Methods of Linguistic Anthropology

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Methods of Linguistic Anthropology

Contrasting Linguistic with Linguistic Anthropology

Linguistic is a scientific study of language. The term does not refer to the study of a particular language or
languages for the purpose of learning to speak them; rather, it refers to the analytical study of language, any language to
reveal its structure – the different kinds of language units (its sounds, smallest meaningful parts of words, and so on)
and the rules according to which these units are put together to produce stretches of speech.

The subject matter of linguistic anthropology, which can be briefly defined as the study of language in its
biological and sociocultural context. Perhaps only the term sociocultural needs a comment. The term society is
frequently used almost interchangeably with the term culture and the compound “sociocultural” points out their
interconnection. There in a fine distinction, though, between society and culture, and linguistics anthropologist deal
with aspect of both concepts: when they study and describe the communicative links between individual members of
the group and between groups within a society, and when they study and describe traditional learned behavior (culture)
and how it relates to the values of the members of the group, their linkages with language are sociocultural.

Two linguistic statements:

1. In English, the nasal consonant n as in sin, and n (written as ng) as in sing, are in contrast because they
differentiate the meaning of two English words.
2. The modern English word woman developed over the centuries from the Old wifman.

One will notice that there is no reference in the statements as to the speakers, or the circumstances under
which the words have been used.

Statement from linguistic anthropology:

1. In Javanese, the choice words are determined by such characteristics of the speaker and the addressee as
their age, gender, wealth, education and occupation: and more refined the level of speech, the slower,
softer and more even the presentation will be.
2. The remarkable cave-wall paintings and carvings of the Upper Paleolithic Cro-Magnos serve as an indirect
proof that these prehistoric people had a full-fledge language.

To sum up, then, a division of labor exist between linguistics and linguistics anthropologist.

The Fieldwork Component

 The immersion of anthropological field worker for an extended period in the day-to-day activities of people
whom they study is referred to participant observation.
o To be able to communicate in their own language with the people under study is very helpful to the
anthropologist. Because members of a society who are fluent in two languages are sometimes culturally
marginal people, they should be selected with care.
 Data for analysis of a language or of language use can of course be collected away from the area where the
languages is spoken if an informant lives within reach of linguistic anthropologist.
 Besides being fluent in their native language, informants should be active participants in their culture.
 Informants should be able to enunciate clearly.
 If field-workers wish to include in their studies so-called body language, which may be very important
component of communicative behavior, video recorder is useful.

You might also like