Easement
Easement
Easement
5.
a. No, Romeo has not acquired an easement of light and view by prescription.
Art. 668 of the NCC provides for the period of prescription for the acquisition of an easement of
light and view which shall be counted:
(1) From the time of the opening of the window, if it is through a party wall; or
(2) From the time of the formal prohibition upon the proprietor of the adjoining land or
tenement, if the window is through a wall on the dominant estate.
In the present case, there was no formal prohibition evident as required by law. This
should have been done by means of an instrument acknowledged before a notary public.
Romeo should have prohibited Fred from obstructing his light and view, but he did not.
Additionally, Romeo did not adhere to the legal requirement that there should be a
distance of at least two meters between the windows and Fred’s lot, since the view is
direct. Non-observance of this distance does not give rise to prescription.
b. The action of Fred against Romeo for the closure of the windows will not prosper.
Under the NCC, the prescription for the bringing of such action shall be 10 years
At present, because more than 10 years has already elapsed from the time of the opening of the
windows of Romeo, Fred’s right of action for its closure has already prescribed.
c. No, the failure of such action is not tantamount to saying that Romeo has already acquired an
easement of light and view. The New Civil Code supports the fact that no one can prevent Fred
from obstructing Romeo’s light and view by constructing a building on his lot or by raising a
wall thereon contiguous to the windows of A.