h205 Paper 1 1
h205 Paper 1 1
h205 Paper 1 1
Emma Schmidt
H205
9/4/2020
I think the aim of education should be Human Flourishing, which is better than Social
Efficiency. In order to understand why I believe that Human Flourishing is better than Social
Efficiency, it's important to know the difference between the two. I believe that Human
Flourishing is the aim of education based on the criteria that Brighouse has laid out. In the text
he states that, “academic subjects themselves present opportunities that are relevant to the child’s
long-term... flourishing and are not merely preparation for the world of work” (Brighouse, 2008
pg 62). Students need to flourish and not just in academics. When they flourish in other aspects
of life, that ultimately makes for a better education because students are flourishing in other
aspects. Academic subjects for students are not enough for human flourishing, and if we only
focus on the academics of schooling, that we have failed as a system. Education and school are
not merely black and white, subjects learned, and discipline. It's the outside forces around us that
make us flourish in school and ultimately lead us to a happier and better life. It's the teachers that
make us enjoy those classes, the friendships made during group work, and lessons learned. All of
those things are needed to make up the aim of education. We need to focus on lifelong skills and
the other elements that make us flourish, rather than the Social Efficiency which is what Labaree
believes.
2
Labaree states that Social Efficiency is when “everyone benefits from more skilled
workers, makes education more practical by offering more practical study matters and some
degree of stratification” (Labaree 1997 pg 6). Having the ideology that the economy is solely
dependent on the ability to prepare students for economic roles. If you have this closed mindset
education is meant to prepare people for economic roles, that it misses all the key elements for
the aims of education. If you are not flourishing in life and have happiness, then you won’t be
successful enough to hold a job to benefit the economy. A prime example of that is teaching.
When teachers are unable to flourish in their life, it’s a direct reflection on how the students are
able to learn. When teachers are not motivated, or unhappy they are unable to produce the best
education they can give to their students. This leads the students into an unfair expectation set by
Labaree that if you prepare them correctly, they will be suitable for the economy. Brighouse
states that, “Formal learning and education are used to foster flourishing outside of the
classroom” (Brighouse 2008 pg. 64). It’s only when students are flourishing both inside and
outside of the classroom that the aim of education can be achieved. As a society we can not only
rely on skills for success to use for economic roles. When this happens, oftentimes people are not
happy or flourishing in their roles, and it causes them to have a poor job or not want to work at
all. In reality, you need human flourishing in order to be a useful member of society. Social
efficiency is when “everyone benefits from more skilled workers, make education more practical
by offering more practical study matters and some degree of stratification” (Labaree 1997 pg. 5).
While in hindsight having a good education will make skilled workers, it does not mean that they
will have the happiness, motivation, or human flourishing to perform their tasks to become an
active member of society. This means, they have had a good education and produce mediocre
work into the economy because they are lacking the happiness and flourishing it takes to
3
properly complete a job. This is where Labaree falls short. It's only putting tape over a hole in a
sinking ship. It may work for the time being, but it will swiftly show that it’s not what can
suffice when dealing with the aim of education and making someone flourish in society.
Brighouse touches on this saying, “flourishing and happiness are not merely preparation for the
Overall, the aim of education only works when it's based on human flourishing. This
allows people to flourish outside and inside of the classroom to make for a successful student and
member of society for later in life. Social efficiency only focuses on a small part of what could
potentially make a person successful in the economy. Which is why human flourishing is the
better aim for education because it covers other influences, not just the obvious one.
References:
4
Labaree, David F. Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle over Educational
Goals . 1997, David F. Labaree .