h205 Paper 1 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

1

Emma Schmidt

H205

9/4/2020

Aim of Education is achievable by Human Flourishing

I think the aim of education should be Human Flourishing, which is better than Social

Efficiency. In order to understand why I believe that Human Flourishing is better than Social

Efficiency, it's important to know the difference between the two. I believe that Human

Flourishing is the aim of education based on the criteria that Brighouse has laid out. In the text

he states that, “academic subjects themselves present opportunities that are relevant to the child’s

long-term... flourishing and are not merely preparation for the world of work” (Brighouse, 2008

pg 62). Students need to flourish and not just in academics. When they flourish in other aspects

of life, that ultimately makes for a better education because students are flourishing in other

aspects. Academic subjects for students are not enough for human flourishing, and if we only

focus on the academics of schooling, that we have failed as a system. Education and school are

not merely black and white, subjects learned, and discipline. It's the outside forces around us that

make us flourish in school and ultimately lead us to a happier and better life. It's the teachers that

make us enjoy those classes, the friendships made during group work, and lessons learned. All of

those things are needed to make up the aim of education. We need to focus on lifelong skills and

the other elements that make us flourish, rather than the Social Efficiency which is what Labaree

believes.
2

Labaree states that Social Efficiency is when “everyone benefits from more skilled

workers, makes education more practical by offering more practical study matters and some

degree of stratification” (Labaree 1997 pg 6). Having the ideology that the economy is solely

dependent on the ability to prepare students for economic roles. If you have this closed mindset

education is meant to prepare people for economic roles, that it misses all the key elements for

the aims of education. If you are not flourishing in life and have happiness, then you won’t be

successful enough to hold a job to benefit the economy. A prime example of that is teaching.

When teachers are unable to flourish in their life, it’s a direct reflection on how the students are

able to learn. When teachers are not motivated, or unhappy they are unable to produce the best

education they can give to their students. This leads the students into an unfair expectation set by

Labaree that if you prepare them correctly, they will be suitable for the economy. Brighouse

states that, “Formal learning and education are used to foster flourishing outside of the

classroom” (Brighouse 2008 pg. 64). It’s only when students are flourishing both inside and

outside of the classroom that the aim of education can be achieved. As a society we can not only

rely on skills for success to use for economic roles. When this happens, oftentimes people are not

happy or flourishing in their roles, and it causes them to have a poor job or not want to work at

all. In reality, you need human flourishing in order to be a useful member of society. Social

efficiency is when “everyone benefits from more skilled workers, make education more practical

by offering more practical study matters and some degree of stratification” (Labaree 1997 pg. 5).

While in hindsight having a good education will make skilled workers, it does not mean that they

will have the happiness, motivation, or human flourishing to perform their tasks to become an

active member of society. This means, they have had a good education and produce mediocre

work into the economy because they are lacking the happiness and flourishing it takes to
3

properly complete a job. This is where Labaree falls short. It's only putting tape over a hole in a

sinking ship. It may work for the time being, but it will swiftly show that it’s not what can

suffice when dealing with the aim of education and making someone flourish in society.

Brighouse touches on this saying, “flourishing and happiness are not merely preparation for the

world of work” (Brighouse 2008 pg. 62).

Overall, the aim of education only works when it's based on human flourishing. This

allows people to flourish outside and inside of the classroom to make for a successful student and

member of society for later in life. Social efficiency only focuses on a small part of what could

potentially make a person successful in the economy. Which is why human flourishing is the

better aim for education because it covers other influences, not just the obvious one.

References:
4

Labaree, David F. Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle over Educational
Goals . 1997, David F. Labaree .

Brighouse, Harry. Education for a Flourishing Life. www.sarahlawrence.edu/news-


events/media/pdf/brighouse-education-for-a-flourishing-life.pdf.

You might also like