03 Chapter 3
03 Chapter 3
03 Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, we discuss the research design, area of study, population, sample
of the population, sampling technique, instrument for data collection, validation of
the questionnaire, administration of the instrument and method of data analysis.
The researcher chose a survey research design because it best served to answer
the questions and the purposes of the study.
In this study, the options, the percentage of the students in STI College Novaliches
in favor of attending concerts between international and local artist: 30 boys and 30
girls who are the students of STI College Novaliches. They are shown in table 2
below.
3-1
S/N Name of the Grade level Specific Stran
student (girl)
4th Year
1 Marilene BSHRM
Villafuente
4th Year
2 Joy BSHRM
4th Year
3 Darren BSHRM
4th Year
4 Trisha HRM
4th Year
5 Nadine BSHRM
4th Year
6 Mary BHTM
30 Female 12 IT201
32 Female 12 IT201
39 Male 11 STEM101
The target population for this research defined to include the students of STI
College Novaliches, while the accessible population is still the students of STI
College Novaliches, since these are the students within the researcher’s reach.
In this study, the accessible population comprised all the students of STI College
Novaliches who are in favor on attending concerts between international and local
artistists.
3.4 SAMPLE OF THE POPULATION
For some studies, the population may be small enough to warrant the inclusion of
all of them in the study. But a study may entail a large population which cannot all
be studied. That portion of the population that is studied is called a sample of the
population (Nworgu 1991:69). A sample in this study is, therefore, a smaller group
of elements drawn through a definite procedure from an accessible population. The
elements making up this sample are those that are actually studied.
The sample of the population of this study stood at 30 girls and 30 boys, in total of
60 respondents.
A stratified random sampling procedure was used for selecting the participants in
this study. This technique was employed to ensure a fairly equal representation of
the variables for the study. The stratification was based on the students of STI
College Novaliches. Within each section, selection of staff was by simple random
sampling. This was achieved by allowing the students to enter the reseacher’s
museum and give them the questionnaire. That is, researcher applied sampling
with replacement.
The instrument was structured in the modified Likert fashion, on a 4 – point scale,
ranging from “very likely” (VL), somewhat likely ( SL), unsure (U), somewhat unlikely
(SU) to “very unlikely” (VU). Subjects were then instructed to respond to their
degree of agreement with the statements contained in the instrument.
The questionnaire designed for the study was subjected to a validation process for
face and content validity. Face and content validity have been defined by
McBurney (1994:123) as following:
Face validity is the idea that a test should appear superficially to test what it
is supposed to test; and
Content validity is the notion that a test should sample the range of
behaviour represented by the theoretical concept being tested.
In the validation process of this study, copies of the questionnaire and copies of the
research questions were given to some musicologists and ethnomusicologists.
These experts went through the research questions and the questionnaire carefully
to ascertain the appropriateness and adequacy of the instrument. They suggested
structuring the questionnaire in the Likert fashion, on a five-point scale instead of
modified 4 point Likert fashion (Nworgu 1991:117). Researcher prefers the
modified Likert scale because according to normal Likert scale, strongly agree
assigns 5 points, agree 4 points, undecided 3 points, disagree 2 points and
strongly disagree 1 point. Many researchers and educationists feel that there is no
logical enough reason to assign the weight of 3 points to somebody who is
undecided on a given issue. Therefore the modified 4 Likert scale is preferred.
However the other useful observations and suggestions by the experts were
modified, and the corrections were made.
Having validated the questionnaire, a pilot testing was carried out on the
instrument using 30 music teachers and 10 music educators from Enugu State of
Nigeria, which is not the State in which the actual research will be carried out. This
was done in order to see:
how the subject will react to the questionnaire;
whether the items are clear enough and easily understood;
whether there is the need to include more items in certain areas; or
whether there are some items to which they would not like to respond;
as well as
to determine the workability of the proposed method of data analysis for the
study.
However, from the pilot test, the researcher was able to understand the ambiguity
of some items and so had to modify it to the level of the questionnaire. That is, the
researcher resorted to using simple English.
3.7 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
After the pilot testing and all necessary modifications, the questionnaires were
administered directly to the chosen sample for the study. Three hundred and
thirteen copies of the questionnaire given out were successfully completed and
returned. The possibility of retrieving back all the questionnaire was as a result of
the researchers colleagues who offered a helping hand. The opposite could have
been the case if the researcher had taken the lonely task of going round the
schools to collect the questionnaire.
The data collected from the field were analyzed. Statistically weighted mean was
used in answering the research questions. The response options in the instrument
are weighted as shown below:
▪ The acceptance point for the items was 2.50 and any mean below 2.50
was regarded as rejected, not prevalent and as unpopular view.
The t-test is defined as testing hypothesis about the differences between means
when the sample size is small (Nworgu 1991:161). It is therefore, the t-test
statistical analysis that was employed in testing the five null hypotheses used in
this study. Then, when the calculated t-value is greater than the critical value of t,
the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative, which is “significance” was
accepted.
But when the calculated t-value was less than the critical t-value, the null
hypothesis was accepted and the alternative rejected. However, the null
hypotheses were tested at 0.05 (5 %) level of significance (see Appendix IV). This
means 5 chances of being in error out of every 100 cases. That is, the chances of
error are very low.
3.9 SUMMARY
The main purpose of this survey design sets out to test whether there are
differences in problem-perception between music educators and music teachers
(both trained and non-trained) both of whom are active role players either as a
planner of music curriculum or as a music teacher in Nigerian primary school
classroom. The assumptions as well as the findings are stated in the last section of
chapter four.