2 Nihms963463
2 Nihms963463
2 Nihms963463
Author manuscript
J Clin Nurs. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Abstract
Author Manuscript
Aim—To describe and explain how the concept of family functioning has been used in the
targeted sample of health literature on adult family members with illness.
Design—Concept analysis
Data sources—Academic Search Premier, ProQuest Research Library, Family & Society
Studies Worldwide, PsychoInfo, SocINDEX, PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched
Author Manuscript
within the last 20 years (1997 – Dec. 2016) using the terms “family function*” and “patient”.
Studies of pediatric patients and non-English articles were excluded.
Results—The findings suggest that family functioning in the context of illness is defined as how
well family members communicate with each other, fulfill family roles, accept family routines and
procedures, cope with and adjust to family stress, and relate to each other.
Correspondence: Yingzi Zhang, MS, Doctoral student, School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 701 Highland Ave, Suite
# 3134, Madison, WI 53705 ([email protected]).
The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Zhang Page 2
Keywords
Author Manuscript
Family Functioning; Concept Analysis; Adult Patient; Patient- and Family-centered Care
Introduction
Illness management is complex and takes place in various settings (i.e., home, hospital,
community facility). Regardless of setting, the context of illness management includes
family and may impact family functioning. The illness affects not only the patient, but also
imposes changes in the whole family system (Northouse, 2012). Family members may be
asked to provide physical and psychological care (e.g., assistance with daily meals,
medications, physical activity, and emotional coping) to support the patients' illness recovery
and management. The role family plays in adult family members' illness experience had
Author Manuscript
been examined in adult patients with a variety of medical conditions, such as cancer, mental
health issues, and other chronic illnesses (Friedmann et al., 1997; Mahrer-Imhof et al., 2013;
Ozono et al., 2005); and has been studied in Western and non-Western cultures, by nurse-
and non-nurse investigators (Geurtsen, van Heugten, Meijer, Martina, & Geurts, 2011; Wang
& Zhao, 2012). In current health literature, family functioning is one of the main concepts
explored with respect to the role of family in illness, and how illness impacts the family
system (Çuhadar, Savaş, Ünal, & Gökpınar, 2015; Khattak, 2007; Furgał et al., 2009).
Family functioning has been widely discussed in nursing practice, education, and research.
In practice, family functioning is an essential component of patient and family centered care
(PFCC). The Joint Commission in the United States (2010) has incorporated tenets of PFCC
into their standards and requirements for health care organization performance. These
strategies encourage the delivery of health care “…that is grounded in mutually beneficial
Author Manuscript
partnerships among health care providers, patients, and families” (The Joint Commission,
2010, page 1). Patient- and family-centered care is valued and highlighted in clinical practice
to support families and enhance family functioning during difficult times (Feinberg, 2012).
Nurse researchers have developed theories regarding family functioning in the context of
illness. For example, the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Model has been
widely utilized as a theoretical underpinning for examining family functioning in nursing
education, research, and family care (Leahey & Wright, 2016). Nurse researchers have also
developed and tested instruments to measure family functioning, such as Feetham's Family
Functioning Scale (Roberts & Feetham, 1982), Survey of Family Environment (Hohashi &
Honda, 2012), and Family Functioning, Health and Social Support questionnaire (Åstedt-
Kurki, Tarkka, Paavilainen, & Lehti, 2002).
Author Manuscript
The term “family functioning” has been used frequently in the context of health research.
Previous literature suggests that effective family functioning results when the family
members play their respective roles, successfully perform practical tasks, and maintain
relationships within and beyond the family context (Çuhadar et al., 2015; Astedt-Kurki,
Tarkka, Rikala, Lehti, & Paavilainen, 2009). However, the conceptual and operational
definitions of family functioning differ across studies, which limits the ability to compare
and synthesize findings regarding the concept. For example, across three studies of families
of an adult patient with cancer or in palliative care, family functioning was conceptually
Author Manuscript
defined as the daily processes families engage in to achieve goals and to support family
members' health and development (Kühne et al., 2013); as a resiliency factor equivalent to
family flexibility (Lim & Ashing-Giwa, 2012); or the concept was not defined (Schuler et
al., 2014). Operational definitions included the Family Assessment Device (FAD), which
assesses problem solving, communication, roles, affective involvement, affective
responsiveness, and general functioning; the Family Relationships Index, which assesses
cohesiveness, expressiveness, and conflict resolution; and the Family Adaptability and
Cohesion Evaluation Scales-III (FACES-III), which measures adaptability and cohesion
(Kühne et al., 2013; Lim & Ashing-Giwa, 2012; Schuler et al., 2014). Some similarities
(e.g., roles, adaptability, communication/expressiveness, cohesion) and some differences
(e.g., conflict resolving vs. behavior control) are evident in the conceptual and operational
definitions used by these three research teams. This lack of consistency creates confusion
Author Manuscript
about the concept and can interfere with theory development in nursing science. A clear
conceptual definition of attributes of family functioning based on concept analysis could act
as a guide in the development of instruments to assess family functioning, the design of
family-based interventions, and their application in clinical practice.
Purpose
Although several health researchers have used the term, no concept analysis of family
functioning in the context of an adult family member with illness is currently available. This
concept analysis is necessary to clarify and distinguish attributes or characteristics of the
concept from those of other related or surrogate concepts found in family-centered health
research. By nature, the concept of family functioning is context-dependent. Families with
different cultural, social and political backgrounds may have different perspectives on the
Author Manuscript
composition and meaning of family. For the purpose of this analysis, family is used in the
traditional sense: as blood related or legally adopted, in nuclear and/or extended families.
The context of illness includes an adult family member with any acute or chronic illness
receiving medical or rehabilitative care in any setting including a hospital, community care
facility, home, or transitioning across care settings. Subsequent use of the term “patient” is
meant to be inclusive of adult family members with illness, regardless of settings (home,
community, or care facility).
Methods
Rodgers' Method
Rodgers evolutionary concept analysis was selected as the method for this study. Concept
analysis provides a method by which one can “define the concept of interest in terms of its
Author Manuscript
critical attributes or ‘essence,’ which typically is presented as a set of conditions that are
both necessary and sufficient to delineate the domain and boundaries of the concept”
(Rodgers, 2000, p. 77). Rodgers described concepts as abstract ideas that are influenced by
“socialization and public interaction” (Rodgers, 2000, p. 78). Given that family functioning
is context dependent, adopting an evolutionary perspective to concept analysis, as proposed
by Rodgers (2000), is beneficial in clarifying and advancing understanding of the concept.
Rodgers' method includes six steps: (1) identify the concept of interest and associated
expressions; (2) identify and select the appropriate setting and samples for data collection;
Author Manuscript
(3) collect relevant data to identify attributes, contextual basis including interdisciplinary,
sociocultural, and temporal (antecedents, consequences) variations, surrogate terms, and
related concepts; (4) analyze and summarize data regarding characteristics of the concept;
(5) identify an exemplar of the concept, if appropriate; and (6) identify implications and
hypotheses for further development of the concept.
step in the concept analysis process. The search was restricted to those papers published
within the last 20 years (1997 – Dec. 2016) with “family functioning” as the main concept,
“patient” in the abstract, and “adult” (≥ 18 years old) age group. A span of 20 years was
selected for this analysis because the historical shifts in the way Americans define family
that began in the late 1960s have stabilized since 1990 (Roberts, 2008). Articles involving
pediatric or normal populations, articles without a focus on family functioning, letters to
editor, editorial commentary, published abstracts, and non-English report were excluded.
Zotero was used to organize the citations retrieved and delete duplicates, resulting in a total
of 767 records. I screened all titles and excluded 158 records that were not relevant; I then
read abstracts of the remaining 609 articles and identified 359 records that met inclusion
criteria. A total of 253 records were published within the last 20 years: 46 by nurse authors
(first or corresponding author) and 207 by non-nurses. Rodgers (2000) recommended that at
Author Manuscript
least 20% of the total population should be sampled for concept analysis; n=51 in this case.
Given the fact that papers by nurse authors comprised a small proportion of all articles, I
oversampled them (selecting 40% rather than 20% of nursing articles) to ensure that results
included nursing's conceptualization of “family functioning” in the context of an adult
family member with illness. Records were sorted by publication date from oldest to newest,
within categories of nursing and non-nursing publications. A random number table
generated by SPSS 22.0 (NY: IBM Corp.) was used to identify and select n=18 articles from
nurse authors, and n=33 articles from non-nurse authors (See flow diagram in Figure 1).
Data Abstraction
I read the full text of each article and abstracted data to a review matrix. The review matrix
was organized with a column for each characteristic specified by Rodgers' method: (1)
Author Manuscript
the study setting/environment. Temporal antecedents were identified in the text as factors
Author Manuscript
Results
The selected publications included 47 quantitative studies (42 research articles and 5
dissertations), one qualitative study, one case study, and two narrative literature reviews. One
literature review described interventions to support family functioning among mothers with
high-risk pregnancies needing treatment or hospitalization (Martin-Arafeh, Watson, & Baird,
1999). The other review summarized evidence supporting nursing activities for the Nursing
Intervention Classification, “Family Integrity Promotion” (Van Horn & Kautz, 2007).
Neither review overlapped with the purpose of the current concept analysis.
Defining Attributes
Identification of attributes represents the primary interest of concept analysis. The attributes
Author Manuscript
constitute a definition of the concept and make it possible to “identify situations that fall
under the concept” (Rodgers, 2000, p. 91). Five attributes of family functioning were
identified in the publications reviewed, including sense of cohesion, role fulfillment,
problem solving, behavior control, and communication (Table 1).
2011; Weinstock et al., 2013). In addition, cohesion was the basis of developing
relationships with one another, as well as how family members interact and support each
other to accomplish family tasks (Furgał et al., 2009; Krawetz et al., 2001, Beardslee et al.,
2007).
Goto, Tasaki, & Someya, 2001). It referred to the recurrent patterns of behavior that achieve
Author Manuscript
family functions and meet an individual's and family's needs (Brennan, 2000). Each family
member had many roles depending on the subsystem within which they were functioning
(Scionti, 2001). For example, one can be husband within the marital subsystem while also
father in the parent-child subsystem (King et al., 2001; Krawetz et al., 2001; Knauth, 2000).
The foci of family role fulfillment were on responsibilities for specific functions, such as
provision of food, clothing, and money to family members (Chenhall, 1998; Li et al., 2009,
Martin-Arafeh et al., 1999), and behaviors individuals engage in to fulfill their roles (King et
al., 2001; Furgał et al., 2009, Chien et al., 2004). The literature reviewed indicated that the
added demands of caregiving disrupt usual patterns of family life (Mercer et al., 1999;
Geurtsen et al., 2011). Therefore, in order to meet family members' needs, family roles were
negotiated and responsibilities were reallocated among family members (Van Horn & Kautz,
2007, Ozono et al., 2005; Furgał et al., 2009, Li. Lin, Ji, Sun, & Rotheram-Borus, 2009;
Author Manuscript
reorganizing family rules and routines to determine the family adjustment to stress and
response to developmental needs (Mahrer-Imhof et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2015; Tramonti,
Barsanti, Bongioanni, Bogliolo, & Rossi, 2014).
feelings and thoughts; and the way family members express themselves (Furgał et al., 2009;
Author Manuscript
Chien, Norman, & Thompson, 2004). The reviewed literature focused primarily on verbal
communication due to methodological difficulties in measuring non-verbal communication
(Ozono et al., 2005; Krawetz et al., 2001). Affective and instrumental communication were
prevalent (e.g., Chenhall, 1998; Simoneau & Miklowitz, 2001; Martin-Arafeh et al., 1999).
Affective communication was described as the exchange of information related to feelings
and emotional experiences (Latham, Sowell, Phillips, & Murdaugh, 2001). Instrumental
communication was described as the exchange of information related to everyday life
(Brennan, 2000). Although there was overlap between the two types of communication,
some researchers found that families exhibited difficulties with affective communication
while functioning well with instrumental communication (Chenhall, 1998; Scionti, 2001).
Families experienced problems with communication when facing illness and made changes
in communication patterns or content to adapt to the illness experience and successfully
Author Manuscript
The five attributes of family functioning were interrelated; none existed independently
(Geurtsen et al., 2011; Krawetz et al., 2001; Weinstock et al., 2013). For example, problem
solving required absorption of new information and adjusting family rules and family roles
(behavior control, role fulfillment). To negotiate role changes among family members and
establish new family routines or rules, clear and effective communication was desirable. The
process of coping with illness (problem solving) may strengthen the emotional bond among
family members (sense of cohesion).
Contextual Basis
Author Manuscript
Rodgers (2000) described the contextual basis of a concept as the disciplinary and
sociocultural milieus and temporal context for application of the concept. Themes related to
context identified in the articles are summarized in Table 1 in the categories of
“disciplinary,” “sociocultural,” and “temporal” context.
countries, including the United States (n = 19), Finland (n = 6), China (n = 6), Spain (n = 4),
Canada (n = 3), Japan (n = 2), and others (n = 1 each). Several studies described the
sociocultural context of the sample, including ethnic cultures [African American (Latham et
al., 2001), Chinese culture (Chien et al., 2004; Jiang et al., 2015), and Japanese culture
(Ozono et al., 2005)], and social characteristics [low socioeconomic status (Latham et al.,
2001; Li et al., 2009), cultural gender roles (Morales-Asencio et al., 2008), culture of war/
violence (Ebrahimzadeh & Rajabi, 2007; Milenković, Simonović, Stanković, & Samardžić,
Author Manuscript
medical diagnoses (Li et al., 2009; van der Peol & Greeff, 2003), and health events such as
falls (Vera et al., 2015) and hospitalizations (Van Horn & Kautz, 2007). Family member-
related factors included demographic characteristics such as age, education (Kristjanson, et
al., 1997), family role (Krawetz et al., 2001; Knauth, 2000; Scionti, 2001)], psychological
factors such as psychological distress (O'Farrell et al., 2000; Saunders, 1997), and factors
related to resources and demands including social support (Carnes, 2000; Chien et al., 2004;
Yu, Wang, He, Liang, & Zhou, 2015), financial security (Carnes, 2000), caregiving demands
(Heru & Ryan, 2004; Yu et al., 2015), and premorbid relationship quality (Carnes, 2000).
Some family unit-related factors influenced family functioning, including family
demographic factors [e.g., “empty nesters” (Wang & Zhao, 2012)], and factors related to
resources and demands [e.g., a telehealth care transition intervention (Chiang et al., 2012),
group support and information (Beardslee et al., 2007), and the birth of a new family
Author Manuscript
Consequences: In most of the literature reviewed, family functioning was analyzed as the
primary outcome variable, with few subsequent secondary outcomes (consequences)
described. Consequences of family functioning were summarized as psychological and
medical outcomes. Psychological outcomes of family functioning included patient or family
member quality of life (Li et al., 2009), satisfaction with rehabilitation progress (Clark &
Smith, 1998), perceived body size distortion and body dissatisfaction (Benninghoven,
Tetsch, Kunzendorf, & Jantschek, 2007), coping (Tramonti et al., 2014; Cuhadar et al.,
2015), and motivation for childbearing in HIV infected women (Latham et al., 2001),
parental competence (Knauth, 2000), depression (King et al., 2001), anxiety (Ozono et al.,
2005), and caregiving burden (Tramonti et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2015). Medical outcomes of
family functioning included clinician-family therapeutic alliance (Sherer et al., 2007),
Author Manuscript
patient re-hospitalization (Mercer et al., 1999), and changes in family members' health
(Astedt-Kurki, Lehti, Tarkka, & Paavilainen, 2004) (Table 1).
Related Concepts
Three related concepts were identified in the literature reviewed, including family resiliency,
family relationship, and family coping. Each “bear some relationship to the concept of
interest but do not share the same set of attributes” (Rodgers, 2000, p. 92). Family resiliency
was defined as the ability to develop adaptive coping strategies when a family member is
Author Manuscript
facing illness (Heru & Ryan, 2004). Family resiliency as a strength facilitates and offsets
difficulties in maintaining family functioning (Heru & Ryan, 2004). Family relationship
referred to relatedness or connection by various methods (i.e. blood, marriage) and included
relationships among immediate family members, relationships between the family and
extended family, and relationships between family and broader units, such as one's
community or church (Chiang et al., 2012). The quality of a family relationship may affect
the level of bonding and emotional connection, and communication among family members,
which influence overall family functioning (Li et al., 2009; Knauth, 2003). Family coping
was defined as the family's effort and utilization of resources in response to problems or
difficulties (Saunders, 1997). Literature described the process of family coping and use of
resources to maintain family functioning (Table 1).
Surrogate Terms
Author Manuscript
Four surrogate terms were identified in the text of the articles reviewed, and used
interchangeably with “family functioning”. These terms were family adaptation (Carnes,
2000; Saunders, 1997), family environment (Clark & Smith, 1998; Simoneau & Miklowitz,
2001; Weinstock et al., 2013), family integrity (Van Horn & Kautz, 2007), and family
dynamics (Mercer et al., 1999; Krawetz et al., 2001; Furgał et al., 2009; Geurtsen et al.,
2011; Vera et al., 2015) (Table 1).
Discussion
This is the first concept analysis of family functioning in the context of adult family
members with illness. The findings of this concept analysis may improve conceptual clarity
and can be used to enhance family-centered research and practice. Based on the most
Author Manuscript
emotional bonding to meet developmental and situational needs (Epstein et al., 1978;
Steinhauer et al., 1984). This concept analysis contributed to the existing models by
summarizing the antecedents and consequences of family functioning evidenced in current
literature.
The concept of family functioning in the context of illness was of interest in several
disciplines. In this review, the most frequent among them were psychology, nursing, and
medicine. The attributes were similar across disciplines. From oversampled nursing
Author Manuscript
family conversations with family members guided by the family system nursing framework
that focused on illness, treatment, and well-being were useful to families involved in stroke
care in Sweden (Östlund, Bäckström, Saveman, Lindh, & Sundin, 2016). With regard to
familial care for a person with mental illness, family members expressed that they needed
help in identifying and managing patient's disruptive behavior, improving family cohesion,
and maintaining family routines (Iseselo, Kajula, & Yahya-Malima, 2016). More nursing
research is needed to explore if and how family functioning differs when facing physical
health challenges as opposed to behavioral or psychosocial dysfunction outside of physical/
medical illness. This knowledge could help nurses to better identify and treat salient issues
for families facing different types of illness.
Antecedents of family functioning were noted in most of the studies reviewed, and these
frequently fell into the categories of demographic characteristics, psychological/behavioral
Author Manuscript
factors, and medical factors related to the patients, family members, and family units.
Similarly, consequences of family functioning were categorized into psychological and
medical outcomes. In general, good family functioning predicted desirable medical and
psychosocial health outcomes. From a biopsychosocial perspective, one may expect that an
individual's and family's characteristics including background (e.g. demographic), medical
condition, psychological status (e.g. distress), and social structure (e.g., family
characteristics) influence family functioning. Nurses should pay attention to these various
characteristics as targets for intervention and support of family functioning.
Family resiliency, family relationships, and family coping were identified as related
concepts. Family functioning shared some attributes with family resiliency, such as
emotional boding and communication skills (Heru & Ryan, 2004). Family coping, which
Author Manuscript
was defined as the utilization of resources in response to family stress, shared the attribute of
problem-solving with family functioning (Carnes, 2000; Saunders, 1997). In addition, family
relationship shared the attributes of communication and cohesion with family functioning
(Li et al., 2009; Knauth, 2000). Nursing interventions addressing family resiliency, family
coping, and family relationship may help to enhance some aspects of family functioning.
Nurse researchers need to select concepts cautiously and provide clear conceptual
definitions to avoid misuse of comparable terms.
With regard to surrogate terms, the use of family adaptation as a surrogate for family
Author Manuscript
The use of a team approach to review, data extraction and syntheses would provide greater
evidence of rigor. The articles reviewed were limited to those published in the English
language, which narrows the scope of the data analyzed. The small number of publications
from disciplines other than psychology may call into question the applicability of the new
concept definition to contexts other than mental health concerns. Given the heterogeneity of
the study settings and samples, it is difficult to draw any conclusion about consensus on
what “optimal” family functioning in the context of illness would be. Most of the literature
reviewed did not mention the sociocultural or political context of family functioning,
although a few provided some information about how families of particular sociocultural
contexts functioned in the face of illness (Ozono et al., 2005, Jiang et al., 2015). The
proposed definition of family functioning was based largely on conceptualizations from
Western studies. Further research is needed to inform nurses' practice when assessing
Author Manuscript
Conclusion
Author Manuscript
The findings of this concept analysis provide an overview of how family functioning in the
context of adult chronic illness is conceptualized in a targeted sample of the health literature.
Most of the reviewed studies used cross-sectional descriptive designs to explore the
antecedents and consequences of family functioning. Also, few studies focused on
interventions that could improve family functioning. It is important to conduct more
longitudinal follow-up studies and intervention studies to gain a better understanding of the
modifiable antecedents of family functioning. For example, future nursing research could
target antecedent variables, such as providing social support or managing psychological
distress in both patients and their caregivers as interventions to improve family functioning.
Being aware of related concepts and surrogate terms will help researchers to differentiate
among similar concepts and promote clear and consistent usage of the concept across studies
to help with synthesizing evidence.
Author Manuscript
poor communication among patients and their family members. In response, nurses could
provide communication strategies or refer families to appropriate counseling or social work
services. Similarly, nurses may better recognize anticipated changes caused by illness that
may initiate alterations in family functioning. For example, nurses may identify increases in
patient or caregiver illness-related distress levels and provide emotional support to minimize
potential disruption in family functioning.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the Kwekkeboom research group for feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript.
I thank Dr. Kwekkeboom and Dr. Audrey Tluceck for their insightful feedback and suggestions.
The work was conducted as part of my PhD training at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, under the
supervision of Dr. Kristine Kwekkeboom. My training is supported by an NIH-funded Research Assistant position
Author Manuscript
on Dr. Kwekkeboom's National Institute of Nursing Research award number R01NR013468. The content is solely
the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of
Health.
References
Abilés V, Rodríguez-Ruiz S, Abilés J, Mellado C, García A, Pérez de la Cruz A, Fernández-Santaella
MC. Psychological characteristics of morbidly obese candidates for bariatric surgery. Obesity
Surgery. 2010; 20(2):161–167. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-008-9726-1 [PubMed: 18958537]
Çuhadar D, Savaş H, Ünal A, Gökpınar F. Family Functionality and Coping Attitudes of Patients with
Bipolar Disorder. Journal of Religion & Health. 2015; 54(5):1731–1746. DOI: 10.1007/
s10943-014-9919-y [PubMed: 25086849]
Ebrahimzadeh MH, Rajabi MT. Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing war-related amputations
of the foot and ankle. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2007; 46(6):429–433. DOI:
10.1053/j.jfas.2007.08.011 [PubMed: 17980838]
Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Levin S. The McMaster Model of Family Functioning. Journal of Marital and
Family Therapy. 1978; 4(4):19–31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1978.tb00537.x
Feinberg LF. Moving Toward Person- and Family-Centered Care. Public Policy & Aging Report. 2012;
24(3):97–101. DOI: 10.1093/ppar/pru027
Furgał M, Nowobilski R, Pulka G, Polczyk R, De Barbaro B, Nizankowska-Mogilnicka E, Szczeklik
A. Dyspnea is related to family functioning in adult asthmatics. Journal of Asthma. 2009; 46(3):
280–283. DOI: 10.1080/02770900802660964 [PubMed: 19373637]
Friedmann MS, McDermut WH, Solomon DA, Ryan CE, Keitner GI, Miller IW. Family functioning
and mental illness: a comparison of psychiatric and nonclinical families. Family Process. 1997;
Author Manuscript
Heru AM, Ryan CE. Burden, reward and family functioning of caregivers for relatives with mood
disorders: 1-year follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004; 83(2–3):221–225. DOI:
Author Manuscript
after stroke: depression, physical health, and adaptive processes in support persons. Research in
Nursing & Health. 2001; 24(4):307–323. [PubMed: 11746061]
Knauth DG. Predictors of parental sense of competence for the couple during the transition to
parenthood. Research in Nursing & Health. 2000; 23(6):496–509. DOI:
10.1002/1098-240X(200012)23:6<496∷AID-NUR8>3.0.CO;2-1 [PubMed: 11130608]
Krawetz P, Fleisher W, Pillay N, Staley D, Arnett J, Maher J. Family functioning in subjects with
pseudoseizures and epilepsy. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2001; 189(1):38–43.
[PubMed: 11206663]
Kristjanson LJ, Leis A, Koop PM, Carrière KC, Mueller B. Family members' care expectations, care
perceptions, and satisfaction with advanced cancer care: results of a multi-site pilot study. Journal
of Palliative Care. 1997; 13(4):5–13.
Kühne F, Krattenmacher T, Bergelt C, Beierlein V, Herzog W, v Klitzing K, et al. Möller B. “There is
still so much ahead of us”—Family functioning in families of palliative cancer patients. Families,
Systems, & Health. 2013; 31(2):181–193. DOI: 10.1037/a0032274
Latham BC, Sowell RL, Phillips KD, Murdaugh C. Family functioning and motivation for childbearing
Author Manuscript
among HIV-infected women at increased risk for pregnancy. Journal of Family Nursing. 2001;
7(4):345–370.
Leahey M, Wright LM. Application of the Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models:
Reflections on the reciprocity between the personal and the professional. Journal of Family
Nursing. 2016; 22(4):450–459. DOI: 10.1177/1074840716667972 [PubMed: 27619397]
Li L, Lin C, Ji G, Sun S, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Parents living with HIV in China: family functioning
and quality of life. Journal of Child & Family Studies. 2009; 18(1):93–101. [PubMed: 19890449]
Lim J, Ashing-Giwa KT. Is family functioning and communication associated with health-related
quality of life for Chinese- and Korean-American breast cancer survivors? Quality of Life
Research. 2012; 22(6):1319–1329. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0247-y [PubMed: 22875219]
Mahrer-Imhof R, Jaggi S, Bonomo A, Hediger H, Eggenschwiler P, Krämer G, Oberholzer E. Quality
of life in adult patients with epilepsy and their family members. Seizure. 2013; 22(2):128–135.
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2012.11.012 [PubMed: 23273809]
Martin-Arafeh JM, Watson CL, Baird SM. Promoting family-centered care in high risk pregnancy. The
Author Manuscript
Scionti LA. An investigation into individuals with eating disorders and their perceptions of family
functioning, depression, and seasonal affective disorder in an outpatient population. 2001
Retrieved from PsycINFO. (619726068; 2001-95016-065).
Schuler TA, Zaider TI, Li Y, Hichenberg S, Masterson M, Kissane DW. Typology of perceived family
functioning in an American sample of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and
Symptom Management. 2014; 48(2):281–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.09.013
[PubMed: 24766739]
Sherer M, Evans CC, Leverenz J, Stouter J, Irby JW, Lee JE, Yablon SA. Therapeutic alliance in post-
acute brain injury rehabilitation: predictors of strength of alliance and impact of alliance on
outcome. Brain Injury. 2007; 21(7):663–672. DOI: 10.1080/02699050701481589 [PubMed:
17653940]
Simoneau TL, Miklowitz DJ. Integrating psychiatric illness into healthy family functioning: The
family psychoeducational treatment of a patient with bipolar disorder. In: McDaniel SH,
Lusterman DD, Philpot CL, editorsCasebook for integrating family therapy: An ecosystemic
approach. American Psychological Association; Washington, DC: 2001. 359–372.
Author Manuscript
Steinhauer PD, Santa-Barbara J, Skinner H. The process model of family functioning. Canadian
Journal of Psychiatry. 1984; 29(2):77–88. [PubMed: 6722715]
Tammentie T, Paavilainen E, Tarkka MT, Astedt-Kurki P. Families' experiences of interaction with the
public health nurse at the child health clinic in connection with mother's post-natal depression.
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2009; 16(8):716–724. DOI: 10.1111/j.
1365-2850.2009.01448.x [PubMed: 19744061]
The Joint Commission. Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence, and Patient- and
Family-Centered Care: A Roadmap for Hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission;
2010.
care and in the general population: comparison between 1992 and 1995. Quality of Life Research.
1998; 7(8):751–760. [PubMed: 10097623]
Wang J, Zhao X. Family functioning, social support, and quality of life for Chinese empty nest older
people with depression. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2012; 27(11):1204–1206.
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2832 [PubMed: 23042110]
Weinstock LM, Wenze SJ, Munroe MK, Miller IW. Concordance between patient and family reports of
family functioning in bipolar I disorder and major depressive disorder. Journal of Nervous and
Mental Disease. 2013; 201(5):377–383. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31828e1041 [PubMed:
23588224]
Wisotsky W, Dancyger I, Fornari V, Swencionis C, Fisher M, Schneider M, Wisotsky W. Is perceived
family dysfunction related to comorbid psychopathology? A study at an eating disorder day
treatment program. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 2006; 18(2):235–
244. [PubMed: 16894862]
Wong RSK. Multidimensional influences of family environment in education: The Case of socialist
Czechoslovakia. Sociology of Education. 1998; 71(1):1–22. DOI: 10.2307/2673219
Author Manuscript
Yu H, Wang X, He R, Liang R, Zhou L. Measuring the caregiver burden of caring for community-
residing people with Alzheimer's disease. PloS One. 2015; 10(7):e0132168.doi: 10.1371/
journal.pone.0132168 [PubMed: 26154626]
Zhao P, Yang R, Phillips MR. Age-specific characteristics of serious suicide attempters in China.
Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 2010; 40(4):383–393. DOI: 10.1521/suli.2010.40.4.383
[PubMed: 20822365]
Author Manuscript
Summary statement
Author Manuscript
‘What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?
Table 1
Matrix of abstracted data in reviewed literature
Zhang
Author (year) Country Discipline Sociocultural Sample Attributes* Antecedents Consequences Related Surrogate
context (patient's health concept terms
condition)
Abilés et al. Spain Dietetics Patients with morbidly Communication (e.g. the way
(2010) obese having bariatric family discusses and shares),
surgery cohesion (e.g. help, support, love)
Astedt-Kurki et al. Finland Nursing Family members of Behavior control (e.g. shared
(2002) patients with heart disease activities within the family),
cohesion (e.g. emotional ties)
Astedt-Kurki et al. Finland Nursing Family members of Behavior control (e.g. shared Family health
(2004) patients with heart disease activities within the family),
cohesion (e.g. emotional ties)
Astedt-Kurki et al. Finland Nursing Family members of Behavior control (e.g. shared
(2009) patients with heart disease activities within the family),
cohesion (e.g. emotional ties)
Beardslee et al. US Psychology Parents with depression Communication (e.g.
(2007) expressiveness), problem solving
(e.g. manage conflict), cohesion
(e.g. cohesion)
Benninghoven et Germany Medicine Patients with eating Communication (e.g. express Patients' perceived body size
al. (2007) disorders and their mothers emotions), role fulfillment (e.g. role distortion and body dissatisfaction
performance), behavior control (e.g.
rules), cohesion (e.g. degree of
coherence)
Brennan (2000) US Nursing Patients with medically Communication (e.g. interaction
intractable temporal lobe among family members), role
epilepsy fulfillment (e.g. various roles),
behavior control (e.g. rules),
problem solving (e.g. manage
conflict), cohesion (e.g. support)
Author (year) Country Discipline Sociocultural Sample Attributes* Antecedents Consequences Related Surrogate
context (patient's health concept terms
condition)
emotional problems and financial
Zhang
Author (year) Country Discipline Sociocultural Sample Attributes* Antecedents Consequences Related Surrogate
context (patient's health concept terms
condition)
Zhang
Heru & Ryan US Psychology Relatives of patients with Communication (e.g. emotional Caregivers of patients with Family resilience
(2004) bipolar disorder/ major expression), role fulfillment (e.g. bipolar disorder vs. depression
depression caregiving role), behavior control
(e.g. standards), problem solving
(e.g. develop adaptive skills),
cohesion (e.g. empathy
involvement)
Jiang et al. (2015) China Psychology Cultural belief that Patients on hemodialysis Role fulfillment (e.g. flexibility in
instrumental and their spouses roles), behavior control (e.g. rules),
support is more cohesion (e.g. emotional bonds)
useful than
affective helpful
Khattak (2007) Pakistan Psychology Patients with dissociative Communication(e.g.
disorders communication),role fulfillment
(e.g. define roles), problem solving
(e.g. manage conflict)
King et al. (2001) US Rehabilitatio n Stroke survivors and their Problem solving (e.g. handling PSP depression
primary support persons communication impairment), role
(PSP) fulfillment (e.g. caregiving role,
managing multiple roles)
Knauth (2000) US Nursing Patients and their partners Role fulfillment (roles within family Parent role Parental competence Family relationship
from high-risk hospital subsystem), problem solving (e.g.
maternity units making positive changes in
response to complex environment)
Krawetz et al. Canada Psychology Patients with Communication (e.g. verbal Family role being first degree Family dynamics
(2001) pseudoseizures and their communication, emotion relative
families expression), role fulfillment (e.g.
role related duties within the
family), behavior control (e.g.
boundary, rules), problem solving
(e.g. conflict resolution), cohesion
(e.g. support)
Author (year) Country Discipline Sociocultural Sample Attributes* Antecedents Consequences Related Surrogate
context (patient's health concept terms
condition)
conflict), cohesion (e.g. help,
Zhang
Author (year) Country Discipline Sociocultural Sample Attributes* Antecedents Consequences Related Surrogate
context (patient's health concept terms
condition)
resolve instrumental and affective
Zhang
Author (year) Country Discipline Sociocultural Sample Attributes* Antecedents Consequences Related Surrogate
context (patient's health concept terms
condition)
(e.g. resolve problem), cohesion
Zhang
*
The italic texts in parentheses were examples of quotes from reviewed studies.
The blanks in each cell were characteristics which cannot find in original articles.