Eco Products - Factor Analysis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .613


Approx. Chi-Square 407.224

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity df 136

Sig. .000

 KMO Measure = 0.613 > 0.5 Accepted.

 Bartlett’s Test Sig.= 0.000<< 0.05, the significance level is small enough to reject the
null hypothesis. This means that correlation matrix is not an identity matrix.

Communalities

Initial Extraction

Ireadlabelstoseewhetherprod 1.000 .722


uctsareenvironmentallysafe
Iwillcarrymyownbagwhilegoin 1.000 .516
gtosupermarket
Ihavealreadyusedproductsm 1.000 .842
adefromnaturalingredientsec
o
Iamfamiliaraboutecofriendlyp 1.000 .759
aper
Iamhavinggoodknowledgeab 1.000 .466
outecofriendlypaper
Ecofriendlypaperismoreappr 1.000 .800
opriatefortheenvironmentrath
e
Ecofriendlypaperismanufactu 1.000 .605
redbytheenvironmentalfriendl
y
Ibelievethatecofriendlypaper 1.000 .870
havemanygoodqualities
Ecofriendlypaperappealstom 1.000 .802
e
Ilikeecofriendlypaper 1.000 .750
MostpeoplethinkthatIshouldp 1.000 .831
urchaseecofriendlyproducts
MostpeoplethinkthatIshoulde 1.000 .702
ngageinecofriendlyproducts
Ifeelstrongpersonalobligation 1.000 .752
stopurchasegreenproducts
Iamwillingtoputextraefforttos 1.000 .882
electgreenproducts
IfeelguiltyifIdontchoosegreen 1.000 .726
products
IfIbuypaperIwillbuyecofriendl 1.000 .573
ypaper
InfutureIwillgivepriorityforgre 1.000 .794
enproductswhilepurchas

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Total Variance Explained

Compone Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings
nt Loadings

Total % of Cumulative Total % of Cumulative Total % of Cumulative


Variance % Variance % Variance %

1 9.497 55.866 55.866 9.497 55.866 55.866 4.789 28.172 28.172


2 1.692 9.952 65.818 1.692 9.952 65.818 3.966 23.330 51.501
3 1.201 7.067 72.885 1.201 7.067 72.885 3.635 21.384 72.885
4 .929 5.465 78.351
5 .795 4.674 83.025
6 .693 4.075 87.101
7 .675 3.973 91.074
8 .428 2.515 93.589
9 .375 2.207 95.796
10 .290 1.708 97.503
11 .192 1.127 98.630
12 .076 .447 99.077
13 .072 .425 99.501
14 .041 .239 99.740
15 .026 .151 99.891
16 .015 .086 99.977
17 .004 .023 100.000

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


 From the above table, our 17 variables seem to measure 3 underlying factors. This is
because only our first 3 components have an Eigen value of at least 1. The other
components having low values are not assumed to represent real traits underlying
our 17 questions.

 A scree plot visualizes the Eigen values. We see that the first 3 components have
Eigen values over 1. We consider these “strong factors”. After that the Eigen values
drop off and almost become constant.

Component Matrixa

Component

1 2 3

Ireadlabelstoseewhetherprod .791 .072 .301


uctsareenvironmentallysafe
Iwillcarrymyownbagwhilegoin .649 .154 -.266
gtosupermarket
Ihavealreadyusedproductsm .705 .547 -.215
adefromnaturalingredientsec
o
Iamfamiliaraboutecofriendlyp .839 .224 .069
aper
Iamhavinggoodknowledgeab .556 .393 .039
outecofriendlypaper
Ecofriendlypaperismoreappr .777 -.415 -.154
opriatefortheenvironmentrath
e
Ecofriendlypaperismanufactu .747 -.026 .216
redbytheenvironmentalfriendl
y
Ibelievethatecofriendlypaper .821 -.162 -.412
havemanygoodqualities
Ecofriendlypaperappealstom .833 -.015 -.327
e
Ilikeecofriendlypaper .735 -.422 -.178
MostpeoplethinkthatIshouldp .816 -.394 .102
urchaseecofriendlyproducts
MostpeoplethinkthatIshoulde .740 -.290 .263
ngageinecofriendlyproducts
Ifeelstrongpersonalobligation .805 -.009 .323
stopurchasegreenproducts
Iamwillingtoputextraefforttos .676 .594 -.269
electgreenproducts
IfeelguiltyifIdontchoosegreen .650 .354 .422
products
IfIbuypaperIwillbuyecofriendl .660 -.050 .367
ypaper
InfutureIwillgivepriorityforgre .832 -.249 -.198
enproductswhilepurchas

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.


a. 3 components extracted.

 We have extracted three variables wherein the 17 items are divided into 3 variables
according to most important items which similar responses in component 1 and
simultaneously in component 2 and 3.
 In component 1, all the factors contribute to all the variables.
 In component 2, only 2 factors contribute to all the variables.
 In component 3, no factor contributes to all the variables. Hence we can ignore this
component.

You might also like