric power [kW]
Pth Thermal power [kW]
ηe Electric efficiency of the plant [%]
ηg Efficiency of the generator [%]
ηth Thermal efficiency of the plant [%]
Ptot Maximum power of the plant [kW]
m Steam flow [kg/s]
h Enthalpy [kJ/kg]

Assumptions:
ηe 24 %
ηg 98 % [154]
ηth 24 %
m 17.0 kg/s
hc 3208 kJ/kg
ha 146.6 kJ/kg

Result:
The electric power in scenario 2 is 12.2 MW and the thermal power is 12.5 MW.
The power that needs to be cooled away can be determined by knowing the enthalpy and mass
flow of the steam before the condenser and the water after the condenser. This knowledge will
determine the required size of the cooling tower. The calculations in box 20 show that the
power that needs to be cooled away are 24.0 MW and 23.4 MW in scenarios 1 and 2,
respectively.

Box 20 The power that needs to be cooled in scenarios 1 and 2

𝑃𝑐 = 𝑚 ∙ (𝑕𝑑 − 𝑕𝑎 )

Where:
Data Scenario 1 Scenario 2
ha [kJ/kg] 146.6 146.6
hd [kJ/kg] 2270 2270
m [kg/s] 11.3 11.0

Result:
The power that needs to be cooled is 24.0 MW for scenario 1 and 23.4 MW for
scenario 2.

86
5.3.2.5 Summary of the estimated technical parameters
The result of technical calculations is presented in table 27.

Table 27 The estimated technical parameters.

Parameters Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Total amount of fuel
[tons/day] 350 466
Fuel power of plant [MW] 34 52
Steam flow [kg/s] 11.3 17.0
Electric efficiency [%] 31 24
Thermal efficiency [%] - 24
Cooling power [MW] 24.0 23.4
Electric power [MW] 10.5 12.2
Thermal power [MW] - 12.5

5.4 Financial viability

The costs for setting up and operate a waste incineration facility can vary greatly in different
parts of the world. Labour costs and the price of manufacturing resources in the country
where the facility will be set up are example of factors that will determine the final cost for
the project. According to Bengt Heike at EON in Norrköping, Sweden, the facility described
in this case study would cost about Rs. 5 billion, ($100 million) if it would be set up in
Sweden. This price includes everything such as flue gas treatment, piping, labour costs and
material for the construction work etc. [150] See appendix 8 for price estimations of specific
components needed in an MSW-incineration plant.

Because of the difficulties finding relevant data for the investment and operational costs in
India and the uncertainties applying the same data from developed countries on India, this
case study will focus on the revenues from the plant. The estimated revenues will determine
which plant cost is financially viable for the project.

5.4.1 Revenues
The possible revenues that the investor can get from building the plant are profits from selling
electricity and/or steam, CERs and from getting subsidies. The revenues from de two
scenarios are given in table 28.

Table 28 Revenues from scenarios 1 and 2. [37]

Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Electricity Electricity and steam
CERs (electricity) CERs (electricity and steam)
Subsidy Subsidy

5.4.1.1 Revenues from selling electricity and steam

The generated electricity will be sold to the state electricity board in Tamil Nadu, TNEB. The
price for selling electricity generated from burning MSW in Chennai is currently Rs.
3.15/kWh ($0.065). [130] The process steam which is generated in scenario 2 will be sold to
the company Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. At the moment they generate steam
to a price of Rs. 1/kWh ($0.021). Therefore, this process steam will be sold to a lower price,

87
which is assumed to be Rs. 0.8/kWh ($0.017). The number of working hours per year is
specified to 8000.

The calculations of the revenues from electricity and steam are presented in box 21. The result
shows that the annual revenue from selling electricity is Rs. 265 million ($5.5 million) in
scenario 1 and Rs. 307 million ($6.4 million) in scenario 2 and the annual revenue from
selling process steam is Rs. 80 million ($1.7 million).

Box 21 The revenues from selling electricity and process steam

𝑅𝑒 = 𝑝𝑒 ∙ 𝑃𝑒 ∙ 𝑕𝑜𝑝

𝑅𝑡𝑕 = 𝑝𝑡𝑕 ∙ 𝑃𝑡𝑕 ∙ 𝑕𝑜𝑝

Where:
Re Revenues from selling electricity [Rs./year]
Rth Revenues from selling process steam [Rs/year]
pe Price for electricity [Rs./kWh]
pth Price for process steam [Rs./kWh]
Pe Electric power of the plant [kW]
Pth Thermal power of the plant [kW]
hop Working hours per year [h]

Assumptions:
Parameter Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Price for electricity (pe) [Rs/KWh] 3.15 3.15
Price for steam(pth) [Rs/KWh] - 0.8
Electric power (Pe) [MW] 10.5 12.2
Thermal power (Pth)[MW] - 12.5
Working hours/year (hop) 8000 8000

Result:
The annual revenue from selling electricity is Rs. 265 million ($5.5 million) in scenario 1
and Rs. 307 million ($6.4 million) in scenario 2. The annual revenue from selling process
steam is Rs. 80 million ($1.7 million).

The company Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd will profit by switching from their
old system to buying steam generated from the incineration plant. Considering that they will
buy steam to a Rs. 0.2/kWh ($0.0042) lower price, they will save about Rs. 20 million ($0.42
million) each year.

5.4.1.2 Revenues from getting subsidies

As explained in section 4.2.1.1, there are possibilities to get subsidies for an MSW-to-energy
project from MNRE. As formulated by MNRE, it is possible to get financial assistance of Rs.
20 million ($0.42 million) per MW, subject to ceiling of 20 percent of project cost or Rs. 100
million ($2.1 million) per project, whichever is less. [50] Since the plants in scenarios 1 and 2
both are larger than 5 MW, it is assumed that the revenues from subsidies will be Rs. 100
million ($2.1 million).

88
5.4.1.3 Revenues from selling CERs
The prevented tons of CO2 emissions for a project correspond to the amount of CERs that can
be issued (section 4.2.1.3). The calculations of the prevented CO2 emissions for scenario 1
and scenario 2 can be seen in appendix 10. The market price for a CER, January to April
2009, was 11-12 Euros [110]. The CERs generated for a project will be sold before the project
has been realized, i.e. before the actual emission reduction has occurred and the CERs have
been issued. The buyer thereby takes a risk, as the project could fail to reduce the projected
emission reductions. Because of the involved risk the CERs have to be sold to less than the
market price. [146] The CERs are in this study assumed to be sold for 10 Euros (Rs. 680). The
revenues from CERs in both scenarios can be seen in table 29.
Table 29 The potential revenues from CERs. [110] [146]
Parameter Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Prevented CO2 emissions [tons/year] 66 076 104 056
Revenues from CERs [Rs/year] (million $) 44 931 680 (0.93) 70 758 080 (1.5)

The CERs are issued annually and can be issued more than once for a specific project. The
project proponent can choose between two crediting periods:

 A fixed crediting period of 10 years

 A renewable crediting period of 7 years renewed thrice (that is 7·3 = 21 years) [147]

In the second option the project proponent needs to justify baseline and calculate the CO2
emissions once every 7 years and then apply for renewal. Therefore, the most common is to
choose a straight 10 years period, which also is chosen for this case.

5.4.2 Alternative cost

In Hydroair Tectonics existing plant in Ichalkaranji they sell their produced RDF to industries
for Rs. 1000 ($21) per ton. In the case study it is assumed that Hydroair Tectonics has the
option to sell their produced RDF for the same price. If the revenue from the incineration
plant is less than the revenue from selling the RDF directly to the industries, the plant should
not be built. Therefore, in this case study, the price Rs. 1000 ($21) per ton will be used as an
alternative cost in order to estimate the allowed plant cost of the project.

5.4.3 Estimation of allowed plant cost

The revenues and costs described in the past sections will be used to estimate the allowed
plant cost. The allowed plant cost is the total cost (investment costs including operational
costs) that the project is allowed to have to be profitable, for a chosen payback time. A
summary of the known revenues and costs is presented in table 30.

89
Table 30 The known revenues and costs for the plant.
Parameter Scenario 1 Scenario 2
Annual revenues [Rs/year] [Rs/year]
Revenues from electricity* [Rs/year] 264 600 000 307 440 000
Revenues from steam*[Rs/year] - 80 000 000
Revenues from CERs** [Rs/year] 24 125 687 51 825 539
One time revenue [Rs] [Rs]
Subsidies [Rs) 100 000 000 100 000 000
Annual cost [Rs/year] [Rs/year]
RDF 116 550 000 116 550 000
*the revenue will increase with the price of electricity and steam (see section 5.4.3.1)
**max 10 years

By using the data in table 30, the allowed plant cost is estimated for scenarios 1 and 2, for
different chosen payback times.

5.4.3.1 Assumptions
 The price for electricity and steam will most likely increase with time. In the
calculations it is assumed that the price for electricity and steam each will increase
with 2.5 percent annually, from the values in 2009 which was Rs. 3.15/kWh ($0.065)
and Rs. 0.8/kWh ($0.017) respectively.
 The incineration plant could only operate for 8000 working hours per year due to
maintenance work etc. It is assumed that the working hours are the same for the
industry.

5.4.4 Result
The aim with the case study was to answer the following question:

 Should Hydroair Tectonics invest in a combustion unit burning RDF with recovery of
electricity and/or steam or should they sell their RDF to industries?

The answer depends on which payback time the investor allows. Considering that the investor
allows a payback time of 15 years for setting up an incineration plant, the allowed plant cost
is Rs. 3546 million ($74 million) for scenario 1 and Rs. 6007 million ($125 million) for
scenario 2, as seen in table 31. If the investor estimates that the total plant costs (investment
costs and operational costs) will be less than this amount, the plant should be built. If not, the
RDF should be sold to industries. The result is shown graphically in figure 36.

Table 31 Allowed plant costs for different payback times.

Payback time Scenario 1 Scenario 2
[year] [M Rs] [M USD] [M Rs] [M USD]
5 1133 24 1908 40
10 2348 49 3983 83
15 3546 74 6007 125
20 4977 104 8374 174

90
 .
Figure 36 Allowed plant costs for different payback times in million Rupees.

5.4.4.1 Discussion of result

The result shows that in scenario 2, when both steam and electricity are recovered, the
allowed plant costs are considerably higher. However, since additional components will come
with scenario 2 such as an extra steam piping system, modifications of the current steam
system in the industry, a more expensive back pressure turbine etc, the investment cost will be
higher. Nevertheless, most likely the extra cost will not exceed the revenues that will come
with scenario 2; hence, this scenario is probably the most profitable. In reality, finding a
steam demanding industry that could establish a production unit close to one of the dumpsites
in Chennai and at the same time generates suitable waste for co-incineration could be
difficult. The most realistic scenario is scenario 1.

Whether or not the real costs for setting up a plant will be less than “the allowed plant cost”
can be difficult to say. The investment cost for the plant described in scenario 1 would be
about Rs. 4808 million ($100 million), if it would be built in Sweden. [150] (The plant in
scenario 2 would be slightly more expensive.) This price only includes the investment cost,
not the operational cost during the plant’s lifetime. Considering scenario 1 (when only
electricity is produced) the total allowed plant cost during 15 years is Rs. 3546 million, which
is less than just the investment cost if it would have been built in Sweden. An assumption of
this could be that this plant should not be built. However, the costs in India could be
considerably lower due to lower labour costs and the possibility of using domestic resources.
As seen in box 3 in section 2.7.1.2 the plant costs for setting up the 6 MW RDF plant in
Hyderabad in 2003 was Rs. 400 million ($8.3 million), which is a lot cheaper than the
investment cost of the plant in Sweden. [32] In that case it could be profitable to build this
incineration plant. One aspect that could be questioned, regarding the price difference, is if the
plant in Hyderabad has the same flue gas treatment as a plant in Sweden, since the flu gas
treatment is a large part of the investment cost.

Another aspect of consideration is the environmental situation of the alternative method, i.e.
selling RDF to coal-firing industries. Which flue gas treatment do these coal boilers have?
Selling RDF to industries has certain environmental benefits. An advantage of burning RDF
in existing coal boilers is that a new plant does not need to be build, which causes less stress
on the environment with respect of building material. Furthermore when RDF is burnt in

91
existing coal boilers, it will replace coal and thereby also decrease the carbon dioxide
emissions to the atmosphere.

To sum up from the discussion above: It could be difficult to get profitability from setting up
an RDF-plant in India, if the same standard and the same flue gas treatment are demanded, as
in Sweden. Nevertheless, by using domestic labour and natural resources in India, the price
could be significantly lower and should therefore be analyzed further. Besides from analyzing
the financial gains, the environmental gains from building the plant could also be compared to
the alternative method of selling the RDF to industries, in order to determine the feasibility of
the project.

92
6 Conclusions
Based on the analysis in the case study, the following conclusions can be drawn on which is
the best solution for future MSW management in Chennai.

The best solution for waste incineration in Chennai is combustion of RDF and not mass
burning of MSW. The production of RDF should take place in a processing facility, set up by
Hydroair Tectonics. The products generated from the plant should be compost, bricks, RDF
and recyclable material.

The RDF generated from the processing plant should be sold to coal fired industries or burnt
with energy recovery. Considering that the RDF should be burnt with energy recovery, it
should be combusted in a bubbling fluidized bed. Since the amount of RDF is the same from
both of the dumpsites, the plant could be situated at either one of the dumpsites. It should be
situated close to the processing plant at (or close to) the dumpsite to minimize the
transportation costs. The plant should have a semi-dry flue gas treatment system, which has
low investment cost but sufficient flue gas treatment in order to meet the national emission
standards. The combustion process should generate energy in two different scenarios:

 Scenario 1: The fuel should consist of RDF with an average lower heating value of 2.6
MWh/ton (2236 kcal/kg). There should be recovery of electricity, which will be sold
to TNEB. 350 tons of RDF per day will be combusted in an incineration plant with an
electric power of 10.5 MW.
 Scenario 2: The fuel should consist of a fuel mix of RDF and industrial waste with a
lower heating value of 3 MWh/ton (2580 kcal/kg). There will be recovery of
electricity which will be sold to TNEB, and process steam which will be sold to a
nearby industry. Every day, 466 tons of RDF and industrial waste will be combusted
in an incineration plant with an electric power of 12.2 MW and a thermal power of
12.5 MW.

Considering a payback time of 15 years the produced RDF should be

 combusted in an incineration plant with recovery of electricity

- if the total plant cost does not exceed about Rs. 3546 million ($74 million)
 combusted in an incineration plant together with industrial waste, with recovery of
electricity and process steam
- if there would be an industry close to the incineration plant, with suitable waste for
co-incineration as well as a demand for process steam. Considering the specific
case which assumes that Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd will expand
their business and build a production unit close to the dumpsite, the plant should
be built if the total plant cost does not exceed about Rs. 6007 million ($125
million).
 sold to industries for Rs. 1000 ($21) per ton
- if the plant costs exceed the above mentioned.

93
94
7 Conclusive discussion
This section will discuss the result of the master’s thesis with respect of method criticism,
source of errors and suggestions of further studies.

7.1 Method criticism

The conclusion regarding if the RDF should be incinerated or sold to industries, is only based
on the financial viability. However, there are other aspects besides the financial that could be
considered, such as the environmental. This could be further analyzed.

In scenario 1, it is assumed that the lower heating value of the RDF is sufficient to sustain
combustion in the chosen boiler. It is said, that this specific boiler can handle heating values,
as low as 2.2 MWh/ton (1892 kcal/kg) (LHV). The average lower heating value of RDF is 2.6
MWh/ton (2236 kcal/kg) and it is therefore assumed that the RDF could be co-incinerated
without additional fuel. According to table 12 in section 3.1.2.2 the lower heating value of
RDF ranges from 2.0 to 3.1 MWh/ton (1720-2666 kcal/kg). It means that in the monsoon
time, when the heating value of RDF is at its minimum, there could be a need for co-
incineration. This is not considered in this study.

As mentioned in the case study, RDF could be co-incinerated with coal in order to increase
the heating value. Considering scenario 1 when 350 tons of RDF is incinerated every day, a
15 percent infusion of sub-bituminous coal with a lower heating value of 5.25 MWh/ton
(4515 kcal/kg) would give a total lower heating value of 3 MWh/ton (2580 kcal/kg). This
corresponds to about 62 tons of coal per day, which with a cost of Rs. 3000 ($63) per ton will
give an extra annual cost of Rs. 62 million ($1.3 million). Whether or not this is financially
viable could be further analyzed.

In the case study in scenario 2, it is assumed that the industrial waste is co-incinerated with
RDF. The method for feeding the industrial waste into the combustion unit is not specified.
Depending on the characteristics of the waste, the boiler might need to be modified. A
sprinkler system could be necessary if the waste is fluent and pelletation could be the case if it
is heterogeneous. This needs to be considered in order to determine the financial and technical
viability. Another issue is that the industrial waste might not even be suitable for incineration,
for certain reasons. The specifications described in section 5.1.4.2 should preferably be
fulfilled.

The incineration plant in the case study is situated at, or close to the dumpsite. It would be
most advantageous if it would be situated at the dumpsite, considering the lack of land area in
Chennai and because it would minimize the transportation costs. If the incineration plant is
suitable to place on the dumping ground or not needs further investigations.

The choice of flue gas treatment in the case study was determined from the fact that the
emission standards in India and Sweden were at the same level, which would mean that the
plant in India should have the same flue gas treatment as in Sweden, in order not to exceed
these standards. How strict these standards are followed in India is unknown. According to
Mr S. Balaji at TNPCB, depending on where the plant is located, different emission limits are
allowed. It is TNPCB that will decide whether or not it is possible to build the plant in the
requested area. Since the two dumpsites in Chennai are rigorously polluted, getting a
clearance from TNPCB to build an incineration plant at or close to one of these dumpsites can

95
be difficult. As Mr S. Balaji was saying, it would require a plant with very good flue gas
treatment. [132]

7.2 Sources of errors

The calculations of the heating value of the MSW in Chennai are based on the percentage of
the different components’ fractions in the MSW. In the studies where these data were found, it
does not say where in the waste stream the analyses were made. If they were made on the
dumpsite, the fraction of recyclable material would be less than in the beginning of the waste
stream considering that the ragpickers have sorted them out. A lower fraction of the
recyclable material, such as plastic, will decrease the heating value of the waste.

The calculations of the heating value of RDF are based on data about the content of specific
substances in the RDF. The quality of these data is unknown. Information about the heating
value of the industrial waste comes from personal communication with employees at Orchid
Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Also in this case, the quality of the data is unknown. Since
the calculation of potential power of the plant depends on the heating value of RDF and the
fuel mix of RDF and industrial waste, uncertainties in these values will affect the result.

7.3 Suggestions of further studies

 Investigate the possibility of using the organic fraction in a biomethanation plant for
electricity generation instead of producing compost at one of Hydroair Tectonics’
processing plants. Regarding the electricity deficit in India, this technique is to prefer.

 Examine the possibility to build an incineration plant at the processing plant in

Ichalkaranji. In Ichalkaranji, where one of Hydroair Tectonics processing plants is
situated, there are many textile industries that are in need of steam for their
production. Furthermore, there are large areas where they cultivate sugarcanes near the
processing plant. The waste from the sugarcanes could be used for co-incineration
with RDF to increase the heating value, while process steam could be provided to the
textile industries. In this area the ground water level is relatively high, meaning that
water is not so scarce compared to other places in India, which is advantageous if
setting up an incineration plant. [123]

 Study the potential for building an incineration plant with co-generation of electricity
and district cooling. Because of the warm climate in Chennai, district heating is not an
alternative. District cooling on the other hand could be an alternative. However,
considering the large investment costs for district cooling pipelines as well as the
current infrastructure in Chennai today, this alternative might be more suitable in a
few years from now.

 Investigate the possibility for using hot flue gases, generated from the incineration
process in the case study, to dry the RDF further and thereby increase the heating
value.

96
8 References

8.1 Written references

[1] Government of India, India at a glance, available at http://india.gov.in/knowindia/india_at_a_glance.php,
access date 2009-04-14.

[2] Rediff NEWS, India has fewer poor people: World Bank, available at
http://www.rediff.com/money/2008/aug/27poor.htm, access date 2009-05-27

[3] English in India, available at http://adaniel.tripod.com/Languages3.htm, access date 2009-04-14.

[4] United Nations, United Nations population division, available at http://esa.un.org/unpp/p2k0data.asp, access
date 2009-01-27.

[5] Central Intelligence Agency, CIA – The world factbook, available at

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html, access date 2009-05-18.

[6] Government of India, Planning commission, Eleventh five-year plan, December 2007, available at
http://ddws.gov.in/popups/XIPlan_BHARAT%20NIRMAN.pdf, access date 2009-01-27.

[7] Bhada P., Feasibility analysis of waste-to-energy as a key component of integrated solid waste management
in Mumbai, India, Columbia University, 1 July, 2007.

[8] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Annual Report, Renewable energy for urban, industrial and
commercial applications, available at
http://mnes.nic.in/annualreport/2007_2008_English/Chapter%204/chapter%204_1.htm, access date 2009-05-18.

[9] Asnani P.U., India infrastructural report 2006, Solid waste management, available at
http://www.iitk.ac.in/3inetwork/html/reports/IIR2006/Solid_Waste.pdf, access date 2009-05-18.

[10] International Energy Agency, Turning a liability into asset: Landfill methane utilization potential in India,
August 2008, available at http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/India_methane.pdf, access date 2009-
05-18.

[11] Dr. Kurian J., Lessons from municipal solid waste processing initiatives in India, available at
http://www.swlf.ait.ac.th/UpdData/International/LESSONS%20FROM%20msw.pdf, access date 2009-05-18.

[12] India Watch, Wake up call for India, available at

http://www.wakeupcall.org/administration_in_india/poverty_line.php, access date 2009-02-16.

[13] Ministry of Environment & Forests (MoEF), available at http://www.envfor.nic.in/, access date 2009-05-26.

[14] UNICEF, Water, environment and sanitation, available at http://www.unicef.org/india/wes_1427.htm,

access date 2009-01-27.

[15] Solid waste Management Manual, available at

http://urbanindia.nic.in/moud/publicinfo/swm/swm_manual.htm, access date 2009-05-28.

[16] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Planning Commission, Report of the working group on new and
renewable energy for XIth five year plan (2007-12), December 2006, available at
http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp11/wg11_renewable.pdf, access date 2009-01-23.

[17] Vallero D., Fundamentals of air pollution, Academic press 2008 fourth edition. ISBN 9-7801-2373-615-4.

[18] Indian e-waste guide, Hazardous processes, available at

http://india.ewasteguide.info/hazardous_processes#open_burning, access date 2009-05-18.

97
[19] The national law school of India University, Municipal solid waste, available at
http://www.nls.ac.in/CEERA/ceerafeb04/html/documents/Muncipalsoildwaste.htm, access date 2009-01-15.

[20] Central Pollution Control Board, Municipal solid waste, available

at http://www.cpcb.nic.in/Municipal_Solid_Waste.php, access date 2009-01-15.

[21] Ministry of Environment and Forest, Notification, available at http://envfor.nic.in/legis/hsm/mswmhr.html,

access date 2009-04-19.

[22] Central Pollution Control Board, Functions, available at http://www.cpcb.nic.in/Functions.php, access date
2009-03-06.

[23] Avfall Sverige, Svensk Avfallshantering 2008, available at

http://www.avfallsverige.se/m4n?oid=2582&_locale=1, access date 2009-01-27.

[24] Sunil K., Status of municipal solid waste management in India, available at
http://www.adb.org/Documents/Events/2005/Sanitation-Wastewater-Management/paper-kumar.pdf, access date
2009-02-12.

[25] Upadhyay V.P., Rajeswar Prasad M., Srivastav A. and Singh K., Eco tools for urban waste management in
India, available at http://www.krepublishers.com/02-Journals/JHE/JHE-18-0-000-000-2005-Web/JHE-18-4-000-
000-2005-Abst-PDF/JHE-18-4-253-269-2005-1353-Upadhyay-V-P/JHE-18-4-253-269-2005-1353-Upadhyay-
V-P-Abstract.pdf, access date 2009-03-05.

[26] Central Electricity Authority, Monthly review of power sector (executive summery), May, available at
http://www.cea.nic.in/power_sec_reports/Executive_Summary/2006_05/index.htm, access date 2009-05-18.

[27] Central Electricity Authority, Function and duties of CEA, available at

http://www.cea.nic.in/about_us/functions_cea.html, access date 2009-02-17.

[28] Central Electricity Authority, Monthly review of power sector (executive summery), May, available at
http://www.cea.nic.in/power_sec_reports/executive_summary/2009_01/index.htm, access date 2009-02-17.

[29] New Energy India, available at http://www.newenergyindia.org, access date 2009-03-29.

[30] Waste Technology, available at http://www.waste-technology.co.uk/index.html, access date 2009-03-01

[31] Sharholy M., Ahmed K., Mahmood G. and Trivedi R.C., Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities
– A review, available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VFR-4NGBB2K-
2&_user=651519&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=full&_orig=search&_cdi=6017&_sort=d&
_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035158&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651519&md5=5e2d4df6955
34a4f5a7e72ba654c3885#secx15, access date 2009-02-09.

[32] Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, Government of India, Energy recovery from waste,
available at http://mnes.nic.in/booklets/Book5-e.pdf, access date 2009-02-09.

[33] Friends of Earth, Pyrolysis, gasification and plasma, available at

http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/gasification_pyrolysis.pdf, access date 2009-04-27.

[34] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Solid waste, available at

http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/urbanenvironment/sectors/solid-waste.html, access date 2009-04-28.

[35] Ångpanne Föreningen, Energi och miljöfakta, available at

http://www.energiochmiljo.se/abonnemang.asp?cat=abo_mall&sid=1328, access date 2009-04-28.

[36] Science Direct, Estimation of residual MSW heating value as a function of waste component recycling,
available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VFR-4S0356W-
1&_user=651519&_coverDate=12%2F31%2F2008&_rdoc=1&_fmt=full&_orig=search&_cdi=6017&_sort=d&
_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000035158&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=651519&md5=b574b7f3ace
76a802f3ae01c41860017#bib16, access date 2008-01-05

98
[37] Hydroair Tectonics, various documents, 2008.

[38] Banwari L. and Reddy M.R.V.P, Wealth from waste, teri second edition, available at
http://books.google.com/books?hl=sv&lr=&id=1lv1Z_zd9csC&oi=fnd&pg=PA133&dq=RDF+MSW++India&o
ts=-82gGKrvkh&sig=osz6ey95VZkCaxQgCv7JfL1kiO8#PPA151,M1, access date 2009-04-19.

[39] http://www.swlf.ait.ac.th/UpdData/International/NRIs/MSW%20management%20in%20Chennai.pdf,
access date 2009-04-21.

[40] Borlänge Energi AB, Waste management in Sweden,information sheet 2008.

[41] Mälar Energi, Avfallsförgasning i Västerås, available at:

http://www.gasforeningen.se/upload/files/seminarier/gasdagarna%202008/8%20sven%20lees.pdf, access date
2009-05-05.

[42] University of Texas, available at

www.uth.tmc.edu/safety/environment/Onsite%20Biomedical%20Waste%20Treament%20, access date 2009-
05-26.

[43] XE, available at http://www.xe.com/ucc/convert.cgi, access date 2009-07-31.

[44] My Forecatse, Chennai, available at http://www.myforecast.com/bin/climate.m?city=64397&metric=false,
access date 2009-05-25

[45] Pinkmoose Birding, available at http://www.pinkmoose.ic24.net/india/india.htm, access date 2009-05-18.

[46] Chennai Hub, History of Chennai, India, available at http://www.chennaihub.com/history-of-chennai.html,

access date 2009-01-12.

[47] Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Second Master Plan for Chennai Metropolitan Area, 2026,
Volume 1, September 2008.

[48] Center for Civil Society, A statistical insight into health & education in Chennai slums, available at
http://www.ccs.in/ccsindia/interns2006/Statistical%20Analysis%20Health%20&%20Education%20in%20Chenn
ai%20Slums%20%20-%20Vydyanathan.pdf, access date 2009-02-13.

[49] Chennai Corporation, available at http://www.chennaicorporation.gov.in, access date 2009-05-18.

[50] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, F.No 10/3/2005-UICA, available at http://mnes.nic.in/adm-
approvals/er-municipalsw-0809.pdf, access date 2009-05-25.

[51] Central Pollution Control Board, Municipal solid waste, available

at http://www.cpcb.nic.in/Municipal_Solid_Waste.php, access date 2009-01-15.

[52] Singh S. and Bindloss J., Lonely Planet India, 12th edition 2007. ISBN 978-1-74104-308-2.

[53] Eca International, The gap between Chinese cities continues to narrow, available at http://www.eca-
international.com/showpressrelease.aspx?ArticleID=6432, access date 2009-01-11.

[54] Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Second Master Plan for Chennai Metropolitan Area, 2026,
Volume 3, September 2008.

[55] TeachMeFinance.com, Industrial waste, available at

http://www.teachmefinance.com/Scientific_Terms/Industrial_Waste.html, access date 2008-12-29.

[56] OECD, available at http://stats.oecd/org/glossary/search.asp, access date 2009-03-12.

[57] Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, available at

http://mnes.nic.in/annualreport/2006_2007_English/Image/Pic_l5_p8.1.jpg, access date 2009-05-18.

99
[58] State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu, Area Community Environmental Monitors, All
party meet condemns Gummidipoondi waste dumping project, available at
http://www.sipcotcuddalore.com/pr_050507.html, access date 2009-05-18.

[59] Government of Maharashtra, National Guidelines on Hospital Waste Management Based Upon the Bio-
medical Waste (Management & Handeling) Rules 1998, available at http://www.maha-
arogya.gov.in/actsrules/Biomedical/Biomedical.pdf, access date 2009-05-18.

[60] Central Pollution Control Board, Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Hanling) Rules, 1998, available at
http://www.cpcb.nic.in/oldwebsite/Bio%20Medical%20%20Waste/biomed-1998.htm, access date 2009-05-18.

[61] Karthikeyan G. and Karthikeyan S., Evaluation of biomedical waste treatment facility in Chennai, India,
available at
http://www.swlf.ait.ac.th/IntlConf/Data/ICSSWM%20web/FullPaper/Session%20IV/4_07%20_G.Karthikeyan.p
df, access date 2009-05-18.

[62] Central Pollution Control Board, Final e-waste documents, available at

http://www.cpcb.nic.in/oldwebsite/Electronic%20Waste/Final-Ewaste-Documents/Executive_Summary.pdf,
access date 2009-05-18.

[63] Ministry of Environment and Forests, available at http://envfor.nic.in/legis/hsm/mswmhr.html, access date

2009-04-19.

[64] Esakku S., Swaminathan A., Parthiba Karhtikeyan O., Kurain J. and Palanivelu K., Municipal Solid Waste
Management in Chennai city, India, available at
http://www.swlf.ait.ac.th/UpdData/International/NRIs/MSW%20management%20in%20Chennai.pdf, access
date 2008-12-08.

[65] Neel Metal Fanalca, Information sheet, 2007.

[66] Vivek P.S., Scavangers: Mumbai’s neglected workers, available at

http://www.ambedkar.org/News/hl/Scavengers.htm, access date 2009-05-01.

[67] The Hindu, Picking “wealth” from dumping yards, The Hindu – Southern States, August 5, 2002.

[68] The Hindu – Tamil Nadu, Marchland mars health, complain residents, October 6, 2008.

[69] The Hindu – Tamil Nadu, Stand – off between rag-pickers and civic body surface, October 17, 2008.

[70] Chennai Corporation, Solid Waste Management, available at

http://www.chennaicorporation.gov.in/departments/solid-waste-management/index.htm, access date 2009-05-18.

[71] Arvind K. Jha, C. Sharma, Nahar Singh, R. Ramesh, R. Purvaja and Prabhat K. Gupta, Greenhouse gas
emissions from municipal solid waste management in Indian mega-cities: A case study of Chennai landfill sites,
available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V74-4RCNPPV-
1&_user=651519&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000035158&_version=1&_urlV
ersion=0&_userid=651519&md5=d800914531eeb918f68e27c5713602e8, access date 2009-01-12.

[72] Types of coal, available at http://www.ket.org/Trips/Coal/AGSMM/agsmmtypes.html, access date 2009-05-

25.

[73] The Hindu, Once fresh water source, now it´s a quagmire, The Hindu – Tamil Nadu, October 13, 2008.

[74] Bureau of Environmental Health, Landfill gas, available at

http://www.odh.ohio.gov/ASSETS/95EF6FEF9DD346079C1C72C4FD72254E/LandfillGas.pdf, access date
2008-12-06.

[75] Kumar S., Mondal A.N., Gaikwad S.A., Devotta S., Singh R.N., Qualitative assessment of methane
emission inventory from municipal solid waste disposal sites: a case study, available at

100
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiImageURL&_imagekey=B6VH3-4D2WB2M-2-
7&_cdi=6055&_user=651519&_check=y&_orig=search&_coverDate=09%2F01%2F2004&view=c&wchp=dG
LbVtz-zSkWb&md5=62a0ae30c27e1928527d0c14e7a39e94&ie=/sdarticle.pdf, access date 2009-01-30.

[76] Sinha C., Open burning of urban municipal solid waste: state level analysis, available at
http://www.terienvis.nic.in/times2-2.pdf, access date 2009-01-06.

[77] Dr. Devotta S., Modelling LFG Generation in India Sites, available at:
http://www.methanetomarkets.org/events/2006/landfill/docs/devottar.pdf, access date 2009-01-06.

[78] United States Environmental Protection Agency, Open burning, available at

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/iii16_apr2001.pdf, access date 2009-01-16.

[79] N.H Minh, T.B Minh, M. Watanabe, T. Kunisue, I. Monirith, S. Tanabe, S. Sakai, A. Subramanian, K.
Sasikumar, P.H Viet, B.C Tuyen, T.S Tana and M.S Prudente., Open dumping site in Asian developing
countries: A potential source of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans,
Environmental Science & Technology, Vol 37, NO. 8, 2003.

[80] Would Health Organisation, Dioxins and their effects on human health, available at
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs225/en/index.html, access date 2009-01-16.

[81] Central Pollution Control Board, Plastic waste management, available at http://www.cpcb.nic.in/139-
144.pdf, access date 2009-04-03.

[82] Department of Science and Industrial Research, Automotive components, available at

http://dsir.nic.in/reports/ExpTechTNKL/Abs%20new/Automotive_Components.htm, access date 2009-01-17.

[83] Business Standard, IT in India: Big successes, large gaps to be filled, available at http://www.business-
standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=299725, access date 2009-01-17.

[84] Power supply position, available at

http://www.cea.nic.in/power_sec_reports/Executive_Summary/2009_01/23-24.pdf, access date 2009-02-06.

[85] The Hindu, Will there be light in the end of the tunnel?, The Hindu – Tamil Nadu, September 15, 2008.

[86] The Hindu, Mishandling of the crippling power crises, The Hindu – Tamil Nadu, September 8, 2008.

[87] Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, About TNEB, available at http://www.tneb.in/tneb-profile.php, access date
2009-02-06.

[88] Central Electricity Authority, All India installed capacity (in MW) of power stations located in the regions
of main land and islands, available at
http://www.cea.nic.in/power_sec_reports/Executive_Summary/2009_01/27-33.pdf, access date 2009-02-07.

[89] Tamil Nadu Energy Development Agency, About TEDA, available at

http://www.teda.gov.in/page/AboutUs.htm, access date 2009-01-17.

[90] Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited, available at http://www.ireda.in, access date
2008-12-12.

[91] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kyoto protocol to the United Nations
framework convention on climate change, United Nations, 1998, available at
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf#page=12, access date 2009-02-18.

[92] Energimyndigheten, CDM och JI i det Europeiska handelssystemet, avalible at:

http://www.energimyndigheten.se/sv/Internationellt/Internationellt-klimatsamarbete/Projektbaserade-
mekanismer-CDM-och-JI-/CDM-och-JI-i-det-Europeiska-handelssystemet--/, access date 2009-02-18.

[93] Guidence Bureau, available at http://www.tidco.com/guidance.html, access date 2009-01-15.

101
[94] Investing in India, Foreign Direct Investment Policy & Procedures, available at , access date 2008-12-12.

[95]Alstom Power, available at http://www.power.alstom.com/_eLibrary/presentation/upload_56853.pdf, access

date 2009-04-04

[96] Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Data summary of municipal solid waste management
alternatives, available at http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/10170792-amaAp2/10170792.pdf,
access date 2009-04-16.

[97] Klein A., Gasification: An alternative process for energy recovery and disposal of municipal solid wastes,
available at http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/kleinthesis.pdf, access date 2009-05-08.

[98] Bengtsson L. and Paradis H., Miljöeffekter av alternative system för behandling av hushållsavfall i
Santiago, Chile, SLU, Uppsala 2006.

[99] Environment Protection Authority, Use of cyclone for removing dust from gas stream, available at
http://www.epa.sa.gov.au/pdfs/guide_cyclones.pdf, access date 2009-05-19.

[100] Alvaréz H., Energitekniker, Studentlitteratur, third edition 2006. ISBN 91-44-05409-3.

[101] Central Electricity Authority, Office of air quality planning and standards, Fabric filter, available at
http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/td/combust/toolkit/fab-bag.pdf, access date 2009-02-14.

[102] European Commission, Waste incineration, available at ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/eippcb/doc/wi_bref_0806.pdf,

access date 2009-02-14.

[103] Alternativa tekniker för förbränning och rökgasrening, available at

http://www.soderenergi.se/UPLOADED_FILES/documents/73.pdf, access date 2009-02-14.

[104] Tekniska Verken, Gärstadanläggningen, available at:

http://www.tekniskaverken.se/kundservice/broschyrer/anlaggningar/Garstadverket_05_webb.pdf, access date
2009-02-14.

[105] Svensk Fjärrvärme, SCR som metod för kombinerad dioxin- och kväveoxidreduktion vid samförbränning
av biobränsle och avfall åtgärder, available at: http://www.svenskfjarrvarme.se/download/1318/Sam823.pdf,
access date 2009-02-17.

[106] Ny Teknik, Industrifilter renar rökgaser från dioxin, available at:

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/it_telekom/allmant/article9629.ece, access date 2009-02-17.

[107] Naturvårdsverket, Naturvårdsverkets författningssamling, available at:

http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/foreskrifter/nfs2002/NFS2002-28.pdf, access date 2009-05-15.

[108] Central Pollution Control Board, Environmental standards, available at

http://www.cpcb.nic.in/oldwebsite/Environmental%20Standards/COMMON_HAZARDOUS_WASTE_INCINE
RATION.html, access date 2009-05-15.

[109] AE&E Group, available at http://www.aee-group.com/eng/about_us, access date 2009-05-19.

[110] Nord Pool, available at http://www.nordpool.com/System/FinanceMarket/emissions/, access date 2009-05-

08.

[111] Tschanun I. and Mineur M., Biomass combustion with state of the art bubbling bed, available at
http://www.powergeneration.siemens.com/NR/rdonlyres/D9A7DB04-D060-4382-85F4-
70FCF48E445A/0/2_Biomasse_Combustion.pdf, access date 2009-05-19.

[112] United Nations Environment Program, Production of refuse-derived fuel (RDF), available at
http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:DjYppqOsCjsJ:www.unep.or.jp/ietc/publications/spc/solid_waste_manage
ment/Vol_I/18-Chapter12.pdf+RDF+characteristics&cd=3&hl=sv&ct=clnk&gl=se, access date 2009-05-18.

102
[113] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Emissions from waste incineration, available at
http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/bgp/5_3_Waste_Incineration.pdf, access date 2009-05-18.

[114] Joint OPEC/ World Bank Group Workshop on Gas Flaring Reduction, available at
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGGFR/64168360-
1121105776335/20578306/SaschaDjumenaOPEC2005.pdf, access date 2009-02-06.

[115] The World Bank, available at

http://wbcarbonfinance.org/docs/CDM_MethodologyUpdateEB25_Sept18_2006.pdf, access date 2009-01-18.

[116] Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, CDM country fact Sheet: India, available at
http://enviroscope.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/upload/984/attach/india_final.pdf, access date 2009-02-18.

[117] Central Electricity Authory, All India regionwise generating installed capacity (MW) of power utilities
including allocated shares in joint central sector utilities, available at
http://cea.nic.in/power_sec_reports/Executive_Summary/2008_10/8.pdf, access date 2009-03-01.

[118] Waste technology, available at http://www.waste-technology.co.uk/index.html, access date 2009-05-05

[119] Statens Offentliga Utredning SOU 2005:33,Fjärrvärme och kraftvärme i framtiden, available at
http://books.google.se/books?id=PVZ9HVv80d8C&pg=PA113&lpg=PA113&dq=verkningsgrad+p%C3%A5+k
olpanna&source=bl&ots=nyLOpJW3Wm&sig=g6H7oX_sd5szsL9QegpUOp33WBI&hl=sv&ei=uwEQSoKbLoi
J_Qbv7cCsBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1, access date 2009-05-25.

8.2 Personal communication

[120] K. S. Sudhakar, Project Coordinator, Hand-in-hand, Chennai. Interview 2008-08-25.

[121] R. Balasubramanian, Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chennai. Interview 2008-
09-24.

[122] H.B Singh, Chairman & Manager Director, Hydroair Tectonics, Mumbai. Interview 2008-10-30.

[123] R. Thorat, Project Engineer, Hydroair Tectonics, Chennai. Interview 2008-11-04.

[124] R. Arnberg, Head of International Project, Borlänge Energi, Borlänge. Interview 2008-10-12.

[125] I. Johansson, Technical Adviser Waste-to-Energy, Avfall Sverige. Mail 2009-03-18.

[126] B. Pettersson, Maintenance Engineer, E. ON Värme Sverige AB, Norrköping. Interview 2009-04-28.

[127] R. Hansson, Maintenance Engineer, Vattenfall Värme Uppsala, Uppsala. Interview 2009-03-03.

[128] R. Umapathy, Chennai Corporation, MSW Department, Chennai. Interview 2008-10-11.

[129] T.R. Krishnaswamy, Director, Energreen Power Limited. Interview 2008-10-11.

[130] P.R. Muralidharan, Deputy General Manager, Tamilnadu Energy Development Agency. Interview 2008-
10-13.

[131] R. Kannan, District Revenue Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, Biomethanation Plant in
Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Chennai. Interview 2008-10-22.

[132] S. Bajali, Additional Chief Environmental Engineer, Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board, Chennai.
Interview 2008-10-21.

[133] I. Bawa, Deputy General Manager, Neel Metal Fanalca, Chennai. Interview 2008-09-10.

[134] A. Törn, Journalist, Chennai. Interview 2008-10-16.

103
[135] C. Palanivelu, Chief Planner, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai. Interview 2008-10-
13.

[136] K. Balasundaram, Chief Engineer, Chennai Corporation, Chennai. Interview 2008-09-17.

[137] N. Sekar, Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai. Interview 2008-09-23.

[138] N. Kannan, Company Secretary, Guidence Bureau, Industries Department, Government of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai. Interview 2008-10-20.

[139] V. Manimaram, Superintending Engineer, Chennai Metro Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Chennai.
Interview 2008-11-02.

[140] M. Velmurugan, Director, Guidence Bureau, Industries Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.
Interview 2008-10-10.

[141] S. Karlsson, Svenskt Gastekniskt Center. Mail 2009-04-22.

[142] H. Jönsson, SLU. Lecture 2007-11-12.

[143] J. Carlsson, Developing Engineer, Umeå Energy. Mail 2008-09-10.

[144] A. Wahlström, Chief Executive, Svenska von Roll Inova AB. Mail 2009-05-18.

[145] A. Åberg, Head of International projects, Borlänge Energy AB. Telephone interview 2009-05-08.

[146] E. Särnholm, IVL. Telephone interview 2009-05-08.

[147] D. Srinivasan, Senior Consultant – Risk Advisory Service, Ernst & Young. Mail 2009-05-10.

[148] B. Huang, IVL. Mail 2008-09-03.

[149] K. Pernestål, Senior teacher at the department of physical and material, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
Interview 2009-05-20.

[150] B. Heikne, Maintenance Engineer , E. ON Värme Sverige AB (Händelöverket), Norrköping. Telephone

interview 2009-05-18.

[151] M. Jedeur-Palmgren, Maintenance Engineer , Borlänge Energy AB. Telephone interview 2009-05-18.

[152] C. Axelsson, Project Assistant, Svensk Energi. Interview 2009-10-01.

[153] S. Mani, Sr. Vice President and Head – Corporate SHE CSR, Orchid Chemicals, Chennai. Interview
2008-11-01.

[154] N. Ehdahl, Alstom. Telephone interview 2009-05-15.

8.3 Picture Sources

[155] Travelnotes, India, available at http://www.travelnotes.org/Asia/india.htm, access date 2009-05-18.

[156] PBase.com, available at http://k53.pbase.com/u9/android/upload/1718910.sweeper.jpg, access date 2009-

05-18.

[157] Central Pollution Control Board, Municipal solid waste, available at

http://www.cpcb.nic.in/Municipal_Solid_Waste.php, access date 2009-01-15.

[158] Alstom, available at http://www.se.alstom.com/pr_corp/2008/se/_files/file_52363_210889.jpg, access date

2009-05-18

104
[159] Power plants around the world, available at http://www.industcards.com/uppsala-chp.jpg, access date
2009-05-18.

[160] Chennai Corporation, Zone details, available at http://www.chennaicorporation.gov.in/zone/index.htm,

access date 2008-12-13.

[161] Kvarnström T.

[162] Moving grate, available at i, access date 2009-05-28.

[163] Coal boiler, available at http://www.icinorthdakota.com/images/antelope/boiler_schematic.jpg, access date

2009-05-08.

[164] Electrostatic filter and Cyclone, available at

http://images.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://www.epa.gov/apti/bces/module6/matter/control/images/fig09.gif&
imgrefurl=http://www.epa.gov/apti/bces/module6/matter/control/control.htm&usg=__62hFMP07GgH7ns8GSiae
2u0NUQ=&h=250&w=299&sz=15&hl=sv&start=12&um=1&tbnid=FsQ8Mal7EcGTTM:&tbnh=97&tbnw=116
&prev=/images%3Fq%3DElectrostatic%2Bprecipitator%26ndsp%3D21%26hl%3Dsv%26sa%3DN%26um%3D
, access date 2009-05-28.

[165] VPM Engineers, available at

http://images.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://www.electrostaticprecipitators.net/bagfilterpic%2520copy.jpg&im
grefurl=http://www.electrostaticprecipitators.net/baghouse.htm&usg=__uf-
hg78csrrLoCq4uRday4hrW94=&h=2050&w=2396&sz=281&hl=sv&start=2&um=1&tbnid=WmsbYDDPVnYn
M:&tbnh=128&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfabric%2Bfilter%26ndsp%3D21%26hl%3Dsv%26sa%3DN
%26um%3D1, access date 2009-05-28.

[166] Wet scrubber, available at

http://images.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mikropul.com/products/wscrubber/venturi.gif&imgrefurl=htt
p://www.mikropul.com/products/wscrubber/venturi.html&usg=__vmR08dHajOWiCHDNwvuO_ofPM0U=&h=
310&w=300&sz=13&hl=sv&start=4&um=1&tbnid=io_RqQoXdtom6M:&tbnh=117&tbnw=113&prev=/images
%3Fq%3Dscrubber%26ndsp%3D21%26hl%3Dsv%26um%3D1, access date 2009-05-28.

[167] Rankine Cycle, available at

http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/Sciences/Physics/Thermodynamics/BasicThermodynamics/SteamPower/St
eamPower.htm, access date 2009-05-28.

[168] Ekroth I. and Granryd E., Tillämpad termodynamik, KTH, Stockholm 1991,1994 and 1999. ISBN 91-
7170-067-6.

[169] University of Dayton, available at

www.engr.udayton.edu/udiac/Documents/Cooling_CoolTowerTheory.doc, access date 2009-05-28.

[170] NID-system, available at

http://images.google.se/imgres?imgurl=http://www.power.alstom.com/home/equipment___systems/ecs/industry/
waste_incineration/product_details/nid_description/_files/file_36854_43580.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.power.a
lstom.com/_looks/alstomV2/frontofficeScripts/index.php%3FlanguageId%3DEN%26dir%3D/home/equipment_
__systems/ecs/industry/waste_incineration/product_details/nid_description/&usg=__w46iV0-
smfEZ3VbsVaI1p4KgNFk=&h=434&w=590&sz=22&hl=sv&start=14&tbnid=R5KwjE3mdwHM-
M:&tbnh=99&tbnw=135&prev=/images%3Fq%3DNID-system%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Dsv, access date 2009-
05-18

[171] Alstom turbine, available at http://www.p-i-e.com/imgs/news/alstom_turbine.jpg, access date 2009-05-28.

[172] Wikipedia, available at

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c3/Combustion_systems_for_solid_fuels.gif, access date 2009-05-
21.

105
106
Appendix 1 The ownership of the power stations in India
The ownership of the power stations in India is seen in table A1.

Table A1 The ownership of the power stations in India in GW. [28]

Ownership Thermal Total Nuclear Hydro RES* Total
sector Coal Gas Diesel Thermal
State 42598 3912 603 47112 0 26826 2248 76186
Private 5241 4183 579 10022 0 1230 10995 22246
Central 29620 6639 0 36259 4120 8592 0 48971
Total 77459 14734 1182 93393 4120 36648 13242 147403

107
Appendix 2 Annual waste dumped in Chennai
The calculations of the annual population are based on the growth rate in table A2 with 2001
as reference year. The population was 7.04 million in Chennai metropolitan area according to
census 2001. [54] The reference year for per capita waste generation is 1996. The waste
generation in 1996 was 585 g/cap/day. [54] The waste growth rate per year is assumed to be 1
percent. [7]

Table A2 Annual waste generation in Chennai.

Year Population [g/cap/day] [tons/year]
2009 7806349 666 1394128
2008 7702367 659 1361939
2007 7599770 653 1330493
2006 7498540 646 1299773
2005 7404503 640 1270765
2004 7311645 633 1242405
2003 7219951 627 1214677
2002 7129408 621 1187569
2001 7040000 615 1161065
2000 6954460 609 1135601
1999 6869960 603 1110696
1998 6786486 597 1086337
1997 6704026 591 1062513
1996 6622569 585 1039210
1995 6542101 579 1016318
1994 6462611 573 993929
1993 6384087 568 972034
1992 6306516 562 950621
1991 6208423 556 926476
1990 6111856 551 902945
1989 6016791 545 880011
1988 5923204 540 857660
1987 5831073 534 835877
1986 5740375 529 814647
1985 5651088 524 793956
1984 5563190 519 773790
1983 5476658 513 754137
1982 5391473 508 734983
1981 5275414 503 711970
1980 5161853 498 689677
1979 5050737 493 668082
1978 4942013 488 647164
1977 4835629 483 626901
1976 4731535 478 607272
1975 4629682 474 588257
1974 4530022 469 569838
1973 4432506 464 551996
1972 2700124 460 332894
1971 2642000 455 322470

108
Appendix 3 Carbon content of MSW in Chennai
Table A3 shows the carbon content in each fraction of Chennai’s MSW composition as well
as the total organic carbon content in Chennai’s MSW. The MSW composition is based on
survey conducted by NEERI.

𝐶0 = 1000 ∙ 𝑆𝑊𝑖 ∙ 𝑑𝑚𝑖 ∙ 𝐶𝐹𝑖 ∙ 𝑂𝐶𝐹𝑖

𝑖

Where:
SWi Fraction of waste type i (wet weight) [%]
dmi Dry matter content in the waste (wet weight) [%]
CFi Fraction of carbon in the dry matter (total carbon content) [%]
OCFi Fraction of organic carbon in the total carbon [%]
i Type of waste
C0 Organic carbon content [kg/ton]

Assumptions:
Table A3 Characteristics of Chennai’s MSW.
OCFi [%]
Component SWi [%] dmi [%] CFi [%] default [113] Co [kg/ton]
Food 10.3 25 11.7 100 3
Paper/cardboard 8.4 77 33.1 99 21.2
Plastic 7.5 80 48 0 0
Textiles 3.1 90 49.5 80 11
Wood 0.5 80 39.2 100 1.6
Yard 41.1 35 16.7 100 24.1
Other fuel-wastes 0.2 90 48.4 0 -
Glass 0.3 98 0.5 - 0
Metals 0.2 97 4.4 - 0
Other waste 2.5 79.5 20.9 80 3.3
Inerts 26 100 0 - 0
Mixed MSW 100 61.2 16.8 0 0
Total 64.2
Result:
The organic carbon content in the MSW in Chennai is 64 kg per ton.

109
Appendix 4 The total methane emission in Chennai
The total methane emissions from the dumpsites in Chennai for 2008 are seen in Table A4,
and were 28 348 tons. C0 is calculated in appendix 3.

αt = ζ·1,87·Ai·C0·k·e-k·t
Where:
αt Landfill gas formation at a certain time [m3/year]
ζ Landfill gas formation factor
A Amount of waste deposited each year [ton]
C0 Amount of degradable organic carbon in the waste at the time of deposition
[kg/ton]
k Degradation rate constant [year-1]
t Time elapsed since deposition [year]
1.87 Amount of landfill gas produced per kilogram of organic carbon that degrades
[m3/kg]
i A specific year after disposal

Assumptions:
A The amount of MSW generated per year is taken from appendix 2
ζ A typical value for ζ is 0.5. In this study ζ = 0.58 has been used which is
estimated from a study in the Netherlands and a value used in other studies in
India [75]
k 0.094 year-1 is chosen on the same grounds as above [75]
C0 912 kg/ton [appendix 3]

 50 % of the landfill gas consists of methane [75]

 Both the landfills opened in year 1971
 The collection efficiency in Chennai is 73 % [76]

Table A4 Calculated methane emissions in Chennai for 2008.

Year of disposal t [years] A [tons] A*C0 [tons] α(t) *m3/year] CH4 [tons]
2008 0 1361939 87164 8886589 3173
2007 1 1330493 85152 7902533 2822
2006 2 1299773 83185 7027446 2510
2005 3 1270765 81329 6254198 2233
2004 4 1242405 79514 5566033 1988
2003 5 1214677 77739 4953588 1769
2002 6 1187569 76004 4408532 1574
2001 7 1161065 74308 3923450 1401
2000 8 1135601 72678 3493123 1247
1999 9 1110696 71085 3109994 1111
1998 10 1086337 69526 2768887 989
1997 11 1062513 68001 2465193 880
1996 12 1039210 66509 2194809 784
1995 13 1016318 65044 1953885 698
1994 14 993929 63611 1739407 621

110
Year of disposal t [years] A [tons] A*C0 [tons] α(t) *m3/year] CH4 [tons]
1993 15 972034 62210 1548473 553
1992 16 950621 60840 1378497 492
1991 17 926476 59294 1222951 437
1990 18 902945 57788 1084957 387
1989 19 880011 56321 962533 344
1988 20 857660 54890 853924 305
1987 21 835877 53496 757569 271
1986 22 814647 52137 672087 240
1985 23 793956 50813 596251 213
1984 24 773790 49523 528971 189
1983 25 754137 48265 469284 168
1982 26 734983 47039 416331 149
1981 27 711970 45566 367113 131
1980 28 689677 44139 323713 116
1979 29 668082 42757 285444 102
1978 30 647164 41418 251699 90
1977 31 626901 40122 221943 79
1976 32 607272 38865 195705 70
1975 33 588257 37648 172569 62
1974 34 569838 36470 152168 54
1973 35 551996 35328 134179 48
1972 36 332894 21305 73660 26
1971 37 322470 20638 64952 23
Total - 34026945 2177724 79382641 28348

Result:
By adding the amount of methane gas produced from the waste disposed each year, the
methane gas for year 2008 can be estimated. The total methane emissions in Chennai from
MSW in year 2008 were according to the first-order decay method 28 348 tons.

Analysis of methane emission calculations:

 Methane generation in a landfill is a complex process depending on many variables, for
example the anaerobic and aerobic processes on different depths in the dumpsite. These
processes are not totally included in the calculations.
 The landfill gas factor needs to be estimated for Indian conditions, the current value is
estimated from developing countries.
 Ragpickers remove approximately 20 % of the waste before it is landfilled, which is not
considered. On the other hand, the current carbon content in the waste was used for every
year. Previous studies show that using the actual value for the carbon content for each
year gives about 20 % more landfill gas. It is assumed that these two factors cancel each
other. [73]

111
Appendix 5 Calculations of the carbon dioxide emissions from
open dumping in Chennai
The calculations for fossil CO2 emissions are based on 73 % collection efficiency. It is
assumed that the amount of waste which is not collected is open burned in alleys.

The amount of MSW that is open burned:

𝑀𝑆𝑊 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑑

100 − 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦
= 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ∙ 𝑀𝑆𝑊 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ∙ 365 ∙
100

CO2 emissions from open burning, based on 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse
Gas Inventories [113]:

𝐶𝑂2 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 = 𝑀𝑆𝑊 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑑 ∙ (𝑆𝑊𝑖 ∙ 𝑑𝑚𝑖 ∙ 𝐶𝐹𝑖 ∙ 𝑂𝐹𝑖) ∙ 44/12
𝑖

Where:
population The population in Chennai 2009
MSW generation Amount of MSW generated per capita per day [tons/cap/day]
365 Days per year
collection efficiency Collection efficiency of MSW in Chennai [%]
SWi Fraction of waste type i (wet weight) incinerated or open-burned
[%]
dmi Dry matter content in the waste (wet weight) incinerated or open-
burned, (fraction)
CFi Fraction of carbon in the dry matter (total carbon content),
(fraction)
OFi Oxidation factor, (fraction)
44/12 Conversion factor from C to CO2
i Type of waste incinerated/open-burned specific as follows

Assumptions:
population 7702367 [appendix 2]
MSW generation 666 g/cap/day [appendix 2]
collection efficiency 73 % [76]

 The Tier 2b in 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories are
used: SWi, dmi and CFi are country specific while for OFi default parameter is used.
[113]. Table A5 specifies these parameters.
 All the waste in Chennai not collected is open burnt.

112
Table A5 Specifications of SWi, dmi, CFi and OFi in Chennai.
Component SWi [%] dmi [%] CFi [%] OFi [%] default [113]
Food 10.3 25 11.68 58
Paper/cardboard 8.4 77 33.11 58
Plastic 7.5 80 48 58
Textiles 3.1 90 49.5 58
Wood 0.5 80 39.2 58
Yard 41.1 35 16.73 58
Other fuel-wastes 0.2 90 48.42 58
Glass 0.3 98 0.49 58
Metals 0.2 97 4.37 58
Other waste 2.5 79.5 20.91 58
Inerts 26 100 0 58
Mixed MSW 100 61.23 16.79 58

Result:
The amount of waste that is going to be open burned in Chennai in 2009 is 500 225 tons/year.
The total amount of CO2 emissions from this waste will be 213 400 tons/year.

113
Appendix 6 Characteristics of the waste in Chennai analysed
by the CoC and NEERI
Table A6, A7and A8 specify the content of different substances in MSW and RDF, in order to
determine the heating value with Dulong’s formula.
Table A6 Calculations of the heating value of MSW in Chennai based on a study made by the CoC.
Component Content m(w) m(c) m(h) m(o) m(n) m(s) LHV HHV
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Food 8 75 11.68 2 9.72 0.53 0.03
Paper/cardboard 6.5 23 33.11 5.39 33.88 0.15 0.02
Plastic 7.0 20 48 8 18.24 0 0
Textiles 3.1 10 49.5 5.94 28.08 4.05 0.18
Wood 7.0 20 39.2 4.8 34.16 0.16 0.08
Yard 32.3 65 16.73 2.1 13.3 1.19 0.11
Other fuel- 1.5 10 48.42 8.01 20.97 0.75 0.51
wastes
Glass 0 2 0.49 0.1 0.39 0.1 0
Metals 0.03 3 4.37 0.58 4.17 0.1 0
Other waste 0 20.5 20.91 2.39 12.78 0.4 0.1
Inert 34.7 - - - - - -
Mixed MSW 100 31.71 16.84 2.39 12.11 0.59 0.06 1.61 1.98

Table A7 Calculations of the heating value of MSW in Chennai based on a study made by NEERI.
Component Content m(w) m(c) m(h) m(o) m(n) m(s) LHV HHV
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
Food 10.3 75 11.68 2 9.72 0.53 0.03
Paper/cardboard 8.4 23 33.11 5.39 33.88 0.15 0.02
Plastic 7.5 20 48 8 18.24 0 0
Textiles 3.1 10 49.5 5.94 28.08 4.05 0.18
Wood 0.5 20 39.2 4.8 34.16 0.16 0.08
Yard 41.1 65 16.73 2.1 13.3 1.19 0.11
Other fuel- 0.2 10 48.42 8.01 20.97 0.75 0.51
wastes
Glass 0.3 2 0.49 0.1 0.39 0.1 0
Metals 0.2 3 4.37 0.58 4.17 0.1 0
Other waste 2.5 20.5 20.91 2.39 12.78 0.4 0.1
Inert 26.0 - - - - - -
Mixed MSW 100.0 38.77 16.79 2.40 12.08 0.69 0.06 1.56 1.98

Table A8 Calculations of the heating value of RDF made from MSW in Chennai based on a study made
by Hydroair Tectonics.
Component m(w) (%) m(c) (%) m(h) (%) m(o) (%) m(n) (%) m(s) (%) LHV HHV
RDF 20 25 4 22.5 1.25 0.25 2.55 2.94
Lower limit 10 20 3 20 1 0.2 1.96 2.22
Higher limit 30 30 5 25 1.5 0.3 3.15 3.67

114
Appendix 7 Regulatory systems for setting up an incineration
plant in India
The regulatory systems in India differ both on federal and state level. The state level systems
can differ from various states while the federal systems are the same throughout all India. In
every state there is a guidance bureau that can provide help with enquiries regarding state
level regulations and support. [135]

A 7.1 Pre-project clearances

The pre-project clearances need to be dealt with before the company can get the approval to
start a business.

A 7.1.1 Federal level

The company needs to have
 a registered office in India. The company can be 100 percent foreign owned or it can
be a joint venture with an Indian partner
 an approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and a bank account. This is
necessary when the company wants to transfer money out from India. [93]

A 7.1.2 State level

The company needs to have
 a building plan permit
 environmental clearance
 safety clearance for fire, electricity, boilers [140]

Guidance bureau can assist with all the above listed enquiries. Table A9 shows the
responsible authorities/agencies for each enquiry, to which the guidance bureau will send an
application for the company. [140]
Table A9 The responsible authority/agency for the specific enquiry.
Enquiry Responsible authority/agency

Building plan permit Chennai Metropolitan Development Agency

(CMDA) or Corporation of Chennai (COC)
Environmental clearance Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB)
Safety clearance for:
Fire Directory of fire and rescue services
Electricity Chief electrical inspector
Boilers Boilers' directory

A 7.2 Post-project clearances

The post-project clearances can be dealt with when the company has got the approval to start
a business. The main post-project clearance is tax registration. The tax registration should be
made both to the federal and state government.

115
Appendix 8 Example of suitable technology with price
estimations
This chapter will give examples of suitable technology for this specific case, together with
price estimations of specific components.

A 8.1 Boiler
A suitable boiler for this specific case of MSW incineration in Chennai is Ecofluid bubbling
fluidized bed. This boiler is manufactured by AE&E Group, which is an international provider
of systems for thermal power generation and environmental technologies. An advantage with
choosing this company is that they have a manufacturing unit in Chennai, AE&E Chennai
Works. [109] This boiler can burn fuel with lower heating value down to 2.2 MWh/ton (1892
kcal/kg) and the boiler efficiency is about 89 percent. [144]

The boiler is delivered with attaching parts. The principal parts which are included are fuel
feeding system, overheaters and economizer. Furthermore, there will be a feed water system
with a tank, pumps and piping. The excluding parts are roughly spoken those situated before
the feed water system and after the superheaters in the steam cycle. The including components
in the boiler package are specified below in figure A1.

The boiler package from AE&E Group will cost about Rs. 2193 million ($44 million), if it
would be delivered to Sweden. [144] Since the company also has a manufacturing unit in
Chennai, the prices could be lower considering that it will be built there.

116
Figure A1 The including components in the boiler package from AE&E Group.

A 8.2 Turbine and generator

The turbine can be provided by Alstom, which is a global provider of power generation
technology. The price for a turbine (including a generator) depends on the type and size. For
this case, the cost will be about $13 million or Rs. 645 million.

A 8.3 Examples of other components involved in the steam power

process
Besides the boiler package, turbine/generator and the flue gas treatment systems the plant
needs other components such as preheaters, condensate storage tank, accumulator, condenser,

117
piping, pumps etc. Because of the limited amount of water at the dumpsite, a cooling tower
will be used as a cooling devise. No price estimations have been made for these components.

In scenarios 1 and 2 the components used in the steam cycle will differ. The main differences
in the two scenarios are the turbine type, the piping system and the extra components needed
for energy transfer in the industry. The differences in the two scenarios are illustrated in
figures A2 and A3.

Condensing
turbine

Steam boiler Generator  There will only be electricity

production. Hence, there will be a
condensing turbine.
Feed water pump Condenser

Figure A2 The steam process of scenario 1.

Backpressure  Some of the steam will be tapped off

turbine
Generator
the turbine and sent to an industry.
Therefore a backpressure turbine is
Steam boiler used. The rest of the steam will be
used for electricity production and
will therefore follow the same route
Feed water pump Industry as for scenario 1.

 Steam pipes will be used to deliver

the process steam to the industry,
Condenser and water pipes in which the
Figure A3 The steam process of scenario 2.
condensate returns to the plant.

 The industry will have a steam

generator and a heat exchanger. The
condensate that returns from the
industry to the plant will have a
relatively high temperature.
Therefore it will go directly to the
feed water tank.

118
Appendix 9 Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

A 9.1 What is CDM?

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is an arrangement under the Kyoto Protocol and
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). CDM allows
developed nations to reduce greenhouse gases in developing countries to be able to achieve
their emission reduction targets. The countries recited in Annex 1 of the Kyoto protocol, EU,
Australia and New Zeeland, have individual commitments to reduce or limit their greenhouse
gas emissions [91]. Parts of those emission reductions can be obtained in developing
countries, non-Annex 1 countries, where the emission reduction cost is lower. The emission
reductions can be achieved by making the energy production more efficient or by exchange
the electricity produced from fossil fuel to electricity produced from biofuel. The CDM
projects are a way for the Annex 1 countries to compliment the national commitments under
the Kyoto protocol, i.e. the CDM projects shall not be more significant than the arrangements
in the home country. The host country’s government has to approve the proposed CDM
project and evaluate whether the project leads to sustainable development. [92]

CDM does not only contribute to a more cost efficient emission reduction for the developed
country, it also assists the developing country to achieve sustainable development. The CDM
projects provide the developing country with new technology and contribute thereby to a
modernization of the industrial sector and the energy production sector. [92]

A 9.2 Supervisory bodies

The CDM Executive Board (EB) is the international agency to monitor the CDM projects.
They approve the methodologies, register and monitor the CDM projects and issue carbon
credits, CERs. Countries with commitments under the Kyoto protocol must have a responsible
authority, Designated National Authority (DNA), to approve and authorize the CDM project.
Developing countries who want to be a host country for CDM projects must as well have a
DNA to monitor the projects. A third part agency, Designated Operational Entity (DOE),
validate the CDM project before it gets registered at the CDM Executive Board, to ensure the
project results in long term and real emission reductions. [92]

A 9.3 Requirements to become a CDM project

The CDM project has to be approved by the host country which is the developing country
where the project is going to be set up and by the CDM Executive Board. To get approval
from the CDM Executive Board some criteria have to be fulfilled [148]:

Additionality: The first requirement for being considered as a CDM project is additionality.
There are two interpretations of additionality. The first refers to the emission reductions that
will not occur in absence of the project, environmental additionality, i.e. the emissions from
the project have to be lower than the baseline. The second interpretation, project additionality,
means that the project would not be realized without CDM due to financial deficit without the
income from carbon credits. At present the second interpretation is used by the CDM
Executive Board when evaluating a project proposal.

119
Contribute to sustainable development: The function of CDM is not only to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions; it must also contribute to sustainable development in the host
country.

An upcoming project: The project must be identified as an Upcoming Construction or Ready

for Construction. The project cannot be in operation already. This would contradict the
additionality criterion.

Eligibility of the project owner: The CDM project owner can be a country with commitments
under the Kyoto protocol or an industry with emission limits within an Annex 1 country. The
project owner has to be approved by the host country’s DNA. The eligibility of the project
owners is decided by the DNA and varies between countries. For example in some countries
the project owner has to be a national entity or a joint venture.

Eligibility of the host country: The host country must have ratified the Kyoto protocol and be
a non-Annex 1 country. An accrediting entity, a DNA, is as well required in the host country
to approve and monitor the projects and the project owners, and to confirm that the proposed
project will lead to sustainable development for the country.

Identification of a buyer: Before the project can become a CDM project the buyer of the
CERs must be identified.

A 9.4 Project cycle for CDM

It is important that the procedure to become a CDM project is not too bureaucratic. This could
result in default emission reductions or that the most effective option is rejected. However, if
projects that would have happened anyway are registered as CDM projects the net effect of
global greenhouse gas emissions will increase as there will be no change of emissions in the
developing country, but emissions in the home country can proceed corresponding to the
amount of CERs hold from the CDM project. The cycle to become a CDM project is
explained below and an overview is seen in figure A4 [114]:

The developing of the project: The project owner formulates an idea of the project, a Project
Idea Note (PIN), and presents it to the project developer. The idea is further developed by the
project developer to a project description, Project Development Document (PDD).

Validation of the PDD: The PDD is validated by an independent entity, Designated

Operational Entity (DOE), to make sure that the CDM project is in accordance with the
framework for CDM and that the estimated emission reductions are correct. The DOE has to
be accredited by the CDM Executive Board.

Registration of the project at the CDM Executive Board: The DOE present the PDD for the
CDM Executive Board with the validation report. Before the CDM Executive Board decides
whether the project is a CDM project or not, the PDD must be published for 30 days for
possible comments. If the project is approved PDD is registered as a CDM project at the
CDM Executive Board.

120
Verifying the CDM project’s emission reductions: CERs will not be issued until the
corresponding emission reductions are verified, to confirm that the emission reductions are
real. This is performed ones a year at the time of issuing and transfer of the CERs. The
verifying is performed by a DOE which cannot be the same one that did the validation. A
validation report is then sent to the CDM Executive Board.

Issuing and transferring of CERs to the buyer: Verified emission reductions are certified as
CERs and registered and are then issued to the buyer. The CDM Executive Board deducts a
part of the CERs generated by the CDM project before they are sold to the buyer. This is done
to cover for the adjustment costs for developing countries exposed for negative consequences
by the climate change. The project participants are bound to pay a fee to the CDM Executive
Board, based on issued CERs to cover the administrative costs. [92]
Figurekkk
Project Idea Note (PIN)

Project Screening

Project Design Document

Designated National
Host Country Approval Authority (DNA)

Validation Designated Operational

Entity (DOE)

Registration

Monitoring

Verification & Certification

CDM Executive Board

(CDMEB) Issue CERs

Figure A4 The project cycle for CDM.

A 9.5 Certified Emission Reductions (CERs)

A successfully implemented CDM project generates carbon credits, Certified Emission
Reductions (CERs), to the project owner. Each CER is equivalent to one ton reduced carbon
dioxide and is issued in exchange for real emission reductions. These credits can be used by
the investor to manage the reduction target within the Kyoto protocol or be sold on the
International Emission Trading (IET) market to generate income. All CERs have individual
serial numbers guaranteeing that they cannot be sold twice. [92] The value of a CER is not
fixed, it varies with the market. The price for a CER was 11-12 EUR the first months in 2009.
[110]

121
A 9.6 Baseline estimation
To know if the CDM project is environmental additional, it is necessary to estimate the
project’s baseline. The baseline is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per produced unit
energy, i.e. kg CO2/MWh. The project’s baseline is then compared to the baseline estimated
for the area where the project is going to be set up. If the electricity produced from the CDM
project replaces electricity from the national grid, the national baseline is used to calculate the
gained emission reductions. On the other hand, if the CDM project produced electricity is
replacing the regional grid the comparison then has to be made with the regional baseline. If
the CDM project totally replaces coal or oil, the CDM project’s emissions are compared to the
emissions from the corresponding fuel. [92]

A 9.7 Methodology
The proposed CDM project needs to use an approved methodology and be written in the form
prescribed by the UNFCCC. The CDM methodology describes the methodologies used for
determination of potential emission reductions achieved by the proposed CDM project.
Basically it describes the methodologies for baseline estimation, monitoring plans and project
boundaries. Since the projects vary a lot one specific methodology might not be suitable for
more than one project. But with validation of an approved methodology it could be possible to
approach the new methodology to an upcoming project. If no existing methodology is suitable
for a project the project developer can propose a new methodology. The new methodology
then first has to be approved by the CDM Executive Board. All the current methodologies are
possible to view at UNFCCC’s homepage. New methodologies are constantly approved by
the CDM Executive Board. [115]

A 9.8 CDM for a WTE project in India

Incineration of MSW demands a more advanced fluegas treatment then incineration of oil or
coal. MSW is a mixture of the society’s rest products and contains many different materials,
some of them with toxic components. In India the hazardous waste is not sorted out and
follows the MSW stream. Incineration of hazardous waste results in creation of dioxins. Many
other pollutants are formed while incinerating MSW. The nitrogen in meat products gives rise
to the formation of nitrogen hydroxides, and sulphur in plastics form sulphur dioxide. Both of
these harm the environment. The fluegas treatment of a WTE facility is approximately fifty
percent of the investment cost. To be able to build a WTE facility with good fluegas
treatment, CDM can be a way of financing the project. CDM will cover approximately ten
percent of the invested capital cost. CDM can never be the main financing but it gives an
incentive to invest in more environmentally-friendly technology.

At the moment India has 360 CDM projects registered at the CDM Executive Board and
1 426 at or after the validation stage. [116]

A 9.8.1 The Designated National Authority (DNA)

The Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF) is the accredited Designated National
Authority (DNA) in India. They have the power to invite specialists from different areas as
the government, industries, financial institutions, NGOs, commerce, consultants, civil society
and legal profession, as they need technical and professional input. [116]

122
A 9.8.2 Baseline
The national baseline in India is estimated from India’s energy mix. The corresponding
calculation for the state level is estimated from the energy mix in that specific region. In the
total baseline for an area import and export are included. The biggest energy source in India is
sub-bituminous coal which then also is the biggest contributor to the national baseline. [117]
[7] The estimation of the national and regional baselines is done by the Central Electricity
Authority (CEA). To estimate the baselines CEA uses the “Tool to calculating the emission
factors for an electricity system” developed by the CDM Executive Board. The baseline
database is annually updated as it changes when new projects are implemented. [117]

123
Appendix 10 Revenues from CDM in scenarios 1 and 2
If a project that will lower the net emissions of CO2 eq have problems getting founded, it is
possible to become a CDM project. By replacing fossil based energy production with energy
production from renewable sources carbon credits can be generated, i.e. the total amount of
CO2 eq with fossil origin that can be reduced gives the same amount of CERs. The CER can
be sold to market price to generate income to the project.

The CERs are issued annually and can be issued more than once for a specific project. The
project proponent can choose between two crediting periods:
1. a fixed crediting period of 10 years or
2. a renewable crediting period of 7 years renewed thrice (that is 7·3 = 21 years). [147]

In the second option the project proponent needs to justify baseline and calculate the CO2
emissions once every 7 years and then apply for renewal. Therefore, the most common is to
choose a straight 10 years period, which also is chosen for this case. A baseline for the
crediting period is then estimated based on the predicted future baseline. The baseline does
not change drastically and therefore it is possible to assume a realistic value. The Tamil Nadu
baseline has varied between 0.85 and 0.86 tons CO2/MWh since 2000 [139], and it is thereby
assumed that the baseline for the crediting period in this project will be 0.85 tons CO2/MWh.

According to IPCC Guidelines only the fossil carbon fraction should be taken into
consideration when calculating CO2 emissions from waste incineration. [113] As RDF is
derived from waste the same is considered in our case. The most significant greenhouse gas
emission from incineration of waste and coal is CO2. [113] In this study only a rough
estimation of CO2 eq will be made and therefore only CO2 emissions are taken into
consideration.

In the following section, the CO2 eq for the two scenarios are estimated and compared with
the present system to estimate how many CO2 eq that can be prevented. Thereafter the
potential revenues from CERs for both scenarios are estimated.

A 10.1 Prevented CO2 emissions for the two scenarios

In this section the prevented CO2 emissions for both scenarios are calculated.

A.10.1.1 Scenario 1
In scenario 1, only electricity is produced. The electricity produced replaces the electricity
from Tamil Nadu’s gridmix. By calculating the annual amount of emissions from the fuel, i.e.
the fraction of RDF with fossil origin, and compare this with the baseline for Tamil Nadu, the
net emission reduction can be estimated. The regional baseline for Tamil Nadu is 0.85 tons
CO2 eq/MWh. The annual CO2 emissions from scenario 1 are 5 324 tons/year. The
calculations are presented in box A1.

124
 Box A1 CO2 emissions from incineration of RDF

Fossil CO2 emissions from RDF based on IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories [113]:

44
𝐶𝑂2𝑅𝐷𝐹 = 𝑀𝑆𝑊 ∙ (𝐶𝐹 ∙ 𝐹𝐶𝐹 ∙ 𝑂𝐹) ∙ ∙𝜂
12 𝑏
𝑖

Where:
MSW Annual amount of RDF [tons/year]
CF Fraction of RDF that has fossil origin, (fraction of plastic) [%]
FCF Fossil carbon fraction in plastic [%]
OF Oxidation factor, (fraction) [%]
44/12 Molecular weight ratio [CO2/C]
ηb Boiler efficiency [%]

Assumptions:
MSW 116550 tons of RDF per year
CF 5% [112]
FCF 48 %
OF 58 % (default) [113]
ηb 89.5 % [111]

Result:
The amount of CO2 emissions from incineration of RDF is 5 324 tons/year.

The net emission reduction of CO2 in scenario 1 are 66 076 tons/year. The calculations are
presented in box A2.

125
 Box A2 The estimated net emission reduction from scenario 1

Emissions from electricity produced from Tamil Nadu’s gridmix:

𝐶𝑂2𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑥 = 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 ∙ 𝑕𝑜𝑝 ∙ 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑇𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑑𝑢

Prevented CO2 – emissions from scenario 1:

𝐶𝑂2𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 = 𝐶𝑂2𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑥 − 𝐶𝑂2𝑅𝐷 𝐹

Where:
Electric power The potential electric power [MW]
hop Operating hours for the plant [h]
baselineTamilNadu The baseline for Tamil Nadu, estimated from the gridmix
[tons of CO2/MWh]
CO2RDF The CO2 – emissions from scenario 1 [tons/year]

Assumptions:
Electric power 10.5 MW [box 14]
hop 8000 hours
baselineTamilNadu 0.85 tons of CO2/MWh [137]
CO2RDF 5324 tons/year [box A1]

Result:
If electricity is produced with Tamil Nadu’s gridmix, the CO2 emissions will be 71 400
tons/year. The prevented CO2 emissions in scenario 1 will be 66 076 tons/year.

A 10.1.2 Scenario 2
In scenario 2, electricity and process steam are produced. The electricity produced replaces
the electricity from Tamil Nadu’s gridmix. By calculating the annual amount of emissions
from the fuel, i.e. the fraction of RDF with fossil origin and comparing it with the baseline for
Tamil Nadu, the net emission reduction can be estimated. The regional baseline for Tamil
Nadu is 0.85 tons CO2 eq/MWh. It is assumed that the industrial waste is free from fossil
carbon.

In scenario 2, the industry’s present steam production has to be considered. The industry
produces steam from sub-bituminous coal. If the industry buys process steam generated at the
RDF plant CO2 emissions can be prevented. The CO2 emissions prevented are the difference
between the CO2 emissions from sub-bituminous coal that the industry currently uses to
produce their process steam and the CO2 emissions from the fuel in the RDF plant to generate
the required steam. The CO2 emissions from sub-bituminous coal incinerated in the industry
is 37 251 tons/year. The calculations are presented in box A3.

126
Box A3 CO2 emissions from the sub-bituminous coal incinerated in the industry
The annual amount of sub-bituminous coal for the steam production in the industry:

𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 = 𝑕𝑏 − 𝑕𝑎 ∗ 𝑚
𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟
𝑆𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡 =
𝜂𝑏

𝑆𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡 ∗ 𝑕𝑜𝑝

𝐶𝑜𝑎𝑙 =
𝐿𝐻𝑉

CO2 emissions from sub-bituminous coal in the industry:

44
𝐶𝑂2 𝑠𝑢𝑏 −𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠 = 𝐶𝑜𝑎𝑙 ∙ 𝐶𝐹 ∙ ∙𝜂
12 𝑏

Where:
Steam power The industry’s steam demand [MW]
Size of plant The needed size of the plant for the required steam [MW]
Coal Amount of sub-bituminous coal needed [tons/year]
𝑚 Mass flow [kg/s]
hb Enthalpy for steam before the industry [MJ/kg]
ha Enthalpy for condense after the industry [MJ/kg]
ηb Efficiency of coal boiler [%]
hop Operating hours
LHV Lower heating value for sub-bituminous coal [MWh/ton]
CF The carbon fraction in the sub-bituminous coal [%]
44/12 Molecular weight ratio CO2/C

The industry needs steam at 180 degrees Celsius and 10 bar. Considering losses in the
steam generator, the steam temperature drawn from the turbine has to be 190 degrees
Celsius and 12.6 bar.

Assumptions:
𝑚 6 kg/s
hb 2.778 MJ/kg
ha 0.808 MJ/kg
ηb 89 % [119]
hop 8 000
LHV 5.25 MWh/ton [72]
CF 40 % [72]

Result:
The amount of sub-bituminous coal needed for the industry’s steam production will be 20
240 tons/year. The CO2 emissions from sub-bituminous coal for steam production in the
industry will be 26 420 tons/year.

127
The net emission reduction of CO2 in scenario 2 is 87 007 tons/year. The calculations are
presented in box A4.

Box A4 The net emission reduction from scenario 2

Emissions from electricity produced from Tamil Nadu’s gridmix:

𝐶𝑂2𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑥 = 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 ∙ 𝑕𝑜𝑝 ∙ 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑇𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑑𝑢

Prevented CO2 emissions in scenario 2:

𝐶𝑂2𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 = 𝐶𝑂2𝑠𝑢𝑏 −𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠 + 𝐶𝑂2𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑥 − 𝐶𝑂2𝑅𝐷𝐹

Where:
Electric power The potential electric power calculated in Box X [MW]
hop Operating hours for the plant
baselineTamilNadu The baseline for Tamil Nadu, estimated from the gridmix
[tons of CO2/MWh]
CO2RDF The CO2 emissions from RDF [tons/year]
CO2sub −bituminous The CO2 emissions from sub-bituminous coal incinerated in the
industry [tons/year]

Assumptions:
Electric power 12.2 MW [box 15]
hop 8 000
baselineTamilNadu 0.85 tons of CO2/MWh [137]
CO2RDF 5 324 tons/year [box A1]
CO2sub −bituminous 26 420 tons/year [box A3]

Result:
The CO2 emissions from Tamil Nadu gridmix are 82 960 tons/year. The prevented CO2
emissions in scenario 2 will be 104 056 tons/year.

128
Appendix 11 MSW management in developed countries
Many western companies within the waste sector are interested in expanding their business
and in setting up waste incineration plants in developing countries. Somehow, very few of
these companies experience that their projects are successful. A technology which is proven
successful in one country could be complicated to just apply on another country with different
waste characteristics, infrastructure and climate.

To better understand the differences between MSW management in developed and developing
countries and their different choice of technology, this chapter will give an overview of MSW
management in developed countries with focus on Sweden.

A 11.1 MSW management in Sweden

Sweden, which is seen in figure A5, is a small country in the north of Europe with about 9
million inhabitants. It has a temperate climate with cold winters and cool summers.
Residential heating is necessary during the winters while cooling during the summers is more
common in public buildings such as offices and other institutional buildings.

Figure A5 Map of Sweden

Around 20 years ago, the most common method in Sweden to treat waste was mechanical
segregation and processing of RDF. Along with improved waste management, increased
heating value and increased demand for energy the method of direct incineration became
more financially viable. Today the most common way to treat MSW in Sweden is direct
incineration of mixed MSW. [124]

Waste incineration in Sweden is always combined with energy recovery. The largest part of
the energy recovered is heat, which is used as district heating. Electricity generation is
sometimes combined with production of heat, which is delivered to the grid. During the last
years, production of cold has become more common in Sweden, which is used as district
cooling in public buildings. Many incineration plants also deliver process steam directly from
the plant to industries.

A 11.1.1 MSW treatments

The total amount of MSW treated in Sweden in 2007 was 4 717 380 tons, which is about 514
kg per person. Figure A6 illustrates that the largest parts of the MSW treated in Sweden was

129
recycled and incinerated with energy recovery. Only 4.0 percent of the MSW was sent to
sanitary landfills. [23]

Figure A6 MSW treatments in Sweden in 2007. [23]

A 11.1.2 Hazardous waste treatment

An important factor in the MSW management strategy in Sweden is to sort out the hazardous
waste from the MSW generated. 40 880 tons of hazardous waste was collected from the
households in 2007. Even though the hazardous waste stands for less than 1 percent of waste
generated, it contributes to more that 90 percent of the environmental stress from MSW. [124]

The hazardous waste is treated differently depending on the possible damage they can cause.
Impregnated tree and biomedical waste are often burned together with MSW in incineration
plants with certain permission. Material recycling and separation processes of hazardous
components are used for batteries, fluorescent lamps, paint bottles and oil filter. The
Electronic waste (E-waste) is firstly dismantled and thereafter the different components are
recycled, treated or incinerated. It occurs that the E-waste is donated to developing countries,
where the possibilities of taking care of the waste properly are limited. The hazardous
components that cannot be recycled or rendered harmless are put on sanitary landfills. [23]

A 11.1.3 Material recycling and biological processing

The government of Sweden has set up a goal that at least 50 percent of the MSW generated
should be recycled through material recycling or biological processing, by the year 2010.
During 2007 this amount was 2 299 020, which was 48.7 percent of the total amount of MSW
generated. [23]

130
A 11.1.3.1 Material recycling
The amount of material recycled in Sweden in 2007 was 1 737 720 tons. Segregation of
paper, metal, plastic, glass and E-waste is done in the households using different bins for each
fraction. Figure A7 shows the recycling degree of specific materials. [23]

I
Figure A7 Recycling degree of specific materials in Sweden in 2007. [23]

A 11.1.3.2 Biological processing

The total amount of organic waste (food waste and green waste) that was biologically
processed in 2007 was 561 300 tons. [23]

228 8110 MWh of biogas was produced in biomethanation plants throughout Sweden in 2007,
which is equal to 26 million litres of petrol. Today the biogas is mostly used as automotive
fuel. [23]

During 2007, 336 100 tons of fertilizer was produced in compost plants in Sweden. The
produced compost was primarily used as soil conditioner. [23]

A 11.1.4 Incineration with energy recovery

The principal method for treating waste in Sweden is mass burning of mixed MSW in a
moving grate or in a fluidized bed (the technology is described in chapter 7 and appendix 12).
There are about 30 incineration plants in Sweden, of which most are moving grates. [23]

The share of the MSW generated in 2007, that was incinerated with energy recovery, was
46.4 percent. In Sweden it is common to incinerate other types of waste together with MSW
in the same plant, mostly industrial waste but also bio-medical and other less harmful
hazardous waste types. [23]

The total amount of electricity and heat generated in 2007 was 13.6 TWh, of which 90 percent
was heat and 10 percent electricity. [23] About 60 percent of the incineration plants do not

131
have electricity production at all. Table A10 specifies the amount of waste incinerated in
Sweden in 2007 and the electricity and heat recovered.
Table A10 The amount of waste incinerated and the energy recovered in Sweden in 2007. [23]
Incineration [tons] Production [MWh]
MSW 2 190 980 Heat 12 151 270
Other waste 2 279 710 Electricity 1 482 750
Total amount of waste incinerated 4 470 690 Total energy production 13 634 020

A 11.1.4.1 Emissions from waste incineration

Since the middle of 1980s there have been strict emission standards in Sweden for how much
emission that is allowed from an incineration plant. This has resulted in improved flue gas
treatment and better sorting out of hazardous waste from the MSW. Most of the emissions
have been reduced by 90-99 percent during the last decades. Table A11 illustrates the
emissions from waste incineration during 2007.
Table A11 Emissions to air from waste incineration in Sweden in 2007. [23]
Substance Value Unit
Particles 5 g/ton
HCl 13 g/ton
SOx 44 g/ton
NOx 470 g/ton
Hg 8 mg/ton
Cd+Tl 1 mg/ton
Pb 11 mg/ton
Dioxines 0.1 µg/ton

Figure A8 shows the reduced dioxin emissions from waste incineration over time in Sweden.
Between the years 1985 and 2002 the emissions have decreased with 99.4 percent.

F
Figure A8 Dioxin emissions from waste incineration in Sweden 1985-2002. [40]

132
A 11.1.5 Landfilling
186 490 tons of MSW was landfilled during 2007. On 60 sites out of the total of 140 active
landfill sites throughout the country, there was extraction of landfill gas. The energy
generated from the gas was 290 100 GWh, of which 92 percent was heat and 8 percent
electricity. [23]

A 11.1.6 Gasification/pyrolysis
Today there are no large scale plants in Sweden for treating MSW through gasification or
pyrolysis. However, the company Mälarenergy plans to build a 200 MW gasifier in Västerås
for treating MSW and industrial waste. The plant is going to treat waste with low moisture
content in a Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB). [41]

A 11.2 Swedish waste characteristics

The composition of MSW in Sweden is given in figure A9. It is based on analysis of the
MSW from 7 different municipalities in Sweden. [125]

Figure A9 The composition of MSW in Sweden.

A 11.2.1 Heating value

The lower heating value of the waste that is incinerated in the incineration plants in Sweden is
no less than 3 MWh/ton (2580 kcal/kg). [124] Before the MSW is fed into the incineration
plant it is often mixed with industrial waste to increase the heating value. In box A5 the waste
fed into the fluidized bed plant in Norrköping is described. [126]

133
 Box A5 Händelöverket in Norrköping [126]

Figure A10 Händelöverket in Norrköping. [158]

Picture source:
Box A6 explains the type of waste and the heating value of the waste fed into the moving
grate plant in Uppsala.

Box A6 AFA Block 5 in Uppsala [127]

Figure A11 AFA Block 5 in Uppsala. [159]

134
A 11.3 Mass burning vs. combustion of RDF
The conclusion of chapter 7.1.1 was that there should be combustion of RDF and not mass
burning of MSW in India. The choice for Sweden is the opposite. Box A7 discusses why mass
burning of waste is a good choice in a developed country like Sweden.

Box A7 Should there be mass burning of MSW or only combustion of the burnable
fraction of the MSW (RDF) in Sweden?

Incineration of MSW is widely accepted in Sweden. Because of the advanced flue gas
treatment, people are generally not afraid of toxic compounds from the plant. Proposals of
building new plants are most often welcomed by the public.

The segregation of different fractions of MSW takes place in the households. The fractions
which are segregated are recyclables, organic and hazardous waste. This minimizes the
moisture and toxic compounds of the MSW going to the incineration plant, which makes it
more suitable for incineration.

Since the MSW in Sweden and other high income countries have a lower heating value
close to 3 MWh/ton (2580 kcal/kg) it is neither necessary to pre treat the MSW before
combustion, nor is it critical to add auxiliary fuel to sustain the combustion. However, if
suitable fuel is available it could be mixed with MSW to increase the energy content of the
fuel mix. Sweden has a large forest industry that produces waste with a high heating value,
commonly used for co-incineration with MSW.

The Swedish waste incineration companies receive a tipping fee for each kilogram of
MSW that is tipped at the plant. Mass burning of waste in Sweden is always combined
with energy recovery. Because of the cold climate, most of the energy produced is district
heating. Nearly half of the incineration plants in the country also have electricity
production. Furthermore, many incineration plants have started to produce process steam
and district cooling, due to an increased demand during the past years.

Mass burning of MSW

135
Appendix 12 Technologies for treating MSW
This section will describe alternative technologies for waste incineration, other than fluidized
bed technology. It will also cover the most common flue gas treatment systems. Moreover, the
components in the steam process will be described.

A 12.1 Combustion technologies

The main combustion technologies for MSW are fluidized bed and moving grate. The
fluidized bed technology is described in section 7.1.5.1. Both of the techniques require that
the heating value of the waste is at least 3 MWh/ton (2580 kcal/kg) (LHV). The combustion
processes generate bottom ash and fly ash. The fly ash is very toxic and needs to be treated or
landfilled. The bottom ash, which is less toxic can be recycled and used for road material. The
products that could be generated from these plants are electricity that can be sold to the grid,
process steam that could be used by a nearby industry and district heating and/or cooling that
could be delivered to close residential or industrial areas.

A 12.1.1 Moving grate

The majority of the incinerators operating in Europe
are moving grates. They are designed to handle large
volumes of MSW with no pre-treatment. A typical
grate has two to three combustion units, which range
from 100 tpd to 3000 tpd. A crane is used to feed the
waste into the grate, which consists of fixed and
movable grate bars that constantly push the waste
forward. Before the waste reaches the combustion
zone it is dried, by re-using the warm flue gases from
the combustion process. The waste is constantly fed
at one end and the bottom ash is discharged in the
other, as seen in figure A12. [30] The temperature in
the grate is about 1000 degrees Celsius. [100] Figure A12 Moving grate. [162]

A 12.1.3 Coal boiler

RDF can be mixed with coal and incinerated with energy
recovery. It is a proven technology worldwide with both
financial and environmental benefits compared to coal-
firing. The main advantage is that the existing coal fired
boiler can be used and the expenses of building a new
plant can be avoided. Since the sulphur content and the
level of heavy metals is lower in RDF, the environmental
benefits of co-firing compared to burning only coal is
significant. The main disadvantages are that the coal boiler
Moving grate
must be modified and that there could be difficulties
handling RDF compared to coal. [96] Figure A13 shows a Figure A13 Coal boiler. [163]
coil boiler.

136
A 12.1.4 Gasifiers
Gasification of MSW or RDF can be done in a fixed bed or in a fluidized bed. The choice of
technology depends on the size of the plant. For application larger than 12 MW, a fluidized
bed is the best solution. BFB is suitable for smaller applications of 1-50 MW plants while
CFB is better for larger applications of 10-200 MW. [97] An existing fluidized bed for
combustion could be reconstructed for gasification. [141]

Gasification works best when the MSW is carbon-rich and the non-combustible fraction is
sorted out, which is why RDF is suitable for gasification. The process is pressurized and the
temperature is usually above 750 degrees Celsius. Gasification has several advantages over
traditional combustion. First of all it takes place in an oxygen poor environment which
decreases the formation of dioxins, SOx and NOx. The lower volume of oxygen added also
results in a lower volume of syngas generated. Hence, smaller and less expensive gas cleaning
is required compared to the flue gas treatment from the combustion process. However, during
the gasification, tars, heavy metals and alkaline compounds are released which can cause
environmental and operational problems in the boiler and gas turbine. Before gasification can
be a solution for future energy production from MSW or RDF these problems need to be
solved. [97] A fluidized bed can be used for gasification as well as for combustion. If
gasification turns out to be more viable in the future, an existing fluidized bed boiler for
combustion could be reconstructed for gasification. [141] The strength and weaknesses using
gasification over combustion is summarized in box A8. [30]

Box A8 Gasification and pyrolysis vs combustion

+
 Syngas can generate electricity more efficiently via gas turbine, whereas steam
from combustion processes generates electricity less efficiently in steam turbines
 Fewer air emissions are produced by using less oxygen
 Other products except energy can be generated through gasification and pyrolysis,
such as oils and chemicals
 Gas can easily and environmentally friendly be transported in pipes
 Cheaper gas cleaning system is required
-
 Require pre-treatment of waste
 Uncertainties of financial and technical viability
 Problems due to release of tars, heavy metals and alkaline compounds

A 12.2 Flue gas treatment

There are many different types of pollutants in the flue gases. There are those that depend on
the waste composition, such as dust, metals and acid gases and there are those that depend on
incineration conditions, for example NOx [98]. These substances are hazardous for human
health and/or the environment and need to be removed before released to the atmosphere, in
order to meet the regulatory standards. The pollutants may differ in size, inertia, electrical and
absorption properties compared to the carrying stream. The removal device must therefore be
scientifically properly designed to be able to perform the separation. Hence, different
equipment is needed to get an effective removal or of the varying pollutants. [17] The

137
following section will give an overview of the technical equipment used to remove the
pollutants.

A 12.2.1 Removal of dust pollutants

Dust in the flue gas is correlated to the ash content of the waste as
well as the burnout of the fuel. The burnout depends on the
optimization of the incineration. The different technologies to
eliminate dust are presented below.

A 12.2.1.1 Cyclone
The cyclone separates bigger particles through the gravitation
force occurring while the flue gas is forced into circulation,
shown in figure A14. The particles are hurled to the cyclone walls
and fall down to the bottom of the cyclone where they are
discharged. [17] The flue gas leaves the cyclone in the outlet in
the top. The elimination is 90 percent for particles over 5 µm but
Figure A14 Cyclone.
extensively lower for smaller particles. [99] [164]

A 12.2.1.2 Electrostatic filter

In the electrostatic filter also called
electrostatic precipitator, the particles get
charged by emission electrodes when the
flue gas enters the device. The charged
particles then get attached to metal plates
with the opposite charge. By knocking on
the plates, the particles fall down and are
discharged from the hoppers. The principle
is seen in figure A15. The main advantage
with an electrostatic precipitator is that the
separation rate is very high, over 99.5 Figure A15 Electrostatic filter. [162]
percent. The negative aspect is that the
device is sensitive to operational changes, space demanding and expensive compared to other
treatment methods. [100]

A 12.2.1.3 Fabric filter

The principle for a fabric filter also called bag filter,
is comparable with a vacuum cleaner. The flue gas
passes through heat-resistant textile socks or
cylindrical bags, which prevent the particles to pass,
see figure A16. The dust cakes formed on the fabric
filter is removed by shaking or blowing. The
separation rate is high, 99.95 percent [100] even for
small particles. The high temperature of the flue gas
involves a risk for fire. The bag filter is therefore put
in the end of the flue gas treatment where the
temperatures are lower. Another problem is
condensation of the flue gas which can cause Figure A16 Fabric filter. [165]
corrosion or clogging. [101]

138
A 12.2.2 Reduction of acid gases
Acid gases, e.g. hydrogen chloride (HCL), hydrogen fluoride (HF) and sulphur oxides (SOx),
are generally reduced with alkaline reagents. Three different cleaning processes are applied;
dry, semi-wet and wet process which are described below.

These methods reduce the acid gases by adding a chemical or a physical sorption agent that
absorb the pollutants, dissolve them or turn them into dry salts which are separated from the
flue gas in a later stage. [102] All the three methods mentioned above efficiently remove
mercury and dioxins. [103]

A 12.2.2.1 Dry process

The sorption agent in the dry process is lime or sodium bicarbonate, which is fed into the
furnace in the form of a dry powder. The reaction products are solid, which are removed from
the flue gas in the fabric filter. [102] The reduction efficiency is no more than 50 percent for a
grate but significantly higher for a fluidized bed, 70 to 90 percent, due to the possibility to
mix the absorbent with the inert bed material. The investment cost is low but the process
consumes a lot of chemicals. [98]

A 12.2.2.2 Wet process

In the wet process illustrated in figure A17, water or
neutralization liquid is sprayed over the flue gas. The
acid pollutants condense and get mixed with the
sprayed liquid. This is normally performed in one or
more scrubbers. It is common to have one acetic acid
scrubber where dust, HCl, HF, metals and dioxins are
removed and one neutral scrubber where lime is added
to remove SO2. This method generates waste water
which is highly polluted and has to go through a special
treatment to remove metals and get neutralized. [102] Figure A17 Wet scrubber. [166]
[103]

A 12.2.2.3 Semi-wet process

The semi-wet process is an alternative to the wet process in order to get a more efficient
removal of SO2. At the same time HF, HCl and SO3 are removed as well as metals like
mercury, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc. [100] The sorption agent, which in this case is lime
water, is mixed with water to slurry which is sprayed on the flue gases. The heat of the flue
gas makes the solvent evaporate and the reaction product becomes solid and could be
removed in a dust separator. [102] The removal efficiency is 70 - 90 percent. [98]

A 12.2.2.4Wastewater treatment
The wet flue gas treatment generates polluted wastewater and treatment of this water is
necessary. This is done similar to the treatment of municipality wastewater and the process is
very efficient. Most of the pollutants get removed or dissolved. The wastewater treatment
includes neutralization, precipitation, flocculation, sedimentation, ammonia cupellation, sand

139
filter and carbon filter. The cleaned water passes through a final control before it can be let
out in the nearby sea or river. The process creates sludge that needs to be treated. [104]

A 12.2.3 Removal of nitrogen oxides

The formation of NOx depends mainly on the combustion temperature. By optimizing the
incineration, the technical system and the operation of the plant the NOx formation could be
reduced. The technical removal of NOx can be obtained through selective non-catalytic
reduction (SNCR) or selective catalytic reduction (SCR ). [103]

A 12.2.3.1 SNCR
The SNCR reduces NOx without catalyst through injection of ammonia and urea in the
furnace. The injection takes place in the upper part of the furnace where the temperature is
high, 900-1050 degrees Celsius, as the reduction increases with the temperature. SNCR has
lower investment and operational costs than SCR, but the reduction of NO x is also lower (40-
60%). Furthermore, the flue gases from waste incineration contain many different pollutants
which can destroy the catalyst which further speaks for SNCR. [142]

A 12.2.3.2 SCR
The SCR takes place after the furnace and reduces the NOx concentration with 70-90 percent.
The NOx catalyst is placed in the end of the flue gas treatment to avoid other pollutants that
could put strain on the material. Before the catalyst, ammonia is added to the flue gases. The
desired temperature in the catalyst is 300-400 degree Celsius which often requires reheating
of the flue gases. The main advantage with SCR is the high reduction rate. The negative
aspect is the high capital costs as well as its sensitivity to other pollutants that could destroy
the catalyst. [142]

A 12.2.4 Removal of dioxins

Reduction of the formation of dioxins can be made through optimization of the operation of
the incineration plant. High incineration temperature (above 800 degrees Celsius), turbulence
and long incineration time are factors that prevent the formation of these pollutants. [17]
Removal of dioxins can be done through different techniques which are described below.
Once the dioxins have been removed they need to be disposed in a safe final disposal, due to
its toxicity.

A 12.2.4.1 Active carbon

Active carbon is normally injected before the fabric filter. The dioxins get absorbed by the
active carbon and are separated from the flue gas in the fabric filter. [106] This method has a
relatively high operating cost. [105] Nevertheless, this is the most common method for dioxin
reduction.

A 12.2.4.2 SCR and additives

SCR, sulphur and urea reduce dioxins, though they are primarily used for other purposes.
SCR is used to reduce NOx, while sulphur prevents corrosion on heat transferring surfaces and

140
urea is injected to prevent NOx formation. These methods give therefore a cost efficient
reduction of dioxins. [105]

A 12.3 The steam power process

The process in an incineration plant is a steam power process, which means that electricity is
produced from steam and that the working medium appears in both liquid and steam phase.
There are many components involved in a steam power process. This section will describe the
steam cycle and the different components included in the process.

A 12.3.1 The Rankine Cycle

The steam power process in an incineration plant is a Rankine process. In the Rankine cycle
the working medium appears in both liquid- and steam phase. This is to prefer, as the process
then can be pressurized on the liquid side which increases the efficiency. [149]

The cycle consists of four processes which take place in four different components in a closed
system. The four components are: feed water pump, steam boiler, turbine and condenser, all
of which can be seen in figure A18. The feed water pump increases the pressure of the
working medium which is water, called feed water. In the steam boiler the water in the tubes
is heated and then vaporized into steam. The steam goes through a turbine where it expands to
a lower pressure and temperature, as work is extracted. In the condenser the steam condenses
into water when heat is transferred to a cooling medium. From this stage, the condense water
goes back to the feed water pump again and the Rankine cycle is completed.

For the purpose of estimating the electric and thermal power of a steam power plant, a
temperature – entropy diagram, T-s diagram, can be used. By knowing the pressure and
temperature at stage a, b, c and d in figure A18 it is possible, through a T-s diagram, to find
out the enthalpy in the working medium at these specific stages. [167] [168]

Steam boiler

Turbine

Feed water pump

Condenser

Figure A18 The Rankine cycle and T-s diagram.

141
A 12.3.2 The components in the steam cycle
The principal components in the Rankine cycle, pump, boiler and turbine, are described
below, together with other components that often are involved in a steam cycle.

A 12.3.2.1 Feed water pump

After the condenser, the feed water returns to the boiler again. However, since it has a low
pressure, it cannot be fed into the boiler. There has to be a pressure difference before and after
the boiler in order to get the water to flow, where the pressure before the boiler has to be
higher. Therefore one or two pumps are used to increase the pressure. [149]

A 12.3.2.2 Steam boiler

There are two types of boilers, steam boiler and hot water boiler. A hot water boiler is less
expensive but can only produce hot water. A steam boiler can produce electricity, process
steam, heat and cold, depending on the demand in the area.

In the steam boiler there are several tubes through which the feed water runs. As the
temperature increases the water gets vaporized into steam, which is tapped off in the steam
dome situated on top of the boiler.

A 12.3.2.3 Steam turbine

The principal use of a turbine is to convert the energy in the hot steam into a rotary motion. A
generator is attached to the turbine which generates electricity. There are two main types of
turbines, condensing turbine and back pressure turbine.

Inside a condensing turbine, the steam expands below the atmospheric pressure. After the
turbine the pressure of the steam is so low that it cannot be used for industrial applications.
The backpressure turbines allow the possibility to tap off part of the steam, before it has fully
expanded in the turbine. Hence, this way the high pressurized steam could be used for
industrial processes such as drying and heating. [115]

An incineration plant could use one or more turbines, and with more turbines it is possible to
extract more electricity. For smaller plants it is common to use only one turbine, because it is
not financially viable with more. [151]

A 12.3.2.4 Condenser
A condenser is put after the turbine to condense the steam into water before the boiler and to
maintain a low pressure after the turbine. The lower the pressure and temperature is in the
condenser, the higher is the potential electricity generation.

If the power plant would be situated close to the ocean, sea water could be used as cooling
medium in the condenser. Nevertheless, if water is scarce, which often is the case in
developing countries, a cooling tower could be used.

A cooling tower is a heat exchanger that removes the heat from water and transfers it to air.
The process is illustrated in figure A19. [169] As the hot water falls through the cooling tower
some of it evaporates, which cools the remaining water. The cooled water is collected at the

142
bottom of the cooling tower and returned to the plant. The process water is cooled to near the
dew point.

Figure A19 The process of cooling in a cooling tower.

A 12.3.2.5 Other components

The steam process described above is a simplification of the real process, which often
contains several more components. Below are some of the most important components
described.

Condensate storage tank: When the steam has expanded in the turbine and condensed to
water in a condenser, the water is collected in a condense tank. If the plant produces more
products than electricity, such as process steam, district heating and cooling the plant could
have more than one condensate storage tank, if there are great variations of the characteristics
of the condensate. In the tanks, hot steam is fed from below to remove oxygen from the
water. [150]

Feed water tank: The feed water tank is placed after the condense tank and before the boiler.
Here, more oxygen is removed in the same way as for the condense tanks. [150]

Economizer: The principal use of an economizer is to heat the feed water. In the economizer
the hot flue gases give their energy to the feed water, which runs in pipes inside the devise.
Another use for this energy is for district heating/cooling purposes. The process of taking
care of the energy in the flue gases, which otherwise would be lost, “economizes” or saves
energy. [149]

Preheaters: If the feed water has a high temperature when it is fed into the plant, the
efficiency of the process increases. The steam generated in the process could be tapped off at
different points in the steam process cycle and be used to pre-heat the feed water in so called
preheaters. An incineration plant could have one or more preheaters. [149]

Superheaters: Superheaters are used after the boiler to convert saturated steam into dry steam,
so that it can be fed into the turbine for electricity generation. One or more superheaters can
be used. [149]

143
Fuel bunker and feeding system: When the fuel arrives to the plant it needs to have a bunker
for storage. Furthermore, a feeding system for the fuel into the plant is required.

Accumulator tank: An accumulator tank is an energy storage device, which is required if there
are large fluctuations in the requirements for steam. The main reason for using an accumulator
is to make the system respond more quickly to temporary demand. [145]

144
Appendix 13 Dioxins
The term dioxin is used to refer to 2,3,7,8–tetrachlorodibenzo para dioxin (TCDD), the most
toxic compound in the group dioxins. Dioxins is the collective name for chemical compounds
with several toxic responses similar to TCDD, namely polychlorinated dibenzo para dioxins
(PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and some polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) that are dioxin-like. Totally there are 419 types of dioxin-related compounds but only
30 of these have significant toxicity. [7]

Dioxins are formed when organic and chlorinated material is burned together. [80] PCDD/Fs
are not produced intentionally but are formed in some industrial processes, while incinerating
coal, oil, wood or MSW and through some natural processes such as forest fires. PCBs,
however, are manufactured on purpose but are banned in many countries today. Dioxins are
persistent pollutants and will therefore remain in the environment for a long time after the
actual emission. [7]

Dioxins are toxic to human and wildlife. They are lipophilic, which means that they are
soluble in fats, oils and lipids and can therefore bio-accumulate in fatty tissues in humans and
wildlife. The toxicity of dioxins is often measured in Toxic Equivalents (TEQs). [80]

145