European Journal of Social Sciences Studies
European Journal of Social Sciences Studies
European Journal of Social Sciences Studies
ISSN: 2501-8590
ISSN-L: 2501-8590
Available on-line at: www.oapub.org/soc
Gondo Reniko1i,
Maturure Kennedy J.2,
Mutopa Sevious3,
Tokwe Tapiwa4,
Chirefu Harison5,
Nyevedzanayi Mary6
Okavango Research Institute,
1
Abstract:
In 1999, the Nziramasanga Commission of inquiry into the Zimbabwean education
system was tasked to look into the issues surrounding the education system. While the
commission came up with recommendations, however, political and economic
challenges could not allow such transformations. Thus, this paper discusses concerns
surrounding the updated school curriculum in Zimbabwe. This is based on the feeling
that the education system must be characterized by dramatic technological revolution
that has a strong bearing on the curriculum. Guided by the foundational curriculum
theory, the paper argues that education is a tool geared to reform society and creates
change for the better. Hence, authentic education in Zimbabwe addresses the whole
person and does not limit professional development and curriculum design to
workplace readiness. To this end, there is every need to review the status quo of
secondary school curriculum in Zimbabwe in order to consolidate further the new basic
education programme and to ensure the actualization of the Ministry of Primary and
Secondary Education policy in the area of human capital development. Finally, the
1. Introduction
The history of Zimbabwe runs parallel to her education system. This is because of the
realisation by the early nationalists that the country could not develop without a proper
grounding in a national education system that can guarantee the production of the
desired high quality workforce. In line with the government’s Nziramasanga
Commission (1999), the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education was mandated to
review the secondary and primary education programmes to meet the targets of
education in the context of Zimbabwe Agenda for Sustainable Socio-Economic
Transformation (ZimAsset) which is a national obligations of the government of
Zimbabwe. In light of this, curriculum implementation in Zimbabwe has been
attributed to many factors including funding, obsolete educational facilities, high
turnover and inadequate qualified teachers among others. It is against this background
that this paper examines the issues of effective implementation of a national curriculum
(NC) in Zimbabwe with a view to proffering far reaching solutions in view of the new
political dispensation obtaining in Zimbabwe.
School curriculum is all about experiences required of a learner for all round
development (Ahmad & Lukman, 2015; Lopes, 2016). It is a particular form of
specification about the practice of teaching and learning and is not a package of
materials or syllabi on issues to be covered rather it is a way of translating an
educational idea into hypothesis testable in practice (Esau & Mpofu 2017; Jansen, 1991).
Furthermore, curriculum is a specification about the practice of teaching which involves
pragmatic efficacy of the learners’ experiences. Experience as a general concept
comprises knowledge of or skills of something or some events gained through
involvement in or exposure to that event. In light of this, curriculum is an important
element of education in which overall objectives of education depend largely on the
nature of the curriculum. Curriculum development experts have argued that
curriculum making either at the level of development, design, implementation or
reformation needs the inputs of critical stakeholders if it is to be relevant, meaningful
and adequate to meet the needs of the people for whom it has been put together. In this
view, Dewey (1938) contends that education is a social construct which is a part of
society and should reflect the community’s desires. In Zimbabwe, for instance,
secondary school curriculum is designed to encourage all learners to achieve their
“the process of putting all that have been planned as curriculum document into practice
in the classroom through the combined efforts of teachers, learners, school administrators,
parents as well as interaction with physical facilities, instructional materials,
psychological and social environment.”
The scope of this definition therefore entails that putting curriculum into
operation requires an implementation agent and Ahmadi & Lukman (2015) identify a
teacher as the main agent in the process. CI therefore refers to how the planned,
officially designed course of study is translated by the teacher into syllabus, schemes of
work and lessons plans to be delivered to learners. Accordingly, CI involves
interactions amongst teachers, learners and other stakeholders with the aim of
achieving the objectives of education. In this way, CI therefore involves day to day
activities in which the school management and classroom teachers undertake in the
pursuit of the objectives of a given curriculum. However, literature has shown that
teachers are not often involved during policy formulation even though they are
expected to implement the curriculum (Ahmadi & Lukman, 2015; Clyton & Moses,
2017). A major setback in effective CI is the problem of unqualified teachers especially
specialist teachers in areas like ITC and technical subjects given the fact that such
teachers would not have been consulted in the policy formulation stage. In recent times,
curriculum is designed up to implementation stage without adequate manpower to
translate it into reality
3. Methodology
3.2 Methods
Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used in data collection. While some
sources of data collection were primary, (interviews, questionnaires, focused group
discussions), others were secondary (government documents, peer reviewed-published
research articles). Different techniques were used to collect qualitative information and
these included five in-depth key informant interviews and questionnaire surveys. In
addition, a total of two focussed group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with groups
constituting heads and teachers. A questionnaire for heads of schools was designed and
it comprised both structured and open ended questions. Data analysis, which was
mainly content analysis focused mainly on understanding of challenges encountered in
implementation of the new curriculum mainly in Hurungwe districts but some
questionnaires were sent to districts in Masvingo and Mashonaland East in Zimbabwe.
This was done so that at least a national coverage of the issues surrounding the
curriculum implementation would be captured.
curriculum aims to modernise the education system at all the three levels (infant, junior
and secondary) in order to align them with global trends and with modern technologies
(GoZ, 2017). According to the curriculum framework, the MoPSE remains committed to
fulfilling the potential of learners in Zimbabwe. Emphasis on the updated curriculum is
on providing improved access and quality education to every learner that would
subsequently contribute to bringing about meaningful transformation in the lives of
ordinary Zimbabweans. The CFPSE (2015-2022) is anchored on a long term policy
direction to make improvements in the education system. It establishes a clear sequence
of priorities to ensure that the return on investment in education is optimised in terms
of the results that matter most, which are learner outcomes. The updated Curriculum
provides today’s generation with relevant knowledge, skills, attitudes that will drive
the country‘s socio-economic growth and prosperity forward.
Figure 2 outlines the stages of curriculum update in Zimbabwe from 1998 up to January
2017 when the implementation was done. The first stage was embarked on soon after
the NC report. The preparation stage had six key issues and these were preparation of a
handbook on curriculum review, designing a questionnaire for data collection,
developing a training manual and setting up a technical working group, which
included key ministries, recruited team leaders and mobilised resources from
government & partners.
Stage one was followed by stage 2 in which a nationwide consultations using the
different platforms from school to national levels were made. Consultation was done
through platforms such as print or electronic media, Mai Chisamba show and other social
gatherings. The targeted stakeholders included universities, colleges, and examination
board among others.
The data gathered from consultations were used to compile a narrative report
(stage 3) which formed the basis for drafting a curriculum blueprint (stage 4). Besides
issues from a nationwide consultations, other factors engendered the review of the old
curriculum. While acknowledging the NC recommendations, the curriculum
framework has taken on aboard the human capital, social, political, economic and
technological transformations in the country. While the impact of the land reform and
the need to cultivate a patriotic citizenry enriched the framework, the curriculum had
also to reflect the national efforts as enshrined in the national economic policy, the
Zimbabwe’s home grown constitution and regional and international treaties to which
the country is a signatory. Additionally, the expansion in the capabilities of information
and communication technologies and the emergence of an information-driven economy
underpin the need for the development of new skill to enable citizens to live and work
competitively in the global village.
Table 1 shows the distribution of respondents based on their gender and age group.
Data reveal that most (78%) of the respondents were males. The dominance of males
was perhaps influenced by the fact that in Zimbabwe men are usually found in rural
schools and women mostly in urban schools. Majority (40%) of the respondents
comprised those within the age range of 33-37 years. Approximately, 30% of them fell
within the age range of 28-32 years, while only 10% and 20% were aged between 38-42
and 43-47 years, respectively. The study revealed that both male and female teachers
were negatively affected by the implementation of the updated curriculum.
subscribed to the feeling that the former minister of education rushed to introduce a
new curriculum without having conducted adequate consultation with stakeholders.
One interviewee buttressed this by saying “[i]t is only in 2018 that the Ministry has now
realised the absence of grass roots consultative engagement that it has started a new
communication and advocacy strategy programme”. The aim is to instil a sense of shared
vision and ownership of the transformation initiatives and also to deal with in-house
misunderstanding in curriculum implementation. Even distinguished officials in the
ministry condemned the way the updated curriculum was implemented. A key
informant says: “[t]he dots are not connecting. The ministry has now awakened to the need of
developing a robust communication strategy four years down the line”.
The study also revealed that there were several areas of concern that remained
contentious for instance, continuous assessment, tasks and projects, workload for
teachers, among others. On the issue of tasks and subject one teacher had this to say:
“Imagine a class of 55 learners at primary school, a teacher asks each kid to bring a rim of
bond paper serious 55 rims of bond paper? Primary school kids are too young to be
burdened with such number of books. We succeeded in life but I wrote 3 subjects at grade
7 English, Maths and Shona. I went to secondary and wrote 10 subjects and came out
with all distinctions now am a professional being forced to see my kid being burdened to
write 8 subjects in primary school, that is unfair.”
“We have totally scrapped the issue of tasks, so we are saying we are not going to have
tasks anymore in our schools. These tasks are not part of the syllabus, from my study and
even if one would look at our syllabus, it has no tasks. Above all, the tasks were too much
a burden to both the students and the teachers because if a learner is doing 10 subjects,
they are required to do at least one task per subject meaning its 10 tasks for the 10
subjects per term or simply 30 tasks per year. We are going to compress the curriculum,
especially for lower levels, because the learning areas are too much for them. We need to
combine some of the subjects like Physical Education, Mass displays and Sport.” (The
Sunday Times 4 March 2018)
Buttressing this and applauding the move by the government a key informant
remarked:
“The new curriculum is just the worst idea there. Although it tries to lighten up
education for the kids it is actually doing the opposite of its purpose. for instance take a
pupil doing 13 subjects, that means he has to have 13 projects, and 13 ×5 tasks, at the end
of the day the child is failing to balance all that load, the obvious case is a decline in the
education sector of the country to me it’s actually good news if new curriculum has been
recalled.”
“While the issue of Religious studies appears to be a misconception and misreading of the
new curriculum by the general public, a mere mention of Islamism invokes feelings of
fundamentalism associated with Muslims. Parents feel this will send wrong signals to
their children.”
probably this was for religious reasons as they felt challenged by the introduction of
other religions to be taught alongside their religion.
Zimbabwean teachers’ monthly take home salaries and allowances are very poor and
unattractive (Newsday, 2014) and as such cannot sustain them in the face of the rising
cost of living ever since the country has been declared a pariah state way back in the
1999.
Application of information and communication technology (ICT) has proved
very useful and effective in the teaching and learning process (Ramesh & Dibaba, 2017).
But teachers’ inability to apply ICT in teaching at secondary schools in Zimbabwe could
be one of the problems militating against effective implementation of the updated
secondary school curriculum (Bukaliya & Mubika, 2011; Ncube & Tshabalala, 2016).
Many secondary school teachers do not use computers in teaching their lessons in
Zimbabwe. This has been attributed to many factors which include electricity problem.
Since ICTs require electricity for their use where there is power failure users will be
stranded. Another factor is lack of computer expertise knowledge in the use of
computers. According to one respondent “[t]he current socio-economic and political
condition in Zimbabwe today has compelled the government to show little concern for the
application of ICT in education”. While most urban schools have access to computers
donated by the former president; there is lack of human and material resources to use
ICT in such schools and the situation is even worse in rural schools where there is no
electricity (Musingarabwi, 2017).
References
Government of Zimbabwe The National Budget Statement For 2018 Presented to the
Parliament of Zimbabwe on Thursday, December 7, 2017 By The Hon. P.A.
Chinamasa (M.P.) Minister of Finance and Economic Development.
Gwany, D. M. (2006). Teacher Education: Cognitive neuropsychological and
idiosyncratic foundations in the educational psychologist, a journal of the
Nigerian Council of Educational Psychologists. Nigeria.
Harris, R., & Burn, K. (2011). Curriculum theory, curriculum policy and the problem of
ill‐disciplined thinking. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 245-261.
Ipaye, B. (2012). Teachers’ apathy to teaching in searchlight on secondary education in
Nigeria. A handbook of 21-year educational research paper from the all Nigeria
conference of principals of secondary schools, ANCOPSS. Ado-Ekiti: All Nigeria
Conference of Principals of Secondary Schools.
Jansen, J. (1991). The state and curriculum in the transition to socialism: the
Zimbabwean experience. Comparative Education Review, 35(1), 76-91.
Kanyongo, G. Y. (2005). Zimbabwe's Public Education System Reforms: Successes and
Challenges. International Education Journal, 6(1), 65-74.
Koo, H. C. K. (2002). Quality education through a post-modern curriculum. Hong Kong
Teacher’s Centre Journal, 1(1), 56-73.
Kurasha, P., & Chabaya, R. A. (2013). Curriculum development and implementation:
Factors contributing towards curriculum development in Zimbabwe higher
education system.
Lopes, A. C. (2016). What are we meaning by Curriculum? TCI (Transnational
Curriculum Inquiry), 13(1), 1-2.
Maba, W. (2017). Teacher's Perception on the Implementation of the Assessment Process
in 2013 Curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH),
1(2), 1-9.
Majoni, C. (2017). Curriculum Overload and Its Impact on Teacher Effectiveness in
Primary Schools. European Journal of Education Studies.
Mkpa, M. A. (2007). Curriculum development. Owerri: Totan publishers Ltd.
Moyo, L., & Hadebe, L. B. (2018). The Relevance of Teacher Education as a Trajectory in
Developing and Sustaining Inclusivity in the Digital Classroom. European Journal
of Open Education and E-learning Studies.
Munikwa, S. (2016). Analysis of the Current Zimbabwe’s Secondary School Two Path-
Way Education Curriculum.
Musingarabwi, S. (2017). Lecturers’ Use of ICTs to implement the Curriculum at a
Teacher Training College in Zimbabwe. Advances in Social Sciences Research
Journal, 4(4).
Ncube, A. C., & Tshabalala, T. (2016). An Investigation into the Challenges Faced by
Secondary School Teachers in Integrating Internet into the Teaching and
Learning Process in Zimbabwe: a Case Study of Harare Province. Nova Journal of
Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3).
Obanya, P. (2004). New goals, new curricula. ADEA Newsletter, 7.