The Neuropsychiatry of Parkinson Disease: A Perfect Storm: Sciencedirect
The Neuropsychiatry of Parkinson Disease: A Perfect Storm: Sciencedirect
The Neuropsychiatry of Parkinson Disease: A Perfect Storm: Sciencedirect
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.ajgponline.org
Review
Article history: Affective disorders, cognitive decline, and psychosis have long been recognized
Received January, 30 2019 as common in Parkinson disease (PD), and other psychiatric disorders
Revised March, 4 2019 include impulse control disorders, anxiety symptoms, disorders of sleep and
Accepted March, 4 2019 wakefulness, and apathy. Psychiatric aspects of PD are associated with
numerous adverse outcomes, yet in spite of this and their frequent occurrence,
Key Words: there is incomplete understanding of epidemiology, presentation, risk factors,
Anxiety neural substrate, and management strategies. Psychiatric features are typi-
cognition cally multimorbid, and there is great intra- and interindividual variability in
dementia presentation. The hallmark neuropathophysiological changes that occur in
depression PD, plus the association between exposure to dopaminergic medications and
impulse control disorder certain psychiatric disorders, suggest a neurobiological basis for many psychi-
Parkinson disease atric symptoms, although psychological factors are involved as well. There is
psychosis evidence that psychiatric disorders in PD are still under-recognized and
undertreated and although psychotropic medication use is common, con-
trolled studies demonstrating efficacy and tolerability are largely lacking.
Future research on neuropsychiatric complications in PD should be oriented
toward determining modifiable correlates or risk factors and establishing effi-
cacious and well-tolerated treatment strategies. (Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019;
&&:&&−&&)
From the Perelman School of Medicine (DW, EM), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and the Parkinson’s Disease Research, Education
and Clinical Center (PADRECC) (DW), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia. Send correspondence and reprint requests
to Daniel Weintraub, M.D., Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. e-mail:
[email protected]
© 2019 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.03.002
illustrative cases had any neuropsychiatric features. education/training, and clinical care. Given the now
In fact, he made a point to note that cognition was irrefutable evidence that PD is a neuropsychiatric dis-
not affected in his patients.1 It has only been in the order, there ensues a responsibility to respond
past 50 years, with the introduction of levodopa and accordingly to improve the lives of patients.
other PD medications and treatments to clinical prac-
tice, the increasing lifespan of patients, and increasing Cognitive Decline
awareness and research, that neuropsychiatric disor-
ders and cognitive complications (here combined Of all NPS that can occur in PD, significant cogni-
and called neuropsychiatric symptoms [NPS]), and tive impairment is the most problematic and dreaded.
non-motor symptoms more broadly,2 have gained The original assumption, based on early cross-sec-
recognition as being common, as disabling as motor tional studies, was that approximately 30% of
symptoms, associated with poor long-term outcomes patients with PD suffer from PD dementia (PDD),
and caregiver burden, and requiring special expertise and that the profile of cognitive impairment in PD
for optimal management.3 was distinct from that of Alzheimer disease (AD). Ini-
By 2020, close to 1 million persons living in the tial cognitive changes in PD were thought to be pri-
United States will have a diagnosis of PD.4 Although marily characterized by impairment in executive
PD is still considered a movement disorder and is abilities and attention, whereas in AD by memory
diagnosed based on motor signs and symptoms,5 the and language impairments. However, it is now recog-
high prevalence of numerous NPS suggests that it is nized that initial impairments in PD occur in a range
more accurately conceptualized as a neuropsychiatric of cognitive domains, including executive, memory,
disorder.3 In addition to the most commonly studied visuospatial, attentional, and even language func-
NPS, such as cognitive impairment (both mild cogni- tions, even in patients with milder cognitive deficits
tive impairment [MCI] and dementia), depression, or MCI.6−10
and psychosis, other relatively common and clinically Prospective, long-term studies have now found that
significant psychiatric complications include compul- dementia may actually occur in up to 80% of PD
sive behaviors diagnosed as impulse control disor- patients.11,12 In addition, approximately 25% of non-
ders (ICDs), various anxiety symptoms, disorders of demented patients have MCI,9 which has prognostic
sleep and wakefulness, apathy, and fatigue. significance for predicting more rapid conversion to
This relatively recent, dramatic shift in our under- dementia, both in early13 and well-established dis-
standing of the symptomatology of PD is in part ease,14 and MCI is also a risk factor for mortality in
because of the efforts of individual and collaborative early PD.15 A significant percentage (10%−20%) of
research efforts, as well as professional society-led newly-diagnosed PD patients have cognitive defi-
task forces and patient-caregiver organizations. Areas cits,16−18 or experience cognitive decline over several
of focus regarding the NPS of PD have included epi- years.19 More recently, changes in cognition have even
demiologic, neurobiological, assessment (diagnostic been reported prior to PD diagnosis20 in population-
criteria and assessment instruments) and treatment based studies.21,22 Additionally, prospective studies
research, educating patients and families, training have demonstrated cognitive worsening in individuals
treatment providers, and improving the delivery of with prodromal or at-risk PD (i.e., those having
treatment. impaired olfaction and dopamine transporter [DAT]
As summarized in the following text, the high deficits23 or rapid eye movement [REM] sleep behav-
cumulative prevalence of a large number of NPS in ior disorder [RBD]),24 and cognitive impairments in
PD does appear to be the result of a perfect storm, the latter population may predict conversion to
with contributing factors including demographic dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) rather than PD.25
characteristics, diffuse and multiple neurodegenera- A point of controversy related to cognition in PD
tive disease pathologies, other neurobiological fac- pertains to the related disorder of DLB, and whether
tors, and PD treatments themselves. Weathering this differences between the two are categorically, or sim-
storm, including adapting to a rapidly changing PD ply dimensionally, different.26 DLB, which presents
treatment landscape, will require an ongoing, con- with dementia and some combination of parkinson-
certed effort with a tripartite focus on research, ism, psychosis, and RBD, is hard to distinguish
clinically and neuropathologically from PDD, with gray and white matter neurodegeneration, primarily in
the exception of increased AD pathology or bio- the medial temporal lobe, parietal lobe, and prefrontal
markers in DLB versus PDD,27−29 or perhaps alpha- cortex (PFC),63−67 some suggestion for increase white
synuclein genetic variability.30 There remains a con- matter hyperintensities,68−70 and metabolic deficits71,72
troversial “one-year rule” in place, with dementia with cognitive decline in PD, as well as electrophysio-
that precedes or occurs within one year of onset of logical changes measured with electroencephalogram,
parkinsonism being labeled as DLB and all other quantitative electroencephalogram, or magnetoence-
cases being diagnosed as PDD,31 although recently phalogram (i.e., overall diffuse slowing, with low peak
proposed clinical diagnostic criteria for PD allow for frequency, high theta power, low beta power and spe-
PDD to be diagnosed at disease onset.5,32 cific patterns of cortical neural synchronization).73−77
A range of demographic and clinical correlates and There is also an emerging interest in plasma-based bio-
potential risk factors for identifying PD patients at markers, with low epidermal growth factor as one
risk for more rapid cognitive decline have emerged, potential predictor of cognitive decline.78,79 Given the
including increasing age and duration of PD (often numerous and diverse changes reported earlier, it is
correlated), male sex (which differentiates PD from likely that pathological and neurochemical heterogene-
AD), “atypical” parkinsonian features (i.e., postural ity underpins cognitive decline in PD,80 with disrup-
instability gait disorder instead of tremor-dominant tions to multiple distinct neural networks occurring
features), psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychosis, apa- over time.81
thy, depression, and RBD),33−39 impaired olfaction,40 A major step forward was taken a decade ago with
autonomic changes (e.g., orthostatic hypotension the creation of an International Parkinson and Move-
[OH]),41 and comorbid vascular disease (e.g., diabetes ment Disorder Society (IPMDS) dementia task force.
mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia).42 Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of PDD82 and an
There have been significant strides made in our cur- algorithm for diagnosing PDD83 were proposed, lead-
rent understanding of the neural substrate of cognitive ing to significant improvements in the validity and
decline in PD. Neuropathological studies have demon- reliability of a PDD diagnosis. This was followed by
strated that diffuse, cortical, fibrillized alpha-synuclein the creation of an IPMDS task force for PD-MCI,
(i.e., Lewy bodies) appears to be the major contributing which produced both a review article84 and recom-
pathology to cognitive decline in PD.43−45 However, at mended diagnostic criteria and guidelines, including
least one-third of PDD patients also have AD-related recommended cognitive testing.85 This task force has
neuropathological changes at autopsy,46 with more also published research on the predictive validity of
beta amyloid plaque than tau tangle deposition,47 and PD-MCI criteria for conversion to PDD,86 and the rel-
the combination of PD and AD pathology is the best ative sensitivity of commonly used cognitive tests in
predictor of a lifetime dementia diagnosis.48 In addi- non-demented PD patients.87 In parallel work, sev-
tion to pathology, AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bio- eral cognitive assessment instruments for different
markers (AB 1-42),49 genetic risk factors (APOE Ɛ4),50 purposes have now been validated for use in PD,
positron emission tomography amyloid scans,51 and a including the Parkinson Disease-Cognitive Rating
structural magnetic resonance imaging AD signature Scale,88 the Parkinson Neuropsychometric Dementia
of atrophy, weighted toward medial temporal lobe Assessment,89 the Scales for Outcomes of Parkinson
and hippocampal atrophy,52 are all associated with Disease-Cognition,90 the Mattis Dementia Rating
cognitive impairment and decline in PD. Scale-2,91,92 and the Montreal Cognitive Assess-
Beyond neuropathology, a range of neurotransmit- ment.93,94 In addition, two PD- and cognition-spe-
ter deficits are associated with cognitive impairment, cific daily function questionnaires have been
including acetylcholine,53 dopamine,54−56 and norepi- developed and validated,95,96 and performance-
nephrine.57,58 Besides APOE Ɛ4, other genes implicated based functional cognition measures have recently
include brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) val66 been validated in PD97 or have been shown to be
met,59 catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) val158met,60 sensitive to change in a PD-MCI clinical trial.98
microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) H1 poly- The management of cognitive impairment has
morphisms,38,61 and glucocerebrosidase (GBA).62 A benefitted from treatment strategies developed for
range of neuroimaging techniques have found diffuse AD. Despite this, only one large, positive controlled
cholinesterase inhibitor randomized controlled trial that the frequency of major (i.e., more severe) depres-
(RCT) in PDD has been published,99 leading to the sion is 5%−20%, with non-major forms of depression
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of (i.e., minor or subsyndromal depression) occurring in
rivastigmine as a treatment of PDD, but this was an additional 10%−30% of patients.115−118 Therefore,
15 years ago. Statistically significant, but clinically up to 50% of PD patients experience depression at
modest, effects for rivastigmine on a range of primary some point in the course of their illness. Yet there is
and secondary outcome measures were observed, evidence that dPD remains under-recognized and
and cholinesterase inhibitor treatment was associated undertreated,119 even in specialty care settings.120,121
with increased nausea, vomiting, tremor, and dizzi- Another advance is our understanding of the
ness. A similar clinical trial of donepezil for PDD pro- numerous correlates or possible risk factors for dPD,
duced similar numerical results for cognitive including female sex,116 a personal122 or familial123 his-
improvement, but because of an outlier site was a tory of depression, early-onset PD,124 “atypical” par-
negative study based on the primary outcome mea- kinsonism,117 and psychiatric comorbidity (e.g., worse
sure.100 In two RCTs that included both PDD and cognition, psychosis, anxiety, apathy, fatigue, and
DLB patients, memantine was found to be partially insomnia).116,125−128 There is inconsistent evidence that
beneficial for PDD in one101 but not the other,102 dPD is distinct from non-PD depression; some studies
although the latter study showed secondary psychiat- report higher rates of anxiety, pessimism, suicide idea-
ric benefit in patients with a DLB diagnosis. The treat- tion without suicide behavior, and less guilt and self-
ment landscape for PD-MCI has been no more reproach in dPD compared with their non-PD counter-
promising to date, with failed RCTs for both rasagi- parts.129 However, overall predictors of depression are
line103 and rivastigmine patch,98 although the latter similar in both populations.130 Not surprisingly, core
study showed a secondary, positive effect on a perfor- non-somatic symptoms of depression discriminate
mance-based measure of cognitive functioning. most highly between depressed and non-depressed
In terms of PD medications, there is no evidence patients (i.e., less likelihood of symptom overlap).131 It
that choice of the initial PD medication makes a dif- has almost become dogma that suicide is uncommon
ference in terms of long-term dementia rates,104,105 in PD,132,133 perhaps related to personality traits (e.g.,
but the association between anticholinergic medica- high neuroticism and harm avoidance, and low open-
tion use and long-term cognitive decline in PD106 is a ness, extraversion, and novelty) thought to characterize
concern given the common use of medications with PD patients overall,134,135 although the notion of a par-
anticholinergic properties in this population.107 For kinsonian personality remains controversial, largely
non-pharmacological approaches, there is prelimi- owing to concerns of recall bias in studies performed
nary evidence that cognitive108 and physical109,110 post-PD diagnosis. Yet more recent research challenges
training/activity may lead to at least short-term bene- this and suggests that both death ideation and suicide
fit in some cognitive abilities. Given the association ideation, if not completed suicide, may be relatively
between vascular risk factors42,111 and pathology112 common.136
and cognitive impairment in PD, and the association Depression in PD likely results from a complex
between both OH41 and obstructive sleep apnea interaction of psychological, physical/neurologic, and
(OSA)113,114 and cognitive performance in PD, treat- neurobiological factors. The strong association between
ing other common medical or non-motor symptoms frequency of depression and severity of PD under-
is important as well. scores the impact of disease-related functional impair-
ments.137,138 Similar rates of depression in PD and
equally disabled patients with other diseases indicates
Depression
that psychological factors are also important.139
Depression has been the most studied of all non- Finally, supporting the contribution of neurobiological
cognitive psychiatric disorders in PD,3 and there have factors are findings that depression may be a prodro-
been major advances in characterizing the frequency, mal syndrome in some PD patients.140−142 Biologically,
clinical phenotype, and diagnosis. Instead of consid- dPD may be related to dysfunction in: 1) subcortical
ering depressed PD (dPD) patients as a homogenous nuclei and the PFC; 2) striatal-thalamic-PFC circuits
group, recent epidemiologic research has reported and the basotemporal limbic circuit; and 3) brainstem
in PD with pre-existing hallucinations,185 indicating and physical morbidity208 in PD patients treated with
that the etiology of PD-P is complex. One proposed both typical and atypical APs, similar to what has
mechanism is that chronic DRT may lead to excessive been reported in AD patients. Among traditional
stimulation or hypersensitivity of mesocorticolimbic atypical APs, quetiapine is the most commonly used,
D2/D3 receptors.186 Cholinergic deficits and a seroto- despite the fact that all controlled clinical trials with
nergic/dopaminergic imbalance using a range of imag- reasonable sample sizes have been negative or unin-
ing modalities and other neural probes, have also been terpretable.209−211 Three randomized clinical trials
implicated,186−188 particularly in the primary visual showed that low-dose clozapine is efficacious for PD-
system and dorsal/ventral visual association path- P,212−214 yet the drug is rarely used in PD,215 likely
ways.189−193 Neurodegeneration of widespread limbic, due to required routine blood monitoring for poten-
paralimbic, and neocortical gray matter, including the tial agranulocytosis, as well as adverse events such as
PFC, is associated with PD-P.194−196 Although many sedation, OH, and sialorrhea.
genes have been examined for an association with There is now an FDA-approved treatment specifi-
PD-P, the results are negative or mixed for all except cally for PD-P, pimavanserin, which is a selective
for CCK.197,198 serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor inverse agonist with-
An IPMDS task force reviewed psychosis rating out dopamine receptor-blocking properties. Pimavan-
scales used in PD, and listed four instruments as “rec- serin was granted breakthrough therapy designation
ommended” for use in PD as primary outcome meas- by the FDA because of the large unmet need in the
ures in clinical trials including the Neuropsychiatric treatment of PD-P, and was approved on the basis of
Inventory (when a caregiver/informed other is avail- a single, positive RCT,200 with a subsequent partially
able), the Schedule for Assessment of Positive Symp- positive (i.e., positive at week 6, but not at week 12)
toms (SAPS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome trial in patients with AD psychosis.216 Given recent
Scale and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the controversy concerning the validity and reliability of
Clinical Global Impression Scale as a secondary out- the primary outcome measure (the SAPS-PD), possi-
come measure.199 A recent pivotal trial200 used a dif- ble delayed response compared with clozapine
ferent instrument, a PD-modified SAPS called the (2−4 weeks versus 1 week), and unanswered ques-
SAPS-PD.201 tions about mortality risk, additional research is
Management of PD-P is complex. Observational needed to confirm the efficacy and more fully evalu-
research suggests that management of comorbid ate the safety and tolerability of pimavanserin in PD-
medical conditions and discontinuation or decreasing P patients, particularly in patients with comorbid
dosages of non-essential medications may be suffi- dementia,217,218 although a secondary analysis of the
cient for many patients, at least in the short-term.202 pivotal PD-P study data found that patients with
PD medications are usually discontinued sequentially lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores had a
and gradually (anticholinergics, MAO-B inhibitors, more robust response to pimavanserin.219
amantadine, DAs, catechol-O-methyltransferase
inhibitors, and finally, a reduction in levodopa dos-
ICDs and Related Behaviors
age), although this strategy is expert-recommended
as opposed to evidence-based, and the aforemen- This topic has been of increasing importance in PD
tioned ordering is contentious (e.g., discontinuing over the past 15 years, coinciding with the introduc-
MAO-B inhibitors before amantadine and DAs).203 tion of D2 receptor-selective DAs. ICDs were first
In PD-P, several theoretically promising atypical reported as a sporadic occurrence in case reports or
antipsychotic (AP) medications, such as risperi- series,220 and then characterized epidemiologically
done,204 olanzapine,205 and aripiprazole,206 either and phenomenologically in detail. Initial systematic
have not been assessed in RCTs or have been tried studies showed that ICDs (i.e., most commonly com-
clinically and found to be associated with adverse pulsive and idiosyncratic gambling, buying, sexual
events, primarily worsening parkinsonism presum- behavior, and eating behaviors) occur relatively com-
ably due to dopamine receptor blocking, have pre- monly in treated PD patients,221,222 and more recent
cluded their routine prescription. In addition, recent studies confirmed that ICD rates are not elevated in
research suggests an increased risk of mortality207 de novo, untreated patients.223 As patients may not
report such behaviors to a treating physician, either also extrastriatal (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex) dopa-
because of embarrassment, not suspecting an associa- mine receptors,245 and decreased striatal DAT avail-
tion with PD treatment, or ambivalence regarding ability in ICD patients.246 Functional imaging studies
ceasing the behavior or treatment, ICDs still remain have reported altered striatal, cingulate and orbito-
generally under-recognized in clinical practice,222 frontal activation, and cortico-striatal connectivity, in
with patient reporting often discrepant from their ICD patients,247−249 particularly when ICD patients
informed others.224 are in an “on” PD medication state.250 More recent
In the largest, international, multisite, cross-sec- prospective studies have demonstrated that lower
tional study done to date, an ICD was identified in striatal DAT availability may be a risk factor for
14% of PD patients, and 29% of those with an ICD future ICD development,251 and certain single nucleo-
had more than one.225 A recent national multisite tide polymorphisms (e.g., serotonin 2A receptor,
study reported a 5-year cumulative ICD incidence kappa or mu opioid receptors, and dopamine decar-
rate of 46%, although the study recruited patients boxylase) previously linked with ICDs in the general
from 2009−2013, before significant changes were population or in PD may also predict incident ICD
made in PD medication prescribing,226 and another behaviors with initiation of DRT.252,253
study found clinically significant ICD symptoms in Several PD-specific questionnaires and rating
36% of PD patients with dyskinesias.227 DA treatment scales have been developed for detecting and moni-
is the strongest PD medication correlate,225,226 but toring ICDs and related behaviors in PD, including
ICDs may not have their onset until years after DA the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disor-
initiation.228 Additionally, higher-dose levodopa,225 ders in Parkinson Disease,254 the Questionnaire for
amantadine,229 and MAO-B inhibitor230 have all been Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson Dis-
associated with ICDs in PD, although to a lesser ease-Rating Scale,255 the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in
extent compared with DA treatment. The effects of Parkinson Disease,256 and the Parkinson Impulse-
DAs do not appear unique to PD patients, as a similar Control Scale for the Severity Rating of Impul-
association with ICDs has been reported in restless se Control Behaviors in Parkinson Disease.257
legs syndrome (RLS),231,232 fibromyalgia,233 and pro- In terms of clinical monitoring, as previously men-
lactinoma or pituitary adenoma234 patients treated tioned, ICDs may not have their onset until many
with a DA. years after initiation of DA or other PD medication
A personal or familial history of alcoholism or therapy,228,258 so ongoing, long-term vigilance is
gambling, impulsive or novelty-seeking characteris- required. ICD behaviors often resolve after discontin-
tics, young age, male sex, depression and anxiety, uing DA treatment.259 However, some patients do
and early PD onset have emerged as additional corre- not want to or tolerate DA discontinuation, and a DA
lates, or potential risk factors, associated with ICDs in withdrawal syndrome with significant physical and
PD.221,225,235 Dopamine dysregulation syndrome psychological symptoms has been described.260 The
(DDS) (or compulsive PD medication use) and other relationship between deep brain stimulation (DBS)
compulsive disorders in PD have also been recog- and ICDs is complex. Subthalamic nucleus (STN)
nized, particularly in the countries where high doses DBS has been associated with short- and long-term
of levodopa are used.236 Punding (i.e., repetitive non- improvement in ICD symptoms,261−263 most notably
goal directed activity) was reported in 14% of PD when significant decreases in DRT is made postsur-
patients on higher levodopa dosages in one study,237 gery.264 However, there is also anecdotal evidence
but another larger study of unselected PD patients that ICDs may begin or worsen transiently post-DBS
reported a frequency of less than 2%.238 surgery,265 possibly when DRT doses remain high
A range of cognitive impairments have been postsurgery.266 A range of psychiatric treatments
reported in PD ICD patients, most commonly execu- (e.g., antidepressants and APs) have been used to
tive deficits, including impulsive decision-making treat ICDs in PD, but there is no empirical evidence to
and impaired set shifting.239−242 The dopamine sys- support their use in PD patients. A small RCT
tem has been implicated, with both ICD and DDS reported benefit for amantadine as a treatment for
patients having sensitized D2/D3 receptors243,244 and pathological gambling in PD,267 but as previously
dysfunction not only in midbrain D2/D3 receptors by noted amantadine has been associated with ICDs in a
large epidemiologic study.229 An RCT using naltrex- more recent research suggests they may actually be a
one, an opioid antagonist FDA-approved for alcohol manifestation of EDS.284
use disorder, was negative on the primary outcome Treatment of disorders of sleep and wakefulness
(Clinical Global Impression Scale−Investigator) but depends on the underlying etiology, and includes
positive for change on the Questionnaire for Impul- adjustment to PD medications (for PD motor symp-
sive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson Disease-Rat- tom-related sleep disturbances, RLS, and periodic leg
ing Scale,268 and there has been a positive CBT study movements in sleep) and clonazepam (for RBD),
for ICDs in PD.269 although there have been no RCTs for clonazepam in
PD RBD in spite of its common use clinically. Melato-
nin may improve subjective sleep disturbance and
Disorders of Sleep and Wakefulness
RBD in PD,285,286 and a controlled trial of eszopiclone
Remarkably, disorders of sleep and wakefulness (a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic) was partially posi-
have emerged as perhaps the most common non- tive.287 Evidence has been mixed for modafinil for
motor complications of PD, with up to 90% of daytime sleepiness,288−291 although a recent meta-
patients reporting insomnia (either initiating or main- analysis of three trials showed a significant reduction
taining sleep), hypersomnia, sleep fragmentation, in sleepiness, as assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness
sleep terrors, nightmares, nocturnal movements, Scale.292 An RCT of caffeine for EDS in PD was par-
reductions in non-REM or REM sleep, or RBD.270,271 tially positive.293 Psychostimulants (methylpheni-
RBD, along with impaired olfaction and affective dis- date)294 are also used clinically for EDS and fatigue in
orders (depression and anxiety), may be a key clinical PD. There has been a single, limited quality positive
feature of prodromal PD,272 with near universal con- study of continuous positive airway pressure therapy
version of idiopathic RBD to a Lewy body disorder in improving sleep and daytime sleepiness in patients
(PD, DLB, or multiple system atrophy) long with PD and OSA.295
term.273,274 Consistent with idiopathic RBD predict-
ing conversion to DLB in approximately 50% of cases,
Complications of DBS Surgery
RBD in the context of PD is also associated with long-
term cognitive decline.275 Other sleep cycle-related Over the past 15 years, DBS has been used increas-
disorders occurring in PD are RLS, periodic leg ingly as a treatment for PD, and in spite of many
movements in sleep, and OSA,270 with OSA associ- studies its impact on non-motor symptoms appears
ated with worse cognitive performance in PD.276 to be varied and complex.296,297 A recent meta-analy-
RBD and other sleep disturbances have been attrib- sis298 and two controlled studies of DBS versus best
uted both to progressive degeneration of the cholin- medical therapy299,300 identified significant declines
ergic pedunculopontine nucleus277 and reduced post-DBS in executive functions and verbal learning
striatal dopaminergic activity.278 Associated clinical and memory, not surprising given that DBS electro-
factors that can disrupt sleep in PD patients are par- des course through the PFC and subcortical white
kinsonism, autonomic symptoms, and psychiatric/ matter when implanted. Cortical point of entry dur-
cognitive disorders.33,270,279 ing surgery, passage through the caudate nucleus,
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) (persistent and stimulation of particular STN subregions may
sleepiness) and physical/mental fatigue (tiredness or also increase risk of cognitive impairment post-
exhaustion) both are common in PD,280−282 but the DBS.301 Use of model-based stimulation parameters
difference and relationship between the two has not to minimize the spread of current to non-motor por-
been fully delineated. EDS has been attributed vari- tions of the STN reverses the cognitive decline that
ably to impairments in the striatal-thalamic-frontal occurred post-DBS,302 suggesting that post-DBS cog-
cortical system, exposure to DRT (especially DAs), nitive decline may be preventable. In addition, a
and nocturnal sleep disturbances.270,279 As with RBD, more recent study of DBS in younger patients with
psychiatric comorbidity280,283 is frequently associated shorter disease duration showed better cognitive
with EDS and fatigue. Daytime “sleep attacks” were tolerability.303
first reported toward the end of the last century and In addition to the relationship between DBS and
were initially attributed to DA treatment, although ICDs already discussed, other psychiatric findings
post-DBS have included both overall improvement including generalized anxiety disorder, panic attacks,
and occasionally worsening of depression, anxiety, and social phobia,314−317 and anxiety and depression
psychosis, mania, apathy, and emotional lability.296 symptoms are highly comorbid.318 Increasing anxiety
In controlled DBS studies, there were no between- and discrete anxiety attacks have been associated
group differences in mood post-DBS surgery,300,304 with NMFs, particularly the onset of “off” peri-
and one study reported improvement in anxiety ods.316,317 Similar to depression, there is an increased
symptoms with DBS.299 Interestingly, in one con- frequency of anxiety disorders up to 20 years prior to
trolled study comparing STN with globus pallidus PD onset,319,320 but other than this clue little is known
interna DBS, patients who received STN DBS were about the etiology of anxiety in PD. There is now a
more likely to experience worsening in both depres- PD-specific, validated anxiety rating scale, the Parkin-
sive symptoms and processing speed,305 but meta- son Anxiety Scale.321 There have been no published
analyses of RCTs have come to mixed conclusions on RCTs focused on anxiety in PD, and some157 but not
this topic.306,307 Clinically, pre- and post-DBS psychi- all158 antidepressant treatment studies have reported
atric and cognitive monitoring are important, espe- secondary benefit for anxiety symptoms. For patients
cially given reports of postsurgical suicide ideation who experience anxiety as part of an “off” state, PD
and completed or attempted suicide,308 although medication adjustments, using FDA-approved medi-
analysis of data from one RCT found no increase in cations for MFs, can be made in an attempt to
suicide ideation or attempts in the 6-month period decrease the duration and severity of these episodes.
after patients were randomized to DBS versus best However, some patients require treatment with ben-
medical therapy.309 zodiazepines (e.g., lorazepam or alprazolam) owing
to the disabling nature of their anxiety symptoms,
although this medication class must be used cau-
Non-Motor Fluctuations tiously in PD patients because of their propensity to
Although motor fluctuations (MFs) (i.e., dyskine- increase sedation, gait imbalance, and cognitive
sias and “off” periods) have long been recognized as a impairment. For non-pharmacologic approaches,
complication of DRT, only recently has research dem- CBT techniques can be effective for treating situa-
onstrated that the majority of patients with MFs also tional anxiety and anxiety attacks.
experience non-motor fluctuations (NMFs), including
anxiety (e.g., anxiety attacks), slowness of thinking, Apathy
fatigue, and dysphoria.310 Furthermore, NMFs are
often the more disabling of these complications.310 Apathy occurs in approximately 40% of PD
The relationship between motor status and NMFs is patients322,323 and can occur independently of depres-
complex, as there is not always a correlation between sion and cognitive impairment, although overlap is
affect and motor state,311,312 and improvements in common.322,324 Studies of apathy in PD have reported
mood post-levodopa infusion in patients with MFs associations with executive deficits, verbal memory
can precede improvements in motor status.313 It impairment, and bradyphrenia,322,325 and with
remains to be seen if treatments approved on the basis decreased cingulate and inferior frontal gyri vol-
of reducing severity or time of MFs, including newly umes.326 There has been one RCT showing benefit for
available longer-acting levodopa or levodopa admin- reintroduction of a DA in patients experiencing apa-
istered via enteral or oral suspension, also lead to thy with DA discontinuation post-DBS surgery,327
improvements in severity or duration of NMFs. and stimulants (e.g., methylphenidate and amphet-
amines) are used clinically.
PD.328 Similar to apathy, PBA and depression appear the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale has an
to be overlapping but distinct disorders. Regarding expanded Part I that queries about cognitive
the neuropathophysiology of PBA, a final common impairment, psychosis, depression and anxious
pathway appears to be disinhibition of brainstem bul- mood, apathy, and impulse control disorder behav-
bar nuclei that control the expression of crying and iors, sleep problems, daytime sleepiness, and
laughing, possibly from impairment in neural path- fatigue.341 Finally, the IPMDS has commissioned
ways connecting the cortex and brainstem.329 Numer- development and validation of a new global, compre-
ous small-scale studies have found both tricyclic hensive non-motor rating scale, including NPS, called
antidepressants and SSRIs to be efficacious in the the Movement Disorder Society Non-Motor Scale,342
treatment of PBA, although none included PD with the primary validation study now completed.
patients,330 and studies in multiple sclerosis and
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis found benefit for the
Landmark Studies and Research Efforts
FDA-approved combination of dextromethorphan
and quinidine.331,332 In addition, it is important to There have been numerous longitudinal, observa-
educate patients and family members regarding the tional studies and other academic efforts, many ongo-
distinction between PBA and depression. ing, that have informed our understanding of
psychiatric and cognitive complications in PD,
including the Sydney Multicenter Study of PD,12 the
Global NPS
Norwegian ParkWest Study Group,11 the CamPaIGN
Recent neuropsychiatric research focuses on global Study of PD,38 the DeNoPa Study,42 the Fox Founda-
NPS and advanced statistical techniques to delineate tion-funded international PD-MCI Task Force,86,87 the
neuropsychiatric profiles in PD, to help account for PD Cognitive Genetics Consortium,343 the IPMDS
the substantial comorbidity and interindividual het- Non-Motor PD Study Group, and the Cognitive/Psy-
erogeneity.333 For instance, in one study that used chiatric (Behavior) Working Group of the Parkinson
latent class analysis in a cohort of mild-moderate PD Study Group.37,344
patients, three of the four delineated classes (psychiat- A landmark research study is the Parkinson Pro-
ric, psychiatric-cognitive, cognitive, and intact) expe- gression Markers Initiative (PPMI), conducted by the
rienced significant, but different, patterns of cognitive Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson Research
and psychiatric symptoms and comprised over two- with numerous co-funders and supporting agencies.
thirds of patients.334 Another study using factor anal- PPMI is a biomarker-intensive study following a rela-
ysis found that the first and strongest of four factors tively large cohort of de novo PD patients, at-risk PD
included cognitive impairment, psychotic symptoms, patients (based on specific genes or having idiopathic
depression, and EDS.335 Finally, a study using cluster RBD), and healthy controls longitudinally. Cognitive
analysis and including both broad non-motor and findings to emerge from this study include: 1) the
motor symptoms identified four clusters: mild, non- prevalence of cognitive impairment in PD patients at
motor dominant, motor-dominant, and severe. In baseline varies based on assessment methods used,
addition, when including only non-motor symptom ranging from 10%−20%; 2) significant cognitive
data, six clusters were identified.336 This line of impairment (i.e., dementia) is uncommon in the first
research has also established that the burden of global 5 years of disease, in part related to the relatively
NPS has a significant, detrimental effect on health- young, highly educated and highly motivated cohort,
related quality of life even in early PD.337 but using internal (i.e., derived from healthy controls)
Recently, several global assessment instruments versus published normative data increases sensitivity
have been developed and tested for clinical use in to detecting initial cognitive decline; 3) there are mul-
PD, including the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale338 and tiple clinical (e.g., age, olfaction, and RBD symptoms)
the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson Disease-Psychi- and biological (e.g., biofluids, CSF, AD biomarkers),
atric Complications.339 The Neuropsychiatric Inven- neuroimaging (DAT scan, structural magnetic reso-
tory340 is commonly used in PD to document the nance imaging, white matter hyperintensities, and
presence and severity of a range of NPS, and the genetics) predictors of cognitive decline in early PD;
Movement Disorder Society Sponsored Revision of 4) there is significant overlap between cognitive
decline in PD and other non-motor symptoms (e.g., outcomes (including morbidity and mortality), and
olfactory impairment and RBD symptoms); 5) there greater caregiver burden; 3) there have been signifi-
are modifiable risk factors (e.g., vascular disease) that cant advances in the assessment (e.g., questionnaires
predict cognitive decline in early PD; and 6) cognitive and rating scales) and diagnosis (i.e., consensus diag-
changes can be detected in general population nostic criteria) of disorders, which has led to
patients at risk for PD, most notably idiopathic RBD improved clinical management and higher quality
patients.18,40,68,275,345−352 Psychiatric findings from research; 4) mounting evidence finds that the neural
PPMI include: 1) overall non-motor symptom burden substrate of non-motor complications in PD is a com-
increases significantly over time in early PD, and plex interaction of strategically placed PD and other
have clinical predictors (e.g., female sex, older age, (i.e., AD) neurodegenerative disease pathology,
and worse PD motor symptoms); 2) affective disorder changes in multiple neurotransmitter systems, impair-
symptoms (i.e., depression and anxiety) are common ments in neural circuitry subserving mental function-
in PD and increase slightly in prevalence over the first ing, and genetic influences; 5) core PD treatments,
5 years of disease; 3) symptoms associated with DRT, especially DRT and DBS, have a complex and varied
particularly chronic or higher-dose exposure (e.g., effect on psychiatric symptoms and cognitive abilities;
psychosis and ICDs), remain relatively uncommon in and 6) in spite of the advances highlighted earlier,
the first 5 years of PD; 4) symptoms of sleep and current treatment options for the range of disorders
wakefulness disorders (e.g., insomnia, RBD, and discussed, while growing, still remain quite limited,
fatigue) increase significantly in frequency over time; with nearly all efficacious drugs developed or first
5) there are biological predictors of NPS presence or used for similar conditions in non-PD patients.
development, including changes in DAT availability, Looking ahead, high priority areas for future
specific genetic single nucleotide polymorphisms, research in PD include continuing long-term, longitu-
and structural imaging changes; 6) both antidepres- dinal epidemiologic research focused on course and
sant and anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotic medication predictors of prevalent and incident psychiatric disor-
use are common in early PD (each medication class ders and cognitive decline; expanding use of sophisti-
taken by approximately 25% of patients), and antide- cated statistical techniques to re-conceptualize the
pressant use may have an impact on amyloid bio- classification of psychiatric and cognitive disorders,
markers and cognitive course; 7) patients diagnosed to account for the significant interindividual hetero-
with PD but without evidence of dopaminergic deficit geneity that occurs; improving recognition and diag-
have an increase in a range of non-motor symptoms nosis through continued development and validation
compared with healthy controls; and 8) there are sex of diagnostic criteria and clinically useful assessment
differences in several non-motor symptoms in de tools that are specific to PD; improving our under-
novo PD, with men predisposed to some and women standing of the neural substrate of cognitive and psy-
to others.18,223,251,252,350,353−359 chiatric complications, through examination of
neuropathology, disease-specific biomarkers (includ-
ing developing a positron emission tomography
tracer that binds to abnormal or misfolded alpha-syn-
CONCLUSION
uclein, or even a validated CSF or plasma alpha-synu-
Some overarching themes have emerged over the clein biomarker), neurotransmitters, brain structure,
past 20 years in our understanding of psychiatric and neural circuitry, and genetics; resolving the DLB ver-
cognitive complications in PD, including: 1) prospec- sus PDD debate, perhaps by using the umbrella clini-
tive, longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the cal diagnosis of Lewy body disorders with subtypes
cumulative prevalence of most psychiatric and cogni- to capture both disorders, or a diagnosis of synuclei-
tive complications are far higher than earlier cross- nopathies to also include multiple system atrophy;
sectional studies suggested, with many disorders hav- and conducting large-scale clinical trials to determine
ing a cumulative frequency over 50%, with dementia the efficacy of different interventions for different
and sleep disorders likely reaching 80% long term; 2) psychiatric and cognitive complications, including
non-motor complications are associated overall with use of disease-modifying agents (when available) to
excess disability, worse quality of life, poorer delay or prevent cognitive and psychiatric
complications. Ultimately, reducing the impact of PD Research Initiative (ATRI), Alzheimer’s Disease Coopera-
on patients and families will require improved recog- tive Study (ADCS), the International Parkinson and
nition and development of better therapies for its Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS), and the Parkinson
numerous and clinically significant neuropsychiatric Study Group (PSG); honoraria for consultancy from Aca-
complications. dia, Alkahest, Cure Huntingdon’s Disease Initiative
(CHDI) Foundation, Clintrex, LLC, F. Hoffmann-La
E.M. receives consulting fees from the Michael J. Fox Roche Ltd., and Sunovion; license fee payments from the
Foundation. D.W. has received research funding or sup- University of Pennsylvania for the Questionnaire for
port from the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease
Research, National Institutes of Health (NINDS), Depart- (QUIP) and Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Dis-
ment of Veterans Affairs, Alzheimer’s Therapeutic orders in Parkinson’s Disease-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS).
References
1. Obeso JA, Stamelou M, Goetz CG, et al: Past, present, and future 18. Weintraub D, Simuni T, Caspell-Garcia C, et al: Cognitive perfor-
of Parkinson’s disease: a special essay on the 200th anniversary mance and neuropsychiatric symptoms in early, untreated
of the shaking palsy. Mov Disord 2017; 32:1264–1310 Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2015; 30:919–927
2. Chaudhuri K, Healy D, Schapira A: Non-motor symptoms of 19. Kandiah N, Narasimhalu K, Lau P-N, et al: Cognitive decline in
Parkinson’s disease: diagnosis and management. Lancet Neurol early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2009; 24:605–616
2006; 5:235–245 20. Fengler S, Liepelt-Scarfone I, Brockman K, et al: Cognitive
3. Weintraub D, Burn D: Parkinson’s disease: the quintessential changes in prodromal Parkinson’s disease: a review. Mov Dis-
neuropsychiatric disorder. Mov Disord 2011; 26:1022–1031 ord 2017; 32:1655–1666
4. Marras C, Beck JC, Bower JH, et al: Prevalence of Parkinson’s 21. Darweesh SKL, Wolters F, Postuma R, et al: Association between
disease across North America. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2018; 4:21 poor cognitive functioning and risk of incident parkinsonism:
5. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, et al: MDS clinical diagnostic cri- the Rotterdam Study. JAMA Neurol 2017; 74:1431–1438
teria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2015; 30:1591–1601 22. Darweesh SK, Verlinden VJ, Stricker BH, et al: Trajectories of
6. Dujardin K, Degreef J, Rogelet P, et al: Impairment of the super- prediagnostic functioning in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2017;
visory attentional system in early untreated patients with 140:429–441
Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 1999; 246:783–788 23. Chahine LM, Weintraub D, Hawkins KA, et al: Cognition in indi-
7. Cronin-Golomb A, Braun A: Visuospatial dysfunction and problem viduals at risk for Parkinson’s: Parkinson associated risk syn-
solving in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychology 1997; 11:44–52 drome (PARS) study findings. Mov Disord 2016; 31:86–94
8. Lewis S, Cools R, Robbins T, et al: Using executive heterogene- 24. Fantini ML, Farini E, Ortelli P, et al: Longitudinal study of cogni-
ity to explore the nature of working memory deficits in tive function in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep
Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41:645–654 2011; 34:619–625
9. Aarsland D, Bronnick K, Williams-Gray C, et al: Mild cognitive 25. Genier Marchand D, Montplaisir J, Postuma RB, et al: Detecting
impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter pooled analy- the cognitive prodrome of dementia with Lewy bodies: a pro-
sis. Neurology 2010; 75:1062–1069 spective study of REM sleep behavior disorder. Sleep 2017;
10. Weintraub D, Moberg P, Culbertson W, et al: Evidence for both 40:1–11
impaired encoding and retrieval memory profiles in Parkinson’s 26. Aarsland D, Ballard CG, Halliday G: Are Parkinson’s disease with
disease. Cogn Behav Neurol 2004; 17:195–200 dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies the same entity? J
11. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen J, et al: Prevalence and charac- Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004; 17:137–145
teristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: an 8-year prospective 27. Tsuang D, Leverenz J, Lopez O, et al: APOE E4 increases risk for
study. Arch Neurol 2003; 60:387–392 dementia in pure synulceinopathies. JAMA Neurol 2013;
12. Hely M, Reid W, Adena M, et al: The Sydney multicenter study 70:223–228
of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. 28. Jellinger KA, Korczyn AD: Are dementia with Lewy bodies and
Mov Disord 2008; 23:837–844 Parkinson’s disease dementia the same disease? BMC Med 2018;
13. Janvin C, Larsen J, Aarsland D, et al: Subtypes of mild cognitive 16:34
impairment in Parkinson’s disease: progression to dementia. 29. Irwin DJ, Grossman M, Weintraub D, et al: Neuropathological
Mov Disord 2006; 21:1343–1349 and genetic correlates of survival and dementia onset in synu-
14. Pigott K, Rick J, Xie S, et al: Longitudinal study of normal cogni- cleinopathies: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Neurol 2017;
tion in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2015; 85:1276–1282 16:55–65
15. Backstrom D, Granasen G, Domellof ME, et al: Early predictors 30. Guella I, Evans DM, Szu-Tu C, et al: alpha-synuclein genetic vari-
of mortality in parkinsonism and Parkinson disease: a popula- ability: a biomarker for dementia in Parkinson disease. Ann Neu-
tion-based study. Neurology 2018; 91:e2045–e2056 rol 2016; 79:991–999
16. Elgh E, Domell€ of M, Linder J, et al: Cognitive function in early 31. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al: Diagnosis and man-
Parkinson’s disease: a population-based study. Eur J Neurol agement of dementia with Lewy bodies: fourth consensus
2009; 16:1278–1284 report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology 2017; 89:88–100
17. Aarsland D, Bronnick K, Larsen J, et al: Cognitive impairment in 32. Berg D, Postuma R, Bloem B, et al: Time to redefine PD? Intro-
incident, untreated Parkinson disease: the Norwegian ParkWest ductory statement of the MDS Task Force on the definition of
Study. Neurology 2009; 72:1121–1126 Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2014; 29:454–462
33. Vendette M, Gagnon J-F, Decary A, et al: REM sleep behavior 53. Bohnen N, Albin R: Cholinergic denervation occurs early in
disorder predicts cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2010; 73:256–257
without dementia. Neurology 2007; 69:1843–1849 54. Kaasinen V, Rinne J: Functional imaging studies of dopamine
34. Tomer R, Levin B, Weiner W: Side of onset of motor symptoms system and cognition in normal aging and Parkinson’s disease.
influences cognition in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1993; Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2002; 26:785–793
34:579–584 55. Rinne J, Portin R, Ruottinen H, et al: Cognitive impairment and
35. Green J, McDonald W, Vitek J, et al: Cognitive impairments the brain dopaminergic system in Parkinson disease. Arch
in advanced PD without dementia. Neurology 2002; 59: Neurol 2000; 57:470–475
1320–1324 56. M€uller U, W€achter T, Barthel H, et al: Striatal [123I]b-CIT SPECT
36. Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen J, et al: Risk of dementia in and prefrontal cognitive functions in Parkinson’s disease. J Neu-
Parkinson’s disease: a community-based, prospective study. ral Transm 2000; 107:303–319
Neurology 2001; 56:730–736 57. Zweig R, Cardillo J, Cohen M, et al: The locus ceruleus and
37. Uc E, McDermott M, Marder K, et al: Incidence of and risk fac- dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43:986
tors for cognitive impairment in an early Parkinson disease clini- 58. Del Tredici K, Braak H: Dysfunction of the locus coeruleus-nor-
cal trial cohort. Neurology 2009; 73:1469–1477 epinephrine system and related circuitry in Parkinson’s dis-
38. Williams-Gray C, Evans J, Goris A, et al: The distinct cognitive ease-related dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84:
syndromes of Parkinson’s disease: 5 year follow-up of the Cam- 774–783
PaIGN cohort. Brain 2009; 132:2958–2969 59. Foltynie T, Lewis S, Goldberg T, et al: The BDNF Val66Met poly-
39. Starkstein S, Mayberg H, Leiguarda R, et al: A prospective longi- morphism has a gender specific influence on planning ability in
tudinal study of depression, cognitive decline, and physical Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 2005; 252:833–838
impairments in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neu- 60. Williams-Gray C, Hampshire A, Barker R, et al: Attentional con-
rosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:377–382 trol in Parkinson’s disease is dependent on COMT val158met
40. Fullard ME, Tran B, Xie SX, et al: Olfactory impairment predicts genotype. Brain 2008; 131:397–408
cognitive decline in early Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism 61. Seto-Salvia N, Clarimon J, Pagonabarraga J, et al: Dementia risk
Relat Disord 2016; 25:45–51 in Parkinson disease: disentangling the role of MAPT haplo-
41. Centi J, Freeman R, Gibbons CH, et al: Effects of orthostatic types. Arch Neurol 2011; 68:359–364
hypotension on cognition in Parkinson disease. Neurology 62. Mata IF, Leverenz JB, Weintraub D, et al: GBA variants are asso-
2017; 88:17–24 ciated with a distinct pattern of cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s
42. Mollenhauer B, Zimmermann J, Sixel-Doring F, et al: Baseline disease. Mov Disord 2016; 31:95–102
predictors for progression 4 years after Parkinson’s disease diag- 63. Kenny E, Burton E, O’Brien J: A volumetric magnetic resonance
nosis in the De Novo Parkinson Cohort (DeNoPa). Mov Disord imaging study of entorhinal cortex volume in dementia with
2019; 34:67–77 Lewy bodies. A comparison with Alzheimer’s disease and
43. Hurtig H, Trojanowski J, Galvin J, et al: Alpha-synuclein cortical Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia. Dement Geriatr
Lewy bodies correlate with dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Cogn Disord 2008; 26:218–225
Neurology 2000; 54:1916–1921 64. Burton E, McKeith I, Burn D, et al: Cerebral atrophy in
44. Kovari E, Gold G, Herrmann F, et al: Lewy body densities in the Parkinson’s disease with and without dementia: a comparison
entorhinal and anterior cingulate cortex predict cognitive defi- with Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and con-
cits in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathologica 2003; trols. Brain 2004; 127:791–800
106:83–88 65. Gattellaro G, Minati L, Grisoli M, et al: White matter involve-
45. Aarsland D, Perry R, Brown A, et al: Neuropathology of demen- ment in idiopathic Parkinson disease: a diffusion tensor imaging
tia in Parkinson’s disease: a prospective, community-based study. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30:1222–1226
study. Ann Neurol 2005; 58:773–776 66. Kendi A, Lehericy S, Luciana M, et al: Altered diffusion in the
46. Jellinger K, Seppi K, Wenning G, et al: Impact of coexistent Alz- frontal lobe in Parkinson disease. Am J Neuroradiol 2008;
heimer pathology on the natural history of Parkinson’s disease. 29:501–505
J Neural Transm 2002; 109:329–339 67. Goldman JG, Bledsoe IO, Merkitch D, et al: Corpus callosal atro-
47. Kotzbauer P, Cairns N, Campbell M, et al: Pathologic accumula- phy and associations with cognitive impairment in Parkinson
tion of a-synuclein and AB in Parkinson disease patients with disease. Neurology 2017; 88:1265–1272
dementia. Arch Neurol 2012; 69:1326–1331 68. Dadar M, Zeighami Y, Yau Y, et al: White matter hyperin-
48. Compta Y, Parkkinen L, O’Sullivan S, et al: Lewy- and Alze- tensities are linked to future cognitive decline in de novo
heimer-type pathologies in Parkinson’s disease dementia: which Parkinson’s disease patients. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 20:
is more important? Brain 2011; 134:1493–1505 892–900
49. Siderowf A, Xie S, Hurtig H, et al: CSF amyloid B 1-42 predicts 69. Kandiah N, Mak E, Ng A, et al: Cerebral white matter hyper-
cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2010; intensity in Parkinson’s disease: a major risk factor for mild
75:1055–1061 cognitive impairment. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013; 19:
50. Morley J, Xie S, Hurtig H, et al: Genetic influences on cognitive 680–683
decline in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2012; 27:512–518 70. Bledsoe IO, Stebbins GT, Merkitch D, et al: White matter abnor-
51. Gomperts S, Locascio J, Rentz D, et al: Amyloid is linked to cog- malities in the corpus callosum with cognitive impairment in
nitive decline in patients with Parkinson’s disease without Parkinson disease. Neurology 2018; 91:e2244–e2255
dementia. Neurology 2013; 80:85–91 71. Mentis M, McIntosh A, Perrine K, et al: Relationships among the
52. Weintraub D, Dietz N, Duda J, et al: Alzheimer’s disease pattern metabolic patterns that correlate with mnemonic, visuospatial,
of brain atrophy predicts cognitive decline in Parkinson’s dis- and mood symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Am J Psychiatry
ease. Brain 2012; 135:170–180 2002; 159:746–754
72. Huang C, Mattis P, Tang C, et al: Metabolic brain networks associ- 92. Turner TH, Hinson V: Mattis Dementia Rating Scale cutoffs are
ated with cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease. NeuroImage inadequate for detecting dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Appl
2007; 34:714–723 Neuropsychol Adult 2013; 20:61–65
73. Olde Dubbelink KT, Hillebrand A, Twisk JW, et al: Predicting 93. Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf A, et al: Validity of the MoCA and
dementia in Parkinson disease by combining neurophysiologic MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson’s dis-
and cognitive markers. Neurology 2014; 82:263–270 ease. Neurology 2009; 73:1738–1745
74. Cozac VV, Gschwandtner U, Hatz F, et al: Quantitative EEG and 94. Dalrymple-Alford J, MacAskill M, Nakas C, et al: The MoCA:
cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis 2016; well-suited screen for cognitive impairment in Parkinson dis-
2016:9060649 ease. Neurology 2010; 75:1717–1725
75. Geraedts VJ, Boon LI, Marinus J, et al: Clinical correlates of 95. Brennan L, Siderowf A, Rubright JD, et al: Development and ini-
quantitative EEG in Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Neu- tial testing of the Penn Parkinson’s Daily Activities Question-
rology 2018; 91:871–883 naire. Mov Disord 2016; 31:126–134
76. Babiloni C, Del Percio C, Lizio R, et al: Abnormalities of cortical 96. Kulisevsky J, Fernandez de Bobadilla R, Pagonabarraga J, et al:
neural synchronization mechanisms in subjects with mild cog- Measuring functional impact of cognitive impairment: valida-
nitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases: tion of the Parkinson’s Disease Cognitive Functional Rating
an EEG study. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 59:339–358 Scale. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013; 19:812–817
77. Betrouni N, Delval A, Chaton L, et al: Electroencephalography- 97. Holden SK, Medina LD, Hoyt B, et al: Validation of a perfor-
based machine learning for cognitive profiling in Parkinson’s mance-based assessement of cognitive functional ability
disease: preliminary results. Mov Disord 2019; 34:210–217 Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2018; 33:1760–1768
78. Lim NS, Swanson CR, Cherng HR, et al: Plasma EGF and cogni- 98. Mamikonyan E, Xie SX, Melvin E, et al: Rivastigmine for mild
tive decline in Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease: a placebo-controlled
Clin Transl Neurol 2016; 3:346–355 study. Mov Disord 2015; 30:912–918
79. Chen-Plotkin A, Hu W, Siderowf A, et al: Plasma EGF levels pre- 99. Emre M, Aarsland D, Albanese A, et al: Rivastigmine for demen-
dict cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 2011; tia associated with Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:
69:655–663 2509–2518
80. Delgado-Alvarado M, Gago B, Navalpotro-Gomez I, et al: Bio- 100. Dubois B, Tollefson G, Katzenschlager R, et al: Donepezil in
markers for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease dementia: a randomized, double-blind effi-
Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2016; 31:861–881 cacy and safety study. Mov Disord 2012; 27:1230–1238
81. Gratwicke J, Jahanshahi M, Foltynie T: Parkinson’s disease demen- 101. Aarsland D, Ballard C, Walker Z, et al: Memantine in patients
tia: a neural networks perspective. Brain 2015; 138:1454–1476 with Parkinson’s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bod-
82. Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R, et al: Clinical diagnostic criteria ies: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet
for dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord Neurol 2009; 8:613–618
2007; 22:1689–1707 102. Emre M, Tsolaki M, Bonuccelli U, et al: Memantine for patients
83. Dubois B, Burn D, Goetz C, et al: Diagnostic procedures for with Parkinson’s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bod-
Parkinson’s disease dementia: recommendations for the ies: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet
Movement Disorder Society Task Force. Mov Disord 2007; 16: Neurol 2010; 9:969–977
2314–2324 103. Weintraub D, Hauser RA, Elm JJ, et al: Rasagiline for mild cogni-
84. Litvan I, Aarsland D, Adler C, et al: MDS Task Force on mild cog- tive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a placebo-controlled
nitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: critical review of PD- trial. Mov Disord 2016; 31:709–714
MCI. Mov Disord 2011; 26:1814–1824 104. PD Med Collaborative Group: Gray R, Ives N, et al: Long-term
85. Litvan I, Goldman J, Troster A, et al: Diagnostic criteria for effectiveness of dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase B
mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: Movement inhibitors compared with levodopa as initial treatment for
Disorder Society Task Force Guidelines. Mov Disord 2012; Parkinson’s disease (PD MED): a large, open-label, pragmatic
27:349–356 randomised trial. Lancet 2014; 384:1196–1205
86. Hoogland J, Boel JA, de Bie RMA, et al: Mild cognitive 105. Verschuur CVM, Suwijn SR, Boel JA, et al: Randomized delayed-
impairment as a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease dementia. start trial of levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med
Mov Disord 2017; 32:1056–1065 2019; 380:315–324
87. Hoogland J, van Wanrooij LL, Boel JA, et al: Detecting mild cog- 106. Ehrt U, Broich K, Larsen J, et al: Use of drugs with anticholiner-
nitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease: comparison of neuropsy- gic effect and impact on cognition in Parkinson’s disease: a
chological tests. Mov Disord 2018; 33:1750–1759 cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81:160–165
88. Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, Llebaria G, et al: Parkinson’s dis- 107. Mantri S, Fullard M, Gray SL, et al: Patterns of dementia treat-
ease-cognitive rating scale: a new cognitive scale specific for ment and frank prescribing errors in older adults with Parkin-
Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 23:998–1005 son disease. JAMA Neurol 2019; 76:41–49
89. Kalbe E, Calabrese P, Kohn N, et al: Screening for cognitive defi- 108. Leung IH, Walton CC, Hallock H, et al: Cognitive training in Par-
cits in Parkinson’s disease with the Parkinson neuropsychomet- kinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol-
ric dementia assessment (PANDA) instrument. Parkinsonism ogy 2015; 85:1843–1851
Relat Disord 2008; 14:93–101 109. Lauze M, Daneault JF, Duval C: The effects of physical activity in
90. Marinus J, Visser M, Verwey N, et al: Assessment of cognition in Parkinson’s disease: a review. J Parkinsons Dis 2016; 6:685–698
Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2003; 61:1222–1228 110. da Silva FC, Iop RDR, de Oliveira LC, et al: Effects of physical
91. Pirogovsky E, Schiehser D, Litvan I, et al: The utility of the Mat- exercise programs on cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease
tis Dementia Rating Scale in Parkinson’s disease mild cognitive patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of
impairment. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014; 20:627–631 the last 10 years. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0193113
111. Chahine LM, Dos Santos C, Fullard M, et al: Modifiable vascular 132. Stenager E, Wermuth L, Stenager E, et al: Suicide in patients
risk factors, white matter disease, and cognition in early with Parkinson’s disease: an epidemiological study. Acta Psy-
Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2019; 26:246–e218 chiatr Scand 1994; 90:70–72
112. Adler C, Caviness J, Sabbagh M, et al: Heterogeneous neuropath- 133. Myslobodsky M, Lalonde F, Hicks L: Are patients with
ological findings in Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive Parkinson’s disease suicidal? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2001;
impairment. Acta Neuropathol 2010; 120:827–828 14:120–124
113. Harmell AL, Neikrug AB, Palmer BW, et al: Obstructive sleep 134. Menza M, Golbe L, Cody R, et al: Dopamine-related personality
apnea and cognition in Parkinson’s disease. Sleep Med 2016; traits in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43:505–508
21:28–34 135. Santangelo G, Garramone F, Baiano C, et al: Personality and
114. Kaminska M, Mery VP, Lafontaine AL, et al: Change in cognition Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord
and other non-motor symptoms with obstructive sleep apnea 2018; 49:67–74
treatment in Parkinson disease. J Clin Sleep Med 2018; 14: 136. Nazem S, Siderowf A, Duda J, et al: Suicidal and death ideation
819–828 in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 10:1573–1579
115. Allain H, Schuck S, Manduit N: Depression in Parkinson’s dis- 137. Menza M, Mark M: Parkinson’s disease and depression: the rela-
ease. BMJ 2000; 320:1287–1288 tionship to disability and personality. J Neuropsychiatry Clin
116. Tandberg E, Larsen J, Aarsland D, et al: The occurrence of Neurosci 1994; 6:165–169
depression in Parkinson’s disease. A community-based study. 138. Tandberg E, Larsen J, Aarsland D, et al: Risk factors for depres-
Arch Neurol 1996; 53:175–179 sion in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 1997; 54:625–630
117. Starkstein S, Petracca G, Chemerinski E, et al: Depression in 139. Gotham A-M, Brown R, Marsden C: Depression in Parkinson’s
classic versus akinetic-rigid Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord disease: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. J Neurol Neuro-
1998; 13:29–33 surg Psychiatry 1986; 49:381–389
118. Reijnders J, Ehrt U, Weber W, et al: A systematic review of prev- 140. Fang G, Xu Q, Park Y, et al: Depression and subsequent risk of
alence studies of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord Parkinson’s disease in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.
2008; 23:183–189 Mov Disord 2010; 25:1157–1162
119. Althaus A, Becker O, Spottke A, et al: Frequency and treatment 141. Alonso A, Rodriguez L, Logroscino G, et al: Use of antidepres-
of depressive symptoms in a Parkinson’s disease registry. Par- sants and the risk of Parkinson’s disease: a prospective study. J
kinsonism Relat Disord 2008; 14:626–632 Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80:671–675
120. Shulman L, Taback R, Rabinstein A, et al: Non-recognition of 142. Schrag A, Horsfall L, Walters K, et al: Prediagnostic presenta-
depression and other non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s dis- tions of Parkinson’s disease in primary care: a case-control
ease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2002; 8:193–197 study. Lancet Neurol 2014; 14:57–64
121. Weintraub D, Moberg P, Duda J, et al: Recognition and treat- 143. Feldmann A, Illes Z, Kosztolanyi P, et al: Morphometric changes
ment of depression in Parkinson’s disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry of gray matter in Parkinson’s disease with depression: a voxel-
Neurol 2003; 16:178–183 based morphometry study. Mov Disord 2008; 23:42–46
122. Starkstein S, Preziosi T, Bolduc P, et al: Depression in 144. Cardoso E, Maia F, Fregni F, et al: Depression in Parkinson’s dis-
Parkinson’s disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990; 178:27–31 ease: convergence from voxel-based morphometry and func-
123. Leentjens A, Lousberg R, Verhey F: Markers for depression in tional magnetic resonance imaging in the limbic thalamus.
Parkinson’s disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002; 106:196–201 NeuroImage 2009; 47:467–472
124. Cole S, Woodard J, Juncos J, et al: Depression and disability in 145. Walter U, Skoloukik D, Berg D: Transcranial sonography find-
Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996; ings related to non-motor features of Parkinson’s disease. J Neu-
8:20–25 rol Sci 2010; 289:123–127
125. Lou J-S, Kearns G, Oken B, et al: Exacerbated physical fatigue 146. Mayberg H: Modulating dysfunctional limbic-cortical circuits in
and mental fatigue in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2001; depression: towards development of brain-based algorithms for
16:190–196 diagnosis and optimised treatment. Br Med Bull 2003; 65:
126. Aarsland D, Larsen J, Cummings J, et al: Prevalence and clinical 193–207
correlates of psychotic symptoms in Parkinson disease: a com- 147. Murai T, Muller U, Werheid K, et al: In vivo evidence for differ-
munity-based study. Arch Neurol 1999; 56:595–601 ential association of striatal dopamine and midbrain serotonin
127. Marsh L, Williams J, Rocco M, et al: Psychiatric comorbidities in systems with neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s dis-
patients with Parkinson disease and psychosis. Neurology ease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001; 13:222–228
2004; 63:293–300 148. Hesse S, Meyer P, Strecker K, et al: Monoamine transporter
128. Caap-Ahlgren M, Dehlin O: Insomnia and depressive symptoms availability in Parkinson’s disease patients with or without
in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Relationship to health- depression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36:428–435
related quality of life. An interview of patients living at home. 149. Weintraub D, Newberg A, Cary M, et al: Striatal dopamine trans-
Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2001; 32:23–33 porter imaging correlates with anxiety and depression symp-
129. Leentjens A: Depression in Parkinson’s disease: conceptual toms in Parkinson’s disease. J Nucl Med 2005; 46:227–232
issues and clinical challenges. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004; 150. Felicio A, Moriyama T, Godeiro-Junior C, et al: Higher dopamine
17:120–126 transporter density in Parkinson’s disease patients with depres-
130. Leentjens AF, Moonen AJ, Dujardin K, et al: Modeling depres- sion. Psychopharmacology 2010; 211:27–31
sion in Parkinson disease: disease-specific and nonspecific risk 151. Zheng J, Yang X, Zhao Q, et al: Association between gene poly-
factors. Neurology 2013; 81:1036–1043 morphism and depression in Parkinson’s disease: a case-control
131. Leentjens A, Marinus J, Van Hilten J, et al: The contribution of study. J Neurol Sci 2017; 375:231–234
somatic symptoms to the diagnosis of depression in Parkinson’s 152. Schrag A, Barone P, Brown R, et al: Depression rating scales in
disease: a discriminant analytic approach. J Neuropsychiatry Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord
Clin Neurosci 2003; 15:74–77 2007; 22:1077–1092
153. Marsh L, McDonald W, Cummings J, et al: Provisional diagnostic 173. Goetz C, Stebbins G: Risk factors for nursing home place-
criteria for depression in Parkinson’s disease: report of an ment in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43:
NINDS/NIMH work group. Mov Disord 2006; 21:148–158 2227–2229
154. Olin J, Schneider L, Katz I, et al: Provisional diagnostic criteria 174. Factor S, Feustel P, Freidman J, et al: Longitudinal outcome of
for depression of Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Parkinson’s disease patients with psychosis. Neurology 2003;
2002; 10:125–128 60:1756–1761
155. Smith KM, Eyal E, Weintraub D: Combined rasagiline and anti- 175. Rodriguez-Violante M, Camacho-Ordonez A, Cervantes-Arriaga
depressant use in Parkinson disease in the ADAGIO study: A, et al: Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects
effects on nonmotor symptoms and tolerability. JAMA Neurol with Parkinson’s disease and burden on their caregivers. Neuro-
2015; 72:88–95 logia 2015; 30:257–263
156. Richard IH, Kurlan R: A survey of antidepressant use in 176. Schrag A, Hovris A, Morley D, et al: Caregiver-burden in
Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson Study Group. Neurology 1997; Parkinson’s disease is closely associated with psychiatric symp-
49:1168–1170 toms, falls, and disability. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2006;
157. Menza M, Dobkin R, Marin H, et al: A controlled trial of antide- 12:35–41
pressants in patients with Parkinson’s disease and depression. 177. Klein C, Prokhorov T, Miniovitz A, et al: Admission of Parkinso-
Neurology 2009; 72:886–892 nian patients to a neurological ward in a community hospital. J
158. Richard I, McDermott M, Kurlan R, et al: A randomized, double- Neural Transm (Vienna) 2009; 116:1509–1512
blind, placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants in Parkinson’s 178. Gerlach OH, Winogrodzka A, Weber WE: Clinical problems in
disease. Neurology 2012; 78:1229–1236 the hospitalized Parkinson’s disease patient: systematic review.
159. Weintraub D, Mavandadi S, Mamikonyan E, et al: Atomoxetine Mov Disord 2011; 26:197–208
for depression and other neuropsychiatric symptoms in 179. Fenelon G, Soulas T, Zenasni F, et al: The changing face of
Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2010; 75:448–455 Parkinson’s disease-associated psychosis: a cross-sectional study
160. Barone P, Poewe W, Albrecht S, et al: Pramipexole for the treat- based on the new NINDS-NIMH criteria. Mov Disord 2010;
ment of depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s dis- 25:763–766
ease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 180. Henderson M, Mellers J: Psychosis in Parkinson’s disease:
Lancet Neurol 2010; 9:573–580 ‘between a rock and a hard place’. Int Rev Psychiatry 2000;
161. Barone P, Santangelo G, Morgante L, et al: A randomized clinical 12:319–334
trial to evaluate the effects of rasagiline on depressive symp- 181. Aarsland D, Cummings J, Larsen J: Neuropsychiatric differences
toms in non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients. Eur J Neu- between Parkinson’s disease with dementia and Alzheimer’s
rol 2015; 22:1184–1191 disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16:184–191
162. Dobkin R, Menza M, Allen L, et al: Cognitive-behavioral therapy 182. Pacchetti C, Manni R, Zangaglia R, et al: Relationship between
for depression in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, controlled hallucinatons, delusions, and rapid eye movement sleep behav-
trial. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168:1066–1074 ior disorder in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2005; 20:1439–
163. Oehlberg K, Barg F, Weintraub D, et al: How depressed 1448
Parkinson’s disease patients view the etiology and treatment of 183. Arnulf I, Bonnet A-M, Damier P, et al: Hallucinations, REM sleep,
depression. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2008; 21:123–132 and Parkinson’s disease: a medical hypothesis. Neurology 2000;
164. Popeo D, Kellner CH: ECT for Parkinson’s disease. Med Hypoth- 55:281–288
eses 2009; 73:468–469 184. Sanchez-Ramos J, Ortoll R, Paulson G: Visual hallucinations
165. Fenelon G, Goetz C, Karenberg A: Hallucinations in Parkinson associated with Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 1996; 53:
disease in the prelevodopa era. Neurology 2006; 66:93–98 1265–1268
166. Pagonabarraga J, Martinez-Horta S, Fernandez de Bobadilla R, 185. Goetz CG, Pappert EJ, Blasucci LM, et al: Intravenous levodopa
et al: Minor hallucinations occur in drug-naive Parkinson’s dis- in hallucinating Parkinson’s disease patients: high-dose chal-
ease patients, even from the premotor phase. Mov Disord 2016; lenge does not precipitate hallucinations. Neurology 1998;
31:45–52 50:515–517
167. Forsaa E, Larsen J, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al: A 12-year population- 186. Wolters E: Dopaminomimetic psychosis in Parkinson’s disease
based study of psychosis in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol patients: diagnosis and treatment. Neurology 1999;52(suppl 3):
2010; 67:996–1001 S10–S13
168. McKinlay A, Grace R, Dalrymple-Alford J, et al: A profile of neu- 187. Wolters E: Intrinsic and extrinsic psychosis in Parkinson’s dis-
ropsychiatric problems and their relationship to quality of life ease. J Neurol 2001;248(suppl 3):22–27
for Parkinson’s disease patients without dementia. Parkinson- 188. Manganelli F, Vitale C, Santangelo G, et al: Functional involve-
ism Relat Disord 2008; 14:37–42 ment of central cholinergic circuits and visual hallucinations in
169. Alvarado-Bolanos A, Cervantes-Arriaga A, Rodriguez-Violante M, Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2009; 132:2350–2355
et al: Impact of neuropsychiatric symptoms on the quality of 189. Huot P, Johnston TH, Darr T, et al: Increased 5-HT2A receptors
life of subjects with Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2015; in the temporal cortex of parkinsonian patients with visual hal-
5:541–548 lucinations. Mov Disord 2010; 25:1399–1408
170. Friedman JH: Parkinson disease psychosis: update. Behav Neu- 190. Ballanger B, Strafella A, van Eimeren T, et al: Serotonin 2A
rol 2013; 27:469–477 receptors and visual hallucinations in Parkinson disease. Arch
171. Forsaa E, Larsen J, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al: What predicts mortal- Neurol 2010; 67:416–421
ity in Parkinson disease? A prospective population-based long- 191. Kurita A, Murakami M, Takagi S, et al: Visual hallucinations and
term study. Neurology 2010; 75:1270–1276 altered visual information processing in Parkinson disease and
172. Aarsland D, Larsen J, Tandberg E, et al: Predictors of nursing dementia with Lewy bodies. Mov Disord 2010; 25:167–171
home placement in Parkinson’s disease: a population-based, 192. Ramirez-Ruiz B, Martı M, Tolosa E, et al: Brain response to com-
prospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48:938–942 plex visual stimuli in Parkinson’s patients with hallucinations: a
functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Mov Disord 212. Parkinson Study Group: Low-dose clozapine for the treatment
2008; 23:2335–2343 of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med
193. Boecker H, Ceballos-Baumann A, Volk D, et al: Metabolic altera- 1999; 340:757–763
tions in patients with Parkinson disease and visual hallucina- 213. The French Clozapine Parkinson Study Group: Clozapine in
tions. Arch Neurol 2007; 64:984–988 drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 1999;
194. Sanchez-Castaneda C, Rene R, Ramirez-Ruiz B, et al: Frontal and 353:2041–2042
associative visual areas related to visual hallucinations in 214. Pollak P, Tison F, Rascol O, et al: Clozapine in drug induced psy-
dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson’s disease with chosis in Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, placebo controlled
dementia. Mov Disord 2010; 25:615–622 study with open follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
195. Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Ramirez-Ruiz B, Junque C, et al: Differential 2004; 75:689–695
progression of brain atrophy in Parkinson’s disease with and 215. Weintraub D, Chen P, Ignacio R, et al: Patterns and trends in
without visual hallucinations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry antipsychotic prescribing for Parkinson disease psychosis. Arch
2010; 81:650–657 Neurol 2011; 68:899–904
196. Goldman J, Stebbins G, Dinh V, et al: Visuoperceptive region atro- 216. Ballard C, Banister C, Khan Z, et al: Evaluation of the safety, tol-
phy independent of cognitive status in patients with Parkinson’s erability, and efficacy of pimavanserin versus placebo in
disease with hallucinations. Brain 2014; 137:849–859 patients with Alzheimer’s disease psychosis: a phase 2, rando-
197. Goldman J, Goetz C, Berry-Kravis E, et al: Genetic polymor- mised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Lancet Neurol
phisms in Parkinson disease subjects with and without halluci- 2018; 17:213–222
nations: an analysis of the cholecystokinin system. Arch Neurol 217. Schubmehl S, Sussman J: Perspective on pimavansering and the
2004; 61:1280–1284 SAPS-PD: novel scale development as a means to FDA approval.
198. Lenka A, Arumugham SS, Christopher R, et al: Genetic sub- Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018; 26:1007–1011
strates of psychosis in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a criti- 218. The Lancet Neurology: Difficult choices in treating Parkinson’s
cal review. J Neurol Sci 2016; 364:33–41 disease psychosis. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:569
199. Fernandez H, Aarsland D, Fenelon G, et al: Scales to assess psy- 219. Espay AJ, Guskey MT, Norton JC, et al: Pimavanserin for
chosis in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Parkinson’s disease psychosis: effects stratified by baseline cog-
Mov Disord 2008; 23:484–500 nition and use of cognitive-enhancing medications. Mov Disord
200. Cummings J, Isaacson S, Mills R, et al: Pimavanserin for patients 2018; 33:1769–1776
with Parkinson’s disease psychosis: a randomised, placebo-con- 220. Driver-Dunckley E, Samanta J, Stacy M: Pathological gambling
trolled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2014; 383:533–540 associated with dopamine agonist therapy in Parkinson’s dis-
201. Voss T, Bahr D, Cummings J, et al: Performance of a shortened ease. Neurology 2003; 61:422–423
Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson’s dis- 221. Voon V, Fox S: Medication-related impulse control and repeti-
ease psychosis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013; 19:295–299 tive behaviors in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2007;
202. Thomsen T, Panisset M, Suchowersky O, et al: Impact of stan- 64:1089–1096
dard of care for psychosis in Parkinson disease. J Neurol Neuro- 222. Weintraub D, Siderowf A, Potenza M, et al: Association of dopa-
surg Psychiatry 2008; 79:1413–1415 mine agonist use with impulse control disorders in Parkinson
203. Olanow C, Stern M, Sethi K: The scientific and clinical basis of disease. Arch Neurol 2006; 63:969–973
the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009). Neurology 2009;72 223. Weintraub D, Papay K, Siderowf A, et al: Screening for impulse
(21 suppl 4):S1–S136 control disorder symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson
204. Mohr E, Mendis T, Hildebrand K, et al: Risperidone in the treat- disease: a case-control study. Neurology 2013; 80:176–180
ment of dopamine-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease: an 224. Papay K, Mamikonyan E, Siderowf A, et al: Patient versus infor-
open pilot trial. Mov Disord 2000; 15:1230–1237 mant reporting of ICD symptoms in Parkinson’s disease using
205. Nichols MJ, Hartlein JM, Eicken MG, et al: A fixed-dose random- the QUIP: validity and variability. Parkinsonism Relat Disord
ized controlled trial of olanzapine for psychosis in Parkinson 2011; 17:153–155
disease. F1000Res 2013; 2:150 225. Weintraub D, Koester J, Potenza M, et al: Impulse control disor-
206. Fernandez H, Trieschmann M, Friedman J: Aripiprazole for ders in Parkinson disease: a cross-sectional study of 3090
drug-induced psyhcosis in Parkinson’s disease: preliminary patients. Arch Neurol 2010; 67:589–595
experience. Clin Neuropharmacol 2004; 27:4–5 226. Corvol JC, Artaud F, Cormier-Dequaire F, et al: Longitudinal
207. Weintraub D, Chiang C, Kim HM, et al: Association of antipsy- analysis of impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease. Neu-
chotic use with mortality risk in patients with Parkinson dis- rology 2018; 91:e189–e201
ease. JAMA Neurol 2016; 73:535–541 227. Biundo R, Weis L, Abbruzzese G, et al: Impulse control disor-
208. Weintraub D, Chiang C, Kim HM, et al: Antipsychotic use and ders in advanced Parkinson’s disease with dyskinesia: the
physical morbidity in Parkinson disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ALTHEA study. Mov Disord 2017; 32:1557–1565
2017; 25:697–705 228. Antonini A, Chaudhuri KR, Boroojerdi B, et al: Impulse
209. Ondo W, Tintner R, Voung K, et al: Double-blind, placebo-con- control disorder related behaviours during long-term rotigo-
trolled, unforced titration parallel trial of quetiapine for dopami- tine treatment: a post hoc analysis. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23:
nergic-induced hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease. Mov 1556–1565
Disord 2005; 20:958–963 229. Weintraub D, Sohr M, Potenza M, et al: Amantadine use associ-
210. Rabey J, Prokhorov T, Miniovitz A, et al: Effect of quetiapine in ated with impulse control disorders in Parkinson disease in
psychotic Parkinson’s disease patients: a double-blind labeled cross-sectional study. Ann Neurol 2010; 68:963–968
study of 3 months’ duration. Mov Disord 2007; 22:313–318 230. Garcia-Ruiz PJ, Martinez Castrillo JC, Alonso-Canovas A, et al:
211. Shotbolt P, Samuel M, Fox C, et al: A randomized controlled trial Impulse control disorders in patients with Parkinson’s disease
of quetiapine for psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsy- under dopamine agonist therapy: a multicentre study. J Neurol
chiatr Dis Treat 2009; 5:327–332 Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85:840–844
231. Ondo W, Lai D: Predictors of impulsivity and reward seeking 251. Smith KM, Xie SX, Weintraub D: Incident impulse control disor-
behavior with dopamine agonists. Parkinsonism Relat Disord der symptoms and dopamine transporter imaging in Parkinson
2008; 14:28–32 disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87:864–870
232. Cornelius J, Tippmann-Peikert M, Slocumb N, et al: Impulse 252. Kraemmer J, Smith K, Weintraub D, et al: Clinical-genetic model
control disorders with the use of dopaminergic agents in rest- predicts incident impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s dis-
less legs syndrome: a case-control study. Sleep 2010; 33:81–87 ease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 87:1106–1111
233. Holman A: Impulse control disorder behaviors associated with 253. Cormier-Dequaire F, Bekadar S, Anheim M, et al: Suggestive
pramipexole used to treat fibromyalgia. J Gambl Stud 2009; association between OPRM1 and impulse control disorders in
25:425–431 Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2018; 33:1878–1886
234. Bancos I, Nannenga MR, Bostwick JM, et al: Impulse control dis- 254. Weintraub D, Stewart S, Shea J, et al: Validation of the Question-
orders in patients with dopamine agonist-treated prolactinomas naire for Impulsive-Compulsive Behaviors in Parkinson’s Dis-
and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a case-control study. ease (QUIP). Mov Disord 2009; 24:1461–1467
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014; 80:863–868 255. Weintraub D, Mamikonyan E, Papay K, et al: Questionnaire for
235. Voon V, Sohr M, Lang A, et al: Impulse control disorders in Par- Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease-Rating
kinson disease: a multicenter case-control study. Ann Neurol Scale. Mov Disord 2012; 27:242–247
2011; 69:986–996 256. Rieu I, Martinez-Martin P, Pereira B, et al: International valida-
236. Giovannoni G, O’Sullivan J, Turner K, et al: Hedonistic homeo- tion of a behavioral scale in Parkinson’s disease without demen-
static dysregulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease on tia. Mov Disord 2015; 30:705–713
dopamine replacement therapies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia- 257. Okai D, Askey-Jones S, Mack J, et al: Parkinson’s Impulse Con-
try 2000; 68:423–428 trol Scale (PICS) for the rating of severity of impulsive compul-
237. Evans A, Katzenschlager R, Paviour D, et al: Punding in sive behaviors in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2016; 3:
Parkinson’s disease: its relation to the dopamine dysregulation 494–499
syndrome. Mov Disord 2004; 19:397–405 258. Bastiaens J, Dorfman B, Christos P, et al: Prospective cohort
238. Miyasaki J, Hassan K, Lang A, et al: Punding prevalence in study of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Mov
Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2007; 22:1179–1181 Disord 2013; 28:327–333
239. Voon V, Reynolds B, Brezing C, et al: Impulsive choice and 259. Mamikonyan E, Siderowf A, Duda J, et al: Long-term follow-up
response in dopamine agonist-related impulse control behav- of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord
iors. Psychopharmacology 2010; 207:645–659 2008; 23:75–80
240. Housden C, O’Sullivan S, Joyce E, et al: Intact reward learning 260. Rabinak C, Nirenberg M: Dopamine agonist withdrawal syn-
but elevated delay discounting in Parkinson’s disease patients drome in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2010; 67:58–63
with impulsive-compulsive spectrum behaviors. Neuropsycho- 261. Ardouin C, Voon V, Worbe Y, et al: Pathological gambling in
pharmacology 2010; 35:2155–2164 Parkinson’s disease improves on chronic subthalamic nucleus
241. Santangelo G, Vitale C, Trojano L, et al: Cognitive dysfunctions stimulation. Mov Disord 2006; 21:1941–1946
and pathological gambling in patients with Parkinson’s disease. 262. Abbes M, Lhommee E, Thobois S, et al: Subthalamic stimulation
Mov Disord 2009; 24:899–905 and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: results
242. Martini A, Dal Lago D, Edelstyn NMJ, et al: Impulse control dis- from a long-term follow-up cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg
order in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of cognitive, affec- Psychiatry 2018; 89:836–843
tive, and motivational correlates. Front Neurol 2018; 9:654 263. Lhommee E, Wojtecki L, Czernecki V, et al: Behavioural out-
243. Evans A, Pavese N, Lawrence A, et al: Compulsive drug use comes of subthalamic stimulation and medical therapy versus
linked to sensitized ventral striatal dopamine transmission. Ann medical therapy alone for Parkinson’s disease with early motor
Neurol 2006; 59:852–858 complications (EARLYSTIM trial): secondary analysis of an
244. Steeves T, Miyasaki J, Zurowski M, et al: Increased striatal dopa- open-label randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:223–231
mine release in Parkinsonian patients with pathological gam- 264. Lhommee E, Klinger H, Thobois S, et al: Subthalamic stimula-
bling: a 11C raclopride PET study. Brain 2009; 132:1376–1385 tion in Parkinson’s disease: restoring the balance of motivated
245. Ray N, Miyasaki J, Zurowski M, et al: Extrastriatal dopaminergic behaviors. Brain 2012; 135:1463–1477
abnormalities of DA homeostasis in Parkinson’s patients with 265. Smeding H, Goudriaan A, Foncke E, et al: Pathological gambling
medication-induced pathological gambling: A [11C] FLB-457 after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson dis-
and PET study. Neurobiol Dis 2012; 48:519–525 ease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78:517–519
246. Cilia R, Ko J, Cho S, et al: Reduced dopamine transporter den- 266. Okun M, Weintraub D: Should impulse control disorders and
sity in the ventral striatum of patients with Parkinson’s disease dopamine dysregulation syndrome be indications for deep brain
and pathological gambling. Neurobiol Dis 2010; 39:98–104 stimulation and intestinal levodopa? Mov Disord 2013;
247. Voon V, Pessiglione M, Brezing C, et al: Mechanisms underlying 28:1915–1919
dopamine-mediated reward bias in compulsive behaviors. Neu- 267. Thomas A, Bonnani L, Gambi F, et al: Pathological gambling in
ron 2010; 65:135–142 Parkinson disease is reduced by amantadine. Ann Neurol 2010;
248. Rao H, Mamikonyan E, Detre J, et al: Decreased ventral striatal 68:400–404
activity with impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. 268. Papay K, Xie SX, Stern M, et al: Naltrexone for impulse control
Mov Disord 2010; 25:1660–1669 disorders in Parkinson disease: a placebo-controlled study. Neu-
249. Claassen DO, Stark AJ, Spears CA, et al: Mesocorticolimbic rology 2014; 83:826–833
hemodynamic response in Parkinson’s disease patients with 269. Okai D, Askey-Jones S, Samuel M, et al: Trial of CBT for impulse
compulsive behaviors. Mov Disord 2017; 32:1574–1583 control behaviors affecting Parkinson patients and their care-
250. Politis M, Loane C, Wu K, et al: Neural response to visual sexual givers. Neurology 2013; 80:792–799
cues in dopamine treatment-linked hypersexuality in 270. Stacy M: Sleep disorders in Parkinson’s disease: epidemiology
Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2013; 136:400–411 and management. Drugs Aging 2002; 19:733–739
271. Chaudhuri K, Prieto-Jurcynska C, Naidu Y, et al: The nonde- 291. Lou J-S, Dimitrova D, Park B, et al: Using modafinil to treat
claration of nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease to fatigue in Parkinson disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled
health care professionals: an international study using the pilot study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2009; 32:305–310
Nonmotor Symptoms Questionnaire. Mov Disord 2010; 292. Rodrigues TM, Castro Caldas A, Ferreira JJ: Pharmacological
25:704–709 interventions for daytime sleepiness and sleep disorders in
272. Claassen D, Josephs K, Ahlskog J, et al: REM sleep behavior dis- Parkinson’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Par-
order preceding other aspects of synuceinopathies by up to kinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 27:25–34
half a century. Neurology 2010; 75:494–499 293. Postuma R, Lang A, Munhoz R, et al: Caffeine for treatment of
273. Iranzo A, Fernandez-Arcos A, Tolosa E, et al: Neurodegenerative Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology
disorder risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: study 2012; 79:651–658
in 174 patients. PLoS One 2014; 9:e89741 294. Mendonça D, Menezes K, Jog M: Methylphenidate improves
274. Postuma R, Gagnon J-F, Bertrand J-A, et al: Parkinson risk in idio- fatigue scores in Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled
pathic REM sleep behavior disorder: preparing for neuroprotec- trial. Mov Disord 2007; 22:2070–2076
tive trials. Neurology 2015; 84:1–10 295. Neikrug AB, Liu L, Avanzino JA, et al: Continuous positive air-
275. Chahine LM, Xie SX, Simuni T, et al: Longitudinal changes in way pressure improves sleep and daytime sleepiness in patients
cognition in early Parkinson’s disease patients with REM sleep with Parkinson disease and sleep apnea. Sleep 2014; 37:
behavior disorder. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016; 27:102–106 177–185
276. Mery VP, Gros P, Lafontaine AL, et al: Reduced cognitive func- 296. Voon V, Kubu C, Krack P, et al: Deep brain stimulation: neuro-
tion in patients with Parkinson disease and obstructive sleep psychological and neuropsychiatric issues. Mov Disord 2006;21
apnea. Neurology 2017; 88:1120–1128 (suppl 14):S305–S326
277. Jellinger K: The pedunculopontine nucleus in Parkinson’s dis- 297. Appleby B, Duggan P, Regenberg A, et al: Psychiatric and neuro-
ease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51:540–543 psychiatric adverse events associated with deep brain stimlua-
278. Eisensehr I, Linke R, Noachtar S, et al: Reduced striatal dopa- tion: a meta-analysis of ten years’ experience. Mov Disord 2007;
mine transporters in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep 22:1722–1728
behavior disorder. Comparison with Parkinson’s disease and 298. Parsons T, Rogers S, Braaten A, et al: Cognitive sequelae of sub-
controls. Brain 2000; 123:1155–1160 thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease:
279. Phillips B: Movement disorders: a sleep specialist’s perspective. a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:578–588
Neurology 2004;62(suppl 2):S9–S16 299. Witt K, Daniels C, Reiff J, et al: Neuropsychological and psychi-
280. Tandberg E, Larsen J, Karlsen K: Excessive daytime sleepiness atric changes after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s dis-
and sleep benefit in Parkinson’s disease: a community-based ease: a randomised, multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 2008;
study. Mov Disord 1999; 14:922–927 7:605–614
281. Schifitto G, Friedman J, Oakes D, et al: Fatigue in levodopa-naive 300. Weaver F, Follett K, Stern M, et al: Bilateral deep brain stimula-
subjects with Parkinson disease. Neurology 2008; 71:481–485 tion vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkin-
282. Friedman JH, Beck JC, Chou KL, et al: Fatigue in Parkinson’s dis- son disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2009; 301:63–73
ease: report from a mutidisciplinary symposium. NPJ Parkin- 301. Witt K, Granert O, Daniels C, et al: Relation of lead trajectory
sons Dis 2016; 2:15025 and electrode position to neuropsychological outcomes of sub-
283. Karlsen K, Larsen J, Tandberg E, et al: Fatigue in patients with thalamic neurostimulation in Parkinson’s disease: results from a
Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1999; 14:237–241 randomized trial. Brain 2013; 136:2109–2119
284. Hobson D, Lang A, Martin W, et al: Excessive daytime sleepiness 302. Frankemolle A, Wu J, Noecker A, et al: Reversing cognitive-
and sudden-onset sleep in Parkinson disease: a survey by motor impairments in Parkinson’s disease patients using a
the Canadian Movement Disorders Group. JAMA 2005; 287: computational modelling approach to deep brain stimulation
455–463 programming. Brain 2010; 133:746–761
285. Dowling G, Mastick J, Colling E, et al: Melatonin for sleep distur- 303. Schuepbach W, Rau J, Knudsen K, et al: Neurostimulation for
bances in Parkinson’s disease. Sleep Med 2005; 6:459–466 early Parkinson’s disease with early motor complications. N
286. Medeiros C, de Bruin P, Lopes L, et al: Effect of exogenous mela- Engl J Med 2013; 368:610–622
tonin on sleep and motor dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: a 304. Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, et al: A randomized
randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J Neurol trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J
2007; 254:459–464 Med 2006; 355:896–908
287. Menza M, Dobkin R, Marin H, et al: Treatment of insomnia in 305. Follett K, Weaver F, Stern M, et al: Pallidal versus subthalamic
Parkinson’s disease: a controlled trial of eszopiclone and pla- deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med
cebo. Mov Disord 2010; 25:1708–1714 2010; 362:2077–2091
288. Ondo W, Fayle R, Atassi F, et al: Modafinil for daytime som- 306. Sako W, Miyazaki Y, Izumi Y, et al: Which target is best for
nolence in Parkinson’s disease: double blind, placebo con- patients with Parkinson’s disease? A meta-analysis of pallidal
trolled parallel trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; and subthalamic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
76:1636–1639 2014; 85:982–986
289. Adler C, Caviness J, Hentz J, et al: Randomized trial of modafinil 307. Wang JW, Zhang YQ, Zhang XH, et al: Cognitive and psychiatric
for treating subjective daytime sleepiness in patients with effects of STN versus GPi deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s
Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2003; 18:287–293 disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS
290. Hogl B, Saletu M, Brandauer E, et al: Modafinil for the treatment One 2016; 11:e0156721
of daytime sleepiness in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, 308. Voon V, Krack P, Lang A, et al: A multicentre study on suicide
randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled polygraphic trial. outcomes following subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s dis-
Sleep 2002; 25:62–66 ease. Brain 2008; 131:2720–2728
309. Weintraub D, Duda J, Carlson K, et al: Suicide ideation and 329. Green R: Regulation of affect. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry
behaviors after STN and GPi DBS surgery for Parkinson’s dis- 1998; 3:195–200
ease: results from a randomized, controlled trial. J Neurol Neu- 330. Arciniegas D, Topkoff J: The neuropsychiatry of pathologic
rosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84:1113–1118 affect: an approach to evaluation and treatment. Semin Clin
310. Witjas T, Kaphan E, Azulay J, et al: Nonmotor fluctuations in Neuropsychiatry 2000; 5:290–306
Parkinson’s disease: frequent and disabling. Neurology 2002; 331. Panitch H, Thisted R, Smith R, et al: Randomized, controlled
59:408–413 trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine for pseudobulbar affect in
311. Richard I, Justus A, Kurlan R: Relationship between mood and multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2006; 59:780–787
motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry 332. Brooks B, Thisted R, Appel S, et al: Treatment of pseudobulbar
Clin Neurosci 2001; 13:35–41 affect in ALS with dextromethorphan/quinidine: a randomized
312. Kulisevsky J, Pascual-Sedano B, Barbanoj M, et al: Acute effects trial. Neurology 2004; 63:1364–1370
of immediate and controlled-release levodopa on mood in 333. Sauerbier A, Jenner P, Todorova A, et al: Non motor subtypes
Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind study. Mov Disord 2007; and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2016;22
22:62–67 (suppl 1):S41–S46
313. Maricle R, Nutt J, Carter J: Mood and anxiety fluctuation in 334. Mavandadi S, Nazem S, Ten Have T, et al: Use of latent variable
Parkinson’s disease associated with levodopa infusion: prelimi- modeling to delineate psychiatric and cognitive profiles in
nary findings. Mov Disord 1995; 10:329–332 Parkinson’s disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 17:986–995
314. Richard I, Schiffer R, Kurlan R: Anxiety and Parkinson’s disease. 335. van Rooden S, Visser M, Verbaan D, et al: Patterns of motor and
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996; 8:383–392 non-motor features in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg
315. Kummer A, Cardoso F, Teixeira A: Frequency of social phobia Psychiatry 2009; 80:846–850
and psychometric properties of the Liebowitz social anxiety 336. Mu J, Chaudhuri KR, Bielza C, et al: Parkinson’s disease sub-
scale in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 23:1739–1743 types identified from cluster analysis of motor and non-motor
316. Pontone G, Williams J, Anderson K, et al: Prevalence of anxiety symptoms. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9:301
disorders and anxiety subtypes in patients with Parkinson’s dis- 337. Martinez-Martin P: Nonmotor symptoms and health-related
ease. Mov Disord 2009; 24:1333–1338 quality of life in early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2014;
317. Dissanayaka N, Sellbach A, Matheson S, et al: Anxiety disorders 29:166–168
in Parkinson’s disease: prevalence and risk factors. Mov Disord 338. Chaudhuri K, Martinez-Martin P, Brown R, et al: The metric
2010; 25:838–845 properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s
318. Menza M, Robertson-Hoffman D, Bonapace A: Parkinson’s dis- disease: results from an international pilot study. Mov Disord
ease and anxiety: comorbidity with depression. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 22:1901–1911
1993; 34:465–470 339. Visser M, Verbaan D, van Rooden S, et al: Assessment of psychi-
319. Gonera E, van’t Hof M, Berger H, et al: Symptoms and duration atric complications in Parkinson’s disease: the SCOPA-PC. Mov
of the prodromal phase in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord Disord 2007; 22:2221–2228
1997; 12:871–876 340. Cummings J, Mega M, Gray K, et al: The Neuropsychiatric
320. Shiba M, Bower J, Maraganore D, et al: Anxiety disorders and Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in
depressive disorders preceding Parkinson’s disease: a case-con- dementia. Neurology 1994; 44:2308–2314
trol study. Mov Disord 2000; 15:669–677 341. Goetz C, Tilley B, Shaftman S, et al: Movement Disorder Society-
321. Leentjens AF, Dujardin K, Pontone GM, et al: The Parkinson sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating
Anxiety Scale (PAS): development and validation of a new anxi- Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and climimetric testing
ety scale. Mov Disord 2014; 29:1035–1043 results. Mov Disord 2008; 23:2129–2170
322. Starkstein S, Mayberg H, Preziosi T, et al: Reliability, validity, 342. Martinez-Martin P, Schrag A, Weintraub D, et al: Pilot study of
and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuro- the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society-
psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992; 4:134–139 sponsored Non-Motor Rating Scale (MDS-NMS). Mov Disord
323. Starkstein S, Merello M, Jorge R, et al: The syndromic validity Clin Pract 2019; 6:227–234
and nosological position of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov 343. Mata IF, Johnson CO, Leverenz JB, et al: Large-scale exploratory
Disord 2009; 24:1211–1216 genetic analysis of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease.
324. Kirsch-Darrow L, Fernandez H, Marsiske M, et al: Dissociating Neurobiol Aging 2017; 56:211.e1–211.e7
apathy and depression in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2006; 344. Chou K, Amick M, Brandt J, et al: A recommended scale for cog-
67:33–38 nitive screening in clinical trials of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Dis-
325. Isella V, Melzi P, Grimaldi M, et al: Clinical, neuropsychological, ord 2010; 25:2501–2507
and morphometric correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. 345. Caspell-Garcia C, Simuni T, Tosun-Turgut D, et al: Multiple
Mov Disord 2002; 17:366–371 modality biomarker prediction of cognitive impairment in pro-
326. Reijnders J, Scholtissen B, Weber W, et al: Neuroanatomical cor- spectively followed de novo Parkinson disease. PLoS One 2017;
relates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease: a magnetic resonance 12:e0175674
imaging study using voxel-based morphometry. Mov Disord 346. Wyman-Chick KA, Martin PK, Weintraub D, et al: Selection of
2010; 25:2318–2325 normative group affects rates of mild vognitive impairment in
327. Thobois S, Lhommee E, Klinger H, et al: Parkinsonian apathy Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2018; 33:839–843
responds to dopaminergic stimulation of D2/D3 receptors with 347. Schulz J, Pagano G, Fernandez Bonfante JA, et al: Nucleus basa-
piribedil. Brain 2013; 136:1568–1577 lis of Meynert degeneration precedes and predicts cognitive
328. Phuong L, Garg S, Duda J, et al: Involuntary emotional disorder impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2018; 141:1501–1516
in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009; 348. Schrag A, Siddiqui UF, Anastasiou Z, et al: Clinical variables and
15:511–515 biomarkers in prediction of cognitive impairment in patients
with newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease: a cohort study. Lan- 354. Barrett MJ, Blair JC, Sperling SA, et al: Baseline symptoms and
cet Neurol 2017; 16:66–75 basal forebrain volume predict future psychosis in early Parkin-
349. Pereira JB, Svenningsson P, Weintraub D, et al: Initial cognitive son disease. Neurology 2018; 90:e1618–e1626
decline is associated with cortical thinning in early Parkinson 355. Kotagal V, Spino C, Bohnen NI, et al: Serotonin, beta-amyloid,
disease. Neurology 2014; 82:2017–2025 and cognition in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 2018; 83:
350. de la Riva P, Smith K, Xie SX, et al: Course of psychiatric symp- 994–1002
toms and global cognition in early Parkinson disease. Neurology 356. Ffytche D, Pereira J, Ballard C, et al: Risk factors for early psy-
2014; 83:1096–1103 chosis in PD: insights from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers
351. Chahine LM, Urbe L, Caspell-Garcia C, et al: Cognition among Initiative. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2016; 88:325–331
individuals along a spectrum of increased risk for Parkinson’s 357. Picillo M, Santangelo G, Erro R, et al: Association between dopa-
disease. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201964 minergic dysfunction and anxiety in de novo Parkinson’s dis-
352. Fiorenzato E, Biundo R, Cecchin D, et al: Brain amyloid contri- ease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2017; 37:106–110
bution to cognitive dysfunction in early-stage Parkinson’s dis- 358. Sprenger FS, Seppi K, Djamshidian A, et al: Nonmotor symp-
ease: the PPMI dataset. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 66:229–237 toms in subjects without evidence of dopaminergic deficits.
353. Simuni T, Caspell-Garcia C, Walker M, et al: Baseline prevalence Mov Disord 2015; 30:976–981
and longitudinal evolution of non-motor symptoms in early 359. Liu R, Umbach DM, Peddada SD, et al: Potential sex differences
Parkinson’s disease: the PPMI cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psy- in nonmotor symptoms in early drug-naive Parkinson disease.
chiatry 2018; 89:78–88 Neurology 2015; 84:2107–2115