What's The Difference Between Monitoring and Assessment and Why Are They Important?

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Andrea Ricardo, Julian Godoy, Sofia Diaz

What’s the difference between Monitoring and Assessment and why are they
important?

When we talk about monitoring and assessment in education we are going to create
a direct relationship with evaluation and analysis. Usually when a curriculum is
created the teacher tends to design some steps in which the plan can be developed
with a certain order and of course that those can be valid and reliable. That is why
analysis procedures are so important, it helps us to gather the results and to set out
again the strategies if necessary.

First of all, Monitoring is an organized process in which we can start to analyze and
observe the context in which we are applying our teaching strategies and evidence
the possible reactions and changes of the students. At the same time, we can
evidence how students feel with the materials and what they think about those
strategies. In this way, they can provide valuable information for the Assessment
process.

Assessment refers to methods for establishing if students have achieved learning


outcomes, or are on their way toward a learning objective. These methods can be
put into practice according to the identification of the different types of learning, by
doing this we can analyze and monitor that learning goal, also we are going to be
able to evidence how students react and if it is necessary to redesign some content,
materials or strategies.

Regardless of the approach or method used, the following principles will aid in
monitoring and assessing a language curriculum. In the first place, it is necessary to
take into account “ongoing needs and environment analysis” which ensure that
course development begins with an analysis of needs and an analysis of the
environment, in other words it is not possible to develop a successful class without a
previous analysis about students and context. Furthermore this is not a static or
steady process, on the contrary this should enable a continuous analysis throughout
the course. In the second place, doing a “feedback” can not be forgotten, due to it
ensures a significant response to the learning process, in addition creating
meaningful and usable feedback opportunities during a course allow students to
learn from their mistakes and errors. A feedback not only originates from teachers
but also from learners and peers.

To conclude, teachers have to look at all aspects of the curriculum from planning,
executing, and results. As an evaluation is a kind of research of the curriculum, the
following question may be helpful; Are the goals a good fit for the students ? Is the
teacher prepared to teach the course? Is he/she effective? Are students satisfied
with the results of the course? Are students completing the objectives of the course
in a timely fashion ?

You might also like