Demand Analysis
Demand Analysis
Demand Analysis
- A poor man’s desire to stay in a five – star hotel room & his willingness
to pay rent for that room is not ‘demand’, because he lacks the
necessary purchasing power & so it is merely his wishful thinking.
- A miser’s desire for and his ability to pay for a car is not demand
because he does not have willingness to pay for a car.
- One may also come across a well-established person who possesses
both the willingness and the ability to pay for higher education. But he
has really no desire to have it ; he pays the fees for a regular course,
and eventually does not attend his classes. In an economic sense, he
does not have a ‘demand’ for higher education degree /diploma.
Dx = D( Px Py, Pz,,B,W,A,E,T,U)
(Cateris Paribus )
- If the price of good x falls, cateris paribus, two effects take place
simultaneously:
a) There is a change in the relative prices of all goods. Since good
x is now relatively cheaper to all other goods, it is now
substituted for other goods. This change in quantity demanded
due to a change in relative prices (alone) is called the
substitution effect.
- PE = IE + SE
b) For inferior goods, the + ve income effect & the – ve substitution effect,
work in opposite directions. However, the – ve substitution effect is
stronger than the + ve income effect so that the price effect is –ve. i.e.
for inferior goods, price & quantity are inversely related, Cateris
Paribus.
c) For Giffen goods, too, the + ve income effect & the – ve substn. effect,
work in opposite directions. But the + ve Income effect is stronger than
the –ve susbstn. effect so that the price effect is + ve. Effectively, this
means that for Giffen goods price & quantity are directly related, Cateris
Paribus.
ELASTICITY
The demand schedule & the demand curve indicate the direction of change
of demand when price varies. The intensity with which demand reacts to
price change cannot be captured by them. Hence the need to introduce
the concept of elasticity of demand.
Change in price
Original Price
Price Elasticity & changes in Total Exp.: This is of great significance in the
theory of price.
Sugar ,salt, electricity don’t have their close substitute & hence their
ep is lower.
b) Nature of commodity:
People get the old one repaired or buy a ‘second hand’ when price
increases
d) Time period : Demand is usually more elastic in the long run than in
the short run. Given more time, the Consumer has more
opportunities to adjust to changes in prices. e.g. if price of TV sets is
decreased, demand will not immediately ↑se unless people possess
excess purchasing power.
(f) The no. & closeness of substitutes: the more & the better the
substitutes, the greater is the price n. e.g.
Directly related –e.g. Aluminum has several uses &hence if the price
of aluminium fell by a small amount, the quantity demanded would
↑se substantially since it can be put to so many uses. Since the %
age change in price is small and the % age change in Qy large,
Aluminium has a high elasticity.
(h) Time period: the greater the time period, the greater is the price n.
The % age change in quantity demanded is greater in the long run
for the same % age change in price.
- Efforts in reducing price will be fruitful when the demand for the product
in relatively more elastic. The demand will ↑se substantially, revenue
will expand significantly & profits will ↑se.
- For a Monopolist :
- If the demand for a factor is inelastic, the factor can command a high
remuneration. Firms employing such skilled labour can’t afford to
reduce their demand for such labour, even if they have to pay high
wages.
- If the demand for labour is relatively more elastic, low wages will prevail.
Efforts of trade unions in getting high wages through strikes etc. would
not materialise.
- Factors of Prodn. With more elastic demand have to accept low wages
& factors with less elastic demand can command high wages.
Price Elasticity & decision making : Information about price elasticities can
be extremely useful to managers as they contemplate pricing decisions. If
demand is inelastic at the current price, a price ↓se will result in a ↓se in
total revenue. Alternatively, reducing the price of a product with elastic
demand would cause revenue to ↑se.
∆ xq ∆ xq y
exy = ____ = ____ . ____
xq ∆y xq
_________
∆y
____
y
- During periods of expansion, incomes are rising & firms selling luxury
tems such as exotic vacations will find that the demand for their
products will ↑ se at a rate faster than the rate of income growth.
However, during a recession, demand may ↓se rapidly.
- Conversely, sellers of necessities such as fuel & basic food items will not
benefit as much during periods of economic prosperity, but will also find
that their markets are some what recession – proof. i.e. the change in
demand will be less than that in the economy in general.
The concept can be useful in estimating future demand provided the rate
of ↑se in income & income n of demand for the products are known.
- DEMAND depends not only on own price but also on other factors. e.g.
it may depend on the prices of related goods like coffee & tea
( substitutes ) or coffee & sugar (Complements).
- e i j > o then i & j are substitute goods. i.e. an ↑se in the price of jth
goods (tea) ↑es the quantity demanded of the ith goods (coffee).
- eij < 0 ; i & j are complementary goods. Am ↑se in the price of the jth
goods (sugar) reduces the quantity demanded of the ith goods (tea).
d Qx
-------- = -5,000
d Px
Ep = - 5000 x 5 = -0.625
40,000
Becoz demand is inelastic, raising the price of the novels would ↑se
total revenue.
d Qx
b) -------- = 5
dI
EI = 5 x 10,000 = 1.25
---------
40,000
Becoz EI > 1, the novels are a luxury good. Thus as income ↑se,
sales should ↑se more than proportionately.
d Qx
c) -------- = 500
d Pc
EC = 500 x 6 = 0.075
40,000
i.e. a 1 per cent ↑se, in the price of other books results in a .075
percent ↑se in demand for ABC’s romance novels.
Q. When the price of good x falls from Rs. 10 to Rs. 9, the demand for
good y
↑es from 20 kg to 25 kg.
= 25 – 20
----------- x 100
20
___________________
9 –10
------------- x 100
10
= -2.5
x and y are complements.
2. a) ei = % change in Qy demanded
------------------------------------
% change in income
= 2% to 5% = 0.2 to 0.5
10% 10%
b) % change in Qy demanded =
ei x % change in income
1% of 13 Kg = 0.13 Kg
& 2.5 % of 13 Kg = 0.325 Kg
thus cheese consn. ↑se by 0.13 kg. to 0.325 kg year.
Cross n of Demand
d Qx d Py
= ------ --------
Qx Py
d Qx Py
= ------ --------
d Py Qx
Q. When the price of substitute good, say coffee, increases from Rs. 65 to Rs.
70 per kg., the quantity of tea sold ↑es from 4000 kg to 5000 kg.
ec = 1000 x 65
5 4000
= 3.25
We find that the cross n of demand for tea against coffee is highly elastic.