CGL - Medoro - 43-101 - 14-Oct-09 - Zona Alta

Scott E Wilson Consulting Inc Phone: (720) 348‐1646
6 Inverness Court East, Suite 110 Fax: (303) 790‐1872
Englewood, CO 80112 www.wilsonmining.com

TECHNICAL REPORT
COLOMBIA GOLFIELDS LTD.
MEDORO RESOURCES LTD.
MARMATO PROJECT, ZONA ALTA PROPERTY
DEPARTMENT OF CALDAS
REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA

OCTOBER 14, 2009

Prepared by
SCOTT E. WILSON CONSULTING, INC.
Scott E. Wilson, C.P.G.

______________
Scott E. Wilson, C.P.G

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION ................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Ownership ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 DRILLING AND SAMPLING ............................................................................................................................... 5
1.5 RESOURCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
1.5.1 NI 43‐101 COMPLIANT MEASURED AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES ......................................... 5
1.5.2 NI 43‐101 COMPLIANT INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES ...................................................................... 6
1.6 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 6
1.6.1 ADEQUACY OF PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................. 6
1.6.2 ADEQUACY OF DATA .............................................................................................................................. 7
1.6.3 COMPLIANCE WITH CANADIAN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT NI 43‐101 .................................................... 7
1.6.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 7
2 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ....................................................................................................... 8
2.1 Purpose of Technical Report ........................................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Sources of Information .................................................................................................................................... 8
2.3 Extent of Involvement of Qualified Person ..................................................................................................... 9
2.4 Terms of Reference ......................................................................................................................................... 9
3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ........................................................................................................................... 14
4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION .......................................................................................................... 15
4.1 MARMATO PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................... 19
4.2 CARAMANTA PROJECT .................................................................................................................................. 34
4.3 COLOMBIAN MINING LAW ............................................................................................................................ 39
4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND LIABILITIES ....................................................................................... 41
5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ................................... 44
6 HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................................. 52
6.1 General History ............................................................................................................................................. 52
6.2 Historical Resource Estimates ....................................................................................................................... 65
6.3 PRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 72
6.3.1 Results of Colombia Goldfields Research ............................................................................................ 72
6.3.2 Mineros Nacionales ............................................................................................................................. 79
6.3.3 Marmato Zona Alta .............................................................................................................................. 81
7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ........................................................................................................................................ 84
7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................... 84
7.2 PROJECT GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 87
8 DEPOSIT TYPES ................................................................................................................................................... 95
9 MINERALIZATION ............................................................................................................................................... 97
10 EXPLORATION .................................................................................................................................................. 102
10.1 MARMATO PROJECT ............................................................................................................................... 103
10.1.1 Imagery and Topography .............................................................................................................. 103
10.1.2 Underground Mapping ................................................................................................................. 103
10.1.3 Geological Mapping ...................................................................................................................... 103
10.1.4 Geochemistry ................................................................................................................................ 103
10.1.5 Geophysics .................................................................................................................................... 105
11 DRILLING .......................................................................................................................................................... 106
12 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH ............................................................................................................. 139
13 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ......................................................................................... 143
13.1 SAMPLE SECURITY AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY ......................................................................................... 144
13.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION ........................................................................................................................... 147
13.3 SAMPLE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 148

Colombia Goldfields Ltd. Medoro Resources Ltd.
Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page II

13.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)............................................................................... 149
13.5 REFERENCE MATERIALS .......................................................................................................................... 150
13.6 BLANK SAMPLES ..................................................................................................................................... 162
13.7 PREPARATION DUPLICATES .................................................................................................................... 164
13.8 FIELD DUPLICATES .................................................................................................................................. 169
13.9 CORE SAW CUTTINGS AND SLUDGE SAMPLES ....................................................................................... 177
13.10 INTERNAL LABORATORY REPEATS .......................................................................................................... 178
13.11 EXTERNAL LABORATORY REPEATS ......................................................................................................... 180
13.12 METALLICS ASSAYS ................................................................................................................................. 187
13.13 DENSITY AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY ............................................................................................................ 188
13.14 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................................... 191
14 DATA VERIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................... 192
15 ADJACENT PROPERTIES .................................................................................................................................... 193
15.1 MARMATO, ZONA BAJA.......................................................................................................................... 195
15.2 ECHANDIA PROPERTY ............................................................................................................................. 197
15.3 CARAMANTA EXPLORATION PROJECT OF CGL ....................................................................................... 199
15.4 OTHER EXPLORATION PROJECTS IN THE REGION ................................................................................... 201
16 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING .................................................................................. 204
16.1 KAPPES CASSIDY PRELIMINARY TEST WORK 2006 ................................................................................. 204
16.2 SGS LAKEFIELD TEST WORK 2007 ........................................................................................................... 205
17 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES .............................................................................. 210
17.1 ZONA ALTA MINERAL RESOURCE ........................................................................................................... 210
17.1.1 Resource Data for Grade Estimation and Block Modeling ............................................................ 210
17.1.1.1 Drilling Data .............................................................................................................................. 210
17.1.1.2 Assay Corrections ..................................................................................................................... 210
17.1.1.3 Topographic Data ..................................................................................................................... 211
17.1.1.4 Geologic Model ........................................................................................................................ 211
17.1.1.5 Densities ................................................................................................................................... 211
17.1.1.6 Drillhole Compositing ............................................................................................................... 211
17.1.2 Grade Capping .............................................................................................................................. 214
17.1.3 Variography and Grade Estimation ............................................................................................... 215
17.1.4 Veins and Face Samples modeled separately ............................................................................... 216
17.1.5 Block Modeling ............................................................................................................................. 216
17.2 MINERAL RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION .................................................................................................... 218
17.3 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES ............................................................................................................ 218
17.3.1 Resource Summary ‐ Gold............................................................................................................. 218
17.3.2 Resource Summary – Silver ........................................................................................................... 219
17.3.3 Resource Summary – Grade/Tonne Charts ................................................................................... 220
18 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 222
18.1 CURRENT SOCIAL AND MINING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 222
18.1.1 Historical Importance ................................................................................................................... 222
18.1.2 Social Issues .................................................................................................................................. 222
18.1.2.1 Social Impact of the Topography/Geology on the Urban Center of Marmato ........................ 223
18.1.3 Mining Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 223
18.1.4 Relocation Efforts ......................................................................................................................... 224
18.2 MINERA DE CALDAS’ POSITION ON RELOCATION .................................................................................. 226
18.2.1 Position ......................................................................................................................................... 226
18.2.2 Collaboration with Public Authorities ........................................................................................... 226

Scott E. Wilson Consulting, Inc. CGL_Medoro_43‐101_14‐Oct‐09.docx
October 14, 2009 sew

Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page III

18.2.2.1 Role of the Relocation Committee ........................................................................................... 227
18.3 CURRENT ACTIVITIES OF MINERA DE CALDAS ........................................................................................ 227
18.4 CESSATION OF CURRENT MINING ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................ 228
18.4.1 Employment Opportunities .......................................................................................................... 228
18.4.2 Training ......................................................................................................................................... 229
18.5 RETENTION OF MARMATO’S HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE ...................................................................... 229
18.6 MARMATO’S ROLE AS THE COMMUNITY CENTER ................................................................................. 230
18.7 MARMATO’S ROLE AS A MINING DISTRICT ............................................................................................ 230
18.8 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AT MARMATO ..................................................................................... 230
18.8.1 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 231
18.8.2 Air Resources ................................................................................................................................ 231
18.8.3 Soil Resources ............................................................................................................................... 231
18.8.4 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................................................ 232
19 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................... 233
20 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 234
21 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 235
22 DATE ................................................................................................................................................................. 240
23 AUTHOR’S CERTIFICATE ................................................................................................................................... 241


Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page IV

List of Tables

Table 1.1 Zona Alta Measured and Indicated Gold Mineral Resources ............................. 5
Table 1.2 Zona Alta Measured and Indicated Silver Mineral Resources ............................ 6
Table 1.3 Inferred Gold Mineral Resources ........................................................................ 6
Table 1.4Inferred Silver Mineral Resources ........................................................................ 6
Table 4.1 Mineral Licenses Purchased or Optioned, Zona Alta, Category 1 (Registered
Title). ........................................................................................................ 28
Table 4.2 Mineral Licenses Purchased or Optioned, Zona Alta, ...................................... 32
Table 4.3 Mineral Licenses Purchased or Optioned, Zona Alta, Category 3 (Applications
for Legalization) ....................................................................................... 33
Table 4.4 New Contract Proposals Marmato Zona Alta .................................................. 34
Table 4.5 CGF Exploration Licenses ................................................................................. 37
Table 6.1 Summary of Conquistador’s Significant Diamond Drill Hole Results for the
Marmato Project ...................................................................................... 59
Table 6.2 1998 MRDI Table 4, Total Resource Estimate in Whole Blocks including
Contact Dilution ....................................................................................... 69
Table 6.3 1998 MRDI Table 5, Zona Alta (above 1298 m) Resource Estimate in Whole
Blocks including Contact Dilution ............................................................ 70
Table 6.4 1998 MRDI Table 6, Zona Baja (below 1298 m) Resource Estimate in Whole
Blocks including Contact Dilution ............................................................ 71
Table 6.5 Gold Production1 at Marmato from 1778 to 1823 ........................................... 75
Table 6.6 Gold Production at Marmato from 1832 to 1836 ............................................. 76
Table 6.7 Gold production at Marmato from 1909 to 1914 ............................................. 76
Table 6.8 Gold Production1 at Marmato from 1931 to 1935 .......................................... 77
Table 6.9 Gold production at Marmato from 1941 to 1944 ............................................. 77
Table 6.10 Gold Production1 at Marmato from 1967 to 1998 ........................................ 77
Table 6.11 Gold and Silver Production from the Zona Baja, Marmato from 2002 to 2008
by Mineros Nacionales S.A. ..................................................................... 80
Table 10.1 CGL Exploration Expenditures (US$) on the Marmato Property ................. 102
Table 11.1 Zona Alta Drill Program 2007‐08 Summary Statistics ................................... 107
Table 11.2Summary of the Drill Holes for the 2007 to 2008 Drilling Program on the Zona
Alta ......................................................................................................... 112
Table 11.3 Significant Intersections from the 2007 to 2008 Drilling Program on the Zona
Alta ......................................................................................................... 123
Table 13.1 Certified Standard Reference Material Information for Gold ...................... 151
Table 13.2Certified Standard Reference Material Information for Silver ...................... 151
Table 13.3 Results of the Screen Metallic Test work ..................................................... 187
Table 13.4 Bulk Densities of Metallurgical Sample Composite 1 .................................. 189
Table 13.5 Bulk Densities of Metallurgical Sample MET 05 .......................................... 190


Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page V

Table 15.1Gold and Silver Production History Zona Baja at Marmato by Mineros
Nacionales S.A. ....................................................................................... 196
Table 15.2 Summary of Drill Intersections (>1 g/t Gold) for the Echandia Property (1995
to 1997) .................................................................................................. 197
Table 16.1 Gold Recoveries in Milled Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests (Table 5, Kappes Cassidy
Report, 2006) ......................................................................................... 207
Table 16.2 Silver Recoveries in Milled Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests (Table 5, Kappes
Cassidy, 2006) ........................................................................................ 208
Table 17.1General Statistics for the Zona Alta Composite Database ............................. 212
Table 17.2Gold and Silver Drill Hole Statistics ................................................................ 213
Table 17.3 Channel Sample Statistics ............................................................................. 213
Table 17.4 Block Model Estimation Parameters ............................................................. 215
Table 17.5 Variogram Parameters for modeling Secondary Structure Mineralization .. 216
Table 17.6 Zona Alta Measured and Indicated In Situ Gold Mineral Resources ............ 218
Table 17.7 Zona Alta Inferred In Situ Gold Mineral Resources ....................................... 218
Table 17.8 Measured and Indicated In Situ Silver Mineral Resources ........................... 219
Table 17.9 Inferred In Situ Silver Mineral Resources ...................................................... 219
Table 17.10 October 2, 2009 Measured and Indicated Gold ......................................... 220
Table 17.11 October 2, 2009 Measured and Indicated Silver ........................................ 220
Table 17.12 October 2, 2009 Inferred Gold Mineral Resources ..................................... 221
Table 17.13 October 2, 2009 Inferred Silver Mineral Resources .................................... 221
Table 20.1 Estimated Budget (US$) for 40,000 meter Zona Alta Exploration Program . 234


Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page VI

List of Figures

Figure 4.1 Location Map for the Marmato Projects (CGL) ............................................... 17
Figure 4.2 Marmato Property Mineral Concession Map (CGL) ........................................ 18
Figure 4.3 Zona Alta Division within the Marmato Property (CGL) .................................. 21
Figure 4.4 Cascabel River .................................................................................................. 43
Figure 5.1View of the Community of Marmato ................................................................ 45
Figure 5.2Topography of the Marmato Area .................................................................... 46
Figure 5.3 Stamp California Mill working at the Colombiano Mill in Marmato in 2006 .. 50
Figure 5.4 Boulder Top with Carved Spiral Petroglyphs located below the CGL Base
Camp ........................................................................................................ 51
Figure 6.1 One of the Masterpieces of Gold Workmanship from the Quimbaya Culture 53
Figure 6.2 Gold production chart for Marmato (excludes Echandia and Zona Baja post‐
1925) ........................................................................................................ 73
Figure 6.3 A View of the Mineros Nacionales Mill ........................................................... 81
Figure 6.4Mining Activity in the Zona Alta at Marmato ................................................... 83
Figure 7.1 Regional Map of the Geology of the Marmato Project (CGL) ......................... 86
Figure 7.2 Summary of the Geological Evolution of the Marmato Deposit. ................... 90
Figure 7.3 Map of the District Geology of the Marmato and Caramanta Properties (CGL)91
Figure 7.4 Map of the Local Geology for the Marmato Property .................................... 92
Figure 11.1 Terramundo’s Boyles 37A Drill Rig on Drill Hole MT‐1001 with Cerro El
Burro in the Background ........................................................................ 108
Figure 11.2 Terramundo’s Boyles 37A Drill Rig being set up on Drill Hole MT‐1003 .... 108
Figure 11.3 CGL’s Ingetrol Junior Explorer 30E Drill Rig set‐up on Drill Hole MT‐1046 in
the Old El Cuatro Mill ............................................................................. 109
Figure 11.4 Example Drill Hole Cap ................................................................................ 111
Figure 11.5 Plan View of the Drill Hole Locations on the Zona Alta .............................. 119
Figure 11.6 View of Section 3150NW on the Zona Alta through July 2009 ................... 120
Figure 11.7 View of Section 3600NW on the Zona Alta through July 2009 ................... 121
Figure 11.8 View of Section 3850NW on the Zona Alta, through July 2009 .................. 122
Figure 12.1 Photograph of Cleaned Core after Reception at the CGL Camp at Marmato140
Figure 12.2 Photograph of Same Core Interval as in Figure 12.1 after it has been Logged
and Cut ................................................................................................... 141
Figure 13.1 CGL Core Logging Facilities at Marmato ..................................................... 146
Figure 13.2 Performance of CSRM SE19 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007 152
Figure 13.3 Performance of CSRM SG14 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007 152
Figure 13.4 Performance of CSRM SI15 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007. 153
Figure 13.5 Performance of CSRM SE29 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007.153
Figure 13.6 Performance of CSRM SE29 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007. ............................ 154


Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page VII

Figure 13.7Performance of CSRM SE29 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009 ... 155
Figure 13.8 Performance of CSRM SF30 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007. 155
Figure 13.9 Performance of CSRM SF30 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007. ............................. 156
Figure 13.10 Performance of CSRM SF30 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009. 157
Figure 13.11 Performance of CSRM SG31 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007.157
Figure 13.12 Performance of CSRM SG31 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007. .......................... 158
Figure 13.13 Performance of CSRM SG31 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2007.158
Figure 13.14 Performance of CSRM SH35 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007159
Figure 13.15 Performance of CSRM SH35 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007. .......................... 159
Figure 13.16 Performance of CSRM SH35 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009.160
Figure 13.17 Performance of CSRM SG14 for silver at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007160
Figure 13.18 Performance of CSRM SI15 for silver at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007161
Figure 13.19 Performance of blank samples for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to
2007 ....................................................................................................... 162
Figure 13.20 Performance of blank samples at SGS Peru, 2007 ..................................... 163
Figure 13.21 Performance of blank samples for gold at Inspectorate, Peru, 2007 to 2009163
Figure 13.22. Preparation duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate, Reno,
2006 to 2007. ......................................................................................... 164
Figure 13.23. Preparation duplicates for silver by ICP in core samples at Inspectorate,
Reno, 2006 to 2007. ............................................................................... 165
Figure 13.24. Preparation duplicates for gold in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007. ....... 166
Figure 13.25. Preparation duplicates for silver in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007. ...... 167
Figure 13.26. Preparation duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate Peru,
2007 to 2009. ......................................................................................... 168
Figure 13.27. Preparation duplicates for silver in core samples at Inspectorate Peru,
2007 to 2009. ......................................................................................... 169
Figure 13.28 Field duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to
2007 ....................................................................................................... 170
Figure 13.29 Field duplicates for silver at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007 (core
samples) ................................................................................................. 171
Figure 13.30 Field duplicates for gold in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007. ................... 172
Figure 13.31 Field duplicates for silver in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007. ................. 173
Figure 13.32. Field duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to
2009. ...................................................................................................... 174
Figure 13.33. Field duplicates for silver in core samples at Inspectorate, Peru, 2007 to
2009. ...................................................................................................... 175
Figure 13.34 Field duplicates for gold in mine channel samples at Inspectorate, Reno
and Peru, 2006 to 2008. ........................................................................ 176


Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page VIII

Figure 13.35 Core Saw Rejects versus the Weighted Average for the Core Intervals
which Comprise the Core Saw Reject Composite Sample for Gold less
than 10 ppm ........................................................................................... 177
Figure 13.36 Core Saw Rejects versus the Weighted Average for the Core Intervals
which Comprise the Core Saw Reject Composite Sample for Gold less
than 2 ppm ............................................................................................. 178
Figure 13.37 Fire Assay AA Finish versus Fire Assay Gravimetric Finish for all Marmato
Samples Assayed using both Methods .................................................. 179
Figure 13.38 Check assays for Au < 5 ppm Inspectorate vs SGS ..................................... 181
Figure 13.39. Check assays for silver by AA, Inspectorate vs SGS .................................. 182
Figure 13.40. Check analyses of zinc by ICP, Inspectorate Lima vs SGS Lima. ................ 182
Figure 13.41. Check assays of gold >5.0 ppm, SGS Lima vs Inspectorate Lima. ............. 183
Figure 13.42. Check assays of silver by AA, SGS Lima vs Inspectorate Lima .................. 183
Figure 13.43. Check analyses of zinc by ICP, SGS Lima vs Inspectorate. ........................ 184
Figure 13.44. Replicate assays of gold below 5 ppm, Inspectorate vs SGS Lima. .......... 185
Figure 13.45. Replicate assays of gold (no cut‐off), Inspectorate Lima vs SGS Lima ...... 185
Figure 13.46. Replicate assays of silver by AA, Inspectorate vs SGS Lima. ..................... 186
Figure 13.47. Replicate analyses of zinc by ICP, Inspectorate vs SGS Lima. ................... 186
Figure 13.48 Scatter Plot of the Original Gold Assay versus the Screen Metallic Gold
Analysis .................................................................................................. 188
Figure 15.1 Mineral Deposits and Projects around the Marmato Project .................... 194
Figure 15.2 Gold Targets in the Caramanta Project around the Marmato Project ...... 202
Figure 17.2 Lognormal Probability Plot for Gold ............................................................ 214
Figure 17.3 Lognormal Probability Plot for Silver ........................................................... 215
Figure 17.4 Marmato Project Block Model .................................................................... 217


Technical Report – Marmato Zona Alta Page 1

1 SUMMARY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This NI 43‐101 compliant Technical Report was prepared by Scott E. Wilson Consulting, Inc.
(“SEWC”) of Englewood, Colorado. The report is authored at the request of two companies;
Colombia Goldfields Limited (CGL) and Medoro Resources Ltd. (Medoro). CGL is listed on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB). Medoro is
listed on the TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV). CGL’s main asset is the Zona Alta Concession at
Marmato which is the subject of this report.
On June 8, 2009, CGL announced that it had executed a binding Arrangement Agreement with
Medoro whereby Medoro will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of CGF in
exchange for common shares and warrants of Medoro. The proposed arrangement is subject to
regulatory approval and stockholder approval by CGF, in particular the Security and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") approval of the stockholder proxy statements, and approval by the
Supreme Court of Yukon. On August 10, 2009, CGF announced a 20% increase in the exchange
ratio of the proposed transaction so that Medoro will now issue 35,120,227 common shares
and 1,128,864 warrants to the stockholders of CGF in exchange for the 104,524,486
outstanding shares of CGF. This gives an exchange ratio of 0.336 of a common share plus
0.0108 of a consideration warrant of Medoro for each common share of CGF. Each full warrant
is exercisable into one Medoro common share at a subscription price of Cdn$0.50 per Medoro
common share for a term of two years. On completion of the proposed arrangement, CGF’s
stockholders will own approximately 18% of Medoro based upon the number of issued and
outstanding shares of Medoro as of the date of the announcement.
This report describes Zona Alta Concession of the Marmato gold project. The project is located
approximately 80 km south of the city of Medellín which is the capital of the State of Antioquia.
The Marmato project is readily accessible from Medellín via the Medellín to Cali highway (Pan
American Highway).
All material within Zona Alta has been classified in accordance with the resource classification
of the Canadian Institute on Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) as in compliance with
National Instrument 43‐101 (NI 43‐101).
This new Technical Report identifies changes to the NI 43‐101 compliant Mineral Resources that
were reported in the May 30, 2008 Technical Report, authored by Micon International Limited
(Micon) and published on the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval
(SEDAR). Numerous sources of information, both digital and hard copy, were used in the
preparation of this report. The data comprises 205 drillholes as well as updated geological


interpretations. Inverse Distance Squared and Ordinary Kriging was used as the grade
estimation technique.
The author of this report, Scott Wilson, a Qualified Person, visited the Marmato Project August
11 and 12, 2009 to review the project drilling facilities and to understand the current mining
climate, accessibility and current mining operations throughout Marmato.
The Marmato project is one of the most important historical gold properties in Colombia and
lies in the heart of the main historical gold producing region. The Middle Cauca region, where
the Marmato project is located, was occupied for two thousand years before the Spanish
conquest by farmers, potters, gold miners and goldsmiths of the Quimbaya culture.
The Middle Cauca region was important during the Spanish era following the colonization
period from 1514 to 1537. The gold mines of Marmato are mentioned in Spanish chronicles of
1583 and 1625, with the Cauca valley noted as a rich gold producer in the 16th and 17th
centuries. The reputed wealth of Marmato was such that Simon Bolivar, the liberator of
Colombia from Spanish rule, used it as collateral with the British government to secure funding
for his war of independence against Spain. Following the wars of independence various English
companies mined at Marmato until approximately 1925.
From 1925 the mines were managed by state bodies and leased to local mining companies and
small miners. Since 1978, various foreign companies have conducted exploration work on the
Marmato project however most of these data are unavailable. In 1993, Mineros Nacionales
S.A. (Mineros Nacionales) started mining the Zona Baja (Lower Zone) with a 300 t/d plant.
CGL’s Caramanta project which surrounds the Marmato project has also experienced small
scale artisanal mining since the pre‐Colombian times; however, to the author’s knowledge no
systematic modern exploration program has been conducted on this property. Artisanal miners
have been working a number of small pits at the El Salto prospect of the Caramanta project.
Colombia has seen only sporadic mineral exploration during the past half century largely due to
the instability which the country experienced and the relatively dangerous travel conditions.
The instability of the country has lead to the majority of the regions experiencing no modern
exploration programs. However, past gold production from Colombia indicates that the
country has good exploration potential and now that stability has returned, this potential is
being recognized by a number of foreign companies.



1.2 GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION
The Marmato project is located on the eastern side of the Western Cordillera in the Colombian
Andes. This is separated from the Central Cordillera to the east by the Cauca River. Marmato
lies within the Romeral terrane, an oceanic terrane comprising metamorphosed mafic to
ultramafic complexes, ophiolite sequences and oceanic sediments of probable Late Jurassic to
Early Cretaceous age. This was accreted to the continental margin along the Romeral Fault,
which lies east of the Cauca River, during the Aptian.
The Romeral terrane is partially covered by continental sediments of the Oligocene to Lower
Miocene age Amagá Formation, which is overlain by thick volcanic and sedimentary rocks of the
Late Miocene Combia Formation. This is intruded by porphyry stocks. Gold mineralization at
the Marmato project is related to the emplacement of the porphyry stocks.
The Marmato porphyry stock is 18 km long by 3 to 6 km wide, is elongated north to south and is
one of a number of porphyry stocks in the district. The Marmato porphyry intrudes the Arquía
Complex metamorphic rocks and the Amagá Formation in the Cauca Valley and Combia
Formation which outcrops on the west side.
Mineralization is of the epithermal intermediate sulphidation type with a relatively high depth
and temperature of formation, and straddles the deep epithermal to mesothermal transition.
The mineralization is interpreted to be genetically related to the host porphyries. The host
stocks might be considered as late‐mineral intrusions with respect to the porphyries that host
the nearby Oro Fino or possibly other, undiscovered, porphyry gold‐copper‐molybdenum
centers.
Gold‐silver mineralization at Marmato is hosted by a sheeted pyrite veinlet system associated
with intermediate argillic and propylitic alteration in dacite and andesite porphyry intrusions of
Late Miocene age. Mineralization occurs in parallel, sheeted and anastomosing veinlets with a
regional structural control. Gold is associated with sulfides and is mostly free gold.
Mineralization that is potentially bulk mineable is developed in with a sufficiently high veinlet
density. The veinlets are notable for being composed of massive sulfides with a low percentage
of gangue (quartz, calcite and chlorite). The sulfides are dominantly pyrite along with base
metal sulfides, and silver sulfides and sulfosalts are also present. Vein textures are generally
massive to coarsely banded with coarse grained, well crystallized, friable sulfides, and small
vugs. The Marmato deposit differs from other epithermal deposits in the predominance of
pyrite in the veinlets and low percentage of gangue. The Marmato deposit is very similar to the



Kori Kollo gold deposit in Bolivia which produced over 5 million ounces of gold between 1983
and 2003.
The Marmato mining property is divided into two horizontal levels which are vertically situated
above each other, the Zona Alta and the Zona Baja. The Zona Alta is mined by numerous
artisanal miners and CGL is in the process of purchasing the individual mineral licenses from the
miners. The Zona Baja is operated by a single company, Mineros Nacionales, under Contract
041‐89M
1.3 Ownership
CGL holds its interest in the Marmato and Caramanta properties through its wholly‐owned
Colombian subsidiaries Compañia Minera de Caldas S.A. (Minera de Caldas) and Gavilan
Minerales S.A. (Gavilan). Minera de Caldas holds a number of mineral licenses in the Zona Alta
(Upper Zone) of Marmato which has an area of 178.95 hectares (ha). CGL also hold 18,765 ha
(for a net area of 16,571 ha due to overlaps) of mining concessions, applications and purchase
agreements in the district around the Marmato project, which is referred to as the Caramanta
exploration project (Caramanta project).
CGL purchased 100% of RNC (Colombia) Limited (RNC) via a number of Stock Purchase
Agreements completed from December 2006 to September 2007. The total purchase price was
US $22,030,000 in cash and shares of CGL common stock. RNC is the beneficial holder of
94.99% of the issued and outstanding stock of Minera de Caldas, a Colombia corporation that
owns certain mining rights, has options to acquire mining rights, and has exclusive rights to
evaluate certain property, all located within the Zona Alta portion of the Marmato project.
Colombian law requires a minimum of five shareholders for Colombian companies; as a result,
the remaining 5.01% of Minera de Caldas is held by directors, officers, and senior management
of CGL.
The total expenditure by CGL on the Marmato project for the period from the start of work in
2005 up to June 30, 2009 was $87,191,000. Of the total expenditures, CGL has spent
US$22,030,000 in cash and shares on the acquisition of RNC, US$26,368,000 in cash on
purchasing mines and mills at Marmato, US$26,362,000 has been expended directly on
exploration of the Marmato property, and US$12,161,000 on legal and administration (with in
excess of 50% of the G&A incurred in respect of legal, accounting, Sarbanes Oxley and other
regulatory expenses associated with the Company’s public company status).



1.4 DRILLING AND SAMPLING
Following recommendations of the Micon Technical Report 2008, CGL has completed Phase 1,
Stage A of the budget and has conducted most of Stage B of the Phase 1 budget with the
exception of the Caramanta drilling.
Current sample collection, assaying and certification of assays are consistent with currently
accepted mining and operating practices. The sampling methods are standardized and tracked
by mine site geologists. Sample preparation, analysis and security are handled by two
reputable laboratories. All data is verified before being entered into the drillhole databases for
resource estimation.
1.5 RESOURCES
1.5.1 NI 43‐101 COMPLIANT MEASURED AND INDICATED MINERAL RESOURCES
The October 2, 2009 measured and indicated resource is reported at a 0.30 g Au/t cutoff grade.
Measured and Indicated Gold Resources for Zona Alta are shown in Table 1.1. Measured and
Indicated silver resources for Zona Alta are shown in Table 1.2.
Table 1.1 Zona Alta Measured and Indicated Gold Mineral Resources
October 2, 2009 Measured Resource
Cutoff Type Tonnes Grade Au g/t Ounces
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 13,065 0.87 364
October 2, 2009 Indicated Resource
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 75,142 0.81 1,955
October 2, 2009 Measured and Indicated Resource
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 88,207 0.82 2,319



Table 1.2 Zona Alta Measured and Indicated Silver Mineral Resources
Cutoff Type Tonnes Grade Ag g/t Ounces
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ve r 13,065 4.94 2,074
Cutoff Type Tonnes GradeAg g/t Ounces
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ve r 75,142 4.60 11,121
Cutoff Type Tonnes Grade Ag g/t Ounces
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ve r 88,207 4.65 13,195
1.5.2 NI 43‐101 COMPLIANT INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCES
The October 2, 2009 inferred mineral resource is reported at a 0.30 g Au/t cutoff grade.
Measured and Indicated Gold Resources for Zona Alta are shown in Table 1.3. Inferred silver
resources for Zona Alta are shown in Table 1.4.
Table 1.3 Inferred Gold Mineral Resources
October 2, 2009 Inferred Resource
Cutoff Type Tonnes Grade g/t Ounces
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 27,609 1.21 1,075
Table 1.4Inferred Silver Mineral Resources
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ver 27,609 6.74 5,981
1.6 CONCLUSIONS
1.6.1 ADEQUACY OF PROCEDURES
SEWC has reviewed the methods and procedures of CGL with respect to the Zona Alta portion
of the Marmato Project. The methods of geological interpretation and assaying procedures are
reasonable and meet generally accepted practices for advance stage exploration projects.



1.6.2 ADEQUACY OF DATA
SEWC believes that CGL has conducted exploration and development sampling and analysis
programs using industry standard practices. The resulting data can be relied upon to estimate
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves at the Zona Alta of the Marmato Project.
1.6.3 COMPLIANCE WITH CANADIAN NATIONAL INSTRUMENT NI 43‐101
The drillhole database and assaying quality for Zona Alta is sufficient for the determination of
Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources. All of the aforementioned categories are
compliant as defined by the December 23, 2005 CIM Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects, Form 43‐101F1 and Companion Policy 43‐101CP.
1.6.4 Recommendations
SEWC recommends that CGL and Medoro continue with resource development drilling that will
further delineate Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources. CGL and Medoro should
investigate gold and silver recovery processing methods for Zona Alta ore types.



2 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE
2.1 Purpose of Technical Report
Scott E. Wilson Consulting, Inc. (SEWC) prepared this technical report of the Zona Alta Marmato
at the request of CGL and Medoro. CGL is using this report to release an updated Mineral
Resource. CGL and Medoro have entered into a binding Arrangement Agreement whereby
Medoro will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of CGF in exchange for common
shares and warrants in Medoro. The proposed arrangement is subject to regulatory approval
and stockholder approval by CGF. CGL and Medoro may be referred to as the “companies”
throughout this report.
This report is intended to provide a technical summary of the Zona Alta gold resource for the
companies. This technical report is written in compliance with disclosure and reporting
requirements set forth in the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43‐101,
Companion Policy 43‐101CP, and Form 43‐101F1. Prior to this report, Micon of Toronto Canada
authored technical reports pertaining to the Marmato Project dated November 14, 2006 (Lewis,
2006) and May 18, 2008 (Lewis & San Martin, 2008). The technical information contained in
this technical report reflects material changes that have occurred since the May 2008 Report.
The resources cited for Zona Alta are current as of August 17 2009.
2.2 Sources of Information
The scope of this study included a review of pertinent technical reports and data in possession
of the Companies relative to the general setting, geology, project history, exploration activities
and results, methodology, quality assurance, interpretations and resource determinations.
Observations and interpretations of geostatistics, geology, grade estimation and determination
of mineralized trends at Zona Alta were generated independently by SEWC and discussed
internally with the Companies. The Zona Alta model was generated and evaluated with
Vulcan® 3D scientific software.
The geological setting of the properties, mineralization style and occurrences, and exploration
history were described in a number of reports by William J. Lewis, B.Sc. P. Eng., (Lewis, 2006,
Lewis & San Martin, 2008), Stewart D. Redwood, Ph.D., FIMMM (2005a, b, 2006, 2008, 2009),
and in a scoping study report by Mineral Resources Development Inc. (MRDI, 1998) as well as in
other government, academic, and individual publications listed in Section 21 “References” of
this report. The relevant sections of those reports are quoted or reproduced herein.



CGL is targeting bulk tonnage, low grade gold and silver deposits at Marmato that is potentially
amenable to open pit mining with recovery of precious metals by milling and cyanide leaching
or by heap leaching. The grade of bulk tonnage zones is dependent on encountering areas with
a sufficiently high density or number of mineralized veinlets and exploration is focused on
defining such zones.
CGL has continued to explore the Marmato project and to acquire the remaining individual
mines and mills within the Zona Alta since the May 2008 Technical Report was written by
Micon. In addition to its previous underground and regional mapping and sampling programs
CGL has completed an extensive drilling program at Marmato.
2.3 Extent of Involvement of Qualified Person
The author’s mandate was to determine the most current gold Mineral Resource estimates for
the Zona Alta. The author is responsible for the construction of the Zona Alta block model and
the interpretation of statistics and grade estimation techniques for Zona Alta. The author
visited the property for a personal inspection on August 5 and 6, 2009 as required by NI 43‐101.
2.4 Terms of Reference
Unless stated otherwise, all volumes and grades are in metric units and currencies are
expressed in constant 2009 US dollars.



Table 2.1
List of the Abbreviations

Description Abbreviation
AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. AGA
Battle Mountain Gold Exploration Corp. Battle Mountain Gold
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum CIM
Canadian National Instrument 43‐101 NI 43‐101
Carbon in leach CIL
Centimeter(s) cm
GeoMinas S.A Geo Minas
Colombia Goldfields Limited CGL
Colombian Peso COP
Compañía Minera de Caldas, S.A. Minera de Caldas
Compañía de Servicios y Logisticos de Colombia Ltda Cia Servicios Logisticos

Conquistador Mines Limited Conquistador
Corona Goldfields S.A. Corona Goldfields
Corporación Autónoma Regional de Caldas CORPOCALDAS
Day d
o
Degree(s)
o
Degrees Celsius C
Department of Antioquia Antioquia
Department of Caldas Caldas
Digital elevation model DEM
Dollar(s), Canadian and US $, Cdn$ and US$
Empresa Colombiana de Minas ECOMINAS
Empresa Nacional Minera Ltda MINERCOL
Gavilan Minerales S.A. Gavilan



GeoMinas S.A. GeoMinas
Gram(s) g
Grams per metric tonne g/t
Greater than >
Gulf Resources Exploration Company Gulf Exploration
Hectare(s) Ha
horse power hp
Inspectorate America Corporation Inspectorate
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geológico‐Mineras, (since
INGEOMINAS
2004 Instituto Colombiano de Geología y Minería)
Instituto Geografico Augustin Codazzi INAC
Internal rate of return IRR
Investcol Limited Investcol
Kilogram(s) kg
Kilometer(s) km
Less than <
Litre(s) L
Meter(s) m
Micon International Limited Micon
Million tonnes Mt
Million ounces Moz
Million years Ma
Million metric tonnes per year Mt/y
Milligram(s) Mg
Millimeter(s) Mm
Minera Phelps Dodge de Colombia S.A. Minera Phelps Dodge



Mineral Resources Development Inc MRDI
Minerales de Colombia S.A. MINERALCO
Mineros de Antioquia S.A. Mineros de Antioquia
Mineros Nacionales S.A. Mineros Nacionales
Ministerio de Minas y Energía MME
Net present value NPV
Net smelter return NSR
Not available/applicable n.a.
Ounces Oz
Ounces per year oz/y
Parts per billion Ppb
Parts per million Ppm
Percent(age) %
Phelps Dodge Corporation Phelps Dodge
Quality Assurance/Quality Control QA/QC
Republic of Colombia Colombia
RNC (Colombia) Limited RNC
Second S
Sistema de Informació Minero Colombiano SIMCO
Sociedad Kedahda S. A. Kedahda
Specific gravity SG
Système International d'Unités SI
Tonne (metric) T
Tonnes (metric) per day t/d
Universal Transverse Mercator UTM
Year Y



Year to date YTD



3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS
The opinions expressed in this report are based on the available information and geologic
interpretations as provided by the Companies. SEWC regularly discusses the Marmato Project
and Zona Alta with the following people:
• Dr. Stewart Redwood, Vice President of Exploration, Colombia Goldfields Limited
• Dr. Jeffery Brooks, Chief Geologist, Colombia Goldfields Limited
• Mr. Elkin Ceballos, Senior Geologist, Databases and Resources, Colombia Goldfields Limited
The author has exercised independence in reviewing the supplied information and believes
that the basic assumptions are factual and correct and the interpretations are reasonable. The
author has relied on this data and has no reason to believe that any material facts have been
withheld.



4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The Marmato project is located in the Department of Caldas, Colombia and is approximately 80
km due south of the city of Medellín, the capital of the Department of Antioquia. The latitude
and longitude for the Marmato project is approximately 5°28’24” N, 75°35’57”W.
The Zona Alta of the Marmato project is located on Cerro El Burro, which is also known
unofficially as Alto del Burro, on the west side of urban center of Marmato at Universal
Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates, Zone 18N 433,493E and 605,232N (Figure 4.1). The
datum used for the UTM coordinates is WGS84 Zone 18N.
CGL advises that it holds its interest in the Marmato project through its wholly‐owned
Colombian subsidiary Minera de Caldas. Minera de Caldas holds a number of mineral licenses
in the Marmato Zona Alta (Upper Zone) which has an area of 178.9489 ha. The mineral and
exploration licenses vary in size however the majority are contiguous.
CGL also holds an interest in the Caramanta project through its subsidiary, Gavilan. The
Caramanta project is comprised of a number of mineral licenses which surround the Marmato
project. These licenses also vary in size however the majority are contiguous with each other.
The Marmato mining property is divided into two levels vertically comprising the Zona Alta and
the Zona Baja. This division was made in 1954 by Decree 2223 and allowed concession
contracts to be defined by horizontal levels. The Zona Alta is mined by numerous small miners
and CGL is in the process of purchasing these individual mineral licenses. The Zona Baja (980
ha) is operated by a single company, Mineros Nacionales S.A., a corporation organized under
the laws of Colombia. Figure 4.2 provides detailed plan of the Marmato mineral licenses along
with the Caramanta mineral licenses.
Marmato became part of the old “Aporte Minero” (Mining Contribution) scheme on January 20,
1981 (Aporte Minero 1017 for precious metals). This was a legal status created in 1940
(Law 1157) to reserve for the state certain minerals and mines considered to be of national
interest. The state could “contribute” (aportar) these deposits to private or official companies
and obtain revenue for the state in addition to royalties. The Aporte Minero was regulated by
Decree 1275 of 1970 which changed the “contributed” (aportados) deposits to exclusive state
ownership and operatorship, and was changed again by the Mining Code (Law 2655) of 1988,
prior to being cancelled by the current Mining Code (Law 685) of 2001. Existing Aporte
contracts remain valid until their expiry date.



A succession of state companies was created to manage and operate the Aporte Minero. The
state mining companies were ECOMINAS (Empresa Colombiana de Minas or Colombian Mining
Company, 1974 to 1992), MINERALCO (Minerales de Colombia S.A. or Minerals of Colombia,
1992 to 1997) and MINERCOL (Empresa Nacional Minera Ltda. or National Mining Company,
1997 to 2004) which was dissolved in 2004 (Decree 0254). The Aporte Minero was cancelled by
the new Mining Code of 2001 (Law 685) and the responsibilities, obligations and rights of
MINERCOL passed to INGEOMINAS (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geológico‐Mineras or
National Institute of Geological‐Mining Investigation, renamed in 2004 to Instituto Colombiano
de Geología y Minería or Colombian Institute of Geology and Mining), or to Departmental
Delegations of the Ministry of Mines and Energy (Delegada del Ministerio de Minas y Energía) in
those Departments where such an institution already existed. Administration of Marmato
became the responsibility of the Mining Delegation Unit of Caldas (Unidad de Delegación
Minera de Caldas). The new Mining Law of 2001 states that existing Aporte Minero contracts
will remain valid until their expiry date plus any extensions permitted in the contract (Article
356, Law 685 of 2001). On expiry these areas will revert to the normal system of concession
contracts.
The Zona Baja Contract No. 041‐89M of Mineros Nacionales, awarded on April 4, 1989 and valid
until October 14, 2021, is an Aporte Minero contract which is still valid and is now administered
by the Unidad de Delegación Minera de Caldas. The contractor pays the state a royalty of 4%
plus an additional sliding royalty based on the gold price, which is currently 6%.



Figure 4.1 Location Map for the Marmato Projects (CGL)



Figure 4.2 Marmato Property Mineral Concession Map (CGL)



4.1 MARMATO PROJECT
The horizontal division (Zona Alta and Zona Baja) of mining rights at Marmato is unique in
Colombia and was created in 1954 to enable concession contracts to be defined by horizontal
mine levels. Marmato became an Aporte Minera mine in 1981.
The only similar system of horizontal mineral rights known to the author is the Cerro Rico silver
mine at Potosi in Bolivia; however, the system there differs as it dates back several hundred
years to the colonial period and is based upon the old Spanish mining law of the mine entrance
(Ley de Boca Mina). Under the Potosi system mine rights are based on the length of the mine
tunnel and the area above it until the next mine tunnel is encountered.
The government started to legalize titles of informal miners in the Zona Alta following the
enactment of Law 141 of 1994 which defined the payment of mineral royalties in Colombia and
the development of a Social Program of Legalization (PSL or Programa Social de Legalización).
The “Exclusion Zone of the Marmato Mining District” (Zona de Exclusion del Distrito Minero de
Marmato), was created for the Zona Alta under the Aporte Minero in 1998 by a special
government resolution. The Zona Alta has an area of 178.9489 ha. This enabled mining
contracts in the Zona Alta to be registered in the National Mining Registry by excluding the
Zona Alta from superposition on Contract No. 014‐89 (the Zona Baja). The contracts are thus
defined in the National Mining Registry by polygons with upper and lower elevations. At the
same time, government started to integrate the individual mining contracts into three contracts
based on level.
The Zona Alta of the Marmato project is further divided into three levels (Figure 4.3). The
Upper Level (Nivel Superior) is located above the 1,500 meter (m) contour to the hilltop at
about 1,705 m; the Intermediate Level (Nivel Intermedio) is between the 1,500 m and 1,363 m
contours; and the Lower Level (Nivel Inferior) is between the 1,363 m contour and the top of
the Zona Baja (Lower Zone). The top of the Zona Baja is defined in Contract 014‐89 with
Mineros Nacionales and coincides with the road and varies from 1,207 m to 1,298.31 m in
elevation.
The contracts of the Lower Level were integrated into a single contract (Contract CHG‐081)
which was signed in August, 2001, by 36 mine owners and is valid for 30 years. The 36 co‐
owners have equal rights in Contract CHG‐081 but operate their mines on an individual basis.
In the Intermediate and Upper Levels the lateral extent of individual mine rights is defined by
polygons with a 10 year contract, renewable for another 10 years, dating from the time of entry



in the National Mining Registry in 2004, even though the contracts were originally signed in the
1990s. Areas not covered by polygons, including the area to the northwest, remain the
property of the government. Following the definition of contract CHG‐081 the Intermediate
Level was defined as Exclusion Zone No. 1 and the Upper Level as Exclusion Zone No. 2, with the
intention to consolidate the contracts of these levels into single contracts as in the Lower Level.
However, it was not possible to complete the integration process under the new Mining Code
of 2001 since this abolished the Aporte Minero system. Instead a process of registration of
individual contracts awarded under the PSL was started.
There are also a few contracts signed by ECOMINAS in the Zona Alta under the Basic Contract
Program (PBC or Programa Básico de Contratación), some of which were registered in the
National Mining Registry.
CGL acquired an interest in certain mining rights and options to acquire mining rights in the
Zona Alta portion of the Marmato deposit as a result of its acquisition of an equity interest in
RNC (Colombia) Limited (RNC), a Belize corporation and a wholly‐owned subsidiary of Investcol
Limited (Investcol), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Belize. Pursuant to a
Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on January 12, 2006 with Investcol and RNC, CGL
acquired 25% of RNC’s issued and outstanding stock. Subsequently on April 28, 2006, CGL
acquired an additional 25% of RNC’s issued and outstanding common stock, resulting in CGL
owning 50% of RNC. CGL holds an option to acquire the remaining 50% equity interest
outstanding in RNC. RNC is the beneficial holder of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of
Minera de Caldas, a Colombia corporation that owns certain mining rights, has options to
acquire mining rights and has exclusive rights to evaluate certain property, all located within
the Zona Alta portion of the Marmato project.
On August 22, 2006 CGL amended its agreement to purchase RNC and exercised its option to
increase its interest in RNC from 50% to 75% ownership. Under the new terms of the amended
purchase agreement, CGL increased its interest in RNC to 75% by issuing an additional 4.2
million shares of CGL restricted common stock and paying US $200,000 to the seller, Investcol.
CGL also agreed to lend an additional US $5.0 million to the project in tranches by
December 31, 2006 and provide sufficient funds to RNC, upon terms satisfactory to CGL, to
complete a full bankable feasibility study.



Figure 4.3 Zona Alta Division within the Marmato Property (CGL)



At the same time, CGL was given the option to acquire the remaining 25% interest in RNC on or
before May 1, 2009 for a purchase price equal to 25% of the value of Minera de Caldas
determined by a bankable feasibility study. The maximum purchase price to be paid is capped
and shall not exceed US $15,000,000 plus 4,000,000 shares of CGL common stock. Payment of
the US $15,000,000 portion of the purchase price can be made by CGL in either cash or
common stock, or any combination thereof.
On December 14, 2006, the parties executed a Second Amendment to the Stock Purchase
Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) in order to revise the consideration required to exercise
CGL’s option to acquire the remaining 25% of the issued and outstanding stock of RNC. Subject
to the revised terms set forth in the Second Amendment, CGL held the option to acquire an
additional 15% interest in RNC, in exchange for the issuance of 4,000,000 common shares of
CGL to Investcol. In connection with the execution of the Second Amendment, CGL exercised its
option, resulting in CGL acquiring an additional 15% of RNC, bringing CGL’s total ownership to
90%. The revised terms set forth in the Second Amendment provided that CGL had the option
to acquire the remaining 10% of RNC until May 1, 2009 in exchange for a purchase price of
$15,000,000. The purchase price could be made in either cash, shares of CGL common stock, or
any combination thereof. Total consideration of $5,120,000 related to this transaction was
recorded as part of acquired mineral and exploration properties and rights in fiscal 2006.
On August 24, 2007 the parties executed a Third Amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement
(the “Third Amendment”) in order to revise the consideration required to exercise CGL’s option
to acquire the final 10% of the issued and outstanding stock of RNC. Subject to the revised
terms set forth in the Third Amendment, on September 14, 2007, CGL acquired the final 10% of
RNC for a cash payment of US $300,000 and the issuance of 3,000,000 common shares of CGL
to Investcol. Total consideration of US $4,710,000 related to this transaction was recorded as
part of acquired mineral and exploration properties and rights in fiscal 2007. CGL now owns
100% of RNC. The total purchase price was US $22,030,000 in cash and shares of CGL common
stock.
RNC is the beneficial holder of 94.99% of the issued and outstanding stock of Minera de Caldas,
a Colombia corporation that owns certain mining rights, has options to acquire mining rights
and has exclusive rights to evaluate certain property, all located within the Zona Alta portion of
the Marmato project. Colombian law requires a minimum of five shareholders for Colombian
companies; as a result, the remaining 5.01% of Minera de Caldas is held by directors, officers,
and senior management of CGL



On November 20, 2007, CGL entered into a letter of intent with Colombia Gold PLC (Colombia
Gold), a corporation organized under the laws of England, to acquire its assets or the issued and
outstanding shares. Colombia Gold’s main assets are the mining rights to the Echandia
property, located adjacent to Marmato Mountain. This transaction was not completed.
On January 29, 2008 CGL entered into a Share Purchase and Sale Agreement with Mineros S.A.,
a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Colombia. Mineros is the owner of
Mineros Nacionales. Under the terms of the Agreement, CGL agreed to purchase all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Mineros Nacionales, for cash consideration of US $35.0
million. The agreement provided that the transaction would be completed on April 29, 2008.
CGL provided a deposit guarantee in the amount of COP 4.9 billion (US $2.296 million), which
would be payable to the vendors if the transaction was not completed for any reason. CGL and
Mineros subsequently agreed to modify the Agreement and extend the completion date of the
Mineros transaction from April 29, 2008 to July 31, 2008. In connection with this extension, on
June 19, 2008 CGL advanced US $7.0 million, representing 20% of the US $35 million purchase
price, with the balance due upon completion of the transaction. On September 22, 2008 CGL
and Mineros agreed to further extend the completion date to October 31, 2008. Both the
deposit and guarantee were non‐refundable if the transaction was not completed for any
reason. On October 31, 2008 Mineros notified CGL it was unwilling to extend the closing of the
transaction beyond October 31, 2008 and terminated the transaction. Mineros exercised its
right to the non refundable advance and term deposit. As a result, a write‐down of US $9.296
million with respect to these items was recognized in CGL’s Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
On June 8, 2009, CGL announced that it had executed a binding Arrangement Agreement with
Medoro Resources Ltd (Medoro), a corporation registered in the Yukon Territory, Canada and
listed on the TSX Venture Exchange, whereby Medoro will acquire all of the issued and
outstanding shares of CGF in exchange for common shares and warrants of Medoro. Under the
proposed arrangement, which is subject to regulatory approval and stockholder approval by
CGF, Medoro would issue 29,266,856 shares and 940,720 warrants to the stockholders of CGF
in exchange for the 104,524,486 outstanding shares of CGF. The share exchange ratio was 0.28
of a share plus 0.009 of a consideration warrant of Medoro for each share of CGF. Each full
warrant is exercisable into one Medoro common share at a subscription price of Cdn$0.50 per
Medoro common share for a term of two years. On completion of the proposed arrangement
CGF’s stockholders would own approximately 25% of Medoro based upon Medoro's issued and



outstanding shares as of the date of the announcement. One of the conditions of the
Arrangement Agreement is that prior to closing, CGF will have reached agreements, acceptable
to Medoro, with its key creditors on repayment of outstanding debts and accounts payable.
Closing will occur upon receipt of stockholder approval, regulatory and court approvals, in
particular the Security and Exchange Commission ("SEC") approval of the stockholder proxy
statements, and approval by the Supreme Court of Yukon.

On July 29, 2009, Medoro announced that it had executed a letter of intent to acquire all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Colombia Gold plc (Colombia Gold), a privately held UK
company whose main assets are the mining rights to the Echandia property adjacent to the
Zona Alta. Consideration for the acquisition will be the issuance of 33,333,333 Medoro shares
and the payment by Medoro, upon closing, of C$2.6 million of Colombia Gold's outstanding
debt. Completion of the transaction is subject to the negotiation and execution of a definitive
agreement, satisfactory completion of technical, financial, legal and other commercial due
diligence and customary conditions, including legal and regulatory approvals.
On August 10, 2009, CGF announced a 20% increase in the exchange ratio of the proposed
transaction so that Medoro will now issue 35,120,227 common shares and 1,128,864 warrants
to the stockholders of CGF in exchange for the 104,524,486 outstanding shares of CGF. This
gives an exchange ratio of 0.336 of a common share plus 0.0108 of a consideration warrant of
Medoro for each common share of CGF. Each full warrant is exercisable into one Medoro
common share at a subscription price of Cdn$0.50 per Medoro common share for a term of two
years. On completion of the proposed arrangement, CGF’s stockholders will own approximately
18% of Medoro based upon the number of issued and outstanding shares of Medoro as of the
date of the announcement.
regulatory expenses associated with the Company’s public company status).
As a result of the worldwide financial crisis and its impact on the Company, an impairment
charge was recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, resulting in the carrying value of



$48,398,000 for acquired mineral properties being reduced to US$25,758,000 in the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.

Certain mining properties have been purchased or optioned and are awaiting final payment
once the documentation and registration is complete. The total number of legally registered
mineral titles acquired by Minera de Caldas at June 30, 2009 is 109. Minera de Caldas is also
purchasing the existing mills on the Zona Alta and has so far purchased 16 out of a total of 35.
The Zona Alta portion of the Marmato project hosts approximately 250 individual small mines
which Minera de Caldas is seeking to purchase. Of these mines, 95 have registered titles in the
Ministry of Mines and Energy in Caldas. These mines are referred to as Category 1. Another 36
mines are located in an area called CHG‐081 for which there is one mining contract and these
mines are referred to as Category 2. Once these Category 2 mines have been purchased,
Minera de Caldas will own the entire CHG‐081 (the lower level) contract. CGL’s objective is to
secure ownership to these 131 properties. Approximately 98 of the remaining mines have
made applications for legalization under the previous mining law and these mines as referred to
as Category 3. CGL has purchased 35 of these. Of the remaining 63 applications made, CGL’s
management believes that between 19 and 25 may be approved, and the remaining are illegal
mines. The Category 3 mines are all small in size and in the event that a mine is not legalized by
the government, it will be cancelled. The rest of the mines are illegal.
Minera de Caldas has been purchasing mineral licenses in the Zona Alta since 2005 and now
owns the majority of the licenses. The company’s objective is to purchase all of the mineral
licenses and then consolidate them into a single license. A list of the exploitation and
exploration concessions for Marmato and the status of Minera de Caldas’ purchase or option of
mineral licenses in the Zona Alta are shown in Tables 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. As of August 31, 2009
the company had acquired 82% of the mines with legal title (108 out of 131 in Category 1 and
2). The total number of mines acquired by Minera de Caldas at the present time is 143, of
which 76 are in Category 1, 32 in Category 2, and 35 in Category 3. Ninety titles are now
registered in the company’s name. The number of mines remaining to be purchased or
optioned is 23 of which 19 are in Category 1 and 4 in Category 2. Of the remaining 63 mine
applications made in Category 3, CGF considers that between 19 and 25 may be approved.
Minera de Caldas is also purchasing the existing mills on the Zona Alta and has so far purchased
16 of the out of a total of 35. The largest mills have been purchased and the remaining ones
are small. Once the purchases are completed the mills are shut down and dismantled. The



mines are also being closed except for maintenance to keep the tunnels open for future
sampling and drilling.
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, there is an additional US $5.1 million (based on an exchange rate
of US$1 = 2,158.67 Colombian pesos, average for June, 2009) in accounts payable for the mines
purchased.
The procedure for purchase is normally a payment of 25% of the total negotiated purchase
price down on signing, 25% of the total negotiated purchase price once all documentation has
been submitted to the Caldas mining department with the final payment occurring when the
mining claim has been registered in the company’s name.
Apart from the staged option payments for the purchase of 100% of the rights to each of the
licenses described, there are neither royalties payable to previous mine owners nor back in
rights or any other type of payment, agreement or encumbrance for the properties contained
within the Marmato project. The tax payable to the government is 4% of the gross value for
gold and silver.
Minera de Caldas has also submitted several new contract proposals over the Zona Alta to
cover gaps between polygons of individual mine licenses. These are listed in Table 4.4.
The consolidation process of the individual mine licenses in the Zona Alta is known as the
integration process. Mine licenses that are registered in Cia Minera de Caldas’ name and that
abut each other are joined together in blocks of two or more, and additional licenses or blocks
of licenses are added once they are registered like assembling a jigsaw puzzle, until all of the
pieces are joined. Once this is done a request will be made for a single mining license. The
process involves making a request to the Minera de Caldas Delegation which will issue a
resolution when the request is approved. Cia Minera de Caldas started this process with 12
mine licenses in five groups in 2007 and awaits the resolutions from the Delegation.
The known mine workings are shown on Figure 4.3. The mines are on the east face of a
prominent hill called Cerro El Burro. There are no existing tailings ponds or waste dumps at
Marmato and all material generated from past and present mining activities is discarded down
the mountain side and into the creeks. Improvements made historically in the area of the
licenses have been limited to the road, the urban center, power line and substation, numerous
small mines and several mills and gold beneficiation plants.



In regards to surface rights, CGL has compiled a GIS database of surface rights ownership within
a 6 km radius of Marmato. Each of the properties was reviewed and to determine
discrepancies between legal descriptions and actual ownership. The Mining Law allows for
expropriation of land if negotiations subsurface and surface owners are unsuccessful.



Table 4.1 Mineral Licenses Purchased or Optioned, Zona Alta, Category 1 (Registered Title).
CONTRACT ALTITUD ALTITUD
MINING
No. or AREA E E FINAL OPTION
MINE REGISTR OWNER LEVEL
APPLICATIO (Ha) (LOWER, (UPPER, OPTION TO PAYMENT DATE DATE OF
Y No.
N No. m) m) PURCHASE REGISTRATION TO
AGREEMENT DATE C.M.CALDAS
LA ESTRADA 088‐98 M HESH‐05 Ruben Darío Gaspar Trejos Intermediate 2.3955 1,437 1,445 March 28, 2006 Pending
November 15,
LA GAVELA 039‐98 M HESH‐01
CMdC Upper 0.3838 1,472 1,480 2005 Pending August 13, 2008
CARRIZALES 168‐98 M HFVH‐01 Jose Uriel Bernal Gallego Intermediate 16.7698 1,484 1,500 April 13, 2005 May 28, 2007
September 15,
169‐98 M HFFC‐01 Rogelio Diaz Y Cia.
EL BARRANCO Upper 16.7698 1,551 1,575 2005 April 15, 2006
September 11,
LA CARIDAD 145‐98 M HETJ‐09
CMdC Upper 11.0623 1,505 1,520 August 11, 2005 2006 August 13, 2008
SAN ANTONIO 162‐98 M HETG‐02 Leopoldo Aguirre Y Cia Intermediate 0.4105 1,466 1,472 January 19, 2005 July 19, 2005
LA BENICIA 146‐98 M HETJ‐02 Luis Alain Hernadez Nuñez Intermediate 0.5584 1,448 1,451 April 13, 2005 December 16, 2005
LA EVA 131‐98M HETL‐14 Abelardo Saldarriaga Y Cia. Intermediate 8.9905 1,394 1,420 May 5, 2005 December 23, 2005
LA LEONA 061‐98 M HESG‐05 CMdC Intermediate 2.4109 1,452 1,495 April 27, 2006 May 13, 2006 July 25, 2007
December 17,
033‐98 M HETJ‐34
LA SEVILLANA CMdC Upper 7.5758 1622 1,660 May 2, 2006 February 1, 2007 2006
December 17,
141‐98 M HETK‐04
LA FLORESTA N° 2 CMdC Intermediate 11.9934 1,420 1,440 May 8, 2006 December 19, 2007 2006
LA PUERQUERA 140‐98M HETL‐05 Jesus Alberto Gallego Intermediate 12.0240 1,420 1,440 May 8, 2006 May 8, 2006
December 17,
071‐98 M HETL‐13
VOLCANES N° 1 CMdC Intermediate 17.1118 1,389 1,405 May 8, 2006 May 8, 2006 2006
December 17,
157‐98 M HETL‐03
VENTANA CMdC Intermediate 17.1118 1,372 1,389 May 8, 2006 December 19, 2007 2006
December 17,
073‐98 M HETJ‐33
LA CARMONA CMdC Upper 7.8476 1,501 1,525 May 10, 2006 February 1, 2007 2006
December 17,
LA ESCALERA 148‐98 M HESF‐01
CMdC Upper 8.0983 1,536 1,560 March 16, 2006 January 26, 2007 2006
December 22,
LA NEPOMUCENA 2 049‐98M HESH‐02
CMdC Intermediate 17.1118 1,370 1,389 April 25, 2006 February 21, 2007 2006
December 17,
V.A 4467 HFCK‐01
PATACON CMdC Intermediate 3.2673 1,472.5 1,474.5 May 25, 2006 February 23, 2007 2006
December 17,
041‐98M HETK‐01
MURCIELAGAL CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,501 1,513 May 25, 2006 February 23, 2007 2006
December 17,
156‐98 M HESG‐03
SAN JOSE CMdC Intermediate 12.2112 1,482 1,502 May 25, 2006 February 23, 2007 2006
December 17,
104‐98 M HETL‐08
GALLINAZA CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,471 1,480 May 25, 2006 February 23, 2007 2006
December 17,
152‐98 M HESG‐04
CIRCACIA CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,480 1,500 May 25, 2006 February 23, 2007 2006
December 17,
166‐98 M HETL‐04
TORRENTICO CMdC Intermediate 12.2112 1,483 1,502 May 23, 2006 January 26, 2007 2006

MINING
Y No.
CURUBITAL 102‐98 M HETJ‐30 Julio Cesar Zamora Y Cia Upper 16.7698 1,500 1,513 May 27, 2005 June 1, 2006
Septiembre 05,
066‐98M HESH‐07
LA MILAGROSA N° 3 CMdC Intermediate 2.0637 1,460 1,472 June 15, 2006 2006 October 11, 2007
MANGO 1 105‐98M HETJ‐07 CMdC Intermediate 16.7689 1,455 1,470 June 15, 2006 April 27, 2007 April 17, 2007
December 17,
149‐98M HETM‐01
MANZANO CMdC Upper 8.0983 1,535 1,560 June 27, 2006 February 1, 2007 2006
CHURIMO N°2 026‐98M HETJ‐14 CMdC Upper 7.5258 1,601 1,620 June 29, 2006 June 22, 2007 May 31, 2007
December 17,
153‐98 HESF‐02
LA SUSPIRA CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,432 1,445 July 13, 2006 February 2, 2007 2006
December 17,
172‐98M HETJ‐20
LA CHINCHILIANA CMdC Intermediate 6.5336 1,368 1,380 July 17, 2006 January 17, 2007 2006
December 17,
173‐98M HETJ‐21
LA ZORRA CMdC Intermediate 6.5336 1,368 1,380 July 17, 2006 January 17, 2007 2006
December 17,
064‐98M HESH‐04
LA PLATA CMdC Intermediate 2.4108 1,455 1,495 July 17, 2006 January 17, 2007 2006
December 17,
069‐98M HETL‐17
LA PLAZOLETA CMdC Intermediate 0.9624 1,407 1,415 July 17, 2006 January 26, 2007 2006
December 17,
067‐98M HETJ‐36
EL DORADO CMdC Upper 9.5076 1,528 1,577 August 3, 2006 January 26, 2007 2006
December 17,
093‐98M HETJ‐39
EL QUILATE CMdC Upper 9.5076 1,578 1,590 August 3, 2006 January 26, 2007 2006
September 22,
075‐98M HETL‐10
LA MILAGROSA N° 2 CMdC Intermediate 7.0637 1,460 1,472 2006 April 13, 2007 March 26, 2007
LA PEÑA 091‐98 M HETJ‐05 CMdC Intermediate 8.9905 1,394 1,420 October 3, 2006 Pending December 5,2007
MARINA N° 1 171‐98 M HETJ‐38 CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,513 1,530 October 4, 2006 April 13, 2007 February 14, 2007
MARINA N° 2 050‐98 M HETJ‐23 CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,514 1,530 October 4, 2006 May 10, 2007 May 2, 2007
MARINA N° 3 051‐98M HETJ‐24 CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,512 1,530 October 4, 2006 May 10, 2007 May 2, 2007
AGUACATE 094‐98M HETJ‐28 CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,572 1,583 October 4, 2006 May 10, 2007 May 2, 2007
TORNO N° 2 055‐98M HETJ‐22 CMdC Intermediate 10.3168 1,406 1,420 October 4, 2006 May 10, 2007 May 2, 2007
OCHOA N° 3 054‐98M HETJ‐25 CMdC Intermediate 10.3168 1,407 1,420 October 4, 2006 May 10, 2007 May 2, 2007
EL ESFUERZO 096‐98M HETJ‐17 CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,536 1,550 October 4, 2006 May 10, 2007 May 2, 2007
FORRA N° 1 097‐98M HETJ‐29 CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,447 1,452 October 4, 2006 April 13, 2007 February 14, 2007
EL COROZO 095‐98M HETJ‐19 CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,438 1,447 October 4, 2006 April 13, 2007 March 26, 2007
December 17,
099‐98M HESG‐02
TORNO N° 1 CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,447 1,452 October 4, 2006 February 1, 2007 2006
LA ESPERANZA 147‐98M HFCK‐02 CMdC Upper 11.0528 1,512 1,523 October 11, 2006 April 9, 2007 March 26, 2007
LA ROTAVISKY 068‐98M HETL‐11 CMdC Intermediate 0.7168 1,397 1,405 October 10, 2006 March 3, 2007 March 26, 2007

MINING
Y No.
EL REFUGIO 058‐98 M HETM‐02 Antonio Rotavisky & Cia Intermediate 0.7168 1,394 1,405 October 23, 2006 Pending Pending
LOS ANGELITOS 221 HGRD‐01 CMdC Upper 0.6003 1,513.48 1,515.14 October 27, 2006 April 27, 2007 April 17, 2007
November 20, November 11,
161‐98 HETJ‐06
LA VENTURA CMdC Upper 16.7698 1,583 1,600 2006 November 15, 2007 2007
CASCABEL 040‐98 HESH‐03 CMdC Intermediate 3.0837 1,445 1,470 December 1, 2006 July 12, 2007 July 6, 2007
GALLINAZA N° 2 101‐98M HETJ‐03 Simeon Henao Intermediate 16.7698 1,471 1,480 December 5, 2006 Pending Pending
HGQM‐
121‐98M
LA GIRALDA 01 CMdC Upper 8.0934 1,550 1,570 December 7, 2006 April 27, 2007 April 17, 2007
December 13, September 20,
043‐98 HETL‐16
LA CALLE N° 2 CMdC Intermediate 1.3015 1,369 1,385 2006 October 5, 2007 2007
December 18,
127‐98 HETJ‐18
TESORITO CMdC Upper 8.0934 1,570 1,590 2006 April 27, 2007 April 17, 2007
December 19, November 11,
151‐98 HETL‐02
PORVENIR CMdC Intermediate 11.9934 1,372 1,389 2006 November 15, 2007 2007
December 19,
134‐98 HFRG‐01 Ricaurte Restrepo Montoya
TORRENTE Upper 11.0623 1,509 1,523 2006 Pending Pending
December 20,
034‐98M HETL‐07
BARRANCA CMdC Intermediate 3.0837 1,468 1,475 2006 April 27, 2007 April 17, 2007
December 20, September 11,
027‐98 GIVD‐01
LA ROLITA N° 2 CMdC (50%) Intermediate 1.9301 1,410 1,418 2006 2007 August 29, 2007
December 22,
LA FLORESTA 22549 GIVD‐02
CMdC Intermediate 7.1295 1,409 1,435 2006 Pending August 13, 2008
EL BOMBO 137‐98M HETL‐06 CMdC Intermediate 8.0847 1,373 1,385 March 12, 2007 July 13, 2007 July 6, 2007
LA TINTILIANA 160‐98M HGWL‐01 CMdC Upper 3.5750 1,605 1,621 March 12, 2007 July 13, 2007 July 6, 2007
CAÑAVERAL 165‐98M HETJ‐08 CMdC Upper 8.0983 1,557 1,570 July 3, 2007 September 7, 2007 July 6, 2007
November 21,
EL PANTANO 3292T HGWL‐02 CMdC Upper 1.1288 1,519 1,540 July 20, 2007 November 27, 2007 2007
CRUZADA EL
HESH‐06
MANGO 100‐98M CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,456 1,470 May 9, 2007 Pending August 3, 2008
LA MILAGROSA N° 1 030‐98M HETL‐12 Jose Edilson Henao Intermediate 7.9680 1,381 1,394 May 12, 2007 Pending Pending
LA ROLITA 118‐98M HETK‐02 CMdC Intermediate 2.0493 1,388 1,408 August 1, 2007 Pending August 3, 2008
September 14,
123‐98M
LA ROLAND 2 HETJ‐13 CMdC Intermediate 2.0493 1,386 1,408 2007 Pending April 30, 2009
September 25,
HETJ‐16
LA OCHOA Nº 1 052‐98M CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,438 1,447 2007 Pending December 5, 2007
Luis Emilio Valencia, Oscar
DCM‐01
EL RETORNO HFKP‐02 Leon Intermediate 0.6640 1,312.69 1,340 October 31, 2007 Pending Pending
November 23,
LA PRINGAMOSA 103‐98M HETL‐09
CMdC Intermediate 16.7698 1,424 1,432 2007 Pending July 21, 2008
NIVEL 2 098‐98M HETJ‐12 Fernando Garcia Intermediate 16.7689 1,452 1,455 January 8, 2008 Pending Pending

MINING
Y No.
LA GARCIA 163‐98M HFLO‐01 CMdC Intermediate 2.8699 1,419 1,440 January 8, 2008 Pending October 3, 2008
OCHOA Nº 2 053‐98M HETJ‐15 CMdC Intermediate 10.3168 1,411 1,420 January 8, 2008 Pending October 3, 2008

Table supplied by CGL.

Table 4.2 Mineral Licenses Purchased or Optioned, Zona Alta,
Category 2 (CHG‐081)
DATE REGISTRATION
MINE OWNER LOCATION PURCHASE DATE
TO CMdC
El Carmen Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos July 18, 2006 August 06, 2007

El Cuatro Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. La Plaza October 20, 2006 August 06, 2007
Socorro N° 1 Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos December 19, 2006 August 06, 2007
Cruzada Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos Mayo31, 2006 August 06, 2007
El Silencio Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos June 07, 2006 August 06, 2007
La Trinidad Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Manzano June 28, 2006 August 06, 2007
Cañada Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cascabel October 23, 2006 August 17, 2007
La Dolores Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos November 29, 2006 August 06, 2007
La Davila Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Plaza March 12, 2007 August 06, 2007
San Pedro Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 08, 2006 August 06, 2007
Villonza Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 08, 2006 August 08, 2007
Cinco Mil Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 17, 2006 August 06, 2007
Cinco Mil Cien Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 17, 2006 August 06, 2007
Cinco Mil Doscientos Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 08, 2006 August 08, 2007
Ultimo Esfuerzo Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 08, 2006 August 08, 2007
Volcanes N° 2 Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos July 24, 2006 August 08, 2007
Villonza Nivel Carretera Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos April 03, 2005 September 19, 2007
Tesorito Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Junio 21, 2007 September 13, 2007
El Aguacate Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 25, 2005 September 19, 2007
La Zorra Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. May 17, 2006 September 13, 2007
Caparrozal 1 Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos May 17, 2006 September 13, 2007
Mellizo Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Manzano Bajo March 25, 2006 September 13, 2007
Socorro Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos September 04, 2006 September 13, 2007
Gartner Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos September 04, 2006 September 13, 2007
Dorotea Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos September 04, 2006 September 13, 2007
San Judas Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Santa Ines March 16, 2007 September 13, 2007
Molino Patacon Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Manzano March 25, 2006 November 11, 2007
Cascabel Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cascabel September 04, 2006 May 02, 2008
Ventana Baja Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos
Botánica Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos
Pending Pending
Granadina Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Canalón
Botánica or Villoncita Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos


Table 4.3 Mineral Licenses Purchased or Optioned, Zona Alta, Category 3 (Applications for
Legalization)
LEGALIZATION APPLICATION
MINE OWNER OPTION TO PURCHASE FINAL PAYMENT DATE
No.
AGREEMENT DATE
El Picacho 274‐17 Jairo Quintero Y Cia January 28, 2005 November 4, 2005
Curubital 2 281‐17 Leonardo Escobar January 19, 2005 July 25, 2005
Conancos 234‐17 Jose Bernardo Castro July 13, 2006 January 5, 2006
El Derrumbe 265‐17 Luis Horacio Izquierdo April 13, 2005 Pending
La Chontadura 277‐17 Gustavo Franco April 13, 2005 Pending
Piedra Dorada 252‐17 Rodrigo Gutierrez Henao April 8, 2005 October 10, 2005
La Araujo 240‐17 Jairo Antonio Castro Muñoz January 14, 2005 July 13, 2005
La Ventura 2 208‐17 Jorge Edison Tabares April 6, 2005 October 10, 2005
La Derrota 316‐17 Danilo Saldarriaga April 5, 2005 October 7, 2005
La Araujo 2 237‐17 Luis Alberto Calle January 14, 2005 July 13, 2005
Cantata 261‐17 José Edier Díaz Bernal y Cía. January 28, 2005 July 28, 2005
La Esperanza 3 226‐17 Jose Bernardo Castro January 20, 2005 July 21, 2005
La Virgen 291‐17 Pedro Erasmo Lengua April 8, 2005 October 10, 2005
Peña N°2 INCLUSION 2002 Julio Enrique Trejos y Cia. January 27, 2005 July 27, 2006

El Cerro 287‐17 Luis Eduardo Castro April 5, 2005 October 7, 2005
La Pinta 2461T Julio Enrique Trejos January 27, 2005 July 27, 2005

La Castro 239‐17 Jairo Antonio Castro Muñoz May 5, 2005 Pending
Los Sapos 297‐17 Carlos Enrique García January 27, 2005 July 27, 2005
La Corroncha 292‐17 Juan Carlos Calvo y Cía. May 5, 2005 Pending
El Uno 256‐17 Bertulfo Morales May 25, 2005 Pending
Rodrigo Alberto Rodas y
May 24, 2005 Pending
El Yarumo 304‐17 Cia.
El Colón 318‐17 Humberto Antonio Castro April 8, 2005 Pending
La Calle 269‐17 Londoño Osorio y Cia September 4, 2006 Pending
Alemania o divisa 2536T Fabio de Jesús Mejía December 14, 2007 Pending
La Ochoa 2391T Fabio de Jesús Mejía July 27, 2007 July 27, 2007
La Chiquita 774‐17 Fabio de Jesús Mejía December 14, 2007 Pending
Guinea 2393T Fabio de Jesús Mejía September 28, 2007 September 28, 2007
La Caleña 310‐17 Sigifredo Jimenez March 30, 2007 Pending
Cascabel 2525T Leonardo Ortiz Parra April 20, 2007 October 5, 2007

Esperanza 3 232‐17 Arbey González April 25, 2007 Pending
La Panfría 4459 T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2007 Pending
La Ortiz 2414T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2008 Pending
Golondrina 2430 T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2009 Pending
Torre 3 2404T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2010 Pending
Cubana o Cubanita 2537T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2011 Pending


Table 4.4 New Contract Proposals Marmato Zona Alta
PROPOSAL APPLICATION ALTITUDE ALTITUDE DATE OF
NUMBER NUMBER LEGAL STATUS AREA (Ha) (lower, m) (upper, m) SUBMITTAL
Propuesta-001 ICQ-080021X Contract Proposal 16.7683 1,445 1,447 26 March 2007
Propuesta-005 ICQ-080411X Contract Proposal 2.7057 1,468 Surface 26 March 2007
Propuesta-020 ILR-09001X Contract Proposal 2.4174 1,363 Surface 27 December 2007

4.2 CARAMANTA PROJECT
CGL also holds a total 18,765.3682 ha (for a net area of 16,571.7350 ha or 165.7 km2 due to
overlaps) of mining concessions, applications and purchase agreements in the district around
the Marmato project, which is referred to as the Caramanta exploration project (Caramanta
project). The mineral concessions for the Caramanta project are shown in Figure 4.5.
On September 22, 2005, CGL entered into an Assignment Agreement with Investcol, where
Investcol assigned, transferred, and conveyed to CGL all of its rights under a Contract for
Purchase Option of Mining Concessions (Original Option Contract) entered into with Cia
Servicios Logisticos. As a result of this agreement, CGL acquired an option to purchase mining
and mineral rights on properties known as Concessions 6602, 1343, and 6329 located in
Caramanta Municipality, of Antioquia.
On April 10, 2006, CGL entered into an Assignment Agreement with Investcol where Investcol
assigned, transferred, and conveyed to CGL all of its rights under a Purchase Contract entered
into with Cia Servicios Logisticos. As a result of this agreement, CGL acquired Investcol’s rights


to exclusively engage in mining activities on Concessions 6993, 7039, 6821, 6770, HETJ‐26,
HETJ‐27, HETJ‐31, HETJ‐32, and HETG‐01 all located within the Caramanta Project area. CGL’s
options on these properties are currently unexercised. The latter five concessions are in the El
Salto prospect and were originally defined horizontally by elevation over the same area, the
same as was done at Marmato. This was based on the precedent set at Marmato and because
they are located within the Municipality of Marmato. However, upon granting and registration
of the concessions the elevations were dropped from the definitions and the five concessions
were combined as a single property. A summary of the details for the concessions are
contained in Table 4.2.
On August 30, 2006, CGL through its subsidiary Minera de Caldas entered into a Transfer of
Properties and Sale Agreement with Sociedad Kedahda S. A. (“Kedahda”), now called AngloGold
Ashanti Colombia S.A., a Colombia corporation which is a subsidiary of AngloGold Ashanti Ltd.
(AGA), and acquired the mining title, mining applications, and mining data for properties
located around the Marmato and Caramanta projects (Table 4.2). CGL paid the purchase price
of US $500,000 for the entire property interests and Minera de Caldas holds the title for the
property interests in its name for the benefit of CGL.
On September 25, 2006, CGL entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the issued
and outstanding shares of Gavilan Minerales S.A. (Gavilan), a Colombia corporation, for the
purchase price of US $300,000 and the issuance of 1,150,000 restricted common shares of CGL
common stock. The principal shareholder of Gavilan was Cia Servicios Logisticos. Gavilan holds
proper legal title to or contract proposals for several properties in the Caramanta project
including properties known as Concessions 6602, 1343, 6329, 6993, 7039, 6821, 6770, HETJ‐31,
32, 26, 27, and HETG‐01 upon which CGL held an option to acquire (Table 4.5). As a result of
the acquisition of Gavilan, CGL became the title holder of these properties and will no longer
have to satisfy any minimum exploratory work obligations on these properties.
Also pursuant to the terms of the agreement of September 25, 2006, Minera de Caldas
purchased assets from Cia Servicios Logisticos including the office building in Medellín and
equipment.
On August 27, 2007, CGL entered into an agreement with an unrelated party that provides it
with an option to acquire 100% of concession No. 669‐17 in the Caramanta region. Over a
twenty‐four month period, CGL has the option to pay a total of 2.4 billion Colombian pesos
(COP) or approximately US $1,200,000 to acquire a 100% interest in the property. At June 30,


2009, the Company had made payments of COP 551 million for a 20% interest. Should CGL
decide not to continue with the project it is not obligated to make any further payments.
with an option to acquire 100% of concession No. 644‐17 in the Caramanta region. CGL has the
option to pay a total of COP 280 million (approximately US $152,000) to acquire a 100% interest
in the property. The payments are in three parts, the first on signing, the second on receiving
authorization from the mining authority to transfer the concession to CGL, and the final when
the concession is registered in the name of CGL. At June 30, 2009, the Company has expended
COP 184.8 million.
On November 19, 2007, CGL entered into an agreement with an unrelated party that provides it
with an option to acquire 100% of concession No. 805‐17 in the Caramanta region. CGL has
paid a total of COP 450 million (approximately US $244,000) to acquire a 100% interest in the
property which is now registered in Minera de Caldas’ name.
with an option to acquire 100% of concession No. 211‐17 in the Caramanta region. CGL has the
option to pay a total of COP 220 million (approximately US $110,000) to acquire a 100% interest
in the property subject to the concession being granted to the underlying applicant in a process
called a legalization proposal, and being subsequently transferred to and registered in the name
of CGL. At June 30, 2009, CGL had expended an initial COP 22 million (about US $16,000). If
CGL decides not to continue with the project, there is no obligation to make any further
payments.


Table 4.5 CGF Exploration Licenses
National
Contract Mining Date Contract or
License Status Licence Owner Area (Ha)
Number Registry Proposal
Number
1 6418B HHMM-03 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 58.4650 October 12, 2004
2 6170 HGDB-03 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 47.2000 July 16, 2007
3 697-17 HHFK-02 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 532.6146 March 27, 2007
Oscar Jhon Ríos Osorio & CMdC
4 653-17 HGAE-07 Contract 84.2851 March 17, 2007
(Note 1)
5 696-17 HGPH-03 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 200.0000 August 28, 2007
6 644-17 HGPJ-04 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 81.1598 August 28, 2006
7 805-17 HHBG-03 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 111.6000 January 25, 2007
8 669-17 HGSF-04 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas & others 587.5680 October 4, 2006
9 6455B HHBP-03 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 32.5260 January 31, 2007
10 14889 FIFI-01 Contract Compañía Minera de Caldas 84.4389 March3, 1993
11 6329 HFQL-04 Contract Gavilan Minerales 82.3850 August 18, 2005
12 6602 HFQL-05 Contract Gavilan Minerales 109.5028 August 18, 2005
13 6821 n/a Contract Proposal Cia. Servicios Logísticos (Note 2) 138.4440 May 26, 2005
November 29,
14 n/a Contract Proposal Cia. Servicios Logísticos (Note 2) 418.1956
7039 2005
15 6993 HHPO-01 Contract Proposal Cia. Servicios Logísticos (Note 2) 203.6895 October 31, 2005
16 1343 n/a Ministry Hernando Molina Vélez (Note 3) 265.1062
17 813-17 n/a Contract Proposal Cia. Servicios Logísticos (Note 2) 360.0000 July 11, 2006
Legalization November 25,
20 n/a Purchase contract by Caldas (Note 4) 23.9200
211-17 Proposal 2004
Legalization December 13,
21 n/a Purchase contract by Caldas (Note 4) 15.2750
217-17 Proposal 2004
135-98M Nov.
22 HETJ-31 Contract (Note 5) Being transferred to Gavilán 6.8320 October 27, 2004
30/98
136-98M Nov.
30/98
072-98M Aug.
26/98
074-98M Sep.
02/98
143-98M Abr.
26 HETG-01 Contract (Note 5) Being transferred to Gavilán 6.8320 October 27, 2004
30/98
December 23,
27 622-17 HHFK-03 Contract Monica Uribe (Note 7, 6)
1,342.2172 2002
28 623-17 HHFK-08 Contract Monica Uribe (Note 8) 1,228.0819 March 27, 2007
September 12,
29 615-17 n/a Contract Proposal Monica Uribe (Note 7, 8)
813.8218 2002
30 616-17 n/a Contract Monica Uribe (Note 6, 8) 1,989.2469 December 9, 2002
December 23,
31 626-17 HIVL-01 Contract Proposal Monica Uribe (Note 7, 8)
592.7612 2002
December 23,
32 628-17 n/a Contract Sandra María Sánchez (Note 4, 9)
2,153.5336 2002
September 5,
33 DI5-151 n/a Contract Proposal Monica Uribe (Note 7, 8)
2,568.9177 2002
34 B5956 n/a Contract Monica Uribe (Note 6, 8) 916.9226 March 21, 2006
35 6454 n/a Contract Proposal Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note 7) 282.7909 October 18, 2004
36 6455 n/a Contract Proposal Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note 7) 633.4064 October 28, 2004
38 6418 HHVN-07 Contract Proposal Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note 7) 60.2865 October 12, 2004
39 6418C n/a Contract Proposal Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note 7) 46.5408 October 12, 2004
40 DHQ-093 (Zone n/a Contract Proposal Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note 193.4500 August 26, 2002


Contract National License Status Licence Owner Area (Ha) Date Contract or
Number Mining Proposal
2) 7,10)
DHQ-093 (Zone Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note
41 n/a Contract Proposal 42.2550 August 26, 2002
1) 7,10)
42 FJT-15D n/a Contract Proposal Anglogold Ashanti Colombia (Note 9) 1,930.6002
Total (ha)
18,765.3682
Total Net (ha) 16,807.4400
Note n/a: – not applicable. Once a contract is approved it is entered in the National Mining Registry and given a registration number.
Note 1: Purchase contract with staged payments over 24 months.
Note 2: Contract proposals cannot be transferred until the contract is awarded and these will be held in trust for Gavilan by Cia Servicios Logisticos under the
agreement of September 25, 2006.
Note 3: Held in trust for Cia Servicios Logisticos.

Note 4: These legalization proposals will be transferred to Caldas when the contract is awarded.
Note 5: These five concession contracts are in the El Salto zone and are superimposed and defined horizontally by altitude, as in Marmato.
Note 6: These contracts are in the process of being transferred from Anglogold Ashanti Colombia, formerly called Sociedad Kedahda S.A., or Monica Uribe of
Anglogold Ashanti Colombia to Caldas under agreement of August 30, 2006.
Note 7: Contract proposals cannot be transferred until the contract is awarded and these are being held in trust for Caldas by Anglogold Ashanti Colombia,
formerly called Sociedad Kedahda S.A., or by Monica Uribe of Anglogold Ashanti Colombia under the agreement of August 30, 2006.
Note 8: This is the are areas remaining following reduction in size. Note also that Contracts FD5-093, 715-17 and FD5-10Z were relinquished.
Note 9: Contract proposal to cover small free areas, awaits definition of free areas.
Note 10: Archived Proposal
On February 27, 2007, CGL entered into an agreement with an unrelated party to acquire 100%
of concession No. 696‐17 in the Caramanta region. CGL has paid a total of COP 100 million
(approximately US $54,000) to acquire a 100% interest in the property which is now registered
in CGL’s name.
On March 17, 2008, CGL entered into an agreement with an unrelated party that provides it
with an option to acquire 100% of concession No. 653‐17 in the Caramanta region. Over a
twenty‐four month period, CGL has the option to pay a total of COP 1.0 billion (approximately
US $542,600) to acquire a 100% interest in the property. At June 30, 2009, CGL had made
payments of COP 300 million for a 30% interest. Should CGL decide not to continue with the
project, it is not obligated to make any further payments.
A royalty of 4% of the gross value of the metal is payable to the government on the gold and
silver produced in Columbia. There are no other royalties, back‐in rights, payments, other
agreements or encumbrances on the Caramanta project.
The exploration targets contained within the Caramanta project are described further in
Section 15.3 of this report.


4.3 COLOMBIAN MINING LAW
Mining in Colombia is governed by the Mining Law 685 of 2001. The contracts of Marmato are,
in addition, governed by the Mining Law 2655 of 1988 and the terms of the contracts awarded
under the Aporte Minero scheme, as explained below.
The mining authorities in Colombia are as follows:
• Ministry of Mines and Energy (Ministerio de Minas y Energia, MME): The highest mining
authority in the country.
• INGEOMINAS (Instituto Colombiano de Geología y Minería): The MME had delegated
the administration of mineral resources to INGEOMINAS and some Department Mining
Delegations. INGEOMINAS has two departments, the Geological Survey (Servcio
Geológico), and the Mines Department (Servicio Minero) responsible for all mining
contracts except where responsibility for the administration has been passed to the
Departmental Mining Delegations.
• Departmental Mining Delegations (Gobernaciones Delegadas). It administers mining
contracts in the Departments with the most mining activity, including Caldas and
Antioquia.
• Mining Energy Planning Unit (Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética, UPME): Provides
technical advice to the MME regarding planning for the development of the mining and
energy sector and maintains the System of Colombian Mining Information (Sistema de
Información Minero Colombiano, SIMCO).
All mineral resources belong to the state and can be explored and exploited by means of
concession contracts granted by the state. Under the Mining Law of 2001 there is a single type
of concession contract covering exploration, construction and mining which is valid for 30 years
and can be extended for another 30 years.
Concession contract areas are defined on a map with reference to a starting point (punto
arcifinio) and distances and bearings, or map coordinates. There is no limit on concession size.
A property tax has to be paid annually during the exploration and construction phases of the
concession contract. This is defined as 1 minimum daily wage per hectare (~US $8.35) for areas
up to 2,000 ha, 2 minimum daily wages per hectare (~US $16.70) for areas of 2,000 to 5,000 ha,


and 3 minimum daily wages per hectare (~US $25.05) for areas of 5,000 to 10,000 ha. The
minimum wage in 2008 is COP 461,500 per month, equivalent to COP 15,383 per day which, at
the present exchange rate of COP 1.843 = US $1.00 (average for March, 2008), which is about
US $8.35.
The concession contract has three phases:
1. Exploration Phase.
• Starts once the contract is inscribed in the National Mining Registry (Registro
Minero Nacional, RMN).
• Valid for 3 years plus a 2 year extension.
• Annual property tax.
• Requires an annual Environmental Mining Insurance Policy for 5% of the value of
the planned exploration expenditure for the year.
• Present a mine plan (PTO) and an Environmental Impact Study (EIA) for the next
phase.
2. Construction Phase.
• Valid for 3 years plus a 1 year extension.
• Annual property tax payments continue as in Exploration Phase.
• Requires an annual Environmental Mining Insurance Policy for 5% of the value of
the planned investment as defined in the PTO for the year.
• Environmental License issued on approval of Environmental Impact Study.
3. Exploitation Phase.
• Valid for 30 years minus the time taken in the exploration and construction
phases, which means that it is 21 to 24 years and is renewable for 30 years.
• Annual Environmental Mining Insurance Policy required.
• No annual property tax.
• Pay royalty based on regulations at time of granting of the Contract.

The 2001 Mining Law allows applications made under the 1988 Mining Law to continue the
application process under the terms of the old law, and titles granted under the 1988 law
continue to be governed by it. The operative and technical benefits of the new law may be
applied to older applications, as well as the abbreviated application process, except in the case
of those concessions subject to royalty agreements (Article 352). In the case of Marmato, the


Mining Delegation Unit of Caldas applied the 2001 Mining Law to all contracts in Marmato
including those granted under the old law. It then changed its name to apply the 1988 Mining
Law on the basis that Marmato was part of the old Aporte Minero. In addition, Article 352 of
the new Mining Code was not applicable given the precedent of the goal Aportes elsewhere in
the country. The effect of these changes it is to prolong the process of granting and registering
mining contracts.
Royalties payable to the state are 4% of gross value at the mine mouth for gold and silver and
5% for copper (Law 141 of 1994 modified by Law 756 of 2002). For the purposes of royalties
the gold and silver price is 80% of the average of the London afternoon fix price for the previous
month.
4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND LIABILITIES
The Mining Law 685 of 2001 requires an Environmental Mining Insurance Policy for each
concession contract. In addition the Law states that a Social and Environmental Impact Study
(EIS) has to be presented at the end of the Exploration Phase if the concession is to proceed to
the Construction Phase. The EIS must be approved and an Environmental License issued before
the Exploitation Phase can begin. In addition, exploitation requires a Permit for Springs, Forest
Use Permit, Certificate of Vehicular Emissions, Emissions Permit, and River Course Occupation
Permit.
Exploration activities require an Environmental Management Plan and a Surficial Water
Concession.
CGL has presented an Environmental Management Plan for drilling to the Departmental
authority Corporación Autónoma Regional de Caldas or Caldas Regional Autonomous
Corporation (CORPOCALDAS). This Plan includes a preliminary phase to close down the small
mines and mills in the Zona Alta to stop the source of much of the contamination. CGL is
currently in discussions with the Colombian government regarding the closure of the small
mines in the Zona Alta and the related environmental liability.
CGL completed an Environmental Baseline Study in December 2007 which gives a full year of
environmental data for incorporation into the Scoping Study. The study will form the basis for
future environmental permits and the EIS. The environmental baseline study monitoring is
continued until September 2008. CGL has received approval for drilling from Corpocaldas
under an approved Environmental Management Plan.


Drilling water is taken from the water permit for the Patacon mill which was ceded to CGL on
purchase of the mill. This permit takes water from the source of three creeks, Cidrera,
Candelaria and Cascabel. CGL has also acquired other water permits with the purchase of
certain mills and mines. The Company has also applied for a surficial water permit for drilling
water from a stream source in Piedra Labrada creek which will require a 1,800 m pipe to the
drilling area.
The Zona Alta has environmental liabilities due to past and current mining activities including:
• Surface disturbance and degradation including deforestation.
• Ground instability, collapse, landslides affecting mountain slopes and Marmato town.
• Absence of waste rock dumps and tailings ponds and dumping of waste rock down
mountain slopes and into the Cascabel River and of tailings into rivers which drain into
the Cauca River.
• Contamination of water by mercury, cyanide, acid drainage, heavy metals and solids. In
addition contamination of water by untreated sewage from Marmato town and by
agricultural chemicals and waste from cultivation of coffee, bananas etc.
• Potential contamination from the Mineros Nacionales operation which has no waste
dumps or tailings pond and discharges tailings directly into the Cascabel River and
subsequently the Cauca River.

See Figure 4.4 for a photograph of falls on the Cascabel River with the black color of the river
due to the material being dumped in it from the Marmato mines and mills.
The objective of the exploration program is to define a bulk tonnage resource that is mineable
by open pit and that will remove many of the small mines and related past sources of
environmental contamination.
CGL has stated to SEWC that they have a letter and legal opinion that they are not responsible
for the past environmental damage and the subsequent clean‐up. However as CGL is
purchasing the individual mines and mills in the Zona Alta they are shutting them down and
removing the mill equipment and buildings. This stops the source of environmental damage
and under Colombian law, CGL is entitled to receive a tax credit for such environmental
remediation and improvements.


SEWC is unaware of any potential outstanding environmental liabilities attached to the
Marmato project and is unable to comment on any remediation which may have been
undertaken by previous owners.
Figure 4.4 Cascabel River


5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY
The Marmato project is located on the eastern side of the Western Cordillera (Cordillera
Occidental) of Colombia on the west side of the Cauca River. The project is in the Municipality
of Marmato in Caldas. See Figure 5.1 for a view of the community of Marmato.
The topography in the Marmato area is abrupt with a relief of about 1,600 m between the
Cauca River at 600 m elevation on the east side of the project and the peaks of the nearby
mountains of up to 2,200 m elevation. There is craggy outcrop in the upper parts of the
mountain, and large landslides and talus slopes have formed, partly as a result of mining
activities. The Marmato veins outcrop on an east‐facing mountain slope called Cerro El Burro
with the mineralized area bounded by the El Pantano stream on the north side and the
Cascabel stream on the south. The Cauca is a major north‐flowing river in a deep valley that
separates the Western and Central Cordilleras. The river has an average flow rate from 500 to
600m3/s. See Figure 5.2 for a view of the topography in the area of Marmato.
The climatic zones vary with elevation and are defined as hot (>24°C) below 1,000 m in the
Cauca River valley; temperate (18°C to 24°C) between 1,000 m and 2,000 m; and cold above
2,000 m (12°C to 18°C). Marmato is situated mostly within the temperate zone where the
climate is warm and humid with an annual rainfall of approximately 2,000 mm. Rainfall has a
bimodal distribution with the wettest months in from March to May and again from September
to December. CGL installed a weather station at El Planchao camp between the towns of
Marmato and El Llano in 2007 as part of the environmental baseline study (Cia Minera de
Caldas, 2007). The station recorded an annual rainfall for 2007 of 2,010 mm. The most intense
rainfall recorded was 126 mm in five hours. The average temperature is 24°C, with a maximum
of 36°C and a minimum of 16°C. The predominant wind direction is from the south to
southeast (150° to 210°) and winds are light with a velocity of 2 km/h and a maximum of 20
km/hour. The highest gust recorded in 2007 was 88 km/h. The town of Marmato has an
average temperature of 23°C and rainfall of 1,885 mm (Municipio de Marmato, 2004). An
average annual rainfall of 2,065 mm was recorded at the nearby town of Supia (1,307 m
elevation) (Cenicafe, 2006).
The ecological zones defined on the Holdridge Life Zone climatic classification system are zoned
by elevation (Municipio de Marmato, 2004; Correa, 2006; Cia Minera de Caldas, 2007):
• Premontane (subtropical) wet forest transitional to tropical moist forest and dry forest;
defined as temperatures >24°C, annual rainfall of 1,500 mm to 2,800 mm, and elevation


of 700 m to 1,000 m. This area includes the Cauca River valley and the lower part of El
Llano town.

Figure 5.1View of the Community of Marmato


Figure 5.2Topography of the Marmato Area

• Premontane (subtropical) wet forest defined as temperatures of 18°C to 24°C, rainfall of
2,000 m to 4,000 mm, and elevation of 1,000 m to 1,900 m. The main areas of mining
and exploration are in this zone.
• Lower montane (warm temperate) wet forest defined as temperatures of 12°C to 18°C,
rainfall of 2,000 mm to 4,000 mm, and elevation of 1,900 m to 2,900 m.

Much of the original forest cover has been cleared for agriculture and grazing, especially at
lower elevations. Land use is cattle grazing, coffee, sugar cane, citrus fruit, bananas, and mining
in Marmato.
The community of Marmato is 200 km northwest of Bogotá (270 km by road), the capital of
Colombia, and 80 km due south of Medellín (125 km by road), the capital of Antioquia.
Medellín is the second largest city in the country (population 2.0 million) and is the
administrative center for the project. Marmato is 91 km by road north of Manizales, the capital
of Caldas. Manizales is the major municipal center for the region with a population of 352,000.


The property is a three‐hour drive from Medellín, via the Medellín to Cali highway (the
highways do not have route numbers) which is part of the Pan American Highway. The route
from Medellín is via Itaguí (7 km), Caldas (12 km), Alto de Minas (13 km), Santa Barbara (27 km),
La Pintada (26 km), La Guaracha del Rayo (32 km), and turn onto a secondary road to Marmato
(8 km, partially asphalted). There is an international airport located in Medellín with flights to
the USA, Panamá, Venezuela and Peru, and a national airport in Manizales with flights to
Medellín and Bogotá.
Marmato is 200 km west of the Pacific Ocean and 300 km south of the Caribbean Sea and
Atlantic Ocean. The nearest port is Buenaventura on the Pacific Ocean (320 km by the Pan
American Highway). There is an abandoned railway cutting along the east side of the Cauca
River opposite Marmato. This was once part of a railway network between the Pacific and
Atlantic Oceans which ran between Buenaventura and Puerto Berrio on the navigable
Magdalena River. The middle section between Medellín and La Felisa (Caldas, 10 km south of
Marmato) was completed in 1942 and closed in 1972. Ferrocarriles del Suroeste S. A.
(Southwestern Railways) applied for a concession to rebuild this 185 km line between La Felisa
and Envigado, near Medellín, in November, 2007, at a cost of US $140 million. This would
become integrated with the national railway network. Ferrocarriles del Oeste S. A. (Western
Railways) were awarded the contract to operate the 499 km Buenaventura to La Felisa railway
in November 2007. The concession is in two stages. In July 2008 they started operating the 388
km railway between Buenaventura and Cartago and La Tebaida which has been rehabilitated. .
In the second stage the new concessionaire will take over operation of the 119 km section
between Cartago and La Felisa once this has been rebuilt by Tren de Occidente (Western Train).
The Cauca River is navigable in the lower (Cáceres to Atlantic) and upper parts (Pereira to Cali),
and had steamer services in the past, but the middle part around Marmato and Medellín has
rapids.
There are two towns at Marmato, the old Marmato town at an elevation of 1,300 m to 1,400 m
which sits on top of the mineral deposit, and the new town of El Llano (also called Nuevo
Marmato or New Marmato) located 1.3 km to the east and at a lower elevation of 1,000 m. Old
Marmato has an estimated population of about 950 to 1,050 inhabitants, while El Llano has
approximately 1,250 inhabitants. There are two other small settlements or villages nearby, San
Juan de Marmato, located 1.5 km southwest of old Marmato at 1,600 m elevation, and
Echandia at 1,500 to 1,600 m elevation located on the ridge 1.0 to 1.5 km north of old
Marmato. The 2005 census indicated that the Municipality of Marmato had a population of
8,175 of which 1,122 were living in old Marmato.


Mining‐induced landslides and alluvial boulder and mud flows, including mining waste, affect
the old Marmato town site and have resulted in recent abandonment of several houses and
public buildings with further risk of landslides. To date there have been no fatalities. In 1986
the national and departmental disaster prevention agencies first determined the necessity to
relocate the town due to environmental risk. In 1989, INGEOMINAS completed a further study
outlining the dangers of slope movements and this study began the first stages of the town
move to El Llano. In the 1990s, the process of relocating the town began: however, the
relocation was not completed even though many people from the nearby settlement of
Echandia were relocated to El Llano during this period. The first 129 new houses were
completed in 1997. In 1999, the vulnerability of the town and the need to relocate public
buildings such as the police station, hospital and court was emphasized again. The Esquema de
Ordenamiento Territorial or Territorial Organizational Scheme (EOT) of 2000 also referred to
the necessity to move the town due to the serious environmental threats from landslide and
collapse. In January, 2001, ten families had to be relocated. In 2002, CORPOCALDAS, the state
agency in charge of the environment concluded that all existing structures in the study zone
and in the area of the old town center needed to be relocated to El Llano and that the
coexistence of an urban community and mining was not sustainable. A new decree in 2004
approved the EOT and ordered the relocation of all the institutions to El Llano. On June 6,
2006, the Directorate of Response and Prevention of Disasters of the Ministry of Interior and
Justice issued Resolution number 23 which declared the situation to be a public emergency
affecting the Municipality of Marmato.
There are currently 160 homes in El Llano and 29 new homes are being built to house families
displaced in landslides in 2007. A further 47 homes are about to receive new subsidies to be
built to house other families displaced in the same landslide. On April 16, 2008, Julian
Arboleda, the Caldas government representative for the relocation of Marmato, confirmed to
the Company that construction of the new Administrative building was to begin within 45 days
with funds from the National Government, and would include the mayor’s office, notary,
registry office and the citizens’ protection office. The police station is currently under
construction in El Llano. In addition the public deeds have been signed with the municipality to
construct the new hospital with funds from the Ministry of Social Protection and the Territorial
administration, and a public deed has been signed for the location of the new school which will
house 1,200 students. An agreement has been reached to use the old location in El Llano to
house a campus for the Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje or National Learning Service (SENA),
the state technical college. Once all the buildings have been completed all the old sites in the
current town site will be torn down. All buildings have been ordered to be inaugurated in 2009.


The current EOT definitively outlines that Marmato is in a state of high vulnerability.
CORPOCALDAS is studying the costs of moving the remainder of the homes in old Marmato. In
addition, a decision has been made to complete paving of the access road to the new town of El
Llano only, but it will not continue to old Marmato.
The area covering Marmato, Supia, Filadelfia, La Merced, and Quinchia has recently been
declared a Mining District by the Ministry of Mines, one of only three areas in Colombia. This is
expected to bring some tax benefits and possibly facilitate processing of claims in the Mines
Registry office but further study of this new district concept is needed.
Any future mining operation at Marmato will have to address the geotechnical issues and the
old town of Marmato town will need to be completely relocated in order to develop any large
scale mining operations at Marmato.
The old town of Marmato is known as the “Cradle of Gold of Colombia” (Pesebre de Oro de
Colombia) and a proposal was made to declare it a National Historic Monument in 1982
(Resolution No. 002 of March, 1982 by the Ministry of Culture), but no follow‐up Law or Decree
was ever enacted to actually create a National Monument or Site of National Cultural Interest
(Bien de Interés Cultural de Carácter Nacional). The town does not have any colonial era
buildings or mine installations. The small church in the town square dates from 1954 and the
oldest buildings are estimated to be 19th century, but these buildings are at the highest risk of
collapse due to the landslide problem and many were recently damaged and abandoned due to
a mudslide in 2006. The oldest mine relic is a 5‐stamp California mill probably dating from the
19th century which operated at the El Colombiano Mill until CGL bought the mill and closed the
operation. See Figure 5.3 for a photograph of the stamp mill in operation in 2006. As part of
CGL’s long term plans a museum in El Llano will be built to preserve the history and develop
tourism.
The Colombian government has no listed archaeological sites in the area. The only known
archaeological relics are carved spiral petroglyphs on a boulder near the road between El Llano
and Marmato, and another reported on the opposite side of the creek. These boulders are
located outside of the area of known mineralization. See Figure 5.4 for a photograph of one of
the boulders with the carved spiral petroglyphs located on the slope below CGL’s base camp.
There are overgrown ruins of a Moraga indigenous village and terraces 2.5 km north east of
Marmato near the Cauca River. These ruins are also located outside of the area of known
mineralization. An archaeological survey of the Marmato area will be carried out for the EIS.


Figure 5.3 Stamp California Mill working at the Colombiano Mill in Marmato in 2006


Figure 5.4 Boulder Top with Carved Spiral Petroglyphs located below the CGL Base Camp

Field personnel for the exploration program are available from the two towns and neighboring
districts and a School of Mines, currently closed, is located in El Llano. In the long term the
surrounding region would be able to supply the basic workforce for any future mining
operation.
Three high tension power lines (230 kV each) belonging to the Colombian national power grid
run along the Cauca River valley on the east side of Marmato. A 132 kV substation is located at
Marmato which supplies power to the community, mines and surrounding area. A ten inch
diameter oil and gas pipeline with a capacity of 12,000 barrels of oil per day runs along the
Cauca River valley and is part of the national network. This portion of the pipeline connects
Buenaventura with Medellín and the hydrocarbon fields in the north and east of Colombia.
The region has high rainfall and there are ample water resources available. Water rights belong
to the state and are governed by Decree 1541 (1978). For any mining purposes, applications for
water concessions are made to CORPOCALDAS.
Waste rock and tailings disposal for a possible future open pit mining operation will be valley fill
and suitable valleys have been identified. Preliminary site selection and engineering work
regarding possible mining scenarios has been carried for the scoping study currently in
progress.


6 HISTORY
CGL has conducted extensive research program to identify the mining production history at
Marmato. This research has been conducted both in the existing colonial archives within
Colombia as well as in the more recent private and state archives in Colombia and England. In
addition some attempts have been made to access the Archive of the Indies (Archivo des Indies)
in Seville but as of yet any data contained in this archive are unavailable.
6.1 General History
Colombian historical gold production is estimated between 29 Moz and 35 Moz from the
Spanish conquest in 1537 until the start of the California gold rush in 1848, making Colombia
the largest gold producer of the Spanish empire and the second in South America after much
larger Brazil (Restrepo, 1952). Seventy‐five percent of this production came from the
Departments of Antioquia and Caldas where the Marmato and Caramanta projects are located.
Colombian gold production between 1514 and 1934 has been estimated at 49 Moz which
makes Colombia number one in South America with 38% of the total production (Emmons,
1937). Two‐thirds of the gold production was from placer deposits. Subsequent Colombian
production is estimated at 30 Moz by the Banco de la Republica (Shaw 2000), which gives
Colombia a total recorded historical gold production of approximately 80 Moz.
Gold production between 2000 and 2008 ranged from 15.5 tonnes (t) to 46.5 t (0.50 Moz to
1.50 Moz) of gold per year. Gold production in 2008 was 34.3 tonnes (1.10 Moz). This recent
production has earned Colombia a ranking which has ranged from 2nd to 5th largest gold
producer in South America and 12th to 20th largest in the world (Boletín Estadístico de Minas y
Energía, 1999‐2005. Ministerio de Minas y Energia, Colombia, 2008).
The above figures indicate the great historical importance of Colombian gold production and,
given that there has been no modern gold exploration until very recently, indicate the high
exploration potential of the country.
Marmato is one of the most important historical gold properties in Colombia and lies in the
heart of the main historical gold producing region. The name is derived from “marmato” or
“marmaja”, an old Spanish term for pyrite. The Middle Cauca region, where Marmato is
located, was occupied for two thousand years before the Spanish conquest by farmers, potters,
gold miners and goldsmiths of the Quimbaya culture (500 BC to 1600 AD). The Quimbaya
culture was noted for some of the finest gold workmanship in Colombia (Bogotá Gold Museum,
2006) and a photograph of one of the masterpieces of this workmanship is seen in Figure 6.1.
The Quimbaya culture was part of the greater Chibcha culture which occupied the present day


countries of Colombia, Panamá and Costa Rica and formed the largest Amerindian group
between the Incas and the Aztecs. The early Spanish chroniclers of the 16th century classified
the indigenous groups into tribes or provinces including the Cartamas in the Marmato area,
whose main occupation was gold mining (Banco de la República Manizales, 1989).
Marmato was important during the Spanish era following the colonization period from 1514 to
1537 and the formation of Nueva Granada. Marmato was founded in 1525 and recognized as a
municipality in 1536, by Sebastián de Belalcázar. The gold mines of Marmato are mentioned in
Spanish chronicles in 1583 and 1625, with the Cauca valley noted as a rich gold producer in the
16th and 17th centuries (Morales, 2004, Restrepo, 1952).
Figure 6.1 One of the Masterpieces of Gold Workmanship from the Quimbaya Culture

In 1634 Captain Jacinto de Arboleda, Mayor of Anserma, began working the Marmato mines
with a team of 40 slaves. Arboleda also built the first mill at the mine which increased the gold
recovery and made this the biggest mine in the district. Previously the ore was processed by


washing, but recovery was low because of the fine nature of the gold. The Arboleda family was
still mining at Marmato in 1776, but in that year they moved their slaves to the Chocó region
(Restrepo, 1952).
The wealth of Marmato was such that Simon Bolivar, the liberator of Colombia from Spanish
rule, used this area and its mines as collateral with the British banks to secure funding for the
war of independence against Spain (Municipio de Marmato, 2004). Following the wars of
independence (1810 to 1819) and the formation of the Republic of Colombia in 1819, various
English companies mined at Marmato until 1925. B. A. Goldschmidt and Company rented
mines at Marmato and Supía from the government in 1825 to 1829(?). Also in 1825, Jean
Boussingault bought several mines at Marmato, Supía and Quiebralomo for the Colombian
Mining Association of London. Boussingault introduced modern technology including black
powder, arrastre mills, stamp mills, concentrator tables and amalgamation to improve the
recovery of gold (Restrepo, 1952). In 1830, Jean Boussingault believed that he had discovered a
new mineral which he named marmatite (after Marmato); however, the mineral was later
shown to actually be black, iron‐rich sphalerite (Boussingault, 1830). Marmatite continues to
be the informal name for the black variation of sphalerite, which is common at Marmato. The
Colombian Mining Association operated until 1848. The concessions then passed to a
succession of English companies, namely Powles Brothers & Co. (1848 – 1850), Marmato
Mining Company (1850 – 1852), the Mariquita & New Granada Mining Co. Ltd. (1852 – 1866),
the Mariquita Mining Co. Ltd. (1866 – 1869), and in 1869 to Percy Brandon.
Brandon sold the mines to the Western Andes Mining Company Ltd. of England which mined at
Marmato from 1872 until 1905. They installed a 40‐stamp mill and there were also 20 old
stamp mills. In 1908 the 40 stamp mill at Marmato was treating 100 tons per day. Free gold
was recovered by sluicing and panning, and the discarded sulfides were retreated by local
miners, who allowed them sulfide to oxidize for some time and then re‐crushed the rock by
hand to extract more free gold by panning (Sharpless, 1908). The Western Andes contract was
not renewed in 1905 and General Alfredo Vásquez Cobo took possession of the mine on behalf
of the government (Gartner, 2005). The following year Cobo rented the mines, and ceded this
contract to the C. W. Syndicate of London in 1907, which in turn ceded the contract to the
Colombian Mining and Exploitation Company Ltd. in 1908.
The Colombian Mining & Exploration Company carried out extensive mine development at
Marmato in the upper levels as well as opening up the lower levels of Zancudero, Maruja and La
Palma for the first time, now part of the Zona Baja. A new cyanide plant with a 40 stamp mill
and capacity of 6,000 to 8,000 tons per month was installed in 1913‐1915. A new beneficiation


plant with capacity of 6,000 tons per month was installed at La Palma in 1920‐1922 (the ruins of
which are at the entrance to the site of Mineros Nacionales in the Zona Baja). The mine was
expropriated in 1925. . The company continued to work private free‐hold mines at Marmato
and Echandia until 1929, and to operate the La Palma plant for a few years.
From 1925, the mines were owned by the government and leased to contractors. For the first
six years the mines remained closed, then were leased from 1931‐1934 to Roberto Luis
Restrepo and Alfredo Londoño, and from 1935‐1938 to Uribe Afanador. From 1938 the
National Government administered the mines directly. They were contracted to José Miguel
Lizarralde in 1938‐1940, and to Gustavo White from 1940.
In 1941‐42 the output of the seven mines at Marmato and Echandia averaged 114.3 metric
tonnes of mill ore per day, from which 0.235 ounce per tonne of gold and 0.250 ounces per
tonne of silver were recovered, equivalent to 9,800 ounces per year (Singewald, 1950). In 1944
the government‐owned lode mines of Marmato, operated by lessees, produced some 12,000
ounces of gold (Singewald, 1950). Singewald (1950) described that milling was done in several
plants with an aggregate daily capacity of less than 150 tons and recovery of only 60 to 65%.
About half of the recovered gold was free and the remainder was recovered by cyanidation.
The mines were under the direct administration of the Ministerio de Minas y Petróleos, whose
policy in 1945 was to give concurrently several short term leases.
Marmato was divided into two zones, Alta (Upper) and Baja (Lower), in 1954 (Decree 2223).
The following year the government signed a contract with a North American, Julio E. Hurtado,
who transferred them to the Mining Enterprises Corporation. The contract covered mining in
both the Zona Alta and the Zona Baja. This venture failed and the mines were returned to the
government. As a result of conflicts between this company and the contractors in the Zona
Alta, the government decided to exploit the Zona Alta and the Zona Baja separately. The Zona
Alta would continue to be exploited by contractors. Throughout the period of government
administration of the mines from the beginning in 1925, it is reported that the mines ran at a
loss and required government subsidies including running the mills (Municipio de Marmato,
2004).
Gulf Resources Exploration Co. (Gulf Resources) explored Marmato in 1978 but the results of
this program are not known.
In 1981, Marmato became part of the Aporte Minero scheme and was managed by a succession
of state mining companies ECOMINAS (1981 to 1992), MINERALCO (1992 to 1997) and
MINECOL (1997 to 2004), and since then by the Unidad de Delegación Minera de Caldas (Caldas


Mining Delegation Unit) (Municipio de Marmato, 2004). The Exclusion Zone of the Marmato
Mining District (Zona de Exclusion del Distrito Minero de Marmato), was created in the Zona
Alta in 1998.
A subsidiary of the Phelps Dodge Corporation (Phelps Dodge) called Minera Phelps Dodge de
Colombia S.A. (Minera Phelps Dodge) explored the Zone Baja of Marmato in 1984 and 1985
with the objective of defining a 300 tpd underground operation. It carried out surface and
underground sampling and drilled 7 underground core holes, and defined a proven reserve of
102,900 t at 7.83 g/t gold and 24 g/t silver, and a total reserve (proven, probable and possible)
of 754,600 t at the same grade (historical reserves which predate NI‐43‐101; Hill, 1988;
Conquistador, 1998).
Electrical and EM surveys at Marmato were described in a paper by Calvache et al (1985) but no
data are available for this program. There have been no other ground geophysical surveys
carried out at Marmato to the author’s knowledge.
In 1988, William Hill Mining Consultants Ltd reviewed the Marmato project for Greenstone
Resources Ltd (Greenstone), Canada. (Hill, 1988). The intention was to review the economic
viability of the mine as a 150 tpd operation (50,000 tpy) based on the reserves outlined by
Minera Phelps Dodge. Greenstone participated in a bid process in 1991 but did not win.
In 1993, Mineros Nacionales S.A. (Mineros Nacionales) started mining the Maruja mine in the
Zona Baja with a 300 t/d underground mine under contract No. 041‐89M. This is an Aporte
Minero contract which is still valid and is now administered by the Unidad de Delegación
Minera de Caldas. The contractor pays the state a royalty of 4% plus an additional sliding
royalty based on the gold price, currently of 6% of the value of gold above US $550/oz. The
following year Mineros de Antioquia S.A. (renamed Mineros S.A. in 2004) acquired 51.75% of
Mineros Nacionales and upgraded the mine and mill. Mineros subsequently increased
ownership of Mineros Nacionales to 94.5%. The plant uses gravimetric separation by cyclones,
flotation to make a sulfide concentrate, and agitation cyanide leach with gold precipitation by
zinc (Merrill Crowe process) and smelting. In the late 1990s, 24 underground core holes and 3
reverse circulation holes were drilled for exploration. The plant was expanded gradually and
now has a capacity of 800 t/d.
Conquistador Mines Ltd. (Conquistador), a Vancouver‐listed junior company (which later
changed its name to Western Platinum Holdings and is now called Orsa Ventures Corp.),
explored Marmato between 1996 and 2000 through its Colombian subsidiary Corona Goldfields
S.A. (Corona Goldfields). Conquistador had an option to explore the Zona Baja over 4 years and


to acquire 50.1% of Mineros Nacionales (it bought 13.15% which it later sold in 2001), and
acquired several mines in the Zona Alta. Conquistador drilled 44 holes (14,678 m), and
commissioned MRDI to complete a resource estimate and scoping study in 1998. Conquistador
carried out no further work on the project due to the expiration of the option contract.
Conquistador carried out surface mapping of fracture systems, veins and alteration, and
detailed mapping of underground cross‐cuts. It took 1,147 channel samples totaling 2,847 m
from surface trenches and underground cross‐cuts. Samples were cut by hand chisel from
channels 2.0 m long x 5 cm wide x 3 cm deep. It also drilled 30 surface diamond drill holes
totaling 11,146 m and 14 underground diamond holes totaling 3,375 m for a total of 30
diamond drill holes totaling 14,678 m. Diamond core was sawn in half with one half sampled in
2.0 m intervals for assay and the other half retained. The drill core is stored in a core store near
the Maruja Mine in the Zona Baja at Marmato. CGL purchased the right to access and sample
the core from the current owner of the Conquistador data, Corona Goldfields, and carried out a
program of re‐logging and check sampling in 2008. CGL also purchased a copy of the digital
database as well as a paper copy of all of the technical data and plans related to the Marmato
held by Corona Goldfields. This data has been incorporated it into the CGL database. Table 6.1
provides a summary Conquistador’s significant drilling results at the Marmato project.
Conquistador reported that the results of preliminary metallurgical tests showed ready
leachability of gold but the appendix of the MRDI report is not available.
At the same time, between 1995 and 1997, another junior Canadian mining company called
Gran Colombia Resource Inc. (Gran Colombia, now called Wave Telecommunications Inc.), a
subsidiary of Bolivar Goldfields Ltd., Canada, carried out exploration of the Echandia and
Chaburquia properties on the northern portion of the Marmato system. Gran Colombia carried
out more than 500 continuous channel samples in La Negra, La Felicia and La Palma adits; soil
surveys; surface magnetic, VLF and radiometric geophysical surveys; and drilled 75 diamond
drill holes from surface and underground for 15,000 m. A scoping study was made by
Geosystems International, Denver, in 1997 which concluded that there was not sufficient grade
continuity for a bulk‐tonnage resource and mining operation, and no further work was carried
out. In 1996, Gran Colombia purchased 48.25% of Mineros Nacionales which it then sold in
1997.
CGL and its subsidiary Minera de Caldas began exploration of Marmato and surrounding areas
in 2005. The objective is to identify a potentially bulk mineable, low grade gold and silver
resource. CGL has carried out property acquisition in the Zona Alta of Marmato, along with
underground sampling, surveying and mapping, preliminary metallurgical test work and


diamond drilling to define a mineral resource. CGL carried out 46,000 m of drilling in 2007‐08.
At the Caramanta Project, CGL has conducted geological mapping, surface geochemistry and
airborne geophysics which have defined five gold‐silver targets.


Table 6.1 Summary of Conquistador’s Significant Diamond Drill Hole Results for the Marmato
Project
Surface Holes drilled from the Zona Alta into the Zona Baja.
Hole Designation Mineralization Intersection (m) Assay Results
From To Core Length Gold (g/t)
MS‐1 276.0 358.0 82.0 2.448
inc. 276.0 332.0 56.0 3.287
Inc 32.0 4.990
Inc 12.0 9.090
Inc 12.0 3.990
Inc 8.0 5.220
MS‐2 324.0 348.0 24.0 4.093
Inc 16.0 5.156
Inc 8.0 6.826
354.0 362.0 8.0 1.795
MS‐3 100.0 110.0 10.0 2.236
250.0 254.0 4.0 5.867
310.0 322.0 12.0 3.320
392.0 412.0 20.0 1.283
424.0 438.0 14.0 1.377
525.0 540.0 15.0 3.120
MS‐4 70.0 82.0 12.0 1.900
152.0 154.0 2.0 3.302
458.0 480.0 22.0 0.460
MS‐5 54.0 88.0 34.0 1.465
MS‐8 391.0 397.0 6.0 1.630
MS‐9 372.0 376.0 4.0 4.985
MS‐15 14.6 30.0 15.4 1.177
92.0 103.3 11.3 1.673
188.0 248.0 60.0 1.143


216.0 238.0 22.0 2.014
346.0 390.0 44.0 0.880
358.0 382.0 24.0 1.251
MS‐17 26.5 44.5 18.0 0.549
68.5 74.5 6.0 3.771
88.5 122.5 34.0 1.989
Inc 112.5 122.5 10.0 4.251
230.5 238.5 8.0 0.994
262.0 284.0 22.0 1.531
MS‐18 13.0 77.0 64.0 20.572
Inc 32.0 57.0 25.0 47.726
Inc 35.5 51.0 15.5 74.469
Inc 35.5 43.0 7.5 129.841
89.0 101.0 12.0 0.514
107.0 115.0 8.0 1.200
133.0 145.0 12.0 1.611
173.0 261.0 88.0 1.284
Inc 187.0 193.0 6.0 3.223
279.0 298.0 19.0 2.223
424.0 434.0 10.0 1.989
445.0 464.0 19.0 1.406
MS‐19 50.0 58.0 8.0 1.659
118.0 124.0 6.0 0.800
170.0 176.0 6.0 1.820
MS‐20 42.0 46.0 4.0 2.591
70.0 80.0 14.0 1.941


MS‐21 18.0 32.0 14.0 3.269
70.0 80.0 10.0 4.961
86.0 90.0 4.0 2.624
MS‐22 227.0 245.0 18.0 1.752
MS‐23 157.0 173.0 16.0 4.095
MS‐24 140.0 154.0 14.0 4.453
MS‐25 54.0 58.0 4.0 1.948
80.0 100.0 20.0 1.116
114.0 122.0 8.0 3.617
234.0 242.0 8.0 1.152
250.0 290.0 40.0 1.306
328.0 356.0 28.0 1.023
360.0 370.0 10.0 1.948
404.0 408.0 4.0 1.561
MS‐26 28.0 50.0 22.0 1.455
66.0 78.0 12.0 1.604
92.0 98.0 6.0 3.397
220.0 272.0 52.0 3.106
Inc 240.0 266.0 26.0 4.467
282.0 286.0 14.0 2.247
354.0 364.0 10.0 1.340
370.0 372.0 2.0 3.078
416.0 420.0 4.0 2.079
MS‐27 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.967
12.0 32.0 20.0 2.111
150.0 166.0 16.0 8.493


230.0 236.0 6.0 1.182
240.0 258.0 18.0 0.978
272.0 286.5 14.5 1.785
MS‐28 58.0 88.0 30.0 1.713
178.0 194.0 16.0 1.042
212.0 226.0 14.0 3.251
232.0 240.0 8.0 0.556
246.0 254.0 8.0 0.714
270.0 292.0 22.0 1.669
296.0 360.0 64.0 1.252
MS‐29 18.0 20.0 2.0 2.743
26.0 40.0 14.0 1.493
76.0 94.0 18.0 0.580
200.0 207.0 7.0 5.102
249.0 255.0 6.0 2.529
275.0 285.0 10.0 0.871
295.0 307.0 12.0 1.808
337.0 345.0 8.0 1.291
351.0 369.0 18.0 0.829
375.0 381.0 6.0 1.024
387.0 435.0 48.0 1.194
445.0 457.0 12.0 0.731
MS‐30 12.0 56.0 14.0 3.296
52.0 68.0 16.0 1.753
Inc 62.0 68.0 6.0 3.428
102.0 114.0 12.0 0.541


124.0 126.0 2.0 10.600
158.0 166.0 8.0 1.723
212.0 244.0 32.0 0.845
Underground Drill Holes Zona Baja
MU‐01 4.5 18.0 13.5 1.509
38.0 42.0 4.0 1.337
78.0 82.0 4.0 0.437
166.0 176.0 10.0 0.754
MU‐02 8.0 20.0 12.0 1.886
58.0 68.0 10.0 1.097
74.0 84.0 10.0 0.651
98.0 104.0 6.0 1.303
152.0 160.0 8.0 1.176
310.0 360.0 8.0 1.166
Inc 312.0 340.0 8.0 1.509
MU‐03 2.0 10.0 8.0 0.857
20.0 30.0 10.0 1.543
80.0 90.0 10.0 4.011
MU‐08 38.0 41.5 3.5 1.395
MU‐09 44.0 51.2 7.2 0.966
MU‐10 34.0 40.0 6.0 0.376
96.0 98.0 2.0 1.048
108.0 110.0 2.0 1.808
132.0 146.0 14.0 2.110
150.0 192.0 42.0 1.301
Inc 172.0 186.0 14.0 2.765


Inc 180.0 186.0 6.0 4.556
210.0 222.0 12.0 4.487
230.0 272.0 42.0 2.076
Inc 256.0 268.0 12.0 3.753
298.0 312.0 14.0 0.816
MU‐11 22.0 26.0 4.0 2.949
137.0 147.0 10.0 1.024
153.0 169.0 16.0 1.348
205.0 209.0 4.0 1.500
MU‐12 26.0 32.0 6.0 2.898
68.0 70.0 2.0 2.699
104.0 106.0 2.0 8.069
130.0 150.0 20.0 0.857
176.0 196.0 20.0 1.848
292.0 299.5 7.5 1.339
MU‐13 2.0 8.0 6.0 1.167
14.0 28.0 14.0 2.714
82.0 96.0 14.0 0.474
102.0 112.0 10.0 1.893
172.0 176.0 4.0 2.949
246.0 256.0 10.0 0.618
266.0 292.0 26.0 0.589
296.0 306.0 10.0 0.446
MU‐14 98.0 108.0 10.0 0.731
124.0 132.0 8.0 1.041
154.0 162.0 8.0 1.285


192.0 208.0 16.0 2.103
22.0 230.0 8.0 1.642
292.0 294.0 2.0 2.250
There are currently about 262 mines and 36 mills and beneficiation plants in the Zona Alta,
which pay an 8% royalty to the government and an additional 12% if they process the ore at the
state plant. The mines are horizontal tunnels usually driven in ore along veins, with some
internal cross‐cuts and mining is conducted by stoping out the veins. Many old stopes
presumably dating from the era of the English companies in the 19th and early 20th centuries
have been encountered and the wall rocks, pillars and stope fill are mined. The beneficiation
plants treat ore from their owner’s mine or work on a custom‐toll basis, or both. There are high
losses and gold recovery is approximately 60%. The waste rock and tailings are dumped down
the mountain sides and into the creeks. Small miners (barequeros) recover gold from the waste
rock and tailings in the creeks by panning and sluicing.
6.2 Historical Resource Estimates
A number of historical resource and reserve estimates are available for various portions of the
Marmato project however, these resource or reserve estimates for the Marmato project
contained in this report should be considered as historical data only and are not compliant with
the current Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) standards and
definitions required by Canadian National Instrument 43‐101 (NI 43‐101) “Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects”.
The Zona Baja was explored by Minera Phelps Dodge between 1984 and 1985 with the
objective of defining a 300 t/d underground operation. It carried out surface and underground
sampling and drilled seven underground core holes, and defined a proven reserve of 102,900 t
grading 7.83 g/t gold and 24 g/t silver, with a total reserve estimate (proven, probable and
possible) of 754,600 t at the same grades.
In 1993, Mineros Nacionales gained control of the Zona Baja and developed a 300 t/d
underground operation. In 1993, Buenaventura Ingenieros S.A. of Peru estimated that the


proven plus probable reserve was 99,787 t at 8.58 g/t gold and the possible reserve was 70,432
t at 6.95 g/t gold.
A mineral resource estimate for inferred resources was made in 1998 for the Marmato project
by MRDI of San Mateo, California and this estimate is contained in a report entitled “Marmato
Gold/Silver Project Scoping Study” which was commissioned by Conquistador. MRDI stated the
“material categorized as “inferred” resource meets the definition put forth in National
Instrument 43‐101 (prepared by Canadian Securities Administrators, dated July 3, 1998)” and
that “some of the inferred resource would meet the criteria for measured and indicated
however this material has not been separately identified”. MRDI’s statement regarding NI 43‐
101 the definitions refers to the the first draft of the proposed NI 43‐101 requirements which
became effective on February 1, 2001.
The MRDI geological model has 30 separate zones of fracture‐controlled gold‐silver
mineralization of 2 to 80 m width defined by surface and underground mapping and using a
grade boundary of 0.3 g/t gold. MRDI defined mineralization over a strike length of 1,500 m on
a northwest trend and a total width of 1,000 m, with a known vertical extent of 660 m.
For the Zona Alta, MRDI estimated an inferred resource of 56 Mt grading 1.06 g/t gold for a
total of 1.9 Moz at a 0.5 g/t gold cutoff grade, and a “mineral potential” of 99 Mt grading 1.07
g/t gold for a total of 3.4 Moz gold. MRDI indicated the total of both these categories was 155
Mt grading 1.07 g/t gold for a total of 5.3 Moz gold.
For the whole deposit, including the Zona Baja, the MRDI inferred resource estimate was 150
Mt grading 1.07 g/t gold for a total of 5.2 Moz gold, plus a “mineral potential” of 200 Mt
grading 1.16 g/t gold for a total of 7.5 Moz gold. MRDI indicated the total of both these
categories was 350 Mt grading 1.13 g/t Au for a total of 12.7 Moz gold.
The inferred resource is based on a block search of 200 m x 35 m x 35 m with the long axis
oriented 300° (also stated elsewhere in the report as 250 m x 50 m x 50 m and it is not clear
which is correct). MRDI states that the estimate conforms to the CIM definition of inferred
resource required by NI 43‐101 regulations and that some of this would meet the criteria for
measured and indicated resources, but that this material had not been separately identified.
Although MRDI acknowledged that “mineral potential” is not a recognized CIM resource
category, it estimated the potential by applying a much larger block search radius of 500 m x
300 m x 300 m, with the same orientation. MRDI stated in its report that “the mineral potential
category was presented to provide an assessment of the potential of the property.”


MRDI calculated resources within the mineralized envelopes, and diluted grades within whole
blocks. This accounts for contact dilution by using the volume‐weighted whole‐block grade for
edge blocks, and also includes material lying outside the mineralized envelopes. At cutoffs
between 0.4 and 0.5 g/t gold, MRDI stated that this adds about 25 to 30% to the tonnage and
reduces the gold grade by 15 to 20%. The average gold grade of the “diluting” material is about
0.21 g/t gold.
Tables 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 duplicate the 1998 MRDI resource estimates (1998, Table 3, Table 4,
Table 5) based on various gold cut‐off grades as found in the MRDI report.
The parameters used by MRDI were as follows:
• A 3‐D wire‐frame model of the mineralized shells was used to constrain the resources
based on the geological interpretation by Conquistador.
• 30 zones of fracture‐controlled mineralization were defined by Conquistador with
widths from 2 m to 80 m, using a grade‐boundary of 0.3 g/t gold.
• Two types of envelopes were used based on strike directions of 307.5° (A type) and
287.5° (B‐type).
• Samples were composited to 6 m.
• Specific gravity was determined on 90 samples, comprised of drill core, surface samples
and underground samples, using the Jolly Balance method. The specific gravity (SG) is
2.62 to 2.78 for propylitically altered granodiorite, and from 2.69 to 3.00 for sericitized
granodiorite. It is not stated what SGs were used for the resource calculation.
• Grades were estimated using ordinary block kriging.
• Block dimensions were 15 m x 6 m x 6 m.

MRDI conducted a mining scoping study using a base case resource of 233.7 Mt at 1.10 g/t gold
and 5.54 g/t silver (8.2 Moz gold) for the whole deposit including 161.2 Mt at 1.00 g/t gold and
5.79 g/t silver ( 5.1 Moz gold) for the Zona Alta. The base case had a waste to ore ratio of 1.3:1
and was calculated by pit optimization to maximize the net present value (NPV) and internal
rate of return (IRR) at a 6% discount rate. At a production rate of 30,000 t/d, the annual
production would total 10.8 Mt/y over a 22 year mine life and produce 352,000 oz of gold and
929,000 oz of silver per year. With an initial capital cost of US $283 million, metal prices of US
$300 per ounce gold and US $5.50 per ounce silver, recoveries of 92.6% for gold and 49.3% for
silver using a milling and agitation leaching process, the base case gave an internal rate of
return (IRR) of 10.3% before taxes, cumulative pre‐tax cash flow of US $659 million, and


payback in 9.6 years with direct operating costs of US $169 per ounce of gold. The project
economics were considerably improved by increasing production to 60,000 t/d, steepening pit
slopes from 45° to 50° and using US $325 per ounce gold, to give 21.6% IRR, US $960 million
NPV and a 3.9 year payback.
Micon reviewed the 1998 MRDI resource estimate for the Marmato project for CGL and
concluded that the estimate appears to have been conducted using the appropriate CIM
standards applied to the industry at the time (Lewis, 2006). However, because the original
Conquistador database and the MRDI report appendices were unable to be reviewed and
verified, the 1998 resource estimate is quoted here as a historical resource and is included in
this report for information purposes only as indication of the potential size of the project.
The historical MRDI resource estimate was superseded by the preliminary mineral resource
estimate conducted by Micon in May 2008 based on the underground sampling program and
surface drilling program conducted by CGL (Lewis & San Martin, 2008).
There are no known published resource estimates for any of the other portions of the Marmato
or Caramanta projects.


Table 6.2 1998 MRDI Table 4, Total Resource Estimate in Whole Blocks including Contact Dilution
Gold Grade Inferred Resources Mineral Potential Total
Cut‐off Tonnage Gold Silver Gold Silver Tonnage Gold Silver Tonnage Gold Silver Gold Silver
(g/t) (Mt) (g/t) (g/t) ounces Ounces (Mt) (g/t) (g/t) (Mt) (g/t) (g/t) ounces Ounces
0.25 252 0.79 4.12 6,400,669 33,380,703 452 0.72 3.61 704 0.74 3.79 16,749,510 85,784,651
0.30 226 0.85 4.31 6,176,253 31,317,236 378 0.80 3.88 604 0.82 4.04 15,923,866 78,454,168
0.40 185 0.96 4.66 5,710,060 27,717,584 289 0.94 4.21 474 0.95 4.39 14,477,703 66,902,228
0.50 150 1.07 5.01 5,160,274 24,161,656 200 1.16 4.79 350 1.13 4.88 12,715,815 54,914,317
0.75 93 1.35 5.65 4,036,588 16,893,869 129 1.48 5.45 222 1.43 5.53 10,206,732 39,470,791
1.00 57 1.66 6.13 3,042,150 11,233,965 90 1.74 5.70 147 1.71 5.86 8,081,857 27,695,721
1.25 36 1.98 6.32 2,291,740 7,315,050 64 2.00 5.82 100 1.99 6.00 6,398,097 19,290,744


Table 6.3 1998 MRDI Table 5, Zona Alta (above 1298 m) Resource Estimate in Whole Blocks including Contact Dilution
0.25 83 0.83 5.82 2,214,899 15,530,978 212 0.7 4.12 295 0.74 4.60 6,992,306 43,604,668
0.30 77 0.88 5.98 2,178,568 14,804,360 190 0.75 4.27 266 0.79 4.76 6,737,979 40,753,215
0.40 66 0.96 6.27 2,037,103 13,304,826 148 0.87 4.53 214 0.89 5.07 6,156,597 34,908,043
0.50 56 1.06 6.57 1,908,498 11,829,084 99 1.07 5.14 155 1.07 5.65 5,303,440 28,102,765
0.75 35 1.32 7.29 1,485,387 8,203,389 59 1.41 6.05 93 1.37 6.51 4,118,470 19,527,488
1.00 20 1.64 7.87 1,054,561 5,060,605 39 1.69 6.26 59 1.67 6.81 3,158,912 12,877,623
1.25 12 2.01 8.20 775,488 3,163,682 26 1.97 6.25 38 1.98 6.87 2,410,179 8,366,172


Table 6.4 1998 MRDI Table 6, Zona Baja (below 1298 m) Resource Estimate in Whole Blocks including Contact Dilution
0.25 169 0.76 3.28 4,129,505 7,822,075 240 0.73 3.16 409 0.74 3.21 9,762,863 42,152,443
0.30 149 0.83 3.45 3,976,144 16,527,345 189 0.85 3.49 338 0.84 3.47 9,147,113 37,729,125
0.40 118 0.96 3.77 3,642,092 14,302,800 141 1.03 3.87 260 0.99 3.82 8,290,963 31,928,138
0.50 95 1.08 4.09 3,298,717 12,492,364 101 1.25 4.45 196 1.17 4.27 7,357,639 26,864,815
0.75 58 1.38 4.67 2,573,385 8,708,485 70 1.54 4.95 129 1.46 4.82 6,049,363 19,952,141
1.00 37 1.68 5.17 1,998,521 6,150,211 51 1.79 5.28 88 1.74 5.23 4,920,010 14,799,640
1.25 24 1.97 5.38 1,520,111 4,151,368 38 2.03 5.53 62 2.00 5.47 3,979,726 10,870,235


6.3 PRODUCTION
CGL has conducted a fairly extensive research program to uncover any historical production
data which may have survived in the various archives in Colombia, Spain and England. The
results of CGL research are discussed below.
6.3.1 Results of Colombia Goldfields Research
Production has occurred from the Marmato property since pre‐colonial times but there are no
published historical records of the actual gold and silver production. CGF has undertaken
historical research in archives in Bogotá, Medellín, Calí, Popayán and Cartagena in Colombia
(Cediel, 2007). The most useful archives were the Archivo General de la Nacion in Bogotá
(National General Archive), the Biblioteca Luís Ángel Arango (BLAA, Luís Ángel Arango Library)
of the Banco de la República in Bogotá, and the Archivo Histórico de Antioquia in Medellín
(Antioquia Historical Archive). The BLAA has additional records about Marmato in a closed
archive which CGF was not able to access, and are believed to deal with old lawsuits. Additional
early production records from the Spanish colonial period may exist in the Archive of the Indies
(Archivo de Indies) in Seville, Spain, but no reply was received to CGF’s enquiries. Records of
some of the English companies were found in the National Archive of the United Kingdom in
London, and in historical mining journals in the library of The Institute of Materials, Minerals &
Mining (IOM3) in London (Redwood, 2009).
Gold production data was obtained for six incomplete periods: 1778‐1823; 1832‐1836; 1909‐
1914; 1931‐1935; 1941‐1944; and 1967 to 1998. However, there are large gaps in the data due
to missing records, and it should be noted that these figures are for recovered gold and that
losses were very high. Gold recovery in the modern small mines is approximately 60%, and gold
recoveries were probably much lower in earlier times. In addition these figures are only for gold
that was declared for royalties and taxation, and do not take into account contraband gold
mined, milled, smelted and sold illegally. Contraband gold production is a well recorded
historical issue which occurred not only during the colonial period but continues into present
times with the presence of illegal miners at Marmato. The data does include some older
production from Echandia and the Zona Baja which are continuation of the Marmato deposit
but are now on separate mining licenses, but does not include post‐1925 Echandia production
or Mineros Nacionales.


Figure 6.2 Gold production chart for Marmato (excludes Echandia and Zona Baja post‐1925)
14,000
12,000
GOLD PRODUCTION OUNCES
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
‐
1778
1786
1794
1802
1810
1818
1826
1833
1841
1849
1857
1865
1873
1881
1889
1897
1905
1912
1920
1928
1935
1942
1950
1958
1966
1974
1982
1990
1998
YEAR

Gold production is recorded for 11 out of 46 years in the period 1778 to 1823 and totalled
25,420 ounces, with an average production of 2,982 ounces per. Production for 1832 to 1836
was 30,310 ounces of gold from 39,100 tons of ore, giving an average grade of 27 g/t, and
average annual production of 6,062 ounces. Production for 1909 to 1914 (4 years data) was
22,453 ounces of gold with an annual average of 5,613 ounces. Production for 1931 to 1935
was 16,759 ounces of gold and 10,067 ounces of silver, with an average of 4,152 ounces of gold
per year. Production for 1941 to 1944 (3 years’ data) was 31,600 ounces of gold an 20,860
ounces of silver, with an average of 10,533 ounces gold per year, which seems rather high.
Production for 1967 to 1998 was 79,291 ounces of gold with an average of 2,900 ounces per
year. The average recovered gold grade in the period 1969 to 1993 is 8.5 g/t (for years with
complete data), with a range between 12.6 g/t and 2.5 g/t per year, showing a decreasing trend
in more recent years. The tonnage mined in this period was 246,000 tonnes at an average of
10,500 tonnes per year (years with complete data). No data has been found yet for production
from 1999 to present.


The total production recorded is 205,834 ounces in 56 years out of a period of 231 years (data
for 24% of years) from 1778 to 2008, with an average of 3,954 ounces per year (based on 50
years with complete data). The data show that gold production was fairly constant for more
than two centuries with similar ranges of production and averages per year for each period. The
annual gold production varies from 1,206 to 12,000 ounces.
An estimate of total production for the period 1778 to 2008 can be made using the average
annual production figure of 3,954 ounces per year, and justified by the continuous mining over
this period of time. This gives an estimated total of recovered gold of about 900,000 ounces. In
addition there is contraband gold, and a time period of 253 years from the founding of
Marmato in 1525 to 1778 for which there is no production data, plus two millennia of pre‐
Colombian gold mining. An educated estimate of 0.5 million ounces is made for this period,
giving an estimated total gold production of about 1.4 million ounces at Marmato. The total
amount of gold actually mined (i.e. contained gold), based on a 60% recovery factor, is thus
approximately 2.3 million ounces. This does not include gold mined at Echandia and Zona Baja
after 1925.


Table 6.5 Gold Production1 at Marmato from 1778 to 1823
Year Gold (Troy Ounces) Notes
1778 1,240.57
1780 1,761.40
1809 3,273.42
1810 3,135.22
1814 413.66 Limited data
1815 5,098.07
1816 2,677.80
1817 4,581.19
1818 59.16 Very limited data
1820 2,089.13
1823 1,090.71 Incomplete
Total 25,420.33
Average 2,982.10 Complete years only
Gold production registered for tax payments at smelters and casas de monedas (Cediel, 2007).


Table 6.6 Gold Production at Marmato from 1832 to 1836
Year Ore (tons) Gold (ounces)
1832 3,400 3,162
1833 3,500 3,173
1834 8,200 6,494
1835 10,900 9,498
1836 13,100 7,983
Total 39,100 30,310
Average 7,820 6,062
Source: Gartner, 2005, p. 185, quoting Leah, 1869, p. 130 (Redwood, 2009)
Table 6.7 Gold production at Marmato from 1909 to 1914
Year Gold (ounce)
1909 2,941
1910 4,328
1911 6,421
1914 8,763
Total 22,453
Average 5,613
Source: Mining Manual & Year Book, The Mining Journal, London (Redwood, 2009)


Year Gold (Troy Ounces) Silver (Troy Ounces) Notes
1931 148.77 87.29 2 months data
1932 3,439.01 1,810.47
1933 4,214.31 2,223.19
1934 5,540.98 3,735.18
1935 3,415.97 2,211.26
Total 16,759.05 10,067.40
Average 4,152.57 2,495.03 Complete years only
SourceGold and silver content of dore bars purchased by the Casa de Moneda de Medellin and produced from the Marmato
mines during the contract with Dr. Roberto Luis Restrepo; source: archive of the Banco de la República, Bogotá
(Cediel, 2007).
Table 6.9 Gold production at Marmato from 1941 to 1944
Year Gold (ounces) Silver (ounces)
1941 9,800 10,430
1942 9,800 10,430
1943
1944 12,000
Total 31,600.00 20,860.00
Average 10,533.33 6,953.33
Source: Singewald, 1950 (in Redwood, 2009)
Year Ore (t) Recovered Gold (oz) Gold Grade (g/t) Notes
1967 2,292.73 Hall et al, 1970.
1968 No data
1969 11,432.76 4,350.69 11.84
1970 9,298.93 3,767.31 12.60
1971 9,330.61 2,056.37 6.85


1972 9,423.90 1,860.91 6.14
1973 9,357.18 1,801.03 5.99
1974 9,745.82 1,414.16 4.51
1975 9,493.42 1,206.13 3.95
1976 9,178.04 1,365.22 4.63
1977 10,052.42 1,899.28 5.88
1978 10,458.42 1,819.72 5.00
1979 8,621.97 1,783.01 6.80
1980 7,837.64 1,561.54 4.19
1981 8,007.87 2,390.21 7.62
1982 11,041.84 2,570.52 6.22
1983 10,999.34 2,897.90 6.40
1984 12,966.34 3,402.29 5.57
1985 12,380.88 2,379.35 3.13
1986 10,521.37 4,720.84 Incomplete
1987 ‐ No data
1988 10,400.90 4,232.10 3.00
1989 5,202.70 1,722.14 Incomplete
1990 5,689.06
1991 13,974.60 5,267.42 2.46
1992 11,410.00 5,974.26 3.32
1993 13,706.20 5,561.52 3.37
1994 11,192.10 3,528.00
1995 ‐ No data
1996 ‐ No data


1997 1,508.59
1998 269.58
Total 246,035.25 79,291.87
Average 10,468.69 3,092.01 5.42 Complete years
Sources: 1967 is from Hall et al., 1970. The period 1969 to 1978 is gold production from the national mines, based on royalties paid at the
Banco de la Republica. There is no data for private mines and mills. Source: production statistics of the Banco de la Republica. The period 1978
to 1998 is gold produced from both the national and private mines based on royalties paid to the state companies. Source: production statistics
of Empresa Colombiana de Minas (ECOMINAS) (1978‐1990) and La Empresa Minerales de Colombia S.A. (MINERALCO) (1991‐98). Data compiled
by Redwood (2009)
6.3.2 Mineros Nacionales
In 1993, Mineros Nacionales S.A. (Mineros Nacionales) started mining the Zona Baja with a 300
t/d underground mine. The following year Mineros de Antioquia S.A. (renamed Mineros S.A. in
2004) acquired 51.75% of Mineros Nacionales (94.5% by 2005) and upgraded the mine and mill.
The mill throughput was expanded gradually to 800 t/d. Production in 2008 was 24,138 oz of
gold and 36,690 oz of silver, with the recovered grades of 2.95 g/t gold and 4.48 g/t silver.


Table 6.11 Gold and Silver Production from the Zona Baja, Marmato from 2002 to 2008 by
Mineros Nacionales S.A.
Year Ore (t) Gold Silver
(ounces) Grade (g/t) (ounces) Grade (g/t)
2002 20,721 34,308
2003
2004 186,330 21,583 3.60 41,504 6.93
2005 231,540 24,541 3.30 39,669 5.33
2006 262,517 26,171 3.10 39,192 4.64
2007 300,756 31,127 3.22 145,115 15.00
2008 254,474 24,138 2.95 36,691 4.48
Totals 1,235,617 148,280 3.21 336,478 7.61

Source: Mineros S.A. Annual Financial Reports, available at www.mineros.com.co. The 2002 data is from Minercol, 2002 and includes some
Zona Alta production. No data was found for 2003, nor for 1993 to 2001. The recovered gold grades were calculated from the published tonnes
and kg. Data compiled by CGL.


Figure 6.3 A View of the Mineros Nacionales Mill

6.3.3 Marmato Zona Alta
Prior to CGL’s involvement in the Marmato project in 2005, there were about 262 mines and 36
mills and beneficiation plants in the Zona Alta. CGL started to close down mines and mills in
2007 when the final purchase payment was made and they were registered in the company’s
name. The mines pay a 4% royalty to the government and an additional COP 1,225
(approximately US $0.66) per tonne of ore processed at the state plant. The mines are
primarily horizontal tunnels usually driven along the veins in ore, with some internal cross‐cuts.
Mining is conducted using a stoping method and many old stopes, presumably dating from the
era of the English companies in the 19th and early 20th centuries, have been encountered with
subsequent mining of the wall rocks, pillars and stope fill. Drilling is conducted by using hand
drills or, in the bigger mines, with compressed air. Underground haulage uses hand‐pushed
wooden mine cars on wooden rails. On surface the ore is transported in steel buckets on
gravity‐driven cableways which criss‐cross the mountain side along with power, water and
compressed air lines. These cableways deliver ore directly to the mills or to ore bins on the
road which are then emptied into trucks for delivery to the mills. The beneficiation plants treat
ore from their owner’s mine or work on a custom‐toll basis, or both.


One of the largest plants is owned by the Unidad Delegación Minera de Caldas however it is
reported that the revenues do not cover the processing costs so the state is effectively
subsidizing the mill. Ore is generally crushed by jaw crusher and ground by using ball mills
however stamp mills are still in use at two plants. Once crushed and ground down, the ore is
processed on Wilfley tables to recover any free gold, which is then cleaned using wooden gold
pans. The sulfide tailings are then leached with cyanide in concrete tanks for 40 days and gold
is recovered by precipitation with zinc powder (Merrill Crowe process) and then smelted.
About 80% of gold is recovered by gravity and 20% by leaching; however, there are high losses
and overall gold recovery is approximately 60%. The waste rock and tailings are dumped down
the mountain sides and into the creeks where small miners recover gold from the waste rock,
tailings and landslides using sluices and panning. See Figure 6.3 for a photograph of some of
the mining activity in the Zona Alta at Marmato along with a view of one of the mills located
below the road.


Figure 6.4Mining Activity in the Zona Alta at Marmato


7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Marmato and Caramanta properties are located on the eastern side of the Western
Cordillera of the Colombian Andes which is separated from the Central Cordillera to the east by
the River Cauca. The Marmato and Caramanta projects lie within the Romeral terrane, an
oceanic terrane comprising metamorphosed mafic to ultramafic complexes, ophiolite
sequences and oceanic sediments of probable Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous age (Cediel &
Cáceres, 2000; Cediel et al., 2003). This terrane was accreted to the continental margin along
the Romeral Fault, which lies east of the River Cauca, in the Aptian (125 to 110 Ma). Movement
on the Romeral Fault was dextral indicating that terrane accretion was highly oblique from the
southwest. These rocks form the country rock to the Marmato porphyry stock and include
metabasalts, amphibolites, serpentinites, graphitic schist, biotite schist, sericite schist and
chlorite schist that are called the Arquía Complex (Calle et al., 1984; Durán et al., 2005). The
Romeral fault zone is marked by dismembered ophiolitic rocks, including glaucophane schist, in
a tectonic mélange and is interpreted as a terrane suture marking an old subduction zone. The
Romeral terrane is bounded on the west side by the Cauca Fault. Further west, additional
oceanic and island arc terranes were subsequently accreted to the Western Cordillera in the
Paleogene and Neogene periods, culminating in the on‐going collision of the Choco (or Panamá)
arc since the late Miocene. This reactivated the Cauca and Romeral faults with left lateral and
reverse movements (Cediel & Cáceres, 2000; Cediel et al., 2003).
The Central Cordillera is formed of continental crust of Proterozoic and Paleozoic‐age
comprising metasediments, amphibolites and gneisses.
The Romeral terrane is partially covered by continental sediments of the Oligocene to Lower
Miocene age Amagá Formation, comprising gray to green colored conglomerates, sandstones,
shales and coal seams (Durán et al., 2005). This is overlain by thick volcanic and sedimentary
rocks of the Late Miocene Combia Formation, divided into a Lower Member of basalt and
andesite lava flows, agglomerates and tuffs, and an Upper Member of conglomerates,
sandstones and tuffs (Durán et al., 2005). The entire rock sequence is intruded by porphyry
stocks. Gold mineralization at Marmato is related to the emplacement of the porphyry stocks.
The Marmato porphyry stock is 18 km long by 3 to 6 km wide and is elongated north‐south
(Calle et al., 1984; Figure 4). There are numerous other porphyry stocks in the district. The
Marmato porphyry intrudes the Arquía Complex metamorphic rocks, the Amagá Formation
sedimentary rocks in the Cauca Valley, and the Combia Formation volcanic rocks which outcrop


on the west side for a total width of 25 km as far as the Mistrato Fault, which is a segment of
the Cauca Fault.
The ages of intrusion, alteration and, by inference, mineralization are Late Miocene. The
Marmato stock has been dated at 6.3 ± 0.7 Ma by potassium‐argon (K‐Ar) for dacite porphyry
(probably P1, defined below, Sillitoe et al., 1982), 7.1 ± 0.2 Ma by K‐Ar for porphyritic andesite
(probably P4, Rossetti & Colombo, 1999), 6.7 ± 0.06 Ma by argon‐argon (Ar‐Ar) on biotite from
andesite porphyry (probably P4, Vinasco, 2001), and 5.6 ± 0.6 Ma for sericitized plagioclase in
dacite (probably P1) from the Lower Zone by K‐Ar dating (Pinzón & Tassinari, 2003, Tassinari et
al., 2008). The latter date is interpreted as the time of ore deposition and is slightly younger
than the intrusion ages.
Tassinari et al. (2008) gave the following summary of the geological and metallogenic evolution
of the Marmato district, based on recent dating and isotope studies (Figure 7.1):
• 12 Ma: Collision of the Panamá‐Chocó Arc against the South American Continent with
reactivation of the Cauca‐Romeral Shear Zone (CRSZ) and development of pull‐apart
basins.
• 11 Ma: Calc‐alkaline and tholeiitic magmatism (Combia Formation), related to pull‐apart
basins.
• 6.3 Ma: Intrusion of Marmato stock associated with Combia Formation magmatism and
the start of hydrothermal alteration related to the CRSZ reactivation and fracturing of
the Marmato stock.
• 5.6 Ma: Reactivation of CRSZ, last magmatic activities of Marmato stock, and main
mineralization episode.
• 5.0 Ma: End of Combia Formation magmatic activity.


Figure 7.1 Regional Map of the Geology of the Marmato Project (CGL)


7.2 PROJECT GEOLOGY
Mineralization at Marmato is hosted by intrusions of dacite porphyry and andesite porphyry.
The regional geological map shows the undifferentiated Marmato porphyry intrusion to be
18 km long and 3 to 6 km wide with a north‐south elongation (Calle et al., 1984). At Marmato
the intrusion is 4.6 to 5.8 km wide and extends east to the Cauca River, where it is in contact
with schist. A roof pendant of sediments of the Amagá Formation occurs east of Marmato and
forms the flatter terrain at the town of El Llano (Calle et al., 1984; Durán et al., 2005).
CGL has carried out geological mapping of the Zona Alta. Geological modeling of the Zona Alta
from drill core and underground mapping was made using cross‐sections oriented northeast‐
southwest at 50 m spacing perpendicular to the strike of the veins, and on level plans at 10 m
intervals from 1,290 m to 1,680 m. In general the vertical limit of drilling in the Phase 1
program was the base of the Zona Alta at 1,207 to 1,298 m. The Zona Alta is covered by section
numbers 3000NW to 4700NW numbered from southeast to northwest. The surveyed mine
workings in the Zona Alta occur between Sections 3100NW and 3800NW with the mountain
Cerro El Burro located on Section 3780NW.
Five porphyries have been identified at Marmato by distinctive textures and cross‐cutting
relationships in drill core and geological mapping, but the full extent of individual intrusions has
not been fully delimited as they extend beyond the limits of the area explored to date in the
Zona Alta and Echandia, where they are shown as undifferentiated porphyry. The two main
intrusions are dacite P1 and andesite P4, while P2, P3 and P5 form dikes. The main host rock to
mineralization is a dacite porphyry stock (P1). There is a NE‐trending intrusive contact with
andesite porphyry P4 stock on the NW side, but the extent on the south and east sides has not
yet been mapped as it extends beyond the studied area, and is shown as undifferentiated
porphyry. An older map by Minera Phelps Dodge (1985, in Hill, 1988) shows that most of this is
dacite porphyry, presumably P1, which extends to El Llano and is in contact with andesite P4
and metamorphic rocks on the west side of the River Cauca, and that the P1 dacite is thus at
least 1,600 to 2,500 m wide (E‐W) by more than 3,000 m long (N‐S). P1 extends north through
the Echandia license where there are is a large schist roof pendant and it is cut by broad dikes
and sills of andesite P4. In the northern part of Echandia license, P1 is contact with andesite P4
to the south and schist to the west. P1 has crowded phenocryts of coarse bipyramidal quartz (5
mm diameter) plus plagioclase, biotite and hornblende.
The dacite P1 is cross cut by dacite porphyry P2 which has less abundant phenocrysts
comprising small, elongate quartz, plagioclase, large euhedral biotite and hornblende. P2 has


not been mapped in outcrop but is observed to cross cut P1 in core in Cien Pesos and parts of
Echandia, and appears to have the form of small stocks.
Dikes of a plagioclase‐megacryst andesite porphyry (P3), with NW (135°) and E‐W (105°) trends
and up to 400 m long, cross‐cut P1 dacite in Cascabel Creek, and other occurrences in Echandia.
P3 has megacrysts of plagioclase up to 15 mm, with small phenocrysts of plagioclase, biotite,
hornblende and minor quartz and magnetite.
An andesite porphyry (P4) forms a stock on the NW side on Cerro Los Novios in the Zona Alta
and extends NE through Echandia. This has abundant phenocrysts of coarse plagioclase with
biotite, hornblende, magnetite and minor small quartz. The stock is elongated NE and is at least
1,600 m long by 750 m wide. It has an intrusive contact with dacite P1 on the SE side and
numerous dikes of P4 with a NW (120°) to E‐W (100°) trend, and up to 550 m long, extend into
the dacite P1 dacite stock. On the NW side andesite P4 is in contact with Arquia Complex schists
and Amagá Formation sediments. The NE part of the stock narrows in Echandia and forms wide
dikes and sills. The Minera Phelps Dodge map (Hill, 1988) shows that andesite (interpreted as
P4) also forms a stock around El Llano, with a large roof pendant of Amagá Formation
sediments.
Dacite P5 forms dikes cross cutting dacite P1 in Cascabel Creek and is only known from a few
drill cores. It has both coarse and smaller euhedral quartz phenocrysts, with large elongated
plagioclase phenocrysts, biotite and hornblende.
Graphite and sericite‐chlorite schist of the Arquia Complex form roof pendants up to at least
820 m long, 300 m wide and 100 m thick, and large xenoliths (up to 20 m) in the porphyries.
The schists form a NE‐trending line of a roof pendants in dacite P1 near to the andesite P4
contact, and a large roof pendant or block of country rock at the NW contact of P4 at the NW
limit of the Zona Alta. There is also a NE‐trending line of roof pendants (or country rock
remnants) of Amagá Formation sediments (up to 250 m by 100 m in size) in P4, parallel to the
NW contact.
Hydrothermal phreatic breccias occur in the P1‐P2 stocks and are often structurally controlled
along P3 dike margins and schist contacts. The breccias are narrow (up to about 10 meters true
width) with clasts of altered porphyry, schists or sediment in a matrix of ground rock which is
commonly black, derived from graphite schist, or gray colored from porphyry.
Mineralization is controlled by a sheeted vein system of steeply dipping sulfide veins and
veinlets with a dominant northwest trend (130 to 140°) and steep dip to northeast, and a


secondary east‐west trend (090 to 105°). Minor NE‐trending veins and flat lying veinlets also
occur. In places the veinlets can become concentrated and form a veinlet stockwork. The width
of individual veins and veinlets varies from less than (<)1 mm to 2.0 m with the wider veins
mined in the numerous small mines, which are accessed by horizontal adits located throughout
the Marmato project area.
The dominant northwest and east‐west trends of the veins are interpreted to be due to
regional tectonic forces and may have formed as tension fractures related to northwest‐
southeast compression and sinistral strike‐slip movement on the north‐south trending Cauca
and Romeral Faults which lie on either side of the deposit.
Two stages of pervasive alteration have been recognized: early propylitic and later intermediate
argillic. These affect all types of porphyry, although alteration is weak in P5. The propylitic
alteration is characterized by epidote replacement of plagioclase cores, albite replacement of
plagioclase rims and matrix, chlorite replacement of mafics, with disseminated pyrite and
pyrrhotite, and varies in intensity from veinlet‐halo to pervasive. Calcite partially replaces
plagioclase where propylitic alteration is weakly developed. Cross‐cutting relationships show
evidence for multiple events of propylitic alteration related to each phase of intrusion.
Intermediate argillic alteration overprints the propylitic alteration and varies in intensity from
vein‐/veinlet‐halo to pervasive. It replaces epidote, chlorite and albite. There is a strong but
generally narrow halo of white to green illite or sericite alteration related to veins and veinlets
which grades outwards to pervasive illite, with smectite in distal parts. The main disseminated
sulfide is pyrite, although pyrrhotite and iron‐rich sphalerite also occur.
Post‐mineral faulting is observed on the margins of some veins and veinlets with alteration to
soft, white clay gouge with ground pyrite (logged as fault gouge, FLG). In some places there is
later, coarse euhedral pyrite in the clay gouge. Brittle fault breccias with no clay gouge are also
observed (BXF).
Supergene white clay (intermediate argillic) alteration occurs in the superficial parts of the
deposit as a result of the weathering of propylitic alteration.
Unconsolidated Quaternary sedimentary deposits have been modelled from drill data. These
comprise rock scree and landslides, and coarse alluvial gravel in creeks which include waste
rock from artisanal mining. Landslides and alluvial flows are a geological hazard, especially on
the steep southeast face of Cerro El Burro above the town of Marmato. There is saprolitic
weathering and little rock exposure on the higher ground to the north west of Cerro El Burro.


Figure 7.2 gives a summary of the interpreted geological evolution of the Marmato deposit and
is described as follows:
1. P1 dacite porphyry stock intrusion into schists.
2. P2 dacite porphyry.
3. Propylitic alteration and sulfide veinlets with low grade Au‐Ag.
4. P3 plagioclase‐megacryst andesite porphyry dikes.
5. P4 andesite porphyry stock and dikes.
6. Propylitic alteration and sulfide veinlets with low grade Au‐Ag.
7. Phreatic breccias.
8. Late stage illite alteration and main Stage 2 sulfide veins and veinlets and Au‐Ag
mineralization.
9. Late‐mineral dacite porphyry P5 dikes Post‐mineral faulting (clay gouge and ground
sulfides).
10. Supergene oxidation and intermediate argillic alteration.

Figure 7.2 Summary of the Geological Evolution of the Marmato Deposit.


Figure 7.3 Map of the District Geology of the Marmato and Caramanta Properties (CGL)


Figure 7.4 Map of the Local Geology for the Marmato Property


The alteration and mineralization at Marmato evolved through early stage, higher‐temperature
propylitic alteration to later, lower‐temperature intermediate argillic alteration, with most of
the gold and silver being deposited in higher‐temperature structural zones during the later
stage.
The gold‐silver and base metal association at Marmato is typical of the intermediate sulfidation
epithermal type. The veins lack typical epithermal textures and the mineralization has a
relatively high depth and temperature of formation, and straddles the deep epithermal to
mesothermal transition as defined by a temperature of 300°C (Heald et al., 1987). The Marmato
deposit lacks shallow epithermal features such as lithocaps, sinters and crustiform banded
veins.
The mineralization is interpreted to be genetically related to the host porphyries. However the
veins and veinlets are structurally controlled and do not form a multi‐directional porphyry
stockwork or breccia. The host stocks might be considered as late‐mineral intrusions with
respect to the porphyries that host the nearby Oro Fino or possibly other, undiscovered,
porphyry gold‐copper‐molybdenum centers.
The dacite and andesite porphyry intrusions are Late Miocene age and are subduction‐related
and of calc‐alkaline affinity, derived from partial melting of subducted oceanic basalt and
metamorphic basement rocks in the crust, typical of epithermal and porphyry systems
worldwide (Pinzón & Tassinari, 2003; Tassiniari et al., 2008). Magma generation and
mineralization was related to the subduction of the oceanic Nazca Plate beneath the
continental South American Plate.
Fluid inclusion studies from the Lower Zone (Bedoya, 1998) and Echandia (Rossetti & Colombo,
1999) show that mineralization formed from fluids with a range of temperature of 250 to 350°C
and salinity from 1.6 to 10.3 wt% eq NaCl. The Echandia fluids have lower temperature and
salinity than those of the Zona Baja. Mineralization was caused by fluid cooling and mixing
between a higher temperatures, moderately saline fluid of probable magmatic‐hydrothermal
origin, with a lower temperature, less saline fluid of probable meteoric origin.
The Marmato deposit differs from other epithermal deposits in the predominance of pyrite in
the veinlets and low percentage of gangue. Marmato is very similar to the Kori Kollo gold
deposit located 165 km southeast of La Paz, Bolivia where Newmont Mining Corporation
(Newmont: previously Battle Mountain Gold) produced over 5 Moz of gold between 1983 and
2003. The oxide reserve was 10 Mt grading 1.62 g/t gold and 23.61 g/t silver and the sulfide
reserve was 64 Mt at 2.26 g/t gold and 13.8 g/t silver for a total resource of 5.2 Moz gold and


29 Moz silver (Redwood 1987, 1993). The deposit was mined by open pit and the sulfides
milled and treated in a carbon in leach (CIL) plant. The main similarities with Marmato are the
association of gold and silver with sheeted veins of polymetallic massive sulfides (dominantly
pyrite) in a phyllic altered granodiorite (dacite) porphyry stock, late‐stage sulphosalts, and non‐
refractory gold. The Kori Kollo deposit was formed by a swarm of parallel pyrite veinlets
trending 020° and dipping 75º to 85° northwest. The veins ranged from fracture coatings to
tens of cm wide and were up to 60 m long and deep. The orebody was 800 m long, 200 m wide
and at least 350 m deep (Long et al., 1992).


8 DEPOSIT TYPES
CGL is targeting a bulk tonnage, low grade gold and silver deposit on the Marmato project that
is potentially amenable to open pit mining with recovery of precious metals by milling and
cyanide leaching or by heap leaching. Most of the mineralization is in sulfides and preliminary
metallurgical test work shows a high percentage recovery of gold and silver by milled cyanide
bottle roll tests. Some oxide gold‐silver mineralization also occurs in the weathering zone
above the sulfides but it is expected that oxides will make up only a small part of the resource
due to the shallow thickness of the oxide zone. Thicker oxide zones may be encountered in
highly fractured areas with deeper weathering, but no such zones have been found to date.
The wider veins in these deposits have been mined by small underground mines and artisanal
miners, but this is not CGLs’ target.
The known mineralization at the Marmato project is of the deep level, epithermal to
mesothermal intermediate sulphidation gold type. This type of mineralization is considered to
be porphyry related. Porphyry gold‐copper‐molybdenum mineralization has been found in the
surrounding project area, as well as other Marmato‐style epithermal gold targets. The
mineralization straddles the epithermal to mesothermal transition as defined by a temperature
of 300°C (Heald et al., 1987) and by the original classification (Lindgren, 1922). CGL will
primarily target the bulk tonnage potential of the Marmato and Caramanta projects; however,
if other targets are discovered CGL will review the potential of these targets as well.
Epithermal gold and silver deposits of both vein‐style and bulk‐tonnage style are grouped into
high sulphidation (HS), intermediate sulphidation (IS) and low sulphidation (LS) types based on
the sulphidation states of their hypogene sulfide assemblages (Hedenquist et al., 2004). The
sulphidation state describes the sulphur activity (logfS2). The terms HS and LS were introduced
in the 1980s, and the term IS was more recently defined. HS deposits are also called “acid
sulphate”, LS deposits “adularia‐sericite” and IS deposits were very often previously included
with LS deposits, and sometimes called a “high sulfide plus high base metal” or “quartz‐sulfide‐
gold+/‐copper” subtypes. HS deposits contain sulfide‐rich assemblages of high sulphidation
state, typically pyrite with enargite, luzonite, famatinite, and covellite, hosted by leached silicic
rock with a halo of advanced argillic minerals. In contrast, LS deposits contain the low‐
sulphidation pair pyrite‐arsenopyrite, and only minor quantities of sulfides which occur in
banded veins of quartz, chalcedony and adularia plus subordinate calcite. Very minor amounts
of copper (usually less than 100 ppm to 200 ppm) are present as chalcopyrite or, less
commonly, tetrahedrite‐tennantite. Pyrrhotite is present in trace amounts in only some LS
deposits. As the name implies, IS deposits possess sulphidation states between those of HS and


LS types, typically with stability of chalcopyrite, tetrahedrite‐tennantite, and Fe‐poor sphalerite,
but lacking appreciable arsenopyrite and pyrrhotite.


9 MINERALIZATION
Gold and silver mineralization at Marmato is hosted by a steeply‐dipping sheeted and
anastamosing system of sulfide veins and veinlets with dominant northwest to west‐northwest
trend. The width of individual veinlets and veins varies from <1 mm up to 2.0 m. These form
structural zones of about 10 to 80 m true width separated by barren zones with weak
alteration, isolated veinlets and grades generally less than 0.3 g/t Au.
The known vertical extent of mineralization is greater than 820 m and is open at depth, from
the top of Cerro El Burro (1,705 m altitude) to the deepest drill hole which ended in
mineralization at 889 m altitude.
The mapped distribution of veins is within a north‐south elongated zone about 1,600 m long (of
which about 900 m is in Zona Alta and 700 m in Echandia) and 900 m wide. The domiant vein
trend within this zone is north west and the veins have a strike length of up to 700 m in the
Zona Alta. Drilling has closed off the mineralization to the northwest in the Zona Alta.
The wider veins are mined in numerous small mines accessed by horizontal adits along the
veins in the Zona Alta. The mine entrances are on the southeast end on the mountain‐side and
the veins trend northwest into the mountain.
Two main stages of mineralization have been identified. Stage 1 comprises veinlets (but no
veins) related to the early propylitic alteration. These have low gold values, usually 0.1 to 0.3
g/t. The main gold‐silver mineralization is related to the Stage 2 veins and veinlets which are
related to the late stage sericite‐illite alteration and cross‐cut all of the porphyry phases
(although P5 is weakly mineralized) and the phreatic breccias.
The Stage 1 veinlets are related to the early propylitic alteration and are irregular, narrow, short
veinlets of pyrite, pyrrhotite and iron‐rich sphalerite with epidote, chlorite, albite(?) and calcite.
They have minor gold mineralization, usually 0.1 to 0.3 g/t.
The Stage 2 veins and veinlets cross‐cut the Stage 1 veinlets, which often have a small offset
(centimeters). They are formed of coarse‐grained (5 to 10 mm), massive to semi‐massive
sulfides which may also have coarse banding, vuggy open space filling, and breccia textures. The
sulfides are predominantly of pyrite commonly associated with black, iron‐rich sphalerite
(marmatite), and with minor galena, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite and tennantite‐tetrahedrite.
Pyrrhotite‐rich veins also occur and tend to have more chalcopyrite and less sphalerite and to
occur at greater depths, and are interpreted as having formed from a higher temperature, more


reduced fluid. Gangue is minor to absent and consists of quartz, calcite and sericite. Fault
breccias occur in some veins with ground and slickensided sulfides.
The depth of oxidation on Marmato is very shallow, in the order of 10 to 20 m, and the mineral
resource is predominantly sulfide. Most or all of the small mines work sulfides. Partial oxidation
may extend deeper along highly fractured zones, and deeper oxidation cuased by acid mine
drainage also occurs around old mine workings. For this reason the base of oxidation has not
been modelled, but it is recommended that this be done in the future. Oxidation is to jarositic
and hematite and is associated with supergene intermediate argillic alteration to white clays
(kaolinite?), and was formed by the oxidation of pyrite.
The sulfides and metallic minerals observed by CGL in mines and core, and in metallurgical test
work carried out for CGL by SGS Minerals Services (Jackman & Fleming, 2008) are:
• Pyrite – dominant
• Black sphalerite (marmatite) – abundant in some areas, absent in others. Has
microscopic inclusions of chalcopyrite.
• Pyrrhotite – moderately abundant in places, can form pyrrhotite veinlets.
• Galena – minor
• Chalcopyrite – minor
• Arsenopyrite – minor
• Stibnite – rare
• Tennantite‐tetrahedrite – rare.
• Gold – microscopic. A high percentage of the gold is recoverable by gravity and cyanide.

Gangue minerals:
• Quartz
• Calcite
• Chlorite
• Epidote
• Gypsum (selenite)
• Rhodochrosite – rare
• Adularia – rare, not confirmed.


Oxide minerals:
• Jarosite
• Hematite
• Goethite

The sulfides described in an older petrographic study (Cuellar & Mora, 1985) are:
• Pyrite. The predominant sulfide. Early euhedral to massive pyrite has inclusions of
arsenopyrite and pyrrhotite and often has a cataclastic texture with sphalerite, galena
and chalcopyrite in fractures.
• Sphalerite. The second most abundant sulfide. Has exsolution of chalcopyrite. Mostly
formed in second stage. Early sphalerite has cataclastic texture.
• Galena. Is formed in the second stage of mineralization.
• Chalcopyrite. In fills fractures in pyrite and exsolutions in pyrite and sphalerite.
• Pyrrhotite. Minor and only observed as exsolution lamellae in sphalerite and with
pyrite.
• Bornite. Minor and is associated with chalcopyrite in granular aggregates.
• Arsenopyrite. Minor and occurs with early pyrite.
• Chalcocite. Minor supergene mineral coating chalcopyrite, bornite and galena.
• Covellite. Minor supergene mineral coating and in fractures in chalcopyrite.

Mineralogical investigation of gold grains was carried out for CGL by SGS Lakefield (Wang et al.,
2007) on a gravity concentrate from a Knelson concentrator and Mozley mineral separator from
a composite metallurgical sample. This study counted and measured 104 gold grains. These
ranged in size from 20 to 200 microns with an average size of 84 microns. Most gold grains
were liberated but four attachments to sulfides were observed. The general shape of the gold
grains was granular, with minor amounts of elongated grains and flakes. The results show that
83% of gold grains are in the 40 to 120 micron size fractions. Based on the area percentage,
gold grains with a size greater than 60 microns accounted for 90% of the gold.
An earlier study also showed that gold occurs as free grains, with a size range of between 9 and
600 microns associated with sulfide grain aggregates, gangue minerals, iron oxides and as small
grains encapsulated in pyrite (Escuela de Minas de Marmato, 2004). This study calculated that
99% of gold grains would be liberated by a 75 micron grind. The gold was described as
electrum although no silver percentages were given. The majority of the gold associated with
sulfides is non‐refractory as shown by high recoveries from preliminary cyanide bottle roll tests.


Two phases of primary mineralization plus a supergene stage are described in petrographic
studies (Cuellar & Mora, 1985; Rubiano, 1986):
1. Pyrite (with pyrrhotite exsolution laminae), iron‐rich sphalerite (marmatite, with
exsolutions of mackinawite ((Fe, Ni, Co)S1‐x), chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite), chalcopyrite (with
exsolutions of mackinawite, cubanite‐II (CuFe2S3) and star sphalerite), rare bornite,
arsenopyrite and pyrrhotite. The inclusions in pyrite, sphalerite and chalcopyrite
formed by exsolution of iron, copper and sulphur on cooling of minerals formed at high
temperature. The presence of cubanite‐II and iron‐rich sphalerite indicates a high
temperature of formation.
2. Fe‐poor sphalerite replaced the pyrite and chalcopyrite of Stage 1; chalcopyrite formed
in fractures in other minerals; galena replaces all other minerals; deposition of
arsenopyrite; melnicovite (FeS2 gel)‐pyrite; melnicovite‐marcasite; rare inclusions in
galena of sulphosalts of silver (acanthite, Ag2S; polybasite, (Ag, Cu)16Sb2S11; freibergite
(Ag, Cu, Fe)12Sb4S13 ‐ Rossetti & Colombo, 1999); gold. Bedoya (1998) described
marcasite and polybasite in this stage. These minerals have a lower temperature of
formation.
3. Supergene minerals are covellite, chalcocite, iron oxides and hydroxides, and minor
malachite.
Bedoya (1998) described three stages of mineralization from the Maruja Level in the Lower
Zone. His Early and Intermediate Stages correspond to the First Phase described above, and his
Late Stage corresponds to the Second Phase. Bedoya (1998) observed that gold was deposited
in all three stages. Tectonic activity ends the Intermediate Stage, and affects minerals
deposited in the Early and Intermediate Stages. The effect is shown through fragmentation,
microfractures and microbreccia textures. The characteristics are:
• Early Stage. Abundant pyrrhotite followed by pyrite and arsenopyrite. Minor calcite.
• Intermediate Stage. Abundant sphalerite, with arsenopyrite at the beginning. Later
sphalerite has chalcopyrite inclusions (“chalcopyrite disease”).
• Late Stage. Fine grained pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena, polybasite, marcasite, gold, some
quartz, minor calcite and chlorite. The Late Stage fluid was richer in copper than the
Early and Intermediate Stages.

The pyrite has oxidized to jarosite to form a thin jarositic cap on the Marmato deposit. This is
accompanied by supergene argillic alteration to white clay. The depth of oxidation is shallow


(in the order of 10 to 20 m) and most or all of the small mines work sulfides, although oxidation
may be deeper along highly fractured zones. Deeper oxidation also occurs around old mine
workings. MRDI (1998) reported deep, partial oxidation; however this is neither supported by
the Conquistador drill logs nor by observations by CGL. Unoxidized sulfides are dominant in all
of the mines sampled and holes drilled by CGL to date. The mineral resource of the Zona Alta
(this study) is sulfide. It includes a small percentage of oxides. No oxide domain has been
interpreted on the geological model, although this should be done in the future.


10 EXPLORATION
regulatory expenses associated with the Company’s public company status). Property and
exploration expenditures to June 30, 2009 are given in Table 10.1
Table 10.1 CGL Exploration Expenditures (US$) on the Marmato Property
Cumulative from Inception (March 25,
Expenditure Details
2003 through March 31, 2008)
Acquisition of mineral concessions $22,030,000
Acquisition of mineral rights $26,368,000
Total acquired mineral properties $48,398,000
Exploration of acquired mineral
$26,632,000
properties
Total mineral property acquisition
$75,030,000
and exploration expenditures
Source: Expenditure details supplied by CGL from it’s Form 10Q filing for June 30, 2009 in the United States.
As a result of the worldwide financial crisis and its impact on the Company, an impairment
charge was recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, resulting in the carrying value of
$48,398,000 for acquired mineral properties being reduced to US$25,758,000 in the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
CGL has also carried out exploration of the Caramanta project by geological mapping, rock and
soil sampling, and airborne geophysics. Exploration was carried directly by CGL’s Colombian
subsidiary companies Minera de Caldas at the Zona Alta of Marmato and Gavilan at Caramanta


10.1 MARMATO PROJECT
10.1.1 Imagery and Topography
CGL commissioned a high resolution Ikonos satellite image and detailed topographic map with
2 m contour intervals derived from the image which was received in early 2007. The new
topographic map provides a detailed base map for improved accuracy when plotting the results
of the exploration programs. An extension to the Ikonos image and topographic map was
commissioned in 2008 and received in late 2008, and was stitched to the original image and
map to provide seamless products. The extensions were to cover areas for evaluation for
possible mining infrastructure for the Marmato project, such as waste rock and tailing storage
areas, and exploration drill targets in the Caramanta project.
10.1.2 Underground Mapping
CGL has conducted detailed surveying and geological mapping of the accessible underground
workings within the Zona Alta. However, the underground program has been limited to those
mines to which CGL had access. A small number of mines remain to be surveyed once
agreements are reached with the owners. The initial surveying of the underground mines was
conducted using a compass and tape, with the entrances surveyed by differential GPS. These
initial surveys had relatively low precision and accuracy which is why CGL subsequently
conducted a more detailed survey of all mines using total station or theodolite and laser range
finder. This ensuing survey has defined the true extent and volume of the various mine
openings underground with a higher precision and accuracy. In a number of cases it was not
possible to resurvey some of the mines due to collapse and the original survey was used. The
two types of survey are distinguished on plans and sections to differentiate the two levels of
surveying precision and accuracy. Surveying was carried out by CGL personnel with a contract
surveying company hired from mid 2007 to 2008 to check the accuracy of the CGL surveys.
10.1.3 Geological Mapping
Geological mapping at 1:1,000 scale was carried out on surface, although outcrop exposures
are very limited away from the steep face of Cerro El Burro above Marmato.
10.1.4 Geochemistry
Systematic channel sampling of all accessible underground mines was been carried out by CGL
in 2007 and 2008. Saw‐cut rock channel samples were taken in conjunction with the surveying
by total station or theodolite. Continuous channel samples were taken along cross‐cuts and
individual samples were taken on the veins, faces and backs at regular intervals. For the


resource estimate, 1,052 samples (total length 1,703 m) from cross‐cuts were used, grouped
together in 274 continuous runs. These are dealt with like horizontal drill holes in the database.
In addition, 509 individual samples (total length 622 m) were used, which were treated as mini‐
drill holes. A total of 1,561 underground samples (2,235 m) were used for the resource
estimate.
In the first phase of underground sampling carried out between December, 2005 and May,
2006, channel samples were obtained using a hammer and chisel. These mines were
resampled in the subsequent detailed sampling phase using a saw to obtain new channel
samples. However due to the collapse of some of the mines, it was not possible to resample all
of the mines originally sampled and in these instances the results of the original sampling has
been retained. Highlights of the channel sampling are shown in Table 10.2. A small number of
mines remain to be sampled and the sampling of these mines will be conducted once
agreements are completed with the owners.
Channel sampling was carried out on surface outcrops however this database is small due to
the limited number of outcrops.
Mine Channel ID From (m) To (m) Length (m) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t)

La Davila Mine M00420 0.00 6.00 6.00 1.255 6.8
La Davila Mine M00424 0.00 12.00 12.00 0.516 2.4
La Davila Mine M00427 0.00 11.83 11.83 0.534 1.9
La Davila Mine M00432 15.92 21.93 6.01 0.306 3.7
La Davila Mine M00438 1.99 11.86 9.87 0.432 1.6
La Davila Mine M00438 17.76 23.61 5.85 0.542 1.4
La Davila Mine M00439 0.00 15.58 15.58 0.749 3.4
La Davila Mine M00444 0.00 8.24 8.24 0.641 2.7
La Davila Mine M00446 0.00 5.41 5.41 1.007 5.1
Botanica Mine M00814 0.00 13.11 13.11 1.038 8.8
Botanica Mine M00816 0.00 6.09 6.09 5.038 13
La Ochoa Mine M01206 0.00 6.61 6.61 0.492 2.3
La Ochoa Mine M01207 4.96 12.35 7.39 0.668 2.3
La Chinchiliana Mine M02811 3.65 10.05 6.40 0.556 2.5
Cinco mil doscientos Mine M02906 0.00 8.88 8.88 0.315 2.7
Cinco mil doscientos Mine M02908 1.85 7.68 5.83 3.168 4.7
Circacia Mine M03221 0.00 12.56 12.56 7.214 5.8
Corozo Mine M03408 2.01 7.89 5.88 0.380 2
Corozo Mine M03432 0.00 6.66 6.66 1.696 9.9
El Cuatro Mine M03604 2.84 18.27 15.43 0.660 3
El Esfuerzo Mine M04305 2.02 14.01 11.99 0.354 4.9


Mine Channel ID From (m) To (m) Length (m) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t)

El Esfuerzo Mine M04314 3.84 12.19 8.35 0.302 2.1
La Floresta 2 Mine M05328 0.00 11.80 11.80 5.882 ‐
Gallinaza 1 Mine M05417 0.00 6.92 6.92 0.515 2.3
El Mango 1 Mine M06509 0.00 5.93 5.93 0.730 3
Chuscal Mine M07601 1.98 7.96 5.98 0.614 3
Chuscal Mine M07607 0.00 6.23 6.23 0.866 ‐
San Pedro Mine M10916 0.00 7.26 7.26 1.290 1.9
San Pedro Mine M10924 0.00 8.49 8.49 0.300 3.2
San Pedro Mine M10927 2.20 11.72 9.52 0.944 11
San Jose 1 Mine M11129 0.00 8.03 8.03 0.411 ‐
Socorro Mine M11649 0.00 14.78 14.78 0.737 2.7
Socorro Mine M11656 1.47 9.56 8.09 0.567 1.7
Socorro Mine M11659 0.00 6.88 6.88 0.607 5.2
Socorro Mine M11661 0.00 5.29 5.29 0.435 4.2
La Calle Mine M15207 0.00 7.11 7.11 1.371 4.1
La Calle Mine M15212 0.00 5.62 5.62 1.469 3.1
Dorotea Mine M16352 0.00 6.12 6.12 0.512 3.5
Dorotea Mine M16354 0.00 15.83 15.83 1.205 5.3
Dorotea Mine M16356 0.00 5.90 5.90 1.088 4.6
Dorotea Mine M16357 0.00 13.74 13.74 0.425 2.7
Note. Table of length weighted average grades of channel samples in underground mines in the Zona Alta. Intervals above 0.3 g/t gold
cutoff and 6.0 m length listed.Cut off of 0.1 g/t Au. No top cut of grade applied. Zero grade given for voids due to lack of sample (opening
or mine support.) The channel samples have been created as pseudo‐drill holes for mineral resource estimation. False samples (voids) with
zero grade were added where there is no sample, for example at an opening or mine support. The maximum void length is 4.0 m. If
greater than 4.0 m then a new channel sample (collar or pseudo‐drill hole) is started. The maximum interval of samples below 0.1 g/t Au
cut‐off permitted in calculation of intervals is 6.0 m.
10.1.5 Geophysics
A helicopter‐geophysical survey comprised of magnetics and radiometrics was conducted for
CGL between December, 2007 and April, 2008. This survey covered both the Marmato Zona
Alta and the surrounding Caramanta project.
No ground geophysical surveys have been carried out by CGL.
The surface and underground exploration programs have enabled CGL to understand the
nature and extent of the mineralization on both the Marmato and Caramanta projects. These
programs have resulted in CGL identifying a number of other targets surrounding the Marmato
project. Based on the results of the exploration programs CGL plans to conduct follow‐up
exploration programs both the Marmato and Caramanta projects. The proposed scope of the
follow‐up exploration program is discussed in Section 19 of this report.


11 DRILLING
On February 5, 2007, CGL began a 60,000 m exploration drilling program on the Zona Alta of
the Marmato project. Drilling was terminated on September 19, 2008 when 205 diamond drill
holes totalling 46,377.82 m had been completed. The drill program was terminated
prematurely by order of the board of CGL in order to cut expenditures as a result of the global
financial crisis and its impact on the company. The holes that were in progress were stopped
prematurely. The three active drill contracts were terminated by force majeure. The results of
CGL’s 2007 to 2008 exploration drilling program are discussed below.
The drill program was supervised by Dr. Stewart D. Redwood, Vice President of Exploration for
CGL and Dr. Jeffrey W. Brooks, Chief Geologist for CGL who was responsible for the daily, on‐
site drill management, assisted by Mr. Jorge E. Vargas from later in 2007. Core logging was
conducted by a team of Colombian geologists.
A total of 18 different drill rigs were used from four contractors. The maximum number of rigs
operating at any time was ten, between May to September, 2008. A summary of the drill
statistics is given in Table 11.1.
Drilling was initially carried out by drilling contractor Terramundo Drilling Inc. (Terramundo), of
Bucaramanga, Colombia using skid‐mounted, 100 hp, Boyles 37A and 25A diamond drill rigs.
Terramundo also provided an Ingetrol Explorer‐Plus SP drill rig for two months in 2007. The
Boyles 37A was demobilized in March 2008. Terramundo’s contract ended in May, 2008 and
the Boyles 25A drill rig was demobilized. See Figures 11.1 and 11.2 for two views of
Terramundo’s Boyles 25A drill rig.
During 2007, CGL purchased three light, portable diamond drill rigs from Ingetrol Limitada
(Ingetrol), of Santiago, Chile. The drills are two Explorer‐Plus SP with hydraulic drives powered
by three turbo‐diesel motors totalling 165 hp and one Explorer Junior 30E rig with a 30 hp
electric motor. Electricity for the Explorer Junior rig was provided by either a portable
generator or grid power lines and transformers located on the Zona Alta. The Ingetrol rigs were
operated for CGL by Terramundo under a service contract until June 30, 2008. Kluane Colombia
E.U. (Kluane), of Bogota, which is a subsidiary of Kluane Drilling Ltd., of Whitehorse, Canada,
took over operation of these three drill rigs on July 1, 2008 under an agreement to purchase the
rigs from CGL and operate them under contract. The rigs were moved off‐site to their workshop
to make modifications but they did not return to the project before the drilling was shut down.
See Figure 11.3 for a picture of CGL’s Explorer Junior 30E drill rig.


Additional drill rigs from three contractors were added to the project starting in April, 2008. By
the end of May, 2008, there were ten drill rigs operating on the Zona Alta. El Consorcio
California, of Medellín (also known as GeoEvaluaciones) provided three drill rigs starting in
April, 2008. The rigs were a Sprague Henwood 40CL, a Sprague Henwood 142 and a Longyear
44. The rigs were skid mounted and had winches which were used for self‐moving.
Andina de Perforaciones S.A., (Andina), of Cundinamarca, Colombia provided three drill rigs in
April, 2008 and added another two rigs in June and July, 2008. One rig was demobilized in
August, 2008 leaving four in operation. The drill rigs were Boart Longyear LF70‐PQ and LF70‐HQ
rigs with hydraulic drives, diesel motors and are skid mounted.
Table 11.1 Zona Alta Drill Program 2007‐08 Summary Statistics
Daily Daily
aver Averag
Rigs Finish Rig Meters No. Recovery age e Per
Company (max) Start Date Date Days Days drilled Holes (%) (m) Rig (m)
Terramundo 3 05-Feb-07 08-May-08 459 709 11,183 45 86.1 24.36 15.77
CGL Ingetrol 3 22-Aug-07 05-Jul-08 319 747 13,793 92 84.3 43.24 18.46
GeoEvaluaci
ones 3 14-Apr-08 20-Sep-08 159 375 3,411 9 88.8 21.45 9.10
Andina 5 08-Apr-08 19-Sep-08 162 609 9,051 24 89.3 55.87 14.86
Kluane 4 12-May-08 19-Sep-08 131 291 8,941 35 88.1 68.25 30.73
Total 18 2,731 46,380 205 86.8 16.98


Figure 11.1 Terramundo’s Boyles 37A Drill Rig on Drill Hole MT‐1001 with Cerro El Burro in
the Background

Figure courtesy of Dr. Stewart D. Redwood.
Figure 11.2 Terramundo’s Boyles 37A Drill Rig being set up on Drill Hole MT‐1003


Figure 11.3 CGL’s Ingetrol Junior Explorer 30E Drill Rig set‐up on Drill Hole MT‐1046 in the Old
El Cuatro Mill

Kluane mobilized four rigs between May and August, 2008. These were lightweight Kluane
KD600 hydraulic driven drill rigs powered by three turbo‐diesel motors which are man‐portable.
All drilling was diamond drilling using the wire‐line system. The core sizes used for drilling were
HQ (63.5 mm diameter, 40% of the total meters), NQ (47.6 mm, 30%) and BQ (36.5 mm, 11%),
while the Kluane rigs used NTW (56.0 mm, 15%) and BTW (42.0 mm, 4%). Average core
recovery for the whole program was 86.8% (Table 11.1).
The drill platforms are situated on steep mountain sides either in forested areas or on bare rock
in mined areas and have no direct road access. The drill platforms were constructed by hand
and were reclaimed, recontoured and revegetated after use. Drills were moved by hauling
themselves along using their own winches on existing mule or foot trails, or on specially cleared
trails. The portable drill rigs were disassembled and the components were carried by hand
using local labour. On the southeast face of Cerro El Burro, the mine dumps and terraces
outside some of the adits were also used as ready‐made drill platforms. The Ingetrol Explorer


Junior 30E rig was purchased by CGL due to its small size in order to be able to drill from
underground from the existing artisanal mines within the Zona Alta. Three holes were drilled
from underground in the Patacon mine, and seven drill chambers were made ready in three
other mines.
Drill holes are plotted on sections oriented north 35° east across the principal structural control
of the deposit and spaced 50 m apart. There are 34 sections covering over 1,700 m of strike
length on the Zona Alta. The sections are numbered from 3000NW at the southeastern end to
4700NW at the northwestern end. The numbering system is arbitrary and was designed to
enable the section lines to be extended to cover adjacent licenses if they are acquired in the
future. The initial phase of drilling was designed as a series of holes inclined to the southwest,
across the principal dip direction of the mineralized veins and veinlets, in order to form drill
fences on the section lines 100 m apart. The drill fences were planned to start in the southeast
and progress towards the northwest as this would first test the extent of known mineralization,
as indicated by the extent of artisanal mining. The drilling has closed off the mineralization to
the northwest. The original drill plan had to modified due to both topographic and logistical
restrictions regarding the drill access points, construction of drill platforms, and landowner
permission.
CGL has presented an Environmental Management Plan for the drilling to the Departmental
authority CORPOCALDAS.
Water for drilling was obtained under the water permit for the Patacon mill which was ceded to
CGL on purchase of the mill. This permit allows for water to be taken from the source of three
creeks, Cidrera, Candelaria and Cascabel. CGL has also acquired other water permits as a result
of the purchase of other mills and mines. In addition, CGL has applied for a surficial water
permit in order to acquire drill water from the Piedra Labrada creek. However, the use of water
from this source will require a 1,800 m pipeline in order to bring the water to the drilling area.
Drill collars were surveyed using a differential GPS. The elevations were adjusted to the CGL
topographic map based on Ikonos satellite imagery. Down hole directional surveys were
conducted using a GyroSmart digital gyro tool, manufactured by Flexit Navigation A.B. (Flexit)
and Imego A.B. (Imego) of Sweden, which was purchased by CGL from Ingetrol. Prior to the
purchase of this instrument in 2007, down hole directional surveys were conducted using a
Flexit Multishot tool supplied by Terramundo. On completion of drilling, the drill holes are
capped by a length of PVC tubing and a cement base which displays the drill hole designation.
Figure 11.4 illustrates the drill caps.


Figure 11.4 Example Drill Hole Cap

The drillers remove core from the core barrel and place the core in wooden core boxes.
Wooden depth makers are placed between each drill run. Lids are nailed onto the core boxes
at the drill site. CGL geologists or field technicians take possession of the drill core in the boxes
at the drill platform and are responsible for transporting it back to the CGL core shack in the El
Planchao camp at Marmato. Most of the drill platforms are not accessible by road and the core
boxes are carried either by mule or by men to the nearest road or trail where they are loaded
into either a pickup truck or quad bike with trailer and transported to the core shack.
Out of the 205 drill holes completed, the average depth was 226 m, the median was 185 m, and
the maximum depth was 587 m. Sixty‐eight holes (33% of the holes and 60% of the meterage)
are greater than 300 m deep. The holes are generally drilled at an azimuth of 215° to the
southwest across the principal strike and dip of the mineralized structures. A lesser amount of
holes were drilled with an azimuth of 035° to the northeast in the opposite direction, and some
holes were drilled with azimuths of 090° to the east, 180° to the south and 270° to the
northwest, with one drilled at 124° to the southeast to test other structural controls. The
inclinations of the drill holes are between 45° to 90° below the horizontal, with an average of
62° and a median of 60°.


Holes were generally drilled to a maximum depth as determined by the lower property limit of
the Zona Alta which lies from 1,207 m to 1,298.31 m in elevation. Some holes were drilled
deeper into the Zona Baja, by agreement with Mineros Nacionales.
See Table 11.1 for a summary of the drill holes for the 2007 to 2008 drilling program on the
Zona Alta.
Table 11.2Summary of the Drill Holes for the 2007 to 2008 Drilling Program on the Zona Alta
Azimuth Inclination
Hole_ID Section Line UTM_Easting UTM_Northing Elevation (m) Depth (m)
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1001 3750 433133.89 605811.69 1523.62 215.00 ‐50.00 189.30

MT‐1002 3700 433134.41 605715.25 1532.67 215.00 ‐50.00 305.00
MT‐1003 3800 432977.95 605681.11 1616.57 215.00 ‐50.00 356.10
MT‐1004 3900 432924.91 605758.32 1670.30 215.00 ‐50.00 420.85
MT‐1005 3850 432843.26 605556.03 1717.39 215.00 ‐55.00 431.80
MT‐1006 3700 432961.13 605439.20 1709.30 0.00 ‐90.00 101.55
MT‐1007 3700 432960.90 605438.78 1709.18 215.00 ‐70.00 298.35
MT‐1008 3700 432959.09 605441.10 1710.07 35.00 ‐61.00 321.10
MT‐1009 3300 433239.88 605097.37 1424.83 215.00 ‐52.00 139.66
MT‐1010 3300 433239.97 605097.75 1424.77 215.00 ‐74.00 183.36
MT‐1011 4100 432627.42 605674.95 1746.29 215.00 ‐70.00 232.10
MT‐1012 3650 433239.00 605791.89 1480.65 215.00 ‐58.00 172.65
MT‐1013 3350 433160.58 605141.63 1467.75 215.00 ‐62.00 121.80
MT‐1014 3300 433241.46 605100.09 1424.20 35.00 ‐57.00 124.60
MT‐1015 3300 433241.34 605099.75 1424.26 35.00 ‐70.00 137.50
MT‐1016 4100 432628.60 605676.11 1747.76 45.00 ‐55.00 253.20
MT‐1017 3350 433160.44 605141.83 1467.82 215.00 ‐80.00 121.00
MT‐1018 3450 433135.94 605220.86 1502.57 215.00 ‐73.00 61.25
MT‐1019 3650 433238.69 605791.28 1480.60 215.00 ‐46.00 147.45
MT‐1020 3350 433162.56 605144.07 1466.44 35.00 ‐49.00 121.00
MT‐1021 3450 433135.86 605220.70 1502.49 215.00 ‐50.00 120.35
MT‐1022 4100 432629.11 605676.39 1748.14 124.00 ‐70.00 380.00
MT‐1023 3650 433239.32 605793.83 1481.03 180.00 ‐60.00 130.05
MT‐1024 3350 433161.63 605144.22 1466.99 0.00 ‐60.00 115.70
MT‐1025 3450 433137.52 605223.25 1503.47 35.00 ‐55.00 178.75
MT‐1026 3650 433239.38 605794.24 1481.14 180.00 ‐70.00 161.15
MT‐1027 3350 433161.90 605141.45 1467.27 180.00 ‐57.00 36.20
MT‐1028 3350 433161.85 605141.22 1467.34 180.00 ‐49.00 114.00


Azimuth Inclination
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1029 3350 433161.58 605144.64 1467.00 0.00 ‐49.00 117.30

MT‐1030 3650 433221.41 605742.74 1486.77 215.00 ‐50.00 214.45
MT‐1031 3950 432860.47 605726.67 1716.82 215.00 ‐45.00 400.00
MT‐1032 3650 433221.75 605743.30 1486.36 215.00 ‐75.00 156.80
MT‐1033 3350 433161.74 605142.68 1467.00 0.00 ‐90.00 30.40
MT‐1034 3350 433161.91 605143.00 1466.88 35.00 ‐80.00 63.90
MT‐1035 3450 433136.97 605222.32 1503.07 35.00 ‐75.00 117.00
MT‐1036 3650 433221.56 605742.97 1486.60 215.00 ‐60.00 122.00
MT‐1037 3750 433119.26 605816.64 1529.32 35.00 ‐65.00 270.00
MT‐1038 3950 432861.04 605727.35 1716.57 215.00 ‐75.00 394.00
MT‐1039 3450 433136.33 605223.10 1504.22 0.00 ‐52.00 117.00
MT‐1040 3250 433371.85 605152.47 1367.17 215.00 ‐66.00 114.05
MT‐1041 3750 433121.96 605818.33 1528.91 270.00 ‐65.00 230.60
MT‐1042 3250 433373.33 605154.54 1366.43 35.00 ‐69.00 118.70
MT‐1043 3750 433122.80 605820.56 1529.21 90.00 ‐63.00 240.00
MT‐1044 3550 433251.50 605643.66 1542.60 215.00 ‐68.00 236.10
MT‐1045 3250 433370.83 605153.47 1367.30 270.00 ‐55.00 116.30
MT‐1046 3250 433374.18 605153.30 1366.38 90.00 ‐55.00 121.10
MT‐1047 3700 433126.83 605716.57 1534.14 215.00 ‐82.00 220.00
MT‐1048 3650 432967.38 605398.31 1511.97 35.00 ‐66.00 92.05
MT‐1049 3650 432965.80 605396.38 1512.12 215.00 ‐59.00 110.35
MT‐1050 3750 432915.36 605506.16 1715.16 215.00 ‐76.00 371.00
MT‐1051 3700 433135.21 605715.17 1532.40 35.00 ‐68.00 42.20
MT‐1052 3700 433135.21 605715.17 1532.40 35.00 ‐68.00 150.40
MT‐1053 3550 433262.23 605640.67 1539.68 35.00 ‐58.00 104.00
MT‐1054 3700 433134.56 605713.74 1533.43 270.00 ‐55.00 1.20
MT‐1055 3850 433103.50 605908.47 1562.81 215.00 ‐45.00 336.30
MT‐1056 3650 432965.38 605395.93 1510.35 215.00 ‐77.00 111.70
MT‐1057 3550 433261.67 605640.60 1539.97 35.00 ‐72.00 157.30
MT‐1058 3550 433258.81 605640.52 1541.33 270.00 ‐60.00 261.50
MT‐1059 3600 432938.15 605238.80 1586.19 215.00 ‐50.00 378.50
MT‐1060 3850 433104.49 605909.23 1562.55 215.00 ‐79.00 255.00
MT‐1061 3150 433455.69 605188.51 1359.71 215.00 ‐70.00 61.20
MT‐1062 3550 433263.60 605640.70 1539.03 90.00 ‐58.00 57.00
MT‐1063 3150 433458.42 605190.95 1360.86 35.00 ‐55.00 63.00


Azimuth Inclination
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1064 3750 432914.39 605506.08 1715.05 215.00 ‐55.00 341.50

MT‐1065 3850 433102.12 605908.67 1563.54 35.00 ‐63.00 325.20
MT‐1066 3150 433454.93 605189.83 1361.19 270.00 ‐55.00 67.40
MT‐1067 3500 433223.84 605503.35 1592.57 215.00 ‐51.00 131.50
MT‐1068 3600 432938.46 605247.97 1591.58 215.00 ‐77.00 356.00
MT‐1069 3150 433458.54 605189.45 1359.46 90.00 ‐55.00 63.90
MT‐1070 3150 433484.98 605221.54 1380.75 215.00 ‐72.00 65.20
MT‐1071 3150 433487.02 605223.84 1381.06 35.00 ‐50.00 74.60
MT‐1072 3150 433485.30 605222.80 1381.11 270.00 ‐50.00 78.00
MT‐1073 3850 433102.84 605911.94 1564.17 270.00 ‐50.00 422.20
MT‐1074 3600 432940.82 605242.94 1589.14 35.00 ‐69.00 146.50
MT‐1075 3150 433486.22 605222.79 1380.89 90.00 ‐50.00 75.00
MT‐1076 3250 433367.88 605213.64 1382.64 35.00 ‐45.00 100.20
MT‐1077 3500 433223.90 605503.32 1592.52 215.00 ‐47.00 259.40
MT‐1078 3250 433363.37 605214.54 1383.76 215.00 ‐80.00 39.70
MT‐1079 3250 433364.58 605206.81 1382.33 215.00 ‐70.00 111.20
MT‐1080 3600 432939.99 605243.09 1589.06 35.00 ‐57.00 324.20
MT‐1081 3750 432913.27 605508.96 1713.73 35.00 ‐60.00 505.70
MT‐1082 3250 433362.36 605213.39 1383.68 270.00 ‐50.00 27.00
MT‐1083 3500 433223.76 605504.10 1592.91 215.00 ‐71.00 201.00
MT‐1084 3850 433104.75 605914.63 1564.04 90.00 ‐65.00 221.65
MT‐1085 3250 433363.06 605214.75 1383.84 270.00 ‐60.00 71.00
MT‐1086 3600 432936.69 605240.99 1587.15 270.00 ‐69.00 374.60
MT‐1087 3250 433366.18 605210.71 1382.63 90.00 ‐50.00 117.50
MT‐1088 3300 433292.24 605257.78 1433.73 215.00 ‐45.00 70.50
MT‐1089 3300 433292.85 605258.21 1433.58 215.00 ‐80.00 97.80
MT‐1090 3600 432940.50 605241.09 1588.00 90.00 ‐59.00 286.60
MT‐1091 3500 433224.33 605503.94 1592.42 0.00 ‐90.00 230.20
MT‐1092 3300 433293.42 605259.89 1433.91 35.00 ‐50.00 113.45
MT‐1093 3850 433026.89 605751.50 1594.84 215.00 ‐47.00 394.30
MT‐1094 3300 433291.90 605258.72 1434.26 270.00 ‐50.00 100.80
MT‐1095 3600 432943.04 605245.68 1591.19 0.00 ‐90.00 353.50
MT‐1096 3300 433294.75 605258.72 1432.79 90.00 ‐50.00 125.90
MT‐1097 3500 433223.90 605503.57 1592.61 215.00 ‐60.00 161.50
MT‐1098 3600 432934.25 605240.66 1586.46 270.00 ‐50.00 375.00


Azimuth Inclination
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1099 3300 433272.56 605198.85 1425.32 45.00 ‐75.00 35.70

MT‐1100 3600 433147.31 605537.88 1639.48 215.00 ‐50.00 99.35
MT‐1101 3300 433272.52 605199.20 1425.47 35.00 ‐55.00 93.10
MT‐1102 3300 433270.57 605196.84 1425.76 215.00 ‐55.00 65.70
MT‐1103 3400 433090.30 605086.66 1436.71 35.00 ‐50.00 47.10
MT‐1104 3600 433147.74 605538.49 1639.07 215.00 ‐75.00 236.50
MT‐1105 3800 432650.65 605210.23 1677.01 35.00 ‐70.00 197.25
MT‐1106 3600 432900.95 605215.79 1561.61 215.00 ‐75.00 366.25
MT‐1107 3400 433089.87 605086.05 1435.92 0.00 ‐90.00 130.20
MT‐1108 3850 433027.44 605753.85 1594.31 35.00 ‐55.00 404.45
MT‐1109 3850 432628.95 605255.76 1693.47 215.00 ‐70.00 495.20
MT‐1110 4350 432780.19 606362.70 1798.77 0.00 ‐90.00 242.45
MT‐1111 4350 432590.90 606082.08 1843.63 0.00 ‐90.00 319.75
MT‐1112 3400 433088.38 605083.92 1433.46 215.00 ‐50.00 10.20
MT‐1113 3400 433088.55 605084.17 1433.70 215.00 ‐55.00 126.90
MT‐1114 3600 432900.32 605214.89 1560.82 215.00 ‐45.00 185.50
MT‐1115 3600 433146.91 605537.31 1639.87 215.00 ‐48.00 262.10
MT‐1116 3400 433090.30 605084.99 1434.71 90.00 ‐50.00 140.70
MT‐1117 3750 432932.66 605539.01 1692.81 215.00 ‐55.00 407.60
MT‐1118 3600 433149.43 605540.91 1637.43 35.00 ‐60.00 132.50
MT‐1119 3600 432900.52 605215.17 1561.07 215.00 ‐50.00 355.90
MT‐1120 3800 433030.23 605753.75 1592.26 0.00 ‐90.00 318.00
MT‐1121 3400 433070.71 605117.72 1467.44 35.00 ‐45.00 31.80
MT‐1122 3650 432871.29 605205.92 1543.33 215.00 ‐60.00 319.50
MT‐1123 3400 433070.61 605117.63 1467.47 35.00 ‐55.00 54.50
MT‐1124 3850 432632.64 605259.25 1689.44 215.00 ‐45.00 565.00
MT‐1125 3400 433068.34 605114.52 1467.32 215.00 ‐45.00 82.60
MT‐1126 3400 433068.78 605115.04 1467.25 215.00 ‐65.00 17.20
MT‐1127 3600 433151.95 605538.75 1636.21 35.00 ‐75.00 186.10
MT‐1128 3650 432873.55 605209.61 1547.12 35.00 ‐65.00 329.00
MT‐1129 3400 433068.82 605115.21 1467.32 215.00 ‐68.00 136.00
MT‐1130 4350 432791.18 606366.45 1796.93 215.00 ‐60.00 400.45
MT‐1131 3800 432996.68 605659.86 1604.25 35.00 ‐75.00 285.34
MT‐1132 3800 432651.60 605210.99 1676.71 35.00 ‐50.00 360.20
MT‐1133 3650 432871.73 605205.73 1543.37 0.00 ‐90.00 332.50


Azimuth Inclination
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1134 4600 432385.82 606207.01 1867.45 0.00 ‐90.00 500.00

MT‐1135 3550 432999.20 605225.95 1581.80 215.00 ‐50.00 107.75
MT‐1136 3850 432633.14 605259.96 1688.76 35.00 ‐70.00 162.70
MT‐1137 3350 433140.00 605066.62 1432.98 215.00 ‐50.00 5.70
MT‐1138 3750 432933.44 605540.11 1692.08 215.00 ‐80.00 295.80
MT‐1139 3800 433025.31 605747.38 1596.08 215.00 ‐75.00 209.50
MT‐1140 3350 433140.20 605066.91 1433.13 215.00 ‐60.00 3.60
MT‐1141 3350 433140.40 605067.20 1433.28 215.00 ‐75.00 145.00
MT‐1142 4350 432780.60 606363.27 1798.64 35.00 ‐45.00 393.50
MT‐1143 3550 432999.20 605225.95 1581.80 0.00 ‐90.00 336.20
MT‐1144 3800 432995.36 605657.98 1605.22 215.00 ‐75.00 317.27
MT‐1145 3350 433140.61 605067.48 1433.42 0.00 ‐90.00 149.20
MT‐1146 3400 433009.25 604994.81 1401.76 215.00 ‐55.00 220.49
MT‐1147 3800 432650.17 605209.53 1677.06 215.00 ‐45.00 571.90
MT‐1148 3550 432999.40 605226.24 1582.02 35.00 ‐50.00 239.00
MT‐1149 3350 433140.84 605067.81 1433.59 35.00 ‐57.00 157.00
MT‐1150 4350 432590.13 606080.98 1843.91 215.00 ‐60.00 328.50
MT‐1151 3400 433009.47 604995.14 1401.63 0.00 ‐90.00 187.70
MT‐1152 3800 433025.72 605747.95 1595.77 35.00 ‐70.00 280.20
MT‐1153 3400 433009.76 604995.55 1401.48 35.00 ‐52.00 110.62
MT‐1154 3650 432919.15 605306.14 1625.65 215.00 ‐65.00 96.50
MT‐1155 3950 432871.73 605732.82 1709.00 35.00 ‐55.00 538.20
MT‐1156 3750 432933.69 605540.48 1691.84 35.00 ‐50.00 449.70
MT‐1157 3850 432774.02 605482.60 1683.13 35.00 ‐70.00 526.95
MT‐1158 4600 432385.39 606206.39 1867.63 215.00 ‐60.00 302.00
MT‐1159 3450 432986.24 605038.32 1411.00 35.00 ‐55.00 177.62
MT‐1160 3650 432920.01 605307.37 1626.74 35.00 ‐80.00 358.40
MT‐1161 3450 432986.11 605037.99 1410.82 0.00 ‐90.00 273.70
MT‐1162 3400 433152.05 605189.19 1485.84 35.00 ‐55.00 153.80
MT‐1163 3850 432632.74 605259.60 1689.21 35.00 ‐75.00 587.25
MT‐1164 3450 432988.21 605035.60 1408.69 215.00 ‐70.00 399.28
MT‐1165 3450 432989.53 605036.61 1408.84 35.00 ‐60.00 400.87
MT‐1166 3850 432844.46 605556.52 1716.68 90.00 ‐65.00 401.30
MT‐1167 3350 433035.01 604935.37 1425.67 35.00 ‐50.00 503.52
MT‐1168 3750 432685.67 605191.55 1650.93 215.00 ‐60.00 429.00


Azimuth Inclination
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1169 3450 433102.14 605164.71 1502.15 215.00 ‐66.00 505.05

MT‐1170 3350 433319.13 605373.82 1488.19 215.00 ‐50.00 131.06
MT‐1171 3750 432646.35 605108.62 1699.30 215.00 ‐50.00 499.15
MT‐1172 4100 432684.07 605752.75 1811.65 90.00 ‐65.00 524.35
MT‐1173 4050 432895.35 605991.03 1749.70 215.00 ‐55.00 400.10
MT‐1174 3350 433033.12 604932.67 1429.19 215.00 ‐70.00 493.47
MT‐1175 3450 433526.55 605788.53 1390.10 215.00 ‐70.00 72.23
MT‐1175‐
3450
A 433519.00 605777.00 1350.00 215.00 ‐70.00 123.44
MT‐1176 3750 432931.70 605537.64 1693.72 215.00 ‐80.00 128.70
MT‐1177 3350 433319.35 605374.13 1488.11 215.00 ‐70.00 491.18
MT‐1178 3900 432904.20 605685.41 1669.92 215.00 ‐65.00 500.00
MT‐1179 3750 432932.01 605537.86 1693.61 215.00 ‐65.00 530.95
MT‐1180 3450 433527.08 605788.90 1390.09 215.00 ‐50.00 41.14
MT‐1181 3450 433527.45 605789.16 1390.08 215.00 ‐52.00 208.02
MT‐1182 3400 432945.55 604946.44 1470.11 35.00 ‐70.00 322.47
MT‐1183 3300 433309.12 605231.60 1419.21 215.00 ‐70.00 94.79
MT‐1184 3400 433151.72 605185.06 1485.16 215.00 ‐75.00 153.92
MT‐1184‐
3400
A 433143.00 605173.00 1424.00 215.00 ‐75.00 390.44
MT‐1185 3550 433371.43 605886.65 1496.29 215.00 ‐65.00 305.10
MT‐1186 3350 432865.97 605044.73 1486.55 215.00 ‐65.00 282.55
MT‐1187 3900 432597.13 605236.05 1718.77 90.00 ‐60.00 107.00
MT‐1188 3300 433364.49 605360.98 1474.90 215.00 ‐70.00 355.70
MT‐1189 3400 433151.91 605186.47 1485.28 270.00 ‐60.00 461.77
MT‐1190 3750 432876.60 605421.20 1691.12 215.00 ‐50.00 451.10
MT‐1191 3900 432596.80 605235.76 1718.98 90.00 ‐70.00 573.75
MT‐1192 3750 433276.12 605945.67 1531.89 215.00 ‐70.00 56.38
MT‐1193 3400 432944.80 604946.87 1469.89 35.00 ‐50.00 500.65
MT‐1194 3250 433452.64 605411.07 1395.97 215.00 ‐45.00 65.55
MT‐1195 3850 432974.22 605746.22 1627.62 215.00 ‐65.00 60.80
MT‐1196 3700 433287.42 605889.70 1505.57 215.00 ‐70.00 240.33
MT‐1197 3150 433593.42 605354.68 1346.74 215.00 ‐45.00 89.91
MT‐1198 3150 433592.91 605355.08 1346.41 215.00 ‐70.00 341.37
MT‐1199 3750 433100.32 605731.15 1542.14 215.00 ‐48.00 125.90
MT‐1200 3750 433268.68 605791.84 1465.53 215.00 ‐65.00 251.46


Azimuth Inclination
(degrees) (degrees)
MT‐1201 3900 432594.98 605234.94 1720.18 270.00 ‐60.00 80.95

MT‐1202 3400 433155.38 605186.55 1482.77 90.00 ‐60.00 57.91
MT‐1203 3400 432944.65 604947.56 1469.29 270.00 ‐55.00 28.95

See Figure 11.5 for a plan view of the locations of the 2007 to 2008 drill holes on the Zona Alta.
See Figures 11.6, 11.7 and 11.8 for examples of sectional views showing the drill holes on the
Zona Alta. All of the sections are viewed looking 45° northwest.
See Table 11.2 for a summary of the gold intersections above 0.3 g/t gold for the 2007 to 2008
drilling program on the Zona Alta. The drill holes were inclined and the intersection lengths do
not represent the true widths. Sample widths are normally 2.0 m but can be varied for
geological and recovery factors. A cut off grade of 0.10 g/t gold has been used and no more
than 6.0 m of internal dilution to identify the intersections with no top cutting of grades
applied. Assay results are reported above a minimum average grade of 0.30 g/t gold. The
average value was used in the case of core duplicates. Voids from old mine workings were
identified and were assigned a zero grade.


Figure 11.5 Plan View of the Drill Hole Locations on the Zona Alta


Figure 11.6 View of Section 3150NW on the Zona Alta through July 2009


Figure 11.7 View of Section 3600NW on the Zona Alta through July 2009
NOTE: The section is viewed looking 45° northwest.


Figure 11.8 View of Section 3850NW on the Zona Alta, through July 2009

NOTE: The section is viewed looking 45° northwest.


Table 11.3 Significant Intersections from the 2007 to 2008 Drilling Program on the Zona
Alta
To Interval
Hole Number From (meters) Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t)
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1001 30.00 44.60 14.60 0.361 4.5
MT‐1001 60.00 66.00 6.00 0.538 10.2
MT‐1001 119.30 134.00 14.70 0.960 6.3
MT‐1001 139.50 152.00 12.50 0.795 11.3
MT‐1001 172.00 186.00 14.00 1.740 8.6
MT‐1002 35.94 56.00 20.06 0.816 9.2
MT‐1002 60.00 82.00 22.00 0.356 4.8
MT‐1002 110.00 113.90 3.90 0.315 4.7
MT‐1002 138.00 142.00 4.00 1.210 1.6
MT‐1002 156.00 160.00 4.00 0.392 1.2
MT‐1002 186.00 190.00 4.00 0.678 3.4
MT‐1002 210.00 214.00 4.00 0.364 3.5
MT‐1002 226.00 298.00 72.00 1.595 14.5
MT‐1003 229.00 294.00 65.00 1.869 9.1
MT‐1003 300.05 310.00 9.95 0.428 6.2
MT‐1003 345.95 354.00 8.05 0.364 1.7
MT‐1004 150.70 153.95 3.25 0.972 48.4
MT‐1004 303.65 306.00 2.35 0.339 4.5
MT‐1004 379.50 393.55 14.05 0.431 3.0
MT‐1004 408.50 411.10 2.60 0.452 0.9
MT‐1005 225.00 233.25 8.25 0.337 2.3
MT‐1005 266.60 277.00 10.40 0.545 3.6
MT‐1005 308.60 316.00 7.40 0.470 4.5
MT‐1006 No significant intervals
MT‐1007 64.00 67.93 3.93 0.425 4.6
MT‐1007 74.15 78.15 4.00 0.617 7.5
MT‐1007 91.15 119.00 27.85 0.515 12.4
MT‐1007 151.00 181.00 30.00 0.784 9.4
MT‐1007 187.00 210.45 23.45 1.370 15.8
MT‐1007 231.00 241.00 10.00 1.019 8.1
MT‐1008 167.00 177.00 10.00 0.525 6.5
MT‐1008 185.00 191.00 6.00 0.570 3.6
MT‐1008 211.00 214.95 3.95 0.629 4.8
MT‐1008 229.00 235.00 6.00 0.314 3.5
MT‐1008 240.30 283.00 42.70 0.837 6.2
MT‐1009 18.00 32.00 14.00 0.384 6.3
MT‐1010 21.00 27.86 6.86 0.348 3.6


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1010 142.00 156.00 14.00 1.568 2.6
MT‐1011 57.00 60.20 3.20 0.438 23.0
MT‐1011 195.60 199.60 4.00 0.390 8.4
MT‐1012 28.35 32.00 3.65 0.971 19.4
MT‐1012 51.00 53.00 2.00 0.392 3.5
MT‐1012 67.00 70.15 3.15 0.408 2.6
MT‐1012 96.00 100.00 4.00 0.446 4.4
MT‐1012 108.05 112.00 3.95 1.310 3.7
MT‐1012 122.00 126.00 4.00 0.856 3.1
MT‐1012 130.00 137.00 7.00 0.649 1.7
MT‐1013 1.95 14.00 12.05 0.965 6.0
MT‐1013 50.00 58.00 8.00 2.043 6.3
MT‐1013 68.00 74.00 6.00 2.424 3.5
MT‐1013 90.00 94.00 4.00 0.308 3.1
MT‐1013 116.00 121.80 5.80 0.314 5.2
MT‐1014 1.80 8.00 6.20 0.348 25.1
MT‐1014 106.50 114.50 8.00 0.342 4.5
MT‐1015 65.95 70.00 4.05 0.532 0.2
MT‐1017 2.00 23.00 21.00 0.719 5.9
MT‐1017 35.00 56.00 21.00 1.164 3.9
MT‐1017 88.00 98.00 10.00 0.721 4.2
MT‐1017 104.00 108.00 4.00 0.729 3.2
MT‐1018 30.00 46.05 16.05 0.537 2.0
MT‐1018 59.90 61.25 1.35 0.665 4.2
MT‐1019 30.30 34.30 4.00 0.423 8.8
MT‐1019 64.50 66.50 2.00 0.399 5.4
MT‐1019 76.45 78.50 2.05 0.403 2.7
MT‐1019 94.50 108.50 14.00 0.330 3.8
MT‐1019 114.50 116.65 2.15 0.463 2.0
MT‐1019 120.70 124.70 4.00 0.474 1.4
MT‐1019 128.70 144.35 15.65 3.816 8.9
MT‐1020 8.20 12.20 4.00 0.345 10.5
MT‐1020 28.20 40.20 12.00 0.355 4.5
MT‐1020 54.20 64.20 10.00 0.655 2.8
MT‐1020 72.20 88.90 16.70 0.814 5.5
MT‐1020 94.90 121.00 26.10 1.905 7.8


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1021 14.00 18.00 4.00 0.626 8.7
MT‐1021 54.00 58.00 4.00 0.328 2.7
MT‐1021 78.00 110.00 32.00 1.135 5.2
MT‐1023 61.15 125.00 63.85 0.584 4.1
MT‐1024 3.95 19.00 15.05 2.430 7.2
MT‐1024 42.80 79.00 36.20 0.431 2.1
MT‐1024 81.00 95.00 14.00 0.300 1.9
MT‐1024 97.00 115.70 18.70 0.863 3.9
MT‐1025 7.45 11.45 4.00 0.331 3.8
MT‐1025 87.50 91.50 4.00 0.307 1.9
MT‐1025 117.50 127.50 10.00 0.455 2.9
MT‐1025 147.50 153.50 6.00 2.134 8.3
MT‐1026 37.00 45.00 8.00 0.313 1.6
MT‐1026 48.15 75.00 26.85 0.912 8.0
MT‐1026 81.00 115.00 34.00 0.812 7.4
MT‐1026 133.00 158.00 25.00 0.582 5.5
MT‐1027 13.00 19.00 6.00 0.435 11.0
MT‐1028 19.50 25.50 6.00 0.495 6.5
MT‐1028 35.55 55.50 19.95 0.586 4.4
MT‐1029 3.10 23.30 20.20 0.678 7.3
MT‐1029 51.30 55.30 4.00 0.303 1.7
MT‐1029 71.30 81.30 10.00 1.210 4.9
MT‐1029 97.30 117.30 20.00 1.017 4.3
MT‐1030 46.00 54.80 8.80 0.921 7.3
MT‐1030 71.00 85.00 14.00 0.535 2.1
MT‐1030 173.00 185.00 12.00 2.174 2.5
MT‐1030 195.00 214.50 19.50 0.526 1.5
MT‐1031 109.00 113.00 4.00 0.333 23.7
MT‐1031 159.65 165.00 5.35 6.017 176.7
MT‐1031 328.40 332.40 4.00 0.319 1.9
MT‐1032 53.00 57.00 4.00 0.670 6.0
MT‐1032 66.00 98.00 32.00 1.327 5.1
MT‐1032 116.00 135.00 19.00 1.942 17.0
MT‐1032 145.00 156.80 11.80 3.124 8.8
MT‐1033 8.70 9.40 0.70 0.489 5.0
MT‐1033 15.20 16.85 1.65 0.480 1.7


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1033 27.25 28.75 1.50 0.465 2.1
MT‐1034 26.00 32.00 6.00 0.316 1.90
MT‐1034 56.00 63.90 7.90 1.436 4.4
MT‐1035 1.10 23.00 21.90 0.735 2.1
MT‐1035 37.00 43.00 6.00 0.308 2.2
MT‐1035 47.00 51.00 4.00 0.367 1.9
MT‐1035 61.00 69.00 8.00 0.308 3.0
MT‐1035 95.00 99.00 4.00 0.728 1.1
MT‐1036 49.00 53.00 4.00 0.508 2.3
MT‐1036 57.00 59.70 2.70 1.562 11.1
MT‐1036 70.50 78.50 8.00 1.019 5.1
MT‐1036 114.50 120.10 5.60 1.355 4.8
MT‐1037 63.60 69.50 5.90 0.379 7.60
MT‐1037 95.50 105.50 10.00 0.449 3.6
MT‐1037 117.50 160.30 42.80 0.837 5.9
MT‐1037 172.30 188.30 16.00 1.020 3.7
MT‐1037 198.30 202.30 4.00 5.859 12.9
MT‐1037 210.00 224.30 14.30 4.540 10.8
MT‐1037 232.30 270.00 37.70 1.645 4.4
MT‐1038 175.70 178.30 2.60 0.626 22.1
MT‐1039 1.30 13.30 12.00 0.360 4.1
MT‐1039 37.00 43.20 6.20 0.693 7.1
MT‐1039 63.00 69.00 6.00 0.370 2.1
MT‐1039 75.00 83.00 8.00 0.741 3.9
MT‐1039 97.00 107.00 10.00 1.408 2.6
MT‐1040 15.70 21.95 6.25 0.525 6.0
MT‐1041 34.50 42.50 8.00 0.338 5.5
MT‐1041 93.25 130.00 36.75 1.135 6.0
MT‐1041 140.00 151.00 11.00 0.313 3.0
MT‐1041 165.00 169.00 4.00 4.725 6.8
MT‐1041 198.38 226.50 28.12 1.041 12.6
MT‐1042 1.40 5.60 4.20 0.325 4.9
MT‐1043 39.70 43.90 4.20 0.695 3.8
MT‐1042 77.90 90.75 12.85 0.630 3.0
MT‐1043 65.50 69.50 4.00 0.857 3.5
MT‐1043 109.60 145.60 36.00 2.374 8.0
MT‐1043 188.40 210.40 22.00 1.024 4.0


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1043 226.30 240.00 13.70 0.751 1.8
MT‐1044 157.60 161.80 4.20 0.317 4.6
MT‐1044 165.85 170.07 4.22 2.111 9.3
MT‐1044 182.00 185.50 3.50 0.705 1.8
MT‐1044 188.29 194.50 6.21 2.307 9.6
MT‐1045 15.40 20.40 5.00 0.340 2.0
MT‐1045 83.15 103.00 19.85 1.584 6.5
MT‐1045 109.00 113.00 4.00 1.085 8.6
MT‐1046 34.50 38.00 3.50 1.333 23.1
MT‐1047 56.50 72.30 15.80 0.756 6.9
MT‐1047 78.30 88.30 10.00 0.831 8.3
MT‐1047 132.30 136.30 4.00 0.747 2.3
MT‐1048 0.00 8.00 8.00 0.361 5.2
MT‐1048 18.00 34.00 16.00 0.372 4.8
MT‐1048 56.00 78.00 22.00 0.769 6.5
MT‐1048 84.00 89.15 5.15 0.678 9.1
MT‐1049 48.00 56.00 8.00 0.618 2.2
MT‐1049 64.00 88.00 24.00 0.903 5.2
MT‐1049 96.00 110.35 14.35 1.953 7.0
MT‐1050 4.70 12.40 7.70 0.591 23.2
MT‐1050 186.40 192.40 6.00 0.337 5.1
MT‐1050 200.40 212.40 12.00 0.482 4.3
MT‐1050 220.40 233.30 12.90 9.528 29.9
MT‐1050 257.35 263.35 6.00 0.301 4.3
MT‐1050 273.35 279.40 6.05 0.754 4.1
MT‐1050 321.15 333.45 12.30 1.085 6.6
MT‐1052 69.30 71.30 2.00 0.310 2.2
MT‐1052 113.30 148.15 34.85 0.767 4.8
MT‐1053 83.00 87.50 4.50 0.429 6.5
MT‐1054 No significant intervals (lost at 1.2 m).
MT‐1055 56.30 60.30 4.00 0.505 17.9
MT‐1055 65.50 69.50 4.00 0.576 9.8
MT‐1055 109.70 113.70 4.00 0.455 1.9
MT‐1055 133.70 139.70 6.00 2.067 4.3
MT‐1055 208.44 220.25 11.81 0.902 9.9
MT‐1055 239.75 244.20 4.45 0.613 5.7


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1055 276.20 285.00 8.80 0.543 14.7
MT‐1055 300.40 306.75 6.35 1.445 6.6
MT‐1055 326.75 336.30 9.55 0.827 3.1
MT‐1056 4.00 6.00 2.00 0.344 4.6
MT‐1056 10.00 16.00 6.00 0.452 4.1
MT‐1056 28.00 32.00 4.00 0.339 3.4
MT‐1056 77.60 89.60 12.00 0.691 4.8
MT‐1057 60.50 62.00 1.50 0.518 6.8
MT‐1057 94.50 104.50 10.00 11.946 8.7
MT‐1057 140.50 153.80 13.30 1.372 5.9
MT‐1058 110.30 119.00 8.70 2.409 3.4
MT‐1058 203.00 217.00 14.00 0.594 2.1
MT‐1058 243.00 247.00 4.00 0.585 4.1
MT‐1059 14.40 18.50 4.10 1.088 10.2
MT‐1059 24.50 30.50 6.00 0.923 14.0
MT‐1059 36.00 66.50 30.50 0.373 3.3
MT‐1059 98.35 100.35 2.00 0.437 2.8
MT‐1059 169.80 173.80 4.00 0.426 1.1
MT‐1059 183.80 201.10 17.30 0.936 7.5
MT‐1059 205.10 213.10 8.00 0.440 1.7
MT‐1059 217.10 229.10 12.00 0.923 5.9
MT‐1059 233.10 243.10 10.00 0.523 2.8
MT‐1059 245.10 253.10 8.00 0.437 2.9
MT‐1059 281.10 285.10 4.00 0.447 6.6
MT‐1059 317.10 321.10 4.00 0.370 8.5
MT‐1059 335.10 341.10 6.00 0.395 2.2
MT‐1060 27.70 30.70 3.00 0.502 52.0
MT‐1060 46.70 50.80 4.10 0.380 3.3
MT‐1060 60.80 64.80 4.00 0.329 0.7
MT‐1060 66.80 70.80 4.00 0.302 4.1
MT‐1060 186.60 188.60 2.00 0.436 1.4
MT‐1060 194.80 196.80 2.00 0.481 2.6
MT‐1060 212.50 213.70 1.20 0.341 5.1
MT‐1061 31.70 35.70 4.00 0.647 3.7
MT‐1063 19.20 22.70 3.50 0.401 5.2
MT‐1064 158.55 162.55 4.00 0.316 8.2
MT‐1064 260.55 262.50 1.95 0.424 3.1
MT‐1064 274.50 276.50 2.00 0.502 6.5
MT‐1064 318.50 341.50 23.00 0.410 3.3
MT‐1065 25.00 40.60 15.60 0.490 24.3
MT‐1065 56.00 58.00 2.00 0.309 13.0


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1065 62.00 64.00 2.00 0.315 17.0
MT‐1065 66.00 68.00 2.00 0.420 3.5
MT‐1065 118.00 120.00 2.00 2.000 3.7
MT‐1065 126.00 138.50 12.50 0.564 6.7
MT‐1065 168.10 170.00 1.90 0.402 3.0
MT‐1065 213.70 219.60 5.90 0.490 16.2
MT‐1065 227.70 240.70 13.00 1.191 2.8
MT‐1065 247.90 250.70 2.80 0.348 2.2
MT‐1065 265.20 325.20 60.00 0.460 2.6
MT‐1067 32.50 34.20 1.70 0.423 15.0
MT‐1067 59.00 67.50 8.50 0.480 3.8
MT‐1067 97.00 103.00 6.00 0.306 3.2
MT‐1068 27.50 33.00 5.50 1.122 4.2
MT‐1068 59.00 63.00 4.00 0.372 2.1
MT‐1068 94.40 99.50 5.10 0.329 2.5
MT‐1068 114.50 160.45 45.95 0.553 2.4
MT‐1068 169.20 170.20 1.00 0.673 25.0
MT‐1068 174.20 176.20 2.00 0.381 3.1
MT‐1068 229.00 279.00 50.00 1.129 2.8
MT‐1068 293.00 297.50 4.50 0.356 0.9
MT‐1068 303.20 333.50 30.30 1.685 9.6
MT‐1069 8.40 10.40 2.00 1.034 1.24
MT‐1069 22.20 24.20 2.00 0.477 0.34
MT‐1069 28.20 30.20 2.00 0.349 2.15
MT‐1073 15.00 32.00 17.00 1.167 66.3
MT‐1073 76.00 78.00 2.00 0.435 5.0
MT‐1073 82.00 84.00 2.00 0.637 23.0
MT‐1073 103.60 111.60 8.00 0.435 2.9
MT‐1073 127.60 135.60 8.00 0.427 1.1
MT‐1073 284.20 286.20 2.00 0.402 3.4
MT‐1073 308.10 315.10 7.00 0.594 8.8
MT‐1073 327.00 331.00 4.00 0.366 1.3
MT‐1073 339.00 341.50 2.50 1.451 5.8
MT‐1073 398.00 404.00 6.00 1.643 8.2
MT‐1073 412.50 414.50 2.00 0.488 5.3
MT‐1074 30.00 35.00 5.00 0.912 2.6
MT‐1074 74.00 86.85 12.85 0.360 3.1
MT‐1074 94.85 116.85 22.00 0.373 2.6
MT‐1074 126.85 143.00 16.15 0.933 4.2


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1075 39.20 41.20 2.00 0.472 7.4
MT‐1076 4.45 10.50 6.05 3.00 7.7
MT‐1076 61.72 65.90 4.18 3.51 16.1
MT‐1077 23.50 31.40 7.90 0.391 4.4
MT‐1077 53.50 60.00 6.50 0.631 11.7
MT‐1077 96.30 104.30 8.00 0.308 3.4
MT‐1077 122.30 142.00 19.70 0.662 8.7
MT‐1077 148.20 152.00 3.80 0.700 7.7
MT‐1078 5.45 7.50 2.05 0.673 7.4
MT‐1078 11.50 19.50 8.00 0.377 4.9
MT‐1078 23.50 27.50 4.00 0.519 7.3
MT‐1078 33.50 37.70 4.20 0.395 3.3
MT‐1079 8.70 38.20 29.50 0.677 3.4
MT‐1079 42.20 50.20 8.00 0.452 1.4
MT‐1080 2.55 15.90 13.35 0.794 7.0
MT‐1080 21.95 24.00 2.05 0.383 2.1
MT‐1080 40.10 69.00 28.90 0.456 2.9
MT‐1080 147.00 149.00 2.00 0.303 0.4
MT‐1080 155.00 161.00 6.00 0.744 2.2
MT‐1080 165.00 177.00 12.00 0.610 7.4
MT‐1080 205.00 207.00 2.00 0.941 0.6
MT‐1080 227.00 229.00 2.00 1.023 13.0
MT‐1080 257.00 259.00 2.00 0.423 1.2
MT‐1080 267.00 273.55 6.55 0.850 0.3
MT‐1080 294.00 295.60 1.60 0.936 1.2
MT‐1080 299.00 324.20 25.20 0.462 2.4
MT‐1081 237.00 239.00 2.00 0.374 7.5
MT‐1081 246.30 248.30 2.00 0.340 0.6
MT‐1081 276.30 278.30 2.00 0.350 8.5
MT‐1081 318.00 320.00 2.00 0.454 0.5
MT‐1081 330.00 341.50 11.50 1.407 5.3
MT‐1081 353.50 357.50 4.00 0.324 1.9
MT‐1081 359.50 361.00 1.50 0.434 4.9
MT‐1081 375.00 377.00 2.00 0.330 2.2
MT‐1081 403.00 405.00 2.00 0.401 5.6
MT‐1081 427.00 435.00 8.00 1.976 12.0
MT‐1081 441.00 453.00 12.00 0.540 4.9
MT‐1081 461.00 467.00 6.00 0.476 2.8
MT‐1081 477.00 481.00 4.00 0.638 3.1
MT‐1081 485.00 487.00 2.00 0.339 0.5
MT‐1081 499.00 501.00 2.00 0.415 1.1
MT‐1082 13.50 27.00 13.50 1.185 6.6
MT‐1083 57.50 75.25 17.75 0.816 4.5


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1083 77.30 83.00 5.70 0.429 2.9
MT‐1083 167.00 175.45 8.45 1.082 6.4
MT‐1083 187.45 201.00 13.55 0.833 3.5
MT‐1084 97.00 99.00 2.00 0.312 7.8
MT‐1084 111.00 117.00 6.00 0.36 5.67
MT‐1084 149.00 165.00 16.00 0.33 2.69
MT‐1084 187.00 209.20 22.20 0.79 4.15
MT‐1085 12.00 44.00 32.00 0.816 4.4
MT‐1085 50.00 56.05 6.05 0.312 6.6
MT‐1085 62.05 66.00 3.95 0.504 5.0
MT‐1086 2.80 39.50 36.70 0.408 5.8
MT‐1086 57.50 63.50 6.00 0.393 1.2
MT‐1086 91.50 111.90 20.40 1.533 7.7
MT‐1086 117.30 123.30 6.00 0.308 2.5
MT‐1086 143.30 145.30 2.00 0.362 2.2
MT‐1086 233.60 235.50 1.90 0.563 4.0
MT‐1086 269.00 275.00 6.00 0.398 1.7
MT‐1086 300.55 306.00 5.45 1.944 13.6
MT‐1086 317.00 341.50 24.50 1.394 5.9
MT‐1086 353.50 355.50 2.00 0.311 1.3
MT‐1088 24.00 26.00 2.00 0.442 3.9
MT‐1088 66.00 66.76 0.76 0.571 6.9
MT‐1089 3.62 7.50 3.88 0.455 5.4
MT‐1090 7.20 8.70 1.50 2.282 11.5
MT‐1090 38.30 58.30 20.00 0.383 2.3
MT‐1090 120.30 124.30 4.00 4.400 3.4
MT‐1090 128.30 130.30 2.00 2.400 1.2
MT‐1090 134.00 138.50 4.50 0.764 7.4
MT‐1090 142.50 158.50 16.00 1.168 3.8
MT‐1090 166.50 192.60 26.10 0.369 4.7
MT‐1090 195.15 199.15 4.00 0.452 2.1
MT‐1090 227.15 237.55 10.40 1.050 13.7
MT‐1090 241.55 247.55 6.00 1.725 4.7
MT‐1090 269.5 283.50 14.00 0.901 7.5
MT‐1091 70.10 72.00 1.90 0.371 4.2
MT‐1091 80.00 82.00 2.00 0.371 4.9
MT‐1091 179.00 181.00 2.00 0.457 2.1
MT‐1091 195.00 197.00 2.00 0.441 2.2
MT‐1091 221.00 223.00 2.00 0.426 2.5
MT‐1092 2.05 10.60 8.55 0.645 4.6
MT‐1092 26.60 30.60 4.00 0.316 13.5
MT‐1092 58.10 66.10 8.00 0.786 3.5


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1093 106.00 108.30 2.30 0.436 5.0
MT‐1093 173.00 175.00 2.00 0.556 3.8
MT‐1093 207.00 211.00 4.00 0.866 7.2
MT‐1093 219.00 221.00 2.00 0.903 11.3
MT‐1093 251.00 253.00 2.00 4.200 7.2
MT‐1093 285.80 286.80 1.00 1.208 6.0
MT‐1093 297.60 325.00 27.40 0.621 5.3
MT‐1093 356.70 361.50 4.80 0.458 2.3
MT‐1093 383.50 385.50 2.00 0.380 9.8
MT‐1095 27.30 29.30 2.00 0.685 2.9
MT‐1095 48.60 77.65 29.05 0.696 2.4
MT‐1095 81.65 87.65 6.00 0.397 1.7
MT‐1095 95.65 105.80 10.15 0.682 1.3
MT‐1095 109.30 113.30 4.00 0.625 2.3
MT‐1095 129.30 133.00 3.70 0.364 2.3
MT‐1095 156.00 161.45 5.45 0.359 0.8
MT‐1095 169.45 171.55 2.10 0.331 0.9
MT‐1095 189.55 193.55 4.00 0.956 3.9
MT‐1095 197.55 263.55 66.00 0.608 4.2
MT‐1095 269.55 329.85 60.30 1.014 4.2
MT‐1095 333.85 335.85 2.00 0.321 1.9
MT‐1095 345.85 347.85 2.00 0.345 3.3
MT‐1096 42.00 44.00 2.00 0.479 4.7
MT‐1096 108.00 116.00 8.00 0.461 3.9
MT‐1097 31.00 35.00 4.00 0.360 7.8
MT‐1097 61.00 65.00 4.00 0.696 9.5
MT‐1097 73.00 75.00 2.00 0.461 1.4
MT‐1097 99.00 103.00 4.00 3.532 4.2
MT‐1097 148.00 158.80 10.80 0.798 7.2
MT‐1098 49.00 93.00 44.00 0.556 4.1
MT‐1098 129.50 133.52 4.02 0.328 1.0
MT‐1098 192.50 196.60 4.10 0.418 3.4
MT‐1098 214.60 219.00 4.40 0.668 4.6
MT‐1098 234.00 240.00 6.00 0.348 1.5
MT‐1098 252.00 260.00 8.00 0.436 1.7
MT‐1098 268.00 276.00 8.00 1.782 4.9
MT‐1098 302.00 308.00 6.00 0.386 5.6
MT‐1099 9.30 32.68 23.38 1.589 9.4
MT‐1100 29.80 31.00 1.20 5.867 3.9
MT‐1100 70.20 72.20 2.00 0.315 3.4
MT‐1100 78.20 86.00 7.80 0.851 9.3
MT‐1101 2.50 10.50 8.00 0.687 14.4


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1101 14.50 16.50 2.00 0.876 6.5
MT‐1101 40.60 42.50 1.90 0.353 11.1
MT‐1101 49.60 59.50 9.90 0.472 2.7
MT‐1101 73.60 76.60 3.00 0.995 9.7
MT‐1102 8.70 63.60 54.90 1.131 10.2
MT‐1103 6.70 8.70 2.00 1.016 4.5
MT‐1103 34.70 36.70 2.00 0.489 1.7
MT‐1103 40.70 42.70 2.00 0.435 5.9
MT‐1104 15.10 23.10 8.00 0.408 20.5
MT‐1104 101.10 107.10 6.00 0.328 2.6
MT‐1104 117.10 121.10 4.00 1.370 8.7
MT‐1104 132.50 136.50 4.00 1.067 4.1
MT‐1104 154.50 232.00 77.50 1.233 6.1
MT‐1105 161.35 167.35 6.00 0.691 2.1
MT‐1105 175.35 185.35 10.00 0.837 8.4
MT‐1106 12.50 14.50 2.00 0.376 3.4
MT‐1106 98.00 100.00 2.00 0.315 3.7
MT‐1106 146.00 148.00 2.00 0.336 2.8
MT‐1106 152.00 164.00 12.00 0.351 2.4
MT‐1106 170.00 172.00 2.00 1.029 3.0
MT‐1106 184.00 208.00 24.00 0.397 5.4
MT‐1106 210.00 216.00 6.00 0.311 2.4
MT‐1106 226.00 228.00 2.00 0.665 4.1
MT‐1106 240.00 250.00 10.00 0.305 2.3
MT‐1106 256.00 274.00 18.00 0.396 3.0
MT‐1106 282.00 290.00 8.00 0.303 2.7
MT‐1106 296.00 298.00 2.00 0.322 0.3
MT‐1106 310.00 314.00 4.00 0.950 7.3
MT‐1106 344.00 346.00 2.00 0.463 0.4
MT‐1106 351.60 358.50 6.90 0.413 20.8
MT‐1107 38.50 61.50 23.00 0.562 7.3
MT‐1108 155.00 167.00 12.00 0.518 3.2
MT‐1108 173.00 201.00 28.00 0.477 2.4
MT‐1108 231.00 242.20 11.20 0.618 3.0
MT‐1108 264.20 270.20 6.00 0.503 4.8
MT‐1108 333.00 359.00 26.00 0.402 1.8
MT‐1108 397.00 404.45 7.45 0.410 1.7
MT‐1109 247.30 253.10 5.80 1.167 1.4
MT‐1109 265.10 275.10 10.00 0.402 0.7
MT‐1109 341.10 361.10 20.00 0.910 5.1
MT‐1109 365.10 375.10 10.00 0.385 1.1
MT‐1110 143.75 151.75 8.00 0.328 2.1
MT‐1111 245.40 251.50 6.10 0.363 5.7


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1111 283.50 291.15 7.65 0.345 7.6
MT‐1112 Results pending
MT‐1113 5.80 11.20 5.40 0.406 4.1
MT‐1113 19.70 21.70 2.00 0.557 9.6
MT‐1113 27.70 29.70 2.00 0.310 1.5
MT‐1113 65.70 94.90 29.20 0.534 6.6
MT‐1113 100.90 102.90 2.00 0.314 10.9
MT‐1113 106.90 108.90 2.00 0.348 3.4
MT‐1114 144.50 183.80 39.30 0.443 2.7
MT‐1115 3.50 5.40 1.90 0.306 7.8
MT‐1115 98.50 102.55 4.05 0.331 3.4
MT‐1115 132.50 166.50 34.00 1.387 9.8
MT‐1115 184.50 188.50 4.00 4.862 5.0
MT‐1115 210.50 262.10 51.60 0.531 4.2
MT‐1117 162.20 172.20 10.00 0.339 6.4
MT‐1117 180.20 219.50 39.30 0.399 4.8
MT‐1117 290.30 316.30 26.00 0.388 3.5
MT‐1117 346.35 356.40 10.05 0.460 2.4
MT‐1117 362.40 370.40 8.00 0.406 4.8
MT‐1119 37.20 46.10 8.90 0.533 2.3
MT‐1119 103.20 113.30 10.10 1.270 10.0
MT‐1119 185.40 194.60 9.20 0.344 2.0
MT‐1119 221.35 231.35 10.00 1.053 2.0
MT‐1120 139.70 160.60 20.90 0.314 5.6
MT‐1120 178.00 188.00 10.00 0.464 9.2
MT‐1120 218.00 230.00 12.00 0.507 7.3
MT‐1122 3.25 11.00 7.75 0.417 8.4
MT‐1122 66.50 75.45 8.95 0.509 5.3
MT‐1122 150.50 160.50 10.00 0.423 0.9
MT‐1122 168.50 182.50 14.00 0.346 4.1
MT‐1122 210.50 232.50 22.00 1.597 4.1
MT‐1125 55.60 67.60 12.00 0.499 1.8
MT‐1125 72.10 81.10 9.00 1.521 9.2
MT‐1127 151.50 159.50 8.00 0.348 6.7
MT‐1128 74.50 174.50 100.00 0.470 2.7
MT‐1128 279.50 293.50 14.00 0.390 4.2
MT‐1129 68.70 74.70 6.00 0.302 7.5


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1132 237.55 253.40 15.85 0.390 10.9
MT‐1132 328.75 360.20 31.45 0.370 8.4
MT‐1135 56.50 77.50 21.00 0.991 4.7
MT‐1138 142.90 180.90 38.00 0.347 3.5
MT‐1138 190.90 234.90 44.00 1.479 9.6
MT‐1138 244.90 280.70 35.80 1.356 7.7
MT‐1139 113.50 120.15 6.65 0.409 9.1
MT‐1143 72.00 88.00 16.00 4.947 4.5
MT‐1143 110.00 122.25 12.25 0.604 2.9
MT‐1143 226.00 302.00 76.00 1.027 3.4
MT‐1144 168.38 184.00 15.62 0.564 8.6
MT‐1144 230.00 236.00 6.00 0.773 4.3
MT‐1144 270.00 301.50 31.50 0.835 4.5
MT‐1145 94.70 106.70 12.00 1.000 3.0
MT‐1146 4.51 16.30 11.79 0.439 10.2
MT‐1146 94.00 100.00 6.00 0.446 5.2
MT‐1147 179.70 185.70 6.00 0.502 3.5
MT‐1147 540.90 554.70 13.80 1.072 24.4
MT‐1148 10.00 20.00 10.00 0.351 6.1
MT‐1148 152.50 162.00 9.50 0.628 4.3
MT‐1148 228.00 239.00 11.00 0.857 7.5
MT‐1151 33.00 40.61 7.61 0.402 5.0
MT‐1151 49.09 65.00 15.91 0.617 10.8
MT‐1151 33.00 40.61 7.61 0.402 5.0
MT‐1151 49.09 65.00 15.91 0.617 10.8
MT‐1151 33.00 40.61 7.61 0.402 5.0
MT‐1151 49.09 65.00 15.91 0.617 10.8
MT‐1152 163.75 177.90 14.15 0.305 5.0
MT‐1152 199.90 219.50 19.60 0.640 12.1
MT‐1153 60.70 68.58 7.88 0.343 1.6
MT‐1154 13.70 18.90 5.20 0.410 7.6
MT‐1154 22.50 40.80 18.30 0.915 10.5


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1154 46.80 54.80 8.00 0.749 4.4
MT‐1154 82.80 92.00 9.20 1.079 5.9
MT‐1155 167.10 179.10 12.00 0.333 8.2
MT‐1155 264.35 278.35 14.00 0.403 1.5
MT‐1155 316.35 322.35 6.00 0.896 2.3
MT‐1155 421.50 429.50 8.00 0.436 6.8
MT‐1155 465.00 471.00 6.00 1.028 1.0
MT‐1155 526.10 538.20 12.10 0.371 1.8
MT‐1156 300.05 305.80 5.75 0.385 2.1
MT‐1156 313.80 329.80 16.00 0.399 20.5
MT‐1156 371.60 389.60 18.00 0.577 6.6
MT‐1156 403.60 433.20 29.60 0.561 4.2
MT‐1157 287.70 297.75 10.05 0.499 11.0
MT‐1157 307.00 349.25 42.25 1.119 3.5
MT‐1157 389.40 400.25 10.85 0.938 7.7
MT‐1157 512.25 522.25 10.00 0.413 1.8
MT‐1159 111.00 153.00 42.00 0.332 3.4
MT‐1160 37.80 47.80 10.00 1.356 15.5
MT‐1160 75.80 133.80 58.00 0.525 3.6
MT‐1160 203.80 211.80 8.00 0.680 4.2
MT‐1160 249.80 263.80 14.00 0.460 2.1
MT‐1160 279.80 291.80 12.00 0.846 5.1
MT‐1160 295.80 309.80 14.00 2.053 4.9
MT‐1161 113.38 144.10 30.72 0.665 5.1
MT‐1162 96.10 137.30 41.20 0.300 2.1
MT‐1163 84.00 90.00 6.00 0.319 12.3
MT‐1163 84.00 90.00 6.00 0.319 12.3
MT‐1164 44.30 50.15 5.85 1.258 26.1
MT‐1165 161.74 167.77 6.03 0.411 3.3
MT‐1167 54.00 59.13 5.13 1.760 18.8
MT‐1167 250.18 259.00 8.82 1.696 7.2
MT‐1167 312.72 328.80 16.08 0.448 9.8
MT‐1167 333.20 342.50 9.30 1.233 7.1
MT‐1167 399.00 419.00 20.00 0.570 4.8
MT‐1167 461.77 473.80 12.03 0.310 2.4
MT‐1168 182.00 194.00 12.00 0.986 4.0
MT‐1168 202.00 218.00 16.00 0.369 2.4
MT‐1168 384.50 392.50 8.00 0.303 0.8
MT‐1169 3.04 23.81 20.77 0.683 2.1
MT‐1169 37.80 85.30 47.50 0.470 2.7
MT‐1169 194.80 200.80 6.00 0.482 6.9


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1169 214.80 222.80 8.00 0.314 1.9
MT‐1169 278.90 288.90 10.00 0.366 2.2
MT‐1170 76.48 82.48 6.00 0.498 7.4
MT‐1175 12.19 17.31 5.12 0.410 3.3
MT‐1175 39.62 46.67 7.05 0.634 4.2
MT‐1175 52.67 58.67 6.00 0.522 2.4
MT‐1175 66.67 72.23 5.56 1.162 7.9
MT‐1175A 52.67 60.67 8.00 0.809 3.9
MT‐1175A 66.67 74.20 7.53 0.984 4.8
MT‐1175A 80.20 88.20 8.00 0.529 3.9
MT‐1175A 133.20 143.20 10.00 0.796 5.3
M‐1179 Results pending
MT‐1181 0.00 13.41 13.41 0.353 12.4
MT‐1181 32.00 88.00 56.00 0.460 7.9
MT‐1181 107.60 142.60 35.00 0.321 4.7
MT‐1181 152.60 204.62 52.02 0.342 4.3
MT‐1183 38.50 92.54 54.04 0.404 3.4
MT‐1184 0.00 6.00 6.00 0.487 6.0
MT‐1184 16.00 22.00 6.00 0.316 3.4
MT‐1184 78.58 108.00 29.42 0.641 4.2
MT‐1184 122.00 140.00 18.00 1.926 8.7
MT‐1184A Results pending
MT‐1185 45.00 92.05 47.05 0.438 3.3
MT‐1185 187.30 299.31 112.01 0.615 3.4
MT‐1186 66.0 72.0 6.00 0.342 8.7
MT‐1186 240.79 249.02 8.23 0.321 11.5
Partial results
MT‐1186 pending
MT‐1188 49.07 57.60 8.53 0.966 10.9
MT‐1188 267.25 282.24 14.99 0.414 1.7
MT‐1189 8.00 41.70 33.70 0.384 3.8
MT‐1189 70.50 152.00 81.50 0.603 2.6
MT‐1189 166.00 184.00 18.00 0.458 2.6
MT‐1189 198.00 212.00 14.00 0.304 3.8


To Interval
(meters) (meters)
MT‐1189 299.00 313.00 14.00 0.349 3.8
MT‐1189 416.50 422.60 6.10 0.357 3.0
MT‐1191 213.50 219.50 6.00 0.501 5.1
MT‐1191 259.50 269.50 10.00 0.336 3.8
MT‐1191 295.50 389.50 94.00 0.877 8.4
MT‐1191 447.50 476.70 29.20 0.815 5.9
MT‐1194 55.00 61.00 6.00 0.978 3.3
MT‐1196 231.20 240.33 9.13 0.409 4.5
MT‐1197 1.52 8.50 6.98 0.387 16.1
MT‐1198 1.52 9.14 7.62 0.514 13.6
MT‐1199 53.12 107.90 54.78 0.733 9.1
MT‐1200 10.66 131.70 121.04 1.055 7.5
MT‐1200 211.20 251.46 40.26 0.602 3.7
MT‐1202 0.00 9.75 9.75 0.363 4.0


12 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH
From December 2005 to 2008, CGL has taken rock channel samples from all accessible
underground mines. Cross‐cuts were sampled in continuous channel samples where
possible; however, timbering or poor ground conditions often necessitated changing from
one rib of the cross‐cut to the other. Individual channel samples were also were taken of
faces, veins, and at systematic intervals on the backs, where accessible. For the face
samples, separate samples were cut for hanging wall, vein and foot wall; in the cases when
no discreet vein was present a single stockwork sample was taken.
During the first phase of underground sampling between December, 2005 and May, 2006,
samples were cut by hand. These samples were taken with hammers and chisels in
sampling channels up to 2.0 m long by 5 cm wide and 1 cm deep. Due to concern regarding
the sample quality, many of these samples were subsequently repeated using a hand‐held
core saw, but analyses from some hand‐cut samples have been retained where it was not
possible to gain access to the mines due to a collapse of the workings. This work is ongoing.
Subsequently all underground samples were taken by saw‐cut, and the original hand‐cut
samples were resamples, as far as accessibility permitted. The hand‐held rock‐saw was
powered by a small gasoline generator placed outside the mine portal. Samples were up to
a maximum of 2 m long but preference was given to geological contacts therefore the
sample length could be less than 2 m. The surface to be sampled was cleaned and then the
individual samples were marked by a geologist. Two horizontal parallel cuts were made
across the length of the sample about 6 to 8 cm apart and 2 cm deep. Then a series of
vertical cuts 10 cm apart were made to facilitate breaking the rock. After these cuts were
completed the rock sample was broken using a hammer and chisel, and collected in a
sample bag. The sample width and depth was designed to give a sample weight similar to a
split HQ drill core sample.
For diamond drill core sampling, the drilling contractors remove the core from the core
barrel and place the core in wooden core boxes. Wooden depth makers (“tacos”), were
marked by the driller and placed at the end of each drill run. Lids were nailed onto the core
boxes once they are filled. CGL geologists or the field technicians took possession of the
boxed drill core at the drilling platform and were responsible for transporting it to the CGL
core shack at Marmato. Most of the drill platforms were not accessible by road and core
boxes were carried by mule or by men to the nearest road or trail, and then transported to
the core shack using either a pickup truck or a quad bike with trailer.


At the core shack the core was washed and the boxes marked with the the box number,
drilling interval and other data by a technician, and digital photographs of pairs of core
boxes were taken (Figure 12.1).
Figure 12.1 Photograph of Cleaned Core after Reception at the CGL Camp at Marmato

Three core logs were made in the following order: geotechnical; geological with
determination of sample intervals; then a mineral content log based on the sample
intervals. The sample lengths were generally 2 m; however, priority was given to veins
and geological contacts so that sample lengths can be less than this. In zones of poor
recovery samples were taken of drill runs, as identified by the drill markers , as it is not
possible to determine depths within these zones. Thus sample lengths may be less than or
more than 2.0 m in zones of poor recovery or adjacent to voids. The minimum sample
length is 0.50 m and is usually o f a vein or veins. Once core logging was completed, the
sample details were written on printed sample cards with consecutive numbering and the
tear‐off numbers (tags) were stapled to the core box at the beginning of each sample
interval. The geologist then marked a cut‐line along the axis of the core to ensure that the
core is cut perpendicular to the dominant vein and veinlet orientation to ensure that they


are sampled equally. Core was cut in half lengthwise by diamond saw and one half placed
in a plastic or cloth sample bag with an outer bag for security. One of the sample tags was
placed in the inner bag along with the sample; the other sample tag was stapled to the
dividers in the box. The sample number was also written on both the inner and outer bags
with indelible marker pen and the sample bag was sealed with a plastic cable tie. The other
half of the core was left in the core box for reference. The core was photographed again
after being cut and sampled (Figure 12.2).
Figure 12.2 Photograph of Same Core Interval as in Figure 12.1 after it has been Logged
and Cut

The core boxes were transported by a CGL vehicle to a CGL warehouse in Medellín for
permanent storage. The Medellín warehouse was set up in 2007 because of the lack of
storage space at Marmato. In 2008, the samples were moved to a larger warehouse facility
in Medellín. Samples of the cuttings were taken from the core saw tray and sludge samples
were taken from the sumps used to settle out fine solids from the drill water. The settling
tanks were installed as part of the environmental management plan for drilling. The core


intervals to which these samples correspond were recorded so that the cuttings and sludge
sample grades can be compared with the average grade for the interval.


13 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY
It is SEWC’s opinion based on a general and specific assessment of the CGL drill core and
channel sample data that the quality for the drill core and channel samples used in the
current resource estimate to date meets accepted industry standards and the CGL core
drilling and channel sampling is believed to be representative of the areas examined.
Drill core and saw‐cut channel samples were prepared by Inspectorate America Corporation
(Inspectorate) and SGS Colombia S.A. (SGS) in sample preparation facilities in Medellín with
the sample pulps either sent to the USA or Peru for analysis.
The primary laboratory used for the samples in the drill and underground sampling
programs was Inspectorate (ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9002:1994 certified) with a sample
preparation laboratory in Medellín, and analytical laboratories in Sparks, Nevada, USA and
Lima, Peru. The Sparks analytical laboratory was used until late 2007 however, considerable
QA/QC problems were experienced during 2007 as well as long delays in turnaround time,
and since late 2007 the Lima analytical laboratory has been used. The analyses from
Inspectorate’s Sparks laboratory which failed QA/QC were repeated at the same laboratory
a second and sometimes a third time, resulting in considerable additional delays. Other
samples analyzed initially at Inspectorate’s Sparks laboratory were re‐analyzed at
Inspectorate’s Lima, Peru laboratory. Only sample batches that passed QA/QC were
accepted and used in the resource estimation. Inspectorate is used as the laboratory for
check and replicate assays of samples analyzed initially at SGS del Peru S.A.C in Callao, Lima,
Peru.
The secondary laboratory used was SGS (ISO 9001 certified) at a sample preparation facility
in Medellín, and at their analytical laboratory run by SGS del Perú S.A.C., El Callao, Lima.
SGS was used for the backlog of samples in late‐2007 and for check and replicate assays of
samples analyzed initially at Inspectorate. They were also used as the primary laboratory
for the Caramanta exploration program samples.
Sample preparation and analysis was put on hold when the drill program was suspended in
September, 2009, and was resumed in July 2009 in order to carry out a new mineral
resource estimation (this report).
Prior to the opening of the Inspectorate and SGS sample preparation laboratories in
Medellín in August, 2006 and November, 2007, respectively there were no internationally
certified sample preparation laboratories for mineral exploration in Colombia. At the start
of exploration work by CGL all samples had to be sent to other countries to be prepared and


analyzed. Entire rock samples were sent by air to Inspectorate in Sparks, Nevada, for
preparation and analysis, or to ALS Chemex in Quito, Ecuador (ISO 9001:2000 and ISO
17025:2005 certified) for preparation, with analysis by ALS Chemex in Lima. ALS Chemex in
Reno, Nevada was also used for some check analyses. Some later samples were prepared
by SGS at a sample preparation facility in its coal laboratory in Barranquilla, Colombia, and
sample pulps were sent to its laboratory in Lima for analysis. The samples prepared in
overseas laboratories were the initial underground samples and surface samples.
13.1 SAMPLE SECURITY AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
The Chain of Custody procedures for sample security were set up for CGL by Dr. Stewart
Redwood in December, 2005 (with the latest update in August 2009).
Samples collected in underground mines or in the field were collected by CGL geologists and
field technicians and were transported to the core logging facility in the Marmato camp by
vehicle. The samples were collected in plastic or cloth bags and were double bagged. The
sample description was written on a printed sample card with consecutive numbering and a
tear‐off number tag to insert in the sample bag. The sample number was also written on
both the inner and outer bags with indelible marker pen. The sample bag was sealed with a
plastic cable tie.
At the beginning of the CGL sampling program (2005 to 2006), the sample numbers were
made up in the field. For example 126GG01T was made up of mine number or project code
(126), sampler (GG), sample point (01) and sample type (T); or PA1005 was made up of the
project code (PA) and consecutive sample number (1005). The sample description was
written in a field notebook which was later transcribed into Excel. The sample number was
written on a piece of flagging tape which was inserted in the sample bag as the ticket. In
addition, the sample number was written with indelible marker pen on both the plastic bag
and the cloth bag. This system was replaced by consecutive numbering in 2006 when
sample cards were printed. The samples numbered using the initial numbering system are
comprised of the early hand‐cut underground mine samples, surface samples and some
Caramanta exploration rock samples.
The drilling contractors removed core from the core barrel manually (i.e.., the core was not
pumped from the core barrel) and placed the core in a 3 m long channel made from drilling
casing cut longitudinally. The core was lightly cleaned with a brush and water to remove
drilling additives while the additives were still wet. Significant care was taken to avoid
washing fines away from the core. The cleaned core was then placed in wooden core boxes


for shipment. CGL geologists or field technicians took possession of the drill core in the
boxes at the drill platform and were responsible for transporting it to the CGL core shack.
Since most of the drill platforms were not accessible by road the core boxes were carried by
mule or by men to the to designated drop‐off points for pick‐up and transport to the core
shack either by pickup truck or quad bike with trailer.
Once the core was logged, the CGL geologists marked the sample intervals on the core and
marked a cut‐line along the axis of the core. The sample details were written on
consecutively‐numbered, printed sample cards. The cut‐line was oriented so as to, as far as
possible, cut the core perpendicular to sulfide‐bearing veins and fractures. Core was cut in
half length‐wise by diamond saw with one half placed in a plastic or cloth sample bag with
an outer bag for security and the other half was returned to the core box. One of the tear‐
off numbers was inserted in the sample bag; the other tear‐off number was stapled into the
core box. The sample number was also written on both the inner and outer bags with
permanent marker. The sample bag was sealed with a plastic cable tie. The half of the core
which is left in the core box is a reference sample available either for re‐logging or quarter
cutting if necessary. After the core was logged and cut, the core box tops were nailed back
on the core boxes and the core boxes were stored in a portion of the logging area that was
locked after normal working hours (Figure 13.1). The boxes were transported by a CGL
vehicle to a CGL warehouse in Medellín for storage. The warehouse was set up in late‐2007
due a lack of storage space at Marmato. Subsequently, in early 2008, the samples were
moved to a larger warehouse in Medellín.


Figure 13.1 CGL Core Logging Facilities at Marmato

All bagged and numbered samples were stored in a secure storage facility at the core
logging facility at CGL’s camp in Marmato. This storage area is a roofed enclosure with wire
mesh fence walls and two doors which are padlocked at night. The CGL camp was under
constant supervision by a private security company and two guard dogs. All movement to
and from the CGL camp was controlled by the private security company. The key to the
secure storage area was held by the camp security guard. In addition, the camp has a
perimeter fence and one single access gate controlled by a 24‐hour security guard.
In preparation for shipment, samples were packed into nylon rice sacks with approximately
5 samples per rice sack. The shipments were accompanied with the requisite laboratory
submittal forms and were transported by CGL vehicle to the CGL warehouse in Medellín. It
is important to note that although at times the logged core boxes were transported to the
CGL warehouse in Medellín by an independent transportation company, the assay samples
were always transported by CGL vehicle. The samples were received by CGL technicians at
the CGL warehouse and verified against the submittal form. Each drill hole was a single
sample submittal. Samples were accumulated in the warehouse, if necessary, until a hole
was completed. Once all of the samples from a single drill hole had arrived in the
warehouse, the drill hole, in its entirety, was loaded into the CGL vehicle for transportation
to the preparation facilities of either Inspectorate or SGS. Upon reception at the sample


preparation facility, the laboratory company checked that the samples received matched
the work order and signed that it had accepted the samples.
Once the sample preparation was completed, the laboratory dispatchet the sample pulps by
courier to their overseas laboratory. The laboratories were instructed to retain excess
sample pulps after analysis which can be used in the event that check analyses are
requested by CGL.
The coarse sample rejects and sample pulps from the preparation facilities in Medellín were
picked up by CGL technicians during routine sample shipments to the preparation facilities.
The coarse rejects and pulps were returned to the CGL sample warehouse in Medellín for
long‐term storage.
13.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION
The sample preparation at the Inspectorate laboratory in Medellín consisted of drying the
entire sample and crushing it to >70% passing ‐10 mesh by jaw crusher and roll mill. This
was later changed to >85% passing ‐10 mesh using a TM Terminator Jaw Crusher. A split of
250 to 500 g was then obtained using a Jones splitter and was pulverized to >80% passing ‐
150 mesh with Labtech LM2 pulverizing ring mill. Tested barren silica sand was used as a
clean wash between each sample in pulverization.
The sample preparation procedures at the SGS laboratory in Medellín comprised drying the
sample, crushing the entire sample in two stages to ‐6 mm and ‐2 mm by jaw crusher (>95%
passing), riffle splitting the sample to 250 g to 500 g, and pulverizing the split to >95%
passing ‐140 mesh in 800 cc chrome steel bowls in a Labtech LM2 vibrating ring mill
(preparation code 321).
The sample preparation method at the Inspectorate laboratory in Sparks, Nevada was to dry
and crush the entire sample to greater than (>) 85% passing ‐10 mesh by TM Terminator
Jaw Crusher, spilt 250 g to 300 g using a Jones splitter and pulverize this to >90% passing ‐
150 mesh with a Labtechniques LM2 pulverizing ring mill. Tested barren silica sand was
used as a clean wash between each sample in pulverization (rock chip 0‐10 lbs method).
The sample preparation procedure at the ALS Chemex laboratory in Quito was to log the
sample into the tracking system, weigh, dry, crush the entire sample to >70% passing 2 mm,
split off up to 1.5 kg and then pulverize the split to >85% passing 75 microns (code PREP‐
32).


The sample preparation procedure at the SGS Colombia S.A. facility in Barranquilla was to
dry the sample, crush the entire sample in two stages to ‐6 mm and ‐2 mm by jaw crusher
(>95% passing), riffle split 250 g to 500 g, and pulverize the split to >95% passing ‐140 mesh
in 800 cc chrome steel bowls in a Labtech LM2 vibrating ring mill (preparation code 321).
13.3 SAMPLE ANALYSIS
The Inspectorate laboratory in Lima analyzed the samples for gold by fire assay with a one
assay tonne (29.2 g) sample and AA finish (detection limits 0.005 ppm to 3 ppm, method
FA/AAS). Silver was analyzed by aqua regia digestion and AA finish (method AA, detection
limits 0.2 ppm to 200.0 ppm). Over‐limit gold assays (above 3,000 ppb or 3.0 ppm) were
repeated by fire assay (1 assay ton, 29.2 g) with gravimetric finish (method Au FA/GRAV).
Samples above a 200 g/t silver upper limit of detection were repeated by fire assay (1 assay
ton, 29.2 g) with gravimetric finish (method Ag FA/GRAV). Samples were analyzed for
multiple elements by aqua regia digestion and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) finish (32
Element ICP Package for Ag, Al*, As, Ba*, Bi, Ca*, Cd, Co, Cr*, Cu, Fe, Hg, K*, La*, Mg*, Mn,
Mo, Na*, Ni, P, Pb, S*, Sb*, Se, Sn*, Sr*, Te*, Ti, Tl*, V, W, Zn). Inspectorate states that for
elements marked * the digestion is partial in aqua regia in most silicate matrices and the
analysis is partial. Over‐ limit zinc and lead analyses (>10,000 ppm) were rereun by aqua
regia digestion and AA. Multielement analyses were not carried out on the final batches of
samples.
The Inspectorate laboratory in Sparks, Nevada analyzed samples for gold and silver by fire
assay (FA) using a one assay ton (29.2 g) sample with an AA finish for gold (detection limits 2
ppb to 3,000 ppb) and AA finish for silver (detection limits 0.1 ppm to 200 ppm) (method
Au, Ag FA/AA/AAS). Over‐limit gold assays (above 3,000 ppb or 3.0 g/t) were repeated by
fire assay with gravimetric finish (method Au FA/GRAV). Samples above a 200 ppm silver
upper limit of detection were repeated by fire assay with gravimetric finish (method Ag
FA/GRAV). Samples were analyzed for multielements by aqua regia digestion and ICP finish
(30 Element ICP Package for Ag, Al*, As, B*, Ba*, Bi, Ca*, Cd, Co, Cr*, Cu, Fe, Hg, K*, La*,
Mg*, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Sb*, Se, Sr*, Ti, Tl*, V, W, Zn). Inspectorate states that for
elements marked * the digestion is partial in aqua regia in most silicate matrices and the
analysis is partial. Overlimit zinc and lead analyses (>10,000 ppm) were rereun by aqua
regia digestion and AA.
SGS del Perú S.A.C. analyzed samples for gold by fire assay (30 g sample) with an AA finish
(code FAA313; detection limits 0.005 ppm to 10 ppm), and for silver with an aqua regia
digestion and an AAS finish (code AAS12CP), or 3‐acid digestion with AAS finish (code


AAS42C); detection limits in both are 0.3 ppm to 500 ppm). Multielement geochemical
analyses were done by two different methods. One method (ICM40B) uses a four acid
digestion and both both ICP‐AES and ICP‐MS for 50 elements (Ag, Al, As, Ba*, Be*, Bi, Ca*,
Cd, Ce, Cr*, Co, Cs, Cu, Fe*, Ga*, Ge*, Hf*, In*, K*, La*, Li*, Lu*, Mg*, Mn*, Mo, Na*, Nb*,
Ni*, P*, Pb, Rb*, S*, Sb, Sc*, Se, Sn*, Sr*, Ta*, Tb, Te*, Th*, Ti*, Tl*, U*, V*, W*, Y*, Yb*,
Zn*, Zr*). The second method (ICP12B) uses a two acid (HNO3 and HCl) digestion and both
ICP‐AES and ICP‐MS for 38 elements (Ag, Al, As, Ba*, Be*, Bi, Ca*, Cd, Co, Cr*, Cu, Fe*, Ga*,
Hg, K*, La*, Mg*, Mn*, Mo, Na*, Nb*, Ni*, P*, Pb, S*, Sb, Sc*, Sn*, Sr*, Ti*, Tl*, V*, W*, Y*,
Zn*, Zr*). SGS indicates that the analysis is partial for elements marked * and depends on
the mineralogy. Over limit gold values were repeated by fire assay with a gravimetric finish
(method FAG303) and a lower limit of detection of 0.02 g/t. Silver grades above 100 ppm
and zinc grades above 1% were repeated by four acid digestion and atomic absorption
(method AAS41B). Gold and silver for some samples was by fire assay and gravimetry on 30
g (method FAG323 with lower limit of detection of 0.03 g/t gold and 0.03 g/t silverAg).
13.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)
The sampling and QA/QC procedures for CGL were set up by Dr. Stewart Redwood in
December, 2005 (updated most recently in August, 2009). Full QA/QC procedures were
conducted from August 1, 2006 and were used for the drilling program and the
underground sampling program. Appendix 1 contains a copy of the updated QA/QC
procedures as outlined and initiated by Dr. Stewart Redwood for CGL.
The routine QA/QC program at Marmato comprises certified standard reference materials
(CSRM), quartz sand blanks, preparation duplicates (PD), field duplicates (FD) and check and
replicate assays. The CSRM, quartz sand blanks and preparation and field duplicate samples
make up that portion of the QA/QC program which provides ongoing monitoring of the
geochemical laboratories. The check assay and replicate assay samples are submitted at
longer time intervals (less frequently) and provide a secondary control on the accuracy of
the geochemical data. Additional aspects of the QA/QC program include screen metallic
test work done in an attempt to prove or disprove the presence of a nugget effect in
Marmato mineralization and comparison of saw‐cut with hammer and chisel cut
underground samples.
The routine QA/QC samples are inserted into the sample stream on the basis of every 100
samples. Currently, within each 100 sample numbers, there are 5 CSRM, 2 quartz sand
blanks, 2 PD samples and 2 FD samples. Thus every 100 samples contain, on average, 89
unknowns and 11 QA/QC samples (12%) which agrees with the best practices guidelines


currently circulating within the industry. At the inception of the QA/QC program there were
only 2 CSRM samples per 100 samples. However, as a result of analytical problems at the
Inspectorate analytical facility in Sparks, the number of CSRM was increased from 2 to 5 per
100 sample numbers. This ensures that there is one CSRM in each “tray” of 20 samples that
are loaded into the fire assay oven.
Sample numbers for CSRM and preparation and field duplicate samples are determined
using a random number generator. This avoids bias or a periodicity in the location of the
QA/QC samples within the overall sample stream. Random numbers are generated by the
geologist using the random number function in Microsoft Excel and they assigned as
follows:
• The random number function in Microsoft Excel produces a random number
between 0 and 1.
• For the CSRM, 5 random numbers are generated and the resulting random numbers
are multiplied by 100 to produce 5 random numbers between 1 and 100.
• For the FD samples, 2 random numbers are generated and these resulting random
numbers are multiplied by 100 to produce 2 random numbers between 1 and 100.
• For the PD samples, 2 random numbers are generated and these resulting random
numbers are multiplied by 100 to produce 2 random numbers between 1 and 100.
• In all cases the random numbers thus generated are added to the minimum number
in that sequence of sample numbers (e.g., in the sequence of 100 sample numbers
from D02301 to D02400, random generated number 26 would be added to D02301
to become sample number D02327).

In contrast, the quartz sand blanks are inserted at points within the sample stream where,
based on the geology, the geologist believes that there is a high likelihood of significant
mineralization. This ensures that the quartz sand blanks occur at points within the sample
stream where they will serve to check the thoroughness of the cleaning of the ring and puck
pulverizer.
13.5 REFERENCE MATERIALS
The CSRM samples for gold (some of which are also certified for silver) were purchased
from Rocklabs Limited (Rocklabs), Auckland, New Zealand and are listed in Table 13.1. They
are supplied in 50 gram sachets. CSRM numbers SE19, SG14 and SI15 were used from
August 2006 until November 2007. Since no more of these CSRM were available from the
Rocklabs, new CSRM numbers SE29, SF30, SG31 and SH35 were used from November 2007


until September 2009. The Certificates of Analysis for the CSRM can be found on the
Rocklabs web site at www.rocklabs.com.
Table 13.1 Certified Standard Reference Material Information for Gold
Reference
Au (ppm)
Material ‐ 3 S.D. ‐ 2 S.D. + 2 S. D. + 3 S. D.
Recommended
No.
SE19 0.505 0.531 0.583 0.635 0.661
SG14 0.857 0.901 0.989 1.077 1.121
SI15 1.604 1.671 1.805 1.939 2.006
SE29 0.549 0.565 0.597 0.629 0.645
SF30 0.769 0.790 0.832 0.874 0.895
SG31 0.912 0.940 0.996 1.052 1.080
SH35 1.191 1.235 1.323 1.411 1.455
Table compiled by CGL based on Rocklabs Certificates of Analysis available at www.rocklabs.com.
Table 13.2Certified Standard Reference Material Information for Silver
Reference
Ag (ppm)
Material ‐ 3 S.D. ‐ 2 S.D. + 2 S.D. + 3 S.D.
Recommended
No.
SG14 8.03 9.06 11.12 13.18 14.21
SI15 16.62 17.64 19.68 21.72 22.74
Table compiled by CGL based on Rocklabs Certificates of Analysis available at www.rocklabs.com. CSRM not listed in the
table are not certified for silver.
CSRM results are monitored on receipt of each assay job by reference to “performance
gates” defined by one, two and three standard deviations (SD) of the certififed
recommended value. CSRM results that are within ±2 SD limits are accepted. A single CSRM
which is greater or less than ±2 SD but within the ±3 SD envelope is also accepted; however,
if two consecutive CSRM are greater or less than ±2 SD but within the ±3 SD envelope they
are rejected. Any CSRM results that are greater or less than ±3 SD are rejected. The
laboratory is notified of the problem and all samples between the two last two accepted
CSRM are rejected and are re‐analyzed. New CSRM are sent to the laboratory for the re‐
assays. The final database used for mineral resource estimations only contains analytical
results associated with CSRM and blanks that passed QC. The performance of the CSRM
associated with the final database are shown graphically in 2 to 8. The x‐axis (assay number)
is in chronological order of the sequential sample numbers.


The previous technical report describes QC problems in the first part of the drill program in
2007 and how these were resolved (Lewis & San Martin,2008).
Figure 13.2 Performance of CSRM SE19 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007

Figure supplied by CGL
Figure 13.3 Performance of CSRM SG14 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007


Figure 13.4 Performance of CSRM SI15 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007.

Figure 13.5 Performance of CSRM SE29 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007.


Figure 13.6 Performance of CSRM SE29 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007.
0.661
0.645 +3 st
0.629 +2 st
0.613
Au(ppm)
0.597
Au (ppm)
0.581
0.565 ‐2 st
Au
Certificated
0.549 ‐3 st
0.533
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Assay Number


Figure 13.7Performance of CSRM SE29 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009
Reference Material ‐ SE29
0.661
0.645 +3 st
0.629 +2 st
0.613
Au(ppm)
0.597 Au (ppm)
Au Certificated
0.581
‐2 st
0.565
‐3 st
0.549
0.533
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Assay Number

Figure 13.8 Performance of CSRM SF30 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007.


Figure 13.9 Performance of CSRM SF30 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007.
0.916
0.895 +3 st
0.874 +2 st
0.853
Au(ppm)
0.832
Au (ppm)
0.811
0.79 ‐2 st
Au
0.769 Certificated
‐3 st
0.748
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Assay Number


Figure 13.10 Performance of CSRM SF30 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009.
Reference Material ‐ SF30
0.916
0.895 +3 st
0.874 +2 st
0.853
Au(ppm)
0.832 Au (ppm)
Au Certificated
0.811
0.79 ‐2 st
0.769 ‐3 st
0.748
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Assay Number

Figure 13.11 Performance of CSRM SG31 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007.


Figure 13.12 Performance of CSRM SG31 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007.
1.108
1.08 +3 st
1.052 +2 st
1.024
Au(ppm)
0.996
Au (ppm)
0.968
0.94 ‐2 st
Au
0.912 ‐3 st Certificated
0.884
0 10 20 30 40 50
Assay Number

Figure 13.13 Performance of CSRM SG31 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2007.


Figure 13.14 Performance of CSRM SH35 for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007

Figure 13.15 Performance of CSRM SH35 for gold at SGS Peru, 2007.
1.499
1.455 +3 st
1.411 +2 st
1.367
Au(ppm)
1.323
Au (ppm)
1.279
1.235 ‐2 st Au

Certificated
1.191 ‐3 st
1.147
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Assay Number


Figure 13.16 Performance of CSRM SH35 for gold at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009.
Reference Material ‐ SH35
1.499
1.455 +3 st
+2 st
1.411
1.367
Au(ppm)
1.323 Au (ppm)
Au Certificated
1.279
1.235 ‐2 st
1.191 ‐3 st
1.147
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Assay Number

Figure 13.17 Performance of CSRM SG14 for silver at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007


Figure 13.18 Performance of CSRM SI15 for silver at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007


13.6 BLANK SAMPLES
Two blank samples are submitted with every 100 samples The first blank sample used was
a coarse quartz sand washed from a kaolinitized granite in the Antioquia batholith in
Colombia. When this was exhausted, a fine grained clean quartz sand purchased at a
swimming pool supply store in Medellín, was used. However, this was a very fine grained
powder and it was felt that it was too fine to assure a “normal” pulverization to check for
possible contamination. Therefore a coarser grained quartz blank was purchased in
Medellín and has been used since August, 2007. Figures 13.19 through 13.21 show the
performance of the blank samples for gold over time. The majorities of results are below
detection and are satisfactory, with very few outliers.
Figure 13.19 Performance of blank samples for gold at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007
0.68
0.646
0.612
0.578
0.544
0.51
0.476
0.442
0.408
Au(ppm)
0.374
0.34
0.306
0.272
0.238 Au (ppm)
0.204
0.17
0.136
0.102
0.068
0.034
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Assay Number

Figure supplied by CGL.


Figure 13.20 Performance of blank samples at SGS Peru, 2007
0.03
0.025
0.02
Au(ppm)
0.015
Au (ppm)
0.01
0.005
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Assay Number

Figure 13.21 Performance of blank samples for gold at Inspectorate, Peru, 2007 to 2009
0.3
Au(ppm)
0.2
Au (ppm)
0.1
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Assay Number



13.7 PREPARATION DUPLICATES
Preparation duplicates are made as a check on adequate sample preparation. Two duplicate
sample pulps per 100 samples were routinely prepared at the sample preparation facility.
For the preparation duplicate samples, an empty, numbered sample bag was submitted as
part of the normal sample stream. A note inside the bag instructed the sample preparation
facility to prepare a second pulp from a certain numbered sample. The preparation
duplicate was never the previous sample. To avoid the preparation of the two samples at
the same time, the preparation duplicate was always a previously prepared sample. This
was assured during the sample numbering process by using the random number generator.
If the random number generator yielded a preparation duplicate sample number lower than
the original sample, the two samples were simply switched. The results of the preparation
duplicate sampling are illustrated in Figures 13.11 through 13.14.
Figure 13.22. Preparation duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006
to 2007.
3
2.75
2.5 y = 0.9385x + 0.0109
Preparation Duplicate Au (ppm)
2.25
2
1.75
1.5
1.25
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3
Original Au (ppm)


Figure 13.23. Preparation duplicates for silver by ICP in core samples at Inspectorate,
Reno, 2006 to 2007.
15
Preparation Duplicate Ag (ppm)
10
y = 0.7762x + 0.3535
0
0 5 10 15
Original Ag (ppm)

(Note one high grade outlier removed)


Figure 13.24. Preparation duplicates for gold in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007.
2.5
2.25
y = 1.3358x ‐ 0.0052
2
1.75
1.5
1.25
0.75
0.5
0.25
0
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2
Original Au (ppm)


Figure 13.25. Preparation duplicates for silver in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007.
16
14
y = 0.8922x + 0.1968
12
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Original Ag (ppm)


Figure 13.26. Preparation duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate Peru, 2007
to 2009.
y = 0.6876x + 0.0389
6
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Original Au (ppm)


Figure 13.27. Preparation duplicates for silver in core samples at Inspectorate Peru, 2007
to 2009.
90
y = 0.9982x ‐ 0.031
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Original Ag (ppm)

Figure 13.222 to Figure 13.27 show all of the preparation duplicate data for gold and silver
at the three main labs used. Overall the data for gold show a good correlation but with
some poor correlations at higher grades, which lowers the correlation coefficients. This is
interpreted to be a minor nugget or cluster effect at higher grades. The data for silver is
generally much better than that for gold. The data for the Inspectorate Peru lab is better
than the other two labs but there is some scatter for gold which requires investigation.
13.8 FIELD DUPLICATES
Field duplicates are taken to test the geological homogeneity of the mineralization and the
sample sizes and procedures. Duplicate samples of drill core were obtained by cutting the
reference half of the core in half again with the core saw, and taking one of the quarter core
samples as the field duplicate sample, leaving the other quarter core for reference. This
method was used in order to leave a reference sample in the core box rather than sampling


the entire remaining half core. This method may introduce a certain amount of additional
variance due to the difference in sample weights, and is a measure of the geological
variability of the mineralization and the sample size. Duplicate samples in the underground
mines were obtained by cutting a second sample immediately below or in some cases,
immediately above the original sample. Where possible the duplicate samples were taken
at the time of the routine sampling, however, in some cases there was a time lapse of days
to months after the initial sampling. [no mine samples on charts – all are D‐samples. Get
mine samples separately]
Figure 13.28 Field duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007
6
5.5
5
4.5 y = 1.038x ‐ 0.0236
Field Duplicate Au (ppm)
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Original Au (ppm)


Figure 13.29 Field duplicates for silver at Inspectorate, Reno, 2006 to 2007 (core samples)
12
y = 1.1177x ‐ 0.2297
10
8
Field Duplicate Ag (ppm)
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Original Ag (ppm)


Figure 13.30 Field duplicates for gold in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007.
2.5
1.5
y = 1.4418x + 0.0071
0.5
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Original Au (ppm)

(Note one outlier removed)


Figure 13.31 Field duplicates for silver in core samples at SGS Peru, 2007.
12
y = 1.0748x + 0.0347
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Original Ag (ppm)


Figure 13.32. Field duplicates for gold in core samples at Inspectorate Peru, 2007 to 2009.
5.5
4.5
4 y = 0.7627x + 0.0557
3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Original Au (ppm)


Figure 13.33. Field duplicates for silver in core samples at Inspectorate, Peru, 2007 to
2009.
60
50
y = 0.7367x + 0.5413
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Original Ag (ppm)

The field duplicate data are shown in Figure 13.28 to


Figure 13.33. The correlation is reasonable but with some poor correlations at higher
grades, particularly of gold, attributed to a nugget effect. The nugget effect is likely
enhanced by the smaller size of the duplicate sample (quarter‐core) compared to the
original half‐core. It is recommended that field duplicates be plotted by core size to
determine this influence, and that some duplicates using all of the remaining half‐core are
taken to make a better comparison using equivalent sample weights.
The field duplicates for gold for mine channel samples show high scatter,and poor
repeatability at values above 2.0 g/t, although the number of duplicates is small.
Figure 13.34 Field duplicates for gold in mine channel samples at Inspectorate, Reno and
Peru, 2006 to 2008.
2.0
R² = 0.6882
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Original Au (ppm)

N = 37 samples. 4 samples >2.0 g/t Au removed from plot due to poor repeatability.


13.9 CORE SAW CUTTINGS AND SLUDGE SAMPLES
Samples were collected from drill core cuttings, the core saw tray and from the sludge
collected in the water settling and clarification sump for the core saw. The samples from
the core saw tray were collected daily and placed into a plastic sample bag where samples
for 3 to 7 day periods were collected. On days when more than one drill hole was cut, the
sample for one hole was collected, placed into a common plastic sample bag and then the
core saw tray was cleaned prior to cutting a different drill hole. The sludge samples were
initially also collected every 3 to 7 days when there was a single drill working and thus there
is a smaller amount of this type of sample; however, when the number of drills working was
increased, these samples were collected several times per day depending on the core being
cut. In both cases the sample could be related to a specific drill hole and interval. When
the final part of a sample was collected, the entire sample was placed into a cloth sample
bag to drain and air dry.
Figure 13.35 Core Saw Rejects versus the Weighted Average for the Core Intervals which
Comprise the Core Saw Reject Composite Sample for Gold less than 10 ppm
Core Saw Rejects <10 ppm Au

10
Core Saw Tray n = 221 Core Saw Tray
9 Average Au (ppm) = 1.606 Sludge Tank
Drill Core Avg. Au (ppm) = 0.266
Linear (Core Saw Tray)
8
Core Weighted Average Au (ppm
Linear (Sludge Tank)

Sludge Tank n = 136
7 Average Au (ppm) = 1.014
Drill Core Avg. Au (ppm) = 0.243
6
2 r = 0.613 r = 0.596
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Reject Au (ppm)


Figure 13.36 Core Saw Rejects versus the Weighted Average for the Core Intervals which
Comprise the Core Saw Reject Composite Sample for Gold less than 2 ppm
Core Saw Rejects <2 ppm Au
2.0
Core Saw Tray n = 184 Core Saw Tray
1.8 Average Au (ppm) = 0.548 Sludge Tank
Drill Core Avg. Au (ppm) = 0.150 Linear (Core Saw Tray)
1.6
Core Weighted Average Au (ppm
Linear (Sludge Tank)

Sludge Tank n = 123
1.4 Average Au (ppm) = 0.484
Drill Core Avg. Au (ppm) = 0.217 r = 0.617
1.2
r = 0.649
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
Reject Au (ppm)

There is reasonable correlation between the core saw reject samples (both core saw tray
and sludge tank); however, there is some degree of scatter in both data sets. Additionally in
all cases the core saw reject samples are significantly higher than the corresponding
weighted average of the core that makes up the core saw reject sample. One would expect
that the two sample types would yield similar gold values. That the core saw reject samples
are significantly higher than the core saw samples indicates that gold is being selectively lost
during the core cutting process. This may be due to the association of free gold with friable
sulfides in veinlets which get preferentially plucked or ground during the saw cutting
process.
It is recommended that hydraulic core splitting be tried in order to minimize any loss of gold
during the sample preparation process. Hydraulic core splitters were purchased and tried in
2008 but proved to be of poor quality and inadequate for the job.
13.10 INTERNAL LABORATORY REPEATS
The default assay method at Inspectorate in Reno and Lima was fire assay with an AA finish
with an upper detection limit of 3.0 ppm. If values are higher, the laboratory dilutes some of
the pregnant solution and re‐runs the sample. For all samples with results >3.0 ppm with
this method, the sample was re‐assayed by fire assay with a gravimetric finish (FA Grav). As


a QC procedure this compares two different analytical methods for gold. There is an
inherent preselection of samples above 3.0 ppm which introduces a sample bias, and it is
not a blind check on the laboratory
Figure 13.37 illustrates the fire assay AA finish versus the fire assay gravimetric finish for all
Marmato samples which were assayed using both methods. The plot of this data shows a
very close correlation which is not unexpected. There was a single outlier sample which
was assayed four times yielding gold assay results of 3.874 g/t, 64.384 g/t, 24.274 g/t and
74.193 g/t with an average of 49.181 g/t. The results for this single sample indicated that at
least for this sample a nugget effect was occurring for gold. In all cases where data for both
FA AA and FA Grav do exist, the FA Grav data were used in the resource estimate.
Figure 13.37 Fire Assay AA Finish versus Fire Assay Gravimetric Finish for all Marmato
Samples Assayed using both Methods
All Data FA AA versus FA Grav
180
R² = 0.9802
160
140
120
FA Grav Au (ppm)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
FA AA Au(ppm)


13.11 EXTERNAL LABORATORY REPEATS
Check and replicate and samples are sent for analysis at an independent lab as a control on
the primary lab. Check assays are carried out on a new sample pulp prepared from the
coarse reject. Replicate assays are made on the same pulp from the initial sample
preparation. The check and replicate assay samples are selected using a random number
generator to avoid bias in sample selection. The standard procedure was originally to
submit 5% of all samples for check assays and 10% for replicate assays. This procedure was
modified in August 2009 in consultation with Scott Wilson. The modified procedure is to do
check assays on 5% of samples above a cut‐off of 0.05 ppm Au, and replicate assays on 5%
of samples above the lower limit of detection of gold. This modification was made in order
to avoid the cost of large amounts of check and replicate assays of samples which are very
low grade or have no detectable gold, as these provide no meaningful QC. It is considered
that this is a large enough sample subset to identify any QC issues.
The primary lab was Inspectorate in Lima, with only 6% of the check samples from
Inspectorate Reno, and the secondary lab was SGS Lima. Some primary assays were carried
out by SGS Lima, and these samples were checked at Inspectorate Lima.
Figure 13.38 to Figure 13.40show check analyses of gold, silver and zinc for drill core and
mine samples from Inspectorate Lima (with 6% Inspectorate Reno and ALS Chemex)
compared with SGS Lima. Gold shows a very good correlation between labs for samples
below 5.0 ppm, with some scatter which can be attributed to a weak nugget effect. Samples
greater than 5.0 ppm have poor repeatability indicating a stronger nugget effect at higher
grades. Silver by AA (Figure 13.39) also shows a very good correlation with much less scatter
than gold, even at high grades, indicating a different mineralogical distribution from gold.
ICP analyses for As, Cu, Fe, Pb and Zn give good correlations, with low to moderate scatter,
after elimination of some high grade samples with poor repeatability. In some elements the
SGS averages are higher than Inspectorate, notably zinc at 13% higher (Figure 13.40), iron at
14% higher, arsenic at 9% higher, while copper is 3% higher. The check analyses show a
problem with potassium by ICP at Inspectorate Lima, which are all below 1.0%, compared
with SGS Lima with up to 5.0%, and there is also a problem with antimony which tends to be
much higher at Inspectorate Lima, with a very poor correlation compared with SGS Lima:
these ICP problems require further investigation to resolve them.
Figure 13.41 to Figure 13.43 show check analyses of gold, silver and zinc for drill core from
SGS Lima compared with Inspectorate Lima. As expected, they show very similar trends to
the check samples of Inspectorate Lima compared with SGS Lima.


Figure 13.38 Check assays for Au < 5 ppm Inspectorate vs SGS
5.0
4.0
3.0
Au Checks-SGS
2.0
R = 0,9544
1.0
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Au Original-Inspectorate

(n = 358 and 6 samples > 5.0 ppm cut. 94% originals done at Inspectorate Lima, balance at Inspectorate Reno
and ALS Chemex.)


Figure 13.39. Check assays for silver by AA, Inspectorate vs SGS
100.0
R² = 0.9886
80.0
60.0
Ag Checks-SGS
40.0
20.0
0.0
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0
Ag Original-Inspectorate

(n = 363, no samples cut. 94% originals done at Inspectorate Lima, balance at Inspectorate Reno and ALS
Chemex)
Figure 13.40. Check analyses of zinc by ICP, Inspectorate Lima vs SGS Lima.
10000.0
R² = 0.8988
8000.0
6000.0
Zn Checks-SGS
4000.0
2000.0
0.0
0.0 2000.0 4000.0 6000.0 8000.0 10000.0
Zn Original-Inspectorate


Figure 13.41. Check assays of gold >5.0 ppm, SGS Lima vs Inspectorate Lima.
5.0
4.0
R² = 0.9932
3.0
Au Checks-IP
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Au Original - SGS

(n = 89. Note 1 sample with bad check eliminated)
Figure 13.42. Check assays of silver by AA, SGS Lima vs Inspectorate Lima
35.0
R² = 0.9781
30.0
25.0
20.0
Ag Checks-IP
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0
Ag Original - SGS


(n = 91)
Figure 13.43. Check analyses of zinc by ICP, SGS Lima vs Inspectorate.
10000.0
R² = 0.9648
8000.0
6000.0
Zn Checks-IP
4000.0
2000.0
0.0
0.0 2000.0 4000.0 6000.0 8000.0 10000.0
Zn Original-SGS

(n = 90. 1 sample with bad check eliminated.)

Figure 13.44 to Figure 13.47 show replicate assays for gold, silver and zinc from
Inspectorate Reno and Lima compared with SGS Lima. They show similar trends to the
check samples. Gold below 5 ppm shows a good correlation between labs, with a bit more
scatter between 1 and 3 ppm when compared with the check samples (Figure 13.44), but
overall much lower variability at higher grades (Figure 13.45). This indicates that the
pulverization is effective in homogenizing the distribution of gold in the samples. The
average of gold assays at SGS is 11% higher than Inspectorate (7% higher for samples < 5
ppm), due to scatter from nugget effect rather than a systematic difference between labs.
The silver replicates by AA show excellent comparison between labs, with a slight high bias
at SGS Lima (5%) caused by some variation in high grade samples. Zinc replicate analyses by
ICP (Figure 13.47) show a very good comparison between labs also, and the SGS average is
only 4% higher than Inspectorate, compared with 11% for the replicates. Other elements
analyzed by ICP (As, Cu, Fe, Pb) show good correlations between labs and are similar to the
check samples, while there are the same problems with potassium and antimony by ICP.


Figure 13.44. Replicate assays of gold below 5 ppm, Inspectorate vs SGS Lima.
5.0
R² = 0.9344
4.0
3.0
Au Checks-SGS
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

(n = 400. Originals 226 at Inspectorate Lima, 169 at Inspectorate Reno, 5 at ALS Chemex)

Figure 13.45. Replicate assays of gold (no cut‐off), Inspectorate Lima vs SGS Lima
20.0
15.0
Au Checks-SGS
10.0
R = 0,9544
5.0
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0



Figure 13.46. Replicate assays of silver by AA, Inspectorate vs SGS Lima.
40.0
R² = 0.9805
35.0
30.0
25.0
Ag Checks-SGS
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0
Ag Original-Inspectorate


Figure 13.47. Replicate analyses of zinc by ICP, Inspectorate vs SGS Lima.
30000.0
R² = 0.9198
25000.0
20000.0
Zn Checks-SGS
15000.0
10000.0
5000.0
0.0
0.0 5000.0 10000.0 15000.0 20000.0 25000.0 30000.0
Zn Original-Inspectorate



13.12 METALLICS ASSAYS
Metallic screen assays were carried out on 15 samples at SGS in Lima to check for the
presence of coarse, free gold, obtain an assay of the whole sample and determine the
nugget effect. The approximately 500 g samples were crushed and pulverized according to
normal SGS QA/QC procedures (85% passing 75µm/200 mesh) and screened at 106µm (140
mesh). Each sample fraction was weighed. The +140 mesh fraction was assayed twice (1
assay ton with FA AA) and the entire ‐140 fraction was assayed. The final assay result is the
weighted average of the average +140 mesh and the ‐140 mesh fractions. The results of the
screen metallic tests are given in Table 13.6 and shown in Figure 13.42.
Table 13.3 Results of the Screen Metallic Test work
-140 +140 -140 +140 Weighted Original
Sample Fraction Fraction Fraction Fraction Avg. Au % Au Assay
Number Weight (g) Weight (g) Au (ppm) Au (ppm) (g/t) +140 Final (g/t)
D00121 480.04 22.13 1.85 13.6 2.37 25.3 2.22
D00228 492.77 25.52 1.58 6.35 1.81 17.3 1.541
D00244 487.68 24.17 0.59 17.83 1.40 60.1 0.486
D00767 501.89 21.19 0.04 <0.02 0.04 0.0 0.03
D00869 524.11 23.71 0.12 0.04 0.11 1.6 0.274
D02094 493.06 22.23 0.12 0.76 0.15 21.9 0.076
D02658 485.47 22.87 2.16 24.27 3.15 34.7 2.88
R1663 496.26 23.01 3.12 6.74 3.28 9.1 3.6
R1667 484.68 25.26 0.28 2.93 0.41 35.4 0.823
R1686 478.22 22.94 0.45 4.4 0.63 32.0 1.989
R1664 472.77 27.77 1.77 29.74 3.32 49.7 2.709
R4105 475.52 27.05 0.45 2.29 0.55 22.4 0.258
R4409 514.14 22.28 0.68 5.16 0.87 24.6 1.927
R4441 493.1 21.76 1.15 5.74 1.34 18.1 1.56
R4442 500.99 21.75 0.86 6.94 1.11 26.0 0.826

The graph shows that on the screen metallic assays and fire assays have a good correlation
but a fairly large amount of scatter, indicative of a nugget effect. The average grade of the
fire assays is 1.41 g/t compared with 1.37 g/t for the screen metallic assays. It should be
noted that 33% of the original samples were from early assay orders that did not pass QC
and were not repeated, so the comparison has limitations and the variation may not all be
attributable to a nugget effect


Figure 13.48 Scatter Plot of the Original Gold Assay versus the Screen Metallic Gold
Analysis
3.50
R² = 0.7536
3.00
Screen Metallics Avg. Au FA (ppm)
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Original Au FA (ppm)

13.13 DENSITY AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY
Density measurements are made routinely by CGL geologists during core logging and
sample preparation. Each geologist tries to make one density measurment daily but this is a
function of the core quality; due to the method used for density calculation, unbroken core
is necessary. A 14 to 15 cm long piece of core from the interval of interest is cut, ensuring
that the cut is perpendicular to the core axis and does not result in the loss of any material
along the cut line. The length of the core is measured and the diameter of the core is
determined with a digital caliper at 3 to 4 cm intervals and the average diameter is
calculated. The core is weighed on a digital balance and the density is calculated as follows:
• Pi * core diameter * core length = core volume


• Core weight / core volume = density

Specific gravity and density measurements were also made externally by SGS Lakefield on
several metallurgical samples provided by CGL (Jackman & Fleming, 2008). The bulk density
of twenty individual samples of Composite 1 was determined using the wax core method.
The samples were then de‐waxed, crushed and the specific gravity was determined. The
results are given in Table 13.7. The average bulk density of Composite 1 was 2.61 g/cm3.
SGS Lakefield also made bulk density measurements on some of the samples received for
the MET‐05 composite. These bulk densities were calculated from water displacement
measurements without waxing because the samples were required for metallurgical testing.
These results are shown in Table 13.8. The specific gravity of MET‐05 was determined to be
2.67 using a pycnometer.
Table 13.4 Bulk Densities of Metallurgical Sample Composite 1
Rock Density Pycnometer
Number Description Ratio
Density (g/cm3) Density (lb/ft3) Density (g/cc3) Density (lb/ft3)
1 032GZ 24XM 2.59 161.60 2.65 165.50 0.98
2 032GZ 25XM 2.59 162.00 2.67 166.70 0.97
3 032GZ 25XM 2.60 162.10 2.68 167.30 0.97
4 032GZ 26XM 2.59 161.80 2.70 168.60 0.96
5 032GZ 26XM 2.64 164.60 2.75 171.70 0.96
6 032GZ 27XM 2.64 164.60 2.68 167.30 0.98
7 032GZ 27XM 2.59 161.50 2.64 164.80 0.98
8 032GZ 28XM 2.64 164.90 2.68 167.30 0.99
9 032GZ 28XM 2.65 165.40 2.68 167.30 0.99
10 032GZ 29XM 2.62 163.70 2.66 166.10 0.99
11 032GZ 30XM 2.61 162.90 2.68 167.30 0.97
12 032GZ 31XM 2.61 162.80 2.68 167.30 0.97
13 032GZ 31XM 2.63 164.00 2.70 168.60 0.97


Rock Density Pycnometer
Number Description Ratio
Density (g/cm3) Density (lb/ft3) Density (g/cc3) Density (lb/ft3)
14 032GZ 31XM 2.62 163.50 2.68 167.30 0.98
15 032GZ 32XM 2.64 165.00 2.63 164.20 1.00
16 032GZ 32XM 2.67 166.50 2.68 167.30 1.00
17 032GZ 33XM 2.63 164.40 2.68 167.30 0.98
18 032GZ 33XM 2.62 163.60 2.68 167.30 0.98
19 032GZ 34XM 2.52 157.40 2.80 174.80 0.90
20 032GZ 35XM 2.52 157.40 2.68 167.30 0.94
Average 2.61 163 2.68 167.6 0.97
Table 13.5 Bulk Densities of Metallurgical Sample MET 05
Number Sample Density (g/cm3) Density (lb/ft3) Number Sample Density (g/cm3) Density (lb/ft3)
1 Met 05 2.52 157.6 21 111YA01X 2.63 164
2 Met 05 2.59 161.9 22 111YA01X 2.63 163.9
3 Met 05 2.61 163.1 23 111YA01X 2.61 163
4 Met 05 2.52 157.6 24 111YA01X 2.67 166.6
5 Met 05 2.54 158.8 25 111YA01X 2.6 162
6 Met 05 2.4 149.7 26 111YA01X 2.6 162.5
7 Met 05 2.46 153.4 27 111YA01X 2.59 161.4
8 Met 05 2.52 157.1 28 111YA01X 2.57 160.2
9 Met 05 2.51 156.9 29 111YA01X 2.63 164.2
10 Met 05 2.47 154.4 30 111YA01X 2.59 161.6
Average 2.51 156.7 Average 2.61 163.1
11 R2428 2.63 164 31 032GZ40X 2.44 152.6


12 R2428 2.51 156.6 32 032GZ40X 2.44 152.6
13 R2428 2.61 162.8 33 032GZ40X 2.39 149
14 R2428 2.73 170.7 34 032GZ40X 2.55 159.1
15 R2428 2.55 159.1 35 032GZ40X 2.59 161.9
16 R2428 2.55 159.1 36 032GZ40X 2.61 163.1
17 R2428 2.68 167.2 37 032GZ40X 2.43 151.9
18 R2428 2.61 163.2 38 032GZ40X 2.46 153.8
19 R2428 2.73 170.4 39 032GZ40X 2.46 153.7
20 R2428 2.63 164.5 40 032GZ40X 2.56 159.8
Average 2.61 162.9 Average 2.49 155.5
13.14 CONCLUSION
Detailed data regarding the QA/QC program is available in the company database, this data
includes the backup material for the preparation duplicate assays, field duplicate assays,
channel sample field duplicate assays, core saw and sludge samples, various laboratory
assay data, blank sample assays and rock density data.
SEWC has reviewed the procedures for sample collection, sample preparation, security,
analytical procedures and the use of external laboratory repeats that were followed during
the exploration program on the Zona Alto Marmato project.
SEWC consider that the QA/QC procedures followed generally conform to the industry best
practices standards currently in effect and the procedures are adequate to ensure a
representative determination of the mineral content.


14 DATA VERIFICATION
During the site visit to the Marmato project, an underground visit to the Mina Botanica was
conducted in addition to a visit to the some of the older mills at Marmato. No samples
were collected to verify the mineralization as this was validated in the November 14, 2006
Technical Report. SEWC concurs with the statement of Micon 2006 “Micon is satisfied that
its sampling underground at Mina Botanica on the Marmato project and one of the pits on
the El Salto prospect of the Caramanta projects has confirmed the presence of gold and
silver mineralization at a similar tenor to that reported previously by CGL.”
SEWC randomly generated a list of twenty drillholes and received copies of the original
assay certificates. The assays were compared to the assays used in this grade estimate.
There is a one hundred percent accuracy of input data as compared to the twenty randomly
generated assay certificates. SEWC is satisfied with the accuracy od the data used in the
resource estimate and technical report.


15 ADJACENT PROPERTIES
Recent work by CGF and other exploration companies has identified significant gold
mineralization in the “Middle Cauca gold belt”. This extends for about 90 km in a north‐
south direction from Titiribi in the north, to Quinchia in the south, with Marmato located
near the middle. The gold mineralization is of intermediate sulphidation epithermal style
(Marmato‐style) and porphyry style. This is part of the Central Porphyry sub belt of Early to
Late Miocene age defined by Sillitoe et al. (1982), with the gold mineralization related to
the emplacement of the porphyry stocks.
AGA recently announced the discovery of porphyry gold mineralization at La Colosa, near
Cajamarca, Tolima, 110 km SSE of Marmato, with a Australian Joint Ore Reserve Committee
(JORC) compliant inferred mineral resource of 468.8 Mt at 0.86 g/t gold containing 12.9
Moz gold, at a cut‐off grade of 0.30 g/t gold (AGA press release, May 6, 2008).
Marmato is one of the most important historical gold properties in Colombia and lies in the
heart of the main historical gold producing region. The Middle Cauca region, where
Marmato is located, was occupied for two thousand years before the Spanish conquest by
farmers, potters, gold miners and goldsmiths of the Quimbaya culture (500 BC to 1600 AD).
The early Spanish chroniclers of the 16th century classified the indigenous groups into tribes
or provinces including the Cartamas in the Marmato area, whose main occupation was gold
mining.
Marmato was important during the Spanish era following the colonization period from 1514
to 1537 and the formation of Nueva Granada. The gold mines of Marmato are mentioned
in Spanish chronicles in 1583 and 1625, with the Cauca valley noted as a rich gold producer
in the 16th and 17th centuries. Other gold and silver mines described from the colonial
period in the district include Echandia, Supia, Quiebralomo, Anserma and Arma (Morales,
2004, Restrepo, 1952).
Other important gold‐silver mineral districts in the area are Riosucio – Supia and Quinchia
to the south of Marmato; and going northwards Caramanta – Valparaiso, Mistrató – Andes,
Aguadas – Pácora – Salamina, Fredonia, Venezia and Titiribi (Duran et al., 2005). These
projects are shown in Figure 15.1 and form a north‐south mineral belt.


Figure 15.1 Mineral Deposits and Projects around the Marmato Project



There are two immediately adjacent properties which directly affect the interpretation and
evaluation of the mineralization or anomalies found at Marmato. In addition there are also
a number of other projects currently being explored in the area by AGA through its
subsidiary AngloGold Ashanti Colombia S.A. (formerly Sociedad Kedahda S.A. (Sociedad
Kedahda)) and its joint venture partner B2 Gold Corp. (formerly part of Bema Gold
Corporation (Bema)) which may have an impact on the projects in the future, as well as
projects being explored by other companies.
The two properties adjacent to Marmato are described below.
15.1 MARMATO, ZONA BAJA
The Marmato Zona Baja is operated by a single company, Mineros Nacionales, under
Contract 041‐89M. Mineros Nacionales operate the underground Maruja Mine in the Zona
Baja which has workings on four levels numbered 16 (Verónica, 1,260 m), 17 (Zancudo,
1,210 m), 18 (La Maruja, 1,160 m – the main level) and 19 (La Clavada, 1,110 m).
The Zona Baja was explored by Minera Phelps Dodge, a subsidiary of Phelps Dodge,
between 1984 and 1985 with the objective of defining a 300 t/d underground operation.
Minera Phelps Dodge drilled 7 underground core holes and defined a proven reserve of
102,900 t at 7.83 g/t gold and 24 g/t silver, and a total reserve (proven, probable and
possible) of 754,600 t at the same grade. The resource estimate pre‐dates the CIM
standards and definitions required under NI‐43‐101 regulations and is quoted here as a
historical resource estimate only.
In 1993, Mineros Nacionales gained control of the Zona Baja and developed an
underground mine operation. The following year the mine and mill were upgraded and
BISA of Peru defined a proven plus probable reserve of 99,787 t at 8.58 g/t gold and a
possible reserve of 70,432 t at 6.95 g/t gold. Once again it should be noted that these
resource estimates pre‐date the CIM standards and definitions required under NI‐43‐101
regulations and are quoted here as historical resource estimates only. By late 1990s the
mine and mill were operating at 300 t/d with grades of 5 to 12 g/t gold (Conquistador,
1998). The mill capacity is now 800 t/d.
Production in 2008 was 24,138 oz gold with calculated recovered grades of 2.95 g/t gold
and 4.48 g/t silver. See Table 15.1 for a production history of the the Zona Baja.


Table 15.1Gold and Silver Production History Zona Baja at Marmato by Mineros
Nacionales S.A.
Year Ore (t) Gold Silver
(kg) (ounces) Grade (g/t) (kg) (ounces) Grade (g/t)
2002 644.5 20,721.16 1,067.10 34,308.06
2003
2004
671.297 1,290.91
186,330 21,582.70 3.60 41,503.82 6.93
2005
763.3 1,233.83
231,540 24,540.66 3.30 39,668.65 5.33
2006
814 1,219.00
262,517 26,170.71 3.10 39,191.76 4.64
2007
968.138 4,513.52
300,756 31,126.84 3.22 145,115.23 15.00
2008
750.774 1,141.20
254,474 24,137.94 2.95 36,690.53 4.48
Source: Mineros S.A. Annual Financial Reports, available at www.mineros.com.co. The 2002 data is from Minercol, 2002 and includes
some Zona Alta production. No data found for 2003 or 1993 to 2001. The recovered gold grades were calculated from the published
tonnes and kg. Data compiled by CGL.
On January 29, 2008 CGL entered into a Share Purchase and Sale Agreement with Mineros
S.A., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Colombia. Mineros is the
owner of Mineros Nacionales. Under the terms of the Agreement, CGL agreed to purchase
all of the issued and outstanding shares of Mineros Nacionales, for cash consideration of
US $35.0 million. The agreement provided that the transaction would be completed on
April 29, 2008, unless such date was extended by mutual agreement. CGL provided a
deposit guarantee in the amount of COP 4.9 billion (US $2.296 million), which would be
payable to the vendors if the transaction was not completed for any reason. CGL and
Mineros subsequently agreed to modify the Agreement and extend the completion date of
the Mineros transaction from April 29, 2008 to July 31, 2008. In connection with this
extension, on June 19, 2008 CGL advanced US $7.0 million, representing 20% of the US $35
million purchase price, with the balance due upon completion of the transaction. On
September 22, 2008 CGL and Mineros agreed to further extend the completion date to
October 31, 2008. Both the deposit and guarantee were non‐refundable if the transaction
was not completed for any reason. On October 31, 2008 Mineros notified CGL it was
unwilling to extend the closing of the transaction beyond October 31, 2008 and terminated
the transaction. Mineros exercised its right to the non refundable advance and term
deposit.


15.2 ECHANDIA PROPERTY
The Echandia property consists of a mineral license located contiguous with the north side
of the Marmato licenses and hosts similar style gold and silver mineralization which is
geologically part of the Marmato deposit. It has been mined historically for gold and silver
since Spanish times with artisanal mining currently exploiting the upper portion of the
property while the Mineros Nacionales mine exploited the veins in the deeper portions until
December 2007.
A Canadian junior company called Gran Colombia Resources Inc. (now called Wavve
Telecommunications Inc.) carried out exploration of the Echandia and Chaburquia
properties on the north part of the Marmato system between 1995 and 1997. It drilled 75
diamond holes for 15,000 m. See Table 15.2 for a summary of the drilling intersections >1
g/t gold for the Echandia property as derived from Gran Colombia press releases. The
drilling was designated into two series the M series which was drilled from surface and the
MU series which was drilled from underground. A scoping study was completed by
Geosystems International of Denver in 1997 however, no further work was carried out after
this date. Gran Colombia bought 48.25% of Mineros Nacionales in 1996 and sold it in 1997.
The property was explored and drilled from 2005 to 2006 by a private company called
Colombia Gold PLC (Colombia Gold), a corporation organized under the laws of England. No
results have been published as the company is private.
Table 15.2 Summary of Drill Intersections (>1 g/t Gold) for the Echandia Property (1995 to
1997)
Drill Hole Number Drilling Intersection (m) Assay Results (g/t)
From To Length Gold Silver
Surface Drill Holes
M2 0.00 117.00 117.00 1.300 19.000
M6 43.00 45.70 2.70 2.14 29.60
7 0.00 136.03 136.03 1.020 19.000
M8 17.30 20.38 3.08 1.380 150.000
26.00 31.60 5.60 1.900 287.000
M14 0.00 43.30 43.30 1.084 15.900


78.53 88.30 9.77 1.250 43.200
98.86 110.00 11.14 3.855 127.600
161.60 165.93 4.33 2.934 352.000
184.05 191.60 7.55 1.561 91.900
M15 181.60 185.60 4.00 5.281 851.200
189.25 195.00 5.75 2.378 342.200
M16 11.00 21.00 10.00 1.322 166.800
123.60 129.50 5.90 1.499 99.400
M18 107.38 110.00 2.62 3.547 19.900
M22 108.00 117.00 9.00 13.67 304.10
180.69 204.62 23.93 1.92 49.60
M – 23 62.60 67.41 4.81 3.39 33.10
M – 24 77.60 80.75 3.15 3.70 26.10
M – 26 106.00 109.74 3.74 3.65 310.80
Underground Drill Holes
MU‐1C 40.28 79.37 39.09 1.093 10.50
MU‐2A 0.00 3.02 3.02 1.801 5.20
14.58 50.07 35.49 1.169 13.10
MU‐3A 30.18 33.50 3.32 1.833 12.60
MU‐3B 10.36 37.03 26.67 1.034 8.30
MU‐5A 0.00 13.26 13.26 2.175 7.50
151.55 158.29 6.74 2.080 10.70
MU‐5B 9.00 11.00 2.00 4.097 13.80
MU‐6A 0.00 33.09 33.09 1.195 3.00
MU‐6B 0.00 31.68 31.68 1.352 4.90


64.62 89.50 24.88 2.083 23.10
MU‐7B 87.78 103.72 15.94 0.860 21.30
MU‐7C 94.47 114.04 19.57 1.400 77.80
MU‐7D 84.49 104.44 19.95 1.004 41.80
MU‐8B 121.17 127.00 5.83 10.678 21.30
MU ‐ 13C 12.98 34.04 21.06 1.86 6.40
Note: The information in this table is from Gran Colombia press releases filed on SEDAR and was
tabulated by CGL
On November 20, 2007, CGL entered into a letter of intent with Colombia Gold to acquire its
assets or the issued and outstanding shares. Colombia Gold’s main assets are the mining
rights to the Echandia property. The transaction was not completed. On July 29, 2009,
Medoro announced that it had executed a letter of intent to acquire all of the issued and
outstanding shares of Colombia Gold. Consideration for the acquisition will be the issuance
of 33,333,333 Medoro shares and the payment by Medoro, upon closing, of Cdn $2.6
million of Colombia Gold's outstanding debt. Completion of the transaction is subject to the
negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement, satisfactory completion of technical,
financial, legal and other commercial due diligence and customary conditions, including
legal and regulatory approvals.
15.3 CARAMANTA EXPLORATION PROJECT OF CGL
CGL holds 16,571 ha (165.7 km2 net area) of exploration licenses in the district surrounding
Marmato known as the Caramanta exploration project (Caramanta project). The Company
has defined five gold targets by surface exploration and surface sampling in 2007. These
targets are Oro Fino, El Salto, Pácora, Campana, and San Bartolome which together with
Marmato form a 12 km diameter gold district. Minor artisanal mining has been conducted
on parts of these targets but no drilling has been carried out. Plans have been made to
carry out reconnaissance diamond drilling of approximately 2,000 m on each of these
projects in 2010.
The exploration program incorporated the database bought from Kedahda (now AngloGold
Ashanti Colombia or AGA) with the purchase of the Kedahda licenses in 2006. The Kedahda
database is comprised of systematic stream sediment sampling, limited follow‐up rock and
soil sampling carried out by Kedahda during 2004‐05, and exploration data generated by


Conquistador in the district from the late 1990s through 2001, latterly in partnership with
AGA.
Gold mineralization in the Caramanta targets is hosted by porphyry stocks of dacitic to
andesitic composition that intrude metamorphic basement rocks. Two different
mineralization styles have been identified in the Marmato district as follows:
• Gold rich porphyry style with copper and molybdenum at Oro Fino, with gold
mineralization related to a quartz veinlets associated with biotite and sericite
alteration.
• Marmato‐style epithermal systems where the mineralization is associated with
stockwork to sheeted massive sulfide veinlets of pyrite with sphalerite, chalcopyrite
and galena associated with sericitic and argillic alteration. The targets are El Salto,
Pácora, Campana and San Bartolome.

Oro Fino is a gold‐rich porphyry system with copper and molybdenum. It lies at the center
of the gold district approximately 7 km northeast of Marmato. The gold anomaly at Oro
Fino is 5.0 km long by 1.5 to 2.3 km wide (defined by gold values greater than 0.1 g/t gold in
soil and rock samples). The gold anomaly is coincident with a copper anomaly 3.5 km long
by 1.8 km wide, and a molybdenum anomaly 3.5 km long by 1.2 km wide. Gold values in
1,220 rock samples measure up to 10.3 g/t, with five outliers between 13.3 and 74.6 g/t.
The maximum copper value in rock samples is 0.82%, and the maximum molybdenum value
is 0.61%.
El Salto is 3.5 km north of Marmato. It has an average gold grade of 0.94 g/t as shown by
rock channel and chip samples taken from artisan open pit mine workings covering an area
of 260 m by 260 m. It lies within a much larger area containing anomalous gold as defined
by values greater than 0.1 g/t obtained from reconnaissance rock and soil sampling covering
at least 1.6 km by 2.0 km. Artisanal miners exploit gold in shallow open pits.
Pácora is 1 km northeast of Oro Fino. Preliminary rock chip sampling has obtained
anomalous gold values (greater than 0.1 g/t Au) over an area of about 2.3 km in diameter
with values up to 4.90 g/t gold.
Campana is 1 km east of Oro Fino. The area of anomalous gold is approximately 1.0 km in
diameter and 56% of the samples have values greater than 0.1 g/t gold.
San Bartolome is 4 km east of Marmato. The gold anomaly covers an area of 3.0 km
diameter and 41% of rock chip samples have values between 0.1 and 1.0 g/t gold.


Figure 15.2 illustrates the location of the other CGL gold targets in the Caramanta project
sites around the Marmato project.
15.4 OTHER EXPLORATION PROJECTS IN THE REGION
This section describes the known exploration projects in the Middle Cauca gold belt. This
extends for about 90 km in a north‐south direction from Titiribi in the north, to Quinchia in
the south. The Marmato district and the Caramanta project are located near the middle. In
addition to the projects being explored by junior companies that are described below, AGA
have been carrying out a systematic regional exploration program of the district and has
drilled a number of projects. No details of the AGA exploration or drilling programs are
available. The deposits are described from north to south as follows.
The Cerro Veta porphyry gold‐copper deposit in the Titiribi district, Antioquia, 67 km north‐
northwest of Marmato, was explored in 1998 by Goldfields, which estimated a historic
resource of 220 Mt at 0.40 g/t gold and 0.15% copper based on 16 drill holes (Pearl, 2006).
Recent exploration by De Beira Goldfields Ltd. (De Beira), Australia, in joint venture with
GoldPlata Resources Inc. (GoldPlata) and Windy Knob Resources Ltd., Australia (Windy
Knob), with 16 drill holes gave intersections of 70 m at 0.48 g/t gold and 0.24% copper (CV‐
001), 97 m of 0.47 g/t gold and 0.26% copper (CV‐001), and 320 m at 0.40 g/t gold and 0.2%
copper (CV‐003) (Windy Knob press release, January 16, 2008). Windy Knob published a
JORC‐compliant inferred resource of 370 Mt at 0.4 g/t gold and 0.2% copper for 5.9 Moz
gold based on 6,100 m of diamond drilling in 2008 (Windy Knob press release, December
15, 2008). The estimated historic production from veins and mantos in the Titiribi district is
1.5 to 2.0 Moz gold equivalent, including silver, zinc, lead and copper (Windy Knob press
release, January 16, 2008). Windy Knob terminated its option to earn 65% of the property in
April 2009.


Figure 15.2 Gold Targets in the Caramanta Project around the Marmato Project

La Mina is a gold‐copper porphyry system with historical gold mining, located near Venecia,
50 km north of Marmato, in Antioquia. A stockwork in a potassically altered intrusive has


been mapped over a 200 m by 300 m area on this property. Channel sampling by AGA
returned up to 135 m at 0.89 g/t gold and 0.21% copper and drilling was planned in 2006
(Bema press release, June 1, 2006).
Quebradona is a B2Gold‐AGA JV project located between Jerico and Tamesis, Antioquia, 35
km northwest of Marmato (Gorham & Dahrouge, 2007). B2Gold have identified porphyry
gold style mineralization in five targets hosted by porphyry stocks cutting Combia Formation
volcanic rocks related to a circular feature 6 km in diameter interpreted to be a caldera. In
2008 B2Gold carried out 13,318.8 m of diamond drilling in 43 holes. Drilling intersected up
to 380 m at 1.1 g/t Au (B2Gold press release, December 18, 2008).
Yarumalito, Antioquia, is a Marmato‐style epithermal gold system located 10 km northwest
of Marmato. It is hosted by porphyry stocks and Combia Formation andesites. A 5 hole,
1,181 m, diamond drill program by Colombian Mines Corporation (Colombian Mines) gave
intercepts including 47.4 m at 0.746 g/t gold (YAR‐1), 19.7 m at 1.020 g/t gold (YAR‐2), 3.05
m at 3.487 g/t gold (YAR‐1), 4.45 m at 3.254 g/t gold (YAR‐3), 2.15 m at 8.345 g/t gold (YAR‐
3), 0.65 m at 10.670 g/t gold (YAR‐3), and 0.70 m at 12.850 g/t gold (YAR‐2) (Thompson,
2006).
Colombian Mines also explored the Guayabales, Caldas epithermal gold system located
3 km northwest of Marmato with 10 diamond drill holes for 1,192 m in 2008. Results
included 44.1 m at 1.24 g/t Au and 11.8 m at 3.11 g/t Au. The company terminated its
option to purchase the project in February 2009 (Thompson, 2007; Colombian Mines press
releases 18 December 2008, 27 February 2009).
At the south end of the Middle Cauca Gold Belt, in Risaralda, is the Quinchia porphyry gold
project which was explored by AGA, and the adjacent Miraflores gold‐bearing hydrothermal
breccia pipe which was explored by a B2Gold‐AGA JV (Gorham, 2007).
Based on the previous mining history of the Marmato region and the exploration potential
of the area as demonstrated by active mining, exploration and recent discoveries, and
contained in reports compiled for previous operators, SEWC considers that these factors
positively affect the prospectivity of the ground under exploration at the Marmato and
Caramanta projects by CGL.


16 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING
CGL has conducted metallurgical studies on the mineralization found at Marmato, No
additional metallurgical studies have been carried out since the May 2008 NI 43‐101
technical report (Lewis & San Martin, 2008). It is expected that further studies and testing
will be completed as the Marmato project advances.
CGL’s focus is on evaluating the extent of the known mineralization located on the Marmato
project, and exploring for additional mineralization on the Caramanta project. To this end,
CGL is targeting bulk tonnage, low grade gold and silver deposits at the Marmato and
Caramanta projects that are potentially amenable to open pit mining with recovery of
precious metals by milling and cyanide leaching or by heap leaching. The grade of bulk
tonnage zones will be dependent on encountering areas with a sufficiently high density of
veinlets or a number of larger mineralized veinlets and exploration is focused on defining
such zones.
In 2006, CGL contracted Kappes Cassidy to conduct preliminary metallurgical test work on
the mineralization of the Zona Alta of Marmato as a precursor to further economic and
technical evaluation of possible treatment options which will likely be required in the
future. The results of the preliminary Kappes Cassidy test work are discussed in Section
16.1.
In 2007, CGL contracted SGS in Lakefield (SGS Lakefield), Ontario to conduct metallurgical
test work for a scoping study. This test work was conducted to test various potential
treatment options to evaluate the recovery of the mineralization from the Zona Alta of the
Marmato project. The results of the SGS Lakefield test work are discussed in Section 16.2.
16.1 KAPPES CASSIDY PRELIMINARY TEST WORK 2006
Preliminary milled cyanide bottle roll tests were carried out by Kappes Cassidy in 2006
(Kappes Cassidy report, 2006). The objective was to test the amenability of the sulfides to
cyanide leaching as the majority of the mineral resource is expected to be sulfide rather
than oxide. Samples were selected from the underground face sampling using coarse
sample rejects and three sulfide composites of about 20 kg were created, using 15 to 17
coarse sample rejects for each. Two composites were made at a grade of 1 g/t to 2 g/t gold
to represent the expected head grade of a possible bulk mining operation based on the
MRDI (1998) resource estimate, and one at a grade of 10 g/t to 15 g/t gold to represent the
head grade of the veins currently being exploited by the small miners. Four bottle roll tests
were carried out on 1 kg sized splits of each composite.


The results show extraction of 77% to 83% gold at a 1.70 mm grind size and 90% to 95%
gold recovery at grind sizes of 0.106 mm, 0.090 mm and 0.075 mm, with no significant
variation in recovery between the three finer grind sizes (Table 16.1). The gold and silver
head grades of the samples show variation between the grades as calculated from weighted
average of individual samples by two laboratories, average head grade of the homogenized
composite samples, and the calculated head grade from the cyanide leach tests. The
variation in grade was interpreted as starting out with a sample that was non‐homogenous,
in which more free gold may have been in the allotment selected as the representative
portion of the sample (either in the original samples or in the sample submitted for
metallurgical testing).
Silver extraction is 51% to 52% at a 1.70 mm grind size and 49% to 81% at the finer grind
sizes (Table 16.2).
16.2 SGS LAKEFIELD TEST WORK 2007
Two samples were shipped to SGS Lakefield for test work in 2007. The metallurgical
samples were composite samples collected as new channel samples from several
underground mines in the Zona Alta. The first sample was received on April 27, 2007. A
total of twenty pieces rock were randomly selected for bulk density determinations with the
remaining sample crushed to minus 1½ inch and 60 kg was riffled out. Once a 10 kg charge
was removed the remaining sample was crushed in stages to ¾ inch, ¼ inch and 6 mesh with
10 kg removed after every stage of crushing. The remaining sample was crushed to ‐10
mesh and rotary split into 1 kg test charges. Representative head samples were riffled out
of a test charge for chemical analysis and mineralogical examination. Lakefield labeled this
sample as Composite 1.
In September, 2007 SGS Lakefield received a shipment of 13 metallurgical samples and two
environmental samples. Samples 1 through 8 were combined to produce the MET‐05
composite. These 8 samples came from the Floresta No. 2, Circacia, Cascabel and San Jose
No. 1 mines. This composite was crushed in stages to 1½ inch, 1 inch, ½ inch, 6 mesh
removing a 10 kg charge at each size. The remaining portion of the sample was crushed to
minus 10 mesh and representative head samples and test charges were prepared in a
similar way as those of Composite 1.
The rapid mineral scans (RMS) of the two composites were similar with 97% to 98% of the
composite being non opaques. Pyrite was the major sulfide mineral with sphalerite, galena


chalcopyrite and arsenopyrite present in trace amounts. Pyrrhotite was also noted in
Composite1.
The bulk density for 20 individual samples of Composite 1 was determined using the wax
core method. The average bulk density of Composite 1 was determined to be 2.61 g/cm3.
Bulk density measurements were also conducted on some of the metallurgical samples
which comprised the MET‐05 composite. The bulk densities were calculated from water
displacement measurements without waxing. The specific gravity of MET‐05 was
determined to be 2.67 using a pycnometer.
Composite 1was a low grade sample which assayed 0.37 g/t gold and MET‐05, which was
the main metallurgical sample, assayed 1.19 g/t gold.


Table 16.1 Gold Recoveries in Milled Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests (Table 5, Kappes Cassidy Report, 2006)
Weighted
KCA Weighted Average Addition
KCA Test Average Calculated Extracted Average Extracted P80 Grind Days of Consumption
Sample Description Average Head2 Ca(OH)2
No. Head2 Head (g/t) Gold (g/t) Tails (g/t) Gold (%) Size (mm) Leach NaCN (kg/t)
No. Head (g/t)1 (g/t)* (kg/t)
(g/t)*
35601 35619A Met Sample 1 1.23 3.61 3.46 3.07 2.54 0.54 83 1.70 4 1.05 1.50
35601 35619B Met Sample 1 1.23 3.61 3.46 3.57 3.28 0.29 92 0.104 4 1.70 1.50
35601 35619C Met Sample 1 1.23 3.61 3.46 4.41 4.12 0.29 93 0.091 4 1.63 1.50
35601 35620A Met Sample 1 1.23 3.61 3.46 3.54 3.26 0.28 92 0.075 4 1.80 2.00
Average 1.23 3.61 3.45 3.65 3.30 0.35 90 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1.55 1.63
35602 35620B Met Sample 2 1.93 1.71 2.30 2.93 2.24 0.69 77 1.70 4 1.17 1.50
35602 35620C Met Sample 2 1.93 1.71 2.30 3.10 2.78 0.33 90 0.108 4 0.83 1.50
35602 35620D Met Sample 2 1.93 1.71 2.30 2.53 2.28 0.26 90 0.092 4 1.01 1.50
35602 35621A Met Sample 2 1.93 1.71 2.30 2.17 1.97 0.21 91 0.075 4 1.76 2.00
Average 1.93 1.71 2.30 2.68 2.32 0.37 87 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1.19 1.63
35603 35621B Met Sample 3 13.36 12.48 13.78 14.77 11.34 3.43 77 1.70 4 2.27 3.00
35603 35621C Met Sample 3 13.36 12.48 13.78 15.01 14.19 0.82 95 0.103 4 2.08 1.50
35603 35621D Met Sample 3 13.36 12.48 13.78 13.26 12.57 0.69 95 0.094 4 2.15 1.50
35603 35622A Met Sample 3 13.36 12.48 13.78 13.52 12.83 0.69 95 0.075 4 3.17 3.50
Average 13.36 12.48 13.79 14.14 12.73 1.41 91 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2.42 2.38
Note 1: Assays supplied by Inspectorate.
Note 2: Assays supplied by Florin Analytical.


Table 16.2 Silver Recoveries in Milled Cyanide Bottle Roll Tests (Table 5, Kappes Cassidy, 2006)
Weighted
KCA Weighted Average Addition
KCA Test Average Calculated Extracted Average Extracted P80 Grind Days of Consumption
Sample Description Average Head2 Ca(OH)2
No. Head2 Head (g/t) Gold (g/t) Tails (g/t) Gold (%) Size (mm) Leach NaCN (kg/t)
No. Head1 (g/t) (g/t)* (kg/t)
(g/t)*
35601 35619A Met Sample 1 16.4 19.7 13.3 12.6 6.6 6.0 52 1.70 4 1.05 1.50
35601 35619B Met Sample 1 16.4 19.7 13.3 11.2 9.1 2.1 81 0.104 4 1.70 1.50
35601 35619C Met Sample 1 16.4 19.7 13.3 14.8 9.7 5.2 65 0.091 4 1.63 1.50
35601 35620A Met Sample 1 16.4 19.7 13.3 14.3 9.3 5.0 65 0.075 4 1.80 2.00
Average 16.4 19.7 13.4 13.2 8.7 4.6 66 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1.55 1.63
35602 35620B Met Sample 2 18.9 22.7 16.0 15.7 8.1 7.5 52 1.70 4 1.17 1.50
35602 35620C Met Sample 2 18.9 22.7 16.0 17.8 8.7 9.1 49 0.108 4 0.83 1.50
35602 35620D Met Sample 2 18.9 22.7 16.0 16.0 8.1 7.9 50 0.092 4 1.01 1.50
35602 35621A Met Sample 2 18.9 22.7 16.0 17.5 10.1 7.4 58 0.075 4 1.76 2.00
Average 18.9 22.7 16.1 16.8 8.8 8.0 52 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 1.19 1.63
35603 35621B Met Sample 3 65.8 75.7 63.1 68.9 35.2 33.8 51 1.70 4 2.27 3.00
35603 35621C Met Sample 3 65.8 75.7 63.1 60.8 38.5 22.3 63 0.103 4 2.08 1.50
35603 35621D Met Sample 3 65.8 75.7 63.1 56.7 39.5 17.1 70 0.094 4 2.15 1.50
35603 35622A Met Sample 3 65.8 75.7 63.1 68.5 41.9 26.6 61 0.075 4 3.17 3.50
Average 65.8 75.7 63.1 63.7 38.8 25.0 61 ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ 2.42 2.38
Note 1: Assays supplied by Inspectorate.
Note 2: Assays supplied by Florin Analytical.


The following test work was conducted by SGS Lakefield on the samples: abrasion and
bond work index, heap leach amenability, gravity separation, cyanidation test work on
the gravity separation tailing, flotation and cyanidation of the flotation concentrate.
The results obtained from the SGS Lakefield scoping test program are summarized as
follows:
• Composite 1 was fairly abrasive with an abrasion index of 0.5788.
• Both samples responded well to heap leach amenability tests. The recovery of
gold from Composite 1 was 78% at a crush size of ¾ inch and 86% at a crush size
of ¼ inch. The recovery of gold from MET‐05 was 74% at a crush size of 1 inch
and 84% at a crush size of ½ inch.
• The recovery of gold from MET‐05 by gravity separation ranged from 26% to
39%.
• CIL treatment of the gravity separation tailings gave 82% to 86% gold extraction.
The overall recovery of gold by gravity separation and CIL was 89% at a K80 of 89
microns and 92% at a K80 of 64 microns.
• The MET‐05 composite responded well to bulk sulfide flotation. The recovery of
gold in a rougher concentrate was 97% to 98% in 13 to 15% of the mass using
PAX and 3418A as collectors. After one cleaning stage, the mass pull was
reduced to 7%, while maintaining 96% gold recovery.
• Cyanidation (CIL) of a rougher concentrate resulted in 78% gold extraction. After
regrinding, the gold extraction increased to 89%. The overall recovery of gold by
gravity separation, rougher flotation and cyanidation yielded 81% gold recovery
without regrinding and 88% with regrinding.
• Gold extraction by cyanidation was 74% ‐ 81% from a cleaner concentrate. This
result could probably be improved with optimization of the leach conditions.
• The consumption of cyanide in whole ore leaching was ~0.8 kg/t NaCN. The
consumption of cyanide, when leaching concentrates, was 3 to 4 kg/t of
concentrate or 0.2 to 0.4 kg/t of ore.


17 MINERAL RESOURCE AND MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES
The resources stated for Zona Alta in this report conform to the definitions adopted by
the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), December 23, 2005,
and meet the criteria of Measured Mineral Resources, Indicated Mineral Resources and
Inferred Mineral Resources. The Zona Alta Mineral Resource is not materially affected
by any known environmental, permitting, and legal, title, taxation, socio‐economic,
political or other relevant issues.
17.1 ZONA ALTA MINERAL RESOURCE
17.1.1 Resource Data for Grade Estimation and Block Modeling
The resource estimate in this report was completed by SEWC under the direction of
Scott E. Wilson, an independent qualified person as defined in NI 43‐101.
17.1.1.1 Drilling Data
Drillhole data for the Zona Alta license is maintained in a Microsoft database by CGL.
CGL validates the database constantly and has certified the data to be clean and error
free. The drillhole database has been converted to a Vulcan Isis database named
cmdc090904all.rl5.isis.
17.1.1.2 Assay Corrections
Numerous check assay and second pulp assays are stored in the database as part of the
CGL QA/QC program. These data have been combined and averaged into a calculated
gold grade field.
• If only the original assay exists it is stored in the calculated gold field.
• If there is a check assay, it is averaged with the original assay
• If there are check and pulp samples for a given interval, the average of those
assays is stored in the calculated gold field.


17.1.1.3 Topographic Data
CGL commissioned a detailed topographic map with 2 m contour intervals derived from
Ikonos satellite imagery which was received in early 2007. The new topographic map
provides a detailed base map for improved accuracy when plotting the results of the
exploration programs, as well as a high resolution satellite image. The topography was
converted to a solid model in Vulcan to limit the grade estimate to the surface.
17.1.1.4 Geologic Model
The MSG schist was modeled as a hard boundary to mineralization at Marmato. Cross
sections were evaluated to make sure that no gold was estimated into the schist. There
are several mineralized intervals within the MSG so a very restrictive estimation was run
separately for that modeled mineralization along structures within this rock type.
An overburden model was used to separate the contact of bedrock from alluvium. No
mineralization was estimated into the overburden.
17.1.1.5 Densities
All rock within Zona Alta was characterized with a density of 2.7.
17.1.1.6 Drillhole Compositing
Drill‐hole assays were composited using 5‐meter down‐the‐hole composites for the
entire Zona Alta concession. Assay values of ‐3 and ‐1 were ignored and then a new
composite would be generated at that point. Assay values of below detection were set
to ½ detection limit. General Statistics for the composites are listed in Table 17.1


Table 17.1General Statistics for the Zona Alta Composite Database
AU AG
Number of Number of
samples 29157 samples 29157
Minimum 0.003 Minimum 0.000
Maximum 41.985 Maximum 1088.865
Average 0.190 Average 2.515
Standard deviation 0.767 Standard deviation 13.470
Variance 0.588 Variance 181.439
Coef. of variance 4.034 Coef. of variance 5.356
Q1 0.010 Q1 0.500
Median 0.028 Median 1.082
Q3 0.112 Q3 2.334

The Marmato Project database used in the present resource estimate was constructed
in Vulcan by importing CSV files provided to SEWC by CGL. The database used for the
estimate comprises drillhole data as well as the underground channel sampling
database. Both databases were used because the drillhole database by itself was
insufficient to demonstrate the continuity of the mineralization. The underground
channel data set is also important to the overall interpretation of the mineralization
because the underground workings follow the veins and vein packages where the
majority of the historical and current mining has been conducted.
After conducting the validation process in Vulcan and a number of manual checks, the
final database contained 205 drillholes, totaling 42,913 m of core and 232 continuous
and individual underground channels, totaling 2,375m of channel samples (Tables 172
and 17.3). The database assay table includes the final analytical results for gold, silver,
copper, zinc, lead, as well as a number of other elements.


Table 17.2Gold and Silver Drill Hole Statistics
AU AG
Number of Number of
Q1 0.009 Q1 0.400
Q3 0.094 Q3 2.200

Table 17.3 Channel Sample Statistics
AU AG
Number of Number of
Q1 0.034 Q1 0.000
Q3 0.617 Q3 2.000

The drill hole and underground channels were organized into different workspaces
within the same database. In the Vulcan Software, a separated workspace setting was
required for each dataset due to differences in the survey methodology between the
two datasets. The drill holes were surveyed using down hole survey techniques which
are based on azimuth and dip while the channels samples were surveyed using 3D
coordinates.


17.1.2 Grade Capping
Using the entire database comprised of both the drill holes and underground channel
samples, grade capping for both gold and silver was investigated. Grade capping was
conducted in order to avoid influencing the resource estimate as a result of the inclusion
of erratic high grade gold and silver assay values. Probability plots for gold and silver
were created from the uncut data set in order to determine the top cut values,
supported by a statistical analysis of the resulting plot lines; the top cut value is
determined by looking at the consistent lognormal distributed populations and the point
at which those populations break down.
Gold was capped at 28 g/t and silver was capped at 100 g/t Figure 17.2 and 17.3.
Figure 17.1 Lognormal Probability Plot for Gold


Figure 17.2 Lognormal Probability Plot for Silver

17.1.3 Variography and Grade Estimation
In Vulcan, semi‐variograms were constructed to model the directions of mineralization
at Zona Alta. Through the evaluation of dozens of estimation techniques it was
determined that a two pass grade estimation technique would best model the
mineralization at Zona Alta. The primary grade interpolation was performed using the
Inverse Distance Squared (ID2) method. It was determined that this best modeled the
overall northwesterly fabric of the ore deposit. The second pass used ordinary kriging to
model mineralization between the main vein structures of the ore deposit. Table
17.14summarizes the search parameters for the block model interpolation.
Table 17.4 Block Model Estimation Parameters
Estimation Type Search Ellipse Azimuth Plunge Dip Discretization Min. Max. Max Samps / Grade Cap
(m) Samples Samples Hole (gpt)
Au Primary Inverse Distance 100x75x25 310 0 ‐70 1x1x1 2 10 3 28

Au Secondary Ordinary Krige 100x85x15 40 ‐50 ‐90 1x1x1 2 10 3 28
Ag Primary Inverse Distance 100x75x25 310 0 ‐70 1x1x1 2 10 3 100
Ag Secondary Ordinary Krige 100x85x15 40 ‐50 ‐90 1x1x1 2 10 3 100


Table 17.5 Variogram Parameters for modeling Secondary Structure Mineralization
Rotation Rotation Rotation Major Semi‐ Minor Nugget Sill

About z About x About y Axis Major Axis Differential
Axis Axis Axis Length Axis Length
Length
Ordinary
Krige 40 ‐50 ‐90 97.65 81.05 10 0.048 0.128

17.1.4 Veins and Face Samples modeled separately
The face samples were modeled separately and then included in the final resources.
This was done to limit the over estimation of preferentially sampled high grades on the
overall metal estimation for the ore deposit. These are referred to as ellipse estimates
and were estimated using ID2. This estimate was also limited to 10 meters laterally and
20 meters vertically from the back sample locations along the drifts.
The Surveyed underground mines were modeled as voids in the block model. These
voids are calculated as having no grade or tonnage. This insures that the total stated
resource for Zona Alta does mistakenly included material that has been previously
mined.
17.1.5 Block Modeling
The Zona Alta block model was created not only to estimate the current resources but
as the basis upon which to apply an open pit shell using Whittle for the purposes of
conducting an economic evaluation for a scoping study to be released in the future.
Block size consists of 5 m along the strike direction, 5 m across the strike direction or
width and 5 m in height. The block model comprises of 440 columns (X), 360 rows (Y),
and 240 levels (Z) that makes a total of 38,016,000 blocks of which 5,822,602 units are
below the topographic surface.
Figure 17.2 illustrates the block model for the Zona Alta project.


Figure 17.3 Marmato Project Block Model


17.2 MINERAL RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION
Resource classes were based on the distance from the center of the model block to the nearest
composite used in the estimation. Inferred Mineral Resources are defined at any block
receiving an estimated grade, where there was at least one hole within the search ellipse.
Indicated resources are defined as being within 15 to 50 meters of the nearest holes and having
at least 2 drillholes in the estimate. Measured Mineral Resources require a minimum of 2
drillholes for the estimate where at least 1 hole is within 15 meters of the nearest hole.
17.3 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES
The CIM definitions of a Mineral Resource require that “there are reasonable prospects for
economic extraction.” SEWC believes that a 0.3 g/t gold cut‐off grade in today’s commodities
market using open pit bulk tonnage methods provides the appropriate basis for a preliminary
mineral resource estimate at Zona Alta.
17.3.1 Resource Summary ‐ Gold
The remaining measured and indicated in situ gold resource as at October 6, 2009 is
summarized in Table 17.2. The total inferred in situ resource is summarized in Table 17.3.
Table 17.6 Zona Alta Measured and Indicated In Situ Gold Mineral Resources
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 13,065 0.87 364
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 75,142 0.81 1,955
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 88,207 0.82 2,319
Table 17.7 Zona Alta Inferred In Situ Gold Mineral Resources
x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Gol d 27,609 1.21 1,075


17.3.2 Resource Summary – Silver
The remaining measured and indicated in situ silver resource is summarized in Table 17.4. The
total inferred resource is summarized in Table 17.5.

Table 17.8 Measured and Indicated In Situ Silver Mineral Resources
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ve r 13,065 4.94 2,074
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ve r 75,142 4.60 11,121
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ve r 88,207 4.65 13,195
Table 17.9 Inferred In Situ Silver Mineral Resources
Au x 1,000 x 1,000
0.30 Si l ver 27,609 6.74 5,981
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of mineral resources do not appear to be materially affected by any
technical, environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio‐political, marketing, or other
relevant issues. There are currently no mineral reserves reported for the Marmato project.


17.3.3 Resource Summary – Grade/Tonne Charts
Table 17.10 October 2, 2009 Measured and Indicated Gold
Cutoff Mea s ured Au Indi ca ted Au M & I Au
g Au/t K Tonnes g Au/t K Oz K Tonnes g Au/t K Oz K Tonnes g Au/t K Oz
0.10 28,496 0.49 449 160,828 0.47 2,430 189,324 0.47 2,879
0.20 18,116 0.69 402 104,702 0.65 2,188 122,818 0.66 2,590
0.30 13,065 0.87 364 75,142 0.81 1,955 88,207 0.82 2,319
0.40 10,010 1.03 331 56,814 0.96 1,754 66,824 0.97 2,085
0.50 7,887 1.18 299 44,804 1.10 1,584 52,691 1.11 1,884
0.60 6,381 1.33 273 35,851 1.23 1,418 42,232 1.25 1,691
0.70 5,250 1.48 250 29,376 1.36 1,284 34,626 1.38 1,534
0.80 4,300 1.64 227 24,236 1.49 1,161 28,536 1.51 1,388
0.90 3,551 1.81 207 19,949 1.63 1,045 23,500 1.66 1,252
1.00 2,983 1.97 189 16,486 1.77 938 19,469 1.80 1,127
1.10 2,523 2.14 174 13,790 1.92 851 16,313 1.95 1,025
1.20 2,177 2.29 160 11,725 2.05 773 13,902 2.09 933
1.30 1,908 2.44 150 10,039 2.18 704 11,947 2.22 853
1.40 1,687 2.59 140 8,491 2.34 639 10,178 2.38 779
1.50 1,476 2.75 130 7,275 2.49 582 8,751 2.53 713
1.60 1,307 2.90 122 6,368 2.62 536 7,675 2.67 658
1.70 1,186 3.03 116 5,693 2.73 500 6,879 2.78 615
1.80 1,074 3.17 109 5,116 2.85 469 6,190 2.91 578
1.90 971 3.30 103 4,641 2.95 440 5,612 3.01 543
Table 17.11 October 2, 2009 Measured and Indicated Silver
Cutoff Mea s ured Ag Indi ca ted Ag M & I Ag
g Au/t K Tonnes g Ag/t K Oz K Tonnes g Ag/t K Oz K Tonnes g Ag/t K Oz
0.10 28,496 3.72 3,408 160,828 3.56 18,407 189,324 3.58 21,815
0.20 18,116 4.38 2,551 104,702 4.10 13,801 122,818 4.14 16,352
0.30 13,065 4.94 2,074 75,142 4.60 11,121 88,207 4.65 13,195
0.40 10,010 5.40 1,738 56,814 5.05 9,224 66,824 5.10 10,962
0.50 7,887 5.84 1,481 44,804 5.43 7,822 52,691 5.49 9,302
0.60 6,381 6.24 1,280 35,851 5.77 6,651 42,232 5.84 7,931
0.70 5,250 6.63 1,119 29,376 6.10 5,761 34,626 6.18 6,880
0.80 4,300 7.00 968 24,236 6.44 5,018 28,536 6.52 5,986
0.90 3,551 7.39 844 19,949 6.75 4,329 23,500 6.85 5,173
1.00 2,983 7.77 745 16,486 7.05 3,737 19,469 7.16 4,482
1.10 2,523 8.15 661 13,790 7.39 3,276 16,313 7.51 3,937
1.20 2,177 8.46 592 11,725 7.71 2,906 13,902 7.83 3,498
1.30 1,908 8.75 537 10,039 7.96 2,569 11,947 8.09 3,106
1.40 1,687 8.99 488 8,491 8.28 2,260 10,178 8.40 2,748
1.50 1,476 9.28 440 7,275 8.66 2,025 8,751 8.76 2,466
1.60 1,307 9.58 403 6,368 9.02 1,847 7,675 9.12 2,249
1.70 1,186 9.82 374 5,693 9.29 1,700 6,879 9.38 2,075
1.80 1,074 10.15 350 5,116 9.54 1,569 6,190 9.65 1,920
1.90 971 10.41 325 4,641 9.81 1,464 5,612 9.91 1,789


Table 17.12 October 2, 2009 Inferred Gold Mineral Resources
Cutoff Inferred Au
g Au/t K Tonnes g Au/t K Oz
0.10 57,861 0.67 1,246
0.20 37,126 0.96 1,146
0.30 27,609 1.21 1,075
0.40 21,629 1.45 1,008
0.50 17,338 1.70 948
0.60 14,500 1.92 895
0.70 12,210 2.16 848
0.80 10,430 2.40 805
0.90 9,001 2.65 767
1.00 7,830 2.91 733
1.10 6,896 3.16 701
1.20 5,988 3.46 666
1.30 5,173 3.81 634
1.40 4,553 4.15 607
1.50 4,008 4.52 582
1.60 3,540 4.91 559
1.70 3,243 5.21 543
1.80 3,016 5.47 530
1.90 2,827 5.71 519
Table 17.13 October 2, 2009 Inferred Silver Mineral Resources
Cutoff Inferred Ag
g Au/t K Tonnes g Ag/t K Oz
0.10 57,861 4.75 8,836
0.20 37,126 5.78 6,899
0.30 27,609 6.74 5,981
0.40 21,629 7.66 5,327
0.50 17,338 8.54 4,760
0.60 14,500 9.36 4,363
0.70 12,210 10.17 3,992
0.80 10,430 11.04 3,702
0.90 9,001 11.84 3,426
1.00 7,830 12.66 3,187
1.10 6,896 13.55 3,004
1.20 5,988 14.60 2,811
1.30 5,173 15.49 2,576
1.40 4,553 16.60 2,430
1.50 4,008 17.80 2,294
1.60 3,540 19.06 2,169
1.70 3,243 20.02 2,087
1.80 3,016 20.83 2,020
1.90 2,827 21.49 1,953


18 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION
Most of the relevant data and information regarding CGL’s Marmato project is included in other
sections of this report, but the historical importance, current social and mining conditions as
well as environmental conditions are discussed in this section. The majority of this section was
referenced and extracted from a draft report by Thomas McGrail of Minera de Caldas (McGrail,
2006). The majority of the material contained in this report was also mentioned in Micon’s
May, 2008 Technical Report on Marmato for CGL.
18.1 CURRENT SOCIAL AND MINING CONDITIONS
The following section on the current social and mining conditions at Marmato is quoted from a
draft report entitled “Scoping Study: Marmato Project” by Thomas McGrail for Minera de
Caldas.
18.1.1 Historical Importance
The importance of Marmato is primarily due to its historical significance, to both the habitants
of Marmato and to the country of Colombia. The Marmato area has been mined for over 500
years and mining has been the economic basis of Marmato since 1537. Due to its perceived
riches, Simon Bolivar, the liberator of Colombia from Spanish rule, used this area and its mines
as a guarantee to obtain English financing to support his revolution.
18.1.2 Social Issues
The current urban center of Marmato is representative of numerous mining areas where, for
ease of access, the original artisan miners built their homes in close proximity to their mines.
Due to the topography of the area, there was and is no area suitable for the erection of an
alternative town site that would provide ease of access to their places of work. This desire to
facilitate access has resulted in an extremely difficult social environment for the habitants of
Marmato; since the historical and currently operating mines, their respective infrastructure and
process plants are situated within and seemingly on top of the homes and infrastructure of the
municipality of Marmato. This area is approximately 2.5 square km and represents less than
seven percent of the total area of this municipality. The general consensus of the population
(+98%, Census by Cia Servicio Logisticos) is that relocation is required as this co‐habitation of
mine and municipal infrastructure is intolerable; however, previously there was reluctance on
the part of some politicians, to significantly change the status quo. This reluctance has changed
recently and relocation of the town and its inhabitants has started.


18.1.2.1 Social Impact of the Topography/Geology on the Urban Center of Marmato
The topography of the area designated as the urban center of Marmato imposes three distinct
problems that require immediate resolution:
1. The first is the instability of this zone and the extremely high risk of landslides impacting
this zone. The current mines have no economically viable means available to dispose of
their waste rock and therefore dump this material into the quebradas (intermittent
streams and creeks) that course through this zone. This promotes mass movements of
this material during significant rain events and is a common occurrence. Additionally,
this collection of material has the tendency to promote erosion of the sides of these
quebradas thus undercutting their side slopes and again promoting landslides.
Subsistence farming, logging for the mines, mine activity and human presence have also
promoted the loss of vegetation and the concomitant resulting superficial flows
promote further erosion and instability. Percolation of surface waters into the substrata
further promotes instability as the predominant geologic jointing runs NW/SE and dips
at 80 degrees to the SW. In summary, the area is extremely unstable and since the early
1980’s, numerous studies have indicated the need to relocate this urban center of
Marmato.
2. Additionally, there is currently neither a potable water system nor a septic treatment
system servicing this entire area. This is a community of approximately 1,000
inhabitants and they generally lack these basic services. The feasibility of providing
these requirements is questionable due to the prohibitive costs associated with the
construction of these systems, due to the physical and geographic conditions that
prevail.
3. The congestion, due to the limited available space, places basic services such as public
transport, movement of mine trucks and pedestrian traffic in conflict. Roadways
designed for limited traffic cannot handle the current traffic patterns and there is no
obvious solution to this problem. Public safety is further placed at risk.
18.1.3 Mining Conditions
The current disposition of mining rights at Marmato is both unique and chaotic. The known
deposit is currently divided vertically into 2 zones; these are denominated the Upper or
Exclusion Zone (179 ha) and the Lower Zone (980 ha). This vertical division is unique and is
possibly only duplicated at the Cerro Rico deposit in Potosi, Bolivia. The current area of the


project is related to this Upper Zone; this zone is further subdivided into three levels for mine
title purposes, the Upper Level at +1,500 m, the Intermediate Level at + 1,363 m to 1,500 m and
the Lower Level at +1,207 m (variable) to 1,363 m. The base elevation of the Lower Level
follows the contour of the access road to Marmato and therefore varies from 1,207 m to 1,298
m. These three Levels are again subdivided into approximately 200 mines that have been
granted titles by the Ministry of Mines. In addition, there are a minimum of 100 mines that are
operated illegally and/or are in the process of legalizing their position.”
There are approximately 30 Process Plants that process the ore from these mines either as
Maquiladoras (Custom Milling) or processing the ore from their own mines or both. These
mines and process plants do not comply with even the minimal requirements of the
Environmental Laws of Colombia; waste rock, cyanide solutions and tailings are discharged to
the arroyos and quebradas with no prior treatment. The situation is chaotic as this subdivision
of the resource prohibits its exploitation in an efficient, structured and orderly manner that
would guarantee the full realization of the deposit’s potential economic and social benefits.
The viability of current mining practices, as exhibited at Marmato, is limited. Without
significant investment, these mines will be unable to exploit their current resource blocks. As
these current extraction tunnels exceed 250 m of length, the ability of these mines to provide
essential services such as ventilation, haulage systems, compressed air, water, etcetera is
greatly compromised. This limitation, i.e., 250 m of horizontal extension, is evident as the
majority of the mines visited and measured to‐date was within this limit. The mines having
longer extraction drifts demonstrate worsening working conditions, lower levels of productivity
and are concomitantly less economically viable.
Additionally, working conditions, in these mines are substandard by general norms established
by the mining industry. Equipment is rudimentary, safety is not a priority and employees are
generally not covered by any form of health care system or required employee benefits. These
are common conditions inherent in artisan mining areas; however, at Marmato, these
conditions are further exacerbated as they impact the community directly.
18.1.4 Relocation Efforts
Various administrations at both the Department and Municipal levels have made efforts to
relocate the urban center of Marmato. In 2002, 154 homes were provided by the municipality
to residents of Echandia (a suburb of Marmato) and Marmato. These efforts have met with
limited success and have prompted increasing dissatisfaction on the part of the inhabitants.


The result has been a partial relocation of the population to the site designated as the “Nuevo
Marmato” situated in the area of El Llano which is located at the base of this mountain slope.
There are several reasons for this dissatisfaction:
1. The quality of construction evident is generally inferior although generally superior to
the construction persistent in the current location.
2. There was no effort made to differentiate the type of housing offered (based on current
conditions). All residents were offered the same conditions.
3. There is a distinguishable difference in the type of climate available between these sites.
The urban center of Marmato enjoys cooler temperatures than the offered site.
Although the difference is minimal, the inhabitants have used this to justify their
reticence to relocate.
The residents in 2002 were relocated due to their homes being subject to a high risk of
landslides. Despite this fact, these residents generally (122 of 154) turned their previous homes
over to family members or rented these homes to migrant mine workers.
In 2004, a new decree was approved by the Territorial Organization Scheme which ordered the
relocation of all the public institutions to El Llano. On June 6, 2006, the directorate of response
and prevention of disasters of the Ministry of Interior and Justice issued Resolution number 23
which declared the situation to be a public emergency affecting the Municipality of Marmato.
There are currently 160 homes in El Llano and 29 new homes are being constructed to house
families displaced in landslides in 2007. A further 47 homes are about to built to house other
families displaced in the same landslide. On April 16, 2008, Julian Arboleda, the Caldas
government representative for the relocation of Marmato, confirmed to CGL that within 45
days construction of the new administrative buildings were to begin with funds from the
national government. These buildings would include the mayors office, notary, registry office
and the citizens’ protection office. The police station is currently under construction in El Llano.
In addition, the public deeds have been signed with the municipality to construct a new
hospital, with funds from the Ministry of Social Protection and the Territorial administration. In
addition, a public deed has been signed for the location of the new school which will house
1,200 students and an agreement has been reached to use the old location in El Llano to house
a campus of SENA, the state technical college. Once all of the buildings in El Llano have been


completed the old sites in the current town site of Marmato will be torn down. All buildings
have been ordered to be inaugurated in 2009.
In addition to the construction in El Llano, a decision has been made to complete paving of the
access road to El Llano only.
18.2 MINERA DE CALDAS’ POSITION ON RELOCATION
The following section on Minera de Caldas’ position on relocation is quoted from a draft report
entitled “Scoping Study: Marmato Project” by Thomas McGrail for Minera de Caldas.
18.2.1 Position
Minera de Caldas has as one of its primary objectives, the relocation of the urban center of
Marmato. As such it has requested, from the pertinent Government entities, a copy of the
studies that have been developed during the last 16 years. To‐date these studies have not
been received. Further, Minera de Caldas believes that it can assume a significant portion of
the cost of this relocation and will define this level of economic contribution when and if these
plans are made available. It further believes that the existence of an atmosphere of
collaboration between the Company and the various Government entities will ensure that the
terms for this relocation can achieve a level of acceptability for all current inhabitants. The
Company believes that it is essential to protect and support the retention of the community
pride that is evident in the inhabitants of the urban center of Marmato in any relocation. The
Company further believes that the urban center of Marmato is in extreme danger of additional
landslides which could result in a human catastrophe of significance. Ultimately the position of
the Company is that the urban center of Marmato must be moved for humanitarian reasons
which fortunately coincide with the needs of the Company.
18.2.2 Collaboration with Public Authorities
The belief of Cia Minera de Caldas, S.A. is that the involvement of the pertinent Public
Authorities would be extremely beneficial in ensuring that the needs of all participants are
considered. To date, the efforts of the Company have been stymied, as current administrations
at both the Department and Municipal levels are not publicly in favor of this relocation.
The Company has proposed the formation of a Committee for the Relocation which will have
representation from the community and their public representatives; representatives that are
both in‐favor and against this relocation. The Company has to date had no meaningful contact
with the various government entities who should participate in the eventual relocation of the
urban center of Marmato. The area of El Llano is under the jurisdiction of the Municipality and


as such is unavailable to the Company currently. In preparation for this inevitable
collaboration, the Company’s Census has further determined that a minimum of three
styles/types of housing must be offered, due to the different classes of homes existing in the
current urban center of Marmato. Once the Company has developed the required relationship
with the various pertinent entities, it is certain that the community will participate in the
development of a Relocation Plan that will address the majority of the community’s
requirements.
18.2.2.1 Role of the Relocation Committee
As stated, the position of the Company is that a Committee representing the community,
incorporating spokespersons from the community, their political and civic leaders and the
Company, must be formed. It is the hope of the Company that this committee will act as the
platform upon which discussions can be held to address the numerous factors that relocation
will impart on the community in general. The anticipated themes to be discussed will be:
• Analysis of the recent reconstruction of Armenia by FOREC, to provide insight into the
experience and requirements of a successful relocation of a community.
• Design of the New Marmato and definition of required services.
• Design of the various styles of homes required.
• Criteria/assignment of homes to affected families.
• Employment requirements and alternative sources of employment.
• Adult education requirements.
• Requirements to ensure Marmato retains its social and economic importance.
• Requirements to ensure Marmato retains its historical importance.
• Development and implementation of the Relocation Plan.
• Define the appropriate treatment of the poor and homeless of their community.
• Oversight of all aspects of the Company’s Social Program.
• Participation in pertinent discussions with participating Government Agencies.
Undoubtedly, this committee will have additional interests to discuss and the expectation is
that solutions will be offered for the Company’s consideration.”
18.3 CURRENT ACTIVITIES OF MINERA DE CALDAS
In 2006 the Company undertook a census to define the actual requirements of this proposed
relocation. This census determined that there are currently 333 buildings of which
approximately 191 would require relocation. These 191 buildings are comprised of 18 building


that offer services to the community (Police, Fire Dept., churches, schools, etc.), 51 commercial
buildings and 122 homes. There are an additional 70 owners of buildings who simply want to
sell and relocate to other areas of Colombia for various personal reasons.
The Company embarked on the process of purchasing these properties, but halted this as the
majority of these owners do not have clear title to the land on which their homes or
establishments are situated. The land of the municipality of Marmato is generally State Land
under the jurisdiction of the Municipality. It is hoped that an agreement can be reached with
the Municipality which would facilitate the purchase of these structures. Once the Company
has been granted the Mining Concession, land usage is frozen and expropriation is available to
the Company. The possible need to expropriate land in the future is considered to be unlikely,
as most inhabitants, 299 of the 333 polled, are in favor of some form of relocation.
The Company contracted the services of an independent evaluator to define the replacement
cost for these structures and lands.
The numbers of buildings and people to be moved by the CGL may differ from the official
numbers stated elsewhere in this report because the area of mining envisioned by CGL will
encompass a number of other dwellings in the hills surrounding Marmato rather than just the
area surrounding the main town site of Marmato.
18.4 CESSATION OF CURRENT MINING ACTIVITIES
The cessation of current mining activities will have a significant social impact on the current
population of the urban center of Marmato as it will impact the current employment conditions
for these residents. The Company has anticipated the requirement to replace current sources
of employment during the transition phase between current mining practices and the eventual
mining project. The skills required will change significantly, from what is currently available.
This transition will further impact the commercial institutions that provide services to the
current mining activity.
18.4.1 Employment Opportunities
CGL is currently involved in the development of several projects that are at various levels of
implementation which will replace, assist, or provide the displaced workers and their families
with alternative employment opportunities.
These opportunities range from employment on an agricultural project to produce citric
products, employment during the exploration phase of this project, and employment in the
construction of the homes, civic buildings and infrastructure anticipated to complete El Llano


(New Marmato). Additional journeymen will be contracted to ensure that there is a transfer of
their knowledge to these workers such that during the execution of this work, properly trained
competent skilled journeymen tradesmen will result.
It is hoped that, in collaboration with the pertinent authorities and residents, additional
projects will be developed, to minimize the economic and social impact of this transition.
18.4.2 Training
The company is also currently reviewing the future skill requirements of employees as the
project advances and has recognized that they will differ significantly from the skills required by
the current mining activities. Therefore the company anticipates that it will choose appropriate
candidates for advanced training and that the selected candidates will receive scholarships
from CGL contingent on their accepting employment with the project at the termination of
their studies. Technical schools will be contacted by CGL and the offered curriculum will be
analyzed to ensure compliance with CGL’s needs. It is anticipated that the participation of
Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA), the national agency for Apprenticeship Training, will
be essential.
Additionally, CGL has anticipated that adult education courses will be organized for those
residents who demonstrate both interest and aptitude. These courses will be designed to
elevate the educational levels of all participants to the minimum standards required by the
projects (Grade 11, final year of Secondary school). These courses will be offered in the
evenings to allow participants to continue their normal activities.
CGL also anticipates that there will be a requirement to provide assistance to the community of
El Llano to ensure the complete integration of the residents of Marmato and El Llano and
culminate in the formation of a new social structure. Any displacement of people requires
support and assistance to facilitate the transition. Government agencies, with expertise in this
area, will be asked to participate in the mitigation of the social impact of this relocation.
Additionally, training will be provided to both the community and their public servants as to the
proper management of their new municipal infrastructure and in the development of the social
infrastructure required to exploit the new opportunities that this relocation will provide.
18.5 RETENTION OF MARMATO’S HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The Company recognizes the historical importance of Marmato. The Company does not intend
to eradicate the historical importance of Marmato with this project. However, the current
location of Marmato makes it virtually inaccessible for tourists and other interested parties.


It is hoped that, through the Committee formed to facilitate the participation of all
Marmateños in the relocation process, the concept of a tourist center can be developed. The
expectation of the Company is that underground workings concomitant with a process plant
would be constructed in the El Llano area. These would model current mining and processing
activities. It would also include a museum where the various mining methodologies that have
been employed by miners through the ages to exploit Marmato would be displayed in an
interactive format. These would be open to the public and Marmateños would act as guides.
This project, in conjunction with the current Jewelry Workshop in El Llano, would give tourists
an opportunity to visit and appreciate the historical importance of Marmato.
18.6 MARMATO’S ROLE AS THE COMMUNITY CENTER
To ensure that the relocated Marmato continues to function as the social and commercial
center of the Municipality, the road system connecting the satellite communities (veredas) of
San Juan and Cabras to El Llano must be constructed and/or improved. It is anticipated that
approximately 3 km of new paved road and the paving of an additional 6 km will ensure the
position of Marmato. With the construction of these roads, the municipalities of Supia de
Caldas and Caramanta de Antioquia would not usurp Marmato’s importance, as the municipal
center. This construction will require the financial participation of all levels of Government and
private industry.
18.7 MARMATO’S ROLE AS A MINING DISTRICT
The area covering Marmato, Supia, Filadelfia, La Merced, and Quinchia has recently been
declared a Mining District by the Ministry of Mines which is now one of only three areas in
Colombia to have this designation. The designation of Marmato as a Mining District is expected
to bring some tax benefits and the possible facilitation of processing claims in the Mines
Registry office but further study of this new district concept is needed.
18.8 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AT MARMATO
As part of its exploration work at Marmato, CGL has carried out an environmental baseline
study. A two year study was initiated in order to determine the environmental baseline for the
Marmato area given the last 470 years of mining activities which have been conducted without
any minimum technical or environmental controls. The unrestrained mining activities has led
to the current large scale environmental deterioration which threatens the stability of higher
portions of the mountain above Marmato and the infrastructure and lives of the inhabitants of
Marmato. The first report regarding the state of the environment at Marmato was completed


in February 2008 (Compania Minera de Caldas, 2008). A summary of the report’s conclusions
follows.
18.8.1 Water Resources
The water discharge from the processing mills as well as from domestic and farm sources have
caused a total deterioration of the Pantanos and Cascabel creeks. The creeks do not show any
relevant improvement prior to entering the Cauca River below Marmato.
The central polluting factors for the water sources in the municipality are the gold processing
mills, the lack of treatment of domestic waste water and the lack of environmental education.
The main pollutant is the high concentration of suspended solids due to the absence of
management plans and discharge permits which would prevent this type of discharge. In
addition, there is a lack of enforcement by the authorities in the area for more than two
decades.
18.8.2 Air Resources
After analyzing the data obtained, in general terms the conclusion is that the different
measuring sites indicate that there are no air pollution problems due to carbon monoxide (CO),
volatile organic compounds (VOC), total suspended particulates (TSP), breathable particulates
under 10 microns (PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). However, there
are air pollution problems due to ozone (O3).

Ozone, a natural neutral constituent of the stratosphere formed by the photolysis of molecular
oxygen can be transported by atmospheric circulation to the lower atmosphere. Ozone is
formed in the lower atmosphere by the reaction which occurs between nitrogen oxides and a
series of hydrocarbons with photochemical reactivity under the influence of sunlight.
The municipality of Marmato has noise problems within the perimeters of both towns due to
the mixture of land uses including residential areas, mining exploitation (adits and mills) and/or
commercial activity.
18.8.3 Soil Resources
The soil resources are mainly affected by the expansion of the farming boundaries which
decreases the fertility of the soil, together with the steep slopes and erosion that decrease the
organic matter in the soils. All of these factors together with the unmanaged mining and
environmental controls has generated the instability of the surrounding slopes in certain areas


or zones within the municipality, creating unsafe conditions for not only the inhabitants but for
those who transit the area.
18.8.4 Flora and Fauna
From the point of view of bird conservation, there was no identification within the area of
influence of the mining of any species which have a conservation priority and for which a
relocation strategy would need to be defined. The birds identified in the study are highly
mobile and it is expected that during the vegetation removal process conducted prior to soil
removal that these species will move to other areas in a natural pattern.
The study did not find any ecosystems of relevant ecological importance and the existing
habitats do not support endangered species.


19 INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
SEWC reviewed pertinent data from the Zona Alta regarding exploration data, methods and
resource estimates. SEWC verifies that this statement of mineral resources for Zona Alta is in
accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43‐101, as set forth in the CIM Standards on
Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (2005). SEWC completed its review of the
project in preparation for this technical report. SEWC met its objective and concludes:
• Exploration drilling, sampling, sample preparation, assaying, density measurements and
drillhole surveys have been carried out in accordance with best industry standard
practices and are suitable to support resource estimates.
• Sampling and assaying includes quality assurance procedures including submission of
blanks, reference materials, pulp duplicates and coarse‐reject duplicates, and execution
of check assays by a second laboratory.
• The Zona Alta gold and silver deposit resource models were developed using industry
accepted methods.
• Mineral resources are classified as Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and as
Inferred Mineral Resources. Resource classification criteria are appropriate in terms of
the confidence in grade estimates and geological continuity and meet the requirements
of National Instrument 43‐101 and CIM Standards on Resources and Reserves,
Definitions and Guidelines (2005).


20 RECOMMENDATIONS
The Zona Alta deposit requires continued drilling in order to properly delineate the size, nature
and confidence in this ore deposit. SEWC recommends a $40 million exploration program to
include drilling to define resources in the measured and indicated category, geotechnical
drilling and geotechnical studies, condemnation drilling, metallurgical drilling and testwork,
environmental impact study, engineering studies, resource updates, and feasibility study. Table
20.1 lists the cost of this single phase project. The budget also includes estimated costs for
acquisition of remaining mineral rights, surface rights and town relocation. Once this program is
complete a new resource should be estimated and a feasibility study carried out.
Table 20.1 Estimated Budget (US$) for Zona Alta Exploration Program
Expenditure Details Cost
Marmato Exploration $40,000,000
Town Relocation $30,000,000
Surface rights acquisition $16,000,000
Legal and administration $3,500,000
Total $89,500,000


21 REFERENCES
Banco de la República Manizales, (1989). Marmato, un pueblo de oro anclado en la montaña.
Bogota, Banco de la República, Departamento Editorial. Available at
http://www.lablaa.org/blaavirtual/antropologia/marmato/indice.htm.
Bedoya, O. G., (1998), Geology, Hydrothermal Alteration, Paragenetic Sequence and Fluid
Inclusion Analysis of La Maruja Level, Marmato District, Caldas Department, Colombia.
Unpublished MSc thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 178 p.
Bogota Gold Museum, (2006), Quimbaya, the people and the gold in the Middle Cauca.
Website: http://quimbaya/banrep.gov.co/museo/eng.
Boussingault, J. B., (1830), Analyse de la blende noire de Marmato, province de Popayán.
Annales de Chimie et du Physique, v. 42, p. 312‐316.
Calle, B., González, H., de la Peña, R., Escorce, E. & Durango, J., (1984), Mapa Geológico
Preliminar. Plancha No. 186 ‐ Riosucio Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Geologico
Minera, Informe 1878 (1980), 1 map at 1:100,000 scale.
Calvache, J. A., Cuellar, J. & Muñoz, F., (1985), Comportamiento electrico y electromagnetico de
los yacimientos de oro de Marmato. In: Wagner, J. E. V. (ed), Sexto Congreso
Latinoamericano de Geologia, Vol. 3, p.359‐374.
Cediel, L., (2007), El Oro de Marmato [Historical Production]. Unpublished report for Compañía
Minera de Caldas, September 2007, 3 volumes, 31 p text plus Annexes of historical
documents.
Cediel, F., Shaw, R. P. & Cáceres, C., (2003), Tectonic Assembly of the Northern Andean Block.
In: Bartolini, C., Buffler, R. T. & Blickwede, J., eds, The Circum‐Gulf of Mexico and the
Caribbean: Hydrocarbon habitats, basin formation, and plate tectonics. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 79, p. 815‐848.
Cediel, F. & Cáceres, C., (2000), Geological Map of Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia, Geotec Ltda,
3rd edition. 7 thematic maps at 1:1,000,000 scale.
Compañía Minera de Caldas, (2008), Estudio de Linea Base Ambiental del Area de Interes del
Proyecto Minero Ambiental en el Municipio de Marmato, Departamento de Caldas.
Unpublished report by Compañía Minera de Caldas S.A., Colombia, February 2008, 132
p.
Conquistador Mines Ltd., (1998), Annual Information Form. 20 April 1998, 71 p. Filed on SEDAR.
Correa, S. L., (2006), Plan de Manejo Ambiental Para Exploracion, Unpublished report by
Compañía Minera de Caldas for CorpoCaldas, Colombia, 66 p.
Cuellar, J. V. & Mora, M., (1985), Estudio geologico del yacimiento de oro de Marmato. In:
Wagner, J. E. V. (ed), Sexto Congreso Latinoamericano de Geologia, Vol. 3, p.342‐377.


Durán, R.,et al., (2005). Complementación Geológica, Geoquímica y Geofísica (Magnetométrica)
de las Planchas 166, 167, 186 y 187, Escala 1:100,000, IGAC, Zona de Influencia del
Sector Caucal‐Romeral. Report by Union Temporal Dunia ATG (Dunia Consultores Ltda &
Asesorias Técnicas Geológicas), Bogotá, 23 November 2005, 462 p.
Emmons, W.H., (1937), Gold Deposits of the World. First Edition, McGraw‐Hill Book Co. Inc.
Escuela de Minas de Marmato, (2004), Aplicación de tecnologías limpias para el beneficio de
metales preciosos en el Municipio de Marmato. Anexo 3, Caracterización Mineralógica.
Unpublished report, March 2004, 63 p. Convenio Interadministrativo Municipio de
Marmato, Escuela de Minas de Marmato, Minercol – Fondo Nacional de Regalías.
Gartner, A., (2005), Los místeres de las minas: Crónica de la colonia europea más grande de
Colombia en el siglo XIX, surgida aldredor de las minas de Marmato, Supía y Riosucio.
Manizales, Editorial Universidad de Caldas, 475 p.
Gorham, J., (2007), Summary Report on the Miraflores Property, Department of Risaralda,
Colombia. NI 43‐101 Report prepared for B2Gold Corp., Vancouver, October 22, 2007,
107 p. Filed on SEDAR.
Gorham, J. & Dahrouge, J., (2007), Summary Report on the Quebradona Property, Department
of Antioquia, Colombia. NI 43‐101 Report prepared for B2Gold Corp., Vancouver,
October 22, 2007, 122 p. Filed on SEDAR.
Hall, R. B., Feininger, T., Barrero, D., Ricoh, H. & Alvarez, J., (1970), Recursos Minerales de Parte
de Antioquia y Caldas. Boletín Geológico, Bogota. 18 (2), 90 p.

Heald, P., Foley, N.`K., & Hayba, D. O., (1987), Comparative Anatomy of Volcanic Hosted
Epithermal Deposits: Acid‐Sulphate and Adularia‐Sericite Types. Economic Geology, 82,
p. 1‐26.
Hedenquist, J. W., Sillitoe, R. H. & Arribas, A., (2004), Characteristics of and exploration for high‐
sulfidation epithermal gold‐copper deposits. In: Cooke, D. R., Deyell, C. & Pongratz, J., 24
Ct Au Workshop. Tasmania, Center for Ore Deposit Research (CODES) Special
Publication 5, p. 99 to 110.
Hill, W., (1988), Preliminary Appraisal of the Marmato Property. Report by William Hill Mining
Consultants Limited for Greenstone Resources Ltd., August 1988, 25 p + annexes.
Jackman, R. & Fleming, C. A. (2008), An Investigation into The Recovery of Gold from Marmato
Samples. Unpublished report for Colombia Goldfields Ltd by SGS Minerals Services,
Lakefield, Ontario, Canada, Project 11600‐001, Report 1, 15 April 2008, 58 p.
Kappes Cassidy, (2006), [Milled cyanide bottle roll testing of samples from Marmato, Colombia].
Report for Colombia Goldfields Ltd., 19 p.


Kilborn Limited, (1988), Engineering and Cost Study, Marmato Gold Project, Colombia. Report
for Empresa Colombiana de Minas, September 1988, 40 p plus annexes.
Lewis, W. J. (2006), NI 43‐101 Technical Report on the Marmato and Caramanta Projects,
Departments of Caldas and Antioquia, Republic of Colombia. Report by Micon
International Limited for Colombia Goldfields Ltd., 120 p.
Lewis, W. J. & San Martin, A. J. (2008), Updated NI 43‐101 Technical Report and Preliminary
Resource Estimate for the Marmato Project, Department of Caldas, Republic of
Colombia. Report by Micon International Limited for Colombia Goldfields Ltd., 201 p
plus Annexes.
Long, K., Ludington, S., du Bray, E., André, O. & McKee, E. H., (1992), Geology and mineral
deposits of the La Joya district, Bolivia. Society of Economic Geologists Newsletter, 10,
(1), p. 13 to 16.
McGrail, T., (2006) Scoping Study: Marmato Project, Draft copy of a report for Minera de Caldas
S.A., 46 p.
Mineral Resources Development Inc. (MRDI), (1998), Scoping Study, Marmato Gold/Silver
Project, Colombia. Report for Conquistador Mines Ltd., October 1998, 184 p.
Morales, O., (2004), Marmato en la persectiva de la historia nacional. In Teoría y aplicación de
las historias locales y regionales, Chapter 9. Bogota, Biblioteca Virtual del Banco de la
República, http://www.lablaa.org/blavirtual/sociologia/histlocal/indice.htm.
Ocampo, S. J. C., (2007), Environmental Baseline Study of the Area of Interest of the
Environmental Mining Project in the Municipality of Marmato, Cepartment of Caldas,
Internal report for Compania de Minera de Caldas and Colombia Goldfields Limited, 124
p.
Park, I., (2008), Marmato Town Move and Recent Development, Internal Cia. Minera de Caldas,
S.A. internal memo, 2 p.
Pearl, L., (2006), Independent Geologist’s Report on the Titiribi Project, Titiribi, Colombia.
Report for De Beira Goldfields Inc., Australia, August 30, 2006, 12 p. Published on De
Beira website.
Petersen, E. U. and Fitzmayer, J. R. (2000), The Kori Kollo deposit, Bolivia: A porphyry‐hosted
gold deposit, Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists conference abstract, 2 p.
Pinzón, F. D. & Tassinari, C. C. G., (2003), Ages and Sources of the Gold Mineralizations from
Marmato Mining District, NW Colombia: Based on Radiogenic Isotope Evidences. IV
South American Symposium on Isotope Geology. IRD (Institut de recherche pour le
développement). Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 24‐27 August 2003, p. 758 to 761.


Redwood, S. D., (1987), The Soledad Caldera, Bolivia: a Miocene caldera with associated
epithermal Au‐Ag‐Cu‐Pb‐Zn mineralization. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 99,
p. 395 to 404.
Redwood, S. D., (1993), The Metallogeny of the Bolivian Andes, 120 p. In: Sillitoe, R., Camus, F.,
Mpodozis, C. & Redwood, S., Metallogeny of the Central Andes. Vancouver, Canada,
University of British Columbia, Mineral Deposit Research Unit, Short Course No. 15.
Redwood, S. D., (2005a), The Geological Model of the Marmato Gold Deposit, Colombia, for
Compañia Minera de Caldas S.A., 30 p.
Redwood, S. D., (2005b), Recommended Sampling and Quality Control Program for
Geochemical Samples for Marmato, Colombia, for Compañia Minera de Caldas S.A., 5 p.
Redwood, S. D., (2006), Report on the Marmato & Caramanta Projects, Departments of Caldas
& Antioquia, Republic of Colombia (Draft Copy), for Colombia Goldfields Ltd., 49 p.
Redwood, S. D., 2008, The Geology of the Marmato Gold Project, Colombia: Core photos of
lithology, alteration and mineralization types. Report for Colombia Goldfields Ltd, 5
November 2008, 31 p.
Redwood, S. D. (2009), The History of the Gold Mines of Marmato, Colombia (Draft copy).
Report for Colombia Goldfields Ltd., 81 p.
Restrepo, V., (1952), Estudio sobre las minas de oro y plata de Colombia. Editions 1885, 1888,
1937 and 1952. Digital copy of 1952 edition on internet at Biblioteca Luis Angel Arango
del Banco de la República de Colombia.
http://www.lablaa.org/blaavirtual/historia/minas/indice.htm.
Rossetti, P. & Colombo, F., (1999), Adularia‐sericite gold deposits of Marmato (Caldas,
Colombia): field and petrographic data. In: McCaffrey, K.J.W., Lonergan, L. & Wilkinson,
J.J. (eds), Fractures, Fluid Flow and Mineralization. Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 155, p 167 to 182.
Rubiano, M., (1986), Presencia de Mackinawita, Cubanita II y Melnicovita en los depósitos de
Oro de Marmato (Caldas), Colombia. Geologia Norandina, 10, p. 29 to 34.
Sharpless, F. F., (1908), Quartz Mines in Colombia, South America. Mining and Scientific Press,
September 26, 1908, 3 p.
Shaw, R. P., (2000), Gold mineralisation in the northen Andes, magmatic setting vs metallogeny.
XI International Mining Congress, Bogotá, Colombia, October 2000 Technical Abstracts.
http://www.grupodebullet.com/technical_publications.htm.
Sillitoe, R. H., Jaramillo, L., Damon, P. E., Shafiqullah, M. & Escovar, R., (1982), Setting,
Characteristics, and Age of the Andean Porphyry Copper Belt in Colombia. Economic
Geology, 77, p. 1837 to 1850.


Singewald, Q. D., (1950), Mineral Resources of Colombia. Washington, United States Geological
Survey Bulletin 964‐B,, p.53‐204.
Tassinari, C. C. G., Pinzon, F. D. & Buena Ventura, J., (2008), Age and Sources of Gold
Mineralization in the Marmato Mining District, NW Colombia: A Miocene‐Pliocene
Epizonal Gold Deposit. Ore Geology Reviews, 33, p. 508‐518.
Thompson, R. J., (2006), Yarumalito Project Technical Report, Departments of Antioquia and
Caldas, Republic of Colombia. NI 43‐101 Report for Colombian Mines Corporation,
November 30, 2006, 111 p. Filed on SEDAR.
Thompson, R. J., (2007), Guayabales Project Technical Report, Department of Caldas, Republic
of Colombia. NI 43‐101 Report for Colombian Mines Corporation, April 5, 2007, 54 p.
Filed on SEDAR.
Wang, D., Chattopadhyay, A. & Marion, R. (2007), Mineralogical Investigation of Gold Particles
in the F3 Mozley Concentrate Sample, prepared for Colombia Goldfields Marmato
Project. Unpublished report for Colombia Goldfields Ltd by SGS Minerals Services,
Lakefield, Ontario, Canada, Project 11600‐001, 12 November 2007, 8 p.
Warden, A. J. & Colley, H., (1990), Field investigation of Marmato gold deposits of Caldas and
Risaralda, Colombia. Transactions Institute of Mining & Metallurgy, Section B, 99,
p. B52‐B54.


22 DATE
The effective date of this report is October 14, 2009


23 AUTHOR’S CERTIFICATE
I, Scott E. Wilson, of Highlands Ranch, Colorado, do hereby certify:
1. I am currently employed as President by Scott E. Wilson Consulting, Inc., 6 Inverness Court East,
Suite 110, Englewood, CO 80112.
2. I graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Geology from the California State University,
Sacramento in 1989.
3. I am a Certified Professional Geologist and member of the American Institute of Professional
Geologists (CPG #10965) and a Registered Member (#4025107) of the Society for Mining,
Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc.
4. I have been employed as either a geologist or an engineer continuously for a total of 20 years.
5. I have read the definition of “Qualified Person” set out in National Instrument 43‐101 (“NI 43‐
101) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as
defined in NI 43‐101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a
“Qualified Person” for the purposes of NI 43‐101.
6. I made a personal inspection of the Marmato Project on August 12, 2009.
7. I have had no prior involvement with either CGL or Medoro with regard to the Marmato Project.
8. I am responsible for the preparation of the technical report titled Technical Report – Colombia
Goldfields Ltd. And Medoro Resources Ltd., Marmato Project, Zona Alta Property, Department
of Caldas, Republic of Colombia, dated October 14, 2009
9. As of the date of the report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the technical
report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make
the technical report not misleading.
10. That I have read NI 43‐101 and Form 43‐101F1, and that this technical report was prepared in
compliance with NI 43‐101.
11. I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in Section 1.4 of NI 43‐101.
12. I consent to the filing of the Technical Report with any stock exchange and other regulatory
authority and any publication by them, including electronic publication in the public company
files on their websites accessible by the public, of the Technical Report.
Dated October 14, 2009

_____________________________
Signature of Qualified Person

Scott E. Wilson
Printed Name of Qualified Person


APPENDIX I
QA/QC PROCEDURES

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES FOR GEOCHEMICAL
SAMPLES FROM THE MARMATO AND CARAMANTA PROJECTS, COLOMBIA
By
Stewart D. Redwood, PhD, FIMMM
Vice President Exploration

Version 5
August 2009
(Original December 2005)

24 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 245
2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 246
3 SAMPLE SECURITY & CHAIN OF CUSTODY ................................................................................. 246
3.1 Sample Security ......................................................................................................................... 246
3.2 Chain of Custody ....................................................................................................................... 247
3.3 Assay Certificates ...................................................................................................................... 248
3.4 Sample Rejects .......................................................................................................................... 249
4 SAMPLE CARDS & NUMBERING ................................................................................................ 249
5 SAMPLE BAGS .......................................................................................................................... 249
6 SAMPLE PREPARATION & ANALYSIS.......................................................................................... 250
7 QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM .................................................................................................. 250
8 CHECK & REPLICATE ANALYSES ................................................................................................. 251
9 DATA HANDLING AND REVIEW OF QA‐QC ................................................................................. 252
Figure 1. Sample card for rock samples. ......................................................................... 255
Figure 2. Sample card for drill samples. .......................................................................... 255

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES FOR

GEOCHEMICAL SAMPLES FROM THE MARMATO AND CARAMANTA
PROJECTS, COLOMBIA

August 2009 (Original December 2005)
25 INTRODUCTION

Correct procedures for sample collection, sample security, chain of custody and quality
assurance and quality control (QA‐QC) are essential for all projects and all companies. They are
a prerequisite for listed companies and for NI 43‐101 technical reports and mineral resource
estimations. This memo outlines the procedures for sampling at the Marmato and Caramanta
Projects, Caldas and Antioquia Departments, Colombia, of Colombia Goldfields Ltd (the
“Company”), and incorporates recommendations from the independent Qualifying Persona for
the Company.
26 SAMPLE SECURITY & CHAIN OF CUSTODY

26.1 Sample Security

Sample security is essential to avoid contamination, tampering or salting. This is especially
important at an active gold mine such as Marmato where there is a ready supply of free gold
and gold in cyanide solution (which can be sprayed on a sample or injected into a sample bag).
Do not wear any metal rings or bangles while collecting or handling samples, nor medicated
bandages (may contain silver).

While in Company custody only Company personnel (geologists and technicians) can handle the
samples. Samples must be kept in a locked storage facility and should not be left outside or in
the field truck at night. Transport of samples is only by Company personnel and Company
vehicle.
26.2 Chain of Custody

The Chain of Custody means that there is a continuous series of people responsible for the
sample from the field to the assay in the database. At each change of responsible person there
is a signed document of receipt. The chain must not be broken e.g. by not getting a signed
receipt on delivery of samples to the lab. The chain of custody is as follows:
1. Company Geologist or Technician:
a. Transport of samples from field, mine or drill rig to the core shack.
b. Secure storage of samples at the core shack.
c. Package samples for transport and preparation of Sample Order Form.
d. Transport of samples by Company vehicle to Medellin.
e. Hand over samples to preparation lab in Medellin in return for signed copy of the
Sample Order Form.
f. Or, delivery of samples to courier company if being shipped to a lab in another
city or overseas. Receive waybill.
2. Courier Company (if appropriate): ‐ packaged samples handed over to them at airport or
their office by the geologist for a signed waybill.
3. Assay Laboratory:
a. Clears samples through customs, if appropriate.
b. Receives samples at destination and checks samples against Company Sample
Order Form order, which is signed as a receipt.
c. Log samples into the lab system.
d. If samples are delivered to a preparation lab in Medellin, the lab is responsible
for shipping the samples onwards to the overseas lab for analysis.
e. Provide internet access to track samples.
f. Send emails of interim and final results.
g. Issues digitally signed electronic assay certificate in PDF format (Adobe Acrobat)
or paper assay certificate.
h. Responsible for storage of sample coarse rejects and pulps acting on instructions
from the Company, or return them to the Company in Medellin.

4. Database Manager:
a. The Sample Order Form signed by the lab is handed to the Database Manager.
b. Track sample orders and receipt of assays by email, certificate, and invoice.
c. Receives assays by email.
d. Checks QA‐QC samples to accept or reject assays. If there is a problem advise the
Chief Geologist who will contact the lab to solve it.
e. Entry of assay data into database.
f. Filing and safe storage in document safe of digital assay certificates and original
paper assay certificates (these are legal documents).
5. Project Manager / Chief Geologist:
a. Final review of QA‐QC to accept sample batches and sign off on results.
b. Revise and approve invoice for payment.
6. Company Geologist:
a. Secure and orderly storage of core boxes in Core Store.
b. Receive coarse rejects and pulps of samples from preparation laboratory for safe
and orderly storage in the Core Store.

26.3 Assay Certificates

Assay certificates are legal documents and must be stored safely.
Digitally signed electronic assay certificates in PDF format have been requested since July 2009.
The Database Manager tracks receipt of these and requests them from the lab if missing. On
receipt the following are checked:
1. Make sure the certificate is complete.
2. Check that the assays correspond to those accepted in the final Excel files.
3. Print a paper copy for filing.
4. Archive the digital copy in the database.

Prior to July 2009 all assay certificates were signed, paper certificates and are kept in a
document safe in the Company office in Medellin. All of these were scanned to make PDF
copies for ease of reference.

Some labs send out paper certificates as well as electronic certificates. These should be checked
in the same manner as the electronic certificates, and archived in the Document Safe with the
paper certificates.
26.4 Sample Rejects

Overseas labs should be instructed to store coarse rejects and sample pulps.
For Medellin labs the coarse rejects and sample pulps should be returned to the Company on a
regular basis and stored at the Company warehouse in Medellin.
27 SAMPLE CARDS & NUMBERING

Sample cards have been printed with consecutive sample numbers and two tear‐off tickets.
One ticket goes in the sample bag and the second ticket is for petrological or other samples. No
other sample numbers or prefixes or suffixes are to be used. There are different sample cards
for rock samples (prefix R), soil samples (prefix S), stream sediment samples (prefix SS) and drill
samples (prefix D). An example of a rock sample card is shown in Figure 1 and of a drill sample
card in Figure 2.
The sample description is written on the sample card. The data is entered into an Access
database at the field camp.
28 SAMPLE BAGS

Rock samples are double bagged in heavy gauge polythene bags, or cloth bag and nylon bag.
The tear‐off sample number ticket is put inside the bag and the sample number is written on
the outside of both bags with indelible black marker pen. The sample bags are securely sealed
with a nylon cable tie so that it cannot be tampered with, and that any tampering is obvious.

29 SAMPLE PREPARATION & ANALYSIS

• Fine crush entire sample (>75% passing 2 mm / 10 mesh), split 300 g using a Jones or
riffle splitter, and pulverize a 300 g split (>80% passing 106 microns / 150 mesh). The
lab should use barren silica sand wash between each sample.
• Assay for gold by fire assay with 30 g charge and AA finish with an upper limit of
detection of 3.0 g/t Au. Over‐limit samples for Au and Ag should be re‐run by FA and
gravimetric finish. Silver is assayed by AAS.
• Note that for use in mineral resource estimates, an assay is required (rather than a
multielement analysis). Thus assays are required for gold and silver, i.e. fire assay or AA.
• Multielements (30 to 35 element packages) by multi‐acid or aqua regia digestion and
ICP finish. Zn, Pb and Cu values above 10,000 ppm (1%) can be re‐run by aqua regia
digestion and AA detection. For Phase 2 drilling at Marmato, ICP will not be done.
• Advise the lab that many samples will have ore grade gold and silver and high base
metal sulphides; the latter can affect precious metal recoveries by fire assay but the lab
can modify the procedure to optimize results.

30 QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

The geologist is responsible for the preparation and insertion of the quality control (QC)
samples using the sample ticket book for reference. The QC samples should be selected and
marked on the sample cards in advance. The QC samples should be at random intervals rather
than regular intervals. Use random numbers generated by Excel for all QC samples except for
blanks, which should be inserted after the most strongly mineralized samples. The geologist
prepares a Quality Control Samples sheet listing QC sample number, type of QC sample, and
comments.
In every batch of 100 sample numbers, 11 QC samples are inserted at random (i.e. 11 QC
samples and 89 unknown samples in 100 samples, or 12% QC). The QC samples are as follows:
• 2 field duplicate samples (FD) every 100 samples. A second sample is taken at the same
field site (rather than taking one sample and splitting it). For underground channel
samples take a full size duplicate sample. For drill core take a quarter‐core sample as

duplicate. This checks geological variability and hence the adequacy of the sampling
procedure and sample size.

• 2 secondary duplicate samples (preparation duplicates or PD) every 100 samples.
Instruct the lab to split a second sample after the fine crushing stage and pulverize it.

• 5 certified standard reference materials (CSRM) every 100 samples. This number has
been increased from 2 to ensure that there is an average of one CSRM in each tray of
20‐25 samples that goes in the assay oven. We have purchased pulverized reference
standards certified for gold (and in some cases, silver) from Rocklabs Limited, Auckland,
New Zealand. Standards check analytical precision and accuracy, and sample switches.
CSRM samples are monitored by plotting graphs with time on the x‐axis and horizontal
lines for recommended value and ± 2 standard deviations (SD) and ± 3 SD. As a rule,
CSRM values within ± 2 SD are accepted; an isolated sample above ± 2 SD but below ± 3
SD is acceptable; two consecutive samples above ± 2 SD are rejected; and any sample
above ± 3 SD is rejected.

• 2 blank samples every 100 samples. Pool filter sand is used as it is readily available. One
sample should ideally be a rock blank from a local source such as a sterile quartzite or an
unaltered andesite, if available. This checks for contamination in preparation, for
analytical precision and detection limits, and for sample switches.

The standards and blanks usually have to be submitted as powdered or fine samples with the
rock samples: they stand out from the rock samples, but on the other hand the lab does not
know the expected grade. Ideally the standards and blanks are inserted after the samples have
been prepared so that they cannot be distinguished, but this is not usually possible in practice.
31 CHECK & REPLICATE ANALYSES

These comprise check assays and replicate assays which are carried out periodically at a
secondary laboratory as an independent check on the primary laboratory’s accuracy and
precision. The first lab can be asked to prepare sample splits from the pulps and send them
directly to the second lab. There is no need to re‐number samples. These samples should be
selected at random by random number generator.

The standard procedure previously was to submit 5% of all samples for check assays and 10%
for replicate assays. This procedure was modified in August 2009 in consultation with Scott
Wilson, QP. The modified procedure is to do check assays on 5% of samples above a cut‐off of
0.05 ppm Au, and replicate assays on 5% of samples above the lower limit of detection of gold.
This modification was made in order to avoid the cost of large amounts of check and replicate
assays of samples which are very low grade or have no detectable gold, as these provide no
meaningful QC. It is considered that this is a large enough sample subset to identify any QC
issues.
Check assays are on a new pulp prepared from the coarse reject. The primary preparation
laboratory can prepare the new pulp. The modified procedure is to do check assays on 5% of
samples above a cut‐off of 0.05 ppm Au.
Replicate assays are carried out on the same sample pulp as the original assay. The modified
procedure is to do replicate assays on 5% of samples above the lower limit of detection of gold.
In both cases, eliminate QC samples before selecting samples for checks (blanks, standards),
and add new standards and blanks.
32 DATA HANDLING AND REVIEW OF QA‐QC

The Database & GIS Manager is responsible for tracking the samples through the laboratory.
The Sample Order Form is given to the Database Manager. Use an excel spreadsheet to track
Company reference number, Lab order number, date of delivery to lab, date of receipt of assays
by email, date of receipt of certificate, date of receipt of invoice.
The Database & GIS Manager is responsible for receiving the assay results and putting them in
the database. This is the only person with authority to do this in order to maintain integrity and
quality control of the database.

On receipt of each batch of assays, the QA‐QC samples should be checked in order to accept or
reject the batch. If there is a problem the Chief Geologist should be notified and he will request
that the lab identify and solve the problem, if possible, or carry out re‐analyses as necessary.
The re‐assays should be of the whole sample batch or tray between the good QC samples on
either side, and not just of a few samples on either side of the problem samples. Use an Excel or
Access spreadsheet and graph to check QC results and update this with each batch so that the
whole program can be monitored progressively.
The lab also carries out their own internal QC samples and the results for these should be
requested and monitored also.
Signed,
“Stewart D. Redwood”
Vice President of Exploration

Figure 4. Sample card for rock samples.
Figure 5. Sample card for drill samples.

CGL - Medoro - 43-101 - 14-Oct-09 - Zona Alta

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CGL - Medoro - 43-101 - 14-Oct-09 - Zona Alta

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CGL - Medoro - 43-101 - 14-Oct-09 - Zona Alta

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Scott E Wilson Consulting Inc Phone: (720) 348‐1646

Compañía de Servicios y Logisticos de Colombia Ltda Cia Servicios Logisticos

El Carmen Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos July 18, 2006 August 06, 2007

Botánica or Villoncita Cia Minera de Caldas S.A. Cien Pesos

Peña N°2 INCLUSION 2002 Julio Enrique Trejos y Cia. January 27, 2005 July 27, 2006

La Pinta 2461T Julio Enrique Trejos January 27, 2005 July 27, 2005

Cascabel 2525T Leonardo Ortiz Parra April 20, 2007 October 5, 2007

La Panfría 4459 T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2007 Pending

La Ortiz 2414T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2008 Pending

Golondrina 2430 T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2009 Pending

Torre 3 2404T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2010 Pending

Cubana o Cubanita 2537T Fernando Garcia December 28, 2011 Pending

Note 3: Held in trust for Cia Servicios Logisticos.

Note 10: Archived Proposal

Hole Designation Mineralization Intersection (m) Assay Results

From To Core Length Gold (g/t)

MS‐1 276.0 358.0 82.0 2.448

inc. 276.0 332.0 56.0 3.287

Inc 32.0 4.990

Inc 12.0 9.090

Inc 12.0 3.990

Inc 8.0 5.220

MS‐2 324.0 348.0 24.0 4.093

Inc 16.0 5.156

Inc 8.0 6.826

354.0 362.0 8.0 1.795

MS‐3 100.0 110.0 10.0 2.236

250.0 254.0 4.0 5.867

310.0 322.0 12.0 3.320

392.0 412.0 20.0 1.283

424.0 438.0 14.0 1.377

525.0 540.0 15.0 3.120

MS‐4 70.0 82.0 12.0 1.900

152.0 154.0 2.0 3.302

458.0 480.0 22.0 0.460

MS‐5 54.0 88.0 34.0 1.465

MS‐8 391.0 397.0 6.0 1.630

MS‐9 372.0 376.0 4.0 4.985

MS‐15 14.6 30.0 15.4 1.177

92.0 103.3 11.3 1.673

188.0 248.0 60.0 1.143

Hole Designation Mineralization Intersection (m) Assay Results

From To Core Length Gold (g/t)

216.0 238.0 22.0 2.014

346.0 390.0 44.0 0.880

358.0 382.0 24.0 1.251

MS‐17 26.5 44.5 18.0 0.549

68.5 74.5 6.0 3.771

88.5 122.5 34.0 1.989

Inc 112.5 122.5 10.0 4.251

230.5 238.5 8.0 0.994

262.0 284.0 22.0 1.531

MS‐18 13.0 77.0 64.0 20.572

Inc 32.0 57.0 25.0 47.726

Inc 35.5 51.0 15.5 74.469

Inc 35.5 43.0 7.5 129.841

89.0 101.0 12.0 0.514

107.0 115.0 8.0 1.200

133.0 145.0 12.0 1.611