Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 102 views

    Harvard VS Princeton

    Uploaded by

    Freddie Mendez
    1. The Harvard model proposes handling HR activities under four categories: employee influence, human resource flow, reward systems, and work systems. 2. The Von Neumann model simplifies the control unit design but allows only serial processing, while the Harvard model allows parallel data and instruction access but has a more complex design requiring two separate memories and buses. 3. The Von Neumann model is typically used for desktops, laptops, and workstations, while the Harvard model is used for small embedded computers and digital signal processors (DSPs). The main difference is that Von Neumann uses one memory for both data and instructions, while Harvard uses separate memories.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Harvard VS Princeton

    Uploaded by

    Freddie Mendez
    102 views1 page
    1. The Harvard model proposes handling HR activities under four categories: employee influence, human resource flow, reward systems, and work systems. 2. The Von Neumann model simplifies the control unit design but allows only serial processing, while the Harvard model allows parallel data and instruction access but has a more complex design requiring two separate memories and buses. 3. The Von Neumann model is typically used for desktops, laptops, and workstations, while the Harvard model is used for small embedded computers and digital signal processors (DSPs). The main difference is that Von Neumann uses one memory for both data and instructions, while Harvard uses separate memories.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The Harvard model proposes handling HR activities under four categories: employee influence, human resource flow, reward systems, and work systems. 2. The Von Neumann model simplifies the control unit design but allows only serial processing, while the Harvard model allows parallel data and instruction access but has a more complex design requiring two separate memories and buses. 3. The Von Neumann model is typically used for desktops, laptops, and workstations, while the Harvard model is used for small embedded computers and digital signal processors (DSPs). The main difference is that Von Neumann uses one memory for both data and instructions, while Harvard uses separate memories.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    102 views1 page

    Harvard VS Princeton

    Uploaded by

    Freddie Mendez
    1. The Harvard model proposes handling HR activities under four categories: employee influence, human resource flow, reward systems, and work systems. 2. The Von Neumann model simplifies the control unit design but allows only serial processing, while the Harvard model allows parallel data and instruction access but has a more complex design requiring two separate memories and buses. 3. The Von Neumann model is typically used for desktops, laptops, and workstations, while the Harvard model is used for small embedded computers and digital signal processors (DSPs). The main difference is that Von Neumann uses one memory for both data and instructions, while Harvard uses separate memories.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Frederick Geronimo

    1. What is Harvard model?

    The Harvard model proposes that many of the diverse personnel and labour relations activities can be dealt with
    under four human resource (HR) categories: employee influence, human resource flow, reward systems and work
    systems.

    2. What is its difference with the von Neumann Model? Use a PRO-CON table

    Von Neumann Model


    ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
    the control unit gets data and instructions in the same
    way from one memory. It simplifies design and Bottlenecking is an issue because only one bit of
    development of the control unit information can be accessed at once
    Data from memory and from devices are accessed in
    the same way.
    Development of control unit is cheaper and faster than Confusion between data and instructions can lead to a
    Harvard system trash.
    East memory organization for the user Instruction stored in the same memory as the data can
    It is better for desktop computers, laptops, workstations be accidentally rewritten by an error in a program
    and high performance computers
    Serial instruction processing does not allow parallel
    The programs can be optimized in smaller size. execution of the program. Parallel execution are
    simulated later by the operating system.
    The code is executed serially and takes more clock Only handles one task at a time.
    styles.

    Harvard Model
    Advantages Disadvantages
    It has two memories with two buses, this allows a Free data cannot be used for instructions and vice-
    parallel access to data and instructions versa
    The program cannot write itself
    Data and instructions are accessed in the same way Development of the control unit is expensive and needs
    more time
    Less chance of program corruption
    Instead of one data bus there are now two. Which
    means more pins on the CPU, a more complex
    motherboards and doubling up on RAM chips as well as
    Both memories can use different cell sizes more complex cache design. This is why it is rarely
    used outside the CPU
    Production of a computer with two buses is expensive
    and needs more time

    3. What technologies implement these two models? Are they any different in purpose or function?

    The technologies implement for Von Neumann model are desktop computers, laptops, workstations and high
    performance computer. For Harvard model it is used for small embedded computer and signal processing (DSP). Von
    Neumann is also known as stored program architecture and the most important feature is the memory that holds both
    data and program. For Harvard architecture it is sometimes used within the CPU to handle its caches, but it is less
    used with main memory because of complexity and cost.

    You might also like