Organisational Structure and Design

Chapter 9
Organizational Structure and Design
Chapter 9, Stephen P. Robbins, Mary Coulter, and Nancy Langton, Management, Eighth Canadian Edition.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 1
OUTLINE
• Defining Organizational Structure
– Work specialization
– Departmentalization
– Chain of Command
– Span of Control
– Centralize vs. Decentralize
– Formalization
• Org. Design Decisions
– Mechanistic and Organic
– Contingency Factors
– Common Designs
Defining Organizational Structure
• Organizational Structure
– The formal arrangement of jobs within an organization
• Organizational Design
– A process involving decisions about six key elements:
1. Work specialization
2. Departmentalization
3. Chain of command
4. Span of control
5. Centralization and decentralization
6. Formalization
Exhibit 9.1 Purposes of Organizing
• Divides work to be done into specific jobs and

departments
• Assigns tasks and responsibilities associated with
individual jobs
• Coordinates diverse organizational tasks
• Clusters jobs into units
• Establishes relationships among individuals,
groups, and departments
• Establishes formal lines of authority
• Allocates and deploys organizational resources
Organizational Structure
• Work Specialization
– The degree to which tasks in the organization are
divided into separate jobs with each step
completed by a different person
• Overspecialization can result in human diseconomies
from boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality, increased
absenteeism, and higher turnover
Departmentalization by Type
• Functional • Process
– Grouping jobs by – Grouping jobs on the
functions performed basis of product or
• Product customer flow
– Grouping jobs by • Customer
product line – Grouping jobs by type
• Geographical of customer and needs
– Grouping jobs on the
basis of territory or
geography
Exhibit 9.2a Functional
Departmentalization
Plant Manager
Manager, Manager, Manager, Manager, Manager,

Engineering Accounting Manufacturing Human Resources Purchasing
+ Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and

people with common skills, knowledge, and orientations
+ Coordination within functional area
+ In-depth specialization
– Poor communication across functional areas
– Limited view of organizational goals
Exhibit 9.2b Geographical
Departmentalization
Vice President
for Sales
Sales Director, Sales Director, Sales Director, Sales Director,

Western Region Prairies Region Central Region Eastern Region
+ More effective and efficient handling of specific

regional issues that arise
+ Serve needs of unique geographic markets better
– Duplication of functions
– Can feel isolated from other organizational areas
Exhibit 9.2c Product Departmentalization
Bombardier, Ltd.
Mass Transit Sector Recreational and Rail Products

Utility Vehicles Sector
Sector
Mass Transit Bombardier–Rotax Rail and Diesel

Division (Vienna) Products Division
Recreational Logistic Industrial Bombardier–Rotax

Products Division Equipment Division Equipment Division (Gunskirchen)
+ Allows specialization in particular products and services

+ Managers can become experts in their industry
+ Closer to customers
Source: Bombardier Annual Report.
Exhibit 9.2d Process
Departmentalization
Plant
Superintendent
Sawing Assembling Lacquering Finishing Inspection and

Planing and
Department Department and Sanding Department Shipping
Milling
Manager Manager Department Manager Department
Department
Manager Manager
Manager
+ More efficient flow of work activities

– Can only be used with certain types of products
Exhibit 9.2e Customer
Departmentalization
Director
of Sales
Manager, Manager, Manager,

Retail Accounts Wholesale Accounts Government Accounts
+ Customers’ needs and problems can be met by specialists

Group Exercise
• Think of a place where you have (or do)

work(ed). Looking at the various forms of
departmentalization…choose an example from
one of your group members places of
employment and answer the following:
– Which would have been (would be) the most
appropriate model of departmentalization for this
workplace? Why – explain your rationale?
Organizational Structure (cont’d)
• Chain of Command
– The continuous line of authority that extends from upper
levels of an organization to the lowest levels of the
organization and clarifies who reports to whom
• Authority
– The rights inherent in a managerial position to tell people what to
do and to expect them to do it
• Responsibility
– The obligation or expectation to perform. Responsibility brings
with it accountability (the need to report and justify work to
manager’s superiors)
• Unity of Command
– The concept that a person should have one boss and should report
only to that person
• Delegation
– The assignment of authority to another person to carry out specific
duties
• Line and Staff Authority

– Line managers are responsible for the essential
activities of the organization, including
production and sales. Line managers have the
authority to issue orders to those in the chain of
command
• The president, the production manager, and the sales
manager are examples of line managers
– Staff managers have advisory authority, and
cannot issue orders to those in the chain of
command (except those in their own department)
• Span of Control
– The number of employees who can be effectively and
efficiently supervised by a manager
– Width of span is affected by:
• Skills and abilities of the manager and the employees
• Characteristics of the work being done
• Similarity of tasks
• Complexity of tasks
• Physical proximity of subordinates
• Standardization of tasks
• Sophistication of the organization’s information system
• Strength of the organization’s culture
• Preferred style of the manager
Exhibit 9.3 Contrasting Spans of
Control
Members at Each Level
(Highest) Assuming Span of 4 Assuming Span of 8
1 1 1
Organizational Level
2 4 8
3 16 64
4 64 512
5 256 4096
6 1024
7 4096
(Lowest)
Span of 4: Span of 8:
Employees: = 4096 Employees: = 4096
Managers (level 1–6) = 1365 Managers (level 1–4) = 585
• Centralization
– The degree to which decision making is concentrated at a
single point in the organization
• Organizations in which top managers make all the decisions
and lower-level employees simply carry out those orders
• Decentralization
– The degree to which lower-level employees provide input
or actually make decisions
– Employee Empowerment
• Increasing the decision-making discretion of employees
Figure 9.4a Factors that Influence
the Amount of Centralization
• More Centralization
– Environment is stable
– Lower-level managers are not as capable or experienced
at making decisions as upper-level managers
– Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in
decisions
– Decisions are significant
– Organization is facing a crisis or the risk of company
failure
– Company is large
– Effective implementation of company strategies depends
on managers retaining say over what happens
Figure 9.4b Factors that Influence
the Amount of Decentralization
• More Decentralization
– Environment is complex, uncertain
– Lower-level managers are capable and experienced at
making decisions
– Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions
– Decisions are relatively minor
– Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to have a
say in what happens
– Company is geographically dispersed
– Effective implementation of company strategies depends
on managers having involvement and flexibility to make
decisions
• Formalization
– The degree to which jobs within the organization
are standardized and the extent to which
employee behaviour is guided by rules and
procedures.
Organizational Design Decisions
• Mechanistic Organization • Organic Organization
– A rigid and tightly – Highly flexible and
controlled structure adaptable structure
Mechanistic Organic
• High Specialization • Cross-Functional Teams

• Rigid Departmentalization • Cross-Hierarchical Teams
• Clear Chain of Command • Free Flow of Information
• Narrow Spans of Control • Wide Spans of Control
• Centralization • Decentralization
• High Formalization • Low Formalization
Structural Contingency Factors
• Structural decisions are influenced by:
– Overall strategy of the organization
• Organizational structure follows strategy
– Size of the organization
• Firms change from organic to mechanistic organizations as
they grow in size
– Technology use by the organization
• Firms adapt their structure to the technology they use
– Degree of environmental uncertainty
• Dynamic environments require organic structures; mechanistic
structures need stable environments
(cont’d)
• Strategy Frameworks:
– Innovation
• Pursuing competitive advantage through meaningful and
unique innovations favours an organic structuring
– Cost minimization
• Focusing on tightly controlling costs requires a
mechanistic structure for the organization
– Imitation
• Minimizing risks and maximizing profitability by
copying market leaders requires both organic and
mechanistic elements in the organization’s structure
(cont’d)
• Strategy and Structure
– Achievement of strategic goals is facilitated by
changes in organizational structure that
accommodate and support change
• Size and Structure
– As an organization grows larger, its structure
tends to change from organic to mechanistic with
increased specialization, departmentalization,
centralization, and rules and regulations
(cont’d)
• Technology and Structure
– Organizations adapt their structures to their
technology
– Routine technology = mechanistic organizations
– Non–routine technology = organic organizations
Common Organizational Designs
• Traditional Designs
– Simple Structure
• Low departmentalization, wide spans of control, centralized
authority, little formalization
– Functional Structure
• Departmentalization by function
– Operations, finance, human resources, and product research and
development
– Divisional Structure
• Composed of separate business units or divisions with limited
autonomy under the coordination and control of the parent
corporation
Exhibit 9.7 Strengths and
Weaknesses of Common Traditional
Organizational Designs
Organizational Designs (cont’d)
• Contemporary Organizational Designs

– Team Structures
• The entire organization is made up of work groups or
self-managed teams of empowered employees
– Matrix Structures
• Specialists for different functional departments are
assigned to work on projects led by project managers
• Matrix participants have two managers
– Project Structures
• Employees work continuously on projects, moving on to
another project as each project is completed
Exhibit 9.8 Contemporary
Organizational Designs
Exhibit 9.9 A Matrix Organization
in an Aerospace Firm
Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting Human
Engineering Administration Resources (HR)
Alpha Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

Project Group Group Group Group Group Group
Beta Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

Gamma Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

Omega Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

• Contemporary Organizational Designs (cont’d)

– Boundaryless Organization
• A flexible and an unstructured organizational design that
is intended to break down external barriers between the
organization and its customers and suppliers
• Removes internal (horizontal) boundaries:
– Eliminates the chain of command
– Has limitless spans of control
– Uses empowered teams rather than departments
• Eliminates external boundaries:
– Uses virtual, network, and modular organizational
structures to get closer to stakeholders
Removing Boundaries
• Virtual Organization
– An organization that consists of a small core of full-time
employees and that temporarily hires specialists to work
on opportunities that arise
• Network Organization
– A small core organization that outsources its major
business functions (e.g., manufacturing) in order to
concentrate on what it does best
• Modular Organization
– A manufacturing organization that uses outside suppliers
to provide product components for its final assembly
operations
• Learning Organization
– An organization that has developed the capacity to
continuously learn, adapt, and change through the practice
of knowledge management by employees
Organizational Design
• Boundaryless
• Teams
• Empowerment
Organizational Culture Information Sharing

• Strong Mutual Relationships THE LEARNING • Open
• Sense of Community ORGANIZATION • Timely
• Caring • Accurate
• Trust
Leadership
• Shared Vision
• Collaboration
Thanks!

Organisational Structure and Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Organisational Structure and Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Organisational Structure and Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 9

Organizational Structure and Design

• Divides work to be done into specific jobs and

Manager, Manager, Manager, Manager, Manager,

+ Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and

Sales Director, Sales Director, Sales Director, Sales Director,

+ More effective and efficient handling of specific

Mass Transit Sector Recreational and Rail Products

Mass Transit Bombardier–Rotax Rail and Diesel

Recreational Logistic Industrial Bombardier–Rotax

+ Allows specialization in particular products and services

Sawing Assembling Lacquering Finishing Inspection and

+ More efficient flow of work activities

Manager, Manager, Manager,

+ Customers’ needs and problems can be met by specialists

• Think of a place where you have (or do)

• Line and Staff Authority

• High Specialization • Cross-Functional Teams

• Contemporary Organizational Designs

Alpha Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

Beta Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

Gamma Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

Omega Design Manufacturing Contract Purchasing Accounting HR

• Contemporary Organizational Designs (cont’d)

Organizational Culture Information Sharing

You might also like