Flow Measurement Basic
Flow Measurement Basic
Flow Measurement Basic
Velocity Flowmeters
Mass Flowmeters
Flow Nozzles
Venturi Tubes
Orifice Plate
With an orifice plate, the fluid flow is measured through the difference in pressure from the upstream side to the
downstream side of a partially obstructed pipe. The plate obstructing the flow offers a precisely measured
obstruction that narrows the pipe and forces the flowing fluid to constrict.
The orifice plates are simple, cheap and can be delivered for almost any application in any material.
The TurnDown Rate for orifice plates are less than 5:1. Their accuracy are poor at low flow rates. A high
accuracy depend on an orifice plate in good shape, with a sharp edge to the upstream side. Wear reduces the
accuracy.
Orifice, Nozzle and Venturi Meters
Venturi Tube
Due to simplicity and dependability, the Venturi tube flowmeter is often used in applications where it's
necessary with higher TurnDown Rates, or lower pressure drops, than the orifice plate can provide.
In the Venturi Tube the fluid flowrate is measured by reducing the cross sectional flow area in the flow path,
generating a pressure difference. After the constricted area, the fluid is passes through a pressure recovery exit
section, where up to 80% of the differential pressure generated at the constricted area, is recovered.
With proper instrumentation and flow calibrating, the Venturi Tube flowrate can be reduced to about 10% of its
full scale range with proper accuracy. This provides a TurnDown Rate 10:1.
Orifice, Nozzle and Venturi Meters
Flow Nozzles
Flow nozzles are often used as measuring elements for air and gas flow in industrial applications.
The flow nozzle is relative simple and cheap, and available for many applications in many materials.
The TurnDown Rate and accuracy can be compared with the orifice plate.
Orifice, Nozzle and Venturi Meters
The Sonic Nozzle - Critical (Choked) Flow Nozzle
When a gas accelerate through a nozzle, the velocity increase and the pressure and the gas density decrease.
The maximum velocity is achieved at the throat, the minimum area, where it breaks Mach 1 or sonic. At this
point it's not possible to increase the flow by lowering the downstream pressure. The flow is choked.
This situation is used in many control systems to maintain fixed, accurate, repeatable gas flow rates unaffected
by the downstream pressure.
Velocity Flowmeters
In a velocity flowmeter the flow is calculated by measuring the speed in one or more points in the flow, and
integrating the flow speed over the flow area.
Pitot Tubes
The pitot tube are one the most used (and cheapest) ways to measure fluid flow, especially in air applications
as ventilation and HVAC systems, even used in airplanes for the speed measurent.
The pitot tube measures the fluid flow velocity by converting the kinetic energy of the flow into potential energy.
The use of the pitot tube is restricted to point measuring. With the "annubar", or multi-orifice pitot probe, the
dynamic pressure can be measured across the velocity profile, and the annubar obtains an averaging effect.
Calorimetric Flowmeter
The calorimetric principle for fluid flow measurement is based on two temperature sensors in close contact with
the fluid but thermal insulated from each other.
One of the two sensors is constantly heated and the cooling effect of the flowing fluid is used to monitor the
flowrate. In a stationary (no flow) fluid condition there is a constant temperature difference between the two
temperature sensors. When the fluid flow increases, heat energy is drawn from the heated sensor and the
temperature difference between the sensors are reduced. The reduction is proportional to the flow rate of the
fluid.
Response times will vary due the thermal conductivity of the fluid. In general lower thermal conductivity require
higher velocity for proper measurement.
The calorimetric flowmeter can achieve relatively high accuracy at low flow rates.
Turbine Flowmeter
There is many different manufacturing design of turbine flow meters, but in general they are all based on the
same simple principle:
If a fluid moves through a pipe and acts on the vanes of a turbine, the turbine will start to spin and rotate. The
rate of spin is measured to calculate the flow.
The turndown ratios may be more than 100:1 if the turbine meter is calibrated for a single fluid and used at
constant conditions. Accuracy may be better than +/-0,1%.
These alternating low pressure zones cause the obstruction to move towards the low pressure zone. With
sensors gauging the vortices the strength of the flow can be measured.
The Vortex Flowmeter Principle - An introduction to the vortex
flowmeter principle.
Electromagnetic Flowmeter
An electromagnetic flowmeter operate on Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction that states that a voltage
will be induced when a conductor moves through a magnetic field. The liquid serves as the conductor and the
magnetic field is created by energized coils outside the flow tube.
The voltage produced is directly proportional to the flow rate. Two electrodes mounted in the pipe wall detect
the voltage which is measured by a secondary element.
Electromagnetic flowmeters can measure difficult and corrosive liquids and slurries, and they can measure flow
in both directions with equal accuracy.
Electromagnetic flowmeters have a relatively high power consumption and can only be used for electrical
conductive fluids as water.
The Electromagnetic Flowmeter Principle - An introduction to the
electromagnetic flowmeter principle
Oval-gear meters have two rotating, oval-shaped gears with synchronized, close fitting teeth. A
fixed quantity of liquid passes through the meter for each revolution. Shaft rotation can be
monitored to obtain specific flow rates.
Nutating disk meters have moveable disks mounted on a concentric sphere located in spherical side-
walled chambers. The pressure of the liquid passing through the measuring chamber causes the
disk to rock in a circulating path without rotating about its own axis. It is the only moving part in the
measuring chamber.
Rotary vane meters consists of equally divided, rotating impellers, two or more compartments, inside
the meter's housings. The impellers are in continuous contact with the casing. A fixed volume of
liquid is swept to the meter's outlet from each compartment as the impeller rotates. The revolutions of
the impeller are counted and registered in volumetric units.
The positive displacement flowmeter may be used for all relatively nonabrasive fluids such as heating oils,
lubrication oils, polymer additives, animal and vegetable fat, printing ink, freon, and many more.
Accuracy may be up to �0.1% of full rate with a TurnDown of 70:1 or more.
Mass Flowmeters
Mass meters measure the mass flow rate directly.
Thermal Flowmeter
The thermal mass flowmeter operates independent of density, pressure, and viscosity. Thermal meters use a
heated sensing element isolated from the fluid flow path where the flow stream conducts heat from the sensing
element. The conducted heat is directly proportional to the mass flow rate and the he temperature difference is
calculated to mass flow.
The accuracy of the thermal mass flow device depends on the calibrations reliability of the actual process and
variations in the temperature, pressure, flow rate, heat capacity and viscosity of the fluid.
Coriolis Flowmeter
Direct mass measurement sets Coriolis flowmeters apart from other technologies. Mass measurement is not
sensitive to changes in pressure, temperature, viscosity and density. With the ability to measure liquids, slurries
and gases, Coriolis flowmeters are universal meters.
Coriolis Mass Flowmeter uses the Coriolis effect to measure the amount of mass moving through the element.
The fluid to be measured runs through a U-shaped tube that is caused to vibrate in an angular harmonic
oscillation. Due to the Coriolis forces, the tubes will deform and an additional vibration component will be added
to the oscillation. This additional component causes a phase shift on some places of the tubes which can be
measured with sensors.
The Coriolis flow meters are in general very accurate, better than +/-0,1% with an turndown rate more than
100:1. The Coriolis meter can also be used to measure the fluids density.
1.0 Introduction
Sensors to measure process conditions and valves to influence process operations are essential for all
aspects of engineering practice. Engineers want to design and operate processes that remain in safe
conditions, produce the desired amounts of high quality products and are profitable. Therefore, engineers
must provide measuring devices for key variables and valves (or other devices, such as variable speed
electric motors) to influence of “steer” the process. This site provides educational material on sensors
and valves for use in the process industries.
While sensors and valves are important in all aspects of engineering, they assume greatest importance in
the study of automatic control, which is termed process controlwhen applied in the process industries.
Process control deals with the regulation of processes by applying the feedback principle using various
computing devices, principally digital computation. Process control requires sensors for measuring
variables and valves for implementing decisions. Therefore, the presentation of this material is designed
to complement other learning topics in process control.
Since successful process control requires appropriate instrumentation, engineers should understand the
principles of common instruments introduced in this section. The descriptions in this section cover the
basic principles and information on the performance for standard, commercially available instruments.
Thus, selection and sizing of standard equipment is emphasized, not designing equipment “from scratch”.
Perhaps the best advice for engineering students is that “instruments are always incorrect”. This
surprising statement is not intended to undermine reasonable confidence in applications of sensors and
valves. However, new engineers sometimes tend to accept instruments as exactlycorrect without
evaluating the likely errors associated with their use. Depending on the instrument, the process operating
conditions and the application, the instrument errors can be small enough to be insignificant or can be
large enough to seriously degrade control performance. The engineer must evaluate each application
during the process design and select an appropriate instrument.
Lets remember that chemical engineers work in a wide range of industries: chemicals, pulp and paper,
microelectronis, mineral processing, metals production, polymer processing, power generation, and more.
Perhaps, many of the details on sensors and valves might not be applicable to every industry. However,
the principles used to select the appropriate sessors and final elements can be applied to essentially all
industries. Therefore,
The Material in this document is gathered from a large array of public-domain sources, and it provides a
good introduction to the principles of common instrumentations and a summary of they key features
important for control application. However, many important sensors are not addressed here, and new
equipment is becoming available. Therefore, readers should gather information used to specify, procure,
install, and maintain industrial equipment from reliable and up-to-date sources, such as testing
laboratories, engineering handbooks, professional and industrial organizations, and equipment
suppliers
The following topics are addressed at this site.
2. Sensors
3. Valves
4. Signal transmission for process control
5. Instrumentation safety
6. Control equipment cost
7. Process Drawings
8. Solved examples
9. Terminology
10. Conclusions
11. References
Each section contains valuable introductory material and links to excellent resources on the WWW for
further study and solving open-ended problems in university courses and industrial practice.
2.0 Sensors
Sensors are used for process monitoring and for process control. These are essential elements of safe and
profitable plant operation that can be achieved only if the proper sensors are selected and installed in the
correct locations. While sensors differ greatly in their physical principles, their selection can be guided
by the analysis of a small set of issues, which are presented in this section. Each issue is introduced here
with process examples, and details on the issues are provided in the remainder of this site for the most
common sensors in the process industries.
For guidance on selecting the process variables, see Chapter 2 and Chapter 24 in Marlin (2000). Guidance on selecting sensors is pro
Figu
When defining sensor requirements and principles, the engineer should use terminology that has a unique
meaning, which is not easily achieved. Therefore, the engineer should refer to accepted standards and
use the terminology provided in the standards. For instrumentation, standards published by the ISA
(formerly, Instrument Society of America) are the most relevant. This section uses terms from the ISA
wherever possible.
The major issues in sensor selection are summarized in the following. The relative importance of each
issue depends upon the specific application; for example, one application might require excellent
accuracy, while another might require only moderate accuracy, but high reliability. Generally, we find
that the greater the requirements for good performance, the higher the cost for purchase and maintenance.
Therefore, we must find the proper balance of performance and cost, rather than always specify the best
performing sensor.
ISSUE COMMENTS
Accuracy - Accuracy is the degree of Accuracy is usually expressed in
conformity of the measured value with the engineering units or as a percentage of the
accepted standard or ideal value, which we can sensor range, for example:
take as the true physical variable. Accuracy is
usually reported as a range of maximum Thermocouple temperature sensor with
inaccuracy. These ranges should have a accuracy of 1.5 K.
significance level, such as 95% of the
measurements will be within the inaccuracy Orifice flow meters with accuracy of ±3%
range. of maximum flow range.
The engineer should understand the common sources of measurements errors and how these errors are
evaluated experimentally, characterized and considered when several elements are used in series. The
following WWW sites provide useful material for further study.
How would you select the proper physical principle for each sensor? For example, what principle should be used by flow sensor F
Figure 2.
The measurement is displayed for observation by plant personnel. Typically, the display uses analog
principles, which means that the display presents the measurement as a position in a graphical format,
which could, for example, be the height of a slide bar or the position of a pointer. Often, the value is
displayed as a line on a trend plot that provides the values for some time in the past. In addition, the
measurement can be displayed as a digital number to provide more accuracy for calibration. Finally,
measurements that are transmitted to a digital control system can be stored in a historical database for
later recall and for use in calculating important parameters useful in monitoring process behavior, for
example, reactor yields or heat transfer coefficients.
The engineer must ensure that the measurements are displayed where needed by personnel. Several
common approaches are briefly summarized in the following.
Local display- A sensor can display the measurement at the point where the
sensor is located. This information can be used by the people when monitoring or
working on the equipment. A measurement that has only local display involves the
lowest cost, because the cost of transmission and interfacing to a digital system are not
required. Note that no history of these measurements is available unless people record
the values periodically.
Local panel display- Some equipment is operated from a local panel, where
sensors associated with a unit are collected. This enables a person to startup, shutdown
and maintain the unit locally. This must be provided for units that require manual actions
at the process during normal operation (loading feed materials, cleaning filters, etc.) or
during startup and shutdown. Usually, the values displayed at a local panel are also
displayed at a centralized control room.
Centralized control room- Many processes are operated from a centralized
control room that can be located a significant distance (e.g., hundreds of meters) from the
process. The measurement must be converted to a signal (usually electronic) for
transmission and be converted to a digital number when interfaced with the control
system. A centralized control system facilitates the analysis and control of the integrated
plant.
Remote monitoring- In a few cases, processes can be operated without a
human operator at the location. In these situations, the measurements are transmitted by
radio frequency signals to a centralized location where a person can monitor the behavior
of many plants. Typical examples are remote oil production sites and small, safe
chemical plants, such as air separation units.
Exercise 2.03 For each of the sensors used in the following list, determine the proper sensor location.
Currently, sensor technology is experiencing a dramatic change. While the basic physics
and chemistry of sensors are not changing, sensors are being enhanced by the addition of
microprocessors at the location of the sensor. This change makes the following features
possible that were not available with older technologies.
with RT the resistance, RT0 the resistance at base temperature of 0 °C, T the temperature of the
sensor (to be determined from RT) and a the temperature coefficient of the metal. This linear
relationship sometimes provides sufficient accuracy, but nonlinear correlations are available for
higher accuracy (Omega, 1995). RTDs are commonly used for applications in which higher
accuracy than provided by thermocouples is required.
Thermistor: This sensor is similar to an RTD, but applies metals for which the resistance
decreases with increasing temperature. The relationship is often very nonlinear, but thermistors
can provide very accurate temperature measurements for small spans and low temperatures.
Bimetallic: Metals expand with increasing temperature, and the rate of expansion differs among
metals. A spiral constructed of two bonded metal strips will coil (uncoil) as the temperature
changes. The changing position of the coil can be detected and used to determine the
temperature. This provides a rugged, low cost sensor that is often used for local displays and for
on-off temperature control, i.e., a thermostat.
Filled systems: A fluid expands with increasing temperature and exerts a varying pressure on
the containing vessel. When the vessel is similar to a bourbon tube, the varying pressure causes
a deformation that changes the position detected to determine the temperature.
For further information on temperature sensors, including
optical pyrometers, select this button to be directed to a
site on the WWW.
-self-heating
-good accuracy
-less physically
RTD -200 to 650 0.15 + 0.2|T| see note 3 -small span rugged
possible
-self-heating
-linearity
error
-highly
nonlinear
-good accuracy -only small span
Thermister -40 to 150 ± 0.10 °C see note 3
-little drift -less physically
rugged
-drift
-low cost
Bimetallic - ± 2% - -physically -local display
rugged
-not high
-simple and temperatures
Filled system -200 to 800 ± 1% 1 to 10 low cost -sensitive to
-no hazards external
pressure
Notes:
1. Accuracy is measured in °C or % of span, whichever is larger.
2. With RTDs, the inaccuracy increases approximately linearly with temperature deviation from 0
°C.
3. The dynamics depend strongly on the sheath or thermowell (material, diameter, and wall
thickness), the location of the element in the sheath (i.e. bonded or air space, the fluid type, and
the fluid velocity. Typical values are 2 to 5 seconds for high fluid velocities.
(2)
Bernoulli's equation
where Sf represents the total friction loss that is usually assumed negligible. This equation can be
simplified and rearranged to give (Foust et. al, 1981; Janna, 1993)
The meter coefficient, Cmeter, accounts for all non-idealities, including friction losses, and
depends on the type of meter, the ratio of cross sectional areas and the Reynolds number. The
compressibility factor, Y, accounts for the expansion of compressible gases; it is 1.0 for
incompressible fluids. These two factors can be estimated from correlations (ASME, 1959;
Janna, 1993) or can be determined through calibration. Equation (3) is used for designing head
flow meters for specific plant operating conditions.
When the process is operating, the meter parameters are fixed, and the pressure difference is
measured. Then, the flow can be calculated from the meter equation, using the appropriate
values for Cmeter and Y. All constants are combined, leading to the following relationship.
In the usual situation in which only reproducibility is required, the fluid density is not measured
and is assumed constant; the simplified calculation is where the density is assumed to be its
design value of ro. This is a good assumption for liquid and can provide acceptable accuracy for
gases in some situations. Again, all constants can be combined (including ro) into C1 to give the
following relationship.
relationship for installed
head meter with constant (5)
density
If the density of a gas varies significantly because of variation in temperature and pressure (but
not average molecular weight), correction is usually based on the ideal gas law using low cost
sensors to measure T and P according to
relationship for installed
head meter, gas with (6)
constant MW, changing
T and P
where the density (assumed constant at ro), temperature (To) and pressure (Po) were the base case
values used in determining Co. If the density varies significantly due to composition changes and
high accuracy is required, the real-time value of fluid density (r) can be measured by an on-
stream analyzer for use as ro in equation (4) (Clevett, 1985).
The flow is determined from equation (5) by taking the square root of the measured pressure
difference, which can be measured by many methods. A U-tube manometer provides an
excellent visual display for laboratory experiments but is not typically used industrially. For
industrial practice a diaphragm is used for measuring the pressure drop; a diaphragm with one
pressure on each side will deform according to the pressure difference.
Note that the pressure in the pipe increases after the vena contracta where the flow cross section
returns to its original value, but because of the meter resistance, the pressure downstream of the
meter (P3) is lower than upstream pressure (P1). This is the “non-recoverable” pressure drop of
the meter that requires energy, e.g., compressor work, to overcome and increases the cost of plant
operation. The non-recoverable pressure losses for three important head meters are given in
Figure 5.
The low pressure at the point of highest velocity creates the possibility for the liquid to partially
vaporize; it might remain partially vaporized after the sensor (called flashing) or it might return
to a liquid as the pressure increases after the lowest pressure point (called cavitation). We want
to avoid any vaporization to ensure proper sensor operation and to retain the relationship
between pressure difference and flow. Vaporization can be prevented by maintaining the inlet
pressure sufficiently high and the inlet temperature sufficiently low.
Some typical head meters are described briefly in the following.
Orifice: An orifice plate is a restriction with an opening smaller than the pipe diameter which is
inserted in the pipe; the typical orifice plate has a concentric, sharp edged opening, as shown in
Figure 1. Because of the smaller area the fluid velocity increases, causing a corresponding
decrease in pressure. The flow rate can be calculated from the measured pressure drop across the
orifice plate, P1-P3. The orifice plate is the most commonly used flow sensor, but it creates a
rather large non-recoverable pressure due to the turbulence around the plate, leading to high
energy consumption (Foust, 1981).
Venturi Tube: The venturi tube shown in Figure 2 is similar to an orifice meter, but it is
designed to nearly eliminate boundary layer separation, and thus form drag. The change in cross-
sectional area in the venturi tube causes a pressure change between the convergent section and
the throat, and the flow rate can be determined from this pressure drop. Although more expensive
that an orifice plate; the venturi tube introduces substantially lower non-recoverable pressure
drops (Foust, 1981).
Flow Nozzle: A flow nozzle consists of a restriction with an elliptical contour approach section that
terminates in a cylindrical throat section. Pressure drop between the locations one pipe diameter upstream
and one-half pipe diameter downstream is measured. Flow nozzles provide an intermediate pressure drop
between orifice plates and venturi tubes; also, they are applicable to some slurry systems.
Elbow meter: A differential pressure exists when a flowing fluid changes direction due to a pipe turn or
elbow, as shown in Figure 3 below. The pressure difference results from the centrifugal force. Since pipe
elbows exist in plants, the cost for these meters is very low. However, the accuracy is very poor; there are
only applied when reproducibility is sufficient and other flow measurements would be very costly.
Figure 5. Flow meter non-recoverable pressure losses (Andrews and Williams, Vol 1, 1979)
The following flow sensors are based on physical principles other than head.
Turbine: As fluid flows through the turbine, it causes the turbine to rotate with an angular
velocity that is proportional to the fluid flow rate. The frequency of rotation can be measured
and used to determine flow. This sensor should not be used for slurries or systems experiencing
large, rapid flow or pressure variation.
Vortex shedding : Fluid vortices are formed against the body introduced in the pipe. These
vortices are produced from the downstream face in a oscillatory manner. The shedding is sensed
using a thermistor and the frequency of shedding is proportional to volumetric flow rate.
Positive displacement: In these sensors, the fluid is separated into individual volumetric
elements and the number of elements per unit time are measured. These sensors provide high
accuracy over a large range. An example is a wet test meter.
-smaller pressure
typically -low cost
0.5% of full range of application
bellows vacuum to 500 - -differential
span -temperature
kPa pressure
compensation needed
-usually limited to
0.5-1.5% of -very small span
diaphragm up to 60 kPa - low pressures (i.e.
full span possible
below 8 kPa)
capacitance/ 0.2% of full
up to 30 kPa - - -
inductance span
resistive/strain 0.1-1% of full -large range of
up to 100 MPa fast -
gauge span pressures
0.5% of full -sensitive to
piezoelectric - very fast -fast dynamics
span temperature changes
2.4 Level Measurement
Level of liquid in a vessel should be maintained above the exit pipe because if the vessel empties the exit
flow will become zero, a situation that would upset downstream processes and could damage pumping
equipment that requires liquid. Also, the level should not overflow an open vessel nor should it exit
through a vapor line of a closed vessel, which could disturb a process designed for vapor. In addition,
level can influence the performance of a process; the most common example is a liquid phase chemical
reactor. Level is usually reported as percent of span, rather than in length (e.g., m). Level sensors can be
located in the vessel holding the liquid or in an external “leg” which acts as a manometer. When in the
vessel, float and displacement sensors are usually placed in a “stilling chamber” which reduces the effects
of flows in the vessel.
Float : The float of material that is lighter than the fluid follows the movement of the liquid level. The
position of the float, perhaps attached to a rod, can be determined to measure the level.
Displacement: By Archimedes principle, a body immersed in a liquid is buoyed by a force equal to the
weight of the liquid displaced by the body. Thus, a body that is more dense than the liquid can be placed
in the vessel, and the amount of liquid displaced by the body, measured by the weight of the body when in
the liquid, can be used to determine the level.
Differential pressure: The difference in pressures between to points in a vessel depends on the fluids
between these two points. If the difference in densities between the fluids is significant, which is
certainly true for a vapor and liquid and can be true for two different liquids, the difference in pressure
can be used to determine the interface level between the fluids. Usually, a seal liquid is used in the two
connecting pipes (legs) to prevent plugging at the sensing points.
Capacitance : A capacitance probe can be immersed in the liquid of the tank, and the capacitance
between the probe and the vessel wall depends on the level. By measuring the capacitance of the liquid,
the level of the tank can be determined.
A smaller sample for analysis is taken from the fast loop. This sample needs to be preprocessed or
"conditioned" to ensure that it is acceptable for the analyzer. For example, the sample might be heated
to ensure continuous flow of a material that might solidify, or it might be cooled to satisfy limits of the
analyzer equipment. In addition, the pressure is regulated to ensure that a large pressure surge in the
process is not transmitted to a sensitive analyzer. A pressure regulator is often used; this is a self-
contained sensor, proportional controller and valve which provides low cost and reliable protection, but
not exact control. Finally, limited physical separation to protect the analyzer may be advantageous; often,
a filter is used to remove fine particulate matter, and a coalescer can separate undesired liquid
components, for example, occasional water in a hydrocarbon stream.
The flow of the stream to the analyzer should be regulated. This flow could be continuous or
periodic, depending on the requirements of the analyzer. For example, a chromatogragh requires
a periodic flow and provides periodic or discrete values of the measured variable. A continuous
stream might be regulated by a rotameter, and a periodic flow could be regulated by electrically
operated on/off (solenoid) valves.
All effluent material, whether or not it was processed by the analyzer, must be disposed of
properly. The best approach is to return all material to the process. This requires either a
collection vessel with a pumped return flow or a return to the process at a lower pressure than the
analyzer effluent. Environmentally benign material can be vented to the atmosphere or sewer.
Two additional sources of material are common. For startup, shutdown, and pressure testing, a
source of clean fluid is required to fill and flush the system. For checking the performance of the
on-stream analyzer, a source of fluid with known properties (a calibration sample) is provided,
and the plant personnel can divert the process sample and send a test sample to the analyzer.
This procedure contributes to confidence in the analyzer and much greater use of the measured
value in timely decisions.
Finally, the analyzer and sample equipment physically near the analyzer are often located inside
an enclosure, an “analyzer house”, which can be temperature controlled. This provides shelter
for the sensitive electronics and measurement equipment. Also, the shelter provides a barrier
between the atmosphere in the plant which might (even very infrequently) contain explosive
vapors and the electronic power need by the analyzer.
Clearly, an on-stream analyzer involves a complicated system of flow, pressure and temperature
control in addition to the analyzer itself. As a result, the installed cost of an on-stream analyzer
can be more than twice the cost of the analyzer alone for laboratory use. An additional cost
results from the frequent maintenance of the analyzer; a rough guideline is that one technician
working 40 hours per week can maintain about 10-15 on-stream analyzers. However, the
measurement and tight control of product quality provide substantial benefits, which justify the
total cost of many analyzers (for example, Bajek et al, 1987; Black et al, 1987; Marlin et al,
1987).
As we know the resistance to fluid flow increases as the flow rate increases. Also, the source of
the high pressure, here a pump, may be influenced by the flow rate; in this case, the pump head
decreases as the flow increases. The relationship between the pressures at the inlet and exit of
the valve are shown in Figure 7, and the required pressure drop across the valve is shown as
DPv. Therefore, any desired flow from 0 to 110% of the design valve can be achieved by
adjusting the valve opening to provide the required resistance to flow, DPv. For the example in
Figure 7, when the flow is 80% of design, the valve pressure drop is about 40 psi, which can be
achieved by adjusting the valve opening for flow to the proper value.
Note that energy is required to raise the stream pressure to P1 is "lost energy". Therefore,
efficient design minimizes the valve pressure drop while providing sufficient variable resistance
for good flow regulation. Theoretically, a control valve would not be needed if the supply
pressure, in Figure 7 this is P1, could be varied. Variable speed electrical motors to drive pumps
are available for liquid systems, but the added cost and lower efficiencies of these pumps has
resulted in the control valve remaining the standard choice for regulating liquid flow (Bauman,
1981). Variable speed steam turbines to drive compressors are commonly applied for gas
systems; thus, two methods for adjusting flow in gas systems are common in the process
industries: these are:
1. manipulating the supply pressure (by the speed of the compressor or pump) and
2. manipulating the variable flow resistance (by a control valve).
We will concentrate on control valves, which are the overwhelming choice for flow control in the
process industries.
Valves are used extensively for affecting the process; we often say that values are the “handles” by which
we operate a process. We have many goals in influencing the process; therefore, we use the flow and
valve principles in many applications. There are many types of valves. The four most prominent types of
valves are summarized below.
When defining valve requirements and principles, the engineer should use terminology that has a unique
meaning, which is not easily achieved. Therefore, the engineer should refer to accepted standards and use
the terminology provided in the standards. For instrumentation, standards published by the ISA
(formerly, Instrument Society of America) are the most relevant. This section uses terms from the ISA
wherever possible.
In some cases, a valve can affect the operating costs See a reference on engineering economics
of the process, where the pumping (or compression) to learn how to consider costs over time,
costs can be high, and the pressure drop occurring using principles of the time value of
because of the valve can significantly increase the money and profitability measures.
pumping costs. In such situations, a valve with a low
(non-recoverable) pressure drop is selected.
Links to WWW resources
The following portal provides links to valuable information on
valves. Some special topics addressed in the links include the
following.
Cavitation
Noise
Emissions
Diagnosing valve performance
Masoneilan
Currently, valve technology is experiencing a dramatic change. While the basic physics of valves is not
changing, valves are being enhanced by the addition of microprocessors at the location of the actuator and
valve body. This change makes the following features possible that were not available with older
technologies. The following assumes a digital valve positioner.
Globe Valve: The name "globe" refers to the external shape of the valve, not the internal flow
area. A typical globe valve has a stem that is adjusted linearly (up and down) to change the
position of the plug. As the plug changes, the area for flow between the plug and seat (opening)
changes. Many different seat and plug designs are available to achieve desired relationships
between the stem position and flow rate; see the discussion on valve characteristic below. The
standard plug must oppose the pressure drop across the valve, which is acceptable for small
pressure drops. For large pressure drops, a balanced globe valve is used to enable a valve with
small force to open and close the plug.
Ball: The restriction for this body is a solid ball which has some part of the ball removed to
provide an adjustable area for flow. The ball is rotated to influence the amount of flow. The
example ball valve displayed through the link below has a tunnel through the ball, and the ball is
rotated to adjust the fraction of the tunnel opening available for flow. Other types of ball valves
have different sections removed from the ball to give desired properties.
Butterfly: The butterfly valve provides a damper that is rotated to adjust the resistance to flow.
This valve provides a small pressure drop for gas flows.
Diaphragm: The diaphragm valve has one surface which is deformed by the force from the
valve stem to vary the resistance to flow.
Gate: These valves have a flat barrier that is adjusted to influence the area for flow. These
bodies are used primary for hand-operated valves and valves automated for emergency shutoff.
Table 5. Summary of Features for Selected Control Valve Bodies
Valve Body Advantages Disadvantages
-large range -unbalanced forces
globe (unbalanced)
-good shutoff -high pressure loss
-high capacity
-poor shutoff
globe (balanced) -large range
-high pressure loss
-balanced forces
-high capacity -moderate pressure drop applications
ball
-tight shutoff -tends to plug (except segmented ball)
-high torque
-high capacity -large deadband
butterfly -low pressure loss -affects flow through limited range (i.e.
0-60%)
-slurry applications
-tight shutoff requires special seat
material
-short diaphragm life
-slurry applications
diaphragm -limited pressure and temperature
-corrosion resistant materials
-small range
gate -tight shutoff -used only with clean fluids
with, in this expression, the characteristic expressed as a percentage of the maximum flow, and F max is the
maximum flow rate with a pressure drop of 1 psi.
A wide range of functional relationships for the C v can be implemented through the detailed design of the
shapes of the plug and seat. Some typical characteristics are shown in Figure 8. The valve characteristic
relationship is usually selected to provide a nearly linear relationship between the stem position, which
should be the controller output sent to the valve, and the controlled variable. If this goal is achieved,
constant controller tuning will be appropriate for the entire range of controller output (and flow rate). To
achieve this goal for a process with a constant process gain , a linear characteristic is appropriate, and
when the process gain changes with
flow rate, the valve characteristic should be the inverse of the process non-linearity.
where
When the process conditions, including the valve (Cv), are known, equation (9) can be used to calculate
the flow. When designing the process, the desired flow is known but the valve is not; equation (9) can be
rearranged to calculate the valve coefficient required for the specified conditions.
The pressure decreases as the liquid flows through the valve. The possibility exists for the liquid to
partially vaporize due the pressure drop, and this vaporization can have serious consequences for the
control valve. Two situations can occur: cavitation where the vapor forms and is condensed due to the
pressure recovery and flashing where vapor remains after the pressure recovery. The effect of
vaporization on the flow is shown in Figure 9. Importantly, cavitation involves the collapsing of bubbles
that can generate significant forces that will damage the valve components, so that cavitation should be
avoided when designing a flow system. This can be achieved by raising the pressure (e.g., higher supply
pressure), lowering the stream temperature (e.g., locating upstream of a heater) or using a valve with little
pressure recovery.
Flashing occurs when vapor remains downstream of the valve after the pressure recovery. This
situation will not result in damage to the valve and is an acceptable design. Special flow models
are required for valve sizing when vaporization occurs and can be found is standard references,
e.g., Driskell (1983).
For gases and vapors with subsonic flow, the development of the equation is similar but must
consider the change in density with an expansion factor and the lack of ideal behavior with the
compressibility.
relationship for gases and
vapors with subsonic flow
through an orifice
(10)
where
z = compressibility factor
Figure 9. Typical effect of vaporization on flow rate.
Booster: The flow rate of air in the pneumatic line is not large and significant time may be
required to transfer sufficient air into the actuator so that the actuator pressure equals the line
pressure. This time slows the dynamic response of the closed-loop system and can degrade
control performance. When the delay is significant in comparison with the other elements in the
control loop, a booster can be located in the pneumatic line near the valve which increases the
volumetric flow rate of air and greatly speeds the dynamic response of the actuator.
Failure position: Major failures of control equipment, such as the break of a pneumatic line or
air compressor, lead to a low (atmospheric) pressure for the signal to the actuator. In such
situations, where control has been lost, the valve should be designed to attain the safest possible
position, which is usually fully opened or closed. The proper failure position must be determined
through a careful analysis of the specific process; usually, the pressure and temperature near
atmospheric are the safest. The failure position is achieved by selecting the design in which the
actuator valve places the valve stem in its safest position. The design is usually described as fail
open or fail closed. Other failure modes can be achieved in response to unusual circumstances,
for example, fail to a fixed position and fail slowly to the safe position.
Positioner: The valve is a mechanical device that must overcome friction and inertia to move
the stem and plug to the desired position. Typically, the valve does not achieve exactly the
position specified by the control signal. This imperfection may not be significant because
feedback controllers have an integral mode to reduce offset to zero at steady state. However, the
difference might degrade control performance, especially in a slow control loop. A positioner is
a simple, proportional-only controller that regulates the measured stem position close to the
value specified by the control signal to the valve. For further discussion on positioners, see
Hutchison (1976).
Hand wheel: Some control valves must occasionally be set to specified positions by personnel
located at the process equipment. A manual hand wheel provides the ability for local personnel
to override the control signal to the valve.
3.6 Steps in Selecting a Control Valve
The basic steps in control valve selection are presented below.
1. The first step in control valve selection involves collecting all relevant data and completing the
ISA Form S20.50. The piping size must be set prior to valve sizing, and determining the supply
pressure may require specifying a pump. The novice might have to iterate on the needed piping,
pump pressure and pressure drop through the piping network.
2. Next, the size of the valve is required; select the smallest valve C v that satisfies the maximum Cv
requirement at 90% opening. While performing these calculations, checks should be made
regarding flashing, cavitation, sonic flow and Reynolds number to ensure that the proper equation
and correction factors are used. As many difficulties occur due to oversized valves as to
undersized valves. Adding lots of “safety factors” will result in a valve that is nearly closed
during normal operation and has poor rangeability.
3. The trim characteristic is selected to provide good performance; goals are usually linear control
loop behavior along with acceptable rangeability.
4. The valve body can be selected based on the features in Table 5 and the typical availability in
Table 6. Note that the valve size is either equal to the pipe size or slightly less, for example, a 3-
inch pipe with a 2-inch globe valve body. When the valve size is smaller than the process piping,
an inlet reducer and outlet expander are required to make connections to the process piping.
5. The actuator is now selected to provide sufficient force to position the stem and plug.
6. Finally, auxiliaries can be added to enhance performance. A booster can be increase the volume
of the pneumatic signal for long pneumatic lines and large actuators. A positioner can be applied
for slow feedback loops with large valves or valves with high actuator force or friction. A hand
wheel is needed if manual operation of the valve is expected.
Table 6. Information on Standard Commercial Control Valves1
4.0 Control
Signal
Transmission
Most process control systems involve a structure of distributed equipment, with sensors and valves at the
process equipment and the control calculations and displays located in a remote, centralized facility.
Therefore, values of key variables must be communicated between the sensors, calculations and valves
(or other final elements). Schematics of typical control systems with analog and digital control are given
in Figure 4.0.1.
Central
Central control room
control room
Figure 4.0.1a Distributed control with analog Figure 4.0.1b. Distributed control with digital
control calculations. control calculations
Not all sensors and valves require signal transmission. Sensors with local displays and valves
requiring manual operation have no signal to transmit. However, many (most) sensors and valves require
signal transmission, so that personnel in a single location can manage the entire process. Reliable,
accurate and rapid signal transmission is essential for excellent process control.
A schematic of the equipment in a control loop, which presents the most typical signal
transmission, is given in Figure 4.02. The most common equipment in the loop is described in this
paragraph, while some other possibilities are shown in the figure. The process variable is measured using
a sensor applying technology presented in Section 1. Typically, the measured value is converted to a
“signal” that can be transmitted. The signal can be electronic or digital, as will be covered in subsequent
sections;this conversion is achieved at the location of the sensor. The signal is sent from the transmitter to
the control room, where it can be employed for many purposes, such as display to control as shown in
Figure 4.02. When the signal is used for control, the value of the controlled variable (signal from the
sensor) is used by the controller to determine the value of the controller output. The controller output is
transmitted to the final element, which is shown as a valve in Figure 4.02, but could be switching a motor
on/off or other automated action. For a control valve, the stem position is affected by air pressure to a
pneumatic actuator; therefore, the electrical signal from the controller must be converted to air pressure
signal. This conversion is achieved at the valve. The valve stem moves the valve plug, changes the
resistance to flow, and the flow rate changes.
Located with process equipment Central control room
transmitter
Sensor Display
Reports
Convert signal
to air pressure Alarm
MV = Kc * [ ….. ]
Controller
Control valve
Figure 4.0.2. Schematic of the key elements required for monitoring and control.
Learning the basics of signal transmission is becoming a greater challenge than it was in previous
decades. The challenge results from the recent, rapid change in technology for control signal
transmission. From the inception of process control until the 1990’s, each signal involved the value a
single variable transmitted in only one direction by pneumatic, electronic, or hydraulic techniques; these
are termed analog signals. This lack of two-way communication limits the capability of the system. For
example, when the controller output value is sent to the valve (more correctly, to the i/p converter), no
information can be returned by the same wire, so that the control system has no confirmation that the
valve stem has moved.
Recently, new technology is being used for the signal transmission using digital communication,
which has much greater flexibility for transmitting multiple variable values, communicating to both
directions and performing calculations. Two-way communication and computation at any element in the
system (not just the controller) provides the opportunity for diagnostic information to be communicated
about the performance of the sensor and final element. Diagnostics can be used to schedule maintenance,
when the maloperationis not too serious, such as a slow drift from good accuracy. When the fault
prevents proper control, the system can immediately stop the operation of the control loop and alarm the
operations personnel.
Since control equipment has a long lifetime, practicing engineers will encounter many examples
of both analog and digital transmission technologies and therefore, must have a basic understanding of
both.
A major issue in signal transmission is the variable(s) transmitted. In analog systems, this choice
is limited to a single variable, so that the choice is obvious. The sensor sends its measured variable to the
controller and the controller sends its calculated output to the valve.
, repeated below.
etween the following elements in a control system via digital transmission. In answering this question, you can assume that any variable or
transmitter
Sensor Display
Reports
Convert signal to air pressure
Alarm
MV = Kc * [ ….. ]
Controller
Control valve
4.2 Analog Signal Transmission
We have learned that feedback control consists of a loop with common elements, for example, a sensor,
control calculation, and final element. Generally, the three elements are distinct physical entities and can
be located at significant distances from each other. Therefore, transmission of signals, or information,
between the elements is essential.
7.734 mV 11.2 mA
Heating medium
Figure 4.2.1. Typical analog signal transmission with analog control calculation.
Analog signal transmission was the only method for communication in process control from its inception
until the later part of the twentieth century. By “analog”, we mean that the value of a physical variable is
an “analogy” to the control system variable. For an example, consider the stirred tank process in Figure
4.2.1 in which the thermocouple measures the liquid temperature in the stirrer tank. When the
temperature changes, the millivolt signal from the thermocouple also changes; therefore, the millivoltis an
analog signal representing the liquid temperature. The relationship between the hot junction temperature
and the millivolt signal for each thermocouple design (here, a J-type) can be found in standard references
(Omega Themocouple, 2006). The millivolt is converted into a signal for transmission to a control system
for display, recording, and control.
The basic equipment in a loop is shown in Figures 4.2.1 and 4.2.2. The measured value from the
sensor is converted to the appropriate signal (physical variable and value) by a transmitter. The converted
signal is sent to the control system. The controller can be analog (continuous) or digital (discrete), and
naturally, the conversion of the signal for the controller must be appropriate for the type of controller.
The controller provides an output that must be converted to a signal for transmission to the final element.
The figures show an additional conversion that provides pneumatic pressure to the actuator of a control
valve. This design is appropriate for electronic analog signals being transmitted to a pneumatic valve,
which is typical in the process industries. However, we recognize that other situations occur, for example,
the final element could be speed of an electric motor, which would not require conversion to a continuous
pneumatic signal.
Thermocouple temperature sensor, mVAnalog
signal signal transmission (4-20 mA) Analog to digital conversion
Digital number
7.734 mV 11.2 mA
A/D
Digital controller
transmitter
En SPn CVn
1 i n (CVn CVn1 )
MVn KC En T Ei ti Td
tn
I
I i 0
145 CPneumatic signal transmission
(3-15 psig)
Heating medium
Figure 4.2.2. Typical analog signal transmission with digital control calculation.
In this section, we will restrict the discussion to electronic signals, except for the signal to pneumatic
control valves. The other three signals have limitations in distance, but find application in specialized,
simple control equipment. The standard electronic analog signal used internationally is 4-20 mA
(milliamp) to ensure interoperability.
The use of an analog signal to represent a sensor value involves the concept of a scaled variable
that establishes the relationship between a specific value of milliamps and the control system variable. To
understand, consider the example given in the following and shown in Figures 4.2.1 and 4.2.2.
Temperature = 145 °C
Temperature sensor/transmitter range = 100 to 200 °C
Therefore, the transmitter zero = 100 °C and the span is 200-100=100 C
Sensor signal range = 4 to 20 mA
We note that the sensor/transmitter provides a valid indication of temperature within its range. If the
temperature exceeds the range, the reported value remains at the appropriate limit, either low or high.
The use of a limited range improves the accuracy of the measurement and signal transmission. The
transmitter provides the value of milliamps (mA) for transmission, according to the following calculation
of the scaled variable, which represents a linear relationship between process variable and signal value.
(Signalsensor
PV Zero Span * (4.2.1)
4)mA
(20 4)mA
(Signalsensor 4)mA
PV
100scaled (4.2.2)
(20 4)mA
with
Equations (4.2.1) and (4.2.2) are valid when the process variable has a value within the range of
the sensor. The signal is never less than 4 mA nor greater than 20 mA. Therefore, the engineer must take
care when specifying sensor ranges; ranges that are too small to achieve improved accuracy will fail to
provide a useful valve during disturbances. Also, care is needed interpreting a signal at either limit of the
sensor range.
In many controllers, including all analog (continuous controllers), the calculations are performed
in scaled variables, i.e., PVscaled. See Marlin (2000) Chapter 12 or other references for further discussion
of the use of scaled variables.
Note that the electronic analog signal contains no information about the process variable type
(whether it is temperature, pressure, etc.), variable identification (heat exchanger outlet, reactor bed, etc.)
or the transmitter range. Therefore, thorough documentation, calibration and verification are required
when installing control equipment so that a signal can be correctly interpreted where it is received.
The transmitter generally is faster and more accurate than other elements in the loop, and the
signal transmission is essentially instantaneous and without error. Generally, the sensor and transmitter
are purchased as a single unit from the instrument supplier. Therefore, dynamics and accuracy
specifications are typically provided for the integrated sensor and transmitter. Typical values are given in
Section 2 on sensors.
The control calculation can be analog or digital. If digital, the signal is converted from a current
to a digital representation by an analog to digital (A/D) converter. Sampling rates can be over 100,000
samples per second, which is much higher than required for most process applications. However, control
of high-speed machinery requires very high sampling rates. The A/D accuracy depends on the equipment
design and the number of bits in the digital (binary) representation of the number. The accuracy is
determined by the last bit, because signal change smaller in magnitude than the smallest bit does not
change the value of the binary number. The accuracy is approximately 1 in 2n-1, where n is the number of
bits in the binary number and is usually between 10 and 13. Typically, commercial process control A/D
equipment has an accuracy between 1:1024 to 1:8192 (expressed as inaccuracy in fraction of sensor span)
and a conversion time much faster than process elements in the loop (0.1 ms) (Liptak, 1999). Because of
the speed and accuracy, the A/D conversion has little effect on a typical feedback loop controlling
pressure, level, temperature, etc.
The result of a control calculation is sent to the final element. If the control calculations are
performed via digital computation, the result must be converted using a digital to analog (D/A) converter.
Typically, commercial process control D/A equipment has an accuracy of about 1:1024 (expressed as
inaccuracy in fraction of output span, 0-100%) and a conversion time much faster than other elements in
the loop (Liptak, 1999). Again, the D/A conversion has little effect on a typical feedback loop controlling
pressure, level, temperature, etc.
Typically, the controller output in percent is transmitted to a throttling control valve, i.e., a valve
whose opening is adjusted as a continuous variable to determine the flow. Often, the value transmitted is
the result of the famous PID calculation. The signal transmitted is the same percentage of the range of the
electronic signal. Recalling that the electronic signal is 4-20 mA, the conversion from controller output to
current is given in the following linear relationship.
(20 (4.2.4)
Signa valv signal MV
4)mA
l e Zero (100
0)%
with
For example, if the controller output (MV) were 63%, the signal transmitted would be 14.08 milliamp.
The electronic signal is converted to pneumatic because most control valves employ air pressure
to provide the force needed to move the stem position. Using air eliminates the need for electric motors,
which could be sources of hazardous power and equipment faults. Naturally, a reliable source of dry
compressed air must be provided and distributed throughout the process to every valve actuator. Again,
an international standard signal has been agreed; for pneumatic signals, the standard is 3-15 psig. When
applying this standard to the example above, the input to the i/p converter would be 14.08 mAand the
output would be 11.56 psig. Ideally, the valve stem position for the signal of 11.56 psig would be 63%;
the actual position would not be exactly 63% because of calibration inaccuracies and friction.
Exercise 4.2.1Calculate all signals with units for the system in Figure 4.2.3. You do not have to
determine the binary values for the digital numbers, and my assume that all equipment functions
perfectly (which does not happen in real life!).
Thermocouple type: K
Temperature transmitter range: 150-400
°C Set point (SP): 245 C
Kc 0.62 %/ C , TI 12 min , Td 0 min
Controller tuning:
Thermocouple temperature Ainnal1og signal transmission Analog to digital
sensor, mVCsVignna1l7C
23 ,
(4 -20Emi At) 75.5(min 30c%on,verstion 0.50s
C), I
i0
Past controller values: Digital number
A/D
Digital controller
transmitter
En SPn CVn
Td (CV CV )
E t
in
MV n K C E n 1 I
238 C Pneumatic signal
TI
i i
nt n1
i0 n
transmission
(3-15 psig)
Valve stem
position
0-100%)
Analog signal transmission Digital to analog
(4-20 mA) conversion
Cooling medium
Figure 4.2.3. Loop schematic for Exercise 4.2.1.
Exercise 4.2.2 The electronic signal from the sensor/transmitter to the controller has a value of
1.3 mA. What can you conclude from this value? What is the proper action to be taken by the
controller? Can this action be automated?
Exercise 4.2.3 Typical values are given for measured variables in Figure 4.2.4.
PV-3
P3 TAL
T5
14
F7
63 m3/ h
dP-1
13
T6
AC-1
T10
3
TC-7
dP-2 2 F4
140 C
1
LAH
LAL
LC-3
F9
33 m3/ h
1.2 mole% AC-2 F8
A typical fieldbusstructure is shown in Figure 4.3.1. One important difference from analog
transmission is immediately apparent. In analog transmission, individual cables link each sensor and final
element to the controller. The multitude of cables is very expensive but has the advantage of limited
effect from a single cable fault. On the other hand, the fieldbusstructure has one (or a few) cable for the
data transmission for all sensors and final elements. This design is much less costly to purchase and
install but has the disadvantage of greater effects from a cable fault.
Figure 4.3.1. A typical fieldbus control system structure highlighted with dark blue lines.
The major advantages of fieldbusrequire that sensors and final elements have digital computing
capabilities. With computing at key elements in the control loop, much more information is available and
can be provided for improved control. To take advantage of much of this information, we must broaden
our view of the control loop, which traditionally involves one-way communication from sensor to
controller to value. Now, we seek advantages from two-way communication and calculations at all loop
elements. A few examples are given in Table 4.3.1.
•••Filtering measurement
Linearization
Correction for process environment (e.g., orifice for fluid temperature and pressure) which can require the use of several sensor
Controller
Output oftocontroller
valve calculation sent to the valve (i/p
To valve
converter)
(to the i/p converter)
Output of controller
Con•fi•g•uration of valve (max/min openings, characteristic, etc.)
Modification of relationship between control signal and stem position to modify characteristic
In the traditional analog system, the sensor and valve are passive elements and all decision-
making ability resides in the controller. In the digital system, key loop elements send and receive
information and perform calculations in real time.
Thus, the fieldbus includes a change from a “controller-centric” distributed digital control system
(DCS) design to Field Control System (FCS), in which all key components are actively involved
in computation and data storage.
Some of the more important features of elements in a fieldbus system are introduced in the following.
1. Configuration - A large effort is required to configure (specify parameters like sensor range and
valve characteristic) and verify data for elements of the loop. With Fieldbus, configuration can be
prepared prior to plant construction and can be loaded and checked quickly. The savings in time
and personnel costs can be substantial.
2. Calculations- Many calculations can be performed by the local processors to improve the
performance of the elements.
Sensor nonlinearities can be corrected, e.g., thermocouple conversions from millivolt to
temperature.
Several sensors can be combined to determine a more accurate value of a variable, e.g.,
density correction for a flow sensor.
A desired inherent valve characteristic can be programmed into a valve.
3. Multidrop - The fieldbuscan connect many elements using the same cable, rather than using
individual cables for each signal as required by analog transmission. Again, saving can be
substantial.
4. Two-way communication - Any element can send and receive information, and any element can
communicate with any other element on the fieldbus.
The distributed computing available in fieldbusmakes possible the distribution of the controller
calculations. For example, the element performing the controller (e.g., PID) calculation could be
physically located at the sensor or valve. However, most plants desire control information to be available
at a centralized location, the control room; therefore, the controllers are usually located in this control
room.
In fieldbusdesigns, all elements (sensor, controller and final element) exchange information via
digital transmission. We desire to purchase the best elements available from different suppliers.
Therefore, international standards are essential to ensure equipment from different suppliers will
function in a network; this is termed interoperability.
Industry began to develop these standards in 1985, initial fieldbussystems were placed in operation in the
1990’s, and standards and systems continue to evolve.
4.4 Comparison of Transmission Technologies
Electronic analog transmission has been the standard for several decades. As a motivation for changing,
we require potential improvements for the digital transmission and smart instrument technology, and
potential advantages for digital systems exist in performance and cost. A summary of some key
advantages for each technology is given in Table 4.4.1.
Some recent provides experience on the savings for fieldbusover standard analog equipment.
Cost reductions for fieldbus equipment were reported to be (Baltus, 2004),
Wiring - 50%
Commissioning (checkout and calibration) - 90%
Space in the control house for instrumentation - 85%
Maintenace - 50%
Cost advantages have been reported for projects involving many instruments. For example, the
instrumentation cost for an acetic acid plant was reduced 31% by using fieldbustechnology rather than
conventional analog technology (ARC, 2005). It is important to recognize that while the equipment cost
was higher for fieldbus, substantial savings were realized in cabling, wiring, calibration and
programming.
All control equipment outside of a protected control room is in an environment with air and possibly,
combustible materials; hydrocarbons, dust, or other materials. Note that these combustibles might not
normally be present, but they are present in the process (e.g., within vessels and pipes) and could be in
proximity to control equipment during unusual situations. The electrical power provided for the
instrument introduces the third of the three components required for combustion or explosion, as shown
in Figure 5.1. Naturally, combustion and explosion must be prevented, and two commonly employed
approaches to prevent hazards are summarized in this section.
fuel
oxygen ignition
Figure 5.1. Triangle showing the three key elements leading to fire and explosions.
Safety can be achieved by removing at least one of the elements in the environment around
instrumentation. An additional safety measure could contain the effects of any fire or explosion in a small
region, which would prevent it from propagating and creating a major hazard. An approach for achieving
safety by influencing each approach is introduced in the following.
Fuel - A controlled environment can be continuously purged with air or an inert to remove fuel.
Oxygen - The environment around an instrument can be immersed in a liquid or granular solid
that will prevent oxygen (and fuel) from being affected by the source of ignition.
Ignition- The power source can be maintained below the critical value that could initiate fire or
explosion.
Containment- An instrument can be surrounded with an enclosure that can contain a fire or
explosion within the small region, where it will extinguish quickly because of lack of fuel and
oxygen. This approach is termed "explosionproofing" in the United States and Canada and
"flameproofing" in Europe; note that the term “proof” here does not mean “no explosion or
flame”, it means the combustion is contained and will not propagate to other areas in the process.
Generally, a process has a centralized control building that has an environment free from
combustibles. The computers performing control calculations, safety controllers, historical data storage
and other higher-level computing are located in this building, as are operations personnel. Sensors and
final elements are located at the process, which can have oxygen and fuel present. We note that the fuel
should not be present in high concentrations, except within process vessels and pipes. Instrumentation
must be designed and operated to be safe, and instrumentation located in areas where a fuel source is not
normally present must be safe even during the occurrence of very infrequent fuel releases due to small
leaks or spills.
The proper instrumentation design and installation depends on the likelihood of fuel being present and the
type of fuel that could be present. The engineer must select the area classification from several categories
and ensure that the instrumentation is compatible with safe operation. The appropriate local regulatory
agency defines the categories, and the instrumentation manufacturer defines the set of specifications
appropriate for each equipment. In most countries, the instrumentation equipment must be tested by an
independent agency, such as Factory Mutual or Underwriters Laboratory, to verify the specifications
given by its manufacturer.
Hazardous Area
The hazardous area classifications differ from country to country; for example, the classifications
are different between North America and Europe, although efforts are being made to make them
consistent. The classifications presented here are for North America, although since the classifications are
in a state of change, the practicing engineer should check with the relevant agency for up-to-date
information. Then, references are given for comparisons between the North American and European
standards. Area classifications for combustible vapors and dusts are given in Table 5.1 (Ode, 2000).
In addition to a general quantity and likelihood of hazardous materials, the specific material is
important. To simplify classification, several groups shown in Table 5.2 have been defined (Ode, 2000).
A key difference between the groups is the amount of energy required to cause ignition. For the gases,
the most restrictive is Group A (lowest energy for ignition) and least restrictive is Group C.
Temperature Specification
Additional specifications are given for other performance variables, such as the operating temperature;
categories for the maximum temperature are given in Table 5.3 Ode, 2000).
The specifications just described apply to above ground manufacturing and address fire and
explosions, and they do not apply to special conditions, such as the following.
Highly oxygenated atmospheres (oxygen greater than 20 mole %)
Pyrophoric materials
Underground, mines
Any other hazards, e.g., hygiene or toxicology in food and pharmaceuticals
The remainder of this section presents two of the most important approaches for achieving safe
instrumentation in the process industries, intrinsic safety and explosion proofing.
Intrinsic safety
Intrinsic safety influences the potential source of ignition without affecting the other two key elements in
the safety triangle in Figure 5.1.
Intrinsic Safety: “A technique that achieves safety by limiting the ignition energy and surface
temperature that can arise in normal operation, or under certain foreseeable fault conditions, to
levels that are insufficient to ignite an explosive atmosphere” (Bentley Nevada, 2006).
If safety is to be ensured by preventing sources of ignition, excessive power must be prevented for normal
and foreseeable fault conditions. For example, low electrical power could be used during normal
operation, but reliable safety must also ensure that an electrical fault, which would provide higher voltage
or current, must not propagate to the areas in contact with the combustibles.
The concept is shown in Figure 5.2. Note that the intrinsic safety barriers, wiring and the field
instrumentation in the process area must be designed and installed as an integrated system.
Process area which can have Control room with safe, controlled
combustibles present environment
•••
Sensor/transmitter
Figure 5.2. Concept of intrinsic safety in a process plant. Intrinsic safety includes the barriers, field instruments
and wiring that must combine to prevent a source of ignition.
The fuel sources can vary widely in the process industries or even within different sections of a
large plant. Therefore, several hazardous area classifications are defined that depend on the types of
materials. The definitions and equipment performances are provided by national and international
professional organizations and each country defines the requirements that must be satisfied within their
jurisdiction. To satisfy these requirements, the equipment must be tested and certified by a body accepted
by the relevant governmental agency. While the concepts and general goals for intrinsic safety are the
same throughout the world, the numerous agencies can define different specifications, so that the engineer
must be aware of and abide by the local regulations. In addition, insurance providers may define
additional or more restrictive designs.
Explosion proofing
This approach reduces the possibility of a combustible mixture near the source of power combined with
limits to the damage that could be caused by an explosion. Again, national and international regulations
and standards are available.
Table 5.4 provides a quick comparison of intrinsic safety and explosion proofing, which is
paraphrased from Honeywell (2006).
Economics are always an issue in engineering practice. In a typical project, we incur expenses and
acquire revenues over time, and we face the challenge of determining the best project decisions, where
best means achieving the highest net profit. Fortunately, methods for economic analysis are readily
available. These methods consider the time-value of money and provide appropriate measures of
profitability, such as net present value (NPV). The methods for economic analysis are presented in many
excellent textbooks, for example, Blank and Tarquin (2002).
Engineers are responsible for estimating the benefits and costs of a project. The benefits accrue
from improved operation that improves product quality, increases reactor selectivity and separator
recovery, increases production rates, reduces fuel consumption, and reduces undesirable effluents. The
approaches and calculations for determining the benefits depend upon the specific project. General
approaches and example data and calculations are available in, among others, Marlin et. al. (1987) and
Shunta (1995).
This section presents some useful information for estimating the cost of control equipment. We
must recognize the cost includes the following components.
Purchase
Transportation from supplier to user
Installation and documentation
Calibration
Maintenance over the equipment lifetime
Some typical purchase costs are given in this section. Transportation cost clearly depends on the
particular item and supplier. Installation includes the wiring, power, and programming any associated
computing equipment. Calibration includes checking that the proper signal is connected to the desired
computing element and ensuring that standard signals evoke the desired result, e.g., a temperature at the
sensor provides the correct reading for display, alarm and control. Maintenance includes the cost of
personnel and spare parts.
Typical purchase costs are given in Tables 6.1 to 6.3 at the end of this section. Most of this data
has been provided by Liptak (2003; Liptak, 1999), who provides much valuable detail about each item.
Proper cost estimation requires that the equipment matches the process requirements, which requires
careful evaluation of equipment performance. Therefore, reference to Liptak(2003) and to suppliers’ data
is strongly recommended when performing cost estimations. However, the following typical data can be
helpful for educational purposes and for quickly screening many potential projects.
In addition, we must recall that prices are a commercial decision negotiated between purchasers
and suppliers. We expect that an order of many components will have a lower unit price than an order of
one or a few components. The data below is typical for unit purchases.
Finally, engineers use “quick and dirty” approximate estimates when initially evaluating many
projects. These methods are not very accurate, typically having uncertainty of 30% or more. An
example that is often needed is the cost of all instrumentation, including installation, for a plant
construction project. Estimates are available (e.g., Perry’s Handbook, 1997); however, the technology
and costs have been changing rapidly, especially since the introduction of fieldbusdigital communication.
Therefore, caution must be used when applying correlations based on old technology, often from the
1960’s.
Table 6.1 Sensors (conventional technology with transmitter, additional cost for “smart” features to be
compatible with fieldbus technology)
Process variable Cost Comments
(US$ in 2003)
Flow - orifice 500-3500 Flange connections, 2-12 in pipe
Flow - pitot and similar 1000-2000 Calibration costs extra
Flow - mass 1500-7000 1 in. pipe, cost depends strongly on sensor
technology
Flow - positive displacement 3000-5000 1500 SCMH
Flow - turbine 3000 2-3 in. pipe, cost depends strongly on pipe
size
Flow - venture/nozzle 500-1000 6 in. pipe, costs vary depending on sensor type
and materials of construction
Temperature - thermocouple 200 Cost includes thermal well. With transmitter
could cost up to $2000
Temperature - RTD 100-250 Cost includes thermal well. With transmitter
could cost up to $2000
Temperature - thermister See RTD
Temperature - optical pyrometer 500-5500 Thermal imaging much more expensive
Temperature - bimetalic 65 For local display only
Pressure - bourdon 300 Local indication
Pressure - electronic 1000-4000 Many technologies (See Liptak, 2003)
Level - pressure difference 1500 Local indicators few hundred dollars
Level - float 2000-5000 Switch or local indicator lower cost
Level - displacement 2500
Level - Laser 4000-6000
Level - Radar 1500-5000
Level - Ultransonic 650-2500
Analyzer - sampling system 3500-7000 Single sample stream
Analyzer - installation -- Varies depending upon the location, safety
requirements, and analyzer technology
Analyzer -- Must determine the cost for each analyzer type
individually
This drawing shows only the major units and process flows. The
Block Flow general goal is to provide an overview of the process to build
understanding. An entire plant can be shown in a single drawing.
Typically, each unit is shown as a rectangle (block), and the blocks are
connected by solid lines with the flow direction indicated with arrows.
No special symbols or guidelines are used in developing these
drawings.
Process This drawing shows all major equipment and process flows in a single
Flow Diagram drawing. Symbols and identifications (e.g., T-201) are used to represent
(PFD) unit operations, and each stream is designated with a number. The
stream properties are given in associated tables, but utility flow rates
(e.g., air, steam, fuel, etc.) are typically not given.
Piping These drawings give details on all piping, including valves (automated
and and manual), by-pass lines, pipe sizes, sample points, etc. In addition,
Instrumentatio all instrumentation is shown. A moderate level of mechanical detail is
n Drawing provided for process equipment, so that the piping and instrumentation
(P&ID) can be precisely documented.
Many pages of drawings are required for a single unit. The drawings
are not to scale.
While these general categories are used widely, each organization applies its own modifications.
Therefore, every set of drawings should be accompanied by a key that defines the use of symbols and
other drawing standards.
Many other drawings are used to document special issues. Examples are given in the following.
Details of piping, sampling, etc.
Loop drawings of connections between a sensor and valve in each control loop
Logic diagrams for safety and other discrete control systems
Plot plans of the entire site
In addition, documentation is required for cost estimation for the purchase, construction and start up of
the process. This information is usually included in tables; some typical contents are pump/motor power,
vessel size, piping diameter and lengths, pressures, temperatures, and materials of construction. Also,
written documentation is required to purchase every one of the thousands and thousands of items. For
example, a specification sheet is required for every sensor, transmitter, and valve.
Process Drawings: This sample chapter from Turton, et. al. (1998) discusses the
range of drawings used in process design and presents a few examples.
Avg. MW 16 18.8
Solution:
The standard orifice meter measures only DP = P1- P3 and assumes the coefficient of resistance
and the density are constant, i.e., Fsensor = Kv (DP/r0)0.5 , with r0 the density at the design or base
case. The error due to the assumption can be evaluated by comparing the square root of the
densities at the design point and the maximum deviation in molecular weight.
The error due to the change in density will be a bias of -8 percent, which would be in addition to
other inaccuracies associated with an orifice meter. The actual volumetric flow rate would be
less than recorded by a sensor assuming constant density. If the flow meter were the basis for
purchasing the stream, you would be paying 8 percent too much! Where accuracy is needed,
compensation should be applied by measuring the molecular weight of the gas and correcting as
shown in the equation above.
Solution:
The two likely choices for measuring the gas stream are 1) immediately after the drum before the
pressure control valve and 2) after the control valve. The key factor is accuracy; which location
more closely satisfies the assumptions associated with the standard orifice sensor? Since the
standard orifice sensor assumes constant density, you should select the location that has the most
constant pressure. The pressure in the overhead circuit is controlled, while the pressure
downstream from the valve will vary with the flow rate. Therefore, the sensor before the control
valve, F1, is chosen.
Solution:
The work required by the compressor depends on several factors, including pressure rise. To
achieve the desired (low) pressure in the process upstream of the compressor, the suction
pressure must be lower to account for the non-recoverable pressure loss due to the flow sensor.
Thus, the pressure loss requires additional work to achieve the desired inlet and outlet pressures.
For this reason, a sensor with a very small pressure drop is selected. Usually, this would be an
annubar or pitot tube.
Example 8) Measuring a highly variable flow rate:
We want to measure the vapor flow rate, F4. The vapor flow rate from a flash drum varies over a
large range because of changes in the upstream operation. The variation in total flow rate is
about 20-100% of its maximum during normal operation; the composition does not change
appreciably. You want to measure the flow rate with moderate accuracy, say ± 5% of its true
value during normal operation; you do not need to measure the stream accurately during startup
or shutdown. Decide which sensor to use.
Solution:
Let us discuss orifice meter technology first since it is inexpensive and very high accuracy is not
required. The 5:1 range of variation is too great for accurate measurement using one orifice
sensor. Therefore, you could install two sensors on the same pipe, one with a small range (0-
35%) and one with a large range (0-100%). When the flow is small, the sensor with the smaller
range would provide acceptable accuracy, and when the flow is large, above 35%, the sensor
with the larger range would provide acceptable accuracy. Both sensors could use the same
orifice meter. Other meters can provide this range with good accuracy and a single sensor.
Examples are a turbine meter and various types of mass flow meters. See the Section 2.2 for
details.
This can be rearranged to express the concentration as a function of the feed flow.
The gain always is positive. At low flow rates, the gain has its highest value, and as the flow
increases (the control valve opens) the gain decreases in magnitude. Therefore, the proper
installed valve characteristic would have a low gain at small valve openings and a large gain at
large valve openings. This is generally the shape of an equal percentage characteristic. To
finalize the design, we would have to substitute the numerical values for the parameters, and
also, we would have to determine how much the supply pressure changes with valve opening.
9.0 Terminology
Experience has shown that considerable misunderstanding can occur when engineers discuss the
performance of process instrumentation. Clearly, this situation is likely to impede education; in
addition, it can cause serious errors in specifying and purchasing instrumentation to satisfy
requirements. Purchasers and suppliers must share an unequivocal understanding of the
performance specifications of equipment, including instrumentation. Thus, professional
organizations have prepared standard definitions of key terms (e.g., ISA, 1979); practicing
engineers are well advised to use these standards.
10.0 Conclusions
Basic principles of physics and chemistry provide the basis for understanding process
instrumentation, while the selection of the proper equipment depends on the needs of the specific
application. This section has introduced many of the more common instruments used in the
process industries. The material in this section provides the reader with sufficient understanding
to begin industrial practice but should not be used for industrial practice; reliable and up-to-date
information on process instrumentation is available from equipment manufacturers and
professional societies. The ISA data sheets (ISA, 1992) provide a helpful checklist of the
information needed when specifying equipment in preparation for interactions with equipment
suppliers.