Intention To Create Legal Relationship: The Parties Entering Into A Contract Must
Intention To Create Legal Relationship: The Parties Entering Into A Contract Must
Intention To Create Legal Relationship: The Parties Entering Into A Contract Must
What is a contract?
Lawful Object: The objective of the agreement must be lawful. Any act prohibited
by law will not be valid and such agreements cannot be treated as a valid contract.
A rents out his house for the business of prostitution or for making bomb, the acts
performing there are unlawful. Hence such agreement cannot be treated as a valid
contract. Therefore the consideration as well as the object of the agreement should
be lawful.
Agreement not expressly declared void: Section 24 to 30 specify certain types of
agreement which have been expressly declared void. For example Restraint of
marriage which has been expressly declared void under Section 26. If John
promises to pay $50 to Mary if she does not marry throughout her life and Mary
promise not to marry at all. But this agreement cannot be treated as a valid contract
owing to the fact that, under section 26 restraint of marriage expressly declared
void. Some of the agreement which have been expressly declared void
are agreement in restraint of legal proceedings, agreement in restraint of trade,
agreement in restraint of marriage and agreement by way of wager.
Proper offer and it s acceptance: To create a valid contract, there must be two or
more parties. One who makes the offer and the other who accepts the offer. One
person cannot make an offer and accept it. There must be at least two persons. Also
the offer must be clear and properly communicated to the other party. Similarly
acceptance must be communicated to the other party and the proper and
unconditional acceptance must be communicated to the offerer. Proper offer and
proper acceptance should be there to treat the agreement as a contract which is
enforceable by law.
Legal formalities: The contract act does not insist that the agreement must be in
writing, it could be oral. But, in some cases the law strictly insist that the
agreement must be in writing like agreement to sell immovable property must be in
writing and should be registered under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. These
agreement are valid only when they fulfill the formalities like writing, registration,
signing by the both the parties are completed. If these legal formalities are not
completed, it cannot be treated as a valid contract.
Most important essentials of a valid contract are mentioned above. These elements
should be present in a contract to make it a valid contract. If any one of them is
missing we cannot treat that agreement as a valid contract.
The broadest division of contracts is into formal and simple contracts. From other
standpoints divisions may be made in order to furnish a terminology indicating the
condition, state, and evidence of the contract.
b. Recognizances.
2. Oral contracts;
3. Implied contracts.
a. Express contracts.
1. Formal contracts.
3. * Oral contracts.
b. Implied contracts.
a. Executory contracts.
1. Contracts in which one party performs an act for the promise of the other party
thereafter to perform an act (executory on one side, called also unilateral).
A. Bilateral;
B. Simple;
C. Express;
D. In writing.
If the contract above had the seals of the parties attached to their signatures, it
would be a contract under seal instead of a simple contract.
Example 2. John Doe orders groceries from Richard Roe's store saying nothing
about paying for them and Roe promises to send them over. We have in this
example a contract which is:
A. Bilateral;
B. Simple;
Example 3. John Doe offers a public reward to anyone who will procure certain
information for him. Richard Roe furnishes the information. Here we have an
example of a contract which is accepted by the act as well as thereby performed. It
is a unilateral simple contract. All contracts are two sided and in that sense
bilateral, but the word unilateral signifies a contract in which one side only is
executory.